When you say ＂I do,＂ do you know what you're really doing？
Episode Stats
Words per minute
166.71251
Harmful content
Misogyny
13
sentences flagged
Hate speech
5
sentences flagged
Summary
Andrea Morozik and Peter J. Mitchell discuss their new book, The Question Mark: A New Look at Marriage in Canada. They talk about the history of marriage in Canada, why it s important, what it means for children, and how it affects us as a society.
Transcript
00:00:01.000
Good evening, Western Standard viewers, and welcome to Hannaford, a weekly politics show.
00:00:06.400
Joining me tonight is somebody who may be familiar to Western Standard readers from the days when the Standard was a print product.
00:00:13.260
That would be Andrea Morozik, who is very much still writing with her colleague Peter John Mitchell, who has just published a book.
00:00:24.740
Andrea, I've always recalled you as the investigative reporter who broke the story in the Western Standard that sex-selective abortion was widely practiced in B.C. among...
00:00:41.000
Yes, it was widely practiced in B.C. among immigrant communities who wanted sons, not daughters.
00:00:47.380
I'm making light of it in this interview, but of course it was an extremely serious story.
00:00:52.240
I think one of the landmark pieces of journalism in 2006.
00:00:58.080
Anyway, these days you're doing great work with the Christian think tank, CARDIS, in Ottawa.
00:01:07.500
And that's a wonderful project for you as well, isn't it?
00:01:09.740
You made it sound like I got married as a research experiment, but yes, indeed.
00:01:13.920
Ten years of research into my own personal marriage, I suppose.
00:01:18.800
Got married quite late in life, actually, in keeping with today's Canadian statistics.
00:01:27.460
In a few moments, I'm going to give you a chance to tell viewers where to get your book.
00:01:31.360
But first, marriage has been around for a while, hasn't it?
00:01:35.160
And yet you've called your book, I dot, dot, dot, do, question mark.
00:01:45.640
I mean, the question mark, I'm glad you picked up on that.
00:01:48.060
It's an important part of the title because today we have a culture and a younger generation
00:01:53.360
who view marriage as maybe nice, but unnecessary and certainly not, it's something that's met
00:02:02.540
with, I think, a fair amount of ambivalence as well.
00:02:04.920
And so we put the question mark in to reflect that cultural trend, but at the same time to
00:02:11.680
indicate that we would like people to start asking questions afresh about the institution
00:02:16.580
of marriage, which over time and research I've come to see as far more critically important,
00:02:21.740
not just for ourselves, but for the culture and the communities that we live in.
00:02:25.900
So the question mark reflects that ambivalence and the fact that we view marriage as kind
00:02:34.460
And also the fact that we are encouraging readers, young and old, to reconsider or reimagine
00:02:45.400
Well, to me, there's always seemed to be a contractual element to marriage.
00:02:51.000
And, you know, the one partner does something for the other partner and the other partner
00:02:56.940
And to that point, we've just published a story from BC.
00:03:01.060
We have a reporter in BC, young Jared Jaeger, and he reports that a child advocacy group says
00:03:06.720
nearly half the children living in poverty, as they define it, are actually in single parent
00:03:13.420
And that's likely to be single mothers, far more likely than to be single fathers.
00:03:19.880
So when the man-woman contract breaks down, the one where a man basically promises to support
00:03:25.600
a woman and his family, and in return, she looks after him and his needs.
00:03:33.680
And then, and honestly, authors of the poverty study we're talking about do this, there's
00:03:42.100
So women end up looking to the state for what they should be looking for from a husband.
1.00
00:03:50.620
So I think that you've just said a lot, of course, but one angle of that that I'll immediately
00:03:56.080
comment on is that, yes, we do see less income, less financial resources in single parenting
00:04:03.920
And marriage remains a source of stability for longevity, and that's good for the kids
00:04:09.600
But when you see stories like that arise, and they will often talk about many aspects
00:04:17.300
of poverty eradication that are very valuable, whether it's turning to the state or to the
00:04:23.560
But the one thing no one ever talks about is the obvious family angle, which is foundational
00:04:33.020
So I come to this question of marriage also with an eye to helping those who are poor,
00:04:41.960
And what we see in marriage culture today is that there's a marriage divide and wealthier
00:04:49.180
We're less wealthy, lower income people, the marriage rates are dropping off even more than
00:04:57.260
I think that that speaks to the idea of luxury beliefs, which is a term coined by a scholar,
00:05:03.560
He was raised virtually without family in the foster care system in the United States.
00:05:09.860
So when we're thinking about some of the pressing social issues that we face as a society, be
00:05:14.580
it child poverty, be it rising rates of social isolation or loneliness, the family angle often
00:05:23.400
And so part of the book's effort is to bring the family angle back in, not as a form of judgment or saying
00:05:29.320
everybody must be married, but as a simple research question that we see benefits from this.
00:05:33.480
So why not talk about the institution of marriage?
00:05:36.240
So Andrea, look, you said just a moment ago that for wealthier people, they tend to carry
00:05:43.740
on, get married and have families, but that marriage rates are dropping off among the less
00:06:04.080
And I think there is different theories on that and you can see factors coming together
00:06:09.580
in a circular way and that it's not, it's a complex issue.
00:06:12.620
And so you might have, you know, simple choices amongst people who are wealthier towards getting
00:06:20.240
You have the education factor mixed in there, but ultimately we want to see a society where
00:06:25.400
we treat people equally, regardless of education level, regardless of income level, that they,
00:06:29.840
everybody sees marriage as an opportunity for their own family stability, regardless of
00:06:34.940
how we get into the place of seeing less educated or lower income North Americans, really.
00:06:40.900
It says across North America, we see that trend line.
00:06:43.460
We want marriage to be an accessible option to everybody.
00:06:46.900
I'm not sure if your viewers are aware, but there's something called the success sequence
00:06:55.740
The success sequence, which virtually eliminates the probability that you're ever going to live
00:07:06.420
You finish your schooling first, you get married next, then you have kids after that in that
00:07:11.740
And so that, I guess, gets the poverty angle again, as well as some of the differences between
00:07:21.420
But really, we want marriage to be there for everybody and not just a certain segment of
00:07:28.260
So in the course of your researches, you must have observed that in this day and age, unlike
00:07:34.420
maybe 20 or 50 years ago, often you have the wife earning or has the ability to earn more
0.99
00:07:45.560
So if the woman is earning more than the man, does that tend to make men less anxious to
00:07:53.740
Is it kind of a little power thing going on there that deters them?
00:07:58.040
I don't know about that, Nigel, but I do think there is the sense today that we have, which
00:08:02.580
I would argue is wrongheaded, that we just don't need marriage as much anymore.
00:08:07.860
And that may have something to do with income generation on the part of women and rising opportunities
1.00
00:08:13.620
in the workforce, whether we're in the 2000s or back in the 50s, I think the same thing
00:08:21.460
is at play, which is to say that marriage acts as a future-oriented institution in your
00:08:28.740
life, and it contains the love of partners in it.
00:08:32.140
And that means that we can view marriage more as like an adventure, a Tolkien-style adventure,
00:08:39.840
And you can have a lot of variation in the ways that people live out their marriages.
00:08:45.760
But it is still something that is future-oriented and holding families together, maintaining
00:08:51.480
stability at a greater rate than, say, merely living together.
00:08:55.440
And it remains important regardless of the ways in which people negotiate particular aspects
00:09:02.440
I do know there's research available to suggest that women still, even today, with all of our
0.91
00:09:08.940
earning potential and all of the career opportunities available, which are a good thing, but even
00:09:13.080
today, women would like men who also earn as much or more than they do.
1.00
00:09:18.000
I don't think this is a deal breaker for marriage as an institution.
00:09:21.140
Really, we're getting at that foundational idea of marriage and how it undergirds our social
00:09:26.080
stability and helps us in raising our families and having a source of long-term, like thinking
00:09:34.700
about the long-term in our lives, looking towards the future.
00:09:38.000
I think what you just talked about there is something you refer to in the book as a life
00:09:42.020
script, this sequential, I think you said you finish school and then you get married and
00:09:50.060
then you have children, do it in that order and things go better.
00:09:53.320
Now, I guess one of the questions would be is if you are wanting to do that, do you have
00:10:05.720
You could still finish school, start a relationship and have children and I know there's a whole
00:10:13.900
lot of people who are out there living in that situation who would say, well, and it works
00:10:18.280
fine for us, but you're saying marriage is better.
00:10:24.560
Yeah, and the answer there is going to be a bit dry and certainly we all have those examples
00:10:28.200
in our lives and perhaps living them ourselves, but the data on the nature of cohabitation just
00:10:35.100
shows that it works itself in the aggregate in spite of the wonderful examples of people
00:10:41.640
who look exactly as if they're married, raising children happily and the data is just not the
00:10:48.860
And so I think we can intuitively understand that both can coexist, both can be true, but
00:10:54.060
in the aggregate, people who end up living together have come into that relationship for
00:11:00.720
And some of them are very intentional and others slide into a living together arrangement
00:11:11.920
The intentionality, the purposeful nature of it may not be the same.
00:11:17.680
If you want to get in and out quickly, it's really not the same type of commitment as marriage
00:11:25.700
might be in spite of many beautiful examples that we might see around us.
00:11:29.020
So the answer's a bit dry there, simply say that the data doesn't bear out, but they're
00:11:33.820
And so on heated issues and family and marriage can be quite heated because they are so personal.
00:11:41.040
Oftentimes I'm just like, what does the data, what did the data show us?
00:11:47.360
Well, being pretty ancient as I am, I grew up in an era when the joke was that men didn't
00:11:56.900
And it seems to me that just to take that seriously for a moment, for cohabitation without
00:12:05.920
marriage seems, whatever the law says, but seems to a man a kind of lower level of commitment.
00:12:18.440
Now, is that perhaps at the root of why the data, and where are the data you're talking
00:12:25.160
about, it's very clear, the cohabitation, the less successful outcome.
00:12:32.300
But is it the fact that men go into this thing thinking they can get out of it a bit easier?
00:12:38.880
Yeah, the law says otherwise, but men often think stupid things.
00:12:44.520
You know, as you were talking, I thought of some of the feminist literature on marriage,
00:12:50.820
You know, second wave feminism and beyond has almost, without exception, said that marriage
1.00
00:12:55.980
is terrible for women, a bit of a prison for women, and that it constrains women.
1.00
00:13:00.620
But that conversation is pushed out the side, saying that what actually marriage can do
00:13:05.300
is constrain men and limit their options in such a way that is beneficial to the woman
1.00
00:13:11.360
and perhaps mother of a child and family, also beneficial to men.
0.97
00:13:16.400
But I often like to bring up that point of marriage as a constraint on men acting as a constraint
00:13:23.600
in a way that we haven't had that conversation, because we're, you know, immersed very much
00:13:28.800
in this, in a lot of the feminist literature on marriage, declaring that it's bad, it's bad
1.00
00:13:34.780
So we have a section in the book talking about the ways in which marriage is beneficial to
00:13:39.560
men alone, and then to women alone, then to children, as if they were separate.
00:13:43.120
But really, that amounts to benefits for everybody, even if it comes through constraints.
00:13:48.200
So endless choices don't always amount to greater happiness.
00:13:52.040
So, you know, hence all the jokes about marriage.
00:13:55.100
Everybody grumbles, and yet so many of us still do it.
00:13:59.240
Look, putting this together, Andrea, you're saying that society at large has an interest
00:14:04.020
in not only marriage, but in stable marriage, and yet that can sound pretty harsh to people
00:14:10.660
who have never been married, but wish to, and to those for whom it's not even something
00:14:26.400
The question mark remains at the beginning, and we hope that this book is a soft entry point
00:14:30.760
into discussing the ways in which marriage matters without compelling anyone to a particular
00:14:36.100
But because family is so personal, and it's a place of great joy, but also our deepest wounds,
00:14:41.000
oftentimes we can't even have the conversations that engender, you know, thinking on the subject
00:14:47.500
So we haven't even begun to touch on how we consider marriage today as a largely romantic
00:14:57.440
Our hope is to return to a bit of a more robust model, which is more institutional, and
00:15:02.340
yet at the same time, to return to your question, this is not to say that those who are not married
00:15:08.600
I myself got married very, very late in life and feel that the 40 years leading up to that
00:15:16.140
were quite meaningful and fruitful, as it were.
00:15:22.280
And if I may toot our own horn just a little bit, we were concerned about the judgment factor
00:15:27.700
And one person who's read it is a divorced mother of a 14-year-old, and her own marriage
00:15:34.020
had ended for good reason, and it had been very traumatic for the family.
00:15:38.320
And this divorced mother was going to be giving her 14-year-old daughter a book so that she
0.98
00:15:42.780
could encounter some of these more academic arguments around marriage with a lot of the
00:15:48.960
So I felt quite proud of that to understand that it was a book that spoke to people who
00:15:59.260
And, you know, if anybody could actually take the subject of marriage and set it on one
00:16:05.100
side and look at it from all angles and come up with a good read, that would be you.
00:16:10.040
So really, really good to hear your comments about it.
00:16:21.760
I work for Cardus, and so it's up at cardus.ca as well.
00:16:26.840
Okay, well, you know, for all the times that I've talked to people who've written books,
00:16:32.060
We really should be tapping up Amazon for some advertising, but there it is.
00:16:38.800
Speaking as a taxpayer, I sure hope that marriages will last, because when marriages last, they
0.59
00:16:45.220
don't go back and become a charge to the state.
00:16:48.380
And that's when I go back into that contractual argument.
00:16:50.820
But anyway, you have done a wonderful job here in taking this subject apart and putting it back
00:16:58.960
Bless your heart, and it's great to see you, Andrea.
00:17:03.320
It's good to reconnect with the Western Standard.
00:17:14.580
We've been privileged to have with us Western Standard viewers, Andrea Morozek.
00:17:20.640
She works for Cardus in Ottawa, and it is her job to study and be well-informed about marriage.
00:17:27.340
And she has put it out in a book, and she tells us you can get it via Amazon.
00:17:31.480
It's called I...do question mark, and by Andrea Morozek.
00:17:40.860
And for the Western Standard, I'm Nigel Henneford.