Why abolishing the Senate isn't the simple answer
Episode Stats
Words per minute
145.82468
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Summary
Would no Senate be better than the current one we have right now? We talk about the unfairness of the current Senate, and the ridiculous numbers of seats it has in it, and how it discriminates against the Western provinces.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
I mean, would no Senate be better than the current Senate?
00:00:08.120
So most of the time it's just appointed by liberals without any real democratic mandate from Alberta.
00:00:12.640
So even Alberta senators, quote unquote, are not, they're not even appointed by someone who has the backing of Alberta in most cases.
00:00:25.900
Roughly a quarter of the seats are for Ontario.
00:00:31.240
And, you know, the territories, I think, get one each or something.
00:00:39.860
Alberta, B.C., Saskatchewan, I think we get six each.
00:00:45.380
Alberta alone has roughly three times the population of all four Atlantic provinces.
00:00:51.940
Roughly three times the population of all four of the Atlantic provinces.
00:00:55.900
Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick. New Brunswick alone
00:01:01.960
has nearly twice the senators of just Alberta. New Brunswick alone has nearly twice the senators
00:01:12.220
of Alberta, but Alberta has three times the population of all four of those provinces,
00:01:18.400
and that's set in stone for all time. It doesn't change based on populations of a province going
00:01:23.880
up or down. It's just set in stone for all time. So the current Senate is practically medieval
00:01:31.080
in the way it's designed. It wildly discriminates against the Western provinces.