Western Standard - January 31, 2023


Why is Trudeau getting Emergencies Act Inquiry report before you do?


Episode Stats

Length

20 minutes

Words per Minute

149.35927

Word Count

3,077

Sentence Count

186

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

The Public Order Emergency Commission has concluded its investigation of the use of the Emergency Order Decade Act, which was passed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government in response to a protest by a Freedom Convoy on the streets of Canada on February 19th, 2019.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Minister Blair, Public Safety Minister, Minister Mendicino, National Security Intelligence
00:00:11.040 Advisor Jody Thomas and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Luckey and today you testified that
00:00:16.720 the federal government was committed to exhausting all alternatives to a resolution prior to making
00:00:21.840 a decision to invoke the extraordinary powers of the Emergencies Act. Do you agree that that
00:00:28.000 accurately describes your government's position? That the invocation of the Emergencies Act was a
00:00:33.920 measure of last resort, was not something to be taken lightly and something to do when other options
00:00:41.040 were not effective. And you are aware that the OPP along with others developed an engagement proposal
00:00:48.080 and you were advised of that proposal at the IRG meeting on February 12th, correct? It was a proposal
00:00:56.160 but we had, and it was presented to us, we had more questions about how it would actually work.
00:01:04.000 There, it was not a complete proposal. My last question, Mr. Prime Minister,
00:01:08.240 when did you and your government start to become so afraid of your own citizens?
00:01:14.720 That's a very unfair… I am not, and we are not. Those are my questions.
00:01:19.280 I thought, by the way, that was a tour de force of questioning. And I think the country,
00:01:27.520 at least those who were watching that day, recognized that Justin Trudeau lied
00:01:34.160 when you asked him why he called Canadians names.
00:01:37.360 Yeah, well, it's so interesting because the question was, in fact, do you as a leader think that
00:01:45.840 your job is to unite Canadians or divide them with name-calling? And I guess, you know,
00:01:52.560 he couldn't really answer that question apart from saying, I didn't call anyone names, but it was
00:01:57.920 what the role of a leader is. And it was interesting to see how he scrambled with that one.
00:02:05.040 Yes, he certainly did scramble and denied it all, even though he had said, of course,
00:02:10.160 in two separate occasions that people opposed to the vaccine were misogynistic and racist, which was,
00:02:17.200 I personally believe, and I think everybody associated with the Freedom Convoy believed
00:02:22.480 was just unacceptable. You also asked him, and you repeated that in a tweet the other day,
00:02:29.520 when did you start to become afraid of Canadians? Do you really think, do you think Justin Trudeau is
00:02:34.240 afraid of Canadians? Well, so I was in Ottawa for the convoy protest, and I was in the middle of so
00:02:43.120 many negotiations with the city police. So all we had to do, the only people we had to deal with at
00:02:48.720 first was Ottawa city police, and then the city of Ottawa came to the table because they were desperate.
00:02:55.200 And then I sat through six weeks of hearings with all these representatives of Ottawa. Beside me,
00:03:01.760 most of the time Tamara Leach was sitting and like, you know, protesters were in and out. Then the last
00:03:08.000 week we had ministers and Brenda Luckey. And all I thought the whole time was, what were you afraid of?
00:03:17.200 You know, we're sitting here in the same room, we're all Canadians, we're all adults, I think. And all you
00:03:23.600 had to do was talk to us, talk to the protesters, they came to your doorstep. What on earth are you so
00:03:31.040 afraid of? Like, I do think so, because there was absolutely no reason for there not to be any
00:03:38.400 dialogue. All right. And certainly his reaction, the authoritarian reaction did seem to indicate
00:03:48.000 fear. And certainly his ministers, I think of the justice minister, I call him the injustice minister,
00:03:54.480 when he actually asked for tanks to go out and confront these peaceful protesters. You wonder
00:04:01.040 what they were thinking. But it was just a joke, David. Yeah, it was just, yes, that's right. Afterwards,
00:04:07.520 it was just a joke. But of course, this cabinet often looks like a joke. And that's, that's part of the
00:04:15.040 problem. I want to turn, of course, to the issue of the hour, which is,
00:04:19.440 why is Justin Trudeau getting a copy of the Public Order Emergency Commission report, or as people
00:04:26.640 generally know it, the Emergencies Act inquiry report, two weeks ahead of everybody else,
00:04:32.160 including you or the opposition? Great question. And we don't have an answer to it. So I tried to
00:04:39.360 explain it as best I could on social media. And in our, it's in our final submission as well.
00:04:45.280 So this is a statutory requirement to do this into for the inquiry to happen and for a report to be
00:04:54.000 tabled in the House of Commons. That's a statutory legal requirement. No other commission or inquiry in
00:05:01.840 Canadian history has been conducted because of a lawful act like an act. And usually they're by order and
00:05:11.440 counsel, something like there's a, you know, a plane goes down, let's investigate it, let's figure it
00:05:17.280 out. So they come to the table, they make up an order in council, and they move forward. So in this
00:05:23.760 case, they also issued an order in council that has a different deadline. So the cabinet,
00:05:31.440 including Trudeau, wrote the mandate for the commission in addition to what's in the act.
00:05:37.760 And it has a different deadline. And that deadline is only for Trudeau and his cabinet to get an
00:05:44.080 advanced copy basically of the commission's report.
00:05:48.320 That does certainly sound mysterious. Do you think the public, you and the opposition,
00:05:56.880 the official opposition could be seeing a different version of this report after two weeks?
00:06:01.680 You know, that would be the more sinister result after having some time with the report so they
00:06:09.200 could, you know, ask for an amendment. I don't know. At a less sinister view of it,
00:06:16.320 they just have an opportunity before everyone else to start their messaging campaign,
00:06:22.400 their spin campaign before anybody else. And, you know, one thing that we really have to
00:06:28.080 think about and talk about is when the Emergencies Act was debated after the War Measures Act,
00:06:35.440 there was strong opposition to it. And it was the NDP that was demanding transparency and accountability.
00:06:43.440 And they're the ones that heavily pushed for this inquiry to happen because this is such a strong tool.
00:06:50.480 So we shouldn't be willy-nilly about any of this. This is so important, this inquiry. It's in statute.
00:06:58.400 It was debated. It's in law. And none of these mysterious questions about what's going to happen
00:07:06.080 and early reports should ever be touching the tongues of any Canadians. Like, this should not be a discussion.
00:07:12.800 Hmm. Yes. And certainly, it can only raise more questions and concerns. And so many Canadians
00:07:21.760 already have questions and concerns about the invocation of the Emergencies Act. So...
00:07:27.520 Exactly.
00:07:28.080 Now, you also mentioned the fact in your Twitter feed that there's been no comment from the federal
00:07:35.920 government on the legal opinion that was offered the cabinet. Now, can we think anything else,
00:07:42.240 then, that the cabinet didn't like this legal opinion?
00:07:46.320 So that, to me, is incredibly shocking. And I'm surprised more Canadians aren't outraged about that.
00:07:53.600 But... So when Minister Lamedi came to this stand, he came saying he was a fact witness.
00:08:01.520 So why do we need somebody providing facts? We already have the facts from tons of police officers.
00:08:08.960 That's... That was their job. They were the ones informing the minister. It's not like I wanted
00:08:13.840 Alamedi's first-hand experience during the three weeks there. That's not what he was there for.
00:08:18.960 And so he made that qualification at the beginning, which was very troubling for our group.
00:08:27.360 And one thing I want to mention before I go on is that on the first day, the commissioner said that
00:08:33.280 this isn't meant to be an adversarial process. This is an inquisitorial process. So our group wasn't there
00:08:39.760 to be at odds and demanding and fighting with. It's for the commission to do that. So we saw that
00:08:47.120 play out with the redactions and the late documents. It shouldn't have been on our group
00:08:52.080 to be the ones asking for that. That should have been the responsibility. And that is the role of the
00:08:57.120 commission. They had a huge team there to support that. So again, nobody's speaking up that this
00:09:05.360 doesn't make sense. That Alamedi is up there talking about being a fact witness. And
00:09:10.880 there's only so many challenges one can make. And so he goes up there and I'm sure it was shown during
00:09:17.760 his evidence or maybe somebody else. It said Department of Justice. And then the rest of the page was
00:09:24.800 blanked out. And he would not agree to waive or even ask his clients to waive privilege because
00:09:34.320 a lawyer has to abide by solicitor-client privilege. And clients are allowed to have discussions with
00:09:42.880 their lawyers in a protected environment. But we're not talking about those discussions anymore.
00:09:49.440 We're talking about the legal opinion, which they then said informed the cabinet of making the
00:09:55.920 decision of invoking the Emergencies Act. So in my view, this is a legal opinion that all Canadians
00:10:03.360 deserve to see. It's not about what was said, what the advice was, that was their opinion. And based on
00:10:09.040 that piece of paper, it was made, evidence was given that that's the reason they invoked the
00:10:15.520 Emergencies Act. So Canadians, for transparency, in my opinion, deserve to see that legal opinion as
00:10:22.480 well. And of course, if they're not releasing it, there must be something there that they don't
00:10:29.360 want to release. That is contrary to their opinion. Yeah. There was, after November 25th and Trudeau
00:10:40.720 stepped down, of course, there were, the Commission continued its hearings very quietly because they
00:10:47.600 certainly didn't promote them. They brought in a series of experts, so-called experts, to discuss
00:10:52.960 whether the invocation of the Emergencies Act was the appropriate thing to do. Most of these experts,
00:10:58.000 I attended a few of these meetings. There was no media present except myself, no public. Most of these
00:11:04.720 experts, as far as I can see, were pro-emergencies act. Were you invited, or was anybody from the
00:11:10.640 Freedom Convoy legal staff invited to attend these sessions? Interesting question. So I didn't stay on
00:11:19.040 in Ottawa any longer, but we had one of our legal team members still there. And so she informed,
00:11:25.120 first, we didn't really know about the process. We knew it existed, but we didn't know how involved we
00:11:32.240 could be. We thought we would be part of the panel discussion. After six weeks of evidence,
00:11:37.520 you know, we're there, let's have an informed conversation about what was discovered in the
00:11:43.120 last six weeks. No, that's not how it was. So what we were told to do is email a question to the lead
00:11:51.440 lawyer for the council, and they will determine whether or not that question will be put to the panel.
00:11:57.600 In addition, many people don't know this. They actually took away the microphones from all of the
00:12:04.000 parties, apart from the government of Canada. They still had a microphone in front of them.
00:12:10.320 All other parties, microphones were gone. So even if you wanted to raise a question, it was not possible
00:12:16.240 for you to do so. That's exactly what I suspected. Because as I said, it was most of these people,
00:12:24.800 they were there to reinforce the government. And I was quite surprised. Well, maybe I shouldn't have
00:12:31.520 been. But I was almost shocked that there was very little mention to the media that the process was
00:12:38.080 continuing, because they obviously didn't want a lot of coverage. So yeah, what was troubling to me,
00:12:45.600 as I mentioned, is after six weeks of so much evidence, and we weren't invited to be part of the
00:12:52.560 panel, you could really see that many of the panel members, they were still talking on MSM talking points.
00:13:01.040 It's like they hadn't heard anything from the six weeks, and they're just providing their academic
00:13:07.200 opinion. So you see how siloed it was. And it's like, how is this furthering any of the benefits
00:13:15.920 that we were looking to do it? Maybe that's the case. Maybe they didn't want that. Again,
00:13:20.320 you noted that the media wasn't really alerted to it. So working in silos and, you know, it's
00:13:27.200 incredibly unfortunate to me that that's how things were conducted in Canada. Dialogue is missing.
00:13:35.760 Yeah, I wanted to ask you as well, you probably haven't seen this, but I'll read a couple of
00:13:42.000 paragraphs from it. The Ottawa People's Commission, which sounds to me like a bunch of
00:13:48.880 neo-communists hiding out someplace in the gutters of Ottawa. But they've released a report today,
00:13:55.280 and the only media agency I think that's covered it has been the CBC, of course. And the allegations
00:14:02.000 in this report are so over the top, are so outrageous, that it's almost like a parody.
00:14:08.160 And I'll read you their key line. And apparently, they claim they spoke to 200 people, which of
00:14:15.440 course, it's nothing. But I doubt they even spoke to that many. And the commentary runs like this.
00:14:23.360 People who live and work in Ottawa endured several weeks of widespread human rights abuse amidst the
00:14:29.520 climate of threats, fear, sexual harassment, and intimidation marked by racism, misogyny,
00:14:36.160 anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, and other expressions of hate and intolerance.
00:14:44.640 I just, I just, I wonder if this was for real or not. But here's really where I want your comment.
00:14:52.240 This is, well, yes, people told this commission they were driven into by truck
00:14:59.120 drivers, beaten, pushed, chased, and threatened. Now, obviously, if any of this had been anything
00:15:06.400 but fiction, I think people would have been running to the police, and people would have been charged
00:15:10.800 for driving over residents or beating them up. So, do you have any comment on that?
00:15:17.280 Yeah, well, and I actually just tweeted about it today is, unfortunately, and I've said this many times
00:15:25.040 since, especially the Public Order Emergencies Inquiry, it really exposed the incompetence of our
00:15:33.520 government agencies and police authorities. And I don't say that with pride or that I'm happy about
00:15:42.880 that. I don't say that at all. What I think it did is definitely shone a light on the issues. But to some
00:15:50.240 extent, I have to feel for police authorities who are getting this kind of just silly. So, basically,
00:16:00.720 what they're saying is everyone failed them. It was so bad that the police, like, it sounds like the
00:16:07.280 police just abandoned these people and the city. And so, how can, how do you reconcile that? And I do blame
00:16:15.760 our Prime Minister Trudeau from the top starting this rhetoric of hate and division. And who's the
00:16:24.000 one that has to deal with it on a day-to-day basis? It's the police authorities on the ground with
00:16:30.400 protests and anti-protests, with city council that was on the ground, because of the hate divisive
00:16:37.920 rhetoric that came straight from our Prime Minister. And it's just sad, honestly.
00:16:44.240 Yeah. People have asked me why I spent so much time at the Freedom Convoy a year ago and why I've
00:16:52.560 spent so much time writing about it ever since and why I'm going to keep writing about it. Because I think
00:16:57.920 we're living in a historically very fragile time because of the preponderance of social media,
00:17:05.840 the distrust of the mainstream media, and the fact that we hear words like misinformation,
00:17:11.920 disinformation constantly spewned by this government. And I think it's important that
00:17:18.880 that people like me, and I think what you're doing and what you have done is so important
00:17:24.800 to define actually, historically, what happened during that time of the Freedom Convoy. Because otherwise,
00:17:31.920 the official history being written by the Trudeau government, and people like this,
00:17:38.240 is going to paint this peaceful protest like it was a Nazi Nuremberg rally. And I spent the time I
00:17:46.640 spent, I saw nothing but love and compassion and people who are hurting because of excessive mandates
00:17:53.840 and authoritarian laws from this government. So I want to thank you for keeping up the fight
00:18:00.880 in this. Because I think it's not just a matter of politics and it's not a matter of whether or not
00:18:06.400 you agree with the mandates or you're vaccinated or not. It's a matter of historical record. And I
00:18:13.200 think what you're doing and you continue to do with on social media and in interviews like this and the
00:18:19.120 other work you do is so important because you have credibility and people listen and we need more
00:18:25.200 people to define actually what happened last February. Well, thanks so much, David. And like,
00:18:31.200 I appreciate all the work that everyone else is doing. And speaking to what you mentioned,
00:18:38.560 making sure history is pretty accurate. That was a big reason that, too, I had read those statements to
00:18:47.040 Prime Minister Trudeau. Many people didn't realize that, too, because that became an exhibit that forms
00:18:53.840 part of the public order emergencies inquiry. I read three short paragraphs from three different
00:18:59.920 people of I think it was 500 or 300. We had so many, we couldn't even put it together. But getting
00:19:06.240 those stories of people that were there, and more so my heart goes out to the people that are Indigenous
00:19:14.720 and Black and LGBTQ that were there to support and they're doubly getting it. So they're being told that
00:19:24.240 like myself being a female, a misogynist or a Black person or an Indigenous person,
00:19:30.000 they're racist for supporting it. Those are the stories that are still out there. And they brought
00:19:37.040 tears to my eyes when I was reading them all the time. And yes, let's keep sharing those important
00:19:43.120 stories from the people that were actually there and not those that made it up in their heads.
00:19:47.920 Well, thank you so much, Eva. I hope we can talk again, certainly when the actual report comes out,
00:19:54.800 and perhaps next week when Justin Trudeau gets his secret copy. Thank you so much again, Eva.
00:20:00.640 My pleasure. Thank you.
00:20:02.080 Without the CSSA, our gun rights would have been taken long, long ago. These guys are on the front
00:20:08.240 lines helping to draft smart and intelligent firearms regulations and legislation in Canada.
00:20:14.960 And more importantly, educating the public about how we keep guns out of the hands of the wrong
00:20:19.680 people who become a member. It's absolutely worth every penny.
00:20:25.360 You can become a Western Standard member for just $10 a month or $99 a year for unlimited access.