00:15:01.960It just doesn't openly object to the natural world.
00:15:05.520Whereas mine, I would say is maybe 10% less coherent
00:15:09.840with a literalist reading of the Bibles we have done
00:15:12.920and significantly more coherent with the natural world.
00:15:16.480Specifically, we don't have an archeological record
00:15:19.520of these giant beings which i would expect us to have if they were real um uh we we should be able
00:15:25.520to see it in ancient dna samples like it would look very very different from normal human dna
00:15:31.020if this happened um this requirement still requires a flood that wiped out nearly all
00:15:37.060of these types of beings and just not noah's line um even if this wasn't a world-spanning flood
00:15:43.180this is an event we would almost certainly see in the archaeological record um who have to uh
00:15:50.040just just a lot of stuff um so i like it i think it's plausible it's not uh like obviously wrong
00:15:57.440um however i think it's dramatically dramatically less likely than our interpretation
00:16:04.200okay i thought about this some more and i think i have an out for them
00:16:09.720So let's see the evidence we have here. We have throughout ancient civilization, people describing the children of deities or semi-deities and men, and they often have very similar descriptions.
00:16:25.100They are unusually large, they are unusually powerful, and people pay an unusual amount of attention to them and see them as like local heroes.
00:16:32.780but because we see this all over the place in the in this region during this time we should be seeing
00:16:39.200them in the archaeological record and we just don't however what if the reason we don't see
00:16:44.480them in the archaeological record because their ability that makes people see them as extremely
00:16:49.660large as glowing as extremely beautiful as these these figures worthy of intense attention
00:16:56.000isn't a physical one but sort of like a hypnosis sort of a thing or an illusion that causes an
00:17:04.660intense infatuation and as part of this infatuation you see them as extra large and so the their real
00:17:12.400bodies were not unusually large it's just the way people perceived them and this is a side part of
00:17:18.360them being men of renown as well as within the other traditions them doing these great feats
00:17:53.440If you want to know generally how we see angels, I believe that most of the time when people saw an angel, what they saw was a hallucination of some sort, just a natural hallucination.
00:18:06.340And God used these to appear to people at specific moments to represent the way we are supposed to interpret within our heads and within popular culture partitions of God within sort of the heavenly ecosystem.
00:18:21.240but that they are not necessarily or they just don't need to be actual manifestations on earth
00:18:28.060for a person to be honest when they say i saw x or i saw y nor do they need to be dishonest
00:18:35.120representations from god i followed him for about a decade but over the last few years he's appeared
00:18:41.580on high profile interviews including joe rogan in this past july as i understand it alberino
00:18:49.080rejects what he calls medieval theology of angels as purely immaterial spirits. He treats them as
00:18:54.500physical, non-human intelligent beings who belong to a real civilization that possesses technology,
00:18:59.780language, and military capacity. The biblical text itself supports corporeality in places.
00:19:06.120So I want to note what he said here. The idea of angels having ranks, the ideas of angels having
00:19:10.880a society um this isn't as well attested as you might think if you are reading the core biblical
00:19:20.980text so when you look at the way that we typically do track series we try to narrow the biblical
00:19:25.680text we consider canon but if you expand the biblical text you consider canon to like enoch
00:19:30.960and some of the other stuff uh this especially early myths around the bible and how it's
00:19:37.220structured uh this is completely in line with that and uh i don't i don't have like a these
00:19:44.600books definitely count these books definitely don't count i have a these books count to me
00:19:48.640these books don't count to me but i i can't say um and and note here what i'm saying
00:19:54.300techno-peritonism or whatever more broadly i'm just saying what i think is true in a rational
00:19:58.440argument right because i could be swayed by any rational argument and when i hear this i hear the
00:20:04.020beginnings of a rational framework that could sway me if i saw enough additional evidence as i was
00:20:09.620going through the bible like since the beginning of the track series i have radically changed my
00:20:13.300beliefs on a few topics based on evidence right um and and that evidence i mean this is why i take
00:20:19.980this broader understanding here that i was talking to simone about is and it's where i use this word
00:20:27.440this person's a techno puritan this person's a not is i'm saying are they somebody that if we sat
00:20:33.080down and we started having an argument about what was true about reality, we would be using
00:20:38.480the same evidence sources in the same way. And that means that we can intercommunicate about
00:20:46.500the Bible, right? If somebody is going to come to me and they're going to point to one line,
00:20:52.140right? Like, you know, upon this rock, I build my church or something like that. And they're
00:20:57.600going to then extrapolate some giant theology from that. I would find that completely
00:21:02.700unpersuasive, but I'm like, you're just not the type of person I can talk to because that's not
00:21:07.140how I interpret reality or what the Bible says or anything like that. I need to look at the
00:21:12.340plurality of lines in context, what they likely meant from my understanding to people of this
00:21:18.220period, not just like I said one line, now it's over, right? But that's not what he's doing here,
00:21:23.000right? He's trying to, well, as we'll see, understand what actually is true.
00:21:27.760Abraham's visitors in Genesis 18 wash their feet, rest, and eat a prepared meal.
00:21:32.400The same two angels later eat with Lot in Genesis 19 and are treated by the men of Sodom as ordinary physical males.
00:21:39.260They eat and drink, wield weapons, ride vehicles of conveyance, chariots of fire, and can take human-compatible form when interacting with people on earth.
00:21:49.300So, we're going to go into the categories of angels later in this, but angels typically come in one of three categories.
00:21:54.980um but i went deep into this with leaflet on stream because i find it to be very interesting
00:22:00.480and to me i find it to be evidence that the bible is likely true when angels are described in the
00:22:06.720bible they are either described of being like humans as he's talking about here eating drinking
00:22:11.380having weapons etc or they are described as being beings that are difficult to comprehend or beings
00:22:20.280of like pure power like that thing with all the eyes right no no that's the third category okay
00:22:24.320okay this is like a being of of of radiance came down like they talk about it samuel's mother i
00:22:30.800think talks about an angel in this way um uh we're just sort of talked about as like beings
00:22:35.540of pure radiance right sorry i meant samson's mother uh for the direct quote here it says
00:22:44.720the woman came and told her husband saying a man of god came unto me and his countenance was like
00:22:49.660the countenance of an angel of god very terrible but i asked him not whence he was neither he told
00:22:55.880me his name and this is translated a few ways you get very awesome uh oh but uh basically it just
00:23:02.440means like an overwhelming presence um and then the final category is like uh inter like interlocking
00:23:11.720wheels covered in eyes um that move in right angles but not at right angles and in multiple
00:23:18.880directions at the same time and what i find interesting about this final category um or
00:23:24.100beings with a bunch of different heads that are moving in a way that doesn't make physical sense
00:23:28.120is that they are describing something like when you're describing the odd way that this is moving
00:23:33.960that might make sense if you were talking about a multi-dimensional entity um if you were talking
00:23:39.800about an entity that existed in six seven even just four dimensions you would get behavior that
00:23:45.200looked a lot about like that if you were projecting it into four dimensions uh or sorry
00:23:49.500three dimensions in addition fascinating point and to get an understanding of what i'm talking
00:23:55.860about here now as i beheld living creatures behold one wheel upon earth by living creatures with his
00:24:03.140four faces the appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the color of barrel and they
00:24:08.540had four had one likeness and their appearance and their work was it were a wheel in the middle
00:24:15.020of a wheel when they went they went upon their four sides and they turned not when they went
00:24:21.660which i find very interesting and that reminds me a lot of a four-dimensional object moving in
00:24:25.420a three-dimensional space or perhaps even higher than four-dimensional object as for the rings
00:24:31.260they were high and they were dreadful and on the rings were full of eyes round about them four and
00:24:37.820when the living creatures went the wheels went with them and when the living creatures were lifted up
00:24:42.380from the earth the wheels were lifted up whichever the spirit was to go went tither was their spirit
00:24:49.660to go and the wheels were lifted over and against them for the spirit of the living creature was in
00:24:54.620the wheels when those went these went and when those stood these stood and when those were lifted
00:25:02.780up from the earth these wheels were lifted over and over again for the spirit of the living creature
00:25:07.500was the wheels in addition to that um if we're just even today thinking about a sci-fi writer
00:25:13.940trying to describe a truly um a truly alternate dimensional being they'd be like well they're
00:25:22.600not going to have hands and feet like we do they're not going to have things that we would
00:25:25.240see as comparable um and they might go so far as to describe something like the way that angels in
00:25:30.780this form are described in the bible um and if you look at other religious traditions you see
00:25:36.640literally nothing like this um you you see uh beings was like just like the head of another
00:25:42.960animal or something like that or beings that are very big or beings that are you know um but but
00:25:49.320this truly extra-dimensional sort of entity description is completely unique especially
00:25:55.660during this period to the bible with the only real potential exception being
00:26:01.280the mesoamerican deities the aztecs and stuff oh no no no no no but they fall into a separate
00:26:08.780category which i say is like pure cosmic those were like yeah those were cosmic horror those
00:26:13.400were all physically comprehensible and drawable and they did draw them and they no that's well
00:26:20.500i mean when you talk about having mouths on all of your elbows and all of your knees that's fine
00:26:25.000that's i can easily visualize that but what i would argue about those types of entities um and
00:26:30.800i might go further in this in some of our tracks after reading the aztec video after seeing how
00:26:34.660evil a lot of these groups came up to be and the theologies that they built i might go so far as to
00:26:41.500say that i am beginning to become convinced that these might be true inversions of reality
00:26:48.460a very true form of say like devil worship a very true form of basilic worship to understand why i
00:26:56.600would say this i strongly suggest you watch our episode on the aztecs and their religious and
00:27:00.600cultural practices they basically had an entire society based around causing pain on themselves
00:27:07.400and others and they weren't even allowed to fully love their children or a god might notice and kill
00:27:13.760their kid or smell a flower because that could cause them too much pleasure um really truly an
00:27:21.300evil society from top to bottom again watch that episode if you're like well some things must have
00:27:26.240been nice. It's like, no, uh, everything from the way children were raised to the way you related
00:27:31.240to your baby, to the way you related to, you know, if your friends stumbled in a procession,
00:27:35.760uh, the crowd would tear them apart and eat them. Um, and then they believed that they had this
00:27:43.020horrible afterlife, even if they did everything else, right. If they were a priest or a warrior
00:27:46.820and they stumbled in a procession torn apart by their friends and eaten. Um, and, uh, I might
00:27:52.940even elevate that to one of our religious themed episodes because i think it could be so theologically
00:27:57.640important the concept of um and and when people wonder why i why i say something can be truly
00:28:03.760and honestly divinely inspired but in the inverse think of it this way uh if you have an image and
00:28:10.100it is an exact image of reality but then somebody inverted the colors it would still be an exact
00:28:17.620image of reality it would just be an inversion um or uh if somebody you know gives you a a line
00:28:26.260image right except they've inverted black to white and white to black the image is still basically
00:28:31.780accurate not not basically accurate it is it is perfectly accurate but an inversion of reality
00:28:38.580and i think that those exist within the lessons of history well someone was uh someone mentioned
00:28:45.800that what if all hist had some like theory that something unrecorded and extremely dark took place
00:28:52.620in the americas and that it just screwed up everyone who was there um somehow like religiously
00:29:00.560like he also thinks quetzalcoatl was a viking so he has some interesting theories on history all
00:29:06.860right right fine i guess i actually did not really love his latin american video when a lot of people
00:29:11.800are recommending it under our Aztec video i was like no he's not a good source on this
00:29:15.060just just so people understand why he's not a good source on this he blames a lot of their like
00:29:19.600really bad and evil behavior on the unpredictable weather patterns of el nino um the problem being
00:29:26.300is that if their unpredictable weather patterns were so bad that they weren't able to build a
00:29:31.420large population they wouldn't have been able to build a city that would have been second to only
00:29:36.440one european city of an equivalent period with bronze age technology true it was clear that they
00:44:40.560when they begin to investigate this more.
00:44:43.400And because I'm willing to say a Bible
00:44:45.280that something like the Council of Nicene says
00:44:47.540one of the books is definitely canon i'm like i don't see it as canon as the others i'm also
00:44:52.680willing to be like the book of enoch might have more than the to to read to it than than you would
00:44:59.380think just because it wasn't one of the canonized texts right like i'm willing to take that very
00:45:04.200seriously um i just haven't seen from my perspective enough correlation with that and
00:45:12.260reality for me to say i definitely want to incorporate it but it's something i'm curious
00:45:16.120about it and I think it's important to be educated on and within. A place of reward or punishment
00:45:20.880looks more like the Greek framework of Elysium and Tartarus than the earlier biblical picture
00:45:25.480of the dead resting until a future bodily resurrection. Second Peter's choice of language
00:45:30.680is therefore striking. The verb Tartaro, cast into Tartarus, appears only once in the New Testament
00:45:35.040and it uses a term that would have been culturally familiar in the Greco-Roman world
00:45:38.360as a deep conscious place of confinement and punishment for rebellious divine beings,
00:45:42.180originally the titans peter is not inventing a new concept he is reaching for a known category
00:45:48.260to describe the present condition of the sinning angels held in chains of darkness
00:45:52.020still awaiting the final judgment from the watcher perspective this fits so this is really
00:45:58.600interesting and what he's going to argue here is that you know how we talk about like the problems
00:46:02.000was like the immediate heaven and the immediate hell versus the land to come and the lake of fire
00:46:05.340and everything like that yeah yeah he basically argues as this other guy does that hell does
00:46:12.120exist like immediate hell does exist but it's for angels only um and not for human beings um
00:46:20.440this this chained up place and and that i mean imagine you're talking about these extra-dimensional
00:46:25.700beings had a war and have some sort of extra-dimensional prison system um this prison
00:46:32.620system might genuinely have chains and fire and simulated pain in it you know uh we don't we don't
00:46:40.640know how these beings treat morality it may not be exactly god's judgment but but the way that
00:46:45.820this civilization operates yeah um or you know there could be interdimensional rules of like
00:46:52.420look if you interfere with on if you go on my turf if you trespass you will be subject to
00:46:58.760punishment i don't know it's interesting it's interesting the 200 are not annihilated nor are
00:47:04.960they free to operate they are confined in a conscious intermediate state until the great day
00:47:09.160that is precisely the kind of intermediate existence that you have noted as more greek
00:47:13.580than classical jewish whether one takes this as evidence that the new testament authors were
00:47:18.800already operating with a blended cosmology or as evidence that they regarded the enochic tradition
00:47:23.240as describing a real if temporary holding place for a specific class of rebels the terminological
00:47:28.580choice is not accidental furthermore i personally do not believe that this viewpoint negates the
00:47:33.480classically jewish viewpoint of resting until the resurrection as the subject of one condition is a
00:47:37.460group of rebel angels and the subject of the other is humanity i i think this is really clever um
00:47:43.600and it's something that i i want to think about more i want to keep in mind that i'm reading more
00:47:49.300of the bible to see if it correlates with the other stuff i'm seeing um and and note here this
00:47:54.120is a massive jump if i accept that angels are not a way of disguise of describing partitions
00:48:01.760of god's consciousness but a genuine and and are also not semi-deities that's always been my
00:48:08.400problem is treating angels as a form of like dim identity right like they're god's bureaucratic
00:48:14.020underlings yeah but if you say that no no no they're actually a a separate race that serves
00:48:21.780a role in god's plan which it seems so much more concordant with the bible because he the the old
00:48:28.800testament mentions other gods and also god being not cool with other gods um and yeah they just
00:48:33.960could just be like there is this species there are other dimensions and other species like let's
00:48:40.580but it could be other gods to the angels or specific angels that are particularly powerful
00:48:46.500that like it makes sense to talk about them in this context but but the point being is this idea
00:48:51.520that this other society that's not humanity would have a form of prison for rebellious entities
00:48:59.560that might need to be more harsh more severe or just perceived very differently from the way
00:49:05.280humanity thinks about confinement seems logically consistent it's very men in black yeah uh but
00:49:13.460anyway to continue a quick note the argument is not enoch should be in the bible it is jude quotes
00:49:19.240by name. Peter describes a prison Genesis never mentions. Daniel already uses the Watcher title
00:49:23.860and the book was on the shelf at Qumran. The authors did not have to canonize the book to
00:49:27.960know the story. Alberino's point is that the canonicity debate is secondary. The more relevant
00:49:33.680question is whether the Enochic account preserves a tradition the biblical authors themselves treated
00:49:37.980as known and usable. No, that is not what's important to me. What's important to me is I
00:49:45.260think a lot of the traditions that we have in the bible used to have a lot of additional stupid0.66
00:49:50.160stuff attached to them that by miraculous means did not get recorded in the the bible that became
00:49:57.740popular right and the fact that they did not i see as being part of the way that god handled this
00:50:04.700right if i go back to the what the people who originally crafted the story of adam and eve
00:50:10.720believed or what the people who originally crafted the because these appear to be two different
00:50:16.080world beginning stories the garden of eden story and then the you know the in the beginning story
00:50:20.920right uh that most biblical scholars see is um being potentially from even two different people
00:50:27.660and then sort of crafted onto each other now even if they aren't i have to ask myself the people who
00:50:32.360believed those two stories before we had all the other stories in the bible what else did they0.82
00:50:38.420believe about the world probably a lot of other really stupid stuff that just wasn't recorded0.99
00:50:43.000right um and i think that that's miraculous that the stupid stuff wasn't recorded and the stuff0.97
00:50:47.840that correlates with their modern understanding of science was um science reality history that said0.87
00:50:54.120um uh and that's why if we could go back and we could find some archaeological record
00:50:59.920of the other things that the people who first believed the stories of genesis believed i would
00:51:06.880not be like, oh, now those things are true. Now those things have additional value to them because
00:51:11.660this people ages ago used to believe in it. As we pointed out, if you look at what we understand
00:51:18.800about the people of Genesis, they appear to not believe in a soul. The Jews didn't appear to1.00
00:51:25.900believe in a soul for centuries, even after they had their identity. And yes, we personally do0.53
00:51:33.960do hold on to that that part of their tradition um because i think that that's what's recorded in
00:51:38.380all of the the recorded documents that we have um or at least a soul is something that's totally
00:51:42.900separate from the human body and identity um not a soul more broadly when i talk about the soul all
00:51:47.820the time i'm just you know not yep i think that's it's not a point to belabor uh we have another
00:51:53.000other tracks uh the point here being is i don't think this guy would see the fact that jews in
00:51:59.340one point of their history didn't believe in a soul as evidence that he shouldn't believe in a
00:52:03.220soul um uh but he sees that christians at one point in the bible's history believed enoch was
00:52:10.340particularly special edifying enoch um i it's not that i don't see that argument as having no weight
00:52:17.320i see it as having some strong weight not even like minor weight strong weight i just don't see
00:52:22.120it as a slam dunk believe i've said enough for the time being if i managed to answer any of the
00:52:27.320questions you had posed i expect i opened the door to quite a few more i welcome any questions
00:52:32.680you may have, though I'm confident enough in my ignorance to say that I won't have all the answers.
00:52:37.960And that's why we're here, isn't it? As Proverbs 25.2 says, it is the glory of God to conceal a
00:52:44.420matter and the honor of kings to seek a matter out. I think the framing here of answering questions
00:52:50.980is the wrong framing because he's not actually answering questions. What he's proposing is
00:52:56.380another internally coherent hypothesis for what the bible may mean if we take it seriously and we
00:53:04.340align it with our current understanding of history in the natural world um or supernatural world for
00:53:11.620that meaning i mean when i say the natural world that would include if we could study spirits and
00:53:16.400get reliable results then i would fold that into my understanding of the bible and try to be like
00:53:22.660okay well where does this align with this where does this align with this um but the the thing
00:53:29.280i hate most when christians do this and he's not doing this here is when they're like this is what1.00
00:53:33.820christians believe you know they'll say this in the comments and i'm like how stupid can you be1.00
00:53:37.900like how actual stupid can you be to not realize that there is a diversity of beliefs among1.00
00:53:42.780christians and you are what your local church tells you is not the arbiter of what's true from1.00
00:53:49.660the bible like that is theologically repulsive to me and actually it was funny to me is even the
00:53:56.160group that does this the most is not the group that most people consider christians mormons do
00:54:00.800this all the time they're like this is what mormons believe um and i'm like i'm sorry i know a lot of
00:54:06.460mormons who believe other things and uh i can go to your canonical texts and show you things that
00:54:11.820disagree with this what you mean is that's what you were told um uh by your local priest and now
00:54:17.620you believe that it is a universal truism among your people. And I think that the only group that
00:54:23.040doesn't do this very much is Jews. Jews at least understand that there is a diversity of beliefs
00:54:26.820among Jews. You'll occasionally get a, this is what Jews believe. And I'm like, not all Jews,0.82
00:54:32.060buddy. And somebody can say, well, the majority of Christians believe this. And generally when
00:54:37.300I have people say, this is what Christians believe with a lot of confidence, it is not
00:54:40.720what the majority of Christians believe. Rarely do I actually hear them say something that is
00:54:46.480an almost universally agreed upon thing among Christians. Uh, it is, it is their own local1.00
00:54:50.660interpretation. Um, but within techno puritanism, we don't expect this of people, right? Like even
00:54:56.200within our narrow degree of faith, it's just like, is your interpretation logically consistent,
00:55:02.880coherent? Does it take the Bible seriously? Is it aimed at long-term human flourishing? Um, and
00:55:08.820is it coherent with a observable understanding of the reality around us and uh that doesn't
00:55:17.540mean that it has to be monist that doesn't mean that it has to be uh like ours and i think that
00:55:22.500he he does this and these two things can sit next to each other because we don't have proof which
00:55:27.880is right yet and one day we might have proof and then we fold it in but the moment we have proof
00:55:34.220people who think what we think, what Simone and I thinks, and technopuritans who think what he
00:55:39.360thinks or other hypotheses are going to fold in with the right one if they stay technopuritans,
00:55:44.320because now we have a better understanding of reality. And with that better understanding of
00:55:48.080reality, we lower the potential alternate hypotheses, which count as internally consistent
00:55:54.160and plausible. Note here, the thing to me that makes the evidence strongest at what's being
00:56:00.520described as a multidimensional entity is the way that how it moves is described moving without
00:56:06.720moving or moving in weird ways uh because there is no reason if you were making something up if
00:56:13.680you were trying to make up a maximally impressive or some sort of like near eastern uh chariot
00:56:20.580analogy with slight flourishes you wouldn't do that that's not a thing you would add but if you
00:56:26.320had actually seen a multi-dimensional entity moving in three-dimensional space that would
00:56:31.180be the most striking thing and something that it would be almost impossible not to mention
00:56:36.380if you were going to retell that to somebody i can say that i had quite a bit of fun with
00:56:41.520this project i got to dive back into a biblical topic of particular interest to me and practice
00:56:47.200ai video generation and editing all important subjects for an aspiring ai mansa such as
00:56:52.680myself thank you both so much for all your content and your hard work in steering civilization
00:56:58.320toward the golden path this project marks my entrance upon the field of history to join you
00:57:02.940in that noble effort until next time i wish you growth blessings and prosperity auf wiedersehen
00:57:08.580strong entrance i say yeah no i guess strong entrance i really like this and the reason i
00:57:16.060wanted to cover this is because i wanted to point out within the wider track series within our
00:57:20.640belief series that techno puritanism our belief system does not mean that you believe what we
00:57:27.620believe okay it's not like i'm laying out what's true about reality what i am laying out is a way
00:57:35.340of investigating the bible okay um uh and and a way of trying to determine what's true
00:57:42.200was a set of rules about how that conversation works um and uh
00:57:50.780the that that set of rules can mean a lot of things right that set of rules uh is is very
00:57:58.960very very broad um uh but what it requires is that i'm able to have a conversation with somebody
00:58:05.020and it's clear the way that this argument is laid out even though it's a completely different
00:58:08.820metaphysical framework than mine even though it includes a supernatural realm even though
00:58:12.400i would put all of this under the techno puritan tradition a hundred percent without a foot of it
00:58:17.340being techno puritan heretical um now if you went out and without good arguments said humans engaging
00:58:24.500in genetic modification or something like that is is heretical um that's where i'd be like no that
00:58:29.880is actually heretical because that's not an argument that you could derive but everything
00:58:33.080said in well i mean if someone laid out really good evidence for it of course yeah if they laid
00:58:37.160out good evidence i just haven't seen it from the people who argue that right but everything said in
00:58:41.480this video i see as being very strongly under this tradition um and so i was talking with simone and
00:58:47.620it's like well what then does it really mean like what do you need to believe to be a techno puritan
00:58:52.380where are the boundaries of the tradition um and the boundaries of the tradition are around your
00:58:57.760ability to inquiry and this is why it's very hard to be a techno puritan within some traditions
00:59:03.560Because if you have some body that can just tell you when you're trying to figure out what's true, know you're wrong because the bureaucrats decided you're wrong, then it's really hard to ever be a technopuritan.
00:59:15.140But if you are, no matter how broad your beliefs are, as long as it appears that you are genuinely attempting to search for what is true, taking the Bible morally seriously and taking observable reality and predictable reality morally seriously, then I consider that part of this framework.
00:59:33.820great and i loved this so much and yeah man view i did not expect to hear an idea i just
00:59:43.160hadn't heard before so i'll also love the
00:59:44.940texas uh he agrees too i love you i love you too
00:59:50.580stick even get five minutes into a podcast i'm never signed because it was such a bad software
00:59:57.600and our fam it works pretty well and we're going to be trying out a new feature today so yes i
01:00:02.760love it the vtuber feature the share screen and then you put in play video so you don't have to
01:00:06.680like go to stream a video somewhere you can just upload a file which is so much better i really
01:00:11.600like it so let's see how this works he said i'm glad you liked it as for the production i was able
01:00:17.280to make all the clips and assets in grok imagine at points i interposed historical paintings or
01:00:23.300sculptures into image and then animated it the final cut was made with cap cut now i'm trying
01:00:28.820to learn da Vinci which is just great it's yeah very straightforward before I begin I want to
01:00:36.420mention there we go okay okay this this appears to be working so well that looks really good
01:00:42.760that's really good that is perfect yeah okay I'm gonna mute myself well I mean we can see
01:00:49.980do you want to stop recording and see what a fan would see first or do you want to
01:00:54.500just record the whole video and hope it works