00:20:04.700But if you are a transgender and you're coming out and saying being a transgender doesn't matter and that maybe it's even tolerable, I'm sorry.
00:20:18.300And I would hear stories about Evelyn.
00:20:20.040And I'm sorry, maybe I'm not being diplomatic as I thought.
00:20:22.700But everyone who knows Evelyn would be in these chats, especially like Millennial Woes' chat, and he would get a perverted delight out of, you know, a tricking straight man.
00:20:34.800So Evelyn has the appearance of a woman, you know, on the avatar there.
00:20:40.020Like, there's like a glamour photo there.
00:20:51.520when when a girl walks in um and then they would say oh that's actually a guy and this evelyn would
00:20:57.520get a think that's funny it's funny tricking straight guys i'm like and that's sick it's sick
00:21:04.420because you need to understand that men generally hate that but especially right wing men like why
00:21:10.380do you think that's funny it's because you're undermining masculinities because you're
00:21:14.740undermining heterosexuality if you actually were on the side of these guys you wouldn't even swim
00:21:20.540in those fucking waters you wouldn't even try that prank right because you're a not you're not
00:21:26.000of this fucking space you are a fucking cancer sorry i've been going off you go i don't want to
00:21:30.960be the diplomatic one i don't think that's fair like on their side and by their side i mean the
00:21:35.440left-wingers of which this fucking guy duncan is one because he's not a woman he's a man in a dress
00:21:40.180um if you so much as think if you say it's okay to be white you'll never get a platform on their
00:21:47.540side so who are we like you say even the way you're framing it it's like these guys are just
00:21:53.200being nice and naive we're being bullies no we're not being bullies we're being perfectly even-handed
00:21:58.360in what is a it's a cultural war right we're being perfectly even-handed by saying i don't care how
00:22:05.060right-wing or how smart you are you're fucking dead to me i i don't even look i don't i wouldn't
00:22:09.920even accept a gay i don't i don't want to talk to a normal fucking fag let alone a gay who dresses
00:22:18.440in women's clothes and says that it's okay for him to go in the girls washroom i want to hit that
00:22:23.660person hard enough to put them in the hospital that's what i want to do to that person i don't
00:22:27.540give a fuck about their politics this is just it's insanity and i the buck has to stop somewhere
00:22:34.460Like, I don't know what, what it makes me feel very isolated seeing the number of people who I respected who are platforming guys like Duncan. And I don't get it. Like, I don't, I don't know why it's up to us to try to navigate the politics of this and like not step on anybody's toes.
00:22:53.600To me, it's just an opportunity to say, well, that's great. I guess I don't have to worry about interacting with you anymore because you're the sort of person who thinks trans are legitimate.
00:23:03.880You're the sort of person who, like, I don't want to, I'm not trying to throw people under the bus, but there's people on this list who will interact with and platform Duncan and who have not responded to our requests to work together or to talk on our show.
00:23:23.600There are people on this list who won't come on our fucking show, but they'll put a random fucking tranny who has done nothing and came out of nowhere, by the way, just showed up in the past 18 months.
00:23:36.420Not that we're not old heads, but we've been around for five, six years.
00:54:02.860And right up until the end, he ends up getting fired, right?
00:54:07.760But right up until that last scene, he's convinced that he's doing such good work, he's going to force his boss to quit, and he's going to get his boss's job.
00:54:16.600Like, he's cocky sitting in the office telling himself, like, he's going to come in, and I'm going to give him a choice.
00:54:22.460either leave willingly or i call the security and then the boss comes with security like
00:54:26.520i'm sorry i talked to the main guy and we can't let you gotta go
00:54:31.940and it's just the reality comes crashing down on him and it's just but he never really admits it
00:54:38.060and then it recontextualizes the whole thing like my god this guy really this entire time he has
00:54:44.100just been insane i'm obsessed with that character i'm obsessed with like the the smugness he has
00:54:50.920and the pretentiousness and the ambition that he thinks i can i why shouldn't they let me do this
00:54:56.720but you never know what the work is like maybe the work's not fucking important yeah yeah that's
00:55:01.340the other thing and to me it just i said it seemed like a scandinavian movie because it's so cold
00:55:07.300and so like yes and then he gets fired and he dies he should i i want to see it now that actually
00:55:15.540sounds like it's right up my alley that sounds good and and again if you go into it knowing
00:55:19.280that's what it is i i wasn't on board with it until after the movie finished and then i thought
00:55:25.060this is fucking amazing because then you think about because it's not like there's a twist
00:55:31.580the twist would make you retroactively think about it the twist kind of comes early and it
00:55:38.120forces you to enjoy it as if you're watching it the second time where you're seeing his co-workers
00:55:44.440who are kind of concerned about him and then there's the scene right at the end that really
00:55:48.820drives to home where he's being walked out to his car it's the snow in this big parking lot he's
00:55:53.640carrying a box of his stuff escorted by security and then he's narrating it's still this delusional
00:56:00.100thing he drops his box runs back up gets around them goes and goes right back into the room
00:56:05.440and i guess it's implied that he like stays there forever right i think he's just in his own mind
00:56:10.680but it kind of flashes everyone around him like everyone in the office is like gathered around
00:56:14.900him and is worried about him like are you okay please you know come out come out it's like
00:56:19.400oh these aren't bad people these aren't like cold office drones they're just regular nice people and
00:56:26.140he's just like autistic and he spent the whole movie judging them and like making snide remarks
00:56:32.160about them like he goes in the office the first thing he does like i'm gonna cycle i'm gonna
00:56:36.140psychoanalyze everyone and he ends up like psychoanalyzing this like woman who's like yeah
00:56:41.240she's like the main bitch in charge and but she doesn't even know that her child's drawing there
00:56:46.740is incorrect like that's not what a house looks like like he's criticizing a child's drawing and
00:56:55.260it's like that that's a comment on her ability to do her job it really does sound like the horror
00:57:00.220of working with autists in the in the office that they think they're smarter than everybody else but
00:57:05.620they're actually just fucking insane and you're everyone's cleaning up after them well this is
00:57:09.260what i love because right now there is this trend in hollywood to glorify like severe autism in the
00:57:15.980sense that everyone who listens to this show is of course autistic but there's this autism like oh
00:57:20.860they're just sort of like delightful quirky people and like a lot of the people with asperger's that
00:57:25.280i've known growing up they're very judgy they're awful i despise them they're the most like they're
00:57:31.200so conceited and judgy and narcissistic and they're generally they're they always want to
00:57:36.460tell these stories but you know albert einstein was had asperger's and all these different
00:57:40.800geniuses had asperger's first of all no they fucking didn't second of all you're not them
00:57:45.220you're an idiot your iq is like 85 your favorite thing is yugioh cards like what the fuck are you
00:57:50.540talking about you don't like you're hyper focused on one thing if that one thing is physics cool
00:57:56.060that's good here's the thing it's never physics it's all usually yugioh cards yeah it's always
00:58:01.940some media it's always some horse shit that's really colorful and dumb but it and and i think
00:58:08.980this movie really gets across that elitism where like he goes to the office party he deigns to be
00:58:14.940there it's like why would i want to be here like no one wants to be there right everyone's kind of
00:58:20.300dude trying to make the best of it but you're the guy you're the one who's figured it out like
00:58:24.800on one hand there's the not understanding social cues but his thing and a lot of these guys is
00:58:30.460you think the social cues are stupid like why should i have to do this why should i have to
00:58:35.140try and be nice to people i don't want to be nice to people i want them to to understand how smart
00:58:40.060i am and that's kind of like the joke of this like are you that smart and i think it's great
00:58:45.520that it never really establishes what they're doing like it's just something with spreadsheets
00:58:49.140something with emails you know and he's he's hyper focused on like little things like you
00:58:56.500know someone's papers went over on my desk and you know how do i communicate what a grievous error
00:59:02.000that was and then you know it's like they still tolerate it this entire time he's being tolerated
00:59:07.540until he pushes it too far so in a sense if you've ever had an issue with a guy with asperger's
00:59:13.200this is the movie for you it's the movie where they push it so far they get their comeuppance
00:59:17.800that are just fired i love this anyway that's that if um i don't know how much we want to talk
00:59:26.640about this but have you been following the this alien disclosure going on in mexico right now
00:59:32.920yeah i just saw some clips of it yeah but i i was reading some of the uh some of the replies
00:59:37.340on twitter it's kind of interesting but now mexico's congress is taking things to a whole
00:59:42.820other level, shown the remains of what certainly looks like tiny aliens with elongated heads
01:14:54.720tried to be Japanese but weren't good at it.
01:14:57.840This is the name of a group. A group of indigenous people also
01:15:00.740known as the Pine Creek First Nation, just say that, excavated
01:15:04.78014 sites in the basement of Our Lady of Seven
01:15:08.640Sorrows Catholic Church. Seven Sorrows is right. Near the Pine
01:15:12.640creek residential school the so-called anomalies were first detected using ground penetrating radar
01:15:18.880but uh reveal no remains to be found uh they were just a bunch of fucking rocks which to me
01:15:26.580not only casts doubt on this entire story but on ground penetrating radar period because it would
01:15:35.680seem that the only reason you would have ground penetrating radar is to have is to avoid shit
01:15:41.200like this you know what i mean like i guess you can tell when there's like bedrock or something
01:15:45.600but like like just have you seen have you seen ground penetrating radar it's a fish finder you
01:15:51.180know what a fish finder is all it is is it shows like a blip and anybody who operates the system
01:15:57.240will tell you the blip isn't a body it's just a change in like density and material makeup at
01:16:02.900that spot it could be a hole it could be an aquifer it could be a rock it could be a stump
01:16:07.260it could be fucking anything it could be anything so the fact the real story here is that the news
01:16:13.960media will trot out ground penetrating radar and use the word proof in the same sentence just get a
01:16:21.340fucking shovel man it's only six feet down christ yeah anytime and they were fighting digging them
01:16:28.300up too and they did the same thing of course because you dig them up there they know there's
01:16:32.360no bodies down there like this is this is the canadian holocaust they can't have evidence
01:16:36.980because otherwise they lose their fucking story and that's the funniest thing it's like up until
01:16:42.620now i guess none of these aboriginal families knew their kids were missing because you never
01:16:47.820hear about it until you know what like i don't want to they'll say it's oral history but it's
01:16:51.840like it turns out that we didn't really hear about it until recently because none of these families
01:16:55.820noticed their kids didn't come home like i don't know like there's no evidence
01:17:00.100you understand that like you you need to show me do they have a letter from the school saying
01:17:05.500sorry we killed your kid none of them have that so it's like you really haven't noticed a dip
01:17:12.580in the population or you would also know any of this stuff if they wrote anything down i don't
01:17:16.820think the kids even existed to be honest with you i don't think the kids i don't think most
01:17:21.300these kids are even real also like there's this idea that residential schools were just made for
01:17:26.720like indian kids but it's like no they were residential schools it was for anyone who lived
01:17:31.480in the area so you would have these residential schools that were full of white kids and they're
01:17:36.240full of like whatever mishmash we're living out there like italian kids it's like oh they made
01:17:40.120them learn english yeah they made a bunch of italian and ukrainian kids learn english too
01:17:44.040because they're in fucking canada by the way i had to learn french we all had to fucking learn
01:17:48.980french so suck my dick and so i think can you believe they made them forget their culture well
01:17:55.840apparently not really what they did was teach you how to write it's not like they made you to forget
01:18:01.380how to write in your language because you didn't have a written fucking language yeah you barely
01:18:07.020even understood let me just say this also the europeans are the first people to actually learn
01:18:12.840how to talk to birds we trained birds we trained hawks we have parrots so get spare me this shit
01:18:19.700that you are the guys who are at one with nature and can communicate with animals no only white
01:18:25.060people know how to communicate with animals the embarrassing thing is they've been sitting out
01:18:28.880there in the woods talking to these fucking birds the whole time the birds are like what
01:18:32.300what are you they were so happy when white people showed up shit finally somebody to talk to god
01:18:40.220birds love white people everyone knows it and they don't they just try to ignore it like have
01:18:45.700you seen an indian actually try and talk to a crow crow looks like i want to blow its fucking brains
01:18:50.500out show a show a fucking indian guy a parrot what's he gonna do he's gonna short circuit he's
01:18:58.600gonna his fucking brains are gonna melt out of his he's gonna do a hop skip and a jump into a
01:19:05.600river full of logs i reckon but you show show a white guy a parrot he's gonna teach us some cool
01:19:10.740shit to say immediately the thing they always bring up about the residential schools forcing
01:19:16.100the kids to speak english and not be able to speak their home language is so weird because it's like
01:19:21.180in any other case with an immigrant group right this is obvious like this is what you're supposed
01:19:28.360to do because you're trying to integrate the person into your society so the only difference
01:19:32.320here is that these people who were trying to integrate aren't immigrants they were actually
01:19:36.680there before us it's like okay but the goal is identical you're taking people who are not
01:19:43.860integrated in your civilization not because they came from another continent but because they came
01:19:48.040from the hillside and you need to force them to read the bible and speak english and wear shoes
01:19:54.700and yeah if you don't force them to they're going to regress this is called civilization
01:19:59.720um and it's just wild that like we fought them they lost we had the the english decency to not
01:20:07.500massacre them and we tried to integrate them at great cost and this is the thanks that we get
01:20:14.380also let me just say we've covered this before in some level of detail but it's important to
01:20:20.260recognize that they requested this the entire residential school system was done at the behest
01:20:26.300of the aboriginal leaders because they had said look you guys are industrializing you're blowing
01:20:32.960gold over the place we want to cut we want involved we're not going to let you push us to
01:20:37.300the margins you better be giving us that education for free that that's the entire indian act that's
01:20:42.980why it lasted so long that's why residential schools were there until the fucking 90s
01:20:47.480because like the premise was something that indians fought for because what were you supposed
01:20:52.700to do just like leave them in the woods that's that that would be the worst thing ever so it's
01:20:56.120like okay we're going to teach you our language we're going to teach you skills we're going to
01:20:59.520train you we're gonna teach you math you didn't have math you didn't have like you didn't know
01:21:05.260how to read a fucking map sorry uh you didn't know how to like do do all kinds of shit so we
01:21:10.320taught you for free and then you know not to relitigate this whole thing but anyway that's
01:21:17.320that's the other thing is we and you're right we have been over it many times talking about
01:21:21.580the aboriginals is not talking about like when we went to china or even when we went to india
01:21:26.640when we dealt with the real indians as much as we hate indians they had some semblance of
01:21:32.000civilization like they did have a written language they did have you know bricks you know and i think
01:21:40.160and soap i think but like this is not this with the aboriginals they were literally living in
01:21:46.680grass huts and did not have a written language we had to we had to make a written language for them
01:21:52.140So let me just say this. The reason I brought this up isn't just a retread over this ground. It's that I was thinking about this the other day and I consider that what really ground my gears was the headline that gets lost in the wash here.
01:22:08.180it's that something to the tune of 85 churches were burned in the wake of this um the churches
01:22:15.220were burned in revenge of this happening and then of course all of the protests all of the defacing
01:22:22.780all the statues of sir john mcdonald being pulled down and all this bullshit orange shirt day all
01:22:29.580this stuff but it's the church burnings it's the church burnings that really got me and it's the
01:22:33.780I THINK IT'S AN ACCEPTABLE ARSON THAT NO ONE IS REALLY BLAMING THE ABORIGINALS FOR THIS.
01:22:39.400WELL, THEY'RE BURNING CATHOLIC AND ANGLICAN CHURCHES IN RECENT DAYS.
01:26:48.780but i'm like well you guys didn't think anything you thought just property damage and arson and
01:26:54.980targeting innocent people was acceptable and also funny there's a lot of things that i think would
01:27:00.700be funny let's not talk about them right now but there's a lot of stuff that i think that i think
01:27:06.220would be justified and funny that we could do back and it would be easy and it wouldn't take
01:27:10.900that many fucking people but let's just try and like remind people what happened but i think
01:27:15.780that's that's kind of why i wanted to bring it up anyway we got to move on we got to move on to
01:27:21.180this will be the last book in our little i don't know what you would call it i didn't want to
01:27:27.660become an mmt arg it was just supposed to be sort of a general economics discussion about stuff that
01:27:33.880we hadn't come because you can discuss stuff from the past like what's being discussed now this is
01:27:37.940like mmt is what any for everyone's talking about whether for it or against it right but i found
01:27:44.000this other book that i think you'll like a lot more um there's parts of it that i disagree with
01:27:52.200but there's a lot of good that's in here and i think it will cross a lot of boundaries for
01:27:56.960listeners of the show who might be on the fence about some of the issues but the book is titled
01:28:02.680geopolitical alpha the subtitle is an investment framework for predicting the future it's by
01:28:09.460marco popic this was given to me by some people some more economics minded people in our scene
01:28:16.280and this it's not really an economic theory it's not an ideology it's not really trying to tell
01:28:22.880you how money works it's coming from the perspective of someone who's a bit more of a
01:28:26.940speculator who's worked at investment firms and he's trying to tie together these two worlds
01:28:33.400of economics and geopolitics and also behavioral economics and psychology and he does it in a very
01:28:42.740interesting way because what i like about this is he's like you know what a lot of people like
01:28:49.040to predict geopolitical events a lot of people like to forecast what's going to happen in the
01:28:53.840world or retroactively explain why something happened he said well if you really believe
01:28:59.240in what you're forecasting would you put money on it because there's ways if you're truly convinced
01:29:05.620you know how the world works geopolitically you know which way the winds are changing
01:29:09.660there's things you can bet on and you can make money on it you know you can you can tell if a
01:29:15.880certain decision being made in a government is going to like tank their currency you can predict
01:29:22.760that and bet against that market a lot of people don't a lot of people like to retroactively
01:29:27.880say of course this was destined to happen well you know how many people are actually willing to
01:29:32.200predict what's going to happen and put money on it and if you do think like that perhaps the way
01:29:39.560the world works is less about holistic ideology and more about really subtle behaviors and i'll
01:29:44.440explain what he means by that it is almost all the time that i've been right in markets has been
01:29:51.480moving against the geopolitical relevance you know i know a lot of a lot of people find this
01:29:56.520surprising when they talk to me the first time they're like oh he's a geopolitical guy he's
01:29:59.560going to tell me how china u.s conflict matters how ukraine matters so this matters so that matters
01:30:03.560and most of the time when i've had compelling geopolitical alpha views it's because i pushed
01:30:08.520against the view that it matters because in the short term in the short term jay powell is so much
01:30:13.720more powerful than vladimir putin and so i would argue that my entire book which is really a
01:30:19.240framework for generating geopolitical alpha is cute and sexy and useful and people should read it but
01:30:24.680the truth behind being a successful investment strategist off of politics and geopolitics is
01:30:30.200finding geopolitical beta which is getting those huge macro shifts that are driven by paradigm
01:30:36.920shifts in geopolitics and politics um where something that you've taken for granted for
01:30:41.800like a decade is suddenly undermined so he kind of sets the stage by saying there's there was
01:30:49.080was an old way of seeing economics and then there's a new way and this is sort of related
01:30:54.720what we're talking about with mmt and he's not saying whether it's good or bad but i think you'll
01:30:59.640like this part because it does seem obvious from where i'm standing anyway he's saying like you
01:31:04.500know back in the mid 20th century laissez-faire economics was much more popular the reagan
01:31:10.680thatcher type of economics it's very popular however in the modern era the more modern era
01:31:17.080rather that won out over the previous form of economics which was like french socialist economics
01:31:23.000after and that was after the fall of the soviets and stuff this was called the washington consensus
01:31:27.880the washington consensus was this sort of american laissez-faire economic model the markets are king
01:31:33.240and everything um and it kind of put capitalist economics as a standard and at that point 1980
01:31:40.040saw this adoption of these best practices that many economists and journalists and kind of
01:31:46.520professors have dubbed the washington consensus that was a really really important moment in
01:31:52.600history and then from 85 to 90 the soviet union collapses so as the west is adopting these policies
01:31:58.840of capitalism the alternative which is institutionalized socialism and communism
01:32:05.400collapses and so then the rest of the world says well which which system work we'll take the
01:32:10.360washington consensus and that's when the imf and the world bank starts propagating this set of best
01:32:14.920practices around the world however with the end in this was written very recently in the past
01:32:22.680couple years at the end of american hegemony the rise of political multi-polarity in the world
01:32:28.840which we discussed with you know the the geopolitics books like uh peter zyhan and whatnot
01:32:34.920uh and after we've reached the apex of globalization we're starting to see the end of
01:32:40.920laissez-faire economics which defined the 2010s which kind of ended during the great recession
01:32:47.800now what we're seeing is a new form of economics emerge that's more centrally planned and i think
01:32:53.640you would find this interesting because you've kind of noticed this the scene you've noticed that
01:32:57.560a lot of the conservatives and even look at the conservatives now and the far-right people
01:33:01.800now more than ever i think there's more of an acceptance of what you and i might call socialism
01:33:07.640like if you look at the i don't like it but it's a correct observation yeah if you look at the
01:33:12.280republicans now you're seeing the republicans for the first time in christ i don't know like
01:33:15.700half a century really open to the idea of socialist economic policy arguably centrally
01:33:21.480planned he's like well guess what that's kind of happening everywhere whether you like it or not
01:33:26.680and he said that's going to be one economic trend that's going to define the next 10 years for
01:33:30.860better or worse so he's like if you're placing a bet bet on that um and he says one thing a lot of
01:33:39.640the former economists aren't really equipped to deal with new economics he said you know what
01:33:45.980the laissez-faire system and american dominance allowed economists to be very lazy he called it
01:33:52.300the quant obsession uh the quantum session is you just you just look at market flows and mathematics
01:33:58.220And this was, you know, when you watch stuff like, you know, the big short or anything to do with the housing crisis, you're used to economics talking about like we can remove everything and just look at data.
01:34:09.500He says that era is ending. The idea where you can just look at graphs is kind of ending.
01:34:15.600And you could do that because the markets were relatively stable because of American dominance and global multipolarity.
01:34:21.380polarity and in a sense the end of globalization maybe not the end of globalization but like peak
01:34:27.960globalization where more countries are involved and there's no one clear leader it's like
01:34:32.300you cannot remove other factors from the equation so classical economists are not going to be
01:34:38.900equipped to deal with this new world um he actually has a name for them he's called newtonian
01:34:45.200investors newtonian investors are individuals attracted to investing through engineering
01:34:50.320and mathematics and only look at economics through mathematical models uh he says this
01:34:55.680is just as dangerous as ideologically driven people um and then you know because we deal
01:35:02.320with those people who hate ideologies like if you're just data driven that's even worse because
01:35:06.000you've got to factor in other stuff too if you go to um and a former member of the intelligence
01:35:13.340world or a former politician they're rarely going to talk to you about what they can't do
01:35:19.560because they've spent their whole lives trying to overcome that.
01:35:23.440And, you know, like, that's why we elect many of these people.
01:35:25.900That's why we hired them, so they can do better than their constraints.
01:35:29.300And so they're wired in a certain way.
01:35:31.280Then on the other side, you have the investment community.
01:35:33.220When the investment community tries to approach geopolitics,
01:35:36.700again, because the last 40 years were so clear for many investors
01:35:40.580what they needed to learn, and they basically needed to get a CFA,
01:35:44.040they needed to know how to value things, you know, mathematically.
01:35:47.400Like it became very a mathematical routine kind of a job that very few of them really
01:35:54.280looked at geopolitics and politics in a systematic way.
01:35:58.160And so they started to think of geopolitics as a realm of voodoo, where you got to go
01:36:02.420and find a former politician to tell you what's happening, you know?
01:36:05.860And so you have this real mismatch in cultures where on one hand investors are extremely
01:36:11.160systematic, framework driven, objective, quantitative. But when they're faced with
01:36:17.520geopolitics and politics, they suddenly become like chicken on trail readers.
01:36:22.720And he gives an example of how these people end up in charge. He says,
01:36:25.740the problem with political consultancy firms is that they use the intelligence model where they
01:36:31.440usually hire retired technocrats and policymakers, which means that they are decoupled from the
01:36:38.160machine and have less access to the data that they would if they were not retired there.
01:36:42.820And then they usually just regurgitate the news and don't do much analytics and research. So a
01:36:48.160lot of these like financial firms, they hire like old bureaucrats to like tell them what's going on
01:36:53.180and they don't know if the fuck's going on. You know, they know as they retire or they leave the
01:36:57.580main arena that they're dealing with, they don't know much more than anybody else. They can kind
01:37:02.340to give you their gut feeling but not much more than that um so he's talking about this new form
01:37:09.920we need a new model to deal with the new economics and it can't just be mathematics and it can't just
01:37:14.640be like retired bureaucrats and he's got this phrase that he says in the book that kind of
01:37:20.340summarizes his entire worldview he says identifying a macro model for identifying political trends
01:37:27.480is built on the following maximum because that's what you want to do you want to identify political
01:37:31.700trends because the political trends will allow you to kind of chart the economics as well he says
01:37:37.380preferences are optional and subject to constraint whereas constraints are neither optional nor
01:37:45.200subject to preference so in other words he's like saying you know people can say what they want to
01:37:51.100but there's certain material constraints that you can't fucking ignore and material constraints can
01:37:57.360be defined in a lot of different ways but he says people can't think their way out of material
01:38:02.980constraints he actually says material constraints birth thoughts this is kind of a marxist way of
01:38:08.280looking at it but um he says if you know there's an interplay between the two but if you actually
01:38:13.300look at the material constraints you will have higher diagnosticity than preferences for judging
01:38:20.360political events so that don't just listen to what people say look at kind of the forces that
01:38:25.240they're subject to and that might be you know pressures from different markets pressures from
01:38:30.480how much land do they own or what's their industry like like they can say they want a revolution
01:38:35.780can they have a revolution is it realistic that they can do it because you know like because what
01:38:42.300they're saying will always come up against what they're able to do and it's easier to judge what
01:38:46.580they're able to do in the short term than what their grand goals are and it's interesting that
01:38:53.360But in an era driven by data, you would think that the more data you have, the more we should
01:38:58.940be able to forecast political events or geopolitical events or an economy collapsing or a huge
01:39:05.500year for growth or something like that.
01:39:08.000But there's this line he has when he's referring to intelligence analysis.
01:39:11.900It's given by the CIA's former director, Richard Hewer.
01:39:16.440He says, having more information does not necessarily help one forecast.
01:39:21.260That's where judgment kind of fills the gaps.
01:39:23.360And the quality of information, which is measured by diagnosticity, is more important.
01:39:30.680So it's like the more data you have flowing in doesn't really matter.
01:39:34.980It's actually picking and choosing which data flows to look at.
01:39:38.360And he says, an analysis of financial trends over the decades saw that each decade was kind of anchored by a big geopolitical event that had market forces dancing around it.
01:39:50.480and you could more accurately um judge you can kind of like annihilate the concept of black
01:39:57.340swans with proper geopolitical forecasting because that's one thing we never talked about when we
01:40:01.320talked about black swans um there's this idea that black swans are inevitable but even nasim
01:40:07.020talib makes a claim that you know black swans shouldn't be the standard like there's no reason
01:40:12.560like there's certain things that are unpredictable but there's a lot of things that we think are
01:40:16.180unpredictable that shouldn't be unpredictable yeah there's a lot of things that were predicted
01:40:20.980by a lot of people and just the way society is organized those people weren't listened to so
01:40:25.140yeah there's probably there's probably an upper limit of black swans that are just outside of our
01:40:29.360you know abilities to predict but there's i would say there's a majority of them
01:40:33.480could be predictive if society was organized and he gives a few examples in the book just
01:40:38.680to contextualize what i'm talking about um some big ones that everyone got wrong
01:40:43.680first one is no one foresaw donald trump winning the election how the fuck did that happen that
01:40:51.460was a famous one where this every statistician was fucking wrong i don't think nate silver ever
01:40:58.000recovered from that fucking nate silver i haven't heard that name he's been he's been running from
01:41:04.460that ever since there's certain things so he's kind of he's giving you the scenario where like
01:41:11.200a lot of times politicians will talk about big changes and revolutions. But the moment they get
01:41:16.820into power, you don't see any of that shit happen. Part of it is they could be liars. A lot of them
01:41:23.180are just, of course, liars saying whatever they can to get into power. But a lot of them might
01:41:28.300genuinely believe it and get there and realize that the practicality of the situation is that,
01:41:33.440look, okay, I get that you might want to be a sovereign entity. But if you're a sovereign
01:41:37.580that means that your currency is going to collapse that's going to mean that capital flows turn off
01:41:43.440and that the country is not going to exist anymore and those are like material like material concerns
01:41:48.220would be like like oh if you make this country your enemy they stop giving you oil that's like
01:41:54.640an easy one right so it's like you can talk like a big china does this all the time this is a k
01:41:59.940perfect case study in china a lot of this anti-western sentiment anti-american sentiment
01:44:09.780Just like like North Korea, it's like, oh, they might nuke America, I'm like, I would
01:44:13.780bet against that, like they, they're, even they're not that fucking stupid.
01:44:19.160So imagine, imagine everyone kind of gets that.
01:44:21.220imagine north korea in a bunch you can judge every country like north korea because come back to the
01:44:26.780maximum like preferences are subject more to constraints than you might think and you can
01:44:31.360bet easier based on the constraints another example was what they called a black swan event
01:44:37.280no one could predict it was um everyone being wrong on the argentinian election um which was
01:44:43.400people were believing insiders there was too many people listening to like the wrong types of people
01:44:48.540of the inside of relaying too much information on perceived intelligence um he says there's a
01:44:55.900system that he uses because he's trying to give you a practical model here he said the system
01:45:00.480that he uses to gauge political capital and by political capital you mean let's say a leader
01:45:06.500wants to do something and you're betting whether or not he can do it whether or not he can meet
01:45:12.200those constraints he says here's the model to whether or not he can make the political decision
01:45:16.580It's popularity, time and power, legislative math, like whether or not they control the Congress or the Senate or the Supreme Court, that stuff that's on a country by country basis.
01:45:28.460The economic context, whether or not you're in a crisis or a recession or something, the support of special interest groups and kind of what he calls the global momentum.
01:45:39.840them. These are all factored in together. So that's why you can look at something like Donald
01:45:44.140Trump, where it's like, okay, he wants to do this. Well, how long has he been in power? Does he have
01:45:50.100a lot of good capital, a lot of negative capital? Okay. Are they currently going through a recession?
01:45:55.920He's got the Congress. He doesn't have the Senate. Does that matter? But also, do you have special
01:46:02.560interest group supports? And that's something Trump never had. And people always forget that.
01:46:06.280Also, you might recall a long time ago when we were talking about coups, whether or not a military could successfully take over a nation, you need the buy-in of a lot of special interest groups to grant you power.
01:46:22.800And where a lot of coups fail is they forget about the church, they forget about the unions, they forget about the special interest groups, and that's where they fucking fail.
01:46:31.660So you can actually look at the success rate, the success of whether or not a leader can do something, whether or not you can kind of detect if those groups are against him, which Trump unfortunately did.
01:46:42.900And whether or not you like Trump, whether or not you think, well, he's got the he's got his people in Congress for a brief window of time.
01:46:49.820It's like, well, he doesn't have all this other stuff. And that's I would bet against him doing a lot of what he wants to do.
01:46:54.960So again, if you bet against Trump doing what he wanted to do, you'd make money on that.
01:47:02.860And then there's other macroeconomic constraints that are bundled in there, too, like what's
01:48:56.040But especially for the Trump election, that was that was the one group that they said was not important.
01:49:01.520The median voter is the voter in the middle or the most centrist voter, or you could say, in a way, the most typical voter in society.
01:49:09.140And here, imagine you have a normal distribution of voters with a lot of individuals clustered here in the center, a smaller number with more extreme left-wing views and a smaller number with more extreme right-wing views.
01:49:35.340So, you know, they still try to figure out what the median voter cares about.
01:49:38.140Now, in the case of Trump, he said, you know, on our side, on the right, we would say the issue of the day was, you know, migration, the great replacement.
01:50:01.760And the migrant stuff is bundled up in that.
01:50:03.820it's more trade protectionism bringing jobs back it's about you know being firm new tariffs
01:50:12.320new walls we're not we're not going to be in this globalist world anymore it's anti-globalism
01:50:17.700and a lot of people were on the same page about that it might not be explicitly about race but
01:50:22.400race is bundled in there as well and that's why i think we talked about this on the show recently
01:50:27.180and i think that's true do you think that's true first of all yeah yeah absolutely that's actually
01:50:32.420a really good way to frame it and i'm kind of surprised it wasn't framed that way or it still
01:50:38.120isn't you know often framed that way it would be better you know it doesn't explain everything but
01:50:45.200you could place a bet on which way the winds you think are turning with the median voter
01:50:50.380and kind of tell which which way you should be moving as well now might not predict every single
01:50:56.180decision, but you can judge with accuracy certain outcomes. And so that's why we were talking before
01:51:04.300and an interesting game to play, not a game, but just a thought experiment for people who are
01:51:10.000listening to this or watching this and wanted something to think about later. Think about what
01:51:14.580is the story right now? What is the median voter in America? And what is their single issue that
01:51:22.160they're most concerned about and people might think it's and the single issue will usually
01:51:26.740factor in economics and demographics and stuff because any big issue always does and let me know
01:51:34.560what you think about this and i said this before but my idea is i don't know how to phrase it but
01:51:40.620it's like media lies that sounds very reductive but what i mean it's like the one thing everybody
01:51:47.760is talking about on any side is disinformation and misinformation that's all you hear from the
01:51:54.400left that disinformation is a threat to our democracy all you hear from the right is the
01:51:58.800media is lying to you everyone's lying to you the media itself what you might call the cathedral
01:52:03.740whatever academia is in there too they're all saying that you're being lied to all the time
01:52:08.680in fact that's all they fucking talk about so i think the issue of the day if i were to pull the
01:52:14.420median voter would be something about like the veracity of information there's probably a better
01:52:20.520way to explain it you know but like that would be it like how do we know we're not being lied to by
01:52:24.820every single institution all the fucking time and i think any politician that really addresses that
01:52:31.800they're going to climb to the top of the heap and it's interesting because i can't even imagine
01:52:37.240how that would be approached but for that reason i think that's that's like uh that's a that's
01:52:44.340the superconductor that's the room temperature superconductor right now in politics is how if
01:52:49.060somebody could come in and actually create like a trustworthy institution that people from many
01:52:56.760different spheres actually said yeah you know what for once i believe you like then i haven't heard
01:53:01.720those words in 15 years so that'd be magic and like he says here like if you're taking the
01:53:07.900temperature of the room if you're just trying to find what to bet on he says you know the right has
01:53:12.800moved left on economics if we're using the left-right paradigm he says the left is not moving
01:53:18.060to the center to outflank them um choose the left is choosing instead to go actually further left
01:53:24.360but that means the entire zeitgeist we know right now has kind of moved leftward um away from
01:53:32.100laissez-faire and free trade economics and he said this will define the pendulum swing in america
01:53:37.400going forward even so even more so than europe because in europe like this is going to be
01:53:42.780supercharged right now but like there there is no laissez-faire economics there is no conservative
01:53:48.900economics that is effectively dead so you're no matter what you believe you're we're stuck riding
01:53:55.820this pendulum swing until or maybe you don't believe in a pendulum swing but it's going to
01:53:59.980go that direction until it stops i guess um he's got this graph here just to stay on the populist
01:54:08.180thing that i found so interesting it's a graph of where you would find populism um on a map it
01:54:15.900it has these two axis uh one is uh generational earnings and the other is uh the genie coefficient
01:54:23.480basically it's a chart that charts uh social mobility so if you have less upward mobility
01:54:31.420and more income equality that's kind of like the zone where you find populism that's the uk that's
01:54:37.500the us and that's uh italy as well but you can like go down in upward mobility but more income
01:54:45.680equality but you can't be a populist then so there's like this sweet spot where you find
01:54:50.060populists where it's like high income equality but like no social mobility or something you know
01:54:57.120i mean and and that's like such an interesting that's why it's so rare anyway and also you could
01:55:03.080tech you might be able to include spain in there because spain's right on the edge outside of that
01:55:08.220zone but these are also the people that are leading the charge and he says we talked about
01:55:13.460the washington consensus the washington consensus was traditional laissez-faire economics this new
01:55:19.780one is called the buenos aires consensus the shift towards economic populism because that's
01:55:25.000what you can call it you can call it leftist economics but it's also economic populism
01:55:29.400um which is in short modern monetary theory it's the belief that you can just inject cash and
01:55:36.300credit into the economy and blow gold all over the place so you're gonna see the main proponents
01:55:42.780of that like there's no surprise coming mainly from america and the uk and this side of the
01:55:48.660you don't really hear like the real strong advocates coming out of like fucking ireland
01:55:54.740or portugal you know um and there is uh one element that he talked about earlier one constraint
01:56:02.740that you need to pay attention to and that's it's not the defining constraint but it's contributory
01:56:09.460which is sort of mass global trends and this would be like um capitalism versus communism
01:56:16.820You know, like it does. It is an effect where as capitalism was getting popularity in America, it did sweep through Europe. That's why it swept into Margaret Thatcher and these other places. There is kind of a domino effect. However, don't counter that domino effect every single time because that's what the Soviets counted on. They counted on domino effect really, really hard and it just didn't work.
01:56:40.480You know, the Soviet Union is a great example of ideology versus material constraints.
01:56:46.820It thought it could solve the material constraints, but it just couldn't.
01:56:50.180And it really couldn't reconcile with that.
01:56:54.680Just some other examples, just to illustrate what we're talking about.
01:56:58.040It says, throughout the 2010s, journalists and Euroskeptics discuss whether Germany would leave the European Union.
01:57:05.020But the macroeconomic constraints make Germany export dependent.
01:57:09.780uh the euro devalued the deutsch mark which allowed them to trade more effectively and they
01:57:14.800need the european market as a production sink so you know just with that in mind the likelihood of
01:57:19.300germany ideologically leaving the eu for whatever reason is low and and frankly this is the problem
01:57:26.300that a lot of eu countries are in where like they might hate the migration crisis of course they
01:57:31.840don't think any a lot of them don't like but it's like can we still leave the eu we're stuck in this
01:57:36.340fucking bind where like we we at this point to rejigger our own currency we we would fucking
01:57:45.260collapse there's a lot of countries that benefit from joining the eu that are stuck there now
01:57:50.000unfortunately no matter what economic you know or sovereignty argument you want to make
01:57:56.300they're fucking if if you leave it up to policymakers they're always going to err
01:58:01.380on the side of that status quo that doesn't lead to destruction
01:58:04.840um and she says here the the macroeconomic demands of the european union uh the fear of
01:58:15.720weakness and reliance on internal unity is more sustainable than idealist or utopian goals like
01:58:22.120no matter what it's very difficult to make the case for most of these nations that they're
01:58:27.160stronger on their own because there's a reason they did it like the whole reason the eu exists
01:58:31.760is to kind of compete on an international stage
02:01:18.620or where he's coming from on some things,
02:01:20.460I think the entire purpose of this is very useful, because what he's saying is that the old way, we all intuit that the old way of handling economics is over. There's some kind of shift happening. And we need to change how we think about it. And he's saying we need to factor in geopolitical concerns as well, not just math, not just looking at graphs.
02:01:40.180we have to look at like the psychology of the voters we need to look at the psychology of the
02:01:45.780policymakers the relationship between those two and look at the prevailing wins globally like is
02:01:52.680is there an economic for example the economic trend sweeping the europe right now is this sort
02:01:59.520of economic populism and it would make not a lot of sense to bet against that right now whether
02:02:06.680you like it or not whatever your ideology is similarly you can look at you know like what is
02:02:12.360the war in russia between russia and ukraine really doing to like the energy markets and you
02:02:18.020know things like that and i like that way of looking at it because it seems more nuanced and
02:02:23.020seems more realistic and it makes you at people like asking these questions because it's like
02:02:27.900well what are the data vectors for that what are the the information flows from that it's like well
02:02:32.320here's the thing you don't need every single information flow you need a few key information
02:02:38.360flows for example he says that you know our the way we used to uh try and judge these the way we
02:02:45.180used to get information was looking for like insiders and intelligence people and he's like
02:02:50.280you know they can help but if you rely too much on intelligence people you'll get a bunch of
02:02:53.600bullshit because they get tricked more than anyways like you should look at is historians
02:02:58.740like there's there's more types of data that you should be looking at that no one is looking at
02:03:04.680right now he says academic ease the tip he gave was find someone who knows has an incredible depth
02:03:13.020of knowledge about one specific thing if you're looking at an expert on policy makers fuck that
02:03:19.600guy he knows less than anyone but you find an academic that has studied like agricultural
02:03:26.720output in america for the past 100 years that guy can probably tell you more about the way the
02:03:33.540winds are blowing in america than a guy who just watches a bunch of news see what i'm saying like
02:03:38.900find find guys who know a lot about a boring thing who can tell you about like the context
02:03:43.620the context of how that's changed over time that will give you more information on like what's
02:03:48.820happening in america you know and then but those are the types of people that no one looks at
02:03:54.520so find like rely on less information but more but but deeper and more specific information
02:04:01.300and make bets based on that kind of like the way doctors do it like doctors you don't do a full
02:04:06.160body scan when you find something wrong with someone like you need to know which symptoms
02:04:10.840to prioritize because you'll get more information from that than just opening your mind to all the
02:04:17.100data because even ai struggles with that as well um and he uses this to make some predictions over
02:04:24.900the next decade or so so we can tell whether or not he's he's realistic or not his predictions
02:04:30.320for the oncoming decades are america versus it's going to be america versus china still but
02:04:35.940relatively constrained it won't be an outright trade war because that doesn't benefit either of
02:04:41.000them we're going to see deglobalization that's what we're seeing right now when people talk
02:04:45.280about friend shoring or reshoring of industries that is happening that will continue to happen
02:04:51.880de-globalization is going to happen over the next couple decades um moving away from laissez for
02:04:58.780capitalism due to multi-polarity and more of this economic populism that's that's here to stay
02:05:04.540there's no way you're going to vote against that right now so you just need to figure out what
02:05:08.680you're going to do about that and he says uh you know there's three lenses that he uses to
02:05:14.440forecast geopolitical events and there are three levels of um accuracy he says look at these three
02:05:21.800things discrete events like assassinations or protests cyclical events like elections or
02:05:27.480summits and kind of figure out where they're going and then around the curve long-term
02:05:32.760possibilities which are grouped by regional themes rather rather than specific countries
02:05:37.160and i like that it's like don't just look at the country look at the region look at its neighbors
02:05:42.200like what's france doing but what's france and germany and britain what's europe doing what's
02:05:47.540north america doing it's not just what's iran doing what's the middle east doing that's where
02:05:53.240you find the actual trend like there's more to looking at geopolit like really look at the
02:05:58.520geopolitics look at entire areas look at eurasia like what's what's russia and like what's you
02:06:04.780know india doing in relationship to china and all of asia doing shit like that so i like that i think
02:06:10.720that's the right way to look at it because that once you look at that you'll understand what the
02:06:14.780policymakers are thinking because that's what they're thinking about as well um
02:06:18.580yeah so that's that's basically the book in a nutshell and uh first of all what did you think
02:06:25.920about that i think that's probably more aligned with with your views would you say yeah i think
02:06:31.000i think we probably agree there's a lot of interesting stuff in there um i like a lot of
02:06:35.560the way that it's framed not sure about all of the conclusions but i mean i haven't read it so
02:06:40.160it sounds good it's good i'd recommend people read it at least even if because there's some
02:06:44.420there's one thing that he said in it that i didn't just i didn't agree with i didn't like
02:06:48.800and it didn't really make sense to me he was saying like um he was giving the example of
02:06:53.600donald trump and list listing the constraints of what he was dealing with to predict what he
02:06:59.380couldn't do and he was he was applying material constraints to opinions like for example he's
02:07:06.100saying he wants to put this law through but you know he had the constraint of that nancy pelosi
02:07:13.000hated him and john mccain hated him and so he went up against that but i said well that's not
02:07:17.920a material constraint because you had said that that's more of a preference he says preferences
02:07:23.020can change material constraints can't but then you can't put people's attitudes as a material
02:07:27.740constraint he did that like a couple of times so that made me question like that that example
02:07:32.840doesn't make sense within your model because the idea is like a material constraint is something
02:07:37.040you can't fucking control like you can't control that your country is like like that's the problem
02:07:42.800that ukraine has like the material constraint of ukraine is that it's at the gates of europe
02:07:47.560and that russia is there like that's going to inform no matter what it wants to do
02:07:52.160ukraine could never realistically exist in a world where it's not in conflict with russia
02:07:57.580that to me is more of a material constraint based on geography and it can never never
02:08:02.720never exists without that so any decision it makes has to factor that in which like any nationalism
02:08:08.760that ukraine comes up with has to factor in that it's always going to be at that inflection point
02:08:15.660between russia and europe and then in russia and europe are always going to be at odds forever and
02:08:20.680what do you do about that you know any national identity that doesn't factor that in the ukrainian
02:08:26.000church ironically factored that in into its creation but you know that's sort of the thing
02:08:30.620that we're talking about here and again it's not like a full 360 degree ideology but it's not
02:08:36.460supposed to be an ideology it's more of a financial framework to say let's figure let's have a new
02:08:43.120model to try and predict events something that you can bet on and you don't need to explain
02:08:51.420everything that happens in the world to kind of bet on the probability of something happening i
02:08:56.440i liked that way of looking at it right right right no that's a good thing a good way of looking
02:09:00.660anyway that's that's the book i really like i'd recommend it geopolitical alpha we could probably
02:09:05.300talk about it for a bit longer and i bet it'll come up in the future but again the existence of
02:09:10.080the median voter theory really stood out to me and even as a thought experiment i would still
02:09:14.740welcome people in your country wherever you're living try because the median isn't just the
02:09:20.420average normie it's like you're you're factoring in all the extremes but because the median will
02:09:25.720change year by year but like what is the average person thinking right now and what what is the
02:09:33.320average person thinking and what does the average person need to have an opinion on and that's
02:09:39.320something not a lot of people think about but that's something that can help you actually
02:09:42.880predict where an election is going to go anyway that's that i'll let you go now because we gotta
02:09:48.500to get going yeah cool i'll talk to you soon
02:09:52.240i wonder if rogan would have you on because i saw you on tucker and you know tucker in a lot
02:10:14.780the sense is kind of a I'd say he's a kingmaker you know like he will blast your ideas and you
02:10:20.820were up there and you weren't rambling like a schizo well I mean the part of the thing is I
02:10:25.600just refuse to sell myself right you know I I make no effort like engagement clout you know I would
02:10:33.080never try to worm my way into Rogan if Rogan wants to call me because he heard about me that's fine
02:10:38.460but I'm going to spend a grand total of zero seconds trying to be on Rogan I suspect that's
02:10:43.540not true for most people so you probably need to work harder at it to get on rogan yeah like i
02:10:49.500have a feeling that you wouldn't need to edit yourself very much for me i'd be going on rogan
02:10:55.320i'd be staring sweating in the mirror telling myself don't talk about nuking the moon whatever
02:11:01.840you do and that because he's going to ask you why and i'm not going to have an answer it just feels
02:11:06.180right all right well i don't know man you got a new something let's see what's going on in the
02:11:13.200moon don't tell me you don't want to know it's holla don't you know honestly i've been down the
02:11:19.200road with so many moon theories i was joking with um a friend of mine uh the host of the
02:11:25.740paranormies johnny monoxide i'm saying the moon landing conspiracies are almost the most acceptable
02:11:33.000in polite society because i know some very serious very respected highly intelligent people
02:11:39.300who hate conspiracy theories but they like all the moon stuff they'll talk to you for an hour
02:11:45.700about how the moon landing was fake and how the moon is something's going on with that
02:11:49.000huh well you know i was born right around the time of the moon landing so i i can't i can't say but
02:11:57.060i i think it's not fake in any case let's get let's get the part that's like i'm not i'm not
02:12:01.460even like a fake moon that's gonna lose me some listeners like oh here comes dimes talking about
02:12:05.700the moon's real now. I'm just going to introduce you very quickly because we've been chit-chatting.
02:12:12.120I'm here with a prestigious guest by the name of Charles Haywood, and he's an individual that I've
02:12:18.760been following for quite some time. He is the maximum leader of The Worthy House, the founder
02:12:25.240of foundationalism, creator of the Society for American Civic Renewal, a great many projects,
02:12:33.160and a great interesting career path that took you to here.
02:36:18.020You have to organize the administration of justice.
02:36:20.720You have to administer social activities, marriages, weddings.
02:36:25.720I mean, so ultimately, as you say, and Hoppe has written on this as well as other people,
02:36:30.040The Armed Patriot Network, it's kind of a tongue-in-cheek name, though people seem to like it, is simply the idea that a social organizing device is on a small scale, groups of people coalesce around natural leaders who then provide organization and protection in exchange for providing order, because no one will abide in Mad Max type scenario.
02:36:52.440Mad Max scenarios simply do not exist in the West, the end, never have, never will.
02:36:57.980And even more or less possible in America where everyone's armed to the teeth, because it's very hard to run around being a predator, like a stereotypical warlord, like a Somali warlord.
02:37:11.440You can't be a predator of everyone you're going after is armed.
02:37:14.700Eventually, you're going to take a bullet in the face and that's going to be the end of your warlord career.
02:37:18.560What people need in socially uncertain situations is organizing in order to avoid having to
02:38:56.560The entire point of having someone in charge
02:39:01.420is to alleviate the people who are being led
02:39:05.460from having to make a bunch of decisions
02:39:07.480because people don't want to make decisions.
02:39:09.440That is, they do want to make some decisions. They don't want it to be micromanaged. But when they come to a person saying, I need a decision, and they get an instant decision that doesn't involve a lot of hemming and hawing, and, well, let's talk first about what you want, and let's do a 360 review, and let's take everyone's temperature.
02:39:28.340People want decisions when they want decisions. So if you're able to deliver those decisions, the people you lead will be very happy with you. So again, I don't mean to say you need to make all the decisions that you shouldn't micromanage. You should give people a very wide amount of independence.
02:39:47.160But the being decisive is extremely important for any leader.
02:39:54.740And I think that the people who are type A are frequently decisive, but they're also
02:40:00.740frequently very desirous of both micromanaging and second-guessing people.
02:40:06.900And both those things are fatal to a leader.
02:40:09.280In order to lead any significant group of people, you have to allow people a very wide
02:40:45.300Yeah, it's very difficult because all of society is built around breaking down and tearing down young men. And every time something comes along that seems like it might help organize young men to self-improvement, that person or theory or whatever is attacked.
02:41:07.220The clearest example of this is Jordan Peterson, who now is irrelevant because he no longer speaks to young men directly. He's been broken deliberately, I think. So now he talks vaguely about philosophy and a bunch of other things and thinks they're kind of tangentially related, whereas in the past, his target was young men, young lost men, how they can get meaning, how they can have rules for life, obviously, which was his first book.
02:41:33.720And that's very dangerous, I think, to the regime for young men to have regained meaning and a sense of purpose. The problem is that it's not clear how one can offer to young men meaning and a sense of purpose when the avenues for implementing those things in real life are very narrow.
02:41:53.980That is, you have, as a young man, you can't join the military anymore in order to self-actualize, for lack of a better term, for obvious reasons, because the military is designed for young men to be humiliated, spat upon, and made to shine the shoes of whichever tranny is in charge in the platoon.
02:42:15.560And the other things that if you go into the corporate world, everything is hugely feminized, HR inheritance rule your life. So doing anything masculine is almost impossible in a corporate environment.
02:42:32.540Maybe a little bit more possible in a small business environment, but the opportunities are more limited there.
02:42:38.360And at the same time, young men are a wide range of vices are paraded in front of and funded for young men.
02:42:49.080Here, smoke this weed, watch this porn, do all these things that make you innervated and fat and you have no meaning in your life.
02:42:57.960just be sedated here, you know, feel free to, to take some extra fentanyl. So you become another
02:43:04.220drug overdose death and it's not a problem anymore for us. So what young men can do is really, I
02:43:10.520think the question of the hour. And I don't really have perfect advice. I have a long piece called
02:43:17.320my advice to the young, where I do talk about this. I think fundamentally young men should seek
02:43:23.180to enter a, they should seek to be resilient. So psychologically resilient, which means self
02:43:31.780education, physically resilient, which means physical improvement, which is obviously a big
02:43:36.000thing on the right. And they should try to get a job that is a resilient job as opposed to an email
02:43:42.660class kind of job, which is both probably going to end and therefore is not resilient in the
02:43:48.840anti-fragile sense, but also will suck the soul out of them and it'll lead to nothing good in
02:43:55.460their life. The problem is that those jobs are all socially not prestigious. So especially for
02:44:01.360a young man who's kind of on the professional managerial elite track, what does that young
02:44:06.240man do? And I honestly don't have a great answer for that. I think that kind of goes back to what
02:44:10.520we were talking about earlier, which is that a lot of this is kind of a waiting game. That is,
02:44:14.880If you're a young man who's, say, 22 now, just to pick a random age, you should really hope that there's a societal fracture in the immediate future because you don't want to get to age 40 without opportunities opening up for you.
02:44:27.920And they're not really going to open up for you if you're a young man who is masculine and desires to stay masculine as opposed to knuckle under to the feminized and narco tyranny that characterizes our regime today.
02:44:40.440you you want something to change but you can't make it change it's not going to change because
02:44:46.900you you you do something about it yeah i mean you get these psychos occasionally who decide
02:44:51.740that shooting something up is going to going to change things but most of those people are actually
02:44:55.620mentally ill there's used to be that a hundred years ago late russian empire and so on people
02:45:03.320engaged in bad activities ideologically fortunately young men who are mentally stable don't do that
02:45:09.560nowadays. And I'm not encouraging them to do it, obviously. But I can see it's very frustrating for
02:45:14.880young men who don't know what the future holds to just kind of sit around and wait. And there's
02:45:21.300really nothing else for it but to sit around and wait and engage in self-improvement and having
02:45:27.320whatever degree of resiliency your circumstances allow. I agree with that completely. And this is
02:45:33.800something we'd mentioned on the show before. And I'm curious to see what you think about it,
02:45:37.980Cause some people push back on me with this, but, uh, what I encourage people to do, and
02:45:42.500it sounds ironic given our listenership, but I would say if you're young, don't get into
02:48:23.260the internet doesn't know that you packed on 20 pounds because you couldn't be bothered to uh
02:48:27.340to get out of your basement whereas people who are local be like hey dude you know getting fat
02:48:32.300are we so that's a great point actually there's no you know angled lighting online in the real
02:48:38.060life and and this is but and this is the problem though that this sort of thing just like on a
02:48:44.340grand scale jordan peterson's activities were discouraged on a small scale this is also
02:48:49.960discouraged that it and it's discouraged in a variety of ways obviously people say oh look at
02:48:54.820you you know right wing bodybuilder types or whatever it's also discouraged by by suggestions
02:48:59.680that if you have close male friends well you must be gay you know the kind of thing yeah and so and
02:49:05.400and that that's very deliberate this idea that that somehow men shouldn't be allowed to have
02:49:11.300have male friends because that threatens pretty much everybody in modern society
02:49:17.720small and great that is at an elementary school for example our kids go to a classical christian
02:49:24.280school and you'd think it would be super based in the sense that not super based but not like
02:49:30.980public schools but the we complain all the time that it's overly feminized even there they want
02:49:38.320the little boys to act like little girls and so if a group i can assure you that if a group of
02:49:44.200five little boys start putting their heads together and forming a club, even at a classical
02:49:48.900Christian school, the administration will crack down on it hard. We can't have that. You know,
02:49:53.400they're going to get up to no good kind of thing. And so you start that young enough and obviously
02:49:57.600in high school and everything is designed around this, it makes it very difficult. So I think
02:50:05.200that just reinforces your point. It's crucially important that a young man find a local group like
02:50:10.980that that's fascinating to hear about your kids there because i remember even when i was growing
02:50:15.520up kids boys are always trying to form a gang and we're not talking about the bloods and the
02:50:20.040crips here but the idea of like five kids and maybe they give themselves a name and then they
02:50:24.380go they do something as like a click or a unit and from the sounds of it that that's that itself
02:50:30.800is being cracked down as maybe you know too nationalistic absolutely i mean i don't claim
02:50:37.000to have my finger on the pulse of every school in the area but it's definitely true and they're
02:50:41.660they're very i like the school and they get a great education everything everything's fine but
02:50:46.520the the yeah at a very early age they admonish the boys don't play with sticks you know it's
02:50:54.300aggressive uh you know kind of thing and you know and every and this is a problem i think
02:51:00.520frequently with christians classical schools which are not all christian but generically
02:51:06.380classical Christian schools, they tend not to have a lot of money. And so their teachers are
02:51:11.660almost all women who are working on the side. So the male role models are few and far between.
02:51:20.780And the default becomes feminized, not like a pernicious pussy hat kind of feminism, but a
02:51:28.680soft, gentle, consensus-based, agreeable, let's all be kind to each other feminism.
02:51:34.500and having any group of men is just inherently opposed to that because men advance by competing
02:51:41.940with each other, by beating up on each other occasionally, by aggressive behavior of various
02:51:47.000types. And obviously that has to be modulated by society at large. You don't want, you don't want
02:51:51.220the men as the actual crips and the bloods, or if those are even still gangs nowadays. And,
02:51:57.080but it's a big problem. So we, we aggressively encourage our, our boys to, to let's put,
02:52:05.700how do I put it? Be masculine, obviously without beating up on their sisters kind of thing.
02:52:09.760Well, that's interesting because I have a son that was born a few months ago,
02:52:13.420and this is something that, thank you very much. Something I talk about, because this is kind of
02:52:18.140the classic, you know, mother, father, husband, wife debate about how much to protect the child.
02:52:23.420And just as you're saying that, I was kind of laughing to myself about all the wild shit that I used to do as a kid, just things that like as a father now, like, oh, just go play in the woods for three hours, you know, and what I would do is like you're jumping between cliffs and you're getting into stick fights and stuff.
02:52:40.780but you know it is interesting that i was listening i forget what i was listening to
02:52:45.920some kind of podcast but they're talking about how you know boys do need to process their feelings
02:52:52.360but they need to do it in a male way that usually needs to be taught by a male and when they're
02:52:57.060taught to process it in a very feminized way there's like this constant tension because it
02:53:02.220doesn't make sense to them and i try and keep that in mind that's something i had to tell my
02:53:05.960wife which was like you know boys are gonna fight and they need to they kind of need to do that and
02:53:10.960they need to know what that's like because guys who've never been into a fight believe it or not
02:53:15.020are more dangerous they get a straight sense of invincibility then they're the ones who pick up
02:53:19.880guns because it's invincibility but weakness at the same time that tension but uh divorce from
02:53:25.780reality if you're a man who doesn't grow up that way you live in this fantasy universe that's
02:53:30.980fundamentally antithetical to your substance and no wonder that leads to bad things especially when
02:53:35.540combined with all the other problems facing young men that we were discussing a few minutes ago.
02:53:40.020And this is something that we have all these grand political and philosophical ideas. And
02:53:45.060oftentimes when I speak to our listeners, we call them friends of the show, especially guys who are
02:53:51.340younger than me, they'll say like, well, here's what we're dealing with on the ground. We can
02:53:55.060talk about great economic movements, but if you're like a young guy, you feel like you're just in
02:54:01.700this prison like you don't you can't meet girls the same way and like for me in my career i mentioned
02:54:08.980before we started that i work in marketing i've worked in marketing for 10 years and i've worked
02:54:13.840in a variety of agencies and we're client side and working in an office for those who haven't done it
02:54:20.480is just as bad as or worse than you would imagine i mean up until like last year i kind of had a
02:54:27.820I had to break from it because I'm like, I feel like my way of thinking has become so
03:04:44.720That's why I find you so interesting, which is that you're actually trying to jailbreak people from this grift, not only a political grift.
03:04:55.040focusing on survival rather than ideology but also focusing on like the qualities that
03:05:01.020the things that can actually get guys to acquire the characteristics of the man they want to be
03:05:07.760rather than just like pantomiming them which is what a lot of these other guys do yeah pantomime
03:05:12.940is a good term and i think but that's because people have lost a lot of social structures that
03:05:18.920inculcated into young men behaviors that weren't pantomimes and so it's understandable obviously
03:05:24.460that they seek out these red pill guys
03:08:09.320So whether they're polite about that or not. And so, I mean, I enjoyed it, but I didn't want people telling me what to do and I wanted to be rich. So I came back to Indiana and ultimately after doing a few things, I started a shampoo making business. That's the short form version.
03:08:26.700It was really a contract manufacturer of mostly hair care products, styling products, care products, which are in the trade or shampoo, conditioner, things like that, styling products, which are things like pomade, fixatives, things that make your hair stand up kind of things.
03:08:44.580As I talk about, I think it's in my Tucker Carlson interview, which is fairly well trafficked.
03:08:49.200I was the North American king of black hair care.
03:08:53.060And you would never know that, hear my name, because the company is a contract manufacturer, or was.
03:09:18.540I started this business with literally nothing, no customers, a tiny fraction of the equipment needed, and just somehow stumbled into having an extremely large, not extremely large, but very large, and more importantly, very high margin.
03:09:33.640That is, most people think that contract manufacturing is a low margin business.
03:09:37.100That's simply not true if you're in the right area and you have the right functions, which is basically a value add, but does never compete on price.
03:09:46.380then you're just a bitch we used to call that the bitch model and uh and so so it's very profitable
03:09:52.180and i sold it for a bunch of money and you know now a bunch of people on the internet think that
03:09:56.360i i uh i spend my days funding weird right-wing causes that they can't really specify when the
03:10:03.460reality is i spend most of my days as a gentleman farmer raising bees and uh and tilling the land
03:10:08.660to amuse myself and writing on my site. I mean, I suppose if I had like some super awesome secret
03:10:17.620society that I thought was going to take over the world, I wouldn't fund it, but that's
03:10:24.000unfortunately not what's going on. And for the most part, like I don't give money to politicians.
03:10:29.440I don't give money to political things, except for a few political things. I much rather give
03:10:36.340money to local charities, which is really where most of the money tends to go.
03:10:40.400Well, that's a fascinating story. And it's something resonates with me because I know
03:10:45.980in the Tucker interview, it's mentioned something that I try and press on people, especially
03:10:51.240entrepreneurs, because that was going to be the next question about sort of advice for
03:10:54.440young entrepreneurs. But what I would always tell people is I am attracted to what you
03:10:59.620described as unsexy businesses. Those are the ones that tend to make the most money.
03:11:04.680They're not the top of mind businesses.
03:11:06.640Everyone wants to start a tech startup.
03:11:08.400And I've worked, I've had them as clients and I've worked inside of them and it's not
03:11:28.580Like if you get a good organization that's somewhere on the manufacturing pipeline, you'll learn more about how society functions than like a top level startup owned by Google.
03:12:18.760But the goal of being an entrepreneur should be to be rich.
03:12:22.520Because if you don't want to be rich, you just want to be your own boss, say, you're
03:12:27.160going to have the drive necessary to make it successful. But I didn't care what it was. That
03:12:32.540is, for a brief while, I ran a cabinetry making business, but that was mostly a stopgap while I
03:12:36.860was looking for something else. The problem is that I discussed this in one of the pieces on my
03:12:41.580site. It's difficult to find a business to buy, that everyone thinks that you can, I'm going to
03:12:49.200find a business to buy that the owner doesn't really know what he's doing or he's going to
03:12:55.540retire and he's not going to know how to value it. So I'll buy it for cheap. And because I'm this
03:12:59.600smart guy, I'm going to make it much bigger and I'll be rich. That's just moronic, especially
03:13:07.080with the internet. There are no undervalued businesses to buy. I mean, every Tom, Dick and
03:13:14.860Harry out there, every small PE fund, every guy like you is looking around for businesses to buy.
03:13:21.240So the only way to start a successful business without incurring a bunch of debt to buy a successful business and pray you can make it bigger while making the debt service, because I had almost no debt when I started this business, I didn't have any money.
03:13:34.340I mean, I was dirt poor and I didn't have any savings.
03:13:36.940My wife would just now she was pregnant with our second child.
03:13:39.560And I'm like, I think I'll take my income to zero and and, you know, we have no savings.
03:13:45.320And then I'll like borrow 20 grand to start this business.
03:13:54.940But I was looking for a business to buy that was distressed, in essence.
03:13:59.880So, for example, I would troll bankruptcy filings, local bankruptcy filings, using the federal court system, court filing system, which is called PACER.
03:14:10.940I didn't find anything there, but there were ultimately.
03:14:13.100And the week before, I'll tell in a second how I got into the shampoo business precisely.
03:14:21.240No, but this is far more interesting, especially that story of you starting debt-free but also dirt poor and being in a position with a family, which is a lot of people will resonate with that.
03:14:32.320And I think that's a fascinating element of the story.
03:14:34.860Well, you have to be willing to take the risks and you have to have a supportive spouse.
03:14:38.580But it's true that my risks weren't as great as some people, perhaps, because I did have
03:14:43.220these fancy law and business degrees, so I could always have gone back to doing those
03:14:47.800So I say it was risky, but the risk was largely humiliation and having to dig myself out
03:14:53.240of a financial hole, not so much that I would be literally homeless.
03:14:59.060That said, you know, we didn't have any savings.
03:15:00.740We don't have any rich relatives or parents or anything or even well-to-do parents.
03:15:04.780And so so but the week before I started the shampoo business, I bid at auction on the assets of a concrete cutting and coring business, you know, big three foot saws that cut highway from highway holes for manholes or something like that.
03:15:22.500And I was outbid and that probably would have been a terrible business for a variety of reasons.
03:15:26.180But I could have been, you know, Haywood could have been one of those guys out there in the blazing sun using a concrete saw.
03:17:17.620And I was certainly about to pay someone a couple hundred bucks to do it and take out the trash and do this and do that, mix the shampoo myself, do all these things.
03:17:24.760And we didn't have any, I didn't have any employees at the beginning.
03:17:26.860So eventually it came together, but I mostly learned by doing.
03:17:32.260I didn't have any plan at all, I guess, to answer your earlier question.
03:17:34.940It wasn't, it wasn't, I identified this sector.
03:17:37.080It just randomly popped up and I became a shampoo guy.
03:17:39.640Well, I like the angle that you took though, which is a lot of people when they start a business, and this is something I've been guilty of in the past too.
03:17:47.620especially if they're of the mind where I'm like,
03:17:49.980I need to start a disruptive business.
03:18:09.740I first, right at the gate, I got to hire 10 people
03:18:12.280and I'm going to need a couple of interns to make it work.
03:18:14.780and they and then you know they they get paralyzed by this crazy business plan that they've drawn up
03:18:21.000for themselves because drawing up a business plan almost feels like you're running a business you
03:18:25.620know you're like i did it i got a business plan um you know but but identifying and this is the
03:18:31.640part of marketing that i like which is the marketing aspect finding the hole that needs to
03:18:37.000be filled in the marketplace like what do people need what's a safe bet what's what's an unsexy
03:18:41.600thing but you use it all the time like i i would have a joke not a joke more of a comment really
03:18:47.480but then i would say that i i if i find someone at a party who started a tech startup i want to
03:18:54.380be nowhere near them but find me a guy who runs a factory that makes doorknobs that guy's going
03:19:00.560to have stories for days and he's probably going to be very highly intelligent and he's going to
03:19:06.360have a charisma about him and not a fake charisma that a lot of these glorified salesmen have so
03:19:12.820they don't have to impress a bunch of people i i will say that the the secret behind
03:19:18.020entrepreneurial success aside from decisiveness and some of these other things i talk about
03:19:24.520is realizing that the vast majority of other businesses even successful businesses are run
03:19:32.020incompetently. So if you can simply be having a adequate level of competence, that is, you respond
03:19:39.340to customer inquiries, you communicate with customers, you do what you say you're going to do
03:19:44.000when there's a problem. These principles seem obvious, but it never ceased to amaze me. And I
03:19:49.960have never understood why, take my business, the vast majority of my competitors were just
03:19:55.480bone incompetent. And that's why we grew so rapidly in part because we were just better.
03:20:00.920And it's not because I'm a great manager or a great identifier of talent, but I did have a great team. How I assembled that team is not clear to me because I'm not good at identifying talent. I'm not good at managing. But it wasn't just that I was competent, is my point. Everybody was competent and everyone was very independent in some of the stuff we talked about earlier.
03:20:20.860But most businesses, your competitors are going to be incompetent, or if they're not overtly incompetent, they're going to be hampered by something. They'll be hampered by feminization. They're going to be hampered by a culture of risk aversion because the guy at the top isn't predictable. Another thing, I mean, a boss should always be predictable. Same inputs, same outputs, except once a year, I always lost my temper on principle, fake or not, just to show that I wasn't.
03:20:44.460um but it's uh uh so it's my point is if you're willing to take the risk and do what it takes
03:20:52.180and if you're competent you can get everything done it's surprising how much traction you'll get
03:20:57.360simply because the customers of whatever it is you're selling are likely to be frustrated
03:21:02.900particularly in a b2b kind of environment they're likely to be frustrated or at least some of them
03:21:07.260are going to be frustrated by their current service and even though switching costs in
03:21:11.380almost every industry are actually much higher than you would think, mostly in terms of risk
03:21:15.500rather than out-of-pocket switching costs, they'll be willing to take a chance on you.
03:21:19.520And if you can make it happen, then you get word of mouth. At the end of the day,
03:21:23.260most B2B businesses are word of mouth and reputation is everything. So you can do it too.
03:21:29.080You just need to put one foot in front of the other. That's what I noticed too, especially
03:21:33.040with B2B, but even a lot of B2C stuff, it's the word of mouth. And a lot of marketing right now
03:21:38.180um and advertising advertising is in a bit of a strange state right now generally especially
03:21:42.820digital advertising but it's trying to either generate word of mouth or create the facade of
03:21:48.600word of mouth and that's why influencer marketing has exploded as like influencer marketing is kind
03:21:54.960of weird though i've got stories about that shit but it all comes down to fake numbers like across
03:22:00.200the board most digital marketing i've begun to sour on because i became aware of just how fake
03:22:07.060most of these numbers are they can't really be trusted but that's a whole other thing entirely
03:22:12.360yeah it's fascinating I don't pay much attention to it I mean I see you know the Kardashians are
03:22:16.440influencers but I'm so I'm so not in that world that it's completely indifferent to me well that's
03:22:22.540because again this is why I like these sorts of businesses because you know I still have clients
03:22:27.420now and I do the due diligence of if I'm running a digital campaign for them I will call them up
03:22:32.780and say, now they're saying that you got 20 new phone calls this week. Have you received extra
03:22:38.400phone calls? And sometimes they'll say no. And that's how I know Google is lying about their
03:22:42.080call tracking. But like a lot of places don't do that. And just to add on to your point for young
03:22:47.800entrepreneurs out there, if you approach this as a human and actually give a shit about dealing
03:22:53.960with your clients or dealing with everything, you'll be shocked at how rare that is. And they'll
03:22:59.700think you're trying to do something crazy by like calling them up and acting like hey is this
03:23:03.620campaign working because i want it to work i'm invested in you succeeding not just taking your
03:23:08.460money that doesn't happen a lot it's fascinating i mean i i think the direct approach actually does
03:23:15.620make a lot of sense i mean i i started doing a lot of that ultimately when the company had
03:23:20.840enough word of mouth that people were generally aware of the company even if they ever talked to
03:23:26.200at that point especially you can contact people and they'll have heard a few so they'll be polite
03:23:33.380and either they have a need or they don't so you basically win either way if you don't if you they
03:23:38.080don't have a current need they'll remember that you're an organized guy who reached out to them
03:23:42.000politely and asked if they had a need if they do have a need they're like well now that you mention
03:23:45.580it i have some business for you it's just not that hard yeah honestly like that that's a great
03:23:50.560point and that's something i would encourage again to bring this back to young entrepreneurs
03:23:54.280guys who might want to follow in your footsteps or do something similar, like do not, and I've
03:24:00.460dealt with some people recently like this, like don't undervalue picking up a phone and calling
03:24:05.460people and just having a conversation that will stick in their memory more than a thousand
03:24:12.820exposures to your ad, you know, because there's social proof established in that. And I would
03:24:17.920apply that to anyone who's getting into politics, anyone who's doing anything, like just networking
03:24:23.380sucks. Everyone hates networking, me more than anyone. But the only time my career has ever
03:24:29.640gone well is when I actually just like showed up at a place or picked up a phone and called someone
03:24:33.580that's paid off in spades later. It doesn't surprise me. And I mean, there's two kinds of
03:24:38.860networking, right? There's fake networking, where you're basically looking to get something out of
03:24:43.080somebody else. And you're not really interested in that person. And you don't really see it as
03:24:48.220through a lens of reciprocity and that everybody can sense that right but if you it it's like the
03:24:53.940thing that i'm old enough now that your friends from previous years or decades or whatever fall
03:25:01.620into the two categories the kind who call you just because they want want to stay in touch and the
03:25:06.980kind to call you when they want something yeah so you know you don't want to be that latter thing
03:25:11.500and that doesn't mean they're not your friends still but it does it changes the the meaning of
03:25:15.900friendship when the p when every time you hear from somebody it's because they want something
03:25:19.260you you feel used and cheap and so yeah no that's a great thing and that's something that um
03:25:26.760you know as as you accumulate wisdom that all becomes very clear and i guess being a
03:25:31.560having a family changes that as well because you have less patience for useless people
03:25:36.740because me and my wife were laughing at the other day it's like hey remember when we used to have
03:25:41.860free time remember we used to just like hang out and do a thing like but you know when you have
03:25:47.840kids and you have a family it's like yeah you know what the rest of the year looks like pretty
03:25:51.760much what are you doing this weekend i ask i know exactly what i'm doing i'm not milling around
03:25:56.520yeah exactly and and if you do find yourself at loose ends you kind of look at yourself
03:26:04.180differently you're like why am i not doing something useful yeah especially as you get
03:26:08.060older there's a panic that uh falls over you if you and that's a good panic to have that means
03:26:14.060you're on the right track yes now i know you've got to get going now so i just wanted to thank you
03:26:20.020once again for taking the time uh to talk to me i want to make sure everyone checks out the worthy
03:26:25.060house at theworthyhouse.com um that's where you can find all your recent appearances all your
03:26:30.980reviews and uh was there any other anything that i missed that you were wanted to plug
03:26:37.280not a thing i think we were we were we covered a lot of ground and uh and uh you know clarified
03:26:44.240a lot of things and i think it was very fun now and i want people to check out this site because
03:26:48.560as someone myself who writes 5 000 word articles about things if you like that you're going to
03:26:55.340really like charles's stuff it's very very good so once again thank you so much for taking the
03:27:00.600time and I hope to speak to you soon. My pleasure. Thank you.