00:02:39.960...posting a video in which he tells Roseanne Barr that he was responsible for a dead bear cub that turned up in Central Park in 2014.
00:02:48.920I had an old bike in my car that somebody asked me to get rid of it.
00:02:52.040I said, let's go put the bear in Central Park and we'll make it look like he got hit by the bike.
00:02:56.840We thought it would be amusing for whoever found it.
00:03:00.220The incident grabbing headlines at the time, leaving officials scratching their heads, wondering how a bear cub hit by a car ended up in the middle of Manhattan.0.98
00:03:10.780He was on a fucking so he's on a podcast.0.81
00:03:13.880He's on an interview in Central Park, like in New York, in New York City, the Central America's Park, America's Park.0.98
00:03:21.360I really think that RFK Jr. sees his election as a lark at this point.
00:03:25.940I don't think he wants to get elected.
00:03:27.220I don't know what he's doing, frankly.
00:03:29.300he's just yeah he's he's still technically running but as far as i know he doesn't have a campaign
00:03:35.000this campaign is going to events full of strange men and going on podcasts and he's there
00:03:40.840on this podcast i saw the video of it he's sitting on what looks to be just a bar stool
00:03:45.340one of these kitchen podcasts you hear about he's got his arms folded right he's got tilted back
00:03:52.300real nice lead on him he's telling a story about he hit a baby bear with his car
00:03:57.840and he put the bear in the back because the story sounds fake but the fake parts he added make it
00:04:07.180sound worse because he makes it sound like he was going to save the bear for its meat and its pelt
00:04:13.080but he had to go somewhere else he had to hop on a plane so i was going to skin the bear and it was
00:04:20.280very good condition and i was going to and put the meat in my refrigerator and you can do that
00:04:53.920but the dumbest crime you've ever heard of0.98
00:04:56.000because maybe hitting a bear isn't illegal i don't know i bet most new york cops wouldn't0.99
00:05:01.340i don't think you can kill a bear by hitting it with a bike though i mean this would have been at0.84
00:05:05.280a time where their number one thing was like mexican teens with switchblades like a baby0.72
00:05:10.520bear dead does not hit their radar fair fair but but this sort of bizarre crime would because this
00:05:18.000is the bizarre crime that state and someone heard him say that and said oh this is that cold case
00:05:22.740from like 10 years ago and then 10 years ago so it was like 20 2014 i'm making up the let me see
00:05:30.160let me get the actual date it wasn't even that long ago i don't know a decade a decade after
00:05:36.020the shocking discovery so it was it was not that long ago comparatively he's old enough where at
00:05:43.120that time he would have looked pretty much like he does right now slightly less right so like he's
00:05:47.620coming back from where Adirondacks or the upstate New York driving back to the city and he hits one
00:05:55.140on the highway that's kind of believable and I actually do believe like I mean I would do the
00:06:00.120same thing if I hit an animal and it was dead or not I mean I would put it out of its misery and
00:06:04.360I'd take it with me because I would also take the meat and the pelt but like to I guess no just walk
00:06:12.180through it if you lived in an apartment in in New York what are you going to do with it I'd
00:06:17.400probably do the same thing actually i just wouldn't stage it with a bike that doesn't0.82
00:06:20.420make what the fuck just dump it you've never heard of this before you've never heard of someone
00:06:24.560killing anything and driving it into central manhattan well you drive it home but if you1.00
00:06:30.680live there then you kill someone in manhattan then drive them to upstate new york um what the
00:06:37.300sigma you drop them in cops central i like i was there like i said recently you've never seen so0.52
00:06:42.600many cops just milling around in your life this is the most insane thing it's like putting a dead
00:06:48.820body on the subway it is funny it's the story you tell when you know you're not going to be president
00:06:55.780it's the story you tell everyone says man that guy should be president he kills things0.99
00:07:01.400fuck if dick cheney ran after shooting his friend everyone acted pissed off at the time1.00
00:07:08.380about that remember that yeah when we everyone was a hypocrite and acted like shooting a guy1.00
00:07:15.820in the back wasn't cool yeah oh he shot oh let me i'm clutching my pearls he shot he shot a man0.88
00:07:24.160in the back that's how dare you oh he he's like oh he means like a hit man he's like agent 47
00:07:29.660all right so i was in toronto uh just this last weekend long weekend my condolences yeah
00:07:41.060and we myself and the house of dimes have a tendency to enter into cities at the worst
00:07:50.940possible time so when we went to new york we touched down into their pride parade
00:07:55.560which is not as bad as the toronto one toronto's got you know it beats new york in a few things0.81
00:08:03.540one is the outrageousness and perversity of our gay pride parades it was quaint in new york0.52
00:08:09.160but then this time we entered toronto during carabana no um now if if you don't know what0.74
00:08:17.520that is carabana i don't know how this happened but toronto it doesn't make sense for one weekend
00:08:22.440Every year, like, the biggest festival Toronto has, it's a Caribbean festival.
00:08:28.100North America's biggest street festival is back for its 57th year.
00:08:33.780The festival celebrates the diverse cultures of Caribbeans living in Toronto through music, dancing, food, and thousands of masqueraders in elaborate costumes.
00:08:44.060Which is weird because, like, we don't even have that many Caribbeans in the GTA.
00:08:47.660And the ones that we do have are in small boroughs.0.99
00:08:49.880like you would actually make more sense to have like a Chinese or Indian
00:08:53.400cultural festival in Toronto than a Caribbean one.
00:28:18.060is it a reception is it an oh oh sorry you went from receptionist to office manager
00:28:23.280is some of this just like i low iq home ec where like look i mean i only make 40 grand so i could
00:28:31.000never if i had kids it would destroy my ability to order out it's like yeah but what if you had
00:28:37.860a husband who made more than 40 grand and you actually had more money than that what if you
00:28:44.680had what if you had children and you paid a lot in but then the things that you like you they're
00:28:48.940going to take care of you when you're older and these are like basic points but it just seems
00:28:53.320like it honestly seems like they have not thought of it when they say i can't think of a single
00:28:57.200situation where children would benefit me like i i love all of the moral and civilizational
00:29:03.680arguments for having kids but aside from that kids do economically benefit you in the long game
00:29:09.000if you think they don't benefit you you're just not thinking long game i don't know 33
00:29:14.360female here i'm so glad i chose not to have them uh i own an apartment have a well-paid career
00:29:21.020and am retraining to study again this year oh it's a great career but i'm trying to do something
00:29:27.240else woman moment as someone who has multiple women in my extended family who had kids because
00:29:35.960everyone told them to and then they abandoned those kids don't have them if you don't if you0.97
00:29:41.220don't know you want them i'm getting a theme here that there's a lot of bad moms out there
00:29:47.460have you noticed that let me just we'll stop reading this now i think we we got the bit um
00:29:53.920that there's it's just gradations of i'm so happy i just thought about the other day and me and my
00:30:01.100partner we were overjoyed and we didn't have kids like it's very strange but one thing i noticed
00:30:05.900recently and i'm curious if you've seen the same thing that and i didn't see this until i became a
00:30:13.020father and i didn't i wouldn't know about this unless i was interacting with other parents so
00:30:18.120when we take nickels to the park or to playdates whatever it is and sometimes you get to know
00:30:26.060parents and you can hear them talking i'm very surprised at the bitterness and antagonism i've
00:30:34.200seen from mothers specifically towards their children there seems to be a sea change that
00:30:40.420occurred i don't know when but every dad that i see with their kids uh seems to love being with
00:30:46.960their kids you can say oh they don't see them as much as the mother yeah maybe but there i do see
00:30:52.320like there's dads you see a lot when they're out like they seem to be the main ones taking them out
00:30:57.240and they seem to have a good relationship with their kids they seem to want to raise their kids
00:31:01.520they like playing with them they like interacting with them i'm talking toddlers here right
00:31:05.540but mothers even mothers of one child it's not like these mothers have six kids but i'm like
00:31:10.740they seem really pissed the things they say to their kids that they think is funny like telling
00:31:16.960their kids to shut up or sounding annoyed towards them when they're doing something when they know
00:31:21.640i'm in earshot they think i'll think it's funny i'm like acting like you don't like your kid
00:31:26.820isn't funny to me i don't know like why would you say that i'm not your this isn't a set you're
00:31:33.540doing right now but anyway i've just noticed that i don't know man it's rough i've seen the same
00:31:37.340thing at the playground like i've seen and i i was gonna say about the dads the dads that are
00:31:41.960bad there are bad dads but they just don't take their kids to the playground the only dads that
00:31:45.920will actually take the time are the ones that actually love their kids but it seems like the
00:31:49.120bad moms still drag their kids everywhere they just do it like it's a burden or like uh like0.98
00:31:55.760it's a way to to score like you said scoring social points or at least they think that that's1.00
00:31:59.760what they're getting they like mock their kids and berate their kids in front of people at the
00:32:03.500park but yeah it's like even with the the kind of the stuff you're quoting off reddit there a second
00:32:08.140ago it's so the problems with this are so much deeper than just just women choosing to not have
00:32:15.300children it's all of the governmental and economic incentives and destruction of marriage and
00:32:19.540destruction of the community and i almost i some of those posts like i want to be mad at them but
00:32:25.540it's like no you know what i like the woman saying like you know i had all of my older sisters had0.99
00:32:29.880children and they all abandoned them so i'm not gonna have kids like fuck that's that is rough0.94
00:32:36.860dude i i am you know a bit more charitable to things like that and i remember i had gotten0.99
00:32:44.020into a debate at one point with um an individual there's this great show called full house
00:32:50.440it's a show that's in our scene they're like associated more with the far right but it's
00:32:55.260about families right but they had this quote i really liked which is about having how many kids
00:33:02.700should you have they said have as many children as you think you can afford then have one more
00:33:08.580i kind of like that but the thing i liked about that the most was the word afford
00:33:14.000and i got into a debate with someone uh who was saying that you need to have as many kids as you
00:33:20.620possibly can as fast as humanly possible because he's doing it's hard to tell whether or not these
00:33:26.100people are genuine when they say this but they'll say something like we need to raise the new
00:33:31.040soldiers for the oncoming war you know stuff like that you know i'm kind of paraphrasing it here
00:33:36.120and i just said like okay if i'm taking this seriously i get where you're coming from it's
00:33:40.500better to be fruitful and multiply um and i don't think we tend to be a pretty pro natalist group
00:33:46.780But I said, like, look, in a sense, you do need to keep finances in mind in the sense that it is possible to have too many children where you create what we might call a dysgenic environment.
00:33:59.200And by dysgenic, I don't mean that they have poor genetics.
00:34:01.860I mean that you every here's the thing.
00:34:04.940It's very easy to say have as many kids as possible.
00:34:07.680If you haven't grown up around families who have done that and went beyond their means and that collapsed the family.
00:34:14.820We've got people in our group, our community, who their families, their parents did the trad thing.
00:34:21.260They had like eight, nine kids, and they were poor, raised in poverty.
00:34:24.660The bottom of that pile is mothers putting their children up for adoption, which was very, very common in an age gone by.
00:34:31.900Yeah, or even if you keep the family together, it seems very likely in these situations that that environment pushes kids towards drug abuse.
00:34:42.100Can I say there, I understand what, if the person is, if this is a rhetorical statement, like it's for the sake of argument, I do get what they're saying, which is, and I'll phrase it differently, the sort of people who ought to have many children or the sort of people who have done a genuine financial analysis and are worried about them not being able to provide a good life for their kids.
00:35:05.540and so they don't they don't have that many kids those people can have plus one plus two kids
00:35:10.760beyond what they've planned because those people are people who are capable of planning if that
00:35:16.880makes sense it's the people that just knock them out and the people that just keep getting pregnant
00:35:22.360and haven't planned it at all are the ones who are you know the the problem in this case i think0.87
00:35:28.860and if you talk to a lot of people who were raised in that situation they say i fucking hated that
00:35:33.700i wouldn't do that i wouldn't do that to my children and a lot of kids who grew up from big
00:35:38.960families who grew up poor they're the ones who want to have small families the most right so
00:35:43.420i have to take that into account now i understand the whole be fruitful multiply have as many kids
00:35:49.540a big family who doesn't want that but you have there has to be a worst case scenario
00:35:53.860you have to understand that there is a floor you can't fall between where once you fall below that0.89
00:35:58.820floor you're raising your kids in a fucked up way and then that doesn't benefit anyone0.77
00:36:03.100you see what i'm saying well and there's another one i would say and this is something i um i throw0.99
00:36:07.780this back at some people sometimes you tell me that oh i can't afford to have kids like my wife
00:36:12.440and i had we were never very wealthy but we used to have a lot more money for ourselves we used to
00:36:18.500run a large business and there were lots of things that we did like and i'm not gonna like go off and
00:36:23.680name things but like there's no normal normal person stuff that we did a lot and i think for
00:36:30.240a lot of people they don't they they don't dig enough into that budget and say this is a thing
00:36:37.060that if i say i can't have kids because it will take away from this i'm literally saying this is
00:36:40.500more important than children and when we we did that we said yeah there's actually a lot of stuff
00:36:44.600that we completely cut and we have not done as a family in year one of them is like vacation
00:36:50.020vacation we haven't taken like a what you would call a vacation like get on a plane and go
00:36:54.560somewhere we drove to ottawa was the biggest thing that we've done but part of that is we can't you
00:37:01.680know we're in it we're in the position where if if we were being those people and looking at our
00:37:06.420finances we can't afford to have two kids but we have two kids we're okay and we'll probably have
00:37:11.020a third and we're just we're gonna fucking figure it out but i don't think that it's a matter of um
00:37:16.340i don't think it's to the point of being where we you know they're going to be in a bad situation0.72
00:37:23.420when they're older i think it forces you to be more sensitive to your finances and you find ways
00:37:29.480to get that money in that extra time yeah and but i would say to you maybe don't have nine which is
00:37:34.960kind of what some people say which is like you have to actually you have to understand that there
00:37:38.720is there is an extreme but if you operate as if there is no worst case scenario i don't think
00:37:44.140that's realistic this is just of course memes right yeah that's not what people who are taking
00:37:49.060the question seriously would say that's why i like that uh full house quote and this might sound
00:37:54.800unfair and then we'll move on after this but i kind of wanted to get this out there to see what
00:37:58.700you think that and if i've said this before you know stop me because i don't want to repeat myself
00:38:03.180but my sense is that more men actually game out what having a child is going to be like and how
00:38:11.620it's going to affect their lives more than women uh by which i mean and that's why i think a lot
00:38:17.000of guys panic and flee because they correctly realize that my life is going to change forever
00:38:22.540and based on what i've seen from most women even as they're pregnant i think up until
00:38:29.340of the first week after a child is born they don't really think their life's going to change
00:38:35.540And it's only when they're doing that third 3 a.m. feeding that's like, oh, no, this is what it is.
00:38:42.300But every guy's already gamed that out and schemed that out in their heads.
00:38:46.280And so they've kind of emotionally prepared for it.0.64
00:38:48.020But for women, it kind of hits them all at once after the kid's there.
00:38:51.400And I think that's a big contributor to what we call postpartum depression.
00:38:56.240And that's sort of that thing can be addressed.
00:38:58.660That's not like no one knows what postpartum depression is.1.00
00:39:01.700What it is, it's women having their part of its hormones.0.99
00:39:04.960Part of it is just, you know, your body went through a lot of trauma, but a lot of it is0.59
00:39:09.480I think women for the first time realize like, oh, this is forever now.
00:39:14.060And they didn't think that before for whatever reason.
00:39:17.140I think there's also the hormonal thing, like it screws them up in the beginning.
00:39:21.560It doesn't matter how prepared they are for the first few months after birth.
00:39:24.880They got all kinds of things running through their heads too.
00:39:27.260Moving on. Speaking of a woman's life can be summarized as one long woman moment.
00:48:35.560This post, again, gets like 1.8 million followers.
00:48:38.040And you're like, oh, well, this is bigger than nearly anything we've got going on over here.
00:48:44.380I myself am a centrist, an esoteric neoliberal in Anna's terms.
00:48:49.060I received pushback at every turn when I tried to keep the council living up to its promises of political mediation and not become a left reactionary PSYOP or right reactionary PSYOP.
00:48:59.580Notice how like they're using like a PSYOP is just something you can do.
00:49:03.160When we say a PSYOP, it's usually affiliated with some institution or it's like military strategic.
00:49:09.020We put those words and those concepts out into the ether and they've adopted them and made them their own.
00:49:16.720And now they're using them totally out of context.
00:49:18.740but that's why it has 1.8 million views and not 300 is because she's using it in a soft body
00:49:27.320context yeah and here's the thing they had this big event planned um they're gonna have this big
00:49:33.940launch party and it got canceled due to what they said were death threats bomb threats rape threats
00:49:40.860girls will use these threats interchangeably like i was going to do something but i received
00:49:45.360a death rape bomb threat so i decided not to and hopefully they don't do it next time
00:49:50.980bye hopefully it's a one-time thing it always ends up being one-time thing this guy like called
00:49:57.400the venue and found out that there was not even an event booked they just like made up an event0.98
00:50:02.920and then faked a hate crime it's but it's like i don't know it just seems people fall like ass1.00
00:50:08.320backwards and in order if you're in new york you can just do the dumbest shit imaginable0.99
00:50:13.280and it's politics right it's i don't know right that's from my perspective there's other people0.74
00:50:19.520out here building parallel societies but if you're like a girl who read slava zizek's wikipedia page
00:50:25.480and and she says here like to reiterate i generally believe in their stated vision or i believe that
00:50:30.640they believe i'm like what stated vision like what are you talking about yeah i mean i i want to
00:50:36.460kind of draw a line between because you mentioned you brought up you know there's people trying to
00:50:41.980operate or create parallel societies parallel society isn't like a network of associations
00:50:47.720like what they're talking about here and that's what i i was going to say that when i look at
00:50:52.220these people i'm not seeing like they're we're talking about networks and associations and
00:50:56.660policies and this and that i see like the diameter of her neck and her wrists and i'm thinking about
00:51:03.520how much her body weighs and how much i could sell her for to a turk that's what i'm thinking1.00
00:51:08.520about you're built different because she speaks maybe one language she doesn't know how to cook1.00
00:51:14.460she lives in a small new york apartment that is paid for you know cooperatively by the government1.00
00:51:20.080and her parents and when i break all of this down she will either be chained in my basement or be1.00
00:51:26.560on the back of a truck to the turk it's one or the other but she doesn't she's a piece of meat0.98
00:51:31.060and she has no value outside of her sexual value and it's embarrassing to me and to the other0.95
00:51:37.960men observing this to think that this ever mattered at all parallel communities to the
00:51:43.960extent that they are networks of associations are also equally as embarrassing but real parallel
00:51:48.620communities are acres of land equipment you know gold ammunition actual relationships between
00:51:58.040people that live within a stone's throw who have a plan and a thought and a future together and a
00:52:04.380family that that's a that's a that's a network businesses that actually produce products for
00:52:10.120profit in a market that is a real that's a real thing i don't know i feel like i'm the one being
00:52:16.460like um philosophical and i want to say the word real but this is this is r-e-a-l real right like0.97
00:52:25.020you joining even look at the fucking photo they have their their cute printed t-shirts hegel's0.97
00:52:30.560phrenology something yeah phrenology of spirit like give me a fucking break you have print t-shirts0.99
00:52:36.120you're wearing a book t-shirt let me hold on let me understand this you're a 23 year old woman0.97
00:52:41.420living in new york city unmarried friendless cute t-shirt joined a political society and you are
00:52:47.460fronting on a social media platform about how you are a very important person and part of a secret
00:52:53.460society i think we should kidnap you on a lark and sell you to the turk as a fun saturday that
00:53:00.800would be a cool fun thing to do sometimes with this show i feel like i'm your madam in a sense0.98
00:53:06.280i'm always bringing people to you and you're saying slave meat slave meat and you're sorting
00:53:13.140them into two different buckets that's why i do the show that's the only reason i even show up0.99
00:53:16.620for the fucking show he just likes i bring him people to slaughter in his mind slaughter as a0.97
00:53:24.200schematic of the fucking aztec pyramid he's gonna build no you're right if it wasn't clear i'd like0.99
00:53:29.720deeply viscerally hate these people also you look at this and even if you want to enter into them0.97
00:53:36.320within their framework they're engaging with theory the wrong way and i should know this
00:53:42.120because i've spent some time in the trenches reading all this theory reading theory should
00:53:47.400drive you insane reading theory is not fun it's it sucks and it breaks your mind for them to like
00:53:54.260read and be like he i'm wearing a t-shirt i'm like that means you don't get it it means you
00:53:59.040don't get anything be like i think we can use this for something real no you can't because if
00:54:03.860you did the world would split in half yeah like if you really understand the stuff that a lot of
00:54:09.880these guys are talking about if you if you really dabble in esotericism you're living in darkness
00:54:15.540forever this isn't fun so if you're having fun with it you're doing it wrong yeah yeah it's easy
00:54:22.800to overdose on theory i should know i've done it do i sound like i'm having fun do i just listen
00:54:29.920go listen to the early episodes of the show yeah let you hear the joie de vivre in our voice0.97
00:54:36.080you can hear the spring in our step i listen to them like damn what happened to that guy
00:54:42.560i bet that guy's fun you know what this is this is like her wearing the the hegel
00:54:48.780t-shirt is like if shoe on head was wearing an acdc t-shirt it's like i get it i know what you're
00:54:59.020doing but it's and it's cute but also i'm so embarrassed for you well true and i were in acd
00:55:06.360like oh you're trying to meet a guy you're trying you've identified that oh what do you think these
00:55:10.080women are doing i don't think they're doing i don't know well they're trying to meet guys i0.99
00:55:15.360think they're well i think they're trying to establish are they trying to fuck logo daedalus0.99
00:55:19.160i was gonna say because like the the the vietnamese girl well this one sanjay not not that pretty0.98
00:55:26.620and then the other one because at the end of the day it's women right it's and then the other one0.94
00:55:31.640the anna not the anna anna but this anna is funny because she looks like the other anna and she
00:55:36.380seems to be clearly trying to model her appearance after that anna why because she's an e-girl it's0.54
00:55:41.500right in the fucking title what is an e-girl an e-girl is a woman who lives for the constant1.00
00:55:46.120affection of strange men on social media this has nothing to do with philosophy this has nothing to0.99
00:55:52.180do with philosophy at best it has to do with you finding a boyfriend but more likely you're in a
00:55:57.160sick parasocial parasexual relationship with strange men on the internet because society is
00:56:02.900broken and you are its tool like there's this has nothing to do with hagel and it's reminded of that
00:56:08.740book bowling alone by robert putnam and there is this great and i've talked about it a lot recently
00:56:14.760but there's this one part where he's discussing about the uh disintegration of local groups like
00:56:22.000back in the 50s and the 40s people used to have more civic affiliations and fraternal organizations
00:56:27.180you would go to community events you would go bowling with your friends people were part of
00:56:31.280bowling leagues or you know elk lodges whatnot that started to go away but people did continue
00:56:38.740to meet up later on younger generations the gen x and whatnot but they would meet almost exclusively
00:56:46.280over political affiliations so people stopped hanging out just to have fun and they would hang
00:56:52.300out and shoot the shit and drink and you know find dates and stuff but it was only in the context of0.96
00:56:58.740we're starting a revolution it's in like communist clubs or fascist clubs or whatever it might be0.98
00:57:03.860right so it's like you can't you don't even know how to interact with people in a regular way
00:57:09.160unless it's under the umbrella of trying to change the world forever yeah and so it's like
00:57:16.660to your point like yeah maybe this is the only way these people know how to meet people if it's
00:57:21.760like i invented a new type of horny philosophy like i'm wondering this this e-girl thing how
00:57:26.420long has this been going on is it because the way that they are talking about it it seems really
00:57:30.440simple is it has it been years and years or has it been like three four months has it been a direct1.00
00:57:36.520response to you know the fucking uh what's his name moldbugs angels you know these dumb bitches1.00
00:57:45.540that showed up about a year ago i like that i wouldn't be surprised if the number of women1.00
00:57:51.140especially in new york who see all that going on aren't allowed in because they're not high value1.00
00:57:55.880enough and just create their own fucking thing which is then ironically one layer down is what0.93
00:58:00.420sanjay is doing in this thread she said well actually i was a big part there but also i'm0.98
00:58:06.160very pretty and cool and also you should i'm gonna blow them up so you can all be my friend
00:58:11.160ana you know met with moldbug and then he rebuffed her cast her aside and she said i too
00:58:19.360can be a terminally online celebrity with hair too big for the type of head shape that i have
01:00:44.800We've attacked them. They were attacked. And I said, well, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Donald Trump assassinate one of their most beloved generals, one of the icons of their country? And their response was to make a SpongeBob joke?
01:01:01.740just days after insisting he doesn't want war with iran american officials say president donald
01:01:09.160trump authorized a drone strike at baghdad international airport last night that of course
01:01:15.000killed iran's top general a deputy was also killed the strike puts the united states on a war footing
01:01:22.860with tehran like everything it seems that it's water off of ducks back to iran like we've done
01:01:29.780worse to iran and nothing's really happened it seems like theater and a lot of very serious
01:01:35.380people are saying like anytime it's israel and iran trading munitions it's like oh yeah they'll
01:01:41.220do that it's kind of like north korea threatening thermonuclear apocalypse like oh yeah they're on
01:01:46.820their period but i i weight that against the fact that it seems that if there is a world war three
01:01:57.660iran will be involved it seems that many politicians on the west are openly advocating
01:02:06.200for war with iran they seem to want it they seem to be pushing for it or they seem to talk about
01:02:11.820it like it's inevitability and to me if you just keep talking about that that does at some point
01:02:19.780it must manifest into reality otherwise propaganda doesn't work at all right like if you just keep0.94
01:02:27.320hammering people with that eventually it's going to fucking happen or you're going to
01:02:30.540desensitize people and if it doesn't then why there's then there's no marketing then there's0.95
01:02:34.840no propaganda then there's no multimedia apparatus right so that has to be there has to be a breaking
01:02:40.840point there and then also it seems that israel hates iran so if israel sees a geopolitical enemy
01:02:48.200it will harangue america into doing something you see what i'm saying so like i think you're right
01:02:53.540initially when you said that like they seem to not care about anything not do anything i think
01:02:58.180that's uh the nature of the position that they're in they know that they're in a really really well
01:03:04.020defended spot the reason they used to be at the top of this list of for the americans in nato to
01:03:08.940take down and we actually went about knocking everybody else out first and left them for last
01:03:13.640and it's mostly like it's about geography and the size of the country and the economics
01:03:17.760um i think though that probably this will keep happening like they have to keep like
01:03:24.760do a little rocket barrage do a little um like you have to respond in some way so that you don't
01:03:31.360lose credibility with your own people yeah but if a war an actual war started the problem wouldn't
01:03:38.360be us fighting with iran and attacking them even though that would be a tough war would that be
01:03:43.300It would never just stay a war with Iran.
01:03:45.400It would become Iran and Syria and Yemen and Lebanon and then Russia and then whoever else.0.84
01:03:56.580I've heard, and I don't know how much of this is true, but I've heard stories of recently certain columns of troops crossing the border from Iraq into Syria on their way to Israel.
01:04:08.000i've heard of them pulling out certain types of weapons out of bunkers in iran in order to be sent
01:04:14.580to again to iraq and syria so i don't know how much of this is true i just know that
01:04:20.300it doesn't it doesn't sound good well that's again i'm not saying like oh iran's gonna bomb
01:04:25.700everybody like no this is just accelerating to a point where israel declares war on them we have
01:04:30.920to join the war and by all of us joining the war iran's allies have to join the war and then here
01:04:35.680we i mean here we are so yeah and like i said we can say oh it's a nothing burger now but i'm like
01:04:41.300it seems like an inevitability if if the geopolitical masterminds are to be believed
01:04:48.160and that iran represents a hypothetical hegemon in that region and by hegemon you mean like the
01:04:55.440leader of that entire middle eastern region if there was a internal conflict iran would emerge
01:05:03.380as the figurehead they would emerge as the most capable leader and so i think i think the west
01:05:09.840sees them that way and if you're politicking for war it's like well at some point it's just a matter
01:05:15.440of when right unless i can find a another reason why this whole circus is happening like if you're
01:05:23.060to say oh they're just pretending because it's kayfabe or it's it's a face type thing they're
01:05:29.040just trying to do but like it doesn't seem like like north korea they call it saber rattling i
01:05:33.920hate that term but it's like you know they're just trying to it's building it's building even0.97
01:05:38.760the shit like it's it's almost the boiling frog which i know is kind of depreciated but0.98
01:05:43.480when they we talk about the stuff that's going on in israel we get into this mode where it's like0.99
01:05:49.120oh well there's always something going on in the middle east like yeah i mean the war in gaza is
01:05:52.680actually unprecedented and then what they have been doing in lebanon like leveling entire city
01:05:58.440blocks just to find one Hamas colonel is unprecedented since the previous war they0.76
01:06:04.400had with Lebanon which was not recent like what was I forget it was fucking 15 20 years ago0.77
01:06:08.540so like this is you can say that this has been going on it has been going on since the creation0.85
01:06:14.600of Israel in some way this is the nature of Israel's they're constantly at war with everyone0.65
01:06:18.080around them but also this is definitely a high point and the fact that this high point is0.93
01:06:23.120happening with everything else that's happening like Ukraine yeah I mean it doesn't I'm not0.96
01:06:27.300saying it's the end of the world i'm just saying like why you know we're talking about i'm not0.99
01:06:31.720saying not talking about you but like people really do want to be following hagel girls on twitter
01:06:36.760and yeah like it's the type of person who said who has said nothing ever happened so much
01:06:45.180that they've got a draw with it it's become a it's a post slogan you believe nothing ever
01:06:50.920happened so much that you start creating an alternate reality where something could happen
01:06:54.920And I'm just saying the things can and are still happening here.0.98
01:06:59.300Look, Israel is out there saying they should be able to rape prisoners.1.00
01:07:03.160They should be doing more gay rape.1.00
01:07:05.000And there's an internal Israeli civil war about whether or not they should be able to rape men.1.00
01:07:13.340Israel's Channel 12 News aired shocking footage of Israeli soldiers sexually abusing a Palestinian prisoner.0.87
01:07:20.800The video shows a group of blindfolded prisoners lying on the ground inside a prison at Sveteman
01:07:26.740Army Base, which critics have compared to Guantanamo.
01:07:30.420Israeli guards are then seen taking one man into a corner where the soldiers encircled
01:07:35.000him and reportedly sexually assaulted him.
01:07:38.020Israel's investigation of this incident is what led a group of far-right Israeli protesters
01:07:44.000and lawmakers to break into two military bases last week in an effort to prevent the soldiers
01:07:50.300from being questioned that was the other thing so i i you've noticed it's pretty much clockwork
01:07:57.720at this point when there is an election right when there's an election coming up they will
01:08:03.920bomb gaza or they will do something they'll bomb jordan or they'll bomb lebanon or somewhere
01:08:09.120there's no election the next election is in 2026 but they do have a political problem which is the
01:08:14.140war in gaza is so unpopular because this one wasn't started by them it was actually started
01:08:18.060by Hamas uh the war is so unpopular that they have got riots in the street they've got the far
01:08:25.320left-wing Jews attacking them for being cruel to the Gazans and they've got the far right-wing
01:08:30.540orthodox Jews attacking them because they don't want to serve as conscripts in the military
01:08:34.520so they have huge huge internal political pressure right now and I think that that is triggering the0.96
01:08:41.380same switch where it's like the only way to calm this down is to bomb somebody big so that we all
01:08:46.660have to shut up and i'm and i'm kind of waiting for them to do it and they have the point is they0.98
01:08:51.940have been doing it they fucking sent a cruise missile into tehran they sent a cruise missile0.98
01:08:57.160to fucking tehran and the only reason we're not in world war three already is because iran is iran0.98
01:09:02.600and they're they're literally not gonna fucking do they're not gonna do anything but if if israel0.99
01:09:08.280keeps poking the bear or the dog or whatever you know euphemism you want to use it's not gonna end0.90
01:09:14.740well for the globe yeah and i just want to keep that on the table where we don't become so cynical
01:09:21.640that we stop being realistic that it is possible for a thing to happen people it is possible and
01:09:30.100that yeah i understand us sitting here like what can we do to stop it what what does it matter what
01:09:36.340we say but like well you know if we're going to talk about anything when i talk about that
01:09:41.980Paul is the servant of Satan, and the scales that fell from his eyes was his descent into corruption on the way back from the road to Gaul or wherever the fuck.0.98
01:10:00.680And then for years the Catholic Church was tainted by the corruption of Satanism, but that's been changed recently.0.99
01:10:06.320It doesn't have to be promoted, but just like Black Craft Masonry was corrupted, the Catholic Church was corrupted.
01:10:13.980And then the Pope. Why'd they have two Popes? Why'd Black Pope try to take over the job?0.92
01:10:18.540Well, it's because the fucking extraterrestrials and the demons and the shit that boiled out of the fucking crack and the fucking interdimensional barrier,1.00
01:10:25.380they were trying to take over the planet, and then they're not. They're not.1.00
01:17:57.040it isn't a matter of the patterns of behavior that jews as a biological creature exhibit for me0.99
01:18:06.420that's the reason i hate them i don't even hate judaism as a religion i mean i hate it but i don't1.00
01:18:11.380hate it nearly as much as i hate jews as a blood race of people who are incapable of for example0.99
01:18:17.300telling the fucking truth or being trusted right like the fact that you would trust her shows that1.00
01:18:23.080this is just about stripe to you it's just in paris so don't tell me that nick fuentes even0.98
01:18:29.060really believes in his anti-semitism that much which is of course which is pretty much the only
01:18:32.980thing he's got going from that and saying america should be catholic uh i'm not even going to get
01:18:38.340into that but you know so to me i'm like if he could tweak that a little bit then all these
01:18:43.680groups they can coalesce into one block and then that could actually be the accepted that would be
01:18:52.180the new alt light that would be the because that's what rich has mentioned all they don't want to go
01:18:57.100on cnn they would they want to be invited to the big table they want the big room so because it was0.99
01:19:02.600never about actual action or succeeding at anything it was just about getting pussy and making money0.98
01:19:07.760yeah and so i'm like that is how this castizo futurism thing gets laundered because if you're0.99
01:19:13.420just like here's the thing if you're just a white guy white guy in america and you believe white
01:19:18.980people exist and they should be allowed to exist that's it that's your first principle you got two0.60
01:19:23.880options you've got castizo futurism on one side which is that we should let these very pale1.00
01:19:32.060hispanics lead us because they are the most virile and extreme or you've got the white republicans0.99
01:19:39.720who are still white saying that aren't you excited that we have so many hispanics around voting for1.00
01:19:44.980like they they are no one is more excited about legal migration from mexico than republicans0.85
01:19:52.480you actually so if you're a white guy standing there like which one do i want do i want mexican
01:19:57.220nazis or do i want the conservatives who are going to bring in regular mexicans like you you0.55
01:20:02.460don't get a third option if you're like i just surveying the landscape so i you have to feel for
01:20:07.500that guy you know the guy who's like can i just give me someone to vote for who actually
01:20:12.580thinks I should exist that isn't just trying to take my identity and say like no that's us now
01:20:18.340you know what I mean anyway so that's what I talked about in that recent episode pay attention
01:20:22.780to which discourses you're being locked out of that's how this all started when we started
01:20:27.640discussing first principles so many episodes ago it's like all I'm doing is noting that we
01:20:33.140you and me and the people who've been on this tip for the longest time people way longer than us
01:20:38.420how many conversations are we being locked out of and they're being adopted by these these0.98
01:20:44.140fucking weirdos who've got no priors and who actually want your dispossession you know that1.00
01:20:50.480again that sam high quote when we went remember these people want you raped humiliated dead1.00
01:20:55.500humiliated your children you know raped and they think it's funny i'm like these people are those1.00
01:21:01.440people too that's also richard spencer like that's also richard hanania he wants you fucking1.00
01:21:07.960dead and molested and your kids transed that's what they think that's funny also the next bit0.99
01:21:15.660of show news it's that um we had some really great live interviews lately and these interviews do0.98
01:21:22.440make it on the show uh during these episodes i put them at the end of the episode for the
01:21:26.900coprano society but we do live stream them now on our youtube if you didn't know we had a youtube
01:21:32.740blood satellite clips look that up look on the live streams that's where i'm doing them now
01:21:39.060so you can participate in that when we're doing them live usually it's a tuesday night
01:21:43.440easter standard time but sometimes it's based around the uh the guest schedule so it'll be a
01:21:49.660different time but anyway pay attention to your twitter telegram you'll find out when we're going
01:21:54.720live and you could see them as they happen the last few have been really really good the one
01:21:59.160you're going to hear on this episode uh i space age maximalist it's one of my favorite ones so
01:22:04.980i'm excited keep listening if you want to hear that but that one was recorded a couple weeks
01:22:09.880ago also check out the vanguardist journal vanguardist journal.com that's on the dot com
01:22:16.840or it's on substack as well vanguardist journal.substack.com that's where we publish our
01:22:22.400long form articles i recently started uploading voiceover narration to them
01:22:27.320these are pretty long articles so if you want to just listen to a reading of it like its own
01:22:34.620mini podcast some of these are like an hour and a half long you can do that now so it'll be
01:22:39.600available at the top on the sub stack they're not on the vanguard's journal site right now but
01:22:43.760i'm working on getting those uploaded so check that out if you haven't if you're just like an
01:22:48.560anti-reading person which you should be now it's the greatest moment of your life um the most recent
01:22:55.580article was uh a pretty good one i was pretty happy about um it was all about it's called the
01:23:02.900cult imperialism of the new patronage states it summarizes a lot of stuff we've talked about on
01:23:07.980the show with the network state and basically how to build a parallel society a parallel secret
01:23:14.520society if you like the stuff we were talking about there this is a one-stop place where it
01:23:20.700ties everything together in a pretty serious way so check that out there's this book i read
01:23:27.720recently that i really liked and i wanted to cover this because it was recommended to me
01:23:34.120by someone we interviewed recently on the show uh fortisax fortisax people might know the name
01:23:41.460my man yeah really popular guy he's got a sub stack called fortisax is typing great stuff people
01:23:49.060are loving it um he would call himself a vitalist uh but he is not a really but he is he different
01:23:56.460he is different than what you or i might think he's a pagan probably wouldn't even call himself
01:24:01.940a pagan in the interview he explains what he is i i would call him a vitalist i mean i know i know
01:24:07.880the guy a little bit and i would say he's what he's what vitalism ought to mean to people who
01:24:14.020haven't read bronze age mindset and then for people who have read it say you can't don't don't
01:24:19.400tar my my 40 like that well that's the thing so when i first heard vitalism described i would
01:24:25.000imagine someone like him and then i learned about what it really was i said oh no my heavens it's1.00
01:24:32.240actually the gayest shit imaginable this is this is gay and dark this is this is a fucking bathhouse0.99
01:24:38.240with the lights out but he recommended this book called archaeofuturism the author is and i'm gonna1.00
01:24:49.060get this name wrong and i shouldn't but it's a guillemme fey a french political activist
01:24:55.660however we are not here to survey the nouvelle droid but its second most famous member fey
01:25:02.620He was one of the original core members of the Nouvelle Droit, but he split from them
01:25:08.420and mostly disappeared from view around 1985, only resurfacing with the publication of this book
01:25:14.680in 1998. In the meantime, he did things like radio comedy acting and starring in pornographic films.
01:25:25.560So, this is-I looked at this like a good counterpart to our coverage of
01:25:31.080reflections on violence by george sorel because that was a book that was 20th century book
01:25:37.000discussing the internal collapse of the french left movement right it was it was kind of all
01:25:47.000over the place it was you know at parts it seemed stream of consciousness great book but it was a
01:25:53.080french leftist saying what the fuck happened to the french leftists and then this book is similar0.98
01:25:59.200to that except from the right perspective saying what the fuck happened to the french new right0.98
01:26:03.860and it's really good and and the stories are actually very similar but he said look0.92
01:26:09.080uh four sexes said look this is closer to what i believe in archaeo futurism um sort of taking0.58
01:26:16.480traditionalism but forward thinking and so i wanted to read it because i didn't want people
01:26:21.980to leave our coverage of the bronze age mindset and the selective breeding book thinking that
01:26:28.780there's no interesting ideas emerging from this very very uh expansive milieu and there's a lot
01:26:37.920of stuff in this book that's parallel to the bronze age mindset it's a love of Nietzsche of
01:26:45.440Nietzscheanism and of uh tradition and sort of a warrior spirit a lot of the same notes are being
01:26:51.640hit here but it's very different and there's a lot of really good stuff here i'd recommend people
01:26:57.360read it if only to get uh the whole first part of the book which is like his view of what led to
01:27:04.780the collapse of the new right and also the emergence of the national front so he actually
01:27:10.220talks about sort of the rise of marine le pen in this too as like something that was not good for
01:27:15.900the scene um so hearing it from from a french perspective i thought was very illuminating
01:27:21.540He says, already the advancements made in technology and science, particularly in biology and computer science, can no longer be managed with modern humanistic values and ways of thinking.
01:27:34.380Already geopolitical and social events prior point to the tumultuous and violent emergence of problems connected to religion, ethics, food production, and epidemics.
01:27:43.560It is necessary to return to primary issues.
01:27:47.340Hence the new idea I'm suggesting, archaeofuturism.
01:27:50.400this idea enables us to make a break with the obsolete philosophy of progress and the egalitarian
01:27:57.280humanitarian and individualist dogmas of modernity which are unsuited to our need to think about the
01:28:04.500future and survive the century of iron and fire that is looming near so one thing he establishes
01:28:09.860throughout the book especially at the end it's that technology is here to stay we must reckon
01:28:15.420with technology we cannot turn the clock back some technology he also says that sort of secular
01:28:20.820humanist egalitarianism is ill-equipped to handle technology like technology cannot be in place in
01:28:27.480the developments of just anybody because down that way madness lies right so it's like if you are
01:28:35.960a traditionalist but you also believe in the inevitability of technological progress you have
01:28:41.260ask okay how can we harness this control it how can we make sure that basically the global south
01:28:47.640doesn't end up in charge of ai development right he says our current our current of thought broadly
01:28:56.160conceived must necessarily unite on a european level forgetting about provincial disputes and
01:29:01.760narrow doctrines in such a way as to seize the opportunity that is being offered to acquire the
01:29:08.500monopoly over alternative thought, rebel thought. Let us take advantage of the present global crisis
01:29:14.700and formulate suggestions that may stir the conscience of the young. And this is something
01:29:19.600that once I read it, you know, it kind of brought some thoughts together in my mind, which is that
01:29:24.780this thing called the dissident right, you know, what is the dissident right? It's just a rebranding
01:29:30.420of the alt-right. I actually like the term the alt-right because it's just alternatives. It's
01:29:36.020many alternatives cluster together it's not a movement it's not a coalition it's not any sort
01:29:41.480of unity or cartel even but it is just a conglomeration of interesting new dissident
01:29:50.780rebellious ideas kind of clanging together in a mosh pit that's what it is i think what's most
01:29:58.240interesting about the scene is that if we play our cards right and i think this is what makes
01:30:02.700us attractive to the types of people we were talking about before you know the urban girls
01:30:07.160who are just looking for their next idea drug that's what we are we we have we can have monopoly
01:30:14.200on every alternative to modernity sometimes that's futurist fascism sometimes that's a0.89
01:30:23.120fucking ai monarchy sometimes that's a new a new type of pastoralism you know but those things are0.58
01:30:30.620all alongside us they're not on the left they're not liberal spaces we we kind of do have a monopoly0.97
01:30:35.520right now on the most revolutionary thoughts so compared to when this was written i think
01:30:42.220i think we're there and we're still trying to figure out what to do with that that's what we've
01:30:46.960won that's why we are still rebellious um in my opinion anyway it says he goes into that here he
01:30:54.140says, to quote Renee Thorne, author of the catastrophe theory, only radical ideas can
01:31:01.160make a system plunge into chaos, catastrophe, or a traumatic change of state in such a way as to
01:31:08.040bring about a new order. Radical thought is neither extremist nor utopian. I would like to
01:31:14.920make clear that a catastrophe is not necessarily something negative. It is not the apocalypse.
01:31:30.340A catastrophe is a sudden change in state of a system that has been considered before stable, like our civilization, and which then plunges into chaos.
01:31:46.340chaos a different order is then established after the chaos on a new basis in this sense0.57
01:31:56.580the catastrophe is different from long-term decadence like the roman empire for example
01:32:04.020in order to shape history it's necessary to unleash ideological storms by attacking
01:32:09.300as nietzsche correctly observed the values that form the framework and skeleton of the system
01:32:15.060so he's basically saying like the right despite the left's monopoly on revolution because when
01:32:21.660you think of revolution you always think of leftists you think of communists right
01:32:25.020i think one of the big transitions we saw is that the right has a monopoly on revolution
01:32:31.320whereas the left sort of has a monopoly on like the status quo the chaotic status quo
01:32:36.400but they don't really have the language of change anymore or at least it doesn't
01:32:41.380ring true we have the language of change we have the language of revolution now
01:32:46.860and that means that we actually could attack the system the leftists can't attack the system they
01:32:52.260don't know how to attack the system what are they attacking that women don't have enough rights it's0.99
01:32:57.640weird shit that's the whole that's a little kamala presidency they're trying to say it's like now it's0.99
01:33:02.800time for a woman to take over okay well what's what's the woman bringing to the table well you1.00
01:33:08.200know we need to be woker that's what she said we have to stay woke like everybody needs to be woke
01:33:15.140and you can talk about if you're the wokest or woker but just stay more woke than less woke
01:33:22.940right now right now is everything that you want but you need to be right now but more
01:33:28.780i got news for you that doesn't resonate with voters that never has
01:33:32.680vote people never vote on the status quo they vote on change that's why obama was such a0.91
01:33:38.840fucking carbon copy caricature which is he just said hey i'm change i'm hope0.91
01:33:43.180hey you ever heard of change changes here change what well it's about time0.99
01:33:48.700it's hey hey listen my wife was born a man she changed
01:33:53.120it's it's so great that everyone knows that right everyone knows that michelle obama's a guy but it's
01:34:01.900just like i don't even if you're a democrat you're like yeah yeah maybe maybe one day she'll come out0.99
01:34:08.040michelle obama standing there with her his fucking legs splayed open like a guy on the subway0.99
01:34:15.720leaning forward with a coach's gate oh geez all right so the new right in the tongue of the1.00
01:34:54.880which led to this and then he published this book so he says in brief the nouvelle
01:34:59.840doit has been confined to the periphery of the debate regrettably it has turned
01:35:04.920into an ideological ghetto it no longer sees itself as a powerhouse for the
01:35:09.880diffusion of energies with the ultimate aim of acquiring power but rather as a
01:35:14.900publishing enterprise that also organizes conference but has limited ambitions
01:35:19.000sound familiar right and and that's something that we we've remarked on maybe not on the show
01:35:25.960but um in this space that we're all in this thing of ours there are people that want to corral you
01:35:33.500into a content ghetto um and i think even leftists have this critique of leftists it's like
01:35:39.820do you want to change power or do you want to endlessly critique power are you here just to
01:35:47.060rebel against whatever is in power or do you just like the mode of critique is that what you're in
01:35:53.940for arguably that's what zizek and a lot of these other people do like i can tell your thing is just
01:35:58.800dialectical critique you don't want anything else so his argument with the nouvelle doit became just
01:36:04.180you're an engine of criticism but you don't want to harness any tools for actual change you just
01:36:10.880want to be a publishing house forever he says i believe that the chief causes for this withdrawal
01:36:15.940are and he is saying that and this is something that i think people will they'll find a parallel
01:36:22.240here to our experiences over here in north america which is that if you look at our spaces the things
01:36:26.920we're talking about now used to have more prominence on the center stage like race realism
01:36:33.220back when v dare and american renaissance first started v dare and american renaissance used to
01:36:39.040be way more popular than they are now it's not like they took a hit in their quality they still
01:36:44.080publish good work except vdare closed down recently but there was a heyday of vdare
01:36:48.380where more serious people would read vdare but what happened why did you know these places end
01:36:55.200up where they are now closing down you know there's the you know legal troubles they've
01:36:59.680been having but you know and oh jared taylor doesn't have his twitter account but we stopped
01:37:05.560being invited we stopped being like an exciting powerhouse for i rev for exciting new ideas
01:37:12.540That's what he's saying. So what happened in France, similar to what happened over here? He says, the competitive emergence of the Front National and of the thought of Antonio Gramsci, which was badly understood by the Nouvelle Doile, we used to see them as being bigoted, papist, reactionary, servile towards America, jingoist, anti-European.
01:37:35.020um that's the first thing number two a tightening of censorship through the through a blacking out
01:37:42.680and closing off of the mainstream media which followed the strengthening of ideological
01:37:47.220introductions against all forms of alternative thought the nouvelle draw submitted to these
01:37:52.220dictates not daring to fight them through a creative disorienting and provocative reaction
01:37:57.420the media fascinated by the shocking political incorrectness of the front national and his
01:38:03.040president soon forgot all about the Nouvelle-Drois. So basically the Front National was more
01:38:08.980interesting and the Nouvelle-Drois became too boring and academic and the censorship was on
01:38:13.880top of that. And we never fought censorship. We kind of do that on our side. We accept censorship.
01:38:19.800We've just accepted that we'll never be allowed to be popular again, even if we never say that
01:38:25.160outright. A lot of us kind of believe it. I think the daring few on the side understand like, no,
01:38:30.180there's no reason why our ideas can't be popular and a lot we return to the simple fact that look
01:38:36.960we are fucking censored we are suppressed there was a time when we weren't early on in twitter0.62
01:38:42.880early on in youtube our we were very very organically popular they need to keep us tamped0.98
01:38:47.700down and unless we don't buy into our oppressors framing that we're schizophrenic insane and would0.98
01:38:55.560not be welcome in popular society we would be not all of us some of us really just fucking schizos0.89
01:39:02.280but most of us would be okay the number three the third reason the profound inadequacy of0.81
01:39:10.880publications with respect to current media communication strategies combined with an
01:39:16.860editorial tactic that was hardly effective the nouvelle doit has three magazines the function
01:39:24.080the first two of these which are theoretical in nature is to establish intellectual foundations
01:39:28.800by contrast elements the sheet the chief media bridge is badly positioned while the analyses
01:39:36.160are made are often very sharp and concrete practical theses and suggestions are lacking
01:39:41.120other than let's open the debate you know and i think this is interesting it's like okay we have
01:39:47.340magazines we have our newspapers we put ideas and discourse out there we don't give solid
01:39:54.220practical solutions of problems that we just open up the floor to debate what is to be done here's
01:40:00.580the problems what is to be done people don't find questions that engaging they find answers engaging
01:40:08.580even if the answer is extreme people like solutions or problems you can ask the question
01:40:13.320you can point out the problem but if you don't present a hard solution even if it sounds kind
01:40:18.300of extreme people don't even find that interesting really that's something we do on the right i think
01:40:23.620where we point to problems like look crime statistics rape statistics look that's a problem
01:40:29.180well what should we do well i mean someone's got to do something people need to wake up
01:40:33.680you know people are awake what they want is a solution maybe even if you propose something
01:40:39.140very extreme that's something they can latch on to if you stop doing that people don't even know
01:40:45.040what to do with the information you're giving them you know that's why an advertisement needs
01:40:49.960a call to action at the end of the advertisement you can tell them all about your product you can
01:40:55.880tell them the benefits that you can sell them in the lifestyle at the end of it you gotta say here's
01:41:00.180where you can get it you want to get it go get it here otherwise you're just giving them a weird
01:41:05.680promise you're giving them a feeling people are frustrated when you just give them feelings0.96
01:41:10.540give them something to do and then they'll keep coming back to your fucking publication i've never0.97
01:41:17.240read any of these magazines by the way they might be great uh they might be great but he's saying0.98
01:41:21.980like look the readership's fallen off it's inarguable that the readership's fallen off
01:41:27.240so why is it falling off and he's given the answer here so he said the nouvelle doit will
01:41:32.320only prove creative incredible once more
01:41:36.580if it manages to formulate disorienting doctrines.
01:41:40.120I love that phrase, disorienting doctrines
01:41:42.560regarding all major contemporary issues,
01:41:44.940and if it is able to establish a new ideological corpus
01:41:48.740on economic, scientific, geopolitical, and sociological matters.
01:41:53.520I think that's what we try to do with the Vanguardist Journal.
01:41:56.780It's that, look, we can get into theory and the history
01:41:59.600and these really highfalutin or trippy esoteric ideas.
01:42:19.040Should you look at something differently?
01:42:20.660It's exciting teaching someone a really trippy idea
01:42:25.660and showing them how that relates to their lived experience.
01:42:28.800you can do that with almost anything if you understand it enough but like we were showing
01:42:35.100with the hegelian e-girl thing like we're showing with these these people who just like being
01:42:40.860confused there's people who like who like having lots of questions and like being confused and like
01:42:47.220seeing the most insane version of something and they kind of collect that like shitty art they0.98
01:42:54.000put around their house like look at this dumb shit i read wow you know hey look i fall into0.99
01:42:59.240that too i've read dumb shit but it does feel like a waste of your mental capacity if that's0.99
01:43:05.080all you're doing real people want real solutions to real problems so so the number four he said0.98
01:43:11.320the continued adoption of an outdated apparatus logic of the type to be found in political parties
01:43:18.300which is not appropriate for a movement and a school of thought as well as journalistic or
01:43:23.120editorial policy and which led cadres to flee on account of problems with the apparatus like they
01:43:28.740just using a language that doesn't fit and you know when we talked about the njp the collapse
01:43:35.440of the national justice party on the live stream a lot of them ago we said that look what you're
01:43:40.640taking is a very dynamic decentralized affiliation network and trying to hammer it into an early 20th0.97
01:43:47.300century military organization a dictatorship and it doesn't fucking work you're trying to adopt
01:43:53.460a logic and terminology that is ill-fitting for this emergent phenomenon and a lot of people0.93
01:44:00.200want to do that because they think that leads to legitimacy we have to adorn ourselves in the
01:44:05.880regalia of something serious but you're not letting the emergent phenomena sort of write
01:44:12.040itself in real time you know that's what kills it in the end um number five here he says
01:44:16.780a certain ideological fossilization combined with the persistence of a rightist cultural
01:44:24.080attachment to sentimentalizing the past and the abandonment in many fields of the idea of radical
01:44:29.420thought to this we could add the contradiction between implicit euro-imperial references and
01:44:35.580explicitly euro-pluralist or even immigrationist stance the nouvelle droit presented itself as a
01:44:42.340pagan church one moreover without a deity but paganism by its very nature is unserviceable as
01:44:48.940a meta-political banner unlike christianity islam or judaism interesting point the pagan soul is an
01:44:57.140inner strength that must permeate all ideological and cultural expressions it's the heart of a
01:45:02.880nuclear reactor is not something to be openly displayed through instrumental slogans interesting
01:45:09.720And therein, you could actually see some kind of political synthesis between paganism and Christianity.
01:45:18.940I think that's what interested Fortisax and many others who understand that, look, you cannot surgically remove Christianity from the DNA of the West.
01:49:35.160Parts of it set on fire, including a library.
01:49:38.340A hotel housing asylum seekers targeted by rioters.
01:49:46.860Smashing a window and trying to storm in.
01:49:52.260The group also targeted the officers trying to protect the building.
01:49:56.060Their weapons, anything they could get their hands on.
01:50:00.440And we could spend a lot of time on this.
01:50:03.060This deserves to be its own segment.0.97
01:50:04.500We could spend probably half the episode just on the recent clashes in Britain over the slaying of those three young girls and the injury of many, many others at that Taylor Swift concert, perpetrator of which being a brown recent immigrant, as far as I know.
01:50:21.700And there was some confusion early on. But I guess that's the point I was making, which is, if you look at this young man who carried out this attack, no motive has been proven, but there doesn't need to be. Everyone knows the motive. Everyone on the ground understands what this is.
01:50:40.100Because the propaganda machine from the British state apparatus kicked into gear.
01:50:46.640And the funny thing about that propaganda machine is it's the same one they've been using in the exact same template for years.
01:50:54.240As I can remember, any time there is a terrorist attack, any time there is a slaying, a killing, they will, you know, they did the same with Trayvon Martin.
01:51:03.520They'll wallpaper over his recent stuff.
01:51:06.160They'll show an old photograph of him when he's at school.0.98
01:51:10.100in a fucking gown of some kind graduation and say he was named some characteristics of a child0.97
01:51:17.300he was precocious he was short he was he liked to smile you know but then you contrast that against0.99
01:51:25.780whatever the recent photo taken from the trial was like this individual who's dead-eyed giant0.95
01:51:31.700nappy hair laughing in court when they're recounting his crimes a vile subhuman creature and the
01:51:39.620But news was, you know, they were trying to say the assumption was he was Muslim.0.93
01:51:43.240Turns out he might have been Christian.
01:51:45.340And there's some debate about that.0.53
01:51:47.480However, that doesn't matter because white Britons, and I say white because I'm not even classifying it based on religion.0.72
01:51:55.920They understood that this is a brown invader.0.86
01:52:01.300And that's not uncalled for, because all of the brown Muslims gathered around this individual, this child from a different religious background. Why did they do that? Why have there been gangs of brown people masked up with machetes attacking white people, just civilians in the street, unrelated?1.00
01:52:25.080it i've seen two videos of white people being beaten with palestinian flags or in palestinian
01:52:31.760flags in the frame so it is this is a race war otherwise there will be no reason for people to
01:52:39.320automatically click into place on what the battle lines are and who the enemies are that's what's
01:52:45.140happening and i'm gonna say something and i'm not targeting anyone in particular when i say this
01:52:52.200of anything i'm targeting myself and this is something a thought that just occurred as we
01:52:57.780saw the latest atrocity the latest you know three innocent young white girls who are targeted0.94
01:53:03.500obviously because they are white obviously because they are natives right that's why every single0.97
01:53:09.900time that's why it fucking happens we know that the propaganda stops working over time we've seen0.98
01:53:16.560a gradation of reaction to the propaganda and this is just the latest one because0.94
01:53:21.520it actually doesn't matter what the propaganda machine says because people aren't listening
01:53:25.720they're not buying into it they're getting their information from elsewhere so they'll have to
01:53:30.240either evolve the propaganda evolve the narrative or this will keep happening anyway the point being
01:53:36.900that my sense when i read about this is i felt partially responsible that that sounds crazy
01:53:45.320because i'm canadian i don't live there right and what what's my responsibility there but i think
01:53:50.860in that sense, it's all of our faults because I do believe what we say is correct. The things we
01:53:58.040believe, the values we hold, the things we pronounce, the policies, everything we say,
01:54:04.040we say it because we believe in it, at great risk to our careers and our freedom and our
01:54:10.160friendships and our family. A lot of us are out here risking quite a bit just saying these things,
01:54:15.440especially in Canada. We can be imprisoned oftentimes for the things we have said,
01:54:18.840And it has happened. But I do think it's inevitable. And I think it's inevitable not in a Marxist sense where you say that the internal contradictions of a system or the logical fallacies will lead to an inevitable collapse. I don't think it's a system like that. But I do believe in the cause and effect of it all. I do believe that, well, if you bring in millions of immigrants, it's going to do this to the economy. It's going to do this to the job market. Everything's going to get worse, obviously.
01:54:48.840And so the collapse in that sense is inevitable. The negative outcomes have been inevitable. We've been saying it. And violence was always going to increase. And we've been saying that. However, it is interesting that more normal people are coming around to what we've been saying.
01:55:07.480the mainstream despite our oppression despite our censorship is adopting a lot of reviews but
01:55:13.580i do see it as a point of failure if it really took these many people to die for it to become
01:55:23.500unignorable that means our discourse our rhetoric our persuasive abilities weren't good enough to
01:55:31.460prevent this you know this righteous indignation required three innocent girls to be brutally
01:55:39.880murdered and i it just it feels like that's the natural response to all of this but i do feel
01:55:48.760some responsibility that it had to get this far that we've we failed if we let it if we let the
01:55:54.560inevitable occur without doing something well dimes what could we have done i don't know i don't i
01:56:00.540don't know maybe we couldn't have done anything but i do feel like we are getting a participation
01:56:06.340trophy when people say you were right at this point and they never say we were right but if0.96
01:56:12.380they ever do it's it's you know we came in second place we lost the race against the total fucking0.96
01:56:19.880downfall and and we had to let the most heinous acts slap people in the face grab them by their0.99
01:56:26.760fucking throat i don't want to hear anyone with this like one struggle shit anymore if if you if0.99
01:56:33.120you say that you're my you're my enemy at this point if you can look at that and say oh this is1.00
01:56:38.120just the jews trying to buy us fuck you anyway and and this is what he's saying it's like look1.00
01:56:44.260we were naive to think that we could have all these islamic allegiances we opened the fucking1.00
01:56:49.620doors these ideas and where the fuck did it get us where did it get the nouvelle door all this0.99
01:56:54.800pro-islamic and third worldism are they really popular did they get a lot of funding from0.95
01:57:01.600islamist groups you know anyway did they publish this how many islamic publishers published like0.65
01:57:08.700the fucking elements did they published nothing not in english or anything that's been translated0.98
01:57:15.900no the contemporary communitarian and multiculturalist discourse of the nouvelle0.98
01:57:21.900can be interpreted as a sort of fatalism for it sees the ethnic kaleidoscope of europe
01:57:27.740multiracial society and immigration as in illocutable events we should accept and submit
01:57:34.840to managing and putting up with them as best we can sound familiar sound like castizo futurism0.98
01:57:42.300sound more like look these people are going to take on this cause better than these these0.99
01:57:47.260fucking pathetic losers over here this has happened before um and then he goes on to0.99
01:57:54.180describe more what he's proposing he says i would term vitalist constructivism an overall1.00
01:58:00.880ideological framework that unites an organic and daring approach approach to life with the
01:58:07.080complementary worldviews of nietzschean will to power roman order and realist hellenic wisdom
02:19:40.220let's do here by the way can people hear me clearly because yeah that's probably the most
02:19:49.020important thing yeah yeah yeah yeah you sound okay excellent
02:19:58.060okay good so you have the first slide yeah excellent okay so basically to give some
02:20:05.460context here um the last episodes i posted on jungle bunker telemetric funk the three long
02:20:11.700episodes with stormy waters about spirituality and that was basically him you know completely
02:20:17.300spurging out and when we were talking i realized there was some well you know as one does that's
02:20:24.120the best content but uh in our conversations i realized that this series that i read about a long
02:20:31.100time ago um i got into this maybe seven eight years ago had some parallels to the mystical
02:20:38.280explanations that he was giving on how the universe works and i then did a you know short
02:20:43.920let's say half an hour segment in that uh episode and the second one and you know you can only get
02:20:50.860so much across this audio because it's very visual it's hard physics it's difficult to visualize
02:20:55.960sometimes so i thought well you know after that you actually reached out to me and asked me to
02:21:02.500explain this further so without further ado subquantum kinetics is an alternative theory of
02:21:09.420physics that basically turns a lot of the paradigms that we have today on the heads because
02:21:16.480you know right now we live in this system where could you please change the slide dimes
02:21:22.560yeah ah perfect so yeah yeah so essentially you know we have this system of physics right now
02:21:36.220which is all broken up into these smaller models and and they don't really work between each other
02:21:41.700we have some real inconsistencies in the data now they're coming up with all sorts of nonsense like
02:21:46.900dark matter because gravity is not working the way they wanted to you know cosmology is full of these
02:21:51.680holes and every time they find a hole they add more mathematical band-aids to it to try and make
02:21:56.040it work together but this is a problem and not only that there are things that we have in in our
02:22:02.700current system that don't look like problems but are actually quite limiting so there are a couple
02:22:09.400of sacred cows in physics today which subquantum kinetics attacks and to respond to the comment
02:22:18.280now that this book is four thousand dollars on amazon it is zero dollars on anna's archive so
02:22:24.040you know just be smart about it use a vpn basically uh we have the first law of thermodynamics so
02:22:30.800conservation of energy this is something that is uh you know disputed in subquantum kinetics
02:22:36.500then we have field particle dualism so basically fields and particles we just say that fields
02:22:42.960particles create fields but nobody really talks about how and that's something that we also talk
02:22:49.300about here then you have relativity which subquantum kinetics actually does agree with
02:22:54.140largely that just some parts of it which are you know in contention and i'll get to that in a second
02:23:00.280so we have the fixed speed of light we have relative reference frames and there's no
02:23:05.900luminiferous ether that can exist within relativity or at least that's the assumption that relativity
02:23:11.820sort of piggybacked on in the early 20th century then of course we have the opal drama about black
02:23:18.580holes because you know current theories predict that you can have these singularities in gravity
02:23:24.940fields and all of the consequences of taking this math equation having a certain solution seriously
02:23:31.300led us to i think a path that seems a bit ludicrous but okay then of course we have the big bang and
02:23:38.040that is another whole uh you know can of worms uh that you know give us one miracle and we'll
02:23:44.600solve the rest you know all of matter was created in a single instance and i can kind of understand
02:23:49.820why creationists are a bit uh iffy on that one because it does sound a bit silly but we all take
02:23:55.520it as gospel as a consequence of the big bang of course is that our universe is expanding because
02:24:01.120it banged at the beginning and it's now flying apart and that's why we have redshift and so on
02:24:06.460and then finally we have the wave particle dualism if i could just interrupt yeah uh just from my
02:24:12.680perspective someone to sound choppy for the stream um even i have seen to back away from dark yeah
02:24:25.360Yeah. Yeah. Because the status. Yeah. Because, you know, there's no real, it's not defensible and it's, it's just completely ad hoc. So, yeah. So we have all these sacred cows of physics and, you know, to contextualize subquantum kinetics a bit, this was written by Paul LaViolette. He is not a physicist by training. He's a systems, yeah, thinker, systems scientist. And that's a different approach because a system scientist, he takes models from different fields and he integrates
02:24:55.260them in places where they shouldn't normally be and he wrote this in the 70s so a lot of the
02:25:00.940predictions uh that he made back then actually were confirmed in the decades following that and
02:25:06.740he died unfortunately uh in 2022 so you know when i was reading this he was still alive it's quite
02:25:13.700fascinating i even sent him an email but he didn't answer me so yeah let's get right into it the new
02:25:19.440physics if you could change the slide uh there are some different assumptions here well some
02:25:24.940different consequences of of taking the theory to its logical conclusion so the universe is not a
02:25:30.700closed system it is an open system now what does this mean thermodynamically in a closed system
02:25:36.680mass and energy have to be conserved right that's that's the definition and if you treat our
02:25:43.240physical universe as an open system that means it's interacting with some other level of reality
02:25:48.080then now you don't need mass and energy to be conserved at this level here even though it may
02:25:54.120conserved at a higher level in another regard particles now are fields so they are also waves
02:26:02.200and we will see exactly what that looks like in a moment the speed of light c is no longer the
02:26:07.640speed limit of the universe because that's what we had observed so far but there are quite a few
02:26:12.520experiments that's proving this already we have to make sense of this why is c not the speed limit
02:26:17.560then we have the transmuting fluid luminous isa and i'll explain that in a moment
02:26:23.680and of course we also have a fixed reference frame for the universe now what does that mean
02:26:29.560in relativity they say that there is no fixed reference frame for the universe
02:26:34.700and that's because you know newtonian physics the cartesian plane it was all very nice and
02:26:42.100and fixed and it makes calculations easier once they went down the rabbit hole of thinking that
02:26:47.280all reference frames are relative to each other then you don't have a single fixed point from
02:26:52.360which you can make calculations and you know measure positions and so on uh then we also have
02:26:58.040the generative cosmological evolution of the universe and this is quite fascinating we have
02:27:03.180an excellent image of this later on in the presentation and finally redshift as tired light
02:27:09.500so energy is being lost as light travels through the universe this is different from redshift
02:27:15.800happening because things are accelerating away from us through the Doppler effect so
02:27:21.500let's continue next slide please let's get into this what is the ether exactly
02:27:26.580okay so like I just mentioned now you know back in the 19th century as a consequence of
02:27:35.220newtonian mechanics and so on we had this view of the universe that was very mechanical you know
02:27:40.560if you had a cartesian plane like you can see in the bottom right there uh it's oh i realize now
02:27:46.180that our screens will cover up some of the graphs and so on well anyway oh can oh that's excellent
02:27:55.400much better yeah so in the bottom right there you can see a 3d cartesian plane and this was how we
02:28:28.600transmitted through something, right? Because you
02:28:31.780can't have a vibration in vacuum but light can travel through vacuum so how does that get
02:28:37.320transported so they had this idea of a mechanical ether that would transport the light and somehow
02:28:42.220does not interact with anything else and um this idea was it's basically like a fixed um almost
02:28:50.800like a solid because otherwise the vibrations wouldn't really work i mean you can also have
02:28:55.160vibrations in liquid but they're better in solids and they tested this back in 1887 so this was a
02:29:02.260michelson moley experiment and basically what they did is they took an into inferteron excuse me
02:29:07.540infer inferometer and they measured the speed of light going back and forward so they they used
02:29:17.300this mirror to split a light beam and then they saw how fast the speed of light would be
02:29:21.000And the idea is, since the solar system is moving through the universe at a given speed, that this would create a relative motion with the fixed luminiferous ether.
02:29:33.960So basically, you would have this change in the velocity of light depending on your orientation, right?
02:29:40.660And so this Michael Morley experiment didn't work.
02:29:44.700it gave a null result they did not find a change in the velocity of light and therefore the ether
02:29:50.440theory was disproved or so we thought right that experiment result was basically the foundation
02:30:00.100for the last 100 years of physics because relativity based itself on there being no
02:30:05.480luminous ether and everything that followed that as well so next slide please unfortunately for them
03:18:05.080see that they actually behave like we want to.
03:18:08.860Could you please change the slide, Dimes?
03:18:12.360excellent thank you so okay so we have all these predictions on how particles would behave
03:18:24.620we uh predict that they would be a this wave pattern that has a central hill and then you
03:18:31.640know oscillates outward and slowly reverses to the baseline and this would affect the surface
03:18:36.520charge of a proton and a neutron of course and also of course the you know the wavelengths of
03:18:43.180this pattern we can predict it but this is actually fitting the data so this is not just
03:18:48.580theory it actually works in the top left here you can see the different models that have been
03:18:54.920proposed to model the charge density of a neutron the most recent one is kelly so that's the dark
03:19:01.460shaded region and that's the most realistic one i'm not going to go into how they arrived at this
03:19:07.520but basically the predictions from subquantum kinetics fit all of the criteria here so on the
03:19:13.900right you can see the wave patterns of a proton and a neutron that's for the charge density and
03:19:18.940the surface charge you can see that the surface charge of a proton is indeed positive and basically
03:19:24.760zero for a neutron and they have exactly the same shape that you would assume so it does have a
03:19:30.800bell-shaped core it has spherical symmetry it has a Bessel function like electric field periodicity
03:19:37.060so it has these wave patterns going outwards periodically the wavelength of the particle
03:19:42.940equals the Compton wavelength which yes it's true and you have the positive electric bias for proton
03:19:49.780and neutron is yeah positive potential but not a you know not a large one but still a small
03:19:56.980positive ones all these predictions came true this is a really cool part right it's not just
03:20:03.260gobbledygook he really went into the data and he made it all work out he's been doing this for
03:20:08.260decades so it makes sense so let's continue and you know i i really i hate to say this but there's
03:20:15.220just so much to say and i cannot you know i'm we are already an hour and 15 minutes and i don't
03:20:21.240know how long you want to make these times i'm around one more than one uh halfway through but
03:20:27.960there's lots of other things that he talks about in the book so you know de broglie phase wave
03:20:31.880theory fixing the wave mechanics model electron diffraction and how you predict it through
03:20:37.480subquantum kinetics and electron orbital quantization and that's on the next slide dimes
03:20:43.240yeah so all these things uh we discuss it um but uh you know i i can't do it right now
03:20:50.840unfortunately you'll have to read the book yourself so let's continue on and talk about
03:20:54.400some other fun things here yeah and let me just people probably can't hear them do i would love
03:21:02.460or with some questions you're doing a fantastic job the people love this sort of thing they're
03:21:09.160love but there's something with this platform now and i'm just trying i'm trying to on you just
03:21:15.400because you're the only thing that's coming yeah this is fantastic so far okay excellent yeah i
03:21:22.460mean we can do i can also read out the questions if you send them to me if if your microphone
03:21:27.440isn't working or something but okay let's continue so there's lots of other things here we've
03:21:32.680basically covered the basics so what is a reaction diffusion system how does this predict the
03:21:38.840arising of particles and and other matter and how do these structures work we even saw that
03:21:45.960they confirmed with the theory and now we talk about some macro effects here so gravity of
03:21:51.000particles how does this arise so basically when you look at the equations x y and z
03:21:57.020please if you're watching this afterwards do go back or if you have the book open you know check
03:22:02.480at yourself but you can basically explain this just because of the concentration of g and why
03:22:10.460the concentration of g is lower in the middle of the particle because of the high level of x and
03:22:15.620x suppresses g and the level to which this happens creates a deficit in g concentration which is the
03:22:22.100same thing as a potential field and that's just gravity so he goes through this whole derivation
03:22:27.820I have two of the steps here on the bottom left, basically just integrating the total G flow into the volume of the particle.
03:22:37.400And that actually gives you the exact same equations that you would get from Newtonian physics.
03:22:42.860Look at that. That first equation on the bottom left, that's the potential depending on one over R, just like in gravity.
03:22:50.660And the one below that is the same thing as gravitational force, you know, depending on the constants, the masses, and very importantly, over R squared, just like the normal theory.
03:23:04.560So basically, we have re-derived Newtonian physics from the foundation of just subquantum kinetics that gives you its predictive power.
03:23:14.200so you can see in the bottom middle here
03:33:59.860and summarize so far have you back on to go in once uh my audio isn't so great
03:34:06.740yeah yeah i would love that i mean it's it's fun for me this is just a little you know a little fly
03:34:14.080in my mind but um it keeps coming back and i think it has real potential for a real you know use in
03:34:20.680physics uh one day so let's talk a bit about galactic redshift so remember at the beginning
03:34:27.440We were talking about, you know, light losing and gaining energy as it travels through space or rather electrons dematerializing in empty space because the criticality is too low and therefore it just it's not stable anymore and it just disappears.
03:34:45.360So when we talk about redshift, just to explain what redshift is quickly, it's when you have a moving source of some oscillation that's called the Doppler effect.
03:34:57.440in the top right there on the screen if if the source is moving away from you the wave fronts
03:35:03.120of that oscillation will actually seem like they're spaced farther apart and that means
03:35:08.960the wavelength is higher the frequency is lower so you know if a car passes you when when it is
03:35:15.200approaching it sounds higher and higher pitched and then it suddenly it becomes lower pitched
03:35:19.440for this exact reason that's a doppler effect the same thing applies to light so when something is
03:35:25.360accelerating away from you and it emits light you will actually see it more red rather than more
03:35:30.080blue because red is a lower wavelength or sorry higher wavelengths lower frequency and that's the
03:35:37.280explanation given for why we see redshift when we look at light from far away galaxies and redshift
03:35:45.520is exactly this it's how much this this light is being redshifted the assumption being that because
03:35:52.000of the expanding universe that everything is moving away from us and therefore it's becoming
03:35:57.360redder when it arrives but there are so many problems with this because you know this has
03:36:03.600consequences for gravity and how galaxies form and how far away they are from each other and what the
03:36:08.640densities are between them and an alternative explanation for why redshift happens is the
03:36:15.120tired light theory so what does that mean the by the way tired light was proposed by
03:36:22.360hubble and he never really managed to fully develop it and it wasn't taken seriously because
03:36:28.260people were all on the bandwagon of expanding universe but he actually came up with this first
03:36:33.360and it completely ties in with sub quantum kinetics because it proposes that as light
03:36:39.680moves through empty space which has a lower criticality it is losing energy remember you
03:36:46.360gain energy in large gravity wells and you lose it when you are just in empty space and when you
03:36:52.500have a g hill and that would cause the opposite effect too so you have a blue shift when light
03:37:00.360passes through g wells so if it passes next to a star or galaxy or something even more massive
03:37:05.660than that a local cluster the light will actually gain more energy um so you can see this illustrated
03:37:11.780in the bottom right there you know you have a between one galaxy and the next and sort of in
03:37:17.900between both of them the g is high enough that it actually causes red shifting instead of blue
03:37:23.140shifting right and remember matter is also created in these high g zones so fascinating stuff um but
03:37:31.340there, you know, this is quite a blatant proposal to make. We have to back this up. So let's look
03:37:39.200at the data a bit. Tired light does actually fit the data better than, of course, the expanding
03:37:45.660universe theory. So there's a whole bunch of different metrics. I'm not going to go into
03:37:49.440detail for time, but if you look at, for example, the harmonic mean angular separation for the
03:37:56.080brightest galaxies with the redshift you see that the tired light fits the data much better than
03:38:04.220the expanding universe does at least at higher redshifts that's on the left graph by the way
03:38:09.700on the right one you have the galaxy size versus the redshift and again the tired light theory
03:38:17.000fits the data much better next slide please
03:38:20.300yeah and then on the left here you have the tolman surface brightness test i'm not going to explain
03:38:32.040that right now but again the galaxy brightness versus the galaxy radius is something else that
03:38:38.720we can predict with tired light and you can see the lines there that the tie light prediction is
03:38:43.260the one that best fits all of the data points that we have an expanding universe is actually
03:38:48.660quite far off and you know we were talking before about dark matter and all of this bullshit that
03:38:53.640they're coming up with these graphs are exactly the reason why because we have data about how
03:39:00.300galaxies evolve and how luminous they are and how many they are and so on but we cannot make our
03:39:06.320predictions fit the data and so we have to come up with all of these things out of our ass add them
03:39:11.040to the theory and you know that's that's where you get this craziness about we're looking for
03:39:16.740dark matter and it's actually 98 percent of the universe okay um yeah so and on the right here
03:39:24.080you have uh the uh quasar redshift and the uh lobe separation between them again the tidalite
03:39:30.840fits the data much better so this is really the tip of the iceberg of the data by the way he has
03:39:36.480i think a majority of the book is actually just him totally spurging out about the astrophysics
03:40:12.640Because if there's no Doppler redshift, because tired light fits the data better, then we don't have an expanding universe. And if we don't have an expanding universe, there's no point from which it would expand. And therefore, we don't need the Big Bang anymore to explain how the universe arose.
03:40:26.940now this to me is so fundamental i you know to tie in these all of these problems of physics
03:40:34.420including how it all started is to me such a magnificent undertaking let's go to the next
03:40:41.140slide and look at um how the universe actually arose and a question from the audience in this
03:40:49.960model z is the universe is not expanding can it speculate a shape so remember at the beginning
03:40:55.540i said that space and time are infinite and you know we can't really make any we can't say anything
03:41:03.200about how it arose or when but we would just assume it's infinite volume and it wouldn't
03:41:10.040really have a shape you know what shape does infinity have so to this degree i think you know
03:41:17.100that's also the kind of question that starts to become a little bit useless after a certain point
03:41:21.540like what shape is the universe i suppose it's flat according to the flat earth's um sorry about
03:41:27.140that but let's see a bit about how it started so remember i was saying at the beginning we had a
03:41:35.220completely homogeneous distribution of ethons and there was no matter or energy or anything at the
03:41:40.100quantum level then you had these small pockets of fluctuations right with the zero point energy
03:41:46.580random fluctuations of x y and z and at some point by chance you would have a stabilized
03:41:52.820fluctuations that then turns into a particle and that would be the first uh neutron and from a
03:42:01.380neutron you would get um a proton or actually you would have beta decay and that would turn into a
03:42:08.020proton and you can see in the bottom here the evolution of the different kinds of particles
03:42:13.380so first neutron then you would get a hydrogen um you know a deuteron so one neutron one proton
03:42:19.860then you would have hydrogen molecule then you would have a hydrogen three then you would get
03:42:25.220helium and so on with the heavier elements um inside of stars but at the beginning it would
03:42:31.000mostly be the creation of these very simple light elements um yeah if you're 12 years old and you're
03:42:38.480following well maybe you shouldn't be on the internet and in some institute you know but uh
03:42:46.020but yeah basically this also explains why the vast majority of matter in the universe is hydrogen and
03:42:54.520helium because if that's what gets created first in from the baseline then it would make sense that
03:43:01.340that would fill everything and it's a much better explanation to me than everything came from the
03:43:07.360same moment in the same place and yeah we just have lots of hydrogen and helium because the
03:43:11.780lighter like okay not really explicative there so okay um like i said matter is continuously
03:43:21.140generated inside of large g wells so stars galaxies inside of galactic cores and this is
03:43:28.320also happening through something we call parsnogenesis so the first metanucleation
03:43:34.720happens just from these random fluctuations you know in empty space but when you have very high
03:43:40.640g wells or low g wells rather you can see on the right here you have an evolution of two particles
03:43:49.680next to each other i'm assuming inside of a star something like that they actually nucleate a third
03:43:55.080particle between them and this happens because of the concentration of g of course but this is
03:44:02.720basically the process by which you would have more and more matter coming out of these really large
03:44:07.580astrophysical objects, astronomical objects. And yeah, so we have normal fluctuations and we have
03:44:17.100personogenesis. So let's take a look at what the actual structure of the universe would be,
03:44:22.760how it would evolve. Now this, I think, is so fascinating. Look at that. So you have first
03:44:28.880the primordial neutron then beta decay happens and it turns into a hydrogen atom then the
03:44:36.480mother atom through parsnogenesis or maybe just because locally it's lowered the g well enough
03:44:43.700so that more matter can arise turns into a daughter atom after many generations it turns
03:44:49.140into a gas cloud that condenses and turns into a brown dwarf that grows and turns into the first
03:44:54.940star that then turns into the first solar system as the star continues emitting more and more matter
03:45:00.520right so you have a daughter planet condensing around it um and then as you go on the first
03:45:07.380mother star turns into the second daughter star you have a star cluster then you have a dwarf
03:45:13.860galaxy and as a galactic core expanse you have an early type spiral galaxy and then a mature one
03:45:20.700and a giant elliptical galaxy and then you know all of the normal processes that you have in
03:45:27.220astrophysics of how galaxies evolve then you can use all of that so they're not you know nullifying
03:45:35.620all of the work that's been done before they're just saying where did it actually start from and
03:45:40.200how did the universe how did all this stuff get there in the first place and now the next slide
03:45:45.920going to be fascinating because you're going to see exactly how this is distributed in space
03:45:52.720so look at this on the right here you have what we call the lyman alpha forest that's what it's
03:46:01.360correlated to its mathematical structure i think and basically that's showing the concentration
03:46:06.640of matter in the universe now you can see that it's kind of dendritic it's like a mycelium of
03:46:14.160a mushroom growing right it's like a network and there's no particular reason for these networks
03:46:20.320to grow like this but if you think about the mechanics we just saw in the previous slide
03:46:26.640about how one generates the next and then uh you know it kind of grows out almost organically
03:46:34.560this begins to make perfect sense now i want to direct your attention to the middle graphs there
03:46:39.600So you see this little sort of brown square.
03:46:43.800That is the simulation of a bruscelator in 3D.
03:46:47.920Now, it's not exactly the same mechanics as on the right here,
03:46:51.720but I think it's quite fascinating to see how they are similar
03:46:54.380because those are the 3D stable wave patterns
03:46:58.320that I was talking about at the beginning.
03:47:00.740And it's interesting to me how you have the same kind of rhizomatic structure.
03:57:11.520you know accelerate that way so i'm i don't know exactly what's happening there but yeah there's
03:57:16.060lots of speculation and that's the problem we don't really know we're not allowed to ask these
03:57:20.400questions i think bob lazard is indeed the guy i don't trust him because uh i think i don't know
03:57:27.520exactly what his name yeah that's yeah there's some there's some uh i forget exactly what the
03:57:32.600drama was but i don't think he's a trustworthy voice unfortunately they also seed people to
03:57:39.180you know say things that aren't true in order to lead people down false rabbit holes but
03:57:43.880you know the the government is becoming more and more incompetent so maybe one day we'll just be
03:57:48.880able to go in and find out all the secrets who knows uh so yeah so let's continue on to the last
03:57:55.920slides these are just some conclusions i'm now wrapping it up um i really hope people manage to
03:58:01.720follow along and um yeah let me see uh el asked a question if you moved as if you didn't have mass
03:58:10.500would you immediately accelerate to light speed well so basically you don't want to do that um
03:58:15.960but you can and in a lot of these ufo videos you see accelerations that would just completely
03:58:20.640crush anything that uh that would be experiencing inertia bob lizard sneed kruper indeed but um
03:58:30.940You know, there's also, I don't think you can cancel all of your inertia. Maybe you're not canceling all of it. Maybe you are canceling all of it. You, of course, you know, that's a good question because the problem with moving so fast as when you go to light speed, in relativity at least, would mean that the closer you get to the speed of light, the more energy you need.
03:58:55.000and this is an exponential relationship it's the lawrence factor you can look this up but
03:59:01.040of course if you cancel your inertia you would not need to supply infinite energy to move to
03:59:06.760light speed so it would be yeah i i you know i i also can't talk too much about this because
03:59:15.080yeah i'm affiliated to the guatemalan space program and and i you know i have ndas that
03:59:21.680have signed so let's let's just uh move on then huh so to conclude all of this let's go through
03:59:29.920some of these points here and i i didn't cover all of them but um you know the ones that we did
03:59:35.740talk about hopefully this will make more sense now after this presentation so to start the sun
03:59:41.460yak silvertooth and ampere force law experiments disprove special and general relativity that's
03:59:46.500those first experiments, to prove that the ESA does exist.
03:59:50.480But no, it doesn't disprove relativity,
03:59:52.620only to the degree that relativity says there's no ESA.
03:59:55.780It just says that there might be an ESA,