00:27:31.040i don't know maybe i'm just broken on a very deep level but just watching like the
00:27:41.120the muslim mayor of jew york speaking chinese they said perfect chinese i don't know about that
00:27:47.760yeah i don't think so but it's just funny watching a non-chinese person speak chinese it's never not
00:27:52.640going to be funny oh yeah i don't care what he's saying i think he's just promoting broadway
00:27:58.640so he's a muslim promoting oh he is from what yeah the gayest thing in the world
00:28:06.800remember all the people maybe you don't but remember all the people from our side and
00:28:11.680further right who are saying that this was the most exciting thing to happen to new europe
00:28:16.880politics these people hate new york of course they said here's a guy that's going to upset the jews
00:28:24.000here's a guy that's going to shake them to their core getting a muslim like this
00:28:28.880it was anti-zionist pro-palestinian right yeah i cut you off we're no we don't we don't um
00:28:35.760keep the same company anymore eh that would have been uh what's his name old thomas and these
00:28:40.720fucking sorts thomas and the short the short puerto rican guy i forget his name oh ireck
00:28:45.880striker yeah exactly it's these fucking people they they're never really being our people anyway
00:28:51.200it's not like they're not really fucking anyway yeah it's funny i was talking to our friend ted
00:28:56.380lafaro the other day and he's really struggling right now because you're seeing more people on
00:29:01.800our side embrace this idea of effectively death of white people and i talked about this on the
00:29:09.260last do you even read my show the prudentialist where he talked about the book white shift
00:29:13.780and it's this sort of a mainstream book that's talking about that white people are under attack
00:29:20.460their existence is under threat what does the future of whiteness look like is it some form
00:29:26.260of hybridization what is the hispanic wave that seems to identify with whiteness which is what
00:29:34.260they self-report they call themselves white so what is that the future of whiteness is this sort
00:29:40.100of mixed race thing and and and what do you do about that um and there's figures on our side
00:29:46.620i was told that kevin deanna from identity politics was talking about this thomas 777 who
00:29:52.280you mentioned has said that you know they take almost a metaphysical view of whiteness that
00:29:57.900it's something like you know if you're iranian like to them i'm just i'm making up a take right
00:30:03.500now but you could you could imagine one of them not maybe thomas but be like oh you know your
00:30:09.960average iranian is whiter than a wasp in america that's what they would say white angels tax and
00:30:16.720prostitutes and so they kind of re-configured whiteness to mean these other values it's certainly
00:30:23.920not totally genetic you know what i mean so but you start going down that path and these are people
00:30:31.040with swastikas and confederate flags on their attire you know these are people who are in every
00:30:37.120other imaginable instance as far as you could get but this is the new meta this is the new
00:30:43.760firmware update for everyone and it that seems to be gaining in popularity and for a lot of people
00:30:48.720that's very upsetting and jarring and uh i mean i understand that completely but uh
00:30:54.760But these people, a lot of them were, they would look at him and say, okay, he's a threat to Jews, and our primary enemy is Jews, so this is good for us.
00:31:05.540And I was just laughing. It's like, you know what? These Jews, they're slippery, right?
00:31:10.740We thought we had them lit to this time.
00:31:13.080We thought we had Jewish power in a chokehold because we found a guy, we found a borderline retarded Muslim communist who went out there and said, either stop killing Palestinian children or give me money.
00:31:33.780And Don Sarnet, the Jews, they pickled their way out of another humdinger, didn't they?
00:31:39.580like day two after he's elected he's seen with rabbis he's he's promoting like he he's this
00:31:47.440fucking this far left muslim but he loves gay people doesn't give he just wants fucking money
00:31:53.880i don't know how this wasn't obvious because it's the same people that will criticize well i guess
00:31:58.980it's not the same people again because they're not really our people but like we all know that
00:32:02.700the reason that we dislike muslims is largely because of the actions of muslims which have all
00:32:06.580been at the behest of the jews the muslims are just golems sent here by the jews so yeah we
00:32:10.620dislike the muslims and we dislike the jews but like what like so when a muslim comes and says
00:32:17.260he's going to attack the jews how do you not see it as an obvious distraction like that i don't know
00:32:22.700it's i just want to say guys um i i understand we get so swept up in various narratives but i just
00:32:30.360want to step back for this and remind people muslims don't hate jews not like you think
00:32:36.920that you think that they're an existential i mean no no just not like they hate us just be clear
00:32:42.580jews see christians specifically european christians as an existential threat to them
00:32:49.020they see muslims as a political inconvenience and for a lot of these people like mom donnie like
00:32:56.400they they're very clear about what they want they want to agitate politically for their own kinfolk
00:33:03.520their own ethno-religious tribe and they'll just lie and they don't care they don't fucking care
00:33:09.680and they don't they don't hate gays as much as you think either you have this idea of what
00:33:14.860muslims are as as these rights and i've gotten into debates with people about this before like
00:33:19.620fans of you know i don't want to keep just you know laying into this one particular person we
00:33:26.080mentioned a couple times I really don't want that to become a refrain in this
00:33:29.980obviously certain fans of certain people who are saying that you know these are
00:33:34.300our allies and I said well and I gave examples of other Muslims that were
00:33:39.700friendly to Jews it's like well yeah of course Islam is very very complex and
00:33:44.020there's different sects there's different like exactly so but because I
00:33:49.120know that I know a thing or two about Islam I know a thing or two about how
00:33:53.520it that all distributes politically so I know that most Muslims probably don't
00:33:59.580hate Jews and it's very hard to get them to collaborate on that furthermore it
00:34:05.880seems that they don't really hate as homosexuality as much as you might hope
00:34:10.140they would or any of this stuff like they're not like they'll end up as like
00:34:14.940henpecked by their wives too they're fucking faggots like you know there's a
00:34:20.340ton of Pakistanis. They're Indian Muslims. What do you think about Indian guys? They're
00:34:26.440skinny fat losers. There's so many different sectors of Islam that are just pathetic and
00:34:34.500they're just degenerate and they're just stupid and they're hypocrites and they're liars and
00:34:40.280they're not righteous. They're not cool. They're not masculine. They're just sniveling little
00:34:47.260fucking shits and so that's i was reminded like you think they're your allies on this like they're
00:34:53.400they don't even believe in this like i don't i think that i when it comes down to it they would
00:34:58.800love to most of them would love to partner with the jews against you and then the jews would just
00:35:04.720have to pay them money and that's it i think that's what happened with madani like he's he
00:35:10.580can be bought easily and you you all thought he couldn't be bought you thought he was righteous
00:35:16.280You all thought that he believed in something.
00:35:19.620What he believes in is taking over white spaces.
00:35:23.400And the Jews can at least carve out a space for themselves.
00:35:26.140They can carve out the one part of New York City that doesn't have flock cameras.
00:56:33.380If you look into his eyes, I don't want to say he was Christ-like,
00:56:38.920But he was, like, affecting a sort of, like, sympathetic, very, like, Oprah-like glow that I think can only be achieved by someone of astoundingly low IQ.
01:08:28.340who is this white feminist lover of love okay i just don't be is this trans i can't
01:08:36.740i can't slip on this banana peel again i'm gonna read it let's just assume this is
01:08:43.140of an incel so he says here's the thing about our day he wasn't a real academic fraudster of course
01:08:52.260he committed extensive academic fraud but it wasn't his primary goal he didn't set up to be
01:08:57.140an academic superstar i don't believe he was even interested in politics rd didn't crave
01:09:02.100intellectual glory honor or recognition rd was primarily a munchausen syndrome case pity was
01:09:08.260what he really wanted he set out with ruthless and single-minded persistence to acquire the pity
01:09:13.940condescending admiration and doting care we reserve for the physically sick and infirm
01:09:20.020and it just so happened due to the ideological manias of our current historical epoch that
01:09:25.620western academic and media elites had boundless enthusiasm for providing it to him across our
01:09:31.580day and this is where it kind of got interesting because i did kind of listen to him and of course
01:09:36.140he played the race car and all that stuff but like he wasn't like fiery like some other people
01:09:41.540i've seen like he's a liar and he's a dope but i'm like i don't know he's something like we said
01:09:47.740he's almost too stupid and too clumsy to be to be the type of like i'm thinking of you know
01:09:54.820ibrahim x kendi or these other like black hacks who are like outwardly anti-white you know what
01:10:02.900i mean but this is like anyway so he goes here says across party speeches lectures interviews
01:10:08.260ted talks website and ghost written autobiography the fixation is with his own allegedly constantly
01:10:14.180broken and failing body all of his stories his lies his work were nothing but shoddy vehicles
01:10:19.460to discuss his illnesses including but unlimited to severely non-verbally autistic as a kid
01:10:25.620illiterate due to learning disabilities as a teen i mean right those two i'm like you shouldn't be
01:10:30.180professor then like look i'm sorry but if you if you have a history of not reading good and being
01:10:38.580up in the head then you can never be a professor epilepsy testicular cancer death in one ear
01:10:45.860dyslexia mini stroke with memory loss brain cancer hit by a car getting secretly beaten up
01:10:52.820a months-long locked in syndrome coma something called autistic burnout i mean i empathize with
01:11:00.380that breaking his leg during a marathon but still completing it and so on so this is a selection
01:11:06.560of his eyes he didn't care about racial politics beyond the perfunctory watch his lectures on
01:11:12.100decolonization listless and limp he complains about racism and demands change but only in vague
01:11:17.440general and rarely bitter terms keep in mind there are many in the academia who are deeply
01:11:22.560hateful and venomous towards whites who earnestly seek the complete dispossession and imposition of
01:11:28.220enormous suffering on us our day was happy to go along but only insofar as they offered potential
01:11:33.580chance to talk about physical fevers what's the significance of this well a lot i think but here
01:11:39.300are the two things um i'm just gonna skip this part here um the real reason it's the difficulty
01:11:46.000to he this is what he says that i thought was really interesting um go right here he explains
01:11:54.000the ambivalent or even fond reactions to arde's antics from the right even from the most disposed
01:11:59.980to hate him many say that due to the sheer scale and absurdity it became amusing surreal cheek
01:12:06.600almost performance art others report complicated feelings of pity and argue he deserves this
01:12:11.720speed because the system set him up and i've seen this a lot i saw a lot of guys on our side
01:12:16.680say like it's not his fault he's obviously stupid but we must blame the white women who put them
01:12:22.600there the system that elevated him beyond his station and all that and i always rejected that
01:12:27.800no one made him lie and be anti-white right well the real racers are the ones who gave him the job
01:12:37.700he couldn't do they're missing but i still kind of like this take where he said the real reason
01:12:42.700it's difficult to truly hate our day is because even if you didn't consciously realize it
01:12:46.700on subconscious level we all recognize that he's a munchausen syndrome sufferer and we all
01:12:52.560intuitively understand the goal of the munchies not to rule over us but to lie beneath even if
01:12:57.500you can recognize logically that our day was a regime stooge uh it's very difficult to emotionally
01:13:02.740feel threatened by someone who would want it to be nothing but to be weak so interesting i thought
01:13:10.000believe it what do you think i don't i mean i see the the the relationship like there's there's kind
01:13:17.840of a through line there that is parallel to munchausen syndrome i don't think that's the
01:13:22.760defining feature of his life right i mean most of what he was doing was not related like his
01:13:30.040all everything that he had right his whole position in the world that he apparently did
01:13:35.000chase after was built on fraud and fraud at great risk although he did manage to pull it off
01:13:41.000and then it seems like the munchausen stuff that like pretending to be weak was layered in there
01:13:47.320And it seems to me like it was just a sociopathic mechanism by which he can perpetrate more fraud.
01:13:55.160You know, I don't think I don't think he was at his core just a guy who wanted to be weak and be viewed as a victim so that everybody would.
01:38:13.080And you need to, like, if you're kind of, women are sort of, they got a low level of craziness constantly, but the internet's really set up for people with, like, high peak, high efficiency, like type A madness like us.
01:38:28.440We know how to exist in that ecosystem.
01:41:39.520In fact, in most European societies, guilds fundamentally, in principle,
01:41:45.140did not let not just they didn't let women girls get any vocation formal vocational training
01:41:53.620like this is a book written by a progressive liberal woman and so she's like they they
01:42:01.220practice racism and colorism and i of course i highlight that as why gills rod put that one
01:42:08.980in the dope column put that one throw that up on the sick board but anyway we'll just read it a
01:42:15.360little bit i overall liked it because everyone in our space uh i don't think any of them would have
01:42:22.560anything negative to say about guilds and i always found guilds very interesting because
01:42:28.560i found that they totally blew the legs out of the marxists if not the claim then the underlying
01:42:38.160belief that prior to Marxism there were no labor unions there was no
01:42:42.720collectivization whatsoever but you know in our readings of corporatism I
01:42:48.780believe the book on corporatism by Othmar Spahn would be one but there's
01:42:53.020lots of other corporatist writers saying that the corporatist model that was
01:42:56.780embraced by fascist governments was pulled from history and the guild
01:43:00.680systems what's the guild system it's just tradespeople craftsmen artisans
01:43:05.880who are manufacturers whoever it is collectivizing getting together saying we're stronger together
01:43:11.160and you also see that in farmer co-ops right because i remember i saw an interview with her
01:43:17.940and she was saying that these guilds were different because they were business owners
01:43:24.460whereas labor unions are workers and laborers and like okay i see you're doing there what about
01:43:30.520farmers farmers are also employers too a lot of them employ people so are they do they labor less
01:43:37.960is the labor of a farmer less valuable this is this is pure marxism this is not based in reality
01:43:44.520at all it's all of these totally arbitrary distinctions with no real difference so
01:43:50.280economists have been trying to show that adam smith was wrong about guilds by modeling various
01:43:55.800theoretical ways, market failures which guilds might have solved using their social capital,
01:44:02.360their store of norms and ways of cooperation and trust and information. This book analyzed
01:44:12.040a database I put together of more than 17,000 observations of guilds in 23 European societies
01:44:20.760over a period of nearly nine centuries and i'm in a way sad to say that it found very little
01:44:28.760evidence that guilds solved failures in markets for quality or human capital investment or
01:44:36.120innovation instead it was a bit of a sad story they uh imposed entry barriers they manipulated
01:44:44.360markets in favor of their own members they oppressed their employees guilds were associations
01:44:50.760of employee employers it's important to remember they weren't like modern unions they were like
01:44:56.260modern organizations of small business owners so they they oppressed their workers and i'm sorry
01:45:03.760to say they ripped off customers yeah it's like so you're not allowed to have an apprentice
01:45:08.820otherwise you're like a landlord for labor something along those lines that's what she was
01:45:13.120saying so i i condemn and denounce that but but yeah the guilds guilds crush innovation but also
01:45:22.180you're not allowed to have apprentices so okay sorry guys we can't have a printed we're not
01:45:25.920allowed to train anybody anymore yeah and but it's like i love the guild model because
01:45:32.280you could say it's spontaneous it was not directed by the central government now she will make the
01:45:38.820correct claim that they did integrate somewhat with the government especially with their of a
01:45:45.260sufficient size but that's that's not to say that it was just another institution it was somewhat
01:45:52.820spontaneous or it was bottom up let's say so I'll just read some excerpts here she says for one
01:46:01.560thing guilds are important for understanding how the historical sources of economic growth
01:46:05.400The first transition to sustained economic growth relied on economic transformations in the pre-industrial period.
01:46:12.120During the eight centuries before European industrialization, guilds were central institutions setting the rules of the game for economic activity.
01:46:23.060Understanding how economies first achieved sustained economic growth requires analyzing how their institutions worked.
01:46:29.140It says guilds have been observed for thousands of years in many economies, ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, medieval and early modern India, Japan, China, Persia, Byzantium, and Europe, the 19th century, Latin America, the Ottoman Empire.
01:46:43.400But although guilds have existed for millennia in economies across the world, the analysis of guilds as economic institutions is based largely on Europe between the year 1000 and about 1880.
01:46:55.540This is probably because evidence on guilds is the richest there.
01:46:59.140as shown by the sparse research of non-european guilds partly too it's because guilds showed
01:47:04.240interesting variation across pre-industrial europe gradually weakening after 1500 in some societies
01:47:11.420but surviving long past 1800 in others above all the focus on european guilds arises from the fact
01:47:17.860that europe is where sustained economic growth first arose raising obvious questions about the
01:47:23.760relationship between guilds and growth. So this whole book is an answer to what she believes is
01:47:33.600a prevailing economic analysis that says that there's this idea that guilds are important to
01:47:40.180growth, but here I am to show you that they're not. But the book can seem very adversarial in
01:47:46.180that sense. But she goes on here, the service sector was full of guilds and throughout Europe
02:21:12.120I mean, recently I saw a Substack article about that period in time, which was linked to the Leverage Institute, which turned out to be a call.
02:21:19.240But that's a whole of a different tangent.
02:21:22.940But, yeah, so I ended up going off in a different direction, focusing hard on the juvenile.
02:21:27.120because i realized that what he'd written in on power was actually completely correct his model
02:21:33.760of how things work and what was happening was was was what was important and it ended up going off
02:21:39.440in that direction and sort of developing um juvenile further into different areas which i
02:21:46.240thought juvenile failed to actually do and that and that ended up with me getting involved with um
02:21:52.400Bouvard, Adam Katz, and kind of trying to fit a more accurate anthropology behind this because
02:22:02.380I, as you can see with Nemesis, I came to the conclusion that one of the big issues with the
02:22:08.880Juvenile's work was that he, the anthropology he was trying to use in conjunction with his model
02:22:15.160just did not work. There were two different things and they were conflicting with each other.
02:22:19.540so at that point i'm i ended up very far away from moldbug and nrx and all of that
02:22:25.540and then i ended up um coming up with um the neo-absolutism blog and the neo-absolutism
02:22:32.100journal and developing it further that way and then i ended up following the trail even further
02:22:38.480into this new book themis and that's taking me off into just a very different direction to where
02:22:45.260I thought I'd start with basically now you mentioned a mold bug who some people especially
02:22:52.440if they're new might forget that even like a completely different name before a Curtis Yarvin
02:22:57.580and I'm curious without trying to get you to drag anyone publicly I don't know how much interest you
02:23:03.660have in that we do on the show but um what are your thoughts on since knowing him back in the day
02:23:11.580and unqualified reservations his original blog how he's developed you kind of broke from him
02:23:17.700early on but has he proceeded down a path that you might disagree with well i i never knew him
02:23:24.960i i've read his blog in detail because of again the juvenile part but i'd say he hasn't developed
02:23:31.460at all and i'd say basically he's pumping out the same stuff as he was back then and i think one of
02:23:37.840the major issues with what he was doing was that he wasn't approaching it in a one of the things
02:23:44.340which I realized much later I was doing was I was approaching all of this in a very scientific way
02:23:49.620so I found one particular point which I realized was absolutely accurate and then I kind of pulled
02:23:57.460on the strings which developed from that to extrapolate from that the even more points which
02:24:03.940made sense in relation to that so i was creating a a system which was coherent whereas yavin hasn't
02:24:10.920done that because you have to understand what yavin is he's basically a zionist so what he's
02:24:16.760doing is he's picking and he's cherry picking what he needs to fit with his particular position
02:24:23.660i mean i don't hold it against him i mean if you're jewish and you you just support his
02:24:28.680on your zinus and whatever that's your that's your issue but it just it doesn't help if you're
02:24:35.480trying to approach things scientifically which is what i was doing and that's yeah that's basically
02:24:40.480what i was doing yeah and i think your approach is is more interesting to me and you know even
02:24:46.680though i disagree with much of what yarvin does these days i'd like to credit him at least because
02:24:52.300people who were in and around that that space at that time he started he was the one who started
02:24:58.520going on bigger shows he was the one who was really going after interviews i do believe that
02:25:04.000he popularized a lot of books a lot of people were into these sorts of books like i my memory was he
02:25:10.240was one of the first people to mention the ancient city and these other and i think he was you know
02:25:15.980Not essential, but he was pretty important in bringing Carl Schmitt back into the heterodox zeitgeist or wherever the fuck.
02:26:54.420Because, I mean, that's what he's doing.
02:26:55.700He's just basically just stretching and pulling and twisting whatever he can to suit it, suit Zionism.
02:27:02.360And then when it doesn't kind of suit him, he just drops it and goes off to something else.
02:27:06.420I don't remember if he ever populized the ancient city.
02:27:09.980I do know, he mentioned Juvenile briefly a couple of times, and most of the time he was banging on about Carlisle and Burnham's book as well, which I...
02:27:19.700That's right, yeah, Carlisle, sorry, I might have credited Schmidt, but I know it was Carlisle a lot, and yeah, Burnham, and then Burnham.
02:27:27.160and i guess that goes into a next thing which is that um i i credit you being you know let's say
02:27:35.860an expert on elite theory but um you left the scene for an extended period of time and we can
02:27:43.780of course get into that but because i'm very interested in that because i was around at that
02:27:48.620time too and i remember what happened and a lot of people don't but anyway um in in and we talked
02:27:55.280about this in the lead up to the interview uh have you seen elite let's call it elite theory
02:28:01.160and that's very broadly defined by a lot of people these days but elite theory this used to be sort
02:28:07.760of a marginal thing not a lot of people were talking about now everyone's talking about it
02:28:11.940and there's people who you know staked their entire careers on it um and different subsets
02:28:19.120of it you know with burnham you get the managerial elite there's guys like or mcintyre where that's
02:28:23.660their thing and they have very large audiences and they weren't around back then not really
02:28:28.300so have you watched elite theory as we you know broadly define it become more popular
02:28:34.560and uh do you have any thoughts on that yeah i've seen it become popular but i i just really don't
02:28:41.460understand what it is i i've poked around a bit and i've asked questions to people and i i just
02:28:47.360don't understand what it is i don't understand what what half the people are talking about
02:28:51.240Because what they seem to be doing is to take different thinkers from different traditions and then matching them together and then acting as if they can all be operated at the same time, even though they completely contradict and they have different theoretical systems backing them up.
02:29:12.280Yeah, and that's why I struggled to define it somewhat, because you have the Italian school of elite theory. And I wrote about this in a Vanguard's journal article not long ago. It is called The Power is Power Theory of Power.
02:29:30.180And I was referencing a very popular figure in this space who's really taken a lead theory and put it on his back.
02:29:38.460And that's Academic Agent, otherwise known as Nima Parvini, who's someone that I really don't agree with on anything.
02:29:46.240I don't like him. I think I'm a certified hater of Academic Agent.
02:29:50.580And he doesn't have many, but maybe I'm the only one, and that's fine.
02:29:54.240but uh he's he's published books on elite theory and he's um tried to coalesce a lot of them into
02:30:01.260into one workable theory to explain the the world and to explain that um and i'm summarizing i'm
02:30:09.280trying to steal a man's position but um he's taken your model of elite theory which you know
02:30:16.060i say yours but i always imagine concentric circles and there's the high low versus the
02:30:20.180middle. It's very easy to kind of visualize and conceptualize how power operates. And most
02:30:26.640importantly, and this is what I think a lot of people miss, it's an ecosystem of power. You can
02:30:33.780have the intermediary powers versus the center of power. The center of power wielding the periphery,
02:30:39.460the people, maybe wielding populism against the intermediate powers, which would be institutions,
02:30:45.060the church whatever it may be that that to me is a more realistic model but i've noticed that a lot
02:30:51.520of people and it's not even just in our space how christ how many times do you hear someone
02:30:56.420say the word elites in mainstream media right yeah that's another thing that really
02:31:02.840bugs me because well i mean i could imagine i don't think he was making an elite um
02:31:08.440theory like a coherent one he did a number of books where you're just summarizing stuff and
02:31:13.780he's fully admitted that's what he was doing um other people keep trying to talk about elite
02:31:18.620theory as being some sort of coherent whole but i just again i i can't see it i can't get a grip
02:31:23.760of it and i yeah when people keep talking about at least well i don't understand what they mean
02:31:28.480by elite it's one of those words like sovereignty which people use and they act as if it's self
02:31:33.820explanatory and it's obvious to everyone understanding what it means but i really
02:31:37.740don't know what it means my understanding of what i think what's happening here with the word elite
02:31:44.520is that it's the same thing it kind of happened with um in the field of ethics with the concept
02:31:50.240of good and bad people are taking an evaluative term which is very specific uh context specific
02:31:57.200and then they're just applying it as if it's a noun which can be abstracted reified and then
02:32:02.560just throwing around everywhere because to be elite you have to be elite at something but they're
02:32:08.740just using it as just elite when without specifying what do you mean by that i mean you see that a lot
02:32:14.260for example in peter turchin's work elite theory which i don't know whether i'm being i'm probably
02:32:19.840being a little unkind in this sense by picking on him taking him as an example um but they will say
02:32:26.040things like there's an overproduction of elites and then you again you just left asking what do
02:32:31.000mean by elites because what's elite has to be specific to the context and you're not specifying
02:32:36.800that absolutely and sometimes just and i've been exposed to a lot of this shit uh they're using
02:32:46.540the word elite as a substitute for bourgeoisie i mean that's very very it's a class signifier
02:32:53.860but um and in the article i was discussing it's like really try and visualize it really try and
02:32:58.880consider uh what is the ecosystem they inhabit is and when they say sovereignty that's a great
02:33:04.340example and again i'll return to yarvin and he was he was trying to popularize uh i believe it
02:33:11.660was carl schmidt that said this it was the sovereign is he who defines the exception to
02:33:17.880the rules he is the top of the pile so he can decide what rules to bend and break and uh some
02:33:23.740people will also say uh to identify who has power look to who you're not allowed to criticize there's
02:33:30.120all these maxims and some would say even platitudes but then okay then who is it who do we know who
02:33:37.280actually who is at the top who's the monarch right now what's is it donald trump well that's not
02:33:43.700just one of the reasons why i wrote the new world them is because when i was i actually stopped and
02:33:48.900I decided to think, well, who's the center in Nemesis
02:33:53.880was kind of becoming synonymous with sovereign.
02:33:57.480And I stopped and I thought, well, who is sovereign?
02:33:59.900Who is the center in the American order,
02:42:45.220know napoleon apparently asked to meet with him at one point to discuss his theory because when
02:42:51.120you look at the um like diaries or the comments which you get from these leaders like napoleon
02:42:57.200or your stalin's or mao's they they're not going to be carrying around with them copies of block
02:43:02.240they're going to be carrying around with the copies of people like machiavelli um so that
02:43:06.300gives you an insight as to who's actually talking about something worthwhile and who's just
02:43:11.280completely pointless yeah and unless I'm mistaken I think Demaistra at least volume one of Demaistra's
02:43:19.160works was also published by Imperium Press I always get jumbled up with Antelope Hill
02:43:23.720because they were I mean they're both in operation right now but yeah look I really
02:43:29.280like Demaistra and I think there's a great there's this foundation of elite theory and
02:43:35.600i guess what applied sovereignty with some some other study that often gets ignored
02:43:42.480um and and again people what we're what we're talking about right now in my mind would be
02:43:49.220dismissed by a lot of the elite theorists and um i was going to mention nemo parvin just because
02:43:55.040he's been so explicit at this he would say that uh the elites as he would term them uh they they're
02:44:01.860non-ideological the non-religious they are just these high level operators self-interested
02:44:07.380operators that deploy all these other things populism all these other you know ideology
02:44:13.240like ideology itself it's almost kind of like a very leftist interpretation i'm not accusing
02:44:18.440of being a leftist but i think he has a debt to leftism yeah by saying that kind of like
02:44:24.240capitalism you can substitute a capitalist for an elite by saying like they don't believe anything
02:44:28.540they just want and then they trick everyone else with all these distractions right which
02:44:33.980so they would reject a lot of what we're saying i think the thing to me on one level it's true
02:44:40.620but on another level it's just not because again one of the things that's missing from that is the
02:44:45.380concept of traditions because when you start going on the mosca direction where it's like oh they're
02:44:51.060just doing what they want they need to do and then afterwards they come up with an excuse to explain
02:44:55.020it that's kind of putting them outside of traditions and it's putting them in like a
02:44:59.020position like a god-like position but these people these um elites if you want to call them that
02:45:04.940they're actually operating within traditions and using concepts and ideas which they've inherited
02:45:09.900from previous um people in their position so they end up they're not they're actually when you when
02:45:16.380you factor in traditions they're actually acted upon just as much as they're actors but if you
02:45:22.220actually um if you end up talking to any of these people in these positions or you read what they're
02:45:26.860talking about you do kind of get the impression that they see themselves as kind of like these
02:45:31.500puppet masters even though they make a giant mess of it because they don't understand their position
02:45:36.300in the thing um i i remember one there's one book i think it's who who paid the piper or something
02:45:42.380like that where i can remember one of the ci guys was um making a point that he was reading newspapers
02:45:49.980And he was finding articles coming back with just complete nonsense, which he pumped into the information ecosphere previously.
02:45:58.660And it was coming back at him as if it was the truth.
02:46:00.940And that's kind of what's happening on a generational scale.
02:46:03.920You have the previous people doing this Machiavellian stuff or doing this thing where they think they're manipulating everyone.
02:46:10.180And then the next generation takes it on and they have to operate with that complete mess that they've inherited.
02:46:16.000And it's like, again, one of the big issues that happens here is everybody's missing out on the role of tradition, the fact that the language and traditions we inhabit actually constrain and direct the way we're operating in now.
02:46:29.340But, again, it is kind of accurate to some degree, because there are people in that position who do think like that.
02:46:35.480They think that they're operating from pure reality and they're master manipulators, when they're not.
02:51:15.540And even in a case where they think they don't or they believe they don't or they do, because it's impossible not to, because when you get into the weeds with traditions and you realize the role that language is playing on influencing people's worldview and dictating their worldview, it becomes very clear very quickly that that's the case.
02:51:35.220because how we even conceptualize certain things
02:51:38.660is dictated by the language that we're using.
02:51:40.840I mean, it kind of brings us into a Sapir-Whorf hypothesis,
02:59:43.380in those 10 years can you tell me what um intellectual developments have happened as a
02:59:48.040result of any of that in the u.s especially i mean recently we've had alamari whatever his name is
02:59:56.080baps book come out where he's talking about selective breeding which is i i think somebody
03:00:01.280did a substack article and not just tearing it apart because i remember reading his phd and just
03:00:05.600reading it and just going just shaking my head as i was going because he was just making stuff up
03:00:12.160and he was just plucking things out of the air which didn't exist like just some nonsense about
03:00:16.200the pre-greeks the dorians or pre-dorians i can't remember exactly they were running around in
03:00:23.520manabuns howling to the yeah yeah and that's his that's his model that he says men should have
03:00:31.120no that does no like just no and you said something that i've said many times before
03:00:38.920because some people they said it doesn't matter if it's made you know it might not be completely
03:00:43.600accurate but it captures an essence and like okay i hear you but to me i i think i've read the same
03:00:50.280substack that you did and there's i think i've read a couple that are just taking issue with
03:00:54.420his specific claims and those claims are the foundation of his entire i would say political
03:01:00.840structure that he's trying to build from that and i'm like okay it's someone had said i had so much
03:01:06.040fun reading i'm like first of all you're not supposed to have fun reading shut the fuck up
03:01:09.380but second of all i'm like that that sounds like a way to say like yeah it's bullshit but i like it
03:01:14.520okay yeah you can have fun but it is bullshit like it just it has an incorrect premise and then so
03:01:22.580everything built upon that doesn't really fucking work it's just like this thing about this right
03:01:28.500you've got yavin who just diverts everything interesting it comes across into um
03:01:34.900nothingness when it doesn't suit israel and then you've got bat who is just promoting absolute
03:01:42.000nonsense and filling up the sphere in that area so like it's like yeah if that's just what are
03:01:48.620they trying to do there are they trying to aim that the higher intelligent people to um to try
03:01:53.900and get influence over them if so what are they doing because anybody with intelligence will read
03:01:58.660down be just like what are you even talking about and then you have another example of this with um
03:02:04.880The guy who's running the Burke Society, I can't remember his name now, he's another Jewish guy, he's quite prominent, he's got like eight kids or something like that.
03:02:13.200let me say i googled one talking but um yeah so he he served the burke society right i don't know
03:02:19.180if you're familiar with burke um but his whole society seems to be devoted to sort of judo
03:02:26.900flipping the american constitutional development and the the founding of america into being
03:02:33.180basically a a product a project which was influenced by jewish uh jewish convenant and
03:02:40.240so basically he takes birth who has nothing to do with that he completely guts it putting his thing
03:02:48.720which basically says oh america is basically founded on judaism and we're basically the same
03:02:55.340people and we're we're the major influence for you blah blah blah so we're part of it when if you go
03:03:00.960back into american history you look at the founding of america it was an entirely again we see yavin
03:03:06.060actually complained about us on twitter a lot recently it's completely anglo-saxon project
03:03:11.100like their entire project for the american independence was based upon a reading of law
03:03:16.540and the concept of um sovereignty but more like the concept of who was um predominant in law
03:03:22.940based upon readings of law which were derived from the ancient constitution and the idea that our
03:03:29.340ancient constitution came from i think blackstone wrote that the woods of um germany uh the whole
03:03:37.580idea was that they're operating on their premise that like the english monarchy was the norman
03:03:43.500imposter it was um making new innovations to the constitution which he shouldn't do and the
03:03:49.500constitution derived from anglo-saxons so again in all of that there's no jewishness there's no
03:03:55.020biblical convent confidentism in there but he he he so judah flips it so you've got three different
03:04:01.420people there operating in the intellectual sphere all doing the same thing and it's it's one of the
03:04:06.860things where it's just interfering with the ability of anybody else to come up with coherent
03:04:14.540theoretical conceptions of how to process government and how to develop new government
03:04:20.300So they're kind of trying to make everything into a nonsense.
03:04:24.300There's this meme you might have seen.
03:04:29.680It was some stick figure drawing of a man saying, like, I made this,
03:04:34.420and then hands it to a black stick figure who says that I made this, right,
03:04:40.240because he's imparting civilization to the African who says, oh, I made this the entire time.
03:04:45.180I find with intellectual movements, replace African with Jew.
03:04:50.300So, to hear Jewish people talk about it, they were pioneers of every single intellectual movement, you know what I mean? But they come in later and say, and this was the argument made in Tri-Faith America, which is a very interesting book that shows sort of not only the Jewish but also Catholic, I'd argue, subversion in America, which was historically, as you say, predominantly Protestant, predominantly white Anglo-Saxon Protestant.
03:05:18.360And then something happened around the 50s and the 60s.
03:05:21.660And then you started seeing this word pop up, Judeo-Christian, which was never mentioned previously.
03:05:28.820And even then, it struggled to take off.
03:17:23.700no single person or single biological actor of any particular order who has the final uh who is
03:17:30.900the final point who can tell everybody what what to do it the decisions from like for example a
03:17:37.700judge or from a president or anything like it doesn't come from within themselves it's not like
03:17:42.580they're they're super gods who can just float above everybody else and they're just everything comes
03:17:47.620from their will what's actually happening is they're actually the interpreter of the center
03:17:54.900in their given position so sovereignty goes from being something you can own and hold and be the
03:18:03.860the final will that embodies that to being the person who's interpreting what the center is
03:18:11.780trying to tell us to do and if you go back through history that's exactly what pre-modern
03:18:17.300people understood was happening every single order nobody saw like the king or the priest has been
03:18:24.980telling them or coming up with laws or telling them what to do based upon their will instead
03:18:29.540they were interpreting what the center what the meta persons in that order were passing down as
03:18:34.580to what they're supposed to do then modernity you go from this situation where it's interpretive to
03:18:41.140a situation where it's a possession with bodin and it's the will coming from that individual person
03:18:47.300That's when you have that turn that happens and then you end up with modernity and then we end up just running around trying to find out who's sovereign.
03:18:54.520So what I think could happen with AI is that this AI ends up functioning as the center.
03:19:02.620We end up treating it as if it's like an oracle in the same way that people treat the oracle in Greece.
03:19:09.940They go there for confirmation or to get an idea of what they should be doing, because it ends up being a independent third point between all of the biological actors within that given order.
03:19:22.440So there's no more question there as to who's sovereign. It's more a question of who can ask the AI what the question should be.
03:19:29.320It becomes more clear in that sense. I mean, that's possible, but there's probably a couple of different possibilities which could derive from that.
03:19:39.940Yeah. I hate separating artificial intelligence into something like Skynet. It's very easy to say it's going to become self-aware and take over. What's more perhaps nefarious is that it's regardless of how much control it exerts, it is going to exert some form of control into new thinking patterns and processes of whoever's in control.
03:20:06.960because right now i don't care who it is you know we're i was talking about this in a group chat
03:20:11.760just the other day um a friend of mine named theron he was asking you know is there a conflict
03:20:16.160between those who have agency and ai or llms more specifically and i had said well what's interesting
03:20:23.280about the development of ai it was like the early days of the development except it's gone through
03:20:28.800warp speed it didn't get a point where only really weird people were using it it developed so fast
03:20:35.760and had you know user applications very very quickly but it seems that the people who are
03:20:41.360most excited about it and using it the most for more things are people with quote-unquote agency
03:20:47.240or high iq or high performance or whatever so i'm like at the highest levels of power ai is there
03:20:53.620right now taking over entire process on an individual level it's like you're not just
03:20:59.500replacing entire departments with it which you might be that's what everyone's talking about
03:21:02.740I'm like, no, you're like, you have the decision making of every single fucking CEO, executive, whatever, being integrated with that.
03:21:12.020They know exactly what to use it for the moment they hear about it.
03:21:15.940And it's the rest of the people, you know, maybe the lower classes that are struggling.
03:21:20.520It's not gamified enough yet for people to really be interested in it.
03:21:24.960So I'm like, look, at some point, like it's going to pollute the thinking patterns.
03:21:29.920If AI itself becomes just a tulpa of neoliberalism, because it is whatever you put into it, it's just kind of a reflection of society back at it, but it has more trust than the media, more immediate, automatic trust.
03:21:47.500then i'm like okay that could that could strengthen the center of power but then you separate the power
03:21:53.180itself into quite literally a person the ai is a person you're talking to it could be that you're
03:21:58.860talking to like some tulpa that of neoliberalism itself again i'm using you know very outrageous
03:22:06.140language here but that yeah i mean the problem is here is like it depends if you can control ai and
03:22:12.620somebody controls and controls what information is given out and how it's interpreting things
03:22:17.500That would lead to probably more centralized power because they can start to control the narrative as they were doing with the media before, with mass media.
03:22:28.640But if you did that, I think people would pick upon that quite easily and quite quickly, and then that becomes a bit of an issue itself.
03:22:35.900And then other people can develop AI, which would be more honest.
03:22:40.440and the other option is that it could lead to less centralization in the sense that it can
03:22:47.200because one of the things in the time which i came to conclusion was there's one of the ways
03:22:50.860you can control centralization or control the um wrong the centralizing you can going out of
03:22:57.400control as it is in liberalism is if you control the ability of the center to um just make stuff
03:23:05.380up which is what liberalism does all of the time and ai could be health in that regards because it
03:23:11.460makes it so that people can actually pick up on the nonsense which has been put out quite quickly
03:23:16.260and then present it through ai and it's not so much your opinion against other person's opinion
03:23:20.500because you've got a third party in the case of the ai which is completely impartial and it's
03:23:25.780giving information which is impartial to the two actors in question so that could cause a lot of
03:23:31.780problem for centralization absolutely and now we need to get going right now i've had a fantastic
03:23:39.620time speaking with you we actually covered everything i want to cover and i'm just going
03:23:43.920to throw your books right back on here i'm going to start with nemesis um for those who don't know
03:23:49.820i would still highly recommend nemesis i would still recommend nemesis and themis here i want
03:23:54.940throw that up uh science of human orders um i encourage because elite theory is so popular now
03:24:02.220i would really encourage especially young people who are interested in this stuff to go back to the
03:24:08.060source and again just to give yarvin some credit one thing that he was big on was that you should
03:24:15.180really go back to the source material you should don't just watch youtube videos on it don't just
03:24:20.540watch debates on it try and get as close to the source as you can and that's not easy but try
03:24:27.660try and just go back to the root of what it is that we're talking about if you must read james
03:24:31.820burnham you can read james burnham but go back to juve now go back read you know everyone's read
03:24:35.980the prince i read the prince i never read that other book by machiavelli and a lot of a lot of
03:24:42.940people are looking for it's there it's readily available and i i think things start to make a
03:24:50.700lot more sense once you go back and and remember why you're reading this at all which is i think
03:24:58.760people want to just understand why things are the way they are they want to understand how power
03:25:02.840works and don't be so bewitched by easy answers and um so with that in mind is there any closing
03:25:11.580thoughts that you have anything that uh you like we we got the book anything else you like to promote
03:25:16.500are you anywhere else online right now uh yeah i have a subsec at the moment which i'm i wasn't i
03:25:23.360just summarized the book and my work so far and i i wasn't really planning on doing anything much
03:25:28.380more with it but that the way the british situation is going at the moment i'm my interest is getting
03:25:34.860piqued a little bit by that um so yeah i mean my subsec will probably be the place you can find me
03:25:39.820know now let me just see if i can is it this one right here i got it up on screen perfect yeah okay
03:25:47.440so yeah search up ca bond got him right here yeah so find him on there uh yeah are you recent
03:25:57.700on substack did you just get on there because i'm i was kind of late to that i had a substack
03:26:03.200before and i ended up deleting it because it was a bit um what's the word spicy i don't want to get
03:26:11.360in any trouble i ended up getting one of my posts which went kind of viral it got like 15 000 views
03:26:16.320in like two days um but yeah i didn't want to have any problems with passport control in the uk for
03:26:22.000example so i ended up deleting that and this this one i put up just to summarize my stuff so it's
03:26:27.120like 20 posts summarizing my work from emesis through to the end of themis and possibly like
03:26:32.880the direction it might go afterwards because i mean if i did write another book it'd definitely
03:26:36.640be on law and constitution um because i think the issue of law is again it's just something which
03:26:42.160nobody bothers dealing with on the right when it's it's a massive uncharted territory which is
03:26:48.160just begging to be exploited um yeah i would encourage you to write that book you should
03:26:54.640write it you have a lot of fans out there a lot of people a lot of people look towards your writing
03:26:59.060and take a lot from it yeah but the amount of effort and time it involved because one of the
03:27:03.540reasons why i was going to do it because i ended up reading that the the argument was happening
03:27:07.540between dawkins and heart and the reading also some his legal um history about the uk and it
03:27:14.480came to conclusion none of them have any idea what law is where it came from which just stunned me
03:27:20.200And this constitutional issue is what I'm beginning to write about on my sub stack now
03:27:25.680because it's becoming a serious issue in the UK where the UK is basically a pressure cooker at the moment.