00:15:51.000You've heard about this, right? All the Trump stuff?
00:15:53.080Yeah, it's predictable at this point. It's very rote.
00:15:58.540Former U.S. President Donald Trump has come and gone from Atlanta, Georgia, surrendering himself at the Fulton County Jail, his fourth criminal indictment this year.
00:16:08.640And this time, he could not avoid having his mugshot taken, a first for any former or sitting president.
00:16:15.940He was arrested on 13 criminal charges, including racketeering and conspiracy to commit false statements,
00:16:22.540accused of a conspiracy to try to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election.
00:16:28.580You should be able to challenge an election. I thought the election was a rigged election, a stolen election.
00:16:33.840And I should have every right to do that.
00:16:36.540As you know, you have many people that you've been
00:16:38.440watching over the years do the same thing, whether
00:16:40.580it's Hillary Clinton or Stacey Abrams or many
00:16:59.640And that goes with the other ones, too.
00:17:01.200What they're doing is election interference.
00:17:03.100They're trying to interfere with an election.
00:17:05.920There's never been anything like it in our country before.
00:17:09.940Some people got up in my grill for saying this, and I hear what they're saying when I would say that I don't really care and I should care.
00:17:23.360And people are saying, you know, yeah, we're not we're not going to vote for him.
00:17:26.200First of all, we are not going to vote for Trump, A, because we're Canadian.
00:17:30.160in a sense though if if america is the core area of the western empire in a sense whoever
00:17:39.500the american president is everybody's president but in a more real way i can't vote and second
00:17:45.880of all we probably wouldn't i don't know um third of all i don't know like i just i look at this
00:17:54.120and i should be excited i should because look a mug shot trump got arrested here's the trump
00:18:00.540mug shot and they're saying this is going to be interesting that's what they're saying like we're
00:18:05.120not going to vote for him we're not going to put our eggs in the trump basket however aren't you
00:18:10.140excited to see what happens and maybe i'm too jaded but i look at this and i i don't make a
00:18:19.040judgment on anyone who is excited i just i cannot describe to you the hole in my soul whenever i
00:18:25.780think of of trump when it's like oh look at this i'm like it's blank dead-eyed i'm like okay that
00:18:32.280barely registers this information and i wish it didn't because i should like it it's it's a big
00:18:37.020silly ridiculous thing look what's happening i'm like i something about this doesn't work for me
00:18:43.880what do you think you can't recapture what happened in 2016 i i remember being really
00:18:48.800optimistic there was the thrill of it just being goofy and you know every we were all shocked that
00:18:53.660he won um but then beyond that there was some genuine hope that this is an anti-establishment
00:18:59.700candidate this is the guy that nobody expected to win and even if he does something even if he
00:19:04.880doesn't do our thing he's gonna do something but i mean and i know there's a lot of guys who
00:19:08.860disagree with me but like i think in the larger scheme of things he did he did kind of move the
00:19:13.860needle in our direction a little bit but he didn't do even a fraction of what he said he was going to
00:19:18.340do or like what we wanted him to do and it's like okay so we're probably going to get even less of
00:19:22.140that even if he does win and it's all played out it's all played out and the other thing is is i
00:19:27.200wouldn't put it past trump to um have been the one who brought the indictment against himself
00:19:33.400not that he can do that but i mean this is essentially again like 2015 2016 they cannot
00:19:39.920stop handing him w's by putting him in the spotlight like with the fulton county jail shit
00:19:45.400like this is this is perfect marketing for his campaign yeah well look i'm looking at an article
00:19:51.500right now on business insider which is barely even a website still the headline is trump raked in
00:19:59.1009.4 million as his campaign sold tens of thousands of mugshot t-shirts and coffee mugs so just what
00:20:07.300you made with lightning fast rapidity uh we saw like trump's mugshot was released and it seemed
00:20:15.860there was already a t-shirt that went with it there was already a tweet there was already like
00:20:21.300i like you could like i would i would believe if someone said yeah this was all planned i'm like
00:20:26.340yeah probably like they already had the fucking merch ready to go no i think there's obviously
00:20:31.700there's legitimate reasons that the dems would want to do this so it probably is them doing it
00:20:36.060but i mean they i as my own i'm not a constitutional anything but my understanding is they're not
00:20:42.900really supposed to be able to do this i think it's possible that the reason they're doing it
00:20:48.200is because trump's letting them do it like they're like we want to do some stupid shit he probably
00:20:52.940could just lawyer up and just not uh but he just went with it and he went with it because it's
00:20:59.020again he's the the underdog he's the you know he's the one that the establishment hates and
00:21:04.340that's why you should vote for him and he managed to get a cool looking mugshot which most people
00:21:08.820don't get that was the coolest mugshot i have ever seen it's surreal yeah most people in mugshots
00:21:15.500don't get a cool looking one um and like i i don't know like when i look at this people are
00:21:22.860like well aren't you excited to see what he'll say not really because i like to your point i think
00:21:28.740that's the whole angle here because what are his policies i remember i said this last time and some
00:21:33.680people came out and said well here's his actual policy i'm like yeah but he doesn't have um he
00:21:38.720doesn't have the hook and we're getting it into this uh when we talk about the misbehaving by
00:21:44.480richard thaler and also geopolitical alpha um by marco poppick but you know the rule is that
00:21:51.400most elections are swung um marco poppick was saying this in geopolitical alpha he said like
00:21:58.240if you could actually map out an election election results um they tend to be swayed
00:22:04.500and politicians know this by sort of what's called like the median voter like there is
00:22:11.060money to be made by trying to take the temperature of the populist vote that's what kind of got trump
00:22:17.580in um and there's this idea that the pop populism is useless and the people don't matter but
00:22:23.080like if if you were to bet on trump by using this logic you would have made a trillion dollars by
00:22:29.000betting on him a lot of people did a lot of people the entire market bet against trump the entire
00:22:33.700market was wrong right so you know he was given like 0.1 percent the chance of winning but you
00:22:41.000could predict it if you actually paid attention to the median the average voter and what the average
00:22:46.320voter was concerned about and it's usually a single issue again i'm saying this and people
00:22:52.840kind of get that um our side thinks it's about race kind of is uh he makes a case in the book
00:23:00.540that i think is more correct that it's about globally globalization and globalism broadly
00:23:05.920race is wrapped up in that but you know there's a lot of stuff wrapped up in globalization and
00:23:11.720and the migrant crisis and and trade and everything like that so you know if you could look at how the
00:23:16.960dems were ignoring that and most conservatives were ignoring that trump was the only guy addressing
00:23:21.620concerns about globalism face on so same thing with the q movement it's like yeah that's that's
00:23:29.580what he did and when i look at him now like i try and use that exact same frame now who is the median
00:23:37.720voter probably the same type probably the same sort of middle america white person um where do
00:23:45.120they like what's the issue of the day is it still globalism or is it something else and i'm asking
00:23:51.360i'm asking you i guess too like what like what what's the story of this election because the
00:23:56.880story of like trump versus biden there really wasn't one and i think that's why trump lost
00:24:00.480it was a very confused campaign he was run but what's what's the thing that's like dominating
00:24:06.100the zeitgeist right now i was never the right person to ask but i'm certainly not the right
00:24:10.920person to ask now i would probably give you a pretty strong opinion um seven eight years ago
00:24:16.700but right now i i don't have the first fucking clue i can tell you what i think is the most
00:24:20.480important issue but if you're asking me what the median american voter thinks i have no idea i
00:24:24.820really don't know i got you as a white guy like that that's kind of like it's housing right it's
00:24:31.280housing it's housing and it's and it's jobs but like that's me as a as a mid-30s white canadian
00:24:38.840guy i don't have any idea what's going on in like arizona so maybe the housing market's fine
00:24:44.940i don't know you know i think a big issue would be and i think this is what trump is trying to
00:24:50.920tap into and we'll see if he's right i think the thing everyone is concerned about maybe they
00:24:57.400shouldn't be is media lies um i think when i hear the libs complain about the same thing
00:25:05.380and like if you notice every political party right now all they talk about is misinformation
00:25:11.220and if i look if i take the temperature of what's in the news right now our enemies and
00:25:17.760the progressives and the libs their line is misinformation and they've repeated it ad
00:25:23.000nauseam and it's since trump and that's why i think this is different than when trump was
00:25:27.260elected when trump was elected it was you know people didn't trust the news generally but
00:25:31.580i'm hearing we all know what happened after trump was elected they were saying disinformation is a
00:25:36.820threat to democracy san antonio's jessica headley and i'm ryan wolf our greatest responsibility is
00:25:43.460to serve our Treasure Valley communities.
00:59:21.940You can tell which reporters have a manuscript they're polishing up underneath the desk.
00:59:30.760I found a couple of interesting articles before we get into what is going to be a continuation, most likely, of the modern monetary theory debate.
00:59:44.120And I might have the drop on you this time because if people can't tell, Judas is sick.
01:06:37.320Yeah. And what I don't want to do is engage in the same intergenerational warfare that we've been seeing. I saw a video just today that was being passed around in our chat about this Australian guy. I don't know his name, but he was giving a message to Zoomers and he was saying that Zoomers often will complain to him that they don't know how to make friendships.
01:07:02.560but they do but they don't know how to make deep friendships according to him they come to him and
01:07:07.460they say i don't know how to connect with people on a deeper level and the one thing he always
01:07:12.120comes back to and it sounds very easy but it's true it's the phone it's that they were raised
01:07:19.000with this smart phone because i've noticed this a lot of people are always saying to me i can't
01:07:24.720make connections anymore you know what i realize it's because everybody is zubers and so you're
01:07:28.200all just a bunch of detached scared little dogs and with like the the kind of chihuahua ones the
01:07:33.940paris hilton's chihuahua in a bag that's what i imagine when i think of gen z people are always
01:07:39.620saved to me now because they say i feel lonely and then i say here's how you make friends and
01:07:43.600they say no i can make friends and then i say can you and they yeah and then they're talking about
01:07:49.160i want to be able to make deeper connections with people because i feel like a lot of the
01:07:53.320connections that i have are very surface level let me just say this zoomers that's a you problem
01:07:58.060that really is that is not what we experienced growing up we had deep connections and i blame
01:08:04.660phones as always i don't know where to draw the line of culpability because in one hand
01:08:11.280like it's someone else in the chat um actually it wasn't the chat it was somewhere else yeah
01:08:18.680it was on twitter somewhere it was some guy and he was saying like you know this young generation
01:08:23.340these millennials they expect the their parents and their grandparents to like move in and help
01:08:30.020take care of the kids for them but when i was young my grandparents never came by we would go
01:08:34.620to visit them but the idea he was saying that the idea that you would expect your parents or even
01:08:39.080your grandparents to raise your kids is kind of a new thing and i can see that i guess but this is
01:08:46.760where like we spend so long in these spaces arguing about how generations past did it and
01:08:53.060what was normal and no one really knows you'd have to get inside their heads in a sense i i would say
01:08:59.980the the large number of people are very confused about it but i would not hazard to say that nobody
01:09:06.420knows i think we have a pretty a pretty solid historical record of what things actually you
01:09:11.500know how things actually looked over the past thousand years of western civilization and it's
01:09:15.880pretty conclusive that you did have a lot of intergenerational families not as a rule but you
01:09:21.800would never be able to say historically that it just didn't happen no it happened a lot probably
01:09:27.440was the majority of families over the past thousand years a fair majority i will say what i said to him
01:09:32.960on twitter was he was telling the story like when i was young you know my my grandparents they had
01:09:38.02012 kids and 45 grandkids they lived up on a farm and we would go to visit them and they never ever
01:09:45.340came down to see us or attend family events and i said okay like they never went to a family event
01:09:52.520your entire life that's kind of fucking weird that is abnormal but even if it but even if it
01:09:57.140was like you said it's abnormal it's anecdotal so now you're saying you're you're on the one hand
01:10:02.200saying this is what happened to me and therefore this is what is good and has always happened
01:10:07.300throughout history like the fuck are you talking about you were raised in the in the post-war
01:10:11.520bubble right let's talk about your grandparents what happened between them and their grandparents
01:10:16.900i'll bet you anything their grandparents helped raise them because that was the that was the
01:10:21.880historical norm again not that it always happened but like say flip a coin 50 50 do we even get 50
01:10:27.00050 here no we don't and this is the problem this is kind of what i was getting to which is that
01:10:32.380you can't lecture these other generations to just do it like you can't go to your grandparents
01:10:38.520parents or your parents and say this is how your great-grandparents said like they don't
01:10:43.440care they're not going to do it and it's almost like we just need to begin again like we just
01:10:48.620need to start if we want to do a trend and there was one thing someone in our chat i think his name
01:10:54.980was osin he was saying like yeah if you want your parents oh you should make it yeah sorry
01:11:00.340what was it there was this fucking we said this in an early early episode but i still find it
01:11:06.840funny we worked at a restaurant together with ocean and uh there was an irish guy there
01:11:14.260and he was very very very irish and like he had just gone off the boat and was working there for
01:11:22.020some reason and he couldn't pronounce we couldn't pronounce his name right his he says his name was
01:11:28.360like oh shine and they used to just call him oh seamus mcfinnigan yeah give him two last irish
01:11:36.500but he was saying i actually liked his angle and i think this is the attitude to adopt
01:11:44.640which is that you just you do need to grab the torch it's like if you think
01:11:48.720your parents or parent if they're a widow is getting alzheimer's or they're getting infirm
01:11:55.740or whatever it's like you you kind of just need to force them to live with you you can't even ask
01:12:00.280them to do that because they won't it's just like okay we got a house we have space you're coming
01:12:05.300you're living here now like you you need to tell them for their own good because they're they seem
01:12:10.580to be even incapable of doing that and that's what our what previous generations did too right
01:12:16.220that's this is what i'm what i was saying before about us taking the torch we are in our 30s some
01:12:21.080of us are in our 40s and we're still talking about it like when are they going to help us
01:12:24.620like you're 20 years past the point we should be talking about that we should be talking about
01:12:29.040how we forcibly take this over and become the heads of the family, right? Like my family's not
01:12:36.660the best example because we actually have a pretty stable family. But like even in my family,
01:12:41.680we essentially went more or less against the wishes of the grandparents and took care of
01:12:46.660the grandparents. They refused to move into a home. So we took over the house and we ran the
01:12:53.300household for them and did things, you know, doing things to them that they don't even know
01:12:57.480that we're doing to them in order to keep them healthy so like there's things like that that
01:13:00.340you end up doing when they're in their old age but they're never going to understand that or
01:13:05.380agree to it you're always you were going to fight them until they die you know so like you said like
01:13:10.460if you want to take care of them you could argue with them and just be bitter and silent and let
01:13:14.680them go to a home or let them die or you could like show up one day with a truck and gaslight
01:13:19.840them into getting on and now they live in your basement yeah that's what you need to do because
01:13:25.660the the dark end to that story is it's like my my grandmother who passed my ukrainian grandmother
01:13:32.900we call her baba you know her she had four kids and she still ended up in a retirement home and
01:13:41.420ended up in a nursing home so she died with dementia surrounded by people who reeked of
01:13:47.340shit and were babbling to themselves and that's not what should happen i don't know what specifically
01:13:53.140should have happened but not that and she was proud and she said she said everything was fine
01:13:59.140and to some members of the family they thought that everything was fine because none of them
01:14:04.760decided to really put their foot down and say no i'm not going to let my mother expire this way
01:14:10.100and she did and it was very disgusting and they sold off the house that their father an architect
01:14:19.060designed and built that they if they had waited on it they could have sold it for 1.5 million
01:14:25.720dollars i bet they didn't fucking sell it for that when they did so they are not only
01:14:31.440despicable but they're also fucking morons anyway this is i might edit that part out or i might not
01:14:37.820i don't know that it really grinds my gears like your father designed and built a house during a
01:14:44.300time when though the houses that were built were good for example like you would have built this
01:14:49.940when the 70s the 70s seemed to be based on my research you can correct me if i'm wrong
01:14:56.100i think the 1970s were the last decade where anything good was designed like furniture you're
01:15:03.340the furniture guy i wanted to ask you this i didn't get to ask you this yet when you you still
01:15:07.940do design furniture but when you designed furniture previously you were designing furniture from a
01:15:13.020specific era it seemed like it was a throwback to like 60s or 70s is that correct yeah yeah no no
01:15:22.180that's that's reasonable and i always looked at that i'm like there's something about this
01:15:26.400furniture and you have an eye for design and you have an eye for construction and manufacturing
01:15:31.120and you're like you know what this shit's just made better it's made to last and it's just the
01:15:35.700way it's built and every when we talk about those old types of chairs like those when people like
01:15:41.860the the proto futuristic stuff like when future movies were made in the 70s everything was like
01:15:47.560egg-shaped and sleek everything seemed ergonomic and seeing that houses when i look at houses that
01:15:54.360were built in the 70s they're kind of swanky there's a different flow to them they seem to
01:15:59.340be built to be lived in more whereas now they're built on like a grid but you had more like
01:16:05.720recessed floors you had beds built into and things were built into other things you had
01:16:11.360like spaces were made to be communal and you don't have that you just have like a blank canvas square
01:16:17.840room yeah i wouldn't um i wouldn't use that as a golden standard but i do think that period from
01:16:23.840the 50s to the 70s in design and architecture and in manufacturing generally in north america
01:16:29.260you had a period where a lot of the constraints of the pre-war period had been removed in terms
01:16:36.140of like material constraints both material in terms of like capital but also in terms of like
01:16:41.400there's all kinds of new materials that could do new things that you haven't explored yet and so
01:16:45.600that's going on but you haven't gotten into this commercial race to the bottom that we're in right
01:16:50.340now where everything has to be mass produced and everything has to be low margin and everything
01:16:55.240has to be disposable so yeah you had i think in architecture and in design and in furniture and
01:17:00.560in cars you had this this weird period from like just after the war till maybe the late 60s or
01:17:06.600early 70s where you had really if nothing else original and interesting and novel um and human
01:17:15.840things going on in design and architecture and you just don't see it that's all gone completely
01:17:20.880flat in the past 30 40 years now and this is the world back to our topic that we started with
01:17:26.200this is the world that a lot of zoomers and gen alpha are being born into so i it's difficult for
01:17:32.240me to be as hard on them as this guy i was talking about in this video this australian guy i was
01:17:37.580talking about zoomers like they're scared little chihuahuas that's the line he used like you guys
01:17:42.500are you're nervous and you're scared to be social and you'll hear a lot of other millennials like
01:17:47.200give zoomers shit like you guys are pussies you guys are little scared types of you know people
01:17:54.880it's like like you're doing exactly what boomers say to you like all boomers talk about all day is
01:18:00.920like millennials and even gen x like they're spoiled fucking kids who who don't know how to
01:18:07.360work and we're doing the exact same thing i'm like well you're living in a world where everything
01:18:11.400sucks you're where everything is built like shit everything is built to fall apart whereas in the
01:18:18.60070s and the 60s it seemed like things were built at least with maintenance built to last forever
01:18:24.860built to be passed down like consider that consider that you are coming of age in a world
01:18:30.980where nothing is constructed to be passed down it can't be no houses yeah sure it isn't
01:18:36.220and then there's this there's this article back to what we really started on microplastics in the
01:18:41.760brain a new study conducted by university of rhode island professor jamie ross investigating
01:18:48.000the infiltration of microplastics in mammals has revealed that this is far more widespread than
01:18:53.400initially thought in fact the plastic particles were found to bio or bioaccumulate in every organ
01:19:00.320including startlingly startlingly enough the brain uh research on the health effects of
01:19:06.220microplastics especially mammals is still very limited he says but um basically what he's saying
01:19:12.420here is that the microplastics we're all used to microplastics in your blood oh there's a little
01:19:17.340tiny plastic in your blood it's in the fish just like mercury but it's in your brain and it's
01:19:23.580causing cognitive failure it's causing mood alterations yeah many studies have demonstrated
01:19:31.800how microplastics make their way into our bodies through food and water however researchers say
01:19:37.060microplastics are even tiny enough to enter the bronchioles and get trapped in different parts of
01:19:42.460the airway branches. Some numbers show humans could be inhaling the equivalent of an entire
01:19:47.780credit card's worth of plastic within a week. A study in the Netherlands analyzed blood
01:19:53.380from 22 people, plastic detected in 17 of them. Plastic, why would you want that in
01:19:58.600you? Microplastics will get into anything. I mean, it's the nature of the beast. I'm
01:20:02.560shocked that it's in the blood. How would it get in the blood? While shocking to some,
01:20:06.640to scientists. Unfortunately, it's not surprising. Microplastics have previously been detected
01:20:11.840in animal blood in human feces and placentas and while the study found it in the blood of 80 of
01:20:18.000its sample group it could be worse in new zealand he says that brain infiltration may also may cause
01:20:26.000a decrease in glial fibrillary acidic protein called gfap a protein that supports many cell
01:20:32.320processes in the brain results have shown previous studies have just suggested that gfap expression
01:20:38.160might decrease early stages of neurodegenerative diseases so long story short the amount of plastic
01:20:45.440that is found and it's give it may very well give people alzheimer's and if something you know they
01:20:51.760they'll use that because that gets enough people to perk up right you know or if it gives you cancer
01:20:57.840cancer is the big scary one but if something causes cancer it causes a constellation of
01:21:03.440other more subtle problems as well right so yeah if you can cause alzheimer's can it also cause
01:21:09.480destabilization of moods can it cause an increased anxiety or lethargy or
01:21:15.220all of this stuff and so again you have a generation us this includes us as well but you
01:21:22.540know them even more that the biologically things are stacked against them like they're being born
01:21:30.700they may very well be born not only into a strange covid environment that's gen alpha
01:21:36.800where they they're not socialized properly because they were locked inside for three
01:21:41.200fucking years but then also the plastic in their brain is making them insane as a toddler right yeah
01:21:48.040yeah so that's just something that i try and be cognizant of like when you talk politics and we
01:21:55.340Because when we talk politics and ideologies and political systems, in a sense, we're trying to project them into the future.
01:22:02.540We're interested in designing something that has legacy.
01:22:07.280And I always try and come back to ā people will talk about, oh, the problems with gender is a big thing and depression and suicide and stuff.
01:22:16.820but I'm like this seems like a a nuclear bomb going off on the horizon that just hasn't reached
01:22:23.780us yet but it will and and I don't think it's localized to North America it can't be
01:22:29.260like maybe like to me it it seems obvious that half of all Indians have to be made of plastic
01:22:38.440by this point right well there's not in this article but I've seen it written that they found
01:22:44.560it in like forest streams in the mountains and in ice caps and like it's everywhere because it's in
01:22:50.620the water system right and these particles are small enough that they can actually evaporate
01:22:54.600and float and find the jet stream like they're microscopic so yeah it's just it's a new type
01:22:59.860of toxin that now exists essentially everywhere it kind of led into this other article i read and
01:23:05.380i'm connecting some interesting dots here but i think this to me is more important than talking
01:23:11.700about trump this to me is more interesting than talking about the latest indian guy that's gonna
01:23:19.720kill wokeness because you know maybe wokeness doesn't exist in this world but it's um darpa
01:23:28.120funded study uses ai to detect violations of social norms in texts um and this is on a site
01:23:36.360called extreme tech but um it's got some some links here and i got the paper here pulled up
01:23:43.000in front of me this is on actually on nature.com um the title of the paper itself is ai for
01:23:50.120identifying social norm violation this was published in 2023 but i'll just read the article
01:23:55.760that references the paper here it says the pentagon's the pentagon's defense advanced
01:24:02.100Research Projects Agency, otherwise known as DARPA, a name that's known to a great many people
01:24:07.300in our scene. DARPA has always been at the forefront of artificial intelligence, driving
01:24:13.000the technology forward. So it's no surprise that we have some pretty definitive views as to where
01:24:17.840it's headed. There's been a lot of hype and bluster about AI. Talk about a singularity that AI will
01:24:25.140exceed the capability of human beings, maybe even displace humanity. We're going to take a much more
01:24:30.600level-headed approach, an attempt to demystify, talk about the technology, what
01:24:35.640it can do, what it can't do, and where it's headed. Back to its very beginning,
01:24:40.800DARPA has been at the forefront of support, advocacy, and leadership in
01:24:45.100artificial intelligence. J.C.R. Licklider, the first director of IPTO in 63, set the
01:24:51.180foundation with a decade of work in AI. DARPA funded some very early work in
01:24:56.580and machine learning back with Project Mac.
01:25:21.240With funding provided by the Agency of Researchers
01:25:24.140That Israel's Ben Garion University have created an AI that detects violations of social norms.
01:25:33.120The tool reliably spots infringements on 10 different types of social norms, offering psychologists and sociologists a unique way to track human behavior.
01:25:43.200So what they're saying is that it can scan a paragraph of text or a chat log and rank whether or not the things you are saying deviate from acceptableness.
01:25:56.800And it says the tool identifies violations across 10 social norm types.
01:26:01.480And those are competence, politeness, trust, discipline, caring, agreeableness, success, conformity, decency, and loyalty.
01:26:11.440and even though you know we can say what we will about the ai that's an interesting set there i
01:26:17.260never actually seen it laid out like that like here's the 10 factors that make it so someone
01:26:23.580fits in to whatever like the zeitgeist is right politeness so it could say like we can scan this
01:26:31.100text and even though there's no terroristic threats there's no there's nothing really that
01:26:36.200jumps out at you they can tell from the tone oh this person sounds a bit disagreeable a bit the
01:26:42.200thing they're talking about oh they're talking about the government oh but i detect um a bit
01:26:47.080of dissonance here with their they seem displeased with the government oh and they they seem paranoid
01:26:53.260uh-oh so but and they also do seem disciplined so they're disciplined and they're paranoid let's flag
01:27:00.160that so that they found and this is just a test they did at this university but like all
01:27:07.900conspiracy theories we come back to well why not right yeah why wouldn't this be used and why
01:27:16.240wouldn't this be used in a in a world where we already talked about at the beginning the topic
01:27:21.820of the day is misinformation that's all any site is talking about just with different tones and
01:27:27.660different you know language but it's the you know fake news versus misinformation it's the exact same
01:27:34.280argument that's occurring okay so this is going to be used hypothetically to ferret out the
01:27:40.980misinformers um and and it can be used to get all the you know anti-social personalities and what
01:27:48.540defines an anti-social personality of course and i i just thought that was interesting to let people
01:27:54.820know that that seems to me to be something that if that's not being employed right now i'd be very
01:28:00.740surprised because we're used to you know your emails are being read so they're looking for key
01:28:06.680phrases you know don't use these certain phrases let's try and use dog whistles but this is a dog
01:28:13.280whistle detector this is they're trying to this is the equivalent of them going through your house
01:28:19.860and looking for fingerprints like this is like weird forensics like there's going to be
01:28:25.100and this to me is the scariest thing of all the idea of psychologists being brought in to like
01:28:31.720interpret these flags that they're not even talking to you they've got your texts and they've
01:28:36.640got the the printout from the ai and psychologist looks at that printout and diagnoses you based on
01:28:42.740that you're not involved in this process at all but it already has the stamp of academia on it
01:28:49.580that that's where i kind of see this going and i think that's tied in you know like we talked
01:28:56.940about with eric weinstein that this is all connected because it's like the world we live
01:29:01.620in we're already used to being watched all the time and that that was the comment made about
01:29:06.940zoomers too like they're in a world where they're used to being watched and being critiqued and they
01:29:12.220assume that everything they're doing is being recorded and they want that too they want to be
01:29:16.280recorded so we have these generations i don't know how to avert the ship i don't think that
01:29:21.700ship can be averted i think that's just the reality now that the successive generations
01:29:28.620might not even understand secrecy like we do or privacy like we do and they're full of plastic
01:29:35.780and and even the ones who are in that who don't like it they'll eventually not know any different
01:29:41.180anyway that's that's more interesting to me than talking about voting anyway yeah and it's it's
01:29:48.060telling too that it's not a big issue outside of our circles really like that it's like people
01:29:54.220are swimming in this water and they don't even seem to care so you know one more thing that
01:29:58.960eric weinstein mentioned is that he uses a phrase and it's probably another synonym for this or
01:30:05.340another phrase but he he was discussing jeffrey epstein and he described it as an anti-interesting
01:30:13.780phenomenon which is different than an uninteresting phenomenon because he says like this that jeffrey
01:30:20.720epstein's story is a slam dunk for a pulitzer prize if you were to really like uncover it like
01:30:27.000the journalists should be salivating about this because no one's really done the work to uncover
01:31:02.300And it seems that every news anchor, every pundit, every journalist out there is like, oh, no one gives a shit about the Jeffrey Epstein story.
01:31:16.140But it's so strange that that's just the opposite of interesting for the people who should find it interesting.
01:31:24.660See, this is one of the most uncomfortable things.
01:31:27.420I think there was a time when mostly when people said collusion or coordination, their presumption was, well, that's kind of, that's pretty far out there.
01:31:37.280We now know, like post Elon Musk's $44 billion adventure at Twitter, that there are these coordinating groups, coordinating social media with the intelligence community or with the Department of Homeland Security or with the State Department.
01:31:52.480we now know that we're living in an orchestrated court you know curated choreographed world
01:31:58.720and we can't know it officially but we all know it if we want to know and just like all the stuff
01:32:07.180we're talking about that that's why rfk jr was so interesting to me is like this is the only guy
01:32:12.680talking about vaccines the only guy i think in politics i've ever seen who's talking about that
01:32:18.060like yeah why aren't any why isn't anyone talking about this no one's talking about
01:32:22.060what happened during covid no one no one's taught no politician is talking about what
01:32:27.820happened during covid have you noticed that has anyone we're just done with that didn't happen
01:32:33.780according to a lot of them it didn't even happen conservatives no one it's done okay fine sure
01:32:39.760we're not talking about epstein like any of the big fucking topics that are on the horizon
01:32:44.320like i'd expect a couple of them to talk about this ufo disclosure shit like you know just it's
01:32:50.140in the news like can someone can someone just acknowledge that these things exist but they're
01:32:56.060anti-interesting phenomena and that's what makes me think that they actually matter or that
01:33:00.420investigation into them would uncover something that is more interesting and it's new and newsworthy
01:33:07.580like if you were to really peel back the layers on the ufo disclosure maybe you'd find something
01:33:12.480really fucked up something about maybe it is fake and we find out why they're doing this
01:33:17.440but i'll i have is any journalist really taking this seriously is any is any journalist taking
01:33:23.200that shit seriously no why what the fuck else is that what are you doing what else is there to talk
01:33:29.380about apparently you know fucking saying misinformation is a threat to our democracy
01:33:34.620anyway i got off on a bit of a ramble there what we got to do is we got to talk about modern
01:33:40.640monetary theory oh boy here we go this i led with warren moser because that was sort of a lead into
01:33:48.280this one this book which is more of a accounting of the history of precisely what we talked about
01:33:56.220last episode modern monetary theory the decoupling of the dollar from the gold standard and the
01:34:02.400current financial state that we seem to be in with multi-trillion dollar deficits um and
01:34:10.180and like what does that mean what can be done about it how did we actually get there
01:34:15.100and it really comes back to the central bank and this really comes back to
01:34:18.400the princes of the yen episode which we talked about two episodes ago
01:34:22.140this that's kind of like another story from across the pond during the 20th century what
01:34:28.320happened because a lot of the things that affected america like the great depression like you know
01:34:34.660the baby boom even like um you know like the the decoupling of the dollar from the gold standard
01:34:40.860that affected everyone across the world so you see usually when a huge economic event happens in
01:34:47.120america it's happening elsewhere you just don't really hear much about it uh the japanese example
01:34:52.620is just one but you know throughout fucking saudi arabia the same things are happening um so
01:34:58.380really it comes back to the federal reserve and it comes back to central banks generally and the
01:35:05.040same sort of power play that was happening in japan is happening in america sort of the power
01:35:11.060of the central bank versus the power of you know the people setting the monetary policy in america
01:35:17.740to set interest rates and whatnot and again feel free to jump in at this i i don't i liked what
01:35:22.980happened last time i want jump in call bullshit or expand or contract you know the credit that
01:35:30.260i'm putting out there um so really the book it's called the money revolution uh the money revolution
01:35:38.800by richard duncan subtitle is how to finance the next american century so what the book does
01:35:46.120is the first half of it is explaining the financial market
01:35:50.100and the American economy as it stands right now.
01:38:34.820the way that he explains it is all in many of the points he makes are kind of inarguable if you want
01:38:40.940to disagree with them you have to dig into the rhetoric and the way they're explained like like
01:38:45.100as you say mmt is presented in an academic way as look this is just how things are we may as well
01:38:51.360use it to our advantage but you're my problem with that is you're talking past the deal you're
01:38:56.360essentially saying um we're currently being raped we may as well become rapists is another way of
01:39:01.420phrasing that right and that's the reason that i don't like it like yeah he is he like he's not
01:39:05.240proposing that they do anything other than what they're already doing he's just proposing that
01:39:09.040they they target it differently yeah and let me just to lead in with this um and i think i might
01:39:15.140mention it on the last episode too but i do want to just underline it here it's that and it mentions
01:39:21.720in this book as well as one of the dangers of this whole system it's like you always need to stay
01:39:27.300ahead of the deficit the idea is if you can just create credit infinitely um you still need to grow
01:39:35.020the economy at two percent every year to stay ahead of it and growth ever stops it all fucking
01:39:40.020collapses right um and there was uh one of our biggest friends of the show uh kel um we we were
01:39:48.940kind of discussing this and he's a huge advocate of it and you know a lot of people in our sector
01:39:54.700are advocates of it as well and they go well you know life needs growth to survive and you'll say
01:40:01.720that right you know you need growth to survive and the moment you stop growing you die so you
01:40:05.500always have to keep growing my maybe what would you call it metaphysical response to that because
01:40:12.360this this isn't me basing it on any study or chart it's just me intuiting that you can't grow
01:40:19.820forever like it's there's no life form that grows forever nothing in the universe seems to just
01:40:26.020or like maybe the universe can expand forever in a sense but like any energy producing thing
01:40:32.780anything that grows eventually contracts and dies we have never seen an organism that just
01:40:39.880lives forever and as i say that i i do know there's some organisms that can just kind of
01:40:45.240copy themselves forever i don't count that as growing necessarily like there's certain types
01:40:50.800of worms that can sort of clone themselves and produce exact copies but that to me is not like
01:40:57.020the a single organism that just keeps growing and growing growing and doesn't contract so
01:41:01.260the idea it just it just feels wrong somewhere in there to say that well we can just keep growing
01:41:09.900forever it's also just then it's the naturalistic fallacy like who gives a fuck about your comparison
01:41:15.080into nature even if it were true it's not true but even if it were i don't care because it doesn't
01:41:19.320apply to the economy it doesn't apply to groups of people in aggregate over time yeah so i'm like
01:41:24.440you know there's and this is actually what happened in princes of the yen um just as a
01:41:28.680rehash there uh you know the japanese war economy the economy that was mobilized for war that became
01:41:34.200mobilized for trade after the end of world war ii the argument there and a lot of people missed this
01:41:41.960But the argument there was that the Bank of Japan, the central bank, did reorient the Japanese economy from a mass production, arguably a war economy, to more of a service-based, consumer-based economy.
01:41:56.800And a lot of people will say, well, the Bank of Japan did that because they're greedy.
01:42:01.040Or maybe they were right, because the problem was that the Japanese, all their businesses, all their firms, they needed access to the global marketplace.
01:42:11.960because their consumer base was capped you can only sell and trade so much internally before
01:42:17.540there's just that much population if you want access to the global network well you had to
01:42:21.940play ball with the power players mainly america america kind of set the standard but everyone
01:42:27.260else the eu as well it's a it's a it's not a war that you win it's a party that you attend
01:42:34.040and so they realize well to attend this party we need to kind of change how we do things that will
01:42:39.940mean a stronger economy overall you know we can't like trade ourselves until we're the only companies
01:42:46.340left and well that's unlikely so the idea there was that there are certain prohibitions to growth
01:42:52.640unless you drastically change how you do things and the what changed was the entire japanese
01:42:58.980economy in the 90s into what it is today um that was outlined in princes at the end that part kind
01:43:05.540of gets missed at the end because a lot of people think that was just a wrong turn but i'm like
01:43:09.420i'm making the argument that maybe they were right you know even though they went about in a
01:43:14.440conspiratorial way but i'm like you know yeah i mean if you wanted to pin it on them like it was
01:43:21.020a huge disaster then you'd have to say japan is much worse off than the rest of us and will
01:43:26.460continue to get worse off and to be frank i don't think that's true i think they had a bad time
01:43:30.240with the asian you know market crash and the one was at in the mid-90s but at this point
01:43:35.080I would much rather Canada and the U.S. look like Japan than look like like industrially, commercially, economically.
01:43:44.180I would I would prefer to have Japan system than to have what we have right now.
01:43:49.200Yeah. So I'm just going to go through some of the points here that summarize how this all works and how this all fits together.
01:43:56.280Just to reiterate and just to bring people up.
01:43:59.120So while the Federal Reserve can create or retract money based on demand, it typically only creates credit and deposits in the accounts of banks. So can like increase the money supply and give everyone money. But usually what they do on the day to day or year to year is just make credit deposits in the accounts of these big banks.
01:44:20.420And then those banks lend that out in the form of loans to the businesses or the people, whoever it might be, usually businesses or people who want to start businesses.
01:44:31.160But that decision is usually left up to the banks, and those banks can operate in concert in a cartelized sort of way, but that's generally the system, how it works.
01:44:40.700And historically, the way this works was each bank and the Federal Reserve held its assets in gold and loans and government securities while the Fed's liabilities were credit creation.
01:44:54.680And historically, the Fed could only create credit based on its gold reserves.
01:54:04.700AOC thinks that this would be ā AOC believes that niggers are the most productive people on earth, and if only we would give them enough money, we would be living in Wakanda, right?
01:54:14.900So there is a metric for figuring out what's productive, and it's called the market, and that's what we use.
01:54:20.860So if you're not using the market to decide what is productive, you're just ā you're falling into the exact same trap of the left-wingers who just want to throw money at a thing that they think will be good.
01:54:31.900He does address this a bit later in the book, but I do want to just also call attention to that, which is true because, you know, it's easy to go down this pathway and forget that central planning typically has a poor track record on this.
02:02:14.980And I do think it's interesting if you look at the gold and silver market, not to go on too much of a tangent here,
02:02:20.560but if you look at the gold and silver market, and a lot of people thought for a long time that they should shoot to the sky,
02:02:24.680and they have gone up quite a bit, but you have gold and silver ETFs and other financial devices which operate similarly to fiat now.
02:02:32.980So gold itself as traded on on, let's say, a futures market is almost fiat in the sense that you have a couple of global organizations that artificially raise or lower the supply of the of the contracts for for these paper gold.
02:02:45.360Right. But with crypto, because nobody can increase it or decrease it artificially or sorry that you can't increase it artificially.
02:02:54.520It it does actually follow the inflation of the of the other government currencies, the fiat currencies.
02:03:00.100and so what have you seen you've seen it go from a dollar to two dollars to fifty dollars
02:03:03.860to sixty thousand dollars like a few years ago and now it's back now what is it like it's eighteen
02:03:08.900thousand canadian or something right now but like if it is interesting that you you're watching
02:03:14.580right now bad bad money driving out good the good money is fleeing into other types of currency
02:03:20.040which are protected like like bitcoin and you can't even you're not even protected in gold
02:03:25.120right now because the way that they run the gold market so yeah it's it's it's really interesting
02:03:29.740how it all fits together because like this is what he's saying the money revolution actually was
02:03:34.700it was um when america was freed from its obligations during the bretonwood system
02:03:39.740and he had this free floating exchange rate and fiat currency by fiat meaning it's mainly just
02:03:46.260backed by the authority of the government and he says like monetary if you actually look at the
02:03:50.300monetary policy because the monetary policy is just the rules about the money about the interest
02:03:54.880rates and everything like that and he says it's usually nothing more than the board of the federal
02:03:59.000reserve deciding whether or not to expand credit or set interest rates and he said like the explosion
02:04:04.760of credit growth in the 60s meant that america the american economy was reliant completely reliant
02:04:11.080on credit for growth um and you know a lot of people like that because you know some people
02:04:16.280say that oh it pulled all these nations out of poverty i'm which i am skeptical of because
02:04:21.960you're pulling out of pulling a nation out of poverty means that like the poverty line is set
02:04:27.240at like a dollar a day and you made so people make one dollar and one cent a day you know i mean
02:04:33.180yeah yeah the poverty line yeah it could be a bit of a trick too but you know it was the 1960s and
02:04:40.180this influx of credit um he says this uh turned america from capitalism to creditism and that's
02:04:47.760a word i thought you might like especially because yeah so like we're not even in a capitalist
02:04:52.560paradigm anymore we're removed from that this is literally just credit creation and trying to
02:04:57.840outpace credit creation pointing out that if we don't have credit growth the economy goes into
02:05:04.480recession and if credit contracts we have a depression so we're now the u.s economy now is
02:05:11.360dependent on credit growth and the book part two shows that any time total credit in the u.s
02:05:17.680And this is adjusted for inflation. Anytime total credit grew by less than 2% from 1950 up until the crisis of 2008, the U.S. went into recession. So we need at least 2% credit growth adjusted for inflation just to stay out of recession. That happened. There were nine recessions between 1950 and 2009.
02:05:40.320And so you said up until 2007, we get into the modern days, the problem was the Fed and the banks created more credit than anyone could ever even begin to pay the interest on.
02:30:52.620easiest thing to do yes it is anyone you could go whack off for free
02:30:59.140people don't know this the whacking off is free all you dumbasses out there been paying to whack
02:31:05.880off damn fuck i've got to wrap this up i've got to say the last little bit here because i want to
02:31:11.060do this book justice so one model for what he's talking about is the federal government adopting
02:31:16.800a venture capital model with a 60-40 split on returns, where the companies that are kind of
02:31:23.180more invested by the government will be listed on the NASDAQ with taxpayers receiving the 60%
02:31:29.100of those returns. That's kind of one model he is for like the innovation. He said American
02:31:36.100investment in technology declined from 7.1% of the GDP to 3.1% since the 1960s. And he says,
02:31:45.560well what does that mean how does the government invest in technology that's what we're talking
02:31:49.900about right now right and that's one thing that you're concerned about is the government just
02:31:53.360owning all this tech it says there's three types of technological research basic research applied
02:31:59.300research and experimental research in america uh has slowed down all this research in the past
02:32:05.740decades being overtaken by china and he said the government spending in basic research would be
02:32:11.700the key here so basic research is essentially what they did with the internet and uh what they
02:32:18.320did with semiconductors so that's like very very like basic stuff then applied research is the
02:32:23.960companies that take that and make stuff with it so he was saying well if we get the government to
02:32:29.040invest in basic research like the nuts and bolts shit the boring stuff and leave applied research
02:32:34.980to the private organizations um that would be one way to do it so it wouldn't be like necessarily
02:32:40.760governments owning companies they would just be doing this research that isn't even economically
02:32:46.140feasible for a lot of private companies like a lot of private companies like when it comes to ai
02:32:50.980they're kind of doing it now but a lot of the research is very front-loaded and venture capital
02:32:56.440owns that completely but it's like well what if you know like the real rigorous like getting
02:33:00.600quantum computing going getting a lot of like the genetic research done like maybe we take care of
02:33:05.700that and make it open source and then you know the other company kind of what like the fed does
02:33:11.380with the banks which like we'll give you the credit you figure it out so that to me was a
02:33:18.480hybrid model of the central planning and the free market like you were talking about which is kind
02:33:24.680of i know we don't like the whole way it's done right now but the model which is like the there's
02:33:29.740the central planning of like the bank releasing credit, but who the loans go to is done by the
02:33:35.600banks or the credit unions or whoever might be. And there might be a model here. If the problem
02:33:40.700is the commercial banks, because a lot of people have problems with commercial banks, is there
02:33:45.180a more tweaked model where more credit goes to like credit unions and they can lend to smaller
02:33:54.320organization you know i mean like maybe there's a way to rejigger this where it's it's a hybrid of
02:34:00.800it maintains what you like about pre uh free market innovation and price discovery but you
02:34:08.260see what i'm saying there does that does that affect your opinion at all no because i mean you
02:34:13.780can't again it's this it's the whole thing about like you're trying to you're trying to break
02:34:17.960physics you're trying to get around these fundamental a priori rules but like it's it
02:34:23.840it just doesn't work in the long run it doesn't work i'm already on board with you know there's
02:34:28.080cases like a war economy type case where you use this as a weapon against an enemy internal or
02:34:33.280external i've already agreed that that that is something that i would be on board with
02:34:37.480but um if and that's why i was saying a minute ago like if if the intent is to create these
02:34:42.680technologies as a weapon to destroy the chinese sure if the if the intent is to create these
02:34:47.220technologies for our own edification for our own growth and stability absolutely not absolutely
02:34:53.320not people don't need ai people need sandwiches that don't have microplastics in them people need
02:34:59.080a water supply that doesn't have endocrine disruptors that's what we need right now
02:35:02.500and we need jobs and we need houses so we don't we don't actually need ai and every dollar that's
02:35:07.980put into ai is a dollar taken away from sandwiches that don't have plastic in it i'm very happy you
02:35:13.780did that and this is this is why i invest in judas coin i want to remind people because a lot
02:35:19.520people are telling some tall tales out there i am the original investor in judas coin yeah he wrote
02:35:25.760the code and i know what they want me to say they want me to say i go long on judas coin
02:35:32.880and i'm not gonna say it what i've just said was me saying what i wouldn't say which isn't
02:35:39.440me saying it haven't said it nevertheless it shall be clipped i like that because really i
02:35:45.340think that recontextualizes the entire thing which is what is the sum total of all this what is the
02:35:50.800sum total of all of this innovation it's microplastics in your fucking sandwiches isn't
02:35:56.220it yep yep the sum total of all of this is the latest human generations in the west being bored
02:36:04.460with fucking neural diseases and that the only technology we can invest in is like how can we
02:36:10.720make ourselves less human because that's the thing like every if if the plan is the plan going
02:36:17.100forward is to supercharge in the direction of gene editing and quantum computing like it sounds like
02:36:23.380there's no good end to any of this and i think to again once again circle back to my original
02:36:28.520concern and my trepidation with the entire system it's like something feels wrong here i think a lot
02:36:35.460of people you get excited about this you get the mind reels at the possibilities of course and i'm
02:36:41.060still i'm interested in this and like i said i'm trying to draw a map for people to say let's let's
02:36:48.040look at the landscape find out where we are find out where we are headed right now where we'd like
02:36:54.460to be headed as long as we have the map we can figure out where we're going that's what all this
02:36:58.640is about i i don't see any strategy that feels good that's kind of my the thing i'm trying to
02:37:06.720get here and that's also the thing you're getting at as well which is yeah i'm saying there isn't
02:37:11.500one and and i understand why people want there to be one i want there to be one but i understand
02:37:17.420that there isn't one the only way out of this is extreme amounts of pain deprivation starvation
02:37:23.920in death it's the only way through this so i'm sorry but that's it's going and i'm not saying
02:37:29.060i'm going to do it i'm just saying like you've wound the economy up like a spring at some point
02:37:32.660it's going to snap back you can't break physics what goes up must come down because and also just
02:37:37.720to remind people this did already happen this was the 2008 collapse and they solved that with
02:37:44.140you know creating all this this deficit but like you it could we know what it feels like when this
02:37:50.340happens so just imagine that magnified by the amount of leverage out there and also remember
02:37:56.400let's just say this the we talked about the cause of the 2008 uh collapse the 2006 2008 collapse was
02:38:04.160over leveraging no liquidity and bad debts like well chris do you think it's possible that a bank
02:38:10.560can loan bad debts again do you think there's a reality where something could be invested maybe
02:38:16.840they're not geniuses maybe they they still do allocate the money properly as long as that can
02:38:23.140happen that's always going to be an axe dangling over your neck yeah absolutely even within the
02:38:29.840model even within most like all we need to do is allocate this money to the good stuff it's like
02:38:33.700well what are the chances like you're first we need to start from a position of we need the
02:38:39.620government to be staffed by completely different people yeah like you need for this to work banks
02:38:45.280You need the people making the decisions to actually have our best interests at heart and to have a governmental system which is robust against corruption, which we have the exact opposite. Democracy is purpose built for corruption.
02:38:59.000this is the thing like i the system is interesting but let's also recall we need to sweep everyone out
02:39:06.900of the banks and government to start doing this because like no one in there right now would you
02:39:11.660want doing anything they're trying to do it right now and what they're trying to do is give three
02:39:16.080trillion dollars to like every black person in america yeah and and not even really try and
02:39:22.080figure out if they're descendants of slaves just to everyone like that's what the democrats want
02:39:26.260to do which is retarded but like the republicans are giving trillions of dollars to raytheon so
02:39:30.680that they can make missiles which they fire into the side of a hill just so they can keep their
02:39:34.440budget so like in both cases the money goes to to something anti-productive not only is it not
02:39:40.000productive it destroys resources yeah all right i think that's we've got a bit over i think that's
02:39:46.240a good end to it though yeah man all right i will talk to you next week super see you
02:39:50.800all right dimes judas welcome back to the show how are you guys doing
02:40:11.080thrilled yeah chilled to be here yeah good man thank you thank you for having us
02:40:15.560yeah you guys are coming off the the lofty heights of uh advertising on the pete quinones show so i'm
02:40:22.100glad you can still condescend to show up here i can deign to come down to the jay burden show
02:40:28.260what my one of my top shows by the way yeah one of the very i don't get excited about nothing no
02:40:33.920more but i like i like me some jay burden well that's good because i i stand by this look like
02:40:39.540if you if you spend a long enough time on this part of the internet you've kind of realized
02:40:43.040you're not a normal person but uh the the two shows that i recommend to people who aren't you
02:40:48.140know fully down the rabbit hole is rn mcintyre for obvious reasons because he's you know he's
02:40:52.720someone you can show to your mom and then your guys's show because it's funny enough that you
02:40:56.320can kind of like get along on that and not notice that like wait a minute did those guys just
02:41:01.540reference schmidt you know wait a minute i'm a cool genius now
02:41:06.700so anyway you show and your fucking your cock and balls are bigger
02:41:13.560can that be the new tagline on like you know apple podcast i got so many shirts i need to
02:41:22.360get printed that's one of them you guys have probably the funniest merch like by far like
02:41:29.320most people it's just like lazy youtuber merch right where it's like their logo or something
02:41:33.000And then you guys went full on, you know, schizoid with it.
02:42:58.220the amount of time I put into the sound effects and like the background music it's I'm not I
02:43:04.720don't even know why I'm giving you a peek behind the curtain there's nothing good behind this
02:43:08.140curtain I should shut up so so you you and I you and I guess all of us are not here actually just
02:43:15.860to talk about podcast or inside baseball you know as much as some people may want that we're actually
02:43:20.360here to talk about kind of a heady topic which is which is crime and punishment so this is based
02:43:27.960on a segment that you did a while back on a book by Foucault about mental institutions,
02:43:37.740correct, about the asylum. That's right. Yeah, it's called Madness and Civilization by Foucault.
02:43:42.780The subtitle is A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason.
02:43:47.900So I think that we should probably start this at a pretty distant level, right? Because Foucault
02:43:54.620has become kind of a dirty name in broadly right-leaning circles. So I'm curious, what led
02:44:01.760you guys to discuss that thinker? Because he's kind of off limits for the right, more generally
02:44:07.780speaking. Yeah. And if you look at Foucault's biography, and a lot of people will know of
02:44:12.920Foucault, but if you look him up, he reads like just an unending list of the things that we should
02:44:18.960hate um he's one of the more degenerate thinkers um and he would run towards that uh we were joking
02:44:26.560the other day about how he comes from a time when everyone was being a little gay and the real gay
02:44:32.880guys were dead dogs and that was him like it's such a debauched live like his his biography is
02:44:40.080insane um but um one of the things that i've said a few times on the show and i'll say it now
02:44:47.760it's that I often don't agree with the conclusions of many what we might call leftist thinkers
02:44:54.260but I like their starting points and so the works of Foucault despite what we might think about him
02:45:01.180I found a lot of his ideas very interesting and I would say the same thing with Slavoj Zizek I
02:45:07.500would say the same thing about Marx I would say the same thing about several I was always
02:45:12.780historically against anarchists until you give anarchists a chance and then i came out the other
02:45:17.900side i'm not an anarchist but i found there's good stuff in there and i think if you're a serious
02:45:22.940person and you want to treat these ideas serious and you'll find things that are interesting and
02:45:27.980so for example like foucault you know on the right what we might call the dissonant right you won't
02:45:33.420see a lot of people really digging into crime punishment imprisonment how we treat madness
02:45:41.500the reasons that would lead us to exclude people from society some people on the right would just
02:45:46.860take that for granted they of course you exclude people that don't fit in but i liked that someone
02:45:52.020was willing to put that under the microscope and i never really considered that before and
02:45:57.820i did you know with madness and civilization we can get into that in a minute but um by the end
02:46:03.340of it he was offering a lot of prescriptions i didn't agree with but the historical pathway
02:46:09.220there I thought was pretty illuminating about like the evolution of our concept of insanity
02:46:15.960that's a bit of a meandering answer but there you go I sort of think that the the right has
02:46:23.300come to a healthy relationship with libertarian thinkers right like Hoppe or Rothbart which is
02:46:29.360basically yeah these guys have some some pretty good you know diagnoses but when it gets to like
02:46:35.020the insurance-based state that's probably a little bit stupid. And it would probably be nice
02:46:39.880to kind of come to, you know, kind of an understanding like that with, you know,
02:46:43.840certain figures on the left. Because in addition to Foucault specifically, I've been reading a
02:46:50.560series of books kind of by accident that dovetail neatly with Foucault. And it's Gene Wolfe,
02:46:58.800right the book of the new sun which i did an episode on a few weeks back it's in cold blood
02:47:05.060by truman capote and then this book which i've read which i can never remember the name of because
02:47:10.340it's it's somewhat clunky discipline and punish by foucault so obviously you know i haven't read
02:47:16.520you know you and i haven't read the same foucault books but there's enough overlap in his thinking
02:47:21.980you know from me reading this volume and you reading that one that i think it's it's worth
02:47:26.400a discussion. So Discipline and Punish starts off with a somewhat, I think it's intentionally
02:47:37.300upsetting, you know, recounting of, you know, this torture of, I think he was an attempted
02:47:43.620regicide, right, this guy who attempted to kill the king. And essentially, he's quite literally,
02:47:49.520you know, ritually, you know, ripped apart, you know, burned, and then drawn in court.
02:47:53.760And so this sort of serves as kind of the evocative opener to it. And from that,
02:47:59.840Foucault goes on to make a series of claims about punishment. So one of them is actually a claim
02:48:07.760about like civilizational confidence, which I think is really interesting. And what he says
02:48:13.980is the public execution is a thing of civilizational confidence, because that's the
02:48:20.680society right the power going out there and saying yeah i'm in charge and if you cross me
02:48:27.600i'm gonna rip you apart with horses you know and display your decapitated corpse and uh i don't
02:48:35.280know that's one of those things where it's like i think he kind of has a point with that you know
02:48:39.840that it is sort of a a feature of a you know kind of a confident self-aware sort of power do you see
02:48:48.840what he's getting at there yeah yeah and he's got a parallel with that in madison civilization this
02:48:54.020is one that always stuck in my mind was he was talking early on about how dealing with the
02:49:00.140insane or dealing with uh the anti-social personalities maybe include witches in that
02:49:05.340if you wanted to they were dealt with in the public's square and there's a ritualization
02:49:11.400of the entire process and he was tracking how eventually we move that process into the shadows
02:49:18.380We move that to the fringes of society, which allowed it sort of mutate and propagate.
02:49:23.540But like early on, you see more of a synthesis between dealing the society dealing with itself in this way, rather than kind of pushing it to the margins and forgetting about it.
02:49:35.320And that sort of almost industrialized segmentation of society.
02:49:39.060I always thought that was interesting.
02:49:41.680He makes that point with execution as well.
02:49:44.960And he talks about the transition from the public torturing to first beheading, right? Where every capital crime is punished the same way. There's no ritual part of it. There's no idea that the punishment should fit the crime, right? That if you're an arsonist, you should be burned to death or something like that.
02:50:07.860then to the guillotine where it's fully mechanized, and then to kind of the modern 20th century
02:50:14.400execution, right? Where after this series of appeals, you're kind of rushed off to a shed
02:50:21.480in the middle of nowhere where you're strapped up to a lethal injection machine. And that's
02:50:28.840actually something really interesting in Truman Capote. Because in this book, In Cold Blood,
02:50:34.840just for you know those who haven't read it it's in three books the first one can you know kind of
02:50:40.720chronicles the you know the the commission of the murder and then our you know our perpetrators on
02:50:46.000the run then the the trial and and then finally the imprisonment and the execution and the way
02:50:52.040the execution is described you know where there's a doctor attendant and specifically he talks about
02:50:58.440the transition point from there being a priest present you know in this even in this horrible
02:51:03.260torture, right? The priest is there, you know, granting the, you know, the, the, and they call
02:51:08.020him the wretch, you know, multiple times absolution, right? There's a doctor there to ensure that
02:51:13.060there's no physical pain, you know, that everything is, you know, medically done. And I think that
02:51:17.920that transition from the priest to the doctor is an interesting one. Is that mirrored in his other
02:51:23.480work? I'm not sure. Is that mirrored in Foucault's? I did, there's nothing like that in there, but
02:51:31.400you just said something there that i found kind of fascinating which was that and maybe you'll
02:51:36.980get to this later but there does seem to be a transition from and he gets to this in a mad
02:51:42.820civilization where you would treat the insane like vegomods almost like animals and then they became
02:51:50.080almost human or superhuman over time in the same way that execution turned from you're killing
02:51:56.700someone to you the we are killing someone like an animal versus we are murdering someone and it's
02:52:04.040like we're we as a society are murdering an individual so we need to take all these extra
02:52:09.280steps whereas previously it would be like well this person's just some some something other than
02:52:15.260us let's just shoot him let's just get rid of him as we would a rabid dog and i think part of the
02:52:21.960the whole discussion on execution is just trying to reconcile those things.
02:52:26.060And if you talk to most liberals, they'll be like, like there's state execution.
02:52:30.620That means I'm murdering them, which is a strange way for that whole process to evolve.
02:52:37.700And it's sort of tied to, and this is not something that Foucault talks about,
02:52:42.340but I feel like it'd be cooler if he did.
02:52:43.960and that's the kind of the the confluence of the idea of a citizen and like the polity itself
02:52:53.820because you know when you have no political power right like if you're a serf does the government
02:53:00.980really represent you you know like are you guilty for the actions of your state
02:53:08.140realistically no but that moment and this is interesting from a french perspective because
02:53:14.280the french sort of innovate this that every oh did we lose judas yeah he's not here right now
02:53:22.160hold on just keep going you'll probably yeah sure i'll bring him back in but the moment in which
02:53:27.780you know every person becomes a a citizen right the first thing you see associated with that
02:53:34.620is the levay on mats right now okay now every man is a soldier the whole the whole society becomes
02:53:41.840militarized but also right now you as a citizen are morally accountable for the actions of your
02:53:50.680state so that that sort of enables total war you know because now when every part of society is
02:53:59.360on a war footing you know part of the war machine now you know civilians become kind of war material
02:54:06.420and so they're simultaneously given guilt and like a certain level of kind of like
02:54:13.040false participation do you see what i'm getting at there dimes yeah yeah you'll just like with
02:54:18.020the evolution of madness you start you see the evolution of how we understand crime over time
02:54:23.260like you were just saying um and in madness and civilization i had always found it interesting how
02:54:28.180uh madness at various points in any by the way let me just say that he focuses primarily on
02:54:35.620europe in this there might be a case be made that it was different in the east or elsewhere
02:54:42.100but he's pretty much focused on europe um and that was i was working on an idea earlier today
02:54:48.860and i'm not sure if i am totally on board with it but it's i there's enough there of a germ of
02:54:55.220an idea where i think the distinct european or western i'm using broad strokes here but the
02:55:02.820european or western mind its tendency to systematize everything makes it makes us able to
02:55:10.800identify madness perhaps more effectively than an eastern mind and our last clip that we did
02:55:18.520um on we can find it on our odyssey channel i was talking about a academic paper that i had read
02:55:24.260that was showing um the different linguistic differences between how different languages
02:55:30.580would translate an english sentence and or it's english paragraph rather and that's a very
02:55:36.820interesting project because a paragraph is built differently in different languages which also
02:55:43.060molds how that individual thinks and so the author was saying that in english it's very direct
02:56:17.160makes it more effective at identifying that which does not exist in the system so we might have a
02:56:23.820more advanced conceptualization of what madness is and what criminality is whereas other cultures
02:56:30.200other peoples other races other whatever they might understand criminality and madness like oh
02:56:34.740you're just something that doesn't belong here but we almost pathologize and put it under a
02:56:39.740microscope and then a microscope within a microscope until it becomes this runaway
02:56:43.660like metaphysical thing but like in africa they're not talking about this is basically what i'm saying
02:56:49.680but hey that's just a different way i was i was looking at it that's kind of a meandering point
02:56:54.960but hopefully something's useful in there well i think so because you see this in the transition
02:57:00.840from the way punishment was in kind of the pre-modern world right where it's like okay
02:57:08.020you stole something we're gonna chop your hand off you know or we're gonna whip you a bunch
02:57:12.160or we're going to make you wear a silly hat and sit on a seat in public to being and you see this
02:57:20.500phrase like rehabilitative you know this idea that we can we can fix you you know that there's
02:57:26.800something kind of medically wrong with you that caused you to you know commit this crime against
02:57:33.520society and one of the interesting things about in cold blood is that both of the characters have
02:57:40.740you know these intensely horrible childhoods and you know it's said as much that that's why they
02:57:48.340ended up this way you know that if they had been that they were blank slates you know and if they
02:57:53.080had been parented differently you know if they had better material circumstances then they would
02:57:57.160have turned out all right and i should say you know in cold blood is quite a good book it's
02:58:01.600definitely written by a liberal it's definitely anti-death penalty but it's sort of a more
02:58:08.200self-confident version of liberalism in the sense that it is still a dialogue you know that the
02:58:13.780points that you know undoubtedly will be raised in this podcast are brought up in the book so it's
02:58:18.100worth your time for that if nothing else well i like that you brought up in cold blood because
02:58:22.740you know i'm just a bit of a pleb when it comes to this i'm more aware of the truman capote story
02:58:29.740and like the author of of in cold blood and his relationship with the killers than i am the actual
02:58:36.820work that he had produced which is arguably as famous like there's there's movies and books
02:58:42.040about capote but his in cold blood sometimes gets lost in the wash the the status of the figure
02:58:48.340but i don't know much about in cold blood so um just for myself and i suppose the folks at home
02:58:54.520what's your take on in cold blood sort of the arc of that story um if you could kind of sell it
02:59:00.940quickly yeah so as i've said before it's sort of it is the should we say based on a true story
02:59:08.880chronicle of a quadruple murder in a kind of sleepy kansas small town by two ex-cons and then
02:59:18.420kind of the story of you know what their life is like on the run you know you get a lot of
02:59:24.540biographical detail about them and then kind of see the change in the community after this crime
02:59:30.560And then, of course, you know, there's the spectacle of the trial.
02:59:36.240And through that, obviously, he doesn't come down necessarily on the side of the murderers, but he certainly shows them in a, I don't even say sympathetic, but a relatively sympathetic light.
02:59:48.260And I don't want this to come across as, you know, Truman Capote, the turbo libtard of the 1950s, the 1960s, because it's definitely sympathetic, but only to a degree.
03:00:02.860You know, these men are murder rapists.
03:00:06.300You know, there's only so much you can do with that image.
03:00:09.300So I'm curious, how about, you know, I'll turn this around on you.
03:00:12.920Could you give me the actual biographical details on this book as well?
03:00:17.020oh on which book in cold blood yes yeah you said you were familiar with the story of the man
03:00:23.280himself oh about Truman Capote uh what I know is what I learned from the movie Capote starring one
03:00:30.260of my favorite actors Philip Seymour Hoffman is that he was like you said a liberal but an
03:00:35.540intellectual and a homosexual and he became enamored with one of the killers during the
03:00:42.900process of writing the book and i don't think it the question always emerged that like did that
03:00:51.540hurt his objectivity with the story of the killers that he was so and he wouldn't say it's just like
03:00:57.000some kind of gay lust thing like he he was an intellectual so he intellectualized them in some
03:01:02.340kind of weird perverted way like that relationship was very strange because i believe they would have
03:01:07.400been on death row when this was occurring so you're like he's falling for someone who was on
03:01:12.960death row which is already crazy so like that's my understanding of the story and i don't think
03:01:20.280he's he's not particularly a villain but i i know that always hung over the in cold blood like oh
03:01:27.160was he maybe wearing rose tinted glasses when he wrote it i would say that that knowing that now
03:01:33.960that makes sense because one of the killers especially is is presented and there's actually
03:01:38.740a moment when was he presented with dewy skin and dreamy eyes in the book kind of yes and no he's
03:01:45.000described this is not in the book but mentally he's basically described as johnny bravo right
03:01:50.200like a kind of short guy who works out a lot uh with a bunch of tattoos and slick hair which
03:01:56.780was i assume not what he was going for but it's my mental image the mind explodes at all the
03:02:03.580dits that can come off of this it's got all these drawings in the book too they don't really make
03:02:08.920sense but if i even if he actually literally just drew like retarded johnny bravo just just with a
03:02:16.220shotgun just blasting away the like high school president of some small town well also because
03:02:21.760on one of the other hand there is there is a way to explore the pathology here of someone being
03:02:26.820attracted to a killer which women do because women would write murderers in prison why do
03:02:33.380they do that um especially if they're in prison for killing other women um but something and this
03:02:42.340is a question i'll leave up to the group because i don't have an answer for this so this is just
03:02:46.540a feeling i get being i'm in my mid-30s so i kind of grew up in the whole columbine era
03:02:54.340and the sense that i get is that sympathizing with killers seems to be out of vogue right now
03:03:03.080There will be obviously liberals who try and defend murderers and defend criminals, but it seems to me like the 60s would have been the peak of trying to get them sympathy, whereas now people are very, very exhausted.
03:03:17.800I don't see many people getting sympathy for any sort of mass shooter anymore, and maybe there was more in the past. I don't know.
03:03:25.020but i i'm actually i'm gonna strongly disagree with that uh i think it was nicholas cruz
03:03:32.040infamously had a lot of uh positive attention oh shit which was that the incel guy or is that
03:03:38.680believe it was it was it was him or whoever shot up the school in florida where uh david hog was
03:03:44.160yeah yeah you know what forget i said anything because now now i remember like oh yeah there's
03:03:50.220also that got the incel the supreme gentleman who's a elliot rogers yeah okay forget i said that
03:03:57.060shit maybe we actually lionize serial killers more than we ever have before never mind fuck
03:04:04.840well that's like that's the whole uh the whole circuit that npr was running for a while with
03:04:09.540that podcast serial right where it was basically like they found a guy who was like a pretty
03:04:16.500pretty open and shut to straight up like wife murderer and they're like well you know it was
03:04:23.4409 11 the country was at an all-time fever pitch yeah okay also so let's continue down this road
03:04:30.040of how wrong i am so now that's why i brought you on dimes dimes is an idiot because i'm a i'm a
03:04:37.720looney tune open up the gate right now because now because i i'm very passionate about true crime
03:04:44.440media in the sense that i think it's all hack frauds um and it started with my investigation
03:04:51.240into you what it started with me getting really into the west memphis three um with the series
03:04:57.320of movies paradise lost there's three movies then there's a documentary by guillermo del toro
03:05:01.840famous case with damien eckles and a couple other freaks um killing a few kids i won't get into it
03:05:08.760but that was like one of those cases where people were advocating about how they were these guys
03:05:14.140were innocent that they were railroaded by an uncaring civilization they were from a small town
03:05:20.200so any anything in small town america is obviously full of small-minded bigots
03:05:24.740and anyway long story short through my own investigation it was clear that these guys did
03:05:30.800it it's clear that they murdered three little boys and then just like that um making a murderer
03:05:36.800show on netflix remember that there was um i forget the guy's names but it was this famous
03:05:42.580that must see documentary it was like the first tiger king where you got to see this it's about
03:05:47.900how this guy's in jail for murder and he was railroaded by the small town chair he obviously
03:05:53.540did it he obviously murdered this woman but you get a director and you get a producer who take
03:05:59.500these guys on as their pet project and they like almost weaponize their sympathy and they're weaving
03:06:05.360this whole narrative about how they've been done wrong by society these guys are clearly guilty
03:06:09.520of the most heinous murders you could imagine and now it's but now it's just fucking everywhere
03:06:15.260that serial one is a great example to the point where if there is sort of a true crime documentary
03:06:20.900or podcast or show and they're trying to you know vie for someone's innocence i assume they're guilty
03:06:26.540you know it's some fucking weird cold case where they liked the guy's eyes in a photo or something
03:06:32.120and they're just i'm you know what i can go off of this for a while you know i saw the other day
03:06:36.060it was capturing the freedman's judas remember that one what capturing the freedman's no the
03:06:40.640documentary about this um i know we're on youtube i don't want to get too crazy with this
03:06:45.460it's a family of chosen pedophiles and again there's some people who are like they were
03:06:52.640these one guys are innocent very clearly guilty but the director's convinced of this one guy's
03:06:57.600innocence and again guilty of the most heinous child rape you can imagine dozens of victims but
03:07:04.340they're like no i think i think he's innocent like and you're committing your life to this sort
03:07:10.480of insane sympathy anyway this is just a total tangent but i could go off forever about these
03:07:15.960fucking frauds and it's it brings up a an interesting point from foucault where he
03:07:21.020basically says like look like the spectacle never went away it's just the spectacle changed
03:07:26.440and instead of being the spectacle of the execution right it's the spectacle of first
03:07:32.800the investigation right which is like a rational process to determine you know kind of like the
03:07:38.720the state of a human soul and then the trial you know and so now right the execution is almost seen
03:07:44.920as like a coda at the end of it you know it's just like oh well you know if it's in a particularly
03:07:48.800backwater state or country maybe we'll you know kind of like ashamedly you know strap them to
03:07:53.880an electric chair or something but the the trial you know and the the institution of kind of like
03:07:59.320the i guess the like the must-see trial is a is a very modern one you guys have anything to add to
03:08:06.260that yeah it's almost the trial is the execution in itself and i think a lot of people who witness
03:08:11.500trials now you're watching the social execution of an individual to the point where sometimes if
03:08:18.340they die later you don't care like there's a lot of cases right now where an individual is paraded
03:08:23.420in front of the court and if it's broadcast so they can be humiliated so you know what was the
03:08:27.860guy uh the george floyd guy the guy the cop Derek Chauvin yeah Derek Chauvin I should I should know
03:08:35.340this stuff what the heck but like that that was just like a total show trial everyone knows it
03:08:41.380and it's it's a it's a ritualized execution and if you were to hear that Derek Chauvin
03:08:47.800died in prison that would just be the period on the end of a sentence of execution basically
03:08:54.560and actually you mentioned something interesting there about in madness and civilization he makes
03:09:01.480a point um i think he puts the marquis de sade as sort of the pivot of this but how after asylums
03:09:09.040were established and they kind of existed in the shadows you saw sort of the the rise of the rock
03:09:14.340star status of like someone who is like in the someone who is institutionalized being dangerous
03:09:19.360and therefore cool and then then the relationship that society had so consider like how this
03:09:26.800started this started with civilization or the tribe or you have to think when this started
03:09:31.520it would just be towns and villages and whatnot expelling someone you want them to leave and now
03:09:37.000we're at a position where we almost want them back into society because they exist on the margins and
03:09:42.720they're they're dangerous and cool so it's literally the exact opposite of what they should
03:09:48.120be, which is put on a ship and sent down the river. That's where the ship of fools came from
03:09:52.820and leper colonies and shit. It's interesting because you mentioned that, that there's often
03:09:59.240times when, you know, when, when you say that, you know, Foucault has very interesting premises,
03:10:05.980but to, to, to very opposite ends. And, you know, we have a, we have a friend in common,
03:10:11.780right thomas 777 and he has a very interesting perspective on crime and punishment both as a
03:10:19.660trial lawyer and as someone who is who spent some time behind bars right and he's i'm not revealing
03:10:25.800that he said it himself and one of the things thomas 777 a trial lawyer he may not have been
03:10:32.280i think he was i might have been wrong he might have been a uh disregard that he is a lawyer
03:10:38.040disregard that disregarded that's going to the thomas 777 lore as far as trial lawyer
03:10:43.920source some guy who said something once on a podcast the word trial the word trial is all
03:10:49.820caps in it trial source it came to me in a thought yeah exactly i
03:10:56.240anyway sorry back to the point in hand and he brings up this idea that
03:11:02.760you know that prison kind of this idea to reform someone to kind of reach inside their brain and
03:11:10.100change it it's actually a really horrifying idea when you think about it that there's something
03:11:15.520kind of simple and plain about just like all right look you killed someone so we're going to
03:11:23.560kill you yes and we can debate the virtues of that but the idea that it's somehow better to
03:11:32.080be locked in a metal box where you're at risk of like non-consensual butt sex for 20 years
03:11:38.860and that's somehow better it's like and i say it in a joking way but it is it is genuinely
03:11:44.640monstrous but uh you know at least we don't have to look at it so it's fine right yeah what would
03:11:50.300you rather be just shot in the back of the head or be raped for 25 years and everyone thinks it's
03:11:55.760funny because that's that's what happens people say like oh don't drop the soap society thinks
03:12:01.820it's funny that you're being raped racially because it's usually by someone not of your race
03:12:07.440that's the thing liberals will add and then forget that they added that part
03:12:11.160um but you had made a point there and i don't get too far ahead of myself but this is one of
03:12:17.780the points he makes near the end of the book that i love and i don't have the quote in front of me
03:12:21.820I'm going to paraphrase it, but he was talking about psychiatry and he gets into the, the book
03:12:27.400goes right up until when he wrote it, goes right into the 20th century and Freud. And he talks
03:12:32.600about how psychotherapy is like sort of almost a manifold sort of prison. He says, I'm trying to
03:12:40.120think of what it was. It was, it's a different type of prison where the subject is constantly
03:12:47.040forced to analyze himself and the therapist isn't just a constant monologue with him so it's like
03:12:53.620a prison within a prison that never ends if you're in sort of like a mental hospital so it's like
03:12:59.720you're not even safe within your own thoughts and it's breaking you down personally and you're just
03:13:05.200getting uploaded all this stuff constantly sometimes forever and if you are an individual
03:13:11.320Even if you're not a criminal, I think you can expand this out to the modern sort of therapeutic state, wherever you want to call it, where like the prison is people constantly forced to self-analyze themselves and erect these prisons.
03:13:25.360We get very metaphysical here as a matter of course, but once you track how that evolves over time, I'm using the word evolve a lot, I apologize, but change, develop, whatever it might be.
03:13:37.720He mentioned that, and I thought that it just made the idea of being in a mental institution so much worse than just being shot in the back of the head.
03:13:45.980there's something and i think it's downstream excuse me of this idea that that that sin right
03:13:57.720that uh you know a transgression against the social order is it's not something you did
03:14:05.240right it's something wrong with you that you would do that so you know instead of being something
03:14:11.480that you need to pay for, that you need to atone for. It's something that needs to be corrected in
03:14:17.860you. So instead of, you know, instead of saying like, all right, you know what, you, you know,
03:14:25.840you stole, you know, to use it, you know, more Levitical, like you stole $10, you have to pay
03:14:31.880$30 back, right? You're making up for it. You know, there's a disincentive to do it again,
03:14:36.900you know or a more like corporal you know like physical punishment where it's kind of one and
03:14:42.220done you know it's instead you need to be reprogrammed right your mind needs to be remade
03:14:49.800you know so you won't be the type of person that does such a thing and i think that that's the
03:14:54.600horror of something like you know a clockwork orange right where it's this this horrifying
03:15:00.680you know, therapeutic, you know, state that wants to reach into your mind and essentially,
03:15:07.300you know, like mess with your neural impulses, you know, nudge you to, to, you know, draw
03:15:13.120allusion to that, you know, book of into, into being like a desired state.
03:18:57.860it might not be relevant to everyone but i think people can like like most people will detect
03:19:04.040something in society where it seems psychoanalyzation comes a bit too quick to people
03:19:09.880like we're very very fast to psychoanalyze and categorize people as mentally unwell
03:19:15.300almost as a convenience to shut them up but it's very like we're playing with fire here like
03:19:20.980we live in a society where everyone's kind of gaslighting each other all the fucking time
03:19:25.760and it's like that's it's a very strange way to live and i i do think it is the maximization of
03:19:31.360this sort of thinking and some people will say oh that's just psychoanalyzation in the modern
03:19:37.160psychoanalyzation that we they'll lay this at the feet of freud maybe but i like most things i'd be
03:19:43.200i'm really annoying so i'm always saying like oh it goes back further than that
03:19:46.420so one of the things that i think illustrates an interesting dynamic in this is the evolution
03:19:56.600of felonies so it used to be that a felony was a crime for which death was a possible penalty
03:20:06.100right so okay that's a very serious thing but but i was i was interacting with you know a friend of
03:20:11.940Right. And they mentioned that, you know, that their senior or their, you know, when they were in high school, the seniors played a prank on the school and it got out of hand. And she's like, yeah, you know, I haven't really thought about that. So she went back and looked at it and she found out that a couple of the kids who ended up spray painting the school caught felonies for it. Right. Which is essentially like a charge that follows you around for the rest of your life.
03:20:36.320It makes it incredibly difficult to get a good job, to do any number of normal things.
03:21:04.160you know and that kind of got me thinking on the growth of the felony that on one hand you know
03:21:11.320the severity of the state right that the kind of like these theatrical public executions have gone
03:21:16.660away but at the same time the number of things for which you are you know subject to state reprisal
03:21:23.640has just grown and grown and one of the things that i think is interesting about that is that
03:21:29.640you guys have made no secret of the fact that you are Canadian. And Canadian is kind of
03:21:36.360like turbo blue America. And I believe that you guys abolished your death penalty much before we
03:21:42.820did. Very proud of that fact. But you're also a country that euthanizes people. And to me,
03:21:50.740at least, it's interesting, that kind of relationship with state power in the sense
03:21:56.420that in one hand you know they're giving up their explicit right over life and death you know saying
03:22:02.700like oh well we won't kill you for disobeying us but on the other hand it's almost being given out
03:22:07.940as a like an administrative solution do you sort of see what i'm i'm poking at there yeah yeah well
03:22:15.260it's interesting because once you deconstruct it like that because you would think that oh
03:22:20.920these people and libertarians are probably like this where i'm i'm anti-death or i'm anti the
03:22:26.760state causing death but in this case people are celebrating the state causing death but it's just
03:22:32.760kind of pivoted away to we're not going to kill you we're just going to recommend that you kill
03:22:38.760yourself and let us do it for you so this really isn't about life and death at all and i think if
03:22:46.160maybe if you're a christian you would have a hard line on that like i'm just anti-death that's why
03:22:50.480we have that it's just a line you don't cross i don't care who it is but once you start taking a
03:22:57.000secular humanist approach then you'll find these very sympathetic people on the side of some of
03:23:03.380the most heinous arguably war crimes that you can imagine um and i think the problem is no one
03:23:10.100really thinks about it um people hear about it in the news but they don't want to admit to it and
03:23:15.700maybe this has something to do with what you were saying about where how death is in the public
03:23:20.380square and like it's all hypothetical like we're aware that the government is phoning people up
03:23:26.680and telling them to kill themselves but it's still abstract it's still hypothetical
03:23:31.920and i think just our relationship with death itself is is again too speculative at this point
03:23:39.560so judas it sounded like you had something to add i'm sorry i cut you off like no no no it's fine i
03:23:46.220just uh i that's kind of what i was saying earlier i think and you were kind of saying
03:23:49.740the same thing like it's on the one hand you kind of have the state saying you have a traditional
03:23:54.860moral judgment like you violated the rules you've done something that we view as wrong and we're
03:23:59.160going to kill you as a result your punishment is being killed and then in canada it's almost like
03:24:04.340like recently they uh they decriminalized possession of hard drugs at bc like that's not a
03:24:08.940crime anymore it's almost like nothing's a crime anymore it's you know like in california where
03:24:13.260you can walk into a shop and steal two thousand dollars of goods and they don't care in fact if
03:24:17.420you try to stop them they'll arrest you so you're going in that direction where nothing you don't
03:24:22.060have this classical morality anymore but it's not like the punishment went away it's just the
03:24:26.460punishment like you said is administrative it's almost like an econ like it's the the the metric
03:24:32.620for the for receiving the punishment is almost economic you know what i mean like if you think
03:24:37.460of the people that receive them made like the suicide program in canada it's largely people
03:24:41.900who are injured and can't work or are homeless um and then the government's like well you know
03:24:47.180have you tried dying and it's okay so we're not killing rapists anymore because rapists can still
03:24:52.780stamp license plates we're killing people who can't stamp license plates yeah i'm gonna go off
03:24:59.280on a bit of a poetic tangent here but as we're talking about this i keep coming back to this
03:25:05.460book that i read a long time ago but i really enjoyed it called darkness at noon and uh i read
03:25:12.340this around the same time i was reading a lot of soviet related stuff it's the story of um one of
03:25:18.020the first soviet revolutionaries living his life in the soviet union and him getting rounded up in
03:25:25.280one of the purges and his experience going through the the machinery of the state and kind of
03:25:32.240explaining his life story and i think you know you could read something like the gulag archipelago
03:25:37.300it could read a whole wealth of soviet knowledge but i think this story really encapsulates the
03:25:43.220entire arc of of the soviet man from the inside because he was like this guy's a diehard communist
03:25:50.000he really believes that he was one of the first guys during the revolution and it still turned
03:25:54.900against him so it's following his psychological break in a sense because this book i hope i'm
03:26:02.300going to ruin it and basically the book ends after this whole truck this the show truck not
03:26:07.180a show trial but he's being interrogated you know it's like it's kafka-esque in the sense that it
03:26:12.420doesn't matter what he did there's no case he can plead and they know that and he knows that it's
03:26:17.700just this strange phenomenon that he's going through and he just ends up shot in the back
03:26:22.800of the head he's walking down like there's no glorious execution they say here's he's walking
03:26:28.120down a tunnel this dingy fucking tunnel and underground and they said just walk and then
03:26:34.020someone behind him shoots him in the back of the head and what always struck me was that at that
03:26:38.880point he doesn't really give a shit if he dies and that's actually how the trial like kafka ends
03:26:43.820too the point being that after the whole rigmarole after the trial after the the state deconstructs
03:26:50.620you with its mechanisms you don't actually care when you're shot in the back of the head
03:26:55.340and that when i hear about the suicide thing i'm like we're all just being shot in the back of the
03:27:00.320head by the government and we're doing it in the shadows where no one can see and usually by the
03:27:05.220time it happens we don't even care because they've had they've engineered a situation where you're
03:27:10.620kind of happy that it's happening and that's a distinct and that was happening in the mid-20th
03:27:15.820century and it's kind of happening now except you're asking for it from the fucking fat lady
03:27:21.640on the phone that just might have been a depressing tangent but now you're in it with me
03:27:29.560no no there there's a i think it's the the stranger by camu uh you know a famous absurdist
03:27:38.400that features something it's kind of similar you know where it revolves around you know the main
03:27:43.240character you know murdering someone in in self-defense and then essentially the the trial
03:27:49.920wears him down to the point where he can't even he can't even really be bothered to defend himself
03:27:55.140and obviously it's an absurdist and and camu is you know kind of his own animal but there there
03:28:00.800is something about that where it's almost like you know the whole process of it you know where
03:28:06.380you know justice can arrive you know three four you know 10 years afterwards it it's sort of a
03:28:15.680you know, its own, like a ghastly punishment. And I don't say this as someone who's like
03:28:22.500particularly a bleeding heart, you know, but it does just seem like, like, do we have to do this?
03:28:29.460You know, like the other, other people were not encumbered by this. And, and as Ed Dutton would,
03:28:35.620would, you know, remind you, they, they had much different results. You know, Judas, you were,
03:28:41.160you were mentioning that you know the essentially like subsidized crime and in certain u.s states
03:28:45.920right where it's like most societies didn't need to do this to themselves and they turned out
03:28:51.440fine yeah and dutton would be the first to tell you him and many others that over time this has a
03:29:00.200striking dysgenic effect so you let crime like this run rampant for a few generations you have
03:29:07.600those genetically biologically predisposed to crime reproducing like you know people like to
03:29:13.840mention idiocracy that's kind of a reductive example but um there's this old alt hype video
03:29:20.280where i went through a phase where i was playing a lot of red dead redemption 2 and just having
03:29:25.200alt hype videos kind of on a playlist so i don't know which one it was but he was talking about how
03:29:30.520in the britain centuries ago the preponderance of execution just murdering so many criminals
03:29:38.960like brought the iq up and essentially genetically removed remove those criminal genes whatever you
03:29:46.600want to call them from the population which would be one of the reasons why you didn't see
03:29:51.460so many criminals just emerging organically which is to say if you remove that uh eugenic factor
03:29:59.260you will have this dysgenic propagation over time so there's real world results to this if
03:30:06.240you just let this happen and there's something to it as well that in in a way the rule to power
03:30:17.340and the rule to commit violence are the same thing you know and we started off this talking about how
03:30:23.260You know, the public execution was the result of a self-confident state. You know, that is a state that basically says, like, yes, I am in charge. You know, if you violate me, you know, everyone is going to see you, you know, publicly humiliated and destroyed.
03:30:40.520and obviously you know i wouldn't want to be the guy on the gibbet so to speak but
03:30:46.300when you lose that will to inflict violence you lose that will to power you know they're connected
03:30:55.560you're also connected to the to the to the will to wage war and i think that there is something
03:31:01.000kind of comforting about the fact that it seems like our elites don't really have the stomach for
03:31:05.000violence in that way uh that's a very good point no that's that's a great point and i'm glad you
03:31:10.840returned to that because i was thinking about that as we were talking about you know a con
03:31:17.040a nation that is confident in its own laws and its own values will be confident in how it deals
03:31:23.220with those who transgress especially those who are behaving antisocially so it would go without
03:31:29.220saying say yeah i'm going to kill you because you know you're you're an offense to everything we
03:31:33.160represent but an unconfident nation like does this nation the north america broadly does it
03:31:41.340even seem confident in its own punishments not really yeah except i guess with derek chauvin
03:31:46.500where it becomes the big show trial but even when we're not confident in executing people
03:31:51.980we're not confident about even imprisoning people anymore you know there might be some groups that
03:31:58.400there's only a few groups that are celebrated when we imprison them you know for most people
03:32:04.120it's like i don't think anyone's really comfortable with punishment period up and down the ladder
03:32:09.660now what do you think about that i think i cut you off judas pretty much yeah i was just going
03:32:15.660to make a comparison because you know we had bill c21 and the gun grab in canada and the big
03:32:20.940argument was you know there's all of these functional good moral uses for guns and you're
03:32:25.400taking them away and everybody kind of has come to the realization now that it has nothing to do
03:32:29.740with gun crime right it's because there's good uses for guns and there's bad uses for guns the
03:32:34.860bad uses for guns they're not talking about crime they're talking about us shooting politicians
03:32:38.180they're worried about us shooting politicians so so long as there's guns on the table and we have
03:32:43.400a moral normal justification for guns then the the bad use is always front of mind it can all
03:32:49.200it's not there now but it's easy for it to bubble up to the surface so it's easier for them to just
03:32:53.280say there's no guns on the table you're not allowed to have them there's no such thing as a
03:32:57.300moral and good use for a gun and everybody ought to know that and then it's much harder for us to
03:33:01.500cross the philosophical bridge to violence to overthrowing our government and i think the same
03:33:06.980thing is true of of of like quote-unquote murder or capital punishment is like it's again if if
03:33:14.040they have they want to have a monopoly on violence and create this huge philosophical divide between
03:33:18.760the population and the government there can't be any part of the society where violence is done as
03:33:25.240a as a symbol or as a ritual it always has like we kill people all the time in canada but we never
03:33:32.640have the word murder or kill or anything and we make sure that it's medical and it's quite quiet
03:33:37.480you know what i mean because if you have it it's like well hey the government is allowed to kill
03:33:41.360people and it is a bit of a spectacle well it's like okay well maybe there's a bit of a quid pro
03:33:45.940quo there sometimes so we're the only group politically that seems concerned with people
03:33:52.320wanting to kill themselves everyone else says well that's their right they should be able to
03:33:56.940kill themselves like no no one should want to kill themselves that's worse than killing someone to me
03:34:02.840like putting them in a situation where like they're they're begging for death who here is
03:34:07.600concerned about the suicide rate it's the freak shows on our side you know just like we seem to
03:34:13.380be the only ones concerned about pedophilia too weird how that works i'll put it this way you
03:34:18.140know we're in a dire strait we're in dire straits when my empathy is higher than the majority of
03:34:23.960people you know i consider myself an unrelenting just curmudgeon you know i just just a despiser
03:34:30.120of people and so what i'm like oh i'm the only one concerned we are we are in a bad place yeah
03:34:36.700let me just say for the record i am an idiot psychopath i no one i shouldn't be on this show
03:34:43.620i shouldn't be in a car i shouldn't be in a lot of things but you know that's that's more of a
03:34:49.600comment on society that i'm where i am well and i believe that you're legally not allowed within
03:34:55.100100 yards official material right like you're not allowed near a nuclear power plant
03:34:58.900it's like you don't miss it until it's gone
03:35:03.900you don't realize that i never got to go into it and then now well that's the thing you're like
03:35:09.880this i see why saddam wanted all this yellow cake it's just so much fun
03:35:13.680dimes you cannot go into the fucking old well museum like what the fuck i don't know why
03:35:22.500his mom always said there's one rule in this house and it's don't make nukes