01:10:31.020out if this is that's the sort of thing that
01:10:32.960you're into i really like this one um on that same wavelength uh i mentioned this a couple episodes
01:10:39.260back but i want to mention it again the blood satellite hats are still available the small run
01:10:46.260that we've been doing there's two different designs two designs and three different colors
01:10:51.800of hats per design so that'd be a red a white and a black and then they're trucker hats and they're
01:10:58.140custom made artisan constructed with partnership that we did with a great friend of the show name
01:11:04.500of mike of paul um he made those with uh these um leather patches that he laser etched with
01:11:12.400designs that we worked on together one is a blood satellite logo and another is an image that i sent
01:11:18.180him i like it a bit more it's more it's um the banner that we used to use for the youtube page
01:11:24.640it's sort of like this weird esoteric chemtrails thing so we i'd say the logo ones are selling out
01:11:31.800the fastest so if you want one of those go over to goodsuffer.com that's good suffer with a v
01:11:39.820instead of a u you can order those there they tend to ship pretty quickly they not only were
01:11:47.000they custom made for us we're handling all the shipping ourselves these are not print on demand
01:11:52.380products so this is the first one of these that we have done so if you would like to support the
01:11:57.340show and support this kind of extra effort and work being put into these products feel free to
01:12:04.160get one of those they're made very well they arrived the first batch i sent out arrived
01:12:08.560at the recipients everything is good even at this time of year in this season so
01:12:15.060it's happy to hear that also two other pieces of show related news one is that we had a new
01:12:23.040real secret coffee hours that was released on the paywall the paywall is located on patreon
01:12:29.780and also on gumroad you can find the links to that on our twitter our telegram or on our website
01:12:35.920bloodsatellite.ca so on the paywall you get the first 100 episodes of blood satellite
01:12:41.820you also get our exclusive paywall show real secret coffee hours where it's more of we go
01:12:49.640through articles and reader submissions um they tend to get pretty long one of my favorite ones
01:12:55.240was where i went line by line through the techno optimist manifesto um i've got some real interesting
01:13:01.680ones coming out in the next uh week or so i'm trying to i might have like a three hour long
01:13:06.900one that's coming up for the end of the year um i was trying to get these done a bit quicker but
01:13:10.880in true form they're taking up the remainder of my time a lot of these are like topping up at
01:13:16.740two and a half hours yeah um similarly on the gumroad the way i was releasing the episodes
01:13:23.540on gumroad was i would make a post i would attach the file release the post that would go on my
01:13:29.060profile and also be sent to an email uh recently gumroad apparently redid how they structure
01:13:36.240everything so for all of our subscribers um on there they didn't have access to the archive of
01:13:43.560the show because you can't really access the posts anymore and there was no episodes that
01:13:47.720were uploaded to like the content depository there but that's been remedied basically what
01:13:53.480i'm saying is if you're if you ever wanted to go and join all the episodes are available not0.71
01:13:59.280in post form but just in one fucking download area separated by two folders and for anyone who0.89
01:14:05.040was confused about where to access them the confusing should be solved by now and this was0.85
01:14:11.560not a problem that the patreon subscribers would have experienced but also i had noticed that um
01:14:17.200only the first 50 episodes are up on the patreon and that's been remedied as of the airing of this
01:14:24.420episode so all 100 episodes will be on the patreon so everything is everywhere all at once nice um
01:14:31.120And also one other piece of news I wanted to bring up was that we have friends over at the show Theopolitics and Psychopolitics and the Jefferson Lee show.
01:14:44.660And it's by Tyler Hamilton and that whole crew.
01:18:11.660Yeah, I know that's something you want to talk about. A lot of people have been asking us to talk about this. A lot of people are talking about it right now in various capacities. It's sort of a developing story. But I think it's something that we might dive into. Hopefully not too much in a vulgar way.
01:18:31.580but i actually specifically not actually to talk about what what went wrong and how can it be
01:18:37.080prevented and how can you know what one way to put it would be how can how can it be done again
01:18:42.680but better this time right i'd like to treat it like a debrief like what did we learn yeah
01:18:48.740without getting into sour grapes without getting into too much he said he she said stuff there's
01:18:55.840stuff that's going to be unavoidable but i think there's a way to look at this to do what we don't
01:19:02.500really do much of in this seed which is do proper debriefs um maybe that's something we don't do as
01:19:07.620a society like we haven't really discussed what we learned from covid you know like we kind of
01:19:14.080moved on from that we anytime something collapses or narrative ends very rarely do we like circle
01:19:20.120back and say okay what now that it's book ended we got a beginning middle and end what do we learn
01:19:25.080through this whole phenomenon that can inspire us or enlighten us in the future so there's something
01:19:30.760there's a lot to be learned from this um and and i think it's gonna be very interesting and we'll
01:19:36.120give you more information on that as it develops but that'll be in the new year
01:19:39.200so moving on now there's a couple things i wanted to get to so there's a book i really really want
01:19:47.000to talk about but i think it dovetails with this um article that i had seen someone passed this to
01:19:54.840me and it'll sound familiar to listeners of the show because it mentions a book that we've talked
01:19:59.320about before but this is on aaron wren.com it's written by aaron wren i believe this is a sub stack
01:20:07.060that's made to look like a website but aaron wren.com uh the title is become illegible
01:20:13.520become illegible and the subtitle here is in the negative world people should look at ways to become
01:20:20.360less visible to governments and their entities this was posted in december of 2023 so it's pretty
01:20:27.160recent so i'll just read some parts here and i'd love to get your comments on it as we're going
01:20:31.980through because this relates directly to what we were just saying before and i think you'll probably
01:20:36.240agree with the general premise here so it opens with the famous seeing like a state how certain
01:20:44.160schemes to improve the human condition have failed is an influential book arguing for skepticism
01:20:49.800about government programs to improve society and you know people may remember we did cover that
01:20:55.020book quite a few episodes ago uh in pretty exhaustive detail it's a fantastic book i would
01:21:01.140say it's my favorite book that we've covered on the topic of anarchism a lot of people wouldn't
01:21:07.400call it an anarchism book but i would because it's it's very hostile to statism generally
01:21:15.380um and it was basically what you were saying before which is that the vast majority of the
01:21:21.340time a government tries to standardize or centralize some form of power it tends to go
01:21:26.740wrong would that be correct yeah and i i said that that's politically agnostic i'm not saying
01:21:33.200left-wing governments do that i think right-wing governments are equally uh party to that that's
01:21:38.420just government that's just the fallibility of man essentially yeah yeah that seems almost just
01:21:44.980anthropological that seems scientific you know i mean like it doesn't need to be ideological at
01:21:50.820all um it says one of the key concepts is legibility uh one example of legibility is the
01:21:57.780introduction of land registers in medieval society rights to land were governed by custom
01:22:02.640were often not even written down and were highly idiosyncratic but by creating formalized land
01:22:08.840ownership structures and registries centralized national governments were able to among other
01:22:13.600things more easily collect taxes today everything about our society is designed around extreme
01:22:20.940legibility it's not just the government doing it the author of the influential newsletter the diff
01:22:27.540has one of the running themes of big tech sees like a state
01:22:32.440the key idea is that if you are not legible to the government and other entities it is harder
01:22:39.500for those entities to impose their mandates on you the legibility construct is something that
01:22:45.300we should take into account in what i've called the negative world where for the first time in
01:22:50.840400 years history of this country official society viewed christianity negatively this is perhaps
01:22:58.220also relevant to non-religious political conservatives but i think within the context
01:23:03.160of this article he's probably going to be citing the christian angle the most um he goes into and
01:23:10.300i like that topic i'm curious to hear what you think about that so basically it's you know if
01:23:15.860we understand how a state sees things the the task at hand is to make yourself invisible to the state
01:23:22.300which seems to run counter to what a lot of uh our contemporaries would want to do which is create
01:23:28.540big hulking organizations or make them as visible to the state as possible now what do you think
01:23:36.440about that i'm so far on that side and i'm so outnumbered that i've stopped bothering to even
01:23:42.660have the discussion but to me if but honestly it is so obvious that people who that people who
01:23:51.820actually do want to create big public facing organizations to me it's a it's a joke it's a
01:23:57.260big fucking joke but there's so many guys that think that that's still the way forward and they're0.64
01:24:01.720guys that i respect that i just i keep my mouth shut because i don't want to counter signal but0.77
01:24:06.960yeah i i think that the only way forward it absolutely is invisibility and illegibility
01:24:13.480yeah yeah and i think that's something that many of us on our side come back to when they talk about
01:24:19.260creating mutual aid networks parallel societies creating these ways to exist outside of the system
01:24:27.880and how we just define the system differs for different people but i think we generally know
01:24:32.500what that means when we say outside the system um and what we talked about before is how can you do
01:24:37.320that effectively without being noticed eventually and the book we talked about not long ago uh called
01:24:45.860the network state i think provided a model for that how you could use a decentralized model to
01:24:52.700sort of accrue capital and and members of your group and leverage technology so that you can
01:24:59.840kind of build something in the shadows to such a point that when you kind of do go public as a
01:25:05.500group you you already have something like uh sovereignty something like you have the numbers
01:25:11.700and you have the capital you need a moat i think they call it in business the idea that
01:25:16.440by the time by the time you're starting to take on risk you have a moat or a defense built up
01:25:22.480where if somebody when you make yourself a target and they come after you it's like oh wait a second
01:25:26.620there's this many people and we don't even know their names and they're behind so many proxies
01:25:32.880and but all of that is done two years in advance so yeah yeah and uh not to bring this back to the
01:25:40.340example we were just talking about which was uh the national justice party uh but they seem to be
01:25:46.400going about it that way which is like we want to create this big public facing loud ossified early
01:25:53.98020th century sort of construct because that will provide legitimacy and i think the quest for
01:26:00.240legitimacy and it's not just them who does this i think the quest for legitimacy sits high in the
01:26:04.760minds of a lot of people on our side um and what i like about this model like the negative world
01:26:09.460it's truly embracing like you will never go prime time like don't even desire that and your desire
01:26:16.180to do that inhibits you in some way and and this will bleed into what we're going to talk about in
01:26:21.500a second which is that this is how organizations operated for most of human history i would say
01:26:27.740like informal fraternal networks affiliations uh you didn't always have like this like it's very0.54
01:26:35.160easy right now to like get real estate within the fucking a first world government and it's like i
01:26:40.480have an office now i'm legitimate but if you didn't have that how would you build this sort0.74
01:26:45.820of decentralized network and have it be real have it be real in people's minds if you're not just
01:26:52.100because a lot of people will put on the pageantry of an organization like i have a website i have a
01:26:56.700logo i've got a mailing list this is real but it's actually it's less real than a bunch of guys who
01:27:02.280just know each other you you picked you picked the low-hanging fruit that you could do without
01:27:07.100actually building anything and then all of the real things that would demonstrate you know action
01:27:12.940and growth you you're not actually doing any of those so you know i i think often back to that
01:27:18.500book uh coup d'etat by edward lutwak when he says that by the time a coup occurs and the generals
01:27:27.700or whoever it might be sees the throne sees the presidency um and they are like driving the tanks
01:27:34.420up to the palace or the parliament um like those few hours where it's like that it looks like the
01:27:40.320mission being executed he's like well that's the last step what you didn't see was the six to 12
01:27:47.360months before that whereas laying the groundwork where like the coup isn't you driving up to the
01:27:53.400palace on an empty street the coup is making sure that when you drive to the palace nobody stops you
01:28:00.140it's making it it's spending the months and months of vetting people of creating this
01:28:06.420network behind the scenes of secret winks and handshakes and offering things to people and
01:28:11.840figuring out where they stand and making it so that the people who will stop you are neutralized
01:28:19.520the people who might stop you are encouraged to show up late to work that day and the people
01:28:25.900who don't really give a shit are kind of kept at a distance and assured that they'll be okay
01:28:30.700right that's a lot of work but a lot of people see the coup being executed and say you know what we
01:28:36.180need we need a bunch of tanks and guys in uniforms and we need to run up there and take it it's like
01:28:40.200no no the taking has already happened this is just the last step it's like you know when you
01:28:46.240march in the streets to celebrate something so we need more marches no you don't need marches
01:28:50.220the march is the cherry on top of the sunday of the what was the movement you know what i mean
01:28:55.800and we kind of miss that part on the right like we kind of get obsessed with the pageantry of things
01:29:02.300and not the the hard work of just straight up relationship building which is kind of what this
01:29:07.580is about and he gives an example here one example is the growth of informal men's retreats as i've
01:29:14.380noted before all men's groups and organizations are heavily stigmatized in our society and outright
01:29:19.860illegal in many cases church men's groups some remaining single-sex schools fraternities and
01:29:26.080fewer the groups are basically what's left and many of them have a target on their back
01:29:29.760witness the years-long jihad the new york times ran against the augusta national golf club
01:29:36.180to bully them into admitting women what's more even if an all-male organization managed to exist
01:29:43.480becoming a member of it could be hazardous to your health so to speak if the media decided to
01:29:48.140make an issue of it as they've been known to do um so what i've seen developing organically in
01:29:54.460response to this is men creating informal men's retreats these are not formally organized
01:29:59.920institutions or networks rather they are friends or birds of a feather who get together for a quote
01:30:05.400guy's weekend that is social but critically also has some professional purpose such as such has
01:30:11.880has a typo such as having speakers giving talks on leadership or particular industries because
01:30:18.920these groups are not incorporated they don't have official membership lists and may not even have a
01:30:23.340name they are far less legible to society at large and this you know people might hear this and think
01:30:28.720of oh this is what they do this is what like the the fucking presidents do when you hear about um
01:30:34.620these these retreats like i'm trying to think of the name what's that one where they do that0.94
01:31:06.880of care and all these strange esoteric rituals which they should but absent that it's still like
01:31:12.260all these important people just getting in a room unofficially and discussing official things
01:31:18.000so it's what everyone else does which is what we don't do we think like well i need to start a
01:31:23.720student club no they they need to like they the powerful people know how to make themselves
01:31:29.520invisible you can also make yourself invisible too it might even be easier because no one gives
01:31:34.560a shit about us um he says besides informal men's retreats another example might be house churches
01:31:43.180i'm not necessarily a fan of these but they are a standard part of the repertoire in other0.51
01:31:47.740countries where officialdom is not entirely friendly to religion such as china something
01:31:54.580like a house a house church or informal men's retreats don't make invisible but they do reduce
01:32:00.420legibility um so basically like there's one example here i just love this he says
01:32:07.840family or clan based networks are an example that in fact do operate in this manner in certain
01:32:13.720domains or particularly low trust environments they can be extremely powerful for example
01:32:19.580a group of ganjarati families from the town of palampur in india took over the antwerp diamond
01:32:27.240mine from the orthodox jews i never heard about that i gotta look at that story based i'm looking
01:32:34.800i just clicked that up on quartz.com how indian families took over the antwerp diamond mine from
01:32:40.340orthodox jews well i don't think you could publish that title in quartz even implying that jews are
01:32:47.520big into diamonds i thought could get you jailed oh this is 2015 when you could talk about that
01:32:54.000anyway i won't go it's not a terribly long article um but i i like what he's grasping at there
01:33:01.320i like the idea of illegibility which isn't you know you might not be able to achieve invisibility
01:33:07.760but you need to make yourself blurred you need to find out how to make yourself censored to the eyes
01:33:14.700of the state because you'll never truly be invisible but i think that's the way to look at it
01:33:19.220And like I said before, this is commonly what you saw across time.
01:33:25.560A lot of these official ossified organizations are kind of a modern invention.
01:33:31.940And interestingly enough, we'll get into that in the future when we talk about the structural transformation of the public sphere by Habermas, which is a surprisingly interesting book.
01:33:42.160I didn't know it would be as cool as it ended up being.
01:33:44.700but what i'm going to do is connect this to a very very large book that i read recently called
01:33:51.440logos rising the history of the ultimate reality by dr e michael jones now dr e michael jones is
01:33:59.760a name that might be familiar to a lot of people on the right he's written a great number of books
01:34:03.500and there could have been a lot of books i reviewed and there might be a lot of his books that we
01:34:07.260review in the future and i'd like to um he's often quoted in our circles some people love him some
01:34:13.380people hate him even on our side uh because he is a staunch catholic and a lot of people have
01:34:18.520mixed feelings on catholics and he's very outspoken on many topics um he tends to be
01:34:25.960very i would say what's a what's a word other than red pilled it doesn't matter red pilled
01:34:31.620on he's very uh vocal on jews and um obviously anti-semitism however on subjects of race maybe
01:36:29.860It discusses the concept of Logos from a theological perspective in relation to the time before Christ and the Greeks and a more ancient metaphysics.
01:36:41.060And I found that very interesting as well.
01:36:43.320And I just wanted to preface it with that and say that, you know, a lot of people listening to the show aren't Catholic.
01:36:48.660And I don't think you need to be to appreciate this book because it's an interesting concept, I think.
01:36:54.380And throughout the book, it touches on the Enlightenment.
01:36:57.140It goes through the development of the concept of Logos as it encountered the European Enlightenment up into the modern day and the transformation of this concept and how it evolved.
01:37:07.460Yeah, shouldn't use that word, but evolved over time.
01:37:48.920It seems obvious, but it's not obvious.
01:37:51.480And what we're talking about is roughly a thousand years of the best and the brightest engaged in a debate and meditation on what this means.
01:38:03.820He starts with this segment here that I found really interesting.
01:38:12.580He says, a man was returning to his home in Belfast one night at the pub when he was stopped in the street by a group of armed men who asked him, are you a Catholic or a Protestant?
01:38:25.260Since it was dark out, the man could not tell by their dress whether the armed men were members of the IRA or the Royal Ulster Constabulary.
01:38:34.080He said, I'm an atheist, to which one of the armed men said, are you a Catholic atheist or a Protestant atheist?
01:38:40.160if he responded by saying that he was an english atheist he might have been shot
01:38:44.300atheism has deep roots in english culture one might say that atheism is the core belief
01:38:49.720of the english ideology i like that that little line there because it implies that even the the
01:38:56.380religion extends beyond faith you know like are you are you a prostitute atheist or a catholic
01:39:03.280atheist i like that i think a lot of people even people who are listening now might say like well
01:39:09.080i've heard people say i'm culturally protestant you know and some people might not know what
01:39:14.460they mean but i think if you think about it a lot of people who don't have any sort of christian
01:39:18.780faith will still feel that they exist within that paradigm in one way or another especially
01:39:25.440if they're american and they just don't want to live in constant rebellion against that
01:39:30.980so i'm going to give a whole shotgun blast of stuff here and and judas as someone who was
01:39:38.160raised in the church i'd love to hear your thoughts on this as i kind of go through this to
01:39:43.660hear if this makes any sense or if you think this is all bunk or whatever so by the way before i
01:39:50.600start like are you familiar with this concept of logos at all i'm same as you man i keep hearing
01:39:56.100it around and i don't i haven't looked into it so i always want to know if this was like it's
01:40:02.140talked about a lot in catholicism but i want to know if it was like also a baptist or a protestant
01:40:06.080or a lutheran thing but anyway he says the logos was both god by nature while simultaneously a
01:40:14.480distinct person specifically the second person in the holy trinity the god the son of the holy
01:40:19.700spirit that's basically what john meant when he said the word was with god and the word was god
01:40:25.760the term with god signifies a distinction in person but not in nature god was logos in motion
01:40:34.360which meant that logos wasn't just a plan logos was a person who had the power to put the plan
01:40:40.400into action the universe has a logos which unfolds over the course of history
01:40:46.620if the lex eterna of the logos understood as a static plan providence was that plan in action
01:40:54.740reaching its telos over time providence is not merely a plan is the fulfillment of that plan
01:41:01.360in time the logos acts out of love and so providence is the plan put into action to the same
01:41:07.440love which moves through the stars and planets um he frames it like this the father is the one
01:41:14.160who generates the father and the son are one however the father is not the son because the
01:41:20.800one who generates is not the one who is generated the prologue articulates this relationship when
01:41:27.760saint john writes the word was with god and the word was god this passage demonstrates both the
01:41:33.600distinction of the word from the father and the consubstantionality of the word with the father
01:41:40.640logos is not an impersonal order of the universe it is a person in relation with other persons who
01:41:47.120are distinct but share the same divine essence which is synonymous with their existence there
01:41:53.120There's no distinction here between thought and being as there is among human persons.
01:41:59.100The word and being are consubstantial.
01:42:01.460The words in the beginning at the opening of the prologue of the gospel of St. John
01:42:06.040refers to the immutable state of God's being.
01:42:10.020Basically, what he's saying here is like you think of the Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit.
01:42:41.280And then you say, and the word was with God, and the word was God.
01:42:46.020Okay, I still don't understand what you're talking about.
01:42:49.080And I did not understand what he was talking about until I got to college and I started studying Greek.
01:42:56.460And then I suddenly opened the Liddell Scott Greek Dictionary, and there are five pages of English equivalence to the one Greek word, logos.
01:43:07.400And I suddenly realized there is a whole universe, literally, behind this word.
01:43:13.020Logos literally talks about the order of the universe.0.95
01:43:17.660This is what the Greeks did on their own.0.93
01:43:20.480The Hebrews had God as their tutor.0.62
01:43:46.720yeah it basically traces the the that that's sort of like the metaphysical philosophical approach it
01:43:53.560goes back to the ancient greeks it says the ancient greeks understood that man was different
01:43:57.720from all other animals because he could speak the word they used for that rationality was logos
01:44:04.100which is also the word for speech discourse language and other related concepts logos is
01:44:10.840quote the word or that by which inward thought is expressed um so really what we're talking about
01:44:18.300here is like the root of language when he talks about logos okay logos is the word of god well
01:44:22.760what's the word of god well it's language right so it comes down to the importance of language
01:44:27.920and communication and we've kind of talked about this before uh when we did our studies even with
01:44:33.240marshall mccluhan about like language as a form of expression but that form of expression fundamentally
01:44:40.020changes that which is doing the expression so an interesting way of thinking about like the word of
01:44:46.020god would be like god employing a type of media and that media effectively changes the nature
01:44:53.560of god like the creator using creation which changes the creator in a sense um and he describes
01:45:01.640it here communication requires two human beings and a language that allows them to communicate
01:45:06.720effectively immediately language can grow in vocabulary and sophistication once it exists
01:45:12.880but cannot evolve from something that is not evolution in other words can play no role in
01:45:19.440the cognitive revolution it's an all-or-nothing proposition which necessitates creation as its
01:45:25.360cause because all the parts parts being man and rationality and speech had to come into existence
01:45:31.600out of nothing simultaneously in order to function so this is kind of a common christian belief that
01:45:39.680you can't you can't just create something out of nothing you know and and that's where these
01:45:44.880thoughts get really really deep and so it's like you can't just a single person can't develop
01:45:51.120language you know you need two people to have a language to generate the this idea of communication
01:45:57.760and absent that how does communication or how does linguistics emerge so how does like the
01:46:03.600act of creation itself or the act of communication begin in a universe where there is nothing right
01:46:14.000and and he makes a good point he says um there every time that scientists are trying to teach0.65
01:46:19.200gorillas how to speak this was the main reason they were doing it he says the excitement
01:46:24.160surrounding washoe the line saint uh the sign language gorilla had more to do with darwinism's
01:46:30.780unfulfilled hopes that any ability of human speech could jump downward over the species barrier with
01:46:36.500which separates humans from animals so this is something goes into in the book which is like how
01:46:41.520how distinct proper language is to humans um and people are trying to say well you know animals
01:46:49.120have their own language and one of the ways they could prove this or they thought they could prove
01:46:53.360this was by like we can teach a gorilla to learn sign language and sign english but i think it's
01:47:00.740widely believed now that that was all bullshit that uh what they thought the animal was trying
01:47:06.960to communicate it was more like it learned that when it did a certain sign people got happy or
01:47:13.000got something but there's actually no evidence that it could cognitively grasp what it was saying
01:47:19.000you know i mean especially since the signs were so simple um it can never really express complex
01:47:25.380thoughts and it was down to the interpretation of the subjective interpretation of whoever the
01:47:29.780interpreter was so you know if if it if you cannot teach an animal complex human speech that does
01:47:37.360mean that speech is distinct to humans which in his mind strikes the heart of the darwin darwinian
01:47:43.280project um or um not the darwinian project i should say the dawkins project like richard dawkins
01:47:52.320and what's interesting is he makes a case in the book that i found interesting
01:47:56.480um he says that what makes the and a lot of people might agree with this what makes the
01:48:04.080christian but also the western understanding of history distinct from a lot of traditional
01:48:09.920cultures is that it's linear and not cyclical and a lot of even the indo-european ancient peoples
01:48:16.560would see everything is cyclical indians still see time and that's the kali yuga and all things like
01:48:22.620that whereas um logos the concept of logos allows us to believe that time is linear and that it's
01:48:32.940there's distinct points that don't always just repeat again and again and again
01:48:37.700He makes a case that to understand Logos was to understand God, whereas human beings, they lacked the metaphysical or philosophical tools to even ascertain what God was or the enormity of God or the abstractness of God.
01:49:00.600They can only understand God in very literal terms, in very pagan terms, and that you needed the Greeks and you needed these very distinct epochs in time to sort of elevate people's minds to such a level where they could grasp the concept of God, the concept of a singular God and a God that existed in this sort of abstraction.
01:49:24.440like yeah it's clear that you can know by natural reason there's a god you can't know whether he
01:49:31.080cares about you right and chances are he doesn't because why should he i mean if you're perfect
01:49:36.800why do you care why do you need anyone else and that was pretty much aristotle's god plato
01:49:41.820wasn't happy with this plato was more humanistic less scientific more humanistic in his approach
01:49:47.500and he came up with a a a demiurge the worker of the people that's god was the worker of the people
01:49:55.840and he cared for you but he wasn't transcendent because he was working for the people and so you
01:50:03.540had a bind here and this is where it ended basically you had two um visions of god that
01:50:10.980contradicted each other no one could resolve it and that was it it's that's the way we left it
01:50:16.140that's the way philosophy was. And Alexander wasn't interested in moving philosophy forward.
01:50:24.720He was interested in conquering the world. And in doing that, he was acting according to God's
01:50:30.180plan. So what you have here is both things at the same time, the development of Logos to a certain
01:50:38.720point and then it fails and also the notion that logos is moving in history and that god can take
01:50:46.640uh someone like alexander and spread it around spread this idea around even if it isn't perfect
01:50:53.520it could the original conception of gods would have been like they're these entities
01:50:57.600that have desires and you must meet those desires or you're punished they couldn't comprehend of like
01:51:02.400god as a manifestation of creation itself that's personified not only in the universe but also you
01:51:10.600distinctly and that means that you are different than animals because you can create in the way
01:51:16.540that animals cannot whereas modern science would try and level everything everything's animals
01:51:22.320everything is chaos um there is no morality everything is amoral whereas prior to that
01:51:28.700everything, you know, human beings were unique because of, and it treated, I think we are in a
01:51:34.800sense returning to that. And I mentioned this when I talked to E. Michael Jones, that when we are
01:51:41.060doing our studies into quantum mechanics, we talk about string theory and string theory isn't that
01:51:48.240popular anymore, or at least it's highly debated, but there is the concept of quantum gravity that
01:51:55.240we were talking about and diving as deep as we can into the quantum realm to look for what
01:52:01.380fundamental particles or whatever would be responsible for gravity because we don't know
01:52:04.720and uh one uh model that they had for the universe was like as because like what what is the universe
01:52:13.400what is time what is all this stuff and it was saying that you know what the universe is is like
01:52:17.800a giant calculator that calculates and remembers quantum states um and like the way they described
01:52:25.340it was almost like an operating system but it could also be interpreted as a mind you know if
01:52:29.980you wanted to go down that road it's like this this really weird strange abstract mind that's
01:52:36.060that's uh calc and has some kind of memory called spin foam you can go back to the um
01:52:41.860episode where we discuss what that is um so it seems that like once you once you drill down to
01:52:49.000the bottom a lot of these scientific problems you kind of re-emerge in this this space where you're
01:52:54.840talking about like the importance of language like as we get into ai as we get into creating
01:53:00.900you know learning machines we understand how important communication and language is and we
01:53:06.120talk when you go about information theory like what what is speech it's not just sounds you make
01:53:10.860with your mouth it's just a media that you use to implant an idea in someone else's head and when
01:53:16.500we even talked about jf careppi's book like what is a meme is a meme a life form and is is speech
01:53:23.260just like a survival mechanism for our dna you start you start conceptualizing in all these
01:53:29.560interconnected ways and it's that interconnectivity that i see expressed here and that's what i find
01:53:36.440interesting and what a lot of people would say is like oh you think god is just like a big man
01:53:40.840in the sky it's like no it's 10 times it's 10 000 times more complex than that when you actually
01:53:47.620think about it logically but his case was that human beings couldn't do that until uh we arrive
01:53:55.540at the greeks who start introducing a more complicated metaphysics and introducing this
01:54:00.280idea of logos which means like truth expressed through speech and we take that idea and that
01:54:06.200evolves over time in through aristotle and through the modern era which takes on a different form
01:54:11.700with thomas aquinas but all along the way human comprehension is also developing and we can more
01:54:18.160we can more accurately comprehend more complex systems and so he said that's what's distinct
01:54:24.540about sort of the christian outlook which is that this is all linear this is all one state development
01:54:30.680it's not just cyclical this just this whole process doesn't just reset and so that was what
01:54:36.380was distinct about the uh the death and resurrection of christ like that's a universally historic
01:54:43.200moment that just doesn't repeat every 10 000 years that's just a hard demarcation in the
01:54:49.840history of the universe and things get better or worse from there but i i thought that was just an
01:54:56.180interesting way of looking at what do you think about that is making any more sense now it's kind
01:55:00.360probably have to look at it more to understand it like you're saying before it's really on the edge
01:55:04.740of like the edge of understanding in terms of metaphysics and it's very it involves everything
01:55:10.980right so well he talks about the the history of the concept of logos as it traveled throughout
01:55:16.460the world because we can track how these philosophical concepts traveled in writing
01:55:22.000he says um so the changes that took place in india had more to do with language than with race he
01:55:27.980says the progress of logos through asia follows the movement of the indo-european language india
01:55:34.420perhaps the prime example of a culture which could not maintain its hold on the logos of its origins
01:55:40.260after viewing monotheism from afar india descended into the jungles of polytheism never to emerge
01:55:47.060since fallen man wants what he wants he's willing to create subsidiary deities and demons who are
01:55:53.480more amenable to ends which the one god would find contemptible such as the death of enemies
01:55:59.240the sexual favors of someone else's spouse etc the egyptians were defeated in their metaphysical
01:56:05.660quest by their own holy language or hieroglyphics because it was insufficiently abstract even more
01:56:12.840than the chinese pictogram egyptian hieroglyphics was made up of pictures representing things for
01:56:18.480an egyptian to conceive of something he had to come up with a picture representing that concept
01:56:23.080this was easy enough when it came to everyday experience and the word for dog could look like
01:56:27.600a dog but it was disastrous when it came to describing something like god which had no form
01:56:32.840because the egyptians were unable to break the concept of mat out of its in encrusted
01:56:38.200encrusted form as cosmological myth like the egyptians they left behind the hebrews found
01:56:45.500it difficult to worship a god which had no form and so they fell into idolatry almost immediately
01:56:51.240saying of the golden calf they made here is your god israel who brought you out of the land of
01:56:56.680egypt the israelites became carriers of a new truth in history but they did so reluctantly
01:57:02.200and to a large extent passively without understanding the implications of the leap
01:57:07.480of being that set them free he says in contrast to gilgamesh the iliad takes place in the broad
01:57:15.300light of day where gods debate their course of action like the human beings upon whom
01:57:20.620they are clearly modeled they can determine the course of human events within the bounds allowed
01:57:25.660by fate or moria moira the god behind the gods whose power overruled the gods and could delay
01:57:33.020what was fated but not prevent its accomplishment eventually the concept of logos would mature
01:57:39.220until it stood in judgment over the behavior of gods themselves provoking on a religious crisis
01:57:45.660which would eventuate in the death of Socrates
01:57:49.880and bring an end to that phase of history.
02:11:52.840I don't know if that clarified anything, because
02:11:55.160um to tell the story logos you almost have to go through the entire history but i i think
02:12:00.380i think i understand it when he would say like the logos is the word of god but to understand
02:12:05.360the word of god you have to understand what words are you have to understand what language is and
02:12:10.980that gets into everything from information theory to quantum mechanics if you want to follow that
02:12:15.340down all the way to the bottom but a communication like as an as a force or entity in itself
02:12:22.880that exists in symbiosis with that which is speaking it and like even Marshall McLuhan
02:12:30.020would say like the extension of yourself in that form of media necessarily changing you
02:12:36.420as you employ it like that's a very modern way of interpreting it but in that same sense
02:12:42.020that Jesus Christ wasn't like the father he didn't he didn't like give birth to Jesus
02:12:49.480it was a manifestation of this one creative force and that logos is the creation but providence is
02:12:57.380sort of like the like logos is the desire to create and providence is that desire to create
02:13:04.740inaction and and he actually likens that to love as well and they say like oh god is love well what
02:13:12.060does that mean and you maybe i'm hard-headed but i need this explained in very clear concise 21st
02:13:20.280century canadian terms like what does that mean yes and you say well love in this sense is the
02:13:25.600desire to create it's the desire in essence the desire to reproduce the desire to create something
02:13:32.560out of nothing the desire to bring something into the world just for the sake of wanting to
02:13:38.860bring it into the world you know i mean and in that sense that you know true love is reproductive
02:13:44.380love and that's where you get into heterosexuality that's where you get into marriage that's that's
02:13:48.380where all this stuff is manifested in marriage which is why heterosexual which is why the
02:13:54.520catholics are so big into not using contraceptives because the manifestation of love must always be
02:14:00.700the creation and in this sense the creation of life that's why they're so big on that0.99
02:14:05.100which is why homosexual marriage is such a fucking affront to that very concept that you could like it's it would be like the fucking you know if you're you you're a fan of art that's like every time you see a urinal in a museum an art museum you're like this is a mockery that's why we only bless the gays yeah that's what exactly flash forward to now it's like okay we're gonna bless these gay unions when in fact they should be0.93
02:14:35.080yeah i'm not gonna say but we don't have the pope for what needs to be done yet0.86
02:14:42.780but you know a lot of christians uh they'll tie themselves into like uh pacifist gordian knots
02:14:50.660about how well it's like well in a sense this is providence so if everything collapses that's god's
02:14:56.360will so we shouldn't do anything now i don't accept that i don't accept that like well
02:15:01.280you know we deserve this everything it's that belief that everything that's happening now we
02:15:07.040deserve it because of our moral failings i would believe that well we can still fight our way out
02:15:11.720of it because we only deserve it as long as you deserve it we only deserve it as long as we
02:15:16.420believe we deserve it if you fight against a state of affairs then you don't necessarily deserve it
02:15:22.180it's just you know you're trying you're not accepting it the moment you accept it
02:15:53.440once the nation becomes corrupted by the barbarism
02:15:56.260of reflection nothing can save it from the new beastly state of nature that so uncannily resembles
02:16:02.460the state capitalism of our day rome was able to delay the decline by holding firm to religion
02:16:08.800marriage and property as the three bulwarks against greek skepticism but even rome succumbed
02:16:14.400to the same power of ideas anyway i'll let that go now um thanks for taking the time and bearing
02:16:21.140with me on this i hope i did a good job you're doing good all right merry christmas buddy
02:16:26.560merry christmas merry christmas talk to you soon
02:16:29.080i am here speaking with an esteemed guest someone i've been trying to speak to for some
02:16:50.740time and getting ready for. I'm here with Dr. E. Michael Jones, which is a name which will be
02:16:56.260familiar to a lot of you. But for those who don't know, he's the founder of Culture Wars magazine.
02:17:02.260He's the author of several books, including a few that I'm very familiar with, Libidio Dominandi,
02:17:09.200The Sexual Liberation and Political Control, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. And most recently,
02:17:15.880the most recent one i have read and what i think we'll talk most about today is logos rising history
02:17:22.160of the ultimate reality um and he's also the host of the emg emj live show on bit you so with that
02:17:31.220having been said um first of all thank you very much uh dr jones for speak with me and did i miss
02:17:36.240anything in there in the intro no that's fine that's uh that's you covered enough thank you
02:17:41.920for having me wait all right all right let me let me just say my most recent book is the holocaust
02:17:48.420narrative and you can find that at fidelitypress.org or culturewars.com do not go to the
02:17:56.800search engine just go straight to there because i am blocked on all the search engines and you
02:18:02.900were also quite not long ago banned from amazon that's correct right right so you can't find me
02:18:08.740on Amazon. So don't go, don't look there. Which, you know, a lot of independent publishers and
02:18:13.800smaller publishers, they say, and I sell books on there too, and I know they gouge you on prices
02:18:18.160anyway. So it's probably better to go through Fidelity Press anyway, just to get value for
02:18:22.840your money. That's right. That's right. And you can, and please, please do not spend $500 for my
02:18:29.940book or a thousand dollars from my books. They are all available for the normal retail price
02:18:36.160at fidelitypress.org. I had a guy who was getting rich, buying my books and selling them for 10
02:18:42.940times the price. He got conscious by them. He sent me a check for $500 for all the money he'd
02:18:47.920gouged. Wow. It is good that he sent you the money though, because I hear about people who
02:18:53.020just do that and just make off with it in the night. The Holocaust narrative, if you wanted0.94
02:18:59.200to just quickly speak on that, I was checking out the Cultures Wars website and just saw it
02:19:03.280advertised there. I assume from the title, people can guess what it's on, but did you want to just
02:19:08.320give it a quick blurb about what inspired you to do that? Yeah, it was my training as a literary
02:19:14.600critic. I decided that the best way to deal with this issue is to examine the artifacts that
02:19:22.120created the narrative. And that's pretty much what I do, beginning with the propaganda films
02:19:28.000that were created right at the end of World War II.
02:19:32.980The first literary productions like Diary of Anne Frank,
02:19:40.080you know, try to put that in the historical context
02:19:42.640and then just go through one after another.
02:19:45.720The Catholic narrative was one of the first at the beginning.
02:19:52.040Father Lenz's book, Christos in Dachau,
02:19:54.440has established basically, at this point, Dachau was the paradigmatic concentration camp.
02:20:01.320It was founded in 1933, the same year that Hitler came to power, years, almost 10 years before
02:20:09.360Auschwitz. And all the early books were talking about the Catholic presence in Dachau.
02:20:16.060That book, Lenz's book came out in 1955. Three years later, the Jews hijacked the narrative
02:20:22.460when François Mauriac, a French Catholic, came up with a book called Nuit, or Night,
02:20:30.200as it came to be known. It was basically his translation into elegant French of a Yiddish
02:20:36.200memoir, Un die Welt hat geschwiegen, by Elie Wiesel. That hijacked the narrative. At that point,
02:20:43.200Auschwitz became the paradigmatic camp and the Jews became the main protagonist. That was not
02:20:48.640the case before that. Anyway, I discovered all the way up to the present, one artifact after
02:20:55.000another, the creation of the tropes, and more importantly, how the narrative gets weaponized
02:21:02.340politically. Well, it's funny that we haven't obviously gone as deep as you have on these
02:21:07.660issues, but on our show not long ago, we did a similar review of Knight. It would have been the
02:21:14.260english translation most recent one but if you know anything about the history of that book a lot
02:21:19.760of people might have read that book in high school so they look at it with a teenager's mind or a
02:21:24.380child's mind but if you read that book with an adult's mind and you're aware of the history of
02:21:28.860all the revisions and the story and how even modern historians say well big chunks of this
02:21:34.860are impossible but even the way it's written is very fantastical and mythological and you're
02:21:39.880reading i'm like oh there's no way this is real like there's lots of premonitions and miracles
02:21:45.500and oddly enough no gas chambers no gas chambers no that that was not part of night so this makes
02:21:54.320alymysel a holocaust denier yeah the book is fascinating because the only thing what i recall
02:22:00.120the book do telling the story because you know maybe there was he was in a concentration camp
02:22:04.120somewhere, but the only individual that was really killed in the book was a Jew in the
02:22:10.980concentration camp, and he was executed by the Nazis for stealing from all the other Jews,
02:22:15.680because he was a dentist, I think was the story. Yeah, we did way back when in Culture Wars0.51
02:22:24.260magazine, Professor O'Connell from Georgia State, he's a professor of French, did an article
02:22:33.340exposing what François Moriac did here, the whole real story behind the writing of that.
02:22:40.780And we published it in Culture Wars magazine. And immediately, Debbie Lipschtheit jumped in
02:22:47.000and accused him of Holocaust denial for doing scholarship. This is what the university is
02:22:53.240supposed to do, right? He's a professor of French. Moriac wrote this book in French.
02:22:58.240and she jumps in and she tried to get him fired. And to their credit, they did put him on a kind
02:23:05.300of trial, but they said, this is scholarship. We're not going to fire the guy. And so Debbie
02:23:09.360Lipstadt was thwarted. If you let people like this in, they will throw you in jail because they
02:23:15.540can't defend their own narrative. And it was funny. I know there's other individuals in this
02:23:21.620scene, like guys from, you know, the right stuff.biz and all of them. They made the joke one
02:23:27.380time they're like look we're doing what you said we should do which was take this seriously we we
02:23:32.760went and we read all the stuff we read all the things and if you explain this to regular people
02:23:38.600they'll think you're lying like if i tell you about a night and say oh he won the nobel prize
02:23:44.340it was taught in schools as fact for a long time and then but if you say what's it like no
02:23:49.320there's no way that's the story because people have never really looked at it with an acute
02:23:55.640eye for this sort of thing anyway yeah that's exactly the paradox here in other words you
02:24:01.440have to read my book but you can't talk about it well wait a minute why am i reading it then
02:24:08.460if i can't talk about it it's true maybe you know what um and i'm curious maybe we could start with
02:24:15.840this and i don't want to spend too too long we don't need to on the whole jewish thing but um
02:24:20.900I'm sure it's been of keen interest to you to see the narrative begin at least momentarily to shift in the popular zeitgeist.
02:24:29.500It seems that now more than ever, at least for mostly non-whites, I would say, but like, you know, there's lots of people who can be very critical and open, openly critical about Israel and these sorts of things.
02:24:43.160Is this historically unique to you with someone who's had a bit more experience seeing these things with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and whatnot?
02:36:20.220And the moment he gets, he comes down and he's ready to explain it.
02:36:23.780And they're all worshiping idols because they can't stand.
02:36:27.980They just don't want this transcendent God.
02:36:31.680They don't want to raise their minds to him.
02:36:33.520They want to bring him down to their level and have him do their bidding.0.97
02:36:36.780And that's been the constant struggle among the Hebrews.0.96
02:36:41.240And what's interesting is, you know, I'm a, you know, modern 21st century Canadian guy,0.62
02:36:47.760you know, so I tend to approach things very rationally as a lot of young people are like,
02:36:51.960it's very difficult for us to really penetrate some of these ideas. You know, when someone says
02:36:56.660like logos, what is logos? It's the truth. What does that mean? You know, when they say God is
02:37:00.840love, like, I don't know what that means. What I liked about your book is that it explained it
02:37:05.940very very plainly that could appeal to a mind like myself or allow me to penetrate these ideas
02:37:11.360and what i like when you'd said you know in the beginning there was the word and again this might
02:37:16.620be a very clumsy approximation of the idea but the way i understood it was like the word the language
02:37:23.080the logos almost as an entity in itself is like the essence like it is the unifying feature of
02:37:30.680existence because it's like creation itself. And when they say love, love is the passion for
02:37:37.740creation. And that is what procreative love is. Like what is love if not to procreate and further
02:37:45.400life itself? A, is that correct? And B, I guess just A, is that correct?
02:37:52.820Yeah. Gravity is love. It's the force that holds the universe together. But the big change,
02:38:00.120So, okay. I said in the book that I think basically St. John wrote this aware of St. Paul's failure at the Areopagus because he gave the wrong speech. He was talking to philosophers and he was talking to idol worshipers. And he needed to correct that. And I think John was the correction.
02:43:37.020They needed Thomism because it had the metaphysical depth and foundation that America needed.
02:43:42.540America was a country that was based on Calvinism.
02:43:46.500And the great Calvinist was Jonathan Edwards.
02:43:49.120And he gave a sermon called Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.
02:43:52.440And he compared man to a spider dangling from a thread.
02:43:56.580God's holding the spider over the fire, which is hell, by this gossamer thread.
02:44:02.900And Edward says, you have nothing to stand on.
02:44:05.900That is the absence of the metaphysical tradition in American culture.
02:44:10.860And it became apparent in the 1930s, and they killed it.
02:44:15.960The anti-Catholic bigots killed it, and so it went to Notre Dame.
02:44:20.280And then Notre Dame strangled it in its cradle.
02:44:23.860There's a long story you can read in the book.
02:44:26.580And it comes down to the man, the last, the last ditch, the last man in the last ditch was Ralph McInerney. And the story, you know, I knew Ralph McInerney and it had failed that Notre Dame killed Thomism. And Ralph was the last guy and he was dying and he basically put the mantle of Thomism around my shoulder. So this is it. You're talking about the cutting edge of Logos and human history. I'm bringing it back.
02:44:53.000now i wonder um i've noticed again you you've had a pretty long time horizon with this sort of thing
02:44:59.920you've probably seen a lot in your many years of advocating for this stuff and you've written a lot
02:45:04.460about the catholic church throughout history and that's partly due to your controversial stance
02:45:09.420within that church specifically i'm a catholic myself um and i you've probably seen various
02:45:15.020movements you know even in the culture right now trying to popularize catholicism you know
02:45:20.440on the America First side of Nick Fuentes and whatnot.
02:45:23.420But there's also some news that seems to be driving some people away from the Catholic Church.
02:45:27.140I'm wondering, is the power and the reputation of the Catholic Church essential for this revolution of the Logos?
02:45:38.360Do we need to fix the Catholic Church essentially for this transition to occur, in your opinion?
02:45:44.280The Catholic Church is the cutting edge of Logos in human history.
02:45:47.920And that began with St. John, which we've already discussed.0.57
02:45:52.280And it sets things in motion to take on a life of their own, but it usually invariably comes back to the Catholic Church because that's the vehicle of Logos.
02:58:05.680and that's what probably hagel would have said to marx that's a fantastic quote i think there's
02:58:11.840gonna be a lot of people who find it interesting and i know you have to get going soon and we have
02:58:15.480a hard stop at uh 10 but i wanted to ask you one ask you a question i'll ask you i'll tell you what
02:58:20.740i mean by asking the question the question is uh what are your feelings about quantum mechanics
02:58:25.760and the reason i asked that is because we covered uh some quantum mechanics on the show before
02:58:31.560And there's this one book that's tied to string theory, which isn't really popular anymore, but it was about quantum gravity. And what I found was, you know, in the book, we talk about how in the scientific world, it became materialist due to atoms, and then the belief that everything was just made of tiny things.
02:58:51.200but what's interesting and maybe this is tying back to the idea of logos in some way coming back
02:58:56.940is when i read about this thing called quantum gravity they're going down to this like what is
02:59:01.340gravity they can't really explain gravity and they're trying to go down to the quantum realm
02:59:05.380to figure out what are the forces that animate the universe itself and just not to draw on too
02:59:10.680long about this but uh in this one book called uh the quest for quantum gravity uh reality is not
02:59:17.100what it seems it was about they're basically saying that the universe is composed of you know
02:59:22.660quarks and things like that but it's almost like it you get to a low enough level and it's just
02:59:28.340phenomena it's just like waves and it's just energy and they said the universe is like a
02:59:35.320giant computer it's a giant computerized record of itself and the way they're explaining it's in
02:59:42.340a very, you know, scientist sort of way, but it sounds like what they were saying was,
02:59:47.420it's just a very, very complex mind, or there's some kind of complex mind interwoven with