00:09:29.640Democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, tolerance, equality, and human rights.
00:09:35.600In the eyes of the ruling class, these values have become the sole test of national identity.
00:09:40.080Anyone from anywhere can become English, German, French or European simply by professing allegiance to them and acquiring legal citizenship.
00:09:50.840This is progress applied to national identity.
00:09:54.300The beauty and character of individual European nations are erased, while ancestry is relegated to mere happenstance.
00:10:01.420The son of an English family that has inhabited the British Isles for 50 generations unbroken0.73
00:10:05.500possesses no greater claim to his nation's identity and inheritance than the Pakistani,
00:10:10.620Somali, Indian, or Chinese who arrived yesterday, provided the newcomer shares our values.
00:10:16.820Across all the nations of European civilization, the same logic is applied.0.96
00:10:21.060What, therefore, meaningfully distinguishes European nations from one another?
00:10:25.460If English, German, Italian, and Canadian identities
00:10:28.480are all defined by adherents to the same set of universal principles,
00:10:32.380then none possesses any substantive content of its own.
00:10:35.860Democracy and the rule of law may be principles
00:10:37.840by which a nation chooses to govern itself,
00:10:40.360but they cannot explain what makes that nation distinct
00:10:42.440from another governed according to precisely the same ones.
00:10:46.640England was England long before the advent of liberal democracy
00:15:40.940Furthermore, the ruling class already discriminates
00:15:43.400against European populations in policing, education, employment, and beyond,
00:15:48.560even while we remain the demographic majority.
00:15:51.200There is no reason to believe that this would abate upon us becoming a minority.
00:15:55.140On the contrary, it would likely intensify.
00:15:57.840If these trends are allowed to reach their ultimate conclusion,
00:16:00.480it will mean the death of European civilisation altogether.
00:16:04.420As such, the first principle of the right in the 2030s must be to reassert ancestry and inheritance as the foundations of both individual European national identities and our collective civilizational identity.
00:16:17.420The Englishman, Frenchman, German and Canadian remain heirs to distinct national inheritances while recognizing in one another branches of the same European family.
00:16:28.060After all, across the nations of European civilisation,
00:16:31.320we face many of the same existential challenges.
00:16:34.380Demographic replacement, the erosion of inherited culture,0.83
00:16:37.600the atomisation of our societies, and ultimately the same foe.
00:16:41.760A self-serving ruling class increasingly hostile
00:16:43.960to the very notion of historic peoplehood itself.
00:16:47.520Our nations must stand shoulder to shoulder
00:16:49.160and meet these challenges as a united European front.0.70
00:16:57.280The religion of European civilization is Christianity.
00:17:26.300This is not because it is instrumentally useful in creating a prosperous society,
00:17:30.500nor simply because it is the faith we have professed for more than a millennium,
00:17:33.740but because it reveals the true nature and ultimate purpose of creation.
00:17:37.780It is our religion because it is true.
00:17:40.180If Christ is God made flesh, most crucially, if he was crucified, died, was buried and rose again from the dead,
00:17:45.860then his teachings cannot be reduced to one lifestyle or moral philosophy among many.
00:17:50.040His claims upon us do not depend upon whether we find them useful or convenient.
00:17:54.100They proceed from the author of creation himself, and it is therefore our duty to embrace them.
00:18:11.180This requires faith, the recognition that the highest truths cannot be discovered by reason alone,
00:18:17.260but must be revealed by God and embraced with humility.
00:18:20.020nothing could be further from the spirit of progress and its heart lies a moral order
00:18:26.140whose ultimate good is ever greater individual autonomy the liberation of the individual from
00:18:31.260every inherited or unchosen constraint upon his ability to determine for himself who he is and
00:18:37.040how he ought to live up to and including the human body itself christianity begins from the opposite
00:18:42.980premise man is not sovereign over himself he is a creature not the creator neither his nature nor
00:18:49.620his ultimate purpose is his to define. Nor does he exist as an isolated individual, but within a web
00:18:55.920of natural relationships, inherited obligations, and authorities that precede his own will.
00:19:02.360This understanding of man is illustrated particularly clearly by the covenantal structure
00:19:07.080of scripture. As theologians such as Scott Hahn have observed, the biblical covenants unfold
00:19:12.620through an expanding series of social forms. Marriage, the household, the tribe, the nation,
00:19:19.020the kingdom, and ultimately the universal church. These covenants between God and man are established
00:19:24.940through a succession of key figures, progressively revealing a hierarchical social order whose
00:19:30.160constituent forms possess objective natures that are not ours to redefine. The first, marriage,
00:19:37.520is revealed through Adam, as one man and one woman united permanently before God. The second,
00:19:43.560the household, is revealed through Noah, as a married couple with their children,0.82
00:19:47.360dependence and property. The third, the tribe, is revealed through Abraham as a series of households0.56
00:19:53.720united by lineage, language and religion. The fourth, the nation, is revealed through Moses
00:19:59.380as a series of tribes united under one law in one land. The fifth, the kingdom, is revealed through
00:20:05.560David as a nation or series of nations united under one political authority, the king. The sixth,
00:20:12.120the universal church, is established by Jesus Christ as the body that unites all nations
00:20:17.080in the one true faith under him, the creator and lord of the universe.0.99
00:20:42.120I knew it was worth sitting in that horrible immigration center for three hours to see you
00:20:48.620guys. This progression reveals a hierarchical social order in which each successive form1.00
00:20:55.300builds upon rather than abolishes those beneath it. The household preserves marriage, the tribe0.94
00:21:00.660the household, the nation the tribe, and the kingdom the nation. Equally the universality
00:21:06.380of the church does not abolish the particularity of nations. Each structure has a proper
00:21:12.040place within an order that precedes individual choice, and their ultimate purpose is not mere
00:21:17.360individual fulfillment, but the salvation of souls. They are schools for the cultivation of
00:21:23.840virtue, prudence, justice, courage, temperance, faith, hope, and charity. Sincerely embraced and
00:21:32.240embodied, they orient the individual towards God and away from sin, preparing us for our ultimate
00:21:37.460end in the kingdom of heaven we tamper with them at our peril yet tamper with them we have
00:21:44.660the ruling class has spent generations attempting to dismantle this order in the name of progress
00:21:49.700treating treating each of its constituent forms as another constraint from which the sovereign
00:21:54.100individual must be liberated marriage has been progressively stripped of almost every
00:21:58.740characteristic that once defined it its sacredness has diminished as it has become as it has come to
00:22:03.860be understood primarily as a civil contract between individuals rather than a solemn covenant before
00:22:08.900god the normalization of divorce has undermined its permanence rendering a lifelong union
00:22:14.260dissoluble at the will of either party normalization of adultery pornography promiscuity
00:22:19.780and sex outside marriage has similarly eroded its demands of fidelity and sexual exclusivity
00:22:25.140while cohabitation has displaced marriage altogether as the expected foundation of family
00:22:29.540life more fundamentally still the purpose and very definition of marriage have been transformed
00:22:35.140where marriage was once understood principally in terms of permanent obligations to one's spouse
00:22:39.680children family and god it is increasingly conceived as an instrument of individual
00:22:45.220fulfillment whose legitimacy endures only for as long as it satisfies the desires of those within
00:22:50.320it same-sex marriage severs its legal definition from the union of man and woman while the growing
00:22:56.040normalization of polyamory challenges its exclusivity to two people. At the same time,
00:23:02.140theories that deny the objective significance of sexual difference attack the underlying
00:23:06.460anthropology from which the traditional Christian understanding of marriage proceeds.
00:23:10.840The cumulative effect is not merely to relax the rules surrounding marriage, but to replace
00:23:15.560one conception of the institution with another. From an objective, permanent, sexually complementary
00:23:20.920covenant ordered by obligations beyond the self to a relationship defined increasingly by the
00:23:26.780preferences and autonomy of the individuals who enter it. As with nationhood, this redefinition
00:23:32.680has been accompanied by a language designed to place these truths beyond the bounds of
00:23:36.460respectable opinion. Belief in the distinct and complementary roles of the sexes is branded
00:23:41.260sexism, belief that marriage is properly the union of man and woman, homophobia, and belief
00:23:46.840that sex is an objective biological reality that cannot be altered by individual will,
00:23:51.100transphobia. In each case, the distinction between irrational hostility towards individuals
00:23:55.980and meaningful moral judgments about sex, marriage, and human nature is deliberately collapsed,
00:24:01.200allowing normal, moral, and healthy beliefs about these things to be pathologized as a prejudice.
00:24:06.980The household has been subjected to a parallel assault. Its most fundamental purpose,
00:24:12.620the creation and raising of the next generation, has been undermined by abortion and contraception,
00:24:18.420while assisted reproduction and commercial surrogacy increasingly separate procreation
00:24:22.520from the marital union and transform the creation of human life into a medical and at times
00:24:27.360commercial transaction. At the same time, the authority of parents over the formation of their
00:24:32.620own children has steadily been ceded to state schools, bureaucracies, corporations, and other
00:24:38.040institutions outside the household. Its economic independence has been weakened no less profoundly.
00:24:43.760A usurious and rent-seeking economic order has loaded households with debt, inflated the cost
00:24:48.540of housing and other necessities, and placed ownership of property increasingly beyond the
00:24:52.560reach of young families. Taxation and the structure of the labour market increasingly assumes that
00:24:57.300both parents will participate fully in paid employment, diminishing the household's capacity
00:25:01.620to provide directly for children and other dependents. Even the intergenerational transmission
00:25:06.420of property, one of the principal means by which households acquire continuity and independence
00:25:10.900across generations, is increasingly impeded. Meanwhile, overextended welfare programs have
00:25:16.280transferred functions once performed by families and communities to the state. The objection is
00:25:21.480not to providing for those genuinely in need, but to a system that can substitute bureaucratic
00:25:25.860provision for familial obligation, penalize marriage, and make individuals increasingly
00:25:30.400dependent upon the state rather than upon durable households of their own. The cumulative result
00:25:36.200is a household progressively deprived of the functions that once made it an independent social
00:25:40.920and economic unit producing and raising children caring for its dependence accumulating and
00:25:46.040transmitting property and providing its members with a sphere of authority and security
00:25:50.040substantially independent from both the market and the state the tribe has been weakened both
00:25:56.440materially and morally these economic pressures on the household have rendered our people
00:26:01.400increasingly nomadic young adults are routinely expected to leave the towns and villages in which
00:26:05.640their families have lived for generations in search of affordable housing education or employment
00:26:10.840scattering extended families and dissolving the dense networks of kinship and familiarity
00:26:14.920from which enduring communities are formed local businesses churches clubs and other institutions
00:26:20.200that once bound households together have declined alongside them not least through the predatory
00:26:24.440expansion of both international corporate interests and the state at the expense of local economic
00:26:29.320life the ideal subject of the ruling class's economy is not a man rooted in a particular
00:26:34.600place among relatives and neighbors to whom he owes particular obligations but a mobile unit of
00:26:39.500labor willing to move wherever his economic utility is greatest. At the same time the very
00:26:46.040instincts towards inherited solidarity has been placed under moral suspicion. As established above
00:26:51.820the ruling class increasingly treats attachments grounded in ancestry and particular peoplehood
00:26:56.400as morally illegitimate when they conflict with its universal conception of identity.
00:27:02.100The result is a demand that individuals regard the bonds of dissent, locality, language, and inherited culture
00:27:08.160that connect one household to another as either irrelevant or shameful.
00:27:12.440Thus, the tribe is attacked from both directions,
00:27:15.080materially by an economic order that uproots and disperses its members,
00:27:19.000and morally by an ideology that delegitimizes the inherited loyalties capable of binding them together.
00:27:25.060The kingdom, too, has been hollowed out.
00:27:27.320kingship conceives political authority as a personal and enduring responsibility for the
00:27:33.000welfare of his people the king embodies the state inherits obligations to those who came before him
00:27:38.320and holds his kingdom in trust for those who will come after liberal democracy substitutes for this
00:27:44.060model a permanent competition for temporary power political leaders are rewarded above all for
00:27:49.720winning elections and therefore for pursuing what is immediately popular rather than what is true
00:27:54.300necessary or conducive to the long-term interests of the nation the electoral cycle privileges the
00:28:00.360next five years over the next 50 while party government encourages rulers to conceive of the
00:28:05.040population as competing constituencies to be assembled into a winning coalition rather than
00:28:09.700as a single person as a single people whose common good they are obliged to serve at the same time
00:28:16.320political office has increasingly become a profession rather than a vocation of stewardship
00:28:21.800Career advancement, party patronage, relationships with donors and organized lobby interests,
00:28:26.820lucrative opportunities after leaving office, and the pursuit of status and influence all pull the
00:28:31.240professional politician away from the interests of those he governs. Yet even as the political
00:28:35.540class has become more professionalized, political responsibility itself has become less personal.
00:28:41.120In a properly ordered kingdom, ultimate political authority has a single and visible locus in the
00:28:46.060sovereign. Today it is dispersed among ministers, parties, courts, bureaucracies, regulators,
00:28:53.340central banks, treaties and supranational institutions. Power is exercised everywhere
00:28:58.660yet ultimate responsibility resides nowhere. The result is government increasingly detached
00:29:06.740from the ideal of kingship. Temporary where it should be continuous, factional where it should
00:29:11.420pursue the common good, short-term where it should be intergenerational, and evasive where it should
00:29:16.240be personally responsible. A healthy political order requires rulers capable of governing
00:29:21.500not merely according to the preferences of the present electorate, but according to truth,
00:29:26.640justice, and the enduring interests of the people entrusted to their care.
00:29:31.040Finally, the universal church has been attacked at its very foundations by the doctrine of progress
00:29:36.100itself progress is morally relativist denying that there exists an objective moral law binding
00:29:42.340upon all men in all times and places and reducing morality instead to individual preference social
00:29:47.860convention or the changing consensus of the age progress is materialist admitting as real only
00:29:54.500that which can be physically observed and measured leaving no place for the soul the supernatural
00:29:59.540or any ultimate purpose beyond the material world progress is atheist its rebellion culminates
00:30:06.020in the denial of god himself severing man from the transcendent source of moral order
00:30:10.660and leaving him answerable ultimately to no authority higher than man
00:30:15.380the consequence has not been the creation of a neutral public realm in which questions of
00:30:19.860ultimate truth are simply left unanswered christianity has instead been progressively
00:30:24.660displaced by a rival moral order with its own account of good and evil, its own orthodoxies
00:30:29.640and taboos, and its own vision of human flourishing. Religion is permitted insofar as it retreats
00:30:35.260into the realm of private preferences, but its claim to describe truths objectively binding
00:30:40.340upon individuals, institutions, and political communities is increasingly treated as illegitimate
00:30:47.140or even dangerous. Christianity may survive as a heritage, ceremony, architecture, or private habit
00:30:53.640what it must not be allowed to do is remain an authoritative account of reality.0.87
00:30:59.800This is the ultimate purpose of progress. The emancipation of man from every authority he did
00:31:05.720not choose culminating in emancipation from God himself. Yet in seeking to make himself sovereign
00:31:11.760man does not become free. He merely exchanges an order directed towards a transcendent good
00:31:16.900for one directed by his own appetites, fashions and temporal interests. The attack upon the church
00:31:22.600therefore completes the assault upon the objective moral order of creation. For once God is rejected,
00:31:28.380man ceases to recognize an authority capable of judging his desires and instead makes his desires
00:31:33.420the measure of all things. Taken together, the full horror of the ruling class's project becomes
00:31:39.420clear. These are not isolated social changes or mere tweaks in policy, but mutually reinforcing
00:31:45.780assaults upon every layer of God's creation. Marriage made temporary and subjective, the
00:31:51.260household deprived of children, property, and independence, the tribe uprooted and stripped of
00:31:55.640moral legitimacy, the nation dissolved through demographic discontinuity, the abandonment of
00:32:00.240the historic peoplehood, and the subordination of economic life to global markets, the kingdom
00:32:05.560reduced to an arena of electoral competition, careerism, and fragmented authority, and the
00:32:10.280church driven from public life by a rival creed that denies the very existence of objective and
00:32:15.680transcendent truth, and which is now embedded throughout the commanding institutions of European
00:32:19.920civilization in the absence of these foundations our civilization is collapsing we are richer than
00:32:27.040almost any people in history yet increasingly lonely anxious rootless indebted childless and
00:32:33.440spiritually adrift our birth rates are collapsing our communities are dying our institutions are
00:32:39.280losing legitimacy and confidence in the future is giving way to resignation and despair these are
00:32:45.360not the symptoms of a flourishing civilization they are the symptoms of one that is dying
00:32:50.880As such, the second principle of the right in the 2030s
00:32:55.040must be to recognize the Christian faith as the truth
00:32:58.000and restore it as the moral foundation of European civilization.
00:33:14.120The law and institutions of a Christian civilization
00:33:17.340should not pretend to be morally neutral.0.74
00:33:19.920Political neutrality is an illusion. Every legal system distinguishes between right and wrong.
00:33:25.240Every education system transmits some conception of good and evil. And every state ultimately
00:33:30.440privileges one moral order over its competitors. The question is not whether our civilization will
00:33:35.280be governed according to a moral creed, but which one. In our own age, that creed has been progress,
00:33:41.580an anti-civilizational and ultimately anti-human force that seeks to tear down the truths, bonds,
00:33:46.660and obligations that give human existence meaning and order we must expunge its doctrines from our
00:33:52.100laws institutions and culture and in its place restore the moral order of jesus christ upon