00:06:54.400because there is a statement from Blake Lively's attorneys.
00:06:57.560They're saying here that Blake Lively won her motion under civil code section 47.1.
00:07:05.140Lively's lawyers Ezra Hudson and Michael Gottlieb told Deadline.
00:07:10.220Today's ruling makes it clear that Ms. Lively brought her claims in good faith that there was no evidence she acted with malice and that she is the prevailing defendant under section 47.1.
00:07:23.860So the problem for the Wayfair parties, I have to say that first, is that they couldn't prove
00:07:28.720that she sued them with malice. And to prove something like that, that she knew what she said
00:07:35.240was false and that she told somebody because they needed evidence that she could have said
00:07:41.440something like, hey, I'm going to tell people that he said that my 1C was sexy, but I didn't
00:07:47.580feel uncomfortable in the moment. I'm just going to say that I did. Something like that, for example,
00:07:52.560I'm guessing that would be with a malice that she sued them in bad faith and of course they
00:07:58.440couldn't prove that and as I said the other day they also used against Justin Baldoni when he said
00:08:04.640that these people are so delusional that they actually believe what they're saying and then
00:08:09.600they were like oh yeah he said that he believes that they believe what they're saying so it can't0.96
00:08:14.960be in bad faith anyways so dumb and Gottlieb and Ezra Hudson also added here the court is awarding
00:08:22.040Ms. Lively's attorney's fees and costs and has explained that a prevailing defendant under0.87
00:08:26.560section 47.1 may seek damages using different procedural mechanisms. The party settlement
00:08:33.800agreement expressly preserves Ms. Lively's right to obtain those damages. Ms. Lively is gratified
00:08:39.920that her lawsuit shows how section 47.1 and laws like it create a path for survivors to hold
00:08:46.960accountable those who weaponize online attacks and retaliatory lawsuits to intimidate and silence
00:08:53.740survivors. It's so interesting. First of all, of course, she's not a survivor, but it's so
00:08:59.980interesting how she has, as I just mentioned, silenced herself. She has been silenced on social
00:09:06.840media for speaking up for other survivors. Isn't it interesting how she says that she's spoken up,
00:09:13.480but then she's been silenced yeah very ironic and I think now after I'm sure Ryan Reynolds called
00:09:20.600her lawyers so many times yelling and screaming at them over the phone saying you effing better
00:09:27.280give us a win now we need a win and that's why they're just like parading this around as some
00:09:33.980kind of win and this is how her lawyers are going to try to convince her and Ryan that she won
00:09:39.560something like look you won aren't we great and ryan would be like no you're not great and you
00:09:46.220promised us but we could win this case in court otherwise we would have never hired you and now
00:09:51.820you owe us this and that you just imagine how he's been going off on these attorneys over the phone
00:09:57.500and now they're like look ryan we won okay so let's jump to how daily mail is covering this
00:10:04.240Thank you, Daily Mail, for telling the truth.
00:10:06.880Their headline is, Justin Baldoni declares victory after Blake Lively suffers fresh court setback that proves there was no smear campaign and no SH.
00:10:19.460That is a little bit of a different headline there than from Deadline.
00:10:23.260It is here that Brian Friedman came out with a statement saying that once again, Lively has failed in her efforts to win damages from his clients after the collapse of the pair's sprawling legal battle over it ends with us.
00:10:36.200Throughout this process, innocent people had their reputations unfairly tarnished.