Flaawsome Talk with Kjersti Flaa - August 13, 2026


FULL PANIC !!

Hosted by
Mentioned
This is BAD !! RYAN SPEAKS OUT !!

Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

155.8

Word count

4,202

Sentence count

132

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00 Well, now we know how Blake Lively is spending the millions of dollars she claims she needed to get her reputation back. 1.00
00:00:13 Hi and welcome to Flossom Talk. I'm Tashley Floor, journalist, Hollywood truth teller, and your voice of reason in a town built on the illusion.
00:00:22 Oh my gosh, there's so much shady stuff going on right now on social media.
00:00:28 As you might remember, Blake hired an expert to tell us how much money she would have to spend to get her reputation back.
00:00:38 This expert estimated it to cost around $14.6 and $24.4 million.
00:00:46 Let's look at what they're spending that money on.
00:00:49 And I have some information from one of my insiders who is sharing how the industry is feeling right now.
00:00:56 And what Ryan Reynolds' biggest problem is, trying to get his reputation back and why he will fail.
00:01:05 And we have a response from the Daily Mail.
00:01:08 As you know, they've been sued by one of the reporters who got dragged into the It Ends With Us drama.
00:01:15 And now they have responded and it looks like this is going to be a dirty fight.
00:01:20 As I mentioned yesterday, I did receive a very disturbing email from someone.
00:01:25 And I just wanted to share it now that I'm talking to this person
00:01:29 and I'm figuring out how to tell this story to get all the facts straight.
00:01:35 So I'm working on that.
00:01:37 It is a story about Ryan Reynolds
00:01:39 and what happened to this person who used to work with him.
00:01:45 So please stay tuned for more on that.
00:01:47 Hopefully I can share that story tomorrow.
00:01:50 Anyways, yesterday it was a total solar eclipse here in Mallorca.
00:01:55 and I got to watch it and it was just pure magic. What a reminder of how small we are when you're
00:02:03 looking at what's happening out in the universe. It was interesting to watch Oscar because he was
00:02:08 acting really weird just watching the sun disappear and it gets pitch dark and then the
00:02:15 sun comes back again. Yeah, it was like an outer body experience for me. Anyway, let's get into
00:02:22 the madness here so as you know as I just said Blake Lively hired an expert her name is Ashley
00:02:28 Humphries and she created this long export report there's also a deposition from her in the legal
00:02:35 filings but her job was basically to figure out how much money it would cost to get Blake's
00:02:42 reputation back and how they would do that and I found this particularly interesting right now
00:02:48 when we're looking at what's happening on social media.
00:02:52 If you watched my episodes lately, you know I've been talking about some shady stuff going on on Reddit.
00:02:59 Before we get into that, I just wanted to remind everyone what Ashley Humphreys actually said,
00:03:06 how she would potentially repair Blake Lively's reputation.
00:03:11 And that does not involve, obviously, having Leslie Sloan call the media every time Blake Lively posts on social media.
00:03:20 Because as I said, this campaign would cost Blake Lively between 14 and 24 million dollars.
00:03:28 So she said in her report that she wanted to change the public attitude towards Blake and the concept would be essentially this.
00:03:36 put new positive corrective messages about Blake in front of the people who were exposed to the
00:03:43 negative claims. I'm guessing that's you guys. Also, have those messages delivered through sources
00:03:49 the audience trusts, especially mentioned social media influencers, and then expose the target
00:03:57 audience to those corrective messages three to five times, which she says is necessary to change
00:04:04 existing attitudes. Then calculate the necessary reach based on how many impressions the allegedly
00:04:12 defamatory statements received. So she basically laid down this communication strategy
00:04:18 that would be required to rebuild Blake's reputation. Since I mentioned the censorship
00:04:26 on Reddit yesterday, I started digging a little bit more and it looks like there are a lot of
00:04:33 things going on right now. So as I mentioned I was planning to talk about a post on Reddit in
00:04:40 my episode yesterday and then when I clicked on the link again the post was still there but all
00:04:46 the content was missing and from what I saw on Reddit today it looks like this user has been
00:04:51 banned. As I said yesterday this post was just a compilation of legal documents of evidence that
00:04:59 everyone can find in the public docket for this lawsuit. So there was no misinformation. It was
00:05:05 no bashing anyone. It was like, hey, this is how the industry described Blake Lively. It's also
00:05:10 been a lot of discussions around one content creator on Reddit. And every time someone mentions
00:05:18 her and criticizes her on Reddit, that post somehow gets reported a lot. And this person's
00:05:27 posts on Instagram is always liked by Ryan Reynolds. And of course, the discussions were
00:05:34 everywhere about who's removing these posts. And today there was a message from a moderator
00:05:39 on Reddit saying that, just to clear up some confusion here, talking about the post that
00:05:45 disappeared I was going to talk about yesterday, it appears this user's account was actioned by
00:05:50 Reddit. When that happened, their prior post disappeared from the sub. We are manually
00:05:55 finding and restoring those posts where we can so you may see some slowly reappear we don't know
00:06:01 why reddit took action against the account and won't speculate the posts were not removed by
00:06:07 our mod team and we're doing what we can to restore them while ensuring compliance with
00:06:12 reddit rules for such actions but it takes time if anyone is in contact with the user we recommend
00:06:19 they use reddit's appeal process and contact them via mod mail if there is anything we can approve
00:06:25 properly assist you with from our end this is obviously a tricky area for us to navigate when
00:06:30 we don't know the reason for reddit's actions if something similar happens to any of you in the
00:06:36 future please reach out to our team via mob mail okay so now that post is back again which i will
00:06:44 talk about later then i received this email from another user called aaron x perez who's saying
00:06:52 that the things he mentioned about reddit and isomera which is the user who posted what i was
00:06:58 going to talk about that was banned from reddit apparently same thing happened to me he says
00:07:04 an automated tool banned me and filtered every post or comment i ever made someone figured out
00:07:12 how to trick reddit's sloppy ai tool into thinking people are spam so everything they've ever said
00:07:20 gets erased i think they're targeting people who have produced content critical of blake ryan and
00:07:26 especially blake's lawyers it's pretty clever i'll give them that if reddit thinks you are spam
00:07:33 everything you ever wrote gets memory hold someone is up to something i think they figured out how to
00:07:40 game the automatic spam tool and trigger bans and mass filters and reddit they're not a great
00:07:47 company it's understood it takes two to six months for anything to happen if you open a ticket i don't
00:07:52 know if it's brian or someone acting in his interest but it's interesting that's the message
00:07:57 i got and this is the message that this person got i'm pretty sure is isomera the other user got a
00:08:04 similar one and this notification he got says your account has been permanently banned your account
00:08:10 has been permanently banned for breaking reddit if you feel like this account was banned in error
00:08:14 visit our help center to learn more how to file an appeal and here is one of the posts that was
00:08:19 six months old that is now missing and it says here deeper analysis of blake's digital expert
00:08:26 report and its deceptive graphs i spoke about that too on my channel and here it says uh sorry
00:08:33 this post was removed by reddit filters archive post new comments cannot be posted and votes
00:08:40 cannot be cast so my original post that i was going to talk about you can't comment on that
00:08:47 anymore either it is locked but as i said it is there now because the reddit moderators put
00:08:55 everything back in order again anyways then i received this link to this post from diane
00:09:00 and thank you diane so this is posted by power pinto who says that he or she is experiencing
00:09:09 a very similar weird thing going on on x so the person was asking here in this post
00:09:16 are blake lively ryan reynolds and new york times lawsuit related x posts being censored suppressed
00:09:22 i noticed my likes disappearing from pro baldoni posts on x so i tested it so this person remembered
00:09:32 a lot of the posts that they had liked on x originally and went back in and checked if those
00:09:40 likes were still there they were not still there so then this person liked all of those posts
00:09:46 one more time to see if they stuck this time and guess what they didn't so they're saying here so
00:09:55 I liked them all again, exited the app, and reopened it, only to find they all reverted to
00:10:01 being unliked again. Wasn't sure if it was a glitch, so I did it again. But this time I liked
00:10:07 five Baldoni-related posts and five completely unrelated posts. Same thing happened, except
00:10:13 only the Justin Baldoni-related posts reverted to unlike, and the unrelated posts remained liked.
00:10:20 somehow though they all showed on my ex like history despite the heart on the actual post
00:10:28 showing that i hadn't liked them and then they're attaching all the actual posts that they liked
00:10:36 uh which is a lot saying that all of these likes were actually gone and and they also say here
00:10:43 however what's even stranger is that i also found tweets i had liked criticizing megan
00:10:49 Thuey's New York Times article hit piece and replies under Blake Lively's account with minimum
00:10:55 engagements that were all showing as unliked. So this person is concluding here that there is
00:11:01 another case of Blake and Ryan's PR team trying to censor, suppress and manipulate public sentiment
00:11:06 as we've seen them do throughout this entire case across all of social media. As I mentioned
00:11:12 yesterday, you know, they hired a CIA guy. He used to work for the CIA, Nick Shapiro.
00:11:18 And as I just mentioned, Blake Lively's marketing expert said that it would cost between 14 and 24 million dollars to rebuild her reputation.
00:11:29 So how are they going to do that if they're not doing it through traditional media?
00:11:34 Because it doesn't cost anything to do it through traditional media.
00:11:38 You would just make a phone call, send a press release, which we've seen happening so many times, several times a week.
00:11:45 every time Blake Lively posts something on her Instagram story it shows up in People Magazine
00:11:52 or E! News or whatever but that's not costing them anything more than just Leslie Sloan's salary
00:11:59 so what are they spending all these millions of dollars on? I think we got the answer here
00:12:04 this is what they're doing anyways now this post is back up again and as I said yesterday I would
00:12:09 love to repeat some of the things that were said in this post so I will do that I also want to get
00:12:14 into what the insider is telling me and what's happening with James Wytushka now that Daily Mail
00:12:23 has responded to him. But before we get into that I wanted to thank the sponsor of this video Jones
00:12:28 Road Beauty. I've been living in my Jones Road Beauty this summer especially since I've been
00:12:34 traveling. The last thing I want to do is fill up a makeup bag with a lot of unnecessary products.
00:12:40 miracle balm is still one of my favorites and if you watch me for a while you know this is my
00:12:45 favorite color it gives you that fresh glowy put-together look without covering my skin with
00:12:52 lots of makeup i use this as a blush a highlighter a bronzer and a lip tint as you can see and i put
00:12:59 a little bit under my brows as well and voila you're ready in like less than a minute and jones
00:13:05 Jon's Road has just launched something new and very exciting.
00:13:08 The new foundation sticks are designed for those days where you want a little more coverage,
00:13:13 but that doesn't mean that you can't still keep a very simple routine.
00:13:16 It offers buildable medium to full coverage with a natural finish and a lot of skin-loving
00:13:23 ingredients, and it's available in 30 different shades.
00:13:27 That's really what I love about Jon's Road.
00:13:29 High-performing makeup that simplifies my routine and still makes my skin look like skin.
00:13:35 Modern-day makeup that's clean, strategic, and multifunctional for effortless routines.
00:13:40 For a limited time, you as my viewer and listener are getting a free full-size mascara on your first purchase when you use the code FLAW at checkout.
00:13:50 Just head to jonesroadbeauty.com and use the code FLAW at checkout.
00:13:55 out. After you purchase they may ask where you heard about them so please support my channel
00:13:59 and tell them that I sent you. Okay so let's get back into it. So this is the post that I mentioned
00:14:06 yesterday. Ryan Reynolds is quoted saying how could they spend so much time with her yet have
00:14:13 no sense of who she is. And Giannetti told Black and Sony executives knew exactly who Blake Lively
00:14:19 was. So here is the email that Ryan originally sent saying that how could they spend so much
00:14:25 time with her yet have no sense of who she is and what she's made of and here is one conversation
00:14:31 between two Sony executives and Giannetti and Sanford Panitch where he says you know Blake said
00:14:36 no way on the date they're talking about a screening date and then he says so now there is
00:14:42 two cuts she texted Josh and then and accused Josh of setting up fake screenings she said they
00:14:50 hired screen engine without consulting her she's going to demand her own cut she said no way on
00:14:58 june and then he's and then he continues here and he says she is a terrorist and then and she says
00:15:06 respectful that there is no process that works with her there isn't what is important is that
00:15:12 we have a baseline so we know you can tell her anything include include her in everything and
00:15:19 still it does not hold and sanford says i can't believe they caved on the producer credit for her
00:15:27 and says she wants to change credits all the order of product producers her second position
00:15:34 moving jamie to third ep's cast order single cards cut film by take out the justin baldone's
00:15:42 film by as you know she demanded that to move cast crawl before k keys have been dealing with
00:15:49 this since 9 a.m so she wanted her producer credit to go ahead of jamie he is producer credit
00:15:57 anyways and then he says this is truly insanity and here is something that and said and she says
00:16:04 she expects sony aka me to persuade wayfarer to agree to remove a film by by justin baldoni and
00:16:12 move her producer credit before theirs getting them to approve giving her a producer credit was
00:16:18 herculean and then signford said i don't want to ask them to do that for her she can ask herself
00:16:23 we've bent over backwards enough this is getting now to the point of absurdity and then here this
00:16:30 is from tara grants also at sony this may not achieve what blake wants it to with the eyesores
00:16:37 Leslie Sloan, her publicist, sounding defensive in response to people calling Blake a bully.
00:16:46 They make Justin sound much more measured and reasonable than I'm sure Blake wanted.
00:16:52 So this is the Daily Mail article they're talking about, the one that James Vitushka
00:16:58 wrote, the reporter that's now suing the Daily Mail, and that was the article, the disturbing
00:17:04 truth behind why blake lively and her it ends with us stars are feuding with justin boldoni
00:17:09 then tara grant says all this would do all this would do is to continue to reinforce what everyone
00:17:16 is saying that blake is a bully and then she said she orchestrated all this drama in a totally
00:17:25 unsavvy and amateur way and basically threatened you and sony and now is mad it backfired on her
00:17:32 better than alternative because she and her team are playing with fire with all this borderline 0.77
00:17:39 abusive language that's where shit can spiral and it hasn't taken hold at all and here is from 0.89
00:17:45 tom rotman who says even though she did bring it all on herself by refusing to listen to advice 0.97
00:17:51 and by selling her products and here is sanford again saying tom thinks she's probably and
00:18:00 bizarrely unhirable right now. Then Sanford says, no, disagree. She is done for, at least for a
00:18:09 while. It's cooked. She said she's retiring to Josh or something. It will take a few years.
00:18:17 Eva Mendes' time, she did it to herself. If she just let him come to the premiere or didn't make
00:18:23 all the cast unfollow him or kick him off the movie and did what everyone ever has done in
00:18:29 show business for time and memorial which is protect the show then none of the sleuthing 1.00
00:18:37 would have happened the hair cell at the same time was epic level stupid she wouldn't listen 1.00
00:18:44 she knows better i could go on and on there are a lot more here actually but it's going to take 0.95
00:18:49 a lot of time to read all of this but this is just like some examples of what this post was about
00:18:55 So no wonder Ryan Reynolds didn't want us all to get reminded about that.
00:19:01 And especially because these are reactions from people in the industry.
00:19:05 And as you know, they want to get their reputation back.
00:19:09 And every time people get reminded of who she really is, it just reinforces what we all know about Blake Lively.
00:19:17 Yeah, anyways, let's get into what my insider told me today.
00:19:21 I've spoken to this person many, many times before.
00:19:24 and this person is in the industry as well and he knows people on both sides here. They say here
00:19:31 that in the industry Justin is the one who's seen to be holding all the cards now because his story
00:19:37 is the only one that is still to be told and people are desperate to hear it. Lively already
00:19:42 broadcasts her story via Megan Tuohy in her online smear campaign against Justin and no one is
00:19:48 interested in that again. What the public is missing is Justin's side. So true I can't wait
00:19:55 to hear his side of this story. Anyways this creates a big problem for Ryan Reynolds as he's
00:20:01 trying to rehabilitate his image because at any moment Justin can decide to share his story which
00:20:08 would inevitably lead to more and more people digging into Ryan's troubled history. Now that
00:20:13 the judge has dismissed Blake's claim they have nothing to fall back on. So true and that is
00:20:20 obviously another reason for why Ryan is behaving so erratic right now. He's terrified of what will
00:20:28 happen when Justin starts talking. They also say people are aware that there is no possible way
00:20:34 Megan Toohey would back up Lively's story in the future now that she's been exposed as a pawn of
00:20:41 the Reynolds team and didn't do any of the research or apply the diligence that the online 0.99
00:20:46 sleuths did. Meghan's reputation took such a huge hit from the ordeal that it will affect the
00:20:51 credibility of every story she does from now on. And they also say here that Ryan is desperate to
00:20:57 try to rebuild his image but the public is not buying it. As I said so many times here, every
00:21:03 time Ryan is tagged in some movie projects or anything, the comment section goes bananas. And
00:21:11 of course there is a reason why Apple TV did not tag him in the trailer of Mayday, the movie that's
00:21:18 coming out soon. And I say here what's interesting is that the younger generation at the studios
00:21:22 are the ones trying to tell their bosses just how toxic Ryan is. The more he posts weird videos and
00:21:29 shows up at comic conventions hiding his face, the more awkward it becomes. People are speculating
00:21:36 about what it would actually take
00:21:38 for Ryan and Blake to return to their former status.
00:21:41 And it all comes down to being humble,
00:21:43 admitting mistakes and owning their missteps.
00:21:46 All the things that Ryan and Blake
00:21:48 don't seem to ever be able to do.
00:21:51 And they're also pointing out here,
00:21:53 they can't really do that
00:21:54 because that opens them up to future legal exposure.
00:21:57 If they say, hey, we made up these SH claims
00:22:02 because we wanted to take over the movie,
00:22:04 then they basically committed perjury here so of course she can never or he can never admit
00:22:12 that what they did was wrong they can't take the accountability that the public is expecting from
00:22:18 them and then they say justin boldoni showed with this one video that he can spend literally zero
00:22:24 dollars and have a massive surge of goodwill anytime he wants there is literally no way ryan
00:22:32 and Blake can compete with that no matter how much money they throw at it it's not changing
00:22:36 anyone's minds yeah let's see now that Blake has to spend between 14 and 24 million dollars to try
00:22:43 and get her reputation back I wonder what it would cost to get Ryan's reputation back so yeah let's
00:22:49 keep an eye on social media for sure and what's going on there anyways I also wanted to mention
00:22:55 the Daily Mail's respond to this lawsuit by James Hutushka, the reporter who used to work for them,
00:23:02 that they now have deleted all tracks from. They removed all his bylines from all the story he ever
00:23:08 wrote for them. And now he's suing them, saying that he was forced to sign a sworn statement and
00:23:16 that he didn't believe what the sworn statement was was true. And he felt pressured to do it.
00:23:23 I spoke about this lawsuit the other day, so I'm not going to repeat all of that.
00:23:27 But anyways, now the Daily Mail has responded to these lawsuits.
00:23:32 So they didn't write anything about it themselves, as far as I could see.
00:23:35 But page six picked this up and asked the Daily Mail for comments.
00:23:39 In a statement to page six, the news outlet blasted his lawsuit as an inaccurate account
00:23:46 of the circumstances surrounding the declaration he signed
00:23:50 in connection with the lively Baldoni litigation.
00:23:53 So as I said, James Sutushka is asking for damages and lost wages,
00:23:59 emotional stress damages, impunity damages, a lot of money.
00:24:04 Obviously, he alleges the mail retaliated against him,
00:24:08 changing the way his work was supervised before firing him in June of 2025.
00:24:13 They also say that his complaint had not yet been reviewed by the county clerk at publication time when they published this.
00:24:21 And then they have a statement from the Daily Mail saying at no point did the Daily Mail pressure James to sign a declaration he believed to be untrue.
00:24:30 In fact, the declaration he signed was consistent with what he had already told senior management after the Baldoni complaint first came to our attention.
00:24:40 As a trusted news organization, we expect our journalists to act with honesty and integrity,
00:24:47 and we rely upon that important expectation.
00:24:52 The Daily Mail concluded the statement by alleging that Vitushkas claims that he is
00:24:58 a whistleblower who suffered retaliation, harassment, discrimination, or other unlawful
00:25:04 treatments are entirely meritless and unsupported by the facts, and we are confident they will
00:25:10 be soundly dismissed. It's funny every time someone responds to a lawsuit it's basically
00:25:16 the same thing this is meritless and we will win this and he's lying and whatever but it's going
00:25:23 to be interesting to follow this. Yeah I'll keep you posted on what happens here when they file
00:25:28 something back which I'm sure they will. Yeah there's so much crazy stuff surrounding this
00:25:34 legal fights still it's been over three months since they settled and we're still talking about
00:25:41 this and who knows there might be even more lawsuits coming out of this i would not be
00:25:46 surprised let's put it that way anyways thank you guys so much for watching i really appreciate all
00:25:52 your support and all the tips you're sending me as i've said so many times i couldn't do this show
00:25:58 without you guys and also a big thank you to my executive producer oscar who's being a bit lazy
00:26:04 today right oscar you're thinking about tomorrow's shows yeah he's planning tomorrow's episode
00:26:10 already always planning ahead and if you haven't subscribed yet please do and hit the notification
00:26:16 bell so you never miss an episode of flawsome talk and we'll see you soon bye
00:26:28 Thank you.