Full Comment - October 12, 2026


The ‘disruptive’ professor who refuses to be censored

Hosted by
Mentioned
Don’t wait up for history’s costliest hypothetical pipeline

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

155.54

Word count

9,048

Sentence count

348

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

19

sentences flagged

Hate speech

21

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Your Uncle Dale is the undisputed king of hot takes.
00:00:02.980 Buffalo, they're a lock because his barber said so.
00:00:05.840 Don't listen to Dale.
00:00:06.880 Go with the score bet.
00:00:08.120 Breaking news, live odds, and real-time stats right at your fingertips.
00:00:11.820 Everything you need for game day is one tap away.
00:00:14.320 Don't go with hot takes.
00:00:15.360 Go with the score bet.
00:00:16.820 19 years or older.
00:00:17.820 Ontario only.
00:00:19.400 If you or somebody you know has gambling concerns,
00:00:21.220 call ConnexOntario 24-7 at 1-866-531-2600.
00:00:24.760 Text us at 247-247 or chat with us at www.ConnexOntario.ca.
00:00:28.600 Standard messaging data rates may apply.
00:00:30.000 Having an opinion about Indian residential schools on campus can be risky these days
00:00:38.320 if you dare to challenge the revisionist narrative.
00:00:41.500 Even debating whether the schools were genocide can get you physically attacked
00:00:45.500 has happened last week with a retired professor at the University of Calgary
00:00:49.380 or arrested, as has happened to today's guest.
00:00:53.200 Hello and welcome to the Full Comment Podcast.
00:00:55.440 I'm Brian Lilly, your host.
00:00:56.500 And today, an academic who's been described as a controversial figure, someone whose views are upsetting and disrespectful.
00:01:04.580 One university administrator even called her an individual who has recently caused significant disruption at other Canadian universities.
00:01:13.300 Frances Whittowson was previously fired from Calgary's Mount Royal University in December 2021,
00:01:18.400 despite being a tenured professor, a rarity in academic circles.
00:01:22.880 And that all happened after expressing unapproved opinions about residential schools and Black Lives Matters.
00:01:28.940 She has since been banned from several campuses and arrested for coming back to speak to university students.
00:01:34.700 And recently, she launched a $3 million lawsuit against the University of Lethbridge, its senior officers and its faculty association,
00:01:43.980 arguing that they made factual accusations of dishonesty, hatred, criminality and physical harm.
00:01:50.480 Francis Whittowson joins me now.
00:01:52.020 Francis, thanks for the time.
00:01:54.380 Thanks for having me on.
00:01:55.900 Give me a quick summary here.
00:01:57.400 Explain to folks why you're suing the University of Lethbridge.
00:02:01.880 I'm suing the University of Lethbridge because they defamed me, or actually it was defamation
00:02:09.480 by innuendo.
00:02:10.760 So there's two entities that are involved, the University of Lethbridge Faculty Association
00:02:15.980 and the University of Lethbridge.
00:02:17.900 It was actually the University of Lethbridge Faculty Association that after an episode on February 4th, 2026, the University of Lethbridge Faculty Association posted a statement from its Gender Equity and Diversity Committee, which is headed by a professor by the name of Patrick Wilson,
00:02:39.800 where it said that I had engaged in misinformation and disinformation, that I was lying, that I had intended to harm students, and that I was motivated by hate.
00:02:56.120 So those were the most egregious, defamatory claims that were made.
00:03:01.320 And after I had just come on campus to collaborate with a professor emeritus there, Anthony Hall, and we were going to do an academic exercise called Spectrum Street Epistemology on the claim that the residential schools were genocidal.
00:03:17.840 And the reason why I wanted to collaborate with Anthony Hall is because he believes that there's evidence for the residential schools being genocidal.
00:03:24.660 So we thought it would be a really great opportunity to showcase civil disagreement before any student or faculty member who wanted to come join us.
00:03:35.140 But the University of Lethbridge was very not going to be having any of this and sent out an email to all students and faculty saying that a controversial figure was on campus with upsetting and disrespectful views.
00:03:50.040 And this resulted in an angry mob of students hunting us down and stopping any discussion that we were trying to have on that matter.
00:04:00.780 So Professor Hall believes in the genocidal claim.
00:04:04.320 You don't.
00:04:05.860 You mentioned the Spectrum Street epistemology.
00:04:09.640 What is that?
00:04:10.860 So what were you going to do with Professor Hall that was too controversial to happen on campus?
00:04:17.060 How does Spectrum Street Epistemology work?
00:04:21.660 Okay, so this is great.
00:04:23.040 This is a great thing for universities.
00:04:26.240 It was spearheaded by a professor who was pushed out of Portland State, whose name is Peter Boghossian.
00:04:33.720 And Peter Boghossian works with another street epistemologist whose name is Reed Nicewonder.
00:04:39.000 And they go around the world doing this method.
00:04:42.460 and what it is is you've got nine mats that go on a spectrum from absolutely agree to absolutely
00:04:51.140 disagree with neutral in the middle you lay out these mats in a in a sort of a public area
00:04:58.020 and you have claims such as the residential schools were genocidal the remains of 215
00:05:04.960 children have been confirmed at the Kamloops Indian Residential School there are only two
00:05:10.840 sexes, you know, there was genocide that occurred in Gaza, or whatever claim you want to choose,
00:05:20.260 and then you get the participants to stand on the mat that they believe best represents their
00:05:27.300 degree of certainty, and then you would get them to explain why they believe what they believe,
00:05:33.700 and then you try to ask what evidence they have for that, and then you ask them what evidence
00:05:39.580 they would need to become less certain or more certain. And the method works the best when,
00:05:45.480 of course, you have two people who strongly disagree with one another, because then you
00:05:50.420 can actually have the divide that you see kind of happening before your eyes. And the best one that
00:05:56.940 Peter, myself, and Reid did, we did it at University of Lethbridge on September 1st, 0.95
00:06:02.200 But the best one was at Muslim Fest in Chestermere, where we examined claims such as apostates should be put to death.
00:06:15.840 Okay, so like some serious questions being asked in this sort of thing. 0.69
00:06:20.720 Yes, exactly.
00:06:21.780 And the university, which is supposed to be a place where you think, you explore ideas, you criticize, you question, said this was too much.
00:06:33.060 Yes, yes, they actively, well, it was the students were emboldened by the university administration. And this has happened not just at University of Lethbridge. University of Lethbridge is just the worst example because they have been so aggressive in trying to paint me as an odious person who's doing these terrible things.
00:06:53.780 But, you know, we've had problems at the University of Winnipeg where my cameraman there, Daniel Page, feared for his life because of the gangsters that showed up.
00:07:05.280 We had, I'm just thinking about the other kind of areas of the street epistemology.
00:07:10.860 That was the University of Regina.
00:07:12.900 We did it there.
00:07:13.400 Actually, that worked out relatively well.
00:07:15.260 But the university was trying to discourage me, seriously discourage me from showing up.
00:07:19.460 But we had a good kind of interaction.
00:07:22.220 This has been going on a number of institutions.
00:07:24.940 So, Francis, your supporters would say you are a free speech advocate.
00:07:30.300 You, in some ways, are a free speech martyr.
00:07:32.400 But your critics would say you're just going out there to provoke a response.
00:07:37.440 Are you going out there to agitate?
00:07:39.520 Is this agitprop?
00:07:41.940 Well, that's the great thing about spectrum street epistemology is that it's meant to be a very non-controversial kind of way of,
00:07:51.260 of trying to get people to think about why they believe the things that they
00:07:55.080 do.
00:07:56.080 Why non-controversial?
00:07:57.360 If you're talking about controversial topics.
00:08:00.320 Sorry,
00:08:01.000 I meant a non-confrontational,
00:08:02.920 non-confrontational.
00:08:03.920 Okay.
00:08:04.380 I guess it's controversial,
00:08:06.320 but,
00:08:06.440 but non-confrontational.
00:08:07.700 So the reason why it's non-confrontational,
00:08:09.620 I guess it is controversial because the claims themselves are controversial,
00:08:14.080 but it's meant to be non-confrontational because it's not about your right,
00:08:19.700 your,
00:08:20.300 your right.
00:08:21.260 or you're wrong and I'm right and you know change my mind kinds of things often have that sort of
00:08:27.160 dynamic someone's owned by someone else it's really about like what would it take just to
00:08:32.940 become a little less certain like you don't have to completely change your mind and you'll see this
00:08:38.000 when you're you're doing this exercise some people in mid discussion will just move to another mat
00:08:44.800 because they've been convinced by the other person who's making the argument so that's kind of the
00:08:50.660 They might just move, they might just move a degree, not all the way to the other side.
00:08:55.160 Exactly.
00:08:55.800 Yeah.
00:08:56.140 And, uh, sometimes they'll just move to neutral because they, they're not quite sure anymore
00:09:00.960 what, what their position is.
00:09:02.460 Like it doesn't have to be, I'm now having a complete change of my, my mind.
00:09:08.020 It's just, I'm just, I'm, I never heard that argument before.
00:09:10.960 I find that quite intriguing.
00:09:13.580 I'll have to look into this more, but at this point it makes me a little less certain as
00:09:18.000 to where I was.
00:09:18.720 The other interesting thing about it is it has the absolutely agree and the absolutely disagree mats.
00:09:25.020 Personally, I almost never get on the absolutely mat because I always want to leave a little bit open for being able to be convinced, you know, that I'm not 100% correct.
00:09:39.620 I must say, though, in Chestermere 0.99
00:09:42.200 with the apostate claim 0.98
00:09:43.780 that apostates should be put to death 0.61
00:09:46.200 I was on 1.00
00:09:47.500 the absolutely disagreeing thing
00:09:50.060 I said, you know, I can't, I don't want to hear
00:09:52.300 I don't want to hear people
00:09:53.820 accept the idea that that's going to happen
00:09:56.280 in a society, I don't want to live in a society
00:09:58.320 like that. You know, maybe
00:10:00.100 I could be convinced that apostate should be 1.00
00:10:02.300 killed. But this guy did, this guy 1.00
00:10:04.100 was on the neutral mat, he was
00:10:06.080 on the neutral mat, saying, you know
00:10:08.020 I don't know about this. 0.66
00:10:11.320 Every atheist should be worried.
00:10:13.280 Every agnostic should be worried at that point.
00:10:15.980 And everyone that's not a true believer of whatever religion you're being an apostate from should be worried.
00:10:22.700 Yes.
00:10:23.480 You are pretty strong in your desire for debate on campus, though.
00:10:32.280 And you are pretty strong in your support of free speech.
00:10:36.660 so you've got this lawsuit where you're suing the the university at senior officers the faculty
00:10:44.020 association for expressing pretty harsh opinions about you how do you square that with free speech
00:10:53.460 well definitely defamation is not part of free speech and this is something i've thought a lot
00:10:59.820 about because i would typically not want to do this at all and i i would i would be very reluctant
00:11:06.340 to do it if it was if it were individuals that were doing it and in fact i have been not pursued
00:11:12.780 people like michael tricello my former colleague who called me a pathetic racist and i just wanted
00:11:18.620 to hang out with white supremacists so that kind of thing i have endured and not done this but the 0.73
00:11:25.060 difference with the university of lethbridge is that and the university of lethbridge faculty
00:11:28.820 Association is that they are using the full weight of institutional power with malice,
00:11:36.240 I would argue, to try to functionally chill discussions on campus. And they will not
00:11:44.820 actually articulate why they believe that I'm spreading misinformation or disinformation or
00:11:54.140 anything like that. And so really, it's only the legal side that gives you an opportunity to force
00:12:00.760 them to be able to justify the terrible things that they are claiming. So there's the couple
00:12:07.700 reasons why I've decided at this point that we have to just pursue the legal route against the
00:12:13.500 University of Lethbridge, because they are using the shield of institutional power to chill
00:12:20.780 discussion on their university campus. Well, having an institution say things about you
00:12:27.820 on the public record carries much more weight than some random guy on social media or even
00:12:33.480 a former colleague. That does carry a lot of weight. You said that people have accused you
00:12:41.040 of just wanting to hang out with white supremacists. I've heard you described as a figure
00:12:47.840 of the far right i'd like you to talk to me about that because your background um academically you
00:12:57.520 come from a marxist point of view uh you you're not known for for being on the far right you're
00:13:05.600 you stand with marxism historical materialism or does that still apply to you is that how you
00:13:14.160 would still describe yourself i'm a little less uh certain of that if i were on the street
00:13:20.840 epistemology mats i'd be moving uh because i'm worried i'm very very worried about the
00:13:26.260 the totalitarianism that is you know emerging and and i'm i'm worried about
00:13:32.080 that sort of side of things from that standpoint i would never uh refer to myself and i never have
00:13:38.160 as a marxist i would it would always be historical materialism which would be the theoretical side
00:13:43.380 which is looking at the class the importance of class and the importance of labor in conflicts
00:13:50.580 that exist but my main concern now is is the truth uh finding people who want to pursue the truth
00:13:58.020 and um i'm a follower of george orwell actually george orwell is the figure that i follow most
00:14:03.940 closely and many people don't know that george orwell was a socialist uh so i'm actually
00:14:08.940 calling myself now an orwellian socialist because i uh i again orwellian is a weird term because
00:14:16.160 it's often used to refer to um the doublespeak aspect not to orwell orwell was not what's known
00:14:23.880 often as an orwellian yeah um uh it's doublespeak that is the orwellian kind of thing that george
00:14:30.180 orwell talked about but george orwell was very very worried about how socialist movements become
00:14:38.440 can become totalitarian in their, in their, in the way they operate. And I think we have to be
00:14:44.680 very, very concerned about that after looking at Stalinism in the Soviet Union and Maoism in China,
00:14:54.020 you know, these, this is stopping people from raising legitimate kinds of objections to what's
00:15:01.360 going on. And if you do that, if you stop honest critics from being able to express their
00:15:07.760 concerns, you're going to be heading down a path that is going to be misguided and have harmful
00:15:15.340 consequences for society. So that's what I'm kind of seeing myself as now. Now, I do associate with
00:15:22.580 people who would be considered to be right-wing. That's because they think the truth is important
00:15:30.020 too. Right now, we've got to get people to understand that the truth is not right-wing.
00:15:38.260 The truth is just a human value that we're trying to understand. Whether we should have
00:15:45.060 more of a right-wing approach or a left-wing approach, those have all got to come out in
00:15:49.540 the arguments that are going to take place once we establish that it's really a matter of evidence
00:15:54.940 and argument. But because we have the relativist position, which is, of course, at the root of the
00:16:00.380 woke kind of takeover. There is no truth. There is no truth. And so then anything goes. And
00:16:06.320 you have all these all sorts of arguments now being made that you should go along with whatever
00:16:13.340 claim that a group that, you know, presumes to be oppressed is making because that's going to
00:16:19.420 empower them but you know telling people falsehoods doesn't empower anyone and that's something that
00:16:26.900 people have to understand when we're looking at this so that's my battle now is universities have
00:16:32.120 to have people pursuing the truth follow the evidence wherever it leads if the evidence goes
00:16:37.880 in a right-wing direction we have to follow that if it goes in the left-wing direction we have to
00:16:41.780 follow that that's all there is to it and I'm just sick of hearing all these academics yakking on
00:16:48.040 about how there's no truth and it's all a matter of your positionality that just is not going to
00:16:53.720 get us anywhere i uh i always try and explain to folks that you know people acting in good faith
00:17:02.080 in politics don't disagree about the problem they disagree about the solution or how to implement
00:17:08.380 the solution if they're acting in good faith and if they're not acting in good faith well then
00:17:12.980 that's something different completely. I don't want to go down too much of a divergent path here,
00:17:19.120 but, you know, historical materialism would be associated with Marxism. Marxism and the left
00:17:25.300 appears to have been taken over by the woke movement and culture. You know, if you're looking
00:17:31.920 at it from a class perspective, it's no longer about the trade union hall. It's about the faculty
00:17:38.400 club you know we've all talked about that before but how do you get folks saying like
00:17:44.480 working class people don't care about an awful lot of this woke stuff they just don't it's like
00:17:51.440 how do i make my life better they're not having arguments a lot of the the woke stuff reminds me
00:17:57.100 of the what we used to hear about uh uh you know monks in the middle ages arguing about how many
00:18:03.040 angels can dance on the head of a pin it has no bearing on real life yeah exactly and that's a
00:18:10.920 huge problem you know university professors should not be activists like and they certainly shouldn't
00:18:17.480 be activists while they're being university professors if they want to go do things on their
00:18:21.060 own time and you know and be engaged but when they're going to be a person in the classroom
00:18:26.520 a person doing research they have to consider the opposing positions and whether they're valid or
00:18:32.840 not, but because the activists have now taken over the universities, you have people like
00:18:38.780 Sean Carlton and Egon Sinclair, who I see are the worst offenders of this.
00:18:43.560 I've never seen such activist professors, or there would be ones in the trans activism
00:18:48.360 side as well, but in terms of my own experience, who are basically saying if you disagree with
00:18:55.420 them, your views should be criminalized.
00:18:58.300 You should be put in jail.
00:18:59.400 That's what they're doing to shield their own activism from scrutiny. And people have to be very concerned about that, because if we have that approach in the universities, we're not going to be able to understand anything.
00:19:15.340 And universities are very important institutions. They're where we disseminate knowledge. They're where you train professionals. And they actually used to provide quite a good bulwark against authoritarianism. But because these activists have taken over the machinery of these institutions, the universities are not operating the way they should anymore.
00:19:36.980 you were hired by mount royal university and i want to talk to you about that in your firing
00:19:43.440 when we come back after the break because um you had controversial opinions before
00:19:48.240 and you weren't fired in fact you got hired because of them then you got fired we'll talk
00:19:54.220 about that when we come back but but first a little capitalism francis i gotta pay the bills
00:19:59.080 here i want to tell you about the post media merch store that's right post media dot store
00:20:05.700 um we've got something new that i didn't know about before today if you love the old brickland
00:20:12.620 do you remember the brickland sports car they were going to build in down in new brunswick
00:20:16.780 it was in i believe it was in back to the future all of this well we've got the brickland gullwing
00:20:22.560 gamble uh post media store merch you can go to postmedia.store or you can just go and get you
00:20:29.240 know the toronto sundat hat the national post tote bag all of that postmedia.store shop now
00:20:34.840 the sports calendar is on fire and the score bet has you covered with breaking news and betting
00:20:39.400 seamlessly connected every play every stat every score giving you the tools you need to bet
00:20:44.580 confidently born in the north built for you the score bet canada sportsbook 19 years or older
00:20:50.080 ontario only if you or someone you know has gambling concerns call connects ontario 24 7
00:20:54.920 at 1-866-531-2600 text us at 247-247 or chat with us at www.connectsontario.ca
00:21:03.100 Standard message and iterates may apply.
00:21:33.100 and behind-the-scenes scoops from Parliament Hill and beyond.
00:21:37.020 With our twice-weekly newsletters,
00:21:39.040 exclusive reports from Washington, D.C.,
00:21:41.820 early access to John Iveson columns,
00:21:44.940 and subscriber-only videos and events,
00:21:48.060 PAC members get insider insight
00:21:50.120 into the minds of the strategists,
00:21:52.420 policy gurus, and power brokers
00:21:54.200 shaping Canada's political future.
00:21:56.580 You don't want to miss all that, do you?
00:21:58.180 I sure don't.
00:21:59.140 And you can get all now
00:22:01.600 for less than a dollar a week.
00:22:04.500 Just go to nationalpost.com slash newsletters to sign up.
00:22:09.860 That's nationalpost.com slash newsletters.
00:22:13.620 So much is happening in politics right now.
00:22:16.620 Rising tensions with the U.S. on trade and defense.
00:22:19.900 Not one, but two provincial separatist movements gaining real ground.
00:22:23.680 The liberals trying to hang on to a razor-thin majority
00:22:27.520 as the economy stumbles and with the cost of living still rising.
00:22:31.600 It's exciting. Extremely exciting.
00:22:33.740 But the only way to get behind the scenes and right into the source code of what politicians and the people around them are really thinking is to get political hack.
00:22:41.940 Go to nationalpost.com slash newsletters.
00:22:45.540 And join us.
00:22:46.900 This is Tristan Hopper, the host of Canada Did What?
00:22:50.320 where we unpack the biggest, weirdest, and wildest political moments in Canadian history you thought you knew and tell you what really happened.
00:22:58.080 Stick around at the end of the episode to hear a sample of one of our favorite episodes from season two.
00:23:03.180 And if you missed it, there are even more episodes from last season.
00:23:06.700 So make sure you subscribe to Canada Did What? Everywhere you get podcasts.
00:23:11.400 OK, quick correction, because I was just told in the break that it was not the Bricklin in the Back to the Future movie.
00:23:18.780 It was the DeLorean. And since we're talking about truth, it's important to be truthful here.
00:23:23.180 uh francis uh i walk through the university of toronto campus on a pretty much daily basis with
00:23:31.480 my uh my little pup chloe the wonder dog and uh above the doorway at victoria university on the 0.98
00:23:39.000 campus it says the truth shall make ye free um not always sometimes it's giant pain in the ass 0.97
00:23:45.560 you wrote the book um disrobing the aboriginal industry in 2008 that same year you get hired by
00:23:55.900 mount royal university in calgary so they knew who they were getting you wrote books on topics
00:24:02.900 that would be controversial after that i mean disrobing was well regarded did you win awards
00:24:08.720 or were you just up for awards on that one yeah we were shortlisted for the donner prize yeah so
00:24:13.900 So, like, you know, the establishment was accepting of a book that now probably wouldn't get published, never mind by McGill Queen's Press.
00:24:23.720 So they know who they're getting.
00:24:26.580 What changed between when you're hired by Mount Royal University in 2008 and when you're fired because of comments you made about Black Lives Matter and about residential schools in 2021?
00:24:43.900 there's a couple there's a number of things that are happening you know we have a cultural shift
00:24:48.860 that it's underway in society but at the university and i was watching this so i i was
00:24:54.880 had a front row seat in seeing mount royal being destroyed i didn't understand the time that this
00:25:00.500 was going to be the end but um i was worried i was very worried and it took place in 2014
00:25:06.940 i remember specifically two things that happened where i thought wow this is not what is going on
00:25:13.580 here and one of them was the provost kathy shaler told us that we would be indigenizing mount royal
00:25:20.740 university she announced that an arts faculty council meeting the second one was an equity
00:25:26.080 workshop put on by the canadian association of university teachers and canadian news association
00:25:33.420 of university teachers for people who aren't familiar with that organization it was formed
00:25:37.300 specifically to protect academic freedom in Canada and to have this organization putting
00:25:43.960 on an equity workshop where people were being encouraged to put territorial land acknowledgements
00:25:50.220 on their syllabus. We were being told to hire on the basis of other things besides, you know,
00:25:56.880 the merit of people, all sorts of activist kinds of things. And I thought, how can the
00:26:06.160 canadian association of university teachers be putting forth this argument anyway that was just
00:26:11.780 the beginning of the institutional takeover by equity diversity and inclusion activists and the
00:26:20.980 professor the professors that were being hired at that time too were were very different than how
00:26:28.100 they had been hired you know at the time i was hired so as we moved through the 2010s
00:26:35.040 You had more and more, you know, sort of woke academics being hired, you know, people who were proponents of queer theory and all these kinds of things.
00:26:45.680 And so what happened is gradually we had more and more professors who thought that it was appropriate to be able to stop people from making the kinds of arguments that I was making.
00:26:55.200 And then that resulted, of course, in 2020. And it started with me defending the journalist Wendy Mesley at CBC because she referred to a book title which had a racial slur in it. The point was being made by Pierre Valliere, who was talking about class, not race, being the important thing to think about. Anyway, Gabrielle Weasel had one of my colleagues.
00:27:23.060 Well, in that incident with Wendy Mesley, my understanding is she was fired because she used the name of the book title in a story meeting to talk about the book and the issue.
00:27:36.260 Yeah, I think there was a couple of different, but one of, like that was another, she was mentioning, she had a guest coming on and, you know, they were talking about the problems he'd researched.
00:27:45.800 And she's using this word in an anti-racist context, but it didn't matter because she had just mentioned this word.
00:27:55.060 And you and I can't say it because we'll get canceled for saying it.
00:27:58.040 People might notice that, you know, because I don't want to get anyone in trouble.
00:28:01.640 You know, I've been burned by this so badly, the ridiculousness of it.
00:28:06.580 I don't want to get anyone in trouble.
00:28:08.640 So I'm just, you know, I think people know what I'm referring to.
00:28:13.160 Yeah, it's a word used often in a certain type of popular music. It's played on the radio.
00:28:19.720 It shows you, I've been censored, because I would typically just mention this word, but since, you know, I've just had so many, and even in academic freedom context, I was at a conference at Stanford, and I was just relaying my case, and there's this huge conflict that emerged.
00:28:38.140 Anyway, that was the backstory of how things started to go off the rails, and when I just insisted that I was going to be able to just refer to this book title, and that was it, I was not going to have any indigenization activists telling me that I was a racist and so on.
00:28:54.640 As a result of that, I was pursued by a mob. It was instigated by Gabrielle Wieselhead. It was a prized indigenization asset. And eventually I was pushed out of Mount Royal University because of the anger that arose when, instead of just taking this from this professor, I turned my Twitter account into a satirical character and satirized her identity.
00:29:24.640 efforts to try to get me fired and congratulated her enthusiastically because she referred to
00:29:32.140 herself as being loving and kind and just trying to bring people together with humility and grace
00:29:37.460 and i was just trying to draw attention to the fact i didn't think that was really you know
00:29:41.660 consistent with her her way she's referring to herself to try to get a professor fired for just 1.00
00:29:47.040 making academic arguments as a result of me satirizing her attempts to get me fired
00:29:50.920 i was charged with harassment and and that's kind of everything started to happen on the basis of
00:29:56.620 that so and jonathan swift wept yeah it's just it's really bad like the situation universities
00:30:03.900 is just you know that that kind of thing anyway this this kind of grad it was it would have
00:30:09.440 happened for one reason or another because of these the and the final thing i should mention
00:30:14.600 is the administration. The administration changed quite significantly in early 2010s.
00:30:22.060 We had fantastic administrators like Manuel Merton and Robin Fisher, and they were replaced by
00:30:28.360 political opportunists who really wanted to just pander to all the activists on campus and didn't
00:30:36.540 stand up against this kind of woke takeover that was starting to happen at the university.
00:30:44.600 I want to ask you if you'd feel any kinship towards someone like Jordan Peterson. Politically, you'd be very different than Jordan. But his journey started a little bit later, 2016. He left U of T in 2021, same year you left Mount Royal.
00:31:02.680 he as a psychologist objected to being told that he had to um agree to people's gender identity and
00:31:13.460 ideology without question and that he would be charged if that that's kind of what started it
00:31:19.460 for him and went down the road from there do you feel any kinship to someone like like jordan
00:31:26.060 Definitely. I've interacted with him a lot and I've been on his Tammy Peterson's podcast a couple of times. And it's true. So Jordan and I have very different sort of religious and political views, but I really admired him.
00:31:48.100 I admired him immensely, and I still do, I still admire him, because you could tell that he was trying to pursue the truth when he was doing things, and he understood the danger of people being forced to say things that they did not believe to be true.
00:32:07.220 And we're seeing that all the time now, is that, you know, people who don't believe something, a territorial land acknowledgement, putting pronouns in their bios, being the two most obvious examples of that.
00:32:20.600 None of which are in my email bios, but I don't even have an email signature, never mind pronouns or a bio.
00:32:26.900 But people, I know people who do that, who don't believe it.
00:32:30.980 They just think that it's going to get them.
00:32:33.060 Yeah, they're told and they believe if they don't do it, they're going to be singled out and they're going to have some negative consequence happen to them. And that is the most soul-destroying thing that someone can do, is to have to mouth things that they don't actually believe.
00:32:48.260 and it actually I believe you know changes your thought process because like this is kind of an
00:32:54.940 interesting thing that Orwell was thinking about which was this idea of a thought crime and freedom
00:33:00.580 of thought there's a relationship between freedom of speech and freedom of thought and if you aren't
00:33:07.060 able to articulate things out loud with your fellow humans your thought process will be diminished
00:33:14.400 and that's what's happening now 0.99
00:33:16.580 is we are becoming stupider as a species 0.99
00:33:19.980 because there's a whole bunch of things 0.99
00:33:22.140 that people don't feel that they can say
00:33:24.400 and that kind of makes their thought process compromised
00:33:28.500 and we are in a terrible situation now.
00:33:33.180 So, you know, all this kind of compelled speech
00:33:34.900 is a real problem. 1.00
00:33:36.120 Can I give you an example of this stupidity 1.00
00:33:37.760 and then I want to hear your comments on it. 1.00
00:33:40.480 The City of Toronto recently put out a memo
00:33:43.740 telling their staff to stop using the term stakeholder
00:33:46.940 because it is colonial and anti-indigenous.
00:33:52.260 Now, the etymology of the word stakeholder
00:33:55.320 has nothing to do with colonialism or indigenous issues.
00:33:59.800 The only thing that they stake that on
00:34:02.500 is that in Oklahoma,
00:34:05.700 people put stakes in the ground to claim their land.
00:34:08.980 That is not where the word stakeholder comes from,
00:34:11.760 but they've latched onto it and they're telling and they're using federal government resources
00:34:18.660 and material to back them up and say see this is this is wrong that's how far we've come we don't
00:34:25.060 even know what the words mean but we want to ban them based on false narratives and and that's
00:34:32.920 happening all the time uh you know all these words that you're not allowed to say which diminishes
00:34:39.020 our vocabulary. It prevents us from articulating ourselves in the way that we want to. And I'm
00:34:47.280 just going to say this book title right now, White F***ers of America, and people can do with that 0.99
00:34:52.440 what they want because I censor myself there. And I told all these people at Mount Royal, 0.99
00:34:58.160 you are not going to get me to censor the title of Pierre Valier's book because he used this word
00:35:05.080 for a reason. He was trying to use it as a rhetorical device.
00:35:09.900 It was about the plight of the Québécois.
00:35:13.380 Exactly. Working class Canadians 1.00
00:35:16.800 who are demeaned and insulted and mean 0.99
00:35:21.100 to seem like they're uncouth because
00:35:24.260 their oppression is being justified by this
00:35:28.900 demeaning treatment. That's what he was getting at. That's what he wanted us to think
00:35:32.980 about with respect to that book title and for people who want to you know censor Pierre Valliere
00:35:38.560 I am not going to allow you to do it so there I've just done it and and that's how bad it is
00:35:44.100 that's how how much I have been um my thoughts have been scrambled because of being persecuted
00:35:52.300 by all these people at Mount Royal for just doing something which I thought was right
00:35:57.420 I think Wendy Mavsley was treated in an abominable way by the CBC and and of course she made it worse
00:36:05.420 for herself by groveling and not standing up and just fighting it out because everyone thought well
00:36:10.740 she's obviously thinks she's done something terrible but she did nothing wrong at all
00:36:14.520 she she was completely just doing the right thing and then got you know taken down by a bunch of 0.98
00:36:19.940 race hustlers and so you know this is terrible so anyway I've done that I've corrected that matter 0.53
00:36:25.020 and that's that book title I will never ever censor myself when I'm talking about it because 0.87
00:36:31.440 Pierre Valliere would be turning over in his grave thinking that you know some academic who
00:36:37.260 just wants to allow an author to express himself for you know a completely anti-oppressive kind of 1.00
00:36:45.900 thought is now being censored by all these idiots who don't know anything about history and don't 0.99
00:36:52.960 know anything about, you know, the importance of academic discussions. And, you know, I'm never 1.00
00:36:58.360 going to allow myself to do that ever again. They can throw me in jail if they want to. That's the
00:37:02.840 end of it. Mostly censored by white liberals. Quick thoughts on the whole DEI front. Is this
00:37:12.600 a movement that started with good intentions or was it always insidious?
00:37:22.960 I'll have to think about that one.
00:37:26.760 I don't know, see, intentions.
00:37:28.640 Like, this is a thing.
00:37:29.460 This is why the University of Lethbridge and University of Lethbridge Faculty Association are in such hot water.
00:37:34.940 Because they've imputed intent to me.
00:37:38.620 They didn't just say I was an incompetent and I do bad research or so on.
00:37:43.440 They're saying I'm actively intending to go on that.
00:37:46.080 And they're never, ever going to be able to provide evidence of that.
00:37:50.100 Yeah, that's why implying motive is always so dangerous.
00:37:53.080 Yes. So I don't know, I guess. I'm sure there's some people who are psychopathic personalities that are doing this for whatever reasons.
00:38:04.080 But I think what's happened is because of the assault on the pursuit of truth that happened in the 1960s, it allowed people to not really think very clearly about what the implications of things were.
00:38:23.420 And this is what equity, diversity, inclusion has done.
00:38:27.600 It's a very interesting area as to what that is.
00:38:31.520 I've done some work on this myself. There's a couple of strands of EDI. One is what's called
00:38:40.340 wokeism, which is Herbert Marcuse's turn away from class politics and the embracing of identity
00:38:47.840 politics. And the idea that the revolution can be brought about through not bothering with the
00:38:54.440 working class anymore, just bothering with the gender and the race and so on. So that's part of
00:39:00.960 it. But the other part of it is something called corporate managerialism, which comes out of
00:39:06.640 the public administration literature. Anyway, it argues that in order to reduce conflicts in
00:39:12.860 society, you should increase the numbers of these groups that are oppressed in the professional
00:39:21.360 managerial class. So if you've got 7% Aboriginal people, 7% of bank executives should be Aboriginal,
00:39:30.540 7% of university presidents should be Aboriginal.
00:39:33.040 7% of, you know, lawyers, etc.
00:39:35.940 And, of course, this strikes at the heart of the meritocracy in a society.
00:39:42.540 Because what you have is you have less qualified people taking those positions.
00:39:47.720 And that's kind of what has gone on when you go into banks or you go into...
00:39:52.040 My view has always been if the person's qualified, it doesn't matter.
00:39:57.440 It's when you start discounting qualifications that it gets into.
00:40:02.960 And interesting to see the two different theories at work behind those two different ways of viewing it. 0.64
00:40:12.100 What made you decide to speak out against Black Lives Matter?
00:40:16.400 You've long been outspoken on Aboriginal, Indigenous issues.
00:40:21.740 um you know as we said earlier you you wrote the book disrobing the aboriginal industry
00:40:27.500 um you know it's and in in many ways it still is an industry i can point to the uh the lobbyists
00:40:35.980 the lawyers the activists that make a fortune off of this industry while the lives of everyday
00:40:43.320 people on reserves does not improve we always spoke out on that for years what made you speak
00:40:50.420 out on Black Lives Matter, because that's kind of the beginning of the end of your official academic
00:40:55.860 career at Mount Royal. Yes. So I was having an interview with the Western Standard about
00:41:02.680 people trying to get me fired. So I think that the petition to get me fired
00:41:08.680 happened just before that. And so I was being interviewed and I was speaking
00:41:14.020 a bit hyperbolically and off the cuff. And for me, I wasn't really zeroing in on Black Lives Matter
00:41:21.720 as a specific entity. I was kind of fighting against my colleagues who had Black Lives Matter 0.96
00:41:29.640 stuff all over their Twitter accounts and all this kind of thing. Because what had happened is
00:41:37.140 that they were trying to bring in mandatory anti-racism training to Mount Royal University.
00:41:46.220 So that was what was afoot. And to do this, to fight against it, because my philosophy
00:41:54.300 colleague, Sinclair McRae, had written this incredible letter that just laid out all the
00:42:00.880 problems with this. And I thought, I can't really say this any better than Sinclair McRae.
00:42:05.340 so I'll use satire to show how this is a wrong-headed idea
00:42:10.820 and so I did this open letter to my colleagues on
00:42:15.380 I guess it was on Twitter or Facebook
00:42:17.300 saying that George Orwell had come to me in a dream
00:42:22.760 and he had told me
00:42:24.640 Francis, although I know you're a fan of my work
00:42:28.500 you don't really understand that it's actually
00:42:34.500 you know uh wokeism i can't remember exactly the words but it's actually this you know sort of
00:42:41.620 kind of woke stuff that is the the path forward that that's where we should be going and then i
00:42:47.060 said uh you know after doing a territorial land acknowledgement um praying to the creator and
00:42:53.620 putting my pronouns on twitter i have decided the right way for mount royal university and that is
00:43:00.540 to do an oppression point system for all faculty members at Mount Royal and those that, you
00:43:07.380 know, are white and male and so on, they should just do the right thing and resign their positions 0.64
00:43:15.240 from Mount Royal because this will be, so I did this incredible, well, I take pride
00:43:21.120 in it, this open letter that was satirical about this mandatory anti-racism training.
00:43:29.860 And you now know that satire in the online world do not meet ever, correct?
00:43:35.800 Yes. So when I did that, and that's what I thought was kind of the Black Lives Matter was,
00:43:42.120 was I just kind of saw that as a generic thing that was kind of making all these things like
00:43:48.140 mandatory anti-racism training seem like it would be a good idea at the university. And when I,
00:43:54.560 when i was talking to this this i think it was uh um i can't i can't remember that i just skipped
00:44:00.360 my mind when i was talking the western standard about this i i just criticized i came out really
00:44:05.200 harshly that i said that black lives matter has destroyed the university and i was really
00:44:09.500 referring to this this idea that you should have this anti-racism kind of stuff you know imposed
00:44:15.720 upon everyone in the university and i spoke out against it and as a result of that it was that
00:44:22.660 And I said that the residential schools brought benefits that were not otherwise available.
00:44:29.340 I think there was those two comments that everyone kind of latched on to and said that was totally unacceptable for anyone to be saying that in the university.
00:44:37.360 And that formed the basis for the complaints that were made to the administration, which were then used to justify why my employment relationship was no longer viable.
00:44:49.260 It's pretty unusual for people in a tenure position to be fired, though, isn't it?
00:44:53.520 It is very unusual.
00:44:54.420 As far as we know, now, of course, there's many of these cases where they never get to the stage that I get to because you have settlements of various kinds.
00:45:03.680 Okay.
00:45:05.200 Now, I'd like to get your thoughts on residential schools and the claim of the 215 graves in Kamloops.
00:45:13.200 have you sat down and and and spoken to people who've gone to residential schools
00:45:18.140 in particular people who had bad experiences um i'm just trying to think i i have face to face
00:45:26.540 so um at university of winnipeg for example you can you can listen to uh interaction between me
00:45:33.880 and grandma uh her name's geraldine shingoose otherwise known as grandma shingoose viv ketchum
00:45:41.100 um other people who are not like people went to residential schools but but had their parents went
00:45:47.400 to residential schools and when I was talking to them I'm saying look I I'm not I'm on the neutral
00:45:54.340 mat about many of these things about the residential schools I'm here not because of any of that I'm
00:46:00.360 here because I want to talk about the Kamloops case the Kamloops 215 deception because you can
00:46:06.860 have many people who suffered terrible experiences at the residential school and that still doesn't
00:46:11.640 mean that a whole bunch of nuns and priests you know murdered 200 plus children and put them in
00:46:17.400 clandestine graves in the in the old apple orchard when not one parent has said that their child went
00:46:22.980 missing from what I understand the Kamloops school it was one of the better schools they did all
00:46:29.240 sorts of things like having a swimming pool where they gave children swimming lessons they had
00:46:36.820 all sorts of dancing classes and there's tremendous amounts of work we're done of students getting on
00:46:45.080 a plane on a trip to mexico yeah so kamloops is seems to be one of the better schools i'm sure
00:46:50.860 there were terrible you know teachers and so on at various schools but you know i'm saying to
00:46:56.960 people look i we can talk about all those other things if you want and you can convince me you
00:47:03.060 know Geraldine Shingoos whose story I might add has changed quite a bit over time is now talking
00:47:09.860 about all the horrible sexual abuse and everything that she has endured at the school and she could
00:47:14.340 be misremembering she could have you know sexual abuse happen in other contexts being you know
00:47:21.360 implanted and so on so I don't know and this is a very difficult area obviously but that's not to
00:47:27.080 deny that a number of people would have suffered sexual abuse, would have suffered sexual abuse,
00:47:34.280 would have suffered various indignities and insensitivities, and that the schools were
00:47:40.060 often poorly built, and that the food in the schools was substandard, etc., etc. So this is
00:47:47.560 all arguments that need to be explored, and you need to get all the evidence to look at that.
00:47:55.020 And that can't happen, obviously, now, because if you even suggest that someone like Rodney Clifton's wife, whose name is Elaine A. Youngman, she just wrote a piece in the C2C Journal about how herself and her parents had incredible experiences at Old Sun Residential School.
00:48:16.800 she is a great beneficiary of the residential schools she met her husband Rodney Clifton
00:48:23.480 who was also a supervisor and a couple of residential schools and has all sorts of
00:48:29.980 information about residential schools so you know that's that's got to be brought in too
00:48:35.720 to look at it I think the general reason for the residential school schools is not well understood
00:48:43.960 which was you had a collapse of the hunting and gathering economy in the fur trade and the
00:48:51.980 buffalo hunt you had people who now would have to become part of a more complex highly developed
00:48:59.660 highly organized society and in order to participate they would need to be able to
00:49:04.340 read and write and participate in modern economic activities and in order for that to happen
00:49:12.240 you have to have formal schooling there's serious the last the last schools opened in the 1970s and
00:49:20.040 closed in the 1990s uh there were uh communities writing to pierre trudeau when he was prime
00:49:27.720 minister asking for schools i was at stephen harper's um official apology on parliament hill
00:49:35.620 and they brought in people who went to schools across the country and francis i don't think
00:49:41.200 that event would be allowed to happen today in the way that it did, because I spoke to people
00:49:45.200 who had horrific experiences at the schools. And I don't doubt that there were horrific
00:49:50.420 experiences. But I also spoke to people who said, I had a great experience. That wasn't the way it
00:49:55.940 was for everyone, but I had a great experience and I got a great education. That last part,
00:50:01.440 you're not allowed to talk about today. And I guess that's where you and I will agree,
00:50:07.500 is that we've got to be able to have those discussions.
00:50:10.780 Now, on the 215 claim, you've got people who will say,
00:50:15.740 nobody ever died at residential schools.
00:50:17.460 And you've got other people saying,
00:50:19.000 well, the teachers and the administrators
00:50:20.500 were killing the children.
00:50:22.700 Reality is there was a lot of things
00:50:24.520 like pneumonia and tuberculosis,
00:50:26.720 which were killing all children.
00:50:30.180 Where do you come down on that?
00:50:34.140 On which spectrum street epistemology map would you put yourself on?
00:50:42.580 There were no children died at school.
00:50:45.140 The children were massacred by the administrators and the teachers or somewhere in between.
00:50:50.220 Yeah, well, there's a lot of claims.
00:50:51.500 First of all, I've never heard anyone say that no children died at the residential school.
00:50:56.000 That's just a myth.
00:50:56.540 I unfortunately have.
00:50:58.360 You have?
00:50:59.140 Oh, I've never heard that.
00:51:01.080 And this seems to me to be a straw man that has been created by Sean Carlton and Negan Sinclair.
00:51:07.040 Another important thing, which I should mention, which I should have said before, is the child welfare problem was a big part of the residential schools as well.
00:51:16.100 So there was a lot of neglected children who had alcoholic homes, violent homes, abusive homes.
00:51:21.580 And you see in the 1991 Fifth Estate program about the Williams Late Residential School, where you have a woman saying the residential school was the only place where she felt safe. And that was not an unusual kind of situation, which, of course, you're never allowed to say anything like that now, because that would draw attention to the terrible abuse that exists in Aboriginal communities, which is still going on and causing huge amounts of child welfare problems.
00:51:49.120 But in terms of how, like, the claim for Spectrum Street epistemology would be something like, to what extent were the deaths at residential schools due to nefarious motives or, like, neglect?
00:52:08.680 It doesn't have to be killing.
00:52:10.200 It can be you knew that these schools were poorly built, yet you didn't do anything to address that, you know, that kind of thing, which is often the claim.
00:52:20.760 Like because, and this is Peter Bryce's arguments, Peter Bryce was trying to sound the alarm about the poor ventilation and so on.
00:52:30.980 The government did respond to Peter Bryce's report.
00:52:35.780 They did make some improvements
00:52:38.080 But they didn't go as far
00:52:40.280 As Peter Bryce thought that they should go
00:52:42.720 And that's kind of the question
00:52:44.440 And I think 0.63
00:52:45.680 I think that's true
00:52:47.540 I think that the government should have
00:52:49.700 Taken these things more seriously
00:52:51.520 Should have spent more resources
00:52:53.140 On dealing with this
00:52:54.800 Should have listened to the concerns more
00:52:57.480 Of Aboriginal
00:52:59.080 You know, parents about
00:53:01.720 You know, all their kind of complaints
00:53:03.840 But, you know, if you look at
00:53:05.740 Duncan Campbell Scott, who is one of the major villains in this story, which I think he's been, it's been exaggerated, his nefarious, or whatever, his villainy, because he was a bit of a disciplinarian, right?
00:53:19.260 He didn't have a lot of time for people criticizing what he was doing.
00:53:25.740 He thought he was right, he was going ahead. 0.99
00:53:28.380 And, you know, he said, you know, I will not stop until all Indians are absorbed into the body politic.
00:53:34.280 When that was a very kind of coercive kind of sentiment about this.
00:53:38.220 And, you know, a lot of things that Aboriginal people were having removed from them were very, very important to their psychological well-being.
00:53:46.980 And it's a very complicated story, too. I'll just raise one more issue, which is quite often talked about, which was the case of Israel Wood Powell in British Columbia, which I'm very familiar with because Simon Hargott and I did a documentary called What Remains, which was on the Powell River kind of case and the Kamloops, how the Kamloops case affected that.
00:54:09.940 There was a number of Aboriginal groups. The potlatch was banned at some periods of time, and potlatch is a gift-giving kind of ceremony. Israel Wood Pell didn't want to ban it. He wanted to be persuasion. He wanted to use persuasion.
00:54:27.540 but four aboriginal groups who were poor came to him and said please you know we want there to be
00:54:35.580 bans on the potlatch because we're poor and the potlatch is a is a forced gift exchange if someone
00:54:42.660 gives you a whole bunch of gifts you have to return that that's part of the culture and we
00:54:46.940 can't afford to be you know involved in these really you know expensive gift giving things so
00:54:52.720 could you please do that so that was part of the the kind of lobbying that that led to bans being
00:54:58.960 made on the potlatch so you know what was israel wood powell supposed to do was he supposed to
00:55:03.740 sacrifice the most vulnerable and the poorest aboriginal groups um to the richer ones like
00:55:10.500 what was these things are very complicated in terms of what should be done and and that that
00:55:15.500 kind of discussion you're not allowed to have anymore uh because people are very worried like
00:55:20.680 if they say the wrong thing they're going to you know land on uh they're going to put their foot
00:55:24.920 on a landmine their career is going to be over they're going to be vilified they're this is the
00:55:30.140 kind of thing that goes on and uh you know that's why you need university professors able to do this
00:55:35.920 work which i would have been doing if i was still in the university but because i'm now ostracized
00:55:43.820 and vilified i have to go in and i have my street epistemology mat stolen and vandalized
00:55:49.920 i have to go in with my billboards what remains and denial of truth which of course is seen by
00:55:56.640 the university of victoria which just recently uh you know we had such a bad mob scene that my
00:56:04.100 my my cinematographer simon here got was uh was punched several times and had his camera destroyed
00:56:09.920 and was pursued through the university by a bunch of stalkers and the police stood by and did
00:56:14.920 nothing um you know this kind of uh uh ability even to ask a question now is completely shut
00:56:23.980 down at universities nuance is not allowed francis thanks for your time thanks for speaking out we'll
00:56:30.280 uh let the audience can have their say and they can have their say in the comments thanks so much
00:56:34.740 thanks thanks very much it was a pleasure full comment is a post media podcast my name is brian
00:56:40.160 Lilly, your host. This episode was produced by Andre Proulx. Theme music by Bryce Hall. Kevin
00:56:44.820 Libin is the executive producer. Thanks for listening. Make sure that you hit the subscribe
00:56:49.060 button wherever you get your podcasts. Share this on social media and let your friends know about us.
00:56:53.940 Thanks for listening. Until next time, I'm Brian Lilly.
00:56:59.020 Here's that clip from Canada Did What? Season 2 that we promised for you. You probably already
00:57:04.880 knew that Rob Ford admitted to smoking crack in November 2013, setting off one of the most
00:57:10.320 dramatic political flame-outs in Canadian history.
00:57:13.080 Yes, I have smoked a crack, okay.
00:57:15.940 But no, do I?
00:57:18.040 Am I an addict?
00:57:18.700 No.
00:57:19.120 Have I tried it?
00:57:21.140 Probably in one of my drunken stupors.
00:57:23.100 But what you probably didn't know was the absolutely bananas behind-the-scenes story 0.65
00:57:28.040 of how all of this was the work of a single Somalian-Canadian gang member who had just
00:57:33.580 been trying to scrape up enough money to start a new life out west in Alberta. Instead, he summoned
00:57:39.440 down an unholy rain of fire and trouble that burned him and several other people way more
00:57:45.840 than it ever burned Rob Ford. Because if you're making a movie about the Rob Ford crack scandal,
00:57:51.140 I'd argue your protagonist isn't Rob Ford. It's the 27-year-old criminal who captured the video,
00:57:57.740 thought he had hit the jackpot only for events to quickly spiral out of his control.
00:58:02.020 If you want to hear the rest of the story, make sure you subscribe to Canada Did What
00:58:08.020 everywhere you get your podcasts.