Civil Debate not War
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
174.73778
Summary
It's okay for Charlie Kirk to spread hate, racism, misogyny, and division because of free speech, but anyone who speaks out against him using their free speech should be punished for celebrating his death. I mean, if you disagree with someone, you debate it out. If you don't like their words, you rebuttal them. You don't kill them. Killing someone in response to their political views is not a civil thing to do in a democratic society.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
It's okay for Charlie Kirk to spread hate, racism, misogyny, and division because of free speech,
00:00:04.960
but anyone who speaks out against him using their free speech should be punished.
00:00:08.720
We're seeing a lot of sentiments like this in response to people who are getting canceled
00:00:13.120
or getting fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk's death,
00:00:16.860
and for left-wing people who don't understand what's going on here.
00:00:20.420
People are finding this really disturbing, you celebrating his death,
00:00:24.560
because typically when you disagree with somebody
00:00:38.760
Killing someone in response to their political views,
00:00:44.580
that you're supposed to do in a democratic society.
00:00:47.680
It's kind of shocking that I need to explain this.
00:00:51.980
if you disagree you debate it out this has really been a culmination of years of the left not being
00:00:58.880
able to win debates is it not charlie kirk gets shot and then normal society is like no no you're
00:01:05.360
not we're not supposed to celebrate that we actually wanted the debate to happen you guys
00:01:09.640
just can't win one apparently and i really do think there is sort of some sort of onus on people
00:01:15.720
like hassan piker and destiny where it's like uh you guys are supposed to be the left wing debate
00:01:21.660
bros and you're going to support the violence instead of having a rebuttal with your words