00:02:25.560from this morning justice center for constitutional freedom yep
00:02:32.840this was the the release that the justice center put out this morning
00:02:37.240the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom so I didn't bring it up one second see I told
00:02:41.800you you're not technologically inclined the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms
00:02:46.840announces that a significant procedural development has occurred in the 290 million
00:02:51.240dollar class action lawsuit targeting peaceful convoy protesters okay I read that already the
00:02:57.080settlement agreement was signed in April of 2024 between the plaintiffs and one of the defendants
00:03:02.200chad eros at the time mr eros did not have a lawyer formally on the court record under the
00:03:07.880agreement once it was signed mr eros was required to provide all relevant documents in his possession
00:03:13.400to the plaintiff's lawyers within 60 days and take part in a private meeting with them to discuss
00:03:18.040those documents mr eros also agreed to forward a settlement amount to the plaintiffs within six
00:03:23.880months all in exchange for his release from the action however it is alleged that the settlement
00:03:30.040funds were never paid the agreement was not shared with the other defense lawyers until january 20
00:03:35.1602026 nearly 19 months later so i i mean i'm not going to totally get into reading all of the
00:03:42.040bulk of that um this is obviously going to have an effect on our case so i'm going to bring on
00:03:48.120our guest john carpe and i'm also bringing on our good friends uh tom marazzo and danny bulford
00:03:55.800welcome to the show everybody come on in we got a house full here tonight we do
00:04:02.760to see everyone good yeah thanks so much for joining us again john it's uh i'm so glad to
00:04:09.880be with you for making the time uh this is a pretty significant development as your press release
00:04:15.800said um what are your initial thoughts on the case conference hearing from thursday
00:04:20.680Well, so we have a shot potentially at pausing the action indefinitely, right? So this is the $290 million lawsuit brought by the Ottawa bureaucrat Zexy Lee and the Happy Goat Coffee Company and other Ottawa residents who think that losing a few nights sleep entitles them to $290 million.
00:04:43.440dollars I'm being a bit facetious but um in class actions you if you want to make a side deal to get
00:04:52.880out which is what happened here so so Chad Eros who was in Ottawa and you know busy and active
00:04:59.420and involved in participating he's one of the defendants in this 290 million dollar lawsuit
00:05:04.380now he's entitled to uh try and make a deal and say look you know I'll pay you uh I'll pay you
00:05:12.680money and you remove my name as a defendant that's okay people can try to advance their own interests
00:05:19.220but it has to be above board and it has to be disclosed and the other defendants have to know
00:05:25.400about it and this has been I think quite dishonorable these last 19 months of of doing this
00:05:32.580secretly again if it's if it's above board it's legitimate you can as a defendant try to get
00:05:39.100yourself out of the lawsuit and say look you know I'm going to pay the plaintiffs you know whatever
00:05:44.840fifty thousand or ten thousand or whatever and I want you to you know get me out so you're no
00:05:51.580longer suing me that's okay to try that but the rules are such that it has to be done fairly and
00:05:58.340above board and so now the lawyer James Manson who is on the case he's part of the Justice
00:06:06.040center's network of lawyers um he's making an application that the entire uh class action
00:06:12.920should be put on hold indefinitely because of this unfairness
00:06:17.640well agreed i mean there is a there is a certain time frame i think that has been set
00:06:24.920for for disclosure of of things like that so yeah hopefully we will we'll get a safe proceeding some
00:06:32.520you also have the you gotta remember like this the terms for this this this deal in the courts
00:06:40.240john correct me if i'm wrong if somebody makes a side deal and the other people in the group don't
00:06:45.820know about that they could potentially give information or get information from that other
00:06:50.280person unknowingly right when he's actually become a traitor to everyone else in the group is that
00:06:55.960what the gist of it is i don't know if that's the underlying premise for the rule but it does
00:11:03.540So my, my understanding, my understanding on the details was he had 60 days to turn over
00:11:10.860the evidence, but he had six months to pay all champ the $60,000.
00:11:16.940so in in essence in the first two months of that six month period he turned over everything that
00:11:23.420he had and then couldn't come up with the sixty thousand dollars to give paul champ and so he
00:11:28.540lost the deal so he turned it all over for free but he's still on the hook i mean a paying sixty
00:11:35.820thousand dollars is you know one thing but you know i can't say it's for free but i you know he
00:11:42.460was trying it's it's bizarre to me it's like saying okay don't sue me because i'm innocent
00:11:48.460but i'll give you sixty thousand dollars if you just leave me alone right but i'll turn on all
00:11:54.060my friends i'll give all the evidence i can provide for you uh if i can come up with the
00:12:00.620sixty thousand but now that i can't come up with the sixty thousand oops sorry i gave her i gave
00:12:05.500you all the evidence i had so are you are you saying that that chad arrows has turned over
00:12:12.620whatever knowledge evidence documents emails whatever that he has turned over
00:12:17.020stuff to uh to the plaintiff's lawyer and again i'm sorry you know i'm not i'm not james manson's
00:12:22.060the lawyer is running this right so i'm i'm a little bit he could wasn't able to join this
00:12:25.980evening but are you saying that that evidence has already gone over to paul champ well we don't know
00:12:31.180what we know is that he had 60 days to do it but he had six months to pay the the money um so
00:12:39.900i like i i can't even comprehend what there would be to turn over to him um but i guess that's you
00:12:47.500know paul champ like when i when i testified at the poec and i was on the stand paul champ cross
00:12:53.420examined me and it was just a fishing expedition he was just asking questions so that i would
00:12:58.700implicate other people so whatever he turned over um i i have absolute 100 full confidence that it's
00:13:07.180nothing that incriminates any of us i just think that it's a fishing expedition um that chad eros
00:13:15.100was willing to pay sixty thousand dollars for well i you know i i was as you know i was not in ottawa
00:13:22.300during Freedom Convoy but of course I've heard lots about it I don't I wouldn't I
00:13:28.880wouldn't lose sleep over if he's turned over documents and emails you guys got
00:13:32.620nothing to hide anyway it's pretty transparent what all occurred and what
00:13:37.000happened and you know it's pretty straightforward I would be I would be
00:13:42.760completely surprised I'd be totally blown away if if he had some email that
00:13:47.920was going to cause harm I think that's just not likely to happen because you
00:13:52.060guys you did what you did you did it peacefully you did it honorably right so even yeah whatever
00:13:58.040he's turned over I couldn't see it really bringing much of an advantage to the to the plaintiffs
00:14:02.960no exactly that's exactly right that is John are we allowed to talk about some of the other
00:14:10.840lawsuits that are going on right now that that a lot of people probably don't know about that
00:14:14.800are already filed and I don't know if I'm going too far in this when I ask this question but
00:14:19.000there's other lawsuits right regarding other people here are we allowed to talk about that at all
00:14:24.240well you can talk about whatever you want uh lawsuits are public right and that's and that's
00:14:31.360a deliberate pillar of the legal system you you can't sue people in secret unless you know and
00:14:36.740there's rare exceptions if you're a sexual abuse victim and you know there's privacy confidentiality
00:14:41.580there's some exceptions but basically the idea is that this should be in public for the sake of
00:14:47.720transparency for the sake of accountability this is why criminal trials are in public
00:14:51.900because if if you could have secret criminal trials right that's a nightmare that that
00:14:57.680repressive regimes do right they they arrest you in secret they lock you up in jail in secret and
00:15:02.480then they give you a secret trial and maybe a secret execution afterwards so yeah if you want
00:15:08.780to talk about other lawsuits that's that's totally up to you well Chad actually has a lawsuit filed
00:15:15.760right now against the justice center right and against that one i was trying to approach it too
00:15:22.280bad in case you couldn't mention it but i was trying to get just there's there's been yeah
00:15:29.120it's well it's it's publicly accessible information that that uh yeah a lot he he has filed a statement
00:15:35.600claim against the justice center saying that we caused him harm by not telling him that if he went
00:15:43.940to Ottawa he could potentially get sued it's a little bit far-fetched you know we're not we
00:15:50.320filed a statement of defense to say that we disagree completely with his allegations
00:15:54.260I remember being part of those those zoom meetings John and listening to him go off on you
00:16:03.000is there any way you could counter sue that for an harm that he caused you I remember being it was
00:16:08.760quite the conflict and we eventually had to we had to say goodbye to Chad because of the that
00:16:13.820anger and that hostility towards you know anyone was out there you know trying to take control of
00:16:19.440whatever fundraising was out there and we uh we had to say goodbye there's a there's a long and
00:16:24.200short story to this this whole saga and i would i would like more people to know about the insides
00:16:29.520of it i i don't feel that i've been harmed by chad eros i i wouldn't i wouldn't sue him i don't feel
00:16:38.720like he's caused me any harm and uh but yeah you know you're also sorry sorry john i'm sorry to
00:16:48.600cut you off um i was just i was just gonna say um uh it would just be frivolous it would be like
00:16:53.580a defamation suit you know you're just gonna spend a whole lot of money a lot of your energy
00:16:58.620a lot of your time um for nothing like for basically nothing you're not gonna really get
00:17:03.560anything out of it so yeah um yeah that was that's just well there's a there's a dark that's
00:17:10.720kind of the problem with defamation lawsuits and and there is a time and a place for them
00:17:14.500if you sue somebody for defamation you have to repeat the defamatory comments in the statement
00:17:21.320of claim and the statement of claim is a public document that's followed at the courthouse that
00:17:25.760is not too hard to get a hold of you can go to the court and pay ten dollars for a search maybe
00:17:30.860they they have electronic ways now but but um you know yeah you have to think twice about suing
00:17:36.460somebody for defamation because whatever bad things they said you know if they said you're
00:17:40.040crooked you're corrupt you're dishonest whatever they said about you you got to print that in your
00:17:44.500statement of claim file it at the courthouse and then whoever wants to can say oh you know so and
00:17:50.000so suing for defamation you know whatever right so it's it's always a defamation lawsuit are
00:17:55.760tricky business that way because they can sometimes draw a lot more attention to whatever
00:18:01.720it was that somebody said about you that's not true. You sue somebody, it's going to get a lot
00:18:07.240of publicity or it can get a lot of publicity. But I'm not aware of whatever Chad has said
00:18:16.840about me or against me. I don't know. I don't care. I'm just not interested.
00:18:22.540yes yeah but you're right it just they end up creating their own monsters much like you know
00:18:28.120chris and me just being it going through the whole trial and the whole process it felt like
00:18:32.260you know every time we were dragged back there it was turned into another media circus and just
00:18:36.860sort of exposed us and platformed us even more so you know in a sense they're they created their
00:18:42.060own monster so i can totally agree with that personally more famous than we ever kind of
00:18:48.080asked to be I guess and that's maybe yeah welcome to our life for the last four years if they would
00:18:55.080have let a lot of it go we would have melted back into the history books and probably been
00:18:58.500forgot about by now but they've drug us through the courts for so long it's made us almost infamous
00:19:03.420so we are going this is an article the next case conference will be March the 4th I'm assuming that
00:19:13.460is when the judge will be hearing uh the state of proceedings argument that was brought on by
00:19:18.980andrew burgess i believe and that is uh the defendant for um pat and those guys no no sorry
00:19:25.860not pat um benjamin and those guys yeah that was benjamin so they're bringing that up which
00:19:33.060obviously we're supporting can we also bring to light this lawsuit right now is 290 million
00:19:39.140dollars and right now the plaintiffs on it are some of the people you're looking at on the screen
00:19:43.220here except for john of course john is helping us defend this um but there's a lot of a lot of
00:19:47.980people involved with freedom convoy that are part of this lawsuit right now but but what paul champ
00:19:52.040downtown lawyer ottawa lawyer wants to do is he wants to add the donor class to the john doe
00:19:58.080section of this lawsuit anyone who donated 25 to the freedom convoy could be liable and be part
00:20:04.740of this lawsuit going forward if paul champ has his way in the courts and has this donor class
00:20:09.880added to the lawsuit so it's imperative that that we win this and we have this this lawsuit
00:20:16.560taking care of us you know in the courts it's absolutely it's important now it's a weak argument
00:20:23.060but just because it's weak doesn't mean you go at it full force anyways so like by way of analogy
00:20:30.080right let's say you donate money to the salvation army registered charity doing good things helping
00:20:36.160people but let's say that there's one particular office of the salvation army in some canadian city
00:20:44.400and uh somebody's been uh let's say an employee is treated unfairly uh gets fired and so is the
00:20:53.360salvation army okay and and maybe that person will win because maybe the salvation army is liable
00:20:59.120they mistreated the person or maybe the claim will be dismissed because it doesn't have a solid basis
00:21:04.480to it. But if that person also said, I'm going to sue all the people who donated to the Salvation
00:21:10.900Army, the law is that it's too remote, right? In law, it's a matter of closeness. If you rear-end
00:21:18.220somebody, right, you can be liable. And the guy that got rear-ended can sue you for rear-ending
00:21:27.140him, he can't sue your boss or your wife who got you upset that morning and got you into
00:21:34.260a bad mood so that you weren't driving properly. But, you know, somebody else caused that
00:21:39.780because they upset you. Therefore, you weren't. That's called remoteness, right? So that's
00:21:43.720very remote. So in the same way that if a former employee of the Salvation Army, they
00:21:49.540can't sue donors to the Salvation Army because you just had no knowledge of whatever. So
00:21:56.260in the same way with with with freedom convoy i mean i don't i don't think the claim has merit
00:22:01.580anyways but for for the people who are actually in ottawa for those defendants but then to try
00:22:07.880to extend it and say somebody that sent in 25 bucks so we're going to fight tooth and nail to
00:22:12.560to defeat that in particular because that would be just a horrible precedent that uh people who
00:22:17.820donate to a cause and then there's somebody who does something wrong and then they're liable for
00:22:24.000for donating that's just that's just wrong that was that's what we've seen happen in the last
00:22:29.740number of years with our trial process is the crown using case law that they have come up with
00:22:34.380in the last number of years i mean tamara and i's case was essentially based on the coots protest
00:22:39.700which we had absolutely nothing to do with it was in a separate protest and other people's actions
00:22:44.740in ottawa that we were not associated with so case law has been evident and this is yet another
00:22:49.780example of case law that could move forward that could potentially ruin somebody else down the
00:22:54.840road this is Canadian this is case law going forward for all Canadians not just us well there
00:23:00.520is yeah there's a bit of a you know counterpoint to that in that that you know every every situation
00:23:06.520is different which is why we've had uh the last four years that that the Justice Centre has been
00:23:11.520funding legal representation for Harold Jonker who won and other people who've won but then other
00:23:17.700people have lost so I mean it's still fact specific but yeah they do try to that's par
00:23:25.040for the course I mean both sides try to use case law there's nothing wrong with that in
00:23:28.880and of itself it's true so we didn't get to use a lot of the case law on our side it seemed
00:23:35.820like in our trial did you Tamara did you feel it that way no um John all right can you speak
00:23:44.260too i've seen a couple comments now um so regarding the money that's in the escrow so
00:23:49.460if this say we do seek a safe proceedings and it is granted and this lawsuit ceases um do
00:23:57.300are you can you explain what will happen with that now i believe paul has first dibs on it
00:24:04.340basically but following that it'll go directly to the attorney general of ontario as far as i know
00:24:11.140James Manson, the lawyer on the file would be able to answer that. I just don't know,
00:24:19.220and I'm not going to risk a guess. I apologize.
00:24:21.700Yeah, that's no problem. No, no, no problem. As far as what I think I know,
00:24:27.860is that there was the two layers on it. The Paul Champ had claimed to that money first and foremost,
00:24:34.340followed by the Attorney General of Ontario. If Paul was unsuccessful in this class action lawsuit,
00:24:40.980it would default automatically to the attorney general of ontario um based on the fact that all
00:24:46.340they really needed was one conviction of mischief from any any of the convoy participants am i right
00:24:51.620tom you're nodding i'm just making sure that i'm getting that that right i i've always been i don't
00:24:58.260know i don't know about the escrow funds i haven't been closely involved in in the legal files
00:25:03.620so i i just don't know it at all yeah in that whole issue all i know is that it's basically
00:25:10.580like keith has explained to me before it's like there's there's two packages it's almost like uh
00:25:16.340one of those russian matushka dolls with all these layers of people making claim to that money
00:25:21.460um and i know paul champ was the very first one and then i do know that the attorney general of
00:25:27.060ontario was the second one so even if paul champs is unraveled then you know to release those monies
00:25:35.540from the uh the escrow we'd have to go through the attorney general of of ontario and that's probably
00:25:41.220just a whole different set of criteria that and i don't even know and i think there might even
00:25:45.780almost be one more layer of this doll around the money um but but keith is the one who really
00:25:52.020intimately understands how this stuff works and james of course and james would have really good
00:25:58.420answers for that i uh yeah i think it might have been the federal government can you hear me okay
00:26:06.500i think it might have been the federal government if if it if it didn't get taken by champ and it
00:26:12.320didn't get taken by ontario i thought somewhere along the line someone told us that the federal
00:26:16.720government might try and go for it right yeah that's still going to be a very long process
00:26:23.600anyways. I suspect it's motivating the lawsuit. There's a few million sitting there, right? So
00:26:29.920it makes it worthwhile for somebody, Paul Champ or any other lawyer to step forward. And I don't
00:26:38.300know anything about the retainer that he signed with the plaintiffs, but it wouldn't surprise me
00:26:42.720if it was a contingency agreement where he's going to get, you know, whatever they agreed upon 30%,
00:26:50.76020 percent 10 percent of the money i mean i don't know that's speculation i mean maybe they're paying
00:26:56.180an hourly rate but it wouldn't surprise me if there's a contingency agreement and there's
00:27:01.040millions sitting there if the millions were not in escrow uh you know there's a there's a pretty
00:27:07.880good chance the the lawsuit might not have been brought there there's about four and a half
00:27:12.500million in you know that was seized and then another 800 000 my understanding in crypto
00:27:19.240and you know for anybody who's interested in doing you know a five minute google search they
00:27:24.780can go on the poec i've posted the link several times on on x um i think it's november 16th when
00:27:32.960the the two forensic audit teams all their findings were presented at the poec i think
00:27:40.400it's either november 16th or the november 2nd is one of those days but there's never been in canada
00:27:47.800crowdfunded money so thoroughly investigated and picked over by two different types of forensic
00:27:53.560audit teams than this money that was donated to the convoy there so every cent every coin
00:28:00.680everything is accounted for it's still in the vault with the attorney general of ontario they
00:28:05.640have the money so you know the rumors of us having it no false nobody has it but doug
00:28:11.720ford's attorney general has it locked behind a big giant safe and um just go and look at the
00:28:18.440testimony i mean the government the federal government presented the forensic audit reports
00:28:22.920themselves they did yeah the reports right there on the poec website there's a whole report on all
00:28:29.080of it yeah i mean that was that's the most um that's the most investigated money of all time
00:28:33.800it was investigated by um fintrac csis the government of canada the government of ontario
00:28:39.960the ottawa police service the ontario uh provincial police the rcmp uh goodness i'm
00:28:47.080forgetting some even so and nobody nobody's been nobody has been criminally charged for
00:28:53.560mishandling uh or stealing money in relation to freedom convoy i mean that says a lot right because
00:29:00.280if they if they felt that they had a case knowing how motivated politically motivated the the
00:29:05.880prosecutors are on this issue if they did have even a little bit of evidence that there was
00:29:10.680something a little bit wrong uh i'm sure they would have moved ahead with with uh with criminal
00:29:15.880charges against whoever they thought was responsible but that says a lot if the money is heavily
00:29:20.600investigated and nobody's getting criminally charged for stealing misappropriation whatever
00:29:26.920then uh yeah that that says a lot i was just trying to find the link for the poec
00:29:33.400website there it was a website and i seem to have lost the link i had it on my old computer i guess
00:29:37.320but it is readily available online and you can look at all the testimony all the documents
00:29:42.680everything on on the poac yeah everything was listed and well documented too i might even have
00:29:50.040it on my phone saved uh so switching gears here on you john for just one second and then we're
00:29:57.080gonna let you go you've been gracious enough you've been gracious enough um to give us your
00:30:01.000time again this evening it has been um over two weeks now since the federal court of appeals
00:30:09.240upheld the justice mosley decision and we have shockingly not seen a statement come out from
00:30:15.960the pmo's office i've not seen a statement come out from sean fraser the justice minister
00:30:21.240i have not seen any exclusive reports from any of the mainstream media so i mean don't you think
00:30:27.720think that's a little bit odd that, you know, this judgment has been upheld. And what's your
00:30:33.620personal opinion? Do you think the federal government is going to take this all the way
00:30:37.640to the Supreme Court? Well, two things. One is I think they've learned from their mistake from
00:30:42.800last time when the federal court trial division, when the lower court released a judgment more
00:30:50.000than 50,000 words in length on 100 pages if you print it. So sizable judgment, you know,
00:30:57.420the size of a short book, maybe, that within, I forget now, 22 minutes, 44 minutes, they held a
00:31:05.240news conference and said, we're appealing, which is obviously a pure political arrogance, because
00:31:11.120a good lawyer would read a judgment first and see if there's something in it that warrants an
00:31:18.460appeal, something that the lawyer or anybody else, a non-lawyer, you got to read the judgment and see
00:31:23.700if there's something in it that that's uh worth appealing so they announced that you know within
00:31:30.020minutes without without having read the judgment so i think they've learned from their mistake
00:31:34.260kudos to the federal government for not you know announcing a decision to appeal without having
00:31:39.380read the decision so it looks like they're doing the proper thing they're actually reading the
00:31:44.100decision and thinking about it now the supreme court of canada is not most courts in canada
00:31:50.180most courts of appeal, and I think Ontario is a little bit different, but most courts of appeal
00:31:54.560in Canada, if you want to appeal the trial judgment, you just follow the appeal and that's it. And the
00:32:00.220court will hear it and they'll grant your appeal or they will dismiss it. The Supreme Court of
00:32:04.600Canada is different. There's a two-step process where first you apply to ask the court to please
00:32:10.680hear your appeal. And if they say yes, it doesn't mean that they like it or they think you have a
00:32:15.500good chance. And then if they say yes, then you have your second thing, which is the actual appeal.
00:32:20.180Now, what the federal government has to persuade, if the federal government wants to appeal this, they have to persuade the Supreme Court of Canada that there is an important legal doctrine that is in dispute where there's a lack of clarity in the law.
00:32:35.400and those are the cases that the supreme court is interested in is if the for example if the
00:32:41.920bc and saskatchewan courts of appeal rule one way on an issue and the alberta and quebec courts of
00:32:48.720appeal rule another way on an issue and if the issue is important that's likely to get heard by
00:32:53.740the supreme court of canada because it's going to say look we've got this legal doctrine it could
00:32:58.320be family law contract law criminal law constitutional law we got this legal doctrine
00:33:03.240and we have conflicting there's a lack of clarity in the law so we're going to take this on
00:33:08.500to render a decision and provide clarity in the law so if the federal government wants to appeal
00:33:14.540they're going to have to try to persuade the supreme court that somewhere in this ruling
00:33:20.820in the federal court of appeal ruling there's an important legal doctrine that is not clear
00:33:27.320that requires the help of the supreme court of canada to bring clarity
00:33:32.120so all that said is to say the federal government would have i think would have an uphill fight
00:33:38.840trying to persuade the supreme court to hear this case and don't we have a little bit of uh
00:33:44.040biased with one of the supreme court judges coming out with some pretty absolutely one of them the
00:33:51.320one the one the grand poobah yes yeah the grand poobah what's his name
00:34:00.600admiring his new bust richard wagner richard wagner yes most people wait until after they
00:34:09.000leave an organization before they you know start hanging up portraits you know like a university
00:34:14.200president will wait until after retirement before there's a nice portrait the premiers of the
00:34:19.400provinces when you go to the legislative assembly uh i'd venture a guess that in in the in alberta's
00:34:25.400legislative assembly there is not a portrait of of danielle smith i i think that's going to be
00:34:30.600at some point in the future when she's no longer premier uh but yeah but not the supreme court of
00:34:35.400canada no we've we've got a bust of the current chief justice i mean it's ludicrous no one loves
00:34:41.560some richard wagner more than richard wagner
00:34:47.640john i want to thank you so much for for making the time to come tonight my pleasure my pleasure
00:34:54.360who has helped so many of uh not just freedom convoy cases but but cases all across the country
00:35:00.680and defending those who can't defend themselves you can go to www.jccf.ca you can also follow them
00:35:07.720at jccf canada on x um john do you have any final thoughts or any of you guys have anything for john
00:35:14.280before we let him go have his dinner john we appreciate everything you do i just have to make
00:35:19.880sure that you know that we've been here you know you've been right from the start and then we uh
00:35:24.200we look up to you and especially the justice center i i look up to you guys you did you did the
00:35:31.480you've suffered so much and you've given so much and i i uh i just i really appreciate what you
00:35:36.440did in in ottawa and fighting back ever since so we'll keep on final word we'll keep on fighting
00:35:42.600until we win absolutely uh you you've got the george jonas freedom award coming up i heard that
00:35:49.480was it was it candace malcolm is the 2026 recipient so we're having uh we're having an
00:35:56.680event in toronto on uh monday june 1st and then an event in vancouver on august the 20th i think
00:36:04.520and then in calgary on september 24th so we're gonna have these events and candace is going to
00:36:09.640be there and speak and uh yeah it's uh just another great canadian in uh following in in
00:36:17.560line with ezra levant and tamara leach and uh christy blackford and mark stein and jordan peterson
00:36:26.520so um yeah it feels like i might have to try and get a work exemption and come report on that dinner
00:36:33.800then uh ezra should ask you to come and report on our calgary dinner on thursday september 24th
00:36:41.080absolutely yes okay okay we'll see what we can do uh danny anything before we let john go
00:36:49.560oh i just thank you very much john for everything you guys have done for us
00:36:53.240man if that team of lawyers hadn't showed up we would have been in a lot more trouble than we
00:36:58.120ended up in so we owe the jccf and everyone that came to lend their expertise a huge thank you and
00:37:05.160i'm forever grateful for everything you guys have done for all of us so thank you so much
00:37:09.560thanks so much for having me with you tonight have a great rest of the night
00:37:12.800see you okay have a great night john thank you
00:37:15.400well i'm thankful to the comment section tonight because it is just a mess fest of people
00:37:21.760there's a time and place for everything everybody but yeah i've been not wanting to share a couple
00:37:30.440comments on the screen but not wanting to do that while john was on here so uh yeah i kept it clean
00:37:35.940and i posted the uh the link to the poec uh and it was uh day 16 november 3rd uh is when the poec
00:37:44.760presented the forensic audit um on on the results of it to the commission themselves i think they
00:37:51.720were up there for quite a while talking about this money but you can go on there and watch it
00:37:55.840yourself if you really want to know where the money went um so yeah everything is there one
00:38:02.400of those three in canadian history right there yeah the four of us were sitting in the room for
00:38:08.380most of that commission listening to uh all this stuff you know seven and a half weeks we sat in
00:38:13.820that room and just stop the miscarriage of government throughout this you know COVID was
00:38:20.340two years you know in the making and mandates and crippling people and I talked about this the
00:38:27.340other day in an interview I did people were taking their lives people were unaliving themselves at a
00:38:32.960fast rate in the suicide the depression everything was at an all-time high in this country because of
00:38:37.380those mandates and when we stood up we were standing up for those people that didn't feel
00:38:41.520like they had a voice and they were they're a really really dark spot and then people stepped
00:38:45.260up and they donated to the cause to support that because people want to change so badly in this
00:38:49.900country and the government came in and froze bank accounts and still holds thank goodness
00:38:55.860you know gofundme the people were able to get the refund on the money except for the million
00:39:00.340thank goodness jacob wells was able to hit the refund button on the give send go and get it back
00:39:05.940to donators before the government came at us i i wish honestly i wish they would have done that
00:39:10.640with everything every dollar would have went back to donors because we didn't it just put a bigger
00:39:16.380target target on and look at the trouble it's caused ever since now sorry i'm just trying to
00:39:24.020find this uh one thing to bring up so talk amongst yourselves well i you know i was i was walking the
00:39:30.140dog today and um i just had this this memory i totally forgot about it and i think chris i was
00:39:36.960out at your fundraiser a couple years ago um in uh swift current and somebody came up to me this
00:39:44.240guy came up a really good dude came up and he showed me a picture on his phone and he goes
00:39:49.360do do you remember me and i'm like i'm sorry i like i feel bad if i don't right and and he's
00:39:55.440like here let me let me give you a hint and he pulled out his cell phone and he showed me a
00:39:59.040picture and it was the inside of a forearm with a phone number on it oh and i'm like now i remember
00:40:06.240who you are now i remember it was the day um when you know the the after the emergencies act was
00:40:13.920invoked and we had all the lawyers show up and we put out a hotline phone number uh for the
00:40:20.880lawyer so basically if you got if you got taken by the police call that phone number when they give
00:40:26.080you a chance to to make a call well i scribbled it in marker on the inside of my forearm in case
00:40:32.560i got taken uh and i was like well i'm not going to remember the phone number but i want it and
00:40:37.200so i met this guy on the street and he was asking me what do we do if if the police arrested and so
00:40:42.480i i lifted up the sleeve on my arm and i said take a picture of my arm call that phone number
00:40:48.160and uh i met him again in swift current like it was it was just hilarious but that phone number
00:40:53.200was to the lawyers the lawyers who showed up to uh to bail us all out and get us you know get it some
00:41:00.080some actual uh help not you tamara but everyone else how many people
00:41:07.360i would have to get a tattoo yeah yeah yeah well um i have a copy of the settlement agreement here
00:41:16.800that i want to try to bring up i've been reading through it here um it's only 10 pages in length
00:41:24.000It does state that there's a $60,000 sum due in $60,000.
01:06:25.020Like the police moved and removed those, those, those convoys or those, you know, those protesters before they officially announced the invocation of the Emergency Act.
01:06:37.280And actually, because the police were probably able to do that without the Emergency Act is part of the reason why they were unjustified in using it in Ottawa.
01:06:48.160Well, I think Coutts, I think, though, Coutts, the Emergencies Act was invoked.
01:06:53.120uh but jason kenney had uh made a deal and so it was a lot easier there was basically a coots
01:07:01.820victory from that point of view where where jason kenney yielded um so there was no reason to
01:07:09.180continue on like that's why you didn't see a coots um takedown like you saw in ottawa because
01:07:16.700right they got they got what they were asking for yeah and so there was no need for it and after
01:07:22.620after the after the earth raids on the coots four and the trailer yeah after all that occurred pre
01:07:30.540emergencies act the protest kind of the protesters at coots or milk river decided that they would
01:07:36.940withdraw after that correct yes i think and i think the last um i think the last of the coots
01:07:43.180for were arrested the early early morning of the 14th very early morning so actually before it was
01:07:50.220invoked also before it was and just while we're on this topic i just want to jump in here and just
01:07:54.540say you know tony olianic is finally home he was finally released from prison for after almost four
01:08:01.420years behind bars uh mostly at reban centers um the last leg was in drumheller minimum security
01:08:08.860i think it is and so i just want to say uh to tony and his family i know we're so happy that
01:08:14.300you're finally back home and may justice be served yeah and kudos to brendan miller yes kudos to
01:08:23.260brendan miller that's right yeah kudos to brendan miller for for for taking that on and
01:08:29.100yeah miller time is always a good time yeah and they wouldn't have been through what they were on
01:08:37.020but uh yeah yes well okay well yeah let's uh let's call her a night i just want to say to everybody
01:08:46.140that came um thank you for joining us this is obviously not our normal day and normal time
01:08:51.740but we did just feel that this was a really important topic and wanted to get that the word
01:08:56.300out and you know this is really good news there's potentially a chance that we're not going to get
01:09:00.620sued for 290 million dollars so i mean i think that uh that's my that's my good feeling news of
01:09:05.820the day i don't know about you guys yeah definitely it brightens the day to feel like there's a little
01:09:12.540bit of a chance that that 290 million dollars isn't going to just continue to crush everything
01:09:17.500that you've worked your whole life to build for your family absolutely exactly yeah yeah back on
01:09:23.660everyone we have a special guest with us this week kayla pollock will be here to talk about
01:09:27.820um her experience through this pandemic shall we say yes yeah i won't be there for that one
01:09:35.980i'll be yeah we're gonna have to talk about her injury yeah yeah good good uh i i'm i i wish no
01:09:43.920i'm gonna miss that one unfortunately i'm gonna miss that one i'll be um just getting back from
01:09:48.100new york city flying out there tomorrow uh talking to the federalist society a group of lawyers that
01:09:55.280are flying me out to New York to talk about the convoy and the emergencies act and stuff like
01:10:01.340that. But my final thought for the night is this. Yeah. If, if you've got receipts about any of us
01:10:07.320during the convoy after four years, just release them. Just say it, man. If not even better, you
01:10:12.240know what you can do? Just, just call up Paul Champ and give him the info you have. Just give it to
01:10:16.720He'll take your $60,000, just pay him $60,000, and he'll take your, exactly, he'll take the 60 grand.
01:10:25.500Usually a receipt looks like this, it's a thin piece of paper, and you usually have to show it, but apparently that doesn't have to matter.
01:10:34.060Did you imagine all the dirty, disgusting lies we could just spew with our audience and people, you know, I've said this before in the past,
01:10:40.740I'm like, we could come on here and say some pretty utter
01:10:42.680ridiculous things, and there's a certain
01:10:44.600segment of a following that would believe
01:10:46.920anything that comes out of our mouth. We don't