Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - October 05, 2021


Human Events Daily - Oct 5 2021 - FB Whistleblower Calls for Government Censorship of Social Media？!


Episode Stats

Length

21 minutes

Words per Minute

156.91216

Word Count

3,446

Sentence Count

247

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

Disgraced NIH Director Francis Collins steps down today after overseeing the funding of gain-of-function experiments in the Wuhan lab. Next, a huge bombshell out of Project Veritas reveals the truth we all know about COVID antibodies and natural immunity. Third, a new story out of WuhAN ordering COVID-type tests in the summer of 2019. And finally, I m going to talk a little bit to deconstruct a new Facebook whistleblower.


Transcript

00:00:00.360 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
00:00:04.280 First story up today, this is a hot one.
00:00:05.920 Disgraced NIH Director Francis Collins set to step down today
00:00:10.760 after overseeing the funding of gain-of-function experiments in the Wuhan lab.
00:00:15.060 Next, huge bombshell out of Project Veritas.
00:00:17.580 Pfizer scientists admit the truth we all know about COVID antibodies and natural immunity.
00:00:23.160 Third, a new story out of Wuhan ordering COVID-type tests in the summer of 2019.
00:00:28.500 And finally, I'm going to talk a little bit to deconstruct this new Facebook whistleblower.
00:00:33.520 Let's just say I'm not exactly buying it.
00:00:35.500 All this and we're ahead, Human Events Daily.
00:00:47.980 This is a big one, folks.
00:00:49.820 Today, NIH Director Francis Collins,
00:00:53.460 the disgraced scientist and government bureaucrat who oversaw the gain-of-function experiments
00:01:00.600 that were funded at the Wuhan lab.
00:01:02.780 A story that we hear at AG Daily that so many people have brought out from conservative media,
00:01:08.900 particularly we were called crazy, we were called tinfoil, we were called everything under the sun.
00:01:14.780 Well, Francis Collins, the time has come to pay the piper.
00:01:18.760 This guy who, by the way, to my friends in the pro-life community,
00:01:22.900 of which, of course, I'm a member as a Catholic and a Christian,
00:01:26.400 this is the same guy that was pushing the fetal experiments
00:01:30.520 that were used in the development of many of these medicines,
00:01:34.020 as well as the baby harvesting that was done at the University of Pittsburgh,
00:01:39.040 the funding that went into it, the organ harvesting that was done there.
00:01:41.900 Francis Collins, you're out.
00:01:44.340 You, sir, are done.
00:01:46.500 Is Fauci next?
00:01:47.500 And I want to just give you a little sense,
00:01:50.560 because this guy, Collins, does a lot of media.
00:01:53.720 He wants a lot of people to like him.
00:01:55.460 He's just such a nice guy.
00:01:57.260 Go and watch what happened,
00:01:59.400 the absolute dissembling act that he went into just recently, a few months ago,
00:02:04.560 when he was asked about his department's funding of the Wuhan lab
00:02:09.640 and the experiments that took place there.
00:02:10.800 Take a listen.
00:02:11.160 There are a couple of different programs that were funded by the NIH that raised these questions.
00:02:20.000 And if you have, you know, tell me what your reaction is to this.
00:02:23.260 Back in 2015, there was a $10 million grant for work that was done by Dr. Baric of UNC and Dr. Zengli of the Wuhan lab.
00:02:31.600 They were building synthetic strains of SARS that, quote, resisted all vaccines and immunotherapy.
00:02:39.120 Then you have Dr. Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance.
00:02:42.620 He was doing bat viruses combined with genes that had spike proteins that had, quote, affinities for human cells.
00:02:50.160 They were untreatable, this virus, and resistant to vaccines.
00:02:53.980 So why was that work being done?
00:02:56.000 And why was it being done in conjunction with NIH-funded scientists?
00:03:02.520 We're the National Institutes of Health.
00:03:04.700 We're the largest supporter of medical research in the world.
00:03:07.580 We knew that bat-driven coronaviruses had caused already two major scares as far as the pandemic, SARS and MERS.
00:03:16.480 It would have been irresponsible for us not to try to understand what else might be lurking out there.
00:03:22.060 But I categorically deny that NIH, in its grant funding, in a subcontract to the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
00:03:30.040 was permitted to do anything that would have created a virus that would have been increased in its transmissibility or its virulence for humans.
00:03:38.000 I categorically deny that.
00:03:39.520 And I'm a bit unhappy that people keep repeating those claims when they're simply not true.
00:03:44.460 You know, I'm a little disturbed, Martha.
00:03:46.840 We're spending all this time on this issue, and here we are today.
00:03:50.120 We should be talking about how to put COVID-19 behind us, not going back to January 2020.
00:03:55.460 We'll get the answers.
00:03:56.520 Right now, we don't have any new data.
00:03:58.300 It absolutely matters.
00:04:00.200 We have been told up and down that anybody who thinks that this was not a zoonotic virus is part of some conspiracy theory,
00:04:08.460 doesn't know what they're talking about.
00:04:09.840 Right now, I'm not a scientist, so I give you that.
00:04:12.000 That's why I wanted to raise these questions with you, because when I read these things,
00:04:15.220 that they're working on things that resist all vaccines and immunotherapy, right?
00:04:19.100 It makes me wonder why we would be allowing this kind of research.
00:04:23.960 So you see, we cut through so much of the PR around this guy.
00:04:28.320 He wants you to like him.
00:04:29.940 He's done so much outreach to the Christian community.
00:04:32.820 I'm a scientist who believes in God, he said.
00:04:34.800 I did the Human Genome Project, but I also believe in God.
00:04:37.720 I'm a Christian just like all of you.
00:04:39.680 My question is, the next time that he goes on one of these Christian media networks,
00:04:45.280 will they ask him, sir, why didn't you come clean about what the NIH was doing in Wuhan,
00:04:52.440 the partnerships that were going on there?
00:04:54.460 Why didn't you demand the data from Wuhan immediately when COVID-19 broke?
00:05:00.020 What did you know?
00:05:01.400 What's in those redacted emails?
00:05:03.120 Why were you funding the harvesting of baby organs, sir?
00:05:07.340 Why was any of this done?
00:05:09.620 Quite frankly, I think that he thinks he can just ride off into the sunset.
00:05:14.300 Not going to work that way.
00:05:16.400 Because if and when Congress undergoes a change in these committees,
00:05:22.680 I see subpoenas and investigations for Francis Collins,
00:05:27.160 everything of the NIH's programs funding these gain-of-function experiments,
00:05:32.700 funding the, again, the harvesting of baby organs,
00:05:36.020 the use of fetal tissue in the development of medicines and vaccinations.
00:05:41.440 Mr. Collins, Dr. Collins, you're not done yet.
00:05:46.800 And we are not done with you.
00:05:47.980 We're not letting you get away with this one.
00:05:49.500 Stay tuned.
00:05:49.980 H-E Daily continues.
00:05:50.660 Folks, Project Veritas is at it again.
00:05:58.280 And I got to say, you know, James and everybody over there,
00:06:01.100 good friends of mine, the whole board, the team,
00:06:03.440 obviously can't talk too much about who I know at Project Veritas
00:06:07.060 because that would give away certain things that they're up to.
00:06:09.660 But just understand that this is an organization
00:06:11.840 that does the work of actual journalism.
00:06:15.280 This is like the muckrakers, the Upton Sinclairs,
00:06:19.820 if you're familiar with this huge history of people actually going
00:06:23.220 and focusing their journalistic abilities,
00:06:26.420 their talents, and their efforts on those in power.
00:06:30.120 There's something that James said once.
00:06:31.560 He said, journalism isn't repeating what those in power want you to say.
00:06:35.420 It's reporting what they don't want you to say.
00:06:37.760 And that's what James does.
00:06:39.100 And that's what they've done today
00:06:40.360 by going and putting their undercover journalists
00:06:43.340 in one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the nation, Pfizer.
00:06:48.260 Go and listen to this absolutely bombshell revelation from Project Veritas.
00:06:54.420 So your antibodies are probably better at that weight than the vaccination.
00:06:59.340 Nick Carl is an experienced biochemist at Pfizer
00:07:02.200 with a history of working in the pharmaceutical industry.
00:07:04.920 Nick admits to our undercover journalist
00:07:06.720 that those who've had COVID have stronger immunity
00:07:10.480 than those who've received the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
00:07:15.380 When somebody is naturally immune, like they got COVID,
00:07:23.220 they probably have better, like not better,
00:07:28.160 but more antibodies against the virus.
00:07:30.320 Because what the vaccine is, like I said,
00:07:35.400 that protein, that's just on the outside.
00:07:38.980 So it's just one antibody against one specific part of the virus.
00:07:43.480 When you actually get the virus,
00:07:45.960 you're going to start producing antibodies
00:07:47.660 against multiple pieces of the virus.
00:07:50.100 And not only just the outside portion,
00:07:53.440 like the inside portion of the actual virus.
00:07:56.040 So your antibodies are probably better at that weight than the vaccination.
00:08:04.700 But don't take his word for it.
00:08:06.500 Two other Pfizer scientists echo the same sentiment.
00:08:09.800 So I mean, well protected?
00:08:11.060 Yes.
00:08:11.920 Like as much as the vaccine?
00:08:13.620 Probably more.
00:08:14.740 How so? Like how much more?
00:08:16.620 You're protected most likely for longer,
00:08:21.700 since it was a natural response.
00:08:23.940 We're like bred and taught to be like,
00:08:26.640 like vaccine is safer than actually getting COVID.
00:08:31.140 You cannot like talk about this.
00:08:32.920 It's public.
00:08:34.340 If you have antibodies built up,
00:08:36.080 like you should be able to prove that you have those built up.
00:08:38.680 I mean, I still feel like I work for like an evil corporation.
00:08:42.100 We're trying to keep track of everyone that's been vaccinated
00:08:46.080 versus the census of how many people are actually reported.
00:08:51.740 Basically, our organization is run on COVID money now.
00:08:58.000 You don't talk about anything that can possibly implicate you or like big pharma.
00:09:05.780 Even if you shut the door to the office, it's kind of like, who's listening?
00:09:12.520 Now look, we've talked about this for a long time.
00:09:15.240 And what's interesting to me is watching that clip,
00:09:19.980 I don't think there's anything on there that the people are saying,
00:09:23.620 it looks like they're out to dinner or for drinks.
00:09:25.400 There's nothing that these scientists are saying that isn't being said by anyone else
00:09:31.160 who understands basic science, the scientific method, basic human biology,
00:09:36.500 who's having these same discussions around their dinner tables
00:09:41.140 or when they're out to dinner with their friends.
00:09:43.420 Why?
00:09:44.200 Because it's common sense.
00:09:47.100 You understand that the antibodies seem to be,
00:09:51.060 which by the way, we also just got on the heels of Project Veritas
00:09:54.920 putting this out.
00:09:55.660 There's a new study that just came out this morning that just dropped
00:09:59.520 talking about Pfizer and the fact that Pfizer's vaccination rates,
00:10:05.640 the efficacy declines rapidly over time.
00:10:10.180 Why is this?
00:10:11.120 You just heard it outlined in the information in this video.
00:10:15.760 But what's more chilling to me and what's I think more important, right?
00:10:19.600 Sure, they admit it.
00:10:20.440 Fine.
00:10:20.840 We got it.
00:10:21.500 That's important.
00:10:22.080 Number two, the fact that they are put through indoctrination sessions at their company.
00:10:27.760 Listen to what they said.
00:10:29.580 Where they're informed, you are not allowed to talk about any problems.
00:10:34.720 You are not allowed to question the narrative.
00:10:36.800 You are not allowed to publicly speak out against the narrative.
00:10:40.360 This would be against your NDA.
00:10:41.860 Anything that Fauci or Collins, I should say, former head of the NIH, Collins, would say
00:10:51.620 cannot be contradicted.
00:10:54.500 Ladies and gentlemen, that's not science.
00:10:56.980 Science is a process.
00:10:58.960 It is a critical process of discovery.
00:11:02.060 It is ever-changing, right?
00:11:04.980 Newton used to rule physics, that entire field, until a guy named Albert Einstein came along.
00:11:11.740 And then he added his physics on top of Newtonian physics.
00:11:16.000 Then we got quantum physics after that.
00:11:18.240 And that is now adding more and more to our understanding of relativity.
00:11:21.660 It is a constant process of change.
00:11:25.460 It is a constant process of discovery.
00:11:27.580 There's no such thing as the science or the data.
00:11:32.420 There is study.
00:11:34.540 There is the next study.
00:11:36.040 And then there are the theories and experiments and research that are conducted after it.
00:11:41.140 But that's not, apparently, what Pfizer wants to talk about.
00:11:44.540 What they want to talk about is upholding political narratives.
00:11:49.040 This isn't about science.
00:11:50.600 This is about scientism, which is the politicization of science.
00:11:59.300 Our ongoing investigation into the Wuhan lab, the gain-of-function experiments that took place there, continues.
00:12:06.060 We now have a new report that came out out of Australia, a group called Internet 2.0,
00:12:11.960 which, from our understanding, has ties to the Australian government, the Australian intelligence agencies.
00:12:17.820 This full report is up at humanevents.com.
00:12:20.720 You guys can go.
00:12:21.440 You can look at it.
00:12:22.140 It's 24 pages.
00:12:23.760 And the crux of it is this.
00:12:25.340 There's a lot of information out there.
00:12:26.740 But what they did was they said, look, a lot of people have been focusing on the public statements of people like Fauci,
00:12:34.180 Dashak, Shijong Li, other members of the CCP, other areas of Wuhan.
00:12:38.920 We're going to do something different.
00:12:40.660 It's marvelous what they've done.
00:12:41.760 Absolutely brilliant.
00:12:43.040 They went and actually searched procurement orders for the area of Wuhan.
00:12:49.160 And it just so happens.
00:12:51.000 It just turns out that in that area, there's a public database where you can go and look this up.
00:12:59.020 So they go to the public database.
00:13:00.460 And what do they type in?
00:13:01.900 You don't even need to know Mandarin.
00:13:03.260 They type in the phrase PCR.
00:13:06.700 We all know about the PCR test.
00:13:08.040 This has been completely ubiquitous since the COVID-19 pandemic hit.
00:13:11.640 However, comma, however, comma, who was ordering PCR tests in the summer of 2019, May of 2019?
00:13:21.840 Now, we can understand why a lab or various other laboratories or institutes of technology would be looking into this.
00:13:31.440 But why, just as a question, very curious, why would you double your number all of a sudden in May of 2019 of your normal baseline PCR tests?
00:13:43.200 Now, you could say, oh, well, maybe they had some study they were working on.
00:13:47.000 Maybe there was something happening.
00:13:49.480 Or maybe, just maybe, it was a reaction to something that had occurred.
00:13:55.360 Now, we know from past statements from Pompeo and other intelligence officials that it looks like early fall or even summer of 2019 may have been when the original COVID-19 variant was introduced in Wuhan.
00:14:09.820 We've still never really been able to pinpoint that date.
00:14:12.660 However, what this group has been able to do is go in and find that in May of 2019, the Wuhan lab and other associated entities there in Wuhan started doubling their purchase orders of PCR laboratory equipment.
00:14:27.580 That raises questions.
00:14:31.040 Were they running some kind of experiment, just like they were running an experiment in the Soviet Union in Chernobyl that went awry?
00:14:37.120 Did something happen?
00:14:38.120 Was this a reaction?
00:14:39.220 We need to get to the bottom of it.
00:14:41.620 But I want to point out that there's somebody who talked about this very scenario all the way back in the summer of 2020.
00:14:49.140 Take a listen.
00:14:49.640 Have you seen anything at this point that gives you a high degree of confidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the origin of this virus?
00:14:58.440 Yes, I have.
00:14:59.420 Yes, I have.
00:15:00.280 And I think that the World Health Organization should be ashamed of themselves because they're like the public relations agency for China.
00:15:09.780 And this country pays them almost 500 million dollars a year and China pays them 38 million dollars a year.
00:15:17.620 And whether it's a lot or more, it doesn't matter.
00:15:22.400 It's still they shouldn't be making excuses when people make horrible mistakes, especially mistakes that are causing hundreds of thousands of people around the world to die.
00:15:31.780 I think the World Health Organization should be ashamed of themselves.
00:15:35.960 Now, again, just like in the past situation when we were talking about natural immunity, which is apparently something we're not supposed to talk about ever, this is a case where everyone who's looking at it in good faith, by the way, in complete good faith, is saying, look, there's a laboratory here in Wuhan, China, that focuses on respiratory viruses, specifically coronaviruses.
00:15:57.800 Now, when you talk to Collins, the former director, Collins, when you talk to Fauci, they'll say, well, we were doing experiments in China because China is where the coronavirus, the SARS epidemic, the MERS epidemic, these other, not MERS, but these other pandemics that come out of.
00:16:12.980 We have to look into this.
00:16:14.100 OK, but that was in Kunming.
00:16:16.920 That's hundreds of miles away for just, you know, we don't need to do a map break on this.
00:16:22.260 But Kunming to Wuhan is as far as New York to New Orleans.
00:16:27.360 A bat is not going to fly all that way.
00:16:30.240 And if they are, you're going to see pockets of populations, villages, towns, cities or travelers of people being infected along the route.
00:16:38.500 The more simple explanation is that there is a coronavirus center in Wuhan and it is that lab.
00:16:45.360 And the more we dig on this, the more information comes out, the more questions are raised and the more evidence piles up around that lab.
00:16:53.900 Stay tuned.
00:16:54.560 H.E. Daily continues.
00:16:55.480 Really good segment coming up.
00:16:56.800 So we have to talk about this new Facebook whistleblower, Frances Haugen, right?
00:17:08.820 And, of course, she comes out and she's treated very differently than any of the Project Veritas whistleblowers.
00:17:16.080 Those ones are, we're told, not to listen to, don't pay attention to anything that comes out of someone who's talking to James O'Keefe.
00:17:22.400 But Frances Haugen, suddenly it's, oh, she's on 60 Minutes.
00:17:26.260 Now, here she is in front of the Senate.
00:17:27.640 The very next day, people are asking, what is going on?
00:17:31.840 And I want to explain this for people because I saw this a mile away.
00:17:35.500 I said, something about this whistleblower seems a little bit off to me.
00:17:41.660 It reminds me a lot of Alexander Vindman.
00:17:44.800 Excuse me, excuse me.
00:17:46.080 Colonel Vindman.
00:17:47.060 Colonel Vindman, right?
00:17:48.800 The chow fiend.
00:17:49.520 And so I want to play this clip from the 60 Minutes interview that she did, a package, to really drive home the point because I think this is the way on, this is the specific spot where it gave up the game.
00:18:01.740 Take a listen.
00:18:02.360 Frances Haugen told us she was recruited by Facebook in 2019.
00:18:07.000 She says she agreed to take the job only if she could work against misinformation because she had lost a friend to online conspiracy theories.
00:18:17.440 I never wanted anyone to feel the pain that I had felt, and I had seen how high the stakes were in terms of making sure there was high-quality information on Facebook.
00:18:27.560 At headquarters, she was assigned to Civic Integrity, which worked on risks to elections, including misinformation.
00:18:35.540 But after this past election, there was a turning point.
00:18:38.760 They told us, we're dissolving Civic Integrity.
00:18:43.720 Like, they basically said, oh, good, we made it through the election.
00:18:46.180 There wasn't riots.
00:18:47.200 We can get rid of Civic Integrity now.
00:18:49.380 Fast forward a couple months, we got the insurrection.
00:18:52.300 And when they got rid of Civic Integrity, it was the moment where I was like, I don't trust that they're willing to actually invest what needs to be invested to keep Facebook from being dangerous.
00:19:04.760 Facebook says the work of Civic Integrity was distributed to other units.
00:19:10.940 Now, even before we started to do our research on Ms. Haugen, from that very clip, I started asking myself, it sort of seems like this whistleblower isn't someone who's exposing nefarious deeds of the company.
00:19:25.420 It sounds like she's pursuing political ends and advocating for government censorship of Facebook.
00:19:34.260 You know, typically a whistleblower goes against the prevailing ideology of an institution to expose something that's going on, not someone who comes out and says, well, the problem with Facebook is that they're not censoring enough.
00:19:47.140 They're not doing enough of this censorship.
00:19:49.720 And so then we started looking into it.
00:19:51.820 The National Pulse came out with a huge investigation of her political leanings, her political donations, specifically 100%, you guessed it, Democrats.
00:19:59.860 Of course, AOC involved.
00:20:01.460 We also now have from the Free Beacon, a top Democrat operative is advising the Facebook whistleblower, Frances Haugen.
00:20:09.660 Who is that?
00:20:10.620 Bill Burton.
00:20:11.880 Bill Burton was the deputy press secretary in the Obama administration.
00:20:16.180 Folks, understand, this whistleblower is out here to push a narrative, to feed a narrative.
00:20:24.760 She is not someone who's exposing malfeasance.
00:20:27.740 This is yet again a political actor using her former position to advocate for something that the industry wants.
00:20:36.220 Of course they want censorship.
00:20:38.040 Of course they want regulation.
00:20:39.220 Not of their businesses.
00:20:42.040 They want regulation of you and what you're allowed to say and your freedom of speech that they want off the table.
00:20:48.420 Now, it's completely unconstitutional, but she's going to go up in front of the Senate and talk about breaking the First Amendment because of dangerous misinformation.
00:20:58.480 Yeah.
00:20:59.100 Okay.
00:21:00.200 We see what's going on here.
00:21:01.640 We see the PSYOP a mile away.
00:21:03.800 That's all the time we have today for Human Advance Daily.
00:21:06.680 Thank you so much for watching, for subscribing.
00:21:09.300 Get this out to everyone you can.
00:21:11.840 Be the influence agent.
00:21:14.080 Subscribe.
00:21:15.060 Share it with your normie friends.
00:21:17.300 We are now back up to number two in politics.
00:21:19.820 But before we go, I'd like to do today's moment of history.
00:21:25.020 Today is the four-year anniversary, not of the Las Vegas shooting, the greatest mass shooting in American history.
00:21:31.940 Still hasn't been explained why Steven Paddock did all that.
00:21:34.960 Today is the four-year anniversary of when the New York Times and the Washington Post came out and said that officials have found no narrative, no motive.
00:21:43.740 We have no idea why this guy would do this.
00:21:45.800 We have no clue.
00:21:47.580 I think America deserves answers as to why Steven Paddock did that.
00:21:53.720 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay ashore.