CARNEY and the Liberals... standing IN THE WAY of prosperity
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
170.7992
Summary
In this episode of the Big Blue Mug, John talks about the continuing standoff between Alberta and the Trudeau government over pipeline development and Bill C-69, and why it's so hard to see any progress being made.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Prime Minister Carney, it's a little unclear, and so I'm going to work over the next six months
00:00:03.780
to try to get those things addressed. Because if it is the case that there's a consensus now
00:00:10.440
about getting our energy to market, getting our resources to market, finding new markets,
00:00:14.800
these are kind of the baseline to reset the relationship with Alberta.
00:00:18.000
Hi, it's John, and welcome to the channel. Wednesday, June 18th, 522 a.m. with the big
00:00:22.940
blue mug of coffee. Hope you're having an awesome day today. That was Premier Daniel Smith during
00:00:28.120
the election campaign, giving the next government six months to, well, to give in to a bunch of
00:00:34.840
demands she had when it came to resource development. And of course, when we're talking
00:00:38.400
Alberta, oil development here. And instead of getting closer to Mark Carney and the Liberals,
00:00:45.840
who won the election on April the 28th, instead of getting closer to those demands, we seem to be
00:00:51.260
getting further apart. Here's just a refresher on what Premier Smith wanted from the Liberal government.
00:00:56.780
We want to see a guaranteed access to economic corridors that include pipelines to get to new
00:01:03.320
markets. We want the repealing of Bill C-69 so that we do not have an unending process for
00:01:09.900
approvals that essentially means no more pipelines can be built. We need to lift the tanker ban off
00:01:14.380
the B.C. coast. We need to eliminate the oil and gas emissions cap that has been proposed,
00:01:19.700
which is a production cap. We need to scrap the so-called clean electricity regulations.
00:01:24.420
We need to end the treatment of plastics as toxic. We need to abandon the net zero car mandate. We need
00:01:31.580
to return oversight of the industrial carbon tax fully to provincial jurisdiction. And we need to
00:01:36.760
halt the federal censorship of energy companies. I mean, this is all very reasonable.
00:01:40.880
As far as I know, none of those demands have been met. Carney is getting further and further away from
00:01:48.320
meeting those demands. He's providing more excuses. I call them outs to not build pipelines in this
00:01:54.100
country. You'd think it would be an easy answer for Carney to come up with. Yeah, we're going to build
00:01:59.720
pipelines. But as you know, during the election campaign, he said he wouldn't get rid of the
00:02:04.500
thing that's in the way. And that's Bill C-69. Can you make a commitment to Canadians and to Albertans
00:02:10.520
that you will fight to get pipelines built? Yeah. Do you plan to repeal Bill C-69?
00:02:18.040
We do not plan to repeal Bill C-69. So there's that Bill C-69, which is the law here in Canada.
00:02:25.760
Now, my question to you is, if the government says we're going to build a pipeline,
00:02:30.720
but there's a law that says you can't build a pipeline, can you build a pipeline? Now, just for
00:02:38.040
fun, I went online to find Bill C-69. And here is the document. This is Royal Assent of the Bill,
00:02:45.280
which goes back to June 21st, 2019. And I opened it up, and this is how ridiculous government is.
00:02:51.660
And I scrolled through this really fast. Look how long this goes on. And I may run out of time in this
00:02:58.120
video before I'm at the end of this document. But we have this Bill C-69, which is in the way.
00:03:03.600
But I'm wondering if that's even a problem now, because Carney keeps piling on top
00:03:07.620
of ways he can avoid building pipelines. We've talked about the aboriginal veto.
00:03:14.480
Here's the latest story right here. This is from the Canadian Broadcorp incastration.
00:03:18.400
Canada's rush for new resource projects can't happen without First Nation support.
00:03:24.280
Here's a story from just, what, yesterday? Smith ally Premier Scott Moe says he won't kiss Quebec's
00:03:31.000
butt for a pipeline. So you've got the veto for the provinces. And then you've got the latest veto,
00:03:36.420
which I talked about yesterday, and more people are talking about online right now. I noticed that
00:03:40.760
Moose on the Loose put a video up early this morning regarding this one, which is a real big one,
00:03:45.300
is the government veto of pipelines. This article right here, Jamie Sarkin at Mark Carney is demanding
00:03:51.940
power to suspend all federal laws. What will he use it for? They're basically going to be able to say
00:03:59.520
no to any project that they don't deem in the public interest of Canada. Now, if you're somebody
00:04:07.080
who thinks the Conservatives should not support allowing the Liberals to have this unprecedented
00:04:12.240
power, you need to write a letter to your MP. I said yesterday I would do that. Here's what I wrote
00:04:17.960
to my MP here in Calgary Shepherd, Tom Kimiuk. Mr. Kimiuk, I hope all is well, and you are enjoying the
00:04:24.900
fine weather as we approach summer. I'm writing to express my concern for Bill C-5, which is expected
00:04:31.160
to get rammed through Parliament before Canada Day. I feel this bill will give sweeping control to Mark
00:04:36.820
Carney and the Liberals, and it will shield all projects they deem in the public interest
00:04:42.060
from any oversight and scrutiny. I side with the Bloc Québécois and the NDP in being cautious when
00:04:49.340
considering or voting in favor of this bill. I know it is a tricky situation, but your party must come
00:04:55.320
up with a strategy to see that this legislation is properly studied. I bring to your attention this
00:05:00.540
article from the National Post. Mark Carney is demanding power to suspend all federal laws. What will
00:05:06.180
he use it for? So I suggest that you write a letter to your MP regarding Bill C-5, and if it's a
00:05:14.940
conservative, be very clear that you don't think they should be voting on this until it gets proper
00:05:19.160
scrutiny. Now, the conservatives have been good on this. They've been doing a good job in the House
00:05:24.480
of Commons and in the Senate as well, talking about Bill C-69. Again, if the government says we can build
00:05:32.120
a pipeline, but we have a law that says you can't build pipelines, can you build a pipeline? So here's
00:05:38.880
a number of different conservatives in the House of Commons and Denise Batters in the Senate talking
00:05:45.280
about Bill C-69. Now Batters is talking to Chrystia Freeland, who gives the regular liberal word salad on
00:05:53.220
this and will not commit to getting rid of this bill, which bans pipelines. So you're going to hear
00:05:57.400
from conservatives Corey Tokor, Melissa Lantzman, conservative Michael Cram, Jazraj Singh Holland,
00:06:03.880
one and again Senator Denise Batters. Just look at our country with over 2 million people every day
00:06:11.020
relying on the food bank just to sustain themselves. This has been caused by liberal inflation because of
00:06:18.520
terrible policies like printing of money, but maybe more importantly has also been the laws they've enacted
00:06:25.120
to ban growth within Canada, like C-69, the No More Pipelines bill.
00:06:31.060
The Prime Minister is at the G7 today surrounded by allies in the largest oil-producing province in
00:06:36.380
the Federation, but thanks to the Liberal government, the oil and gas products they're demanding are still
00:06:40.760
in the ground and instead of powering our economy and Canadian paychecks. We've got laws blocking
00:06:45.200
extraction, a cap that halts production, a shipping ban that stops it from leaving, and an industrial
00:06:49.980
carbon tax that makes it all more expensive to build. Well, the Liberals repeal our anti-energy
00:06:54.860
laws and approved projects so that we can get jobs for our people and our resources to market.
00:07:00.220
In order to get more pipelines built, the Liberals must repeal Bill C-69, the No More Pipelines law.
00:07:07.660
This law, which was passed by the Liberals in 2019, has made it impossible for the private sector to
00:07:14.940
build pipelines in this country. With the G7 now under the way, will this Prime Minister put aside his
00:07:20.860
radical climate agenda to make sure that Canadian resources get into the hands of our allies?
00:07:26.220
We need to be low risk, low cost, and low carbon.
00:07:30.540
So, Minister, rather than allowing Bill C-5 to give your government the ability to circumvent
00:07:36.380
highly problematic federal laws for, quote, national interest projects,
00:07:40.780
why don't you just repeal Bill C-69 for once and for all?
00:07:45.660
Thank you for the question, Senator. As I said, I believe all of us in this House and in the House
00:07:54.380
that I have the privilege of being a member of, we disagree about many things, and that's entirely
00:08:01.340
understandable. That's called democracy. I think this legislation is one piece of legislation every
00:08:08.460
single member of this House can agree on. I just voted in the House of Commons together with
00:08:15.180
Conservative MPs on closure on this legislation. That says to me that my Conservative colleagues
00:08:22.860
across the aisle in the House where I sit recognize that this is a critical moment in Canada. It's a moment
00:08:29.180
we have to set aside partisan divisions and say, let's build in Canada. I'm proud to be a part of
00:08:36.060
that. I hope senators will be as well. We know why this is happening. We've known since Mark Carney
00:08:41.900
got into the race to be the leader of the Liberal Party. We know all the way through the campaign
00:08:49.020
why this is happening. People who voted for Mark Carney didn't seem to think it was really important.
00:08:54.620
I think that the Liberals may throw some crumbs to Alberta and Saskatchewan when it comes to
00:09:00.620
resource development, but not anywhere near the scale we need to satisfy our provinces.
00:09:08.540
But Carney is who he is. It's been said here before. Here he is in his own words.
00:09:15.340
Maybe as much as half of oil reserves, proven reserves need to stay in the ground if we're
00:09:20.700
going to get to where we are. We can't meet our ultimate objectives, which is to get to net zero
00:09:26.620
emissions. We can't get there unless we do not just have a cap on emissions, but those emissions are
00:09:32.140
brought effectively to zero. You know, the stranded asset problem in the energy sector is going to
00:09:37.980
crystallize sooner than people think. There will be a glut of oil and the wisdom of developing new
00:09:46.700
fields just from an economic perspective can be called into question. How do you reconcile keeping
00:09:52.940
Bill C-69 with your plans to build infrastructure in Canada? Do you plan to repeal Bill C-69?
00:10:00.060
We do not plan to repeal Bill C-69, to answer your question directly. What we have said is society is
00:10:07.260
putting tremendous value on achieving net zero. So the companies and those who invest in them and
00:10:14.380
lend to them who are part of the solution will be rewarded. But those who are lagging behind
00:10:20.140
and are still part of the problem will be punished. So to get to net zero, we need to electrify
00:10:26.300
everything and make electricity green. This has been Carney's objective all along.
00:10:32.140
He found an opportunity to become prime minister to lead the liberals. And now he's got an opportunity
00:10:39.580
to push his agenda. It's not to become an energy superpower in the way you and I think about it,
00:10:45.260
with oil and gas and everything. It's an electric superpower using windmills and solar panels and green.
00:10:52.380
And he won't get rid of Bill C-69 and we get further and further away from the list of demands
00:11:01.340
that Danielle Smith laid out several months ago. She said, the government that gets in has six months.
00:11:06.700
We're working on two now. We'll soon be on summer vacation and this will just get pushed further
00:11:11.820
and further down the road. Now, as I've been sitting here for about an hour, a new article pops up on the
00:11:16.700
National Post website. Here it is. Josh DeHaas. Hey, Carney, repealing bad laws is better than
00:11:22.060
exempting favored companies. C-5 is a case of governments picking winners and losers rather
00:11:27.340
than creating the conditions that will allow the best proposal to succeed. Amen. You know, we had a guy
00:11:34.780
who said he would have repealed Bill C-69 and we wouldn't even be discussing this at this point
00:11:41.340
after the election. And you know who that is. I appreciate you being here. What do you think?
00:11:45.420
Let me know in the comments. Give me a thumbs up if you like the video. Subscribe to the channel.
00:11:50.140
Please ring the bell for notifications and I'll see you in the next one.
00:11:53.900
Common sense conservatives will repeal the unconstitutional C-69 that blocks development.