Louder with Crowder - August 14, 2026


Live Reaction: Andrew Wilson vs. Candace Owens - The Great Debate

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Arrests Finally! Ex-SPLC Boss Cuffed For Secretly Funding KKK & Neo Nazis Tim Pool VS. Jubilee: Viral Interaction Perfectly Encapsulates the Left | Ft. Tim Pool

Episode Stats


Length

5 hours and 23 minutes

Words per minute

204.6

Word count

66,213

Sentence count

6,792

Harmful content

Misogyny

266

sentences flagged

Toxicity

276

sentences flagged

Hate speech

293

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "Louder with Crowder" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:02:52 Dopefire, dear.
00:02:54 I specialize in the education and entertainment of entertain I know you're used to Lucy, but I run. 0.63
00:03:20 Surprise!
00:03:21 Hip hop bebabbles, dance till you drop.
00:03:27 Hip hop bebabbles doesn't mean that they don't love.
00:03:39 Hip hop bebabbles, dance till you drop.
00:03:47 Hip hop bebabbles.
00:03:48 Just a little bit of nicotine.
00:03:52 The solid, just a little bit of nicotine.
00:03:58 Cream on your sugar now.
00:04:02 A little bit of nicotine.
00:04:07 Doesn't mean that they don't love you.
00:04:31 Welcome to live coverage of the debate of the century.
00:04:37 The rumble in the jungle.
00:04:38 Why?
00:04:39 I can't say jungle.
00:04:40 You can't say jungle anymore. 0.76
00:04:41 Rumble in it could be, by the way, a white person could be in the jungle. 0.92
00:04:43 It could be a white person and a black lady in the jungle.
00:04:46 But it is a debate Andy versus Candy. 0.83
00:04:50 They meet today.
00:04:52 And look, we're going to be live fact checking all of it for you.
00:04:55 We have drinking game rules, day drinking if you're doing it.
00:04:58 I'll be doing tea and I might move to a hot toddy.
00:05:00 You drink anytime.
00:05:02 A logical fallacy is used.
00:05:04 Anytime the goalposts get moved. 0.99
00:05:06 Anytime Candace mispronounces a word.
00:05:08 Anytime there's a personal attack from either party.
00:05:10 Anytime there's a mention of pregnancy or motherhood.
00:05:14 And finish your drink anytime Patrick Pett David lands a zinger or mentions percentages.
00:05:21 Oh.
00:05:22 That's true.
00:05:22 I put it this way the audience giving you 50%, they're giving you 51%.
00:05:25 That tells us that we have a plus or minus error of 1% in our polling.
00:05:29 Drink responsibly.
00:05:30 Yes.
00:05:31 Also, you finish your drink anytime there's a called it, because I'm going to make some predictions.
00:05:35 The prompts for today's debate.
00:05:37 Just for everyone to be clear.
00:05:39 Claim one there is overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk.
00:05:45 That's the position that Andrew is holding.
00:05:48 By the way, they've agreed to these terms.
00:05:49 And the claim from Candace is there is overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk and is being set up as a patsy.
00:05:58 Now, full disclosure, you know where I line up, but I do want to get to the truth because I don't believe that we have all of the information regarding Tyler Robinson.
00:06:06 I certainly don't believe that we have the full story as it relates to Charlie Kirk. 0.73
00:06:10 That doesn't mean that Mormon communists were training a gay guy.
00:06:12 So, before we go on, we actually have our very own live fact checker.
00:06:17 You know, Andrew was allowed to bring, I believe, plus two, plus three.
00:06:21 He asked me, I couldn't do it.
00:06:22 I had a long, rough night.
00:06:24 Joe Lewis had surgery, prayers appreciated.
00:06:26 There's some stuff going on, first day of school, all that business.
00:06:30 But Gerald did.
00:06:31 And so, Gerald is with one Mr. Andrew Wilson, and they sent us a video live with their predictions.
00:06:39 Here's my prediction it'll look for the first 30 minutes like I'm on the back foot. 1.00
00:06:44 As I draw the position out, and then I'm going to absolutely eviscerate this chick. 1.00
00:06:49 That's what's going to happen. 1.00
00:06:52 Do you think she's going to be able to support her positions?
00:06:54 No, not in any chance.
00:06:55 I don't even think she's going to try.
00:06:58 All right.
00:06:58 Literally, don't even think she's going to try.
00:07:01 Everybody's looking forward to it.
00:07:02 Wish you luck, man.
00:07:03 Thank you.
00:07:04 All right.
00:07:04 Hopefully, they start on time, but there's nothing like perpetuating the original stereotype.
00:07:07 So, share this, give, send, go.
00:07:12 References.
00:07:12 We will make all of our references available at LiderWithCrowder.com.
00:07:15 That page is live now.
00:07:16 We will be updating it.
00:07:18 As we do every show, but today it's pretty important.
00:07:21 Yeah, we're going to give you our predictions, some of the claims, some of the, I guess we should say, where the goals have been set, and what we hope to see after this word from not sponsors, just us for fun.
00:07:35 We offered Candace Owens, I offered her $300,000 to do a debate. 0.50
00:07:41 What is her position? 1.00
00:07:42 What does she think happens?
00:07:43 Conspiracy theorists don't believe in what they believe, they're just saying it because it gives them an audience.
00:07:48 No, that's not why we're saying it.
00:07:50 We very much believe what we are saying.
00:07:53 She thinks that Israel worked in conjunction with TPUSA and Erica Kirk to murder Charlie. 0.98
00:07:58 I want this to be a clean victory.
00:08:02 You're not going to be chain smoking around me, tough guy. 0.97
00:08:10 A big screw you, Tyler Robinson. 1.00
00:08:14 I hope that you get inside yourself. 0.97
00:08:34 Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
00:09:02 Welcome.
00:09:05 Gerald is not here because he's on the ground.
00:09:07 I don't know if Candace knows that yet.
00:09:08 I'm sure she's probably not thrilled.
00:09:10 But honestly, I can't blame her.
00:09:11 I wouldn't be thrilled.
00:09:14 I mean, I wouldn't be thrilled.
00:09:15 I wouldn't be there.
00:09:16 Like, ah, Gerald.
00:09:18 Same thing I do every Monday.
00:09:20 Yes.
00:09:21 Oh, by the way, I have my plugs here.
00:09:25 We're not able to do any of this without your support.
00:09:27 You can join Mug Club Rumble Premium.
00:09:29 Click that button.
00:09:29 By the way, we are starting early today.
00:09:32 I let Dan Bongino know because he is in the lineup and he understands.
00:09:35 So, thank you, Dan, for your understanding.
00:09:36 We appreciate it.
00:09:38 And, of course, after us, we'll still lead you on to the end of the lineup. 1.00
00:09:41 It's supposed to be three hours today with some breaks because Candace is pregnant.
00:09:45 And, by the way, we respect the miracle, the wondrous miracle that is creation of life.
00:09:52 So, that's cool.
00:09:54 So, the breaks are fine and we'll have some breaks with you.
00:09:56 Josh Firestein is here Friday, September 25th, Average Doe's Laredo, Texas.
00:10:00 He will be there.
00:10:01 How are you, sir?
00:10:02 Good.
00:10:02 Thanks for promoting that date.
00:10:03 Yeah, good.
00:10:04 I'm in Gerald's chair.
00:10:04 I'm being Gerald.
00:10:06 I'm doing the drinking game right away.
00:10:07 That's not good.
00:10:08 This is a mimosa.
00:10:09 Yeah, I know what a mimosa is.
00:10:10 I don't like it.
00:10:11 It's champagne. 1.00
00:10:12 I don't like that it's this early and that it's gay. 0.97
00:10:14 No, it's because I'm Gerald today.
00:10:16 Right. 0.99
00:10:17 Climb up that butt. 0.99
00:10:18 Did you hear me? 1.00
00:10:20 Did you hear me say that?
00:10:21 I did.
00:10:22 I feel like it needs like a floating raspberry, which, by the way, we will have fact checks today.
00:10:26 Bring it up.
00:10:26 Anytime there's a fact check, you'll hear this.
00:10:29 Oh, the fact check.
00:10:31 Well, there's different ones here.
00:10:32 The normal one.
00:10:37 No. 1.00
00:10:37 The normal fact check, you silly bitch. 1.00
00:10:39 This one. 1.00
00:10:40 Great.
00:10:40 There it is.
00:10:41 But then we are able to get live fact checks to Gerald there because they will have three fact checkers, one of whom is Gerald.
00:10:46 That is where you will hear.
00:10:52 And I believe we have a third one just because it's fun.
00:10:54 Yeah, fun.
00:10:54 Fact check.
00:10:55 You don't get to ask those questions.
00:10:58 Yes, I do.
00:10:58 It's my show.
00:11:03 Bring up in the window here so people see what we'll be covering this.
00:11:05 We'll be live streaming it.
00:11:06 Of course, go show support to Andrew and to Candace.
00:11:09 I hope, hey, one of those things.
00:11:11 I know you're in chat.
00:11:11 We'll take some of your chats later.
00:11:13 Isn't this good?
00:11:13 Isn't this what we want?
00:11:14 Isn't this what we expect?
00:11:15 People have these conversations.
00:11:17 And if Candace makes a case, if she makes an airtight case here that Tyler Robinson is in fact innocent, then I don't want an innocent man to go to jail.
00:11:25 I don't want an innocent man to be hung.
00:11:27 Let's go through some of the claims surrounding this debate first.
00:11:31 First off, that Andrew was a TPUSA agent.
00:11:35 That was a claim.
00:11:37 No, he actually was putting up his own money.
00:11:39 And then after Candace asked for $500,000 and he said, well, I'll offer you $200,000 and $100,000 from Brian, whatever.
00:11:45 She's been on that show. 0.77
00:11:47 She reduced it, but said that him crowdfunding is pathetic. 0.79
00:11:49 He's crowdfunding to make it back because he is putting up the money. 0.53
00:11:52 And just so you know, Andrew does okay, but that's a lot of money.
00:11:54 I think that's a very good thing to recoup losses from crowdfunding as opposed to a nonprofit, be it PragerU, Forward Publishing, TPUSA, or some giant investor who's unknown.
00:12:06 You guys fund this if you want to see more debates.
00:12:08 He is effectively paying a ransom.
00:12:11 I will tell you this I obviously have a bias because I was asked to debate Candace.
00:12:15 I believe you have an overlay to this effect.
00:12:17 It was the great debate.
00:12:19 Con, whatever it was called, they said, hey, you want to debate Candace?
00:12:22 I said, sure. 1.00
00:12:24 They said, we'll sweeten the pot $30,000.
00:12:26 I said, yeah, okay.
00:12:27 They said, she said no.
00:12:28 I said, well, she can have mine. 0.68
00:12:29 And she said no.
00:12:31 Not at all.
00:12:32 Well, my policy is I'm not going to chase because this is how we do it.
00:12:35 And I don't love the back and forth online and the drama.
00:12:38 But I also understand it building anticipation, like Conor McGregor with a fight.
00:12:42 Here's the other thing, I guess, that we should go through different claims.
00:12:47 She did say she could not travel because she was pregnant.
00:12:50 And that he couldn't smoke, Mr. Tough Guy.
00:12:52 But here's the truth she traveled while pregnant to a podcast where a man was smoking in front of her. 0.90
00:12:58 Climate hoax is one that funds trillions of dollars.
00:13:01 And we are not running out of space.
00:13:03 You could fit the entire world if you stacked it like New York City in Dallas.
00:13:07 It fits.
00:13:07 I just said it's fine.
00:13:09 But the point is that hurricanes are down.
00:13:12 The whole idea that every time it rains, it's because something bad is happening is like it's okay.
00:13:17 And by the way, new information is coming out regarding medical science all the time.
00:13:21 So since then, we might know hey, you don't want secondhand smoke when you're pregnant.
00:13:25 No, it was fine before.
00:13:26 Yeah.
00:13:27 So, okay.
00:13:28 Here's the other claim that she made online, but then kind of retracted.
00:13:32 Where she said, well, hold on a second.
00:13:34 She has never accused Erica Kirk specifically, because that's a big reason for it.
00:13:37 A lot of people feel for the widow of Charlie Kirk, whether you like Erica or not, whether she makes mistakes or not.
00:13:41 You know, leather pants and sparklers, I get it.
00:13:44 But she has never accused Erica Kirk of killing Charlie Kirk. 0.73
00:13:47 Here's the truth.
00:13:47 Of course she has, and she'll have to defend that today.
00:13:50 The amount of evidence that is now piling up against Erica Kirk.
00:13:54 I've seen enough. 1.00
00:13:55 Erica Kirk should be dragged into a police precinct. 0.85
00:13:58 The assassination of Charlie Kirk was something akin to a rush. 0.53
00:14:03 That just seems pretty cut and dry.
00:14:04 Assassination should be stalled.
00:14:07 A new ruler who the king would have never approved of.
00:14:10 Shutting Point USA for Erica Kirk, and what I think is fair to refer to as their federal accomplices.
00:14:19 Let me ask you, does that seem like a claim that Erica Kirk, not that she walked up and shot him with a lemon squeezer like William McKinley, but was she involved in the killing of Charlie Kirk?
00:14:33 Needs to be dragged into a police precinct?
00:14:34 I would say so.
00:14:36 Overthrowing a king?
00:14:38 If I said, you know, Josh woke up tomorrow dead.
00:14:41 And I noticed that he was killed by a nail gun.
00:14:44 And I said, Oh, it came from the tool room? 1.00
00:14:46 They need to drag tool man Tim in by the hair into a police precinct and question his ass. 0.99
00:14:52 And then people say, Oh, so you're saying Tim did it? 1.00
00:14:53 I'm like, Where'd you get that?
00:14:56 It's impossible.
00:14:57 Tim doesn't know how to use a nail gun.
00:14:58 You know what they say about assumptions. 1.00
00:15:00 Makes an ass out of you and me. 1.00
00:15:02 But I'm an ass man, so I'm fine with it. 1.00
00:15:05 Don't. 1.00
00:15:07 You're in the same.
00:15:08 Come on now.
00:15:08 I want to go through this, though, before the debate.
00:15:10 Here's what I think is going to take place.
00:15:12 Now, can you bring this up?
00:15:13 She has said.
00:15:14 Flat out, Candace Owens, that Tala Robinson is innocent.
00:15:19 Laying the brain, you can probably get that to me.
00:15:21 There were a few different ones, but there's one quote that's really pretty clear.
00:15:24 Not just Patsy, but that he is, what's it?
00:15:27 Today's episode has positively explosives, might even free a young man who's being wrongfully framed for the murder of Charlie Kirk, not the Fed slop that you've been sold.
00:15:35 Now, why are you pointing up?
00:15:38 Never mind.
00:15:39 Can you bring that out and put it out on the window so people know that we are going to cover the stream here later on? 1.00
00:15:43 Son of a bitch. 1.00
00:15:46 That's what she does, though. 1.00
00:15:47 She goes, might even.
00:15:50 Free an innocent man.
00:15:50 It's like, right.
00:15:51 Well, you didn't say that he was innocent.
00:15:53 I said, we might find out that he's innocent and he'll be freed.
00:15:57 Yeah.
00:15:57 Well, I was like, come on, you're saying it.
00:15:59 Well, like we said, the prompts are, and this is the debate today there is more evidence that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk.
00:16:05 There is more evidence that he is a patsy and there is a separate conspiracy involving other people who planned, carried out, executed the murder of Charlie Kirk.
00:16:13 Those are the two different positions.
00:16:15 I will tell you where I line up.
00:16:16 I absolutely believe that he was there and he pulled the trigger.
00:16:19 As to who else knew, Who was involved?
00:16:22 Could there be an accomplice?
00:16:24 Are there some things that don't?
00:16:25 Sure, I tend to go with the defense's presentation, and they have used none of Candace's arguments.
00:16:31 They've argued procedural issues.
00:16:33 They've argued perhaps tainting the jury pool.
00:16:36 None of the other theories have been presented.
00:16:38 So I do think that Candace, I'll go through the entire timeline, by the way, because people have said, hey, do you think that Candace believes what she is saying?
00:16:46 And you guys comment first.
00:16:47 Do you believe that Candace believes what she is saying?
00:16:50 Comment.
00:16:51 Okay.
00:16:53 To them, I say which one.
00:16:54 And I have about 15, but I want to start with, I believe, four here.
00:16:59 Four major claims she's going to have to defend because these were specifics that were very quickly, summarily refuted, factually.
00:17:07 I mean, really inarguably refuted.
00:17:10 And I noticed that she has scaled back and then just sort of broadened claims.
00:17:15 So I hope that we see this debate stick to the very specific claims that were made and where she lines up on them now.
00:17:21 So, look, number one, first claim.
00:17:25 These are the ones that she made that I think she needs to definitely account for.
00:17:28 The claim that Egyptian military planes, right, the tail S U B T T, flew out of Provo after Charlie Kirk's assassination, raising suspicion.
00:17:37 This was her claim.
00:17:39 They are also working very hard to try to convince us that that was nothing.
00:17:43 That's just what Egyptian military planes do fly around the skies in the middle of Provo when Charlie Kirk is being assassinated. 0.51
00:17:50 Well, it turns out maybe these planes might be the key to everything, not nothing.
00:17:56 And by the way, you can check the references.
00:17:58 Go see the entire episode.
00:17:59 We want to keep these short so we can go through them, but we're not taking it out of context.
00:18:02 Here's the truth.
00:18:03 And this isn't the thing that matters most because she goes, Oh, I just had a rounding error.
00:18:07 The flight data showed that it departed Provo at around 7 a.m., right?
00:18:10 Hours before the shooting, she misread UTC as Utah time.
00:18:13 It was community noted, it was widespread.
00:18:15 And she tried to say, So these people are saying there's nothing there.
00:18:18 Well, no.
00:18:19 The more important thing is she cited like 73 broad overlaps with the planes.
00:18:25 Those were summarily fact checked.
00:18:27 66% of the claimed plane locations were wrong.
00:18:31 Okay.
00:18:31 They were wrong, they were inaccurate.
00:18:33 60% placed the aircraft in her claims on an entirely different continent.
00:18:39 Even Alex Jones, InfoWars, they've been all on this, said, okay, this obviously doesn't work.
00:18:44 There were over 60% of these claimed conspiratorial overlaps where there was no physical, emotional, spiritual, or temporal connection to the Kirk family whatsoever.
00:18:55 So at what point do you say, okay, 66%, 60% of your 73 claims are completely wrong?
00:19:01 Maybe the others are just coincidence and you got the time zones wrong?
00:19:04 She never really refuted that.
00:19:06 She said she was going to come out with new information, never did.
00:19:08 So let me ask you, those who line up, do you still believe that the Egyptian planes are a smoking gun? 0.55
00:19:15 Number two, this is another one.
00:19:16 These are ones where she's made concrete claims that the French Foreign Legion were training Tyler Robinson, the 13th Brigade, and there was multi state involvement.
00:19:26 This is the claim.
00:19:27 Here's the clip.
00:19:28 More specifically, that the green light was given to a small team in the National Gendarmerie Intervention Group.
00:19:35 I am told there is one Israeli that is on the assassination squad and that plans were formalized. 0.55
00:19:41 Again, this person provided concrete proof that they are well placed within the French government apparatus.
00:19:47 Further to this point, this person claims that Charlie Kirk's assassin trained with the French Legion 13th Brigade with multi state involvement.
00:19:57 Okay, so here's the truth.
00:19:59 And I know what people say well, you're going to believe the government.
00:20:01 No, not necessarily, but the French Ministry of Armed Forces issued obviously a formal denial.
00:20:05 He was never a member of the Legion.
00:20:07 There's no training that involved him.
00:20:08 There's no record of him.
00:20:09 And there's also no record, as far as I know, of him being in France or speaking French.
00:20:13 So let's assume they're lying.
00:20:16 The question is, and this is going to be a central theme where's the evidence?
00:20:19 Where's the evidence that he trained with the French Foreign Legion?
00:20:22 Which brings me to another one that people just sort of skimmed past.
00:20:24 Did he train with the French Foreign Legion?
00:20:28 Or, 2B, did he train with the Mormon Communist Beehive cult? 0.69
00:20:32 Because that was the claim that Charlie's assassination was part of a hive. 0.59
00:20:38 Communist Utah conspiracy of potentially Mormons here.
00:20:42 A Polish underground symbol, like a Polish communist underground symbol that nobody would have recognized outside of people who know what it meant. 0.64
00:20:50 There's imminent danger coming, okay?
00:20:52 It is relating to a school.
00:20:54 I think it's a communist underground, and I don't know why, but it has something to do with bees.
00:20:58 Then came September 10th.
00:20:59 Obviously, Charlie lost his life.
00:21:00 And a few days later, I was told and I sensed instantly that there was like a hive of people that were involved in this.
00:21:08 I just knew it.
00:21:09 And when it happened, I just went, oh my goodness.
00:21:12 Utah recently, extraordinarily, you know, did modernize their bee flag.
00:21:18 I had no idea.
00:21:19 And I believe that they find these candidates in schools.
00:21:23 I really do.
00:21:24 I think they find these candidates in schools.
00:21:25 And so I wanted to express that to you.
00:21:28 Okay.
00:21:29 So there's no truth.
00:21:30 You just moved on from that one.
00:21:31 But my question is all right, did he train?
00:21:34 This is a real question.
00:21:35 If I actually was trying to get, let's say that we had no information other than the Fed saying, Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk, I would be absolutely asking questions, very broad ones.
00:21:45 We have other information.
00:21:46 So I feel like it narrows some information, notably presented from the defense.
00:21:50 But I'd be asking the questions.
00:21:51 I go, wait a second.
00:21:53 Did he train with the French Foreign Legion? 0.90
00:21:56 Or did he train with the Mormon communist cult?
00:22:00 And why would he need to train with any of them for which there's been no evidence provided?
00:22:03 If goalposts move, we go to the final one.
00:22:08 Well, why would it matter?
00:22:09 Why would it need to be trained?
00:22:10 Because Robinson was never on campus at all to begin with.
00:22:13 He was purely the Patsy.
00:22:15 That is the claim that Candace made, which was, of course, summarily disproven here.
00:22:21 What do you think is behind this?
00:22:22 I don't think Tyler Robinson was there.
00:22:25 You don't think he was there?
00:22:27 I think he's a total patsy.
00:22:28 I think they get lookalikes and they got everybody wearing the same outfit. 0.98
00:22:32 So, a lookalike from the French Foreign Legion or the Mormon Communist Gays? 0.96
00:22:37 I don't know. 0.99
00:22:38 I'm just asking questions. 1.00
00:22:40 I want to know if there's a Mormon Communist beehive slash fag cult training assassins, I'm probably at risk. 1.00
00:22:50 There is. 1.00
00:22:51 They're not gay, though.
00:22:51 They're not gay.
00:22:52 No, they like women's. 0.80
00:22:54 I was going to say, are there holy undergarments? 1.00
00:22:56 They're just basically a woman of glory. 0.79
00:22:59 I don't want to offend them.
00:22:59 But, you know, I'm not offending Mormons.
00:23:00 I'm making fun of the gay communists. 0.98
00:23:02 So, her claim here, he wasn't there at all. 0.99
00:23:05 Well, why would he need to be trained?
00:23:06 Well, here's the truth there was a preliminary hearing, and there's far more evidence that's been presented than we have.
00:23:11 And there are many, examples of him.
00:23:16 Not, I get it, people saying there's no footage of him directly on the roof taking the shot that we have seen, but plenty of footage of him on campus, by the way, other people confirming that it was him and him confirming it through his texts.
00:23:28 But I understand all of that is suspicious because of the French Foreign Legion.
00:23:32 Investigators say surveillance video revealed in a Utah court Tuesday shows Tyler Robinson walking on the Utah Valley University campus. 0.88
00:23:41 Hello, welcome.
00:23:42 What does it mean this particular vehicle belongs to Mr. Robinson?
00:23:46 Information that was provided in regards to driver's license and department motor vehicle records.
00:23:53 The vehicle fits the description of a vehicle owned by Mr. Robinson.
00:23:56 What do we see now?
00:23:57 That's the vehicle exiting with Mr. Robinson driving the vehicle.
00:24:01 Let's hold it right there for a second.
00:24:02 So this is significant, right?
00:24:04 He shows up early in the morning, 8 30 in the morning, and is sort of scouting the place out.
00:24:11 He's noticeably wearing different clothing.
00:24:13 He is wearing different clothing, and he also is walking with a gait or a limp in the studio.
00:24:19 With a gait or what?
00:24:21 Limp.
00:24:21 Do you see Mr. Robinson now?
00:24:23 I do, yes.
00:24:24 He's just arriving at the corner of the building, almost the top center of the image.
00:24:29 What are we seeing now?
00:24:31 Mr. Robinson lowering and jumping off of the roof of the Lowsey building onto the grass area.
00:24:36 And then moving away towards Campus Drive.
00:24:40 Okay.
00:24:40 So we've walked through Egyptian planes, obviously incorrect.
00:24:43 She never explained it.
00:24:44 French Foreign Legion, obviously, there was no evidence.
00:24:46 She's never explained it. 0.87
00:24:48 Mormon Beehive Cult, never explained it. 0.72
00:24:50 He was never on campus. 0.53
00:24:51 All of his images, I believe.
00:24:52 Explained that well, no, clearly that's not him because it's the wrong height.
00:24:56 All right, here's the one thing I will say like I said, I accepted the debate a long time ago for several reasons, uh, and I knew that she wouldn't do it.
00:25:02 I'm very surprised that she's doing it right now.
00:25:04 Hats off to her for doing it.
00:25:06 I mean, she gets a nice payday, doesn't really matter when your husband is the you know, in a hair to the House of Lords, but uh, here's one thing I will say whether Candace gets information correct or incorrect, we all make mistakes.
00:25:19 She has no problem, and I can prove this, she has no problem flat out lying.
00:25:23 For clicks.
00:25:24 And I mean, knowingly lying and misleading her audience for clicks.
00:25:28 How do I know this?
00:25:28 Because I experienced it firsthand in a way that would have cost me millions of dollars and my career.
00:25:38 The Nashville Manifesto, when that came out, the pages that we procured from someone who has and will remain anonymous, which was that it was dispelled by the leftist media, which Candace tried to do until they acknowledged that it was real.
00:25:52 And then they said the fact that this was real, the fact that these people have it, is going to be harmful to the family.
00:25:56 So we were threatened.
00:25:57 By a lawsuit with the Nashville police and investigation from the FBI.
00:26:01 Okay?
00:26:03 During that period of time, Candace made this claim that our scoop, our actual pages from the Nashville Journal, Audrey Hale, that they actually were incorrect.
00:26:17 She was glad that she did her due diligence.
00:26:19 And Audrey Hale, in fact, didn't hate Christians, crackers, wasn't a radicalized trans person, just like Tyler Robinson isn't.
00:26:26 She was actually sexually assaulted by her father, who, by the way, is a real person.
00:26:30 Keep that in mind.
00:26:32 I'm going to say allegedly a lot because it's important for you guys to also understand that I physically did not see these documents, but I trust the person who did physically see these documents, or else I would not be reporting this to you.
00:26:48 Now, the police collected a lot of inventory, a lot of property from Audrey Hale.
00:26:54 I'm just going to remind you guys this is just a few pages of some of the stuff that they collected seven journals, one journal.
00:27:00 You see, I'm showing you this list of the inventory sees, 11 home videos.
00:27:04 Bags with target, empty ammo, two journals, a suicide note, passwords on sticky notes.
00:27:10 I mean, it goes on and on and on.
00:27:11 And again, that is what gave me pause in trying to understand what other information they have.
00:27:16 Amongst all of this inventory, what the source conveyed to me is that Audrey Hale claims to have been sexually assaulted in her youth when Audrey Hale was a child.
00:27:28 And I think that that is a very important and a very relevant allegation.
00:27:35 I obviously spend a lot of time on this show.
00:27:38 On this podcast talking about transgenderism. 0.98
00:27:42 Okay, now here's the truth.
00:27:43 And she also claimed in that clip, you know, I'm glad that I did my due diligence as though we didn't.
00:27:49 There is no mention whatsoever, there is no evidence whatsoever of Hale having been sexually assaulted or abused.
00:27:55 As far as we know, it was completely, totally fabricated, but Candace moved on once the pages that we had were confirmed, both by our allies and by our enemies, with lawsuits and investigations from the FBI.
00:28:06 Though, don't forget, also subpoenaed by the ATF.
00:28:09 I'm a fed.
00:28:11 From Candace.
00:28:11 Here's the other claim that she made, and I can prove to you that she said that the Nashville PD sold the documents to Mug Club Undercover.
00:28:20 She said allegedly the documents were sold by one of the officers.
00:28:22 Here's the truth absolutely not.
00:28:25 Our source is still as safe as a baby in their mother's arms.
00:28:29 And by the way, Mug Club Undercover, we do actual journalism.
00:28:33 It ceases to exist unless you join up.
00:28:35 We don't have nonprofit money, we don't have donor money, we don't have any other investors.
00:28:39 I own 100% of what you see.
00:28:41 You can buy Foundation, the other company that I run, multivitamin or creatine.
00:28:45 You can join up.
00:28:46 We are actually supported by viewers like you, and we will go to jail to protect our sources.
00:28:51 Everything she said about that was wrong.
00:28:52 It was fabricated.
00:28:53 It was a proactive lie, along with other personal smears she issued, but we don't need to get into that.
00:28:58 So I have firsthand experience with her willingness to lie.
00:29:01 It doesn't mean that all these other claims have gone through are lies.
00:29:05 You just have to allow for it.
00:29:07 And that's why I'm hoping that we get the truth today.
00:29:09 Is there an update at all?
00:29:10 They're a little late.
00:29:11 I'm working on it now, doing some final touches.
00:29:13 Okay.
00:29:14 But yeah, we got the right stream up and we're just waiting for them to begin.
00:29:18 So do we want to go?
00:29:18 Let's go through this entire timeline here today.
00:29:20 I bet David's going over some percentages right now.
00:29:22 Is he?
00:29:23 No, I wish.
00:29:24 Is he talking?
00:29:24 Finished his mimosa.
00:29:25 No, nothing's happening yet.
00:29:27 All right, guys, look, we're seven minutes late.
00:29:28 If we're going to be seven minutes late, time's too late.
00:29:30 That's 14 minutes late.
00:29:30 Okay, look, that's 200% times that we're late when we should have been on time.
00:29:34 Also, hey, look at the biceps.
00:29:35 But I've also got big triceps, which is 90% of the arm.
00:29:37 So that's a lot of the arm.
00:29:38 I got a big arm.
00:29:39 Anaconda 3, sequel.
00:29:40 Let's put it up.
00:29:41 Jerry Brock, come on, get me a call.
00:29:43 Can I just say that we've got our first Crowder called it?
00:29:46 You did count the stereotype already.
00:29:49 Oh, yeah.
00:29:49 Oh, yeah, that's true.
00:29:50 I did call it.
00:29:51 I said, I bet you they'll be late.
00:29:52 So hit it.
00:29:55 Why is it hitting me?
00:29:58 I don't know.
00:30:00 It's hitting all of us.
00:30:01 We can also take a couple of chats if we want.
00:30:03 But again, references, links, and links in the description.
00:30:08 Oh, I guess I have to.
00:30:09 I'm not finishing my drink, by the way.
00:30:10 This is.
00:30:11 You know, you got a hot drink over there.
00:30:13 That's an odd chance for.
00:30:15 Hot, hot, hot, hot.
00:30:17 So the claim, the prompts are one side argument.
00:30:20 There's overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk.
00:30:24 Notice it isn't.
00:30:25 He's the only one that we know everything about it, but there's overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk.
00:30:30 Claim on Candace's side is there is overwhelming evidence Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk and is being set up as a patsy.
00:30:37 That's what was agreed upon online.
00:30:40 I think it's very important to hold people to their claims here.
00:30:42 Otherwise, it's just going to be mudslinging. 0.88
00:30:46 Let's go through the entire timeline here because it is hard to sort of keep track. 0.97
00:30:50 Okay.
00:30:52 Which claims does Candace believe?
00:30:53 September 15th, September 16th.
00:30:55 Go check out the references. 0.82
00:30:56 This is where we heard the Bill Ackman, the pressure from Israel, right? 0.71
00:30:59 Start with the claim that.
00:30:59 Bill Ackman staged an intervention with Kirk over his views on Israel because Charlie Kirk was very pro Israel for most of his life.
00:31:05 I do believe that he was becoming frustrated with donors who expected you to be more pro Israel than maybe he wanted to, but that does not mean that he had changed his views on Israel as a nation.
00:31:16 He has a very long track record of it.
00:31:18 But the claim was that Bill Ackman staged an intervention with Kirk over the views on Israel and made some threats, blackmail.
00:31:25 Here's that claim.
00:31:26 An intervention was staged by Bill Ackman.
00:31:30 Because Charlie's thoughts, Charlie's rational thoughts about Israel were a no no.
00:31:38 Rational, what have you.
00:31:39 Now, all we really have is Ackman publicly denied it. 1.00
00:31:42 You could say he's full of crap. 1.00
00:31:44 I'd agree. 1.00
00:31:45 You could.
00:31:45 He may be.
00:31:46 But she may be too.
00:31:49 There really hasn't been that much evidence other than a meeting took place.
00:31:52 So if someone says Stephen met with Josh to plot to kill Toolman because he pissed him off yesterday when talking about recording ISOs.
00:32:03 You're projecting.
00:32:06 And then you do have evidence that we met.
00:32:10 Okay.
00:32:10 Did we meet on that?
00:32:12 Or did I meet with Josh to show him how to pack a corncob pipe that he just got?
00:32:15 In other words, the fact that the meeting took place is not evidence.
00:32:18 So that's all we have, even if that.
00:32:21 Next claim September 16th, September 17th, 25.
00:32:25 This is where she made the claim that Netanyahu, Israeli government, obviously had put pressure on.
00:32:32 On Charlie Kirk, there was a large sum of pro Israel funding.
00:32:36 Now, let me tell you this.
00:32:37 I know that Charlie Kirk, this is why I never actually did anything with TPUSA.
00:32:42 Not saying that they were banging down my door to do anything, but this is why I didn't work with nonprofits because I never liked the strings attached with donors.
00:32:47 So, I will grant there is some truth attached to this, donors of any kind.
00:32:51 And I would imagine that they're pro Israel donors, they would probably want to have a say in it.
00:32:55 But the claim here is Netanyahu, government pressure, pro Israel funding.
00:33:00 If you don't take it, well, this is an offer you can't refuse, Charlie.
00:33:04 Charlie denied, and what BB didn't include there, he declined to go to Israel for, I would describe this as like, you know, re education camp.
00:33:14 You know, we've seen it.
00:33:16 Well, you didn't decline to go to Israel, Candace, and nor did Charlie many times.
00:33:20 By the way, you can change your views.
00:33:21 I understand. 0.93
00:33:22 September 24th, that's where we get to the communist Mormon beehive cult is involved. 0.86
00:33:27 We've moved on from Netanyahu at this point. 0.84
00:33:28 Here you go.
00:33:30 A Polish underground symbol, like a Polish communist underground symbol that nobody would have recognized outside of people who know what it meant.
00:33:38 There's imminent danger coming, okay?
00:33:40 It is relating to a school.
00:33:42 I think it's a communist underground, and I don't know why it has something to do with bees.
00:33:46 Then came September 10th.
00:33:47 Obviously, Charlie lost his life.
00:33:48 And a few days later, I. Was told, and I sensed instantly that there was like a hive of people that were involved in this.
00:33:56 I just knew it.
00:33:56 And when it happened, I just went, Oh my goodness.
00:34:00 Utah recently, extraordinarily, you know, did modernize their B flag.
00:34:06 I had no idea.
00:34:07 And I believe that they find these candidates in schools.
00:34:10 I really do.
00:34:11 I think they find these candidates in schools.
00:34:13 And so I wanted to express that to you.
00:34:15 Okay, so Bill Ackman, private donors.
00:34:17 Then we have the actual government of Israel.
00:34:20 All right, but I would imagine that Bill Ackman or the government of Israel, they have a really useful Patsy who.
00:34:24 By the way, did not kill Charlie Kirk. 0.87
00:34:27 They, by proxy, train, I guess like Contra, they train communist Mormons. 0.88
00:34:34 Okay. 0.65
00:34:35 Then I guess the way this brings us to October 12th, October 11th to 12th, the only way to get those communist beehive cultists to train on behalf of the ultimate plot with Israel and Bill Ackman to assassinate Charlie Kirk would be to use planes from Egypt.
00:34:55 Mm hmm.
00:34:56 Which is the claim that was made there tied to military meetings with foreign leaders?
00:35:01 Let's just play a quick, short one.
00:35:02 You've seen this clip.
00:35:03 I'm just going through the entire timeline chronologically.
00:35:06 And on the day of Charlie Kirk's assassination, an Egyptian Air Force plane took off from Provo, Utah airport.
00:35:12 These are not coincidences, okay? 0.82
00:35:14 This is a conspiracy.
00:35:15 There is less than a.000.
00:35:19 All right, that's enough.
00:35:21 We already showed you 66% of them were wrong completely.
00:35:24 October 29th, this is where the claim was made.
00:35:26 So, goalpost move.
00:35:28 Now, we're away.
00:35:30 We've just moved on from Egypt. 0.99
00:35:32 We've just moved on from the communist Mormons. 0.83
00:35:33 And I know people say, well, they could all be involved.
00:35:35 I'm going to tell you, no.
00:35:37 It makes no sense. 0.84
00:35:37 At a certain point, you have to say they could all be involved, or maybe someone who hates Charlie Cart because of radical LGBT. 0.84
00:35:42 Like, that does make more sense. 0.91
00:35:43 You do need to disprove it, provide any evidence.
00:35:45 This is now the point where she made the claim that the federal government helped cover it up on behalf of the pro Israel lobby.
00:35:51 Specifically, the Trump administration said that they were doing this because the pro Israel lobby needed to be served.
00:36:00 And compared the federal involvement to MLK's death.
00:36:03 If you go back, people that are pro-HBO, for whatever reason, were like, do not look any further into this death.
00:36:09 It's never good when the feds are lining up to give you a holiday.
00:36:13 Not good.
00:36:13 You know, Martin Luther King vibes.
00:36:14 I'm struck by Trump and the lack of demand, the lack of pushing on the narrative.
00:36:21 Okay, then the next one.
00:36:22 And how do we say this fort?
00:36:24 Fort Huachuca.
00:36:25 Fort Huachuca.
00:36:26 This is November.
00:36:27 It's one of the Army's homes of intelligence.
00:36:30 18th to 19th, she made the claim that security chief Brian Harpole was at Fort Huachuca.
00:36:35 She claimed that her source saw Harpole and continued to say very likely Erica Kirk at Fort Hachucha.
00:36:41 I don't know how to say it.
00:36:43 Hachuca.
00:36:43 Hachuca.
00:36:44 The day before the shooting, she was meeting senior officials, declared the meeting confirmed.
00:36:49 He had travel records that placed him in Dallas, provided receipts.
00:36:52 He later sued her for defamation.
00:36:53 I don't know how that ended, but she likely will lose, just like she lost the case against her landlord, where she claimed discrimination.
00:36:58 Turns out she lived like a pig and she had to pay $17,000 in back rent and damages. 1.00
00:37:04 She almost always loses, just so you know, in court. 1.00
00:37:08 Conspiracy.
00:37:08 Yeah.
00:37:09 So, okay.
00:37:11 That's all we have.
00:37:11 Her source confirmed and then receipts saying no.
00:37:14 Which is more likely at that point if the receipts, you would have to believe that he had tickets, receipts, and just didn't get on that flight, went to this fort to meet with Erica Kirk so they could discuss communist guerrillas training them in Utah while they take Egyptian planes.
00:37:29 October 25th.
00:37:30 What's that with bees?
00:37:32 Yeah, bees. 0.92
00:37:32 Gorillas and bees. 0.92
00:37:33 Yeah, it's like what's that movie?
00:37:35 The movie with Mark Wahlberg?
00:37:37 The Wind?
00:37:38 Happening.
00:37:38 Oh, yeah, happening.
00:37:39 Transformers with bumblebees.
00:37:40 Yeah, exactly.
00:37:42 That's just hot wind.
00:37:43 See, that's more of a conspiracy.
00:37:45 October 25th, 26th, this is when she officially moved to Turning Point USA, right?
00:37:51 She said that Trump discarded Charlie when he was no longer useful, and then said that she knew the betrayers.
00:38:00 And more specifically, she then sort of escalated it to Andrew Colvett, right?
00:38:04 So TP USA, the closest around him, Donald Trump, the administration, then Andrew Colvett, her source, dreams.
00:38:14 And I just, like, I just, my heart aches for the fact that he gave so much of his life.
00:38:17 To Trump into politics, and they just were like, Nope, that is it.
00:38:23 It serves us or it doesn't serve us, and we want to move on.
00:38:26 And so here's a holiday.
00:38:28 Bro, if they try to give me a holiday, what is with them giving people a holiday after they kill them?
00:38:32 Whenever I would try to listen to what he was saying, it sounded like he was underwater.
00:38:36 So I was frustrated by this.
00:38:37 I can't get to the part where you tell me who betrayed you.
00:38:41 It wasn't until the third week after his death that finally one face came through in this dream.
00:38:47 It came through as clear as day.
00:38:50 From around the corner of the restaurant.
00:38:53 And it was Andrew Kolbetz.
00:38:55 You know what, though?
00:38:55 I will say, I had the same dream.
00:38:57 He was above my bed, though, coming in like the frighteners.
00:39:03 Then he sucked me down into my bed like Johnny Depp in The First Nightmare on Elm Street.
00:39:06 Nice. 1.00
00:39:07 So remember, all of this was she tipped over to Israel, Egyptian. 1.00
00:39:11 Now, I know what you're saying.
00:39:11 Well, the Egyptian planes were to serve Israel because they have such a strong alliance.
00:39:16 And the Egyptian planes to serve Israel and the Trump administration, that makes sense that they would use Utah communists to train them.
00:39:24 Okay. 0.72
00:39:25 Oh, and the French Legion.
00:39:27 Because the French are really very pro Israel if you look at their policies in the UN.
00:39:30 All right.
00:39:31 And they also.
00:39:32 In France, very close.
00:39:33 Yeah, very, very, very close.
00:39:34 So they have their sister cities.
00:39:36 Yep.
00:39:36 And then.
00:39:37 And then.
00:39:38 They call it PP.
00:39:40 TV USA, the Trump administration, which, by the way, if you believe this, hey, you should vote for communists.
00:39:44 You should vote for the actual left who are communists.
00:39:46 And all along, she said, you know what?
00:39:48 The only person who could get me to stop this, to make it stop, would be Erica Kirk, of course.
00:39:53 Because if she says to stop, I will.
00:39:54 I think she wants me asking questions.
00:39:56 Well, then that brings us from March 2026 onward, where, of course, now Erica Kirk is involved.
00:40:02 Also, she had a growing hunch, not only that Erica was involved with portraying her husband, we played that video earlier, who she should be dragged into a police precinct, but something to do with Epstein.
00:40:13 I got to speak to you about something much more seriously.
00:40:16 I have a hunch, a growing hunch, that Erica and Jeffrey Epstein may have crossed paths.
00:40:26 Something is not sitting right with me.
00:40:28 About how she just keeps dancing around Jeffrey Epstein in her life.
00:40:35 Didn't Erica ask her to stop?
00:40:36 Like, hey.
00:40:38 No, but she has a hunch.
00:40:40 Yeah, you know.
00:40:41 Which isn't saying anything.
00:40:41 It's just, you know, it's a feeling that maybe possibly the potential of something being there.
00:40:46 Yeah, hunches come and go.
00:40:47 I'm already tired.
00:40:49 Yeah, you're all hunched over over there.
00:40:51 I, uh, well, I can smoke because I'm a tough guy.
00:40:54 Hey, I'm a tough guy too, pal.
00:40:58 Yeah.
00:40:58 Yeah, well, I'll go get my corn cob pipe.
00:41:01 Tough guy.
00:41:01 Who's your gang?
00:41:03 The Pillsbury?
00:41:05 I'm sorry.
00:41:07 That was uncalled for.
00:41:08 I'm sorry. 1.00
00:41:09 I'm having a sip of this mimosa, you jerk. 1.00
00:41:11 The only gang who's. 1.00
00:41:14 Slogan is, hoo hoo.
00:41:21 He also had a whole bride of Charlie thing, said the marriage wasn't real.
00:41:24 Some people would question that because I don't want to get personal and go through all of her background as a longtime leftist, but she did marry an actual Hair 2 Lordship farmer, is his name.
00:41:34 I always forget.
00:41:34 I was David Chris Farmer.
00:41:36 His name or profession?
00:41:37 His name is Farmer.
00:41:39 18 days after they knew each other, they got engaged, basically doing it by Zoom, FaceTime.
00:41:43 So some people would say that.
00:41:45 You know, but she also was known, she wrote articles on a blog a while ago that gay men make the best husbands.
00:41:51 Which has required some people implying that he is, which of course there's no evidence.
00:41:55 It's just that she said that and then some mannerisms.
00:41:57 But it was Charlie Kirk and Erica Kirk.
00:42:00 Their marriage was not real.
00:42:01 This brings us to okay, so we have Tyler Robinson trained by the Mormon Utah Special Forces and the French Legion, which by the way would be the first time someone was trained by both because I'm familiar with both.
00:42:11 They don't cross train a lot.
00:42:13 Well, using Egyptian planes, though. 0.82
00:42:15 Using Egyptian planes, yeah.
00:42:16 Well, they're the most affordable planes.
00:42:18 And you travel and you always step over in Arizona.
00:42:21 Reliable.
00:42:21 Yeah.
00:42:22 Don't be a silly bitch. 1.00
00:42:23 The pyramids and the ley lines. 1.00
00:42:25 So, all this.
00:42:25 Okay.
00:42:25 So, the training, because here's the thing.
00:42:27 If that's the case, man, I tell you what, if I had access to that kind of training from the French Legion and communist gays in Mormons in Utah, man, I would be a dead eye, wouldn't I? 0.97
00:42:37 But then, why would I need June 2026, the exploding mic? 0.98
00:42:42 So, you do all that training, but then it's really just his security who had a microphone explode on him, right?
00:42:48 This is, it came from a guy named John Bray originally, and then Candace.
00:42:51 Pushed it recently, did two episodes on this.
00:42:53 She argued that Kirk may have been killed by a wireless microphone rigged with a shaped explosive charge rather than a rifle bullet.
00:43:02 And there may be evidence for this because I guess that I will say this it is the calling card of the Utah Mormon communist cults and the French Legion.
00:43:14 So I give this one a maybe. 0.70
00:43:17 How could it be contained, so to speak, if it's not like a bullet?
00:43:21 You're saying, okay, his microphone is rigged.
00:43:23 You're saying it exploded.
00:43:25 If you're like me, you're thinking, well, wouldn't that just go everywhere and cause severe burns to Charlie?
00:43:29 Wouldn't we be able to see severe burns onto Charlie in the process?
00:43:33 So I want to make clear to you is not necessarily, because this isn't just like blowing up a bomb.
00:43:38 Okay.
00:43:39 Obviously, that's explosion as well.
00:43:40 This would be what is known as a shaped charge.
00:43:44 I've learned this recently, and John Ray tried to explain it to me on eggs.
00:43:49 And I was like, I don't comprehend how it could, Operate like a bullet.
00:43:52 And he kept saying it's a shape charge, to shape charge.
00:43:55 And finally, after I got into this Butler assassination, I suddenly found myself researching detonation cords and shape charge.
00:44:01 And now I comprehend what he meant because functionally it is like a bullet.
00:44:04 And what I can say and what I can state rather unequivocally is that there is no more.
00:44:09 All right, that's enough.
00:44:10 It looks like it's starting right now.
00:44:11 Oh, no, it says starting soon. 1.00
00:44:12 Oh my God, son of a bitch. 1.00
00:44:14 Also, is it just, oh, it's a crooked, it's a style choice. 1.00
00:44:17 I thought our TV was crooked. 1.00
00:44:20 It's a Dutch angle. 1.00
00:44:22 By the way, the Dutch could have killed him too. 0.95
00:44:24 And why does this look like a Dolce Gabbana commercial? 0.98
00:44:29 Well, it's, you know, it's film strippy and, you know.
00:44:32 Yeah.
00:44:33 If I were to do it, it'd look like a Tris Leches in Gabbana.
00:44:37 I weighed myself at the vet yesterday.
00:44:39 Don't weigh yourself at the vet.
00:44:40 I was like, this is heavy.
00:44:41 This is heavy, isn't it?
00:44:43 They were like, it's actually not.
00:44:45 So I took off my shoes.
00:44:47 It was like half an ounce. 1.00
00:44:48 I was like, son of a bitch. 1.00
00:44:49 Jeez. 1.00
00:44:50 I'll do a public record.
00:44:52 246.
00:44:53 That's not good.
00:44:54 It's not good.
00:44:56 No, hey, man.
00:44:58 No.
00:45:00 Look, I had surgery.
00:45:02 I got staph infection.
00:45:03 And then I was like, you know what?
00:45:05 Chips are good.
00:45:08 I was watching an episode of The Simpsons the other day, and Homer revealed his weight was 240.
00:45:14 Oh, and that's when I made a change in my life. 0.99
00:45:17 I was like, oh shit. 0.99
00:45:18 Pre surgery, 220 something, 240. 0.99
00:45:20 Okay, well, look, we'll both agree to lose.
00:45:23 I need to lose 20.
00:45:24 Because what happened is I gained all this fat, and then I started training again, and I gained back some of the muscle, but I still kept the fat.
00:45:31 Yeah.
00:45:32 So it's okay.
00:45:33 I mean, it's not okay.
00:45:34 You can fat shame me.
00:45:35 We have pictures of them actually sitting down, right?
00:45:37 So we know that this isn't fat.
00:45:38 It is.
00:45:39 There we go.
00:45:39 It's happening.
00:45:40 It's happening.
00:45:42 Hey, why is Patrick Pet David man spreading?
00:45:45 He asked you.
00:45:47 Noodles knows about this.
00:45:48 When you have a hammer like that, you got to spread those things.
00:45:50 How great would it be if his iPad is just recording the selfie right now?
00:45:54 It's like, all right, get it good.
00:45:56 Hey, guys, can we get in, edit in maybe the Space Odyssey sound so we can get the 42% like Drake of my big member right here?
00:46:01 And that'll be a 60% growth.
00:46:03 Oh, here we go.
00:46:04 Here we go.
00:46:04 We're going to introduce my men.
00:46:06 Let's watch the show.
00:46:07 Candice, Andrew, you know, good to sit down here with you, talking to you guys about the conversation that I think started with you guys.
00:46:15 Drinking game rules, bring them up one more time.
00:46:16 Yeah, I'm offering $300,000.
00:46:18 And for the audience watching this, you have to know when you see this final product, there's a lot of stuff that happens behind closed doors.
00:46:24 There was still communication.
00:46:26 I'm just trying to sell a company.
00:46:29 Finish your drink.
00:46:29 If Patrick L. David Landon's in here, or a deal doesn't work out, but kudos to the both of you guys that you made it work.
00:46:35 The topic of discussion today, how this got prompted is Andrew, you said there's overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk.
00:46:45 And Candace, your position was he's a Patsy.
00:46:48 Tyler Robinson is a Patsy.
00:46:49 So, of course, we'll talk about a lot of different things, but that's kind of how the whole thing got started.
00:46:53 For the audience watching, I think this is truly for three different people.
00:46:57 Number one is anybody out there that loves Charlie, respects Charlie, his legacy, what he did.
00:47:03 We have a lot of love and admiration for what he did.
00:47:05 He changed the lives of many people, young men, young women.
00:47:09 You worked with him for many years.
00:47:10 You guys were friends.
00:47:11 You've said a lot of good things about Charlie, respectful towards him.
00:47:14 You guys may have disagreed on some things, but you had a lot of respect for him.
00:47:17 The second audience is the folks out there, you that's watching.
00:47:21 Also, important to note, as far as you claim, Andrew, just like myself, has never claimed to have been close with or friends with Charlie Kirk.
00:47:27 And he was critical of TPUSA and still is in many ways.
00:47:30 Candace was close with Charlie Kirk, and all the evidence that we have is that they were not very close up to the time of his death, and he had put some distance.
00:47:36 So only one of them is making the claim that they were still close.
00:47:38 Andrew has not made that claim.
00:47:39 The three channels subscribed to him The Candace Show, The Crucible.
00:47:43 I'm sure some of the people from Crucible are watching as well, and the PBD Podcast.
00:47:46 The more you subscribe to this, the more we're able to deliver these types of conversations to you.
00:47:51 And last but not least, it's about the two of you.
00:47:54 My goal is to speak as little as possible.
00:47:56 99% of the time, it'll be you guys.
00:47:57 Speaking, and the audience will be able to see it.
00:48:00 99%, okay, guys, you got a drink. 0.61
00:48:01 Anytime, like I said, he names a percentage because that counts as a zinger.
00:48:04 99%.
00:48:04 There's three people representing Andrew and three people representing Candace to do fact checking.
00:48:10 So at any point, if somebody makes a claim, the other can say, Can we fact check this?
00:48:14 I can jump in and say, Fact check this.
00:48:16 Even the folks in the back can say, Fact check this.
00:48:18 So it is a very fair conversation that we're having here.
00:48:22 And so, with that being said, kudos to Michael Knowles.
00:48:25 Your name was mentioned a lot.
00:48:26 You missed out right now, the last 10 minutes.
00:48:28 We talked about you.
00:48:29 There's a lot of love and respect here mutually from both parties, all three of them here.
00:48:33 And then, of course, the great Joe Rogan that started this conversation.
00:48:36 And he also volunteered, but it ended up being this format that we have here today.
00:48:41 So, with that being said, Andrew, your claim is overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk.
00:48:50 Opening statements, opening comments.
00:48:52 Sure.
00:48:52 And what I mean by overwhelming is I just find it very convincing.
00:48:57 I think that's what most people mean when they say overwhelming evidence.
00:49:01 So, I have a brief opening statement.
00:49:03 On September 10th, 2025, Charlie Kirk was murdered.
00:49:07 Many of you already know a lot about the events which occurred after Kirk's death.
00:49:10 You remember the ghoulish laughter, celebrations, and madness we saw from leftists all over, from TikTok invasions, debates, posts on social media, destruction of memorials, and things like this.
00:49:21 Within weeks of Kirk's death, a cottage industry began to form, peddling various alternative theories on how he died.
00:49:29 What special interests may have killed him?
00:49:31 What nations were involved?
00:49:33 And was our own government one of them? 0.87
00:49:36 Because this was the first nationwide traumatic event in Gen Z's lifetime, the demand for answers was severe and palpable. 0.65
00:49:45 The leading theory from the conspiracy verse is that Israel worked with the United States government to murder Charlie Kirk.
00:49:53 Within a day or two of Kirk's death, Ian Carroll claimed that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
00:49:58 And the conspiracy caught on like wildfire.
00:50:00 This theory was built on one misleading piece of evidence that in his final days, on around September 8th, Charlie sent a text message reading Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes.
00:50:12 I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.
00:50:18 This was sent in the context of a platforming dispute.
00:50:20 Jewish donor stereotypes. 1.00
00:50:21 Fact check true. 0.96
00:50:22 From this scintilla of misleading information, it was speculated that Israel killed Charlie Kirk because he would have successfully opposed the Iranian war.
00:50:31 Now, that's a fun theory, and who doesn't like a good, fun conspiracy theory?
00:50:34 I like them.
00:50:36 But there is no evidence that Israel actually killed Charlie Kirk. 0.55
00:50:39 And if Candace has some, I'd like her to actually show it to me.
00:50:42 I'm open to suggestions, but to date, there hasn't been any.
00:50:46 There is, however, tons of evidence that a leftist killed Charlie Kirk, just as Charlie feared they would.
00:50:51 I believe Charlie Kirk and I have the receipts.
00:50:55 No, I didn't have a dream where he came to me and told me that the left killed him.
00:51:00 No, he didn't come to me in a dream and say, Candace Owens betrayed him.
00:51:04 That never happened.
00:51:06 In fact, I don't need dreams of any kind because I hold in my possession never before seen messages from Charlie Kirk to his security team on September 9th, 2025.
00:51:14 Oh.
00:51:14 I'm going to share the message with you today, which is the first time this information's ever been publicly revealed.
00:51:20 Oh.
00:51:21 On September 9th, Charlie's security team wrote to him, yes.
00:51:24 Law enforcement has been fully supportive and agreed to a security plan and posture.
00:51:29 Tomorrow's event will be covered by both my team and the campus PD.
00:51:33 If additional support is required, patrol units will be available.
00:51:36 I have 11 on site.
00:51:38 Charlie responded with this Okay, great.
00:51:40 Remind them that they are there for one person's security only, because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me.
00:51:50 That was a message sent September 15th.
00:51:54 By the way, personal experience, two people have been in a very similar test.
00:51:59 I think he meant exactly what he meant by the fact that he was worried the left was going to try to kill him. 0.96
00:52:05 Now, we'll discuss this more later on in the debate, and maybe I have more never before seen evidence that exposes just how wrong and, in my opinion, idiotic many of these conspiracy theories have been.
00:52:17 But that's what happens when you rely on what's called the evidence of the gaps.
00:52:21 In other words, they don't have evidence, they seem to just make up evidence.
00:52:25 And what did they make up?
00:52:26 Well, in my opinion, Kind of whatever lined the pockets.
00:52:30 And I think it's ghoulish to profit off of the death of a good man.
00:52:36 But we came here today to debate.
00:52:37 She's going to take a look at it.
00:52:38 So let's go to it.
00:52:38 The debate topic today is one, my belief that there's overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk.
00:52:44 And two, Candace's belief that there's overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson was a patsy and didn't kill Charlie Kirk.
00:52:50 In sum, the audience is going to decide who has more evidence supporting their theory.
00:52:54 My theory is that the state is correct that Tyler Robinson is the killer, at least based on evidence so far.
00:52:58 And Candace's theory that Tyler Robinson.
00:53:00 Don't like him, we'll already dismiss him because he'll say the state is correct.
00:53:03 He's a paid actor, just like I'm a Fed, even though I was investigated and subpoenaed by the FBI.
00:53:07 If it was reasonable doubt, And that's all it is.
00:53:09 Candace has never been.
00:53:10 Never subpoenaed and investigated by the FBI.
00:53:11 I wouldn't even be here having the debate with her.
00:53:14 It's fair to have doubts as a trial has yet to occur.
00:53:17 And the state hasn't even begun to try to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. 0.98
00:53:21 But Candace makes a more forceful claim.
00:53:25 She claims that there's more evidence that Tyler is not guilty of murder and was set up as a patsy than there is for the state's case.
00:53:31 And I just think that that's absurd.
00:53:34 And she will not be able to demonstrate that in any way.
00:53:36 In fact, she has almost no real evidence at all of her theory, whereas my theory is supported by compelling witness testimony.
00:53:42 Physical evidence, multiple confessions, all of which are independently compelling, but which are even more convincing as each piece of evidence corroborates the others.
00:53:51 You'll notice the term overwhelming was included in both theories.
00:53:55 This is because Candace demanded I defend my use of that term, which I think is fair, in describing the evidence against Tyler Robinson.
00:54:02 She, on the other hand, only wanted to defend her theory as merely viable.
00:54:06 That is, until I showed her clips in which she said she believed the evidence of her theory, that Tyler Robinson's and Patsy, was supported by overwhelming evidence.
00:54:14 Only then did she agree to defend that position.
00:54:17 Regardless, we're both defending the claim.
00:54:19 There's overwhelming evidence on our side, so it's worth defining that term.
00:54:23 When I say the evidence against Robinson's overwhelming, all I'm saying is that I mean that as of right now, I find it very convincing.
00:54:31 I see almost no evidence at all, only speculation on verified claims and suggestions of things that could merely be hypothetically possible.
00:54:38 Dreams, vibes, feelings, things like this.
00:54:41 Almost done, by the way. 0.99
00:54:42 I have no problem defending the state's case and welcome Candace bringing up any challenges she would like, but if I'm honest, The reason I was willing to pay the $300,000 for this debate was to finally have a chance for someone to demand Candace be held accountable for the unbelievable theories and claims she's been making. 0.56
00:54:58 Candace's investigation is indistinguishable from a leftist operation. 1.00
00:55:02 She couldn't be doing more damage to the right if she were trying. 1.00
00:55:06 She uses her considerable platform to relentlessly attack one of the most influential conservative outreach organizations for young people. 1.00
00:55:12 And she's making a mockery of the online right wing commentary class. 1.00
00:55:16 She's harming Republicans in an election year by dividing them. 0.99
00:55:19 She's attacking the very organization Charlie spent his life building. 0.99
00:55:22 Right?
00:55:23 With social autopsy and Degree 180, the anti Trump blog where she hoped that conservatives died, and an anti conservative, anti free speech doxing website.
00:55:32 That does matter because her background does matter.
00:55:34 Let's go.
00:55:34 Okay, great.
00:55:35 Well, I'm not going to waste time with the preamble because I think I just want to get to the substance of the debate and we'll just speak to the audience.
00:55:42 I have obviously had an audience since we've been covering his case.
00:55:48 Speak to the evidence.
00:55:53 The pursuit of something that makes sense regarding what happened on September 10th by throwing it to this is just people who are conspiracy theorists, these are people who are just trying to generate clicks.
00:56:04 He didn't dismiss it.
00:56:06 He did not dismiss that.
00:56:07 He said, I see overwhelming evidence, and the only evidence I see to the contrary, as far as evidence, is the pursuit of traffic because there's no evidence.
00:56:14 A couple of years, if you just think of the things that we've learned about our government.
00:56:17 And I do want to say this what's been the most disturbing element, I think, for everyone is that.
00:56:24 Not only does the narrative not make any sense, which I'm going to demonstrate, I need to waste time at the preamble going through the points or trying to insult you or pretending that I've been running a podcast saying it's just dreams and vibes, like I'm Miss Cleo, and that's the reason why it's taking so many influencers.
00:56:37 It looks like a billion dollar industry of influencers to dispute everything Candace says.
00:56:42 It's not because I'm on my platform saying I had a dream last night.
00:56:46 I don't think that that diminishes you as an argument.
00:56:49 Obviously, we have presented a lot of evidence.
00:56:51 You just presented a text message and said this is evidence.
00:56:54 Well, that's how this entire thing works.
00:56:55 Logical fallacy, by the way.
00:56:56 The government obviously has lied on something.
00:56:58 Therefore, the state and the defense of Tyler Robinson are lying.
00:57:01 One of the things we saw was this push to make us all think and remember how much he loved Israel.
00:57:06 It's because the prime minister of Israel, who's fighting like a 27 front war, felt that he needed to come do a little mini tour and to be, strangely, to state that I did not kill Charlie Kirk when nobody was having that thought that I can remember.
00:57:22 Nobody was going, I wonder if Bibi Netanyahu killed Charlie Kirk.
00:57:25 And then we had a round of influencers who.
00:57:28 Lies.
00:57:29 Plenty of people were implying Israel largely.
00:57:30 You and people led to say Benjamin Netanyahu.
00:57:32 That's why he issued any kind of a statement.
00:57:33 If that statement took place.
00:57:34 That's why he issued agreements regarding that topic, that the day he died, he just loved Israel so much.
00:57:39 And I demonstrated via a text message, which you just mentioned, and you're now contextualizing and pretending it was just about Tucker Carlson, which is not true.
00:57:47 It was a part of a broader shift that Charlie was having over the last, I would say, actually, on your show, it began since October 7th, which is when I began asking myself more questions about Israel as well.
00:58:00 By the way, this is not a preamble.
00:58:02 When all of these things happen in immediate aftermath, and then I drop a text message after everyone is dead. 0.99
00:58:06 Four score and seven years ago, I'll just shut the fuck up. 1.00
00:58:10 Blacks are free! 1.00
00:58:11 Megan Kelly then comes out and confirms the private conversations that she had with Charlie. 1.00
00:58:15 People then begin to ask a reasonable question, which is, why are we lying about this?
00:58:20 If they were forthcoming with that and they had said, hey, Charlie was starting to ask questions, I think no one's saying you can't ask questions.
00:58:29 We're talking about what degree of evidence, right?
00:58:31 We need to take this back to the claim.
00:58:32 There is more evidence that he did not do it, Tyler Robinson. 0.74
00:58:34 That he is a Patsy.
00:58:35 There is more evidence that he pulled the trigger. 0.61
00:58:37 No one's saying you can't ask questions.
00:58:39 You're saying you need to answer questions at some point.
00:58:40 Yes, I did share that I had a dream that Charlie was betrayed.
00:58:44 It's not a dream anymore, it's a reality.
00:58:46 I look at what the organization has become the people that they are partnering with, the lies that they are telling, the extraordinary people that they're sending out to say that I hadn't spoken to Charlie since 2018, and it begins to look like a conspiracy.
00:58:59 And just as a historical fact, that entire term was created by the CIA to gaslight people after the assassination of JFK.
00:59:06 So, it's not exactly one that makes me nervous.
00:59:09 Like calling somebody a conspiracy theorist is essentially saying that they demand further answers and they're not accepting the Fed slop.
00:59:15 So, Fed slop got it.
00:59:17 Anyone have evidence yet?
00:59:18 Don't need to, like I said, cheap shots. 0.99
00:59:24 No preamble, shit, she gets the evidence. 1.00
00:59:30 She gets the evidence. 1.00
00:59:33 She gets the evidence. 1.00
00:59:37 Place maybe Erica Kirk.
00:59:38 She did sit down and meet with Erica Kirk in private, and after she left, we can find some clips.
00:59:43 She was very nice and said, So, yes, I understand it, and we're good.
00:59:46 Just out of curiosity, what is the likelihood that you think Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk and killed him based on the evidence right now?
00:59:55 Um, I don't know, I'd say 75, 85 percent.
00:59:58 Candace, zero percent, zero percent.
01:00:01 I'm at zero, so with what we've seen in terms of the evidence, zero, I'm at zero percent.
01:00:05 So, there's zero meaning.
01:00:06 He's making the statement, just to be clear.
01:00:08 Maybe somebody was behind him as a path.
01:00:10 Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Curran.
01:00:12 Also, percentage point from Patrick McDavid.
01:00:14 Was he involved that day?
01:00:15 As I have consistently said on my platform, I would say yes, he was.
01:00:18 I don't know what role it was.
01:00:20 What percentage were you put on?
01:00:21 90%?
01:00:21 You say 0%.
01:00:22 You say 85% of the sentence.
01:00:23 That's 42%.
01:00:24 For what?
01:00:25 My percentage?
01:00:25 For the fact that he didn't shoot and kill Charlie Curtis.
01:00:29 Yes, which I'm hoping we're going to get to all of the evidence that he feels that he has.
01:00:33 I'm not even convinced that Charlie was shot from the rooftop on Losey that day, based on the evidence that has been.
01:00:40 Do you think he was shot?
01:00:43 I do not think that Charlie was shot from a 30 odd six from a.
01:00:47 Yeah, but just shot at all.
01:00:49 I don't know.
01:00:50 I think that a projectile hit Charlie, and I'm open to other people's presentations.
01:00:56 But I have not seen any compelling evidence that Charlie was shot by a 30 odd six.
01:01:00 Can we see maybe if we're going to have an olive branch to each other, if maybe we can establish what we consider the facts of the case to be first?
01:01:08 Yeah, sure.
01:01:09 Okay.
01:01:11 So you're not sure if he was actually shot.
01:01:14 You're open to alternative theories.
01:01:16 He was definitely hit with a projectile of some description.
01:01:18 If I was talking about was he shot with a 30 odd six, I would say definitively no.
01:01:25 I'm writing down in preface.
01:01:26 It defies common sense to think that he had.
01:01:29 A Superman neck, and even if he did have a Superman neck, which has been demonstrated, I think actually recently a YouTuber actually set up Valhalla steel cages and shot it, and it went wrong.
01:01:39 Valhalla has gotten many, many bits of information wrong, just to be clear.
01:01:43 Facts that he was the one who said that.
01:01:44 So Tyler Robinson disassembled the rifle, got on top, reassembled the rifle, zeroed the scope, disassembled it, jumped off, but left his rifle, reassembled in the woods afterwards.
01:01:52 He created a timeline that nobody actually believed. 0.98
01:01:53 That guy's been full of crap in a lot of ways. 0.97
01:01:55 He's gotten some things right. 0.99
01:01:56 Facts.
01:01:57 There's some things that I'm going to make concessions on that I do think we need more answers on, and I'm fine with that, and we can get to those things as well.
01:02:04 The other thing is in the timeline, one of the things that we dispute, I think, on the timeline is that you think that Robinson drove hours away to a steakhouse in the timeline, is that correct?
01:02:17 Yes.
01:02:17 Okay.
01:02:18 And what's the compelling evidence that you think you have there?
01:02:22 I spoke to the owner of the restaurant and I have seen the receipt.
01:02:28 I know the conversation that I had, and I think it's enough that it will be presented.
01:02:32 Witnesses saying they saw him there on campus don't work.
01:02:35 But yes, I do believe that he was in Panguage, which is near his grandparents' home.
01:02:40 Did he give you an unedited copy of that receipt?
01:02:43 I have seen an unedited copy of that receipt.
01:02:45 It was not given to me from the owner.
01:02:47 But I want to, before we get into all the timeline stuff, I want to address what you think is evidence so we can keep this on par with what your claim is.
01:02:54 Well, I think that that's a piece of evidence that's in dispute.
01:02:56 And that's why I'm.
01:02:57 Yeah, but we're trying to get to whether there's overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson did this.
01:03:02 Yeah, I'm trying to get to.
01:03:03 So, whether then starting with.
01:03:04 Right, one of the rest.
01:03:05 Yeah, no, hold on a second.
01:03:06 Overwhelming evidence needs to meet the standard of evidence, meaning something that would be admissible in court.
01:03:10 Does everyone agree with that?
01:03:12 Someone bring up the definition of evidence for me.
01:03:15 Was found near the crime scene.
01:03:18 So I would consider that to be very good evidence.
01:03:21 And also, the fact of the matter is that I dispute this claim that a 30 odd six could not have made this wound.
01:03:27 I think that that's absurd.
01:03:29 150 grain Remington core lock absolutely could shatter when it hits the neck of any human being.
01:03:36 He's an armorer.
01:03:36 You say that there's some steel neck and it's a smaller caliber, you have to make a counter explanation.
01:03:41 Why wouldn't a smaller caliber also go through bone?
01:03:43 It could.
01:03:44 I didn't say it can't.
01:03:45 Right, exactly.
01:03:45 So, if that's the case, then ammunition is going to be the critical key here.
01:03:50 And if we have frangible ammunition, which we do in this case, a flex tip round, well, I'm sorry, not a flex tip, a soft point round from 150 grain Remington core lock, that's just a small jacket that goes around the actual lead piece.
01:04:04 This thing could have split apart in air for all we know, but definitely upon impact.
01:04:08 And we have the medical examiner who confirms this in a summary.
01:04:11 And my team can bring that up, the summarization.
01:04:14 Which means he would have to be a part of some kind of conspiracy as well.
01:04:17 Okay.
01:04:18 So, just to start with your point about saying that the gun was found near him, I mean, near the evidence acts as a sign, proof, or ground for belief in a court case.
01:04:27 It includes facts, objects, documents, or witness statements used to prove a point.
01:04:31 Witness statements would be under oath.
01:04:32 A phone call would not qualify.
01:04:34 So, overwhelming evidence.
01:04:35 We need to be clear about our terms.
01:04:36 Did you watch the testimony that was given by Caitlin Oliver, the ATF woman, Samantha Karner, any of those people who went into the science of.
01:04:46 Yes, I recall.
01:04:47 You're talking about.
01:04:48 The bullet analysis.
01:04:49 Yeah, when they went into the DNN.
01:04:50 Okay.
01:04:51 That's kind of the most relevant part.
01:04:53 I'm not denying, I've never denied on my platform or anywhere else that a gun owned by Tyler Robinson was found near the crime scene, right?
01:05:02 That doesn't remove it.
01:05:02 If you think somebody set up as a patsy, you could take a gun out of this room right now and you could walk out and plant it in a woods near a crime scene.
01:05:10 That's not convincing evidence to me.
01:05:11 I concur with the fact that that's a possibility.
01:05:14 So you are, I think, have said on a platform that you were a gunsmith.
01:05:19 Okay.
01:05:20 And for how many years?
01:05:21 Many, many years.
01:05:22 For many years.
01:05:22 You also said that you were an army sniper.
01:05:25 I wasn't a sniper in the Army.
01:05:26 Okay.
01:05:27 And I never said that before.
01:05:27 Sorry, your wife tweeted that you were an Army sniper.
01:05:29 Yeah, I don't know.
01:05:31 Like 15 years ago, she said something.
01:05:33 Does it change 15 years later?
01:05:34 She said that it was colloquial.
01:05:37 Army sniper is a colloquial term?
01:05:38 Yeah, I'm not an.
01:05:39 I was never an Army sniper.
01:05:40 Don't let her shift the burden here to something that Rachel Wilson tweeted 15 years ago.
01:05:43 She meant to say that he's the equivalent of an Army sniper.
01:05:46 He's a very, very good shot.
01:05:47 I know this for a fact.
01:05:47 He's a shot.
01:05:48 Rifles. 0.81
01:05:49 He's a private.
01:05:49 This is derailing.
01:05:51 Okay.
01:05:53 And I was an NRA instructor for many, many, many years alongside my gun show.
01:05:57 As with your expertise, when.
01:06:00 She gave testimony on the stand, Samantha Carner, that there was dust and there was debris that was found in the gun barrel.
01:06:12 Yep.
01:06:13 And then when we had the person who, and this was, I believe, Caitlin Oliver, who explained painfully about the DNA, the prints.
01:06:23 Well, let's start with a point.
01:06:24 I'm not done.
01:06:25 You said something, so I'm going to finish my thought, right?
01:06:27 I want to do a point in time.
01:06:28 No, well, sure.
01:06:29 If you want to respond to it, I want you to respond to two points.
01:06:32 I want you to start with two points.
01:06:33 Okay.
01:06:34 Dust and debris in the gun barrel.
01:06:36 Secondly, the fact that there were five sets of prints, five plus actually, by the end of the testimony, five sets of prints for which we already had the woman who worked for the FBI forensics testify that above two prints, if you're taking a sample, it's no longer a science, right?
01:06:53 She testified that when they took the sample of what was on the trigger, they saw five plus prints.
01:06:58 And among those five plus prints, Tyler Robinson's was the most degraded.
01:07:04 Mm hmm.
01:07:05 So, I would like you to explain how Tyler Robinson's prints could be the most degraded when she said action.
01:07:10 If the evidence is not adequate, we'll fact check those guys be ready.
01:07:12 You could have DNA on something that you've touched.
01:07:14 You could have DNA on something that you've never touched.
01:07:17 And to get DNA degradation, they've looked at pieces, items 20, 40 years on that don't have degradation.
01:07:26 Yet, Tyler Robinson's prints, amongst five plus other prints, were the most degraded on that weapon.
01:07:32 Yeah.
01:07:32 So, let's get into all three of the claims.
01:07:34 First, with debris.
01:07:35 When it comes to debris, firing a rifle doesn't always blow the debris out of the barrel.
01:07:39 Okay.
01:07:41 You think there could be debris and dust.
01:07:47 He just fired the weapon.
01:07:49 He left it in a forest.
01:07:51 Now, I don't know if you agree with me, but if you leave a rifle in a wooded area, can a firearm be fired and there still be debris in a rifle after the firearm?
01:08:02 I know the answer.
01:08:03 Just bring it up definitively so we can provide the reference on our page for the audience.
01:08:07 The answer is, of course, yes.
01:08:08 But bring it up so we have a source.
01:08:09 You know, dirty rifle, and it's all dusty inside the bore, and you go fire it, you'll often look down the bore and there's still dust.
01:08:16 Okay.
01:08:16 Happens all the time.
01:08:17 Okay.
01:08:17 And the prince?
01:08:18 Yeah, so the prince, we don't know all of the details on just yet.
01:08:22 We do.
01:08:22 It was an excruciatingly long testimony on the prince.
01:08:26 We don't because they haven't gone to trial, so we don't know on the print front.
01:08:30 But Tyler Robinson's DNA was on there.
01:08:32 You made the claim that Lance Twigg's DNA was on there, and it was not.
01:08:35 Well, when she gave the testimony.
01:08:37 No, hold on.
01:08:38 First, let's go to your first point.
01:08:39 That's wrong.
01:08:39 We can get a fact check on that.
01:08:41 We don't have to wait until it goes to trial about the degraded prince.
01:08:43 Dustin Rifle, Lance Twigg.
01:08:44 Lance Twigg was the person who took the prince.
01:08:46 Yes, but the problem is that inside of this.
01:08:48 Particular testimony, you agree with me that there's going to be much more of the DNA analysis in the trial, right?
01:08:54 But you also would agree that her fact is not going to change that among the prints, his was the most degraded.
01:08:59 So I'm asking you to address that.
01:09:00 How could that be possible?
01:09:01 Let's give it, let's just grant this for a second as a possibility that his fingerprints were degraded.
01:09:08 It's not a possibility.
01:09:09 It's a fact.
01:09:09 The person who took it.
01:09:11 I'm just granting it for the sake of argument.
01:09:12 You should grant it because it's a fact that she's presented.
01:09:15 So now it's granted.
01:09:15 So what?
01:09:16 What do you mean, so what?
01:09:18 Yeah, so what?
01:09:19 What does that prove?
01:09:20 It proves that if his prints were the most degraded amongst five of them, you're going to have to explain how that's possible if he's the one that recently fired the weapon.
01:09:31 Yeah, so wait a second.
01:09:32 You're saying that it's an impossibility that if his fingerprints are the most degraded, I'm telling you, explain it.
01:09:38 You're the gunsmith.
01:09:38 Well, wait a second.
01:09:39 How would a gunsmith give an analysis on fingerprints or DNA?
01:09:43 Do you think that I work in a DNA laboratory?
01:09:45 So your answer is I don't know.
01:09:47 You can just say you don't know, but you don't have to.
01:09:49 But I did.
01:09:50 No, you said, so what?
01:09:51 So, say, I don't know.
01:09:52 I actually don't have an explanation for that, Candace.
01:09:54 I don't know.
01:09:54 It's because I don't know.
01:09:55 Well, I think that what it would prove is that it is a more viable theory that people who had stronger prints on the gun may have used it more recently.
01:10:05 Did they say who else had fingerprints on the gun?
01:10:07 They named Matt Robinson.
01:10:08 Give it to me really quickly.
01:10:09 No, not yet.
01:10:09 Sorry.
01:10:10 And this was a part of the testimony where she was speaking about how they got samples of elimination samples from the home of Amber Robinson, Matt Robinson, and Lance Twiggs.
01:10:22 Those were the three names they named.
01:10:23 So, are you saying that Twiggs did not?
01:10:24 Would you like me to finish my statement?
01:10:26 I just want to make sure I'm clarifying.
01:10:27 I'm trying to finish the answer, but it can't be clarified until the answer comes out of my mouth.
01:10:31 Okay, so go ahead.
01:10:32 This was a portion of her testimony where she was explaining how they got elimination samples from the home.
01:10:38 And she named Matt Robinson, Amber Robinson, and Lance Twiggs as the elimination samples that she was using.
01:10:45 And so she explicitly said, she said some of them, some, so we can assume two out of the three, were their prints found on the gun.
01:10:53 She explicitly named Matt Robinson.
01:10:56 As someone who had prints on the gun, and then said there were five people that they had taken that sample from.
01:11:02 And again, what's also relevant here is the earlier testimony, which came from the FBI forensics analyst.
01:11:11 I believe it was on day two, where she said that when you're using those mixtures and those samples and you get up to five plus, it's really hard to make any sort of a determination.
01:11:21 So both of those things are relevant.
01:11:23 If you can't explain why his prints are the most degraded and you're saying he is the shooter, it's not really a so what.
01:11:30 It's an open ended question that people have a right to pursue.
01:11:32 It's not a conspiracy.
01:11:33 It's actually proof of my claim that there is evidence that he was set up as a patsy.
01:11:38 That wouldn't prove anything about him being a patsy.
01:11:41 It said it's evidence to support the claim that he could have been set up as a patsy.
01:11:46 So this is why I said earlier, so what?
01:11:48 Because even if the case doesn't have an explanation for it yet, that doesn't actually give you any evidence in your corner for Tyler Robinson.
01:11:55 DNA on the towel matched to two people.
01:11:57 Jennifer Faumina with the State Bureau of Investigation testified one was Robinson's roommate, Lance Twiggs, and the other was very likely Robinson.
01:12:04 She said Twiggs, a key figure in the prosecution's case, will not testify in person this week, but prosecutors have said they plan to introduce a recorded statement.
01:12:10 I'm saying that it could be Matt Robinson, it could be Amber Robinson.
01:12:13 That sort of information is going to come up.
01:12:14 No testimony, though.
01:12:15 That's not the relevant part.
01:12:16 Argue that Lance Twiggs' DNA was on the gun, only the towel.
01:12:19 That's important.
01:12:20 And the information that I shared on my phone is true.
01:12:21 So, fact check, this gun was given to Tyler Robinson as an heirloom.
01:12:25 I had a conversation with members of the Robinson family, Twiggs family, both of them.
01:12:31 You know, like I said, it's a good thing.
01:12:32 And then you can bring up Hunter Ed right there.
01:12:34 Of course, after any gun fires, there can still be debris in the barrel.
01:12:36 As a matter of fact, it's a common warning because you don't want to fire when there's debris there.
01:12:40 It could cause increased pressure, and that pressure can continue to increase as the debris can remain in the barrel, in some cases, build up more.
01:12:45 You guys can bring it up and put it up there in the map.
01:12:46 Because he's the firstborn.
01:12:48 So, but he's not much of a shooter, is what I was told.
01:12:51 And so he has this because he inherited it, essentially.
01:12:55 So, if I get something from my grandpa and I put it up on the shelf and I own this, you could see that could be.
01:12:59 How do we get to the patsy part?
01:13:02 You don't let me ever get to the end of the sentence, so how could we get to the patsy part?
01:13:05 Okay, I can't wait until we get to the end of the sentence.
01:13:07 So, that could be a reasonable explanation as to why there was dust in the barrel because he doesn't often shoot this weapon and he is indeed a fisher.
01:13:14 And it could also be a reasonable explanation for why we have Matt Robinson's prints on this.
01:13:19 Obviously, Lance Twiggs, even if he has.
01:13:21 Prints on things.
01:13:21 They live together.
01:13:22 That doesn't really mean anything.
01:13:23 But that could demonstrate that somebody took his weapon and put it somewhere.
01:13:28 His prints are the most degraded.
01:13:29 Somebody else's prints, there's more presence of somebody else's prints.
01:13:33 And that could demonstrate that somebody is taking items from his house and putting it into very poor places.
01:13:37 But it also could demonstrate nothing.
01:13:39 So the problem that you have here is that this is pure conjecture.
01:13:42 No.
01:13:42 This is, hang on, this is not evidence that Tyler Robinson is a patsy.
01:13:47 It's only evidence that you have conjectured up that.
01:13:51 Well, if it's the case that these are the more degraded prints, then therefore that means must be Patsy cuz parents' fingerprints, dad's fingerprints on gun.
01:14:02 I didn't say must be Patsy.
01:14:03 Describe how this actually links in to Robinson being a Patsy.
01:14:08 Okay, I just described that for you, so I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you, so I'm going to move on from that.
01:14:13 But to just go back to your point about this is not evidence. 0.82
01:14:16 Did anyone else understand how that proves that he's a Patsy? 0.61
01:14:18 That's the entire basis for why he's not evidence for what he's doing. 0.71
01:14:24 Clear prints or that his prints were the least prominent.
01:14:26 Is that about what I've heard?
01:14:27 I'm saying that they are doing the exact same thing that I am doing.
01:14:30 Yeah.
01:14:31 Okay.
01:14:31 Here's that.
01:14:32 Well, did you watch the preliminary hearing?
01:14:34 Terrible idea at the state.
01:14:37 What I'm here to do is represent my own opinion, which is that you're open to the statement.
01:14:42 Based on the evidence presented so far by the state, the state has presented evidence under Utah's 1102 rule.
01:14:49 But this doesn't demonstrate any patsy.
01:14:51 No, that's very important because that rule is hearsay.
01:14:54 So, you can't say at the same time, Candace, you're not allowed to.
01:14:57 And what that means under the Utah rule, which I'm sure you know, because I'm sure you watched the preliminary hearing and yourself understand what that means, is that the entire hearing was hearsay.
01:15:05 It means none of that information that was presented is going to be allowed.
01:15:09 The majority of it, the overwhelming majority of it, is not going to be allowed at the trial.
01:15:13 They're allowed to present when it's this approbative hearing.
01:15:16 I don't think all the evidence that was put in was hearsay.
01:15:19 I believe what she's trying to say.
01:15:20 Fact check that rule.
01:15:21 And what I believe what she's trying to say is when you have a preliminary hearing, they are determining what would be considered hearsay versus what would be.
01:15:27 Admitted as evidence.
01:15:30 So they said there's a medical examiner's explanation of the shooting that's in the back.
01:15:36 Rob, if you want to pull it up, and then Candace, if anybody from your team wants to pull something up, no problem as well, but they're requesting it.
01:15:43 If you guys got it, pull it up so we can show it.
01:15:46 And in the interim, is that it?
01:15:48 Yeah.
01:15:49 So I'll read this.
01:15:50 What are we looking at, just so we know?
01:15:51 Yeah.
01:15:52 So I would, that'd be an extreme fact check and get that to Gerald.
01:15:55 She just said, as you know, the rule means that it is all hearsay, right?
01:15:59 Everyone heard that?
01:15:59 No.
01:16:01 That's not what the rule is.
01:16:02 The preliminary hearing is used to determine what is hearsay and what would be admitted as evidence.
01:16:06 By the way, every single thing that she has said, for example, my source, my phone call, would be hearsay and not admitted as evidence.
01:16:14 Coroner's report would be admitted as evidence.
01:16:17 Eyewitness testimony, if they are determined to be valid and have been there and could be corroborated with security cameras, would be admitted as evidence.
01:16:23 Hearsay would not.
01:16:24 It doesn't mean that the entire thing is hearsay.
01:16:26 Yes, Noodles, we were about to say something.
01:16:28 Oh, no, no, no.
01:16:30 They're going to be adding more things to the live fact check for you, so you should have it there in the doc for you.
01:16:34 So the summary of the examination is that he was shot.
01:16:37 Okay.
01:16:38 That was what they were pulling that up for.
01:16:39 Okay.
01:16:40 And I'm not disputing that he could have been hit with a projectile.
01:16:44 We're not disputing that, so I don't know why this is brought up as a fact check.
01:16:47 Could you bring up 1102 Utah rule?
01:16:49 Because this is an unbelievable point that you're making by saying that I am not allowed to infer off of evidence.
01:16:54 You can infer.
01:16:55 I'm trying to follow the inferences.
01:16:56 No, no, but your entire reason, like you asserted that you believe there's overwhelming evidence on the basis of what we saw in the preliminary hearing.
01:17:04 The entire preliminary hearing was hearsay.
01:17:07 Yeah, I'm fine with your inferences.
01:17:09 But no, no, you just literally said I couldn't do that.
01:17:11 Yes, I can.
01:17:11 No, I didn't.
01:17:12 The entire preliminary hearing fact check was not hearsay.
01:17:15 The entire preliminary hearing is to determine what is hearsay.
01:17:19 No, no, no, no.
01:17:20 That's why you have preliminary hearings.
01:17:22 Again, this is something important, so we should pull up a fact check about what the 1102 Utah, under their constitution, for the sake of a preliminary hearing, they do not have to have hard evidence.
01:17:33 They don't have to put people on the trials for them. 0.96
01:17:35 They don't have to.
01:17:36 But no, no.
01:17:36 That's why the entire hearing was basically hearsay.
01:17:39 According to background evidence.
01:17:39 But not all of it, like I said.
01:17:41 Reliable hearsay, meaning the legal definition, meaning there isn't enough corroborating evidence for it to be considered hard evidence, is admissible at preliminary criminal examinations.
01:17:51 Okay, so they are determining the level of evidence, basically the credence that it will be given.
01:17:55 It's not to say that the entire preliminary hearing is hearsay.
01:17:57 That's not what the rule is.
01:17:58 She's either not understanding it or lying.
01:18:00 We'll have that reference available.
01:18:02 Link in the description.
01:18:02 Our debate, actually, maybe it was more than our debate before he sat.
01:18:06 And they said, this is not going to be allowed.
01:18:07 You wouldn't even be allowed to do this.
01:18:08 We'd be able to cross examine him.
01:18:10 The questions that they're asking, Glance, are all leading.
01:18:13 And what did he say?
01:18:13 Well, I'm the magistrate under Utah Constitution, you know, 1102.
01:18:18 It is my job to allow all of this so we can see if the state has enough here that we can then move to a trial, which will then.
01:18:25 They would not allow this stuff.
01:18:25 They would say, We get to cross examine Lance.
01:18:27 Lance, you're arguing that I'm not disputing.
01:18:29 No, but the entire substance of your argument is that people can't infer off of evidence.
01:18:35 That's what you're saying to me.
01:18:37 When you say, Candace, I'm not giving up degraded prints, which is a fact.
01:18:40 I'm not saying that.
01:18:41 I'm not saying that.
01:18:42 I didn't say that.
01:18:42 That Tyler could have been a patsy.
01:18:44 You're telling me.
01:18:45 You're literally making stuff up.
01:18:46 So here's what I'm saying.
01:18:47 I'm not making stuff up.
01:18:48 I'm not making stuff up.
01:18:51 I'm saying.
01:18:52 I am doing exactly what the state did.
01:18:54 I am looking at a piece of evidence, and I am saying.
01:18:56 But you're not showing me how you.
01:18:57 Can you describe to the audience what Rule 1102 is?
01:19:00 Just so everybody who's watching this at home understands what I'm saying, even if he doesn't.
01:19:05 What Andrew is arguing is that I don't have the right to extrapolate from a fact like.
01:19:10 Just making it up.
01:19:12 Just purely making it up.
01:19:14 I'm asking based on Andrew's question.
01:19:15 If she tries to say that Rule 1102 says hearsay is all admissible or that it's all hearsay, that's a lot.
01:19:21 Preliminary examinations.
01:19:23 The entire preliminary hearing that you just saw was on the basis of reliable hearsay.
01:19:29 And what that means essentially.
01:19:31 Not sure.
01:19:31 Is the people who are making mistakes and just saying, Patrick told me that he did this.
01:19:36 Not all hearsay is admissible and not everything presented was hearsay.
01:19:43 It's meant to be probative.
01:19:45 And so it's the state saying, here's what we have inferred.
01:19:48 So you are allowed to take a piece of evidence and then you are allowed to infer off of that evidence.
01:19:53 Okay?
01:19:54 Case in point, that's a demonstration of what I just did.
01:19:59 I said, the prints were the most degraded.
01:20:02 Off of Tyler Robinson.
01:20:03 And from that, what I am inferring is that it's plausible that Tyler Robinson was set up.
01:20:07 That doesn't, that's the point in contention.
01:20:09 That's not a point in contention.
01:20:10 That's the point in contention.
01:20:11 It's not a point in contention.
01:20:12 It's not a point of contention.
01:20:12 If you're saying it's a point of contention, it's not the point of contention.
01:20:15 I'm telling you that is what the entire hearing allowed for.
01:20:18 So the evidence that he is describing, that he is using to argue his case, is all based on inference, not fact.
01:20:26 Not true.
01:20:26 Not true.
01:20:27 So they are inferring off of the fact.
01:20:29 Not true.
01:20:30 So again, we're going to take this, and I'm just going to even grant it because it's irrelevant.
01:20:35 I'm asking how you get to the inference that even if you dispute that piece of evidence, that means Patsy.
01:20:42 I'm looking for the logical chain for how you get to that inference.
01:20:47 What I am telling you is it's the exact same way that when you tweeted, I think that this evidence is overwhelming.
01:20:54 When they say that looks like Tyler Robinson's car, he drives a similar car, okay, they are inferring that that's Tyler Robinson's car.
01:21:02 No, they're matching license plates, car, model, year, and him exiting the vehicle.
01:21:06 It's not a fact.
01:21:07 When you show a blurry image, which you kept citing that we can't believe it.
01:21:09 No, no, I'm talking about your inference that the fingerprints, even if they're degraded, equals Patsy.
01:21:14 How do you get that inference?
01:21:16 I didn't say it equals Patsy.
01:21:17 I think it is enough evidence that it should be explored, which is exactly what this preliminary was in the inverse.
01:21:23 It's not in dispute.
01:21:24 What's in dispute is when you said, I'm using this as evidence that he could have been a Patsy.
01:21:28 I'm asking, how do you get the inference to Patsy from that?
01:21:32 Because what I am saying is that it shows that somebody else had more DNA presence on that gun than Tyler Robinson did.
01:21:40 So it is plausible, which is all they're doing.
01:21:41 They're presenting plausibility based off of the facts, okay?
01:21:44 It is plausible.
01:21:46 That somebody just took his gun out.
01:21:47 Josh, remember that day we went to the range?
01:21:49 Yeah, that works.
01:21:50 You used my Walther and I used your 9 11?
01:21:52 1911?
01:21:53 1911, yeah.
01:21:54 Sorry, not 9 11.
01:21:55 Yeah, that.
01:21:56 But my shooting quality was level 9 11.
01:21:58 This is how the court process works.
01:22:00 Could go either way.
01:22:01 More of your DNA on my gun, more of my DNA on yours.
01:22:04 That's just how that works.
01:22:05 If someone grabs it, hand it out.
01:22:07 The guns are putting down on the tables.
01:22:09 It doesn't mean anything.
01:22:10 Well, it's hot and you could be sweaty.
01:22:12 Sweating more.
01:22:13 Sure.
01:22:13 I thought that was the whole defense.
01:22:15 Your whole claim was.
01:22:17 Let me give you one more. 0.98
01:22:18 Let me give you one more.
01:22:19 Maybe.
01:22:20 I don't know if you know this.
01:22:20 I'm going to make a suggestion.
01:22:22 Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
01:22:23 I don't know if you know.
01:22:24 One of the most common things, you ever watch movies where spies or assassin's kills, they do this?
01:22:29 They try to wipe the evidence.
01:22:31 Yeah.
01:22:32 So he could have wiped the gun where his prince, whereas the last person who gave him the gun, didn't wipe.
01:22:37 Would that be a reasonable inference?
01:22:38 Would it be a reasonable inference?
01:22:40 No, I didn't.
01:22:47 The standard white guy coming up the steps that.
01:22:49 Could literally be anyone.
01:22:51 This never happened.
01:22:51 Yeah, I did.
01:22:52 I didn't get a fact check on that.
01:22:53 Let me pull up his tweet where he goes over the evidence.
01:22:55 I didn't say that's what convinced me.
01:22:57 When you actually didn't say it's what convinced me, but you said this is the evidence that you found to be overwhelming.
01:23:01 And you named, I believe, actually five things.
01:23:04 I think you said it was his car.
01:23:06 You said it was.
01:23:07 Well, there's multitudes of things that I find.
01:23:08 You just said you didn't say it, so we're going to get a fact check on that.
01:23:10 You did.
01:23:11 Go ahead.
01:23:11 You said the blurry images coming up the steps.
01:23:14 Quite literally, when Officer Bagley testified, talk about what I'm talking about making inference.
01:23:18 This is the most, I thought, was the most absurd testimony I've ever heard.
01:23:21 And pardon me, it was actually Hull, David Hull.
01:23:24 They asked him a question How did you know the guy in the maroon shirt was the same as the guy that came up the stairs later that was wearing the American flag black shirt?
01:23:33 And he said, They're wearing the same shoes.
01:23:37 Why is that absurd?
01:23:39 That's how you decided these two are the same people.
01:23:41 Oh, wow, what a scientific thing.
01:23:42 They're both wearing converses.
01:23:44 Okay, that's an absurd thing to say.
01:23:47 That is not evidence that these are the same people who are both wearing converses.
01:23:50 Making partial claims.
01:23:52 That's not the only claim of this.
01:23:53 Let me change one thing for you.
01:23:54 This wouldn't be presented until you get to court, and I know this because I've been through it.
01:23:57 If there's a forensic audit of a phone, geotagging.
01:24:00 We have the admission from Tyler Robinson.
01:24:02 We have the footage where it looks like Tyler Robinson.
01:24:04 You have the same shoes, you have the same proximate size proportions.
01:24:07 And if they grabbed his phone, they will likely have the ability to track where his phone was in relative proximity at that point in time.
01:24:14 They're going through that now.
01:24:16 I don't.
01:24:17 All of that is a no?
01:24:19 They're both wearing Converse.
01:24:20 Yeah, I'm not sure if in context that's what happened.
01:24:22 But even if it is.
01:24:24 But even if it is.
01:24:26 Can we fact check?
01:24:26 Is that the only reason that he said it was the same person?
01:24:30 Fact check that for me, guys.
01:24:31 Was it the only reason?
01:24:31 Because that's what she's implying.
01:24:33 And again, 1102 procedure of the Tyler Robinson case is to allow prosecutors to establish if they want to use reliable hearsay.
01:24:40 Without having to call every single witness to testify live, meaning probable cause, reliable hearsay, you know, the stuff that Candace talking on the phone with someone in no receipt wouldn't qualify for.
01:24:50 What I'm looking for is the logical inferences that you have that Tyler Robinson's a patsy based on the totality of evidence that you have.
01:24:56 We can keep going through your other evidence, but we should find his tweet where he lists the reasons that he was convinced.
01:25:02 So let's start with the 30 out of 6.
01:25:04 I think that that's fine.
01:25:05 Your team's looking for do you remember how long ago that was?
01:25:07 The tweets of the five, did you delete it?
01:25:11 Or no?
01:25:12 No, I don't.
01:25:13 Okay, cool.
01:25:14 Just look for, he said the.
01:25:15 Personal attack.
01:25:16 It was his car.
01:25:17 Did you delete it?
01:25:18 The implication there.
01:25:19 Tough guy.
01:25:19 It was the car, and it was definitely the staircase photos, and it was when the trial was going on.
01:25:24 Okay, she has it.
01:25:25 Skyler has it.
01:25:26 If you want to pull it up so we can see it.
01:25:29 Somebody said, so give me the clear evidence right here.
01:25:32 I want you to provide it right here.
01:25:33 All I heard from the investigator was, we believe this to be Tyler Robinson.
01:25:36 Is belief something you go as a fact?
01:25:38 You wrote, the car pulling in.
01:25:39 That's a totally blurry image.
01:25:41 Robinson getting out of it.
01:25:43 You have no idea if that's Tyler Robinson.
01:25:45 The fact that he is seen four other times on camera, the fact being just a standard white boy with brown hair was seen walking upstaircase.
01:25:53 The DNA on the roof, we should discuss that.
01:25:56 And on the screwdriver that he left behind, it's overwhelming, man.
01:26:01 Yeah, but that's not an exhaustive list.
01:26:03 Just so we're clear, you did tweet it.
01:26:04 But it's not an exhaustive list.
01:26:05 Yeah, but just five seconds ago, you should continue.
01:26:07 You said I only said this one thing and said that that was overwhelming.
01:26:10 Just to be clear, the converse helped.
01:26:11 They're also matching blue hat, sunglasses.
01:26:15 American flag shirt with the other ones, depending on the time.
01:26:19 So there are multitudes of matching attire.
01:26:22 Why are you pivoting?
01:26:24 It's cool to just say I was wrong.
01:26:26 I'm not wrong.
01:26:27 So back to the tweet, the tweet aspect here, it was really funny.
01:26:30 That's not an exhaustive list of why I find it.
01:26:32 I didn't say it was exhaustive.
01:26:33 I just said you said it.
01:26:34 And on top of it, well, you said it was his only case.
01:26:38 And then he said, based on that, it's over.
01:26:40 Well, I didn't.
01:26:42 He's trying to say that's his only case.
01:26:44 It's not.
01:26:44 He was saying in that instance, it's much more convincing than Patsy.
01:26:47 No, you're actually incorrect there.
01:26:49 But on top of that, moving over to the actual evidence, are you okay?
01:26:52 Yes, I'm okay.
01:26:54 Anyway, back to the answer.
01:26:55 I'm going to ask if you're okay.
01:26:56 Yes, of course.
01:26:57 Actually, I'm glad you're asserting that you're okay.
01:26:58 I wasn't worried about your health.
01:26:59 I'm just saying that.
01:27:00 I just said you tweeted this.
01:27:01 You said no, I didn't.
01:27:02 We got a fact check, and now you're just going to gaslight me and pretend that I said.
01:27:05 There's no gaslighting.
01:27:06 It wasn't exhaustive.
01:27:07 I never said that.
01:27:07 I just said you did say this.
01:27:08 You need a real gaslight.
01:27:09 I didn't say you couldn't have said more, but I would like to address what you said in that time.
01:27:13 Did he say I never said that?
01:27:15 No, he said I never gaslight you.
01:27:17 No, before, you just said you never said that.
01:27:20 Just don't get lost and go, okay, let's go on to the French Foreign Legion, whatever it is.
01:27:23 That's not what you said.
01:27:24 That's not actually, in fact, what happened in that exchange.
01:27:29 I was here for it.
01:27:31 So, what's your position here?
01:27:32 Yeah, so my position is that based on all of the evidence which has been demonstrated, at least all the evidence to my knowledge, that I am actually not seeing anything that's compelling as an alternative theory.
01:27:46 I'm not seeing anything which is convincing me of something otherwise than what the state is presenting as evidence.
01:27:51 That's my position, if that's what you're asking me.
01:27:55 So, just going back to what you did actually tweet, is it fair for me to ask questions about that?
01:28:00 That's the only tweet you're going to ask me about.
01:28:02 Well, we're addressing your claim that the evidence is overwhelming, and this is a tweet where you listed what you felt was overwhelming.
01:28:06 I think that's fair.
01:28:07 But not exhaustive.
01:28:07 I feel like that's fair.
01:28:08 But not exhaustive, just so you know.
01:28:10 And I never said it was exhaustive, even though you said I did.
01:28:12 Sure, whatever.
01:28:13 But yeah, so going back to that, all of that, as you say to me, well, Candace, why are you addressing and making inferences off of the testimony?
01:28:21 And by the way, you guys can fact check me.
01:28:22 They didn't match the license plates, they didn't have the quality of it.
01:28:24 I was just giving examples of how you would match a vehicle, but you can fact check me.
01:28:28 Because I said that I want to make sure that I'm clear.
01:28:30 I spoke off the cuff.
01:28:31 Like they wouldn't just say, hey, this one piece of evidence.
01:28:34 So there you go.
01:28:35 Fact check me.
01:28:35 What I'm demonstrating is that you permit yourself to do it, and then you say, when I do it, it's a conspiracy, right?
01:28:40 No.
01:28:41 How are you able to infer off of blurry staircase images that that is Tyler Robinson?
01:28:46 Yeah, so in that particular case, what you do is you take that evidence, you combine it with other evidence.
01:28:52 So it's not just that Tyler Robinson is seen in the staircase.
01:28:55 Why are you calling him Tyler Robinson in the staircase?
01:28:57 That's what I want to get to.
01:28:58 Yeah, because, I mean, we'll just use this.
01:29:00 If you don't agree that that's Tyler Robinson, then you would just have to humor me.
01:29:04 I think it is, so I'm using the name.
01:29:06 But why do you think it is?
01:29:06 Because you make everybody call him Tyler Robinson.
01:29:08 That's literally what I'm trying to do.
01:29:09 I'm just going to finish my sentence.
01:29:10 Okay.
01:29:10 So if you're asking, I'm asking for my inference why I think it's Tyler Robinson's because A, Tyler Robinson said in his text messages, you'll be able to see me on security footage at the campus.
01:29:19 Said it in his own messages.
01:29:21 On top of that, Twigs, yes, you can pull them up if you want to fact check that.
01:29:24 He did say.
01:29:25 I actually think I really did miss that.
01:29:27 I'm not saying you're wrong.
01:29:28 I just don't remember him saying you're going to see me in the camera.
01:29:31 I'm paranoid.
01:29:31 Can we pull that up?
01:29:32 You may have a little bit of doubt.
01:29:33 I think that's the way to pull it up.
01:29:35 Fact check true.
01:29:35 He did say something to that effect.
01:29:36 I'll be seen on the security camera footage.
01:29:38 Something like that.
01:29:38 I remember.
01:29:40 Maybe a tiny bit of doubt, but it sure looked like Tyler Robinson inside of this various.
01:29:45 Surveillance footage that he saw.
01:29:47 So, Lance, sorry.
01:29:49 Hang on.
01:29:49 Hang on.
01:29:50 So, there's multiple reasons why it is that I believe that that's Tyler Robinson, not just because of blurry footage.
01:29:57 Did you have a dream?
01:29:59 Just kidding.
01:29:59 No, it's because I combined multitudes of evidences.
01:30:02 Okay.
01:30:03 So, address those multitudes of evidences.
01:30:05 The first one we're working on a fact check on because I do not ever remember him tweeting about it.
01:30:08 It's not an attack if you ask her about a dream because she said it.
01:30:10 He's never said he had a dream.
01:30:11 That's me in the staircase.
01:30:13 I think that.
01:30:15 I didn't say that.
01:30:16 I said he, I literally didn't.
01:30:19 What I said is that he texted over, you'll be able to see me in footage at UVU.
01:30:25 And I'm paraphrasing, but that's what he said.
01:30:26 Yeah, could we get a fact check on that?
01:30:28 The second thing you said was Lance's trash can.
01:30:30 That's actually what Lance says.
01:30:32 In terms of what he wears, again, me pointing out the absurdity, he wears converses, he wears sneakers.
01:30:42 If his boyfriend is 100%, I'd like to understand why Andrew Wilson is overwhelmed by it.
01:30:47 That's correct.
01:30:47 Expect her to move the goalpost and say, well, these all seem to really state.
01:30:50 That's what I would expect.
01:30:51 Would not be permitted.
01:30:53 This was a huge part of the preliminary hearing that they were leading.
01:30:56 All the questions that were asked of him were leading, so they would be struck down at the actual trial.
01:31:01 Mispronunciation.
01:31:01 And also, I would like to remind you that he got used to drink.
01:31:04 I understand.
01:31:05 I understand.
01:31:06 Which means like.
01:31:07 That happens, by the way, all the time in the legislature.
01:31:09 And I'm wondering why it particularly happened for Lance and this testimony.
01:31:11 And I would also like to point out that something that's remarkable about this, again, leaning to my perspective that Lance has a lot more, which I have said many times, Lance has a lot more involvement than the feds are.
01:31:22 Letting us know.
01:31:23 I think more is going to come out.
01:31:24 Because they interviewed him on September 11th, and then for whatever reason, just ahead of what was supposed to be slated as the preliminary hearing, which was initially supposed to be in May, they bring him back to do this interview, which in my opinion should have never been allowed.
01:31:40 And I actually agree with the defense that it's a violation of his constitutional rights not to allow them to have cross examined him.
01:31:46 But I understand Utah 1102, do what you do, it's all hearsay.
01:31:50 But to allow it in that way for him to just Be able to also have use immunity, knowing that he's not going to be, he's not going to get in trouble.
01:31:57 He could literally get up there and lie about anything, and he's not going to get in trouble because the use immunity was given to him in April, I believe.
01:32:03 April 28th is when they gave that testimony to the defense.
01:32:07 I think they shot it in like April 20th of 2026.
01:32:10 That is not compelling to me for somebody who has use immunity to give a testimony and to say, I'm not really sure, but definitely like he wears jeans and stuff.
01:32:20 That's not what he said.
01:32:20 He did actually.
01:32:21 You can get a fact check on that.
01:32:22 That's what he said.
01:32:23 But I'm more than going to.
01:32:25 So, a couple things we have.
01:32:27 We have Rule 801, Tyler's messages, that says it's not hearsay.
01:32:31 But first, go to what Candace is asking about, Skylar.
01:32:34 I think you have it.
01:32:35 You just texted me if you want to pull it up.
01:32:37 You said you have the text.
01:32:39 If we can put that up on the screen.
01:32:40 Thank you.
01:32:42 It was me.
01:32:42 Look at the pictures from Mr. Baylor footage.
01:32:44 It was me.
01:32:44 Okay.
01:32:45 I literally said to you, it's not an oof.
01:32:46 I said I didn't remember this.
01:32:47 And I'm happy to have a fact check on that.
01:32:48 Okay.
01:32:48 I didn't call for the fact check saying you're wrong.
01:32:50 I literally said I don't remember that from the time I'm just saying to you, like, I'm trying to be concise for you.
01:32:55 And then also bring the 801 that you just said.
01:32:57 What was the other one?
01:32:58 Yep.
01:32:58 The 801.
01:33:00 Tyler messages saying it's not hearsay.
01:33:02 If you have that as well.
01:33:09 There you go.
01:33:11 Wait, what are we saying?
01:33:12 It's not hearsay.
01:33:13 It's not hearsay.
01:33:14 A statement that meets the following conditions is not hearsay.
01:33:18 It was hearsay.
01:33:18 They said it in the trial.
01:33:19 Hang on.
01:33:20 Hang on.
01:33:21 Okay.
01:33:22 Okay.
01:33:23 Is consistent with the declarant's testimony and the declarant denies having made the statement or has forgotten, or is consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered a rebut, express implied charge.
01:33:35 That the declarant recently fabricated or acted in recent improper influence or motive in testifying.
01:33:41 So, then wouldn't that mean that a bunch of this wasn't hearsay?
01:33:44 So, the issue with his.
01:33:45 I just want to make sure.
01:33:46 Would that mean that a bunch of this wasn't hearsay?
01:33:49 So, the opposing party, which down the line, like I said, they talked about this for about an hour and a half, and they discussed how if Lance was in court and he was giving his first party, you know, giving his testimony as the opposing party, whatever, all this would be fine.
01:34:02 They had an issue with how the questions were being asked and that they were not allowed to cross examine him.
01:34:07 So, that is why.
01:34:08 His video testimony would not be accepted in the main trial.
01:34:11 And what I said to you is this entire preliminary hearing is under Utah's 1102.
01:34:17 So they are allowed to just use hearsay instead of just.
01:34:20 No, you didn't say that.
01:34:21 You said most of it was hearsay, actually.
01:34:23 Yeah.
01:34:24 The overwhelming majority.
01:34:25 Well, I mean, I'm leaning now into my opinion that some scientific aspects, which they kept asserting, like the federal rule 403 or 402, some of those parts were quite valid.
01:34:35 Sounds like you're backtracking quite a bit.
01:34:37 No, I'm not backtracking at all.
01:34:37 What do you feel like?
01:34:38 Let me help you.
01:34:38 Where do you feel like I'm backtracking?
01:34:40 It was, it literally was done under Utah's 1102.
01:34:42 Yeah, nobody disputed that.
01:34:43 What the dispute was is whether or not most of it was overwhelmingly hearsay.
01:34:46 Yes, it was.
01:34:47 Yes, that's a fact.
01:34:48 I'm not backtracking on it at all.
01:34:49 A lot of the things that I'm watching.
01:34:51 How many times did you watch the video here?
01:34:52 It's like, they constantly, I'm 1102, And the reason for that is because it's allowed.
01:34:58 I'm not saying it's illegal, it's allowed at this stage, but I'm just reminding you that when you're going to sit across from someone and your claim is going to be, where is your hard evidence?
01:35:06 This is what I heard and I agree with what I'm watching.
01:35:08 You are watching the state put on.
01:35:11 A hearsay preliminary hearing.
01:35:14 And all of those things are not going to be allowed, right?
01:35:16 Even when they got into witness statements and things of that nature.
01:35:19 There's a reason why they swear you in and they say, you swear to self the truth, the whole truth.
01:35:23 Did you write this statement?
01:35:26 So the overwhelming majority of what you saw was hearsay because other people were representing other people's statements.
01:35:32 They were saying they had conversations.
01:35:34 We don't know where it came from.
01:35:35 All allowed at this stage, okay?
01:35:37 But it's hearsay.
01:35:38 But even a lot of that stuff may not fall under hearsay.
01:35:41 Under what we just read, right?
01:35:43 Yes, exactly.
01:35:43 The point is this trial, you guys can bring it back up.
01:35:46 They are determining what is reliable hearsay.
01:35:48 And what they would do is exactly what, whether you like it or not, what Andrew just said.
01:35:52 It would be a combination of evidence where they would go, is this reliable hearsay?
01:35:56 Meaning, does this match up with other pieces of evidence that we have where we could include this and we don't need to call them as a witness at trial?
01:36:01 This is not new.
01:36:02 This is not unique.
01:36:03 That happens all the time.
01:36:04 And it's often not given as much credence as hard evidence, of which Candace has presented none.
01:36:08 She's presented hearsay that wouldn't be granted as reliable hearsay.
01:36:12 Someone called me, showed me a receipt, but I can't show it.
01:36:15 They go, well, this person claimed that they saw him, and there is, just as an example, there is security camera footage that matches up with that, that matches up with what he texted.
01:36:23 That would be more reliable hearsay that could be admitted, you know, basically as an adjunct.
01:36:28 That's not the only thing I've ever said on my Twitter about this case.
01:36:30 Right, but the question that was asked of you was pretty direct.
01:36:33 Yeah.
01:36:33 Right?
01:36:34 What did you find?
01:36:35 This is not an exhaustive list of all the things that I found.
01:36:37 You said in the tweet.
01:36:38 You can tweet longer to her.
01:36:39 They get her.
01:36:40 We're limited now to the text.
01:36:42 The Tyler Robinson sent.
01:36:44 Has that been gotten to you guys?
01:36:45 Where he said, very likely, they'll see me on the security camera footage.
01:36:48 Yeah, they brought it up.
01:36:52 It was part of the.
01:36:53 What did she say?
01:36:55 Oh, I didn't notice that.
01:36:58 Okay.
01:36:58 She said a lot of things and they were talking to each other.
01:37:00 Andrew versus Andrew.
01:37:01 Somebody asked you a question.
01:37:02 What are the points that you find to be the most overwhelming?
01:37:05 And you answered.
01:37:06 You mean from that day, from that particular day of the hearing?
01:37:08 So, guys, let me ask you this.
01:37:11 Would it be fair to judge if someone asked me and I put an at reply tweet?
01:37:14 This is what Candace does.
01:37:15 And I go, well, okay, one, two, three, four.
01:37:16 These are things that I think are pretty convincing.
01:37:18 If I had an entire show laying out all of it as we did with Tyler Robinson with the assassination, would it be fair to say, well, then you're adding to it?
01:37:26 You're arguing with yourself?
01:37:27 No, it's a tweet.
01:37:28 It's X.
01:37:29 It's not the same as a full program.
01:37:31 She doesn't want it when people.
01:37:32 She started this off by saying, well, these are people who have not watched my show.
01:37:35 Okay, great.
01:37:36 So we don't want to go just based on your tweets, based on your ex posts.
01:37:40 That is an ex reply.
01:37:42 It's not the totality of his argument, the reason he's convinced.
01:37:45 Same for me.
01:37:46 Okay, we should discuss the text message confessions when we get back, if you'd like to.
01:37:52 Okay.
01:37:52 Remember, I told you?
01:37:53 Folks, we're going to take a quick ad for you.
01:37:55 I said, once we get there, she's going to poison that well and say, I don't believe any of the text messages. 0.78
01:37:58 All right, so a commercial.
01:38:00 So do we have Gerald calling in?
01:38:02 Gerald, we're going to be calling in momentarily.
01:38:03 All right, then I have to put on my headphones.
01:38:05 Well, we don't have a crowd who called it yet because.
01:38:08 You said she would do that.
01:38:09 I said she would do that, but she just said she wants to talk about it.
01:38:10 So let's see if she does it.
01:38:11 Let's see.
01:38:12 Again, what I said is she will say, I believe those were planted.
01:38:14 They're not real, which, hey, you know, that may be the case, but that makes it really easy to not refute.
01:38:19 His head is so big.
01:38:20 Gerald's head is gigantic.
01:38:23 Yeah.
01:38:24 I have a big headphone.
01:38:25 This thing swallows me.
01:38:28 Golly.
01:38:31 All right.
01:38:33 Okay.
01:38:33 Thank you very much.
01:38:35 Do we have Gerald?
01:38:36 Yes, we do.
01:38:38 Gerald, can you hear me, sir?
01:38:40 Yes.
01:38:42 I can.
01:38:43 How are you, Stephen?
01:38:43 I guess she didn't give you access to the Wi Fi.
01:38:47 What's your feel of things going on there?
01:38:48 I know we've sent you some extreme fact checks.
01:38:50 Just so you know, my prediction was she would, once we got to the text where she said, I didn't see those in the text, once they're presented, she will eventually just say, Those texts can't count because they clearly were planted.
01:39:00 They're not genuine.
01:39:01 It's to set them up as a patsy.
01:39:02 So we're going to see if I called that.
01:39:03 What else should we know that we can't see?
01:39:07 Well, I think you're right on the assertion that there has been some stuff that's been said that immediately right after has been kind of declined.
01:39:15 Like, I know I didn't actually say that.
01:39:16 Well, actually, yes, you did.
01:39:18 So I think they got hung up quite a bit and got way down in the weeds and the nuance on that particular case.
01:39:24 Yeah.
01:39:24 But I think what you're going to see going forward is that Andrew's going to press and say, hey, yes, I understand what you're saying.
01:39:29 But even if I can see that it doesn't get to Patsy, it doesn't get you anywhere near there.
01:39:33 And I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding of what hearsay is and why it's considered hearsay in one of those trials.
01:39:38 But I think, like everybody else out there listening, we got.
01:39:40 Way down into the weeds on this.
01:39:42 And I think that they'll start to kind of come out of that just a little bit.
01:39:45 And really, Andrew's going to press very, very hard on why she believes what she believes.
01:39:48 He's fine defending his views.
01:39:50 Even if he grants some of the problems that she has with his case, it still doesn't lead anywhere else other than Tyler Robinson right now.
01:39:58 So that's what I'm really seeing.
01:39:59 That's what I was going to say. 0.54
01:40:00 If I were to offer any feedback, it would be first off, as someone who just wants the truth, Patsy is not the same as trained by a Mormon bee cult.
01:40:06 Patsy is not the same as working with the French Legion.
01:40:08 Patsy is not the same as Erica Kirk being involved, Israel being involved, Netanyahu.
01:40:13 Patsy is not the same as a Trump cover up.
01:40:15 Patsy is not the same as Kirk's security chief.
01:40:17 So I'd like to get to that because I did see quite a bit going back and forth.
01:40:21 She tried to represent his entire argument as an at reply tweet.
01:40:24 So that was like, you know, yeah, yeah.
01:40:27 Doesn't make for great TV.
01:40:30 No, definitely not.
01:40:31 I didn't think that was very fair either.
01:40:33 And I think he was able to make the point like, listen, like, it's not limited to just this.
01:40:36 I actually laid out why I thought that it was more likely that Tyler Robinson did this than anything else.
01:40:41 And I think he said 75, 85% chance that it would lead to him.
01:40:45 And you have to deal with that.
01:40:46 You can't go and say, well, you only said in this tweet right here, and it's Converse Sneakers.
01:40:49 Like, that's the tactic to basically say, like, hey, you're isolating one piece of evidence, and that's the only reason.
01:40:53 It's like, no, it's the totality of the evidence.
01:40:56 Remember, he said overwhelming means I find it convincing.
01:41:00 He defined that at the beginning to make sure that people understood where he was coming from.
01:41:04 Not that this was 100% slam dunk, but it's convincing.
01:41:08 75% to 85% chance.
01:41:10 And if you want that 15% to 20% chance to come up in your favor, you really have to show some counter evidence.
01:41:14 And we haven't seen it yet.
01:41:16 What's the vibe like when the cameras are off there?
01:41:18 Are they talking?
01:41:19 Are they cordial?
01:41:19 Or is it pretty cold standoff?
01:41:21 Cordial before, I imagine things will get a little less cordial as we go on.
01:41:27 Cordial before, for sure.
01:41:29 But then, as we got down to business, obviously, I think things changed just a little bit.
01:41:33 All right.
01:41:34 Okay.
01:41:34 Anything else that you have questions for us or anything?
01:41:37 Is our ability to get the extreme fact checks to you, is that helpful?
01:41:41 Nope.
01:41:41 Yeah.
01:41:41 Everything is helpful.
01:41:42 Keep doing that.
01:41:42 I'm in the room with them right now.
01:41:44 Or when they're on there, it looks like you're in a church basement.
01:41:47 Keep communicating.
01:41:49 I'm in a garage to be, you know, nice to everybody else around and not do a live hit right before everybody's walking back and forth.
01:41:56 He's in Candace's garage.
01:41:59 Put the lotion in the basket.
01:42:02 There's nothing to throw open.
01:42:10 You're sitting there talking with Candace Owens.
01:42:12 You mean that great big black girl?
01:42:14 All right.
01:42:16 Thank you very much, Gerald.
01:42:17 We appreciate it.
01:42:18 I know it says that they will be right back.
01:42:19 I am going to take a quick pee break.
01:42:21 I'm sure you will as well.
01:42:22 And we will continue.
01:42:24 Everyone, go to the website.
01:42:25 Check out the references as we make them available every single show.
01:42:28 And if you want to support more debates like this, you can go to the GoFundMe.
01:42:31 We will be right back because they will be right back.
01:42:40 Josh, you have really gone above and beyond the pale this time.
01:42:43 He went out into the open bullpen office and announced, All right, which one of you ladies is on the rag this month? 1.00
01:42:50 I found your bloody crime scene in the bathroom. 1.00
01:42:52 I didn't say that. 1.00
01:42:57 All right, which one of you ladies is on the rag? 1.00
01:42:59 I found your bloody crime scene in the bathroom. 1.00
01:43:02 That could be anybody.
01:43:04 If there's one thing people know about Joshua Feierstein, it's that he can't stand the sight, smell, Or, general concept of menstruation.
01:43:12 What?
01:43:12 Was I supposed to leave it there?
01:43:14 Just laying there on the floor like some kind of murder victim?
01:43:16 Somebody could have slipped, Sam.
01:43:18 It's a safety issue.
01:43:19 This right here is why you are legendary.
01:43:22 You turned a basic period incident into a full blown office census. 0.53
01:43:26 I've received a formal complaint from every woman in the office, and HR me has to write out sensitivity training modules for the entire office now.
01:43:34 Sensitivity training?
01:43:35 For what?
01:43:36 For asking a question?
01:43:37 All he did was ask a question.
01:43:39 It's not like he jammed it back up.
01:43:41 The culprit like rolled up fast food napkins, Sam.
01:43:44 And.
01:43:44 I even offered to get some gloves and help clean it up.
01:43:47 Am I really being punished for chivalry?
01:43:50 Are you punishing him for being a gentleman, Sam?
01:43:52 Josh, you said the phrase bioweapon twice in describing the said bloodstained matter on the floor of the office with every female employee present, including our intern who just got out of college.
01:44:04 I never said bioweapon. 0.98
01:44:05 Doesn't sound like something to be a goddamn bioweapon. 0.99
01:44:08 Oh, come on. 0.99
01:44:09 That intern's generation invented period positivity.
01:44:13 They should be so grateful that we are acknowledging their menstruation.
01:44:17 In all its glory.
01:44:18 Yeah, next you're going to tell us that we can't notice when somebody is clearly on the rack because it's body shaming.
01:44:23 Meanwhile, the bathroom's going to look like a tampon tino film.
01:44:26 That's a good one.
01:44:27 Yeah, thanks.
01:44:28 Look, I appreciate it.
01:44:29 I took a risk.
01:44:29 No, you know what?
01:44:30 This is one of the rare instances where it paid off.
01:44:32 Look, Sam, tell you what.
01:44:33 To make you feel any better, next time I'll rephrase it.
01:44:37 Okay? 0.67
01:44:37 Something like Excuse me, on this fine day, which one of you queens has left their royal crimson? 0.67
01:44:46 Josh, corporate wants a written apology.
01:44:49 As well as for you to attend the three hour seminar on menstrual equity.
01:44:53 Menstrual equity? 0.77
01:44:54 Great. 0.95
01:44:55 Sign me up.
01:44:56 I'll bring snacks and a mop. 1.00
01:44:59 Yeah, tell the ladies we're there for them. 1.00
01:45:00 Just do me a favor.
01:45:01 Next time, put a sign on the door so Josh doesn't have to go in and play True Blood Detective.
01:45:06 That's another good one.
01:45:06 That's two separate HBO programs.
01:45:08 Oh, get off it, Sam.
01:45:09 He knows that.
01:45:11 But it's two separate programs.
01:45:12 It's two separate programs.
01:45:13 That's what makes it funny.
01:45:15 Oh, Sam.
01:45:17 Your nose is leaking crimson. 1.00
01:45:22 Must be that time of the month.
01:45:24 It doesn't work that way. 1.00
01:45:26 I didn't know Jews did that. 1.00
01:45:28 It's the Crimson Kyle Dreidel. 1.00
01:45:39 Let's check your hoo ha!
01:45:42 Hey, Dolly, I have to ask. 0.78
01:45:44 Who goes there?
01:45:46 Hey, I was just wondering if you had something for my knee, some anti-drinking.
01:45:50 All right, we'll slow down.
01:45:52 Why don't you leave the pirate doctrine to me?
01:45:55 First, we'll need a diagnosis.
01:45:57 Yeah, that's fine.
01:45:58 It's just in the gym.
01:46:00 My knee's been acting up.
01:46:01 It's been kind of inflamed lately.
01:46:02 It's kind of inflamed.
01:46:03 Well, let me ask you. 1.00
01:46:05 Fuck! 1.00
01:46:05 Dude! 1.00
01:46:06 What?
01:46:06 How's your hearing been since the incident?
01:46:08 It's fine.
01:46:09 It's just my knee is.
01:46:10 Needs an anti-inflammatory.
01:46:11 Is it this knee, or is it?
01:46:12 This knee!
01:46:13 Can you cut it out more?
01:46:15 I'm just checking for scurvy.
01:46:16 I don't have scurvy.
01:46:17 That's exactly something that someone with scurvy would say.
01:46:20 You know what else someone with scurvy would do?
01:46:22 He would flinch!
01:46:25 He didn't really flinch that bad.
01:46:27 It's kind of right, a middle ground, but.
01:46:28 I still think it'd be safe to amputate.
01:46:31 Where's my rum?
01:46:33 Let's get.
01:46:35 What about that over there? 0.85
01:46:38 What about.
01:46:39 There's no rum over there.
01:46:40 That's just, uh.
01:46:40 No, no, no.
01:46:41 I said it to distract you when I was about to take your knee.
01:46:44 Oh, there's a bottle.
01:46:45 Hylocrum!
01:46:46 What?
01:46:47 Ah, you're still looking.
01:46:48 Oh!
01:46:49 A bottle over there?
01:46:50 Foundation!
01:46:50 Well, it's only the best multivitamin on the high seas.
01:46:53 Does it help with pain, inflammation?
01:46:56 I think it's more of a general health thing, but, uh, well.
01:47:00 Oh, look, it does have turmeric curcumin, standardized to 95%, which I guess is the most studied supplement in the world for inflammation.
01:47:09 So it actually might.
01:47:10 That sounds great.
01:47:11 But!
01:47:11 It won't mend your bone like a good amputation.
01:47:15 The bone's fine.
01:47:15 Wait.
01:47:17 Do you hear that sound?
01:47:19 The sirens.
01:47:21 They'll call you in with your sweet temptation.
01:47:23 Don't listen to it, Timmy Boyce.
01:47:25 You mustn't listen to the sirens.
01:47:27 Their sweet angelic voices will draw you to the shores of death.
01:47:31 They're police sirens.
01:47:33 They called the cops.
01:47:37 Why would you do a thing like that? 1.00
01:47:39 She practiced in medicine without a license. 1.00
01:47:41 That's sweet. 1.00
01:47:42 Keep that just between you and me. 1.00
01:47:44 You know, I rape. 1.00
01:47:48 I pillage, I kill, but it still hurts to be betrayed by a friend. 0.99
01:47:52 We're not friends. 0.93
01:47:52 You're just giving me medicine. 0.93
01:47:55 Thanks.
01:47:56 Belief!
01:47:58 Proven science, zero secrets.
01:48:00 That's your foundation.
01:48:02 Visit foundationdaily.com today.
01:48:04 Subscribe to save 40% off for life.
01:48:07 Sure.
01:48:08 I'm living large here in the Slam.
01:48:10 I got me a nice cigar, snazzy hat.
01:48:13 They call the place Alcatraz.
01:48:15 I kind of like the sound of that.
01:48:16 Sounds familiar.
01:48:17 Al Capone, Alcatraz.
01:48:20 This is my joint, see?
01:48:22 They named the place after me.
01:48:23 But how exactly did I get pinched?
01:48:25 Well, we didn't have Tax Network USA back then.
01:48:28 I ended up getting caught having to pay $215,000 in interest on back taxes.
01:48:35 That's like $4.4 million in today's bucks.
01:48:38 That kind of scratch can buy a lot of fedoras.
01:48:41 So if you don't want to get pinched by the IRS or the feds and get locked up in an island in California next to the fruitcakes, do yourself a favor.
01:48:48 Take a shot of Hooch, calm your nerves.
01:48:51 And go to tnusa.comslash Crowder.
01:48:55 You'll thank me later.
01:48:58 All right, we are back.
01:48:59 Sorry, they came back from their commercial break.
01:49:00 Let's go.
01:49:01 We are now using Kanis Owens' feed because we were aware that hers was 30 seconds faster.
01:49:04 Let's go.
01:49:05 The defense did do was actually before we got to the preliminary hearing, I had mentioned that it was initially supposed to be scheduled for some time in May.
01:49:13 They asked for an extension.
01:49:15 That, reading through those filings of why they were requesting an extension and why I actually believe their extension should have been granted because they did not receive discovery.
01:49:25 On their text messages.
01:49:26 That was one of the reasons.
01:49:27 There were many reasons why they wanted to have an extension, but this was crucial, right?
01:49:30 So, forget just the general sense that these messages feel off.
01:49:35 And yes, you are allowed to have an intuition.
01:49:37 You are allowed to have a sense and just go, this is very weird.
01:49:39 Called it.
01:49:40 We're being told this is weird.
01:49:41 Text messages cannot be counted.
01:49:42 We know Tyler Robinson.
01:49:43 He wanted to get away.
01:49:45 I think the text messages almost run head to head with themselves.
01:49:49 Like he wanted to get away with it.
01:49:51 So, he thought the best thing to do would be to text a full confession of what he did, down to what I didn't even remember saying, yeah, and that's also me, Mr. Valence Footage.
01:50:01 It felt a little too on the nose.
01:50:03 I just, people have common sense.
01:50:05 Presumption not all killers actually want to get away with it.
01:50:07 A lot of them don't think it through and then afterwards go, ah, you know, I'm probably going to get pinched. 0.60
01:50:10 Not everyone is a serial killer like a Gacy who has a plan. 0.58
01:50:14 Not everyone is like a Jeffrey Dahmer. 1.00
01:50:15 Sometimes they're just people like, you know, the folks who run folks over in parades. 1.00
01:50:21 And sometimes they just want to impress their tranny girlfriend. 1.00
01:50:24 Yeah. 0.99
01:50:25 Or Jody Foster.
01:50:26 He also is a Helldivers player.
01:50:28 He did actually get the 500K code correct.
01:50:31 Yeah, I'm not a gamer, so we'll say that if we start debating that, you'll be way over my head.
01:50:35 But yes, but my point being is just that, just first, it's a general sense of why people had a reaction to these messages that seemed like they were written by Jane Austen rather than like a kid who games and writes catfish.
01:50:47 Have a DC how that's intuition?
01:50:48 That is, I am.
01:50:49 I just said that.
01:50:50 I said, just parking aside the intuition of just something feels wrong here, which you should follow your intuition.
01:50:55 You should actually do that.
01:50:56 If you say the COVID vaccine is running out, feels like it's coming out too fast, and there's too many celebrities telling me to do it, I'd like to take a pause, that's good.
01:51:03 That is, you are.
01:51:04 Allowed to do that.
01:51:05 I believe in intuition.
01:51:05 Following intuition is not a policy.
01:51:06 Hang on, hang on.
01:51:07 Let me respond a little bit here because you've been going for a minute.
01:51:09 Let me at least respond to a little bit of this.
01:51:11 So, the first thing is, is like when people bring up the COVID vaccine, not trusting the COVID vaccine in mass was the science.
01:51:18 That wasn't just intuition, that was the science.
01:51:21 There was tons of competing science.
01:51:23 Now, they tried to suppress it.
01:51:24 That's true.
01:51:25 But there was tons of competing science for why you shouldn't take a risky mRNA vaccine and mass and things like this.
01:51:32 Now, when you're talking about intuition, though, when you say trust your intuition, I'm actually giving a different message.
01:51:38 You actually should be very wary about trusting just your intuition.
01:51:42 It is true that intuition can be useful, but it has to be tempered with logic, reason, explanatory power, and evidence, not just intuition.
01:51:49 That's why we're parking it aside.
01:51:51 Intuition is the first step.
01:51:52 Something feels off, right?
01:51:53 Okay.
01:51:53 That was my first point.
01:51:54 Parking aside the very first thing you mentioned.
01:51:56 It's being pushed.
01:51:56 It shouldn't require a celebrity campaign, by the way.
01:51:59 Another element of that is why people don't feel good about the Charlie thing.
01:52:01 Why do we have so many influencers saying things?
01:52:04 It's over.
01:52:04 Why are you guys all using the same adjective?
01:52:06 Can you switch it up?
01:52:07 I'm overwhelmed.
01:52:08 I'm overwhelmed.
01:52:08 Like, chill.
01:52:09 Like, you could say, I found some parts compelling.
01:52:12 I think this should go.
01:52:13 Like Fed's thoughts.
01:52:14 I found some parts compelling.
01:52:16 Maybe we should, you know, see at the trial.
01:52:18 People find themselves in a situation that, by the way, is horrifying, let's say.
01:52:24 Wouldn't it stand to reason that the most likely adjective to be used would be it was horrifying?
01:52:30 Everyone's in on it?
01:52:32 Everyone is in on it if it's a script that would seem atypical or would seem out of context in relation to the event or claim.
01:52:39 I was overwhelmed, is something that most people I've met have said.
01:52:43 That's her proof.
01:52:44 This is, by the way, this is all the proof that we've seen thus far.
01:52:46 She said it's all hearsay, false.
01:52:48 Intuition, but she wants to put it aside.
01:52:50 Everyone using the same thing, so everyone is lying and in on it but her.
01:52:53 Okay.
01:52:54 And they were requesting an extension saying, We have gone to the prosecution and we have requested all of this stuff in discovery.
01:53:03 Yes, you are saying that you took Lance's phone, okay, and that you collected his phone on September 11th and that you sent it off or whatever.
01:53:12 You took a picture of the text messages and we are being given these text messages to review.
01:53:17 Crucially, Kathy Nestor said, I have not even been given access to my client's phone during this hearing.
01:53:24 She said, I have to be because this is my client's phone.
01:53:26 She can't tell you as a part of the discovery request, it's not enough to say to me, Candace, I just got a text message from Candace, and I say, I didn't send that text message.
01:53:35 Maybe that's what her client's saying.
01:53:36 We don't know because we're not at the trial, right?
01:53:38 Maybe he didn't send those messages.
01:53:40 Could there be someone who logged into his Discord?
01:53:42 Could there be someone who logged into his Discord?
01:53:43 Could there be someone who logged into his Discord?
01:53:44 First off, she's saying, Kathy Nestor, did she say that, and is that relevant?
01:53:49 Has the defense argued that the text messages are inauthentic or that they have not been able to read them?
01:53:54 Because the defense of Tyler Robinson would make that argument, of course.
01:54:00 I know because it's one of the most commonly made arguments.
01:54:02 Have they made that argument?
01:54:05 I know it's no, but I'm asking you to fact check it to bring it up.
01:54:08 I know that we have the capability because my husband does it.
01:54:10 He has the capability to send messages from my phone.
01:54:12 It is not convincing to the public when, for whatever reason, the FBI would not, FBI combined with the SBI, it was not the prosecution's fault.
01:54:21 They made that clear during that hearing, would not allow them that discovery request to be able to see where did the messages come from.
01:54:28 I said, Andrew and Candace agreed to do a long form debate.
01:54:31 Don't expect it to be quick.
01:54:32 Three to four hours, most likely, Andrew's opening himself up for critique to defend his positions.
01:54:37 Once that is done, he'll begin critiquing hers.
01:54:39 So he wanted to give that note to the audience here.
01:54:41 Okay.
01:54:42 Just weird messages.
01:54:44 I want to make sure that, yes, it was actually him.
01:54:46 He was holding his phone, and his boyfriend didn't just log in to his computer when he was home.
01:54:52 Lance was his boyfriend.
01:54:53 That is a crucial fact here.
01:54:55 That discovery was not met by the time we got to preliminary here.
01:54:58 So I remain unconvinced by these text messages.
01:55:02 Just as you feel some binge.
01:55:03 Hands up when you guys got it.
01:55:04 Has his defense argued that in any way?
01:55:06 Have they disputed that the texts are authentic or have they granted that they are authentic and it's been admitted into evidence?
01:55:12 That's what matters here because I would make the argument.
01:55:13 Let's go.
01:55:13 It has not been proven that these messages are valid and they don't sound valid to me.
01:55:17 I don't think anyone, even if someone was selling like a pot on the corner, would be smarter than to write a full fledged confession.
01:55:27 He even writes, I thought I would get away with it and I was hoping never to tell you until old age and then we're being told that he wanted to commit suicide and.
01:55:36 Okay, but he just said he wanted to get away with it, but he's not smart enough to.
01:55:41 That tickles.
01:55:43 Oh my gosh.
01:55:44 Guys, let's log into YouTube Pro.
01:55:45 Please make it.
01:55:46 Go to another stream if we have to.
01:55:49 I'm in the surveillance footage, and I'm here, and I'm wearing my Converse.
01:55:52 You know, I'm being a little facetious here, but it was a little ridiculous.
01:55:56 It didn't pass a sniff test for me.
01:55:58 You have kids, and you love them more than anything.
01:56:00 I do.
01:56:00 If it was the case that you thought that your kid was innocent, wouldn't you be out telling everybody and their brother that you thought that they were innocent?
01:56:08 And also, wouldn't you say.
01:56:10 Wouldn't you maybe recant and say, hey, I didn't actually, he didn't actually confess to me.
01:56:16 He didn't actually, none of this happened the way that the state is presenting it.
01:56:21 What would have prevented the parents from testifying?
01:56:23 Well, two things I can answer that.
01:56:25 And if you watch my show, I keep telling you it's not vibes.
01:56:27 So, right after the shooting happened, Lance Twiggs, you know, the FBI put him into a house, safe house they paid for.
01:56:35 They went to the parents as well, to Matt Robinson and Amber, basically said, your life's at risk.
01:56:39 There could be somebody who jumps up and wants to avenge Charlie Kirk.
01:56:43 And, you know, we're going to watch you.
01:56:44 And they went into a federal safe house.
01:56:48 What happened?
01:56:48 So the defense fought the admission of the text, but didn't dispute authenticity.
01:56:53 Could potentially do that at trial, but during the July 2026 preliminary hearing, a State Bureau of Investigation agent took the stand and authenticated the messages, testifying about how they were photographed directly off the cracked screen of Robinson's roommate's phone and later extracted using Celebrite software.
01:57:10 The defense did not cross examine the agent's accusations that the texts were faked.
01:57:13 So they were just trying to say procedurally, since it was taken off of the screen, that they probably shouldn't be admitted.
01:57:18 At no point did they dispute the authenticity of the actual text.
01:57:21 Yeah, but they could still dispute authenticity at trial.
01:57:25 Okay, so.
01:57:26 That the parents haven't recanted any of this.
01:57:28 Recanted what?
01:57:29 They have no statement from the parents.
01:57:30 Wait, I just want to make sure that I. If it was the case that was being reported in mainstream media that your father came to you and said, hey, is this you?
01:57:39 What's going on here?
01:57:40 And then he and one of his buddies took you in where you turned yourself in.
01:57:46 You wouldn't go out and be like, no, that's not what happened.
01:57:48 That isn't what happened, though.
01:57:49 You're just wrong on this.
01:57:50 Okay, maybe I'm paraphrasing.
01:57:51 What am I wrong on?
01:57:51 So, what is your.
01:57:52 Sorry, just so I'm clear.
01:57:53 What.
01:57:54 Where is your evidence that the parents turned him in?
01:57:58 Well, no, no, no.
01:57:58 I didn't say that.
01:58:00 You said with a sheriff's friend.
01:58:03 Yes.
01:58:04 But the father did confront him.
01:58:06 The father confronted what?
01:58:07 Tyler Robinson.
01:58:08 And where did you learn this, that the Tyler Robinson confronted him?
01:58:10 Well, I mean, that's part of the official documents.
01:58:12 Our fact checkers can pull that up.
01:58:13 But yes.
01:58:14 But I'm saying, when you say official documents, do you mean you saw this on CNN or you saw this play out in the hearing?
01:58:18 No, this was one of the things that I went through and fact checked pre debate.
01:58:21 Are you talking about like the charging documents?
01:58:23 I think it was in the.
01:58:24 It could have been in the charging documents, but I did.
01:58:26 But I do, we can pull them up.
01:58:28 No.
01:58:29 And yes, are you disputing this?
01:58:31 We have that on the back to pull it up.
01:58:33 I can already tell you what you're talking about the charging documents.
01:58:36 Because this is where we had to figure out where this story came from because everyone was operating on the assumption that Matt Robinson turned him in.
01:58:42 Until we got to the preliminary hearing and we understood, like I said, even for that, when you are charging someone, you can use hearsay.
01:58:49 It's all probative, right?
01:58:50 Nothing.
01:58:51 So they didn't have statements.
01:58:52 It's not like Matt Robinson, even though he was interviewed that night, Amber Robinson was interviewed that night by a Fed.
01:58:58 Separate rooms.
01:58:59 Tyler Robinson was interviewed by a fed.
01:59:01 They did not produce statements saying, My son did this.
01:59:03 They just sent in, I would rather kill myself than turn myself in.
01:59:07 Robinson responded when his father urged him to turn himself into authorities, the source said.
01:59:12 That's not suicidal, that's saying I'd rather.
01:59:14 Father persuaded Robinson to confide in a youth pastor who works with the Washington County Sheriff's Office and the U.S. Marshal's Office, the law enforcement source said.
01:59:20 So that's the sources, and then I would imagine they were also in the documents admitted to court.
01:59:23 That would be the initial story, and it was corroborated.
01:59:25 All right, so there you go.
01:59:26 Extreme fact check.
01:59:27 Tyler Robinson from the Washington County Office.
01:59:32 Up to, I think it's Salt Lake City.
01:59:34 I think it was 4 a.m. in the morning.
01:59:35 I think I got up there.
01:59:36 He then writes the charging document.
01:59:40 So he's basically saying, We all spoke to a bunch of people, and here's the information that we got, right?
01:59:46 We've not seen that.
01:59:47 So it could have come from Mike Mitchell.
01:59:49 Mike Mitchell could be saying.
01:59:50 I don't know how this negates the point, though.
01:59:51 Why wouldn't the parents?
01:59:52 It's truly negates the point because you don't have a statement from the parents.
01:59:55 You are going.
01:59:56 Why wouldn't they just correct the misinformation?
01:59:59 It doesn't negate the point.
02:00:00 The point is that we now got the preliminary hearing.
02:00:03 If the parents were the ones who said, I'm turning my son in because he's guilty.
02:00:07 I didn't say they turned him in.
02:00:09 I think you're talking about the over.
02:00:10 You said it's been the narrative.
02:00:11 Everybody's known this.
02:00:12 The narrative initially, which I think you agree with, was that Matt Robinson knew his kid was guilty and turned him into the police station.
02:00:19 What actually happened in terms of Sheriff Brooksby, who was present there and gave a press conference, what happened was this Mike Mitchell character essentially peer pressured him.
02:00:26 And we can get a fact check on this.
02:00:28 We can find Sheriff Brooksby's press conference.
02:00:31 And he said, they know it's you and you're going to come in peaceably.
02:00:37 Or people are going to be banging down your door.
02:00:39 He was an undercover cop, which I don't like that.
02:00:42 I don't know what he did undercover.
02:00:43 It's very hard to find anything about Mike Mitchell, but he worked with them for 20 plus years, the police officers.
02:00:49 The reason why Tyler Robinson knew him was because he lived nearby and he was also his Boy Scout leader.
02:00:54 There's no claim that the father turned him in, by the way.
02:00:55 No one's making that argument here.
02:00:57 No, they're making the claim that it was confirmed, but from information coming from the father.
02:01:01 Yeah.
02:01:01 That it was confirmed.
02:01:02 Not that he went to the police and turned him in, that when the father was asked, he said, I told him, hey, you should probably turn yourself in, like you just said.
02:01:08 You read that quote.
02:01:09 No one's saying the father went to the authority and said, My son is guilty.
02:01:12 One asked, the information came out, corroborated with the text, where the father said, Well, I did tell him this.
02:01:17 And I'm saying it's the charging dock, which could have been derived from the charging dock.
02:01:20 So, again, if that's the case, let's say you believe that he turned him in.
02:01:23 And now you go, oh, no, the father admitted, though, that he knew about this and advised his son that way because he had committed the act and admitted to him.
02:01:30 Does that change anything?
02:01:31 And how does it get us to Egyptian planes and the French Legion and Mormon beehive cult? 0.92
02:01:39 These are all things that I'm not even disputing. 0.88
02:01:41 Okay, so we don't show it.
02:01:42 We never get to the thing that I am disputing.
02:01:44 Well, you were, I was just providing an answer.
02:01:46 We were coming back in from a break because you were talking about the text message as something that you felt was concrete.
02:01:50 So, it was just my rebuttal to you.
02:01:52 That it's not concrete because they haven't had a chance to actually answer that, and she didn't even get to see your client's phone.
02:01:57 So that's effectively.
02:01:58 So fingerprints aren't concrete because his weren't the most notable fingerprints.
02:02:02 Okay?
02:02:02 The text messages aren't concrete because they were taken from a cracked phone, even though the defense didn't dispute the authenticity.
02:02:07 The father's admitting when questioned that his son did it and he advised him to speak to a youth pastor is not concrete because he didn't bring it forward and turn his son in.
02:02:17 But none of those pieces of information, ultimately, the facts that matter in a case, are in dispute.
02:02:21 Not even by Candace.
02:02:22 Okay, continue.
02:02:24 That's the point.
02:02:24 So let's get to the parents' fact check.
02:02:28 Yeah, so I was saying I believe what you're talking about was derived from the charging dock, which was signed off by Brian Davis.
02:02:33 Let's pull it up.
02:02:34 Let's see if that's correct.
02:02:40 What are we looking at?
02:02:41 Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, I'm sorry.
02:02:46 Can you zoom in a little bit?
02:02:48 I can't see it.
02:02:49 After this, Robinson's father reported that when his wife showed him the suspected shooter in the news, he agreed that it looked like their son.
02:02:57 He also believed that the rifle that police suspected the shooter used matched the rifle that was given to his son as a gift.
02:03:03 As a result, Robinson's father contacted his son and asked him to send a photo of the rifle, which makes sense with the text messages.
02:03:10 Robinson did not respond.
02:03:11 However, Robinson's father spoke on the phone with Robinson.
02:03:14 Robinson implied he planned to take his own life.
02:03:17 Robinson's parents were able to convince him to meet at their home.
02:03:20 Yes.
02:03:20 So this is proving my point.
02:03:22 This is from the charging document, correct?
02:03:23 Yeah.
02:03:24 So what I'm saying to you is that three people got interviewed on that night Mike Mitchell got interviewed, Amber Robinson got interviewed, and Matt Robinson got interviewed.
02:03:32 Of the three of them, only one of them actually wrote a statement, which was referred to in this preliminary trial.
02:03:39 He came in, I believe, in March, Mike Mitchell, and he wrote a statement, which I find to be very shady that they decided to bring up.
02:03:44 Why aren't the parents disputing that?
02:03:46 Well, first off, that's the question I've been asked.
02:03:49 That's the parent's point the whole way, by the way.
02:03:50 That the father never speaks.
02:03:51 But why aren't the parents in court play to the cameras in court when they have a legal team that is going to be advising them not to speak to the court because your son could go to prison for that?
02:03:58 But they're playing to somebody else who's your source?
02:04:02 I'm not going to address that.
02:04:03 They're saying to someone else who's your source but won't go publicly tell the media this is not true.
02:04:08 Well, what I did not say to you that I just said I don't have any source, so I want to be very clear and take it from somebody who was involved and permanently sued.
02:04:17 When I have to take my lawyers' advice, you've not been sued by the FBI, you've not been subpoenaed by the ATF, and you lied about the Nashville Manifesto, the Covenant shooting.
02:04:24 It was proven to be false.
02:04:26 We have been subpoenaed by all of the above.
02:04:28 You can support us by joining Mug Club Rumble Premium, just to be clear.
02:04:31 Candace Owens has not been sued by any of those intelligence agencies for misinformation.
02:04:34 She's sued by Bridget McCrone, and she's going to lose.
02:04:37 She was countersued by her landlord because she claimed discrimination, just like she did when she was young, using the NAACP, claiming racism, and she lost to the tune of $17,000 from her landlord.
02:04:45 She loses civil lawsuits routinely. 0.83
02:04:48 You said you had something, Noodles. 1.00
02:04:49 Yes, there you go.
02:04:51 Robinson's father reported that when his wife showed him a surveillance image of the suspected shooter in the news, he agreed it looked like their son, according to the charging documents.
02:04:58 So they haven't disputed it.
02:04:58 And here's the important thing Remember when Johnny Depp Amber heard what's going on?
02:05:01 You'd read summaries, right?
02:05:03 You didn't always have the evidence.
02:05:04 And then you saw the deposition.
02:05:06 So, you'd read the summaries of the depositions.
02:05:08 Like, he then broke a wine glass, or, you know, that's when she says that he, and then you hear the audio.
02:05:15 Then you see the footage.
02:05:17 Then you learn about the abuse.
02:05:19 That's how this happens.
02:05:20 That's the danger of things playing out in the court of public opinion.
02:05:23 I know this because Candace tried to do this with yours truly, and what she tried to claim is very different from what happened in court.
02:05:28 She does this very often.
02:05:29 It's highly likely on the basis of the preliminary hearing that that all came from Mike Mitchell.
02:05:33 And Mike Mitchell would be a part, he's going to be a part of.
02:05:35 Based on the statements of the witness.
02:05:38 Well, it's him saying.
02:05:40 The parents told me this.
02:05:40 The parents could dispute that.
02:05:42 That's going to come down the line, right? 0.95
02:05:43 They're going to be able to seat the parents.
02:05:45 I will say this putting together context clues, if the state had it on 100% certainty that Matt Robinson and Amber Robinson said it, a five day preliminary hearing would be a good time to say we have enough evidence and I can tell you why Matt Robinson made this statement and here is his statement that he signed.
02:06:04 That would have been a good time to present that evidence.
02:06:05 That would also be a good time for the defense to say that's just totally fabricated.
02:06:08 That's not just the wrong time.
02:06:09 Why couldn't they?
02:06:10 That is completely the wrong time.
02:06:11 Why couldn't they?
02:06:11 Because what they're doing is they already said.
02:06:14 They didn't receive discovery.
02:06:15 They literally can't.
02:06:15 They literally can't because they can't.
02:06:17 They did not receive discovery.
02:06:17 You're saying that they didn't receive that information?
02:06:19 No, no.
02:06:20 They just received the text messages.
02:06:22 But in order to.
02:06:22 That's not the text messages.
02:06:25 The probative information.
02:06:26 Yeah, we're talking about the information that we just reviewed.
02:06:28 That's not the text messages.
02:06:29 They never presented it.
02:06:30 The state never put it on.
02:06:32 Yeah, they didn't.
02:06:32 The defense could easily still have presented this, yeah?
02:06:36 No.
02:06:37 They could have said they didn't.
02:06:38 The defense never saw the charging documents? 0.65
02:06:40 Didn't she just say charging documents?
02:06:42 Yeah.
02:06:42 So, of course, the defense would be aware of the charging documents and they would dispute it, right?
02:06:45 She didn't say text messages.
02:06:46 She said the charging documents.
02:06:47 Charging documents is where the person she's claiming is invalid said that the parents had said that.
02:06:52 The parents don't dispute it, and the defense did not dispute it.
02:06:53 Of course, that would be included in the preliminary hearing.
02:06:55 No one is disputing it.
02:06:56 His point is no one is disputing it.
02:06:58 These statements have been made.
02:06:58 There have been multiple versions, corroborations, right?
02:07:01 Pieces of evidence that would suggest these are legitimate.
02:07:03 The defense has at no point disputed it.
02:07:04 Okay.
02:07:05 But they would do it.
02:07:06 In fact, when I talked about depth with the defense, facts aren't facts.
02:07:09 They said that's exactly.
02:07:11 If you had actual evidence that there were fabrications by the feds, that's exactly when you would introduce that.
02:07:16 So, in the document that they filed yesterday or a couple of days ago, The appropriate, like what you're doing at this stage of the hearing, is the state is saying we have enough evidence that we think this needs to go forth with a trial.
02:07:29 Hence the reason that there's this extraordinary, we allow hearsay because it doesn't really need to be perfect.
02:07:34 It can be enough that we feel like we can move forward, right?
02:07:37 And I disagree with that in general when somebody's rotting in prison, but whatever.
02:07:42 The next phase is for them to meet in court and for the defense to essentially present an argument to the state that says, We find this filing to be defective in and of itself.
02:07:54 We don't even have to defend ourselves because you, the state, have a lawyer.
02:07:57 George the Greek, who works for us, he's a lawyer.
02:07:59 Ask him if he would be willing to correct this because she's listing a process that is very likely completely false during the next break.
02:08:05 I think it would be great to have George the Greek come in, who is a lawyer, who chooses to work here, by the way.
02:08:09 He can make more money as a lawyer.
02:08:10 Sorry about that, George.
02:08:10 We can only pay what we can pay.
02:08:12 See if he'd be willing to do that because he's pretty good at breaking that down.
02:08:15 I love it from him, actually.
02:08:17 It's a hypothetical.
02:08:18 The prosecution will only give the bare minimum to show probable cause.
02:08:21 All the big details will come out for the jury. 1.00
02:08:23 Candace is exploiting the legal system to create doubt. 1.00
02:08:25 That's her whole deal. 1.00
02:08:26 That's from George.
02:08:27 Again, the preliminary hearing is not the trial.
02:08:29 The prosecution is not going to blow their whole load at this point.
02:08:32 She's exploiting this to say they have a weak case. 0.90
02:08:34 Right.
02:08:35 They would be shouting it from the rooftops.
02:08:36 They would be losing their minds.
02:08:38 And you're like, nope, the gag order would be enough to keep them quiet.
02:08:41 Not enough for them to talk to your source, but enough to keep them quiet. 0.97
02:08:44 I think that that's quite ridiculous.
02:08:45 But I'll even concede this whole point to you. 0.89
02:08:47 Let's just say maybe this was misconstrued, right?
02:08:52 There's a little bit of reason to doubt it because we're still waiting for the evidence for trial.
02:08:56 If that's the case, then why not take the same standard for the evidence that you present?
02:09:00 You're just waiting for trial.
02:09:01 Well, you didn't do that.
02:09:02 Wait a second.
02:09:03 Wait a second.
02:09:05 I just want to make sure that.
02:09:06 I got this right.
02:09:07 That's your argument to me, right?
02:09:09 My argument to you is what?
02:09:10 My argument, your argument to me is that, hey, wait a second, Andrew, there's not enough here that convinces me, right?
02:09:18 Well, that's actually my rebuttal to you is that you are saying, why are people engaging in what you term to be conspiracy theories?
02:09:26 I term it to be thinking.
02:09:28 They're just thinking because they're recognizing there are a lot of holes in these stories and that this is not strong evidence, right?
02:09:34 This is the reason they're doing it.
02:09:35 I'm explaining to you, this is the reason that they're doing it.
02:09:38 I'm addressing.
02:09:39 What you view to be overwhelming evidence.
02:09:41 And by the way, I want to be clear.
02:09:43 That which convinces me.
02:09:45 What?
02:09:45 Yeah, well, but thus far, every point that you've brought up, did you feel like this is beyond a reasonable doubt?
02:09:54 I mean, you realize it's going to be.
02:09:57 It's not beyond a reasonable doubt.
02:09:59 It's just what I find convincing is what I find overwhelming.
02:10:02 So why are you so upset when people say they don't find it convincing?
02:10:05 If that was the limitation of the claims that you made, if it was just.
02:10:09 Wait a second.
02:10:10 Because there's a little bit of a problem.
02:10:11 Because Erica Kirk killed her husband and that he was training with crazy Mormon communists and the 13th Legion, and that Andrew Colvett was identified as a betrayer and the dream of destroying people's lives. 0.72
02:10:22 That's why.
02:10:23 In fact, I've had tons of Discord calls about this.
02:10:27 My position's always been clear.
02:10:29 Of course, conspiracies exist.
02:10:31 Some of them have way better evidence than others.
02:10:33 But I've seen them myself.
02:10:34 I know conspiracies.
02:10:35 In fact, the federal government has hundreds of thousands of laws about conspiracies, they see them everywhere.
02:10:41 We both know this, right?
02:10:43 That's never what the problem is.
02:10:45 The problem is when you make claims outside of, well, wait a second.
02:10:50 I'm just questioning evidence here.
02:10:52 I'm just questioning what the state's case is here.
02:10:54 I'm just asking questions.
02:10:56 It's when you make claims outside of that where you claim that there's good evidence or good standards you should believe because, and then it turns out that it's all nonsense or it's wackadoo stuff or it makes no sense.
02:11:09 And when we have a chance to cross examine your evidence that you've presented, I'm going to show a lot of that.
02:11:13 A lot of this conjecture that's based on literally nothing.
02:11:17 Yeah, that is important to know.
02:11:19 She is cross examining him.
02:11:20 So he is having to be on defense.
02:11:23 This is her ability to do it.
02:11:24 And then he's going to be able to cross examine her, hopefully, the evidence of all the claims we've gone through, Egyptian planes, French Legion, Mormon cult.
02:11:32 Sorry, I'm sure you talk communist.
02:11:34 I think there's people who remain unconvinced yet until we get to the trial.
02:11:37 I think that's fine.
02:11:38 I think it's fine.
02:11:39 There's people who are convinced, too.
02:11:41 That's never been my problem.
02:11:42 My problem is the claims which are external to that.
02:11:45 Okay.
02:11:46 Um,.
02:11:48 I'm not sure I really care if you have a problem with what I think in my own spare time.
02:11:53 I don't understand this lecture that I gave.
02:11:55 But beyond that, I'm not sure. 0.97
02:11:57 The only way that you make a living, by the way, while writing the book, make him a sandwich and say that women should be at home. 0.83
02:12:02 Yeah, moving the GoPros. 0.79
02:12:02 That's the whole reason for the debate, is you defending your position. 0.79
02:12:05 He's saying he has a problem with them and he's going to critique them.
02:12:07 Going back to you saying I wouldn't have a problem with them.
02:12:10 You certainly had a problem with his one tweet.
02:12:11 Demonstrated pretty thoroughly that what you claim that you have a problem with is exactly what the state is engaged in at this stage.
02:12:18 So it just doesn't make sense.
02:12:19 That's not the case.
02:12:21 In fact, so if people look and they say, I'm looking at the gun and I see and I'm inferring this, and someone else says, I'm looking at the gun.
02:12:27 That's why she keeps backing up.
02:12:29 It's not her argument anymore.
02:12:30 If people ask questions, I'm not the one doing this.
02:12:33 I'm arguing on behalf of everyone else.
02:12:35 No one did Egyptian planes if not for her.
02:12:37 No one did the French Foreign Legion if not for her. 0.59
02:12:39 No one did the Utah Mormon Communist Cult if not for her.
02:12:42 No one did Erica Kirk if not for her.
02:12:43 Just to be clear.
02:12:45 It's the law of excluded middle.
02:12:47 All propositions are going to be true or they're going to be false.
02:12:50 When we get into when we're making inferences, we're making inferences based on propositions.
02:12:56 We can actually come to true conclusions with false premises inside of a proposition.
02:13:01 In fact, what we're talking about here is not whether or not you feel that you're convinced by this evidence.
02:13:07 But you felt like you were convinced.
02:13:08 Right?
02:13:08 Sure.
02:13:09 But here's the thing when you ask me my reason, Andrew, why are you convinced by this?
02:13:13 I can give you my reasons why I'm convinced by it, why it seems reasonable and rational to me to be convinced.
02:13:18 You could even say, But Andrew, I'm just not convinced by it.
02:13:22 If that was the limitation of your claims, we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
02:13:26 That's why I wanted to have the conversation, in fact, was so that we could move into your actual claims that you've made, which transcend the idea of.
02:13:36 I'm just asking questions.
02:13:37 Before we get into that, your team has one thing they want to.
02:13:40 Summer is almost over.
02:13:41 Oh my God.
02:13:43 Fix this during the break.
02:13:44 So help me God.
02:13:49 Had full discovery by April 1st.
02:13:52 They did not.
02:13:53 That's not true.
02:13:54 Wait a second.
02:13:55 Yeah.
02:13:55 To date, the state's prosecutors have disclosed all evidence that is presently and reasonably available to them as required under Rule 16, Utah R criminal, to be more precise as of April 1st.
02:14:07 Yeah.
02:14:08 That was not 100%.
02:14:10 That's why they're caging that by saying what's reasonable.
02:14:12 There was an entire, and we can pull this up, we should now play the Kathy Nestor clip because that's not reasonable.
02:14:17 She said they didn't have the ability to cross-examine, to look at any of the evidence because they weren't given it.
02:14:22 It's not reasonable that you're asking for this when we're going into a hearing that's just going to be based on hearsay and stuff, things of that nature.
02:14:28 But of course, by the time a trial comes, you're going to get all the disclosures.
02:14:31 Wherever the show costs.
02:14:32 Yes.
02:14:32 So that's what they're saying.
02:14:33 Yeah, I understand.
02:14:34 Okay.
02:14:35 And I'm even fine with it.
02:14:37 We all know.
02:14:37 And then, by the way, just now that the hearing is over, and you can also fact-check this.
02:14:42 They now, at the end of the preliminary hearing, dropped like an insane amount of the discovery stuff they gave to them like the week after.
02:14:49 Can someone give us a count?
02:14:51 Maybe we could have AI do it.
02:14:52 How many fact checks has Candace's team presented?
02:14:55 It seems like it's been entirely from either neutral or from Andrew's people.
02:15:00 On my show, as we were watching that preliminary of the preliminary, 60 40.
02:15:04 I mean, I think she presented one.
02:15:06 I know claims.
02:15:07 I haven't seen many fact checks.
02:15:09 I want, why can't you just give them what they're asking for so that they can actually engage you?
02:15:14 And it didn't happen.
02:15:15 So, but.
02:15:16 The judge ruled that it wasn't necessary at this stage, and that was the whole point of that.
02:15:21 Uh, because it's preliminary to the preliminary, yeah.
02:15:23 Yeah, would you like to play the Kathy video?
02:15:25 Uh, well, he's saying he's not disagreeing, so I don't think we need to.
02:15:27 There's no, yeah, there's no disagreement that she said that, yeah.
02:15:31 So, um, the yeah, so I guess the disagreements now would move into the evidences that you have stated, yeah, on the record, which transcend elements of reason.
02:15:42 Why are we having a transcendental conversation now?
02:15:46 Because, I mean, to Because they're all related to the same thing.
02:15:48 Because your entire thing was.
02:15:50 Joe says he doesn't think that it's been any more than one fact check.
02:15:53 From her?
02:15:54 Yeah, from her team.
02:15:55 From her.
02:15:55 And then compared to what?
02:15:56 The eight, nine?
02:15:58 I don't have Andrews yet, but.
02:15:59 Can someone bring up the definition of transcendental?
02:16:01 Does she mean metaphysical? 0.81
02:16:03 She literally just took one word he said and made an argument.
02:16:07 Yeah, I want to watch, but can someone bring up the definition?
02:16:09 I think she meant to say metaphysical, not transcendental.
02:16:13 Yeah, we should discuss the screwdriver as well.
02:16:15 And I'll explain exactly what the groundwork is.
02:16:17 Mm hmm.
02:16:17 When you make claims which pass the idea of the world, transcendental means going beyond ordinary limits, standard sensory experience, or basic physical rules.
02:16:27 Right.
02:16:27 So, typically, yeah, so I guess metaphysical, I guess you could say that they would be sort of interchangeable.
02:16:30 Usually, transcendental is kind of a new age term used for transcendental meditation, which means beyond the physical realm, right, in your mind, whereas metaphysical means something that would exist beyond what can be touched, smelled, heard, you know, like metaverse.
02:16:43 If that's the case, then I would like to finally dive into some of that evidence.
02:16:48 And dive into it.
02:16:49 Well, just to be clear, and I'm happy to have you talk about, like I said publicly, you want to engage in some conspiracies, but I said I want to make sure that we get to the substance of our debate.
02:16:58 The substance of our debate is me demonstrating that all of the quote unquote evidence that you feel that you have, which demonstrates that Tyler Robinson, I mean, that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
02:17:09 You don't find convincing, I get it.
02:17:11 It's not validated by the testimony that we saw.
02:17:14 And in your answer for when I explained to you that he had the most degraded prints, was I don't know.
02:17:18 Okay, well, then there lies my ability to process that.
02:17:23 It's just fine for you to not be convinced up to this point, all of your viewers, everybody watching.
02:17:32 Nobody's giving a dispute that if all your claims ever were, were just up to now, the evidence that the state's given, I'm just kind of not convinced.
02:17:41 That is not what's been happening.
02:17:43 Keep in mind, what's actually been happening is that you've made a million claims.
02:17:47 Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
02:17:49 She said zero.
02:17:49 And in regards to the Kirk assassination, which are far above and beyond, I just doubt the state's theory.
02:17:57 Okay, yeah, I mean, sure.
02:17:58 So those are the things that.
02:17:59 No, I do doubt the state's theory.
02:18:00 No, that's what he said.
02:18:01 Tell me about the other claims.
02:18:02 We know you doubt.
02:18:02 We already granted you that.
02:18:04 If you want to move to the opinions, if you want to talk about Erica Kirk, if you want to talk about Turning Point USA, I'd like to talk about all of it and get into it.
02:18:11 I'm totally happy to do that.
02:18:12 But I just want to say that, like, I do not feel, because I've said what's important to me is that we exhaust this topic first of our actual debate claims.
02:18:20 I do not feel that you sufficiently have argued that the evidence is overwhelming.
02:18:25 I'm sorry, there's a question for you, Will.
02:18:26 But I am sorry you feel that way.
02:18:28 Candace, one question.
02:18:30 What evidence do you need to see for you to say Title Robinson killed Charlie Kirk?
02:18:34 That's a great question.
02:18:36 So, I actually expected in this preliminary hearing, actually, the almost the inverse of what he was saying is true, right?
02:18:43 So, this is now the time the state is putting on their evidence.
02:18:46 That's the purpose of this hearing, right?
02:18:48 The state is using hearsay, but they're also putting on their evidence.
02:18:51 So, I was just expecting some sort of a slam dunk.
02:18:53 Like, we got him on camera taking the shot.
02:18:55 At least we have him clear on camera.
02:18:56 You're telling me this guy drove 13 hours all around?
02:18:59 Like, we can definitely show you a picture that it's going to be beyond a reasonable doubt before we even get to the trial.
02:19:04 People are going to see and go, oh crap, like it was really Tyler Robinson.
02:19:08 I was expecting to at least see.
02:19:10 Evidence that because I had reported early on that the source was saying that Tyler did not step foot on campus that day.
02:19:18 It is my perspective that he had something to do with something.
02:19:20 I do believe he was putting like disposing clothes at this stage, at this phase.
02:19:25 I do believe he was disposing clothes, he was involved somehow.
02:19:28 I find Lance to be more suspicious, if I'm being honest with you.
02:19:32 So that doesn't answer the question.
02:19:33 And also, like I said, the use immunity that was given to Lance by the feds, the fact that the feds didn't ask him any questions, the fact that I spoke with Lance Twiggs' family, and they were like, it's very weird that.
02:19:44 The feds are not asking him more questions.
02:19:46 He's exactly the person asking him more questions or they didn't ask him any questions.
02:19:53 But when we got to the preliminary hearing, there was not a single piece of evidence that I felt was slam dunk.
02:19:59 I was waiting for that.
02:20:00 A photo, I mean, anything would have made me go, all right, I think this could be the guy.
02:20:05 If they had handed over the discovery on the tech messages, since that was their base.
02:20:08 Let's use that term, slam dunk.
02:20:10 He said nothing has been a slam dunk. 0.85
02:20:11 So we're going to use a slam dunk as a standard when we get to her theories.
02:20:15 To say we that she presented as fact, slam dunked over, and we heard we'll hold it to the standard of slam dunk two points.
02:20:21 Saying it's not them and it's not the SBI, it's the FBI that's holding on to things.
02:20:26 Is the FBI took everything?
02:20:27 The FBI took the gun, the FBI took initially the screwdriver.
02:20:31 And then when I heard testimony about the things that they didn't that they found that were suspicious, um, example being the backpack, that's something that really bothers me.
02:20:39 Uh, that they say they traced the shooter, they traced the route that he went on, and then there wasn't a band, we know it looks like he's wearing some sort of a backpack.
02:20:48 We know that there was an abandoned backpack found at the bus stop in front of a library, and they felt that this should be taken into evidence.
02:20:55 They took it.
02:20:56 The FBI, this was the testimony of Amanda Baker.
02:21:00 This coming from George said at this point in the process and in the legal procedure, you won't have slam dunk.
02:21:07 No, that would be.
02:21:08 Never.
02:21:09 You'd never have slam dunk.
02:21:09 No, you'll have that in the trough.
02:21:10 If you presented slam dunk evidence at this point, you would be foolish and would harm your case. 0.99
02:21:14 I know, I've been through it. 0.98
02:21:16 The backpack actually belongs to somebody on Charlie's team.
02:21:19 But if you know the map of the layout of the campus, you're going, well, what the hell were they doing all the way up?
02:21:23 This is nowhere near anywhere.
02:21:25 And by the way, that's not an acceptable answer for why you just gave it back.
02:21:29 That's not good.
02:21:29 That's like, why would you give it back?
02:21:30 You're acting like no one's ever been killed by somebody on their team before, right?
02:21:33 So I found that to be very strange.
02:21:35 So, a claim is that there was a backpack that was found at a bus stop that belonged to a member of Charlie's team.
02:21:39 Can we fact check that and just see what it is that she's talking about, how that might be relevant?
02:21:42 Because I can't imagine it's relevant unless it included a weapon or unless it was Tyler Robinson's backpack.
02:21:48 Different people have backpacks.
02:21:49 The investigation itself feels unacceptable.
02:21:51 Was it a Jan sport?
02:21:52 When you learn, and this is completely crazy to me, that some of the artifacts that Charlie was wearing were immediately returned to Erica, that's absurd.
02:22:02 That is absurd.
02:22:03 Everything should be in evidence.
02:22:05 When you learn that the car that they carried Charlie in to go to the hospital, they had immediately towed, cleaned, and back up for resale, that's absurd.
02:22:15 That should be sitting in evidence.
02:22:16 And any police officer that you speak to will say, or a person that's been involved in a crime will say, I didn't get my stuff back for years.
02:22:22 That had nothing to do with anything.
02:22:23 It was just around.
02:22:24 And they kept it into evidence until the trial was over.
02:22:27 Yeah, we're not always there.
02:22:27 It has to be approved.
02:22:28 I think somebody's justified.
02:22:29 Sometimes it is.
02:22:29 Sometimes it's not.
02:22:30 The Attorney General has to sign off on giving you those objects back.
02:22:32 And we were told this is all fine.
02:22:34 And we see evidence is just one example.
02:22:36 It's true with weapons.
02:22:37 Yeah.
02:22:37 Holding the crucifix.
02:22:42 That should be an evidence.
02:22:43 Irrespective of if you feel bad for her and think she should have it and it's sweet, that should be an evidence.
02:22:50 Immediately paving over the crime scene.
02:22:52 This is like the craziest thing ever.
02:22:54 This defies common sense.
02:22:56 You immediately, and when you heard the guy who did it actually go up on a podcast and explain, I got the call.
02:23:02 They said it was a paver emergency.
02:23:04 I've never in my entire career heard of a paver emergency.
02:23:08 They had already had someone come up and dig up the vehicle.
02:23:11 So by the time he got there on site, he was destroying vehicles and suspensions.
02:23:14 She didn't have a career in construction, to be clear.
02:23:16 That is what people are looking at and going, this is a crime scene.
02:23:20 Or maybe a crime scene that's already been gone over with a fine tooth comb and still perhaps has blood or reminders of a horrible crime that would be disturbing to students.
02:23:28 And once they've gone through everything, they might pave it over to try and make it appropriate.
02:23:34 Yeah, it's a.
02:23:36 Again, these are not things that are.
02:23:37 She would have to prove that it is unprecedented that this never happens.
02:23:40 It's just not true.
02:23:40 It happens all the time.
02:23:41 Maybe not using it in the best way.
02:23:42 Otherwise, every single time there's a crime, that yellow caution tape would just be up forever.
02:23:47 If a crime takes place at a restaurant, you never go to that restaurant again.
02:23:50 Someone gets shot at a 7 Eleven, guess what?
02:23:51 You don't get to go.
02:23:53 You wouldn't have been able to go to the grassy knoll area.
02:23:56 In other words, that entire, all of that traffic, Dallas, downtown Dallas, right outside that museum, would have been shut down indefinitely for years.
02:24:05 It's just not how it works.
02:24:06 Plenty of examples.
02:24:06 So, what would you need to see for you to see something?
02:24:09 If they had, I was expecting here, we have a look at the shot, and then I'd be like, great, a clear image of him on the staircase where I'm like, that's definitively Tyler Robinson and he was on campus.
02:24:16 We got nothing.
02:24:18 We got literally nothing but hearsay of people saying.
02:24:21 But you basically get no case.
02:24:23 What?
02:24:24 Basically, no case on planet Earth.
02:24:25 Do you get that?
02:24:26 Sure.
02:24:26 Oh, we got a picture.
02:24:27 Here you stand with the murder weapon.
02:24:28 Guys, bring up the staircase, Charlotte Robinson footage, image.
02:24:31 I mean, she can say she doesn't agree, but to say it's nothing is absurd.
02:24:35 Fact check that.
02:24:36 Let me know when we have this.
02:24:37 George says police and prosecutors absolutely can return seized property to an owner or their family before a trial if they determine it is not relevant to the case or no longer needed as evidence.
02:24:45 The oppositional story.
02:24:47 Right?
02:24:47 That he's a Patsy or something like that.
02:24:50 Just good, clear, concise evidence that's been presented, right, and is being presented that I could go through and link all together to see if there's actually some clear picture of there being a patsy.
02:25:01 That's what it would take for me.
02:25:02 Okay.
02:25:03 I don't disagree with that.
02:25:04 We haven't heard the defense.
02:25:05 Just a good evidentiary standard.
02:25:07 And then, of course, I would change my mind.
02:25:09 So, just to qualify this, so there is a possibility in the next few months that you may come out and say, guys, it's done.
02:25:16 Tyler killed him.
02:25:17 So you're saying yesterday.
02:25:18 Yeah.
02:25:18 I think it's very important.
02:25:19 40 audience right now at zero percent.
02:25:21 Is there anything Andrew's at about 75 percent?
02:25:24 Just to be quick, of course, I'm gonna always follow evidence.
02:25:27 Perfect.
02:25:27 So, my whole thing is just this it's really important to me.
02:25:32 I don't mind people being truth seekers and justice searchers, and the internet has helped solve tons of crimes.
02:25:39 There's no ifs, ands, or buts about that, right?
02:25:42 However, there's also people who you know they not only don't solve crimes but they just come up with conjecture and they what's called flooding the zone, you flood the zone with.
02:25:52 Tons and tons of conspiracy based ideas and they go nowhere, right?
02:25:55 And in fact, they actually take away from a legitimate investigation.
02:26:01 Now, I'm not even saying anybody here is purposely flooding the zone.
02:26:03 That's not even the claim.
02:26:05 All I'm saying is that the claims made absent, absent, oh, this is just me not being convinced by the state's evidence, those become claims and claims have to be defended.
02:26:18 Just like mine have to be defended, yours have to be defended.
02:26:20 Yes.
02:26:21 And that's what we're going to do now.
02:26:22 Yeah.
02:26:22 There you go.
02:26:23 You want to get into it?
02:26:24 Okay, so these are multiple.
02:26:25 There's also one where he's looking up more towards the camera.
02:26:27 It's not very clear.
02:26:28 Let's see.
02:26:29 No, it's not very clear.
02:26:30 And the conspiracies that have been conjectured by Candace Owens in regards to this case.
02:26:34 There goes the security camera industry.
02:26:36 Let's take a three and a half minute break.
02:26:37 None of them count.
02:26:39 All right, you guys, you have probably seen all the bots.
02:26:41 All right, do we want to bring in George, or do we want to bring in Gerald?
02:26:47 We got Gerald on the next commercial break.
02:26:49 Yeah.
02:26:50 So let's bring in George.
02:26:50 Let's bring in George if he is able to come on in, George the Greek, and give us some legal advice here.
02:26:56 Hold on. 0.60
02:26:56 I'm going to go with that one from Mike. 0.60
02:26:59 George, come on in, George.
02:27:00 George, don't be shy.
02:27:03 Come on in, Georgie.
02:27:04 There he is.
02:27:08 Okay, George.
02:27:09 I have some questions for you.
02:27:12 Because, again, this is kind of the problem with what George, other chair.
02:27:15 Other chair.
02:27:16 Other chair.
02:27:17 You're my lawyer?
02:27:19 I'm going to lose everything.
02:27:21 So, a couple of things.
02:27:23 First off, the idea that they would never pave over a crime scene at all long after, you know, weeks.
02:27:30 After the crime scene.
02:27:31 Is there a precedent for that taking place?
02:27:33 Yeah.
02:27:34 I mean, if they're done with it, they're done with it.
02:27:37 Your analogy with JFK was pretty funny.
02:27:39 Yeah.
02:27:39 Oh, yeah.
02:27:39 It's true.
02:27:39 I mean, by the way, I went down, laid down in the middle of that ex, and it was considered horribly distasteful, and I got a lot of people honking.
02:27:45 They tried to run me over.
02:27:45 This was, of course, decades later.
02:27:47 A crucifix going back to the wife, for example.
02:27:49 Is there precedent for that happening? 0.79
02:27:51 Absolutely.
02:27:52 If they decided it's not evidence, they don't need it, they'll absolutely return it to you.
02:27:57 No reason not to.
02:27:58 Can you think of any evidence, any way that that crucifix could be considered evidence?
02:28:02 Potentially, I mean, a detective could determine whatever it is, but the idea that they've looked at it, they examined it, and they're done with it, sure.
02:28:08 They determine it's not evidence.
02:28:10 I'm sorry?
02:28:10 They determine it's not evidence.
02:28:12 Yeah, they'll give it back.
02:28:13 They won't hold on to it forever.
02:28:14 Or, like a vehicle used, for example, not in a crime, but a vehicle used to transport a victim to a hospital isn't necessarily in evidence forever.
02:28:21 There's precedent for that going back to the owner of the vehicle.
02:28:23 Absolutely.
02:28:24 I may be wrong about this, but they may have auctioned off Renee Goods truck already.
02:28:30 Yeah. 0.99
02:28:32 Okay, explain to us what she is trying to paint here where preliminary hearing versus the actual trial.
02:28:38 Because that's a very important distinction, right?
02:28:39 He was trying to say, well, this is what's being presented.
02:28:42 For example, reasonable hearsay.
02:28:44 Explain to us what a preliminary hearing is, what it's designed to do, what prosecutors wouldn't do, what defenses maybe would do in contrast to a trial.
02:28:52 Right.
02:28:52 So Candace basically got it exactly backwards.
02:28:55 Okay.
02:28:56 So she's arguing, like, where's the smoking gun?
02:28:58 Where is it?
02:28:59 You're not going to try the whole case right now in a preliminary hearing.
02:29:03 The way Utah works right now is they do this.
02:29:05 And by the way, I think the defense really wanted this behind closed doors for obvious reasons, but the judge said this is going to be a public hearing, is to determine is there enough probable cause to take this thing to trial?
02:29:15 Should we even waste our time with a trial?
02:29:17 Now, considering the way this case has unfolded, it may seem redundant or ridiculous or unnecessary, but procedure is procedure.
02:29:23 It's called due process.
02:29:24 This is due process.
02:29:26 And this is where it may sound a little ridiculous, but the point is the prosecution needs to show hey, we have enough reason to go to trial.
02:29:33 They're not going to give you every single piece of detail, they're not going to bring every witness.
02:29:37 They're going to give just as much as they need to overcome this very low hurdle, get this thing now in front of a jury, and that's when they're going to come out with every single little detail.
02:29:48 And a part of that, by the way, would.
02:29:50 It would play directly into what Candace was saying.
02:29:52 They would present as little as they need to because they have to present that to the defense and they don't want to tip their hand with the defense, right?
02:29:57 And as we saw, everything they presented was given to the defense, which she claimed had not been.
02:30:02 Right.
02:30:03 There is no secrets.
02:30:04 It's discovery.
02:30:05 You have to share these things.
02:30:07 There's no surprises.
02:30:08 But at the same time, it's not, I'm going to show you every little thing.
02:30:11 Right.
02:30:12 Before trial, obviously, and during trial, the defense is going to get to impeach the prosecution's witnesses, question their credibility, question where they got all of this.
02:30:20 We're not there yet.
02:30:21 Yeah.
02:30:22 We're not doing this right now. 0.99
02:30:24 And she's exploiting this idea that the prosecution is holding some back or not making their case in the most detail to go see it's a weak case.
02:30:32 I want to see the smoking gun now.
02:30:34 You may want to see the smoking gun now, but they're waiting for the 12 jurors to give them every little piece of detail.
02:30:39 That is something she's exploiting to go, well, if they're not showing it now, they must not have anything or they're concocting something.
02:30:46 It's just she got it exactly backwards.
02:30:49 It's entirely the court of public opinion before that, and then people speculate more, but that's the whole thing.
02:30:53 You don't want to tip your hand.
02:30:56 It'd be like going around hockey where you warm up on your side of the ice and you show your best plays right there.
02:31:01 You go right through, like, no, no, you want them to see you warming up.
02:31:04 See, you want to intimidate them a little bit, let them know that you got something, and then you move on.
02:31:08 For example, I mean, I don't think at the preliminary hearing, I don't think that's where the OJ defense presented Furman saying the N word.
02:31:15 No.
02:31:15 That's what they call the bombshell.
02:31:17 That's exactly right.
02:31:18 I mean, that's a perfect example right there.
02:31:20 And this idea that this means something is just out of control.
02:31:26 I mean, you know, it's unfortunate, but that's where we are.
02:31:29 But at least our audience is getting the clarity that they should be.
02:31:32 Yeah, I think if nothing else, this does help provide clarity.
02:31:34 What would you like to see more of here as we continue on this debate?
02:31:37 Because hopefully we get to the point where we ask her on her specific theories.
02:31:40 I'm hoping Andrew gets to do that.
02:31:41 Like the French 13th Legion, or Foreign Legion, sorry, the Egyptian planes, Erica Kirk obviously taking part in the assassination, the Utah Communist Mormon cult. 0.97
02:31:52 Yeah, this is going to be the fun part. 0.87
02:31:53 And again, this kind of speaks to the MO.
02:31:56 Let's find some circumstantial evidence.
02:31:58 Let's find some, you know, Charlie Day, always sunny Philadelphia meme.
02:32:02 Let's make the connection.
02:32:03 And then tell a fun story, guys.
02:32:04 Conspiracies are fun.
02:32:06 Right.
02:32:06 We like them.
02:32:07 They're fun.
02:32:08 We like to play with them and all that.
02:32:09 But that's what this is.
02:32:11 Gerald said that Andrew is going to get to that.
02:32:13 He is getting to that.
02:32:15 Well, that's a very good analogy.
02:32:16 It's a very good analogy, too, to bring up Charlie Day because, as I understand it, you are one of the top 10 bird lawyers in the state of Texas.
02:32:23 Bird law.
02:32:23 Bird law.
02:32:24 They're ready for a bird bat. 0.99
02:32:25 So we are in good hands.
02:32:27 All right.
02:32:28 Less than anything else. 1.00
02:32:28 Thank you, George the Greek. 1.00
02:32:29 And I'm proud that you're at your post doing the fact checking.
02:32:32 We have to.
02:32:33 Do I have to mention something here?
02:32:34 The.
02:32:36 What did I got to mention?
02:32:36 Yeah, Rumble Wallet.
02:32:38 Yeah, Rumble Wallet.
02:32:39 You got to manage your crypto in one place, secure your finances, and get $5 in U.S. stable coin.
02:32:44 Okay, there you go.
02:32:45 Time promo.
02:32:46 Link in the description.
02:32:47 Yeah, link in the description.
02:32:48 Link in the description, and make sure you use Crowder5.
02:32:50 That's a code Crowder5.
02:32:53 And we did miss the Tax Network USA because here's the thing we don't have any crowdfunding and we don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions from foreign investors.
02:32:59 Do you have the Tax Network USA plug?
02:33:01 Because we had to cut that Al Capone commercial short.
02:33:03 There you go.
02:33:03 TNUSA.com slash Crowder or you call 1 866 686 1417.
02:33:09 Don't do your taxes on your own because, um, You know, you can get raped. 0.99
02:33:15 It's true. 0.99
02:33:16 That's true. 0.93
02:33:16 Sodomized. 0.93
02:33:17 It's all hearsay.
02:33:18 Extreme facts.
02:33:19 Sodomized without mercy.
02:33:21 Where's the evidence?
02:33:23 Found it.
02:33:25 Did we get that number on fact checks?
02:33:26 They only presented one, and it seems like the neutraler Andrew, there's got to be at least, what, eight, nine, ten?
02:33:33 Nothing like that.
02:33:34 I asked Gerald, he didn't have a count, but he said every single fact check, except for the one little reply tweet, has gone Andrew's way.
02:33:43 Do we want to take some chat from the audience?
02:33:44 I guess that might be a good idea to see what they're saying.
02:33:46 Sure.
02:33:47 And do you want to take some as a lawyer?
02:33:48 And then I want you, I need you to go back to your post because I'm flying blind.
02:33:51 But you can take a couple of chats as a lawyer.
02:33:52 You might be able to help me with this because I'm not one.
02:33:54 All right, noodles.
02:33:55 All right, first chat from Rumble Foreskin.
02:33:58 Regardless of the debate outcome, do you think merely having popular independent voices address this will further diminish legacy media or force to cover something besides propaganda?
02:34:09 I mean, I don't know because we've moved past the point where people buy what legacy media sells.
02:34:12 I mean, you saw that with Ivermectin, what they did to Joe Rogan.
02:34:14 You saw that with COVID.
02:34:16 I mean, you saw that with the 2020 election.
02:34:18 You even saw that with the polling, honestly, the 2016 election, to be clear.
02:34:22 This is more so about, I think we moved on to another phase.
02:34:25 Great.
02:34:25 Legacy media is irrelevant.
02:34:27 Not irrelevant, but legacy media doesn't hold a candle to new media.
02:34:30 And now it's about the direction of online media, new media going forward, if we want to be better than legacy media.
02:34:38 Because legacy media turned into a cesspool of propaganda and nothing but inferences and bias.
02:34:43 And new media, by the way, everyone has bias.
02:34:45 I always say just be honest about it.
02:34:47 But does new media want to be better or does new media want to be baseless conspiracies?
02:34:51 Does new media want to be?
02:34:52 TMZ, tabloid, entertainment tonight, smut?
02:34:56 Or do we want to have these conversations and actually have the capabilities of being more productive?
02:35:01 So I think we've crossed that bridge.
02:35:03 Legacy media, smaller, the big contracts are going to new media.
02:35:07 And now it's about determining hey, what do we want new media to be?
02:35:10 And I think that you see a big divide.
02:35:11 People like myself, people who've been around for a very long time, most of them are gone.
02:35:15 They've thrown their hands up because they find it very frustrating.
02:35:18 There was an era where clickbait wasn't a thing.
02:35:19 You had to create really good content where the most important portion of the algorithm was most commented or most liked by individual people.
02:35:25 That was YouTube.
02:35:27 When that changed, a lot of those people are gone.
02:35:29 Now, some of those people are still around saying, like, hey, we started this to bypass the dishonesty of legacy media.
02:35:36 We can't just be acting as dishonestly.
02:35:39 And the newer people, and I would say people who've come in, really, my cutoff would be, I don't know, maybe 2018 after, even though I've been here since 2009.
02:35:47 But I'd say 2018, 2020 after, for sure, is where you see a lot of people who've come in and just go, just asking questions or click, bait.
02:35:55 Things like Epstein Binder Gate, things like we're seeing right now with, with, The Charlie Kirk conspiracies, where, by the way, there are some legitimate questions and there's a lot of bull crap out there that makes absolutely no sense.
02:36:06 So I think this will help determine the future of the media that is going to be most relevant because that's not legacy media.
02:36:14 And I really hope that it fulfills its original purpose, which is why I started doing it.
02:36:20 Right now, it looks like it could go either way.
02:36:23 Next chat.
02:36:24 All right.
02:36:24 Next chat from that fine fellow How can she be 0% sure about something if she admits she doesn't know some things for sure?
02:36:31 How can you be completely sure about something you aren't sure about?
02:36:34 Oh, you just blew my mind.
02:36:37 Fine fellow, mind blown.
02:36:39 No, that's the thing.
02:36:40 If people are watching this, I think it's important.
02:36:43 She says there is a 0% chance that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
02:36:47 I believe that was the question.
02:36:49 Andrew said 75 to 85, I think, George, something like that.
02:36:52 Yeah. 0.64
02:36:53 One, I think, is a pretty reasonable approach.
02:36:56 One tells me that nothing else matters.
02:37:00 No evidence matters.
02:37:01 And I get this a lot of times.
02:37:01 I go, How often have you changed my mind?
02:37:03 Very rarely.
02:37:04 0% makes me think that you're unwilling to hear the evidence, you know.
02:37:09 Contradicting your opinion.
02:37:10 Yes.
02:37:10 Like you're not even willing to hear it out.
02:37:12 I'm zero percent convinced there's nothing you can do, nothing you could say.
02:37:16 Right.
02:37:17 I'm going to go look at every other avenue that could possibly be the truth.
02:37:21 Right.
02:37:21 Yeah, you're absolutely right.
02:37:22 Like when people go, hey, how convinced are you during COVID that the COVID death count is inflated?
02:37:28 Well, 100%.
02:37:29 Okay, it's inflated.
02:37:30 Yeah, because you saw someone who died from a motorcycle crash and they listed that as COVID.
02:37:33 A gunshot wound and tacoma.
02:37:34 Yeah.
02:37:35 But if they say, now by what percentage, if someone were to tell you the COVID death count was actually inflated by 300%, How much do you believe that?
02:37:44 I sound like Patrick Bett David.
02:37:44 I would say, I don't know, 50 50.
02:37:47 Because I don't know if it's been increased by that much, if it's been exaggerated by that much.
02:37:51 I believe it's been exaggerated by that much.
02:37:53 I don't know.
02:37:54 I'd have to make an inference with incomplete data.
02:37:57 When people say, there's one that I could say, how much do you believe that terminating a pregnancy at 34 weeks, which is allowed in Massachusetts, is the ending of a human life?
02:38:06 100%.
02:38:07 100%. 0.96
02:38:10 How much would you say that all women know that they're actively terminating a life? 1.00
02:38:15 I would say, all women, 0%. 0.97
02:38:17 I know all women don't know. 1.00
02:38:18 Most women, I'd say 60, 70%. 1.00
02:38:21 You're right, you're putting a number on it that's reasonable. 0.95
02:38:23 That's what changed my mind, and we do this all the time.
02:38:24 We play percentage games.
02:38:26 His was a reasonable position, hers was, you would say, ideological, hers was dogmatic.
02:38:33 0% is religious level confidence.
02:38:37 0%.
02:38:37 You ask someone, hey, how sure are you that if you commit jihad, you will get 70 plus virgins in heaven?
02:38:44 100%. 0.60
02:38:46 Never a doubt in my mind.
02:38:47 As sure as you and me.
02:38:49 Not even.
02:38:49 And her.
02:38:50 Shut up. 1.00
02:38:50 Not even when you're putting the vest on? 1.00
02:38:52 Right, yeah.
02:38:53 100%.
02:38:53 That's dogmatic.
02:38:54 You don't really see it anywhere outside of dogmatic, really sort of religiosity that demands that.
02:39:00 Honestly, in nothing else outside of faith of the Father could I give you a 100% or a 0%?
02:39:06 Nothing.
02:39:07 Certainly not Tyler Robinson.
02:39:09 I'd probably give you about an 80% chance Tyler Robinson did it.
02:39:13 That he acted alone?
02:39:14 I'd give you 50.
02:39:18 That there's more to the story?
02:39:19 I'd give you a 90% chance there's more to the story than we know because we haven't been to the trial.
02:39:24 Is that more reasonable than 0% he did it? 1.00
02:39:27 Mormon communist gays. 0.99
02:39:30 That's what this debate should actually be about. 0.99
02:39:33 Yeah.
02:39:35 Just a side note if I was the prosecution and we're behind closed doors evaluating how strong our case is and I said 80% chance, I'm pretty sure the lead DA would go, You got work to do.
02:39:44 You've up that number.
02:39:45 You know what I mean?
02:39:46 So Andrew's being very.
02:39:48 Cordial, I think he's being very honest about this.
02:39:50 Me too.
02:39:50 So, all right, listen, I need you back at your legal post.
02:39:52 I appreciate it, George the Greek.
02:39:54 We are back here with act number three.
02:39:56 I have a bunch of questions for you, and I want to make it super painless, right? 1.00
02:40:01 So, no traps, no gotchas.
02:40:04 I'm just going to ask them direct.
02:40:05 And I think that as long as they're not loaded, you should not be spoiling this, you know.
02:40:10 But as long as they're not loaded, if I just directly ask them, I'm hoping that you're just giving me a direct answer.
02:40:16 So, here's the questions that I have.
02:40:18 Wait, wait, before we get into that, I would like to just reply to that.
02:40:21 So, just to be clear, we agreed to debate our claims, and then I agreed publicly that I have no issues having a conversation with you about other things that I've discussed that were outside of the court hearing and things like other evidence that's come across our lap and things that we've been speaking about.
02:40:36 But I just do want to make it clear to viewers that for whatever reason, you think that you have a right to sort of depose me.
02:40:44 I'm not deposing you.
02:40:45 I just want to ask you.
02:40:45 But you literally said that I want to be able to question you.
02:40:48 This is a meta conversation.
02:40:50 Right, but okay, so now we're transcending claims, victim status, no need.
02:40:54 That's a drink, that's a drink.
02:40:56 But this is what you're doing, right?
02:40:58 So, this part to me feels like a bit of a.
02:41:00 Am I allowed to ask the questions?
02:41:02 I've already said you can ask questions, but I made it very clear to you via email and with you in conversation that we should be speaking.
02:41:11 This isn't like you're going to sit in.
02:41:13 I want to ask questions.
02:41:14 I'm just going to ask questions.
02:41:16 Can you answer it?
02:41:18 Blah, blah, blah.
02:41:20 It's like, I don't know what you're going to ask, and I'm going to answer as I understand it.
02:41:25 I'm not.
02:41:25 I get it.
02:41:26 Oh, this is why she doesn't understand what a trial is.
02:41:29 Yeah.
02:41:29 I'm just trying to say I'm Joe Rogan.
02:41:31 They have no evidence.
02:41:32 They have no evidence.
02:41:32 And now you're like, let's move away from the evidence.
02:41:34 Let's talk about transcendentalism.
02:41:35 Yeah, okay.
02:41:36 Anyway, so we got a new buzzword.
02:41:38 Super easy.
02:41:38 Was Lance Twiggs' DNA in the rifle, as far as you know?
02:41:42 We can't say that for certain.
02:41:43 As far as you know.
02:41:44 I already answered that in the first part.
02:41:46 We can't say that for certainty.
02:41:47 I told you the context of which they spoke about those things.
02:41:50 So, no, as far as you know.
02:41:51 We can't say that for certainty until we know what other five sets of prints were on the table.
02:41:55 So that would be no as far as we know.
02:41:56 Fact check, no.
02:41:57 Take a position.
02:41:57 We can't say that for certainty.
02:41:58 You can say no as far as they know for certain.
02:42:01 Uh, We can't say that for certainty.
02:42:03 I actually can't say that for certainty.
02:42:05 She's certain Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Cook, but she's not certain that the forensic examination showed there was no DNA of Twiggs on that gun.
02:42:14 By the way, you can bring it up.
02:42:14 We fact checked that earlier.
02:42:15 We're not debating anymore.
02:42:16 We're having a conversation.
02:42:17 So I already addressed that in the first half of this about why.
02:42:20 No, we're still definitely debating.
02:42:22 This is still.
02:42:23 No, it's not a debate.
02:42:24 This is not a claim to you.
02:42:26 This is not a claim to you.
02:42:28 I actually already addressed this.
02:42:30 You asked me.
02:42:31 You're not going to go like where you're sitting and I'm on trial.
02:42:34 I'm not on trial.
02:42:36 Okay, great.
02:42:38 So.
02:42:38 Let's talk about the Foreign Legion.
02:42:40 Sure.
02:42:41 Was the Foreign Legion, do you believe, trying to kill you? 0.90
02:42:44 Yes, that's why I reported it to the correct officials in government.
02:42:48 That's what I was told, and I handed over that information to Tulsi Gabbard's office.
02:42:52 What's your best piece of evidence for that?
02:42:54 Well, it was positive evidence.
02:42:58 It was told to me by somebody who is high up in the French government.
02:43:02 I passed off that information to Tulsi Gabbard's office.
02:43:05 I also passed it off to Trump's office.
02:43:07 Donald Trump's office.
02:43:07 Not unreliable hearsay.
02:43:09 That's all I can tell you.
02:43:10 I wouldn't be able to probe any evidence because I don't have the power to do that.
02:43:12 I'm not the federal government.
02:43:14 And I would also like to say that this becomes this other piece of what you do.
02:43:17 Let me prove to you.
02:43:18 Because what people say.
02:43:19 We said to you there were engravings on the bullets of Tyler Robinson's gun.
02:43:24 Anti fascist were one of them. 1.00
02:43:26 Duck you, sucker. 1.00
02:43:27 Or catch fascist. 1.00
02:43:29 And some weird trans gaming thing, OWO stuff, stares at Bulge. 0.66
02:43:33 Okay? 0.99
02:43:34 We made that.
02:43:34 And then we were able to prove it to you because that was an evidence.
02:43:36 See how that happens?
02:43:37 You make the claim, then the inference is confirmed. 0.85
02:43:40 She made the claim.
02:43:41 Never confirmed.
02:43:41 She's going after him.
02:43:43 Never miss the screen unseen.
02:43:44 Very, very excited.
02:43:45 I have no idea what I'm going to walk into.
02:43:47 Yeah, I thought you guys fixed it.
02:43:48 Got it.
02:43:49 I just want to make sure I got it correct.
02:43:52 And that's why I say I want to know what you're doing now because this has always been the thing.
02:43:56 It's like we actually can't win on the overwhelming claim.
02:43:58 So we're just going to go and bring up everything that I think can try to embarrass her.
02:44:02 I reported exactly what you're doing.
02:44:03 Your own claims that you made definitively and destroyed lives and put people in the crosshairs figuratively.
02:44:08 Yeah, go ahead.
02:44:08 Defend it.
02:44:08 You have stated multiple times that you believe that Israel's involved in the death of Charlie Kirk.
02:44:13 Can you give me the context?
02:44:14 Yes, we can pull up the clip.
02:44:16 I'm sorry, I'm just saying.
02:44:18 Can I finish the sentence?
02:44:18 Go ahead.
02:44:19 Can you give me the context for what you're talking about?
02:44:23 Like when I say, generally speaking, my people think that Israel's involved?
02:44:26 No, you said so.
02:44:27 Where's your question?
02:44:28 Yeah.
02:44:28 Do you have any positive evidence whatsoever that Israel killed Charlie Kirk?
02:44:32 Well, I couldn't say Israel was on the ground and shot and killed Charlie Kirk.
02:44:36 I would say that there are various things that we're trying to establish, one being a motive.
02:44:40 And since I don't believe that Tyler Robinson and his transfer is a convincing motive.
02:44:47 Okay, extreme fact check, mission control.
02:44:48 We have so many of the Israel clips. 0.95
02:44:50 Get the best one to Gerald.
02:44:52 Okay.
02:44:52 Nor do I believe that he was so into LGBTQ issues, since Lance testified they never spoke about LGBTQ issues, that he stopped and ate at Chick fil A, which, if you are into LGBTQ issues, wouldn't be your lunch.
02:45:05 Lance the boyfriend?
02:45:07 No gays ever eat at Chick fil A. 1.00
02:45:12 Oh, my God. 0.97
02:45:13 Back check false.
02:45:14 Like I said, you don't get two for an hour and a half peppermint.
02:45:16 But the question I'm asking is about positive evidence.
02:45:17 I'm telling you that in any case, establishing a motive, and again, I already.
02:45:23 Explain this at the top of the show, but the reason why people find Israel to be an interesting question is because truthfully, Charlie's perspectives were so just to be clear.
02:45:32 She said that he was starting to realize that they never discussed it was being put on not just our government, sure.
02:45:37 Lance Twiggs and Tyler Robinson never discussed LGBTQ issues. 0.96
02:45:41 They were just fucking people had come out and been honest about that. 0.94
02:45:45 Yeah, talk about it, just do it. 0.98
02:45:47 Claiming he never roommates dating, but everybody's lying and this is not true.
02:45:52 You would probably have people that just go, eh.
02:45:54 That's life.
02:45:55 People change their opinions.
02:45:56 I understand.
02:45:56 And then there was the rabbit.
02:45:58 I mean, not even that. 0.58
02:45:58 Everything was about trying to convince the public how much he liked Israel. 0.58
02:46:01 So then, other than intuition, how you feel about things, do you have any evidence Israel was involved in killing Charlie Kirk? 0.72
02:46:07 I have already said, and if you're watching my show and the context of what I said, this is the general sense of why people think Israel's in power.
02:46:14 No, how about why right now? 0.86
02:46:15 You have made the claim right now.
02:46:16 Is there any evidence?
02:46:18 This is important, guys.
02:46:19 Hey, everyone out there, she's your champion.
02:46:22 Who I think would have the right to assert it.
02:46:25 Noted that there were 12 Israeli cell phones on the ground that day.
02:46:28 I think most people would like to probe that.
02:46:30 Now, it could be maybe they were students, you know, and they were Israeli students in Utah that day.
02:46:36 But we'd like to probe that narrative because what we've seen after coming from the Israeli government, the Israeli prime minister kind of denying that he did it, which wasn't really necessary, was quite busy.
02:46:46 The phone call that happened, which no one wants to discuss in the Hamptons the week prior, or not the week prior, I think it was around August 5th or 6th that took place.
02:46:56 And again, The almost desperate lies about Charlie shifting opinion on Israel lead us to believe that there could be an Israeli angle in this.
02:47:05 But we cannot say for certain.
02:47:06 Very clear.
02:47:07 They're never any shifting opinions on Israel. 0.62
02:47:08 Charlie Kirk's opinions shifted on Israeli donors, which, by the way, I absolutely believe is true, is why I decided to never go the 501 route.
02:47:15 Don't like those donors. 0.98
02:47:16 I like positive evidence.
02:47:19 I like to just have a conversation.
02:47:21 Material evidence and other evidence.
02:47:24 What we've said on our show is what we've said, which is we.
02:47:27 This feels conspiracy building.
02:47:31 There's no reason to lie about these things, and yet people are lying.
02:47:35 BB ain't acting right.
02:47:37 The Hamptons thing was weird, and the way they tried to shove the Israel narrative down our throat immediately I mean, the day he died, posting a picture of him with an American and Israeli AI'd photo on the president's feed doesn't feel right.
02:47:50 Do you have any evidence that Erica Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?
02:47:58 Okay.
02:47:59 Bring it up again. 1.00
02:47:59 Bring up the video that we have just really quickly the milk bar video where she said Erica Kirk needs to be dragged into a precinct. 1.00
02:48:07 The amount of evidence that is now piling up against Erica Kirk.
02:48:11 I've seen enough. 1.00
02:48:12 Erica Kirk should be dragged into a police precinct. 1.00
02:48:15 The assassination of Charlie Kirk. 0.99
02:48:16 Okay.
02:48:17 That's enough.
02:48:17 We'll watch Candace, but we have the whole montage.
02:48:19 Link in the description.
02:48:20 She's made it, she's implied it and flat out claimed it many, many, many, many times.
02:48:23 Go.
02:48:23 If you're.
02:48:26 Yes, you said that there's a video you want to play that Candace said she has full confidence Israel was involved?
02:48:33 Yep.
02:48:34 Yeah.
02:48:35 He said evidence like that.
02:48:36 Extreme fact check.
02:48:37 Hit it, guys.
02:48:38 That's coming in from us.
02:48:39 If they have the clip, if they play the clip, they're referring to a clip.
02:48:43 Yeah.
02:48:48 Via whom?
02:48:50 My guess is Pierre, Erica.
02:48:54 I think that there's a reason Pierre knew that Charlie was dead first.
02:48:57 I think there's a reason he was a priority.
02:49:00 How, why, I think France and Israel are involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination. 0.63
02:49:06 And I'm going to put that out there with full confidence. 0.98
02:49:09 Okay.
02:49:09 I also.
02:49:10 I'm sure.
02:49:11 Yeah. 0.95
02:49:12 So you think, with full confidence, you think that France and Israel.
02:49:17 Yeah.
02:49:17 I wasn't the person that gave me that thing that I remember.
02:49:19 Can we play back what she just said there where she did and she just said things aren't right and other people are?
02:49:23 She said.
02:49:24 France, Israel involved. 0.99
02:49:25 I'll put that with full confidence.
02:49:26 She is, maybe at the end of this, we could have her contradicting herself throughout this thing.
02:49:30 Come on.
02:49:30 We just want, we actually want truth, asking questions.
02:49:32 Go ahead.
02:49:33 Let's keep playing.
02:49:34 Can you just stop?
02:49:35 It's actually just like annoying to hear you keep saying positive evidence.
02:49:38 Just ask me what I think, and I'll just tell you, yes, I think they are involved.
02:49:43 I said, here's what I think.
02:49:45 I have every right to ask you about your claim.
02:49:47 Yeah, but if there's positive evidence for your claim.
02:49:49 I literally just said, I think, and I am allowed to think.
02:49:53 Yeah, you're allowed to think.
02:49:54 You have positive evidence.
02:49:55 I have tons of positive.
02:49:57 Evidence that I'm allowed to think.
02:49:58 I agree, you're allowed to think.
02:50:00 Nobody's disputing whether or not Candace Owens is allowed to think.
02:50:04 What I'm asking is, what is your issue with this evidence? 0.96
02:50:06 I think that Israel is involved.
02:50:10 That's not just what you said.
02:50:11 You said that way.
02:50:14 It's with full confidence.
02:50:15 Yes.
02:50:16 You would think that if you had full confidence.
02:50:19 You have to have evidence to think when you think.
02:50:22 But if I said, for example, to work.
02:50:24 Some evidence?
02:50:25 I would say my evidence for that is that.
02:50:27 I'm 20 minutes away and I need to be there in five.
02:50:29 Andrew, Andrew.
02:50:30 That's how you would know whether or not you had full confidence.
02:50:32 Full confidence.
02:50:33 Let me tell you something.
02:50:33 Let me finish.
02:50:34 Let me finish.
02:50:34 You're right.
02:50:35 If it was the case that I said I have full confidence I'm going to be late to work, I would say my evidence that I'm going to be is that work is 20 minutes away, right, and I have to be there in five.
02:50:44 So I have full confidence.
02:50:45 That's why I would think that.
02:50:47 So I'm asking if you think that Israel and France were involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and you say with full confidence, I'm just asking for the evidence.
02:50:55 Pop Sprouder, you got.
02:50:56 Rope a dope.
02:50:57 He's got to get his out there.
02:50:58 He's like, I don't like how this is going.
02:50:59 I was like, Well, I know he has to cross examine later.
02:51:01 Andrew had to.
02:51:02 I can also.
02:51:03 I can do something that I think with full confidence.
02:51:05 I think with full confidence that you know you lost the substance of this debate.
02:51:08 And now you're moving to those items.
02:51:10 Personal attack, Drake.
02:51:11 Which I can do.
02:51:12 I'm allowed to do that.
02:51:14 It's not exactly pertinent to this debate.
02:51:16 It's not pertinent because our debate is.
02:51:18 These are claims made.
02:51:19 Question.
02:51:21 You said with full 100% confidence.
02:51:24 France and Israel are involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
02:51:27 What evidence do you have?
02:51:28 She has not answered.
02:51:29 Can everyone agree on that?
02:51:31 Comment below.
02:51:31 That's a valid question.
02:51:32 She requires a valid answer.
02:51:34 I'm not asking how you're allowed to reply.
02:51:36 I'm just asking you direct questions.
02:51:38 I have full confidence that you do not feel that you represented your claim well. 1.00
02:51:44 And so now what you came to terms with is that you're a feminist. 1.00
02:51:47 Oh my gosh. 1.00
02:51:47 Tell me you're a feminist without telling me you're a feminist. 1.00
02:51:50 You are not allowed to say that. 1.00
02:51:50 You can't. 1.00
02:51:51 I'm saying.
02:51:51 I don't like the way you're questioning it.
02:51:53 Nobody's disputing that.
02:51:54 I'm asking.
02:51:55 It seems like you are disputing it.
02:51:56 I'm asking specifically that.
02:51:57 I'm asking specifically that when this is all said and done, I've already explained to you.
02:51:59 I explained at the beginning of this why I think Israel is. 0.65
02:52:03 Is ultimately going to be proven to have involvement in this.
02:52:06 I just explained it to you in the middle, and now you're wanting me to structure the sentence or provide evidence.
02:52:10 Important because it disconnects with all of the other conspiracies out there where people present evidence that, by the way, Candace isn't willing to or can't remember in order to present.
02:52:18 Because they'll go this detail, this detail, this detail.
02:52:20 She's saying, I don't need to have any detail.
02:52:23 So, if anything else, hey guys, everyone who believes the conspiracies, everyone who believes that this is Fed slot, you need a new champion because she can't answer.
02:52:31 Wouldn't you be able to answer why you think Israel and France?
02:52:33 Comment.
02:52:34 I believe that there are other people out there who could present a better case.
02:52:37 You need a better champion.
02:52:39 Volunteer is tribute.
02:52:40 Every time we come across Any of these discussions, they're watching this in context and they know why I'm saying it.
02:52:45 So, for example, now you're bringing up what Candace, where's your evidence for France doing this?
02:52:51 I just told you someone who was high ranking in the French government, right?
02:52:54 Who's nameless.
02:52:56 Of course.
02:52:56 Of course.
02:52:57 Of course.
02:52:58 Of course.
02:52:58 But I think it's a good reason to be nameless and right or wrong.
02:53:00 But seriously, though, if I then took it to the federal government, like you can't just go out there making a claim to the federal government, you get in trouble for making false statements and things of that nature.
02:53:07 So, and then you go, well, I'm going to probe that.
02:53:09 Well, how can you probe that?
02:53:10 This happens.
02:53:11 Let me ask you this. 0.99
02:53:12 Well, why is her?
02:53:13 Person in the French government valid, and then the entirety of the French government and French Legion not valid.
02:53:18 For example, she said that, you know, Steven Crowder only gets evidence with undercover because he's the Fed.
02:53:23 Because all of our evidence, all of our claims from the undercover units, they've been proven to be valid, by the way.
02:53:29 We saw it with a manifesto.
02:53:30 We actually saw a guilty man taken from his position, Jay Pharma.
02:53:33 We actually saw DOJ charges dropped as a result many, many times.
02:53:37 She says, I have someone in government.
02:53:39 It's like, okay, well, everyone else in government.
02:53:40 Yeah, but they're not, you believe the government?
02:53:42 But you believe someone in government.
02:53:43 The strategy that you're trying to employ.
02:53:46 So let's get to the next clip you have prepared.
02:53:48 Sure.
02:53:49 They can pull up whatever clips they want.
02:53:50 Whatever it is that you guys have prepared.
02:53:52 But I would still.
02:53:53 Oh, God.
02:53:53 God forbid they prepare for debate.
02:53:55 I just want to make sure that you have full confidence that France and Israel were involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. 0.73
02:53:59 I think in the end.
02:54:00 And you have no evidence for it at all that you'll give us.
02:54:02 Well, I already did tell you where it came from.
02:54:06 Like I said, I can explain it to you.
02:54:08 I can't understand what you're trying to explain.
02:54:10 Did that same hierarchy tell you that it came from?
02:54:11 This is the same person who was criticizing the preliminary hearing allowing reliable hearsay, right?
02:54:15 She had someone call her?
02:54:16 Involved and on the ground that day.
02:54:17 I've already said that.
02:54:18 You just don't like hearing it.
02:54:20 No.
02:54:20 Candace, just out of curiosity, when you pass down that message to a Tulsi or Trump.
02:54:25 Tulsi's office, yes.
02:54:26 Tulsi's office.
02:54:27 Are you giving them who told you that?
02:54:31 Or are you just saying, here's what I heard from someone?
02:54:34 And I have this information.
02:54:35 And of course, if they wanted to open a file on it, which I thought was quite mysterious that Trump's office never got back to us, it was kind of weird about like from maybe they're not the correct office to.
02:54:46 I did receive a response from Tulsi Gabbard's office, but I.
02:54:50 I don't think there was ever any investigation into what I said.
02:54:53 Got it.
02:54:53 So the call was, hey, I've been told somebody.
02:54:56 The email.
02:54:57 Yes.
02:54:57 Email was, I've been told somebody.
02:54:59 I have information.
02:55:00 Yeah, that the French Foreign Legion was on the ground during Charlie's assassination.
02:55:07 And that, I mean, it was a lot of information.
02:55:11 But you didn't give specifics who it was from?
02:55:13 Not in the first email because I figured they would like.
02:55:15 Perfect.
02:55:15 So if they do contact you, are you comfortable giving 100% who it is?
02:55:21 I would absolutely give them as much information as possible.
02:55:23 Can I ask a question?
02:55:24 If whoever is the U.S. government, why are you not?
02:55:26 No, I will tell you this you need to keep sources anonymous.
02:55:29 But you need to keep sources.
02:55:30 We practice of keeping sources anonymous when it's confirmed through other means.
02:55:34 So, for example, the National Manifesto was confirmed by the other members of the MNPD.
02:55:39 The engravings that we got from someone who was under the umbrella of the ATF, it was confirmed.
02:55:44 It was denied, by the way, by the left and Candace until it was confirmed through evidence, people who have no vested interest in doing so.
02:55:50 Same thing with stacking charges, DOJ.
02:55:52 Same thing with sex parties, by the way.
02:55:55 We were tipped off with Jay Varma, and then it was confirmed by him.
02:55:57 So we can keep our sources anonymous because we have valid third party confirmation that proves it to you.
02:56:03 If we just say we have an anonymous source and then there's no other form of confirmation, well, it's of no value because there's no way to know if it's true.
02:56:11 Continue.
02:56:11 She doesn't understand journalism.
02:56:12 She emailed, she gave it, and nobody reached out to want to contact the source.
02:56:16 She probably didn't think it was actionable, is my guess.
02:56:19 But even if they did think it was actionable, great.
02:56:22 Every lead should be followed up on within the confines of what's rational and reasonable.
02:56:26 Is it fair to say that this is maybe a different individual because this is a person that was involved with TP?
02:56:32 Well, we don't.
02:56:32 Well, we don't.
02:56:33 She had a relationship with Charlie?
02:56:34 No, no, her relationship with Charlie.
02:56:37 Like, this isn't just anybody.
02:56:38 So, if an average person sends it, yes.
02:56:40 Yeah, but I mean, we don't know who the source is.
02:56:43 We don't know any of this.
02:56:44 Well, then, if it wouldn't you, if you were in that department, wouldn't you want to, even you assign it to one of your guys?
02:56:50 There's no guarantee they didn't look into it.
02:56:52 How do we know?
02:56:53 We don't know how they could if she didn't give it to you.
02:56:55 How could they if she didn't give it to you?
02:56:57 More of the information, more of the information, because it was a long file.
02:57:00 This is a separate, this has got nothing to do with the debate.
02:57:01 This is more on.
02:57:03 Well, I just, I sent the email, assuming that's, you kept saying, like, you go and you make a report, you, if, Think they're going to come back to you and say, Guys, let's move on from this. 0.95
02:57:11 So, Israel, all right, no answer. 0.86
02:57:14 Vibes. 0.97
02:57:15 Okay.
02:57:15 French Legion, one person, she reported, Tulsi Gabbard, didn't hear anything back.
02:57:20 Let's move on down. 0.95
02:57:21 Mormon communists, Utah communists, sorry. 0.86
02:57:24 Thank you.
02:57:25 Dan Bongino and Tulsi Gabbard's office.
02:57:30 Okay, so a follow up to that is the following.
02:57:33 If they contact you to say, is that specifically to the French government?
02:57:38 Israel's involvement in the killing of Chomsky.
02:57:40 That wasn't about Israel.
02:57:41 That was two separate things.
02:57:42 That wasn't about Israel.
02:57:43 They were saying the French Foreign Legion, that person as a part of it, was saying that it was the French Foreign Legion that was on the ground that day.
02:57:48 So I'm surprised.
02:57:48 By the way, she said, here's maybe the reason they didn't.
02:57:50 I believe she said, guys, correct me if I'm wrong, didn't she say 13th Battalion?
02:57:54 Brigade.
02:57:55 Sorry, 13th Brigade.
02:57:57 They don't have brigades.
02:57:59 They have demi brigades, which, by the way, wouldn't actually apply in the same way as a one to one to American stuff.
02:58:03 These are military terms.
02:58:04 And I'm quite familiar with the Gendarmerie.
02:58:05 Gendarmerie, however you say it, because one of my grail guns is.
02:58:10 A Mannerin revolver that they use for like SWAT type scenarios because it doesn't matter if you limp wrist it and you can actually hold a shield, a bulletproof shield, and use these revolvers.
02:58:20 So, the one of the few special forces who use revolvers in urban scenarios, I'm very familiar.
02:58:24 The terms that she used were completely incorrect.
02:58:26 If I would have received an email, I'd say this is a crazy person because she's literally wrong about everything.
02:58:29 Continue.
02:58:30 In terms of any of the hard evidence that's been presented, I think this has been a huge problem that a lot of us have had.
02:58:35 If anyone wants to donate a Mannerin revolver, we can explore anything else that was going on in Charlie's life personally.
02:58:41 So, if we're not satisfied that Tyler Robinson did this in any way, Then every alternative theory should be explored.
02:58:46 Other evidence should be explored.
02:58:47 But you said 0% Tyler Robinson, not satisfied.
02:58:50 100% Israel and France.
02:58:54 Andrew has presented look, Andrew has presented why he's 75% to 85% convinced that Tyler Robinson did it.
02:59:02 You said 0% chance Tyler did it, 100% certainty that Israel and France.
02:59:10 You have not presented a fraction of the evidence, even circumstantial, that has been presented for Tyler Robinson, but you say 0%, 100, and he's at 75.
02:59:19 Present anything, sweetheart.
02:59:21 I get it. 1.00
02:59:21 It's a man's place. 1.00
02:59:23 So, is CNN allowed to have sources? 0.98
02:59:25 Hang on.
02:59:25 I have sources.
02:59:26 If I said, I have sources that claim none of that's true.
02:59:29 In fact, my sources claim that her sources are lying.
02:59:32 My sources claim that there is none of them believe that there's a conspiracy.
02:59:35 My sources claim all of them really think that Tyler Robinson was a lone gunman.
02:59:40 If I just said that as hypothetical, wouldn't you say, what?
02:59:43 Yeah, I think what probably adds weight is like then when I drop photos of the car that no one was supposed to see, people go, okay, her sources are legit.
02:59:50 So, and then when I'm what I say is about your source of the Covenant High School shooting things, people that Audrey Hale was sexually abused.
02:59:56 My sources are legit.
02:59:57 When I say when you tried to refute us, and it turned out you lie the last days, and then I dropped the text message, which you've just learned about a couple of weeks ago of him saying he was leaving the pro Israel cause when everyone was lying about that.
03:00:08 Then they say, I think Candace's sources are legit.
03:00:10 So I think what's happened is I've actually gotten evidence that she presented to.
03:00:15 Well, come on, don't now you make me look bad because you're presenting her strong case. 1.00
03:00:18 Sorry, piece of shit. 1.00
03:00:20 Day released the content of the shooter on the roof doing the lateral crawl. 1.00
03:00:24 My source, then they're going.
03:00:26 I don't think these are just vibes.
03:00:27 It seems like Candace's sources are legit.
03:00:28 So I've proven myself in the market.
03:00:30 You've proven yourself in none.
03:00:31 I'm not sure that that was legitimate.
03:00:32 We've proven ourselves when you tried to claim I was a Fed.
03:00:34 Feds have investigated me, including the ATF subpoena, issuing a subpoena, including the FBI and national.
03:00:38 You were investigated.
03:00:39 You were subpoenaed in none of them.
03:00:40 I think you're a Fed.
03:00:41 Candace is a Fed. 1.00
03:00:44 How would that legitimize?
03:00:46 Seriously, someone, a whistleblower at the ATF saying, I think the Feds might want to bury that this is trans motivated.
03:00:51 And Candace goes, He's a Fed.
03:00:53 Don't believe it.
03:00:54 I don't know. 0.59
03:00:56 Hey, feds may not want us to know, the police may not want us to know that Audrey Hale was trans motivated.
03:01:00 And Candace goes, That's not what it is. 0.99
03:01:02 I think Candace is a fed. 1.00
03:01:02 No joke. 1.00
03:01:03 No joke.
03:01:04 Fed, continue.
03:01:05 So let me just explain what I was answering here.
03:01:07 And I think that you understood what I was saying I have, because people trust me, compiled a lot of information and presented it to the public.
03:01:17 And this information has been proven true.
03:01:20 We've presented photos, we have presented videos, never before seen stuff.
03:01:24 The public has never seen it.
03:01:25 And so, what that does is your audience goes, okay, when she says that she has these sources, clearly she's telling the truth.
03:01:31 Now, whether you would then go, well, I'm going to believe her when she says they don't believe, they think that there's a truth.
03:01:35 Please bring up Egyptian planes, Andrew. 0.83
03:01:36 That's up to you. 1.00
03:01:37 You cannot watch that.
03:01:38 They trust you.
03:01:39 Over 60% completely incorrect.
03:01:40 You cannot watch my content or believe everything I'm saying.
03:01:42 Well, don't you think questioners should get questioned as well?
03:01:48 By whom?
03:01:49 I'm not committing a crime, am I?
03:01:50 By just, like, just reflecting on that.
03:01:51 Well, I mean, aren't most of the people you ask questions of not actually committing crimes?
03:01:54 But what do you mean they should answer questions where?
03:01:56 Like, at a police station?
03:01:57 Like, what are you saying?
03:01:58 You want people to come in and answer questions for you.
03:02:02 I have questions about this in the investigation.
03:02:05 I have questions about this.
03:02:06 I have questions about that.
03:02:07 You want them to answer your questions.
03:02:09 Doesn't it seem totally fair that you answer back the questions people have for you?
03:02:12 Well, they're not answering our questions.
03:02:13 So it's also fair that they don't answer them.
03:02:16 So you're.
03:02:16 Okay.
03:02:16 So I think Mr. Colvet should be in this chair.
03:02:19 He's not.
03:02:20 But isn't that a double standard?
03:02:21 No, it's not because he's not doing it.
03:02:22 Yeah.
03:02:22 But that would still be a double standard.
03:02:25 If you're requesting that he does do it, then that seems to infer that you think he owes you answers.
03:02:29 Oh, so inferences are allowed again?
03:02:31 They never weren't.
03:02:31 So that seems to infer that.
03:02:33 You think that he owes you answers.
03:02:35 If that's the case, then don't you owe answers?
03:02:37 Well, I feel like I'm answering your questions and his questions about.
03:02:41 I mean, I'm talking about.
03:02:42 I feel like that.
03:02:43 It's not true.
03:02:44 His position is he's a spokesperson for Turning Point.
03:02:46 Okay, answers.
03:02:46 Egyptian plans, you were wrong about 66%.
03:02:48 The crowd turns against Turning Point USA on the basis of a lack of information or because there has been a.
03:02:54 Answers, 100% confident, France and Israel.
03:02:56 Zone of distrust. 0.92
03:02:57 I would imagine.
03:02:59 And forget answering my questions because I don't need to be made.
03:03:01 Aren't you sowing a lot of those seeds of distrust?
03:03:03 Well, I think they're doing a pretty good job themselves, if I'm being honest.
03:03:06 You can blame it on Candace all you want.
03:03:08 Well, I'd love to do that.
03:03:09 People act like I'm ground zero.
03:03:11 I'll be fair with you.
03:03:12 How ground zero of people not trusting Turning Point USA.
03:03:15 I think there was some PR there.
03:03:16 I think there was some PR there.
03:03:17 Sure, they could have done better.
03:03:19 Absolutely.
03:03:19 I'm not disputing any of that.
03:03:21 One thing, though, that I am, I want to just directly ask you is do you actually believe that anybody in TPUSA or Erica Kirk or Erica actually participated, had foreknowledge of, or facilitated the murder of Charlie Kirk?
03:03:38 I'm not going to get myself into a legal pickle here.
03:03:41 Oh, my God.
03:03:42 That is on my podcast.
03:03:44 I think I will.
03:03:45 Hey, if you're out there saying it's clear Erica or TPUSA did it, guess what?
03:03:49 Candace won't say it.
03:03:50 I would seat them all. 1.00
03:03:51 So either she doesn't know or she's a coward and you need a better champion.
03:03:55 So all the people out there with YouTube channels, it's done. 0.60
03:03:59 It's done now.
03:04:00 Your theories, she won't back up because she says she won't get an illegal pickle. 0.99
03:04:03 She doesn't have the courage that you do on your ex profile or Instagram or YouTube channel with 50,000 subscribers. 1.00
03:04:08 She won't do it.
03:04:09 She won't do it.
03:04:10 You need someone better.
03:04:11 And the fact that that was never considered, like I said earlier, the backpack was returned.
03:04:16 How do you know that was never considered?
03:04:18 You don't know what the decision was.
03:04:19 Back the backpack as just one example.
03:04:22 Well, that was considered.
03:04:23 Did they give us any information on that backpack noodles?
03:04:25 That doesn't show a conspiracy.
03:04:28 Well, I mean, it shows that the police trusted everybody and didn't just hold things up for a second.
03:04:32 And that they ruled them out as suspects.
03:04:35 That quickly, I'm not comfortable with that investigation.
03:04:37 It's a pretty big organization.
03:04:38 There's a $100 million incentive.
03:04:40 People, this is.
03:04:41 What $100 million incentive?
03:04:42 What I'm saying is his organization, like it had grown to, I think it was $100 million.
03:04:46 Yeah, so they decided to kill their boss.
03:04:49 Who did it all? 0.83
03:04:51 That makes sense.
03:04:54 Candace said it's impossible to not believe Erica's complicit.
03:04:58 If you guys want to play that video, here's our extreme facts.
03:05:01 And so, right now, their guys are going out and they're going to look for evidence.
03:05:04 And then by May, which is fortunately around the corner, then she'll see what they found.
03:05:10 So, what the F is that performance?
03:05:14 How could you sit up there and say, I, yes, I 100% believe Tyler Robinson did it?
03:05:25 Is why it is impossible for me to think that Erica Kirk is not complicit somehow.
03:05:29 Because what?
03:05:31 Those two thoughts actually don't even follow.
03:05:33 How would it be the case that even if Erica Kirk did believe that Tyler Robinson was 100% responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk, let's say she believed it with every fiber of her being.
03:05:43 I know I shouldn't take that to debate me, but she's just kind of dealing with seven different kinds of us right now.
03:05:50 In his death?
03:05:53 I didn't take implicit in death.
03:05:55 You added those two words.
03:05:56 Oh my gosh. 0.99
03:05:57 What's she complicit in?
03:05:58 Yes.
03:05:58 So, sewing this narrative that Tyler Robinson is guilty.
03:06:01 So, you're chopping up clips.
03:06:02 Like I said, you did not have a clip.
03:06:04 Chopping up clips.
03:06:05 No, no, no. 0.94
03:06:05 You said her dragged into a precinct. 0.94
03:06:07 I'm very happy.
03:06:08 For what?
03:06:08 Spilling milk?
03:06:09 That she did that interview.
03:06:11 And Erica, when she is asked, do you feel with 100% certainty that Tyler Robinson did this?
03:06:18 And she says, I do.
03:06:19 Then, again, context matters.
03:06:21 I sit down with Erica for four hours under the assumption that she had some evidence, right?
03:06:26 Like, I'm like, I actually, this is why I did not engage in any, like, Erica, everyone's questioning what she's wearing and all this stuff.
03:06:33 I was like, I'm gonna wait here because I don't know, just it feels weird to think that.
03:06:40 Do I think that some of her mannerisms were weird and stuff like that?
03:06:42 Yeah, but that's you actually did, by the way.
03:06:43 You can bring up the clip where she talks about Erica's stylist.
03:06:46 And then when I sat down with her, I was stylist making her choices.
03:06:49 So she said, she just this is a definition like I didn't talk about her outfits or stuff.
03:06:53 She literally, guys, we can search Erica Kirk stylist Candace Owens.
03:06:58 She made a specific comment, you know, that's why she's being that's why she has that much confidence two months ago.
03:07:03 And when I sat down with her, it was nothing.
03:07:06 It was nothing.
03:07:07 Okay, so this is a conversation.
03:07:08 How would that make her complicit?
03:07:11 Complicit.
03:07:12 And again, you said complicit in the death of Charlie Kirk.
03:07:15 Complicit in what?
03:07:16 Yeah.
03:07:16 Well, if you let me finish my sentence, I could tell you that.
03:07:18 But my point being is that then you take a look at this and you go, okay, well, this is weird.
03:07:22 Why would you have this confidence?
03:07:24 And then when you sit across from somebody and you say, okay, great, I want to go out there and defend you now, I want people to know that you can't say this stuff publicly, but you know.
03:07:33 Behold, the common. 0.99
03:07:34 Get rid of the corkscrew penis duck. 1.00
03:07:38 That's a female, actually. 1.00
03:07:39 This is on my show. 0.98
03:07:39 So, out of context clips is not going to work because I know what I say on my show. 0.98
03:07:42 So we call her lawyer, and her lawyer says to us, she calls him on the phone, pardon me.
03:07:49 And it's me, her, and Justin Strife.
03:07:50 And I'm like, okay, great.
03:07:52 What do you guys have?
03:07:53 He goes, well, we don't have anything yet.
03:07:56 We're not at that phase yet.
03:07:56 And I'm like, well, what do you mean you don't have anything?
03:07:58 And he says, well, don't you know how it works?
03:08:00 It's a probable cause hearing.
03:08:01 So basically, the state says that they're going to bring this forward.
03:08:05 And now our people go out and they look for the evidence to assert that Tyler Robinson is guilty.
03:08:12 And so I asked her directly, her lawyer directly, the phone's in between us.
03:08:16 I'm like, wait, so just so I'm clear, you haven't seen anything that the public hasn't seen?
03:08:22 And he says, no.
03:08:24 So I'm going back in my head and I'm going, okay, so why is Erica saying with such a degree of certainty, like she was sent out to convince the public and people bit, by the way?
03:08:32 I remember even Megyn Kelly was like, you know, let's wait. 0.96
03:08:36 She's going to have access to things. 0.97
03:08:38 I did think she had access to things that we didn't have.
03:08:40 Why express that confidence to the public as opposed to just being like, we don't know yet?
03:08:44 I feel confident he's involved.
03:08:46 They made the rest.
03:08:47 How would any of this make her complicit in what?
03:08:50 Well, I've already told you. 0.98
03:08:51 She's complicit in trying to fool the public into thinking this is some open and shut thing. 0.94
03:08:55 How is she trying to fool the public into this?
03:08:58 If she believes that Tyler Robinson killed Kirk, if she believes that, how would that be complicit in anything?
03:09:08 Are you saying that you think she doesn't believe it?
03:09:11 I don't believe that at that stage, she sat down with Barry Weiss, that that's what she believes.
03:09:14 No, but that's my opinion.
03:09:15 Right.
03:09:15 But so when you just say complicit, you just mean she believes that Tyler Robinson killed Kirk?
03:09:21 That's it?
03:09:22 That's what we were talking about.
03:09:23 That's why I said if your strategy was to dice up clips and take it out of context and make it seem like I said she was complicit.
03:09:29 Yeah, but then why not just play the full story?
03:09:31 Do you believe that Erica Kirk was complicit, had foreknowledge, or was willing to take part in the death or assassination of Charlie Kirk?
03:09:44 No, there's no doctoring anything.
03:09:47 I'm just making sure that we're not doing anything.
03:09:48 We just ran the montage.
03:09:49 We'll run it again.
03:09:50 That's why we led with this many, times.
03:09:54 Backward because I did not have this perspective.
03:09:56 You don't say that Erica Kirk needs to be dragged into a police precinct because she believes Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. 0.92
03:10:02 People thought Erica was sus from day I forgive him. 0.54
03:10:05 And I was not a part of that.
03:10:06 I did not lean into that.
03:10:08 I did not contribute to that.
03:10:09 I was getting actually terrible messages from my fans being like, Candace, you and Charlie always say to go with your intuition.
03:10:16 You won't address this, how we all feel about her.
03:10:19 Things changed for me when I saw that Zoom call.
03:10:21 I will tell you that for sure. 0.91
03:10:24 And the fact that she lied to me.
03:10:25 So I sat across from her and.
03:10:28 You know, got to, I wanted to have that conversation publicly.
03:10:30 What if she lied to you about whatever it was?
03:10:31 I didn't do it publicly.
03:10:34 She told me some lies.
03:10:37 And so.
03:10:37 Which were?
03:10:38 The next thing that happens naturally when somebody lies to you, you go, when any person lies to you, whether it's a toddler, people only lie when they're trying to obscure something else.
03:10:47 Have you addressed what that lie was?
03:10:49 Yeah, I've talked about, we have a list of lies that we've been told by.
03:10:51 We can find that.
03:10:52 And the meeting with her.
03:10:54 Well, no, I didn't want her to cage up.
03:10:56 I didn't want to do this.
03:10:58 Because I didn't know what to expect.
03:10:59 Like, I didn't.
03:11:01 I didn't know if she was going to be like, I'm so overwhelmed with everything, you know, and I don't know who to trust the organization, and I don't know what I'm doing.
03:11:09 Like, I didn't know, I didn't want to.
03:11:10 Just out of curiosity, before anything happened with Charlie, how close were you and Erica?
03:11:16 Not very close.
03:11:17 So there's not a relationship?
03:11:18 No, I mean, like, I would say it's totally normal.
03:11:22 Like, it's not like there was any issues at all.
03:11:25 She was always, we were always nice to each other.
03:11:27 It just is our life went to a different phase, right?
03:11:30 So Charlie and I. Hitting the ground, running around, traveling four days a week.
03:11:34 Now I get married.
03:11:36 I find love in my life.
03:11:37 I get married and I get pregnant.
03:11:38 I haven't stopped being pregnant.
03:11:40 And what you want out of life changes.
03:11:41 You want to be running around.
03:11:43 Yep, that's right. 1.00
03:11:44 Drink pregnant. 1.00
03:11:44 Four days a week and traveling on a plane nonstop. 1.00
03:11:47 You suddenly want to start building at home and live.
03:11:49 I was desiring that suburban life.
03:11:51 Did you guys ever do the double dates?
03:11:53 You, George, her, and Charlie?
03:11:54 Was there ever double dates between the four?
03:11:56 Oh, I was engaged to George quickly.
03:11:59 We were planning our wedding.
03:11:59 I was kind of in my bubble with George.
03:12:01 George traveled with me and Charlie, but Erica and him were just starting to date at the beginning of 2019.
03:12:06 George and I were planning our marriage.
03:12:08 So George really got to know Charlie.
03:12:10 I wouldn't say that I really got to know Erica.
03:12:12 I was just rooting for them because.
03:12:14 I knew how much Charlie wanted to, you know, find love.
03:12:16 And so I was kind of his wingwoman throughout that phase.
03:12:20 And I was just happy.
03:12:21 And I never was under the impression, obviously, that they were going to get married.
03:12:25 We're seeing wingwoman and child.
03:12:26 And they were dating.
03:12:26 So it wasn't like I would have been consciously, I didn't really need to get to know this person.
03:12:29 And so it was just kind of normal that by that time, because of where I was in my life, that I wasn't spending any time getting to know Erica.
03:12:39 So the complicit part about Erica to you, is that a gut feeling?
03:12:43 You think?
03:12:44 Transformed when she lied.
03:12:46 You can take the lead.
03:12:46 I'm just asking questions.
03:12:48 Yeah, I don't.
03:12:49 I actually don't understand what she's, do you think she's complicit in? 0.95
03:12:53 Yeah, so when I say Erica's complicit, and that's my opinion, when you tweeted Erica's too retarded to kill her husband, would you like to explain how you developed your evidence, your positive evidence for the fact that Erica was retarded? 0.94
03:13:09 Yeah, sure. 1.00
03:13:09 So I just think all women are retarded. 1.00
03:13:11 Oh, so you're allowed to just say stuff. 1.00
03:13:13 Who knew?
03:13:14 So, and by the way, and what dramatically transformed your opinion of Erica after going to the headquarters?
03:13:21 Because you were pretty hostile about.
03:13:24 I wasn't hostile towards him.
03:13:25 You don't think calling somebody too retarded is.
03:13:28 No. 1.00
03:13:28 Come on. 1.00
03:13:29 That's like normal tongue in cheek. 1.00
03:13:30 Andrew has called me retarded, faggot, dumbass. 1.00
03:13:34 He's done so with Gerald publicly on the record. 1.00
03:13:37 You got supporters.
03:13:39 I mean, if you want to use the same exact argument, you would take a supporter like Owen Benjamin.
03:13:44 He called you bad names and called your husband bad names.
03:13:49 Are you just like, well, that's no biggie?
03:13:52 I've never answered him on anything that he said.
03:13:55 I'm saying that you now are her biggest defender. 0.97
03:13:58 So do you still think she's too retarded? 1.00
03:14:00 No, no, no, no. 1.00
03:14:01 I didn't know Erica Kirk.
03:14:02 I'd never met her before. 1.00
03:14:04 Okay, but you had an issue with Turning Point being led by a bunch of fembots talking about the feminist movement. 1.00
03:14:11 Oh, still do. 1.00
03:14:11 And then suddenly you go to their headquarters. 1.00
03:14:13 Call it in real time.
03:14:14 You go to their headquarters.
03:14:15 Call it.
03:14:16 I knew Andrew would, of course.
03:14:18 You're sharing with them, you say that you and your wife are getting involved with management.
03:14:23 No, no, no.
03:14:23 I'm not involved in any management at Turnpulling University.
03:14:25 Well, I'm pretty sure there is a clip of you where you saw her about Charlie Kirk and she went to their recent conference and sat down.
03:14:31 And then when you were on Joe Rogan.
03:14:32 No, Hang on.
03:14:33 I'll explain what happened just so that you understand.
03:14:35 Yeah.
03:14:35 So I was invited there to do some debate training.
03:14:38 That's literally what I was invited there to do on recommendation.
03:14:42 So I went down and did some debate.
03:14:44 That's the first time I ever met anybody at TPUSA.
03:14:46 Okay.
03:14:46 And then you said you sat down with Erica.
03:14:49 Well, I didn't sit down to her, I talked to her in a hallway.
03:14:54 So, you didn't sit down and speak with Erica?
03:14:55 No, I didn't have like some sit down long conversation.
03:14:58 We talked in a hallway.
03:14:59 Okay.
03:15:00 Is that when you gave her the hug?
03:15:02 Yeah, gave her the hug right there.
03:15:03 My wife did too.
03:15:04 We were both very sorry for what happened.
03:15:05 Okay, so at what point did you start receiving text messages that you cited in your opening statement?
03:15:13 Oh, I just reached out to TPUSA and said I'm prepping for a debate.
03:15:16 Is there anything that's pertinent that I can use here?
03:15:19 Do you find it interesting that people have been asking for.
03:15:22 You know, basic answers to questions.
03:15:24 And you're saying that you walked into their headquarters and reached out and they.
03:15:28 It's amazing, isn't it?
03:15:29 If you reach out in good faith and you're not demonizing them and saying that they're complicit in the murder of people's deaths, that perhaps they're actually willing to release things to you that are pertinent, other than thinking that, you know, perhaps you're diabolical.
03:15:42 I feel like if I was going to release that information, I didn't demand that it be released to me.
03:15:48 I actually never demanded that it be released.
03:15:49 I just simply said that this is what was going on in the last 48 hours.
03:15:54 Everyone who knows, I have so much inside baseball that I've never talked about, both with TPUSA, the Wilsons, and with people who have worked.
03:16:01 For and with Candace Owens at Daily Wire as well as outside of Daily Wire.
03:16:07 And I have never brought forth information that I wouldn't be able to confirm to you, either through naming the source or being able to confirm to a third party.
03:16:15 So, that's gossip.
03:16:17 That's what that's called.
03:16:18 That's what it's called. 1.00
03:16:18 That's what girls do. 1.00
03:16:19 And TP, there have been some people at TPUSA who have given me information, and they said, well, but this is not public or something that perhaps may be waiting until trial.
03:16:27 I go, okay, great, good to know.
03:16:29 They gave that to Andrew saying, yes, you can use it.
03:16:31 There's a difference.
03:16:32 That's the agreement, and that's how you build trust.
03:16:34 That's why we have sources everywhere, and Candace has not.
03:16:36 That if you're talking about terrible PR, you know that there's a huge debate that's coming up that's going to be probably one of the most viewed that year.
03:16:43 And one of the debaters calls you and says, I'm taking this position.
03:16:46 This is the position that I feel like there's the most evidence for.
03:16:50 And Candace also agreed to answer many of my questions in regards to this.
03:16:54 So if you got pertinent evidence here that I can use, I'd definitely like to take a look.
03:16:58 What is that?
03:16:58 It was actually amazing to me.
03:17:00 It really was actually amazing to me how if you approach people in good faith and just say, Hey, I'd actually like to know what the facts and details are around this.
03:17:08 They actually do talk to you.
03:17:10 It's amazing.
03:17:10 Yeah, I just do not believe, A, that they are doing this in good faith.
03:17:16 I don't believe that anything you have done is demonstrated that's in good faith.
03:17:18 It doesn't mean that you walked into a different place.
03:17:21 It's a perfectly logical fallacy.
03:17:21 Drink.
03:17:22 If you guys are doing day drinking, I'm sorry.
03:17:24 I'm critical of Erica, and now you're sitting here.
03:17:27 No, I'm not.
03:17:29 Next one, give me the lightest beer possible, because I think this is going to go on a while.
03:17:32 You're less critical of them.
03:17:35 And the inverses happened, too.
03:17:36 I was critical about Erica, and now I'm more critical about it.
03:17:38 I'm not saying that's true, but I'm asking you, isn't it?
03:17:40 The case that there's people you've been critical of, and then you've met them, and you're less critical after you meet them. 1.00
03:17:45 Too retarded. 1.00
03:17:46 I feel like if you think that she's dumb, and you let's just talk about your record. 1.00
03:17:50 I mean, you're a person that has spent time and he was supposed to be cross the curtain.
03:17:55 Could someone bring me either my phone or my personal iPad for my office, please, as they bring those things in?
03:18:01 And red pillars.
03:18:02 Okay.
03:18:02 And a lot of the act after you've quote unquote won the debate already.
03:18:05 And you're like soft explaining what you're doing. 0.78
03:18:08 Here's the thing he really does want to ask her about that, but I wish she would go on to the communists, the Mormon communists in Utah.
03:18:14 She wants to make this all a personal.
03:18:15 You said, I said, and I don't like these people, and you're friends with these people, and why are they friends with you? 0.53
03:18:19 This is why, not all women, but Candace is the example of a woman who shouldn't be in this space, who shouldn't be attempting to debate. 0.95
03:18:27 She's not capable of it. 1.00
03:18:27 Not all women. 1.00
03:18:28 One of the most brilliant policy analysts in the world right now is a woman. 1.00
03:18:33 And I forgot her name because she's not hot. 1.00
03:18:37 Well, Candace is just going to talk out the clock. 1.00
03:18:39 I think that's what's going to happen.
03:18:40 He shouldn't let us.
03:18:41 He shouldn't let us.
03:18:43 No, it makes sense why you would go home to your kids, just so you know.
03:18:46 Wait a second.
03:18:46 That's bizarre.
03:18:47 They don't have a parent.
03:18:48 They don't have a parent and they've just suffered a trauma.
03:18:50 You don't go into the office.
03:18:51 You want to protect your husband's legacy.
03:18:54 Right?
03:18:54 And you're trying to find someone whose legacy is his children, not the organization.
03:18:57 I'm out of both, including the water.
03:18:59 So am I.
03:19:00 It is both.
03:19:00 It's totally rational and reasonable to believe that it would be both Turning Point USA that is part of Charlie Kirk's legacy.
03:19:07 He worked his whole life for it.
03:19:08 This is why people think she's sus. 0.99
03:19:09 And his children.
03:19:10 Now, for you, though, to say that anybody's a girl boss, right? 0.91
03:19:14 That's like the pot calling the kettle black. 0.60
03:19:16 That came out of your mouth.
03:19:17 No, that was you. 1.00
03:19:19 You brought up Girl Boss. 1.00
03:19:20 Girl Boss came out of your mouth.
03:19:21 I'm not. 1.00
03:19:22 I'm telling you that you brought up this idea that I'm defending some feminist nonsense.
03:19:26 I'm not. 0.91
03:19:27 I'm not.
03:19:28 I'm pointing out that they're, by the way, she's not qualified to take over his company.
03:19:33 There's always objections to each situation.
03:19:37 Erica Kirk is not qualified, and she's doing the best that she can.
03:19:40 Erica Kirk is like, I'm still just as critical of feminism inside of TPUSA as I've always been, and I'm just as critical of any pro Zionist position as I've ever been.
03:19:50 None of that's ever changed.
03:19:51 By the way, I would think it's the most rational, reasonable thing on planet Earth to do if you wanted to actually see an organization change.
03:20:00 To try to work with leadership or reach out to leadership to try to do so.
03:20:04 Doesn't that make the most amount of sense? 0.99
03:20:05 I would like to state for the record that I think Erica is underqualified to run the organization.
03:20:12 And on the more emotional aspects, I agree with what seems to be a majority opinion, because I'm not going to say it's scientific, that any woman that would leave her kids and go right into the office after their husband was publicly assassinated would be a priority.
03:20:28 I also think that a woman writing the book, and by the way, Inside Baseball, she told Andrew in a private message that she.
03:20:34 Quote, wrote the book on feminism, to which Andrew responded, No, my wife did, the one that people read.
03:20:40 She wrote the book on feminism, Make Him a Sandwich. 1.00
03:20:43 I also think that Candace Owens is unqualified to write that, considering that she lives like a girl boss. 1.00
03:20:48 So I agree with her that Erica Kirk probably shouldn't be in that position. 1.00
03:20:51 I've talked about that.
03:20:52 I also think some grace should be afforded to someone who just went through an incredible trauma.
03:20:55 It doesn't mean that she killed her husband.
03:20:57 Thank you very much.
03:20:57 As it would happen with a pet and explosives, as we've demonstrated to you in the past, it accidentally, because of how Charlie was crouched, Went up and hit his neck.
03:21:09 And that ruined everything.
03:21:12 That ruined everything.
03:21:13 It was problematic.
03:21:14 It's the reason why Terrell then had to scramble to get the cameras down because they were never supposed to see it.
03:21:20 They could have said reasonably that a 30 yacht six got eaten by Charlie, much more reasonably, obviously, than saying that the chicken bones in his neck stopped it because he ate vegetables.
03:21:37 They panicked.
03:21:38 That was what.
03:21:39 Then that's where Terrell was going to be on the phone with me.
03:21:41 Again, this is my theory, and I am now very much sticking to it.
03:21:45 Okay?
03:21:46 They panicked. 1.00
03:21:47 It's the reason Erica had to step out.
03:21:49 Once, that's why she would have gotten on the phone with Terrell so quickly because I was going, why is Terrell saying, well, I didn't want Erica to relive Oba.
03:21:56 That's why I did it.
03:21:56 He didn't have an answer.
03:21:57 He was nervous.
03:21:58 It was crazy.
03:21:59 But he acknowledged that he spoke to Erica immediately.
03:22:02 Why did you speak to Erica immediately?
03:22:05 Do you believe that there was a shape charge that killed Charlie?
03:22:08 Hey, can I ask you why you keep starting clips mid sentence?
03:22:12 Probably to get to where the clip is.
03:22:14 No, it doesn't seem that way because you can always start a clip at the beginning of a sentence.
03:22:17 Like you're just starting, it's completely out of context.
03:22:19 What are we missing, Dan?
03:22:20 I didn't prepare the clips.
03:22:23 I didn't, but it's fine to ask if you found the clip.
03:22:25 I found the clip of her saying that Erica's stylist hates her.
03:22:27 So we're going to combine that with her statement earlier saying, you notice I didn't do what other people did, questioning her outfits and stuff.
03:22:32 Literally a clip of her saying, Erica's stylist hates her.
03:22:35 And she did it many, many times.
03:22:36 I just was able to find one clip.
03:22:37 I made it very clear that this was a theory that I didn't want to look at.
03:22:41 This is, I believe, because I don't have every episode on my head, but I'm pretty sure this is an episode.
03:22:46 Where we presented the evidence that was in the car, the photos of what was in the car, right?
03:22:51 And so we are now inferring off of what we see in the car that this very much does look like that we are.
03:23:01 Can we put up a poll to Mission Control?
03:23:03 Someone confirmed.
03:23:03 Can we put up a poll if anyone is convinced by Candace's evidence or case today?
03:23:08 Not who they think won the debate.
03:23:09 If anyone is convinced by Candace's evidence and case, because she agreed to present that today.
03:23:15 She agreed to the prompt.
03:23:18 That there was overwhelming evidence Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk and is being set up as a patsy.
03:23:25 So, I'm walking them in order for that to have legs, you need to present an alternative that is more likely because she said zero percent.
03:23:33 Right now, she has not presented any, she said that she refuses to.
03:23:36 Let's continue in the hypothetical right here.
03:23:39 Uh, and you're now introducing this if that's the case, if you're just hypothetically exploring it, that's why I'm just asking directly.
03:23:45 Yes, but if you but that's obvious when you watch this episode, so that's why it feels like I'm in the middle of an interview with CNN when they like pull up random clips and they're like, What's this?
03:23:55 What's this?
03:23:56 You watched the episode, you know what it is.
03:23:57 I was just trying to make sure.
03:23:58 Do you think that your alternative theory.
03:24:01 I think John Bray's theory should be explored, yes.
03:24:03 Okay, do you think that Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive?
03:24:07 I think that that is a possibility, yes.
03:24:10 Okay.
03:24:10 And it should be explored.
03:24:11 He's done a lot of work on it.
03:24:13 John Bray has done good work, and I think that that's why that theory is now starting to gain steam since.
03:24:19 Do you notice that all of her private sources are high up in government and the best of the best who she can't name?
03:24:23 I think it's viable.
03:24:24 But the sources who she can name are YouTubers or commenters.
03:24:27 Mm hmm.
03:24:28 What is that theory that's actually compelling to you?
03:24:30 So, I looked into the explosive mic theory multiple times, and the biggest thing that stood out to me is there's no explosion.
03:24:39 There's literally no explosion.
03:24:41 In fact, there's videos where the shot rings out.
03:24:43 Anytime a logical fallacy is used, anytime gold folks are removed, anytime Candace mentions the word, anytime there's a personal attack, Candace mentions Dragon's Secret Minderhood, or Patrick Fett David lands a zinger.
03:24:54 Also, if there was a targeted projectile, explosive like that, it would happen.
03:24:59 To be pointed toward him.
03:25:01 There's four squares on that microphone.
03:25:03 We have former Marines that have gotten on and said, it looks to me like there's an explosion under his shirt, right?
03:25:11 Obviously, it's a shirt.
03:25:12 Never mind.
03:25:14 Rob O'Neill.
03:25:15 Still, same thing.
03:25:16 Go on to, I'm forgetting which platform it was.
03:25:18 Did you realize that Rob O'Neill has been routinely discounted? 1.00
03:25:21 Rob O'Neill has bankrupted companies by associating his name with them because he's so full of shit. 0.97
03:25:26 We should actually, since they're pulling clips, run that clip of Rob O'Neill and what he said and what he observed and his experience. 0.99
03:25:32 Yeah.
03:25:32 So, I'm gonna take that.
03:25:34 And also, there were people immediately spoke to the style.
03:25:39 It's a person who's got rid of that.
03:25:44 Why is it like somebody shot him from underneath?
03:25:46 Why is his shirt moving first?
03:25:47 It doesn't make sense to me.
03:25:49 And I'm not.
03:25:50 That's because of air dispersal from the bullet.
03:25:53 So, whenever a bullet is shot, a projectile shot, you can actually run this experiment yourself if you have a rifle.
03:25:59 Take an empty box of ammunition and put it on the table.
03:26:03 And then fire it near the muzzle, and that box will actually blow off the table.
03:26:07 Okay, so question for you Does that box go sideways off the table?
03:26:12 It can.
03:26:13 It can?
03:26:13 Yeah, you can.
03:26:14 It depends on the dispersal.
03:26:15 It gives you 3,000 pounds of energy or 2,000 pounds of energy coming at you.
03:26:20 That's how much it carries.
03:26:20 Well, 30,000 pounds of energy.
03:26:22 Well, we can fact check that.
03:26:24 How many pounds of energy is it?
03:26:26 A 30-odd six.
03:26:27 Yeah, a 30-odd six.
03:26:28 Let's take a 30-odd six at 150 yards, I believe, was the shot.
03:26:33 There's very different muzzle energy at the barrel versus that point.
03:26:37 Someone's going to fact check Andrew and say, well, that's just the, that's if you have the muzzle right next to a box.
03:26:41 He's, that's not what he's talking about.
03:26:43 He should have said if you take steps back from the box, just to be fair.
03:26:47 But I also want to say that you're saying this can happen, and Rob O'Neill is infinitely more qualified, I think, to speak on that.
03:26:53 Why?
03:26:54 And, well, because he's actually shot and killed people.
03:26:57 Why would that have anything to do with it?
03:26:59 Well, because.
03:27:00 So have I. Hey, I'm not an expert.
03:27:02 Shut up. 1.00
03:27:03 Josh, have you shot and killed people? 1.00
03:27:04 I'm not answering that question, actually.
03:27:06 You just said, no, I didn't say anything.
03:27:09 Okay. 0.97
03:27:10 Let's assume that you shot and killed people. 1.00
03:27:11 You're much better with a rifle. 0.98
03:27:12 Let me ask you this Who's better with a semi automatic handgun at range?
03:27:15 Near you.
03:27:16 Does that mean that I'm more qualified?
03:27:18 No, it means that I've had more practice with it.
03:27:20 And you are routinely better with a rifle.
03:27:23 Also, it was the first time with that gun.
03:27:25 I've slung a lot of lead, but that doesn't mean I understand everything about, you know, and you understand things that I don't.
03:27:31 Yeah.
03:27:32 Can we both agree?
03:27:33 Andrew, an armorer, understands more about guns than either of us.
03:27:36 Yeah, absolutely.
03:27:37 Dude, you should see his house.
03:27:40 The guns he has and the work he's done on them.
03:27:43 I'm like, are you sure you should customize it this much?
03:27:46 Are you still going to work?
03:27:47 He's like, oh, yeah.
03:27:48 I got some zip ties.
03:27:50 I wouldn't trust you.
03:27:50 This big, and you're telling me it's going to hit his neck, and it's not underneath his shirt.
03:27:55 It starts up here, and the Collar's moving, and then you see the wave here as he's moving backwards.
03:28:00 No.
03:28:01 Yeah.
03:28:01 That's not true.
03:28:02 It's not.
03:28:02 And we obviously can't show that clip.
03:28:04 I disagree with you.
03:28:05 Okay, I understand you can't show it for TOS purposes.
03:28:07 Exactly.
03:28:08 I disagree with you.
03:28:09 People can go watch and make up their own minds.
03:28:10 She also made a claim before why is there no blood, right?
03:28:12 Understanding that you can't show it because of TOS purposes.
03:28:14 Quick show of hands.
03:28:16 Who here saw the actual Charlie Kirk assassination video, the first one?
03:28:19 Who here saw unbelievable amounts of blood hemorrhaging that would make a Tarantino fan blush?
03:28:25 Very odd.
03:28:25 Okay.
03:28:27 So she made that claim too.
03:28:28 I immediately said, I don't think he's going to make it.
03:28:30 Because of the blood.
03:28:31 I think you remember my dad called me.
03:28:33 I said, Yeah, it's not.
03:28:34 I've never said it on my platform.
03:28:35 You think that an explosion generally has smoke?
03:28:39 I don't think that there's any quality version of video that would get us to be able to answer that question other than Terrell's 4K footage that he has.
03:28:46 Thermodynamics.
03:28:46 There's a lot of, if you look at the Israeli pagers.
03:28:49 Yeah, there's so many Israeli guys that can bring up Israeli pager videos of the smoke.
03:28:53 It's hilarious. 1.00
03:28:53 Let's bring it up. 1.00
03:28:54 That was used inside the pagers.
03:28:55 It's appealing to us that way.
03:28:56 Oh, he just brought it up.
03:28:57 Yeah, but let's bring up the video.
03:28:59 Since you love debating, you should debate someone like John Bray, who's worked on that theory for 11 months, and ask.
03:29:04 Those sorts of questions of how a shape charge would work.
03:29:06 He will.
03:29:08 I presented the evidence of what was in the car and I also.
03:29:10 All right, so first things first, before we go on with this, let's have that.
03:29:13 Do we have what she just said earlier that she didn't question the outfits and stuff from Erica Kirk and then the video of her saying her stylist hates her?
03:29:22 I don't think we have the setup.
03:29:24 Okay, so the setup was earlier, right today, I said, let's mark it.
03:29:26 She said, this is why you noticed, unlike other people, I didn't question Erica Kirk's outfits.
03:29:30 So you're just going to have to take my word for it.
03:29:31 Hopefully the team can actually just rewind it, search it.
03:29:34 She said that exactly.
03:29:36 I wasn't doing that, I was talking about other things.
03:29:39 Here's a clip of Candace doing just that. 0.90
03:29:41 I always try to stay away from the pettier things about Erica that don't register as right, but I just go, okay, it's a little too petty when people talk about her outfits, wearing the glitter pants, and things like that. 0.92
03:29:52 Yeah, it does kind of build a profile of somebody.
03:29:55 I personally just say that I think her stylist is just deeply dislikes her, whoever it is, deeply.
03:30:00 Yeah.
03:30:01 Unlike everyone else, I don't talk about her outfits.
03:30:05 Let's keep playing.
03:30:06 I kill people closer than I saw the camera, and I've never seen a shirt move like that. 0.92
03:30:10 That looks like an explosion to me.
03:30:13 Just the fact that no one started doing first aid to Charlie Kirk.
03:30:16 They were more concerned about getting SIM cards out of cameras, removing cameras, and then getting him off the ex somehow.
03:30:22 There didn't seem a lot of concern for his life.
03:30:24 It seemed like just clean it up.
03:30:25 And then, I mean, I've been told they paved it over a couple days later.
03:30:28 And then you get Erica Kirk behind all the razzle dazzle.
03:30:33 And she's really quick to forgive the alleged suitor, which technically says that was him because I forgive him.
03:30:39 But then she can't forgive Candace Owens for having an opinion or asking questions. 0.75
03:30:42 And they mock people by saying, oh, I'm just asking questions.
03:30:45 Yeah.
03:30:46 I'm a SEAL Team 6 sniper.
03:30:47 I'm asking a lot of questions.
03:30:48 No one wants to answer them.
03:30:50 And you're able to ask.
03:30:52 He's actually said very little about the explosive there.
03:30:55 So he observed, he said he's shot people up close and he's never seen a shirt like that.
03:31:00 And it looked to him like an explosive.
03:31:01 I noticed you shooting up close.
03:31:03 When I play that video at full speed, I can't see a shirt.
03:31:06 SEALs will have designations and they do multiple things.
03:31:09 I'm being a little crass here.
03:31:10 Oh my gosh, drink them.
03:31:11 I'm just assuming this, right?
03:31:13 I mean, if I was in real time and I was in like a close quarters combat, you kill somebody situation. 0.99
03:31:20 And I shot them.
03:31:21 Would you even see the shirt move?
03:31:23 Well, I just feel like five minutes ago you were arguing that it was making sense to be there now, guys, together at the end of this I feel, versus wouldn't you think or wouldn't one assume, wouldn't it stand to reason versus I feel, That's the theme of today.
03:31:45 People disagree with you.
03:31:46 Your opinion's on a fact.
03:31:47 That's all.
03:31:47 I understand.
03:31:47 I think that's a good place for us to, if we have another.
03:31:51 Brought a break and then we can keep answering your questions.
03:31:54 Yeah.
03:31:54 I mean, I think, yeah, sounds good.
03:31:57 Perfect.
03:31:58 We'll do a quick three and a half minute at break.
03:31:59 We'll be back for the last segment.
03:32:01 Cool.
03:32:01 All right.
03:32:01 Thank you.
03:32:02 All right, you guys.
03:32:03 I want to tell you about.
03:32:06 Yeah.
03:32:07 So, another thing with Rob O'Neill.
03:32:09 Rob O'Neill, and by the way, I hate to say this because he's kind of been a fan of mine or been a supporter, and so I have no dislike for him.
03:32:14 But personally, a lot of the SEAL members don't like him very much.
03:32:20 A lot of the people who are actually involved with the Osama bin Laden situation say that he fabricated some.
03:32:25 Some of his claims.
03:32:26 He is not seen as very credible, and he's actually been taken off of some positions either, I can't remember if they were boards, things like that, because he has been known to exaggerate.
03:32:34 I'm not saying he's a known liar.
03:32:35 I'm not saying he's unreliable.
03:32:36 I'm not saying that he wasn't a Navy SEAL.
03:32:37 I'm not saying that he doesn't know what he's talking about as it relates to anything firearm related.
03:32:41 I am saying that he is seen as an unreliable source because he has a tendency to exaggerate, and that is the basis, the entire basis of her claim.
03:32:52 Do we have any other fact checks that we want to, or we have Gerald?
03:32:55 We have Gerald.
03:32:55 Okay, gosh, geez, F to P.
03:32:57 But.
03:32:58 You know what?
03:32:59 Gerald's here, so I can just whip it out.
03:33:02 You'll love that.
03:33:03 That's not true at all.
03:33:10 I completely agree.
03:33:12 I mean, I think it is worth exploring.
03:33:14 Gerald, Gerald, Gerald.
03:33:16 You know how when we do run through and Sam from HR doesn't know how to use the walkie talkies?
03:33:22 The mic.
03:33:23 That's you.
03:33:25 Did I do it?
03:33:26 You were talking during your intro.
03:33:28 Oh, sorry.
03:33:30 Okay, so go ahead.
03:33:30 Start from the top like we're interested.
03:33:33 So sorry.
03:33:35 Now I am equated with Sam from HR and I will never live that down.
03:33:38 Thanks a lot.
03:33:39 No, I think it's true.
03:33:40 Like there's.
03:33:41 There's definitely, and it's kind of hard to hear you when you talk over.
03:33:44 Sorry.
03:33:44 So, there's definitely a lot of evidence that people need to look into to make an assertive claim that this was, in fact, what happened.
03:33:51 And listen, that's the kind of thing that has been said to the audience many, many, many times over.
03:33:56 Not that these are just, I'm wondering, I'm speculating, I'm thinking about this.
03:34:00 These have been definitive claims that I now believe X or this is something that happened, right?
03:34:06 And I think it's important to show that there's a lot of clips.
03:34:09 Something that you guys aren't seeing is that there is a Text thread that we are communicating on.
03:34:15 And Patrick is trying to do the very best job that he can of getting fact checks in.
03:34:19 It's just kind of hard.
03:34:20 People are going back and forth talking very quickly.
03:34:22 Fact checks are coming in.
03:34:24 And to his credit, he's not taking just like, hey, if this is just something that was said, you actually have to say, like, this was said on this episode.
03:34:30 Can I not interrupt you?
03:34:30 But to be fair, I've got to wager that a majority of them are coming from you because the clips that we have seen seem to be coming from us straight through.
03:34:38 There's quite a bit that I'm putting in there for sure.
03:34:42 So, yes.
03:34:42 And thank you guys for doing that.
03:34:44 And thank you for all the Mug Club guys for supporting us to be able to do that.
03:34:47 So, there are a lot of claims that we want to be able to fact check, but they end up moving on, right?
03:34:51 So, I think Patrick's trying to do the very best job that he can of interjecting.
03:34:55 Well, you know this.
03:34:56 Let's, let's, one thing.
03:34:57 I want to run.
03:34:58 One thing.
03:34:58 I want to get to you because she said, unlike other people, we ran it on our show, but you couldn't see it.
03:35:02 She said, unlike other people, I don't, I don't go after the outfits or anything.
03:35:06 We just played the clip where she said, Erica Kirk's outfit, oh my gosh, her stylist hates her.
03:35:10 You might want to send that through and ask her to answer for it because she should be caught on one very specific lie. 0.89
03:35:16 Just so that people understand she's comfortable doing it.
03:35:18 I would recommend it.
03:35:19 I'll have them send it to you, but continue.
03:35:22 No, no, no.
03:35:22 I 100% agree.
03:35:23 And I think, look, as we go forward, I think it's very important to remember that a debate is internal critiques on both sides.
03:35:29 The first part was her getting to question Andrew.
03:35:32 The second part is Andrew getting to question her.
03:35:34 There have been a lot more interruptions for Andrew getting to question her.
03:35:38 And a lot of this is about cadence, too.
03:35:39 You're trying to kind of build a case and ask questions.
03:35:43 So for her to start initially by saying, like, hey, this isn't like something where you can just do this.
03:35:46 Now we're just kind of moving outside of the case and having conversation.
03:35:49 It's like, well, hold on, no.
03:35:50 There's a prompt like you have to defend.
03:35:53 So I want to make sure people understand what they were saying.
03:35:55 When she was trying to say that, I thought, hold on, that's not in good faith because this is supposed to be you defending your claims now.
03:36:02 He defended his.
03:36:03 So hopefully we'll see him get a little bit more uninterrupted time to get into that here in however many segments we have left.
03:36:10 If you have any time, talk with him.
03:36:12 My recommendation would be at this point to rapid fire.
03:36:14 If she doesn't answer, go like, okay, no answer on that.
03:36:16 Could you please answer on the communist Utah Mormons?
03:36:19 Okay, no answer on that.
03:36:20 Could you please answer on being wrong about 66% of the Egyptian plains?
03:36:23 Okay, no answer on that.
03:36:24 Could you please answer on Erica Kirk Epstein?
03:36:26 Okay, just go through because right now I think it's more important to establish a pattern as opposed to getting lost in the weeds that she gives an answer for nothing.
03:36:35 Nothing.
03:36:36 So, right now, I would say if I were advising him, go for broke, especially people just gloss past the communist Mormons and no one's discussed that she was wrong about the Egyptian planes and said she would correct it.
03:36:46 I want the answers.
03:36:47 I want to know if there's something there.
03:36:49 I think everybody wants the answers, but I think what we're saying is she's doing what she's done on her show.
03:36:53 Dances around it, makes innuendos while I'm saying this, or I'm just inference, or I'm just thinking about these things, and isn't really having her feet held to the fire on these things.
03:37:01 So, hopefully, that can happen in this last little segment here, and we'll see how it goes.
03:37:05 But I'll let you guys know as we go.
03:37:06 All right, well, go back and talk to your guy.
03:37:08 And my feet have been held to the fire because, you know, I got bitten by fire ants and it turns out I'm allergic.
03:37:12 So, right now, I have to go put on some anti itch cream.
03:37:16 Well, don't lose a toe over it.
03:37:18 I won't.
03:37:18 I have staph in it.
03:37:19 Thank you very much, Gerald.
03:37:20 Go talk with your man on it.
03:37:21 Thanks for being out there.
03:37:22 We appreciate you doing it on short notice.
03:37:24 Absolutely.
03:37:25 All right, can we grab, like, they're just doing, we'll be right back.
03:37:27 Let's actually show people that we actually run commercials here and we run sketches.
03:37:31 If you guys want to see more of this, sign up for Rumble Premium.
03:37:33 We're the only ones even trying, not just asking questions.
03:37:36 I'm going to go relieve my wiener.
03:37:38 What? 0.94
03:37:39 P, bladder, bladder.
03:37:40 Thank you.
03:37:48 It was just an above average day at the White House when your favorite president was catching up on the news. 0.81
03:37:55 When suddenly, oh, Mr. President, there's a deadly virus from China taking American lives. 0.77
03:38:01 Oh, China, gross. 0.70
03:38:04 This sounds like a job for Super Trump. 0.95
03:38:08 Oh, Super Trump, oh no.
03:38:10 Bam.
03:38:12 Pow.
03:38:12 No, I got it.
03:38:13 Boobs.
03:38:14 But then the worst possible thing happened. 0.88
03:38:17 Oh no, I've been infected with a deadly China virus from China. 0.99
03:38:22 Gross. 0.66
03:38:23 So the very strong, heroic Super Trump went to the hospital. 0.94
03:38:27 Some even thought the China virus had defeated him. 1.00
03:38:33 But on the third day, he rose from Walter Reed and the China virus cried like a little infectious bitch. 0.99
03:38:42 And the Cuomo brothers too. 1.00
03:38:43 So Super Trump knocked them unconscious.
03:38:47 And threw them all the way to the planet Mars.
03:38:54 I'm slightly confused.
03:38:59 Sure.
03:39:00 I'm living large here in the Slam.
03:39:03 I got me a nice cigar, a snazzy hat.
03:39:05 They call the place Alcatraz.
03:39:07 I kind of like the sound of that.
03:39:09 Sounds familiar.
03:39:10 Al Capone, Alcatraz.
03:39:12 This is my joint, see?
03:39:14 They named the place after me.
03:39:16 But how exactly did I get pinched?
03:39:18 Well, we didn't have Tax Network USA back then.
03:39:21 I ended up getting caught having to pay $215,000 in interest on back taxes.
03:39:27 That's like $4.4 million in today's bucks.
03:39:31 That kind of scratch can buy a lot of fedoras.
03:39:33 So if you don't want to get pinched by the IRS or the feds and get locked up in an island in California next to the fruitcakes, do yourself a favor.
03:39:41 Take a shot of Hooch, calm your nerves, and go to tnusa.comslash Crowder.
03:39:48 You'll thank me later.
03:39:49 Hey, Al, you done yet? 0.99
03:39:51 Yeah, it's chow time.
03:39:53 So don't let the same happen to you. 0.97
03:39:55 Go to tnusa.comslash Crowder and let them take care of business by taking care of your business.
03:40:03 With benefits such as increased flexibility, added muscle tone, and improved energy and vitality, yoga is a great way to start your day.
03:40:11 Yoga can help you maintain a balanced metabolism, reduce your weight, and attain mystical union with Hanuman the Monkey King.
03:40:19 Tired of worrying about poor heart health, subpar athletic performance, and whether you and Hanuman the Monkey King are really, you know, okay?
03:40:27 Yoga can help.
03:40:28 Since earning his path to deification by performing feats of strength, devotion, and courage while helping Rama, The avatar of Vishnu, and countless exciting incidents, Hanuman the Monkey King has been quite the popular fellow, and you and he can attain true oneness with yoga.
03:40:44 Yoga, stretch your mind.
03:40:48 Well, boys, you know, in the climate we live in today, people start dropping like flies.
03:40:56 So, if there be anything that in your past I ought to know about, please share it now.
03:41:01 I couldn't think of anything.
03:41:03 I don't know anything.
03:41:05 I was quiet.
03:41:06 Well, there is.
03:41:08 One thing.
03:41:09 Well, spit it up, boy.
03:41:10 I'm not proud of it, you know.
03:41:13 I had a lot of grown up to do, but I used to do some cyberbullying.
03:41:17 Oh, no, cyberbullying, not some rough stuff.
03:41:20 I know, we all have our past before we found the pirate life, but.
03:41:24 What kind of cyberbullying you mean?
03:41:26 Ah, well, you might remember the Pneuma Pneuma kid.
03:41:30 Oh, yeah, yeah.
03:41:31 The big fella.
03:41:32 Before viral was viral. 1.00
03:41:33 I told him he should kill himself. 0.99
03:41:35 Oh, yeah, that's pretty rough there. 1.00
03:41:37 Yeah, I told him he should walk the old plank.
03:41:39 Oh, my bad.
03:41:40 The plank. 0.97
03:41:41 Offered to kill Hollow Mesa. 0.95
03:41:42 Well, you know, I hear he grew up.
03:41:44 I hear he owns a business now.
03:41:48 He's still fat? 0.65
03:41:49 He's pretty fat.
03:41:50 Part of me feels responsible.
03:41:51 I can't blame you.
03:42:00 Vitamins are an essential part of living a full and healthy life.
03:42:04 Failing to get the necessary amounts of specific vitamins can cause deficiency states that are unhealthy and even dangerous. 1.00
03:42:11 And let's be honest, people who don't take vitamins are probably a little gay. 0.78
03:42:15 Vitamins are essential for virtually all chemical processes within the body that create and use energy, such as digestion of food and nutrients, elimination of waste, growth and development, and regulation of cell function. 0.99
03:42:28 Also, do you really want to risk looking like a little fancy boy?
03:42:31 Vitamins work.
03:42:32 Together with proteins that regulate biochemical processes or enzymes, substances that assist proteins known as cofactors, and other substances necessary for good health.
03:42:42 And as an added bonus, no one will doubt your sexuality again.
03:42:46 Vitamins don't make them wonder. 0.98
03:43:08 Rock'em Sock'em Rabbis. 1.00
03:43:10 Boom, Brighton Kippa. 1.00
03:43:12 Press the buttons.
03:43:14 Move the joystick thingies. 0.97
03:43:15 Knock his Kippa to the floor. 0.99
03:43:18 You're the winner. 0.97
03:43:22 He's just like me.
03:43:23 Best two out of three?
03:43:24 Dad, you're my best friend.
03:43:27 Rock'em Sock'em Rabbis by Milton Brett.
03:43:31 Remember simpler times? 0.82
03:43:34 Remember punch card voting?
03:43:36 When you woke up on a Wednesday morning, And actually knew who won the election. 0.89
03:43:40 When a pregnant Chad was just an indentation on a piece of paper. 0.74
03:43:45 Now it's an emoji. 0.96
03:43:46 Remember not knowing what an emoji was?
03:43:49 That was nice.
03:43:51 Remember when celebrities didn't tell you to go out and vote?
03:43:54 I'm drinking milk for good.
03:43:56 They just looked pretty and kayaked for no reason.
03:43:59 When the only needles you had to worry about were filled with heroin and not an unproven mRNA injection.
03:44:10 Those were the days when you could just poke a hole through a ballot and Joe couldn't poke his way through a primary when good old Joe was consciously lying. 0.65
03:44:19 That's what you do when you're raised by a single mom. 0.88
03:44:24 All right, we're back. 1.00
03:44:25 Yeah, we're back.
03:44:26 Steven's still leaving his wiener or something.
03:44:28 Let's listen in.
03:44:29 That one is important to me the Twigs DNA clip. 0.60
03:44:31 Yeah. 0.73
03:44:32 And they're going to pull it up just to have you respond to it.
03:44:34 Well, you don't have to play it because, like, if you're saying that when I initially watched it, I. Thought that Lance Twiggs's DNA, like he was directly responding to that because the testimony was a bit confusing.
03:44:43 They started by saying that they were going to, like, explaining how they got the samples, and they said Lance, Matt, and Amber Robinson, how they got their DNA samples.
03:44:55 And then they started speaking about the gun and said, you know, multiple prints were found on them.
03:45:01 And then they moved and they said Lance Twiggs's DNA was found on the screwdriver.
03:45:05 When I went back and rewatched it, I realized, well, they haven't officially said that Lance or Amber are on the gun.
03:45:11 So I think I've already conceded that we don't know that.
03:45:13 So, I think like, but if you're, if you want to, well, no, this is directly you saying it is on the gun.
03:45:20 Twig is the answer.
03:45:21 I'm saying that I feel like I've already said to you, like, I've made that concession. 1.00
03:45:25 Just to be clear, whenever I make a mistake, I just correct it.
03:45:28 So, that's why when you were asking me three times, I've already said we don't know yet, and I've corrected that mistake.
03:45:34 So, if the purpose of you showing this is to demonstrate that Candace makes mistakes sometimes when she's taking in a lot of information and she's reading through legal documents and she's trying to remember nine hour testimony.
03:45:47 Just demonstrate something else.
03:45:48 It is, in fact, the case.
03:45:49 We're all going to make mistakes.
03:45:50 I'm going to make mistakes.
03:45:51 And I've already considered that.
03:45:52 You're going to make mistakes in the case.
03:45:54 Yeah.
03:45:54 But in this case, you were very adamant that his DNA was on the gun itself.
03:46:00 Yeah.
03:46:00 So I'm just saying that it's not ruled out.
03:46:02 We know that there are five plus prints.
03:46:03 I've said this so many times.
03:46:05 I had to re watch the testimony again.
03:46:07 It's like nine hours a day.
03:46:08 It got very scientific when they were speaking about this.
03:46:11 And I think I wrongly extrapolated that they meant all three of them were on the prints when the only person they officially named was Matt Robinson.
03:46:17 So we don't know yet if, um, Lance Twiggs has his DNA on the gun officially just yet.
03:46:25 Okay.
03:46:25 I've already conceded that.
03:46:26 Go closer.
03:46:27 That's fine.
03:46:28 And then the last one is one with their opinion.
03:46:30 Sure.
03:46:31 By the way, thank you to all the lovely producers here, both male and female, who helped everything.
03:46:37 Go swimmingly.
03:46:39 Bring up the audio faster.
03:46:40 Are you even listening?
03:46:41 Get rid of that.
03:46:43 What?
03:46:43 We had to replace Billy because he had an appointment.
03:46:45 So we got Jesse, who, you know, I mean, he's all right.
03:46:48 I don't care who's mad.
03:46:49 I really do not care who wants to be upset after this episode.
03:46:53 Really.
03:46:54 You will be wasting your breath.
03:46:56 You can spend a billion dollars on influencers because this is all becoming increasingly inexplicable. 1.00
03:47:00 You are asking me to be an idiot, actually, and I cannot do that for you. 0.99
03:47:05 No one needs to make that request. 1.00
03:47:05 Someone once commented beneath this show that if the situations were reversed and there were this many verifiable lies. 1.00
03:47:17 Straight to jail?
03:47:19 Yeah, so that's a show intro.
03:47:20 And straight to jail, straight to jail is a monopoly term.
03:47:23 So do not pass code.
03:47:23 It's a monopoly term.
03:47:24 Do not collect $200.
03:47:25 Yes, it's obviously tongue in cheek. 0.96
03:47:28 And then I explained that actually I think that she should be brought in for questioning because of inconsistencies.
03:47:32 So this is the exact same thing.
03:47:34 But hold on.
03:47:34 She said, and again, we're going to do her own claims.
03:47:37 Earlier she said.
03:47:38 I only said that she was complicit in claiming that Tyler Robinson did it.
03:47:42 Nothing else.
03:47:43 So, guys, search that.
03:47:44 We're going to have that combined for social afterwards.
03:47:46 Now she's saying she should be brought in for questioning because of inconsistencies.
03:47:49 Inconsistencies and believing that Tyler Robinson did it?
03:47:53 Why do they owe you that, though?
03:47:56 They don't owe me anything.
03:47:57 That's my show you're watching.
03:47:58 Just, you know, the clips that you're pulling are from my show.
03:48:01 So, if I want to say something on my show, I can say that.
03:48:03 I didn't say they owe me something.
03:48:04 I don't think that's ever, unless you're talking about it.
03:48:06 But if you say, like, you need to be sat down for questioning and you don't even know if they haven't been.
03:48:11 That's strange, right?
03:48:12 Do you know if they have been?
03:48:14 No, I have no idea.
03:48:15 Well, he didn't make the claim.
03:48:16 He was just saying, what if they haven't been?
03:48:17 Yeah, if you're.
03:48:18 If you're.
03:48:18 You're just filling the air out.
03:48:20 If your entire thing is. 0.97
03:48:21 Junk.
03:48:21 If you're.
03:48:22 No, it's not junk.
03:48:23 Isn't that familiar?
03:48:23 If the query is, why is it that Erica Kirk's not being sat down for questioning?
03:48:27 I've got it all to.
03:48:28 But you have absolutely no knowledge whether or not she's been sat down for questioning or not.
03:48:32 What that does is it creates an innuendo.
03:48:34 It creates an inference.
03:48:35 It creates out to the ethos that this should be happening because something's wrong here, when you actually don't have the knowledge that anything's wrong at all.
03:48:44 I just think that my opinion is that she should be sat down and questioned.
03:48:49 But you're not sure if she hasn't been?
03:48:50 Yeah, and you're not sure if she has been either.
03:48:52 Questioned for what?
03:48:53 You said the only thing that she was complicit in was saying Tyler Robinson did it.
03:48:56 You guys all remember that, right?
03:48:57 When she was finally grilled, she said, no, I never said she was complicit in the murder.
03:49:00 Just that she said Tyler Robinson did it.
03:49:02 She's complicit in saying he did it.
03:49:04 You don't bring someone in for questioning saying, like, well, I believe that Tyler Robinson did it, which everyone does.
03:49:11 Sorry, there's a reason she turned me down.
03:49:14 As you can see, We have not planned any other clips for Andrew.
03:49:18 I expressed to him that what we were going to do was just to use people for fact checks, and because I might not remember something, or I remember something and you're saying no.
03:49:26 And that is what I think will register to people as very fair.
03:49:30 We did not take out of context clips of Andrew to try to reply. 0.98
03:49:36 You used a reply tweet and brought up a tweet from his wife from 15 years ago, bitch. 0.82
03:49:42 He brought up direct clips of you in context. 0.93
03:49:46 Saying that Erica Kirk needs to be dragged in for questioning and that you could say with certainty that she did something and that the leadership of TPUSA betrayed Charlie Kirk!
03:49:55 Hold on, not out of context.
03:49:57 15 years ago, Rachel said that you were an army level sniper.
03:50:00 That's not actually what happened.
03:50:02 We were negotiating.
03:50:03 It is true.
03:50:03 We negotiated out the claim itself, right?
03:50:07 Which one's going to take which position.
03:50:09 I wanted to make sure that I had at least an hour and a half on mine and you got the time for yours to question me.
03:50:13 We did.
03:50:14 We got through your hour and a half on mine, roughly an hour and a half now on mine.
03:50:18 That's basically how this went.
03:50:19 But in the beginning, I did not take an hour and a half to just pull out of context this with Angie.
03:50:23 I actually debated the substance of what's going on.
03:50:25 Okay, so guys, let's pull this side by side.
03:50:27 In the beginning, I did not take out of context the tweet, the at reply, and the bringing up and the questioning.
03:50:34 I believe it was not one, not two, but four questions regarding a tweet, because it wasn't X yet, tweet from his wife 15 years ago.
03:50:42 That's how she led it. 0.95
03:50:45 Victim, feminist. 0.98
03:50:48 Maybe you should read your own book or read the one that people have actually read, Rachel Wilson's book on feminism. 0.98
03:50:54 Is your turning points horse?
03:50:57 Quite a few of them were.
03:50:58 Was there three?
03:50:59 Erica's or four?
03:51:00 So you're just making stuff up?
03:51:01 And we get a count of how many people are turning points.
03:51:03 Nixon JFK this by not doing it at her house, not giving him makeup and giving her a whole crew. 1.00
03:51:08 She's admitted that she has a stylist.
03:51:10 Okay, but the point being is now you're veering into trying to get me to defend my opinions and then you completely shirk responsibility when I point out yours.
03:51:17 No, they're not claims. 0.83
03:51:18 When you tweet Erica is too retarded, you go, that's just whatever. 0.90
03:51:22 And then you move on. 0.90
03:51:22 That's a claim that I'm responsible for the claim. 0.90
03:51:26 Well, earlier when I brought it up, you said that it was tongue in cheek.
03:51:29 Yes, sure.
03:51:31 That's me responding to your criticism of the claim.
03:51:34 That's all I'm doing here.
03:51:35 I was interested, and I'm happy to get into also the Patsy stuff now if you would like to.
03:51:41 Your team has one more clip they want to play seven days ago.
03:51:44 They got one more clip.
03:51:45 We were getting into the Patsy stuff, and you stopped it, and I was explaining to you.
03:51:49 Oh, they have one more clip.
03:51:50 Okay, let's go.
03:51:52 They want to hit the minimum of four clips you were saying with Erica, so 100%.
03:51:56 This is absurd.
03:51:59 It's absurd.
03:51:59 I didn't say anything about Erica.
03:52:00 They want to get to four clips at least. 0.85
03:52:03 It's ridiculous.
03:52:04 Seven days ago. 1.00
03:52:07 You beautiful Persian bastard. 1.00
03:52:08 Assyrian. 1.00
03:52:09 Sorry. 1.00
03:52:11 Dude, he's totally power stancing his seat right there.
03:52:14 He's like, look, guys, I don't know who the guy would be with me, but I have 42% bigger power than Candace.
03:52:18 I mean, can I ask a question?
03:52:20 She's got big bulbs, but I got the biggest bulb.
03:52:22 They call me a big bald guy. 0.99
03:52:27 Hey!
03:52:27 The contract does not say that you are allowed to just question me without me being able to respond to you.
03:52:34 I've never said you can't respond to me.
03:52:35 Or have a conversation.
03:52:37 He's actually trying to get responses.
03:52:39 And by the way, the answer is on the poll.
03:52:42 I want it to look like we've done everything Andrew wanted to so that people can fairly assess the situation.
03:52:47 So you have it your way.
03:52:48 I will not ask a question.
03:52:49 They're in your house.
03:52:51 He traveled to you. 1.00
03:52:52 You're the only one with a guaranteed check for $300,000, you crazy bitch. 1.00
03:52:56 And there's like, she's still the victim. 1.00
03:52:59 She gets $300K.
03:53:00 She trashes him for trying to crowdfund.
03:53:02 By the way, go send some money to crowdfundness. 0.99
03:53:05 And now she complains.
03:53:07 They both have the same number of fact checkers.
03:53:08 She's complaining that his are actually able to fact check.
03:53:16 Be a little bit faster, breaking it up, Jesse.
03:53:18 I know it's a.
03:53:18 I don't want to move too fast for you.
03:53:19 They had other two.
03:53:20 That's what I heard.
03:53:21 They were, yeah.
03:53:22 Okay.
03:53:22 Come on, guys.
03:53:23 Did this crime.
03:53:24 Okay?
03:53:25 Because Lance Twiggs has his DNA on the towel.
03:53:29 Lance Twiggs has his DNA on the rifle.
03:53:33 And to be clear, Lance Twiggs' DNA was not as degraded as Tyler Robinson's DNA was.
03:53:41 No Lance Twiggs in the rifle.
03:53:42 To be clear, I'm not going to lie.
03:53:43 Oh, you also said, yeah, it's not as degraded on the rifle.
03:53:46 Yeah, because I thought he was one of the things.
03:53:48 But I've already, that's what I mean when I say that.
03:53:50 Like, it just seems like you're not actually here trying to engage because I, even before you got to this and I knew that you had some secret clip planned, I said to you.
03:53:58 It's from your show!
03:53:59 That's very secret.
03:54:01 You made it. 1.00
03:54:02 It would be like someone saying, did you call Candace a bitch? 0.99
03:54:04 I'd be like, do you mean on this stream right now publicly? 0.98
03:54:07 I hope your team is fulfilled in playing that.
03:54:11 Is there any more?
03:54:11 I'm happy to play every clip that he has on the ready.
03:54:14 Anyone?
03:54:15 You said you had some new evidence.
03:54:17 She's always the victim, man.
03:54:19 She's always the victim.
03:54:21 Her own words.
03:54:22 Ugh, I wasn't ready for them.
03:54:24 I'll do it on my show.
03:54:26 I'll share the text.
03:54:27 So you're going to read it on my show, but not show it?
03:54:29 Correct.
03:54:29 Okay.
03:54:30 I'll show it on my show, but that's what I'll do.
03:54:33 I'll show it on my show.
03:54:34 Can I ask why?
03:54:35 Well, because I want to drip out the evidence, you know?
03:54:39 You've got to drip out that evidence, keep people coming back to the show, right?
03:54:44 I don't know if Snark serves you so well.
03:54:46 I'm just saying, like, I'm the only Snarky one.
03:54:49 I can be sarcastic.
03:54:51 Like, you're really good looking, Andrew.
03:54:53 Not!
03:54:54 Yeah, I'm fine with closings if you want to do closings.
03:54:56 Well, I also would just, if I may ask a question, is that okay?
03:54:59 I like the vibe change since Jesse got in here.
03:55:01 Everyone's serious.
03:55:03 There you go.
03:55:03 Your basis has been evidentiary.
03:55:05 You keep saying that you have evidence or like you are following evidence.
03:55:09 Which one of the charges against or all of them do you think Tyler Robinson is guilty of?
03:55:18 The specific charge?
03:55:20 Yeah.
03:55:20 Yeah.
03:55:20 So I think what I think is that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
03:55:27 Yeah.
03:55:27 Of the seven charges that he's being charged.
03:55:30 Yeah.
03:55:30 Can we list them real quick?
03:55:31 I'll tell you exactly which ones.
03:55:33 We'll pull them up.
03:55:33 Well, do you know any of the charges these up for right now?
03:55:36 Well, the most significant one is that I've got Charlie Kirk.
03:55:39 Yeah, but can you name one?
03:55:42 Because my general opinion is that you don't actually care about this case.
03:55:45 You're not following it.
03:55:45 Is that it?
03:55:46 That's the question.
03:55:47 He's just a character assassination.
03:55:50 My source says you don't care about it.
03:55:52 It's overwhelming that Tyler Robinson did it.
03:55:54 Hey, real quick.
03:55:55 How many charges were against OJ?
03:55:57 How many do you remember?
03:55:58 Do you think he did it?
03:56:00 You just got to ask me, play clips out of context, put me in the hot seat, so please just answer the question.
03:56:05 Just to be fair, name all seven since you've been following the case.
03:56:08 Okay, sure.
03:56:09 You name one.
03:56:10 Yeah, you name all seven.
03:56:11 I'm happy to do that, but can you name one?
03:56:13 I think he's been charged with murder.
03:56:15 That's actually incredible.
03:56:16 Okay, great.
03:56:17 Now name all seven.
03:56:18 He doesn't even.
03:56:18 This is like.
03:56:19 Name all seven.
03:56:20 Can you name all seven?
03:56:22 I can't.
03:56:23 Then do it.
03:56:24 Sure, you don't have to do it.
03:56:25 Do it.
03:56:25 No, do it.
03:56:26 I'll count them.
03:56:26 Go ahead.
03:56:27 Just keep going.
03:56:27 You don't have to put your fingers up.
03:56:28 Okay, I'll name them.
03:56:29 Oh, sure.
03:56:30 Name them.
03:56:31 The first charge is aggravated murder because that's what carries with it.
03:56:33 So that is murder.
03:56:34 So that is murder.
03:56:35 No, it's aggravated murder.
03:56:35 No, literally not murder.
03:56:37 Okay, so just for people.
03:56:38 No, I don't have to do it in a time limit.
03:56:40 There's nothing going on.
03:56:41 And just to explain people the difference of why that really matters, there is something going on.
03:56:44 It's called your spiraling.
03:56:46 It's because aggravated murder, it's narrowly defined, and because it carries a death sentence.
03:56:51 I'm not going to answer the question.
03:56:52 Seven charges.
03:56:53 Your strategy of thinking that people are intimidated when you try to put a time constraint doesn't work.
03:56:57 And you'll be better the next time you debate something.
03:56:58 I got it.
03:56:59 I got it.
03:56:59 Give me the other ones.
03:57:01 The more you cut me off, the longer I'll take.
03:57:02 Do you want to just wait for me to finish of why that's a big difference so that the people don't have to act?
03:57:05 So, how long should they list the charges?
03:57:07 Yeah, I'm going to do that.
03:57:09 Did we all just see this?
03:57:10 You said, name a child.
03:57:10 You said, I believe he's been charged with murdering Charlie Kirk.
03:57:13 Nope, not even one.
03:57:14 Aggravated murder.
03:57:17 I came here in good faith.
03:57:19 You just want to take things and win.
03:57:21 Well, here's the thing.
03:57:22 Andrew's not even upset that she's saying aggravated murder versus murder.
03:57:25 No, she's trying to explain every single charge and trying to draw this out because she's trying to get.
03:57:28 Yeah, she's not going to be able to.
03:57:30 Watch.
03:57:30 I'm calling it.
03:57:31 She won't name all seven.
03:57:31 Go.
03:57:32 The felony discharge of a weapon.
03:57:35 The next two charges are for obstruction of justice.
03:57:39 The next two charges are for witness tampering.
03:57:42 And the final.
03:57:42 What are the specific charges, though?
03:57:44 That is them.
03:57:45 Obstruction of justice, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness tampering.
03:57:48 Okay, and there's no other specifics to him.
03:57:51 Well, I can tell you why he's being charged with it.
03:57:52 No, no, no.
03:57:53 Just the charges and the seven? 0.99
03:57:54 Yeah, see, the bad thing is when you try to be an a hole and it doesn't work. 1.00
03:57:57 What's the seventh? 0.53
03:57:58 The last charge is violence in front of a mild guy.
03:58:01 Okay, got it.
03:58:02 So then he's being charged with murder.
03:58:04 You just say aggravated murder.
03:58:07 To be fair, she did give charges.
03:58:08 So you know what? 1.00
03:58:09 Hats off to give charges. 1.00
03:58:10 She did give charges. 1.00
03:58:11 Good for her. 0.99
03:58:12 Murder versus aggravated murder.
03:58:14 This gets to the entire crux of why him being up for the death sentence.
03:58:18 By the way, just so you know, I have it on good authority, and this is the only time I've ever done this gossip.
03:58:22 And you just saw it play out in real time.
03:58:24 I have it on good authority that she has an earpiece.
03:58:27 And that's why she bought time.
03:58:28 Because the truth is, right, if you want to win right now, what you would just do is you go seven charges, you go bing, For more proof, see my appearances on Piers Morgan.
03:58:34 That's what I do.
03:58:35 She didn't.
03:58:36 She got distracted.
03:58:37 So I cannot prove this, just so you know, it's hearsay.
03:58:40 I have good authority, because again, I know people who have worked with Candace and people who work there right now who don't like her.
03:58:47 High up in.
03:58:47 No, I'm actually not joking.
03:58:50 I'm actually not joking.
03:58:51 I do have these sources that she has a custom fitted earpiece that we wouldn't be able to see.
03:58:56 I don't care about this case enough to know one of the seven charges.
03:58:59 That would track with how she responded.
03:59:01 But just so you know, I can't prove it.
03:59:03 It's the only claim I'll make today that I can't prove.
03:59:05 I'm fine.
03:59:06 I want to make sure Andrew has had the time that he has requested.
03:59:09 I think your team would like to pull up the seven charges that he just asked you about.
03:59:12 If you guys want to pull that up just to confirm the seven you went through.
03:59:18 Can you guys zoom in a little bit for me?
03:59:19 Aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice.
03:59:24 You got this.
03:59:25 Which just counts three and four.
03:59:27 I'm a six-off guy.
03:59:29 Mispronounce the word.
03:59:30 I know, but so am I because this is what, my second or third.
03:59:34 Hot toddy and then beer.
03:59:35 What's the rules?
03:59:36 Was it beer before liquor?
03:59:36 Now, I did notice something I just was curious about.
03:59:40 I'm just wondering.
03:59:42 When you pulled out your phone just before you asked that question, did somebody by chance text you that question?
03:59:46 You can check my phone.
03:59:47 I'm just curious.
03:59:47 No, you can absolutely not.
03:59:49 I have not had one communication with a single person, not even my producers who are in there this whole time we were here.
03:59:54 You want to check my phone?
03:59:55 I told you, she won't have her phone.
03:59:57 I believe earpiece. 0.76
03:59:58 I believe 0% chance that she doesn't have an earpiece.
04:00:03 That's what I feel.
04:00:04 You're the moderator.
04:00:05 Take it.
04:00:05 Let's see if anyone was texted at all during this debate.
04:00:09 All right.
04:00:10 About the violent charges or anything.
04:00:14 I'm looking through this.
04:00:15 You give me permission.
04:00:15 So I'm going to have full permission to go through my phone.
04:00:17 I don't need to show the moderator.
04:00:19 By the way, I'm looking through this.
04:00:20 I feel uncomfortable. 1.00
04:00:21 By the way, nice tits. 1.00
04:00:22 But I will say also that turtle really likes to wear those silly hats. 1.00
04:00:27 That's a good picture. 0.95
04:00:27 I like that meme. 0.95
04:00:29 Now, 40% like that meme. 1.00
04:00:30 60% probably like your tits. 1.00
04:00:31 So if I were to take two, maybe you could have a meme of the turtle with your tits. 1.00
04:00:36 I only have signal. 0.97
04:00:38 Telegram I used in Russia, and that was a download for her.
04:00:41 I'll take your word for it.
04:00:41 Yeah.
04:00:42 I was taking her, Andrew.
04:00:43 Don't ask a question you don't know the answer to, but I give her credit.
04:00:46 She had them.
04:00:47 Good for her.
04:00:47 You know, I have my other question is about the steakhouse receipt.
04:00:52 You just said that you were done asking all your questions.
04:00:53 So you know, nothing there.
04:00:55 Yeah.
04:00:55 Do you have the steakhouse receipts?
04:00:57 My question.
04:00:58 I have said several times that I have never said I have the receipt for the steakhouse.
04:01:02 I have said the person who's working on that story is going to be forthcoming with the receipt, and that was what I was responding to, and he then dropped the receipt.
04:01:09 He redacted elements of it.
04:01:11 And I said, stay tuned.
04:01:12 He's the one working on that story.
04:01:14 Okay.
04:01:14 So you haven't actually confirmed that Robinson was at that steakhouse.
04:01:18 All I did, as I said earlier in this conversation, was I spoke to the owner when I broke that story.
04:01:22 I think it was back in January.
04:01:23 He was through the Utah Communist Mormon training.
04:01:27 And that there was a receipt.
04:01:29 That's it.
04:01:29 That's the extent of what I shared, is what happened.
04:01:32 Okay.
04:01:33 So to be clear, there's no receipt.
04:01:35 Jesse came to find it.
04:01:36 No, I just did the opposite.
04:01:36 I said there is a receipt.
04:01:37 Well, you don't have a copy of the receipt.
04:01:40 The receipt was published online.
04:01:42 Yeah, right, with blurred out.
04:01:43 The person working on this story that blurred that out is what I was referring to when I said stay tuned and keep following his stuff because he went to go do what I hadn't done, which was he interviewed the actual server.
04:01:54 So there's no evidence that Tyler was at that steakhouse.
04:01:56 Does this mean or does Candace have Hakeem Olajuwon hands?
04:01:59 Yeah, I can't figure it out, but I said earlier, I said weird hands.
04:02:03 Because she's very tiny, because Andrew's not a big guy, he'll tell you.
04:02:06 She's much smaller than him, but she got them big hands.
04:02:08 She could palm a basketball. 1.00
04:02:10 I bet she could slap the shit out of me. 0.99
04:02:13 What do your fantasies have to do with this? 1.00
04:02:15 Everything.
04:02:16 Behind that story, something's wrong.
04:02:17 The reason I'm asking you is because you always include it in your timeline that he traveled to the stake.
04:02:21 Yeah, we've been building a timeline with things that we feel are Utah 1102 approved.
04:02:27 Just so you know, I wouldn't end it on this.
04:02:30 I wouldn't go back to something that she's shown she'll already obfuscate. 0.91
04:02:33 I would go through all of the other claims that she made rapid fire because it would make her look pretty absurd.
04:02:38 That's what I would do.
04:02:38 I already know the answers to them.
04:02:39 I would go to the Mormon commune, the Egyptian plains, why she didn't correct it. 0.52
04:02:43 I would go to the Epstein connection. 0.94
04:02:45 I would go through all of those.
04:02:46 That's what I would do.
04:02:47 Andrew is a more skilled debater than I am, but my approach would be to seek the truth because I would like to know if there's any credence to those theories.
04:02:53 That's what I would be doing right now.
04:02:55 And I love Andrew, and I hope that he doesn't take any personal offense to me saying I think that would be a better approach.
04:03:00 Like I said, I did more than enough.
04:03:03 It would definitely pass the test by the Utah 1102 rule, for sure, for certain.
04:03:10 To be submitted as hearsay.
04:03:12 Yeah, beyond that, because they didn't even have receipts.
04:03:14 They were like, Bob told you to do it.
04:03:16 But the question is the receipt itself, it has not been verified to have been Tyler Robinson.
04:03:21 Yeah, I just want to say you're holding me to a higher standard than you are.
04:03:24 I'm not even holding you to a higher standard.
04:03:25 I'm just asking specifically.
04:03:27 Yeah, I. I've been very forthcoming.
04:03:28 I've told exactly what happened.
04:03:29 I spoke to the owner.
04:03:30 I got the tip.
04:03:31 And I'm curious.
04:03:32 So, should that be an official tie?
04:03:34 She could provide that to the defense.
04:03:36 She has no problem with going to.
04:03:39 Did she say.
04:03:40 Who did she say she went to?
04:03:42 Tulsi Gabbard?
04:03:43 Tulsi Gabbard.
04:03:44 She has no problem with going.
04:03:45 And she's been, by the way, to the White House.
04:03:46 She spent a lot of time with Donald Trump and JD Vance.
04:03:48 And I think she's campaigned with some of them, but she's certainly been involved.
04:03:51 There's nothing stopping her from bringing that to the defense, and they would gladly use it.
04:03:56 And by the way, that could also be kept sealed if it was to protect the identity of someone.
04:04:00 There are ways that they do that in court.
04:04:02 She could.
04:04:03 She hasn't.
04:04:04 That's also something really important.
04:04:05 If you have someone that blows the case wide open, it is your duty, especially if you believe this is an innocent man, as she has said, right?
04:04:14 We might even free a young man who is being wrongly framed for the murder of Charlie Kirk.
04:04:19 It would be your moral duty to send that receipt to the defense.
04:04:25 Christopher?
04:04:26 Christopher.
04:04:27 Has she?
04:04:28 When Christopher got up on the roof, you talk a lot about how his camera died?
04:04:33 Well, he talked a lot about that during the preliminary hearing.
04:04:35 How his camera died.
04:04:35 Yeah.
04:04:36 Do you think that he planted that screwdriver up there?
04:04:38 No.
04:04:39 No. 0.99
04:04:42 Jesse, I'm going to tell everyone that you're a registered pedophile because of that mustache if I see one more ad. 0.99
04:04:49 I don't buy his. 0.98
04:04:50 Sorry, Jesse, I'm sorry to be honest.
04:04:52 I say that I love everybody here, but I will slander their reputation and accuse them of pedophilia, right?
04:04:59 Noodles, that's the only thing to do.
04:05:00 Oh, I mean, I've been apt to it myself, yeah.
04:05:03 Yes, of course you have.
04:05:04 I've seen you do it.
04:05:05 Yeah.
04:05:05 You created a whole backstory for Jesse.
04:05:09 It's true.
04:05:10 Died at just the right time.
04:05:11 His body cam died at just the right time.
04:05:14 I think that as you were just grilling me about whether or not I'd got the merchant receipt for a debit card, that kind of makes difficult that we just have to sort of trust that a screwdriver was found and we don't have any should be evidence of a police body cam.
04:05:29 But like I said, you accept that stuff and then are like, did you call the merchant and get like it?
04:05:34 So it seems like you hold the prosecution to a.
04:05:39 Wait a second.
04:05:41 I'm not adding the unconfirmed evidence to an official timeline that I'm putting out either.
04:05:45 What do you mean, official?
04:05:46 Can we also see if Gerald could maybe get us an interview with Andrew at the end of this?
04:05:50 I know he'll be probably tired and want to talk with his lovely wife, who, by the way, may be like the best woman in all of social media out there because she just does it and then disappears and does mom stuff. 0.87
04:06:00 She's the better Wilson.
04:06:01 I like them both.
04:06:02 Rachel's the best Wilson.
04:06:04 But it would be great if we could do that.
04:06:05 And if he's too tired, I understand.
04:06:07 Well, there's no evidence for it.
04:06:09 Or Patrick Berger.
04:06:10 There's no good evidence for it at all.
04:06:11 There's no camera there.
04:06:13 And the steakhouse receipt itself has never been confirmed to be Tyler Robinson's.
04:06:17 I'm assuming this is just like a talking point they gave you, and you got to like keep pushing this.
04:06:20 Who's that?
04:06:21 I've been following it very closely on edge.
04:06:23 The receipt, you weren't even following the charges of Tyler Robinson, but you really wanted to know everything.
04:06:27 He couldn't name all seven charges.
04:06:29 He's been following the receipt because he has a question that's never been answered.
04:06:33 You're following Conwell Live.
04:06:34 I literally followed the entire trial or the preliminary live.
04:06:37 I was live with an attorney.
04:06:39 We covered all of it.
04:06:40 You think because I have a momentary or lapse where I'm like, oh, it's murder?
04:06:44 No, it's aggravated murder.
04:06:45 Come on.
04:06:46 You didn't know any of the charges.
04:06:47 That's splitting here.
04:06:48 You dare me.
04:06:48 No, that's not splitting.
04:06:49 It means you didn't follow the preliminary hearing at all.
04:06:51 Oh, it's not.
04:06:52 No, it doesn't mean that at all.
04:06:53 Any of the charges out of the media. 0.97
04:06:54 You said you've never criticized Erica Kirk's outfits, and I literally have you saying that her stylist hates her because her outfits suck. 0.82
04:06:59 Let me play it. 0.99
04:07:00 Yes.
04:07:01 Sentence.
04:07:01 I actually, this is why I did not engage in any like Erica, everyone's questioning what she's wearing and all this stuff.
04:07:07 I was like, I'm going to wait here because I don't know.
04:07:11 Just it feels weird.
04:07:12 I always try to stay away from the petty things about Erica that don't register as right, but I just go, okay, it's a little too petty when people talk about her outfits or wearing the glitter pants and things like that.
04:07:23 Yeah, it does kind of build a profile of somebody.
04:07:26 I personally just say that I think her stylist is just deeply dislikes her, whoever it is, deeply dislikes her.
04:07:32 Yeah, and here's the beauty of not making the claim that I'm morally more virtuous.
04:07:36 I will make fun of outfits.
04:07:36 I will make fun of hair.
04:07:37 I will make fun of, even by the way, things that are outside of your control, like weird genetic face anomalies. 1.00
04:07:41 I'll call you a cunt. 1.00
04:07:42 I'll call you a bitch. 1.00
04:07:43 I'll say that you have an asshole haircut, and I will answer for it. 1.00
04:07:45 Let's continue. 0.99
04:07:46 This receipt has only the blurred information on it that would actually give you the information to confirm whose receipt it is.
04:07:53 We have to date, nobody has confirmed.
04:07:56 That this was actually Tyler Robinson's receipt, and yet inside of Candace Owens' timeline, which she states over and over again, when she says, This is the longest 13 hours, this is 13 and a half hours, the requirement for about what, roughly five and a half, six hours of that?
04:08:15 I try not to.
04:08:16 That's not great.
04:08:16 Yeah.
04:08:17 And that's not been confirmed at all.
04:08:20 Not even a little bit.
04:08:21 I feel like saying that to the owner of the state.
04:08:23 Baker's dozen ghosts.
04:08:28 And that's why, like I said, If you think this builds up a rapport with your audience and makes you seem like a serious person, we don't have to keep belaboring the point here.
04:08:36 I feel like I've demonstrated that I just.
04:08:38 Personal attack.
04:08:40 A drinker.
04:08:41 Hey, I talked to a guy.
04:08:43 You know, obviously.
04:08:46 Neat.
04:08:46 I noted that there was, in fact, a receipt that he pulled.
04:08:49 You're her.
04:08:50 That receipt that was called the Ping and Jar.
04:08:51 I will say, I worked in many restaurants.
04:08:53 Well, three.
04:08:54 I worked in three restaurants.
04:08:55 And every single time, I remember every single customer that comes in, especially.
04:08:59 That's right.
04:08:59 And the manager does too.
04:09:00 I mean, he's not on the floor or anything.
04:09:02 Yeah.
04:09:02 But he remembers everybody that was served inside that.
04:09:04 Fucking building. 0.99
04:09:05 And I appreciate you giving input, but we do need to add a caveat. 0.99
04:09:08 Josh specialized in takeout, namely taking out his wiener.
04:09:12 He was a sex offender.
04:09:15 I did work the Applebee's to go window.
04:09:16 Yeah.
04:09:16 Oh.
04:09:17 Constantly cite things that are said in that courtroom.
04:09:19 Uber Eats.
04:09:20 You show up and say, Uber Eats, mother. 0.70
04:09:22 All right.
04:09:22 Contacting and speaking with the owner of the restaurant.
04:09:27 It's not like I dreamed it, as to use your expression, so it's in my timeline.
04:09:31 Not his expression.
04:09:32 You said that it came to you in a dream.
04:09:34 I'm just saying that there's no evidence he was ever there.
04:09:36 Okay.
04:09:37 Thank you.
04:09:37 No hard evidence, anyway.
04:09:39 Yeah, I'm talking about 12.
04:09:40 Okay, so the last thing we're going to do before we go into ad break right after this will be final thoughts.
04:09:44 I'll be asking both of you if anything on your opinion, thoughts changed on the case, and then we'll finish out.
04:09:52 And then I'm going to ask you to put a percentage on it.
04:09:54 And for me, it's going to be about 12 to 89%.
04:09:57 I'll tell you which one.
04:09:58 I followed you everywhere that you went, recorded what you searched, and studied your habits.
04:10:02 You took an ad break.
04:10:03 By the way, can I just tell you, too?
04:10:04 Like, here's one thing that I do love about what we do.
04:10:07 And I do love that we're able to do this.
04:10:09 We're only able to do this because of your support.
04:10:10 Hey, if you like what we do, click that button, join up, Rumble Premium.
04:10:14 If not, you know, go to Foundation.
04:10:16 It's the only other company that I run.
04:10:17 We have a multivitamin and we have 99.9% pure creatine.
04:10:21 You can check the lab certificates, it's Cree Vitalis.
04:10:26 That's how you support the show.
04:10:27 No donors, no other investors.
04:10:29 We own it 100%.
04:10:30 I love that I can make fun of Patrick Bet David and do an impression and do it behind his back as well as in front of him and Andrew Wilson and still have relationships with him.
04:10:42 Because they understand we do what we do.
04:10:43 We do this to be entertaining. 1.00
04:10:44 In other words, if I were to say, Andrew, that's retarded, he'd go, Well, either you're wrong or that is retarded. 1.00
04:10:50 For example, I almost blew up my house with a grill when he came over for a barbecue. 0.99
04:10:55 They were giant tomahawk sticks, and I hadn't cleaned the fat off the grill. 1.00
04:10:58 And he was like, Yeah, you almost blew up your house, you effing idiot. 1.00
04:11:02 Yeah, he was telling me about it. 1.00
04:11:03 And I was like, Yeah, I am. 1.00
04:11:05 I am an effing idiot. 1.00
04:11:08 And his daughter is great. 1.00
04:11:09 She was over too with the kid. 0.97
04:11:10 And I just went off on her like Tim Burton sucks because she's no hot topic. 1.00
04:11:14 I was like, Yeah, he sucks. 1.00
04:11:15 Cabinet of Dr. Caligari. 0.99
04:11:16 Oh my gosh, he ripped off Dutch cinema.
04:11:18 And we can all be friends.
04:11:19 Candace doesn't have any friends who can challenge her, it's not a thing.
04:11:23 So that's one thing I'm very grateful for today, to be able to sit down, do this, call balls and strikes.
04:11:27 I don't know if we have Gerald coming on, but Patrick Bet David, by the way, is a really, really nice guy.
04:11:33 He had me over for dinner. 0.99
04:11:35 His house is exactly what you would expect from a Persian marble, yellow gold, lions and shit. 0.99
04:11:43 A giant open wine cellar that's in glass. 0.99
04:11:47 It's not an actual cellar, just so you can see it.
04:11:49 I don't know if this is supposed to be funny.
04:11:50 It sounds awesome.
04:11:51 It is awesome.
04:11:52 It is awesome.
04:11:53 But I walked out of it.
04:11:54 I said, oh my gosh.
04:11:55 I said, Like, this is how I would picture if Xerxes time traveled.
04:11:59 He's like, Oh, my man.
04:12:01 Yeah, that's true.
04:12:01 I do, you know, we do like to have the glam, you know.
04:12:04 I'm like, Okay, cool.
04:12:05 I love it.
04:12:06 I love that we can do that and we all understand that it's love.
04:12:09 This is what we do.
04:12:11 This today, I will say, has gone mostly well.
04:12:14 My thoughts are she hasn't answered specifics.
04:12:18 This is not going to be over.
04:12:20 She is going to, you will see hit pieces on Andrew.
04:12:22 You will see a disproportionate percentage out there of coverage to be hit pieces on him.
04:12:27 You will see poisoning the well.
04:12:29 You will see people saying that he's bought and paid for.
04:12:31 By the way, just search Andrew Wilson Zionism debate.
04:12:35 No one has debated against Zionism more than Andrew Wilson from a Christian perspective.
04:12:40 You've had leftists, and then you've had Andrew. 0.53
04:12:44 That's it.
04:12:45 Doesn't mean that he thinks that Israel doesn't have basically the right to defend themselves as opposed to some predestined claim to that land.
04:12:52 So you'll see all these claims that he's paid for by Israel.
04:12:54 I think she's going to be more aggressive.
04:12:56 I think she's going to then go to her audience and paint it as a way that it didn't actually transpire. 1.00
04:13:00 I think she's going to play victim.
04:13:02 And I think Andrew will say, you know, it went well, but I wasn't able to do X or I would have liked to do Y a little bit better.
04:13:09 That's what I think you'll see from this.
04:13:11 I don't know what these closing statements will be.
04:13:13 We also have kind of an ombudsman moment after this.
04:13:16 We'll be able to go through all of the claims and truths.
04:13:19 Is there anything that we're waiting for?
04:13:20 Is Gerald on the line?
04:13:22 He's not done yet.
04:13:24 They're saying he is going to try and get an interview with one of them.
04:13:27 By the way, can we also just say, like, this is not me.
04:13:29 I mean, you know, I've been doing commercials going back to 2000, whatever, 14.
04:13:34 How much more effort does this whole team put in? 0.94
04:13:36 Like, even though, you know, Jesse is a pedophile because of his mustache, that's my only proof. 0.72
04:13:40 And even though Noodles is like, you know, he's four foot eight, like, Danny DeVito towers over him. 0.90
04:13:45 It's close.
04:13:46 And even though Tim is clearly on the spectrum and he hates people and he pees in jars and has long nails, the effort that everyone here puts in, we don't just do We'll Be Right Back, commercials and sketches and things that are better than legacy media.
04:14:01 So, can everyone please just send a thank you, not to me, but to these folks here who make it happen?
04:14:06 It's not easy to get clips in in real time.
04:14:08 It's not easy to get these commercials up and running.
04:14:10 I sit down with Josh and Johnny Boy.
04:14:12 I used to have to write everything myself.
04:14:13 So grateful that I get to sit down with people whose company I enjoy.
04:14:17 We write it, that we have a production team that everyone here, wouldn't you feel embarrassed, Noodles, if all we had was a We'll Be Right Back?
04:14:24 Yeah.
04:14:25 Like that would be a screw up, right?
04:14:26 We'd be like, oh my gosh, we didn't get in all the content.
04:14:30 It may seem like a small thing.
04:14:32 We'll Be Right Back means, well, we don't care enough about the content.
04:14:35 We just want your money.
04:14:38 This is a content driven space first.
04:14:41 And I would say that compared to anybody else out there, and that really is because of an unbelievable team here.
04:14:46 So, you often don't get to see them.
04:14:48 You don't know who they are.
04:14:49 You'll see them in sketches.
04:14:51 Every single one of them out there, I'm really, really grateful for.
04:14:53 And I'm grateful that we get to do this because we didn't know how this was going to go. 0.96
04:14:56 I was hoping to buy time there and, you know, just making up shit, complimenting people for stuff they don't even do. 0.98
04:15:02 We have a Candace contradiction. 0.99
04:15:05 Oh, maybe we'll get something out of it.
04:15:07 It's just a then and now.
04:15:09 Is it like a couple of them?
04:15:10 It's maybe?
04:15:12 See, you're about as good at answering questions as Candace.
04:15:14 I thought I was coming out strong with Candace.
04:15:16 You're about as good as Candace at answering. 1.00
04:15:19 That embolism did a number on you, you son of a bitch. 1.00
04:15:21 Why express that confidence to the public as opposed to just being like, we don't know yet. 1.00
04:15:26 I feel confident he's involved.
04:15:27 They make the rest.
04:15:28 I don't understand how any of this would make her complicit in what.
04:15:31 Well, I've already told you.
04:15:33 She's complicit in trying to fool the public into thinking this is some open and shut case. 1.00
04:15:37 Erica Kirk should be dragged into a police precinct for questioning. 0.99
04:15:40 Like I said, you can show me the person who disagrees with me on that. 0.99
04:15:49 Thank God.
04:15:50 Please tell me I was sitting down.
04:15:51 You're still.
04:15:51 Okay, good.
04:15:52 I have a torn groin, so if you'd have seen me messaging to Tim where it's painful, I would have been the next Jesse.
04:16:00 Let's take some chats, then, I guess.
04:16:02 And someone let me know if we think that we could get Andrew on after this, or Candace, or Patrick Bett David.
04:16:08 I know Gerald will be here.
04:16:09 I know we have some claims versus truth.
04:16:11 I don't know if we have videos for them.
04:16:13 Oh, they're back now.
04:16:14 Oh, okay, let's go.
04:16:14 Oh, they're there.
04:16:15 And that's maybe a good commentary for you would be the following on if you're a Andrew and he's Persian, he has a lion right behind him.
04:16:23 Look at that line right there. 0.54
04:16:24 That line is 98% better.
04:16:27 Next 2% is me.
04:16:27 Candace, great.
04:16:29 But did anything change your mind?
04:16:31 Did you watch and say, you know, when I had this position?
04:16:32 Anything changed your mind, Candace?
04:16:33 After all, you know, you did a change my mind on campus with the font and logo after we asked you not to do it.
04:16:39 Before we wrap it up, I think whether you're a fan of Andrew or not, whether you're a fan of Candace or not, nobody can dispute the fact that these guys agreed to sit down and talk live.
04:16:51 Others were thinking this was pre recorded.
04:16:53 This is not pre recorded, just so everybody knows.
04:16:55 This is purely live.
04:16:57 This is a little bit scary.
04:16:58 I'm saving almost half a million dollars.
04:16:59 Because pre recording can do edits.
04:17:01 So, whether you agree with them or not, let's make sure we respect both of them for having this sit down.
04:17:06 And before the final thoughts, I want to make sure you guys hear that from me as well for inviting me here as well.
04:17:11 Of course.
04:17:12 I do know one day, I think it was last week, you sent a message on one of our accounts.
04:17:17 You said, Can I talk to Patrick?
04:17:19 We got on the call.
04:17:19 You said, Patrick, can you moderate this?
04:17:21 And then I said, Great, let's do this.
04:17:23 And so, before we wrap up, final thoughts, I'll come to you first.
04:17:27 Yeah, she had nothing.
04:17:28 Just nothing.
04:17:30 Any for all of her claims of Patsy, nothing.
04:17:33 She didn't have a single claim.
04:17:35 She didn't have a single solid piece of evidence.
04:17:36 She had no positive evidence Israel's involved in anything.
04:17:40 No positive evidence that France is involved in anything.
04:17:45 No positive evidence TPUSA is involved in anything.
04:17:48 No positive evidence that Erica Kirk is involved in anything.
04:17:52 When I asked her about her claims about Erica Kirk, yeah, it was just fun.
04:17:57 It's just fun.
04:17:58 You know, or yeah, I do think that she needs to sit down and ask some questions, but or answer some questions.
04:18:03 But you know what?
04:18:05 Um, I don't even know if she has, like maybe she has.
04:18:08 I have no idea.
04:18:10 Yes, I'm gonna have an official timeline with unconfirmed evidence, that's just fine.
04:18:14 Hey, it's hearsay if that's good enough for the state, it's good enough for me.
04:18:17 But my biggest problem with the state is that they're admitting all this hearsay, it's like she's a contradiction machine.
04:18:24 On top of all of this, the thing that I wanted to get out of this more than anything else.
04:18:30 Was to just demonstrate one thing.
04:18:32 Yes, it's true.
04:18:33 I'm not perfect on the case.
04:18:34 I'm not going to ever pretend that I am and never did.
04:18:38 But what has been made very clear to me is that there's nobody with an alternative theory that has any evidence for it at all.
04:18:46 None.
04:18:47 Zero.
04:18:48 And the continuous kind of expression we're running an investigation.
04:18:54 What kind of investigation builds a timeline out on a receipt that they don't even confirm?
04:19:00 What kind of investigation tries to make these bold claims? 0.99
04:19:04 I would add to this she absolutely criticizes and she demonizes, villainizes.
04:19:09 Any other investigations like we had Jay Varma, like we had Nashville Manifesto, like we had DOJ Donald Trump, like we had with the bullet engravings on Charlie Kirk.
04:19:19 And she accuses anyone who actually has conclusive evidence of investigations of being feds.
04:19:24 That is important.
04:19:25 Continue.
04:19:26 Yeah, nobody's trying to tell you how to think.
04:19:28 But you should rationally come to your conclusions based on evidence and facts.
04:19:33 And the truth is that 90% of what you're saying is simply intuition based.
04:19:38 It did.
04:19:39 It came to me in a dream.
04:19:40 It's intuition.
04:19:41 Almost none of it has any evidence at all.
04:19:43 Just, I'm skeptical because these people over here said things, and that makes me skeptical.
04:19:48 It's like, but no evidence.
04:19:50 Note this to the audience, to everybody watching.
04:19:53 You might hate my guts.
04:19:54 That's fair enough.
04:19:55 I get that.
04:19:56 I'm not the most likable man.
04:19:58 I understand that, too.
04:20:00 I'm friends with Andrew, and he's not likable.
04:20:03 Fact check.
04:20:04 That Tyler Robinson was a patsy that was ever put forward by Candace this entire debate.
04:20:11 Now, maybe you could say that we stalemated when it came to whether or not Robinson did it.
04:20:15 She says, I found the evidence convincing.
04:20:18 I, uh, unconvincing.
04:20:19 Andrew says he found the evidence convincing.
04:20:22 Okay, fair enough.
04:20:22 Maybe you can't do too much about that, but there was nothing.
04:20:25 She had nothing for Robinson being a patsy, nothing for any of her conspiracies, not a zero zilch.
04:20:32 And she backed away on a bunch of them. 0.97
04:20:34 This is the first time I think she's ever really backed away from the Twigs thing. 0.92
04:20:38 Gotcha. 0.99
04:20:38 First time I've heard her back away from the Erica thing, back away from TPUSA, being very cynical about the Twigs. 0.99
04:20:43 Well, there's a lot of people out there who are kind of, you need a better champion because you make the, Claims far more aggressively than Candace does. 0.99
04:20:49 She just had nothing the entire debate.
04:20:51 Zero.
04:20:53 Candace.
04:20:55 Well, I think that is quite a conclusion. 1.00
04:20:58 Watch her to play victim. 0.99
04:20:59 Maybe we stalemated.
04:21:01 It probably signifies what I've been saying from the beginning that you didn't feel that you were strong on the actual facts and the evidence, which I was willing to engage with you.
04:21:09 I wanted to go over the screwdriver, I wanted to go over the talent and things that you've mentioned, and you wanted to then move the conversation into a defense of Erica Kirk and her character.
04:21:20 And what I've said about Erica, which is the guy called her retarded, and I have not edited that opinion after discussing with you.
04:21:26 Um, I would like to extend a compliment to you for being willing to sit down and to have the conversation for $300,000 at your house in your basement. 0.71
04:21:35 Feeling that the people who are jumping on the bandwagon about this case don't care about this case, they don't care about Erica Kirk.
04:21:43 It tends to be follow that they take a meeting with Turning Point USA and they come out and suddenly have a lot of junk to say about Candace Owens.
04:21:53 I do want to also stress.
04:21:55 That Turning Point USA tried to pepper him with something as a surprise.
04:21:59 He showed clips that were meant to be a surprise.
04:22:01 I did no such thing.
04:22:02 They were not meant to be a surprise.
04:22:04 They were actually fact checks.
04:22:06 They were responses to her making claims that were false.
04:22:08 She says, I never criticized Erica Kirk's outfit.
04:22:11 Here you go.
04:22:12 She says, I never said Erica Kirk was complicit in anything.
04:22:15 Here you go.
04:22:16 She says, I never said that I was confident. 0.62
04:22:18 I can, with complete certainty and confidence, say that Israel and France did it. 0.77
04:22:22 That's not a surprise. 0.55
04:22:23 That's responsive to your claims in this moment, and that needs to be recognized.
04:22:28 Was in any way overwhelming, which is why I think you wanted to move to end that discussion quickly and to speak to me about France and to talk about this Panguitch receipt and my timeline.
04:22:40 I want to remind people that a lot of the at home investigators, which you were open.
04:23:00 Seriously.
04:23:01 Go to Alaska.
04:23:03 Nothing comes close.
04:23:04 Really, I care about finding out what the truth is here.
04:23:08 My heart is in the right place.
04:23:09 I think anybody who watches my show or even just watched this debate knows that if I get something wrong, I'll instantly correct it and own it.
04:23:15 I'm not arrogant.
04:23:15 I don't need to sit here and pretend that I didn't misspeak on the Lance thing.
04:23:19 It hasn't been ruled out.
04:23:21 But I really wanted to hammer that point.
04:23:23 Now do bullet engravings.
04:23:25 Part of being a well meaning person is to concede when you are wrong, to take something off a timeline when you know it's not right.
04:23:32 And I would like to think that that is why I have earned the audience that continues to follow me because they know my heart's in the right place, that I deeply cared about Charlie and I deeply care about the answers.
04:23:41 I want to thank Andrew's team who are providing the fact that I'm not watching his show.
04:23:46 I want to, as always, thank my team who worked really hard to make this happen and flip this set.
04:23:50 And to you, PBD, just for being a great moderator, I think very fair, letting us both speak and making sure that Andrew got out of this what he wanted, which is a little more than what I wanted, but I'm very content with how I dealt with this.
04:24:05 I trust I don't need to convince the audiences with the magic trick of what they need to think about this debate.
04:24:10 They can watch it and draw their own conclusions.
04:24:12 Beautiful.
04:24:13 Fair from both of you.
04:24:14 I think the audience won.
04:24:15 And again, from the beginning, all of this is because of how much love and respect we have for Charlie Kirk, a great man that's no longer here with us.
04:24:23 His one year anniversary is coming up here.
04:24:25 I can't believe it's that quick that it's here.
04:24:28 The audience, I think you also won.
04:24:29 If you did, support the Crucible, support the Candace Show, support the PBD podcast, subscribe to the channel.
04:24:36 This is how you help.
04:24:37 These voices get out even more, especially going into the future when this happens.
04:24:41 You want a lot of independent creators.
04:24:42 And by the way, most importantly, go check the references as we make them available every single show.
04:24:46 And today, we will provide every single fact check that we have gone over, and including some fact checks that we didn't have time for.
04:24:52 And that's where you can hit the give, send, go, because I will tell you, it was a lot for Andrew to make it out there, go to her basement, get travel arranged, $300,000.
04:25:00 So, you know, you can throw some support if you want to see these debates.
04:25:03 You will only see these debates take place when people like Andrew show up for free, or I would show up for free.
04:25:09 And people like Candace get paid half a million dollars or $300,000.
04:25:13 That's the name of the game. 0.93
04:25:14 It is ransom that you're paying.
04:25:17 But I think today was quite illuminating.
04:25:20 And I would like to see the poll.
04:25:22 I think we put a poll up on social media.
04:25:23 Let me see that.
04:25:24 And then I want to go through some claims.
04:25:26 And then we can perhaps check in with Gerald.
04:25:28 We'll get our poll as well.
04:25:30 But they did send in PBDs, 15,000 votes. 1.00
04:25:34 Favored Candace. 1.00
04:25:35 Candace won 38%. 1.00
04:25:36 Favored Candace.
04:25:37 But Andrew won 9%.
04:25:39 And then favored Andrew.
04:25:40 Andrew won 45%.
04:25:41 Favorite Andrew.
04:25:42 Candace won 8%.
04:25:43 So overall, Andrew at about 54%.
04:25:48 Oh, okay.
04:25:48 Is it 54?
04:25:49 Hold on.
04:25:50 45 plus 9 is 54.
04:25:52 45 plus 9 is 54.
04:25:53 But then, oh, wait. 0.86
04:25:54 Candace won. 0.96
04:25:54 Okay. 0.96
04:25:55 Yeah.
04:25:55 54%.
04:25:55 That's true.
04:25:56 I love, I don't know why, even though, okay.
04:25:59 So look, so we got 54%.
04:26:00 She's at that point, if you do the math. 0.99
04:26:01 But also, you have to divide in half because she's black and she doesn't have biceps like this guy. 0.95
04:26:06 You know, so we divide it by the roots factor. 0.76
04:26:07 We call it the roots factor, or perhaps we call it 12 years of Candace.
04:26:10 That's what we do.
04:26:10 But we talk about it that way.
04:26:11 But we don't want to be racist, right?
04:26:13 My brother, Kate, my man.
04:26:14 Come invest with BBD.
04:26:18 We have our poll.
04:26:20 Waiting on that.
04:26:21 Let me go through some claims then.
04:26:22 And then you guys kind of help me out.
04:26:24 So, again, if you want to see more of this, I would do.
04:26:27 Here's the thing I will tell you this.
04:26:28 I will do any of these debates, but I'm not going to pay $300,000.
04:26:33 I'm not going to pay half a million dollars.
04:26:34 That's why I respect, even though I disagree with, Dave Smith showed up.
04:26:37 That's why I respect, even though I disagree with, Nick Fuentes.
04:26:41 He showed up.
04:26:42 That's why we have coming up in the fall.
04:26:43 Remember, we were supposed to do a debate at Penn State?
04:26:46 Or UPenn, sorry, with Professor Zimmerman.
04:26:48 That's not going to be Harvard.
04:26:50 We do have to put up that cost because it's $10,000 to the charity of their choice or the school, whatever department of the school that they want, just so you can see debates versus actual professors.
04:27:01 I'm not going to pay a ransom because I've done enough debates and people can either do it, we can have a conversation, or not.
04:27:06 But I do understand that it was necessary, and my hat's off to Andrew for doing so.
04:27:10 We will provide the references that, of course, is something we do every show.
04:27:13 And I would ask that Andrew do that with his show, if he doesn't already, and that Candace does that with her show.
04:27:18 We do that so that we don't find ourselves.
04:27:21 In the same kind of situation as Candace.
04:27:23 Let me go through a few claims here that were made, and then we'll, I mean, we'll take your chats.
04:27:27 But she claims, so claim, that the prosecution has this incredibly weak case because the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing wasn't, quote, a slam dunk, and it was all hearsay.
04:27:37 The truth, preliminary hearing is not a trial.
04:27:40 Hearsay, by the way, is not always admissible, but reliable hearsay, that's the reason for the hearing taking place before the trial.
04:27:48 The jury is going to hear all the evidence.
04:27:49 That's when you drop the slam dunks.
04:27:51 Here's another claim that people are saying the dad turned Robinson in.
04:27:55 The truth.
04:27:56 Robinson's dad said when wife showed him footage that the shooter looked like his son and he advised him to speak with a youth pastor.
04:28:04 In other words, he didn't willingly turn him in, but there is a matter of record where his dad said, yep, that looks like my son and I spoke with my son about it.
04:28:10 Here's a Candace claim that she made today.
04:28:13 The only claim that she made, or sorry, I never claimed anything about Erica Kirk when they showed it.
04:28:17 She said, well, you're taking it out of context.
04:28:19 I was saying that Erica was complicit, not in Charlie being killed, nor TPUSA.
04:28:25 I said she was complicit in saying that Tyler Robinson did it.
04:28:31 The truth, let's play that montage that I believe came from Milk Bar.
04:28:35 We had some other ones too.
04:28:38 The amount of evidence that is now piling up against Erica Kirk.
04:28:42 I've seen enough. 1.00
04:28:43 Erica Kirk should be dragged into a police precinct. 0.99
04:28:46 The assassination of Charlie Kirk was something akin to a regicide, right?
04:28:52 The assassination of a king to install a new ruler who the king would have never approved of.
04:28:58 Shutting Point USA for Erica Kirk.
04:29:00 And what I think is fair.
04:29:02 To refer to as their also their federal accomplices.
04:29:07 Sorry, she should be dragged into a precinct because she believed that Tyler Robinson did it.
04:29:12 The federal accomplices, meaning the Trump administration, they would be accomplices to Erica Kirk believing that Tyler Robinson did it.
04:29:18 Don't take her out of context. 0.95
04:29:20 Then another Candace claimed there at the end, like I told you, she will play victim. 1.00
04:29:22 That's what she will do because she's a feminist. 1.00
04:29:24 She doesn't want to admit it. 1.00
04:29:25 She is a feminist. 0.99
04:29:26 She said, I didn't waste time bringing up stuff out of context.
04:29:28 I want to discuss the issue.
04:29:29 Her opening salvo, the truth, was a tweet from Andrew's wife 15 years ago and one of his at replies as to.
04:29:37 Why he was convinced Tyler Robinson did it.
04:29:38 And by the way, that at reply did not say these are the only reasons I believe Tyler Robinson did it.
04:29:42 He just presented some pretty strong pieces of evidence.
04:29:47 Okay.
04:29:47 Also, we have another claim from Candace.
04:29:50 We could actually play it to then and now that she, of course, she's above the fray. 1.00
04:29:55 She does not do the whole criticizing. 0.83
04:29:57 That's why I stayed away from criticizing Erica Kirk, her outfit, or anything. 0.90
04:30:00 You know, that would be ad hominem.
04:30:02 I just criticized the fact that she believed Tyler Robinson did it.
04:30:04 That's all.
04:30:06 And then, of course, she did. 0.95
04:30:07 She made fun of Erica Kirk's outfits and said that her stylist hated her.
04:30:10 Here you go.
04:30:11 I actually, this is why I did not engage in any like Erica, everyone's questioning what she's wearing and all this stuff.
04:30:17 I was like, I'm gonna wait here because I don't know, just it feels weird.
04:30:22 I always try to stay away from the petty things about Erica that don't register as right, but I just go, okay, it's a little too petty when people talk about her outfits, wearing the glitter pants and things like that.
04:30:33 Yeah, it does kind of build a profile of somebody.
04:30:36 I personally just say that I think her stylist is just deeply dislikes her, whoever it is, deeply dislikes her.
04:30:41 Well, if you take it out of context, by the way, I think leather pants and sparklers was a bad look.
04:30:46 So, like, that's valid.
04:30:47 I just wouldn't say that I wouldn't make those criticisms.
04:30:51 Let me know, too.
04:30:51 They can let me know if Gerald is going to be back and if we can get Andrew, if we can get PBD or Candace, just let me know.
04:30:57 Let me ask you this, though, before we get to your chats.
04:30:59 Here are the questions that I wanted answered.
04:31:01 Andrew is good to do it.
04:31:03 Andrew's good to do it.
04:31:03 Okay, guys.
04:31:03 Just a minute or two, yeah.
04:31:05 The questions I wanted answered, and I would like to know if you feel as though you had this answered because I believe, you know, this is what most of you wanted answered.
04:31:12 The Egyptian plains.
04:31:14 That was the big thing before we went into Thanksgiving.
04:31:16 I remember it.
04:31:18 Do you feel like, or do you think you got the answers that you needed for?
04:31:22 How 66% of the plane locations that she claimed were wrong, 60% in an entirely different continent, and she had the wrong time zones.
04:31:30 Do you feel like I got a good answer on Egyptian planes?
04:31:32 Do you think that you got a good answer on the French Foreign Legion training Tyler Robinson?
04:31:39 Do you think you have a good answer on that, or has it been put to bed?
04:31:42 Because here's the thing if you present the conspiracy, if you present the theory, well, only you can put it to bed.
04:31:48 Right?
04:31:48 Either we're never going to get an answer, or here's the answer.
04:31:52 Do you think you got a good answer?
04:31:54 Leaving this, we're just basing this on truth.
04:31:56 Do you think you got a good answer on the Mormon Utah communist beehive cult training Tyler Robinson?
04:32:05 And for those of you who forgot, here's a clip.
04:32:07 A lot of you were saying, Whatever happened with this?
04:32:09 It's clip B's Tyler.
04:32:11 B's Tyler.
04:32:13 A Polish underground symbol, like a Polish communist underground symbol that nobody would have recognized outside of people who know what it meant.
04:32:21 There's imminent danger coming, okay?
04:32:23 It is relating to a school.
04:32:25 I think it's a communist underground, and I don't know why, but it has something to do with bees.
04:32:29 Then came September 10th.
04:32:30 Obviously, Charlie lost his life.
04:32:32 And a few days later, I was told and I sensed instantly that there was like a hive of people that were involved in this.
04:32:39 I just knew it.
04:32:40 And when it happened, I just went, oh my goodness.
04:32:44 Utah recently, extraordinarily, you know, did modernize their bee flag.
04:32:49 I had no idea.
04:32:51 And I believe that they find these candidates in schools.
04:32:54 I really do.
04:32:55 I think they find these candidates in schools.
04:32:56 And so I wanted to express that to you.
04:32:59 So, do you have good answers on that?
04:33:00 Like, which schools?
04:33:03 Just as one question, do you feel like you have a good answer?
04:33:06 Do you think you have a good answer?
04:33:08 I'm using her terms and then the term that you should use, think.
04:33:11 That Tyler Robinson was never on campus, that he's clearly a patsy, he was never there.
04:33:16 Do you think you have a good answer on that?
04:33:17 This is something a lot of people wanted answers for.
04:33:20 Do you think that you have a good answer on Erica Kirk?
04:33:23 Was she involved?
04:33:25 Andrew Colvitt?
04:33:25 Was he involved?
04:33:27 TPUSA?
04:33:27 Were they involved?
04:33:29 And why were they involved?
04:33:31 Do you have good answers on these?
04:33:32 Because these are claims that she made.
04:33:34 These are definitive timelines that she set, but never finished.
04:33:38 I'm trying to think if there's anything else that I have here.
04:33:42 Oh, do you think you have a good answer on Erica Kirk and her connection to Jeffrey Epstein?
04:33:46 Do you think you have a good answer on the exploding microphone?
04:33:50 And then we can get into her personal timeline, which we haven't done.
04:33:52 Maybe we'll do that after because I think it's important to know who you're dealing with.
04:33:55 But I think this has been quite illuminating.
04:33:56 Are you saying that we have Gerald andor Andrew?
04:33:59 Yep.
04:33:59 Yes, correct.
04:34:01 That's not an answer.
04:34:01 Which one?
04:34:03 Both. 0.83
04:34:04 Both?
04:34:04 Both?
04:34:04 Oh my gosh, it's a duo act.
04:34:06 Who's on first?
04:34:07 Okay, let's bring them on.
04:34:12 They don't know that they have an intro going.
04:34:14 All right.
04:34:20 All right.
04:34:20 There was an intro, which I'm sure Gerald talked over.
04:34:23 Andrew, Gerald.
04:34:25 Oh my gosh.
04:34:26 Thank you.
04:34:26 This looks like a hostage video.
04:34:28 I expect one of you to be getting your head sawed off with a machete. 0.99
04:34:31 Very funny. 0.99
04:34:32 Very funny, tall man.
04:34:34 You can't bench press your way out of this one.
04:34:35 Well, there's a reason for this.
04:34:38 I'm trying to make sure I pretty much only get the car in the shot really quickly here.
04:34:42 So, what I'm going to do is pass the camera back to Andrew right here in the back.
04:34:45 Do me a favor, go to just Steven for a second so that Andrew can position so that he's not giving away any location information.
04:34:51 So, okay, position Andrew.
04:34:54 They didn't stay for lunch.
04:34:57 I got lunch hot lunch.
04:35:01 Hey, hey, they're in Nashville, not Cleveland.
04:35:05 There's no steamer.
04:35:06 All right, thank you very much.
04:35:08 Appreciate it.
04:35:10 And Andrew, let me know when you feel comfortable.
04:35:12 Oh, right now it looks like that movie, White Noise.
04:35:15 Sweet.
04:35:16 Remember with Michael Keaton?
04:35:17 They come out of the TV where it goes and the ghost eats you?
04:35:20 Yeah.
04:35:21 Yeah, that is quite noisy.
04:35:22 Okay.
04:35:23 Okay.
04:35:25 I think skin is covering the camera. 0.86
04:35:26 I feel like I'm watching one of those reproductive videos where it's inside the woman when you learn that in college. 0.94
04:35:32 Like, this is how a baby is made.
04:35:33 It looks like I'm in the birth canal.
04:35:35 This is Ryan Mann.
04:35:35 It's buried.
04:35:37 There we go.
04:35:38 There he is.
04:35:40 Mr. Wilson, I'm sure you're tired.
04:35:41 Thank you for taking the time, sir.
04:35:43 Steven, how are you guys doing?
04:35:44 Well, we're doing pretty well.
04:35:46 Of course.
04:35:47 We have the drinking game going, and you know, it's been tough.
04:35:50 I'm not going to lie to you.
04:35:52 What are your thoughts?
04:35:53 I'm surprised you didn't stay by to have drinks with her and her hyperly masculine husband, Mr. Farmer.
04:36:00 So, since you're leaving the homestead, you're just heading right back.
04:36:03 You're leaving?
04:36:06 No, no, no.
04:36:06 We're staying another night.
04:36:08 The debate goals, every single one of them was accomplished.
04:36:12 So, it was we knew going in would be Operation Letter Speak, and we knew that she'd contradict herself, and we knew that she would have zero evidence.
04:36:19 And all of that was accomplished.
04:36:22 Yeah.
04:36:22 I wish we could have gotten into a lot more of it, but she was, it was very obvious to everybody there that if she was getting pushed any harder than she was, that she was going to just, we weren't going to get anywhere.
04:36:35 That's actually a question that I had because there were the one criticism that I would have, and I know, you know, you'll say I'm a dick and I'll say you're a dick, is at the end I would have rapid fired, like, okay, how about the Mormon communists training him? 0.87
04:36:45 How about the, but it seemed like, and I've had to do this with some conversations or debates, you guys were concerned that she might just throw the table over if you went a little too aggressively. 0.91
04:36:57 Right.
04:36:58 That's the whole point.
04:36:59 Yeah.
04:36:59 So, the major points of contention that we got was that she had no evidence whatsoever.
04:37:06 And all the claims that she had made about Erica Kirk at TPUSA were basically tongue in cheek, according to her.
04:37:11 She doesn't even mean them.
04:37:12 She has no evidence for her steakhouse, no evidence for her timeline, no evidence that there's a patsy whatsoever.
04:37:17 And all of her claims that she made were basically just fun. 0.87
04:37:23 Yeah.
04:37:23 Well, I don't know if you probably didn't see because, by the way, I hate to tell you this, but we had to use Candace's stream from YouTube because yours was like.
04:37:29 20 seconds later, and people were complaining.
04:37:30 No problem.
04:37:31 But we've been sending people to the Gibson Go.
04:37:33 And by the way, also, we have Jesse's going to be fired because our YouTube doesn't have premium.
04:37:37 So there were ads running.
04:37:38 So someone's going to be fired.
04:37:39 That makes you feel good because you're, you know, we're both brothers in cruelty.
04:37:44 Yes, 100%. 0.85
04:37:46 I'm going to fire somebody too, just because you are.
04:37:48 Yeah, exactly.
04:37:49 That's all I want you to get.
04:37:50 I don't want you to get or feel in any way like you're going to one up me here, Steve.
04:37:55 How about you give me the guy?
04:37:57 I fire your guy and you fire my guy just because we throw them for a loop.
04:38:02 Let me ask.
04:38:03 Industry, you're fired.
04:38:04 I did it first.
04:38:05 I did it first.
04:38:08 You can't fire Gerald, though, because he's so big and athletic and it's intimidating.
04:38:12 One quick question.
04:38:12 True.
04:38:13 Did they Nixon JFK you? 1.00
04:38:14 Because she has a full stylist and makeup crew. 0.99
04:38:16 Did they give you makeup and, like, no, no, no.
04:38:18 You looked a little bit shiny.
04:38:19 I would have refused.
04:38:20 You looked a little bit shiny.
04:38:21 I would have refused, dude.
04:38:22 You looked a little shiny.
04:38:22 I would have refused, dude.
04:38:23 You looked a little shiny.
04:38:24 Yeah, I would have refused, dude.
04:38:25 You looked a little shiny.
04:38:26 Yeah, I looked a little shiny.
04:38:28 It happens.
04:38:29 But, yeah, I mean, look at that.
04:38:31 Does she have Hakeem Olajuwon hands in real life?
04:38:37 What the hell is that?
04:38:38 Large hands. 0.84
04:38:39 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
04:38:40 No, no, she doesn't.
04:38:43 Okay, all right.
04:38:44 Go ahead with your valid point. 1.00
04:38:45 I'm being childish and stupid. 1.00
04:38:49 No, go ahead with your valid point. 1.00
04:38:50 I was just being childish and stupid because we've had the drinking game. 0.97
04:38:52 Please give it to me. 0.97
04:38:54 Nothing, nothing.
04:38:55 The thing is, we knew that we were probably only going to get three and a half hours of actual runtime.
04:39:02 We knew that that was all we were going to get.
04:39:04 That's why I moved very quickly.
04:39:06 Like, hey, you can interrogate my claims as much as you want for the hour and a half, but I was very adamant that we got the last hour and a half of actual runtime so that I could get into her claims.
04:39:16 So.
04:39:17 I know that this ran a long time.
04:39:19 People from their end, they think it was like five hours, but with all the ads and breaks and everything else, it was actually only like three and a half hours. 1.00
04:39:27 Ah, shut the fuck up. 0.99
04:39:28 They didn't have ads, they just had we're coming back. 1.00
04:39:30 And this is, we actually had ads, we actually had commercials. 1.00
04:39:34 She just wants the money and she doesn't even put ads in there.
04:39:36 I wanted to ask you two things.
04:39:38 So, one, and this is actually important.
04:39:41 We all know that there are people who will agree with you.
04:39:44 And by the way, PBD's crowd mostly agreed, mostly thought you won.
04:39:48 We'll bring up our own poll.
04:39:49 But you know that there are people who will already agree with you no matter what, people who will agree with her no matter what, then there are some who have ears to hear, eyes to see.
04:39:56 How do you think that needle will be moved from today?
04:40:02 Well, I think it's the beginning of a snowball effect.
04:40:05 Okay.
04:40:05 So now that she's been challenged, I think, and had to give an accounting for the evidence, did a very poor job, I think that more of them will feel compelled to do more of these debates, or at least I'm hoping so.
04:40:18 And I think that that'll create the snowball effect.
04:40:21 At least that's what I'm hoping.
04:40:22 But ultimately, there wasn't a need to push back too much on too many things because she just admitted that she didn't have any evidence for anything.
04:40:32 Well, that was where you go from there.
04:40:33 You're like, hey, do you have any evidence for that?
04:40:35 And they're like, no.
04:40:36 Here's where I go from there.
04:40:38 Here's where I go from there because she named like Valhalla, she named a few people.
04:40:42 Andrew, this is important going forward.
04:40:44 And I mean this anyone who's going to present these conspiracies, they need a better champion.
04:40:49 Because there are people online who will tell you why they believe that Israel andor France took out Charlie Kirk.
04:40:54 There are people online who will show you with red yarn why Erica Kirk did it.
04:40:59 She didn't, and she backed away from it.
04:41:01 So, in other words, if people out there are going, we're with you, Candace, go Max, they need a new champion because she absolutely did cower back.
04:41:10 Yeah, she went back on all of her claims.
04:41:12 And so, like, what do you go from there?
04:41:14 There's nowhere, in other words, there was nowhere I needed to go to demonstrate what it was I was trying to demonstrate, which is that these people have lots and lots of claims.
04:41:23 And the second they're confronted with them, they back off on all of them.
04:41:27 Every single time.
04:41:28 Her sources, what a joke that was.
04:41:31 My sources told me, my sources told me.
04:41:33 Well, what validates your sources?
04:41:35 The fact that I've released some footage and stuff.
04:41:38 How would that validate your sources in these things?
04:41:40 That makes no sense at all. 0.79
04:41:43 I think ultimately, I'm sure that there's going to be some negative clips about me, especially pushed by the Owens people. 0.98
04:41:50 I'm going to do some negative clips on you, but that's just for funsies. 1.00
04:41:53 Of course.
04:41:54 But ultimately, She didn't have anything.
04:41:57 She had nothing.
04:41:58 She literally had nothing. 0.98
04:41:59 And so, what made this an easy debate for me was that she didn't fucking have nothing. 0.94
04:42:04 Like, what do you want me to do? 0.96
04:42:05 You don't have anything.
04:42:07 Yeah.
04:42:09 Yeah.
04:42:10 I will say the one thing, if you were to give her credit for anything, what would you give her credit for?
04:42:15 I have one and only one.
04:42:18 I think that she got a gotcha at the end.
04:42:20 I will be fair with that, that that was a gotcha at the end, though I think it wasn't a very good one.
04:42:25 The charges?
04:42:27 What's that?
04:42:28 You mean the gotcha, the charges?
04:42:30 Yeah.
04:42:30 And then the last.
04:42:31 That's what I wrote down to, yeah.
04:42:32 Yeah, that was it, though.
04:42:34 I really don't think I made a single mistake that debate.
04:42:38 Just the gotcha at the end, but who cares?
04:42:40 It's not even important.
04:42:42 Ultimately, what matters is if she has any sort of evidence.
04:42:46 So, the first half of the debate, I remember laughing last night, and I was like, you know, because the trial's not here and this and that, we're really just arguing our opinions on this evidence, right?
04:42:56 Like, am I convinced by it?
04:42:58 Yes.
04:42:59 Are you convinced by it?
04:43:00 No.
04:43:01 Great.
04:43:01 Where do you go from there?
04:43:02 And if that was the extent of all that anybody was talking about, nobody would care.
04:43:08 But it's never been about that. 0.70
04:43:09 It's always been an extensive, overarching, Israel's involved. 0.88
04:43:14 France is involved.
04:43:15 These various people want to kill, you know, blah, And they never have any evidence for any of that.
04:43:21 And that was what was important to demonstrate.
04:43:23 Well, I think it's also important to demonstrate, like we talked about this, this is me being selfish, but, you know, she has called into question our actual investigative journalism, like so the Covenant shooting, right, with Audrey Hale, where she said, actually, my source, I'm glad I did my due diligence, she was sexually abused, wasn't actually true.
04:43:38 Where she said, I was a Fed, our engravings on the bullets, by the way, turned out to be true.
04:43:43 Jay Varma, COVID architect, turned out to be true.
04:43:45 So she calls everyone else into question.
04:43:48 When they actually have ways, there are ways of having an anonymous source and having it validated through a third party in the public eye.
04:43:55 She will tell everyone who will listen that those people are feds.
04:43:58 But what's funny to me is wouldn't a fed be the most likely person to tell you there's no radical trans anything? 0.62
04:44:05 Mr. Crowder's source saying the engravings in the bullet, that's a lie.
04:44:09 And by the way, we've been subpoenaed by the ATF and the FBI. 0.79
04:44:12 Wouldn't a fed say, hey, by the way, Audrey Hale wasn't a radicalized trans shooter, she was sexually abused by a relative? 0.91
04:44:19 So I think she's a fed. 0.75
04:44:23 Yeah, well, look, and feds often feed small amounts of true information so that they can feed false information.
04:44:31 Like, that's how, you know, like if that was a real FedOp, this isn't a FedOp.
04:44:36 Because she has no true information.
04:44:38 Yeah, she doesn't have anything.
04:44:41 There is no counterclaims, in other words.
04:44:43 You can say that you don't believe the state's case.
04:44:46 Sure.
04:44:46 Fair enough.
04:44:47 You can argue about not believing the state's case all day long.
04:44:50 I don't even have a problem with that.
04:44:52 My problem is.
04:44:54 Is that there's tons and tons of these counterclaims, and there is no evidence for any of them.
04:45:00 And she essentially conceded that that was true on every single claim I brought up.
04:45:04 Is there any evidence for that?
04:45:05 Nope.
04:45:06 No.
04:45:06 Any evidence for that?
04:45:07 Long explanation and no.
04:45:09 Is there any evidence for that?
04:45:10 Long explanation followed by no.
04:45:12 Followed by no.
04:45:13 And I pushed each time until I got to no and then moved to the next one. 0.80
04:45:17 I also love how she's like a rabbit, so you can only push so far. 1.00
04:45:21 Wait, you push rabbits?
04:45:22 That's just mean.
04:45:23 I was going to say.
04:45:24 You do it with beagles.
04:45:26 Well, that's where you give them the flea helmet.
04:45:28 The old.
04:45:29 Fauci.
04:45:29 That's right.
04:45:30 But I do that with humans too.
04:45:32 The one thing that I did find funny is at the end, she was like, Well, we agreed to have these fact checkers, but not to just take clips out of context.
04:45:38 And again, I don't think you saw this.
04:45:40 We ran, for example, the side by side of her saying, I've never criticized the outfits, and her saying, Erica Stylus must hate her.
04:45:46 And, you know, it's not about that being the most important claim.
04:45:48 It's just proving that she has no problem verifiably lying.
04:45:53 She has no problem doing that.
04:45:55 Well, her whole thing was to see doubt, right?
04:45:58 Right.
04:45:59 To see doubt with the claims of the state, and my whole point was to see doubt with the claims of her.
04:46:04 It's the same exact thing, right?
04:46:06 It's just question the questioners.
04:46:09 If it's the case that you have problems with state evidence, that's fair, but you should also have problems with the anti evidence people as well.
04:46:16 When they're like, hey, we can just make tons of claims and never have any evidence for any of them, that's insane.
04:46:21 That's literally insane to me.
04:46:23 So I agree with you.
04:46:25 I know you got to go, but tell people the give, send, go because we have it up at our reference page where they can go check our fact check.
04:46:31 Tell folks where they can go and support you and where you'll be next week so they can tune into the after.
04:46:35 Yeah, you can tune into the Crucible.
04:46:37 There's a link on the Crucible's YouTube that goes directly to the Gifts and Go.
04:46:41 We appreciate it.
04:46:42 If you thought that I did a good job today, you want to support me walking into the lion's den, that's a great place to do it.
04:46:49 Also, for those of you who don't know, and I'm going to just say this real quick, even though it's going to embarrass the shit out of him, Steven's, of course, been a great friend to me, and he's supported me 100% of the way.
04:47:00 This entire time, he's supported me 100% of the way. 0.96
04:47:03 Unfortunately, though, he did send dumbass Gerald out here. 0.98
04:47:06 I know. 1.00
04:47:07 I also threatened him with stupid ass Gerald this whole week. 1.00
04:47:11 He's such a. 1.00
04:47:12 Okay, I'm not kidding.
04:47:15 I'm sure.
04:47:16 I also threatened your wife last night, too, Andrew.
04:47:20 I said, if you tell, I said, Joe Lewis has had the surgery, some complications.
04:47:24 I said, but if you bother Andrew with this, I will send your personal address to Candace Owens.
04:47:28 So that happened last night, but go enjoy yourself, take your victory lap.
04:47:32 It is.
04:47:32 And thanks, Lane, and the team for getting all that information to us.
04:47:35 It was incredibly helpful.
04:47:37 So thank you very much.
04:47:38 We very much appreciate it.
04:47:39 Go be safe and stop wearing a tablecloth as your shirt.
04:47:43 All right.
04:47:43 I will not.
04:47:45 I know you won't.
04:47:45 It'll be switched out for a golf shirt or Ed Hardy.
04:47:54 All right, just give me the poll.
04:47:57 And then do we want.
04:48:01 Oh, geez, I was talking.
04:48:03 Give me the results on our poll, and we'll take a few of your chats.
04:48:06 By the way, we take chats every day.
04:48:08 We are live every day, 11 a.m. Eastern.
04:48:11 Today we had to change things around a little bit.
04:48:13 And yeah, we'll be here next week.
04:48:16 We won't go to Rumble Premium today.
04:48:17 We'll just take your chats so that you can see what it is that we do, what you're missing.
04:48:21 And then we will take off and hopefully get some food in us.
04:48:24 What's the poll say?
04:48:25 Ours is a little more decisive.
04:48:27 There you go.
04:48:28 69% for Andrew won and backed him.
04:48:31 Andrew won backed Candace, 4.5%.
04:48:33 Candace won backed her, 18.5%.
04:48:35 And then Candace won backed Andrew, 7.8%.
04:48:39 All right.
04:48:39 Well, that's interesting.
04:48:40 And then, guys, maybe you can kind of take a temperature online from other sources, not like ones that aren't 100% biased either way.
04:48:46 And I think that'll give us a pretty good snapshot.
04:48:47 I'd be willing to bet that.
04:48:49 That Candace didn't come across really well, and the people who are diehards will say, Andrew tried gotchas, and ignore the fact that they brought up a tweet that was 15 years old from his wife or some at reply.
04:48:59 Let's grab, you know what?
04:49:00 Do you have the stinger?
04:49:01 Chats! 1.00
04:49:02 Chats!
04:49:07 Read the chat. 0.88
04:49:07 I'm stretching my legs a little bit, Noodles. 0.88
04:49:09 All right.
04:49:12 Tell her who Mastodon is.
04:49:15 Mastodon?
04:49:15 What?
04:49:15 Mastodon?
04:49:16 Yeah, it's a great band.
04:49:17 Oh, it's a good band.
04:49:18 It's like a social media chat server.
04:49:20 Anyway.
04:49:20 All right, next.
04:49:22 First chat from Ziggy Zoggy. 0.99
04:49:25 If Candace gets smoked, obviously this is earlier. 1.00
04:49:27 If Candace gets smoked in this debate, what. 1.00
04:49:29 We won there earlier. 1.00
04:49:30 What?
04:49:30 I was like, hey, by the way, this is from 1974.
04:49:34 All right, well, I guess your chat gets skipped.
04:49:36 Sorry, Ziggy Zoggy.
04:49:37 Fine, wait, wait, wait.
04:49:38 Give it to me.
04:49:38 I'll read it.
04:49:39 Should have commented later, Zig.
04:49:40 Yeah.
04:49:41 Ziggy sent a chat, sent it from two decades ago.
04:49:46 All right.
04:49:47 If she gets smoked in this debate, which she did, what will be the penalty? 1.00
04:49:50 She's already rich. 1.00
04:49:51 She loses a percentage of her audience.
04:49:53 Sounds like no sanction for any of this, unlike an Alex Jones.
04:49:56 Yeah, what's the penalty? 1.00
04:49:58 Well, she's not just rich because she earned it. 1.00
04:50:00 Let me tell you how Candace got rich. 0.97
04:50:03 This is important. 1.00
04:50:05 She got rich first being a liberal. 0.96
04:50:08 Then she got rich taking money from the Jews. 0.80
04:50:12 And then she got rich marrying a rich guy. 0.85
04:50:14 So let me lay this out for you.
04:50:15 It's important for you to know who you're dealing with.
04:50:16 I think a lot of people aren't familiar with it.
04:50:18 Let me walk through this timeline.
04:50:19 You know what?
04:50:19 Let's just roll some clips on this.
04:50:21 I think this is valid to answer this chat.
04:50:23 And this is why she wouldn't want to debate me.
04:50:25 Because there's one thing I will say to pat myself on the back.
04:50:27 And Tim knows this.
04:50:28 This is why Tim came in, Toolman Tim, where I give a tough time, but very much appreciate him.
04:50:33 He knows a lot about birds, so that's cool.
04:50:36 Very cool.
04:50:37 Knows a lot about birds.
04:50:38 He's not a bird lawyer, but he knows a lot about birds.
04:50:41 He came in ready to think that I was like going to just hate him, but that's because he worked in conservative media for a long time and they basically train up your replacements to fire you.
04:50:49 And we became friends when I realized, hey, Tim's really good at what he does.
04:50:52 Could you help me with X?
04:50:55 So Tim has been here for a while.
04:50:58 Tim also knows that I'm the only one who has a video from me in 2007, 2008 doing Crazy Pete's abortion barn.
04:51:06 There was no grifting, it was only an opportunity cost.
04:51:09 So let's go back to then.
04:51:10 Let me walk you through the timeline. 0.97
04:51:12 The only thing that you could say is a through line is that Candace has done what is financially expedient.
04:51:20 2007, she's in high school.
04:51:22 Okay?
04:51:23 She sued her school.
04:51:25 And I may be getting some details wrong.
04:51:27 I know we have a clip saying that there are racist and sexually threatening voicemails from a group of boys, including the son of then mayor.
04:51:35 And she was repped by the NAACP.
04:51:38 Here's a clip from C SPAN.
04:51:40 This is her in 2007.
04:51:41 And by the way, she ended up winning $37,000. 0.67
04:51:43 I'm going to show you how Candace built her fortune.
04:51:46 I received a slew of messages from the Democrat governor of Connecticut's son, Mr. Daniel Malloy.
04:51:55 And at the time, he was the mayor of Stanford.
04:51:57 And his son, along with three other boys, referred to me as the N word, threatened to tar and feather my family, and put a bullet in the back of my head, like they did to Martin Luther King.
04:52:08 This is a story that's not often spoken about.
04:52:11 Yeah.
04:52:11 And here's one other through line she always presents herself as the victim, as the martyr.
04:52:14 So she was repped by the NAACP.
04:52:17 By the way, she was a known liberal, and I'll show you through a very long period of her life, including that period of her life.
04:52:22 The NAACP held press conferences, as they always do.
04:52:25 Family sued the Stanford Board of Education.
04:52:27 They settled for $37,000.
04:52:29 Okay.
04:52:30 You know, an Al Sharpton type situation.
04:52:32 Then you go to 2015. 0.64
04:52:33 So, how did Candace build her fortune? 1.00
04:52:35 Degree 180, that was an anti Trump blog where she, you know, obviously would have made revenue through traffic. 0.94
04:52:41 She co founded this blog website, Degree 180, that was explicitly progressive and anti conservative to the point of being.
04:52:52 You could argue, rhetorically violent.
04:52:55 What's up, everyone?
04:52:56 My name is Candace Owens.
04:52:58 I'm the CEO of Degree180.com, here answering your questions.
04:53:02 And so, this site, you can check all the references.
04:53:04 We make those available, link in the description, as we do every single show. 0.97
04:53:08 She celebrated the eventual death of the Republican Tea Party, which was obviously backlash to Barack Obama, who she very passionately supported, ran anti Trump pieces, including a whole bunch of pieces about his penis size. 0.72
04:53:21 A lot of that actually came from one of the sites that she ran.
04:53:23 It was shut down by the end of 2016.
04:53:26 As she kind of pivoted.
04:53:27 I know what you're thinking.
04:53:27 She pivoted to something conservative.
04:53:29 No. 1.00
04:53:29 Here's a spring of 2016, again, how she built her fortune social autopsy. 1.00
04:53:34 Kickstarter is what she had for a public searchable database of, quote, awful, nasty comments on social media, specifically from conservatives who were misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, racist.
04:53:47 In other words, she was pitching Kickstarter.
04:53:50 Her shark tank was, hey, let's create a site that gives the names, photos, Employment information of conservatives with a right leaning point of view to destroy their lives.
04:54:03 It was called social autopsy. 0.95
04:54:05 Also, it sought to ban people from public platforms.
04:54:08 Here's a clip.
04:54:08 We are fostering a society of online bullying, social tormenting, and irresponsible sharing.
04:54:15 With the ability to privatize social profiles and use pseudonyms in place of real names, it has been a free for all.
04:54:22 That is until now.
04:54:25 Introducing social autopsy.
04:54:28 The first ever search database that compiles and allows the public to easily access the digital footprint of individuals and companies.
04:54:37 And by the way, there are critics across the spectrum, including on the left back then, who called it basically a doxing or blacklisting tool.
04:54:43 Kickstarter suspended the campaign.
04:54:45 Here's a clip.
04:54:46 Within 48 hours of being published, the social autopsy Kickstarter page was going viral and not in a positive way.
04:54:53 Hannah's contacted Kickstarter to explain what she believed had happened.
04:54:57 She shared the email correspondence between her and Zoe.
04:55:00 At first, they told her they understood and would keep the Kickstarter up.
04:55:03 But eventually, with all the bad publicity, Kickstarter took the campaign down.
04:55:08 Okay, so what do we have?
04:55:09 We have high school using the NAACP to sue basically the mayor's boys.
04:55:14 She has since tried to say, you know what?
04:55:15 This actually got me to reject victimhood culture because I was the victim of a hate crime.
04:55:20 That's how she described it back in the day hate crime.
04:55:23 Then an anti Trump website.
04:55:24 That one really just folded.
04:55:25 She had no excuse.
04:55:26 It was very ineffective.
04:55:28 Then social autopsy.
04:55:29 She framed it as this was actually leftist persecution, which is what eventually red pilled me, which led to her overnight conversion.
04:55:35 In 2017, she said she became a conservative overnight.
04:55:40 We'll give you some examples where it would give me pause.
04:55:44 She said, I realized that liberals were actually the racists when I couldn't make enough money.
04:55:49 I was, I became a conservative overnight. 0.94
04:55:52 You know, I realized that liberals were actually the racists, that liberals were actually the trolls. 0.94
04:55:57 Yeah. 0.91
04:55:58 So she launched this thing, Red Pill Black.
04:56:01 And she, back then, that was kind of an alt right was a thing, and she embraced them.
04:56:06 She claims there, at least back then, you can bring it up Philly Mag, she never voted Democrat.
04:56:11 So here's why this matters because now she's trying to tell you that she's telling the truth.
04:56:14 When she was young, she was a liberal using the NAACP.
04:56:17 Then she had a liberal blog.
04:56:19 Then she had an anti conservative doxing website.
04:56:21 And she says, but after that is when I was red pilled.
04:56:25 After that timeline, she said, by the way, I still, just so you know, I never would have voted Democrat.
04:56:29 But here's a 2025 interview where she said that she definitely would have voted Democrat.
04:56:34 So when you were over at the Daily Wire, now, wait, no, before the Daily Wire, you were a Democrat?
04:56:40 No, that's one of the things I've never been a Democrat.
04:56:41 I've never voted Democrat my entire life.
04:56:43 I just was, I always say I was liberal.
04:56:45 Because I just thought I had to be liberal.
04:56:46 And so if I had voted, I wasn't really politically inclined, I would have voted for Democrats.
04:56:50 And I definitely cried the night Barack Obama won.
04:56:52 Okay.
04:56:55 Where's the consistency other than finances?
04:56:58 This brings us to 2018 onward. 0.96
04:57:01 Blexit, that's how a lot of you maybe knew her.
04:57:03 And I will offer up, hopefully, a fair criticism of Charlie Kirk.
04:57:07 I've got to imagine his researchers knew when Candace said, hey, we're launching Blexit, that she had stolen that.
04:57:14 That had existed from 2016 while she was still a liberal.
04:57:17 Predated her by a good long period of time, but she did decide to commercialize it, fundraise off of it, and say, hey, I'm Mrs. Blexit.
04:57:28 Today in this room, I'm so excited because we are going to launch in front of the world a movement, a movement that will forever be remembered as a piece of American history, a movement called Blexit, the Black Exit.
04:57:43 Now bring up Collage E, it existed back to 2060. 0.59
04:57:46 So she definitely didn't create it, but she profited off of it.
04:57:48 And she was sued, by the way.
04:57:50 I don't know how that lawsuit turned out, but it did exist.
04:57:52 I knew people who were involved with it. 0.95
04:57:54 Candace didn't create Plexit.
04:57:55 Also, there was quite a bit of reporting, not someone showed me, someone said there were receipts showing that there was an unbelievable amount of personal compensation to Candace with Plexit and the organizations with very low donations in comparison.
04:58:10 Meaning, if you were to have a third party audit it, they would say, well, this is basically a slush fund.
04:58:14 The money's going to one person.
04:58:16 It's around this time, by the way, when we talk about money, that she met George Farmer, son of Michael Farmer.
04:58:21 Who is, of course, actually in the House of Lords and her husband, Farmer, confirmed Bullington Club member in London.
04:58:28 So if you guys want to do the Bullington Bohemian Grove or Skull and Bones, the Bullington Club, it's like half of Parliament.
04:58:34 There's nothing on the Bullington Club.
04:58:35 Nothing on the Bullington Club.
04:58:37 It's cheeky about it.
04:58:37 We own half of Parliament.
04:58:39 Part of our initiation is destroying expensive steakhouses and throwing them several thousand dollar bills.
04:58:44 That's actually a real thing.
04:58:45 She got engaged to him 18 days after meeting him via FaceTime, and they got married at the Trump Winery.
04:58:51 In 2019.
04:58:52 Okay.
04:58:53 So we know liberal, liberal, liberal, Kickstarter, Kickstarter. 1.00
04:58:56 This is how she made her money lawsuits. 1.00
04:58:57 Okay.
04:58:57 Then she says, I would have voted Democrat, but I wouldn't have voted Democrat.
04:59:00 Then we go to 2018 to 2023.
04:59:04 This is when she was at not just Daily Wire, but I think Prager U before that.
04:59:09 She made trips to Israel.
04:59:10 She supported Israel.
04:59:11 She was consistently pro Israel.
04:59:14 And she argued against people who were critics of Israel.
04:59:16 Again, opinions change.
04:59:18 But we've already gone from left to right and back to now Israel. 0.79
04:59:23 The one through line is, She's always pro whoever it is that's providing a check.
04:59:28 Here's a clip with Dennis Prager. 0.99
04:59:29 Liberals believe in racial integration.
04:59:32 Leftists believe in racial segregation. 0.99
04:59:34 They are the racists of our day. 0.98
04:59:36 They are truly indistinguishable from the Southern racists that I remember from my childhood, where they would say, no, no, no, we don't want blacks and whites marrying. 0.99
04:59:45 We don't want blacks and whites together. 0.80
04:59:47 That is exactly what you now have from the left. 1.00
04:59:51 So if you believe in a black dorm, you're a leftist, not a liberal. 0.95
04:59:55 Okay, Israel is another example. 0.76
04:59:57 The biggest pro-Israel people in the United States, like Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, were liberals.
05:00:04 Liberals are still pro-Israel.
05:00:06 Leftists hate Israel. 0.67
05:00:07 That's correct.
05:00:08 I could give you example after example.
05:00:10 So I would say the argument could be made that leftists have hijacked liberalism and they've used liberalism as a vehicle to assign their progressivism.
05:00:19 That's right.
05:00:19 So I always say to my fiance, it's so progressive.
05:00:23 It's regressive, right?
05:00:24 So they use a different methodology.
05:00:26 To get to what they want to accomplish is ultimately, like you said, segregation, right?
05:00:30 Or wanting society to be separate, wanting it to be regressive.
05:00:33 So they'll pretend what they're offering is freedom when in fact it's bondage.
05:00:37 You should be so woke as a black person that you should want your own safe space. 0.88
05:00:42 Oh, wait, what? 0.97
05:00:43 You mean segregation?
05:00:44 Excuse me?
05:00:45 I love the idea of preaching what you practice because, and that's what I've always seen, the Jewish community is tremendously conservative and there is a community.
05:00:54 Here's a collage, by the way, with her attending the U.S. Embassy opening in Jerusalem.
05:00:58 And telling people who didn't support it that America, Israel would never forget.
05:01:03 So she wasn't just pro Israel. 0.52
05:01:06 She was very, very, very pro Israel, platformed pro Israel people, and of course took money from nonprofits that would have obviously been notoriously pro Israel.
05:01:15 This is after she said she was a liberal, went back to being a conservative.
05:01:18 Okay.
05:01:19 So now we find ourselves at the point where Candace was a liberal, made all of her bones as a liberal, Kickstarter is a liberal. 0.96
05:01:23 Now she's pro Israel. 0.99
05:01:24 She's taking that check, but she's conservative, but the victimhood culture doesn't leave. 0.78
05:01:29 She rented a luxury apartment in Stamford, Connecticut. 1.00
05:01:33 Stop paying rent for six months.
05:01:35 She claimed that there was discriminatory practice from the landlord.
05:01:38 Toxic mold caused all the severe illness.
05:01:40 She sued.
05:01:42 So, again, claiming victim, this is after she's been conservative.
05:01:45 Landlord countersued and won.
05:01:46 The arbitrator awarded the landlord about $17,000 in unpaid rent.
05:01:51 Now, remember when I opposed the Daily Wire contracts, not because I disagree with Daily Wire on everything politically, I probably agree with them on more than I disagree with them.
05:01:59 She talked about obviously how anyone who criticized Daily Wire was a shill, how I was a horrible person.
05:02:05 She tried to insert herself into Personal affairs with no verification whatsoever.
05:02:09 She tried to discredit our Nashville manifesto, the shooting. 0.99
05:02:13 Then, of course, when she left after taking the checks, she escalated only after leaving.
05:02:21 Only after leaving the financial umbrella of pro Israel and donors and her checks, the rhetoric that some would criticize as anti Semitic.
05:02:29 Candace Owens and conservative website The Daily Wire have officially broken up.
05:02:34 Friday morning, The Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boring posted on X Daily Wire and Candace Owens have ended their relationship.
05:02:42 He did not give a reason on the concern.
05:02:44 On the circumstances that led to this shift, Owens has been outspoken in her commentary about Jewish people in politics, in the media, and her support for Palestine.
05:02:53 Okay.
05:02:53 So, comparing that just with myself, just so we actually have a personal comparison, going from 2007 onward, you can see me as a young man in front of a blue bed sheet, taping on a digital 8 camera, being conservative, conservative, conservative, conservative, obviously becoming more polished or becoming more experienced as far as the delivery mechanism.
05:03:13 But I still own.
05:03:14 The YouTube channel.
05:03:15 I still own everything.
05:03:16 I still own the name.
05:03:17 I still believe the same things, and perhaps I've become more seasoned.
05:03:23 She went back and forth and back and forth and back and forth, and even defended Daily Wire when I said, Hey, you know what?
05:03:28 Their contracts are not good. 0.99
05:03:30 Don't sign them.
05:03:31 Young people don't sign these contracts because they own your name, image, and likeness forever. 0.83
05:03:34 She said, This guy is awful.
05:03:36 He's lying.
05:03:36 They are the best until she left.
05:03:38 Needed to start her own channel because she didn't own her own social media in a lot of facets, which is what I was warning against. 0.74
05:03:45 Then all of a sudden, everyone at the Daily Wire was a shill. 0.91
05:03:48 She may mean what she's saying. 0.99
05:03:51 The question becomes when?
05:03:54 And yes, she is set for life because she did marry into money, which, by the way, I'm sure is just a coincidence.
05:04:00 Also, it's only alleged, only alleged that she was living with some other guy for years until she immediately, within 18 days, took the engagement with super, super wealthy heritage of British lords, George Farmer.
05:04:12 All right, next chat.
05:04:14 All right.
05:04:15 Hey, that's a great aside.
05:04:17 I'm just saying, letting you guys know, like, so which Candace, are you dealing with?
05:04:21 I'm telling you, the Candace you're dealing with today is not the same one you will deal with a year from now.
05:04:25 It will be a flip flop, guaranteed.
05:04:28 And you can just mark this.
05:04:30 It will be based on what is best for an audience at that point in time.
05:04:35 Guarantee you.
05:04:36 I'd bet my life on it.
05:04:37 Next chat.
05:04:38 All right.
05:04:38 Next chat from Mustang Guy 06.
05:04:41 Question for crew Do you think that Candace will claim she won this debate while claiming to be a victim and claim she gave evidence she didn't have? 1.00
05:04:48 What do you think this means for her fan base? 1.00
05:04:50 Yeah.
05:04:50 No, not only will she do that, she'll say that Andy Walsh won.
05:04:54 Yeah.
05:04:55 Well, she said. 0.88
05:04:55 She claimed it, trying to end it early. 0.88
05:04:57 She said, you obviously aren't very confident in your thing because, you know, your wife said that you were an army sniper 15 years ago, and I'm going to hold you to that, but you shouldn't hold me to my exact specific claims with latitude, longitude, and time codes that were wrong.
05:05:12 She not only will do that, she'll claim that Andrew didn't honor the terms, that there was something that was pulled on her, a fast one.
05:05:21 You know, the terms are okay.
05:05:22 You argue this.
05:05:23 There is.
05:05:24 Overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk.
05:05:28 He's a patsy.
05:05:30 Andrew said, I will argue that there is overwhelming evidence that he is the one who most likely shot Charlie Kirk.
05:05:35 And they were both allowed to have, I believe it was three fact checkers.
05:05:38 I don't remember the number.
05:05:39 He was allowed to bring three people with him.
05:05:40 So could she?
05:05:41 Neutral debate moderator, though it was taking place in her house on her stream at her time, which of course, late. 0.94
05:05:49 She's black. 0.82
05:05:51 She'll say that it wasn't fair to her. 0.99
05:05:54 Guarantee you, she will say it was not fair to her.
05:05:57 She already did.
05:05:58 She said that these fact check videos that we were sending in, or that we were helping send in, and that Andrew was providing was all just secret clips and chopped up clips.
05:06:11 Yeah.
05:06:11 And she already tried, but it wasn't like that.
05:06:14 It was in response to things that she was actively saying at the time that people were sending in.
05:06:19 And to be fair, Andrew did ask me to go, and I was like, I can't.
05:06:22 It's the first week of school.
05:06:23 Joe Lewis is going in for a major surgery.
05:06:26 She would have thrown a huge fit, too, by the way.
05:06:28 Yeah.
05:06:28 And I said, you know what?
05:06:29 I said, I don't want this to be a.
05:06:30 She does not want to face you in person because the main reason is because she's said so many things about you in the past not related to this subject.
05:06:37 Right.
05:06:38 And she has yet to say anything about it.
05:06:39 She's yet to apologize.
05:06:40 She's yet to acknowledge that she was wrong, even though in the end of the debate, she's like, I'll always admit when I'm wrong.
05:06:45 She won't.
05:06:46 She hasn't and she won't, and it would have been a huge problem.
05:06:48 And it might have been bad for Andrew if you were there, honestly.
05:06:50 Yeah, so I didn't want to go, but Gerald did.
05:06:54 We all had to have a meeting yesterday to kind of put that together last minute.
05:06:57 So we apologize if there were any glitches.
05:06:59 But, you know, yeah, and to be as straightforward as possible, I do want the truth out of this.
05:07:06 And I don't, my bias is I don't believe that Candace is being truthful at all.
05:07:10 Just like she wasn't truthful when she tried to insert herself and take part in the extortion, allegedly, of my private divorce that was.
05:07:17 Legally held private, and then only as a matter of court record, is one example where there was no infidelity or abuse, which of course was implied the opposite.
05:07:25 She inserted herself trying to claim that I was fed or being fed information from the feds, whereas I've actually been subpoenaed and investigated by the feds.
05:07:34 I don't know if Candace has.
05:07:36 So the truth is, I'm a worth nightmare.
05:07:38 You can call iced tea.
05:07:41 I am glad that Gerald was able to be there.
05:07:45 This is about how I thought it would go.
05:07:47 I would have liked a little bit more kind of.
05:07:49 Laser questioning at the end from Andrew, but you know, I understand too sometimes you have someone who can be skittish and they'll run off and they'll just blow everything up.
05:07:57 So, next chat.
05:07:58 And just real quick to touch on the very, very end of the question what do we think will happen with her fan base? 0.99
05:08:04 Research kind of sent in probably what we expect. 0.91
05:08:06 Yeah.
05:08:06 Yeah.
05:08:07 There are people who shine for her still shilling for her.
05:08:09 It doesn't matter.
05:08:09 Why aren't you asking questions?
05:08:11 She's just asking questions, but she didn't.
05:08:13 They don't understand the difference between asking a question and a claim. 0.87
05:08:15 And let's be honest about 80 to 90% of our audience are women. 0.86
05:08:20 Who are not used to being in the space. 1.00
05:08:22 They've been saturated with true crime.
05:08:24 And they just go, we trust, go Max.
05:08:28 Okay.
05:08:29 There's plenty of evidence to suggest that she is incorrect.
05:08:33 There is none to suggest that she has any type of evidence or inside sources that is unique or would be considered correct by any objective standard, certainly not a court of law. 0.81
05:08:45 That's where she operates. 0.94
05:08:46 And she just moves on to the next one. 0.99
05:08:48 I will say this I hate to be an elitist because there are people on the left who are not dumb. 0.96
05:08:52 They believe some. 0.92
05:08:54 They believe some mistruths, I guess to say. 1.00
05:08:58 A big portion of Candace's audience are substantially stupid. 1.00
05:09:01 Next chat. 1.00
05:09:03 Well, that's a good segue, I suppose.
05:09:04 Kinjax asks Is it still healthy to question things?
05:09:08 Sure.
05:09:08 Especially after COVID or any of the nonsense lies.
05:09:12 Do any of you believe she's questioning anything in good faith?
05:09:16 Of course, you should question things.
05:09:19 Mostly.
05:09:20 She's not doing it in good faith.
05:09:21 She's not doing any of it in good faith.
05:09:22 She does this thing where she'll say something and she's just asking questions.
05:09:26 And then when she's pressed on it, she goes, Well, I didn't make that claim.
05:09:29 Right.
05:09:30 You know, I'm not saying Erica Kirk or TPSA were involved in it, but you all but did.
05:09:34 Right.
05:09:35 You all but did.
05:09:36 That's not questioning it.
05:09:37 It's one thing to say, Well, I don't know. 0.96
05:09:39 Maybe Erica Kirk, she's a little suspicious to me.
05:09:43 It's one thing to say that. 0.56
05:09:44 It's another thing to be like, She should be dragged into the police precinct.
05:09:46 Yeah.
05:09:47 And I've never trusted her, not even when he started dating her. 0.99
05:09:49 Like all this crap. 0.96
05:09:51 It's a totally different thing than just questioning things. 0.99
05:09:54 It's so not in good faith that you have to go, Okay, what's the flash of genius moment where you went from.
05:09:59 Running to the NAACP, running to Kickstarter to start an anti conservative doxing website, running to run an anti Trump, anti conservative blog, to being pro Israel, to then being anti.
05:10:12 It's like my eyes were opened, but four or five times.
05:10:15 So at best.
05:10:17 Yeah, what are you saying?
05:10:19 Yeah, let's say she's being honest.
05:10:20 Okay, how many people do you know in life who have had a genuine awakening four or five times and changed their worldviews?
05:10:28 I know none.
05:10:29 I know zero.
05:10:30 Drug addicts.
05:10:31 Okay. 0.99
05:10:32 Yeah, they'll do it, but that's because their brain's all. 0.98
05:10:34 That's because they're delusional.
05:10:36 How many people do you know who woke up and went, I'm conservative?
05:10:39 Sure, once.
05:10:40 How many do you know who went, I'm liberal?
05:10:42 No, I'm this kind of liberal.
05:10:43 No, I'm conservative, but I'm not this kind of conservative.
05:10:45 And now I'm back to Democrat.
05:10:46 The answer for me is zero outside of people who are doing what is politically or economically expedient.
05:10:53 Next chat.
05:10:53 All right.
05:10:54 Real quick, they did just send in a tweet from Nick Fuentes, if we want to read that.
05:10:57 Okay.
05:10:58 Oh.
05:11:00 If you can't, I.
05:11:00 It says that debate was basically unwatchable, but what is truly striking is how Charlie Kirk has become a background character in the endless soap opera about his own murder.
05:11:10 The story now revolves around the raging narcissist Candace Owens and the mass psychosis she has induced.
05:11:16 Yeah, you know, I think that's a valid point.
05:11:19 We also had a conversation today like, well, you know, how somber should this tone be because there was a guy who was assassinated?
05:11:25 And it's like, well, that's not in our control because Candace has turned it into a circus.
05:11:30 And the only way to deal with a circus is to mock it.
05:11:33 So, yeah, I think Nick makes a good point there.
05:11:37 It doesn't mean I agree with him on everything, but credit where it's due.
05:11:40 Next chat.
05:11:40 All right.
05:11:41 Next chat from Born to Live Free. 1.00
05:11:43 Question for the crew Do you think she opened up herself to lawsuits for lies and libelous statements? 1.00
05:11:50 Would help if you spelled libelous correctly. 1.00
05:11:52 But I don't know.
05:11:56 I don't know, but I don't think so.
05:11:57 It's a little bit different.
05:11:58 Yeah, she was so.
05:11:58 That's just that I don't want to discuss that because I don't want to actually be held to it.
05:12:03 She's going to lose the Macron lawsuit.
05:12:05 And not because. 0.74
05:12:07 Of the New World Order, and not because the Macrones are liberals and socialists, and they are, and I don't like them, but because she's wrong, because they proved to her that she was wrong, because she signed for the snail mail that proved she was wrong with birth certificates, newspaper clippings, evidence of the brother who she claimed Bridget Macron was, and they did in good faith many, many times ask her to stop before they sued her. 0.72
05:12:27 That's why, again, this is just gossip. 0.60
05:12:29 I have it on good authority that the Farmer family, Candace is not allowed at family functions.
05:12:34 It's caused a lot of stress, it's caused fractures in the family. 0.99
05:12:37 Because they don't want to have to pay for her misdeeds.
05:12:40 And she's really running around with a checkbook that she married into. 0.59
05:12:43 She is going to lose. 1.00
05:12:44 You can bookmark that.
05:12:45 I have no doubt.
05:12:46 And it's not because they don't like free speech.
05:12:50 She's going to lose for the same reason that Amber Heard lost after Johnny Depp was dragged through the mud.
05:12:55 She's wrong.
05:12:56 She's lied.
05:12:57 She knows it.
05:12:58 They can prove it.
05:12:59 It's open and shut.
05:13:00 Next chat.
05:13:01 All right.
05:13:01 Next chat from.
05:13:02 I wish that Brigitte Macron would just walk into the courthouse and just drop trowel. 1.00
05:13:06 Just whip it out. 1.00
05:13:07 Because she usually wears pants. 1.00
05:13:08 But the thing is, she would just go, Well, you can have a surgery. 1.00
05:13:12 That's the problem. 0.85
05:13:13 Right?
05:13:13 Yeah.
05:13:14 So instead, they go, You say that there's no evidence of her being born.
05:13:17 You can afford to do that.
05:13:17 Here's a birth certificate.
05:13:18 You say that she's actually taking the identity of her brother.
05:13:21 Here's actually a picture of her and her brother at her wedding to her first husband, who you say don't exist.
05:13:27 Here's a newspaper clipping, right?
05:13:29 All this.
05:13:29 And then they go, Oh, wait, you're not responding to emails?
05:13:31 We are going to send it via snail mail.
05:13:34 Oh, Candace signed for it.
05:13:36 Now, please cease and desist because you know better.
05:13:38 And she continued.
05:13:40 She's going to lose.
05:13:42 Badly.
05:13:43 Dugly blue.
05:13:45 Nice, Jesse.
05:13:46 Very nice. 0.92
05:13:47 The pedophile came through. 0.93
05:13:48 Yeah, good for him. 0.96
05:13:48 Jesus. 0.96
05:13:51 Next chat.
05:13:52 All right, next chat from Liberty Rich. 1.00
05:13:54 She acts like she is only asking these questions to herself. 0.82
05:13:57 To her, herself.
05:13:59 How much influence does she really have on an audience of millions?
05:14:02 She has a lot of influence, but it's not on people who are thoughtful politically or socially. 0.97
05:14:06 It's on people who like gossip and like drama.
05:14:09 Her audience is primarily women who probably wouldn't, not everyone, but a good portion of them.
05:14:14 If you actually look at the demographics of her show, here's the other thing that's really important with Candace.
05:14:20 If Candace isn't pushing a conspiracy or something that's exclusive to her, a scoop, No one watches.
05:14:27 Meaning, Candace wouldn't be able to sustain a show if it was a daily show, just going, okay, what's going on in the news? 0.84
05:14:32 Or let's talk about things, let's inform you of new issues.
05:14:35 Here are some references. 1.00
05:14:37 She wouldn't be able to do it because no one actually cares what Candace thinks about anything. 0.98
05:14:40 They care if Candace has gotten something exclusive and she's convinced enough people that she has the ability to procure investigative journalism and she doesn't.
05:14:50 There's zero proof of it whatsoever. 0.98
05:14:51 She moves on to the next thing.
05:14:53 So that's something else.
05:14:54 She really has boxed herself in.
05:14:56 I mean, I would challenge her.
05:14:57 She wouldn't take it.
05:14:58 Hey, just do two months.
05:15:01 Of just covering the news and creating original content.
05:15:04 They're not scoops, not anything salacious, not gossip, just being really, really, really good as a host and content creator.
05:15:11 She'll never do it. 1.00
05:15:12 She'd go bankrupt.
05:15:13 Next chat. 0.93
05:15:14 All right, next chat from JD surrounded by commies.
05:15:18 Question for Stephen Does she understand that an absence of evidence is not evidence?
05:15:22 No.
05:15:23 And that she is not entitled to the information that is had by the prosecution or Erica?
05:15:27 She does not understand that.
05:15:28 Next chat.
05:15:30 Fair enough.
05:15:31 Two more chats and then we'll go.
05:15:32 Okay.
05:15:34 Next chat from Papa Chaos.
05:15:36 Question for crew Do you think Candace would actually admit it if Andrew was able to even slightly convince her that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk?
05:15:46 So, no, with a caveat.
05:15:49 If she went, Oh my gosh, this trial is just an absolute massacre, and everyone is now seeing that it's clear Tyler Robinson did it, she would switch it and she would say, See, I am able to.
05:16:03 To admit when I am wrong, and she would build a conspiracy up as to why she believed all the misinformation before, as opposed to taking accountability for being the purveyor of it.
05:16:13 So that would be the one exception.
05:16:15 But I tend to doubt. 0.91
05:16:15 She did this stuff during the debate. 0.91
05:16:16 She didn't want to answer for a lot of her claims.
05:16:19 And if I asked her about a claim, she'd go, Well, you got to, well, Rob O'Neill said this.
05:16:23 Right.
05:16:24 Yeah, okay.
05:16:24 Well, Jay, whatever his name is, the guy with the exploding microphone.
05:16:29 Yeah.
05:16:30 Oh, you got to ask him about it.
05:16:31 You should debate him.
05:16:32 Sure.
05:16:33 I will, yeah.
05:16:34 But every time it's like, Well, I got this because this person said it.
05:16:39 They're accountable, not me.
05:16:40 I'm the one that amplified it to millions of people, but it's not me.
05:16:43 I'm not responsible for it.
05:16:44 I'm just asking questions and passing on possible answers.
05:16:47 Yeah, and then she does a thing where it's like, you go, okay, well, we're here to ask these questions.
05:16:52 So can I ask you a follow up?
05:16:53 It seems to me like you're asking that because you're not very confident in how you performed in this debate.
05:16:59 And I hate to use the term narcissist, I hate to use the term pathological because it's overused very, very.
05:17:05 Do you comb your hair? 0.98
05:17:06 You're a narcissist.
05:17:07 But the pathological avoidance of accountability and constantly trying to turn it on someone else so that you are, in fact, the victim.
05:17:15 Does anyone here actually believe that Candace Owens is not an agent of chaos in comparison to the lawyers, in comparison to TPUSA, in comparison to other people who have been providing sources, references, and covering this diligently?
05:17:30 Does anyone want to argue that Candace is more stable and less chaotic because she tried to make the case today that she is actually the beacon of stability?
05:17:38 And everyone else is the ones who are wiffle waffling. 0.93
05:17:42 Batcheck.
05:17:43 You don't get to ask those questions. 0.99
05:17:45 Yes, I do.
05:17:46 You don't tell me what to do.
05:17:47 Final chat.
05:17:48 Let's see.
05:17:49 Final chat from Jackers Johnson.
05:17:53 A question for the crew.
05:17:55 What do you say to young conservatives like me who want to do more to work towards truth but don't have the platform and money that you do?
05:18:01 What can we do to and how can we do it?
05:18:06 Strange phrasing.
05:18:07 Well, by the way, I appreciate the question.
05:18:09 First off, I don't have as much money as you probably think I do.
05:18:12 I don't have TPUSA money.
05:18:14 Yeah, well, that's what I was going to say.
05:18:15 I don't have TPUSA money.
05:18:16 I don't have Daily Wire money.
05:18:17 Two people have turned down a $50 million contract Dave Chappelle and myself.
05:18:20 Now, that was.
05:18:22 $50 million to pay for everything, everyone's salary here, budget, security, all that, insurance, payroll, taxes.
05:18:29 I don't have donor money. 0.67
05:18:31 But I will say this I mean, we just showed that old crazy pizza abortion barn from 2008. 0.59
05:18:35 That's why I started none. 0.98
05:18:37 Everyone starts with no money unless you sell your soul.
05:18:41 And by that I mean join a nonprofit.
05:18:44 And not that all nonprofits are soulless, but by that I mean someone else does get to pull the strings.
05:18:49 You owe, put it that way.
05:18:51 Everyone starts with no money.
05:18:53 Everyone starts with no platform.
05:18:55 I manually added my first 10,000 subscribers by direct messaging.
05:18:59 You could do that on YouTube.
05:19:01 There were no conservatives on YouTube.
05:19:04 There were some gun channels.
05:19:05 And so I manually would message them.
05:19:07 I did a video, I think, on Michael Moore, the Second Amendment, and said, Hey, I think you might, I noticed that you like this channel.
05:19:12 You're subscribed.
05:19:12 You might like my content.
05:19:14 And built it up, built it up, built it up.
05:19:18 Continued to do stand up, continued to take roles where I could.
05:19:23 And now I'm incredibly grateful.
05:19:24 And by the way, this could all go away tomorrow.
05:19:26 The industry is changing.
05:19:27 Click.
05:19:27 Bait is obviously winning out right now, where it's not really the most financially sensible thing to actually create a show, to actually write a show, to actually create content.
05:19:39 What makes more sense is to simply aggregate content and put do you like and turn it into a short.
05:19:45 So, do you like?
05:19:47 Do you like?
05:19:49 But, scuba?
05:19:50 No one has a platform.
05:19:51 And I will tell you this I say this as someone who is smart enough, not a genius.
05:19:58 I say this as someone who is capable enough, not incredibly capable.
05:20:03 I say this as someone who has to get up earlier and stay later and double check everything a few more times, cross my T's and dot my I's, because I believe it's necessary for me to do.
05:20:16 Everyone has the ability to build up something, everyone starts from nothing. 0.99
05:20:23 And that's the problem with this whole black pilling. 0.96
05:20:24 Does it mean that you should compare yourself directly to someone else and be guaranteed that you'll reach that level? 0.90
05:20:30 No.
05:20:32 Good analogy I would use is Phelps.
05:20:35 Michael Phelps is the greatest swimmer that has ever existed.
05:20:39 Now, he ate a lot of McDonald's.
05:20:40 Did he train hard?
05:20:41 Yes.
05:20:41 But some people go, See, he eats McDonald's.
05:20:43 No, it's because the guy has the wingspan of an albatross and he has size 19 feet, whatever it is.
05:20:48 Meaning you can swim your whole life and you'll probably never be a Phelps.
05:20:54 Yeah.
05:20:55 But you can be the best swimmer for your body type.
05:20:59 You could make the big show and maybe you can do something that Phelps can't do.
05:21:03 Some people have genetic gifts.
05:21:05 That's true.
05:21:06 And when you look into the creative arts, when you look into stand up, when you look into hosting, when you look into acting, you look into writing, that's one where the playing field is pretty evened by hard work, not just genetic gifts.
05:21:17 So don't compare yourself directly to somebody else, but you can compare yourself directly to the starting point of a lot of people.
05:21:27 Because barring trust funds, barring nepotism, and that's incredibly rare, everyone starts from zero.
05:21:34 And you don't just have to wait until you build something up, you can do it every day.
05:21:39 The most impactful things for me as far as minds change would be like the lady who cuts my hair. 1.00
05:21:44 I remember when I started, she was apolitical.
05:21:48 I have people who I've worked with, just for example, in transportation.
05:21:52 I have people who I've worked with who've come in who've just sort of helped book guests before.
05:21:57 I can't tell you how many people I've had people who are friends of friends who I've talked with and they've tuned into a couple of shows and go, you know, they gave me something to think about.
05:22:03 I have relatives where day to day interactions.
05:22:06 I have a guy who actually helped me fix my pool when there was a giant flood.
05:22:11 Hi, Jason.
05:22:12 Who then actually printed out Charlie Kirk like hoodies for his company.
05:22:17 Before that, he was entirely apolitical.
05:22:20 You can change minds.
05:22:21 You can change hearts.
05:22:22 You can do it in your day to day and you can find solace and you can really take pride in that or at least a sense of accomplishment while in starting from zero, like almost everybody before you, you build up the platform and your ability to the best that you can be.
05:22:38 And I would say more often than not, you'll surprise yourself with how much you can accomplish.
05:22:45 In Candace's case, sometimes you can just surprise yourself with how much and how effectively you can lie.
05:22:51 We'll see you Monday.
05:23:21 Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $999 a month to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.