Rumble Live is a new streaming service from Crudder with Crowder. This week, the boys discuss the latest in anti-Semitism in the wake of the latest controversy surrounding the new Signal app, and why it's not as bad as the left is making it out to be.
00:01:57.000In live streaming, Rumble, we own live, YouTube is dead, Rumble did it.
00:02:00.000Before we get to the intro here, I want to let you know, today we'll be discussing the major screw-up of the Signal app debacle, but maybe not as big as the left is making it out to be.
00:02:11.000We'll go into some claims, truths, ins and outs.
00:02:13.000And, look, hold your fire here, because all of you will be equally upset.
00:02:18.000We are going to be asking and answering some of the APAC questions.
00:02:24.000But APEC, I know there's been a rash of actual anti-Semitism out there lately, and there's also been a rash of false accusations of anti-Semitism to anyone who is critical of some policies where, you know, some criticism may be warranted.
00:02:37.000We are going to go through all of that and more.
00:03:38.000I just figured we could, you know, kibitz a little bit, you know, as they say, der Menschentachen, Gott lachen, you know, that kind of thing.
00:03:46.000Yeah, it's cool to kick back and relax a little bit, sure, sure.
00:03:48.000Definitely. Do you like the Eschlik for lunch?
00:04:49.000You are now watching the lineup on Rumble Live, exclusively the official home of Louder with Crowder, and you can stream the entire lineup from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
00:07:34.000So yesterday, the former UFC champion, Cain Velasquez, He was sentenced, including, by the way, some time served for a 2022 shooting incident that involved people in the car.
00:07:46.000Now he shot someone who was driving the car, not the alleged child molester who had been systematically molesting his son at a daycare for a long period of time.
00:07:57.000And so Cain Velasquez did what most self-respecting fathers would do.
00:08:04.000That's the sentence for former UFC champion Cain Velasquez after the fighter pleaded no contest to attempted murder and other charges.
00:08:12.000His lawyer asked the judge to release him on probation, but now expects Velasquez will ultimately serve one year in prison after getting credit for time served in jail and in home confinement.
00:08:24.000I believe that in some ways justice was served today, despite feeling disappointed that he is back in custody.
00:08:30.000Now, to be clear, the prosecuting attorney wanted 30 years.
00:08:35.000Velasquez shot at people in a car, included the man Harry Goulart, or Harry Goulart, I have not heard it pronounced, only read it, who allegedly was sexually assaulting his son, and by the way, multiple other children.
00:08:47.000And the reason that we have to say alleged is because the child molester allegedly in question still hasn't been sentenced, still hasn't gone to court.
00:08:55.000And so this does beg the question, look, our justice system.
00:09:01.000But when a man who shoots, who's never been a danger to society whatsoever, shoots someone who, with his verifiable proof from what he claims, molested his son and the so-called molester is still going through the process, at what point do we say, hey, our justice system maybe has a problem?
00:09:19.000And the judge said this when he actually announced the sentence.
00:09:23.000He said, punishment comes in many ways, and one of the worst is forcing a father to not be present in his child's life.
00:10:24.000And it's kind of funny, actually, if this judge says he's not a danger to society, it's actually better than normal because this guy's job was beating people up for a living.
00:10:42.000This guy found a creative outlet instead of being a serial killer.
00:10:45.000Fantastic! Which, by the way, if you're that child molester, I mean, you deserve every consequence that's coming at you just for the fact that you're a moron.
00:10:52.000Or manifest destiny should take care of you because you molested a UFC...
00:12:00.000And then in this instance, if you read some of the headlines and certainly reactions on social media, they seem to be all of a sudden back to law and order.
00:12:11.000Why does it only apply when someone is exacting justice on a pedophile?
00:12:14.000Which, again, you look at the sympathies and where they lie with the left with child-attracted people, was it minor-attracted people, maps.
00:12:21.000And the statistics show that when a pedophile is rehabbed in prison, they do it again.
00:13:20.000Well, at the same time, many of these leftist publications either allowed...
00:13:25.000Advocated for or were understanding of catch-and-release policies, not only for violent felons in our major cities, but even at the borders.
00:13:33.000So I guess they like brown people, just not if they're American shooting pedophiles.
00:13:37.000That's the key thing, shooting pedophiles.
00:13:39.000Yep. They don't want you to shoot pedophiles.
00:13:42.000Why? Seems pretty cut and dry because they like them.
00:15:41.000But this is the guy who, if he had anything that was classified, he would have released it because he fabricated stories like losers and suckers, it only cost $60,000, it's too much to bury a Mexican.
00:16:04.000The National Security Council is right now trying to figure out how a reporter from the Atlantic was added to a group chat discussing upcoming military strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen.
00:16:17.000Atlantic reporter Jeffrey Goldberg says he was added to a small group on the messaging app Signal that included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
00:16:49.000So, at the end of the day, there wasn't anything that was particularly, I should say, poignant as far as military secrets because, of course, if this was leaked to a left-wing press, they often support our enemies and would likely give them a heads-up, especially if it's Hinkle.
00:17:04.000It's not good, but I don't really know that there's a whole lot to come of this other than someone needs to be fired and people need to be careful.
00:17:10.000I also understand why they would move to signal.
00:17:13.000Doesn't mean that it's right, but I can understand the logic.
00:17:17.000President Trump, Secretary Hegseth, they both addressed the controversy yesterday with President Trump finding out seemingly live, and it's entertaining.
00:18:39.000But I also understand, look, to be clear.
00:18:41.000Them going to signal, I understand the presidential, was it presidential records?
00:18:44.000Yeah, well, record preservation of record government, basically, that you can't.
00:18:48.000And I understand they have to go through specific sort of government applications, encrypted services.
00:18:54.000That being said, the first administration, the first term of this administration had more leaks than any administration in our lifetime.
00:19:00.000And so if you're trying to drain the swamp and you don't know who's a friend amongst you, you discuss the official battle plans through the official channels that are required.
00:19:09.000And then you have the contextual conversation that you know you don't want these people reading because they're likely to leak it to the press, where, you know, Pete Hexeth probably doesn't want the press knowing that he calls them a bunch of Eurofags.
00:19:25.000We've had leaks online by accident, which is why we've moved to encrypted apps like Signal, just like this happened last week when we were planning lunch.
00:20:36.000So let's go through some claims and truths here just so we can clear some confusion up.
00:20:40.000Here's a claim that you will hear made across media that top secret war plans were divulged.
00:20:46.000Jeffrey Goldberg reporting he accidentally received top secret war plans from Defense Secretary Pete Hexeth after he was included in a group chat.
00:20:56.000On the encrypted messaging platform, Signal.
00:23:17.000But I think it's a window into there is going to be at some point, presumably some actual opposition to the president and the way it's going on, not just foreign policy, but what's happening with the economy, tariffs, Canada.
00:23:30.000Okay, so, discord among the Trump administration.
00:24:34.000It also made it seem like he's one of the most pro, like, America-first people out there, where he's like, hey, 3% of our shipping goes through there?
00:25:16.000And because I would bet that they are mistrustful of people who may have access to the official government channels.
00:25:22.000I get it, especially considering the leaks of the first administration.
00:25:24.000And when we're talking about the channels that exist and when we're talking about the safeguards that exist as far as protecting information and how it should be treated, The law isn't applied equally.
00:25:35.000See Hillary Clinton, by the way, who tweeted out, who posted on X, are you kidding me?
00:25:39.000No, are you kidding me, you crazy bitch?
00:25:41.000Really? You feel the right to come in?
00:25:44.000So if it's not applied equally, it just means that it can be weaponized.
00:25:46.000I'm willing to bet they were afraid of their private conversations being weaponized, and so they took it to an app.
00:28:30.000Now. Okay, this is something that I've, and just, please, give me a moment to explain some context here.
00:28:38.000I don't like seeing this division that you see on the right, and I think that you have this identity politics, this kind of class warfare going on, really, on what used to be the far left, which is the actual party of anti-Semitism, and then they've sort of connected with the far right in being anti-Semitic.
00:28:54.000There are actual people out there to whom the Jews are at the center of the...
00:29:02.000And then you have people who just like accusing you of racism, homophobia, transphobia, they use anti-Semitic to try and silence any legitimate criticism.
00:29:27.000Your entire religion is effectively based on blasphemy because you're claiming that Jesus Christ isn't the person who he said he is and who we believe him to be.
00:30:05.000I dislike AIPAC for the same reason I dislike ActBlue and the SEIU.
00:30:10.000Because they give huge sums of cash to far-left, anti-American candidates.
00:30:16.000The only caveat with AIPAC is if they support Israel.
00:30:20.000I have no problem with someone who supports Israel.
00:30:22.000I have a problem with someone who's anti-First Amendment, anti-Second Amendment, who's pro-abortion, but goes, oh, I passed the litmus test, pro-Israel.
00:31:04.000I personally support Israel's right to exist, and of course, their war against Hamas right now.
00:31:10.000That doesn't mean that our policy should at any point place allegiance to Israel, Or some kind of lobbying group above that of the United States.
00:31:57.000Just, if you disagree, I expect hate to come from all sides here.
00:32:00.000And I think that most people out there probably line up with this line of thinking more than the people who scream the loudest on social media.
00:32:08.000You can comment at the end of this segment.
00:33:23.000Now, here's the first claim I'm going to address, and this will get me sideways with conservative nonprofits who support Israel no matter what at every single point, including AIPAC, that AIPAC is a very conservative organization.
00:33:38.000APEC's election war chest financed by major donors, including several Republican billionaires and key GOP funders, has started imposing expensive consequences for lawmakers who express criticism of the U.S.'s unwavering support for Israel.
00:34:50.000I didn't realize just how corrosive it was to have such a large organization supporting awful people who seek the destruction of your country.
00:35:26.000That certainly is likely the case, can be argued.
00:35:28.000That doesn't mean that AIPAC is if they're giving to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Hakeem Jeffries and they brag about how 98% of their candidates are elected.
00:35:38.000Am I supposed to be on board with AIPAC?
00:35:40.000Does it make me anti-Semitic if I don't abandon my pro-First Amendment principles, my pro-Second Amendment principles, my pro-life principles?
00:35:45.000Why would I abandon all those principles just because your only qualifier is supporting Israel?
00:36:42.000The choice is a candidate who supports abortion all the way up until including birth, period, and violating your right to self-preservation?
00:36:50.000Why do you not have a problem with abandoning all of those principles?
00:36:54.000Why are conservatives expected to abandon all these principles?
00:36:57.000Because they're afraid of being accused of anti-Semitism if they have a problem with AIPAC supporting Hakeem Jeffries, Wasserman Schultz, Pelosi, Gillibrand.
00:37:06.000The only qualifier of AIPAC, and this is what I believe people have a problem with, it's a legitimate gripe.
00:37:12.000The only qualifier is, do you support Israel regardless of any?
00:38:04.000By the way, it's incredibly responsible to be pro-Israel and also be pissed off at some of the things that Israel does, right?
00:38:10.000Sure. Jesus was exactly this, incredibly pro-Israel, but stood in the temple and basically lambasted them for what they were doing and got really annoyed by them as well.
00:38:18.000I'll just have you sometimes like, ah, how long do I have to put up with these people?
00:38:22.000Oh, if Jesus went to AIPAC headquarters, he'd at least flip a table.
00:38:37.000So, here's another claim that I'm going to go through, and now this is going to anger, unfortunately, the actual anti-Semites of the audience.
00:38:44.000And it's a very, very rare thing, but if you believe that Jews are the cause of all problems in the world, okay.
00:38:49.000I just ask that you apply your outrage equally.
00:38:53.000Alright? And I'm applying it equally here.
00:38:56.000I have the same problem with APEC that I have of ActBlue.
00:38:59.000Or I have with whatever elect Hillary PAC today.
00:39:02.000I don't like them because they don't like our point of view.
00:39:33.000So, if you look at 2024 lobbying, we're sort of separating this here, APEC ranked 191st behind groups like the National Association of Realtors, Chamber of Commerce, and Meta.
00:39:45.000So, if you think the Jews are behind it, a lot of...
00:39:52.000A lot of Pinterest moms with part-time realtors.
00:39:54.000Yeah, there's more money from Botox faces.
00:40:00.000Now, if you look at 2023 to 2024, specifically their direct contributions, AIPAC ranked 18th behind groups like ActBlue, WinRed, Future Forward USA, just to be clear.
00:41:24.000You don't have to worry about a biometric safe like I once had and then couldn't get at 3 in the morning with a man and a loaded rifle and a balaclava at the foot of my bed at 3 in the morning.
00:42:22.000Have you ever wondered how we got to this point, where one of the biggest lobbying groups in America can openly brag that they are representing a foreign country?
00:42:30.000This is from AIPAC's website, but somehow they don't have to register under the FARA Act as someone acting on behalf of a foreign actor.
00:44:05.000Now, I'm asking you if this makes sense.
00:44:08.000All of them should register with Farrah.
00:44:11.000I hate all of the groups that give hundreds and hundreds of thousands to anti-American radical Democrats, whether APAC or ActBlue or the Teachers Union.
00:44:22.000I believe that that is remarkably consistent, and I think it's an important delineator.
00:44:26.000There are some people with whom the Jews can do no right, and some people with whom the Jews can do no wrong.
00:44:32.000Neither one is even close to correct, and this is not some false representation as a moderate.
00:44:50.000They should absolutely have to register, but so should all of these other organizations that are advocating on behalf of other foreign governments.
00:44:56.000Look, Farah has specific rules, though, Ian, and everybody else making this.
00:45:00.000You have to say, we need to change these rules, because technically people can slide in under those rules and not have to do it.
00:45:06.000So change the rules so that nobody else can do it, period.
00:45:40.000Could have had a good Roman nose, in which case I like him.
00:45:43.000Or it could have been a Jew nose, in which case I hate him.
00:45:49.000Let's go to the next claim that is made, and you will see this again from people on the right.
00:45:57.000And people on the right who sell something wholesale and not acknowledge criticism, guess what?
00:46:02.000That foments more conspiracy theories and, frankly, disdain.
00:46:07.000So this claim that you will hear is we actually we absolutely have to keep giving money to Israel because they are our greatest allies and it's necessary something, something, something.
00:46:34.000That we should, and in some instances, because they are an ally, yeah, it makes sense militarily, but this idea that we simply need to send more money as a blanket statement, no, no, we actually don't.
00:46:44.000So between 1946 and 2024, we've given Israel around $300-plus billion in aid.
00:47:17.000How about, maybe, instead of saying we need to continue giving money to Israel as a blank check, and I understand the criticism, how about we just stop funding all sides of the war in the Middle East?
00:47:27.000How about we stop supporting Israel's enemies at the same time, which we are?
00:47:33.000Palestine, since 1950, sent them $6 billion in aid.
00:47:37.000When you look at Iran, not big fans of the Jews.
00:47:40.000The Obama administration gave them billions as part of the nuclear deal.
00:47:44.000Unlocked at least $50 billion in assets, $400 million in cash.
00:47:49.000Donald Trump, the sanctions cost the Iranian economy $1 trillion.
00:47:52.000Hey, that's more of a net benefit to Israel than sending them our money.
00:47:57.000And I know we don't necessarily send money, but again, the idea of supporting or being in supportive relationships with plenty of nations who want to wipe them off the face of the map.
00:48:05.000In other words, we say, hey, let's have a relationship with these people.
00:48:08.000Let's send them money or let's have supportive trade with them.
00:48:12.000Oh, and they want to wipe these people off the face of the map.
00:48:31.000By the way, what that means is it provides foreign partners with certain benefits in areas of defense, trade, and security cooperation.
00:48:37.000However, Qatar sends billions to Hamas, billions to Hezbollah, billions that they invest in American universities that they try and subvert.
00:48:49.000Qatar, we'll do a whole other segment on Qatar, by the way, in the future.
00:48:52.000They certainly are someone to watch out for.
00:49:08.000Israel would be better off and we wouldn't have to be sending them so much money.
00:49:11.000I don't think it's anti-Semitic for someone to say we shouldn't be sending money to Ukraine and I don't think we should be sending so much money to Israel.
00:49:18.000We can have a disagreement over policy, but I won't accuse them of being an anti-Semite.
00:49:23.000And I certainly won't accuse someone of being an anti-Semite simply because they have a problem with AIPAC.
00:50:00.000I think that our perspective here has been remarkably consistent, and I think it's in line with most Americans.
00:50:05.000The problem is that most Americans aren't represented in the era of clickbait, where one side is quick to accuse you of wholesale blanket discrimination or prejudice, and the other side is ready to accuse you of being a Jew.
00:50:19.000I have been referred to as a Jew fag many times.
00:53:52.000When they accuse you of being anti-free speech, I know that you as a reasonable person are going, wait, the left is accusing me of being anti-free speech?
00:53:59.000But you need to be prepared to combat it.
00:54:03.000So Jon Stewart, who, full disclosure, very funny, I just disagree with him, he claimed that President Trump and this administration are unbelievably hypocritical on free speech.
00:54:12.000And actually, this administration and the right-wingers are pro-censorship.
00:54:16.000Generally, you've got to search the archives for contradictions on one's stated principles, dig through policy papers to uncover private actions that are undermined by someone's public stance.
00:55:52.000President Trump, they claim, is attacking universities over speech.
00:55:57.000Columbia University is bowing to President Trump's demands, announcing it will change a number of policies.
00:56:03.000Among them, placing the school's Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department under academic receivership for at least five years.
00:56:13.000Some students protested the war in Gaza.
00:56:15.000Suddenly a whole academic department is on double secret probation?
00:59:12.000There's no list of specific banned words, but more importantly, this was about undoing the enforcement of words that came from the Biden administration.
00:59:22.000The Biden administration said, here are the words you have to use.
00:59:25.000With no basis in history, reality, science.
00:59:31.000Biology. Let me give you some examples here.
00:59:33.000Former Vice President Biden, respect the office.
00:59:36.000In 2021, they changed the word mothers to birthing people.
00:59:40.000Idiots. A lot of their official documents.
00:59:41.000In 2021, they also changed alien to non-citizen.
01:01:24.000When they accuse you of something, they're accusing you of exactly what it is that they are doing, and they know it.
01:01:29.000Their claim here now is that President Trump loves social media, not because it's an alternative to legacy media who effectively boxed him out, but because social media exclusively pushes a right-wing bias and ideology.