Pearl - Why Are Studies More Credible than Anecdotes？

00:00:00.000 Alright, what's up guys? So I'm signing up for debates again. And for those of you that don't

00:00:06.940 know, I had a debate show in 2023. But my personality is pretty easy going. So I don't

00:00:14.300 naturally really enjoy debates. I really like having conversations where we disagree, maybe

00:00:21.580 like with people from different worldviews. But I've never been a big fan of debates

00:00:26.980 because it's like you'll get on stage and they'll just start screaming and especially in YouTube

00:00:33.020 you have to deal with a lot of people that like in normal society would not have jobs do you know

00:00:41.360 what I mean like like I remember I think of Brian from whatever wanted me to debate this woman that

00:00:48.240 had a chest tattoo and just clearly is very mentally unstable and I'm like what am I going

00:00:54.500 to debate with this woman about sorry but anyways I have a few coming up in the fall right and so 0.92

00:01:01.240 I'm starting to do debate prep and one thing that always gets me in debates is I'm really bad with

00:01:06.440 names and if you give me like five minutes I could always find the source but like I am terrible with

00:01:13.000 names of everything the names of sources the names of people that I can't remember the names of like

00:01:20.680 workouts I've done at the gym I know what the workout is it'll be the same thing I know the

00:01:26.260 study or I know the source but just names terrible anyways so I've been going through I have a friend

00:01:34.280 of mine who's pretty good at debate so we've been kind of prepping right and going through like

00:01:39.380 what's a good source what's a bad source and he was saying that the best sources have like a certain

00:01:47.620 amount of people that take them so like ideally you want over 10,000 uh people to take like a

00:01:54.800 survey or to be a part of the numbers um and that there's basically a whole academic institutions

00:02:04.600 that check each other's sources like they're always trying to find out like discredit each

00:02:10.280 other's studies and yada yada yada and me I do a lot of street interviews right

00:02:16.540 and I've always said and felt like that you can get information faster

00:02:23.100 by just talking to people and this friend you know he's like he's saying well yeah but that's

00:02:32.220 only anecdotal evidence and you can't just make decisions based off of anecdotes and I'm like

00:02:38.300 what's wrong with that why not like if I see something in front of me why do I need all these

00:02:44.840 nerds to go back and forth because we're going through all the ways you discredit a study right

00:02:49.320 and you can discredit a study um based on who's funding it based on the number of people that

00:02:57.800 took it based on the year it would like i guess if a study's too old they don't count that either

00:03:03.960 and i'm like by the time you waste all this time going back and forth arguing about the study

00:03:10.280 I and I I'm like I could just go to somebody in the industry ask their opinion and get

00:03:16.800 the information faster

00:03:20.380 and he was looking at me like I was crazy and I'm like

00:03:25.820 am I going am I going like bazonk am I going crazy so anyways um

00:03:35.560 i'm not saying i know the best way to get information

00:03:42.200 but there's something to me like i use studies because i have to um in debates like it's part

00:03:48.560 of my job but you know so then we're going through the difference between qualitative

00:03:55.020 and quantitative studies right and we're talking about how like surveys are less reliable um where

00:04:02.720 like police crime statistics are more reliable and but I'm thinking even the police crime

00:04:09.300 statistics I mean I've had people on my show say that they manipulate those because um there's a

00:04:17.700 lot of political like the people that release those stats run for office and once you run for 0.54

00:04:22.960 office then it's politically motivated and you can't put out statistics that make women or

00:04:29.040 minorities uncomfortable because you lose that boat, right? So I'm like, why do I need a study

00:04:37.620 to tell me what I see with my eyes? And it's always, it always goes back to this. Oh, well,

00:04:43.780 that's anecdotal information or whatever. And I'm like,

00:04:49.360 i really don't see the problem with making decisions based on anecdotal information

00:04:59.640 i really don't um if anything i think this is what i think okay there's all these people that

00:05:07.540 they need to be employed and they need to feel like they're super important and so what they

00:05:12.600 do is they've made this whole industry for these people that should be unemployed

00:05:15.960 um including me right the debaters and these are the debaters and the academics

00:05:22.240 and I think that they want you to to deem their studies as important

00:05:28.940 so that they can stay employed and have influence and jobs because what if I say 0.95

00:05:38.460 f your studies I don't give a shit what your study says I have eyes why do I need to study 0.96

00:05:43.640 to see what I see with my eyes and then they just want to guess like they just want to say oh 0.99

00:05:48.680 well I see something different but you know they're not being honest right you know they're 0.63

00:05:53.740 not being honest because if we were all being honest here uh we would talk about how women 1.00

00:06:00.140 are retarded you know what I mean so I want to hear from you guys what do you think is the best 0.97

00:06:06.880 way and then he was talking about how long it takes to put out one of these studies like it 0.90

00:06:12.660 takes years and I'm like years what if I need the information now like what if I needed it

00:06:20.540 yesterday I have to wait two years to come to a conclusion but I could literally I could

00:06:27.820 literally just ask somebody that works and that like my just being an interviewer my favorite

00:06:34.600 answers are from people that work in the field because I feel as though they catch on to trends

00:06:47.800 before the academics and before everybody else. So I think that interviews and a lot of these

00:06:53.940 shows should have panelists that are um that work directly with people and then he's like yeah but

00:07:07.120 then they'll be biased like those are just the biased ones and I'm like but who isn't biased

00:07:12.200 why are you like every person on the planet has their biases and then he's like yeah but then

00:07:19.400 you're gonna, you're gonna miss out on like certain people's opinions. And I'm like, maybe I

00:07:23.860 want to, maybe I don't want 10,000 people's opinions. Maybe I just want one or two smart

00:07:30.200 people's opinions. And I, and I was telling him, cause this is, this is a smart guy. I'm like,

00:07:35.120 the fact that like, I'll, I'll use, I'll use my father as an example. The fact that my opinion

00:07:44.700 and my father's opinion my dad's way smarter than me his opinion should count for more that's not 0.99

00:07:51.460 in the study that's not in your stupid survey I'm so mad that I have to use these for my job like 0.99

00:07:59.560 because it's like why do I need a study to tell me water is wet the sky is blue 1.00

00:08:06.420 women are big fat slut whores you know it's just ridiculous so anyways let me know what you guys 0.99

00:08:12.500 think of the comments um like the video if you can and subscribe to the channel ring that 1.00

00:08:16.440 notification bell and I'll see you next time

Pearl - July 21, 2026

Why Are Studies More Credible than Anecdotes？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript