00:00:00.000It belongs to the race, you owe your ancestors everything, and you owe your descendants everything, you are just a link in a chain, a tiny one in that, you don't even own 1% of your life.
00:04:31.720I'm not saying don't have to, but I'm saying do fun, do your journey, for the future and for now, both materials and spiritually, this fun is about energy, it's about the wrong, it's about a trial, it's a will, a will to battle, you have to believe it, you have to understand what's the outcome of us,
00:05:00.580We have to have the strength, and that strength will get passed on to our sons, and our sons
00:05:11.720will be in a stronger position, and we have the strength to build ourselves up now, build
00:05:18.480these organizations, build these networks, build these communities, so our sons can be
00:05:25.320part of a bigger organism, a bigger machine, a machine that's coming, a machine whose time
00:05:33.020has come, and it's going to destroy the rots and the pus and the parasites, and we have
00:05:43.700to sharpen that sword, that's our journey.
00:06:25.320hello and good afternoon everybody welcome back to another episode of maple syrup and
00:06:34.840mayhem with me posty and i think i've figured out my soundboard issues let's check
00:06:39.840okay i heard that i don't know if you did let me just say oh no i have not let's go let's try it
00:06:45.900again let's try it again there you go i figured it out um so before we talk about i wanted to
00:06:53.480talk about the Fabian Society, I kind of structured the stream around the Fabian Society, because I
00:07:00.280feel like every couple weeks, something new, some kind of nefarious organization or, or, you know,
00:07:06.140cult comes out and out of the woodwork, and we hear about it. But this actually goes back a long
00:07:11.320time. And it seems that they've been pretty instrumental in the constitutional monarchy
00:07:18.500countries, meaning the UK, Australia and Canada, in getting their socialist policies enacted into
00:07:26.800law. But before we talk about that, I've been getting the feeling lately to that, like, I don't
00:07:33.780know if you ever feel like you say something, and then it's like, nobody really says anything about
00:07:40.520it, or they just don't, you know, they're like, whatever, they kind of ignore it. And then six
00:07:44.640months later, everybody's saying it. So there was a few instances of that. And it's just it's funny,
00:07:50.980because like, it could be longer that I've been saying this. So hold on one second, I'm going to
00:07:55.600show you there's a couple tweets here. And I just don't know if maybe it was too schizo of a theory0.90
00:08:03.180at the time I talked about it. Or if like I said, my voice isn't very loud. I don't have a huge
00:08:07.480following. So that's also very possible. But the first thing was the police force. So I had said,
00:08:16.980again, I don't know how long ago it was. But anyways, at one point in time, I had to go write
00:08:21.800my securities license, not because I was going to be a security guard, but I'm not going to
00:08:26.580give any more information than that. But anyways, and I had noticed at that time, and again, this is
00:08:31.740very a while ago right and so like this isn't even in recent history this was a while ago and
00:08:38.020I noticed that there was a lot of people there mostly Indians but people there writing their
00:08:46.280security guard exam or whatever and I also noticed that it was pretty easy you know to be
00:08:54.580like the testing and all that kind of stuff was pretty pretty simple for what well at least
00:09:01.300from what I would expect a security guard to be but then when you realize what the security guards
00:09:06.420actually do in Canada I guess it kind of makes sense so my thought was that they are because
00:09:12.340I've noticed that there's security guards everywhere now and I understand you know the
00:09:16.600kind of people that are coming into the country are not exactly the law-abiding citizens we
00:09:20.380expected them to be so there is more crime and stuff like that going on but I was just couldn't
00:09:24.560believe the like the just explosion of security guards so what I had said was that I felt like
00:09:31.340because of the convoy and the fact that it took them so long to respond to that due to the lack
00:09:36.980of police manpower that they were going to train security guards because the test was easy but
00:09:45.840it asked a lot of questions that were different than previous years that were more and they
00:09:51.980And they changed it. So they wanted to get more background information on you. So they made the test a little bit easier. But then they wanted you to give more information, more background information, you had to get even special records check from the police. So like not just your normal records check, you had to get like a broad records check and really deep dive into it, which is something I had been doing when I had been getting my license, renewing my license every year, that was not the case.
00:10:19.280So anyways, this is where I came up with this idea that they're going to use these newly trained security guards,
00:10:25.820newly licensed security guards with the so-called enhanced background checks
00:10:31.160as sort of like a militia kind of civilian force because the military will not get involved
00:10:38.300and that's why they did not get involved during the convoy because the military is not for domestic issues.
00:10:43.760So they declined to, now again, we live in Canada, which is slowly, not slowly, sorry,
00:10:48.520quickly becoming a anarcho-tyranny or just a tyrannical governing you know a government
00:10:53.620but the army wouldn't get involved so my theory was that they're going to have all these you know0.89
00:11:00.820again mostly Indians that are have their security guard license that can be deployed at any time if
00:11:08.540there's any kind of you know civilian uprising or action that people may decide to take like the
00:11:16.700convoy, like what happened to the convoy. So now Greg had made the comment that these fake college
00:11:22.800students work as security guards, which is a stepping stone to policing. This is true. If
00:11:27.540there's another COVID lockdown-esque event, we will be brutally enforced by people who have
00:11:31.700nothing in common with us. So what he's getting at is that he believes that these people that are
00:11:38.760coming in as security guards are going to either transition to policing, or like I said, if you0.82
00:11:44.500want to get more schizo like my theory was that they'll be given like special powers like deputized0.98
00:11:49.600like you would in the U.S. and they will get these you know whatever special privileges special0.99
00:11:55.220powers maybe they won't be able to carry weapons but who knows but then they will be you know
00:12:01.840enforcing the jackboots basically and they have no ties to the people or this country so they won't
00:12:07.920feel that guilt that maybe some of the police may have felt during the convoy I don't think there0.84
00:12:12.260was a lot of them that felt that way, but there may have been. So they won't have that same tie
00:12:16.660to the country or the people. So, you know, doing things that are tyrannical and are, you know,
00:12:22.460anti-democracy, like they claim we have a democracy here. They'll have no problem doing that.
00:12:28.040So that was the first thing. And then I noticed this here. And this, I mean, again, this was my
00:12:35.080thoughts on this was not new. I'm sure tons of people have been saying it, but I've been screaming
00:12:39.140about this since probably two three years ago that the minute that the unemployment rate
00:12:45.600goes up like there's a higher unemployment rate the government all of a sudden hires a bunch of
00:12:51.720civil servants so government workers to artificially I mean I guess it's not artificially
00:12:58.440because technically they're employed but they're utilizing taxpayer dollars so it's kind of a net
00:13:04.480negative so this john smith had said the minute the canadian government stops hiring civil servants
00:13:10.560one thing is for sure canada is in crisis the business to transitioning the unemployed to
00:13:15.780government-funded employment is meant to disguise actual unemployment numbers a huge tax hit for the
00:13:22.340working man and i've been saying this it's not actual jobs it's not economy growth or anything
00:13:26.840like that it's simply just taking more taxpayer money and reallocating it to these you know
00:13:33.500bureaucratic jobs that or, you know, what do you want to call it email jobs, that women or diverse1.00
00:13:40.240hires will do. And it comes ultimately out of the taxpayer pocket. But on paper, it makes it look1.00
00:13:46.900like we have we created or Canada created 30,000 jobs this month, this quarter, whatever the
00:13:55.360measure is that they use. And then in reality is like, you know, 40% or not 40%, sorry, 50, 60,
00:14:02.62070% maybe are actual government jobs. So we all know that they're not, you know, trying to
00:14:08.860encourage businesses here or anything like that. Like they're, they're, if anything,
00:14:14.920businesses are leaving here in a rather quick pace, they're trying to get out of here. And I
00:14:20.260don't blame them because with the taxes, the fact that it's a very hostile environment for innovation
00:14:25.940and for new businesses, I wouldn't be surprised. So anyways, that was my little, you know, rant,
00:14:32.040not even rant just like things that I have noticed months and months ago and then all of a sudden I
00:14:38.020find that they go mainstream after and I'm not the only one like I said I think this is pretty
00:14:43.160prevalent among the you know nationalist community that will say something or will notice something
00:14:48.460months ahead or months before it becomes acceptable for the normal right to say it so anyways
00:14:56.200we're talking about the Fabian Society. So I'm going to start with a couple different articles
00:15:05.340I'm going to share with you about the Fabian Society. So and it'll give a background on it
00:15:11.500on what it is. So this is going to be a hopefully it's not too boring for you. I've kind of
00:15:15.760gotten a couple clips and videos to throw in there. So it's not just me talking the whole time.
00:15:20.560But it is a bit of a deeper kind of dive. And there's a bit of a history here. And it ties
00:15:25.060into multiple different political organizations or lobby organizations that heavily influence
00:15:32.320Canadian politics. So I'm going to show you this. Here, let me see if I can move this up so it's a
00:15:43.940bit ahead of the chat. There we go. So you can see the whole thing and I'll move it back down after.
00:15:49.700let's put it up here so it's in the frame okay so they openly say with the fabian society the
00:15:56.380thing is is that they openly make their intentions known so a lot of people think that you know
00:16:01.800lefties and socialists and that they like to you know especially when they're in like government
00:16:06.220or positions of decision making or power as it were that they try to hide their intentions
00:16:13.620but that's not necessarily true with the Fabian society they will they literally have said it and
00:16:19.740there's been many examples of that so this is their actual website they say the future of the
00:16:25.200left since 1884 the Fabian society is Britain's oldest political think tank it was founded in
00:16:34.1001884 the society has been at the forefront of developing political idea ideas sorry and public
00:16:41.220policy on the left for 140 years. So this goes back to what the Fabian name, it comes from the
00:16:48.940Roman general Quintus Fabius, which I'm going to get into a bit of the history on that. But I wanted
00:16:54.480to show you that they show on their website, all the different influences that they've had. This
00:17:01.900is English or British organization, but there were kind of they were they influenced a lot of
00:17:09.260they influenced an organization in australia and they influenced uh one or two here in canada which
00:17:15.080we're going to get to in a second but um yeah they stood they're still basically going they've
00:17:20.580started in 1884 and their express goal now i don't know if they share it on here
00:30:41.840thank you who just subscribed well thank you very much i appreciate that i love maple syrup too
00:30:52.300um nationalization of banks and other financial institutions with a view to the regulation of all
00:30:59.800credit and investment operations and this sounds to most people like oh okay they're taking care
00:31:05.400of the people they're making sure the banks don't you know scam us and stuff like that
00:31:08.640but this is not something that was needed prior to you know 1932 like that it wasn't really
00:31:16.000something that existed and all the nationalization of the banks does is basically creates one central
00:31:22.280you know identity that has all the banking information and what if that fails you know i
00:31:27.300mean so and it also eliminates competition right we see this in canada this is why we only have two
00:31:32.320cell phone or digital communication companies and like three major grocery chains that own all the
00:31:38.960other grocery stores so if that's that's all that happens it takes away competition it inflates
00:31:43.320costs but this is what they wanted this is like i said communism a further development of
00:31:49.200Agricultural Cooperative Institutions for the Production and Merchandising of Agricultural
00:31:53.400Products. I don't know if anybody knows, you know, Pol Pot, right? If you know the history
00:31:59.700of Pol Pot, this is kind of an idea he had with the agricultural stuff, and we know how that went
00:32:05.020for millions of people. Social legislation to secure the worker adequate income and leisure,
00:32:12.680freedom of association, insurance against illness, accident, old age, and unemployment,
00:32:16.460environment and an effective voice in the management of his industry. Now, this one is not
00:32:21.840as terrible as some of the other ones. But when you look at how they've kind of perverted these
00:32:26.960things, that's what happens. It gets it's a slippery slope, right? Like I do agree that
00:32:31.660people should be able to work in environments that are safe and not like the company shouldn't
00:32:36.540be cutting corners to save money at the risk of, you know, harm to an employee. But by doing that,
00:32:44.240it's like now it's become everything it's like oh well you know mental stress could be harmful to
00:32:49.060the employee so we can't joke around anymore or you know like it gets out of control and then when0.96
00:32:54.780you have people who come into the country with different cultures you know where they come from1.00
00:32:59.760a culture where scamming is their primary means of economic you know independence0.94
00:33:05.540you get them scamming unemployment systems scamming old age security systems and stuff
00:33:12.820like that. So the issue with this is it's a slippery slope. And when you're going to do
00:33:17.860something like this, and now, granted, this was in 1932, prior to the Multicultural Act and the
00:33:23.940change to immigration in Canada. But if you're going to do something like this, these things
00:33:28.140only work with a homogenous native population. Because people who build these things are, you0.94
00:33:35.580know, less likely to abuse them. You know, that's not always the case. But so the people that did,
00:33:42.340you know wanted to build these kind of systems they basically built them with their own people
00:33:46.240in mind with the expectation that everybody's paying into it and you know because everybody's
00:33:51.780paying into it they will benefit from it at the end so it's not a terrible idea but again it gets
00:33:56.420perverted and scammed because it's too too free it's the the regulations aren't tight enough
00:34:01.820publicly organized health hospital and medical services and again this is something that sounded
00:34:07.700good. And it is good. And it did work for many years. But when you're allowing non homogenous
00:34:15.180populations to come in, who have not contributed to that who do not have the same.
00:34:23.720They just don't have the same attitude about it. Like they treat the hospital as a walk in clinic,
00:34:28.400they don't have the same, you know, customs that we do and stuff like that.
00:34:32.420it gets out of control, right? And again, I'll go back to the scamming. When people are, you know,
00:34:39.000we've heard about it, like health doctors that are maybe not, you know, and sometimes it's
00:34:43.520Canadian doctors too. But like these kind of things are open, they're easily open to scamming
00:34:48.240and to, you know, whatever you want to call abuse, scamming and abuse. A taxation policy
00:34:54.720emphasizing steeply, sorry, graduated income and inheritance taxes. So inheritance taxes
00:35:02.760punishes people who are rich, right? And so they really, you can tell they have the disdain for
00:35:07.200the rich people. And then they emphasize steeply graduated income. So yeah, basically the tax
00:35:15.460bracket would go up based on how much you earn. So once again, punishing the rich people, right?
00:35:19.940And the one thing I find that most commies have in common is that they don't really know communism. They've never actually lived through or experienced real communism. And they really can boil their idea or communism in their mind down to the fact that, well, there'll be no more rich people and I won't have to do anything, but I'll still get all the luxuries I have today.
00:35:40.080I'll still have food, and I'll still have my internet, and I can just sit at home and, you know, play on the computer all day or go to, you know, tranny Reddit sites or whatever they want to do, and that they'll just get this kind of universal basic income, they'll just be able to survive, basically. And that's all they want. That's their goal in life. So that's how they envision communism, because none of them have actually lived through communism.0.82
00:36:01.080I'm pretty sure if anybody, yeah, that's right, Shamrock.
00:36:07.080I'm pretty sure if anybody, you know, you were to ask anybody who lived through like the communism and, you know, Russia, China or something like that, they probably would have a different view of communism.
00:36:19.460The creation of a national planning commission, again, consolidating everything into one governing body is never a good thing.
00:36:26.140The vesting in Canada of the power to amend and interpret the Canadian Constitution as to give the federal government power to control the national economic development.
00:36:34.560So again, making it into a one kind of state controlled thing, centralizing everything.
00:36:41.260A foreign policy designed to secure international cooperation in regulating trade, industry and finance and to promote disarmament, disarmament, never say that right, and world peace.
00:36:51.560again uh ideas of uh what do they call it what is that uh term they call it flights of fancy i guess
00:36:58.740you could say this is these are ideas that they uh think are actually going to work in geopolitics
00:37:03.340and that's how you know like i said they were just the another name for a communist socialist
00:37:07.960party um and then oh that's different okay so let's get into what i have hold on one second
00:37:16.860here. So basically, I'm going to go through this kind of all the different things I've
00:37:23.740wrote down and kind of tried to formulate into a cohesive monologue, I guess, for you.
00:37:29.700And we'll break it up with some videos of what we're discussing. So when we imagine an enemy,
00:37:39.480right, we imagine war, at least I do. We imagine soldiers storming the gates. But what if I
00:37:46.780told you that in modernity in common times current times the enemy is actually inside the house
00:37:53.000we have actually invited this enemy into all of our institutions and of course this enemy
00:38:02.940wears the face of a friend speaks the language of progress and offers the promise of security
00:38:09.500all while methodically placing the shackles of tyranny upon a nation that's us so today like i
00:38:17.980had mentioned already we're gonna examine the most consequent one of the most consequential and least
00:38:23.060discussed ideological movements in the modern era the fabian society and its signature strategy of
00:38:29.820permeation and when i read that because they use that word a lot permeation um i was like what the
00:38:36.300fuck does that mean because it's it's mostly i think of it in terms of food and stuff like that
00:38:41.480but um it's kind of like you know what let's look it up because when i looked it up initially it was0.98
00:38:50.820like it gave me like food explanations and i was like what the hell does it mean so we're gonna do
00:38:56.460it together we're gonna look it up yeah so it says permeation is the process by which a substance
00:39:00.920i'll share this with you the substance the permeate permeant penetrates dissolves into
00:39:09.860and diffuses through a solid liquid or gas at a molecular level so when they say permeation they
00:39:15.480mean kind of like slowly seeping in and it's kind of evident when you look at what they used for
00:39:23.540their initial logo it was actually uh wolf and sheep's clothing um I don't know did I get
00:39:31.540an image I wonder if I got an image of that anywhere I should show you guys what it looks
00:39:36.260like because hold on society logo because yeah this was their initial one I'm gonna0.98
00:39:48.500if i can show it to you open up you stupid thing0.93
00:39:51.240let's see if you can see it images0.98
00:39:56.600here i'll share the screen with you and see if you guys can see it hold on
00:40:02.460oops wrong one it's this one here if you can see this one in the top
00:40:08.140corner here um the wolf and sheep's clothing that was what their initial
00:40:13.740logo was and it's because they weren't trying to hide the fact that they
00:40:18.020are wolves in sheep's clothing so permeation is kind of like they're in how do you put it they're
00:40:23.820attacking from the inside they've kind of seeped their way in and they're kind of attacking from
00:40:28.340the inside out i guess that would be the easiest way to say it now this is they use the strategy
00:40:37.180of permeation they don't use revolution from the barricades but patient deliberate infiltration of
00:40:43.080institutions, universities, civil service, political parties, media, and education to
00:40:51.160advance the collectivist ideas gradually, almost imperceptibly. And they said, you know,
00:40:57.040they use collectivist ideas, which, you know, a lot of times nationalists will say, well,
00:41:01.440that's what we need to be is collective. It's not the same thing. When they say collectivist,
00:41:05.740they mean like, again, communism, right? Like collectivist, everybody is kind of equal
00:41:09.740in the eyes of you know whoever the state uh where am i here good thing i wrote this down
00:41:18.640because i would never have remembered to write all this or to talk about all this so the movement
00:41:24.780was named after the roman general fabius which they kind of touched on when i showed you that
00:41:29.000first thing who defeated hannibal through delay and attrition rather than head-on-head battle
00:41:35.040the Fabians chose the tortoise after that wolf in sheep's clothing got a little too obvious I guess
00:41:41.380they changed it to the tortoise but originally their symbol was a wolf in sheep's clothing
00:41:45.660so of course it's like they weren't even trying to hide it and they're not you'll when we get to
00:41:50.560some of the prominent Fabians in the three different countries you'll find out that they
00:41:56.840weren't even trying to hide it they were quite open about it so from a nationalist perspective
00:42:02.460because I'm trying to do this from a nationalist perspective. This was never neutral reform. It
00:42:08.480represented a stealthy transfer of power away from the nation and its people by consolidating
00:42:16.240everything, by, you know, centralizing everything. So it took away the distinct histories,
00:42:22.680traditions, and self-reliant spirits towards a rootless class of intellectuals, bureaucrats,
00:42:28.340and planners. And does that sound familiar? That kind of sounds like what we're going through
00:42:32.820now. The result, I argue, has been a dilution of national souls across the Anglosphere. So
00:42:42.160centralized managerial governance, basically, it's replacing our constitutional and local
00:42:47.980traditions. And then of course, the historical revisionism is supplanting heroic national
00:42:53.580narratives we see this um by them trying in canada trying to take down some of our national heroes
00:42:59.480the statues of our national heroes and uh in australia there's a case of you know the anzacs
00:43:04.780they kind of are always you know trying to discredit the anzacs by you know using doing
00:43:11.100these welcome to country uh nonsense things during celebrations of anzac day and little things like
00:43:16.840that right so they try to do the supplant the heroic narrative of national heroes with you
00:43:22.920know historical revisionism and of course they use multicultural frameworks that you know erode
00:43:28.400founding identities of the people now we're going to trace this in this uh you know episode here
00:43:36.880we're going to trace this prime the through the primary sources in britain and then we're going
00:43:41.700to go to australia and then canada because like i said canada didn't have an actual fabian society
00:43:46.900but they did take a lot of the LSR ideology from the Fabians.
00:43:56.260We're going to use direct quotes if I can find them.
00:43:58.880And then obviously some videos you're going to see that's the different videos of some of the original, you know, speeches and stuff like that.
00:44:07.100And a lot of these changes obviously came after a lot of the changes were brought in to address genuine hardships after the Great Depression.
00:44:16.560And then, of course, after World War II. But of course, I'm going to talk about the long term cultural and identity costs, because that's what we do as nationalists.
00:44:26.180So let's start with Britain. We're going to this is the birthplace of the Fabian Society or the Fabian Strategy.
00:44:33.360It was founded in London in 1884. Key figures included Sidney and Beatrice Webb.
00:44:41.160So remember these names because we're going to watch a couple of video clips and these names are going to come up.
00:44:46.560George Bernard Shaw and Edward R. Peace, a long time secretary. And the funny when I was
00:44:53.960researching this, the funny thing about George Bernard Shaw, I don't know if you guys know,
00:44:58.080but in Ontario, they have what's called the Shaw Festival. It's to celebrate him and his works.
00:45:05.360Well, I don't know if these you know, because generally people who support like these are
00:45:09.580artsy fartsy things are liberals left wing but a thing about george bernard shaw is he was a very
00:45:16.920staunch eugenicist um but of course here in progressive canada we celebrate him through
00:45:21.860the shaw festival so it's funny that he hasn't been canceled yet but some of the other great
00:45:26.620actual canadian heroes because george bernard shaw never even stepped foot in canada
00:45:30.680are being taken down their statues are being taken down despite shaw was a very staunch
00:45:36.320eugenicists to the point where it wasn't just white people it was people who were you know had
00:45:41.180any kind of disability or anything like that he believed in pure you know eugenicism like everybody
00:45:46.480has to be perfect the perfect like they blamed Hitler for doing right the same thing that's what
00:45:51.840he was a staunch supporter of yeah so it's funny how leftism works that way so anyways let's skip
00:46:00.360to this video now this is basically a little up like a little kind of insight or i don't know a
00:46:09.420summary of the fabian society in england in britain it's an old video um the video is called
00:46:15.120the mysterious order running britain for 140 years and i kind of got the time stamps of the more
00:46:20.340relevant stuff so we're going to listen to that let's just hope i get the sound works
00:46:25.340The institutions that shaped British public life, the people who designed the welfare state, who founded the London School of Economics, who wrote Labour's constitution, simultaneously and openly advocated eugenics.
00:46:41.260They argued for forced sterilization. They argued for lethal...0.84
00:46:45.480Let me know if you guys can't hear the video, because I believe it's working, but just let me know if you can't hear it, okay?
00:46:50.860Chambers, they published statements about eliminating the people they deemed unfit for
00:46:56.680society. And they did not publish these things under pseudonyms or in private correspondence
00:47:02.700that only came to light decades later. They published them under their real names in
00:47:08.260mainstream publications during their lifetimes. So see what I said, how they had no shame.
00:47:14.140They were able to do that and publish that stuff and not get cancelled. And here in modern day
00:47:19.820canada or the west you can't even say that you don't like indians without being docks and having0.93
00:47:24.860your life ruined so isn't it funny how far we've come from there and a lot of this has to do with1.00
00:47:30.780their policies like they were the kind of beginning of this shit they were not embarrassed0.99
00:47:36.980they were convinced george bernard shaw nobel prize winner in literature co-founder of the0.99
00:47:44.600London School of Economics, the man who designed the famous Fabian stained-glass window, one of the
00:47:51.460most celebrated and widely read figures in early 20th century British intellectual life. In 1903,
00:47:59.580in the appendix to his play Man and Superman, he wrote that the only fundamental and possible
00:48:05.860socialism is the socialism of the selective breeding of man. In 1910, he appeared before
00:48:13.380the Eugenics Education Society, and his lecture was reported in the Daily Express on the 4th of
00:48:20.080March. He said that part of eugenic politics would finally land them in an extensive use of
00:48:31.060the lethal chamber. He said a great many people would have to be put out of existence simply
00:48:36.380because it wastes other people's time to look after them. In 1931, he sat down for a filmed
00:48:42.540interview for Paramount British Pictures, on camera, addressing the lens directly, as if
00:48:48.900speaking to you personally. Shaw said that he did not want to punish anybody, but that there are an
00:48:55.640extraordinary number of people whom I want to kill. He continued, it must be evident to all of you
00:49:02.220that you must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more0.99
00:49:08.120trouble than they are worth and I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a
00:49:13.960properly appointed board and say every five years or every seven years will you be kind enough to
00:49:21.760justify your existence if you cannot justify your existence if you are not pulling your weight in
00:49:28.600the social boat if you're not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more then clearly
00:49:35.560we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive.
00:49:41.520So, and this is funny because, like I mentioned, how modern day commies think that
00:49:46.220they would be able to just basically, you know, they would have the same as everybody else and
00:49:50.460not really have to do any work for it. Well, communists also believe that, you know, people
00:49:54.880need to put in their fair share. And the fair share is not, you know, being a keyboard warrior
00:49:59.780or, you know, sitting there consuming Netflix all day. You're going to be doing hard work,
00:50:04.420right and that means your work may be harder than the next guy and you're going to get paid the same0.73
00:50:08.920that's communism so it's funny that the fabians talk about the fact that if you serve no purpose
00:50:15.320then they would like to you know made you basically like what they would do in canada0.64
00:50:20.520because your life does not benefit us and it cannot be of very much use to yourself
00:50:26.340He said this on camera in 1931. He said it in the same calm, slightly amused, conversational tone
00:50:35.380in which he said everything else. Then, in 1938, he wrote a private letter to Beatrice Webb,
00:50:43.000in which he argued that they ought to tackle what he called the Jewish question by admitting the
00:50:49.120right of the state to make eugenic experiments by weeding out any strains they think undesirable.0.65
00:50:56.340So, again, right, these are the people that are now making the policies, but they had the same issue, the same question, the same Jewish question that Hitler had.0.79
00:51:08.200That letter was written in 1938, the Jewish question, weeding out strains.
00:51:15.340Yeah, five years into the Third Reich, while the apparatus of racial persecution was already fully operational in Germany.
00:51:21.900And then, in 1948, after the liberation of the concentration camps, after the photographs had been published, after the Nuremberg trials had laid out in meticulous detail exactly what eugenic thinking had produced in practice.
00:51:39.020So that's where I'm going to end it because we're going to watch the rest of it in a second, or another part of it.
00:51:45.820But the 1889 collection, so this organization, the Fabian Society, they had an 1889 collection called the Fabian Essays in Socialism, and it was edited by this guy that we just heard about, George Bernard Shaw.
00:52:00.780It laid out the intellectual case for gradual socialism, but the real innovation was actually tactical.
00:52:07.940George Bernard Shaw described permeation clearly, and remember how I said I couldn't figure out what the word means.
00:52:13.880he defines it as this the policy of propagating fabian ideas outside the society wherever there
00:52:21.820was a human brain for them to lodge in so you know similar to what we're experiencing
00:52:27.140indoctrination brainwashing our idea has not been to reform the world ourselves but to persuade the
00:52:35.060world to take our ideas into account in reforming itself so subversive very subversive and then
00:52:43.680Beatrice Webb who they mentioned in here she likened it to a policy of inoculation of giving
00:52:50.520to each class to each person that came under our influence the exact dose of collectivism
00:52:56.840that they were prepared to assimilate all this liberal language they're using
00:53:02.000Edward R Pierce in his insider history of the Fabian society which was and came out in 1916
00:53:10.980and then another edition, I guess, in 1925.
00:55:25.700and had they known that these policies are going to be twisted
00:55:29.160and subverted or whatever, used to target the people like them that are outspoken about certain
00:55:38.260things. I wonder what they would think about that. Webb wrote that no consistent eugenicist
00:55:44.920could be a laissez-faire individualist unless he throws up the game in despair. He must interfere,
00:55:51.700interfere interfere hg wells was a fabian member from 1903 to 1908 and a founding member of the
00:56:01.640british eugenics society in 1901 he published a book called anticipations that he described as
00:56:09.080the keystone of his life's work in it he wrote about those he described as swarms of black and
00:56:15.860brown and dirty white and yellow people who do not come into the needs of efficiency. He wrote1.00
00:56:22.320that the world is not a charitable institution and that they will have to go. And then there is
00:56:28.760William Beveridge. Beveridge wrote the Beveridge Report, the document that gave birth to the
00:56:35.300National Health Service, to the modern social security system, to the welfare state that has
00:56:41.840underpinned British public life for more than 70 years. His name is on buildings and lecture
00:56:48.960theatres across the country. There is a Beveridge Hall at the University of London. The Beveridge
00:56:55.060family is in every social policy textbook. He is remembered as one of the great progressive
00:57:00.940architects of the modern British state. He was also a member of the Eugenic Society.
00:57:06.580He sat on its consultative council until the late 1950s, meaning he sat on it after the Nazi death camps, after Nuremberg, after the word eugenics as impermanently stained by what it had produced in Germany.
00:57:22.340He died in 1963, and on 16 February 1943, while the House of Commons was debating the Beveridge report in the chamber, Beveridge himself was not in the gallery.
00:57:35.160he had slipped out he had gone to the mansion house to deliver the annual galton lecture to0.82
00:57:41.280the eugenics society so that's yeah basically they were all part of this whole eugenics society
00:57:46.840this is an example of what their eventual symbol came became the turtle but funny that that they
00:57:53.920were very big on eugenics and uh now that you know organization this the leftist policies and
00:58:02.140socialist policies they'd be pushing, I don't think would openly admit that they're good with
00:58:07.480eugenics, because of course, that's racist. So we're going to fast forward now to 1945.
00:58:15.740Clement Attlee's Labour government, which was packed with Fabian influence, delivered nationalization
00:58:23.400of key industries, the National Health Service, which is the NHS in the UK, and the expansion of
00:58:30.940the welfare state. Bet you they're kicking themselves in the ass now. These built on0.99
00:58:36.360decades of permeation. From a nationalist viewpoint, consider what they actually lost.
00:58:42.080Britain entered the 20th century as a constitutional monarchy with strong local traditions, imperial
00:58:48.240self-confidence. And of course, they had a working class that valued self-reliance and
00:58:53.780national pride, not, you know, government dependence. Permeation helped shift it toward0.52
00:58:59.720a centralized bureaucratic state, a dependency culture, and eventually, or sorry, an eventual
00:59:06.180entanglement in supranational projects like the European Union.
00:59:12.860Narratives of national decline, loss of empire, erosion of exceptionalism, cultural fragmentation
00:59:18.540gained traction precisely as these expert planners gained power. Working class communities that once0.85
00:59:26.980embodied rugged British character increasingly became clients of the state that's remember how0.86
00:59:33.300we talked about how they at the beginning I was saying how you know the government keeps expanding
00:59:37.380keeps bloating with more jobs and jobs and the more people they have work for the state the more
00:59:42.080people they have that has to believe in the state right think 1984 where every the book 1984 where
00:59:47.220everybody works for the state the method mattered as much as the ends gradualism allowed changes
00:59:52.980that might have faced resistance if proposed openly and suddenly. And what that means is
00:59:58.540that they knew that if they openly said this to the public for them to vote on, that the majority
01:00:03.260of them would not agree to that. Just like, you know, we saw most recently with COVID, right? Like
01:00:08.200they had to make people so afraid in order to get them to agree because they knew nobody would agree
01:00:13.280to just wearing a mask for, you know, for whatever reason, for a cold, right? So they had to put in
01:00:18.140that fear to compel people to follow the rules uh so now we're going to cross the ocean we're
01:00:26.260going to go to the cross the ocean to australia and the australian fabians were actually this
01:00:33.080guy talks about them a little bit but it's a little dry so we're not going to watch the whole
01:00:36.360thing but the australian fabians were formally established in 1947 as a continuous political
01:00:43.640think tank drawing directly from the british model model and they actually did call themselves
01:00:48.560the fabians um or they admitted their their ties to the fabians unlike in canada they don't
01:00:55.620explicitly say they have ties to the fabians but they were you know heavily influenced and we'll
01:01:00.340get to that when we get to that but this is the video here and we're just going to listen to about
01:01:04.96060 seconds of it and uh he explains basically what it is in australia the the fabian society
01:01:12.780In 1891, when the Reverend Charles Marson formed the first overseas branch of the UK Fabians in Adelaide, recruiting trade unionists and reformers.
01:01:25.040That early chapter wound up in 1902, but the seed was planted in fertile ground.
01:01:32.020The modern Australian Fabians date to 1947, an independent left-leaning think tank and membership of society ostensibly oriented to social democratic reform and policy design.
01:02:34.720This is actually, sorry, okay, so this is a more recent thing talking about the Fabians from Australia.
01:02:40.020Sorry, I got my links all mixed up, mixed up.
01:02:44.660One of Australia's oldest political think tanks, the Australian Fabian Society, boasts over 1,000 members,
01:02:51.560most of whom seemingly aligned with the Australian Labour Party.
01:02:55.440The website proudly states that Gough Whitlam adopted a Fabian approach from the day he entered Parliament.
01:03:01.040And there's a conga line of state and federal Labor leaders, including Hayden, Hawke, Keating, Dunstan, Ran and Carr, to name just a few, who all claim to be Fabians.
01:03:12.660And their national patron is feminist Eva Marie Cox AO, who, and I quote,
01:03:36.540But for an organisation with such a commitment to feminism, apparently, it's rather odd that their national board has a vacancy for a women's officer.
01:03:47.020Perhaps them being so gender specific is a bit non-PC these days, and they're having trouble deciding on the title to bestow before selecting the unlucky appointee.
01:05:25.340But it is their success at pursuing their agenda that should trouble you the most.
01:05:33.140The Fabian Society's goal is to, and I quote,
01:05:36.280peaceably use the democratic framework of liberal democracies to achieve gradual conversion to socialism.
01:05:43.940Fabian tactics are notoriously subversive and they embrace evolution rather than revolution.
01:05:51.480In fact, their name derives from the Roman general Quintus Fabius, who was known for his strategy of delaying attacks until just the right moment.
01:06:02.280And when the time comes, you must strike hard, as Fabius did, was the advice in the first Fabian Society pamphlet all those years ago.
01:06:10.940And that helps explain why the Fabian's original coat of arms was a wolf in sheep's clothing, representing its preferred methodology for achieving its goals.
01:06:21.500Now, that has since been abandoned, one presumes, because of the negative connotations.
01:06:27.320But they still have the tortoise as their logo.
01:06:30.200After all, everyone likes tortoises, don't they?
01:14:12.780To promote equality, to involve the people of Australia in the decision-making processes
01:14:18.700of our land, and to liberate the talents and uplift the horizons of the Australian people.
01:14:25.440He ended conscription and Australia's involvement in the Vietnam War.
01:14:28.660He recognised China, freed up universities and put in place a national health scheme.
01:14:32.480Yet for 40 years, the achievements of the Whitlam government have competed for attention with the controversial way he left office.
01:14:38.380This sparks a protracted constitutional crisis, which culminates in the Governor-General dismissing the Whitlam government and appointing the opposition minority as caretaker government.
01:14:53.820Because nothing will save the Governor-General.
01:14:57.340And the double dissolution election was held on December 13, 1975,
01:15:01.860at which Fraser won the biggest majority in Australian political history.
01:15:05.380In Parliament this week, Julia Gillard paid tribute to Whitlam's legacy.
01:15:08.620And I recall particularly the example he has given us in the House
01:15:12.880of a parliamentary career dedicated to the highest of purposes, the public good.
01:15:18.840And, you know, all these ideas, like I said, on their face are not necessarily bad.
01:15:24.400it's that they opened up like again they apply they allow these ideas like as far as you know
01:15:30.880health care and a social safety net for the people and you know obviously free universities0.55
01:15:37.580but it's only works as i'll said is if you have a homogenous society because that's the people who
01:15:46.480built that are the ones that should be benefiting from it not the people that just came because they
01:15:50.900have no skin in the game, if that makes sense. So where they went wrong is that applying this to
01:15:57.500non-Australians or non-Canadians or non-Britains, that's where the problem lies. So when they went
01:16:04.660further and started, you know, opening the floodgates to immigration and stuff like that,
01:16:08.060that's when all these policies kind of fell apart. So I guess it's kind of like, what do you do,
01:16:13.340right? Like, do you, you know, try to do the good for the people and then it eventually falls apart?
01:16:18.740I think if you didn't get rid of the White Australia policy, these ideas probably would have been fine.0.62
01:16:25.820Because, again, the nature of the people that built Australia.0.81
01:16:29.680But because they've done that, now it's a socialist hellscape, just like our country in Canada.
01:16:35.520Former Prime Minister Bob Hawke spoke of the legacy of the short-lived Whitlam government in Blacktown last month.
01:16:40.480From those opening words, we were presented.
01:16:44.980That's enough. We don't need to hear more about this guy. Who cares?
01:16:48.740I was just I was just talking about him just so you can get an idea of this. This goes way back and even in Australia. So basically, for Australia, this represented a deliberate remaking of a new Australia. And do we all remember, you know, Trudeau has said about Canada being a post national state, very similar language.
01:17:08.580they represented a deliberate remaking of new australia the pre-fabian era federation ideals
01:17:17.280rugged individualism and an anglo-celtic core that defined the nation's character through
01:17:22.360hardship and achievement this all gave way to big government approaches and identity
01:17:29.280frameworks that of course diluted the core now multiculturalism was normalized not through
01:17:36.720organic popular evolution but through think tank and party insider permeation there's that word
01:17:44.160again rugged self-reliance was increasingly subordinated to state provision and revised
01:17:50.120historical guilt narratives so they got people away from doing productive things into you know
01:17:57.280state jobs or you know where you were under the thumb of the government or worse handouts from
01:18:02.200the state and of course revised any kind of historical knowledge that people had by making
01:18:08.000them feel guilty. So they revised this history so that people would have some kind of guilt about
01:18:12.580something that happened way before they were born and something that happens in every country and
01:18:17.320has happened for millennia. Many Australians supported expanded social services and a more
01:18:24.560inclusive society after decades of hardship. So notice the Fabians also tend to strike when people0.90
01:18:29.820are at their worst. So when they're kind of in that mode of desperation.0.65
01:18:36.020The critique is not that reforms occurred, like I said, but it's how they were engineered. So it
01:18:41.900was engineered through elite intellectual networks operating over decades, rather than transparent
01:18:47.580national debate rooted in, of course, Australia's founding characters. So they didn't do any of that
01:18:53.420stuff. Again, didn't do that here in Canada either. So you're probably tired of hearing about other
01:18:59.100countries that you don't live in. So now we're going to move on to Canada. So for Canada, like
01:19:05.760I mentioned earlier, the vehicle was the League for Social Reconstruction, which I had pulled up
01:19:12.280here. It was founded in 1931 to 32, between those two years, Montreal and Montreal and Toronto,
01:19:21.100amid the Great Depression. It was led by historian Frank Underhill and law professor F.R. Scott,
01:19:28.180with members including Eugene Forsey, David Lewis,
01:19:32.860the LSR explicitly drew on Fabian methods.
01:19:37.640They produced a major work called Social Planning for Canada,
01:23:08.380You can keep your land, but you're still going to work for the state.
01:23:12.800The CCF's influence extended beyond its political victories.
01:23:17.900It became the official opposition in several provinces and governed Saskatchewan from 1944 to 1960 under Premier Tommy Douglas.
01:23:26.740During this time, Douglas implemented several innovative policies.
01:23:30.320These included state-run automobile and fire insurance, socialized electric power, and public bus transportation.
01:23:39.320These reforms highlighted the party's commitment to social welfare and laid the groundwork for future Canadian social policies.
01:23:48.700You'll see it formed the new Democratic Party, the NDP, who has also strayed very far from their initial roots.
01:23:58.480In 1861, the CCF merged with the Canadian Labar Congress to form the New Democratic Party.
01:24:06.420This transition marked a significant evolution in Canadian socialism,
01:24:11.040as the New Democratic Party continued to advocate for progressive policies and social justice.
01:24:17.240I don't understand when you're making a three-minute video,
01:24:20.000and I don't mean to shit on other content creators because, like I said, it's not easy.
01:24:23.680But can you just not, like, it's three minutes of content.
01:24:26.900Can you not just use your own voice?0.99
01:24:28.480Like, this AI shit, that's so obvious, it gets irritating because, like I said, certain little things, like not being able to pronounce a word properly, it's so obviously AI.0.98
01:24:38.780From a socialist perspective, the CCF serves as an important example of democratic socialism in action.0.99
01:24:45.820It showed how socialist principles could be implemented through parliamentary means.
01:24:51.080The party focused on public ownership and social welfare without adopting the authoritarian structures seen in some communist systems.
01:25:01.760The CCFs' emphasis on democratic decision-making and decentralized governance also illustrated how diverse groups could work together toward common goals.
01:25:11.920Diverse. They were even using that word back then, diverse.
01:25:14.620In the context of worker cooperatives and self-management in socialist systems, the
01:25:21.440CCF's model offers a practical approach to cooperative governance.
01:25:26.620By advocating for public ownership and cooperative institutions, the CCF demonstrated that socialist
01:25:33.780ideals could be applied in ways that benefit both workers and the community at large.
01:25:39.420understanding the cooperative commonwealth federation gives us a glimpse into how
01:25:45.620political movements can influence economic systems and social structures its legacy continues to
01:25:52.900shape discussions around socialism and labor economics in canada today yeah we know and uh
01:25:59.880it's it's not looking good here so these people the lsr members they largely drafted uh this
01:26:07.960organization the cooperative commonwealth federations regina manifesto that we already
01:26:12.580talked about that document declared the existing order marked by glaring inequalities of wealth
01:26:18.360and opportunity by chaotic waste and instability and insisted the solution lay in a planned and
01:26:25.020socialized economy in which our natural resources and principal means of production and distribution
01:26:30.620are owned controlled and operated by the people it seems like this only ever worked out for the
01:26:37.140indigenous people in Canada because they're able to you know control the their natural resources
01:26:42.700and sell without paying tax to the government but this never manifested for the rest of us0.99
01:26:48.360and like I said it always sounds good on paper but then I look at Cuba and I know they'll say
01:26:54.140well this isn't total communism there's different things it always ends up in communism okay like
01:26:59.740that's what happens it always ends up that way they concluded that no CCF government will rest
01:27:07.040content until it has eradicated capitalism and put into operation the full program of socialized
01:27:13.760planning okay so we have another clip here we go this is this is the NDP's dark history so
01:27:24.340this is um because we're going to start talking about the NDP and Tommy Douglas's thing but this
01:27:29.760is the dark history of the NDP because a lot of people think they were the um you know party for
01:27:34.320change, and a lot of people decided to vote for them because, you know, they were going to make
01:27:39.580everything better for everybody, life better for everybody else.
01:27:54.240In 1933, an obscure group known as the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation
01:27:58.980drafted a document entitled, The Regina Manifesto.
01:28:03.580The CCF eventually merged with the Canadian Labour Congress
01:28:06.820to form the political party known today as the New Democratic Party, or NDP.
01:28:12.780In 2011, the NDP surged to become Canada's official opposition for the first time in its history.
01:28:19.180The NDP's manifesto specifically outlined the party's plan to create a fully nationalized,
01:28:24.200government-run economy with government-run corporations, hospitals, schools, banks, and
01:28:29.200media. The manifesto specifically stated,
01:28:32.920We aim to replace the present capitalist system with its inherent injustice and inhumanity.
01:28:38.700The radical aspirations of the CCEF have been exhibited by many NDP governments across Canada,
01:28:45.320including the deposed Saskatchewan NDP, in the province where socialized medicine was born
01:28:51.100and where most telecom, insurance and resource industries are fully nationalized or public.
01:28:57.440The NDP's manifesto also had a vision for a fully controlled economy,
01:29:01.860stating that control of finance is the first step in the control of the whole economy.
01:29:07.020Under Bob Ray's NDP leadership, Ontario faced severe and near-catastrophic economic conditions.
01:29:13.780Saskatchewan, under its own NDP rule, failed to achieve any significant economic prosperity.
01:29:21.100I don't think there has been a successful NDP government in the history.
01:29:28.860I mean, I know not many of them have had the, what do you call it, the majority.
01:29:34.300But I don't think, you know, because socialism doesn't work and that's what their policies are based on.
01:29:39.340And instead ended up with two of its major cities being recognized as national crime capitals.
01:29:44.700Today, under B.C.'s New Democrats, Vancouver is becoming a dystopian nightmare of tent cities and drug addicts, injecting themselves on the street in broad daylight.
01:29:56.940Tommy Douglas, like Jack Layton, was a charismatic orator.
01:30:00.720He had ways in which he would charm and captivate his supporters, many of which knew little about his...
01:30:05.880See, common thread amongst these guys, they're all good orators, so everybody on the right wing needs to get on this.
01:30:12.380His true core beliefs. In the 1960s, Douglass was the focus of an RCMP investigation regarding his ties and associations to members of the Communist Party. What is far more disturbing than Douglass's communist sympathies were his views on eugenics and the mentally unfit.
01:30:31.540Another eugenics. Interesting, but everybody loves Tommy Douglas for bringing in universal health care in Canada.
01:30:38.440He's lauded as a national hero, but he was a eugenicist.0.99
01:30:46.1801933, while Nazi Germany and Hitler were rising, Douglas finished his thesis entitled0.98
01:30:51.760Problems of the Subnormal Family for his MA in Sociology at McMaster University.
01:30:57.900His thesis was an open endorsement of policies that would have required couples to be certified as mentally fit in order to conceive children.
01:31:08.320That doesn't sound very socialist to me. That sounds more nationalist, could I say? National socialism, maybe?
01:31:15.540You know, the eugenics thing and having people have to have, you know, whatever you want to call it, a permit, a license or whatever to have kids.
01:31:24.880I mean, that part sounds socialist, but like the eugenics part is, you know, what they accuse Nazi Germany of doing changed their constitution, which every leader since Jack Layton has refused to discuss once aimed to modify and control the operations of the monopolistic, productive and distributive organizations through economic and social planning towards these ends.
01:31:50.940and where necessary the extension of the principle of social ownership that was from 2003 what is
01:31:57.340truly disturbing is not so much the ndp's principles but their reluctance to share them
01:32:02.200with canadians and to be open and honest about their true ambitions instead the ndp have insisted
01:32:08.800on keeping canadians in the dark about their history to learn more about the ndp's so that
01:32:16.500was that little video about the dark history of the NDP. So obviously, the LSR's influence,
01:32:25.880it flowed into the CCF and later into the New Democratic Party, which this video kind of
01:32:30.500explained. Tommy Douglas's Saskatchewan government pioneered the public Medicare, which then spread
01:32:36.000across the country nationally. Broader LSR-inspired ideas contributed to centralized welfare planning,
01:32:44.500bilingualism policies. Now, I'm not, I don't necessarily have an issue with the bilingualism
01:32:51.900policy, because as much as people don't like to admit that, Quebec had a large part in the,
01:32:56.580you know, making of Canada. And the official multiculturalism framework adopted in 1971.
01:33:03.320So it's admitting here that these, this, you know, League for, what was it called? The League,
01:33:10.460League for Social Reconstruction had a lot to do with the multiculturalism framework that was adopted in 1971.0.96
01:33:19.480This accelerated a shift away from Canada's founding British and French settlers' identities towards an official mosaic model, which none of us fucking voted for.
01:33:31.600Centralized expert-driven governance often subordinated provincial distinctiveness and resource sovereignty.
01:33:38.240uh that's you know we see that with the oil and gas and the fact that we don't mine for stuff
01:33:44.380as much as we used to in provinces like Ontario and and probably still Alberta
01:33:49.300traditional values and national cohesion was reframed through progressive universalism which
01:33:57.060as we all know is uh now the downfall of why is this oh I don't know why this is now the downfall
01:34:06.320of Canada right now. So the result, critics argue, weakened the sense of a unified national
01:34:16.180soul or identity in favor of managed diversity and bureaucratic oversight. Once more, the
01:34:23.200depression created real demand for planning and security, but the LSR and CCF, they channeled
01:34:31.080that demand into lasting institutional change, but through intellectual permeation rather than
01:34:37.720broad-based organic national, you know, consensus, right? So we're going to step back a little bit.
01:34:44.200There's been some several, several rather overarching patterns that of course emerge
01:34:49.220across these three nations. I hear it a lot. A lot of people are like, why is, you know, Australia
01:34:54.520and Canada in such lockstep with everything, and the UK. And this is why, because we've been
01:35:02.520infiltrated by these Fabians, at least in these, and I'm sure other countries too, but primarily0.98
01:35:08.520these three. Now, these are the overarching patterns. First is the managerial governance.1.00
01:35:15.720permeation empowered a class of credentialed experts echo economic god why can't i say words
01:35:24.400today economists planners academics and civil servants to direct society from above so we saw
01:35:31.280this again with the covid scam we see this with everything it's always experts that are guiding
01:35:36.580us as to what to do right we have to listen to the experts on everything and who decides who's an
01:35:41.300expert. Citizens become subjects of administration rather than co-creators of their national
01:35:48.020destiny. This is the core nationalist concern. Power moved from the people and their inherited
01:35:56.160traditions to an unaccountable bureaucratic intellectual elite, often detached from the
01:36:02.780distinct national souls, it sought to reshape. The second thing that is a pattern is historical
01:36:12.640revisionism. In education and public culture, the curricula increasingly emphasized systemic
01:36:19.120critiques, colonial guilt, and identity-based narratives over stories of national achievement,
01:36:24.880resilience, and exceptionalism. The Fabian influenced emphasis on structural explanations
01:36:31.400of poverty and inequality, it lent itself to this reframing. So this goes back to, you know,
01:36:37.900blaming other people for, you know, your poverty or for inequality or trying to make things or
01:36:44.180trying to eliminate, let's say, inequality, which can never happen, because that's just not nature,
01:36:49.600right? And that's this Fabian idea. And this is why we have DEI, right?
01:36:54.900oh boy and third the long-term cultural effects policies like nhs precursors australian social
01:37:06.300reforms and of course the canada medicare or universal health care delivered tangible benefits
01:37:11.500and enjoyed general genuine popular support amid crisis yet they also fostered dependency cultures
01:37:19.960centralized power and identity shifts that nationalists trace to diluted self-reliance and
01:37:26.560cohesion frederick hayek he wrote this book and i just started reading it so i don't know a whole
01:37:34.120lot about it but it's called the road to serfdom and it talks about the dangers of central planning
01:37:39.680and the knowledge problem inherent to expert direction of complex societies
01:37:46.240Those warnings resonate with the permeation story. To be fair and precise, none of this occurred in a vacuum.
01:37:55.740Post-Depression and post-war populations across the West genuinely wanted greater security and fairness.
01:38:02.880Many Fabian-inspired reforms addressed real suffering, like I talked about earlier. There was a place for a lot of these policies.
01:38:10.200the tragedy though from the nationalist standpoint lies in the method and the unintended or quietly
01:38:18.520intended consequences i believe they were quietly intended the gradual replacement of rooted national
01:38:24.440character with cosmopolitan cosmopolitan managerialism permeation succeeded precisely
01:38:31.700because it was patient anonymous were useful and framed as some kind of enlightened progress
01:38:38.840rather than ideological conquest it's basically to sum it all up
01:38:44.120and to end this off basically it's you know not a conspiracy theory the Fabian story
01:38:53.620it's not a conspiracy theory although sometimes it gets framed that way but
01:38:57.420not as much because like I said they've openly admitted it like there's websites and they've
01:39:02.260openly admitted their policies and and there's video evidence of them talking about it but it
01:39:08.400It is documented, and the reason is because it is documented, like I said, in their own essays, their histories, the admissions of their leaders.
01:39:17.380The permeation strategy was openly discussed and, of course, proudly executed.
01:39:21.620They thought that it was so virtuous to do this, and now its effects are visible in the institutions, the welfare state, the cultural shifts in Britain, Australia, and Canada today.
01:39:32.400the nationalist lens does not deny the human desire for security or compassion it acts it0.53
01:39:42.520asks rather oh my god i'm talking like a black person it asks whether the price which is the
01:39:49.300slow erosion of distinct identities national identities the self-reliance and the democratic
01:39:54.840accountability to the people rather than to the experts was worth paying for and i think looking
01:40:01.020back? No, it probably wasn't. It asks whether nations can reclaim their sovereignty and
01:40:08.040character without repeating the same top-down patterns, and that's the huge problem in all
01:40:12.440of our societies. It's top-down. History shows that ideas patiently applied over generations
01:40:18.180can remake the people of that nation. The question for our time, though, is whether
01:40:24.220we will continue to process unconsciously or choose deliberately to defend and renew
01:40:29.820the unique souls of our nations. And that's the whole history, the research that I've done
01:40:37.740on this Fabian Society. And like I said, it was very interesting to know that they were
01:40:42.440responsible for a lot of the policies that we are currently enjoying, probably including
01:40:48.840the new Bill C-9 that has been made effect. And, you know, I will, before I go, I will make a
01:40:58.320comment on that. I don't think that's the worst of the ones that's coming out. I mean, yeah,
01:41:05.580it does have some, you know, obviously, it's tyrannical. It's an assault on free speech,
01:41:11.740which again, we never really had free speech, not in the same context as the US does.
01:41:17.720But it's more so if you make a direct threat, which was already against the law,
01:41:22.740if you spread hate um now this is i guess the problematic thing because what who determines
01:41:29.600what's hateful um or i guess if you were to make maybe if you're making fun of a distinguishing
01:41:34.880a distinguishable group for the characters of that group so no longer can we make fun of you
01:41:41.440know indians for certain characteristics they have you know or for you know incidents that
01:41:47.040supposedly don't happen like shitting in public and stuff like that so yeah these are the things1.00
01:41:52.540that they're going to come after I think for the most part they're probably going to target more
01:41:57.720prominent people in the nationalist movement or the far right as they like to call us
01:42:03.300so I think us regular twitter posters and and stuff like that are probably going to be marked
01:42:08.980safe unless we do something that is pretty egregious but again I'm not a lawyer do not
01:42:13.320take all the advice from me you should look this up on yourself but this is just my interpretation1.00
01:42:17.400of it and obviously you can't protest in front of you know synagogues I'm sure they'll allow it
01:42:23.860in front of churches even though they explicitly say you can't but I'm sure that there will be no
01:42:28.140outrage about that it's really this one is really targeting which is funny like I find it hilarious
01:42:35.560because when you think about it yeah it is wise elk it is misunderstood so when you think about
01:42:44.080this new law it really targets the Muslims because they're the ones that are out there
01:42:50.980for the most part you know protesting against the Jews and what the Jews are doing in or Israel I
01:42:57.420should say is doing in the Middle East right it's not you know nationalists like me and you that are
01:43:04.080you know protesting outside or or vandalizing you know synagogues or burning down these
01:43:12.480christian churches not that they even care about that um but or you know whatever defacing and
01:43:19.320vandalizing mosques it's not the right wing that's doing it or the radical right as they
01:43:24.580like to call us it's an ethnic blood blood feud that was is occurring because we have too many
01:43:31.660different ethnic groups in canada that have you know long-standing histories of violence and and0.97
01:43:38.860you know war and disagreement and all this kind of stuff that they're bringing on to our land0.98
01:43:43.340so my point being is that they're passing this law that is probably going to disproportionately1.00
01:43:50.620affect the muslims because they seem to be the ones that are engaging in this activity more so
01:43:55.540than anybody else so i thought that they were kind of like canada is trying to play the fence
01:44:01.700like they don't want to necessarily target like they're trying to balance in between the jews and
01:44:05.780the Muslims, because, you know, they don't want to piss anybody off, whereas in the US, they're
01:44:10.120clearly pro-Israel. You know, Donald Trump is clearly pro-Israel. So in Canada, I just, I thought
01:44:16.060it was kind of funny that they're going to pass that. Now, I know it's just kind of one step into,
01:44:21.580you know, the further, further down the road we're going with the digital surveillance and ID and
01:44:27.800basically silencing everybody's speech. I understand. It's really, the end goal is to
01:44:32.480silence everybody into you know not saying what we're noticing and not pointing out things and
01:44:38.320just kind of being like the proleys in 1984 and just going back to our shoebox apartment and
01:44:43.860eating the bugs and you know just doing the work pushing the buttons uh you know rewriting history0.95
01:44:49.540all this kind of stuff just like the book outlines but I just thought that was kind of
01:44:53.660interesting about that because it's again it's not the Canadian nationalists that are actually
01:45:00.540doing any kind of physical stuff like vandalizing or you know protesting outside of synagogues or0.78
01:45:06.520or mosques you know we're talking shit on the internet you know what i mean like that's pretty
01:45:11.180much it so i guess if they you know i i guess if they want to round us all up for pointing out0.97
01:45:17.520things i guess we'll have an awesome party and sell block c i don't know like you know but
01:45:23.420there comes a point where you can arrest everybody um and what are you going to do
01:45:30.080when all the productive people are in jail that that's my question like what are you going to do
01:45:34.660because a lot of these people that they consider you know far right or nationalists actually you
01:45:39.640know hold jobs that are beneficial to the like beneficial to the running of society you know
01:45:46.720what i mean like uh tradesmen's and stuff like that so i'm going on a tangent here but anyways
01:45:51.460yeah i just thought that was kind of interesting but i you know i i'll tone it down a little bit
01:45:56.060maybe as far as the words that I say when I'm streaming but like I don't have any hate for
01:46:01.020anybody I just don't want people to live in my country I want a country for my people
01:46:04.620I want a homeland for all of us I don't want to you know have to compete with people that have
01:46:11.140never contributed to the tax bracket or anything for health care I want to be able to have my
01:46:17.080grandkids grow up around people that look like them and speak like them and I don't want to be
01:46:22.460told like I said that I can't say anything about it because back in the day when somebody said
01:46:28.540something like that people were just like hey that yeah that's my old racist uncle you know0.84
01:46:31.780Ron or whatever the fuck his name was nobody gave a shit about it but now it's like you can't even0.99
01:46:37.020notice stuff or you could be subject to you know prison or whatever the fuck it is they're gonna0.98
01:46:42.020do to us so anyways I'm not like I said I'm not too concerned about this one but I believe some
01:46:48.280of the other ones are definitely gonna make things testy around here but what's that saying right
01:46:54.780rather uh die on my feet than live on my knees I guess and I'm at that point now like it's just0.98
01:46:59.960I'm over it like I'm sick and tired of of you know just having to take the bullshit constantly so
01:47:06.600what are we gonna do right anyways that was my little stream I appreciate everybody for coming
01:47:14.060I know it's shorter than normal usually I go a little bit longer but uh I wanted to do something1.00
01:47:19.840you know specific today instead of just rehashing all the fucking stuff that the Indians are doing0.76
01:47:25.820in Canada today I'm thinking maybe next week that I might stream a little bit more often do some0.96
01:47:32.400you know maybe every other day or something just kind of because it just seems to be so much to
01:47:36.920talk about and I feel like I never have enough time I have so many things I want to kind of
01:47:40.520discuss and subjects and all this other stuff and I just never seem to have enough time to do it
01:47:45.840although like I said I do have a lot more free time now so we'll see maybe we'll do that but I
01:47:50.520wish everybody I thank you for coming anyways all of you guys that did show up to watch I appreciate
01:47:55.940you guys are the OGs and I will likely see you probably maybe Monday we'll do something but
01:48:02.940you'll know I'll put it out on my telegram and on x and I hope you guys have an awesome rest of the
01:48:07.660weekend. Enjoy your Saturday afternoon and Sunday. And I will see you next time.