RadixJournal - September 25, 2026


Denying Dionysus

Hosted by
Mentioned
Looksmaxxing, Equality, and Socialism

Episode Stats


Length

25 minutes

Words per minute

129.02

Word count

3,332

Sentence count

112

Harmful content

Toxicity

9

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Yeah, it was just sort of your thoughts on Greek tragedy,
00:00:05.080 because I was reading the part where it's sort of this post-zenith production
00:00:11.820 by the Greeks that they've already sort of gone over the hill and are going down,
00:00:17.520 and just sort of your criticisms or why you view it as this, you know,
00:00:25.280 de-civilizational force because um yeah just what what your thoughts are on so on that in general
00:00:32.120 actually it's not even going to be in the second book it's in the third book that is now uh entitled
00:00:39.580 the death of tragedy we we really actually lay this out directly but i i will explain
00:00:47.320 where we're coming from with this um so we do have an idea of you know sophocles and euripides
00:00:58.200 and aeschylus this they're the greats they're the classics and you read them in leather-bound
00:01:04.860 tomes and they're they're wonderful well they are wonderful in many ways um i guess as i get older
00:01:13.880 Euripides the Bacchae might be my favorite, but I think we should still look at them very seriously
00:01:21.900 and look at them very critically. There is no separation between Dionysus and tragedy. They are
00:01:32.580 coterminous they are one in the same the way of celebrating Dionysus is a tragedy and that
00:01:44.220 in itself should start raising our antennae a little bit to to be skeptical about what's going
00:01:52.340 on so tragedy you you have to ask like why tragedy and this is a a chapter title actually
00:02:02.440 in book three why tragedy why are we watching someone die or be sacrificed in a way as opposed
00:02:11.140 to watching someone succeed why don't we watch Oedipus crush his enemies as opposed to watch
00:02:21.040 him learn the horrible truth and poke his eyes out. And we maybe don't ask that question enough.
00:02:32.220 Tragedy is demoralization, and it's even something deeper. So one theory about the origin of the word
00:02:44.360 tragedy. The word itself is famously goat song. And so you would wonder about what was going on
00:02:54.400 in the dark age of Greece. What was going on before Aeschylus got on the stage and similar
00:03:02.000 playwrights? And we would suggest, and other people have as well, that there was a sacrifice
00:03:11.380 of a goat that accompanied the play. And I would go much further, actually, in terms of what is the
00:03:21.780 real origin of tragedy. Granted, we're engaging in speculation about the past, but it is deeply
00:03:29.460 informed speculation. We're not just spitballing. So in The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche famously
00:03:36.920 suggest that tragedy emerged as a chorus and it was only later on that the protagonist
00:03:45.260 the first man differentiated himself from the chorus and this goes in line with his at the time
00:03:54.500 kind of schopenhauerian vision of the dionysian dithithrom and we're all one and it's the
00:04:04.560 Apollonian act to separate yourself as an individual, as an image, as a sculpture,
00:04:11.540 as opposed to sort of losing yourself in the rhythm and the melody of music and drunkenness,
00:04:22.120 the orgy in effect. Now, this is obviously a highly compelling theory about the origin of
00:04:30.880 tragedy. Our theory is different, and it's very different. We think the tragedy originated with
00:04:39.300 the protagonist, in fact, because it's the protagonist who is the sacrificial victim.
00:04:46.820 Tragedy was always about killing something or killing someone. And later on, it became
00:04:56.460 sublimated in terms of oh it's about Oedipus or you know that that Pentheus prude gets torn up
00:05:06.160 by the orgy oh yeah but that's all a sort of sublimation a kind of like late stage expression
00:05:12.720 of what it was originally which was not just sacrificing a goat and here we're being very
00:05:21.480 speculative and maybe a little bit outlandish it was about sacrificing a human being and
00:05:28.520 rubbing his blood all over you while you're drunk and having sex in this group that's the origin of 0.97
00:05:38.600 tragedy it was the death lust of the orgy and that involves sacrificing someone so the question is 0.99
00:05:48.860 who's being sacrificed this great listening to a oh sorry you need to mute
00:05:55.640 um okay i think the guy muted himself
00:06:02.080 so who's being sacrificed we have this notion of like the best being sacrificed
00:06:10.280 now in it's a little bit it it is a little bit different in prometheus bound and there you see
00:06:21.360 another type of figure as the tragic hero as it were but we know who the tragic figure is the
00:06:30.120 tragic figure is a great man oedipus is very successful pentheus is a little a bit ambiguous
00:06:36.320 us in terms of his identity, but he is still admirable on some level. He's trying to keep
00:06:40.820 order at the least in Thebes. And it is the sacrifice of the Arian to be frank. And it 0.98
00:06:50.600 coincides with our general theory of feeding Yahweh the fire god food, giving him the goat, 0.95
00:07:00.140 giving him Esau, the goat, giving him women to eat, to rape, to burn up with his flaming passion.
00:07:12.600 So the origin of tragedy is human sacrifice, and it was sacrifice of the best of us. 0.83
00:07:21.500 It was sacrifice on a very deep level of the Arian. 0.93
00:07:25.120 Now, Prometheus is a very interesting figure in this regard 1.00
00:07:30.400 because this goes against, you could say, what I'm saying.
00:07:34.960 Prometheus is the adversary of Zeus.
00:07:37.700 It's, in fact, Zeus who is torturing him.
00:07:39.980 In fact, tragedy is giving you an opportunity to sympathize with the bad guy, so to speak.
00:07:49.060 You see this now, like Netflix, you know, what is their latest one? Lizzie Borden or Eileen Orris, or I think that's her name, this damaged woman, sympathetic in some ways. She was damaged, but horrible person, murderer. You want to sympathize with the devil, so to speak.
00:08:11.420 well prometheus bound gives us an opportunity to sympathize with the devil he is offering gifts to
00:08:20.740 mankind of course so there's there's something you know the adjective promethean certainly fits here
00:08:26.720 it's redundant but he's an enemy of zeus he's an enemy of the olympians you are sympathizing with
00:08:33.060 the villain, with the adversary of God. Look at what is happening there. He's bound on a rock.
00:08:44.400 He's pierced for our inequities. He's a proto-Jewish figure, of course. He's a proto-Jesus 1.00
00:08:53.620 figure, in fact. And this type of suffering servant to mankind gets worked out in many,
00:09:03.920 many different variations before he ends up on the cross as Jesus Christ.
00:09:12.360 So there's a lot going on, but that is our view of the origin of tragedy. To sum up,
00:09:22.440 tragedy originates with human sacrifice 0.97
00:09:25.800 human sacrifice to the orgy
00:09:27.960 the image of Pentheus being torn apart 0.99
00:09:31.120 dismembered
00:09:33.180 drinking his blood even
00:09:35.780 I think it was pretty wild
00:09:37.660 and there's a sort of twist
00:09:41.880 you could say on it
00:09:43.080 or a kind of development of tragedy
00:09:45.220 where you have the suffering
00:09:47.320 servant to humanity
00:09:50.020 jesus christ prometheus as the tragic hero uh so that's how i would sum up our thoughts
00:09:58.540 if i if i could i'm glad you asked that question no that was really good so your idea is that
00:10:06.220 through this sort of this primordial encounter with this sacrifice that is the basic root of
00:10:14.960 tragedy. And it's only sort of a late stage where this individualist Apollonian character emerges.
00:10:22.140 That's Nietzsche's view. Our view is something like the opposite, which is that the origin of
00:10:28.600 tragedy is the individualism of the human sacrifice. Like, why don't we see a, why don't,
00:10:35.400 why isn't the great art of the most famous, at least most salient art of the Greeks? Why is it
00:10:41.960 tragedy, as opposed to Oedipus winning, kicking ass. So what if he married his mother? 1.00
00:10:52.280 Not marrying his mother, but why is it not Oedipus triumphant? Why is it the sublimated 0.99
00:11:01.280 sacrifice of Oedipus? Why do we go watch a sacrifice? Because that's what tragedy is. 0.93
00:11:10.480 it's a human sacrifice of this great individual for the whole it's the same logic of uh sacrificing
00:11:20.740 uh you know one azazel you know kick him out into the wilderness this one's for yahweh it's
00:11:26.400 the same logic that you find in in the torah yeah i see i i i definitely see um
00:11:36.160 more so that it's a productive tension between the apollonian and the dionysian and oedipus is
00:11:45.000 the greatest example because he's sort of almost a proto-critique of socratism that you can take
00:11:52.240 rationality and push it to those extremes and at the base of all reality it is sort of dionysian
00:12:00.960 and suffering but yeah that's Nietzsche's view I'm just I'm trying to differentiate our view
00:12:07.180 from Nietzsche's now look Nietzsche I resonate with all of that and I it you know at no point
00:12:14.380 in my life am I going to really like strongly contradict Nietzsche but we are saying we're
00:12:20.920 inspired by Nietzsche sure but we are saying something fundamentally different like Nietzsche
00:12:25.740 is embracing tragedy on some level and he's embracing Dionysus on some level and we're not
00:12:32.500 but isn't the sort of productive tension between Apollo and Dionysus I mean
00:12:38.720 I guess after the greatest tragedies is when the Parthenon is built isn't that the height of
00:12:44.740 Athens doesn't that productive tension produce the greatest works of art I think I think you
00:12:51.560 could definitely say that and i resonate with that the notion that you you can't really fully
00:12:57.780 kick dionysus out of olympus even you need that chaos energy for lack of a better word what you
00:13:07.220 have to have chaos in your soul to give birth to a dancing star there's some aphorism from
00:13:11.460 nisha like that from beyond good and evil or a book like that i i i get it and i resonate with
00:13:17.020 that quite a bit and that is that speaks to my soul but we are saying something different and
00:13:22.520 something more critical why can't we have an apollonian epic where oedipus wins because it
00:13:31.360 doesn't full moralization doesn't it because it doesn't produce productive tension in in our
00:13:39.540 spirit we need we need chaos and we need rationality and realize there's look because
00:13:46.080 that's kind of what i think that i get it why not why not have oedipus like experience the chaos
00:13:54.440 and then ultimately triumph over it why do we need this tragic outlook because that's
00:14:02.300 socratism that's saying that we can solve all of life's problems and through rationality and that
00:14:09.640 doesn't produce culture that produces Euripides and I think Euripides the Bacchae I think Nietzsche
00:14:17.880 says this somewhere it's almost an apologia of how he ran tragedy before where he kind of just
00:14:24.760 explains the plot and explains okay this guy did a bad thing so something's bad going to happen to
00:14:30.180 him and the Bacchae is Pentheus getting punished because he denied Dionysus his rightful place
00:14:38.400 Yeah. And that's kind of the. I guess I agree with you that Dionysus.
00:14:45.840 Look, I totally understand what you were saying and you're speaking directly to my heart on the sense of like you have to have a tension between life and death and chaos and order and et cetera, et cetera.
00:14:59.840 I totally get it. But I don't know. One thing that Nietzsche really, really missed, and we get to this in book three, and I think it was a he missed the mark completely was, you know, late in his life, he was signing letters to, you know, what is it, Peter Gast and Jacob Burkhardt.
00:15:23.700 He was signing letters as Dionysus, and he signed one, Dionysus versus the crucified.
00:15:32.120 Dionysus is the crucified.
00:15:35.640 So you know that whole, there's a new God, son of God, and he's walking around town demanding to be recognized?
00:15:43.120 That's the gospel.
00:15:44.280 That's Jesus Christ.
00:15:46.160 He missed the boat in terms of not using Roman interpretation
00:15:52.720 and understanding the equation between Jesus and Dionysus.
00:16:00.300 And I think that did lead him into some very important errors.
00:16:07.880 Euripides, which might very well have been an inspiration for the Gospel of John,
00:16:12.900 by the way is a an expression of Dionysus triumphant he's the son of God he was denied
00:16:23.700 and looks look what happens to them in the end and the fact that Nietzsche missed that I I think
00:16:31.740 it's just a I mean yeah from our perspective it's like a blind spot and it's also you know again
00:16:40.160 what we are adding on to it.
00:16:42.420 I mean, I might be more of a Nietzschean
00:16:44.720 than Mark Brahman,
00:16:46.020 just in terms of overtly being inspired by Nietzsche
00:16:49.120 and overtly appreciating Nietzsche.
00:16:52.120 But Zarathustra told his students
00:16:55.960 to move beyond him,
00:16:57.320 to start criticizing him.
00:16:58.780 He didn't want a cult of personality
00:17:00.440 or a dead religion
00:17:03.240 where they're just vaguely mouthing the sayings
00:17:06.260 without understanding them.
00:17:07.280 He wanted to move forward.
00:17:10.160 And that's what we're doing.
00:17:11.540 And we're going after Freddie on this one.
00:17:17.480 Yeah, I think that what you're saying is right in Dionysus and Christ are both suffering.
00:17:26.100 But what I get from Nietzsche is Dionysus is suffering as affirmation, as loving life even with its suffering, whereas Jesus and the Christians are rejecting that for the afterlife.
00:17:40.160 They're rejecting the suffering of this world and positing nihilist, ex nihilo, something that's going to come after, that's going to make everything right.
00:17:51.120 Whereas Dionysus says, no, you live with this here and now.
00:17:55.320 We build these beautiful things on top of it, but we recognize at the heart of it, life is suffering. 0.91
00:18:01.700 The Christians reject that because they can't deal with it. 0.72
00:18:05.220 And they say, well, in the next life, it'll be okay. 0.96
00:18:07.840 Yeah. You have accurately explicated his view. There's no doubt about it. And I resonate with that view. I just think we need to be, you know, there's Nietzsche's vision of Dionysus and there's the real Dionysus as he appeared in the ancient world and continues to appear through Jewish and post-Jewish archetypes.
00:18:36.000 It continues to recur. And I do think that Nietzsche just missed the fact that Jesus is a version of him. He's a sublimated version of Dionysus, and he's definitely a more puritanical version of Dionysus, at least when it comes to sex.
00:18:55.900 You have Venus as a virgin for God's sake, yet she gives birth to the Son of God.
00:19:02.320 Although it's not in the Gospel of Mark, but you have a virgin Son of God ruling over you.
00:19:09.340 I mean, they really sublimated these things.
00:19:12.340 As opposed to Venus mourning Adonis, who has to go back to the underworld,
00:19:18.800 you have mary magdalene pitying pieta jesus her son so there's this who's going down to hell 0.72
00:19:28.480 before he comes back up just like adonis adonis is another one of these proto-jewish proto-jesus
00:19:34.000 you know entities and there's no doubt that it's different but nietzsche really because he was not
00:19:43.460 and he should have been aware of roman interpretation but he wasn't and he didn't
00:19:47.540 use it and he just sort of missed these things and i do appreciate the like the tragic dionysian
00:19:57.000 spirit as more attractive to people like us like nietzsche's version of dionysus is much more
00:20:06.760 attractive to people like us than jesus but dionysus is jesus do you think that the parthenon
00:20:15.020 could have been built without the tragic view of life yes you think that the tragic view had to
00:20:23.540 come out of the apollonianism had to come out of the dionysian in in nietzsche's view right yeah
00:20:31.420 yeah it's only from housing the dionysian like at the end of um
00:20:37.420 orestes whatever that is when the furies are coming after orestes and athena she houses them 0.88
00:20:46.560 and turns this dionysian chthonic force into the humanides which becomes the structure on which
00:20:54.120 the parthenon is built and that's saying you have to acknowledge the founding violence that yeah
00:21:00.360 your city was built on but at the same time you create beautiful images on top of them
00:21:06.720 even if they're not infinite even if they're not limitless but i took too much time thank you no
00:21:11.660 no this is great stuff this is great stuff um i think that our view can be in a productive dialogue
00:21:21.020 with a a more like and i mean this in a good way like more like fundamentalist view of nietzsche
00:21:27.720 like you're yeah i i totally think that is the case i also think if there's anything that like
00:21:37.360 i i've i thought about this a few ways like everything is founded on violence
00:21:44.640 there there's a dionysian death energy to everything that's great and we'll just use
00:21:51.660 the United States of America as an example. It was founded on a genocide and land theft, 0.97
00:21:58.600 et cetera, just like Israel. And it's like, on the one hand, the left is more honest about 0.91
00:22:08.380 this foundation, but then they reject it. So you have like the 1619 Project, whatever it was called,
00:22:14.520 where it's like, it's all evil. It's all based on slavery, genocide of the Native Americans,
00:22:19.520 land theft brutality etc etc etc and you you sort of have to like reject it in a way whereas the
00:22:28.060 conservatives are less honest and they want to deny it you know they're like oh well you know
00:22:34.640 actually it wasn't a genocide when you really think of it and you know they'll come up with
00:22:40.420 various ways of explaining slavery like we were so good that we freed the slaves or if you're a
00:22:45.840 southerner it's like we were the nice guys who took care of our slaves it wasn't bad
00:22:50.360 all of that you know there might be even there there are definitely kernels of truth to the
00:22:55.600 right-wing views but you're just fundamentally denying the dark reality of america that it was
00:23:03.980 founded on the bones of native americans and slaves to be blunt and it's like the left wants
00:23:13.220 to demoralize you and say that nothing good can be built on the bones. And the right is like,
00:23:20.580 bones? We don't see bones. Both are wrong. And I think a Nietzschean perspective on this is right,
00:23:30.000 where you can't deny the bones, but then you also can't deny the shining city that's built on top
00:23:38.240 of the bodies and to accept both is a proper, like even psychological, it's a proper way of
00:23:48.720 achieving psychological health. You know, like in Jungian psychology, you have to understand your
00:23:54.240 own shadow self, your own dark side. And in Freudian psychology, you can't like, there's this
00:24:02.200 Because in the circulation of the psyche, there's a block because you're not facing something. And that something might be very disturbing. It might have been that you were abused as a child. It might have been that you still resent your father from sort of ripping you away from maternal warmth.
00:24:19.720 You want to kill your father and have sex with your mother. 1.00
00:24:21.840 Well, that's one way of saying what I just said. 1.00
00:24:24.140 The father, the paternalistic energy took you away from that perfect place you were in as a baby with your mother.
00:24:34.860 And you're not facing these things.
00:24:37.360 You're not facing your own libido.
00:24:39.960 You've repressed your urges. 0.96
00:24:44.780 You've repressed your homosexuality even. 0.93
00:24:47.280 This is the Freudian way of looking at it, and it is Nietzschean. There's a lot of parallels with Jung, obviously. Jung was his student or colleague. And it's about facing the dark side. And I agree with this 100%.
00:25:02.600 I mean, I don't agree with 100% of the things Freud wrote, but I agree 100% with his overall ethos, let's say, of looking at the darkness and in some ways embracing the darkness, bringing it into yourself.
00:25:21.040 And that's what Nietzsche was doing.
00:25:23.100 Yeah, go on.
00:25:23.540 And you don't think the purely Apollonian art form wouldn't just degenerate into Socrates with these noble lies of a beautiful world where we don't have any suffering and we just sort of like can go off into rational land and just construct good things and ignore the bad things.
00:25:46.740 You make a very good critique.