In the Eye of the Beholder
Episode Stats
Words per minute
165.54318
Harmful content
Misogyny
23
sentences flagged
Toxicity
34
sentences flagged
Hate speech
17
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, we discuss the scandal surrounding a French journalist who transitioned from female to male, and the implications of a teacher who seduced a 15 year old to a 16 year old, and then a 25 year old teacher who had sex with her former student when they were in high school.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
oh brigitte gate no what's happening with brigitte gate supposedly there's no uh there's no evidence
00:00:06.960
that uh brigitte macron existed before she was 30 years old and uh there's supposedly
00:00:16.720
uh she transitioned at the age of 30 and was previously jean luke are you serious
00:00:25.760
candace owens has a tweet about it right now of course she does okay so i saw someone tweet about
00:00:33.600
this and they they were showing her face and um saying oh she looks like a man one thing that i've
00:00:42.080
noticed i mean this has been like a long-term trend on social media is is this like weird speculation
00:00:50.560
about liberals about they're they're really men and it's like everyone's a man like taylor swift's a
00:00:56.960
man like jennifer aniston's a man it's just becomes bizarre oh my god okay this episode is blowing up
00:01:06.000
so i just want to say after looking into this i would stake my entire professional reputation okay
00:01:10.960
well that's not very much candace on the fact that brigitte macron is in fact a man any journalist or
00:01:16.240
publication that is trying to okay we could watch this yeah i remember seeing this stuff about this
00:01:22.480
was like early q anon theorizing in 2010 or so involving michelle obama yeah being a man and i
00:01:32.000
think the the whole yeah anyway it seems to be a misunderstanding of like sexual dimorphism and
00:01:38.080
africans but anyway let's go this is crazy i'm talking crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy stop everything
0.67
00:01:49.840
pay attention if you're driving pull over just kidding you don't have to pull over you can keep
00:01:53.520
driving but i'm you just prepare yourself for what is happening right now in france so let me give you
00:01:59.280
guys the background emmanuel macron is the president of france he is married to brigitte macron okay
00:02:07.280
her love story has always been extremely weird and extremely creepy she is 70 years old allegedly
00:02:14.240
and he is just 46 years old so already right there you have a 24 year age gap between them
00:02:21.440
and at the very least just looking into their love story you're looking at what might be because they
00:02:27.920
changed the age throughout the years a story of pedophilia i'll tell you what their official
00:02:32.480
narrative has been the official narrative is that when emmanuel was just 15 years old he was a drama
00:02:38.640
student at a school and his teacher was brigitte and while he was very young they somehow managed to
00:02:46.080
fall in love that would have made brigitte way too old to be falling in love with you know just as an
0.58
00:02:51.280
aside to to use the word pedophilia to particularly in the context of france to describe like a
00:02:59.840
relationship between a teacher and a 15 year old i think is a bit much
00:03:04.960
i don't know it's a bit moralizing on her part well i mean look i obviously think that like a
00:03:14.320
an adult let's just put let's switch the genders like an adult male who seduces a 15 year old or a 16
0.68
00:03:20.480
year old or even an 18 year old certainly is his class his student or something absolute like that
00:03:26.480
is a no-go jail but then to like equate it with child molesters or something it is just simply wrong
00:03:35.760
like it's a different thing and men and women don't play by the same rules when it comes to sex and this
00:03:43.760
is just another example of that exactly yeah like trump and melania they have the same age gap but nobody
00:03:49.840
really complains about that right because honestly they probably don't need to she's an adult yeah
00:03:56.560
and again like i i would also say that again if they let's let's go to the brigitte macron you know
00:04:06.400
gender swap i mean it's like if a if some you see this a lot it happens more often than you would
00:04:12.720
imagine but like these 25 year old girls who become teachers and they have sex with their 16 year old
00:04:19.200
student again obviously firing offense to say the least and probably some jail time should be in
00:04:27.120
there but you're making school a a you're disrupting the the whole concept of school and and teaching
00:04:35.200
and mentorship and so you're you're really subverting that in a in a very bad way that being said i'm sorry
00:04:42.560
the notion that like that 15 year old boy is traumatized for life give me a break i mean i just
00:04:50.240
come on he's anyway i don't i won't say any more it's just the fact that we're just calling all of
00:04:58.480
this pedophilia it just is seems uh wrong it's like they're separate terms for separate things
00:05:04.560
and to associate that with some like wicked person who is abusing children or or i mean i i don't know
00:05:14.640
it's just i don't know i won't dwell on this like where was she when i was in high school right yeah
00:05:20.800
exactly you're not going to be traumatized now obviously she should be punished legally for that
1.00
00:05:25.920
neil is safe fired but sure and i probably wouldn't marry her she's not a you know monster yeah yeah like
0.97
00:05:32.160
these people who who uh absolutely abused traumatized and like physically harm children
0.99
00:05:39.120
those are fucking monsters that 25 year old teacher is i don't know what to describe her
1.00
00:05:46.160
slut you know like there are other words that we have in the english language yeah you know but
1.00
00:05:52.080
nevertheless it does point to a certain kind of ubiquitous decadence in the culture right it is
0.98
00:05:57.840
bizarre how common it is that yeah orda you have all these women that are sleeping with their
1.00
00:06:03.920
with their uh students right so it does speak to some kind of general decadence yeah i mean it's not
0.75
00:06:11.520
it's a rabbi raping a child doubtlessly that's that's obviously true but um it's nevertheless uh
0.97
00:06:20.400
it's a little sort of unsettling or there's something wrong with the society essentially you know yeah i would
0.66
00:06:26.880
agree with that i mean look i mean it doesn't look it is like a sort of 1980s like music video fantasy
00:06:34.240
i forget where you you sleep with hot for teacher hot for teacher yeah uh and so everyone can
00:06:41.440
understand it from a kind of hot-blooded american sort of bacchanal perspective of like yeah a hot
00:06:47.440
teacher and and there's something healthy there obviously yeah there is yeah you know in fact we look
00:06:53.440
back to those days and say wow that that's relatively healthy right when we look at the days today which
00:06:59.120
are relatively sexless and uh porn saturated to the point of yeah sexlessness essentially nevertheless
00:07:08.400
it it does point to a problem it points to a symptom that we could say is a relatively mild symptom
00:07:16.640
right it's it's not the worst thing that's occurring today um but it is nevertheless very odd and it's
00:07:23.760
yeah well also if women in making that sort of women being that sort of sexually aggressive is another
1.00
00:07:31.280
thing that's sort of interesting about it right yeah well that's what i was about to say like if you
00:07:36.560
if you look into some of these stories like if you read the you know go down to paragraph three of some
00:07:42.560
of these stories from florida texas or whatever this is happening um you you'll see that like she was
00:07:50.480
texting him and that they they started like sharing snapchats and i think there's also something to the
00:07:57.760
fact of of like a lot of these girls who are 25 they're they're almost contemporaries with like a 15 year
00:08:06.640
old and so they're like oh yeah yeah what's your handle on snapchat or whatever and it's like no
00:08:13.280
no no no like that's you know you you can obviously be friendly with students a lot of my teachers were
00:08:21.440
very they were kind of fun and and friendly but like you're you're sexting each other i mean like what
00:08:29.680
well that's just in some cases you're three years removed from wanting to date the high school
00:08:34.320
right like or whatever like they're yeah wait they're three years away from that mentality
00:08:39.600
so they're still in that mindset right and now they're a teacher at a college or rather at a high
00:08:45.920
school uh so i mean four years i guess would be the appropriate um right ration but then but college has
00:08:52.880
some similarity to high school there's athletes and so forth and there's a there's a social hierarchy
00:08:59.040
it's less uh depending on how large the school is if it's a large school that's less uh salient
00:09:06.000
people find their little groups and whatever but smaller schools it's probably more similar i didn't
00:09:11.040
go to a small school but it's probably more similar to high school in a lot of ways so they're still kind
00:09:15.520
of in that mindset as these young teachers um so it does seem to naturally follow that they're going to be
00:09:22.800
attracted to the popular kids at high school right yeah part of it i guess it's a kind of cliche but
00:09:28.800
i think part of it is sort of the porn culture as well so it's there's something um forbidden about
00:09:35.120
it right so and a woman showing sexual aggression and so forth uh porn provides a lot of models for that
1.00
00:09:43.040
right so i think that that could be part of it this also says something about the right-wing media
00:09:49.040
ecosystem where they're uh where they you know they're so humorless on this issue and they they're
00:09:55.520
they're so quick to condemn and oversimplify it as pedophilia which technically it might be but like
00:10:03.120
they just want to see pedophiles everywhere and trannies everywhere they just yeah they're fixated
1.00
00:10:09.200
on those two things and so it's an unhealthy fascination no doubt all right let's keep going i want to hear
00:10:16.480
15 or 14 year old depending on which article you're reading but yes apparently she was just so
00:10:21.920
moved from his depth this little boy's depth and the poetry and the way that he would write
00:10:27.760
that they fell in love so much so that the now first lady left her then husband despite the fact
00:10:34.160
that they had three kids okay so that's the background story nobody cares doesn't matter happened
00:10:38.080
so long ago now she's the first lady we should celebrate her uh no some major update now happening
00:10:46.000
major major updates let me tell you about how i happened upon this story there was just an
00:10:49.760
article that was published in the daily mail here is the headline the proof france's first lady
00:10:56.240
wasn't born a man what i was going what so i of course instantly read it because what a bizarre
00:11:03.440
thing that you're even needing to present proof that brigitte macron was not born a man and embedded
00:11:09.200
within the article they showed two photos and i'm going to show you right now this is the first photo
00:11:14.480
this is allegedly brigitte macron when she was a little girl sitting on her mom's lap but when i
00:11:22.080
saw this photo the first thing i noticed was that the person on the far left the boy that actually
00:11:28.080
looks like brigitte macron i'm taking you guys through my thought process i saw this and i was
00:11:31.760
like i'm already getting she might actually be the guy maybe she's a dead ringer for her brother
00:11:36.080
but i don't see any resemblance there with the little girl may show the second photo debunking this is
00:11:41.280
just ridiculous like um there is actually a really remarkable resemblance between my nephews and like
00:11:51.040
my daughter when they're like one and a half or something this is just a candace is just i i think
00:11:58.720
this is actually all absurd this is probably just kremlin propaganda to be frank i already got skeptical but
00:12:05.440
let me just put that aside and hear her out another young photo allegedly of brigitte macron
00:12:13.520
what i thought when i looked at this photo that this looks way too new to be a photo of a 70 year
00:12:18.160
old when they were a child now again these are my thought processes when i then read the article
00:12:23.840
there was no debunking whatsoever they just were calling people that were saying otherwise far right
00:12:30.160
you know all the typical buzzwords far right conspiracy theorists racist sexist it's homophobic
00:12:35.120
it's anti-semitism just the thing that we are all now able to immediately look through these names
00:12:40.080
don't mean anything anymore and that's interesting she said that actually because she she's now she's
00:12:44.880
kind of like equating calling someone far right or a racist with calling them anti-semitic i don't
00:12:50.800
think previous conservatives would have done that oh definitely not this makes you want to look
00:12:55.120
further into the alleged theory go ahead oh i was just gonna say like the title of this insane this
00:13:01.200
is the biggest political scandal in human history i don't know i can think of some others yeah you
00:13:07.440
know there's a huge problem here because it's like it's sort of a kind of exaggerated problem of what um
00:13:15.520
red red eyes had for example like the production values of daily wire are very professional
00:13:20.960
but there's a lack of quality control they just let the schizos get on there because honestly some
00:13:27.600
of the stuff candace owens has done i think is sort of brave and like cool but there's she doesn't
0.97
00:13:33.600
have a producer saying okay this is bad shit this is bad shit this is legit yeah right and that's
0.95
00:13:40.400
the problem with a lot of these uh demagogues you know and i would i would include for example
0.99
00:13:46.480
nick fuentes you know as much as we may have a kind of affection for nick fuentes like
00:13:50.480
he could really benefit for like a producer who's like saying okay this is great stuff this is
00:13:54.880
great don't go there that's bullshit you know i mean yeah it's content control it's being an editor
0.90
00:14:00.000
yeah yeah right i mean and i think that the and you know just the credibility is suffering here is the
0.98
00:14:07.520
problem there needs to be kind of more nuance and then they can start persuading intelligent
00:14:12.240
people yeah of course i understand they're not going to do it no i i don't think they feel but
00:14:18.000
maybe kind of maybe the next evolution of them will do because i think what i'm seeing is the
00:14:22.720
problem is that you again you have these content creators who are basically kind of i mean uh candace
00:14:28.960
owen is like off the leash right in in some ways we love it because we're like oh okay great yeah
00:14:34.880
she's going after rabbi schmuley or whatever yeah but on another level it's just like it's just
1.00
00:14:40.720
half the shit she's saying is just bullshit or is just invented or fabricated
0.99
00:14:44.480
yeah right but that's it's the credibility of the good stuff that she's doing yeah but that's
1.00
00:14:50.240
how these people make their clicks you know candace owens crowder tim pool they just like
00:14:54.960
make they look basically they make it up and get their clicks they still which is what i'm saying
00:15:00.480
they just need quality control and i think they're lacking it i i agree with alberto on this i i think
00:15:06.400
what i've seen over the past five years is this q anon adjacent quality to mainstream conservatives
00:15:16.080
where they don't quite use they they often will use the same buzzwords they they're not quite q anon but
00:15:22.560
they might as well be in effect and right the someone even like sean hannity is kind of
00:15:30.160
outmoded at this point so i mean i obviously agree with what mark's saying like we need quality
00:15:38.560
control and i understand everybody's well i understand yeah right so yeah there is this sort
00:15:43.760
of populist there's this kind of uh love of conspiracy theories it's popular and even aliens and all this
0.71
00:15:50.800
kinds of shit uh where people are able to kind of click bait that so yeah i mean this is this is just
00:15:55.120
how these people make their living what i'm describing kind of experiment that has not yet occurred
0.92
00:16:00.400
right so in other words uh daily wire has shown that they have the technical proficiency to like
00:16:06.480
create high-end productions right evidently uh so they can show professionalism in the technical realm
00:16:13.600
and in the marketing realm and so forth but in terms of the content uh control content generation and
00:16:21.280
control uh they've shown themselves lacking so honestly and you're right you're right a lot of this
0.96
00:16:27.120
stupid shit is popular uh but again the experiment that i'm describing has yet to be run you know and
0.96
00:16:34.640
i think that if you if you just like took some of the talent like some of the talent they have now
1.00
00:16:38.960
even uh candace owens you just had a producer basically kind of like rein her in sort out the
1.00
00:16:45.840
bullshit and sharpened her legitimate arguments then the thing would just be next level you know
1.00
00:16:52.560
what i'm saying in any case yeah shale oil billionaire fundamentalist wackos from texas fund this whole
0.99
00:17:00.720
thing so at some point someone should talk to them i think some of these people are just lost i mean i i
00:17:07.440
just like you you you can bring a horse to water as they say i i just right i get that but if they
00:17:14.160
have so much money they could just they could have another little brand and just experiment with like
00:17:19.520
something that's a little more so yeah but something that's radical yet i i obviously agree with what
00:17:24.880
you're saying but like the the types of people who do this at the end of the day they're they're like
0.93
00:17:31.920
trumped up white trash i i just i have to be brutally frank is this you know these is your
0.99
00:17:40.000
investor appeal no it is my investor appeal because i separate yourself from the jumped up white trash
1.00
00:17:47.840
yeah it's like it yeah like separate yourself do something actually worthwhile it's i don't think we
00:17:55.280
can appeal to these uh folks but anyway let's keep watching and i did and holy smokes so the quote
00:18:05.920
unquote conspiracy theory is actually a three-year thorough investigation that was conducted by
00:18:13.040
journalists that were working with genealogists it was published in six issues in fair documents i'm
00:18:21.920
sorry my french is not that good but they yes they published six issues unpacking what they had
00:18:26.720
discovered after a three-year investigation and here is what they are saying right so again i'm going
00:18:33.040
to say allegedly this is what they have published their theory is that the first lady brigitte macron
00:18:39.520
was actually born jean michel so bridget is actually john michael john michael lived as a man for 30
00:18:48.000
years fathered five children okay and then transitioned at the age of 30 to become brigitte
00:18:56.640
okay now i'm just going to show you this before and after photo just right here they actually used as
00:19:01.760
a part of their investigation chinese software uh and this is a side by side it is such a dead ringer
00:19:08.800
it's crazy to me that you would not say that these two individuals look alike this is potentially the
00:19:14.800
same individual age so on the left what i'm showing you is john michael on the right is a photo of the
00:19:21.360
first lady okay now i will tell you why this has legs and why i'm going to encourage you to read the
00:19:28.480
very long document that i read which we will include in the link in bio the first obvious thing the first
00:19:34.640
obvious reason that i am very much believing what they have published is because the first lady is
00:19:40.560
simply unable to produce any photos of herself throughout the first 30 years of her life
00:19:47.120
guys how easy to debunk this if you say candace no actually you lived as a man for 30 years
00:19:53.680
i lived for 30 years i'm going to show you every photo of every year that i've lived here's me in
00:19:57.680
college right here's me while i was pregnant with my children here's me and my husband on our wedding
00:20:03.120
day there would be so many photos that brigitte should have at her disposal if this is false
00:20:09.520
they didn't have instagram they won't produce any nope they're just following everybody wrong and
00:20:13.440
backwards and transphobic just produce the photos instead the only photos they had produced that are
00:20:19.440
circling in the media are the photos that i just showed you and as i said the first photo she looks
00:20:24.720
more like the john michael who she claims is actually her brother who she won't just present to the public
00:20:31.280
if that is in fact your brother please just go on a walk with him so we can capture it and say ah no
00:20:37.440
she just happens to look like her brother here's john michael no john michael has disappeared the
00:20:42.320
genealogist just can't find a single trace of john michael since brigitte came into the public space
00:20:50.640
at the age of 30. so john michael existed for 30 years according to the genealogist okay and then
00:20:56.080
john michael stops existing and brigitte exists but brigitte doesn't exist for the first 30 years okay
00:21:01.360
the second photo the one that i said to you looked a little too recent for an alleged 70 year old
00:21:07.120
well yeah they were able to debunk that that's actually a photo of her daughter her daughter
00:21:12.240
trephane you can see now side by side of course that is her daughter it's a dead ringer for her
00:21:16.640
daughter so why would you colorize a photo and make it black and white and try to pass it as yourself
00:21:23.280
when it is in fact your daughter i'm sure somebody will say well it wasn't didn't come directly from the
00:21:27.600
first lady it is very obvious that they are trying to dissuade the narrative by producing these two
00:21:34.800
photos which are easily debunked there's a second reason debunked it just looks a lot like her
00:21:41.120
daughter yeah it's called like you look like your children like did they debunk that like forensically
00:21:48.560
are they just saying this looks like her daughter this strikes me i am extremely skeptical of this no
00:21:54.560
she's just saying oh this looks like her daughter oh we debunked it and by the way all these photos
00:21:58.800
that we have seen oh well they're they're fake too for some reason and yeah like you said like people
00:22:04.320
just didn't have as many photos uh back you know yeah like my i've seen photos of of my yeah it's it was
00:22:11.600
kind of an event when you took a photograph i mean my my mother she was alive and i think my parents
00:22:19.680
were married in 1969 or 1968 i can't quite remember but yeah she was she was alive in the 50s it's just
00:22:26.720
kind of different this is just bizarre and again you if you want to forensically debunk that photograph
00:22:35.760
but just just saying that it's a dead ringer give me a break as i've said they're these kind of
00:22:40.960
remarkable things i've noticed it like my um one of my nephews so my my sister's son look like when you
00:22:49.600
see photos of him and then of my daughter it's like oh wow look it's it's so there's such a
00:22:55.200
striking resemblance it's a dead ringer of course it's not now obviously as they've grown but like
00:23:01.280
that's just a completely ridiculous argument anyway say major red flags rather than just producing what
00:23:10.720
should be ample evidence of your existence for the first 30 years of your life they're suing yes the
00:23:17.280
first lady actually sued two of the journalists that were involved in producing the story brigitte
00:23:24.160
macron here's a headline from the telegraph brigitte macron sues women who claimed that she is
00:23:29.600
transgender i'd suit something to note is what exactly brigitte is suing for she's suing them for
0.95
00:23:36.880
violation of privacy and so yeah i don't know how it is in france but this is a difference between the
00:23:44.560
the uk and the united states yeah definitely yeah people will sue you for libel and slander
00:23:51.280
in the uk uh it doesn't happen in the united states so that i think that's why uh candace owens is so
1.00
00:23:58.000
surprised that someone would do this right right what is her position on uh michelle obama wasn't
0.92
00:24:04.720
that a conspiracy theory this is sort of like a an interesting and strange vein of conspiracy theory
00:24:10.240
where they think that some guy some woman is really a man and vice versa yes i i have seen
00:24:17.040
this on on twitter and if you ever click on one of these tweets you'll get served like more of the
00:24:24.080
same for the the next month you have to like actively say please stop like i'm not interested but there is a
00:24:32.880
cottage industry of like they'll show some photo of taylor swift like performing on stage and she'll
0.92
00:24:40.400
like turn around and her crotch area will like kind of vaguely look like there's a penis there but
1.00
00:24:49.760
there's just you you know plausible explanations like she's turning and it kind of has that or like
0.88
00:24:56.960
there's a microphone i don't know there's like so many it's like a fold in the fabric or something
00:25:02.000
like that exactly that that's the that's the most plausible explanation and they're like look at
00:25:06.720
this what do you see here and you know like it's just it is bizarre i think a lot of these people
00:25:13.520
we've had social media induced schizophrenia basically oh that's affecting millions of people
00:25:22.400
yeah and some people then and maybe this is also its own uh sort of form of schizophrenia but
00:25:28.240
people will look at uh candace owens and be like oh yeah well she was doing some good anti-zionist stuff
0.99
00:25:34.240
and now she's coming up with these sort of strange conspiracy theories that are baseless and crazy
00:25:40.080
maybe she's false opposition she's deliberately developed to make the uh kind of anti-zionist
00:25:46.880
positions seem schizophrenic right yeah right because you know she may as well be talking about ufos now and
00:25:54.160
therefore anti-zionism will be uh connected to ufology and so forth right but again i again that
00:26:01.760
might be its own sort of schizophrenia i mean she the simpler explanation might be this chick is just
1.00
00:26:07.520
kind of generally batshit but gets you know a a broken clock is correct twice a day right in any case
00:26:15.600
doesn't candace kind of look like pretty kind of mannish do you like just look at the screen right now
00:26:21.840
yeah look at that jawline i mean i'm sorry i mean i don't think i genuinely don't think she's a man
00:26:27.760
but it's kind of like maybe you should take a look at yourself in the mirror there all can't just like
00:26:32.640
we could start speculating like you know the burden proof is on candace you know she has to prove to me
1.00
00:26:41.280
that she is not in fact a man where are the pictures of her as a child
00:26:46.320
the transsexual uh cries out as as he or she strikes you right yes exactly one of the funniest
1.00
00:26:54.800
hiding it the adam's apple yeah exactly why are you wearing that drawing one of the funniest
00:26:59.680
scenes like 90s comedy was the austin powers scene where um he's like with basil exposition
00:27:08.560
which is kind of he's and and like uh he's like welcome austin i'd like to introduce you to my
00:27:15.520
mother he's like that's not your mother it's a man man he's punching i don't know pretty hilarious
00:27:25.840
scene i guess you had to be there um okay we'll continue rights plus illicit use of her image
1.00
00:27:34.080
but what does that mean that doesn't mean anything like why don't you say you completely
00:27:38.880
lied and i can prove it and i'm going to ruin your entire lives which you would just have to show
0.86
00:27:43.520
again pictures of your first 30 years of life but no this is really just a tactic to pretend
00:27:50.080
as if these journalists didn't produce concrete proof to substantiate their claims now the two
00:27:56.880
journalists being sued by the way are amandine roy and natasha ray and they were eventually punished
00:28:03.360
with symbolic fines for i guess invading uh the privacy of the first lady it's gonna get even
1.00
00:28:10.720
crazier though because journalists that worked on this case were also threatened they sent the police
00:28:18.240
to threaten them while they were conducting research atasha ray the woman that was punished with a
0.91
00:28:24.000
symbolic fine as she was conducting research she reached out to somebody to ask some questions
00:28:29.520
about the first lady's upbringing the first 30 years of the first lady's life and then what
00:28:34.880
happened as she was examining these inconsistencies in the story was the police burst into her home
00:28:41.760
on july 13 2021 they then took her into custody without being summoned on the pretext of a complaint
00:28:50.320
that was filed by one of the individuals that she had reached out to katherine audoy uh she was then
00:28:57.200
released after five hours of tough interrogation with a lesson and you shouldn't be doing this they
00:29:03.520
tried to humiliate her they tried to threaten her and of course this only made the public even more
00:29:09.200
interested in the story she was also asked to produce a list of journalists with whom she had been in
00:29:16.480
contact with the police also seized her phone that is not normal none of this should be happening in a
00:29:24.080
story that again would be so easy to debunk they similarly arrested a man named eric verhi another
00:29:32.640
journalist working on the story similarly had no charges they just wanted to question him i don't know
00:29:40.000
guys you tell me what are you thinking if you're alleging that somebody was a man for the first 30 years
00:29:45.680
of their life why go through these efforts when you could just show photos but of course obviously
00:29:52.960
to tell a lie this big you'd have to have a very good memory this is actually something that judge
00:29:58.400
judy used to say i used to love watching judge judy okay i'll just throw this out there i don't think
00:30:04.720
this is necessarily the most plausible explanation um first off the police do question you sometimes like
00:30:12.480
you can you can get questioned by the police or the fbi you're not under arrest maybe you shouldn't
00:30:18.320
do it because you know anything you say can be held against you all that stuff but that happens and it
00:30:25.440
doesn't i don't know um might they be investigating russian influence on promoting a story like this
00:30:33.920
just throw it out there i was young with my grandma and she used to say you know if you don't lie you
00:30:39.760
don't have to have a good memory but if you lie you got to have a very good memory and what's keep
00:30:45.280
what keeps happening throughout the years of her being the first lady so since that's richard that's
00:30:50.640
actually a great aphorism now yeah that is actually a great aphorism if you lie yeah great memory yeah
00:30:59.520
and we can think of a kind of important example of that 17 and the first lady tells a story about
00:31:04.800
herself in her childhood the math doesn't quite math right for example uh she recalled living alone
00:31:14.080
in the united states during neil armstrong's moon landing in 1969 the only problem is that
00:31:21.200
she would have been just 16 years old uh what 16 year old living alone in the united states
0.90
00:31:28.640
the first lady is in the united states but if the theory is true that she's actually john michelle
00:31:34.160
who is eight years older which would make the first lady 78 years old today that story would make perfect
0.98
00:31:41.360
sense because of course you could live alone when you are 24 years old in the united states again there
00:31:48.320
are multiple examples of the first lady just being too young in terms of the past stories that
00:31:55.920
she keeps telling then there is the remarkably strange case of brigitte's alleged ex-husband so
00:32:03.600
just to remind you jog your memory the story goes she was married right and at the age of 40 years
00:32:09.440
old she fell in love so much so that she left her husband because she just loved this 16 year old or
00:32:15.520
15 year old or 14 year old drama student so much she left her husband and her three kids to be with him
00:32:21.920
okay so it should be pretty easy to find her ex-husband that she had three kids with
00:32:30.640
but it turns out that they can't find that man yeah back when emmanuel macron was elected president
00:32:37.920
journalists all over the world international journalists were obviously prying into his
00:32:42.240
background and her background and they just could not find this man allegedly his name is andre
00:32:48.640
louis oxier and internationally they they just couldn't locate him allegedly he is a banker or
00:32:56.000
was a banker because now they say he died just suddenly died but he was allegedly a banker so it's
00:33:01.520
very weird there wouldn't be a trail for journalists to find him in 2017 during the presidential election
00:33:09.200
they tried to interview him and it was all their attempts in vain in fact in an article that was
00:33:15.760
published in french magazine gala magazine they titled the article as if he had never existed so
00:33:23.520
that is in the year that he became president they were just like this other guy doesn't really seem
00:33:28.000
to exist it also seems to be the case that every time the press is trying to assist the narrative that he
00:33:34.800
did exist they keep accidentally showing photos of other men for example in 2018 france 3 tv produced a
00:33:45.040
movie entitled brigitte macron un roman francais and they showed this photo very quickly featuring brigitte
00:33:53.200
and her first husband andre louis oxier but it turns out that upon inspection that actually isn't him
00:34:01.440
it's actually an old faculty photo because it has been confirmed that brigitte was a teacher obviously
00:34:07.360
that's how she fell in love with young student emmanuel and here is the full photo of the faculty
00:34:13.520
oopsies we got it wrong again guys when i tell you that there is so much proof to this claim i'm
00:34:22.720
not a person that just pushes out these these narratives right i'm not a person that's like
00:34:27.520
come with me and we're going to examine q anon or pizzagate i am telling you that this has legs and you know
00:34:34.800
yeah i mean again something mysterious doesn't imply this claim that she's transgender you know i mean i i
00:34:48.160
don't know what's going on with her first husband interesting question well but let's let's accept the
0.71
00:34:55.280
premise though that uh she's a uh that uh macron's wife is a man uh uh it's pretty gross it's crazy
00:35:04.480
does macron know what yeah is he the real victim but but also like what ultimately is the sort of
00:35:13.520
geopolitical significance of it the issues with france are not that macron his wife is really a man
00:35:20.880
those are not the issues with france those are not the issues that europe are struggling with
00:35:25.680
right i mean granted it would be grotesque and shocking and right things about macron and it
00:35:32.800
would probably darken my opinion of macron but my my opinion of macron right now and i view him
00:35:38.400
politically is mixed anyways right so i'm but i'm critical of him i you know i don't care that the
00:35:44.800
guys like it's already sort of unusual the guy's wife was so much older than him right well yeah it
00:35:51.520
just seems coincidental like you said the the politics is what really matters of it and this
00:35:55.840
comes out like a day or two after macron's made signals that he might enter into the war in ukraine
00:36:01.200
he might send um material support yeah look macron made some bold statements where he basically said
00:36:11.200
sending troops into ukraine and i i guess in this case he was um talking about french troops and not
00:36:19.920
necessarily bringing nato uh you know in enacting the all for one clause of nato i i presume that but
00:36:28.960
i mean it was a vague yet quite bold statement saying that we should consider this not take it off the table
00:36:36.560
and he actually delayed a meeting recently i saw due to these bold statements now when macron was
00:36:46.640
running against jean-marie le pen i don't know if you guys remember the so-called macron leaks
00:36:52.880
but there was forensic analysis done i believe it was done by like a third party but i believe it was
00:37:00.960
published by the southern poverty law center now we we can have our opinions about them or opinions
00:37:06.640
about them particularly in the past but i don't doubt actually their analysis and the first person to
00:37:16.080
use the hashtag macron leaks on twitter was jack sobiac this is someone i've mentioned and i am
00:37:24.720
extremely skeptical of this person he has this background in military intelligence he's
00:37:31.920
naval intelligence in fact and he's uh but a lot of people have said he's been he was run out of there
00:37:38.000
or something very odd person someone who came out of the woodwork and was very very interested in me
00:37:45.040
in 2016 and talking to me and all that kind of stuff and then turned his heels and denounced me the
00:37:50.240
next moment i am highly skeptical of him i've seen a video i could go find it but candace was doing an
00:37:57.360
earlier version of a show that she has on the daily wire called candace where she it was almost like
00:38:02.800
she was oprah and she had like a studio audience it was that type of style and she had him on and this was
00:38:11.520
in 2022 um right but right uh following the ukraine invasion and she had him on as her geopol you know
00:38:21.280
expert and he was doing all the lines ukraine isn't a real country it's just russia why do we care if we
00:38:29.440
do care we could start world war three do you want to nuke the world over ukraine but all of the like
1.00
00:38:35.840
the the talking points were uttered and i just found it or also the my favorite is you know
00:38:42.720
there's this huge nazi problem in ukraine and well you know someone's got to do something about it all
0.92
00:38:47.760
these nazis running around um you know again all of these things have little kernels of truth they
00:38:53.200
might even be kind of like 30 correct or whatever but they're propaganda and she was he was doing that
00:39:01.600
with candace and kind of whispering in her ear is my thought so to go back to macron leaks um
00:39:10.160
jack vasobiec claimed that he was on 4chan randomly and he saw this leak of macron's emails
00:39:18.080
so it was just random now there's also forensic evidence that um the person who put that link on
00:39:26.560
4chan was either weave himself or connected to weave now look i can't verify all this forensic stuff i
00:39:34.160
mean i i can i've forgotten my password in fact i'm you know i'm not quite that bad but i i certainly
00:39:40.800
don't do digital forensics but i i'm just going with them on this i don't i don't think they're
00:39:47.120
lying and it just makes a lot of sense that weave would be involved in this so they hacked macron's
00:39:53.520
email and lo and behold they put forth all these like you know emails about sex toys and wife swapping
00:40:03.840
whatever there was nothing even that surprising for france i guess i guess but it was just throwing
0.98
00:40:12.480
shit up against the wall to see if it can stick and again like le pen etc they the the far right
0.94
00:40:23.040
populist are at the very least highly sympathetic towards russia and at the very most i mean we can
0.98
00:40:30.800
talk about orban today they just wanted to fund the war immediately so they're they're on russia's side
00:40:36.960
and they might very well benefit um from this you remember in tucker's unbearable interview with
00:40:45.120
vladimir putin there was this weird situation where he said where vladimir putin mentioned that
00:40:50.480
hungary has some claims in ukraine and um tucker asked him well are would hungary get some of these
00:40:58.560
territories and he was like oh i don't know i've never talked about this book it's just an odd moment
00:41:04.400
and today or yesterday it was revealed that when orban visited mar-a-lago he was talking about trump's
00:41:14.240
bid to end the war and it was basically to totally defund ukraine so that ukraine would just have to
00:41:20.880
capitulate out of the necessity of surviving and um that was his secret plan to end the war basically
00:41:29.600
now i think a lot of the world leaders are kind of reacting to this and uh europe might be stepping up
00:41:35.360
macron might be making some bold statements so there's some weird tensions and all of you know the
00:41:43.200
fact that this all this might have been happening the research might have been going on in 2021 and
00:41:48.480
22 and i'll i'll even grant just for the sake of argument that there's some kind of mystery involved
00:41:55.120
of like you know who is she where's her husband you know okay i don't know but the fact that this is
00:42:01.440
all coming right now and the fact that it presses the hottest hot button of these conservatives which is
0.99
00:42:08.960
chicks with dicks basically i don't know i don't have any evidence to suggest this but just on a kind
0.99
00:42:15.680
of cuibona reasoning and just my kind of gut sense this strikes me as russian propaganda to be honest
0.98