Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1164 Scott Adams： Coyotes to Protect the Border, Black Support for President Trump, Mask Science

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody. Come on in. Come on in. It's time. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:17.080 the best time of the day. You know it is. Every time. Have I ever been wrong yet? No. Not even

00:00:24.920 once, at least about this topic. And all you need to enjoy it fully is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:00:31.300 a tank or chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:37.900 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:43.880 the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:48.560 It's called the Simultaneous Sip and it happens now. Go.

00:00:54.920 Ah, the only thing that could taste better than this is, as I see in the comments,

00:01:01.820 the tears of our enemies. Yes, they are sweeter than the coffee, but only barely.

00:01:09.500 This morning I got a tweet from a concerned viewer who said that I used to be unpredictable.

00:01:17.720 And when he watched my opinions, he would think, oh, I didn't see that coming.

00:01:23.360 But now he says I've become completely predictable and he can tell in advance what I'm going to say

00:01:30.480 and do. So I blocked him. See if he saw that coming.

00:01:38.540 They call this crazy in California.

00:01:42.220 I'm just laughing at my own joke. Sorry.

00:01:45.060 Every now and then I have to pause to laugh at my own jokes.

00:01:49.820 By the way, that's a humor writing technique.

00:01:56.940 I've said this before, but it's worth saying again.

00:01:59.820 One of the ways that I write humor is I use my body as a sensor.

00:02:05.020 And as I'm cycling through ideas and I'll think, what about this?

00:02:08.360 What about this? What about this?

00:02:09.920 The ones I keep are the ones I feel in my body.

00:02:13.180 So if I actually laugh, that's a physical response.

00:02:17.160 I go, oh, I'll keep that one.

00:02:18.920 If it made me laugh, maybe it'll make somebody else laugh.

00:02:23.600 Anyway, they called us crazy in California when we battled the coronavirus here by setting

00:02:29.740 all of our forests on fire.

00:02:32.660 And I'm pretty sure the smoke killed the coronavirus.

00:02:37.760 Yeah.

00:02:39.520 Or it was coyotes.

00:02:41.080 If you haven't been watching the news, there's not much that coyotes can't do.

00:02:48.500 Apparently coyotes can carry children all the way across the border and deposit them in America.

00:02:54.880 Go back, get some more children.

00:02:58.400 Children, I think, put tiny saddles on the coyotes.

00:03:01.460 I haven't actually seen the coyotes working.

00:03:03.960 But you assume, just sort of common sense, that the way they would do it is not, and this is stupid.

00:03:10.460 Some people thought, can a coyote, you know, actually grab a child by the collar and drag them all the way across the border?

00:03:20.120 No.

00:03:21.380 No.

00:03:21.900 A coyote isn't that big.

00:03:23.760 They're not going to, like, drag a kid all the way across the border.

00:03:27.100 The only way to do it is to put a tiny saddle on the coyote.

00:03:31.800 And then they can bear the weight because all four legs are now working.

00:03:37.160 So if you were close to the border, you would see those little stampedes.

00:03:41.980 You know, from a distance, it looks dangerous.

00:03:44.420 But if you get up close, you'll see that it's actually very safe because every baby is on a saddle on the coyote.

00:03:52.080 And they're heading toward the border, sort of in unison.

00:03:56.360 And the babies are actually wearing bicycle helmets.

00:04:00.120 Because the first thing you're thinking is, well, that doesn't sound safe.

00:04:03.720 Put a baby on a coyote?

00:04:06.340 That doesn't sound safe.

00:04:08.960 Don't worry.

00:04:10.540 All the babies have bicycle helmets.

00:04:12.780 And they have proper saddles.

00:04:14.620 And the coyotes are trained.

00:04:16.400 Some of the coyotes actually know first aid.

00:04:18.680 So they pretty much have everything covered.

00:04:22.140 We'll talk more about that later.

00:04:25.680 Did you know that the amazing documentary The Plot Against the President is now available on Amazon?

00:04:33.560 That's probably what you were waiting for.

00:04:35.720 When it first came out, a lot of people wanted to see it.

00:04:38.440 But it wasn't, you know, everywhere that movies are available.

00:04:41.980 But now it's on Amazon.

00:04:43.280 So The Plot Against the President, which describes, you know, the plot against the president.

00:04:51.900 The attempted coup.

00:04:53.600 And when you see the details, you're going to learn stuff that you thought you knew, but you don't know.

00:05:01.440 And it's mind-boggling.

00:05:03.940 So you have to watch that.

00:05:04.940 It's on Amazon now.

00:05:05.800 The Plot Against the President.

00:05:07.380 You should all see it before Election Day.

00:05:09.360 You know, speaking of the coyotes, joking aside, when the president mentioned coyotes bringing children across the border,

00:05:21.080 of course he was talking about human beings, not actual animal coyotes, and they're called coyotes if you didn't know that,

00:05:30.040 that I saw a tweet where there was some poor woman who didn't know that coyotes was the name for the human traffickers,

00:05:37.460 and she tweeted that it was dumb for the president to say coyotes are bringing children across the border

00:05:44.060 because they're just small animals, and how can they do that?

00:05:47.800 Now, when I saw that, my first thought was, well, there can't be more than one person in the whole world

00:05:55.760 who actually thought he was talking about the physical animal, a coyote.

00:06:01.280 There can't be more than one of those.

00:06:03.280 Well, it turns out there was more than one.

00:06:07.140 In fact, a number of blue check people were quite concerned about this problem of coyotes

00:06:13.940 and bringing children across the border.

00:06:17.860 So just when you think that the public cannot be any more dumb than what you've seen so far,

00:06:23.720 oh yeah, they can be.

00:06:25.100 Oh yeah.

00:06:26.160 Don't count out the public when it comes to dumbness.

00:06:29.140 Nobody ever got rich by, was it, overestimating the public's intelligence?

00:06:41.040 Here's a little sign of the simulation that wants to keep us amused.

00:06:44.860 If you were to think of Trump and all he's done, say, for peace in the Middle East

00:06:50.560 and calming down things in North Korea, etc.,

00:06:53.220 you might think that a good phrase to describe him would be peace in action, right?

00:07:02.140 Because he's creating peace in the Middle East,

00:07:04.960 new countries signing up all the time,

00:07:07.600 and he's taking action.

00:07:09.220 You know, it's not happening by accident.

00:07:12.300 It's because of actual action to make it happen.

00:07:14.960 So it's peace in action.

00:07:16.540 Versus Joe Biden, who's more of a piece of the action kind of a guy.

00:07:20.880 So it's peace in action versus a piece of the action.

00:07:27.180 So I thought that was worth repeating.

00:07:29.640 I don't know why.

00:07:31.000 So Sudan and Israel have decided to normalize relations

00:07:34.920 thanks to the good work of the United States.

00:07:40.380 And that got signed yesterday.

00:07:44.620 Apparently there's some more countries that might be signing on.

00:07:48.240 And here's my question.

00:07:50.320 If you were one of the many people

00:07:52.100 who were convinced by the mainstream media and by Democrats

00:07:55.560 that President Trump was an Islamophobe,

00:08:00.000 how does any of this make sense?

00:08:01.860 But then you say to yourself,

00:08:04.700 no, no, no, Scott.

00:08:05.540 He's not doing it for the Islamic nations.

00:08:10.240 He's doing it for Israel.

00:08:12.320 To which I say, well, wait a minute, wait a minute.

00:08:14.760 Why would he be doing something for Israel

00:08:17.260 while Democrats actually believe

00:08:20.420 that he praised neo-Nazis in Charlottesville

00:08:23.780 who are anti-Semitic?

00:08:26.720 How do those two things fit in the same reality?

00:08:30.060 One of those things can't be real.

00:08:33.820 Well, the fine people hoax, of course, was not real.

00:08:37.980 And it turns out that the president is doing good work

00:08:42.020 to make sure that Israel is safer

00:08:44.360 and the Islamic countries are doing better.

00:08:46.340 So how do you believe that he is opposed

00:08:50.820 to the Jewish population of the world,

00:08:55.420 according to Democrats,

00:08:57.540 while he has a Jewish son-in-law,

00:09:01.080 a Jewish converted daughter,

00:09:02.980 Jewish grandchildren,

00:09:04.720 is so popular in Israel

00:09:06.820 that they are naming things after him?

00:09:09.060 And you still believe the fine people hoax?

00:09:16.280 That he was on the side with the neo-Nazis?

00:09:19.460 I don't think so.

00:09:21.240 Have you ever noticed

00:09:22.240 that Israel is pretty good at spotting anti-Semites?

00:09:27.700 Pretty good at it.

00:09:29.140 They've had some practice.

00:09:31.120 Have they not spotted President Trump's

00:09:34.760 anti-Semitic ways, allegedly?

00:09:36.940 Because Israel can't pick up on those clues?

00:09:41.920 No.

00:09:42.900 It's because if you believe

00:09:44.660 that the president ever said those things in Charlottesville,

00:09:48.560 you have been brainwashed.

00:09:51.360 Now, compare my explanation of reality

00:09:54.900 that some people were brainwashed

00:09:57.340 into believing something that wasn't true

00:09:59.140 with the other explanation.

00:10:01.940 The other explanation is that Israel didn't notice.

00:10:05.720 Didn't notice.

00:10:07.620 You think?

00:10:08.400 You think Israel doesn't watch our news

00:10:11.040 in the United States?

00:10:12.840 You think they don't know

00:10:14.080 what the president of the United States

00:10:16.040 is accused of doing?

00:10:18.180 Obviously,

00:10:19.260 if they thought any of that was true,

00:10:22.560 we'd be hearing about it.

00:10:24.380 Because one thing that Israel is never accused of

00:10:28.320 is being quiet when they have a complaint.

00:10:32.780 Has anybody ever accused them of that?

00:10:34.940 I don't think so.

00:10:38.000 So every time the president does something

00:10:40.320 that counters the brainwashing,

00:10:42.660 that's working in his favor.

00:10:44.800 So doing a whole bunch of peace deals

00:10:46.540 in the Middle East

00:10:47.380 has got to be blowing some minds right now.

00:10:51.500 The other thing that's blowing minds,

00:10:53.740 and I said this on Periscope,

00:10:55.660 and I was happy to see that other people

00:10:57.440 picked up the same thought.

00:10:59.540 There's very little that you remember

00:11:01.860 from a debate.

00:11:03.360 If you go a few days into the future,

00:11:06.260 people don't remember anything specifically

00:11:08.560 that was said.

00:11:09.340 They remember the vibe.

00:11:11.200 They remember how it felt.

00:11:12.700 And the big takeaway from the most recent debate,

00:11:16.960 the one that will have the most effect

00:11:18.560 probably on the election outcome, if any,

00:11:21.180 is that Trump can act presidential.

00:11:25.520 He can act like he's not a bully.

00:11:29.940 And that was something that his supporters noticed.

00:11:35.500 You know, I called it out.

00:11:36.660 But I didn't expect the other team to notice it

00:11:41.080 and call it out.

00:11:42.120 And they did.

00:11:43.300 So even CNN pundits, et cetera,

00:11:46.380 are noting that the president

00:11:48.060 does apparently have the capability

00:11:50.140 to control himself

00:11:52.660 when there's a strategic reason to do it.

00:11:55.920 That is completely different

00:11:58.080 from what the anti-Trumpers have been fed

00:12:02.600 as their belief system for four years.

00:12:06.660 For four years, people have been saying

00:12:08.780 that the president doesn't have any ability

00:12:11.640 to control himself.

00:12:13.720 And then you watched him do it.

00:12:16.140 He was given a reason.

00:12:17.920 Oh, we don't like the way you were bullying

00:12:20.820 and talking over Biden in that last debate.

00:12:24.160 I tend to think that that strategy

00:12:25.800 was more effective than pundits give us credit for

00:12:29.620 because it did show some dominance.

00:12:31.660 And that counts.

00:12:32.560 That counts for a lot.

00:12:34.280 But he got that feedback.

00:12:36.660 He incorporated it.

00:12:39.440 He implemented it.

00:12:41.500 And you could see quite plainly

00:12:43.140 he wasn't struggling to do it.

00:12:45.660 Was there any time during the debate

00:12:47.440 you said to yourself,

00:12:48.360 oh, my God, he's struggling to act presidential?

00:12:53.500 No.

00:12:54.420 He wasn't struggling at all.

00:12:56.380 Well, it was easy because, in fact,

00:13:00.300 you see him changing modes all the time.

00:13:03.060 You see him doing a head of state meeting.

00:13:07.360 He's in that mode.

00:13:09.000 You see him on the rally, you know,

00:13:11.120 talking to the crowd.

00:13:12.120 It's stand-up comedy.

00:13:13.660 You see him talking to children who visit the White House

00:13:17.060 and he talks like a grandfather.

00:13:18.480 He goes into whatever mode he needs to.

00:13:22.520 And when you see that he isn't crazy

00:13:25.840 unless he wants to act that way for strategic purposes,

00:13:29.900 because it does work.

00:13:31.620 You know, his critics call it crazy,

00:13:33.680 but his supporters would just say he's being honest

00:13:37.020 and high energy and all that other stuff.

00:13:38.700 So I think that made a difference.

00:13:45.140 I think that made a big difference.

00:13:46.780 And I don't know that if you asked anybody in a poll

00:13:50.160 and you said, did your vote change

00:13:52.860 because President Trump acted presidential in a debate,

00:13:56.400 probably nobody would say that that was the reason.

00:13:59.780 But it gives you comfort if you were worried about it.

00:14:05.120 It just takes that worry away.

00:14:06.800 Likewise, all the Middle East peace deals

00:14:10.440 should be taking those worries you might have had

00:14:13.960 about Islamophobia

00:14:15.060 and about his alleged anti-Semitism,

00:14:19.020 which is crazy,

00:14:20.100 given the situation.

00:14:21.180 It's just a crazy thing to think about him.

00:14:23.660 But it just allows you not to worry about that.

00:14:26.240 It just takes it down to a lower priority,

00:14:29.000 even if you're still a little suspicious.

00:14:31.360 It certainly takes it off the top ten.

00:14:33.000 On another topic on Twitter,

00:14:40.440 Drowlord, a Twitter user,

00:14:44.960 says, how many people are actively listening to pollsters?

00:14:49.860 And this is just one person's experience.

00:14:54.000 And he said, three months ago,

00:14:55.440 it didn't occur to me that anyone did that,

00:14:58.720 meaning lying to pollsters.

00:15:00.520 How many people are actively lying to pollsters?

00:15:04.340 And he says,

00:15:05.180 I've been shocked to learn

00:15:06.120 that almost all of my conservative acquaintances

00:15:09.140 do it on purpose.

00:15:12.540 Pollsters are not neutral observers.

00:15:15.160 They're using you to undermine you.

00:15:18.160 They're using you to undermine you.

00:15:20.760 Okay.

00:15:21.840 I'm not sure I know what that sentence means.

00:15:23.920 But how many of you have had the same experience?

00:15:28.440 That if you talk to your conservative acquaintances,

00:15:32.300 that they're sort of unified at this point

00:15:35.380 in saying that they lie to pollsters.

00:15:39.020 Now, I don't know how many of those people

00:15:40.800 are lying to you about lying to pollsters,

00:15:44.520 because if somebody is willing to lie to a pollster,

00:15:47.860 well, they might be willing to lie

00:15:49.480 to their acquaintances as well

00:15:51.000 about this sort of thing.

00:15:53.680 But I think this hidden Trump vote

00:15:56.300 is going to be a big surprise to some people.

00:16:00.640 Here's another big surprise.

00:16:02.220 According to Rasmussen,

00:16:04.260 who does a continually polling on things

00:16:08.240 such as National Daily Black Likely Voter Job Approval

00:16:12.980 for the president.

00:16:15.320 So these are likely voters who are also black

00:16:18.440 and how much they approve of the president.

00:16:22.220 Back on...

00:16:23.480 This is just not long ago.

00:16:25.280 This is October 19th.

00:16:28.720 Not that long ago, right?

00:16:30.380 Just last week.

00:16:32.940 Black Likely Voters

00:16:34.480 had a 25% approval rating for the president,

00:16:37.340 which would be crazy.

00:16:39.740 Like, off-the-charts crazy.

00:16:41.740 Because he only got, like, 11% of the vote.

00:16:45.160 So you'd expect his approval

00:16:46.540 would be closer to that 10% range, right?

00:16:48.900 10%, 11%.

00:16:49.840 But 25% last week?

00:16:54.880 That close to the election?

00:16:56.360 Oh, I'm not done yet.

00:16:58.220 That was last week.

00:17:00.360 And so that was the 19th.

00:17:01.700 On the 20th, it dipped a little bit.

00:17:04.600 And, okay, that's back to normal.

00:17:05.900 Well, it dipped to 24%.

00:17:07.660 Still really high,

00:17:09.360 but at least you can see it trending down

00:17:11.360 where you'd expect it to trend, right?

00:17:13.560 You kind of expect it to sink back down.

00:17:16.180 Except, oh, what happened on the 21st?

00:17:19.100 Huh.

00:17:19.780 It reversed directions and went to 31%.

00:17:22.540 What?

00:17:24.600 31% of black likely voters

00:17:27.340 have given the president,

00:17:31.760 who is considered by his enemies

00:17:34.320 the worst person in the world,

00:17:36.580 they're giving him 31% approval

00:17:39.100 on the 21st?

00:17:40.960 That was only a few days ago.

00:17:44.180 So, but you know that's not going to hold, right?

00:17:46.380 That's the kind of number where you hear it,

00:17:48.440 you say, okay, that's not going to hold.

00:17:50.500 And it didn't, it didn't hold.

00:17:52.280 So the very next day, it was pretty different.

00:17:55.120 It was up to 37 frickin' percent.

00:17:59.260 Black likely voters,

00:18:01.640 37% approved of the president

00:18:04.320 on the 22nd.

00:18:07.000 What's today?

00:18:07.520 Today's the 24th.

00:18:11.460 That was only two days ago.

00:18:14.260 37% of the black likely voters

00:18:17.400 approve of the president?

00:18:19.640 What's happening here?

00:18:21.360 So one thing you can say for sure,

00:18:23.180 again, you know,

00:18:24.460 the 25% was crazy,

00:18:26.820 so you didn't really expect that to hold.

00:18:28.480 But when it reaches 37%,

00:18:30.540 you know that number's not going to stay there, right?

00:18:34.840 Because that's just crazy.

00:18:36.180 It's not going to stay at 37%.

00:18:39.060 And indeed, sure enough,

00:18:40.940 the very next day on the 23rd,

00:18:43.400 it changed again by quite a bit

00:18:45.220 to 46%.

00:18:48.500 46%.

00:18:52.120 I feel like I have to keep reading this again

00:18:56.340 because you won't believe you heard it right.

00:19:00.000 Let me say it again,

00:19:00.880 so make sure you heard it right.

00:19:03.040 The National Daily Black Likely

00:19:06.080 voter job approval

00:19:07.480 for the president,

00:19:09.460 according to Rasmussen,

00:19:11.460 went from 25%,

00:19:13.080 which was sky high on the 19th,

00:19:15.520 just a few days ago,

00:19:16.780 to 24%,

00:19:18.300 31%,

00:19:19.640 37%,

00:19:21.380 and 46%.

00:19:24.080 What the hell is happening?

00:19:26.880 What the hell is happening?

00:19:29.760 What the hell is happening?

00:19:30.520 I don't know.

00:19:32.340 But it feels like

00:19:34.120 the silo's got a crack.

00:19:37.600 You know,

00:19:37.960 the silo,

00:19:38.740 the new silo

00:19:39.980 that keeps the left

00:19:41.080 in their bubble?

00:19:42.900 I feel like it cracked.

00:19:45.200 What cracked it?

00:19:47.320 Was it

00:19:48.000 50 Cent?

00:19:50.700 Maybe.

00:19:52.160 Maybe.

00:19:53.000 I don't know.

00:19:53.460 Was it the fact

00:19:54.780 that even Van Jones,

00:19:57.400 as of yesterday,

00:19:59.020 I think it was,

00:20:00.260 said that President Trump

00:20:01.540 doesn't get enough credit

00:20:03.220 for what he's done

00:20:04.660 for black Americans?

00:20:07.920 Now,

00:20:08.360 Van also added

00:20:09.480 that the president's rhetoric

00:20:11.720 is hurting him,

00:20:13.520 and that's bad.

00:20:15.260 But he says

00:20:16.120 out loud

00:20:17.500 President Trump

00:20:19.340 doesn't get enough credit

00:20:20.820 for what he's doing.

00:20:22.320 Some people are saying

00:20:23.900 Kanye.

00:20:25.180 Maybe,

00:20:25.720 but I think Kanye's

00:20:26.600 baked into the cake by now.

00:20:28.540 Some people in the comments

00:20:29.680 are saying Ice Cube.

00:20:32.020 Maybe.

00:20:33.400 How does that story

00:20:34.660 strike you

00:20:35.580 when you hear

00:20:36.320 that Ice Cube

00:20:37.140 had some actual plans

00:20:39.100 he put on paper?

00:20:40.720 And again,

00:20:41.460 I'm going to compliment

00:20:42.660 Ice Cube.

00:20:44.000 It's easy to talk.

00:20:46.640 Everybody likes to talk.

00:20:49.060 But he put it on paper.

00:20:50.080 And then he took

00:20:51.760 a reputational risk

00:20:53.240 that's extreme

00:20:54.920 by talking to both sides.

00:20:57.940 Because he's supposed

00:20:58.600 to just talk to the Democrats,

00:21:00.020 right?

00:21:00.780 But he talked to

00:21:01.700 the other side too,

00:21:02.980 and the other side

00:21:03.680 being the Trump administration,

00:21:04.800 and he got a better answer

00:21:06.940 from them.

00:21:08.080 Because you know

00:21:08.660 what the Trump administration

00:21:09.900 would love to do

00:21:10.780 more than anything?

00:21:12.560 This is not a joke.

00:21:14.460 This is no surprise.

00:21:16.480 Well,

00:21:17.000 it won't be to Republicans.

00:21:17.980 But it might be a surprise

00:21:20.360 if there's some black

00:21:22.580 likely voters

00:21:23.640 watching this.

00:21:25.120 I don't know

00:21:25.820 if you know this.

00:21:27.140 Because you've been told

00:21:28.100 exactly the opposite

00:21:29.160 forever.

00:21:30.340 But if the Trump administration

00:21:32.240 could do something specific,

00:21:34.500 you know,

00:21:34.680 a real plan,

00:21:35.800 an idea

00:21:36.280 that was

00:21:37.860 clearly beneficial

00:21:39.540 for the black

00:21:40.580 public,

00:21:42.000 they would love that.

00:21:44.060 They wouldn't

00:21:44.840 ignore it.

00:21:46.660 grudgingly

00:21:49.380 look at it.

00:21:51.080 They wouldn't

00:21:52.160 make you feel good

00:21:53.860 to talk to you

00:21:54.700 and then brush you off.

00:21:56.700 They would love it.

00:21:58.420 Because it's in their

00:21:59.420 best interest.

00:22:01.380 That's it.

00:22:02.620 People do act

00:22:03.800 in their best interest.

00:22:05.040 It's the one thing

00:22:05.660 that you can count on

00:22:06.660 more than anything else

00:22:07.760 in the world.

00:22:08.740 You can always

00:22:09.720 count on people

00:22:10.460 to act in their

00:22:11.220 best interest.

00:22:11.920 And I don't think

00:22:13.780 there's anything

00:22:14.420 that the Trump

00:22:15.440 administration

00:22:15.940 would like better

00:22:17.260 than to do

00:22:18.620 a good job.

00:22:20.080 All right?

00:22:21.080 Is there anybody

00:22:22.340 who wakes up

00:22:23.060 and says,

00:22:23.540 I think I'll do

00:22:24.040 a bad job today?

00:22:25.160 Nobody.

00:22:26.360 Is there any world

00:22:27.600 in which

00:22:28.200 the Trump administration

00:22:29.760 would look bad

00:22:31.460 if they legitimately

00:22:33.300 did a good job

00:22:34.220 for the black public?

00:22:36.860 No.

00:22:37.740 There's no scenario

00:22:38.860 in which they would

00:22:39.780 look bad

00:22:40.520 for doing a good job.

00:22:43.080 Of course they wanted

00:22:44.360 to talk to Ice Cube.

00:22:46.120 Everybody who thought

00:22:47.180 that that was unusual,

00:22:49.540 you are brainwashed.

00:22:51.380 If you think that

00:22:52.300 any administration,

00:22:53.880 really,

00:22:54.380 if you think

00:22:54.920 any administration

00:22:55.860 is unwilling

00:22:59.060 to listen to good ideas

00:23:00.480 that help a big part

00:23:01.680 of their public

00:23:02.240 that can get them

00:23:03.000 re-elected,

00:23:03.700 you've got to re-examine

00:23:07.200 where you're getting

00:23:07.820 your news

00:23:08.320 because of course

00:23:09.220 they want to help.

00:23:10.960 All right.

00:23:13.480 So,

00:23:14.160 here's a question

00:23:14.820 I have

00:23:15.340 for Democrats.

00:23:18.460 And I like to ask

00:23:19.880 this kind of question

00:23:21.120 and it's one

00:23:21.940 you should ask yourself

00:23:22.920 all the time.

00:23:24.080 And the question

00:23:24.940 goes like this.

00:23:27.900 How do you explain

00:23:29.300 with your worldview

00:23:30.580 what you observe?

00:23:32.800 In other words,

00:23:33.260 you have a view

00:23:34.460 of the world

00:23:35.040 and you think,

00:23:36.320 okay,

00:23:36.480 this is the way

00:23:37.120 the world is.

00:23:38.280 This is what

00:23:38.920 these people want.

00:23:40.080 This is what

00:23:40.560 they're trying to get.

00:23:42.020 And it kind of

00:23:42.640 fits together.

00:23:43.740 And then you observe

00:23:44.780 the news.

00:23:46.300 If the news

00:23:47.220 doesn't fit

00:23:48.280 with your worldview,

00:23:50.260 what do you do?

00:23:51.500 Well,

00:23:51.920 you should change

00:23:52.660 your worldview.

00:23:53.820 If there's enough

00:23:54.640 news that doesn't

00:23:56.920 fit your worldview,

00:23:58.040 you should change it.

00:23:58.820 And I like to

00:24:01.100 point out

00:24:02.460 when the news

00:24:03.480 fits my worldview

00:24:05.040 perfectly,

00:24:05.820 but it doesn't

00:24:06.320 fit the popular one

00:24:07.440 because those

00:24:08.340 are the important

00:24:09.080 things to notice.

00:24:11.420 So here's one

00:24:12.460 and it's a question

00:24:13.600 for the Democrats.

00:24:14.920 If you're a Democrat

00:24:16.160 and let's say

00:24:17.360 you are 100%

00:24:18.860 certain

00:24:19.400 that Trump

00:24:21.500 is obviously

00:24:22.740 a racist.

00:24:23.760 Now,

00:24:24.100 I'm not talking

00:24:24.640 about you figured it

00:24:25.960 down on your own.

00:24:27.600 But if you're

00:24:28.080 a Democrat

00:24:28.500 and you believe

00:24:29.580 that everybody

00:24:30.760 looking at the

00:24:31.700 same information

00:24:32.480 can see it,

00:24:33.760 it's just clear,

00:24:35.120 it's obvious,

00:24:36.220 and you believe

00:24:36.780 that everyone

00:24:37.620 can see this,

00:24:39.180 that Trump

00:24:39.560 is obviously,

00:24:41.180 not subtly,

00:24:42.620 but obviously

00:24:43.640 a racist,

00:24:45.200 how do you explain

00:24:46.120 all the black people

00:24:47.360 who don't see it?

00:24:49.680 Serious question.

00:24:52.020 Do you believe,

00:24:53.640 just as you would be,

00:24:55.460 I guess,

00:24:55.960 confused that Israel

00:24:57.620 doesn't seem to notice

00:24:59.420 that the president

00:25:00.420 is anti-Semitic

00:25:02.020 if you have

00:25:02.600 that worldview?

00:25:03.920 Now,

00:25:04.160 my worldview

00:25:04.680 is that he's not

00:25:06.040 anti-Semitic at all.

00:25:07.700 In fact,

00:25:08.100 he loves Israel.

00:25:09.900 Obviously.

00:25:11.740 And so my worldview

00:25:13.320 is completely consistent.

00:25:15.420 Everything that's

00:25:16.060 happening with Israel

00:25:17.100 and the president

00:25:18.200 is exactly

00:25:19.620 what it looks like

00:25:20.660 in my worldview.

00:25:22.100 Oh yeah,

00:25:22.420 he wants to help,

00:25:23.800 he's good at negotiating,

00:25:25.060 he puts some work

00:25:26.640 into it,

00:25:27.800 and he's getting

00:25:28.460 a good result.

00:25:29.720 Completely consistent.

00:25:32.700 Now,

00:25:33.340 same thing with

00:25:34.400 what Trump

00:25:35.500 has done

00:25:35.860 for the black public.

00:25:38.400 If he's this

00:25:39.780 big old racist,

00:25:41.480 and it's obvious,

00:25:42.940 everybody can see it,

00:25:44.520 why are there

00:25:45.580 so many black people

00:25:46.720 who can't see it?

00:25:47.780 How would there be

00:25:49.360 even one black person

00:25:51.680 in the United States

00:25:52.800 who would somehow

00:25:54.360 miss what the Democrats

00:25:56.360 say is right in front

00:25:57.540 of your face?

00:25:58.960 Look at it.

00:25:59.720 It's right there.

00:26:02.340 You know,

00:26:02.700 I can see if,

00:26:04.500 in general,

00:26:05.600 generally speaking,

00:26:06.700 10% of the public

00:26:07.780 will believe

00:26:08.340 just about anything.

00:26:09.940 You know,

00:26:10.140 10% will believe

00:26:11.220 in any story

00:26:12.240 you give them.

00:26:12.720 But once you get up

00:26:14.420 around a job approval

00:26:15.640 of 46%,

00:26:17.120 as the likely

00:26:19.580 black voter

00:26:20.440 job approval

00:26:21.280 for the president

00:26:22.020 just hit,

00:26:23.160 at around 46%,

00:26:25.000 the people

00:26:26.200 in the other half

00:26:27.560 of the group

00:26:28.720 have to start

00:26:29.980 asking themselves,

00:26:33.080 what are they seeing

00:26:34.420 that I'm not seeing?

00:26:36.200 Why does my worldview

00:26:37.700 keep getting violated?

00:26:40.200 Because my worldview

00:26:41.020 says the president

00:26:41.980 would not do

00:26:42.740 a platinum plan

00:26:43.680 for black America.

00:26:45.740 You know,

00:26:46.160 their worldview

00:26:47.580 that the Trump

00:26:49.280 is racist

00:26:49.900 says he would not

00:26:51.280 do prison reform.

00:26:53.100 It says he would not

00:26:54.100 brag continually

00:26:55.380 about black

00:26:56.480 unemployment rates

00:26:57.460 before coronavirus

00:26:58.780 and we hope

00:26:59.600 soon again

00:27:00.200 being incredibly good.

00:27:02.960 Why would he

00:27:03.400 act like that?

00:27:05.160 Does any of that

00:27:05.880 make sense

00:27:06.660 if you believe

00:27:08.600 he's an obvious racist?

00:27:10.800 You can't explain

00:27:12.240 why your own people,

00:27:14.940 Democrats who happen

00:27:15.880 to be black,

00:27:17.220 don't see it

00:27:18.100 if it's so obvious.

00:27:20.540 And what's the other hypothesis?

00:27:22.820 Give me one other hypothesis

00:27:24.560 that makes sense

00:27:25.840 for why,

00:27:27.280 let's say,

00:27:27.920 let's say half

00:27:28.700 of the black public

00:27:29.600 thinks they see

00:27:31.080 an obvious problem

00:27:32.220 with Trump

00:27:32.760 and 46%

00:27:34.620 apparently not seeing it.

00:27:37.400 How do you explain that

00:27:38.640 in any other way?

00:27:40.480 Well,

00:27:41.340 my worldview

00:27:42.100 explains it perfectly.

00:27:43.900 My worldview

00:27:44.600 is that our opinions

00:27:46.040 are assigned to us

00:27:47.260 by our chosen media.

00:27:49.460 And if the media

00:27:50.660 you're absorbing

00:27:51.460 is telling you

00:27:52.420 Trump is a monster,

00:27:54.140 you go away

00:27:54.740 believing it

00:27:55.420 and you believe

00:27:56.760 you made up

00:27:57.320 your own mind.

00:27:58.780 But you didn't.

00:28:00.380 And I would say

00:28:01.280 that my worldview

00:28:01.980 has all of the

00:28:02.980 scientific backing

00:28:03.960 that people

00:28:05.060 can be convinced

00:28:06.100 to believe anything,

00:28:08.240 just about anything,

00:28:09.260 if their news

00:28:09.920 source is consistent.

00:28:12.000 And so,

00:28:13.000 my worldview

00:28:13.500 is completely intact.

00:28:15.600 The people

00:28:15.960 who watch

00:28:16.420 the wrong news

00:28:17.400 get the wrong

00:28:18.320 feeling about the world.

00:28:20.380 The people

00:28:20.840 who watch

00:28:21.300 the correct news

00:28:22.380 or at least

00:28:22.920 they're smart enough

00:28:23.860 to recognize

00:28:25.300 fake news

00:28:25.940 when they see it

00:28:26.740 have not been

00:28:28.660 brainwashed.

00:28:30.240 And that's it.

00:28:30.860 And that's what we see.

00:28:32.180 We see some

00:28:32.840 brainwashed people,

00:28:33.720 some not brainwashed people.

00:28:35.280 It's all perfectly

00:28:35.900 consistent

00:28:36.480 and scientifically

00:28:38.080 backed,

00:28:39.460 I would say.

00:28:40.920 All right.

00:28:44.180 And then,

00:28:47.140 of course,

00:28:47.400 the next thing

00:28:47.980 that the people

00:28:48.580 who are hypnotized

00:28:49.640 would say

00:28:51.420 is like,

00:28:52.000 Scott,

00:28:52.420 Scott,

00:28:52.740 Scott,

00:28:53.680 I know what you're saying.

00:28:54.920 You're saying

00:28:55.340 that I'm just being fooled

00:28:56.480 by the media,

00:28:57.300 but I'm not.

00:28:58.300 I'm looking at the facts.

00:29:00.440 For example,

00:29:00.980 what about the fact

00:29:01.980 of the fine people?

00:29:03.200 Oh,

00:29:03.720 that was a hoax.

00:29:05.140 That's not a fact.

00:29:06.620 It's opposite of a fact.

00:29:08.580 And then they'll say,

00:29:09.400 but Scott,

00:29:10.080 Scott,

00:29:10.400 Scott,

00:29:11.520 you know,

00:29:11.980 what about,

00:29:12.920 I mean,

00:29:13.280 obviously,

00:29:13.960 the Central Park Five thing,

00:29:16.660 President did a full-page ad

00:29:18.600 saying they should be executed.

00:29:21.020 Except

00:29:21.540 he didn't.

00:29:23.880 He did a full-page ad

00:29:25.420 about crime in general

00:29:27.100 that he did around that time

00:29:29.200 because that was one

00:29:29.940 of the reasons

00:29:30.280 people were talking

00:29:31.040 about crime in general.

00:29:33.340 He didn't mention

00:29:34.320 those particular people.

00:29:35.660 He didn't mention race.

00:29:37.080 He mentioned

00:29:37.860 a lot of violence.

00:29:39.740 We should have

00:29:40.160 the death sentence.

00:29:41.540 Now,

00:29:41.740 in order to think

00:29:42.700 that that full-page ad

00:29:44.600 was really

00:29:45.800 secretly in his mind

00:29:47.700 was a racist thing,

00:29:49.620 in order to believe that,

00:29:51.680 here's what you would

00:29:52.500 have to believe.

00:29:53.300 that President Trump

00:29:55.440 would not be in favor

00:29:56.700 of executing

00:29:58.460 white criminals

00:30:00.600 who had committed

00:30:02.220 those same crimes.

00:30:04.360 Do you believe that?

00:30:06.960 Seriously.

00:30:08.080 Do you believe

00:30:08.760 that Trump,

00:30:09.700 all you've seen about him,

00:30:11.280 how tough on crime he is,

00:30:13.520 how, you know,

00:30:14.640 sort of macho

00:30:15.680 he presents himself,

00:30:16.740 et cetera,

00:30:17.440 do you think

00:30:18.000 he would not be in favor?

00:30:20.000 Let's do a mental experiment.

00:30:22.220 Let's say,

00:30:22.620 let's say that

00:30:23.920 the Central Park Five

00:30:25.120 were proven innocent,

00:30:27.600 and by the way,

00:30:28.580 that's the official story.

00:30:30.320 There are still people

00:30:31.080 who believe that

00:30:31.760 maybe they weren't

00:30:32.520 so innocent,

00:30:33.720 but in terms of

00:30:34.520 the judicial system

00:30:35.840 and our presumption

00:30:37.400 of innocence,

00:30:39.220 they were found

00:30:40.640 not guilty

00:30:41.340 of that crime.

00:30:42.740 Now, suppose

00:30:43.340 this next part

00:30:44.340 didn't happen,

00:30:45.460 but suppose it had.

00:30:47.040 Suppose that

00:30:48.000 five, you know,

00:30:50.380 white teenagers

00:30:51.260 had come forward

00:30:52.220 and they said,

00:30:53.160 it was us.

00:30:54.320 We're the ones

00:30:54.960 who did that terrible crime

00:30:56.260 in Central Park,

00:30:58.260 and let's say

00:31:00.300 there's evidence

00:31:00.980 and they're proven

00:31:02.220 to be the actual

00:31:03.220 perpetrators.

00:31:04.600 Do you think

00:31:05.080 that the president

00:31:05.800 would have said,

00:31:07.860 oh, okay,

00:31:09.160 I don't,

00:31:09.800 I'm not in favor

00:31:10.360 of executing those guys?

00:31:12.760 Do you believe that?

00:31:13.700 That's crazy.

00:31:16.780 You know,

00:31:18.220 nobody knows

00:31:18.880 what anybody else

00:31:19.680 is really thinking

00:31:20.620 in their private thoughts,

00:31:22.020 but I can't see

00:31:23.460 any scenario

00:31:24.320 where if it had come out,

00:31:26.960 and it didn't,

00:31:27.920 but if it had come out

00:31:28.940 that the perpetrators

00:31:30.500 had been, you know,

00:31:31.400 five white teenagers,

00:31:33.260 maybe he wouldn't want

00:31:34.160 to execute teenagers,

00:31:35.660 so let's make them,

00:31:36.460 let's make them over 18.

00:31:39.320 Five white guys?

00:31:40.260 You don't think

00:31:40.980 that the president

00:31:41.640 wanted those same

00:31:42.700 five white guys

00:31:43.540 executed right away?

00:31:45.400 Because I don't think

00:31:46.360 you met him,

00:31:47.200 or you don't know

00:31:47.960 anything about him,

00:31:49.460 if you think

00:31:50.100 he would have said,

00:31:50.640 oh, no, they're white.

00:31:52.260 Let's let them free.

00:31:54.720 No.

00:31:56.240 No, that would be crazy.

00:31:57.940 And the rest of the examples

00:31:58.920 are sort of as crazy as that.

00:32:04.500 I gave you a tip

00:32:06.100 in my book,

00:32:07.160 Loser Think,

00:32:08.000 which I mention

00:32:08.820 all the time,

00:32:10.260 which is

00:32:11.220 how to determine

00:32:12.160 what is true

00:32:13.160 and what is false

00:32:14.840 in the news.

00:32:16.680 And there's one tip

00:32:18.340 that needs a little adjustment.

00:32:20.900 And that tip was this.

00:32:22.460 I said that

00:32:23.320 if the left-leaning news

00:32:25.260 and the right-leaning news

00:32:26.660 report a fact

00:32:27.760 the same

00:32:29.060 as the same fact,

00:32:33.620 then it's probably true.

00:32:35.020 So if Fox News

00:32:37.420 says there's a hurricane

00:32:38.800 and CNN says

00:32:40.440 there's a hurricane,

00:32:41.440 there's probably a hurricane.

00:32:43.440 They're reporting

00:32:44.240 the same news.

00:32:45.240 But if one of them

00:32:46.220 says there's

00:32:47.320 something is true

00:32:48.440 and the other says

00:32:49.760 we've looked into it,

00:32:50.740 it's totally not true,

00:32:52.480 it's probably not true.

00:32:54.260 And it doesn't matter

00:32:55.100 which one says it's true

00:32:56.480 and which one says it's not.

00:32:58.100 If one of them

00:32:59.140 says it's not true,

00:33:00.220 I'm not going to say

00:33:02.600 100% of the time

00:33:04.260 this rule works.

00:33:05.940 But I can't think

00:33:07.000 of an example

00:33:07.580 where it didn't.

00:33:09.020 All right?

00:33:09.640 So it's a good general rule.

00:33:11.420 Now, that brings us

00:33:12.580 to Hunter Biden's laptop.

00:33:15.080 Would you say

00:33:15.900 that Fox News

00:33:17.260 is reporting it as true,

00:33:20.180 meaning that there's

00:33:21.240 a really laptop,

00:33:22.900 it is not

00:33:23.660 Soviet interference,

00:33:25.900 it's real emails

00:33:27.020 and the interpretation

00:33:28.360 of them

00:33:29.000 has been confirmed

00:33:30.680 by the ex-business partner

00:33:33.320 of Hunter Biden.

00:33:34.760 And so there's

00:33:35.240 a set of facts here

00:33:36.340 that we can determine

00:33:37.340 are true facts.

00:33:39.220 What is CNN doing?

00:33:41.880 Well, CNN is not

00:33:43.680 exactly saying

00:33:45.040 that the things

00:33:46.980 that a Fox News

00:33:48.340 reporter would say

00:33:50.500 are true.

00:33:51.960 CNN isn't saying

00:33:53.300 they're untrue.

00:33:55.080 Exactly.

00:33:56.520 They're much more

00:33:57.740 clever about that.

00:33:58.780 And that's why

00:33:59.300 you have to watch out

00:34:00.100 with this one.

00:34:01.020 Because if they were,

00:34:02.460 if CNN were saying,

00:34:03.780 yep,

00:34:04.720 the emails on the laptop

00:34:06.240 we have confirmed

00:34:07.480 are not true.

00:34:09.260 They're fake.

00:34:10.480 If they had done that,

00:34:12.420 I would lean towards

00:34:13.800 saying the whole thing

00:34:14.500 is fake.

00:34:15.860 But they didn't.

00:34:17.400 They simply

00:34:18.240 don't cover it.

00:34:19.820 And when they do

00:34:20.620 cover it,

00:34:21.220 they speak of it

00:34:22.140 in generalities

00:34:23.240 as if the sketchy

00:34:25.140 stuff

00:34:25.500 and the stuff

00:34:26.640 that's largely verified

00:34:28.020 are somehow

00:34:28.780 all the same stuff.

00:34:30.680 And that we shouldn't

00:34:31.920 take it seriously

00:34:32.900 and, you know,

00:34:34.500 there might be

00:34:35.000 Russian interference.

00:34:36.420 But it's sort of

00:34:37.080 this general statement

00:34:39.480 of avoid that story

00:34:41.080 under those conditions

00:34:43.360 where somebody's

00:34:44.220 trying to avoid

00:34:45.080 a story

00:34:45.600 which is different

00:34:47.140 from debunking it.

00:34:49.040 because the debunking

00:34:50.860 is just sort of

00:34:51.660 hand-waving debunking.

00:34:53.400 It's not real news debunking.

00:34:55.480 I think that actually

00:34:56.840 proves it's true

00:34:57.720 because you've got

00:34:58.940 one saying it's true

00:35:00.080 and one who would be hurt

00:35:02.520 by it being true

00:35:03.800 who is doing everything

00:35:05.180 they can

00:35:05.800 to not directly

00:35:07.280 answer the question

00:35:08.280 is it true?

00:35:10.320 They're trying to

00:35:11.320 tell you,

00:35:12.420 they're trying to convince you

00:35:13.540 it's not true

00:35:14.360 but they don't want to go

00:35:16.020 all the way

00:35:16.700 to just directly lying.

00:35:19.840 Right?

00:35:20.200 So they're just trying

00:35:21.000 to work on your credibility

00:35:23.100 make you not think about it

00:35:25.380 hey look over here

00:35:26.900 so anyway

00:35:28.400 my rule of

00:35:29.780 it's true

00:35:30.420 if both reported

00:35:31.800 as true

00:35:32.340 seems to hold.

00:35:33.760 Let me give you

00:35:34.200 some examples.

00:35:35.540 The fine people hoax

00:35:36.600 CNN usually reports

00:35:38.540 it's true.

00:35:40.100 Fox News,

00:35:40.920 Breitbart,

00:35:41.640 right-leaning places

00:35:42.600 universally report

00:35:44.940 that it's not true

00:35:46.000 and you can check

00:35:47.560 the transcript

00:35:48.260 and see it's not true.

00:35:50.340 So it holds

00:35:51.140 on almost all cases.

00:35:52.720 Alright,

00:35:53.640 let's talk about masks.

00:35:55.660 I desperately

00:35:56.800 want to never

00:35:57.580 talk about masks

00:35:58.940 again.

00:36:00.240 Specifically

00:36:00.760 the question

00:36:01.540 about whether

00:36:02.140 they work.

00:36:04.620 I don't think

00:36:05.760 there are too many

00:36:06.440 things

00:36:06.880 that are more

00:36:09.080 just annoying

00:36:10.260 as a topic.

00:36:11.900 You know,

00:36:12.060 most things

00:36:12.520 I like talking

00:36:13.160 about all day long

00:36:14.040 because there's

00:36:15.020 always a new wrinkle

00:36:15.880 and there's

00:36:16.500 always something

00:36:16.940 else to say

00:36:17.600 but the mask

00:36:18.940 thing is just

00:36:19.760 making me crazy.

00:36:21.960 And

00:36:22.240 here's the

00:36:24.080 newest update.

00:36:26.200 So there's

00:36:26.920 I guess it was

00:36:27.760 the New York Times

00:36:28.560 was linking

00:36:29.140 to some studies

00:36:30.240 about masks

00:36:31.660 and here's

00:36:32.500 and here's the

00:36:32.680 claim.

00:36:33.060 The claim was

00:36:34.240 that if you

00:36:34.660 looked at

00:36:35.180 the meta-analyses

00:36:37.320 you know,

00:36:38.240 you looked at

00:36:38.720 all of the

00:36:39.280 studies of masks

00:36:40.320 there's

00:36:41.360 the conclusion

00:36:42.460 is from

00:36:43.120 actual scientific

00:36:44.220 people

00:36:44.740 the belief

00:36:46.260 is that you

00:36:46.860 could reduce

00:36:47.440 COVID infections

00:36:48.500 by 40%

00:36:49.580 if you had

00:36:51.060 universal mask

00:36:52.420 compliance.

00:36:54.320 40%.

00:36:55.080 Now

00:36:56.820 if that were

00:36:58.160 true

00:36:58.520 and let me

00:37:00.040 tell you

00:37:00.380 it took

00:37:00.760 exactly

00:37:01.260 one minute

00:37:02.040 from the

00:37:03.060 time that

00:37:03.560 I tweeted

00:37:04.100 this

00:37:04.580 to the

00:37:05.780 time that

00:37:06.180 somebody

00:37:06.520 tweeted

00:37:06.960 out

00:37:07.240 another

00:37:08.640 source

00:37:09.200 that was

00:37:10.180 opposite

00:37:10.660 information

00:37:11.380 and masks

00:37:12.020 don't work.

00:37:13.440 Alright?

00:37:14.220 So just

00:37:15.260 keep these

00:37:15.720 two things

00:37:16.220 in mind.

00:37:17.600 There was

00:37:18.060 a credible

00:37:18.680 link

00:37:19.200 to studies

00:37:20.700 showing

00:37:21.220 oh masks

00:37:21.840 definitely work.

00:37:22.880 Not only

00:37:23.320 do they work

00:37:23.920 it's like a

00:37:24.740 40%

00:37:25.340 difference

00:37:25.820 in infections.

00:37:27.240 That's a

00:37:27.600 big deal.

00:37:29.260 One minute

00:37:30.000 later

00:37:30.340 a credible

00:37:31.680 link

00:37:32.080 telling me

00:37:33.220 that all

00:37:33.660 of that's

00:37:34.020 not true.

00:37:35.820 So

00:37:36.140 but

00:37:37.680 you know

00:37:38.240 I wouldn't

00:37:38.600 say that

00:37:39.040 the mask

00:37:39.980 information

00:37:40.700 has lined

00:37:41.420 up

00:37:41.780 left or

00:37:43.020 right yet.

00:37:44.200 I would

00:37:44.640 say it's

00:37:44.960 just sort

00:37:45.340 of murky

00:37:46.080 everywhere.

00:37:46.960 It's not

00:37:47.200 so much

00:37:47.680 that one

00:37:48.500 side

00:37:48.740 has said

00:37:49.040 it's

00:37:49.220 true

00:37:49.440 and the

00:37:49.660 other

00:37:49.800 side

00:37:50.020 says

00:37:50.300 it isn't

00:37:51.260 true.

00:37:51.960 I'd say

00:37:52.300 both sides

00:37:52.820 say it's

00:37:53.180 true

00:37:53.400 but they

00:37:53.760 don't

00:37:53.900 know

00:37:54.060 how

00:37:54.220 much.

00:37:57.140 So

00:37:57.740 here's

00:37:59.220 my

00:37:59.580 problem

00:38:00.340 with

00:38:00.680 the

00:38:00.840 40%.

00:38:01.620 If

00:38:03.240 masks

00:38:03.860 made

00:38:04.500 a

00:38:04.700 40%

00:38:05.440 difference

00:38:06.100 how

00:38:07.180 would

00:38:07.420 you

00:38:07.580 not

00:38:08.020 see

00:38:08.360 that

00:38:08.760 on

00:38:09.140 a

00:38:09.320 graph?

00:38:10.560 Because

00:38:11.040 you've

00:38:11.340 probably

00:38:11.540 seen

00:38:11.840 plenty

00:38:12.160 of

00:38:12.320 graphs

00:38:12.640 on

00:38:12.860 social

00:38:13.180 media.

00:38:13.660 Twitter

00:38:13.820 has

00:38:14.080 them

00:38:14.180 all

00:38:14.300 the

00:38:14.420 time.

00:38:15.220 Somebody

00:38:15.500 will

00:38:15.880 usually

00:38:16.540 it's

00:38:16.780 a

00:38:16.920 mask

00:38:17.320 skeptic

00:38:18.140 who

00:38:18.780 will

00:38:18.960 tweet

00:38:19.200 around

00:38:19.600 a

00:38:19.900 graph

00:38:20.240 that

00:38:20.460 says

00:38:20.680 here

00:38:20.860 are

00:38:20.960 the

00:38:21.040 number

00:38:21.320 of

00:38:21.560 infections

00:38:22.160 in

00:38:22.620 this

00:38:23.480 state

00:38:23.900 or

00:38:24.080 this

00:38:24.340 country

00:38:25.200 and

00:38:26.000 then

00:38:26.180 they'll

00:38:26.380 mark

00:38:26.700 on the

00:38:26.980 graph

00:38:27.320 where

00:38:27.860 masks

00:38:28.440 became

00:38:28.900 mandatory

00:38:29.500 or

00:38:30.160 lockdowns.

00:38:31.100 It's the

00:38:31.380 same

00:38:31.560 argument.

00:38:32.380 And then

00:38:32.600 you'll see

00:38:32.900 it didn't

00:38:33.240 seem to

00:38:33.600 change the

00:38:34.200 curve.

00:38:35.300 The curve

00:38:36.020 just kept

00:38:36.640 going.

00:38:38.620 So what's that

00:38:39.180 tell you?

00:38:39.560 Well that

00:38:40.580 would tell

00:38:40.920 you that

00:38:41.500 if

00:38:42.360 masks

00:38:42.940 work

00:38:43.520 and I

00:38:43.900 believe

00:38:44.140 that

00:38:44.340 they

00:38:44.480 do

00:38:44.720 that's

00:38:45.360 my

00:38:45.520 best

00:38:45.800 guess

00:38:46.220 could

00:38:46.980 be

00:38:47.120 wrong

00:38:47.360 but it's

00:38:47.700 my

00:38:47.840 best

00:38:48.100 guess

00:38:48.460 they

00:38:50.060 don't

00:38:50.240 work

00:38:50.460 40%

00:38:51.120 or

00:38:52.780 it

00:38:53.160 could

00:38:53.360 be

00:38:53.560 that

00:38:53.920 there's

00:38:54.720 no

00:38:54.900 such

00:38:55.180 thing

00:38:55.500 as

00:38:55.920 good

00:38:56.400 compliance

00:38:57.000 with

00:38:57.240 masks.

00:38:58.380 It

00:38:58.580 could

00:38:58.780 be

00:38:58.960 that

00:38:59.260 you

00:38:59.860 can

00:39:00.120 say

00:39:00.580 masks

00:39:01.060 are

00:39:01.260 necessary

00:39:01.840 but

00:39:02.760 just

00:39:02.980 when

00:39:03.740 nobody's

00:39:04.480 looking

00:39:04.700 people

00:39:05.000 don't

00:39:05.240 wear

00:39:05.440 them

00:39:05.640 as

00:39:05.800 much.

00:39:06.060 So

00:39:06.960 I'm

00:39:07.820 going

00:39:07.920 to

00:39:08.020 call

00:39:08.260 BS

00:39:08.800 on

00:39:09.140 the

00:39:09.300 40%

00:39:09.940 number

00:39:10.420 but

00:39:12.540 I'll

00:39:12.680 bet

00:39:12.840 there's

00:39:13.920 something

00:39:14.260 that

00:39:15.160 matters.

00:39:15.800 I mean

00:39:16.000 if I

00:39:17.500 had to

00:39:17.900 bet my

00:39:18.520 own

00:39:18.820 money

00:39:19.100 on this

00:39:19.540 and let's

00:39:20.000 say it

00:39:20.240 was a

00:39:20.560 serious

00:39:20.920 amount

00:39:21.240 of

00:39:21.380 money

00:39:21.600 and I

00:39:22.720 had to

00:39:23.020 bet

00:39:23.280 and there

00:39:23.600 was a

00:39:23.820 gun

00:39:23.980 to my

00:39:24.260 head

00:39:24.500 it's

00:39:24.680 like

00:39:24.840 okay

00:39:25.060 you

00:39:25.240 don't

00:39:25.420 get

00:39:25.600 to

00:39:25.740 not

00:39:25.940 bet

00:39:26.340 you

00:39:26.920 have

00:39:27.200 to

00:39:27.380 bet

00:39:27.640 now

00:39:28.520 I

00:39:29.140 want

00:39:29.360 you

00:39:29.440 to

00:39:29.560 give

00:39:29.740 a

00:39:30.040 percentage

00:39:30.780 that

00:39:31.620 you

00:39:31.820 think

00:39:32.140 masks

00:39:32.700 make

00:39:33.060 the

00:39:33.240 difference

00:39:36.060 10 to

00:39:37.380 20%

00:39:38.080 10 to

00:39:39.700 20%

00:39:40.320 now if

00:39:41.320 that's

00:39:41.600 true

00:39:41.880 that's

00:39:42.520 certainly

00:39:43.020 a good

00:39:43.380 reason

00:39:43.660 to wear

00:39:43.920 a mask

00:39:44.360 if you

00:39:45.080 could

00:39:45.280 cut

00:39:45.600 deaths

00:39:46.180 by

00:39:46.440 10 to

00:39:46.840 20%

00:39:47.520 well you

00:39:48.500 would

00:39:48.680 certainly

00:39:48.940 do

00:39:49.200 that

00:39:49.580 and you

00:39:50.440 would

00:39:50.580 work

00:39:50.840 pretty

00:39:51.100 hard

00:39:51.380 and you

00:39:51.660 would

00:39:51.800 take

00:39:52.020 quite

00:39:52.400 a

00:39:52.540 sacrifice

00:39:53.100 in

00:39:53.980 order

00:39:54.200 to

00:39:54.400 cut

00:39:54.580 deaths

00:39:54.880 10 to

00:39:55.300 20%

00:39:55.880 and I

00:39:57.520 don't

00:39:57.640 know

00:39:57.760 if

00:39:57.880 10 to

00:39:58.160 20%

00:39:58.700 would

00:39:58.900 show

00:39:59.100 up

00:39:59.260 on

00:39:59.360 a

00:39:59.460 graph

00:39:59.700 or

00:39:59.820 not

00:40:00.120 because

00:40:00.500 there's

00:40:00.720 some

00:40:00.900 delay

00:40:01.320 and

00:40:01.600 there's

00:40:01.780 lots

00:40:02.020 of

00:40:02.140 other

00:40:06.060 in

00:40:06.220 that

00:40:06.440 range

00:40:07.160 totally

00:40:08.840 worth

00:40:09.160 wearing

00:40:09.420 the

00:40:09.600 masks

00:40:10.020 I

00:40:10.300 recommend

00:40:10.680 it

00:40:10.940 if

00:40:11.120 you

00:40:11.260 can

00:40:11.480 all

00:40:12.440 right

00:40:12.660 that

00:40:15.320 is

00:40:16.760 just

00:40:16.980 about

00:40:17.220 all

00:40:17.380 I

00:40:17.500 had

00:40:17.640 to

00:40:17.760 say

00:40:17.880 today

00:40:18.240 I

00:40:19.320 hear

00:40:19.660 that

00:40:20.280 there

00:40:20.500 is

00:40:20.720 more

00:40:21.000 to

00:40:21.180 come

00:40:21.320 out

00:40:21.580 on

00:40:21.840 the

00:40:21.980 hunter

00:40:22.340 laptop

00:40:23.040 there's

00:40:24.340 you

00:40:24.640 heard

00:40:24.840 the

00:40:25.020 story

00:40:25.320 about

00:40:25.640 some

00:40:26.040 underage

00:40:27.200 underage

00:40:28.900 women

00:40:29.280 women

00:40:30.800 they're

00:40:31.860 not

00:40:32.240 women

00:40:32.540 if

00:40:32.720 they're

00:40:32.880 underage

00:40:33.380 underage

00:40:34.280 females

00:40:36.220 I

00:40:37.740 don't

00:40:37.880 know

00:40:38.020 if

00:40:38.200 girls

00:40:38.760 is

00:40:39.000 the

00:40:39.120 right

00:40:39.400 reference

00:40:40.660 in

00:40:40.880 this

00:40:41.040 case

00:40:41.320 but

00:40:42.060 there's

00:40:42.300 some

00:40:42.480 underage

00:40:42.960 females

00:40:43.400 on

00:40:43.820 Biden's

00:40:44.540 laptop

00:40:44.840 and

00:40:45.160 now

00:40:45.340 we

00:40:45.520 know

00:40:45.720 that

00:40:46.040 one

00:40:46.480 of

00:40:46.600 them

00:40:46.800 is

00:40:47.140 his

00:40:47.400 niece

00:40:47.840 14

00:40:49.100 year

00:40:49.360 old

00:40:49.540 niece

00:40:49.880 and

00:40:51.440 I'm

00:40:52.900 going

00:40:53.060 to

00:40:53.180 say

00:40:53.400 without

00:40:53.680 seeing

00:40:54.200 the

00:40:54.400 photos

00:40:54.760 that

00:40:56.180 they

00:40:56.340 might

00:40:56.660 sort

00:40:57.240 of

00:40:57.380 look

00:40:57.600 sketchy

00:40:58.200 because

00:40:58.680 photos

00:40:59.920 can

00:41:00.120 look

00:41:00.320 sketchy

00:41:00.820 but

00:41:01.740 I'll

00:41:02.160 bet

00:41:02.340 there's

00:41:02.600 nothing

00:41:02.900 there

00:41:03.300 I'll

00:41:04.460 bet

00:41:04.620 the

00:41:04.840 whole

00:41:05.180 14

00:41:06.300 year

00:41:06.500 old

00:41:06.660 niece

00:41:06.960 thing

00:41:07.280 that's

00:41:07.660 probably

00:41:07.920 not

00:41:08.160 real

00:41:08.480 if I

00:41:09.240 had

00:41:09.340 to

00:41:09.480 guess

00:41:09.820 I

00:41:10.380 could

00:41:10.540 be

00:41:10.700 wrong

00:41:10.980 I

00:41:11.220 mean

00:41:11.440 anything's

00:41:12.400 possible

00:41:12.780 but

00:41:13.800 I'm

00:41:14.340 feeling

00:41:14.540 that's

00:41:14.880 not

00:41:15.080 real

00:41:15.320 and

00:41:16.220 I

00:41:17.100 would

00:41:17.280 be

00:41:17.520 surprised

00:41:18.480 if

00:41:20.000 the

00:41:20.180 other

00:41:20.460 stuff

00:41:20.780 is

00:41:20.960 real

00:41:21.240 just

00:41:21.660 because

00:41:22.220 why

00:41:23.040 would

00:41:23.200 that

00:41:23.360 be

00:41:23.480 on

00:41:23.620 a

00:41:23.740 laptop

00:41:24.260 is

00:41:26.080 there

00:41:26.220 anybody

00:41:26.500 who

00:41:26.740 keeps

00:41:26.980 that

00:41:27.240 kind

00:41:27.520 of

00:41:27.640 stuff

00:41:27.900 on

00:41:28.100 their

00:41:28.260 laptop

00:41:28.660 and

00:41:29.580 then

00:41:29.760 takes

00:41:30.040 the

00:41:30.260 laptop

00:41:30.600 and

00:41:31.000 drops

00:41:31.280 it

00:41:31.420 off

00:41:33.300 if

00:41:33.880 you

00:41:34.040 know

00:41:34.320 you

00:41:34.480 have

00:41:34.660 that

00:41:34.840 kind

00:41:35.080 of

00:41:35.180 content

00:41:35.560 on

00:41:35.900 it

00:41:36.100 so

00:41:36.740 here's

00:41:37.020 my

00:41:37.200 guess

00:41:37.620 my

00:41:38.560 guess

00:41:38.900 is

00:41:39.320 that

00:41:40.640 Hunter

00:41:41.720 Biden

00:41:42.120 does

00:41:43.180 not

00:41:43.480 believe

00:41:43.820 those

00:41:44.100 pictures

00:41:44.520 are

00:41:44.980 some

00:41:45.220 kind

00:41:45.480 of

00:41:45.680 problem

00:41:46.380 that

00:41:47.620 he

00:41:47.820 might

00:41:48.040 know

00:41:48.200 the

00:41:48.400 context

00:41:48.900 to

00:41:49.160 them

00:41:49.460 he

00:41:50.020 might

00:41:50.220 know

00:41:50.400 his

00:41:50.560 own

00:41:50.740 thinking

00:41:51.140 he

00:41:51.540 might

00:41:51.720 know

00:41:51.900 the

00:41:52.080 situation

00:41:52.580 in

00:41:52.820 which

00:41:53.000 they

00:41:53.160 were

00:41:53.280 taken

00:41:53.580 he

00:41:54.260 might

00:41:54.480 know

00:41:54.680 why

00:41:54.880 they're

00:41:55.020 on

00:41:55.140 the

00:41:55.300 laptop

00:41:55.600 and

00:41:56.420 maybe

00:41:56.680 in

00:41:56.860 his

00:41:57.020 own

00:41:57.220 mind

00:41:57.560 there's

00:41:58.120 nothing

00:41:58.720 wrong

00:41:59.040 with

00:42:03.300 so

00:42:03.580 I've

00:42:03.720 got

00:42:03.860 a

00:42:04.000 feeling

00:42:04.240 it's

00:42:04.520 the

00:42:04.660 sort

00:42:04.840 of

00:42:04.960 thing

00:42:05.140 where

00:42:05.340 different

00:42:05.640 people

00:42:05.940 are

00:42:06.100 going

00:42:06.220 to

00:42:06.320 interpret

00:42:06.640 them

00:42:06.920 differently

00:42:07.340 now

00:42:08.120 if

00:42:08.380 it

00:42:08.520 turns

00:42:08.760 out

00:42:09.200 that

00:42:10.340 it's

00:42:11.200 the

00:42:11.360 worst

00:42:11.640 case

00:42:12.080 then

00:42:12.940 I

00:42:13.120 would

00:42:13.300 have

00:42:13.420 expected

00:42:13.980 more

00:42:14.680 of

00:42:14.900 a

00:42:15.060 response

00:42:15.640 from

00:42:16.360 the

00:42:16.560 people

00:42:16.820 who

00:42:17.020 have

00:42:17.180 seen

00:42:17.420 them

00:42:17.700 right

00:42:18.880 because

00:42:19.760 remember

00:42:20.140 a number

00:42:20.560 of

00:42:20.720 people

00:42:20.920 have

00:42:21.120 seen

00:42:21.320 them

00:42:21.500 now

00:42:21.760 if

00:42:22.700 you

00:42:22.840 look

00:42:23.040 at

00:42:23.160 their

00:42:23.320 responses

00:42:23.880 there

00:42:24.260 was

00:42:24.520 Giuliani

00:42:26.320 turned

00:42:26.700 it

00:42:26.860 over

00:42:27.020 to

00:42:27.220 the

00:42:27.360 FBI

00:42:27.700 which

00:42:28.140 was

00:42:28.420 absolutely

00:42:29.600 the

00:42:29.940 right

00:42:30.140 thing

00:42:30.320 to

00:42:30.480 do

00:42:30.680 so

00:42:32.140 if

00:42:32.340 you're

00:42:32.500 Giuliani

00:42:33.020 and

00:42:33.480 you're

00:42:33.820 steeped

00:42:34.700 in the

00:42:34.940 legal

00:42:35.220 system

00:42:35.660 and

00:42:36.020 you're

00:42:36.240 smart

00:42:36.660 and

00:42:36.900 you

00:42:37.840 understand

00:42:38.960 how

00:42:39.220 the

00:42:39.340 world

00:42:39.560 works

00:42:40.000 it

00:42:40.600 was

00:42:40.720 exactly

00:42:41.280 the

00:42:41.540 right

00:42:41.700 thing

00:42:41.900 to

00:42:42.040 do

00:42:42.260 but

00:42:43.040 that's

00:42:43.280 different

00:42:43.760 from

00:42:44.100 saying

00:42:44.600 that

00:42:45.520 they

00:42:45.660 were

00:42:45.820 necessarily

00:42:46.500 illegal

00:42:47.160 or

00:42:47.540 necessarily

00:42:48.220 showing

00:42:49.220 something

00:42:49.640 that

00:42:49.900 was

00:42:50.260 bad

00:42:51.220 somebody

00:42:52.280 says

00:42:52.640 you'd

00:42:52.880 be

00:42:53.000 surprised

00:42:53.600 and

00:42:54.100 a

00:42:55.320 crack

00:42:55.760 ad

00:42:56.080 crack

00:42:57.500 ads

00:42:58.220 will

00:42:58.480 in

00:42:59.860 the

00:43:00.000 comments

00:43:00.380 I'm

00:43:00.580 seeing

00:43:00.820 you

00:43:01.020 saying

00:43:01.240 that

00:43:01.460 if

00:43:01.760 he

00:43:01.860 was

00:43:02.000 a

00:43:02.120 crack

00:43:02.380 ad

00:43:02.660 that

00:43:03.460 could

00:43:03.640 explain

00:43:04.080 it

00:43:04.240 all

00:43:04.440 and

00:43:04.680 I

00:43:04.780 would

00:43:04.880 agree

00:43:05.080 with

00:43:05.240 you

00:43:05.360 I

00:43:06.020 would

00:43:06.160 agree

00:43:06.380 that

00:43:06.580 there's

00:43:06.800 some

00:43:06.980 amount

00:43:07.220 of

00:43:07.360 drug

00:43:07.600 use

00:43:07.960 that

00:43:08.700 would

00:43:08.820 make

00:43:09.080 anything

00:43:09.480 happen

00:43:09.880 but

00:43:10.760 I

00:43:10.900 still

00:43:11.100 don't

00:43:11.320 see

00:43:11.520 him

00:43:11.640 keeping

00:43:11.920 it

00:43:12.120 on

00:43:12.260 his

00:43:12.420 laptop

00:43:12.800 if

00:43:13.320 he

00:43:13.560 thought

00:43:13.860 they

00:43:14.060 were

00:43:14.220 inappropriate

00:43:14.660 so

00:43:15.700 I

00:43:15.840 think

00:43:16.000 there's

00:43:16.220 going

00:43:16.360 to

00:43:16.400 be

00:43:16.620 an

00:43:16.980 interpretation

00:43:17.640 thing

00:43:18.140 now

00:43:18.720 let

00:43:18.920 me

00:43:19.020 finish

00:43:19.260 the

00:43:19.480 thought

00:43:19.740 other

00:43:20.500 people

00:43:20.840 besides

00:43:21.420 Giuliani

00:43:22.140 have

00:43:22.520 now

00:43:22.740 seen

00:43:23.040 those

00:43:23.280 pictures

00:43:23.680 and

00:43:26.100 the

00:43:26.360 people

00:43:26.620 who've

00:43:26.800 seen

00:43:26.940 the

00:43:27.080 pictures

00:43:27.460 sort

00:43:28.760 of

00:43:28.880 have

00:43:29.040 a

00:43:29.200 smile

00:43:29.600 on

00:43:29.840 their

00:43:30.000 face

00:43:30.480 and

00:43:31.500 tell

00:43:31.680 you

00:43:31.920 that

00:43:32.200 oh

00:43:32.480 these

00:43:32.760 are

00:43:32.920 really

00:43:33.140 bad

00:43:33.580 right

00:43:34.720 is

00:43:36.540 that

00:43:36.720 the

00:43:36.880 way

00:43:37.040 you

00:43:37.260 act

00:43:37.760 if

00:43:38.680 those

00:43:38.980 are

00:43:39.160 really

00:43:39.560 you

00:43:40.780 know

00:43:41.000 some

00:43:41.700 kind

00:43:41.960 of

00:43:42.140 underage

00:43:43.420 problem

00:43:43.940 not

00:43:44.780 really

00:43:45.340 the

00:43:46.160 people

00:43:46.580 the

00:43:46.860 reaction

00:43:47.520 of the

00:43:47.860 people

00:43:48.100 who've

00:43:48.340 seen

00:43:48.600 the

00:43:48.820 pictures

00:43:49.160 is

00:43:50.260 closer

00:43:50.820 to

00:43:51.260 a

00:43:51.540 Jeffrey

00:43:52.020 Toobin

00:43:52.620 kind

00:43:52.920 of

00:43:53.020 reaction

00:43:53.500 that

00:43:54.560 it's

00:43:54.740 all

00:43:54.880 part

00:43:55.160 of

00:43:55.320 what

00:43:55.560 makes

00:43:55.840 the

00:43:56.040 story

00:43:56.380 interesting

00:43:56.920 what

00:43:57.980 you're

00:43:58.180 not

00:43:58.460 seeing

00:43:58.860 is

00:43:59.680 the

00:43:59.840 people

00:44:00.120 who

00:44:00.320 have

00:44:00.460 seen

00:44:00.740 the

00:44:01.020 photos

00:44:01.420 that

00:44:01.580 you

00:44:01.680 haven't

00:44:01.900 seen

00:44:02.120 yet

00:44:02.400 saying

00:44:03.260 oh

00:44:03.700 my

00:44:03.940 god

00:44:04.400 he

00:44:05.400 has

00:44:05.620 to

00:44:05.740 be

00:44:05.880 in

00:44:06.060 jail

00:44:06.280 right

00:44:06.540 away

00:44:06.800 and

00:44:08.180 that's

00:44:08.460 what

00:44:08.620 you

00:44:08.780 would

00:44:08.900 expect

00:44:09.420 if

00:44:09.660 those

00:44:09.900 pictures

00:44:10.260 were

00:44:10.620 unambiguous

00:44:11.420 meaning

00:44:12.380 anybody

00:44:12.840 who

00:44:13.000 looked

00:44:13.160 at

00:44:13.320 them

00:44:13.440 would

00:44:13.560 say

00:44:13.700 ah

00:44:14.060 my

00:44:14.780 god

00:44:15.020 there's

00:44:15.280 a

00:44:15.400 crime

00:44:15.660 here

00:44:15.940 then

00:44:16.840 the

00:44:17.020 people

00:44:17.240 who

00:44:17.380 have

00:44:17.440 seen

00:44:17.660 them

00:44:17.800 would

00:44:18.040 be

00:44:18.220 acting

00:44:18.580 like

00:44:18.880 that

00:44:19.340 but

00:44:20.400 instead

00:44:20.760 they're

00:44:21.120 acting

00:44:21.400 like

00:44:21.660 it's

00:44:21.860 just

00:44:22.040 part

00:44:22.260 of

00:44:22.360 the

00:44:22.500 story

00:44:22.960 which

00:44:24.200 is

00:44:24.320 not

00:44:24.500 really

00:44:24.740 the

00:44:24.940 reaction

00:44:25.680 if

00:44:26.340 you

00:44:26.520 knew

00:44:27.160 that

00:44:27.380 those

00:44:27.600 were

00:44:27.760 criminal

00:44:28.140 so

00:44:28.780 it's

00:44:29.000 not

00:44:29.140 my

00:44:29.320 job

00:44:29.560 to

00:44:29.760 defend

00:44:30.220 hunter

00:44:30.640 biden

00:44:30.980 i'm

00:44:31.220 just

00:44:31.360 giving

00:44:31.580 you

00:44:31.740 a

00:44:31.840 heads

00:44:32.020 up

00:44:32.280 about

00:44:33.120 what

00:44:33.440 to

00:44:33.760 believe

00:44:34.240 and

00:44:34.580 what

00:44:34.760 not

00:44:35.020 to

00:44:35.320 and

00:44:36.580 they

00:44:36.980 could

00:44:37.240 be

00:44:37.460 inappropriate

00:44:37.980 i'm

00:44:39.560 sure

00:44:39.820 that

00:44:40.040 they're

00:44:40.240 going

00:44:40.380 to

00:44:40.500 raise

00:44:40.820 your

00:44:41.000 eyebrow

00:44:41.320 at

00:44:41.560 the

00:44:41.660 very

00:44:41.880 least

00:44:42.340 but

00:44:43.380 are

00:44:43.660 they

00:44:43.820 fully

00:44:44.180 illegal

00:44:44.720 are

00:44:45.060 they

00:44:45.320 indications

00:44:45.940 of

00:44:46.440 underage

00:44:47.880 criminal

00:44:49.000 behavior

00:44:49.620 maybe

00:44:51.420 maybe

00:44:52.920 all

00:44:54.220 right

00:44:54.440 a

00:44:58.220 word

00:44:58.480 about

00:44:58.760 my

00:44:59.180 weird

00:45:00.260 Trey

00:45:01.480 Gowdy

00:45:01.940 hair

00:45:02.960 situation

00:45:03.560 i've

00:45:05.580 told you

00:45:05.860 before

00:45:06.140 that

00:45:06.440 Christina

00:45:07.240 cuts

00:45:07.720 my

00:45:07.960 hair

00:45:08.280 not

00:45:09.200 because

00:45:09.500 it's

00:45:09.740 the

00:45:09.880 only

00:45:10.020 way

00:45:10.220 to

00:45:10.340 cut

00:45:10.480 hair

00:45:10.720 but

00:45:10.940 because

00:45:11.520 if

00:45:12.360 she

00:45:12.520 offered

00:45:12.760 to

00:45:12.940 cut

00:45:13.080 your

00:45:13.300 hair

00:45:13.520 you'd

00:45:13.800 say

00:45:13.960 yes

00:45:14.260 to

00:45:14.460 let's

00:45:14.800 put

00:45:14.960 it

00:45:15.060 that

00:45:15.220 way

00:45:15.520 because

00:45:16.820 it's

00:45:16.980 way

00:45:17.160 more

00:45:17.360 fun

00:45:17.620 that

00:45:17.820 way

00:45:18.040 and

00:45:19.980 i

00:45:20.080 don't

00:45:20.180 think

00:45:20.360 there's

00:45:20.580 i

00:45:21.520 don't

00:45:21.640 think

00:45:21.800 there's

00:45:22.000 anything

00:45:22.280 quite

00:45:22.700 that's

00:45:24.480 quite

00:45:24.820 feels

00:45:25.440 as

00:45:25.700 good

00:45:26.060 as

00:45:27.380 having

00:45:27.660 a

00:45:27.900 woman

00:45:28.160 you

00:45:28.400 love

00:45:28.680 cut

00:45:28.940 your

00:45:29.100 hair

00:45:29.380 i

00:45:30.760 don't

00:45:30.880 know

00:45:31.020 it's

00:45:31.180 just

00:45:31.300 a

00:45:31.480 wonderful

00:45:31.860 experience

00:45:32.580 to

00:45:32.800 me

00:45:32.960 so

00:45:33.680 i'm

00:45:33.820 saving

00:45:34.200 it

00:45:34.500 i could

00:45:35.240 get

00:45:35.400 it

00:45:35.540 i could

00:45:36.060 do it

00:45:36.280 myself

00:45:36.660 pretty

00:45:37.180 easily

00:45:37.460 but

00:45:38.400 but

00:45:39.460 christina

00:45:40.060 took

00:45:41.120 a

00:45:41.400 her

00:45:41.800 first

00:45:42.260 long

00:45:43.260 flight

00:45:44.060 as a

00:45:44.940 pilot

00:45:45.200 so

00:45:45.980 she's

00:45:46.240 learning

00:45:46.480 to be

00:45:46.720 a

00:45:46.840 pilot

00:45:47.100 and

00:45:48.320 part

00:45:48.660 of

00:45:48.760 that

00:45:48.900 process

00:45:49.280 is

00:45:49.780 you

00:45:49.960 get

00:45:50.120 to

00:45:50.240 the

00:45:50.360 point

00:45:50.560 where

00:45:50.740 you

00:45:50.880 take

00:45:51.120 your

00:45:51.300 first

00:45:51.720 long

00:45:52.460 range

00:45:52.780 flight

00:45:53.180 by

00:45:53.540 yourself

00:45:54.020 that

00:45:55.080 happened

00:45:55.380 this

00:45:55.640 week

00:45:55.960 but

00:45:57.080 she

00:45:57.440 has

00:45:57.620 some

00:45:57.780 bad

00:45:58.020 weather

00:45:58.340 in

00:45:58.720 another

00:45:59.040 state

00:45:59.460 and

00:46:00.680 because

00:46:01.220 of

00:46:01.460 low

00:46:02.280 clouds

00:46:02.720 and

00:46:02.900 high

00:46:03.240 mountains

00:46:03.740 she

00:46:05.000 had

00:46:05.200 to

00:46:05.440 wait

00:46:06.240 a

00:46:06.400 little

00:46:06.500 bit

00:46:06.720 so

00:46:07.080 she

00:46:07.240 isn't

00:46:07.500 back

00:46:07.900 yet

00:46:08.140 but

00:46:08.500 everything

00:46:08.880 is

00:46:09.040 going

00:46:09.260 well

00:46:09.560 her

00:46:10.580 first

00:46:11.440 flight

00:46:11.760 is

00:46:12.200 all

00:46:12.760 good

00:46:13.040 and

00:46:14.060 she

00:46:14.280 should

00:46:14.560 be

00:46:14.740 back

00:46:15.060 by

00:46:15.380 tonight

00:46:15.820 and

00:46:19.040 you'll

00:46:20.140 know

00:46:20.320 she's

00:46:20.620 back

00:46:21.020 when

00:46:21.480 you

00:46:21.600 see

00:46:22.720 my

00:46:22.960 haircut

00:46:24.180 all

00:46:25.380 right

00:46:25.600 that's

00:46:26.200 all

00:46:26.300 for

00:46:26.420 now

00:46:26.740 somebody

00:46:28.180 says

00:46:28.480 in

00:46:28.640 the

00:46:28.860 comments

00:46:29.240 that

00:46:29.560 Giuliani

00:46:30.260 thinks

00:46:30.820 they

00:46:31.100 are

00:46:31.280 criminal

00:46:31.780 he

00:46:32.880 might

00:46:33.060 be

00:46:33.180 right

00:46:33.440 he

00:46:34.540 might

00:46:34.700 be

00:46:34.820 right

00:46:35.060 I

00:46:36.280 won't

00:46:36.520 rule

00:46:36.740 it

00:46:36.880 out

00:46:37.140 you

00:46:37.500 know

00:46:37.660 if

00:46:37.980 it's

00:46:38.680 up

00:46:38.840 to

00:46:38.980 me

00:46:39.300 who

00:46:40.120 haven't

00:46:40.540 seen

00:46:40.740 the

00:46:40.900 pictures

00:46:41.220 or

00:46:41.720 Giuliani

00:46:42.360 who

00:46:42.640 has

00:46:42.900 seen

00:46:43.080 the

00:46:43.220 pictures

00:46:43.520 and

00:46:44.040 knows

00:46:44.560 the

00:46:44.760 law

00:46:45.040 I'd

00:46:46.260 probably

00:46:46.540 trust

00:46:47.020 Giuliani

00:46:47.540 over

00:46:47.920 me

00:46:48.220 especially

00:46:49.300 since

00:46:49.660 I

00:46:49.780 haven't

00:46:50.000 seen

00:46:50.180 them

00:46:50.400 all

00:46:51.240 right

00:46:51.300 that's

00:46:51.520 all

00:46:51.660 for

00:46:51.760 now

00:46:52.020 and

00:46:52.740 I'll

00:46:52.920 talk

00:46:53.180 to

00:46:53.340 you

00:46:53.560 later

00:46:59.240 to

00:47:01.800 You

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 24, 2020

Episode 1164 Scott Adams： Coyotes to Protect the Border, Black Support for President Trump, Mask Science

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript