Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1164 Scott Adams： Coyotes to Protect the Border, Black Support for President Trump, Mask Science

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody. Come on in. Come on in. It's time. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:17.080 the best time of the day. You know it is. Every time. Have I ever been wrong yet? No. Not even

00:00:24.920 once, at least about this topic. And all you need to enjoy it fully is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:00:31.300 a tank or chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:37.900 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:43.880 the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:48.560 It's called the Simultaneous Sip and it happens now. Go.

00:00:54.920 Ah, the only thing that could taste better than this is, as I see in the comments,

00:01:01.820 the tears of our enemies. Yes, they are sweeter than the coffee, but only barely.

00:01:09.500 This morning I got a tweet from a concerned viewer who said that I used to be unpredictable.

00:01:17.720 And when he watched my opinions, he would think, oh, I didn't see that coming.

00:01:23.360 But now he says I've become completely predictable and he can tell in advance what I'm going to say

00:01:30.480 and do. So I blocked him. See if he saw that coming.

00:01:38.540 They call this crazy in California.

00:01:42.220 I'm just laughing at my own joke. Sorry.

00:01:45.060 Every now and then I have to pause to laugh at my own jokes.

00:01:49.820 By the way, that's a humor writing technique.

00:01:56.940 I've said this before, but it's worth saying again.

00:01:59.820 One of the ways that I write humor is I use my body as a sensor.

00:02:05.020 And as I'm cycling through ideas and I'll think, what about this?

00:02:08.360 What about this? What about this?

00:02:09.920 The ones I keep are the ones I feel in my body.

00:02:13.180 So if I actually laugh, that's a physical response.

00:02:17.160 I go, oh, I'll keep that one.

00:02:18.920 If it made me laugh, maybe it'll make somebody else laugh.

00:02:23.600 Anyway, they called us crazy in California when we battled the coronavirus here by setting

00:02:29.740 all of our forests on fire.

00:02:32.660 And I'm pretty sure the smoke killed the coronavirus.

00:02:37.760 Yeah.

00:02:39.520 Or it was coyotes.

00:02:41.080 If you haven't been watching the news, there's not much that coyotes can't do.

00:02:48.500 Apparently coyotes can carry children all the way across the border and deposit them in America.

00:02:54.880 Go back, get some more children. 0.86

00:02:58.400 Children, I think, put tiny saddles on the coyotes.

00:03:01.460 I haven't actually seen the coyotes working.

00:03:03.960 But you assume, just sort of common sense, that the way they would do it is not, and this is stupid.

00:03:10.460 Some people thought, can a coyote, you know, actually grab a child by the collar and drag them all the way across the border?

00:03:20.120 No.

00:03:21.380 No.

00:03:21.900 A coyote isn't that big.

00:03:23.760 They're not going to, like, drag a kid all the way across the border.

00:03:27.100 The only way to do it is to put a tiny saddle on the coyote.

00:03:31.800 And then they can bear the weight because all four legs are now working.

00:03:37.160 So if you were close to the border, you would see those little stampedes.

00:03:41.980 You know, from a distance, it looks dangerous.

00:03:44.420 But if you get up close, you'll see that it's actually very safe because every baby is on a saddle on the coyote.

00:03:52.080 And they're heading toward the border, sort of in unison.

00:03:56.360 And the babies are actually wearing bicycle helmets.

00:04:00.120 Because the first thing you're thinking is, well, that doesn't sound safe.

00:04:03.720 Put a baby on a coyote? 0.67

00:04:06.340 That doesn't sound safe.

00:04:08.960 Don't worry.

00:04:10.540 All the babies have bicycle helmets.

00:04:12.780 And they have proper saddles.

00:04:14.620 And the coyotes are trained.

00:04:16.400 Some of the coyotes actually know first aid.

00:04:18.680 So they pretty much have everything covered.

00:04:22.140 We'll talk more about that later.

00:04:25.680 Did you know that the amazing documentary The Plot Against the President is now available on Amazon?

00:04:33.560 That's probably what you were waiting for.

00:04:35.720 When it first came out, a lot of people wanted to see it.

00:04:38.440 But it wasn't, you know, everywhere that movies are available.

00:04:41.980 But now it's on Amazon.

00:04:43.280 So The Plot Against the President, which describes, you know, the plot against the president.

00:04:51.900 The attempted coup.

00:04:53.600 And when you see the details, you're going to learn stuff that you thought you knew, but you don't know.

00:05:01.440 And it's mind-boggling.

00:05:03.940 So you have to watch that.

00:05:04.940 It's on Amazon now.

00:05:05.800 The Plot Against the President.

00:05:07.380 You should all see it before Election Day.

00:05:09.360 You know, speaking of the coyotes, joking aside, when the president mentioned coyotes bringing children across the border,

00:05:21.080 of course he was talking about human beings, not actual animal coyotes, and they're called coyotes if you didn't know that,

00:05:30.040 that I saw a tweet where there was some poor woman who didn't know that coyotes was the name for the human traffickers,

00:05:37.460 and she tweeted that it was dumb for the president to say coyotes are bringing children across the border

00:05:44.060 because they're just small animals, and how can they do that?

00:05:47.800 Now, when I saw that, my first thought was, well, there can't be more than one person in the whole world

00:05:55.760 who actually thought he was talking about the physical animal, a coyote.

00:06:01.280 There can't be more than one of those.

00:06:03.280 Well, it turns out there was more than one.

00:06:07.140 In fact, a number of blue check people were quite concerned about this problem of coyotes

00:06:13.940 and bringing children across the border.

00:06:17.860 So just when you think that the public cannot be any more dumb than what you've seen so far,

00:06:23.720 oh yeah, they can be.

00:06:25.100 Oh yeah.

00:06:26.160 Don't count out the public when it comes to dumbness.

00:06:29.140 Nobody ever got rich by, was it, overestimating the public's intelligence?

00:06:41.040 Here's a little sign of the simulation that wants to keep us amused.

00:06:44.860 If you were to think of Trump and all he's done, say, for peace in the Middle East

00:06:50.560 and calming down things in North Korea, etc.,

00:06:53.220 you might think that a good phrase to describe him would be peace in action, right?

00:07:02.140 Because he's creating peace in the Middle East,

00:07:04.960 new countries signing up all the time,

00:07:07.600 and he's taking action.

00:07:09.220 You know, it's not happening by accident.

00:07:12.300 It's because of actual action to make it happen.

00:07:14.960 So it's peace in action.

00:07:16.540 Versus Joe Biden, who's more of a piece of the action kind of a guy.

00:07:20.880 So it's peace in action versus a piece of the action.

00:07:27.180 So I thought that was worth repeating.

00:07:29.640 I don't know why.

00:07:31.000 So Sudan and Israel have decided to normalize relations

00:07:34.920 thanks to the good work of the United States.

00:07:40.380 And that got signed yesterday.

00:07:44.620 Apparently there's some more countries that might be signing on.

00:07:48.240 And here's my question.

00:07:50.320 If you were one of the many people

00:07:52.100 who were convinced by the mainstream media and by Democrats

00:07:55.560 that President Trump was an Islamophobe,

00:08:00.000 how does any of this make sense?

00:08:01.860 But then you say to yourself,

00:08:04.700 no, no, no, Scott.

00:08:05.540 He's not doing it for the Islamic nations. 0.99

00:08:10.240 He's doing it for Israel.

00:08:12.320 To which I say, well, wait a minute, wait a minute.

00:08:14.760 Why would he be doing something for Israel 0.81

00:08:17.260 while Democrats actually believe

00:08:20.420 that he praised neo-Nazis in Charlottesville

00:08:23.780 who are anti-Semitic?

00:08:26.720 How do those two things fit in the same reality?

00:08:30.060 One of those things can't be real.

00:08:33.820 Well, the fine people hoax, of course, was not real.

00:08:37.980 And it turns out that the president is doing good work

00:08:42.020 to make sure that Israel is safer

00:08:44.360 and the Islamic countries are doing better.

00:08:46.340 So how do you believe that he is opposed

00:08:50.820 to the Jewish population of the world,

00:08:55.420 according to Democrats,

00:08:57.540 while he has a Jewish son-in-law,

00:09:01.080 a Jewish converted daughter,

00:09:02.980 Jewish grandchildren,

00:09:04.720 is so popular in Israel

00:09:06.820 that they are naming things after him?

00:09:09.060 And you still believe the fine people hoax?

00:09:16.280 That he was on the side with the neo-Nazis?

00:09:19.460 I don't think so.

00:09:21.240 Have you ever noticed

00:09:22.240 that Israel is pretty good at spotting anti-Semites?

00:09:27.700 Pretty good at it.

00:09:29.140 They've had some practice.

00:09:31.120 Have they not spotted President Trump's

00:09:34.760 anti-Semitic ways, allegedly?

00:09:36.940 Because Israel can't pick up on those clues?

00:09:41.920 No.

00:09:42.900 It's because if you believe

00:09:44.660 that the president ever said those things in Charlottesville,

00:09:48.560 you have been brainwashed. 0.63

00:09:51.360 Now, compare my explanation of reality

00:09:54.900 that some people were brainwashed

00:09:57.340 into believing something that wasn't true

00:09:59.140 with the other explanation.

00:10:01.940 The other explanation is that Israel didn't notice.

00:10:05.720 Didn't notice.

00:10:07.620 You think?

00:10:08.400 You think Israel doesn't watch our news

00:10:11.040 in the United States?

00:10:12.840 You think they don't know

00:10:14.080 what the president of the United States

00:10:16.040 is accused of doing?

00:10:18.180 Obviously,

00:10:19.260 if they thought any of that was true,

00:10:22.560 we'd be hearing about it.

00:10:24.380 Because one thing that Israel is never accused of 0.92

00:10:28.320 is being quiet when they have a complaint.

00:10:32.780 Has anybody ever accused them of that?

00:10:34.940 I don't think so.

00:10:38.000 So every time the president does something

00:10:40.320 that counters the brainwashing, 0.61

00:10:42.660 that's working in his favor.

00:10:44.800 So doing a whole bunch of peace deals

00:10:46.540 in the Middle East

00:10:47.380 has got to be blowing some minds right now.

00:10:51.500 The other thing that's blowing minds,

00:10:53.740 and I said this on Periscope,

00:10:55.660 and I was happy to see that other people

00:10:57.440 picked up the same thought.

00:10:59.540 There's very little that you remember

00:11:01.860 from a debate.

00:11:03.360 If you go a few days into the future,

00:11:06.260 people don't remember anything specifically

00:11:08.560 that was said.

00:11:09.340 They remember the vibe.

00:11:11.200 They remember how it felt.

00:11:12.700 And the big takeaway from the most recent debate,

00:11:16.960 the one that will have the most effect

00:11:18.560 probably on the election outcome, if any,

00:11:21.180 is that Trump can act presidential.

00:11:25.520 He can act like he's not a bully.

00:11:29.940 And that was something that his supporters noticed.

00:11:35.500 You know, I called it out.

00:11:36.660 But I didn't expect the other team to notice it

00:11:41.080 and call it out.

00:11:42.120 And they did.

00:11:43.300 So even CNN pundits, et cetera,

00:11:46.380 are noting that the president

00:11:48.060 does apparently have the capability

00:11:50.140 to control himself

00:11:52.660 when there's a strategic reason to do it.

00:11:55.920 That is completely different

00:11:58.080 from what the anti-Trumpers have been fed

00:12:02.600 as their belief system for four years.

00:12:06.660 For four years, people have been saying

00:12:08.780 that the president doesn't have any ability

00:12:11.640 to control himself.

00:12:13.720 And then you watched him do it.

00:12:16.140 He was given a reason.

00:12:17.920 Oh, we don't like the way you were bullying

00:12:20.820 and talking over Biden in that last debate.

00:12:24.160 I tend to think that that strategy

00:12:25.800 was more effective than pundits give us credit for

00:12:29.620 because it did show some dominance.

00:12:31.660 And that counts.

00:12:32.560 That counts for a lot.

00:12:34.280 But he got that feedback.

00:12:36.660 He incorporated it.

00:12:39.440 He implemented it.

00:12:41.500 And you could see quite plainly

00:12:43.140 he wasn't struggling to do it.

00:12:45.660 Was there any time during the debate

00:12:47.440 you said to yourself,

00:12:48.360 oh, my God, he's struggling to act presidential?

00:12:53.500 No.

00:12:54.420 He wasn't struggling at all.

00:12:56.380 Well, it was easy because, in fact,

00:13:00.300 you see him changing modes all the time.

00:13:03.060 You see him doing a head of state meeting.

00:13:07.360 He's in that mode.

00:13:09.000 You see him on the rally, you know,

00:13:11.120 talking to the crowd.

00:13:12.120 It's stand-up comedy.

00:13:13.660 You see him talking to children who visit the White House

00:13:17.060 and he talks like a grandfather.

00:13:18.480 He goes into whatever mode he needs to.

00:13:22.520 And when you see that he isn't crazy

00:13:25.840 unless he wants to act that way for strategic purposes,

00:13:29.900 because it does work.

00:13:31.620 You know, his critics call it crazy,

00:13:33.680 but his supporters would just say he's being honest

00:13:37.020 and high energy and all that other stuff.

00:13:38.700 So I think that made a difference.

00:13:45.140 I think that made a big difference.

00:13:46.780 And I don't know that if you asked anybody in a poll

00:13:50.160 and you said, did your vote change

00:13:52.860 because President Trump acted presidential in a debate,

00:13:56.400 probably nobody would say that that was the reason.

00:13:59.780 But it gives you comfort if you were worried about it.

00:14:05.120 It just takes that worry away.

00:14:06.800 Likewise, all the Middle East peace deals

00:14:10.440 should be taking those worries you might have had

00:14:13.960 about Islamophobia

00:14:15.060 and about his alleged anti-Semitism,

00:14:19.020 which is crazy,

00:14:20.100 given the situation.

00:14:21.180 It's just a crazy thing to think about him.

00:14:23.660 But it just allows you not to worry about that.

00:14:26.240 It just takes it down to a lower priority,

00:14:29.000 even if you're still a little suspicious.

00:14:31.360 It certainly takes it off the top ten.

00:14:33.000 On another topic on Twitter,

00:14:40.440 Drowlord, a Twitter user,

00:14:44.960 says, how many people are actively listening to pollsters?

00:14:49.860 And this is just one person's experience.

00:14:54.000 And he said, three months ago,

00:14:55.440 it didn't occur to me that anyone did that,

00:14:58.720 meaning lying to pollsters.

00:15:00.520 How many people are actively lying to pollsters?

00:15:04.340 And he says,

00:15:05.180 I've been shocked to learn

00:15:06.120 that almost all of my conservative acquaintances

00:15:09.140 do it on purpose.

00:15:12.540 Pollsters are not neutral observers.

00:15:15.160 They're using you to undermine you.

00:15:18.160 They're using you to undermine you.

00:15:20.760 Okay.

00:15:21.840 I'm not sure I know what that sentence means.

00:15:23.920 But how many of you have had the same experience?

00:15:28.440 That if you talk to your conservative acquaintances,

00:15:32.300 that they're sort of unified at this point

00:15:35.380 in saying that they lie to pollsters.

00:15:39.020 Now, I don't know how many of those people

00:15:40.800 are lying to you about lying to pollsters,

00:15:44.520 because if somebody is willing to lie to a pollster,

00:15:47.860 well, they might be willing to lie

00:15:49.480 to their acquaintances as well

00:15:51.000 about this sort of thing.

00:15:53.680 But I think this hidden Trump vote

00:15:56.300 is going to be a big surprise to some people.

00:16:00.640 Here's another big surprise.

00:16:02.220 According to Rasmussen,

00:16:04.260 who does a continually polling on things

00:16:08.240 such as National Daily Black Likely Voter Job Approval

00:16:12.980 for the president.

00:16:15.320 So these are likely voters who are also black

00:16:18.440 and how much they approve of the president.

00:16:22.220 Back on...

00:16:23.480 This is just not long ago.

00:16:25.280 This is October 19th.

00:16:28.720 Not that long ago, right?

00:16:30.380 Just last week.

00:16:32.940 Black Likely Voters

00:16:34.480 had a 25% approval rating for the president,

00:16:37.340 which would be crazy.

00:16:39.740 Like, off-the-charts crazy.

00:16:41.740 Because he only got, like, 11% of the vote.

00:16:45.160 So you'd expect his approval

00:16:46.540 would be closer to that 10% range, right?

00:16:48.900 10%, 11%.

00:16:49.840 But 25% last week?

00:16:54.880 That close to the election?

00:16:56.360 Oh, I'm not done yet.

00:16:58.220 That was last week.

00:17:00.360 And so that was the 19th.

00:17:01.700 On the 20th, it dipped a little bit.

00:17:04.600 And, okay, that's back to normal.

00:17:05.900 Well, it dipped to 24%.

00:17:07.660 Still really high,

00:17:09.360 but at least you can see it trending down

00:17:11.360 where you'd expect it to trend, right?

00:17:13.560 You kind of expect it to sink back down.

00:17:16.180 Except, oh, what happened on the 21st?

00:17:19.100 Huh.

00:17:19.780 It reversed directions and went to 31%.

00:17:22.540 What?

00:17:24.600 31% of black likely voters

00:17:27.340 have given the president,

00:17:31.760 who is considered by his enemies

00:17:34.320 the worst person in the world,

00:17:36.580 they're giving him 31% approval

00:17:39.100 on the 21st?

00:17:40.960 That was only a few days ago.

00:17:44.180 So, but you know that's not going to hold, right?

00:17:46.380 That's the kind of number where you hear it,

00:17:48.440 you say, okay, that's not going to hold.

00:17:50.500 And it didn't, it didn't hold.

00:17:52.280 So the very next day, it was pretty different.

00:17:55.120 It was up to 37 frickin' percent.

00:17:59.260 Black likely voters,

00:18:01.640 37% approved of the president

00:18:04.320 on the 22nd.

00:18:07.000 What's today?

00:18:07.520 Today's the 24th.

00:18:11.460 That was only two days ago.

00:18:14.260 37% of the black likely voters

00:18:17.400 approve of the president?

00:18:19.640 What's happening here?

00:18:21.360 So one thing you can say for sure,

00:18:23.180 again, you know,

00:18:24.460 the 25% was crazy,

00:18:26.820 so you didn't really expect that to hold.

00:18:28.480 But when it reaches 37%,

00:18:30.540 you know that number's not going to stay there, right?

00:18:34.840 Because that's just crazy.

00:18:36.180 It's not going to stay at 37%.

00:18:39.060 And indeed, sure enough,

00:18:40.940 the very next day on the 23rd,

00:18:43.400 it changed again by quite a bit

00:18:45.220 to 46%.

00:18:48.500 46%.

00:18:52.120 I feel like I have to keep reading this again

00:18:56.340 because you won't believe you heard it right.

00:19:00.000 Let me say it again,

00:19:00.880 so make sure you heard it right.

00:19:03.040 The National Daily Black Likely

00:19:06.080 voter job approval

00:19:07.480 for the president,

00:19:09.460 according to Rasmussen,

00:19:11.460 went from 25%,

00:19:13.080 which was sky high on the 19th,

00:19:15.520 just a few days ago,

00:19:16.780 to 24%,

00:19:18.300 31%,

00:19:19.640 37%,

00:19:21.380 and 46%.

00:19:24.080 What the hell is happening?

00:19:26.880 What the hell is happening?

00:19:29.760 What the hell is happening?

00:19:30.520 I don't know.

00:19:32.340 But it feels like

00:19:34.120 the silo's got a crack.

00:19:37.600 You know,

00:19:37.960 the silo,

00:19:38.740 the new silo

00:19:39.980 that keeps the left

00:19:41.080 in their bubble?

00:19:42.900 I feel like it cracked.

00:19:45.200 What cracked it?

00:19:47.320 Was it

00:19:48.000 50 Cent?

00:19:50.700 Maybe.

00:19:52.160 Maybe.

00:19:53.000 I don't know.

00:19:53.460 Was it the fact

00:19:54.780 that even Van Jones,

00:19:57.400 as of yesterday,

00:19:59.020 I think it was,

00:20:00.260 said that President Trump

00:20:01.540 doesn't get enough credit

00:20:03.220 for what he's done

00:20:04.660 for black Americans?

00:20:07.920 Now,

00:20:08.360 Van also added

00:20:09.480 that the president's rhetoric

00:20:11.720 is hurting him,

00:20:13.520 and that's bad.

00:20:15.260 But he says

00:20:16.120 out loud

00:20:17.500 President Trump

00:20:19.340 doesn't get enough credit

00:20:20.820 for what he's doing.

00:20:22.320 Some people are saying

00:20:23.900 Kanye.

00:20:25.180 Maybe,

00:20:25.720 but I think Kanye's

00:20:26.600 baked into the cake by now.

00:20:28.540 Some people in the comments

00:20:29.680 are saying Ice Cube.

00:20:32.020 Maybe.

00:20:33.400 How does that story

00:20:34.660 strike you 0.66

00:20:35.580 when you hear

00:20:36.320 that Ice Cube

00:20:37.140 had some actual plans

00:20:39.100 he put on paper?

00:20:40.720 And again,

00:20:41.460 I'm going to compliment

00:20:42.660 Ice Cube.

00:20:44.000 It's easy to talk.

00:20:46.640 Everybody likes to talk.

00:20:49.060 But he put it on paper.

00:20:50.080 And then he took

00:20:51.760 a reputational risk

00:20:53.240 that's extreme

00:20:54.920 by talking to both sides.

00:20:57.940 Because he's supposed

00:20:58.600 to just talk to the Democrats,

00:21:00.020 right?

00:21:00.780 But he talked to

00:21:01.700 the other side too,

00:21:02.980 and the other side

00:21:03.680 being the Trump administration,

00:21:04.800 and he got a better answer

00:21:06.940 from them.

00:21:08.080 Because you know

00:21:08.660 what the Trump administration

00:21:09.900 would love to do

00:21:10.780 more than anything?

00:21:12.560 This is not a joke.

00:21:14.460 This is no surprise.

00:21:16.480 Well,

00:21:17.000 it won't be to Republicans.

00:21:17.980 But it might be a surprise

00:21:20.360 if there's some black

00:21:22.580 likely voters

00:21:23.640 watching this.

00:21:25.120 I don't know

00:21:25.820 if you know this.

00:21:27.140 Because you've been told

00:21:28.100 exactly the opposite

00:21:29.160 forever.

00:21:30.340 But if the Trump administration

00:21:32.240 could do something specific,

00:21:34.500 you know,

00:21:34.680 a real plan,

00:21:35.800 an idea

00:21:36.280 that was

00:21:37.860 clearly beneficial

00:21:39.540 for the black

00:21:40.580 public,

00:21:42.000 they would love that.

00:21:44.060 They wouldn't

00:21:44.840 ignore it.

00:21:46.660 grudgingly

00:21:49.380 look at it.

00:21:51.080 They wouldn't

00:21:52.160 make you feel good

00:21:53.860 to talk to you

00:21:54.700 and then brush you off.

00:21:56.700 They would love it.

00:21:58.420 Because it's in their

00:21:59.420 best interest.

00:22:01.380 That's it.

00:22:02.620 People do act

00:22:03.800 in their best interest.

00:22:05.040 It's the one thing

00:22:05.660 that you can count on

00:22:06.660 more than anything else

00:22:07.760 in the world.

00:22:08.740 You can always

00:22:09.720 count on people

00:22:10.460 to act in their

00:22:11.220 best interest.

00:22:11.920 And I don't think

00:22:13.780 there's anything

00:22:14.420 that the Trump

00:22:15.440 administration

00:22:15.940 would like better

00:22:17.260 than to do

00:22:18.620 a good job.

00:22:20.080 All right?

00:22:21.080 Is there anybody

00:22:22.340 who wakes up

00:22:23.060 and says,

00:22:23.540 I think I'll do

00:22:24.040 a bad job today?

00:22:25.160 Nobody.

00:22:26.360 Is there any world

00:22:27.600 in which

00:22:28.200 the Trump administration

00:22:29.760 would look bad

00:22:31.460 if they legitimately

00:22:33.300 did a good job

00:22:34.220 for the black public?

00:22:36.860 No.

00:22:37.740 There's no scenario

00:22:38.860 in which they would

00:22:39.780 look bad

00:22:40.520 for doing a good job.

00:22:43.080 Of course they wanted

00:22:44.360 to talk to Ice Cube.

00:22:46.120 Everybody who thought

00:22:47.180 that that was unusual,

00:22:49.540 you are brainwashed. 0.62

00:22:51.380 If you think that

00:22:52.300 any administration,

00:22:53.880 really,

00:22:54.380 if you think

00:22:54.920 any administration

00:22:55.860 is unwilling

00:22:59.060 to listen to good ideas

00:23:00.480 that help a big part

00:23:01.680 of their public

00:23:02.240 that can get them

00:23:03.000 re-elected,

00:23:03.700 you've got to re-examine

00:23:07.200 where you're getting

00:23:07.820 your news

00:23:08.320 because of course

00:23:09.220 they want to help.

00:23:10.960 All right.

00:23:13.480 So,

00:23:14.160 here's a question

00:23:14.820 I have

00:23:15.340 for Democrats.

00:23:18.460 And I like to ask

00:23:19.880 this kind of question

00:23:21.120 and it's one

00:23:21.940 you should ask yourself

00:23:22.920 all the time.

00:23:24.080 And the question

00:23:24.940 goes like this.

00:23:27.900 How do you explain

00:23:29.300 with your worldview

00:23:30.580 what you observe?

00:23:32.800 In other words,

00:23:33.260 you have a view

00:23:34.460 of the world

00:23:35.040 and you think,

00:23:36.320 okay,

00:23:36.480 this is the way

00:23:37.120 the world is.

00:23:38.280 This is what

00:23:38.920 these people want.

00:23:40.080 This is what

00:23:40.560 they're trying to get.

00:23:42.020 And it kind of

00:23:42.640 fits together.

00:23:43.740 And then you observe

00:23:44.780 the news.

00:23:46.300 If the news

00:23:47.220 doesn't fit

00:23:48.280 with your worldview,

00:23:50.260 what do you do?

00:23:51.500 Well,

00:23:51.920 you should change

00:23:52.660 your worldview.

00:23:53.820 If there's enough

00:23:54.640 news that doesn't

00:23:56.920 fit your worldview,

00:23:58.040 you should change it.

00:23:58.820 And I like to

00:24:01.100 point out

00:24:02.460 when the news

00:24:03.480 fits my worldview

00:24:05.040 perfectly,

00:24:05.820 but it doesn't

00:24:06.320 fit the popular one

00:24:07.440 because those

00:24:08.340 are the important

00:24:09.080 things to notice.

00:24:11.420 So here's one

00:24:12.460 and it's a question

00:24:13.600 for the Democrats.

00:24:14.920 If you're a Democrat

00:24:16.160 and let's say

00:24:17.360 you are 100%

00:24:18.860 certain

00:24:19.400 that Trump

00:24:21.500 is obviously

00:24:22.740 a racist.

00:24:23.760 Now,

00:24:24.100 I'm not talking

00:24:24.640 about you figured it

00:24:25.960 down on your own.

00:24:27.600 But if you're

00:24:28.080 a Democrat

00:24:28.500 and you believe

00:24:29.580 that everybody

00:24:30.760 looking at the

00:24:31.700 same information

00:24:32.480 can see it,

00:24:33.760 it's just clear,

00:24:35.120 it's obvious,

00:24:36.220 and you believe

00:24:36.780 that everyone

00:24:37.620 can see this,

00:24:39.180 that Trump

00:24:39.560 is obviously,

00:24:41.180 not subtly,

00:24:42.620 but obviously

00:24:43.640 a racist,

00:24:45.200 how do you explain

00:24:46.120 all the black people

00:24:47.360 who don't see it?

00:24:49.680 Serious question.

00:24:52.020 Do you believe,

00:24:53.640 just as you would be,

00:24:55.460 I guess,

00:24:55.960 confused that Israel

00:24:57.620 doesn't seem to notice

00:24:59.420 that the president

00:25:00.420 is anti-Semitic

00:25:02.020 if you have

00:25:02.600 that worldview?

00:25:03.920 Now,

00:25:04.160 my worldview

00:25:04.680 is that he's not

00:25:06.040 anti-Semitic at all.

00:25:07.700 In fact,

00:25:08.100 he loves Israel.

00:25:09.900 Obviously.

00:25:11.740 And so my worldview

00:25:13.320 is completely consistent.

00:25:15.420 Everything that's

00:25:16.060 happening with Israel 1.00

00:25:17.100 and the president

00:25:18.200 is exactly

00:25:19.620 what it looks like

00:25:20.660 in my worldview.

00:25:22.100 Oh yeah,

00:25:22.420 he wants to help,

00:25:23.800 he's good at negotiating,

00:25:25.060 he puts some work

00:25:26.640 into it,

00:25:27.800 and he's getting

00:25:28.460 a good result.

00:25:29.720 Completely consistent.

00:25:32.700 Now,

00:25:33.340 same thing with

00:25:34.400 what Trump

00:25:35.500 has done

00:25:35.860 for the black public.

00:25:38.400 If he's this

00:25:39.780 big old racist,

00:25:41.480 and it's obvious,

00:25:42.940 everybody can see it,

00:25:44.520 why are there

00:25:45.580 so many black people

00:25:46.720 who can't see it?

00:25:47.780 How would there be

00:25:49.360 even one black person

00:25:51.680 in the United States

00:25:52.800 who would somehow

00:25:54.360 miss what the Democrats

00:25:56.360 say is right in front

00:25:57.540 of your face?

00:25:58.960 Look at it.

00:25:59.720 It's right there.

00:26:02.340 You know,

00:26:02.700 I can see if,

00:26:04.500 in general,

00:26:05.600 generally speaking,

00:26:06.700 10% of the public

00:26:07.780 will believe

00:26:08.340 just about anything.

00:26:09.940 You know,

00:26:10.140 10% will believe

00:26:11.220 in any story

00:26:12.240 you give them.

00:26:12.720 But once you get up

00:26:14.420 around a job approval

00:26:15.640 of 46%,

00:26:17.120 as the likely

00:26:19.580 black voter

00:26:20.440 job approval

00:26:21.280 for the president

00:26:22.020 just hit,

00:26:23.160 at around 46%,

00:26:25.000 the people

00:26:26.200 in the other half

00:26:27.560 of the group

00:26:28.720 have to start

00:26:29.980 asking themselves,

00:26:33.080 what are they seeing

00:26:34.420 that I'm not seeing?

00:26:36.200 Why does my worldview

00:26:37.700 keep getting violated?

00:26:40.200 Because my worldview

00:26:41.020 says the president

00:26:41.980 would not do

00:26:42.740 a platinum plan

00:26:43.680 for black America.

00:26:45.740 You know,

00:26:46.160 their worldview

00:26:47.580 that the Trump

00:26:49.280 is racist

00:26:49.900 says he would not

00:26:51.280 do prison reform.

00:26:53.100 It says he would not

00:26:54.100 brag continually

00:26:55.380 about black

00:26:56.480 unemployment rates

00:26:57.460 before coronavirus

00:26:58.780 and we hope

00:26:59.600 soon again

00:27:00.200 being incredibly good.

00:27:02.960 Why would he

00:27:03.400 act like that?

00:27:05.160 Does any of that

00:27:05.880 make sense

00:27:06.660 if you believe

00:27:08.600 he's an obvious racist?

00:27:10.800 You can't explain

00:27:12.240 why your own people,

00:27:14.940 Democrats who happen

00:27:15.880 to be black,

00:27:17.220 don't see it

00:27:18.100 if it's so obvious.

00:27:20.540 And what's the other hypothesis?

00:27:22.820 Give me one other hypothesis

00:27:24.560 that makes sense

00:27:25.840 for why,

00:27:27.280 let's say,

00:27:27.920 let's say half

00:27:28.700 of the black public

00:27:29.600 thinks they see

00:27:31.080 an obvious problem

00:27:32.220 with Trump

00:27:32.760 and 46%

00:27:34.620 apparently not seeing it.

00:27:37.400 How do you explain that

00:27:38.640 in any other way?

00:27:40.480 Well,

00:27:41.340 my worldview

00:27:42.100 explains it perfectly.

00:27:43.900 My worldview

00:27:44.600 is that our opinions

00:27:46.040 are assigned to us

00:27:47.260 by our chosen media.

00:27:49.460 And if the media

00:27:50.660 you're absorbing

00:27:51.460 is telling you

00:27:52.420 Trump is a monster,

00:27:54.140 you go away

00:27:54.740 believing it

00:27:55.420 and you believe

00:27:56.760 you made up

00:27:57.320 your own mind.

00:27:58.780 But you didn't.

00:28:00.380 And I would say

00:28:01.280 that my worldview

00:28:01.980 has all of the

00:28:02.980 scientific backing

00:28:03.960 that people

00:28:05.060 can be convinced

00:28:06.100 to believe anything,

00:28:08.240 just about anything,

00:28:09.260 if their news

00:28:09.920 source is consistent.

00:28:12.000 And so,

00:28:13.000 my worldview

00:28:13.500 is completely intact.

00:28:15.600 The people

00:28:15.960 who watch

00:28:16.420 the wrong news

00:28:17.400 get the wrong

00:28:18.320 feeling about the world.

00:28:20.380 The people

00:28:20.840 who watch

00:28:21.300 the correct news

00:28:22.380 or at least

00:28:22.920 they're smart enough

00:28:23.860 to recognize

00:28:25.300 fake news

00:28:25.940 when they see it

00:28:26.740 have not been

00:28:28.660 brainwashed.

00:28:30.240 And that's it.

00:28:30.860 And that's what we see.

00:28:32.180 We see some

00:28:32.840 brainwashed people,

00:28:33.720 some not brainwashed people.

00:28:35.280 It's all perfectly

00:28:35.900 consistent

00:28:36.480 and scientifically

00:28:38.080 backed,

00:28:39.460 I would say.

00:28:40.920 All right.

00:28:44.180 And then,

00:28:47.140 of course,

00:28:47.400 the next thing

00:28:47.980 that the people

00:28:48.580 who are hypnotized

00:28:49.640 would say

00:28:51.420 is like,

00:28:52.000 Scott,

00:28:52.420 Scott,

00:28:52.740 Scott,

00:28:53.680 I know what you're saying.

00:28:54.920 You're saying

00:28:55.340 that I'm just being fooled

00:28:56.480 by the media,

00:28:57.300 but I'm not.

00:28:58.300 I'm looking at the facts.

00:29:00.440 For example,

00:29:00.980 what about the fact

00:29:01.980 of the fine people?

00:29:03.200 Oh,

00:29:03.720 that was a hoax.

00:29:05.140 That's not a fact.

00:29:06.620 It's opposite of a fact.

00:29:08.580 And then they'll say,

00:29:09.400 but Scott,

00:29:10.080 Scott,

00:29:10.400 Scott,

00:29:11.520 you know,

00:29:11.980 what about,

00:29:12.920 I mean,

00:29:13.280 obviously,

00:29:13.960 the Central Park Five thing,

00:29:16.660 President did a full-page ad

00:29:18.600 saying they should be executed.

00:29:21.020 Except

00:29:21.540 he didn't.

00:29:23.880 He did a full-page ad

00:29:25.420 about crime in general

00:29:27.100 that he did around that time

00:29:29.200 because that was one

00:29:29.940 of the reasons

00:29:30.280 people were talking

00:29:31.040 about crime in general.

00:29:33.340 He didn't mention

00:29:34.320 those particular people.

00:29:35.660 He didn't mention race.

00:29:37.080 He mentioned

00:29:37.860 a lot of violence.

00:29:39.740 We should have

00:29:40.160 the death sentence.

00:29:41.540 Now,

00:29:41.740 in order to think

00:29:42.700 that that full-page ad

00:29:44.600 was really

00:29:45.800 secretly in his mind

00:29:47.700 was a racist thing,

00:29:49.620 in order to believe that,

00:29:51.680 here's what you would

00:29:52.500 have to believe.

00:29:53.300 that President Trump

00:29:55.440 would not be in favor

00:29:56.700 of executing

00:29:58.460 white criminals 0.98

00:30:00.600 who had committed

00:30:02.220 those same crimes.

00:30:04.360 Do you believe that?

00:30:06.960 Seriously.

00:30:08.080 Do you believe

00:30:08.760 that Trump,

00:30:09.700 all you've seen about him,

00:30:11.280 how tough on crime he is,

00:30:13.520 how, you know,

00:30:14.640 sort of macho

00:30:15.680 he presents himself,

00:30:16.740 et cetera,

00:30:17.440 do you think

00:30:18.000 he would not be in favor?

00:30:20.000 Let's do a mental experiment.

00:30:22.220 Let's say,

00:30:22.620 let's say that

00:30:23.920 the Central Park Five

00:30:25.120 were proven innocent,

00:30:27.600 and by the way,

00:30:28.580 that's the official story.

00:30:30.320 There are still people

00:30:31.080 who believe that

00:30:31.760 maybe they weren't

00:30:32.520 so innocent,

00:30:33.720 but in terms of

00:30:34.520 the judicial system

00:30:35.840 and our presumption

00:30:37.400 of innocence,

00:30:39.220 they were found

00:30:40.640 not guilty

00:30:41.340 of that crime.

00:30:42.740 Now, suppose

00:30:43.340 this next part

00:30:44.340 didn't happen,

00:30:45.460 but suppose it had.

00:30:47.040 Suppose that

00:30:48.000 five, you know,

00:30:50.380 white teenagers

00:30:51.260 had come forward

00:30:52.220 and they said,

00:30:53.160 it was us.

00:30:54.320 We're the ones

00:30:54.960 who did that terrible crime

00:30:56.260 in Central Park,

00:30:58.260 and let's say

00:31:00.300 there's evidence

00:31:00.980 and they're proven

00:31:02.220 to be the actual

00:31:03.220 perpetrators.

00:31:04.600 Do you think

00:31:05.080 that the president

00:31:05.800 would have said,

00:31:07.860 oh, okay,

00:31:09.160 I don't,

00:31:09.800 I'm not in favor

00:31:10.360 of executing those guys?

00:31:12.760 Do you believe that?

00:31:13.700 That's crazy.

00:31:16.780 You know,

00:31:18.220 nobody knows

00:31:18.880 what anybody else

00:31:19.680 is really thinking

00:31:20.620 in their private thoughts,

00:31:22.020 but I can't see

00:31:23.460 any scenario

00:31:24.320 where if it had come out,

00:31:26.960 and it didn't,

00:31:27.920 but if it had come out

00:31:28.940 that the perpetrators

00:31:30.500 had been, you know,

00:31:31.400 five white teenagers,

00:31:33.260 maybe he wouldn't want

00:31:34.160 to execute teenagers,

00:31:35.660 so let's make them,

00:31:36.460 let's make them over 18.

00:31:39.320 Five white guys? 0.70

00:31:40.260 You don't think

00:31:40.980 that the president

00:31:41.640 wanted those same

00:31:42.700 five white guys

00:31:43.540 executed right away?

00:31:45.400 Because I don't think

00:31:46.360 you met him,

00:31:47.200 or you don't know

00:31:47.960 anything about him,

00:31:49.460 if you think

00:31:50.100 he would have said,

00:31:50.640 oh, no, they're white.

00:31:52.260 Let's let them free. 0.84

00:31:54.720 No.

00:31:56.240 No, that would be crazy.

00:31:57.940 And the rest of the examples

00:31:58.920 are sort of as crazy as that.

00:32:04.500 I gave you a tip

00:32:06.100 in my book,

00:32:07.160 Loser Think,

00:32:08.000 which I mention

00:32:08.820 all the time,

00:32:10.260 which is

00:32:11.220 how to determine

00:32:12.160 what is true

00:32:13.160 and what is false

00:32:14.840 in the news.

00:32:16.680 And there's one tip

00:32:18.340 that needs a little adjustment.

00:32:20.900 And that tip was this.

00:32:22.460 I said that

00:32:23.320 if the left-leaning news

00:32:25.260 and the right-leaning news

00:32:26.660 report a fact

00:32:27.760 the same

00:32:29.060 as the same fact,

00:32:33.620 then it's probably true.

00:32:35.020 So if Fox News

00:32:37.420 says there's a hurricane

00:32:38.800 and CNN says

00:32:40.440 there's a hurricane,

00:32:41.440 there's probably a hurricane.

00:32:43.440 They're reporting

00:32:44.240 the same news.

00:32:45.240 But if one of them

00:32:46.220 says there's

00:32:47.320 something is true

00:32:48.440 and the other says

00:32:49.760 we've looked into it,

00:32:50.740 it's totally not true,

00:32:52.480 it's probably not true.

00:32:54.260 And it doesn't matter

00:32:55.100 which one says it's true

00:32:56.480 and which one says it's not.

00:32:58.100 If one of them

00:32:59.140 says it's not true,

00:33:00.220 I'm not going to say

00:33:02.600 100% of the time

00:33:04.260 this rule works.

00:33:05.940 But I can't think

00:33:07.000 of an example

00:33:07.580 where it didn't.

00:33:09.020 All right?

00:33:09.640 So it's a good general rule.

00:33:11.420 Now, that brings us

00:33:12.580 to Hunter Biden's laptop.

00:33:15.080 Would you say

00:33:15.900 that Fox News

00:33:17.260 is reporting it as true,

00:33:20.180 meaning that there's

00:33:21.240 a really laptop,

00:33:22.900 it is not

00:33:23.660 Soviet interference,

00:33:25.900 it's real emails

00:33:27.020 and the interpretation

00:33:28.360 of them

00:33:29.000 has been confirmed

00:33:30.680 by the ex-business partner

00:33:33.320 of Hunter Biden.

00:33:34.760 And so there's

00:33:35.240 a set of facts here

00:33:36.340 that we can determine

00:33:37.340 are true facts.

00:33:39.220 What is CNN doing?

00:33:41.880 Well, CNN is not

00:33:43.680 exactly saying

00:33:45.040 that the things

00:33:46.980 that a Fox News

00:33:48.340 reporter would say

00:33:50.500 are true.

00:33:51.960 CNN isn't saying

00:33:53.300 they're untrue.

00:33:55.080 Exactly.

00:33:56.520 They're much more

00:33:57.740 clever about that.

00:33:58.780 And that's why

00:33:59.300 you have to watch out

00:34:00.100 with this one.

00:34:01.020 Because if they were,

00:34:02.460 if CNN were saying,

00:34:03.780 yep,

00:34:04.720 the emails on the laptop

00:34:06.240 we have confirmed

00:34:07.480 are not true.

00:34:09.260 They're fake.

00:34:10.480 If they had done that,

00:34:12.420 I would lean towards

00:34:13.800 saying the whole thing

00:34:14.500 is fake.

00:34:15.860 But they didn't.

00:34:17.400 They simply

00:34:18.240 don't cover it.

00:34:19.820 And when they do

00:34:20.620 cover it,

00:34:21.220 they speak of it

00:34:22.140 in generalities

00:34:23.240 as if the sketchy

00:34:25.140 stuff

00:34:25.500 and the stuff

00:34:26.640 that's largely verified

00:34:28.020 are somehow

00:34:28.780 all the same stuff.

00:34:30.680 And that we shouldn't

00:34:31.920 take it seriously

00:34:32.900 and, you know,

00:34:34.500 there might be

00:34:35.000 Russian interference.

00:34:36.420 But it's sort of

00:34:37.080 this general statement

00:34:39.480 of avoid that story

00:34:41.080 under those conditions

00:34:43.360 where somebody's

00:34:44.220 trying to avoid

00:34:45.080 a story

00:34:45.600 which is different

00:34:47.140 from debunking it.

00:34:49.040 because the debunking

00:34:50.860 is just sort of

00:34:51.660 hand-waving debunking.

00:34:53.400 It's not real news debunking.

00:34:55.480 I think that actually

00:34:56.840 proves it's true

00:34:57.720 because you've got

00:34:58.940 one saying it's true

00:35:00.080 and one who would be hurt

00:35:02.520 by it being true

00:35:03.800 who is doing everything

00:35:05.180 they can

00:35:05.800 to not directly

00:35:07.280 answer the question

00:35:08.280 is it true?

00:35:10.320 They're trying to

00:35:11.320 tell you,

00:35:12.420 they're trying to convince you

00:35:13.540 it's not true

00:35:14.360 but they don't want to go

00:35:16.020 all the way

00:35:16.700 to just directly lying.

00:35:19.840 Right?

00:35:20.200 So they're just trying

00:35:21.000 to work on your credibility

00:35:23.100 make you not think about it

00:35:25.380 hey look over here

00:35:26.900 so anyway

00:35:28.400 my rule of

00:35:29.780 it's true

00:35:30.420 if both reported

00:35:31.800 as true

00:35:32.340 seems to hold.

00:35:33.760 Let me give you

00:35:34.200 some examples.

00:35:35.540 The fine people hoax

00:35:36.600 CNN usually reports

00:35:38.540 it's true.

00:35:40.100 Fox News,

00:35:40.920 Breitbart,

00:35:41.640 right-leaning places

00:35:42.600 universally report

00:35:44.940 that it's not true

00:35:46.000 and you can check

00:35:47.560 the transcript

00:35:48.260 and see it's not true.

00:35:50.340 So it holds

00:35:51.140 on almost all cases.

00:35:52.720 Alright,

00:35:53.640 let's talk about masks.

00:35:55.660 I desperately

00:35:56.800 want to never

00:35:57.580 talk about masks

00:35:58.940 again.

00:36:00.240 Specifically

00:36:00.760 the question

00:36:01.540 about whether

00:36:02.140 they work.

00:36:04.620 I don't think

00:36:05.760 there are too many

00:36:06.440 things

00:36:06.880 that are more

00:36:09.080 just annoying

00:36:10.260 as a topic.

00:36:11.900 You know,

00:36:12.060 most things

00:36:12.520 I like talking

00:36:13.160 about all day long

00:36:14.040 because there's

00:36:15.020 always a new wrinkle

00:36:15.880 and there's

00:36:16.500 always something

00:36:16.940 else to say

00:36:17.600 but the mask

00:36:18.940 thing is just

00:36:19.760 making me crazy.

00:36:21.960 And

00:36:22.240 here's the

00:36:24.080 newest update.

00:36:26.200 So there's

00:36:26.920 I guess it was

00:36:27.760 the New York Times

00:36:28.560 was linking

00:36:29.140 to some studies

00:36:30.240 about masks

00:36:31.660 and here's

00:36:32.500 and here's the

00:36:32.680 claim.

00:36:33.060 The claim was

00:36:34.240 that if you

00:36:34.660 looked at

00:36:35.180 the meta-analyses

00:36:37.320 you know,

00:36:38.240 you looked at

00:36:38.720 all of the

00:36:39.280 studies of masks

00:36:40.320 there's

00:36:41.360 the conclusion

00:36:42.460 is from

00:36:43.120 actual scientific

00:36:44.220 people

00:36:44.740 the belief

00:36:46.260 is that you

00:36:46.860 could reduce

00:36:47.440 COVID infections

00:36:48.500 by 40%

00:36:49.580 if you had

00:36:51.060 universal mask

00:36:52.420 compliance.

00:36:54.320 40%.

00:36:55.080 Now

00:36:56.820 if that were

00:36:58.160 true

00:36:58.520 and let me

00:37:00.040 tell you

00:37:00.380 it took

00:37:00.760 exactly

00:37:01.260 one minute

00:37:02.040 from the

00:37:03.060 time that

00:37:03.560 I tweeted

00:37:04.100 this

00:37:04.580 to the

00:37:05.780 time that

00:37:06.180 somebody

00:37:06.520 tweeted

00:37:06.960 out

00:37:07.240 another

00:37:08.640 source

00:37:09.200 that was

00:37:10.180 opposite

00:37:10.660 information

00:37:11.380 and masks

00:37:12.020 don't work.

00:37:13.440 Alright?

00:37:14.220 So just

00:37:15.260 keep these

00:37:15.720 two things

00:37:16.220 in mind.

00:37:17.600 There was

00:37:18.060 a credible

00:37:18.680 link

00:37:19.200 to studies

00:37:20.700 showing

00:37:21.220 oh masks

00:37:21.840 definitely work.

00:37:22.880 Not only

00:37:23.320 do they work

00:37:23.920 it's like a

00:37:24.740 40%

00:37:25.340 difference

00:37:25.820 in infections.

00:37:27.240 That's a

00:37:27.600 big deal.

00:37:29.260 One minute

00:37:30.000 later

00:37:30.340 a credible

00:37:31.680 link

00:37:32.080 telling me

00:37:33.220 that all

00:37:33.660 of that's

00:37:34.020 not true.

00:37:35.820 So

00:37:36.140 but

00:37:37.680 you know

00:37:38.240 I wouldn't

00:37:38.600 say that

00:37:39.040 the mask

00:37:39.980 information

00:37:40.700 has lined

00:37:41.420 up

00:37:41.780 left or

00:37:43.020 right yet.

00:37:44.200 I would

00:37:44.640 say it's

00:37:44.960 just sort

00:37:45.340 of murky

00:37:46.080 everywhere.

00:37:46.960 It's not

00:37:47.200 so much

00:37:47.680 that one

00:37:48.500 side

00:37:48.740 has said

00:37:49.040 it's

00:37:49.220 true

00:37:49.440 and the

00:37:49.660 other

00:37:49.800 side

00:37:50.020 says

00:37:50.300 it isn't

00:37:51.260 true.

00:37:51.960 I'd say

00:37:52.300 both sides

00:37:52.820 say it's

00:37:53.180 true

00:37:53.400 but they

00:37:53.760 don't

00:37:53.900 know

00:37:54.060 how

00:37:54.220 much.

00:37:57.140 So

00:37:57.740 here's

00:37:59.220 my

00:37:59.580 problem

00:38:00.340 with

00:38:00.680 the

00:38:00.840 40%.

00:38:01.620 If

00:38:03.240 masks

00:38:03.860 made

00:38:04.500 a

00:38:04.700 40%

00:38:05.440 difference

00:38:06.100 how

00:38:07.180 would

00:38:07.420 you

00:38:07.580 not

00:38:08.020 see

00:38:08.360 that

00:38:08.760 on

00:38:09.140 a

00:38:09.320 graph?

00:38:10.560 Because

00:38:11.040 you've

00:38:11.340 probably

00:38:11.540 seen

00:38:11.840 plenty

00:38:12.160 of

00:38:12.320 graphs

00:38:12.640 on

00:38:12.860 social

00:38:13.180 media.

00:38:13.660 Twitter

00:38:13.820 has

00:38:14.080 them

00:38:14.180 all

00:38:14.300 the

00:38:14.420 time.

00:38:15.220 Somebody

00:38:15.500 will

00:38:15.880 usually

00:38:16.540 it's

00:38:16.780 a

00:38:16.920 mask

00:38:17.320 skeptic

00:38:18.140 who

00:38:18.780 will

00:38:18.960 tweet

00:38:19.200 around

00:38:19.600 a

00:38:19.900 graph

00:38:20.240 that

00:38:20.460 says

00:38:20.680 here

00:38:20.860 are

00:38:20.960 the

00:38:21.040 number

00:38:21.320 of

00:38:21.560 infections

00:38:22.160 in

00:38:22.620 this

00:38:23.480 state

00:38:23.900 or

00:38:24.080 this

00:38:24.340 country

00:38:25.200 and

00:38:26.000 then

00:38:26.180 they'll

00:38:26.380 mark

00:38:26.700 on the

00:38:26.980 graph

00:38:27.320 where

00:38:27.860 masks

00:38:28.440 became

00:38:28.900 mandatory

00:38:29.500 or

00:38:30.160 lockdowns.

00:38:31.100 It's the

00:38:31.380 same

00:38:31.560 argument.

00:38:32.380 And then

00:38:32.600 you'll see

00:38:32.900 it didn't

00:38:33.240 seem to

00:38:33.600 change the

00:38:34.200 curve.

00:38:35.300 The curve

00:38:36.020 just kept

00:38:36.640 going.

00:38:38.620 So what's that

00:38:39.180 tell you?

00:38:39.560 Well that

00:38:40.580 would tell

00:38:40.920 you that

00:38:41.500 if

00:38:42.360 masks

00:38:42.940 work

00:38:43.520 and I

00:38:43.900 believe

00:38:44.140 that

00:38:44.340 they

00:38:44.480 do

00:38:44.720 that's

00:38:45.360 my

00:38:45.520 best

00:38:45.800 guess

00:38:46.220 could

00:38:46.980 be

00:38:47.120 wrong

00:38:47.360 but it's

00:38:47.700 my

00:38:47.840 best

00:38:48.100 guess

00:38:48.460 they

00:38:50.060 don't

00:38:50.240 work

00:38:50.460 40%

00:38:51.120 or

00:38:52.780 it

00:38:53.160 could

00:38:53.360 be

00:38:53.560 that

00:38:53.920 there's

00:38:54.720 no

00:38:54.900 such

00:38:55.180 thing

00:38:55.500 as

00:38:55.920 good

00:38:56.400 compliance

00:38:57.000 with

00:38:57.240 masks.

00:38:58.380 It

00:38:58.580 could

00:38:58.780 be

00:38:58.960 that

00:38:59.260 you

00:38:59.860 can

00:39:00.120 say

00:39:00.580 masks

00:39:01.060 are

00:39:01.260 necessary

00:39:01.840 but

00:39:02.760 just

00:39:02.980 when

00:39:03.740 nobody's

00:39:04.480 looking

00:39:04.700 people

00:39:05.000 don't

00:39:05.240 wear

00:39:05.440 them

00:39:05.640 as

00:39:05.800 much.

00:39:06.060 So

00:39:06.960 I'm

00:39:07.820 going

00:39:07.920 to

00:39:08.020 call

00:39:08.260 BS

00:39:08.800 on

00:39:09.140 the

00:39:09.300 40%

00:39:09.940 number

00:39:10.420 but

00:39:12.540 I'll

00:39:12.680 bet

00:39:12.840 there's

00:39:13.920 something

00:39:14.260 that

00:39:15.160 matters.

00:39:15.800 I mean

00:39:16.000 if I

00:39:17.500 had to

00:39:17.900 bet my

00:39:18.520 own

00:39:18.820 money

00:39:19.100 on this

00:39:19.540 and let's

00:39:20.000 say it

00:39:20.240 was a

00:39:20.560 serious

00:39:20.920 amount

00:39:21.240 of

00:39:21.380 money

00:39:21.600 and I

00:39:22.720 had to

00:39:23.020 bet

00:39:23.280 and there

00:39:23.600 was a

00:39:23.820 gun

00:39:23.980 to my

00:39:24.260 head

00:39:24.500 it's

00:39:24.680 like

00:39:24.840 okay

00:39:25.060 you

00:39:25.240 don't

00:39:25.420 get

00:39:25.600 to

00:39:25.740 not

00:39:25.940 bet

00:39:26.340 you

00:39:26.920 have

00:39:27.200 to

00:39:27.380 bet

00:39:27.640 now

00:39:28.520 I

00:39:29.140 want

00:39:29.360 you

00:39:29.440 to

00:39:29.560 give

00:39:29.740 a

00:39:30.040 percentage

00:39:30.780 that

00:39:31.620 you

00:39:31.820 think

00:39:32.140 masks

00:39:32.700 make

00:39:33.060 the

00:39:33.240 difference

00:39:36.060 10 to

00:39:37.380 20%

00:39:38.080 10 to

00:39:39.700 20%

00:39:40.320 now if

00:39:41.320 that's

00:39:41.600 true

00:39:41.880 that's

00:39:42.520 certainly

00:39:43.020 a good

00:39:43.380 reason

00:39:43.660 to wear

00:39:43.920 a mask

00:39:44.360 if you

00:39:45.080 could

00:39:45.280 cut

00:39:45.600 deaths

00:39:46.180 by

00:39:46.440 10 to

00:39:46.840 20%

00:39:47.520 well you

00:39:48.500 would

00:39:48.680 certainly

00:39:48.940 do

00:39:49.200 that

00:39:49.580 and you

00:39:50.440 would

00:39:50.580 work

00:39:50.840 pretty

00:39:51.100 hard

00:39:51.380 and you

00:39:51.660 would

00:39:51.800 take

00:39:52.020 quite

00:39:52.400 a

00:39:52.540 sacrifice

00:39:53.100 in

00:39:53.980 order

00:39:54.200 to

00:39:54.400 cut

00:39:54.580 deaths

00:39:54.880 10 to

00:39:55.300 20%

00:39:55.880 and I

00:39:57.520 don't

00:39:57.640 know

00:39:57.760 if

00:39:57.880 10 to

00:39:58.160 20%

00:39:58.700 would

00:39:58.900 show

00:39:59.100 up

00:39:59.260 on

00:39:59.360 a

00:39:59.460 graph

00:39:59.700 or

00:39:59.820 not

00:40:00.120 because

00:40:00.500 there's

00:40:00.720 some

00:40:00.900 delay

00:40:01.320 and

00:40:01.600 there's

00:40:01.780 lots

00:40:02.020 of

00:40:02.140 other

00:40:06.060 in

00:40:06.220 that

00:40:06.440 range

00:40:07.160 totally

00:40:08.840 worth

00:40:09.160 wearing

00:40:09.420 the

00:40:09.600 masks

00:40:10.020 I

00:40:10.300 recommend

00:40:10.680 it

00:40:10.940 if

00:40:11.120 you

00:40:11.260 can

00:40:11.480 all

00:40:12.440 right

00:40:12.660 that

00:40:15.320 is

00:40:16.760 just

00:40:16.980 about

00:40:17.220 all

00:40:17.380 I

00:40:17.500 had

00:40:17.640 to

00:40:17.760 say

00:40:17.880 today

00:40:18.240 I

00:40:19.320 hear

00:40:19.660 that

00:40:20.280 there

00:40:20.500 is

00:40:20.720 more

00:40:21.000 to

00:40:21.180 come

00:40:21.320 out

00:40:21.580 on

00:40:21.840 the

00:40:21.980 hunter

00:40:22.340 laptop

00:40:23.040 there's

00:40:24.340 you

00:40:24.640 heard

00:40:24.840 the

00:40:25.020 story

00:40:25.320 about

00:40:25.640 some

00:40:26.040 underage

00:40:27.200 underage

00:40:28.900 women 1.00

00:40:29.280 women 1.00

00:40:30.800 they're

00:40:31.860 not

00:40:32.240 women 1.00

00:40:32.540 if

00:40:32.720 they're

00:40:32.880 underage

00:40:33.380 underage

00:40:34.280 females 0.96

00:40:36.220 I

00:40:37.740 don't

00:40:37.880 know

00:40:38.020 if

00:40:38.200 girls 0.98

00:40:38.760 is

00:40:39.000 the

00:40:39.120 right

00:40:39.400 reference

00:40:40.660 in

00:40:40.880 this

00:40:41.040 case

00:40:41.320 but

00:40:42.060 there's

00:40:42.300 some

00:40:42.480 underage

00:40:42.960 females 0.96

00:40:43.400 on

00:40:43.820 Biden's

00:40:44.540 laptop

00:40:44.840 and

00:40:45.160 now

00:40:45.340 we

00:40:45.520 know

00:40:45.720 that

00:40:46.040 one

00:40:46.480 of

00:40:46.600 them

00:40:46.800 is

00:40:47.140 his

00:40:47.400 niece

00:40:47.840 14

00:40:49.100 year

00:40:49.360 old

00:40:49.540 niece

00:40:49.880 and

00:40:51.440 I'm

00:40:52.900 going

00:40:53.060 to

00:40:53.180 say

00:40:53.400 without

00:40:53.680 seeing

00:40:54.200 the

00:40:54.400 photos

00:40:54.760 that

00:40:56.180 they

00:40:56.340 might

00:40:56.660 sort

00:40:57.240 of

00:40:57.380 look

00:40:57.600 sketchy

00:40:58.200 because

00:40:58.680 photos

00:40:59.920 can

00:41:00.120 look

00:41:00.320 sketchy

00:41:00.820 but

00:41:01.740 I'll

00:41:02.160 bet

00:41:02.340 there's

00:41:02.600 nothing

00:41:02.900 there

00:41:03.300 I'll

00:41:04.460 bet

00:41:04.620 the

00:41:04.840 whole

00:41:05.180 14

00:41:06.300 year

00:41:06.500 old

00:41:06.660 niece

00:41:06.960 thing

00:41:07.280 that's

00:41:07.660 probably

00:41:07.920 not

00:41:08.160 real

00:41:08.480 if I

00:41:09.240 had

00:41:09.340 to

00:41:09.480 guess

00:41:09.820 I

00:41:10.380 could

00:41:10.540 be

00:41:10.700 wrong

00:41:10.980 I

00:41:11.220 mean

00:41:11.440 anything's

00:41:12.400 possible

00:41:12.780 but

00:41:13.800 I'm

00:41:14.340 feeling

00:41:14.540 that's

00:41:14.880 not

00:41:15.080 real

00:41:15.320 and

00:41:16.220 I

00:41:17.100 would

00:41:17.280 be

00:41:17.520 surprised

00:41:18.480 if

00:41:20.000 the

00:41:20.180 other

00:41:20.460 stuff

00:41:20.780 is

00:41:20.960 real

00:41:21.240 just

00:41:21.660 because

00:41:22.220 why

00:41:23.040 would

00:41:23.200 that

00:41:23.360 be

00:41:23.480 on

00:41:23.620 a

00:41:23.740 laptop

00:41:24.260 is

00:41:26.080 there

00:41:26.220 anybody

00:41:26.500 who

00:41:26.740 keeps

00:41:26.980 that

00:41:27.240 kind

00:41:27.520 of

00:41:27.640 stuff

00:41:27.900 on

00:41:28.100 their

00:41:28.260 laptop

00:41:28.660 and

00:41:29.580 then

00:41:29.760 takes

00:41:30.040 the

00:41:30.260 laptop

00:41:30.600 and

00:41:31.000 drops

00:41:31.280 it

00:41:31.420 off

00:41:33.300 if

00:41:33.880 you

00:41:34.040 know

00:41:34.320 you

00:41:34.480 have

00:41:34.660 that

00:41:34.840 kind

00:41:35.080 of

00:41:35.180 content

00:41:35.560 on

00:41:35.900 it

00:41:36.100 so

00:41:36.740 here's

00:41:37.020 my

00:41:37.200 guess

00:41:37.620 my

00:41:38.560 guess

00:41:38.900 is

00:41:39.320 that

00:41:40.640 Hunter

00:41:41.720 Biden

00:41:42.120 does

00:41:43.180 not

00:41:43.480 believe

00:41:43.820 those

00:41:44.100 pictures

00:41:44.520 are

00:41:44.980 some

00:41:45.220 kind

00:41:45.480 of

00:41:45.680 problem

00:41:46.380 that

00:41:47.620 he

00:41:47.820 might

00:41:48.040 know

00:41:48.200 the

00:41:48.400 context

00:41:48.900 to

00:41:49.160 them

00:41:49.460 he

00:41:50.020 might

00:41:50.220 know

00:41:50.400 his

00:41:50.560 own

00:41:50.740 thinking

00:41:51.140 he

00:41:51.540 might

00:41:51.720 know

00:41:51.900 the

00:41:52.080 situation

00:41:52.580 in

00:41:52.820 which

00:41:53.000 they

00:41:53.160 were

00:41:53.280 taken

00:41:53.580 he

00:41:54.260 might

00:41:54.480 know

00:41:54.680 why

00:41:54.880 they're

00:41:55.020 on

00:41:55.140 the

00:41:55.300 laptop

00:41:55.600 and

00:41:56.420 maybe

00:41:56.680 in

00:41:56.860 his

00:41:57.020 own

00:41:57.220 mind

00:41:57.560 there's

00:41:58.120 nothing

00:41:58.720 wrong

00:41:59.040 with

00:42:03.300 so

00:42:03.580 I've

00:42:03.720 got

00:42:03.860 a

00:42:04.000 feeling

00:42:04.240 it's

00:42:04.520 the

00:42:04.660 sort

00:42:04.840 of

00:42:04.960 thing

00:42:05.140 where

00:42:05.340 different

00:42:05.640 people

00:42:05.940 are

00:42:06.100 going

00:42:06.220 to

00:42:06.320 interpret

00:42:06.640 them

00:42:06.920 differently

00:42:07.340 now

00:42:08.120 if

00:42:08.380 it

00:42:08.520 turns

00:42:08.760 out

00:42:09.200 that

00:42:10.340 it's

00:42:11.200 the

00:42:11.360 worst

00:42:11.640 case

00:42:12.080 then

00:42:12.940 I

00:42:13.120 would

00:42:13.300 have

00:42:13.420 expected

00:42:13.980 more

00:42:14.680 of

00:42:14.900 a

00:42:15.060 response

00:42:15.640 from

00:42:16.360 the

00:42:16.560 people

00:42:16.820 who

00:42:17.020 have

00:42:17.180 seen

00:42:17.420 them

00:42:17.700 right

00:42:18.880 because

00:42:19.760 remember

00:42:20.140 a number

00:42:20.560 of

00:42:20.720 people

00:42:20.920 have

00:42:21.120 seen

00:42:21.320 them

00:42:21.500 now

00:42:21.760 if

00:42:22.700 you

00:42:22.840 look

00:42:23.040 at

00:42:23.160 their

00:42:23.320 responses

00:42:23.880 there

00:42:24.260 was

00:42:24.520 Giuliani

00:42:26.320 turned

00:42:26.700 it

00:42:26.860 over

00:42:27.020 to

00:42:27.220 the

00:42:27.360 FBI

00:42:27.700 which

00:42:28.140 was

00:42:28.420 absolutely

00:42:29.600 the

00:42:29.940 right

00:42:30.140 thing

00:42:30.320 to

00:42:30.480 do

00:42:30.680 so

00:42:32.140 if

00:42:32.340 you're

00:42:32.500 Giuliani

00:42:33.020 and

00:42:33.480 you're

00:42:33.820 steeped

00:42:34.700 in the

00:42:34.940 legal

00:42:35.220 system

00:42:35.660 and

00:42:36.020 you're

00:42:36.240 smart

00:42:36.660 and

00:42:36.900 you

00:42:37.840 understand

00:42:38.960 how

00:42:39.220 the

00:42:39.340 world

00:42:39.560 works

00:42:40.000 it

00:42:40.600 was

00:42:40.720 exactly

00:42:41.280 the

00:42:41.540 right

00:42:41.700 thing

00:42:41.900 to

00:42:42.040 do

00:42:42.260 but

00:42:43.040 that's

00:42:43.280 different

00:42:43.760 from

00:42:44.100 saying

00:42:44.600 that

00:42:45.520 they

00:42:45.660 were

00:42:45.820 necessarily

00:42:46.500 illegal

00:42:47.160 or

00:42:47.540 necessarily

00:42:48.220 showing

00:42:49.220 something

00:42:49.640 that

00:42:49.900 was

00:42:50.260 bad

00:42:51.220 somebody

00:42:52.280 says

00:42:52.640 you'd

00:42:52.880 be

00:42:53.000 surprised

00:42:53.600 and

00:42:54.100 a

00:42:55.320 crack

00:42:55.760 ad

00:42:56.080 crack

00:42:57.500 ads

00:42:58.220 will

00:42:58.480 in

00:42:59.860 the

00:43:00.000 comments

00:43:00.380 I'm

00:43:00.580 seeing

00:43:00.820 you

00:43:01.020 saying

00:43:01.240 that

00:43:01.460 if

00:43:01.760 he

00:43:01.860 was

00:43:02.000 a

00:43:02.120 crack

00:43:02.380 ad

00:43:02.660 that

00:43:03.460 could

00:43:03.640 explain

00:43:04.080 it

00:43:04.240 all

00:43:04.440 and

00:43:04.680 I

00:43:04.780 would

00:43:04.880 agree

00:43:05.080 with

00:43:05.240 you

00:43:05.360 I

00:43:06.020 would

00:43:06.160 agree

00:43:06.380 that

00:43:06.580 there's

00:43:06.800 some

00:43:06.980 amount

00:43:07.220 of

00:43:07.360 drug

00:43:07.600 use

00:43:07.960 that

00:43:08.700 would

00:43:08.820 make

00:43:09.080 anything

00:43:09.480 happen

00:43:09.880 but

00:43:10.760 I

00:43:10.900 still

00:43:11.100 don't

00:43:11.320 see

00:43:11.520 him

00:43:11.640 keeping

00:43:11.920 it

00:43:12.120 on

00:43:12.260 his

00:43:12.420 laptop

00:43:12.800 if

00:43:13.320 he

00:43:13.560 thought

00:43:13.860 they

00:43:14.060 were

00:43:14.220 inappropriate

00:43:14.660 so

00:43:15.700 I

00:43:15.840 think

00:43:16.000 there's

00:43:16.220 going

00:43:16.360 to

00:43:16.400 be

00:43:16.620 an

00:43:16.980 interpretation

00:43:17.640 thing

00:43:18.140 now

00:43:18.720 let

00:43:18.920 me

00:43:19.020 finish

00:43:19.260 the

00:43:19.480 thought

00:43:19.740 other

00:43:20.500 people

00:43:20.840 besides

00:43:21.420 Giuliani

00:43:22.140 have

00:43:22.520 now

00:43:22.740 seen

00:43:23.040 those

00:43:23.280 pictures

00:43:23.680 and

00:43:26.100 the

00:43:26.360 people

00:43:26.620 who've

00:43:26.800 seen

00:43:26.940 the

00:43:27.080 pictures

00:43:27.460 sort

00:43:28.760 of

00:43:28.880 have

00:43:29.040 a

00:43:29.200 smile

00:43:29.600 on

00:43:29.840 their

00:43:30.000 face

00:43:30.480 and

00:43:31.500 tell

00:43:31.680 you

00:43:31.920 that

00:43:32.200 oh

00:43:32.480 these

00:43:32.760 are

00:43:32.920 really

00:43:33.140 bad

00:43:33.580 right

00:43:34.720 is

00:43:36.540 that

00:43:36.720 the

00:43:36.880 way

00:43:37.040 you

00:43:37.260 act

00:43:37.760 if

00:43:38.680 those

00:43:38.980 are

00:43:39.160 really

00:43:39.560 you

00:43:40.780 know

00:43:41.000 some

00:43:41.700 kind

00:43:41.960 of

00:43:42.140 underage

00:43:43.420 problem

00:43:43.940 not

00:43:44.780 really

00:43:45.340 the

00:43:46.160 people

00:43:46.580 the

00:43:46.860 reaction

00:43:47.520 of the

00:43:47.860 people

00:43:48.100 who've

00:43:48.340 seen

00:43:48.600 the

00:43:48.820 pictures

00:43:49.160 is

00:43:50.260 closer

00:43:50.820 to

00:43:51.260 a

00:43:51.540 Jeffrey

00:43:52.020 Toobin

00:43:52.620 kind

00:43:52.920 of

00:43:53.020 reaction

00:43:53.500 that

00:43:54.560 it's

00:43:54.740 all

00:43:54.880 part

00:43:55.160 of

00:43:55.320 what

00:43:55.560 makes

00:43:55.840 the

00:43:56.040 story

00:43:56.380 interesting

00:43:56.920 what

00:43:57.980 you're

00:43:58.180 not

00:43:58.460 seeing

00:43:58.860 is

00:43:59.680 the

00:43:59.840 people

00:44:00.120 who

00:44:00.320 have

00:44:00.460 seen

00:44:00.740 the

00:44:01.020 photos

00:44:01.420 that

00:44:01.580 you

00:44:01.680 haven't

00:44:01.900 seen

00:44:02.120 yet

00:44:02.400 saying

00:44:03.260 oh

00:44:03.700 my

00:44:03.940 god

00:44:04.400 he

00:44:05.400 has

00:44:05.620 to

00:44:05.740 be

00:44:05.880 in

00:44:06.060 jail

00:44:06.280 right

00:44:06.540 away

00:44:06.800 and

00:44:08.180 that's

00:44:08.460 what

00:44:08.620 you

00:44:08.780 would

00:44:08.900 expect

00:44:09.420 if

00:44:09.660 those

00:44:09.900 pictures

00:44:10.260 were

00:44:10.620 unambiguous

00:44:11.420 meaning

00:44:12.380 anybody

00:44:12.840 who

00:44:13.000 looked

00:44:13.160 at

00:44:13.320 them

00:44:13.440 would

00:44:13.560 say

00:44:13.700 ah

00:44:14.060 my

00:44:14.780 god

00:44:15.020 there's

00:44:15.280 a

00:44:15.400 crime

00:44:15.660 here

00:44:15.940 then

00:44:16.840 the

00:44:17.020 people

00:44:17.240 who

00:44:17.380 have

00:44:17.440 seen

00:44:17.660 them

00:44:17.800 would

00:44:18.040 be

00:44:18.220 acting

00:44:18.580 like

00:44:18.880 that

00:44:19.340 but

00:44:20.400 instead

00:44:20.760 they're

00:44:21.120 acting

00:44:21.400 like

00:44:21.660 it's

00:44:21.860 just

00:44:22.040 part

00:44:22.260 of

00:44:22.360 the

00:44:22.500 story

00:44:22.960 which

00:44:24.200 is

00:44:24.320 not

00:44:24.500 really

00:44:24.740 the

00:44:24.940 reaction

00:44:25.680 if

00:44:26.340 you

00:44:26.520 knew

00:44:27.160 that

00:44:27.380 those

00:44:27.600 were

00:44:27.760 criminal

00:44:28.140 so

00:44:28.780 it's

00:44:29.000 not

00:44:29.140 my

00:44:29.320 job

00:44:29.560 to

00:44:29.760 defend

00:44:30.220 hunter

00:44:30.640 biden

00:44:30.980 i'm

00:44:31.220 just

00:44:31.360 giving

00:44:31.580 you

00:44:31.740 a

00:44:31.840 heads

00:44:32.020 up

00:44:32.280 about

00:44:33.120 what

00:44:33.440 to

00:44:33.760 believe

00:44:34.240 and

00:44:34.580 what

00:44:34.760 not

00:44:35.020 to

00:44:35.320 and

00:44:36.580 they

00:44:36.980 could

00:44:37.240 be

00:44:37.460 inappropriate

00:44:37.980 i'm

00:44:39.560 sure

00:44:39.820 that

00:44:40.040 they're

00:44:40.240 going

00:44:40.380 to

00:44:40.500 raise

00:44:40.820 your

00:44:41.000 eyebrow

00:44:41.320 at

00:44:41.560 the

00:44:41.660 very

00:44:41.880 least

00:44:42.340 but

00:44:43.380 are

00:44:43.660 they

00:44:43.820 fully

00:44:44.180 illegal

00:44:44.720 are

00:44:45.060 they

00:44:45.320 indications

00:44:45.940 of

00:44:46.440 underage

00:44:47.880 criminal

00:44:49.000 behavior

00:44:49.620 maybe

00:44:51.420 maybe

00:44:52.920 all

00:44:54.220 right

00:44:54.440 a

00:44:58.220 word

00:44:58.480 about

00:44:58.760 my

00:44:59.180 weird

00:45:00.260 Trey

00:45:01.480 Gowdy

00:45:01.940 hair

00:45:02.960 situation

00:45:03.560 i've

00:45:05.580 told you

00:45:05.860 before

00:45:06.140 that

00:45:06.440 Christina

00:45:07.240 cuts

00:45:07.720 my

00:45:07.960 hair

00:45:08.280 not

00:45:09.200 because

00:45:09.500 it's

00:45:09.740 the

00:45:09.880 only

00:45:10.020 way

00:45:10.220 to

00:45:10.340 cut

00:45:10.480 hair

00:45:10.720 but

00:45:10.940 because

00:45:11.520 if

00:45:12.360 she

00:45:12.520 offered

00:45:12.760 to

00:45:12.940 cut

00:45:13.080 your

00:45:13.300 hair

00:45:13.520 you'd

00:45:13.800 say

00:45:13.960 yes

00:45:14.260 to

00:45:14.460 let's

00:45:14.800 put

00:45:14.960 it

00:45:15.060 that

00:45:15.220 way

00:45:15.520 because

00:45:16.820 it's

00:45:16.980 way

00:45:17.160 more

00:45:17.360 fun

00:45:17.620 that

00:45:17.820 way

00:45:18.040 and

00:45:19.980 i

00:45:20.080 don't

00:45:20.180 think

00:45:20.360 there's

00:45:20.580 i

00:45:21.520 don't

00:45:21.640 think

00:45:21.800 there's

00:45:22.000 anything

00:45:22.280 quite

00:45:22.700 that's

00:45:24.480 quite

00:45:24.820 feels

00:45:25.440 as

00:45:25.700 good

00:45:26.060 as

00:45:27.380 having

00:45:27.660 a

00:45:27.900 woman 0.99

00:45:28.160 you

00:45:28.400 love

00:45:28.680 cut

00:45:28.940 your

00:45:29.100 hair

00:45:29.380 i

00:45:30.760 don't

00:45:30.880 know

00:45:31.020 it's

00:45:31.180 just

00:45:31.300 a

00:45:31.480 wonderful

00:45:31.860 experience

00:45:32.580 to

00:45:32.800 me

00:45:32.960 so

00:45:33.680 i'm

00:45:33.820 saving

00:45:34.200 it

00:45:34.500 i could

00:45:35.240 get

00:45:35.400 it

00:45:35.540 i could

00:45:36.060 do it

00:45:36.280 myself

00:45:36.660 pretty

00:45:37.180 easily

00:45:37.460 but

00:45:38.400 but

00:45:39.460 christina

00:45:40.060 took

00:45:41.120 a

00:45:41.400 her

00:45:41.800 first

00:45:42.260 long

00:45:43.260 flight

00:45:44.060 as a

00:45:44.940 pilot

00:45:45.200 so

00:45:45.980 she's

00:45:46.240 learning

00:45:46.480 to be

00:45:46.720 a

00:45:46.840 pilot

00:45:47.100 and

00:45:48.320 part

00:45:48.660 of

00:45:48.760 that

00:45:48.900 process

00:45:49.280 is

00:45:49.780 you

00:45:49.960 get

00:45:50.120 to

00:45:50.240 the

00:45:50.360 point

00:45:50.560 where

00:45:50.740 you

00:45:50.880 take

00:45:51.120 your

00:45:51.300 first

00:45:51.720 long

00:45:52.460 range

00:45:52.780 flight

00:45:53.180 by

00:45:53.540 yourself

00:45:54.020 that

00:45:55.080 happened

00:45:55.380 this

00:45:55.640 week

00:45:55.960 but

00:45:57.080 she

00:45:57.440 has

00:45:57.620 some

00:45:57.780 bad

00:45:58.020 weather

00:45:58.340 in

00:45:58.720 another

00:45:59.040 state

00:45:59.460 and

00:46:00.680 because

00:46:01.220 of

00:46:01.460 low

00:46:02.280 clouds

00:46:02.720 and

00:46:02.900 high

00:46:03.240 mountains

00:46:03.740 she

00:46:05.000 had

00:46:05.200 to

00:46:05.440 wait

00:46:06.240 a

00:46:06.400 little

00:46:06.500 bit

00:46:06.720 so

00:46:07.080 she

00:46:07.240 isn't

00:46:07.500 back

00:46:07.900 yet

00:46:08.140 but

00:46:08.500 everything

00:46:08.880 is

00:46:09.040 going

00:46:09.260 well

00:46:09.560 her

00:46:10.580 first

00:46:11.440 flight

00:46:11.760 is

00:46:12.200 all

00:46:12.760 good

00:46:13.040 and

00:46:14.060 she

00:46:14.280 should

00:46:14.560 be

00:46:14.740 back

00:46:15.060 by

00:46:15.380 tonight

00:46:15.820 and

00:46:19.040 you'll

00:46:20.140 know

00:46:20.320 she's

00:46:20.620 back

00:46:21.020 when

00:46:21.480 you

00:46:21.600 see

00:46:22.720 my

00:46:22.960 haircut

00:46:24.180 all

00:46:25.380 right

00:46:25.600 that's

00:46:26.200 all

00:46:26.300 for

00:46:26.420 now

00:46:26.740 somebody

00:46:28.180 says

00:46:28.480 in

00:46:28.640 the

00:46:28.860 comments

00:46:29.240 that

00:46:29.560 Giuliani

00:46:30.260 thinks

00:46:30.820 they

00:46:31.100 are

00:46:31.280 criminal

00:46:31.780 he

00:46:32.880 might

00:46:33.060 be

00:46:33.180 right

00:46:33.440 he

00:46:34.540 might

00:46:34.700 be

00:46:34.820 right

00:46:35.060 I

00:46:36.280 won't

00:46:36.520 rule

00:46:36.740 it

00:46:36.880 out

00:46:37.140 you

00:46:37.500 know

00:46:37.660 if

00:46:37.980 it's

00:46:38.680 up

00:46:38.840 to

00:46:38.980 me

00:46:39.300 who

00:46:40.120 haven't

00:46:40.540 seen

00:46:40.740 the

00:46:40.900 pictures

00:46:41.220 or

00:46:41.720 Giuliani

00:46:42.360 who

00:46:42.640 has

00:46:42.900 seen

00:46:43.080 the

00:46:43.220 pictures

00:46:43.520 and

00:46:44.040 knows

00:46:44.560 the

00:46:44.760 law

00:46:45.040 I'd

00:46:46.260 probably

00:46:46.540 trust

00:46:47.020 Giuliani

00:46:47.540 over

00:46:47.920 me

00:46:48.220 especially

00:46:49.300 since

00:46:49.660 I

00:46:49.780 haven't

00:46:50.000 seen

00:46:50.180 them

00:46:50.400 all

00:46:51.240 right

00:46:51.300 that's

00:46:51.520 all

00:46:51.660 for

00:46:51.760 now

00:46:52.020 and

00:46:52.740 I'll

00:46:52.920 talk

00:46:53.180 to

00:46:53.340 you

00:46:53.560 later

00:46:59.240 to

00:47:01.800 You

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 24, 2020

Episode 1164 Scott Adams： Coyotes to Protect the Border, Black Support for President Trump, Mask Science

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript