Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1634 Scott Adams： The Day We Found Out Our Government Lied About 100% of Everything

00:00:00.000 Welcome to the highlight of your whole damn life.

00:00:03.640 Yes, everything from the moment of your conception

00:00:06.200 has been pointing at this moment.

00:00:09.520 Good luck. You made it.

00:00:11.880 You made it all the way from that spunky little sperm

00:00:16.980 that made it to the egg.

00:00:19.540 And from there, an unbroken chain of cause and effect

00:00:23.540 brought you to me.

00:00:25.820 Well, it's about time.

00:00:26.940 And how would you like to take it up another notch?

00:00:33.880 Of course. Of course you would.

00:00:35.440 All you need is a cupper mugger, a glass of tanker,

00:00:38.520 a chalice of stein, a canteen jug, a flask,

00:00:40.040 a vessel of any kind.

00:00:41.080 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:43.040 I like coffee.

00:00:45.320 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:48.500 the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:50.160 It's the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:52.520 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:54.780 And watch it do its work now. Go.

00:00:56.940 Oh, yeah.

00:01:02.520 Oh.

00:01:03.900 Mm.

00:01:07.540 All right.

00:01:08.340 The most important story of the day is a follow-up.

00:01:11.580 You heard the story a few days ago.

00:01:13.620 A hundred monkeys were in a truck on the way to a lab in Pennsylvania.

00:01:18.720 And there was a traffic mishap of some kind.

00:01:21.440 And some monkeys escaped.

00:01:24.940 Some monkeys escaped.

00:01:26.100 But we have good news about the monkeys.

00:01:28.320 They have all been identified.

00:01:30.780 So we know where all the monkeys are.

00:01:33.280 Now, they haven't all been collected up,

00:01:35.340 because it turns out that several of the monkeys

00:01:37.100 were able to integrate into society and take jobs.

00:01:41.620 So in case you're wondering what kind of jobs the monkeys got,

00:01:46.880 three of them are fact-checkers for Facebook.

00:01:49.180 Two of them are in charge of emergency use authorizations for COVID.

00:01:54.380 And one of them is Joe Biden's speechwriter,

00:01:57.300 specifically for his open mic comments.

00:02:00.960 They already had a speechwriter for his regular speeches.

00:02:03.800 But they needed someone for the open mic situations.

00:02:07.000 So one of those monkeys filled in.

00:02:09.240 And I don't know if you heard, but that monkey is killing it.

00:02:12.880 That monkey is really doing a good job.

00:02:17.760 For example, you may know that yesterday,

00:02:22.240 Peter, was it Peter?

00:02:24.400 Yeah, Peter Doocy.

00:02:26.400 Asked a question of Joe Biden at an event,

00:02:29.440 an event, I don't know, a press conference or something.

00:02:32.300 And Doocy yelled as people were filing out.

00:02:35.600 He said, Mr. President, I'm paraphrasing,

00:02:40.180 do you think that inflation will be a political liability

00:02:43.740 going into the midterms?

00:02:46.460 Biden, thinking that his microphone might have been off,

00:02:49.820 or maybe he didn't.

00:02:51.420 Maybe he thought it was on.

00:02:52.620 Who knows?

00:02:54.240 Muttered under his breath without moving his lips,

00:02:57.740 kind of like a ventriloquist.

00:03:00.840 Yeah, inflation's an asset.

00:03:04.240 Stupid son of a bitch.

00:03:05.680 Now, I suppose I'm supposed to be all offended or something

00:03:14.400 about his terrible choice of language.

00:03:18.160 I don't find anything that I don't like about this story.

00:03:21.580 If ever there were a story where every bit of it was good,

00:03:26.260 from the left, from the right, like every part of it.

00:03:29.060 I've never seen a story that I like all of it.

00:03:32.420 All right?

00:03:33.160 And there's more to it.

00:03:34.260 So, number one, was it a dumb question?

00:03:39.720 Yes.

00:03:41.060 Yes.

00:03:41.700 Because nobody thinks that inflation is going to be a positive.

00:03:44.760 But, of course, the point of asking questions to the president

00:03:47.700 is not that you don't know the answer, right?

00:03:51.060 That's not why you ask the question.

00:03:52.800 You ask the question to make him, you know, expand on it,

00:03:57.040 to get him on record for something.

00:03:59.260 So it's not so much that you need the information.

00:04:01.420 It's not like Peter Doocy was thinking,

00:04:04.320 oh, I wonder if inflation is a good thing.

00:04:06.440 No.

00:04:07.360 He was just trying to get him on record.

00:04:09.140 But you can see that Biden's irritation with that kind of question,

00:04:14.340 completely understandable.

00:04:15.360 My impression of Biden, I have to tell you, went up.

00:04:21.580 It went up.

00:04:22.780 I'm not going to be the guy who says I liked it when Trump was offensive sounding.

00:04:28.660 And I don't like who Biden is.

00:04:30.400 I liked it both.

00:04:31.380 I like this version of Biden.

00:04:35.240 And I would love to find out that he knew that the microphone was on.

00:04:39.140 Wouldn't that be the best?

00:04:41.080 You find out later, oh, yeah, he knew it was on.

00:04:42.960 He planned this all along.

00:04:44.640 That would have been just kind of awesome, I think.

00:04:46.680 I don't think that's the case.

00:04:48.480 Yeah, I don't think that's the case.

00:04:50.560 But then you wonder, how do people handle criticisms like this

00:04:54.100 from the president of the United States?

00:04:55.720 Well, Peter Doocy went on The Five yesterday.

00:04:58.980 He was talking to Jesse Waters.

00:05:02.020 And when asked about it, Peter Doocy,

00:05:04.640 when asked about being called a stupid son of a bitch,

00:05:07.820 Peter Doocy smiled and said,

00:05:10.500 well, nobody's fact-checked it and said it wasn't true.

00:05:15.620 That, my friends, is a triple plus handling of a situation.

00:05:22.500 Now, the fact that his smile when he said it

00:05:25.620 looked genuine, it didn't look so much like,

00:05:29.160 well, maybe he had practiced the line, I don't know.

00:05:32.420 But it didn't look like he felt like he was in any kind of stress.

00:05:37.980 Am I right?

00:05:39.300 He looked like he had a good day.

00:05:41.500 Because I think he did.

00:05:43.580 Honestly, if a president called me a stupid son of a bitch

00:05:46.520 in front of the world and it trended,

00:05:48.540 that would be a good day.

00:05:50.860 Am I right?

00:05:51.380 Is there anybody who would disagree with that?

00:05:53.920 If the president of the United States called you out specifically,

00:05:58.380 and remember, he was insulting the question, really.

00:06:01.680 Right?

00:06:02.240 And the question isn't really supposed to be a real question in the first place.

00:06:06.800 So, yeah, we like Biden 5% better this morning because of that.

00:06:15.640 And I think Peter Doocy came out looking good, too.

00:06:18.380 So, everybody won.

00:06:22.220 Yeah, you hardly ever get a story where everybody wins.

00:06:24.660 But everybody won this time.

00:06:25.900 We got entertained and nobody got hurt.

00:06:28.260 So, good job, everybody.

00:06:29.300 Speaking of how to handle criticism,

00:06:33.760 we got this suggestion from a Twitter user called Danoyaz.

00:06:39.300 And Danoyaz suggests that Biden should get a new dog and name it Brandon.

00:06:43.880 But, to expand on that idea,

00:06:48.760 Adam Dopamine on Twitter gave us this visualization.

00:06:54.140 Picture it.

00:06:55.760 Boarding Marine One, Biden turns around, whistles and shouts,

00:07:00.280 Let's go, Brandon!

00:07:01.820 A black lab with a red bandana sprints down from the White House and into the chopper.

00:07:07.740 Politics aside, that level of trolling would be epic.

00:07:11.120 Poll numbers up 7% overnight.

00:07:12.980 All right.

00:07:14.660 Yep.

00:07:16.720 Yep.

00:07:17.820 Right on target.

00:07:20.140 If Biden got a dog and named it Brandon and said,

00:07:24.420 Let's go, Brandon, every time you sell the dog,

00:07:26.540 it would totally be funny.

00:07:29.420 And it would totally diffuse that whole situation.

00:07:33.220 It would be absolutely the right thing to do.

00:07:35.200 As long as you wanted a dog.

00:07:37.120 You know, you don't want him to get a dog just for the political part of it.

00:07:40.720 But, if you like the dog, that would be good news.

00:07:43.980 Well, Kirsten, Sinema in Arizona, Senator, is in a little bit of trouble.

00:07:49.380 There's a group called Voto Latino, at least on Twitter.

00:07:54.000 Apparently, it's a real group.

00:07:54.920 And they're doing a Remove Senator Sinema campaign.

00:08:00.100 So, they're launching the hashtag Adios Sinema campaign,

00:08:05.240 committed to getting rid of her and for blocking voting rights.

00:08:10.320 Now, here's my question to you.

00:08:13.700 Isn't this foreign interference in our elections?

00:08:17.900 Am I wrong?

00:08:19.460 Now, I'm not saying that the group doing it, Voto Latino,

00:08:23.320 I'm not saying that they're not American,

00:08:25.400 because they probably are.

00:08:26.400 I mean, they're highly visible.

00:08:28.280 They're doing this.

00:08:29.060 I assume it's Americans.

00:08:30.540 But, who are they doing it for?

00:08:32.780 Am I reading too much between the lines?

00:08:38.160 Aren't they doing it for the benefit of non-citizens?

00:08:42.900 Isn't that really sort of the point of it?

00:08:45.120 Or am I missing the point?

00:08:47.100 Yeah, I mean, I don't know that they express it that way.

00:08:50.400 You know, they would act like they're helping the Latino,

00:08:53.560 or as they say, Latinx population.

00:08:56.780 But, really, aren't those voting rights really sort of aimed

00:09:01.880 at allowing people who are not citizens

00:09:05.000 at least some access to voting?

00:09:08.340 It feels like that's, you know, not the stated purpose,

00:09:11.780 but it seems like that's the purpose.

00:09:14.020 So, but quite seriously, am I wrong

00:09:16.480 that this looks like foreign interference?

00:09:18.660 Because this would be empowering people who are non-citizens

00:09:21.640 to vote in our election.

00:09:23.900 How is this legal?

00:09:25.000 I'm actually curious.

00:09:30.000 Well, under the category of everything you used to think

00:09:32.800 is right is wrong,

00:09:34.440 which will, I think, eventually apply to literally everything.

00:09:38.040 You know, literally everything you thought was right is wrong.

00:09:41.020 How many of you thought that Israel was having

00:09:43.240 a giant spike in infections,

00:09:46.380 even though everybody is vaccinated?

00:09:49.280 How many think that's true?

00:09:50.940 Giant spike in infections,

00:09:52.660 even though maybe the highest vaccination rate?

00:09:57.320 How many think that's actually happening?

00:10:01.300 I see yeses, I see noes, I see trues.

00:10:04.880 I mean, it's wildly believed to be true, right?

00:10:07.420 Have you seen the graph?

00:10:09.140 I mean, the graph is just the hockey stick.

00:10:12.460 The infections on the graph,

00:10:14.940 the data under Israel would show

00:10:17.400 that the number of infections

00:10:18.620 that just went through the roof

00:10:19.960 while at the same time they're highly vaccinated.

00:10:22.900 Give me a fact check.

00:10:24.100 True or false,

00:10:25.920 Israel has one of the highest vaccination rates,

00:10:28.840 if not the highest,

00:10:30.080 and they also have a giant surge in infection rate.

00:10:33.880 True?

00:10:34.780 True.

00:10:35.060 Okay, here's something else that's true.

00:10:38.440 At the same time they had that giant increase in infections,

00:10:42.160 it's perfectly correlated

00:10:44.140 when they massively increased testing.

00:10:48.240 True or false?

00:10:50.340 That the massive increase in infections,

00:10:53.600 coincidentally,

00:10:55.160 matched the massive increase in new testing.

00:10:59.520 True.

00:11:00.040 True, I think.

00:11:02.320 I mean, that's an item from the news today,

00:11:06.240 so there's a fact check on that,

00:11:08.240 saying that it just corresponded with more testing,

00:11:11.020 so that basically that's all we know.

00:11:13.220 There was more testing.

00:11:15.160 So put that in the category

00:11:16.480 of everything you think is clear and obvious and true,

00:11:19.720 that's probably wrong.

00:11:21.420 Probably wrong.

00:11:24.940 And maybe home testing, somebody says.

00:11:26.860 Yeah, that might be part of it.

00:11:27.860 All right, let's talk about the rogue doctors.

00:11:32.800 Dr. McCullough making some claims.

00:11:36.280 I'm not even going to mention them,

00:11:38.160 but they would be, you know,

00:11:39.800 let's say non-standard claims about vaccinations

00:11:42.560 and the pandemic.

00:11:45.140 It doesn't even matter what his claim is.

00:11:47.240 Do you think that people who are credible

00:11:49.040 debunked all of his claims within minutes

00:11:51.200 of them hitting Twitter?

00:11:53.120 Yes, they did.

00:11:54.100 Can I tell if the debunks are more credible

00:11:59.800 than what the doctor said?

00:12:02.520 No, I can't.

00:12:05.200 So all I know is that he said some things

00:12:09.440 that sounded pretty convincing,

00:12:11.240 and all I know is that the people who debunked it

00:12:13.720 also sounded pretty convincing.

00:12:16.000 They also did.

00:12:16.840 So I'm going to say, I don't know.

00:12:20.840 I don't know.

00:12:21.560 I usually believe the debunkers.

00:12:24.560 That's my bias.

00:12:26.220 I'm generally a debunker believer.

00:12:29.220 If the last thing I saw was a debunk,

00:12:31.660 probably going to believe it.

00:12:33.720 Even if there's a debunk to the debunk,

00:12:35.780 I'm very biased toward the debunks.

00:12:38.040 But I'm also aware of it, right?

00:12:41.360 So at least I have a little bit of caution about myself

00:12:44.380 because I know I'm biased toward the debunks.

00:12:46.800 Same way if somebody's accused of a crime.

00:12:49.820 Don't you think they're usually guilty?

00:12:52.660 Right?

00:12:52.880 Not always.

00:12:53.980 Plenty of innocent people get accused of things.

00:12:56.800 But as soon as you hear somebody's accused of a crime,

00:12:59.500 and let's say they got indicted,

00:13:01.360 you kind of think they're guilty most of the time.

00:13:06.380 So let's talk some more about rogue doctors.

00:13:09.360 There was a fascinating hypothesis by Julian Sanchez.

00:13:14.280 I saw this on Twitter.

00:13:16.040 And his basic idea is that the reason that rogue doctors

00:13:19.180 are so accepted by the public is because of movies.

00:13:26.660 Because if you watch a movie in which there's a rogue anything,

00:13:30.640 a rogue doctor, rogue lawyer, rogue whistleblower,

00:13:34.780 who is always right by the end of the movie?

00:13:36.960 Have you ever seen a movie where there was a rogue doctor

00:13:41.000 and then at the end of the movie,

00:13:42.460 oh, we just found out the rogue doctor was wrong about everything?

00:13:45.860 Turns out the consensus was right all along.

00:13:48.980 Well, that's not a movie.

00:13:50.820 You can't make a movie out of the rogue doctor being wrong.

00:13:54.300 That doesn't work.

00:13:56.040 So I've told you before that we're so tuned to movies

00:13:59.500 that our reality starts matching a three-act movie.

00:14:04.020 I've been saying this for how long?

00:14:07.380 Since the beginning of the Trump era.

00:14:08.940 I've been telling you that we're seeing things as three acts,

00:14:12.400 maybe not by accident.

00:14:14.420 Some of it could be perceptual.

00:14:16.240 But I think we're so primed that things have to have three acts

00:14:20.060 that we will force a third act into an otherwise normal situation.

00:14:26.260 Like we'll just make that third act happen,

00:14:28.000 the impossible problem that the hero has to solve.

00:14:31.800 And so Julian Sanchez's idea is that since all movies

00:14:36.780 make the rogue doctor the one that's right

00:14:39.260 and that human beings are essentially programmed by movies and narrative,

00:14:45.980 that the narrative of the rogue being right is so strong in our fiction

00:14:49.840 and really even in our reality shows

00:14:52.580 because those are the ones that get picked to make a real movie out of them,

00:14:56.360 that that's all we can see.

00:14:57.460 And if you can't see past the movie filter,

00:15:01.640 you'll be locked in the movie filter.

00:15:04.920 And I would say that there are a whole bunch of people

00:15:07.720 from the claims of Q to the claims of the rogue doctors

00:15:12.840 who never got out of the movie frame,

00:15:16.920 meaning they never really engaged with science

00:15:21.040 or so-called science or what we think is science or any of that.

00:15:23.760 They just saw the movie form and just embraced it.

00:15:28.080 Now, there's some thought that the QAnon people,

00:15:32.620 based on interviews, were aware that it wasn't real.

00:15:38.160 Do you think that's true?

00:15:39.860 That the some number, not all of them, of course,

00:15:43.440 but the some number of the QAnon people

00:15:45.280 were completely aware that it was all fiction,

00:15:49.560 but it didn't matter

00:15:50.740 because they embraced it like they embraced a movie.

00:15:53.960 You watch a movie and it's sad and it makes you cry,

00:15:56.560 but it wasn't real.

00:15:58.120 You watch a movie and it makes you laugh

00:15:59.960 or makes you inspired,

00:16:02.060 but it probably wasn't based on anything real.

00:16:04.540 So we know that things that are not real

00:16:06.480 and that we know are not real

00:16:08.340 affect us like they're real.

00:16:12.180 Would it surprise you

00:16:13.140 that some people would take QAnon

00:16:15.380 as just entertainment

00:16:16.520 and simply act as if it's real

00:16:18.860 and keep that act up

00:16:20.800 because that's part of the fun?

00:16:23.240 I don't know.

00:16:26.060 I'm not going to say that that's most of the Q supporters,

00:16:29.440 but I feel like it would describe some.

00:16:32.340 Some, maybe.

00:16:33.820 Just a hypothesis.

00:16:35.040 All right.

00:16:36.880 I'm trying to figure out

00:16:42.120 what's going on with monoclonal antibodies,

00:16:46.940 Regeneron and Remdesivir.

00:16:49.880 Correct me if I'm wrong,

00:16:52.660 but monoclonal antibodies went from the best thing ever

00:16:55.900 to we're going to remove your emergency authorization,

00:16:59.560 at least for most of them, if not all of them.

00:17:02.060 Now, was that something that was done

00:17:05.140 to disadvantage Florida

00:17:06.880 because they had this good monoclonal antibody thing going on?

00:17:10.360 Or is it because there was new information

00:17:12.480 showing that it didn't work?

00:17:15.660 Now, when I say didn't work,

00:17:17.100 I mean in the context of

00:17:19.900 the only agency tasked with protection of whistleblowers is OSHA.

00:17:26.860 See the issue here.

00:17:28.260 Yes, I do.

00:17:29.140 I didn't know that.

00:17:30.460 Interesting.

00:17:32.060 Anyway, so what I was going to say is

00:17:36.180 there are two versions of this story.

00:17:38.480 On one version, the government found out

00:17:40.620 that monoclonal antibodies don't work against Omicron.

00:17:46.280 Has anybody heard that?

00:17:47.960 Has anybody heard that monoclonal antibodies

00:17:50.640 don't work against Omicron?

00:17:54.240 Do you believe that?

00:17:56.600 Do you believe that

00:17:57.860 that the one thing,

00:18:02.040 let's say the monoclonal antibodies,

00:18:04.040 do you believe that the one thing

00:18:05.480 that doesn't work against Omicron

00:18:08.220 and the other variants

00:18:09.420 is the only thing that doesn't work on all the variants?

00:18:11.880 Because the vaccines do,

00:18:13.480 the therapeutics do.

00:18:16.380 Basically everything does, right?

00:18:18.840 But this is the only thing,

00:18:20.420 just the only drug

00:18:21.560 that's useless is against Omicron,

00:18:23.980 but it was really great against the other variants.

00:18:26.940 Really?

00:18:28.500 Really?

00:18:30.100 Now, I know that that could technically be true.

00:18:33.140 In other words, on a scientific basis,

00:18:35.300 that is totally possible,

00:18:36.640 that it could be effective on one variant

00:18:39.440 and not another.

00:18:40.200 We'd all agree with that, right?

00:18:42.120 But what are the odds that the only one,

00:18:44.980 the only one that doesn't work on Omicron

00:18:48.380 is the one that DeSantis was using in Florida

00:18:52.260 to great effect?

00:18:54.860 Really?

00:18:56.340 Now, that could be true,

00:18:58.220 which is, you know, the sign of a good hoax.

00:19:00.320 Could be true.

00:19:01.820 But that is really, really stretching my skepticism, right?

00:19:07.840 You know, I saw Mike Cernovich tweet

00:19:10.580 suggesting the same suspicion,

00:19:13.740 that there's probably a political filter on this,

00:19:17.160 that you don't want Florida

00:19:18.900 to look like they did everything right,

00:19:21.320 because DeSantis is probably a threat

00:19:23.600 to win the presidency.

00:19:25.780 And it's kind of sickening.

00:19:29.140 At the same time, remdesivir,

00:19:31.780 which, can you do a fact check on me?

00:19:34.880 I thought that early on,

00:19:36.380 we knew that remdesivir doesn't work

00:19:38.280 and that it causes more problems than it fixes.

00:19:41.360 And now it's being approved for outpatient?

00:19:44.600 Even when we thought it worked,

00:19:47.500 we only thought it worked for inpatient,

00:19:49.860 meaning that you had to be pretty bad shape

00:19:53.600 and actually hospitalized

00:19:55.060 before you could even see the signal of it working.

00:19:59.120 And then I think they decided

00:20:00.420 it was more downside than upside.

00:20:03.580 But now, suddenly,

00:20:05.300 that thing that was more downside than upside

00:20:07.860 for the other variants

00:20:09.020 is just the thing you need for Omicron

00:20:11.200 and the thing that Fauci is most associated with

00:20:15.200 in terms of his dealings

00:20:17.900 and, let's say, connections

00:20:20.160 and maybe even past monetary flow,

00:20:24.480 is that a coincidence

00:20:25.700 that at this point in the pandemic,

00:20:28.600 miraculously monoclonal antibodies

00:20:30.820 stopped working

00:20:31.720 at exactly the same time,

00:20:34.640 the most damned medication

00:20:36.320 in all of the pandemic,

00:20:39.640 meaning people said the most bad things about it,

00:20:42.160 remdesivir,

00:20:43.180 about it not working

00:20:44.120 and hurting you more than it helps,

00:20:46.100 and then suddenly that's good again.

00:20:48.500 Not only is it good,

00:20:50.400 but it's so good,

00:20:51.460 you could use it in an outpatient setting,

00:20:54.260 whereas before you couldn't.

00:20:56.500 Really?

00:20:56.920 Really?

00:20:57.780 I don't believe any of this.

00:21:00.620 Any of it.

00:21:01.680 It's beginning to look

00:21:03.040 like the government

00:21:04.560 just stopped trying

00:21:06.140 to even pretend

00:21:08.360 to be on our side.

00:21:11.800 Am I wrong?

00:21:12.960 This doesn't even look slightly medical.

00:21:16.720 I mean, usually,

00:21:17.900 even when the government

00:21:19.060 is doing things that look sketchy,

00:21:21.560 you say to yourself,

00:21:22.260 well, I don't know,

00:21:24.000 I'm a little skeptical,

00:21:25.400 but at least I see the reasons.

00:21:28.180 You know, the reasons are laid out,

00:21:29.860 so maybe I don't agree with them,

00:21:31.480 but at least there are reasons.

00:21:33.180 But I feel like they just abandoned

00:21:35.860 anything except giving money

00:21:38.640 to whoever,

00:21:39.880 whatever pharmaceutical company

00:21:41.320 is bribing them best.

00:21:43.340 That's what it looks like.

00:21:45.780 I saw this data,

00:21:47.820 and I wonder if it's true.

00:21:49.180 There's a new study.

00:21:49.900 I saw this in a tweet

00:21:51.920 by Anna Cutsteel

00:21:53.880 that Omicron is clearly

00:21:56.320 a game-changer.

00:21:57.300 In a large new study

00:21:58.220 by researchers

00:21:59.540 from Berkeley and Kaiser Permanente,

00:22:02.180 just one in 52,000

00:22:04.420 Omicron patients died.

00:22:06.880 One out of 52,000.

00:22:09.420 Now, what this study did was

00:22:10.920 I think it did a better job

00:22:12.240 of getting a random sample.

00:22:14.560 So instead of just looking

00:22:15.460 at people who were hospitalized,

00:22:17.200 I think they looked

00:22:17.860 at the whole public.

00:22:18.660 and said that

00:22:20.280 one in 52,000 died

00:22:22.660 compared to 14,000

00:22:24.940 and of 14 people

00:22:26.460 and of 17,000 for Delta.

00:22:29.080 Now, if I told you

00:22:30.220 that 14 and of 17,000

00:22:32.380 had died of something,

00:22:33.660 how worried would you be?

00:22:36.360 14 and of 17,000 people died.

00:22:39.660 How worried would you be?

00:22:41.520 Really?

00:22:42.480 You would be zero worried.

00:22:44.360 So if you went to a stadium game,

00:22:47.060 let's say the Super Bowl,

00:22:48.660 and you knew that,

00:22:50.040 let's say the Super Bowl

00:22:51.540 would be probably three times that,

00:22:53.460 if you knew that 12 people

00:22:55.020 were going to die in the stadium

00:22:56.240 while you watched the Super Bowl,

00:22:58.140 you'd still go?

00:22:59.860 Would you?

00:23:01.180 Let's say you thought

00:23:02.280 there were going to be

00:23:02.980 50,000 people at the Super Bowl,

00:23:05.660 but you knew in advance

00:23:07.380 12 of them were going to die.

00:23:09.720 And forget about the stampedes

00:23:10.940 and the crowd control.

00:23:11.960 Forget about that.

00:23:12.560 You just knew that

00:23:14.060 in that stadium,

00:23:14.980 12 of you were going to die

00:23:16.180 before the end of the game.

00:23:17.940 Do you go to that game

00:23:19.020 in person?

00:23:22.520 I see a lot of yeses.

00:23:26.760 Yeah.

00:23:27.680 I don't know.

00:23:28.560 I mean, it could be that

00:23:29.580 going to that game

00:23:30.740 is safer than driving your car.

00:23:33.720 Could be.

00:23:34.360 But I've got a feeling

00:23:36.280 that if 12 people died

00:23:37.640 in a stadium,

00:23:39.200 we'd never have

00:23:39.980 stadium sports again.

00:23:43.360 It'd be like the last time

00:23:44.680 anybody went to a stadium.

00:23:47.180 Now, you know,

00:23:48.980 we're all irrational

00:23:49.720 with big numbers.

00:23:50.680 We're, you know,

00:23:51.060 humans are not good

00:23:52.000 at handling percentages

00:23:53.820 when they turn

00:23:55.120 into these big numbers.

00:23:56.680 But I would say

00:23:57.640 that one out of 52,000

00:23:59.120 would give me

00:23:59.700 exactly zero concern.

00:24:01.240 But if a dozen people

00:24:04.240 died in a stadium-sized event,

00:24:07.200 I would be concerned

00:24:08.060 about that.

00:24:09.920 Somebody says

00:24:10.520 bad analogy.

00:24:11.300 Why is it a bad analogy?

00:24:13.360 All I'm doing

00:24:14.180 is taking numbers

00:24:15.600 and deaths

00:24:16.260 so you could take

00:24:17.100 the analogy out of it.

00:24:18.980 But I did.

00:24:19.500 The reason I wanted

00:24:20.460 to put you in the scene,

00:24:21.880 you know,

00:24:22.080 imagine you're going

00:24:22.920 to the Super Bowl,

00:24:24.100 is I wanted you

00:24:24.660 actually to imagine it

00:24:25.580 like it's real,

00:24:26.320 like you actually

00:24:26.960 had to make the decision.

00:24:30.180 All right.

00:24:30.680 Well,

00:24:31.940 those are the numbers.

00:24:35.760 I provocatively

00:24:36.860 tweeted this today.

00:24:37.960 Why can't we have

00:24:39.080 vitamin D passports?

00:24:41.300 So we have passports

00:24:42.560 if you have a certain

00:24:43.280 number of vaccinations.

00:24:45.600 And there's talk about,

00:24:47.620 of course,

00:24:48.540 adding natural immunity

00:24:49.620 if you've been infected before,

00:24:51.340 if you could prove it,

00:24:52.140 I guess.

00:24:53.700 And, you know,

00:24:54.420 we'd like to see

00:24:55.100 that part of the protocol.

00:24:57.060 But given that we know

00:24:58.620 that high vitamin D

00:24:59.820 makes you virtually

00:25:01.300 invulnerable,

00:25:03.800 you know,

00:25:04.420 statistically speaking,

00:25:05.700 if I had a vitamin D test

00:25:08.400 that showed I was

00:25:09.780 in that high vitamin D category,

00:25:12.060 and let's say

00:25:12.580 I'm under a certain age,

00:25:14.940 how about this?

00:25:16.740 Why can't I get a,

00:25:18.920 effectively,

00:25:19.800 a vaccine passport

00:25:20.760 with no vaccination

00:25:22.360 as long as I had

00:25:24.220 high vitamin D,

00:25:25.160 and I could prove it,

00:25:25.900 I was a certain age,

00:25:28.840 you know,

00:25:29.060 I'm not 80 years old

00:25:30.020 or something,

00:25:30.460 I could prove I'm

00:25:31.120 below a certain age.

00:25:32.860 My BMI is acceptable.

00:25:34.740 Again,

00:25:35.020 I could prove that.

00:25:35.960 I could have a test

00:25:36.660 of my BMI.

00:25:38.740 Other comorbidities,

00:25:40.120 I suppose I could prove that

00:25:41.140 with a medical record.

00:25:44.740 And then in the age

00:25:45.760 of Omicron,

00:25:46.500 when, you know,

00:25:47.600 we're all going to get it anyway

00:25:48.700 and probably won't die,

00:25:51.240 shouldn't that be a,

00:25:52.800 shouldn't that be enough?

00:25:53.740 I could prove

00:25:55.300 every one of these.

00:25:56.260 I could definitely measure

00:25:57.100 my vitamin D,

00:25:59.000 my age,

00:25:59.740 my BMI,

00:26:00.720 and my medical records

00:26:02.360 would show if I had

00:26:03.100 other comorbidities.

00:26:04.960 Are you telling me

00:26:05.880 that in the age of Omicron,

00:26:08.540 right,

00:26:08.760 just specifically

00:26:09.560 the age of Omicron,

00:26:11.480 when that's,

00:26:11.920 that's really all

00:26:12.580 you're going to get

00:26:13.080 at this point

00:26:13.560 is Omicron?

00:26:14.800 In the age of Omicron,

00:26:16.120 you tell me that

00:26:16.700 I'm not as safe

00:26:17.520 as your fucking vaccinations

00:26:19.320 if I've got high vitamin D,

00:26:22.000 I'm below,

00:26:22.640 let's say 65,

00:26:25.160 perfect BMI,

00:26:28.140 no other comorbidities

00:26:29.380 that are important.

00:26:30.900 Really?

00:26:31.940 You think that

00:26:32.880 I have a lower chance

00:26:33.940 of dying

00:26:34.480 with all of this

00:26:35.900 going for me

00:26:36.660 than you do

00:26:38.280 with your fat fucking ass

00:26:39.780 and 16 vaccinations?

00:26:42.240 I say it's not even close.

00:26:44.580 Am I wrong?

00:26:45.280 If you weigh 400 pounds

00:26:48.080 and you're vaccinated

00:26:49.000 17 times,

00:26:51.000 do you think

00:26:52.300 you have a better chance

00:26:53.220 of survival

00:26:53.760 than I do

00:26:54.340 with my vitamin D

00:26:56.020 at astronomical,

00:26:57.460 well,

00:26:57.860 I don't know,

00:26:58.220 I think they're

00:26:58.580 pretty sufficient.

00:27:00.460 Young enough,

00:27:01.640 low BMI,

00:27:03.280 perfectly healthy?

00:27:05.260 I don't think

00:27:06.020 it's even close.

00:27:07.480 So we're definitely

00:27:08.740 not following the science.

00:27:10.320 I mean,

00:27:10.500 it might be impractical

00:27:11.460 for somebody

00:27:11.900 to measure

00:27:12.620 all of these things,

00:27:13.740 but if you did measure them,

00:27:15.380 I'm pretty sure

00:27:16.040 my mortality risk

00:27:18.140 would be way lower

00:27:19.340 than some vaccinated people.

00:27:21.500 You know what I mean?

00:27:22.300 You know what I mean?

00:27:24.420 All right.

00:27:25.760 Here's an account

00:27:27.880 that you should follow.

00:27:29.400 If you don't remember

00:27:30.560 what I tell you now,

00:27:31.980 just look in my Twitter feed

00:27:33.220 because I just tweeted

00:27:34.720 before I got on here

00:27:35.660 that you should follow

00:27:36.960 this account.

00:27:37.640 It is Jason,

00:27:39.540 the germ guy,

00:27:40.620 Tetro,

00:27:41.820 and he goes by

00:27:42.560 at J-A Tetro,

00:27:45.040 T-E-E,

00:27:45.960 I'm sorry,

00:27:46.520 T-E-T-R-O.

00:27:49.220 And every now and then

00:27:51.560 you watch,

00:27:52.920 I'll call them whales.

00:27:54.940 Every now and then

00:27:56.720 a whale

00:27:57.400 will enter a conversation

00:27:59.320 on Twitter

00:27:59.860 and just change everything.

00:28:02.680 So Jason,

00:28:04.680 the germ guy,

00:28:05.300 Tetro,

00:28:05.680 is a whale,

00:28:07.420 meaning that

00:28:08.140 his background

00:28:09.400 on this topic

00:28:11.040 is the right kind

00:28:12.440 of background

00:28:12.840 and he really,

00:28:14.380 really knows his shit

00:28:15.200 and he really,

00:28:16.120 really knows the research

00:28:17.060 and he really,

00:28:18.280 really can tell

00:28:18.740 the difference

00:28:19.200 between good and bad.

00:28:21.020 So watching this whale

00:28:22.040 come into the thread

00:28:23.020 and just,

00:28:24.480 I'm going to use

00:28:24.920 another analogy,

00:28:27.280 it looked like

00:28:27.940 raking leaves.

00:28:30.500 You know,

00:28:30.720 sometimes you see

00:28:31.380 the fight

00:28:31.960 and it looks like

00:28:32.500 two pit bulls,

00:28:33.340 kind of fair fight.

00:28:35.260 because they both

00:28:37.260 have an argument

00:28:37.860 but, you know,

00:28:38.780 they seem about

00:28:39.440 the same to you.

00:28:41.180 Well,

00:28:42.040 Jason comes into

00:28:43.100 the thread

00:28:43.560 and I swear to God

00:28:44.640 it looked like

00:28:45.080 he was just

00:28:45.460 raking leaves.

00:28:47.040 Hey,

00:28:47.260 what's your argument?

00:28:48.860 Oh,

00:28:49.020 here we go.

00:28:51.060 Okay,

00:28:51.540 what else?

00:28:52.900 Anybody else have some?

00:28:56.100 There's a,

00:28:56.900 and you,

00:28:57.460 a follow-up.

00:28:58.480 And each time

00:29:01.340 he did it,

00:29:01.740 he did it with a,

00:29:02.580 I think almost every time

00:29:04.040 with a link

00:29:04.600 to some data

00:29:05.260 that looked

00:29:05.680 both new

00:29:06.880 and reasonable.

00:29:09.360 So,

00:29:10.280 here,

00:29:10.480 but here are some

00:29:11.000 things he said.

00:29:13.960 I think he indicated,

00:29:15.420 and I may have read it wrong,

00:29:17.400 that if you were

00:29:18.320 over 65

00:29:19.340 and you got

00:29:20.360 at least the earlier versions,

00:29:21.840 you know,

00:29:22.000 the Delta,

00:29:22.660 whatever,

00:29:23.600 that your odds

00:29:24.420 of hospitalization

00:29:25.940 were as high as 9%.

00:29:27.320 Does that sound right?

00:29:30.620 He's a rogue scientist.

00:29:33.120 Now,

00:29:33.940 he's actually

00:29:34.780 not a rogue scientist

00:29:35.720 because I think

00:29:36.760 most of his takes

00:29:37.480 are pretty close

00:29:38.840 to the mainstream,

00:29:39.700 but he defends them better.

00:29:42.780 I don't think

00:29:43.740 it's that high,

00:29:44.380 is it?

00:29:45.760 9% of people

00:29:47.020 over 65

00:29:47.760 getting hospitalized

00:29:48.540 with Delta?

00:29:50.740 That doesn't seem right.

00:29:52.560 So,

00:29:52.860 I'm just going to say

00:29:53.640 I may have read that wrong.

00:29:55.180 So,

00:29:55.460 don't blame,

00:29:55.940 don't blame Jason

00:29:56.860 for that data?

00:29:58.420 Because I think

00:29:59.140 I was interpreting it wrong.

00:30:01.080 I think that's on me.

00:30:03.580 Adam Townsend

00:30:04.480 made this

00:30:04.980 observation

00:30:06.480 now a year ago,

00:30:08.880 but it's twice

00:30:09.700 as true today.

00:30:11.460 Do you remember

00:30:11.920 that,

00:30:12.340 the videos

00:30:13.120 of Wuhan

00:30:14.120 where people

00:30:15.060 were collapsing

00:30:15.740 in the street

00:30:16.360 from the virus?

00:30:19.060 And do you remember

00:30:19.800 you thought to yourself,

00:30:20.720 because I remember I did,

00:30:22.220 I don't know

00:30:23.100 if that's real or not,

00:30:24.080 but it sure looks real.

00:30:25.400 Or it looks real enough.

00:30:27.240 That I'm going to be

00:30:28.160 scared about it.

00:30:30.220 Go back and look

00:30:31.280 at it today.

00:30:34.460 You've got a surprise

00:30:35.500 coming.

00:30:36.740 You look at it today,

00:30:38.380 it's obviously fake.

00:30:40.700 It's obviously fake.

00:30:42.860 You should see

00:30:43.460 the guy falling.

00:30:44.880 The guy,

00:30:45.280 the guy standing

00:30:45.860 straight up,

00:30:46.800 and then he starts

00:30:47.540 to fall like he's a tree.

00:30:49.260 And then just before

00:30:50.160 he hits the ground,

00:30:51.100 he puts his arms out.

00:30:51.960 Who does that?

00:30:55.300 If you're falling

00:30:56.160 like a tree,

00:30:57.660 by the way,

00:30:58.340 I've seen people

00:30:59.120 fall like a tree.

00:31:01.840 I was at an event

00:31:03.640 for single people

00:31:05.500 a million years ago

00:31:06.360 in San Francisco,

00:31:07.220 and there was

00:31:08.580 a Dilbert-looking guy

00:31:09.900 who was just standing

00:31:10.600 by the outdoor bar

00:31:11.820 just slamming drinks

00:31:12.840 because he was too nervous

00:31:13.780 to talk to anybody.

00:31:14.800 And I stood there

00:31:16.580 and watched him

00:31:17.160 actually stand straight up

00:31:18.400 and fall straight

00:31:19.860 on his face

00:31:20.440 on concrete

00:31:21.040 without breaking his fall.

00:31:24.040 Paramedics had to come.

00:31:25.100 I don't know

00:31:25.420 if he lived or died.

00:31:27.400 But that's what

00:31:29.740 it looks like

00:31:30.380 when you're unconscious.

00:31:33.720 He was unconscious

00:31:34.680 before he hit the ground,

00:31:36.000 and the ground

00:31:36.720 didn't help

00:31:37.140 his consciousness any.

00:31:38.940 Now, you don't fall

00:31:40.900 like you're not even

00:31:41.700 going to use your arms,

00:31:42.980 and then you wake up

00:31:43.980 just before the ground.

00:31:45.000 Oh, it looks like

00:31:46.240 I'm two feet

00:31:46.760 from the ground.

00:31:47.480 I better do this.

00:31:50.480 We have become

00:31:51.780 so much better educated

00:31:53.420 about the fakeness

00:31:54.720 of everything we see

00:31:55.720 that if you look

00:31:57.060 at that 20-20 video,

00:32:01.260 if you look at that

00:32:02.140 early 2020 video,

00:32:04.280 with the eyes of 2022,

00:32:06.980 you will laugh

00:32:08.200 at how obviously fake it is.

00:32:10.440 You will laugh.

00:32:12.660 And I swear,

00:32:13.440 I couldn't see it

00:32:14.180 as clearly

00:32:14.620 when it happened.

00:32:17.720 You're coming out

00:32:18.500 of hypnosis.

00:32:21.980 Yeah.

00:32:22.680 Well, it was always sketchy,

00:32:24.840 but it never looked

00:32:26.340 so fake

00:32:27.060 until our brains

00:32:28.740 were more tuned

00:32:29.380 to it today.

00:32:32.060 Rasmussen

00:32:32.420 had some interesting polls,

00:32:33.960 said,

00:32:34.200 do laws requiring

00:32:35.760 photo IDs

00:32:36.440 of polls

00:32:36.840 discriminate

00:32:37.520 against some voters?

00:32:39.760 What do you think

00:32:40.380 people said to that?

00:32:41.180 What percentage

00:32:42.280 of people

00:32:42.720 thought that

00:32:43.460 voter IDs

00:32:44.380 to vote

00:32:45.480 discriminates?

00:32:47.540 Just take a guess.

00:32:49.020 Hey, that was

00:32:49.400 a really good guess.

00:32:50.500 The people on Locals,

00:32:51.940 wow, you guys

00:32:52.520 are good guessers.

00:32:54.540 Everybody on Locals

00:32:55.540 got the right answer.

00:32:56.920 That's amazing.

00:32:57.880 It's actually 26%,

00:32:59.140 but you rounded it,

00:33:00.320 25%.

00:33:01.120 Yeah, 25%.

00:33:02.740 25%.

00:33:04.840 25%.

00:33:06.780 Seems like exactly

00:33:08.760 the number of idiots

00:33:09.820 who answer every poll.

00:33:11.140 That's right.

00:33:11.720 25% of the idiots

00:33:13.000 said,

00:33:14.000 yeah, you don't

00:33:14.400 have photo ID.

00:33:15.200 That would discriminate

00:33:15.880 against people

00:33:16.940 who don't know

00:33:17.940 how to get photo ID,

00:33:19.120 I guess,

00:33:19.480 or something.

00:33:21.800 But two-thirds

00:33:22.760 were smart.

00:33:24.480 Another question

00:33:25.080 Rasmussen asked

00:33:25.880 was,

00:33:26.480 do you agree with this?

00:33:28.440 That Congress

00:33:28.880 should pass a truly

00:33:30.100 bipartisan election

00:33:31.780 reform bill

00:33:32.520 to help restore

00:33:33.740 confidence in the elections.

00:33:35.760 How many people

00:33:36.780 thought that it

00:33:38.680 would be a bad idea,

00:33:39.960 a bad idea,

00:33:41.900 to have true

00:33:43.420 bipartisan election

00:33:45.120 reform?

00:33:45.980 Just approximately.

00:33:49.320 God, you guys

00:33:50.020 are good.

00:33:50.920 You guys are good.

00:33:53.120 Wow.

00:33:54.340 It's like a

00:33:55.320 psychic convention

00:33:56.900 here.

00:33:57.820 Yeah, yeah.

00:33:58.880 Turns out it was,

00:34:00.500 you won't believe this,

00:34:01.300 but 24%

00:34:02.260 thought that

00:34:03.600 bipartisan effort

00:34:05.200 to fix our elections.

00:34:08.080 Bad idea.

00:34:12.420 25%.

00:34:13.100 Well,

00:34:17.600 here's an update

00:34:18.320 on California masks.

00:34:20.580 My updated understanding

00:34:22.440 is that the mask mandates

00:34:24.480 that are in effect

00:34:25.140 in California

00:34:25.820 were actually

00:34:26.620 supposed to time

00:34:27.420 out

00:34:27.820 January 15th.

00:34:30.600 So,

00:34:31.280 in theory,

00:34:32.460 if we don't do

00:34:33.260 anything,

00:34:34.760 two and a half weeks

00:34:36.600 more

00:34:36.940 and the masks

00:34:37.960 will go away.

00:34:41.980 I don't know

00:34:42.620 if that's true

00:34:43.120 and I think

00:34:43.500 we need to speed

00:34:44.140 that up.

00:34:45.080 So,

00:34:45.320 I'd like to see that

00:34:45.980 still be February 1st.

00:34:48.440 And there is some,

00:34:49.600 maybe some motion.

00:34:50.940 Apparently,

00:34:51.360 the state

00:34:51.760 Supreme Court

00:34:52.560 in New York,

00:34:53.520 New York State,

00:34:55.420 decided that

00:34:56.660 mask mandates

00:34:57.320 were unconstitutional.

00:35:01.020 That's right.

00:35:03.080 A court

00:35:04.780 has now ruled

00:35:05.700 in New York State

00:35:07.220 that mask mandates

00:35:08.960 are unconstitutional.

00:35:11.600 Do you think

00:35:12.380 anybody in California

00:35:13.280 saw that?

00:35:15.200 Do you think

00:35:15.940 anybody in California

00:35:16.920 is going to say,

00:35:17.460 wait,

00:35:17.780 that worked?

00:35:19.440 And they're already

00:35:20.300 running to the court

00:35:21.180 with some kind of

00:35:21.880 a petition

00:35:22.500 or case

00:35:23.300 or something?

00:35:29.360 So,

00:35:30.200 that's happening.

00:35:34.240 Now,

00:35:34.800 obviously,

00:35:35.360 we would expect

00:35:36.300 a higher court,

00:35:37.680 even though

00:35:38.080 it's the state

00:35:39.300 Supreme Court,

00:35:40.080 but apparently

00:35:40.440 that's not

00:35:40.980 the actual

00:35:41.740 Supreme Court.

00:35:43.220 There are courts

00:35:43.800 above it

00:35:44.280 that can kill

00:35:45.820 this ruling

00:35:46.360 or put a stay

00:35:47.500 on it,

00:35:47.860 which might happen.

00:35:49.260 But,

00:35:49.740 it does show

00:35:50.420 that there is

00:35:51.200 certainly

00:35:51.780 anti-mask movement.

00:35:53.840 You know what else

00:35:54.440 shows some

00:35:54.960 anti-mask movement?

00:35:56.520 I told this story

00:35:57.580 on the locals

00:35:58.420 platform yesterday

00:35:59.360 where I can give them

00:36:00.320 a little bit more

00:36:01.060 detail than I can say

00:36:02.120 in public-public.

00:36:04.780 So,

00:36:05.260 I'll give you

00:36:06.040 on YouTube

00:36:06.520 the more general

00:36:07.840 statement.

00:36:09.100 Let's just say

00:36:09.800 that yesterday

00:36:10.320 I was in a place

00:36:11.400 that required masks.

00:36:14.700 I'm not going

00:36:15.360 to give you

00:36:15.660 any detail

00:36:16.180 because I don't

00:36:16.760 want to get

00:36:17.120 anybody in trouble.

00:36:17.780 Let's just say

00:36:19.340 that in one

00:36:19.980 large room

00:36:20.720 of which there

00:36:21.260 were roughly

00:36:21.860 15 people,

00:36:22.980 including me,

00:36:24.660 as soon as

00:36:25.620 the first

00:36:26.060 two attractive

00:36:27.100 women removed

00:36:27.960 their masks,

00:36:30.080 everybody removed

00:36:30.920 their masks.

00:36:32.660 Everybody.

00:36:34.720 All it took

00:36:35.560 was two attractive

00:36:36.320 women to go first

00:36:37.340 because they never

00:36:38.280 get in trouble.

00:36:39.800 You all know

00:36:40.380 that, right?

00:36:41.500 I'm not telling

00:36:42.300 you this for the

00:36:42.940 first time.

00:36:44.340 Attractive women

00:36:45.120 have no repercussions

00:36:46.700 if they do

00:36:47.320 something that's

00:36:47.920 socially unacceptable.

00:36:50.680 Right?

00:36:51.340 Now,

00:36:51.860 if somebody

00:36:52.480 like me

00:36:53.000 does it,

00:36:54.300 maybe an

00:36:54.920 employee comes

00:36:55.520 up and says

00:36:56.060 put it on.

00:36:58.840 It wasn't

00:36:59.880 Christine in this

00:37:00.680 case,

00:37:01.080 but it would

00:37:01.560 have worked

00:37:01.840 with her.

00:37:02.760 And I've been

00:37:03.480 watching this

00:37:04.060 phenomenon,

00:37:04.800 the pretty

00:37:05.340 privilege,

00:37:06.080 and I just

00:37:06.940 haven't seen

00:37:07.460 an attractive

00:37:08.600 woman be asked

00:37:09.540 to put on a

00:37:10.060 mask once

00:37:10.780 past the

00:37:11.800 door.

00:37:11.960 I guess

00:37:14.960 the Walmart

00:37:15.760 in Quebec

00:37:16.600 has decided

00:37:18.020 that you

00:37:18.380 can't shop

00:37:18.920 there unless

00:37:20.380 you have

00:37:20.780 all your

00:37:21.300 vaccines.

00:37:23.860 And

00:37:24.340 this could

00:37:26.740 be a big

00:37:27.060 problem

00:37:27.540 because

00:37:29.160 if the

00:37:30.780 Canadians

00:37:31.220 start

00:37:31.760 illegally

00:37:33.080 immigrating

00:37:33.680 into America

00:37:34.300 to get away

00:37:34.920 from this

00:37:36.360 Walmart policy

00:37:37.500 and maybe

00:37:38.160 shop at our

00:37:38.840 much more

00:37:39.840 free Walmarts,

00:37:40.600 I think

00:37:42.380 that Biden's

00:37:43.460 going to

00:37:43.620 have to

00:37:43.840 send Kamala

00:37:44.380 Harris there

00:37:44.940 to see if

00:37:45.480 they can

00:37:45.780 deal with

00:37:46.100 the root

00:37:46.380 problem.

00:37:48.240 Yeah,

00:37:48.640 Kamala

00:37:48.920 Harris needs

00:37:49.400 to go to

00:37:49.840 Canada and

00:37:51.580 maybe stop

00:37:53.040 this potential

00:37:54.440 stem of

00:37:55.280 illegal immigrants

00:37:57.020 across the

00:37:57.680 northern border

00:37:58.360 and maybe

00:38:00.520 that'll help.

00:38:05.260 Let me

00:38:06.020 test an idea

00:38:07.160 with you.

00:38:08.640 See if this

00:38:09.280 seems mostly

00:38:10.120 true.

00:38:11.360 Nothing's

00:38:11.880 100% true.

00:38:12.620 But see if

00:38:13.060 this generalization

00:38:14.080 sounds mostly

00:38:15.460 true to you.

00:38:16.740 Number one,

00:38:18.280 two years

00:38:19.420 ago, if

00:38:20.840 somebody said

00:38:21.400 follow the

00:38:22.060 science, what

00:38:23.320 did you think

00:38:23.880 of that?

00:38:24.980 Maybe you

00:38:25.420 thought that

00:38:25.720 was common

00:38:26.100 sense.

00:38:27.360 Maybe you

00:38:27.660 thought that

00:38:27.940 was a very

00:38:28.360 rational thing

00:38:29.020 to do.

00:38:30.060 And probably,

00:38:30.920 yeah, totally

00:38:31.700 reasonable.

00:38:33.320 In fact, the

00:38:34.440 person who said

00:38:35.020 follow the

00:38:35.500 science was

00:38:36.540 generally judged

00:38:37.440 to be the

00:38:38.160 superior thinker

00:38:39.360 in the

00:38:40.720 conversation.

00:38:41.280 Two years

00:38:43.180 later, when

00:38:44.780 you hear

00:38:45.140 follow the

00:38:45.780 science, are

00:38:46.920 you more

00:38:47.240 likely to

00:38:47.800 think it's

00:38:48.180 serious or

00:38:48.920 sarcasm?

00:38:50.060 Go.

00:38:51.160 Today, if

00:38:51.820 you hear it,

00:38:52.540 is your first

00:38:53.620 instinct, it's

00:38:54.500 serious, or

00:38:55.560 then it might

00:38:56.020 be sarcasm or

00:38:57.780 brainwashing?

00:38:59.840 Yeah.

00:39:00.580 The entire

00:39:01.400 idea of

00:39:02.260 follow the

00:39:02.800 science has

00:39:03.520 been debunked.

00:39:05.580 I don't mean

00:39:06.360 that you

00:39:06.760 shouldn't follow

00:39:07.220 the science.

00:39:08.160 I'm saying

00:39:08.580 that the

00:39:09.000 public's

00:39:09.500 opinion of

00:39:10.060 this has

00:39:10.800 completely

00:39:11.240 changed.

00:39:12.440 And the

00:39:12.820 pandemic did

00:39:13.480 this.

00:39:14.340 The pandemic

00:39:14.980 made us see

00:39:15.720 following the

00:39:16.260 science as

00:39:16.800 absurd.

00:39:17.780 Because here's

00:39:18.320 what's happened.

00:39:19.940 A lot of

00:39:20.720 people followed

00:39:21.340 the science,

00:39:22.400 and where did

00:39:22.940 they end up?

00:39:24.680 So once they

00:39:25.300 followed it,

00:39:26.160 where'd they

00:39:26.580 go?

00:39:27.820 They went to

00:39:28.620 their team.

00:39:30.140 Some followed

00:39:31.040 it to the

00:39:31.480 Democrat side,

00:39:32.240 some followed

00:39:33.400 science to

00:39:34.300 the Republican

00:39:34.760 side.

00:39:35.580 Which ones

00:39:36.220 were not

00:39:36.580 following

00:39:36.880 science?

00:39:38.460 Nobody.

00:39:40.060 Nobody.

00:39:40.580 We were all

00:39:41.080 following the

00:39:41.640 science as

00:39:42.860 we saw it.

00:39:44.260 Now, sometimes

00:39:44.880 that meant

00:39:45.360 disbelieving

00:39:47.080 science that

00:39:47.800 seemed obviously

00:39:48.600 not credible,

00:39:50.040 maybe because

00:39:50.500 it came through

00:39:51.120 people who had

00:39:51.840 money or bad

00:39:53.300 intentions.

00:39:54.380 That's fair.

00:39:55.560 That's part of

00:39:56.120 following the

00:39:56.560 science.

00:39:57.300 Part of

00:39:57.580 following the

00:39:58.060 salty methods,

00:40:03.160 Scott got

00:40:03.760 duped.

00:40:04.800 Can you give

00:40:05.340 me a fucking

00:40:06.180 example of

00:40:07.120 what I got

00:40:07.580 duped on?

00:40:08.400 Anything.

00:40:09.740 Never mind,

00:40:10.460 you're going to

00:40:10.740 get blocked.

00:40:12.020 The people

00:40:12.600 hallucinating that

00:40:13.680 I got fooled

00:40:14.840 by something,

00:40:15.660 go read my

00:40:16.320 profile link.

00:40:18.020 You'll see my

00:40:18.560 opinions, what

00:40:19.260 they were, and

00:40:19.960 what they used

00:40:22.740 to be, and

00:40:23.700 see if you

00:40:24.280 can find

00:40:24.840 something that

00:40:26.280 I got duped

00:40:26.960 by.

00:40:27.660 See if you

00:40:28.080 can do that.

00:40:29.200 And then

00:40:29.640 get back to

00:40:30.420 me.

00:40:31.320 But, if you

00:40:32.420 can't find

00:40:32.880 anything that

00:40:33.460 I was duped

00:40:34.080 by, next

00:40:35.320 time you

00:40:35.660 hear, shut

00:40:36.880 the fuck

00:40:37.360 up.

00:40:40.040 All right.

00:40:44.720 Does the

00:40:45.440 Ukraine situation

00:40:46.500 look to you

00:40:47.320 like our

00:40:50.680 deep state

00:40:52.680 or somebody,

00:40:53.500 the military

00:40:55.080 industrial

00:40:55.720 complex?

00:40:56.960 Does it

00:40:57.560 look to

00:40:57.880 you like

00:40:59.780 somebody is

00:41:00.620 ginning up

00:41:01.100 a fake

00:41:01.480 war for,

00:41:03.160 I don't

00:41:03.420 know, I

00:41:04.340 guess monetary

00:41:05.000 use?

00:41:06.200 The Ukraine

00:41:06.880 situation just

00:41:07.820 looks like a

00:41:09.020 fake war to

00:41:10.160 me.

00:41:10.920 I don't see

00:41:11.860 anything else

00:41:12.380 there.

00:41:13.260 Like, I can't

00:41:13.840 even see it as

00:41:14.780 legitimate, a

00:41:15.780 little bit.

00:41:17.460 You know,

00:41:17.780 during the

00:41:18.360 weapons of

00:41:19.680 mass destruction

00:41:20.420 phase in

00:41:21.300 Iraq, I was

00:41:23.100 open to the

00:41:25.820 possibility they

00:41:26.560 had weapons of

00:41:27.220 mass destruction.

00:41:28.000 It seemed

00:41:28.280 reasonable.

00:41:29.380 You know, at

00:41:29.700 least, you

00:41:30.240 figure they'd

00:41:30.960 at least have

00:41:31.440 illegal chemicals

00:41:33.200 or something.

00:41:34.980 I was actually

00:41:35.860 quite surprised

00:41:36.440 that they

00:41:36.800 didn't.

00:41:37.740 But it's

00:41:38.620 2022 now.

00:41:40.380 We're a lot

00:41:41.020 smarter about

00:41:41.780 this stuff now.

00:41:43.040 At this point,

00:41:43.700 I don't have any

00:41:44.640 belief that the

00:41:45.680 entire Ukraine

00:41:46.500 thing is even

00:41:47.560 legitimate.

00:41:48.980 Like, that we're

00:41:49.480 even talking about

00:41:50.420 a war.

00:41:50.800 Now, I'd like

00:41:54.320 to believe that

00:41:54.980 we're just

00:41:55.300 talking about it

00:41:56.060 because that's

00:41:56.560 part of the

00:41:56.940 process of

00:41:57.520 preventing it.

00:41:59.300 That would be

00:41:59.940 the most positive

00:42:00.700 spin you could

00:42:01.320 put on it, but

00:42:01.840 it doesn't look

00:42:02.500 like it.

00:42:03.480 It looks exactly

00:42:04.600 like we're being

00:42:05.500 somebody who's

00:42:06.600 trying to prime

00:42:07.240 us for war that

00:42:08.280 we don't need,

00:42:09.600 that nobody

00:42:10.160 needs, because

00:42:11.040 somebody's got a

00:42:11.880 profit motive, it

00:42:12.860 looks like.

00:42:14.620 Now, it could be

00:42:15.480 not a profit

00:42:16.160 motive.

00:42:16.600 It could be,

00:42:17.220 you know,

00:42:17.960 Chinese shenanigans

00:42:20.220 or something.

00:42:21.000 I suppose that's

00:42:21.600 possible.

00:42:25.600 Do you remember

00:42:27.140 pre-COVID?

00:42:28.260 I think there's

00:42:29.280 going to be a

00:42:29.660 thing called

00:42:30.100 pre-COVID

00:42:31.080 thinking,

00:42:32.420 meaning that

00:42:34.000 before COVID,

00:42:35.400 you could at

00:42:36.160 least imagine

00:42:37.480 that the

00:42:37.980 government wasn't

00:42:38.780 lying to you

00:42:39.420 in some

00:42:39.860 situations,

00:42:41.240 right?

00:42:42.060 Pre-COVID,

00:42:43.040 you were at

00:42:43.640 least open to

00:42:44.440 the possibility

00:42:45.100 that this time

00:42:46.640 they weren't

00:42:47.020 lying.

00:42:48.440 Sure, there

00:42:49.120 were other

00:42:49.340 times they lied

00:42:50.000 and we know

00:42:50.440 it, but you

00:42:51.500 were still

00:42:51.820 open to the

00:42:52.440 possibility,

00:42:53.140 okay, well,

00:42:53.600 this could be

00:42:54.020 true.

00:42:54.820 I mean, I'm

00:42:55.220 going to still

00:42:55.620 be skeptical.

00:42:56.860 I'm going to

00:42:57.220 make them prove

00:42:57.760 their case, but

00:42:58.400 you know, that

00:42:58.960 could be true.

00:43:00.220 What's your

00:43:00.660 assumption now?

00:43:02.740 Isn't your

00:43:03.420 first assumption

00:43:04.200 it's not true?

00:43:07.720 All right.

00:43:08.860 Now, I don't

00:43:10.160 agree with the

00:43:10.980 people who made

00:43:11.480 the assumption

00:43:12.200 that all of

00:43:13.840 the pharmaceutical

00:43:14.440 products are bad

00:43:16.340 because we can't

00:43:17.700 trust anybody.

00:43:18.360 because that

00:43:20.320 doesn't really

00:43:20.900 track with my

00:43:22.760 sense of

00:43:23.200 reality.

00:43:23.920 It's certainly

00:43:24.720 possible that

00:43:26.180 three-quarters of

00:43:27.040 them are bad.

00:43:28.420 If you said,

00:43:29.380 would you bet

00:43:30.000 against that?

00:43:30.580 I'd say, no,

00:43:31.140 no, I wouldn't

00:43:32.100 bet against three-quarters

00:43:33.080 of them being

00:43:33.680 fraudulent.

00:43:34.300 But it's kind of

00:43:35.760 a stretch to

00:43:36.340 imagine that all

00:43:37.580 of them are

00:43:38.000 fraudulent.

00:43:40.660 Maybe, but I'm

00:43:42.560 still not there.

00:43:43.660 That would be a

00:43:44.160 big, big stretch.

00:43:46.300 All right.

00:43:46.700 Biggest story of the

00:43:47.660 day, which will be

00:43:48.580 immediately ignored by

00:43:50.540 the mainstream media,

00:43:52.280 is there's a new

00:43:53.000 book coming out by

00:43:54.680 Peter Schweitzer.

00:43:56.780 I guess it comes out

00:43:58.000 right around now.

00:43:59.280 And the book claims

00:44:00.120 that the Biden

00:44:00.640 family earned $31

00:44:01.860 million from five

00:44:03.260 deals involving

00:44:04.280 people with direct

00:44:05.160 ties to Chinese

00:44:06.100 intelligence.

00:44:07.360 And this is being

00:44:08.160 called Chinese

00:44:10.660 elite capture.

00:44:12.580 In other words,

00:44:13.180 finding ways to

00:44:14.360 bribe or influence

00:44:15.940 the elites.

00:44:17.860 And I guess they

00:44:18.540 thought that Biden

00:44:19.280 was connected

00:44:20.600 enough to the

00:44:21.220 elites that

00:44:22.660 controlling him

00:44:23.700 would be good

00:44:24.280 for China.

00:44:25.460 So this book

00:44:26.140 alleges, and I

00:44:27.380 haven't read it

00:44:27.840 yet, but this is

00:44:28.640 the news, that

00:44:31.620 the Chinese

00:44:32.220 communists saw

00:44:32.900 like a big

00:44:33.760 opportunity here.

00:44:36.860 And that Hunter

00:44:37.240 Biden got meetings

00:44:38.080 and major deals

00:44:38.900 with people

00:44:39.440 associated with

00:44:40.860 the Chinese

00:44:41.280 government, and

00:44:43.100 that it clearly

00:44:44.760 was just China

00:44:45.640 buying off the

00:44:46.680 elites.

00:44:49.000 Now, I don't

00:44:51.200 know how much

00:44:51.760 of this could be

00:44:52.640 proven.

00:44:54.740 So I haven't

00:44:55.640 seen the book.

00:44:56.680 So you're going

00:44:57.060 to have to wait

00:44:57.500 for the, I would

00:44:58.300 say, keep an open

00:44:59.520 mind and wait

00:45:01.180 for any debunking

00:45:02.920 of this book.

00:45:04.740 But I'll bet

00:45:06.220 you won't see

00:45:06.780 any.

00:45:08.280 I've got a

00:45:08.940 feeling it won't

00:45:09.540 be debunked, it

00:45:10.620 will just be

00:45:11.500 de-emphasized.

00:45:13.080 It will just be

00:45:13.780 disappeared.

00:45:14.960 It will be

00:45:15.480 another thing that

00:45:16.240 only the people

00:45:16.880 on the right are

00:45:17.540 ever aware of.

00:45:19.360 That won't change

00:45:20.260 anything.

00:45:21.240 Because the people

00:45:21.760 on the right already

00:45:22.660 thought that Biden

00:45:23.420 was corrupt, so

00:45:24.500 this would just add

00:45:25.400 a number to it,

00:45:26.080 but it doesn't

00:45:26.420 change it.

00:45:26.840 And the people

00:45:27.600 on the left

00:45:28.020 will just never

00:45:28.560 see it.

00:45:29.500 They'll just

00:45:29.860 never see it.

00:45:32.300 Now, what happens

00:45:33.360 when Peter Doocy

00:45:35.280 asks Joe Biden

00:45:36.540 a question about

00:45:37.240 it?

00:45:37.500 Oh, there's a

00:45:37.940 new book out

00:45:38.500 that says,

00:45:39.200 well, what is

00:45:41.680 Biden going to

00:45:42.220 do?

00:45:42.980 He's going to

00:45:43.540 get that stupid

00:45:44.520 smile of his and

00:45:45.540 call him a stupid

00:45:46.400 son of a bitch.

00:45:51.680 All right.

00:45:52.980 Let's get rid of

00:45:53.760 this asshole.

00:45:55.120 One more

00:45:55.600 asshole bites

00:45:56.340 the dust.

00:45:56.840 Anybody else?

00:46:02.560 All right.

00:46:03.180 Goodbye, John

00:46:04.100 Frank.

00:46:06.760 Well, to me, it

00:46:07.800 looks like China

00:46:08.680 owns the Bidens.

00:46:10.960 That's what I'd

00:46:11.640 say.

00:46:12.200 What do you say?

00:46:13.980 I think China

00:46:15.000 owns the Bidens.

00:46:18.320 Debunking

00:46:18.880 implies some

00:46:19.600 credibility.

00:46:20.380 Well, that

00:46:21.240 sounds like

00:46:22.000 pre-COVID

00:46:22.560 thinking.

00:46:24.000 In the old

00:46:24.880 days,

00:46:25.300 debunking did

00:46:27.220 imply credibility,

00:46:28.680 even if it

00:46:29.860 wasn't there.

00:46:31.020 Today, I think

00:46:32.400 fact-checking

00:46:33.220 doesn't have any

00:46:34.080 credibility.

00:46:35.780 Maybe it

00:46:36.200 shouldn't.

00:46:38.640 So here's where

00:46:39.840 everybody's trying

00:46:40.560 to dunk on me.

00:46:41.620 If you said the

00:46:45.460 government is lying

00:46:46.420 and you were

00:46:47.080 right, that

00:46:49.340 wasn't a

00:46:49.880 surprise to me.

00:46:51.220 If you thought

00:46:51.920 it was, then

00:46:54.320 I don't know,

00:46:54.840 that's mind

00:46:55.300 reading or

00:46:55.880 maybe you

00:46:56.460 haven't sampled

00:46:57.060 enough of my

00:46:57.680 materials or

00:46:58.640 something.

00:46:58.880 But I'm

00:46:59.600 literally the

00:47:00.220 most distrusting

00:47:01.400 person of

00:47:01.980 authority in

00:47:02.740 the planet.

00:47:04.820 I've spent

00:47:05.400 30 years

00:47:06.040 talking about

00:47:06.780 almost nothing

00:47:07.480 but that,

00:47:08.440 not trusting

00:47:09.140 authority.

00:47:10.440 So, I'm

00:47:11.760 sorry, on

00:47:13.600 Locals, one

00:47:14.360 of the users

00:47:14.940 to say that

00:47:15.820 they are

00:47:16.180 actually the

00:47:17.000 most skeptical

00:47:18.180 person.

00:47:19.180 Well, I'm the

00:47:19.600 second most

00:47:20.140 skeptical person

00:47:20.840 in the world

00:47:21.260 after this

00:47:22.680 person.

00:47:26.200 Michael

00:47:26.720 Malice might

00:47:27.320 be more

00:47:27.780 distrusting.

00:47:28.460 Well, we

00:47:28.820 might be a

00:47:29.280 tie.

00:47:30.340 We might be

00:47:30.820 a tie.

00:47:31.140 Have I

00:47:38.300 read Atlas

00:47:38.980 Shrugged?

00:47:40.120 Yes.

00:47:41.440 Did I like

00:47:42.060 it?

00:47:42.620 No.

00:47:43.400 I thought it

00:47:43.880 was poorly

00:47:44.280 written and

00:47:45.860 had no impact

00:47:46.640 on my

00:47:47.060 political

00:47:47.620 thinking

00:47:48.060 whatsoever.

00:47:49.080 I really

00:47:49.660 don't understand

00:47:50.260 how anybody

00:47:50.860 is influenced

00:47:51.500 by Atlas

00:47:52.180 Shrugged.

00:47:54.660 It's not a

00:47:55.560 good book.

00:47:57.120 And I

00:47:58.400 didn't get

00:47:58.740 anything

00:47:59.100 political out

00:47:59.760 of it.

00:48:01.400 Anything.

00:48:02.120 I mean, I

00:48:02.460 don't know

00:48:02.720 how that

00:48:03.040 could influence

00:48:03.500 anybody.

00:48:05.520 The idea

00:48:06.220 of it, I

00:48:06.980 don't know.

00:48:08.020 It was just

00:48:08.360 an author

00:48:08.760 with a bunch

00:48:09.260 of opinions

00:48:09.820 that didn't

00:48:10.100 do anything

00:48:10.460 for me.

00:48:13.640 Huge book

00:48:14.220 for a guy

00:48:14.600 that doesn't

00:48:14.960 like to read

00:48:15.420 books.

00:48:15.760 Well, that's

00:48:16.060 one of the

00:48:16.640 reasons I

00:48:17.060 don't like

00:48:17.360 to read

00:48:17.620 books.

00:48:19.240 You know, I

00:48:19.660 read that one

00:48:20.180 because everybody

00:48:20.660 was talking

00:48:21.120 about it.

00:48:23.020 Shelly wrecked

00:48:23.760 you.

00:48:25.660 Goodbye,

00:48:26.200 trolls.

00:48:26.440 I heard

00:48:28.000 that a lot

00:48:28.460 of the

00:48:28.780 bots, the

00:48:29.600 trolls and

00:48:30.180 bots are

00:48:30.680 actually scripts.

00:48:32.120 Have you ever

00:48:32.500 heard that?

00:48:33.580 There's a script

00:48:34.960 that sends sort

00:48:36.500 of generic

00:48:37.000 comments to

00:48:37.820 people like me

00:48:38.460 because I've

00:48:39.660 been wondering

00:48:40.080 why the

00:48:40.620 comments were

00:48:41.280 so generic.

00:48:43.440 Like, I was

00:48:44.820 just showing

00:48:45.180 somebody yesterday,

00:48:46.220 every day I get

00:48:47.540 a comment that

00:48:48.240 just says,

00:48:48.700 go fuck

00:48:49.060 yourself, or

00:48:50.440 some version

00:48:51.000 of it.

00:48:52.100 And I

00:48:52.360 think to

00:48:52.620 myself, was

00:48:53.500 that really

00:48:54.080 based on what

00:48:55.660 my tweet was?

00:48:57.320 Because it

00:48:57.700 looks like

00:48:58.060 they're just

00:48:58.380 randomly coming

00:48:59.140 in with

00:48:59.680 insults about

00:49:00.640 me.

00:49:01.440 And then

00:49:01.680 there are

00:49:01.860 about, I

00:49:02.920 don't know,

00:49:03.180 there may be a

00:49:03.640 dozen things

00:49:04.340 that all the

00:49:04.880 trolls say

00:49:05.320 about me.

00:49:06.120 It's just

00:49:06.460 always from

00:49:06.940 the checklist.

00:49:08.000 The fact

00:49:08.500 that it's so

00:49:09.060 checklist-y,

00:49:10.580 their comments

00:49:11.360 to me, they

00:49:11.860 all look the

00:49:12.300 same.

00:49:13.720 It looks

00:49:14.240 pretty programmed.

00:49:17.000 Did you

00:49:17.540 think War

00:49:18.000 and Peace

00:49:18.400 sucked too?

00:49:19.460 I would

00:49:19.740 never read

00:49:20.260 War and

00:49:20.600 Peace.

00:49:21.000 Atlas

00:49:23.700 Shrugged is

00:49:24.260 not for

00:49:24.720 stupid

00:49:25.060 people.

00:49:26.400 It's

00:49:26.620 probably

00:49:26.860 true.

00:49:31.060 The

00:49:31.580 sound sucks

00:49:32.200 right now.

00:49:32.960 I should

00:49:33.300 block you

00:49:33.760 for that.

00:49:38.400 All

00:49:38.880 right.

00:49:39.620 Well,

00:49:40.840 what do

00:49:44.140 you think

00:49:44.320 is going

00:49:44.620 to happen?

00:49:46.340 Ooh.

00:49:49.540 U.S.

00:49:50.160 facing

00:49:50.520 massive

00:49:50.900 shortage

00:49:51.340 of

00:49:51.600 conspiracy

00:49:52.180 theories

00:49:52.740 as all

00:49:53.640 of them

00:49:53.920 have

00:49:54.060 come

00:49:54.240 true.

00:49:56.420 Headline

00:49:56.900 today.

00:50:00.440 All right.

00:50:04.860 Russian

00:50:05.340 authors are

00:50:06.020 tedious.

00:50:06.520 Yeah,

00:50:06.680 probably so.

00:50:07.280 All right,

00:50:07.480 that's all

00:50:07.760 for now,

00:50:08.300 YouTubers.

00:50:09.000 I'm going to

00:50:09.360 say goodbye

00:50:09.780 and I'll

00:50:10.220 talk to you

00:50:10.700 tomorrow.

00:50:11.120 say goodbye.

00:50:11.800 All right.

00:50:14.920 Well,

00:50:16.040 if you are

00:50:16.440 listening to to this

00:50:29.280 rule, you can't have a

00:50:29.440 time but, but, but,

00:50:30.220 let's do this

00:50:30.880 espaço, based on the

00:50:31.920 고민.

00:50:32.540 So you

00:50:32.660 don't, you

00:50:33.240 don't have to be

00:50:33.360 etchedRIfe.

00:50:33.440 It's about to be a

00:50:33.820 lot more time but, and

00:50:34.600 I'm going to

00:50:35.040 list you

00:50:35.680 out.

00:50:35.840 Nothing knows

00:50:36.780 there.

00:50:37.180 Interesting, I'm going to go

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 25, 2022

Episode 1634 Scott Adams： The Day We Found Out Our Government Lied About 100% of Everything

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript