Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1734 Scott Adams： The Universe Is Becoming Conscious, More Amber Turd, Supreme Court, More

00:00:00.000 highlight of civilization it's called coffee with scott adams and if you didn't think that was enough

00:00:06.620 and it really is enough let's take it to another level because we can all you need is a copper

00:00:13.220 mug or a glass a tanker chelser stein a canteen jug or a flask a vessel of any kind fill it with

00:00:19.400 your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the

00:00:25.520 dopamine today thing that makes everything better um it's called the simultaneous sip it's going to

00:00:32.780 happen now and watch what happens to your dopamine level whoa it's going to start surging in a moment

00:00:38.440 you ready for this dopamine get ready systems go

00:00:43.120 delightful all right here's a question for you do you believe yes or no

00:00:55.020 that hypnosis could raise your dopamine level go now we'd be talking temporarily you know during

00:01:02.480 during the time of the suggestions what do you say almost all of you seem to be saying yes

00:01:10.480 a few knows yes of course um have i ever done it i ever have i ever intentionally raised somebody's

00:01:21.100 dopamine with hypnosis oh yeah oh yeah yeah under the right conditions you can send it through the roof

00:01:30.940 um but can everybody do that i don't know i mean i've never even talked about it with another hypnotist

00:01:39.260 so i don't know um i can't teach you how sadly i wish i could but i can't first of all it would take

00:01:48.240 you years of of uh practice and uh because the because of the nature of it i can't tell you what

00:01:57.220 it is i just trust me it's a thing so it makes me wonder why there's not more attention to this

00:02:03.460 one of the things we know is that uh if you can take a time away from your screens and your social

00:02:09.900 media if you just take some time off that does seem to make you healthier and happier and

00:02:14.400 probably boost your dopamine too so we do have tools for directly boosting our moods without drugs

00:02:22.000 why is it there more of it isn't that a weird i actually google to see if there are any studies

00:02:28.960 on hypnosis and and dopamine and there's some you know some indirect references and stuff but it

00:02:34.840 doesn't look like anybody tested it directly which would be not too hard would it would it be i don't

00:02:41.980 think it'd be that hard so i'm pretty sure you can hypnotize people into uh higher dopamine and

00:02:48.500 therefore higher happiness and satisfaction everything else japan announced that it's going to

00:02:55.600 be using nuclear reactors to reduce dependence on russian energy

00:02:59.700 everything is going in the same direction with nuclear

00:03:04.000 it's it's really amazing it's it's probably one of the greatest persuasion success stories of all

00:03:12.200 time literally saving the world maybe depending on your point of view about the danger of climate

00:03:19.180 change but uh it's just i i can't get over how insanely effective this was that people like michael

00:03:28.180 schellenberger and mark schneider and a number of other people actually just turned this battleship

00:03:34.740 around i think so that's that's just the best news in the whole uh universe right now here was a small

00:03:44.060 part of this story that i think i missed until i saw a video of it so you all know about uh dave

00:03:48.980 chappelle was giving his comedy presentation on stage doing some stand-up and some crazy person in the

00:03:55.920 audience ran up and tackled him and uh apparently this guy was caught and injured in in the catching

00:04:05.820 and uh what i didn't realize is that chris rock who was in the audience coincidentally came up on stage

00:04:14.440 and you know grabbed the microphone from chappelle and asked was that will smith now that's one of the

00:04:21.020 best natural jokes you'll ever hear like because the situation created something that could not have

00:04:26.780 been more perfect it had to be chappelle getting attacked chris rock being in the audience will smith

00:04:33.180 still being in our minds i mean that's why chris rock is chris rock and and you and i are not chris rock

00:04:41.640 talk about talk about seeing an opportunity and grabbing it that was pretty awesome so isn't it

00:04:49.760 interesting that every day that goes by chris rock looks better and uh will smith looks worse

00:04:57.220 am i wrong i think chris rock came out of this looking better than he's ever looked probably

00:05:05.780 all right rasmussen has a poll says the majority of voters think uh joe bryden shouldn't seek

00:05:14.580 re-election in 2024 what is that majority um and he would lose a rematch with uh trump

00:05:21.960 a hypothetical rematch by double digits margins so 61 percent of likely u.s voters this is again

00:05:29.440 per rasmussen um believe biden should not run for a second term 61 percent and only 28 percent think

00:05:37.800 he should seek re-election uh if uh the question was also asked if biden were running against trump

00:05:45.420 50 percent would vote for trump while only 36 percent would vote for biden i mean that would

00:05:51.260 just be a total blowout but uh the hypothetical matchup between florida governor ron desantis

00:05:58.380 and biden would still show desantis winning cleanly but not by as much he would be 46 percent to 35

00:06:07.440 but you have to assume that if desantis actually ran you know got past the primary his name

00:06:15.080 recognition would then become somewhat similar to trump's probably the margins would be similar

00:06:21.500 i would think but desantis has much less name recognition outside of the political followers

00:06:28.280 such as you and such as me so what do you think do you believe that does that does that poll sound

00:06:35.580 about what you thought i definitely can see that there would be a number of democrats who don't think

00:06:41.160 biden should run again and then if you add all every every single uh republican who thinks that

00:06:48.420 yeah that sounds about right 61 percent don't think he should run again

00:06:52.780 uh but i am uh the one the numbers that i think are the least believable

00:06:58.400 are anything about a rematch because that's sort of a steady state prediction

00:07:04.660 uh steady state means that none of the variables change everything you know today stays roughly the

00:07:11.460 same but that never happens there's zero chance of that so anything that says you know what a matchup

00:07:17.520 would look like cannot account for all the surprises and those would be probably decisive like hunter

00:07:24.420 biden's laptop uh for example all right adam schiff uh tweeted this about the supreme court leak

00:07:33.960 on roe versus wade he said i don't care how the draft leaked that's a sideshow what i care about

00:07:40.600 is that a small number of conservative justices who lied about their plans to the senate intend to

00:07:46.040 deprive millions of women of reproductive care codifying roe isn't enough he says we must expand

00:07:52.980 the court now even joe biden is not in favor of expanding the court and the reason is it would

00:08:02.080 destroy the entire system if everybody who came in could just add to the court and then have a court

00:08:07.940 that would do whatever they wanted you've ruined your entire you know balance of power the entire

00:08:13.200 everything that makes the system work would be gone it would be the most fundamental part of the system

00:08:18.260 it would just be gone you know the the competitive nature of the the different branches

00:08:23.160 um so adam schiff is in favor of the thing that would literally destroy the republic

00:08:29.300 and he's still got a job he was the one who pushed the russia collusion

00:08:37.360 that almost destroyed the country and he didn't get penalized for that so here's the question that i

00:08:47.360 asked and i asked this in all seriousness how many ways can one person uh try to injure the republic

00:08:54.960 before you have to ask who's paying him am i right he doesn't look like he's working for the united

00:09:03.200 states he doesn't even look like he's working for democrats right joe biden looks like he's working

00:09:10.140 for democrats

00:09:10.920 if if i can say that you know unpopular opinion joe biden looks like he's trying to make the world a

00:09:20.520 better place and he has a you know a democrat worldview about it but adam schiff doesn't look

00:09:25.300 like that adam schiff just looks like he's trying to destroy the republic how many times does he have

00:09:32.000 to do something that doesn't look productive like it looks like it's designed to make things worse 0.96

00:09:37.120 before you have to ask who the fuck is paying him that's a fair question because if somebody 0.95

00:09:43.360 continually acts just like a democrat i don't have any question about that hey he's acting like a 0.98

00:09:50.280 democrat and the republicans are acting like republicans okay and maybe even some of them are more

00:09:56.080 extreme than others okay none of none of that looks like any kind of foreign interference but as soon

00:10:05.320 as you throw in the stuff that schiff does like russia collusion and expanding the court these are

00:10:11.060 literally system destroying concepts that he's a primary voice behind i don't see him as like other

00:10:19.240 democrats he looks like he's working for another country now i'm not that's not a accusation

00:10:25.580 because i don't have any data to support that but if somebody continually acts in a fashion that

00:10:32.500 doesn't look even political it doesn't look like it's good for the country it doesn't even look

00:10:37.420 political it looks literally like he's working for russia not saying he is he just acts exactly like

00:10:44.740 it or china i suppose well my series about dave the new engineer who uh if you're watching a color

00:10:54.220 version of the strip which doesn't run in every paper um you can see that he's colorized in a way

00:11:00.040 that would make him look like he is black but uh he was hired to help the diversity quota within the

00:11:06.560 the dilbert universe and uh but dave does not play along we learn he's a prankster and he refuses to

00:11:13.720 identify as black even though he was hired for that purpose now he's qualified where we're not

00:11:20.420 suggesting he's not a qualified engineer but the the pointy ear boss says he was trying to you know

00:11:26.620 improve his diversity so um so far here's the blowback from dave the engineer who is black and

00:11:35.760 identifies as white i have received in total now this is just the ones i know about

00:11:42.820 so a lot of people complain to me in a lot of different ways i don't see all the complaints

00:11:48.700 of course but as far as i know out of can somebody do the math for me uh 13 percent of 370 million

00:11:58.700 citizens are in this country are black and american out of all the black americans in the entire country

00:12:05.860 now of course they're not all reading dilbert of course but i don't think i receive one complaint

00:12:12.720 that i'm aware of nobody that i know is black and i you know you can't know for sure but if you're

00:12:20.500 looking at the profiles and what people tell you nobody uh so the first thing i did was confirm a

00:12:28.200 suspicion that i've had for a long time it's very racist but i'm going to say it i'm going to say it in

00:12:34.040 public anyway it's super racist it's like really racist are you ready for this i've always

00:12:42.400 suspected that black people have a good sense of humor because it seems that way whenever i meet 1.00

00:12:48.860 somebody who's black i'm always laughing right now of course that's just a bigoted you know anecdotal 0.68

00:12:59.460 biased not based on any data but it sure feels like it right you meet a white guy sometimes they

00:13:08.920 have a good sense of humor sometimes they don't but it's pretty rare in my own experience to me

00:13:14.960 anybody black who doesn't have a good sense of humor it's just rare now so here i did a comic which

00:13:23.540 literally had nothing but respect for the black character nothing but respect because he's treated as a 0.99

00:13:30.240 high functioning uh engineer because he got the job he is one of the crowd and he's got a good sense

00:13:38.100 of humor and he's he's mocking the boss like the other cartoon like the other characters do so it's

00:13:43.540 nothing but positive and so when black people looked at it said oh added a black character we like that

00:13:50.260 maybe i don't know who knows what anybody's thinking and uh no problem here but the trans community

00:13:57.340 is up in arms the comic has nothing to do with trans anything it's not directly or indirectly

00:14:04.260 talking about them it really is just about how the employees in the office deal with this

00:14:11.100 you know awkward situation basically so you cannot make everybody happy if you wondered can you make

00:14:19.840 everybody happy nope nope you can't oh don't tempt me damn it i have just been challenged 0.95

00:14:28.660 not not in direct words but somebody said i should make dave the black character also trans 0.99

00:14:35.960 oh how i hate you i hate your freaking guts right now because you know how much i want to do that 0.99

00:14:42.700 i want to do that oh i want to do that 1.00

00:14:46.940 damn it damn it no i probably won't because it just complicates things but i hate to be challenged 0.97

00:14:57.740 that way because it's just too tempting to do it all right i'm weak are you watching the uh amber turd 0.99

00:15:05.560 trial she got to testify uh it is really fascinating

00:15:11.120 she she does the cry face without tears like she's the worst actress in the world the only 1.00

00:15:21.360 professional actress who can't cry on command and she doesn't even look like a good liar 0.99

00:15:27.900 it is so well you know i can't read her mind so i'll be i'll be humble about what i can really

00:15:35.340 know about her private thoughts but the way it comes across is so disingenuous whereas johnny depp's

00:15:43.180 story came across as quite believable now here's the interesting thing we've had expert testimony

00:15:50.060 the amber heard uh seems to have some borderline personality trait or um some hysterical thing or maybe

00:15:59.220 she's a vulnerable narcissist anyway she's in that class b group of personality disorders 1.00

00:16:05.280 according to an expert now if you're on the trial and you hear an expert say yes we've diagnosed this

00:16:14.660 person as a person with these personality traits there's something missing in the diagnosis

00:16:21.800 what would have been really useful and perhaps johnny depp's attorney will get to this is that if you're in

00:16:29.320 that class of class b people you don't tell the truth that's a defining characteristic now i got some

00:16:39.120 pushback when i called that lying i called it lying and you know a medical doctor pushed back and said

00:16:47.080 well maybe it's not lying in the sense that they know they're doing it because they might talk themselves

00:16:53.340 into an alternative truth and act as if it's true i don't believe that i don't believe that i believe that they're just

00:17:02.940 lying i believe that they inhabit the character really really well to the point where

00:17:09.100 even a professional would say i think you actually believe this in my personal experience

00:17:15.140 it's just lying they don't believe it but that's that's just subjective you know so keep in mind that the

00:17:22.240 experts and i think i think this is a true that the experts are more likely to believe um that they've come to

00:17:30.860 believe their own lies it's just personally i'm not convinced that's all so how do you have a trial

00:17:38.520 continue after the expert has said that the one person whose testimony will be key to all of this

00:17:44.660 is a known medically medically they're liars medically from a mental health perspective

00:17:55.900 one of the two people whose claims are really the central part of the case because it's a lot about

00:18:02.920 their testimony right it's not just the audio recordings and things like that you got to hear

00:18:08.260 what they say about it and what one person is saying about it is coming from somebody who an expert has

00:18:14.120 labeled as a professional liar basically not professional but somebody who would be a continuous

00:18:20.260 expected to be lying about everything now i suppose in a trial everybody who's guilty is lying all the

00:18:26.820 time but this is really a different level this is somebody you can guarantee will lie about everything

00:18:33.540 all the time everything all the time everything important sometimes unimportant things yeah because

00:18:40.480 this is the kind of lying that isn't even related to a benefit it's just lying to lie it's just lying all

00:18:46.700 the time for anything so how do you even have a trial because there's no expert who has said

00:18:53.100 johnny depp is a liar by medical necessity right keep in mind that if the expert is right amber heard

00:19:02.480 can't tell the truth it's just not even an option do you understand that do you understand that if the 0.72

00:19:10.000 expert is right about amber heard she can't tell the truth and it's not one of her possible it's not a

00:19:16.280 possibility she doesn't have that feature it's just a bug there's no feature there and i don't think that

00:19:24.880 that point has come across to the jury yet do you i don't think the jury has heard you know this is a person

00:19:32.920 who can't tell the truth that's not even an option that's the way it should be described as someone who doesn't

00:19:39.660 have the option of telling the truth all right um

00:19:45.200 so uh here's more um foreshadowing i told you a while ago that it seemed to me that the biden

00:19:56.520 administration had shifted from trying to you know minimize the damage in ukraine or something like

00:20:03.460 that to outright winning just outright winning here's more foreshadowing on that so you cnn has

00:20:11.660 a report that the former commander of the u.s special operations command in europe uh and he's retired

00:20:19.680 u.s army major general mike ripas all right so he's been advising ukraine for the last six years

00:20:27.020 and who better right the head of u.s special operations command in europe advising ukraine on

00:20:33.680 how to how to defend themselves i guess that's the person you'd want to do it right but uh so he says

00:20:41.560 this ukraine is in trouble because their supply chain is inefficient no surprise but he says to win the war 0.99

00:20:47.480 uh we'd have to put a lot more effort into it and we'd need to stand up uh five brigade five brigades

00:20:55.380 of forty thousand ukrainian soldiers each to push rush out so two hundred thousand ukrainian soldiers

00:21:03.400 to push rush out which would be uh double what they have now i'm not sure what the numbers are

00:21:12.360 but that's a lot of people especially in the in the uh context of an ongoing war i don't know how you

00:21:19.600 get two hundred thousand extra people quickly but that's a very specific prediction isn't it

00:21:26.340 that's pretty specific because here's what i what i see in this if it's true and i would at this point

00:21:34.800 i don't see any reason to doubt the opinion of general ripas i mean he's like i said he's exactly

00:21:41.380 the right person to be talking about this topic uh if he says two hundred thousand people would

00:21:47.400 push rush out two hundred thousand soldiers who obviously would have to be equipped and resupplied

00:21:52.640 but doesn't that sound like something that could be done

00:21:56.200 am i right it sounds really hard like really hard but i think it's within the realm of doable isn't it

00:22:06.820 you don't think you well i'm seeing some no's on the locals platform what um do you think that

00:22:13.620 they just wouldn't have the manpower or wouldn't have the time or wouldn't be able to supply them

00:22:18.040 or all of the above it's possible it's undoable i'll give you that but it's it feels so specific

00:22:26.520 that it's now putting it in the range of something that we could actually do

00:22:32.240 right so have we has anybody ever given us a specific um invoice for winning the war this is

00:22:46.920 the first time i've seen it so and it's not that specific but it's like it's like somebody who

00:22:52.900 actually knew what they're talking about and said all right if you want to win the war here's the

00:22:56.640 invoice it's whatever it costs for you know these five uh brigades of forty thousand each plus the

00:23:04.200 resupply plus the weapons it's probably i don't know another fifty billion or something if you had

00:23:10.580 to guess fifty billion maybe i don't know something like that so now there's a price tag on it

00:23:17.320 what do you think now of course there are too many wild cars

00:23:22.600 putin could go tactical nuclear anything could happen but this is a big change isn't it when you

00:23:30.640 go from hey it looks like ukraine is doing better than we thought oh wow they've lasted a week well

00:23:38.620 russia's definitely gonna win but you know they're sure getting the bloody nose in the process now it's 0.80

00:23:44.440 all the way to ukraine could win and here's the invoice if you want to do it here's the price

00:23:48.920 i don't know that seems like a gigantic change to me and it also suggests that the biden administration

00:23:55.100 is thinking in these terms of actually winning which is what i told you i was starting to see

00:24:00.700 by the way has anybody else talked about this scott the neocon for whoever's calling me a neocon

00:24:08.620 i'm not exactly in favor of war that's certainly not with russia

00:24:14.280 um yeah the question of whether we need to stay out of it is is a good one and separate

00:24:22.240 uh but i think i was the only one who was saying um based on the language and by the way this is

00:24:28.280 what hypnotists learn hypnotists learn to look at the language not just what it's saying the choice

00:24:35.320 of words because that gives you a little foreshadowing sometimes of what's to come

00:24:39.020 so anyway to me it looked like we've changed from uh holding them off to winning outright

00:24:45.100 um let's talk about the supreme court leak you know the weird thing about this story is that people

00:24:52.060 did such a good job people meeting the pundits of considering all the angles on this there's not much

00:24:57.980 left people did a good job of this um i would say the bottom line is it's clearly politically motivated

00:25:05.200 the timing is probably not a coincidence and that it's perfectly timed to

00:25:10.860 reboot and reset the democrat um messaging which they're doing so they're going to take it to

00:25:18.640 um republicans are evil and they're bad people and they're going to take away your rights so that'll be

00:25:25.400 the new technique will it work probably yeah it probably will work because this distraction is a good 0.90

00:25:32.880 one it's you know life and death it's an emotional thing it's babies it's everything you'd want in a

00:25:38.540 diversion so uh it does look uh like it's probably a left-leaning person who had a political motive

00:25:46.900 but also and i'm going to be generous here also i i strongly suspect that whoever leaked this

00:25:55.160 thought they were making the world better i don't believe it was leaked

00:25:59.920 somebody somebody's saying that i've changed since ilan took over twitter you're wrong you're just

00:26:08.840 wrong

00:26:09.160 all right but you everybody sees what they want to see all right uh so there's not much more to say

00:26:17.660 about the supreme court leak um joy behar has called for a sex strike if abortion becomes

00:26:24.400 or if roe versus wade gets overturned i guess she's called for a sex strike now a lot of people 0.98

00:26:30.680 commented wittily that uh she probably could stage a sex strike and it wouldn't hurt really anybody 1.00

00:26:37.840 but here's the uh is it ironic you tell me is this the correct use of the word irony 0.96

00:26:46.320 that if democrat women decided not to have sex there wouldn't be any abortions anyway 1.00

00:26:51.880 am i wrong so finally joy behar has has brought the world together unexpectedly you wouldn't see her

00:27:02.780 as the great unifier but she did because if there's one thing that democrats and republicans can

00:27:08.220 completely agree on is that democrats shouldn't have sex am i right

00:27:13.300 uh i feel like we found we found the middle ground 0.89

00:27:18.160 uh now democrats are doing it for their own reasons you know to to boycott or you know maybe

00:27:25.240 not to um i mean they don't want to serve the patriarchy don't want to be a slave to the patriarchy

00:27:31.760 so democrats have lots of good reasons for going on a sex strike and i think republicans could

00:27:37.060 get behind that it would end it would end uh you know abortions as a problem could end a lot of

00:27:45.520 problems really if you think about it if you if you play the long game could solve a lot of problems

00:27:50.980 all right it turns out that elon musk will not own twitter uh by himself so there are a number of

00:27:57.900 money moneyed people like larry ellison and uh cutter's sovereign wealth fund and uh several others

00:28:05.860 add up to about seven billion i guess so musk would own the rest but there'd be minority ownership

00:28:11.800 do you know what that tells me

00:28:13.200 here's that here's what that tells me that there are a lot of really smart investors who think that

00:28:20.440 elon musk got a good deal that's why they're they're staying in because otherwise they could just you

00:28:27.100 know if they already own shares they could just take their money and leave

00:28:30.000 but apparently people think that uh twitter's a good investment with elon at the musk i'm sorry at

00:28:37.780 the at the helm so i think so too i think musk will add enough to the product that uh it should do

00:28:47.460 fine i i wouldn't be surprised if it doubles in a year or two now i should tell you i do own

00:28:53.040 twitter stock but i think it's irrelevant because if the deal goes through i just get what i get

00:28:57.660 right so an interview with uh grimes elon musk's ex-girlfriend

00:29:04.380 and she was uh she was saying that she thinks the universe is waking up and becoming conscious

00:29:14.800 and that we're experiencing we're we're alive during the most amazing part of evolution

00:29:22.220 that we um grimes is an ex-wife or ex-girlfriend

00:29:27.480 or is she is she ex or still a girlfriend

00:29:33.040 oh i don't know so i don't know what her current situation is with elon musk but that's less

00:29:39.800 important than uh the question of thinking the universe is waking up because remember elon musk

00:29:46.500 tweeted that and i wrote a book about it called god's debris

00:29:51.200 and um are there any coincidences in the world what are the odds that grimes and musk are both

00:30:05.840 talking in terms of the universe becoming aware at the same time that musk is buying twitter which

00:30:11.280 many people including myself believe is god's mind and that god is actually recombining

00:30:20.000 as he or she always does because time is circular that's what i think but it's interesting to see

00:30:27.920 people having the same view i wonder if this will catch on all right here's a weird coincidence that

00:30:33.640 tells you you might be living in a simulation people on the political right are anti-mask

00:30:39.260 generally speaking people on the right are anti-mask and people on the left are anti-musk

00:30:47.580 is that weird we went from anti-mask to anti-musk seriously what are the odds of that and here's what

00:30:57.460 it feels like it feels as though the simulation is winking at us and hinting you know you're waking

00:31:06.460 up you know you're going to realize your actual nature in a pretty in in a minute hey watch this

00:31:15.880 anti-musk anti-mask do you see it just give you a little little coincidence little hints that what

00:31:23.920 you see is not natural that the coincidences maybe are more meaningful maybe it's a hint maybe it's code

00:31:31.860 reuse

00:31:32.380 yes the universe is waking and some of us are baking all right well anyway simulation is waking up

00:31:43.540 um biden has decided to be uh totally divisive uh he had his deplorables moment finally you know

00:31:55.140 hillary clinton called uh much of the magga movement deplorables and now joe biden because he's a 0.99

00:32:02.680 brain-dead idiot has decided to sow more division and uh he said the magga crowd is the most extreme 0.99

00:32:09.080 political organization that's existed in american history really really 1.00

00:32:15.380 because i'll bet there have been more extreme ones than that i'll betcha i'll betcha there have been

00:32:24.220 now now that you know that hillary clinton identified a big part of the country as deplorables

00:32:31.140 and that uh biden has is now deriding a big part of the country does it make you like trump more

00:32:38.880 because as as uh let's say as provocative as trump was he never targeted americans not as a group

00:32:48.380 he targeted you know individuals of course but uh this is really remarkable that we could have two

00:32:56.860 two of the biggest leaders on the left uh literally say bad things about a big portion of the country

00:33:03.120 like just citizens citizens who just have legitimate opinions you don't have to agree with them but

00:33:10.360 they're pretty legitimate as opinions um so once again trump is looking better the longer he's out of

00:33:18.260 uh out of office robbie starbuck had a uh tweet that i thought captured things well

00:33:25.940 and this is where i would say um is this a mea culpa no what is it when you revise your opinion

00:33:35.040 is that that's what's going to happen with me right here in a moment let me read robbie starbuck's tweet

00:33:40.940 he said what de santis did to disney just became a thousand times more important than many realized

00:33:47.260 at the time and that would be me i would be one who didn't realize it at the time he said here's why

00:33:52.720 if roe is in fact overturned the left is going to push corporations to threaten red states over new

00:33:59.240 laws ending abortion what de santis did will make companies think twice to which i say yeah i agree 1.00

00:34:06.700 with that i agree with that and when it was happening i thought it was a smaller deal than it has turned

00:34:14.320 out to be because we're not really seeing corporations weigh in yet are we a few maybe

00:34:19.580 but um i do think this was a warning shot across the bow of corporations to stay out of the political

00:34:26.780 arena which i think is good and it looks like it worked uh it's another win for de santis i mean

00:34:35.840 he's racking him up like it's just crazy at this point i actually want to find something to criticize

00:34:41.580 him for but he's not making it easy he's really not making it easy to criticize him he's he's he's

00:34:47.140 about the tightest politician i've seen in a long time and by tight i mean he just doesn't say things

00:34:54.120 that are gaffes that he doesn't say the thing that puts him at risk just just to get attention right

00:35:00.400 he just does good practical things that his base likes and he just sets him up and knocks him over

00:35:07.820 one after another it's really impressive i have to say there are very few politicians who have

00:35:13.560 impressed me with just skill you know i've i've talked about trump and aoc and i've talked about

00:35:20.040 other people but de santis really does have the whole package there's a big story today how many of you

00:35:26.840 heard about the big pfizer document dump a gazillion pages of stuff and there's hashtags trending and

00:35:35.720 people say that the uh i'm not saying this but people say other people who are not me say that

00:35:42.540 the pfizer documents prove that they knew that there were all kinds of problems with the drug

00:35:46.660 and but people have different ideas of what is showing now why is it not a major story if that's true

00:35:55.000 it's not on fox news it's not on cnn it's not anywhere as far as i know it's not on the left or the right

00:36:04.640 so what do you think is causing that

00:36:07.820 do you think it's because the documents show that there's something horrible happening here

00:36:14.560 and uh ordinary people who have read it and those ordinary people have correctly interpreted the data

00:36:20.080 in its full context and it's a smoking gun is that what's happening and then all of the major

00:36:27.360 networks even fox news is deciding it's not a story for what because they're all bought off by big

00:36:33.200 pharma is that why it's possible yes you know it's funny i say it like it's a ridiculous idea which i do

00:36:42.700 intentionally it's like really you think that both the left and the right were bought off by big pharma

00:36:48.940 to which i say oh yeah that's totally possible because they are the biggest advertisers for the left and the right

00:36:55.100 we know that like we don't have to research it you just turn it on there's the commercial

00:37:00.700 they're the biggest advertisers so no you can't really you can't trust the major media entities at all

00:37:07.820 but i haven't seen any entity uh dig into it and make the case that the data is showing us there's harm

00:37:17.000 i haven't seen anybody even try that yet i've only seen individuals who said they looked at it

00:37:22.440 and clearly didn't understand it and they're pretty they're pretty sure that they have an opinion

00:37:28.520 uh dr peter mccullough please look what he said about it well you're gonna have to give me another

00:37:35.800 source i hear what you're saying i hear what you're saying but it's gonna have to be a source that's not

00:37:43.720 one of the uh rogue doctors here's what i want i want a doctor who is not one of the rogue doctors

00:37:52.440 to look at it and say holy cow there's a problem here that i was not expecting what i don't want is

00:37:59.960 the people who predicted it all along to tell you that it's there if you're believing the people who

00:38:05.640 predicted it all along that is unwise that is unwise because those people don't have the ability to see

00:38:13.080 it differently it's a rorschach it's like a rorschach test so the ones who need it to be the way they

00:38:19.160 want it are going to see it that way dr mccullough needs it to say there's something wrong he will see

00:38:25.240 that dr malone probably needs it to say there's great harm from the vaccine he will see that because

00:38:34.040 he needs it if you don't need it you might not see it and in fact i've seen some pushback

00:38:40.040 uh it doesn't seem that the data has anything scary in it that an expert would agree with but

00:38:47.560 if those experts happen to be one of the rogue doctors who have spoken out about it they're the

00:38:52.840 only ones you should not look to do you understand that that in this particular case if you're trying

00:38:59.320 to see if the pfizer documents are telling you something scary the least credible people even if

00:39:05.080 they're right even if they're right so this has nothing to do with who's right or who's wrong

00:39:11.320 the least credible people would be dr mccullough dr malone um anybody anybody who was predicting it

00:39:20.360 they're the least credible because with all those documents you can see anything you want

00:39:25.240 you need somebody like uh i don't know joe rogan and elon musk somebody who who you know can see both

00:39:37.320 sides if they need to right um yeah so i wouldn't believe any of the famous doctors i would look to

00:39:47.800 people whose names have not been famous for having an opinion on it already yeah i think well well

00:39:56.120 butchern is going to have a problem coming up too as you say in the comments all right so i don't know

00:40:01.960 what to think of the pfizer document that's uh there's nobody talking about it that i find credible

00:40:06.840 if i ever see anybody credible talking about those documents i will let you know

00:40:10.920 um apparently there's a a movement to get major corporations to not advertise on twitter

00:40:21.000 and now we know who is behind it so there's a george soros clinton and obama staffers and european

00:40:29.400 governments are behind it so there are 26 activist organizations and ngos that have all signed some

00:40:37.240 letter um trying to discourage companies from advertising on twitter if if elon musk ends up

00:40:45.400 owning it and and me elon musk says interesting oh he tweeted this interesting i wonder if those

00:40:54.440 of funding these organizations are fully aware of what the organizations are doing does that sound

00:41:01.080 like a familiar question wondering if george soros for example is aware of what he's

00:41:07.080 funding that's what i've been asking for years right i would say do you think he knows no because i

00:41:14.200 think he doesn't i think he funds organizations that generally sound positive in his world view

00:41:21.080 uh that they do more things than he's aware of so i feel like his money is being misused

00:41:27.720 but i don't know that's just a speculation so musk is asking the same question he wonders if the

00:41:34.040 people funding them actually know how the organizations are using their money it's a very good question

00:41:40.360 and are you alarmed that there would be some democrat sort of led operation to kill twitter

00:41:48.280 now that twitter is trying to become a free speech platform in a way that it had not been before

00:41:54.200 i i don't see any coincidences anymore

00:42:01.800 yeah

00:42:04.440 all right ladies and gentlemen

00:42:08.280 have i completed my task of entertaining you like nobody ever could before by the way if if you're

00:42:13.800 wearing uh headphones or ear earbuds you will feel less lonely when you listen to this

00:42:20.600 uh live stream it's true it'll be just like i'm whispering in your ear

00:42:28.040 all right is there any topic i missed today

00:42:33.960 um musk using his cloud to make soros make an official statement has he made a statement

00:42:38.920 uh something about trans kids yeah well what about trans kids i'm not sure what angle you're looking at that i talked about chapelle

00:42:56.120 um

00:42:57.640 i i'm not going to read the norm uh norm's biography madison cawthorne all right so

00:43:06.280 i keep seeing stories that a young guy was partying and joking around is that the whole story

00:43:13.480 oh why do i care about madison cawthorne's private life i don't know uh 2000 mules 1.00

00:43:21.320 so yeah we forgot about that one um so the documentary 2000 mules which purports to show

00:43:28.680 uh this is uh uh dinesh de souza's film and it purports to show that there was some ballot stuffing

00:43:37.400 and irregularities with mail-in ballots it doesn't prove the case it simply uh attempts to show enough

00:43:45.640 evidence that an investigation would be warranted now i guess twitter uh banned their twitter account

00:43:52.680 now i don't know why i didn't see the reason but that's pretty bothersome because i'm pretty sure

00:44:01.560 it's well documented in terms of you know it's interviews with real people and i don't think it's

00:44:07.480 made up so i don't know why you banned that did anybody see a reason

00:44:12.840 scott thinks it's just boys being boys i don't know what you're talking about but you're writing 1.00

00:44:26.120 in all caps i'm gonna get rid of your stupid ass goodbye you know one way to get uh one way to get 1.00

00:44:35.480 banned on my channel is to tell me what i'm thinking in front of other people 1.00

00:44:39.000 now don't tell me what i'm fucking thinking tell me what you're thinking if there's anything 0.99

00:44:45.000 happening in there because you're really bad at telling me what i'm thinking you're really bad at it 0.98

00:44:52.680 well thank you uh redubs i appreciate that

00:44:56.760 i've changed why do you keep saying that

00:45:13.080 i'm going to hide you from this channel for saying that i changed since elan here's why

00:45:20.520 again you're reading my mind i haven't changed

00:45:23.720 did will chamberlain go too far uh so i'm seeing all the tweets about will chamberlain

00:45:32.040 but i haven't seen the story about it so i don't even know what that's all about

00:45:35.240 oh adus yeah talked about that yesterday

00:45:51.080 all right um that's all i got for now he has attempted to out the leaker oh chamberlain

00:45:58.040 tried to out the leaker but uh it's not confirmed right a lot of people were saying there's an

00:46:03.960 individual there who's got connections to politico it would make sense that's probably the person but

00:46:09.720 i think that's that's deeply unfair at this point and imagine if you're wrong about that imagine iding

00:46:16.920 the whistleblower based on just somebody having connections and then being wrong about it

00:46:22.440 i mean that would be really really bad

00:46:31.560 uh it's not a whistleblower

00:46:35.160 because it's a leak so it's not a whistleblower because it's not about uh anything bad going on

00:46:41.320 it's just a regular process oh okay i guess i'll take that

00:46:44.520 yeah will chamberlain proposes a specific leaker i think that's deeply unfair don't you now he could

00:46:53.240 be right or he could be wrong but i don't know if you identify a leaker and it becomes news

00:47:03.000 you can't wash that off i think that would be a lawsuit wouldn't it

00:47:06.840 he framed it as speculation but that doesn't help framing it as speculation doesn't help at all

00:47:17.480 that's a messed up thing to do frankly now i i blocked will chamberlain a long time ago

00:47:23.560 for being a jerk i forget the exact thing but so i guess i'm not surprised by his behavior if that's true

00:47:30.040 well just because he's a lawyer 0.98

00:47:38.360 okay

00:47:38.680 um

00:47:42.200 yeah he might be a lawyer but i don't see how you could out a whistle

00:47:45.480 out a leaker and be wrong about it and think you're going to get away with it

00:47:52.280 i suppose if you frame it as speculation you can get away with it but that's a messed up thing to do

00:48:00.040 yeah adam schiff is a lawyer unfortunately

00:48:09.560 oh somebody says that teaching people how to improve their lives helps you to replace having

00:48:15.240 kids do you agree yes i agree with that yeah more generally speaking because i do not have

00:48:21.720 biological children i do feel and i feel it directly you know it's not it's not like a subtle thing

00:48:29.880 i feel a direct need to help the people who are here sort of help the tribe

00:48:34.680 help the country help the town no i feel that all the time and i do think that if i had biological

00:48:41.000 children my intentions and my energies would be shifted to them so in the sense that your energy has

00:48:49.640 to go somewhere uh my positive energy is not going toward a biological child so it's going toward

00:48:56.280 other ways so yeah yeah yeah there's definitely a compensation thing going on there

00:49:07.320 um all right now i'm just catching up on your comments you're more apparent to me than my parents

00:49:14.840 you know there are a lot of people who don't have functional parents like a lot of people maybe

00:49:20.600 most i don't know i don't know how many people have two functional parents but uh there is this

00:49:26.440 need for something that's like a parent that's functional and i do think the internet dads are filling

00:49:32.520 that filling that hole um

00:49:36.600 oh elon gave me a new topic oh if i'm if i'm different because of elon musk it's because the topic is

00:49:50.520 more fun right um someone's asking me about christina's flying i have no idea unfortunately i'm not the

00:50:00.360 person to ask on that question anymore uh baseball post oh that was great

00:50:10.360 uh yesterday's lifestyle framing for abortion horrible solemnism

00:50:16.360 yeah i don't know what that means

00:50:19.800 um adam schiff has the amber herd disease somebody just said i wonder about that because if you notice

00:50:27.640 that adam schiff tends to blame people for what he's doing have you noticed that that whatever

00:50:34.040 adam schiff is doing he is publicly blaming somebody else for doing it that's not doing it what does that

00:50:40.600 sound like that's projection that's literally a you know that category b personality disorder thing

00:50:49.400 he acts like somebody who has that disorder but i wouldn't say i could diagnose him that way

00:50:54.360 all right that's all i've got for now and i'll talk to you tomorrow

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 05, 2022

Episode 1734 Scott Adams： The Universe Is Becoming Conscious, More Amber Turd, Supreme Court, More

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript