Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1734 Scott Adams： The Universe Is Becoming Conscious, More Amber Turd, Supreme Court, More

00:00:00.000 highlight of civilization it's called coffee with scott adams and if you didn't think that was enough

00:00:06.620 and it really is enough let's take it to another level because we can all you need is a copper

00:00:13.220 mug or a glass a tanker chelser stein a canteen jug or a flask a vessel of any kind fill it with

00:00:19.400 your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the

00:00:25.520 dopamine today thing that makes everything better um it's called the simultaneous sip it's going to

00:00:32.780 happen now and watch what happens to your dopamine level whoa it's going to start surging in a moment

00:00:38.440 you ready for this dopamine get ready systems go

00:00:43.120 delightful all right here's a question for you do you believe yes or no

00:00:55.020 that hypnosis could raise your dopamine level go now we'd be talking temporarily you know during

00:01:02.480 during the time of the suggestions what do you say almost all of you seem to be saying yes

00:01:10.480 a few knows yes of course um have i ever done it i ever have i ever intentionally raised somebody's

00:01:21.100 dopamine with hypnosis oh yeah oh yeah yeah under the right conditions you can send it through the roof

00:01:30.940 um but can everybody do that i don't know i mean i've never even talked about it with another hypnotist

00:01:39.260 so i don't know um i can't teach you how sadly i wish i could but i can't first of all it would take

00:01:48.240 you years of of uh practice and uh because the because of the nature of it i can't tell you what

00:01:57.220 it is i just trust me it's a thing so it makes me wonder why there's not more attention to this

00:02:03.460 one of the things we know is that uh if you can take a time away from your screens and your social

00:02:09.900 media if you just take some time off that does seem to make you healthier and happier and

00:02:14.400 probably boost your dopamine too so we do have tools for directly boosting our moods without drugs

00:02:22.000 why is it there more of it isn't that a weird i actually google to see if there are any studies

00:02:28.960 on hypnosis and and dopamine and there's some you know some indirect references and stuff but it

00:02:34.840 doesn't look like anybody tested it directly which would be not too hard would it would it be i don't

00:02:41.980 think it'd be that hard so i'm pretty sure you can hypnotize people into uh higher dopamine and

00:02:48.500 therefore higher happiness and satisfaction everything else japan announced that it's going to

00:02:55.600 be using nuclear reactors to reduce dependence on russian energy

00:02:59.700 everything is going in the same direction with nuclear

00:03:04.000 it's it's really amazing it's it's probably one of the greatest persuasion success stories of all

00:03:12.200 time literally saving the world maybe depending on your point of view about the danger of climate

00:03:19.180 change but uh it's just i i can't get over how insanely effective this was that people like michael

00:03:28.180 schellenberger and mark schneider and a number of other people actually just turned this battleship

00:03:34.740 around i think so that's that's just the best news in the whole uh universe right now here was a small

00:03:44.060 part of this story that i think i missed until i saw a video of it so you all know about uh dave

00:03:48.980 chappelle was giving his comedy presentation on stage doing some stand-up and some crazy person in the

00:03:55.920 audience ran up and tackled him and uh apparently this guy was caught and injured in in the catching

00:04:05.820 and uh what i didn't realize is that chris rock who was in the audience coincidentally came up on stage

00:04:14.440 and you know grabbed the microphone from chappelle and asked was that will smith now that's one of the

00:04:21.020 best natural jokes you'll ever hear like because the situation created something that could not have

00:04:26.780 been more perfect it had to be chappelle getting attacked chris rock being in the audience will smith

00:04:33.180 still being in our minds i mean that's why chris rock is chris rock and and you and i are not chris rock

00:04:41.640 talk about talk about seeing an opportunity and grabbing it that was pretty awesome so isn't it

00:04:49.760 interesting that every day that goes by chris rock looks better and uh will smith looks worse

00:04:57.220 am i wrong i think chris rock came out of this looking better than he's ever looked probably

00:05:05.780 all right rasmussen has a poll says the majority of voters think uh joe bryden shouldn't seek

00:05:14.580 re-election in 2024 what is that majority um and he would lose a rematch with uh trump

00:05:21.960 a hypothetical rematch by double digits margins so 61 percent of likely u.s voters this is again

00:05:29.440 per rasmussen um believe biden should not run for a second term 61 percent and only 28 percent think

00:05:37.800 he should seek re-election uh if uh the question was also asked if biden were running against trump

00:05:45.420 50 percent would vote for trump while only 36 percent would vote for biden i mean that would

00:05:51.260 just be a total blowout but uh the hypothetical matchup between florida governor ron desantis

00:05:58.380 and biden would still show desantis winning cleanly but not by as much he would be 46 percent to 35

00:06:07.440 but you have to assume that if desantis actually ran you know got past the primary his name

00:06:15.080 recognition would then become somewhat similar to trump's probably the margins would be similar

00:06:21.500 i would think but desantis has much less name recognition outside of the political followers

00:06:28.280 such as you and such as me so what do you think do you believe that does that does that poll sound

00:06:35.580 about what you thought i definitely can see that there would be a number of democrats who don't think

00:06:41.160 biden should run again and then if you add all every every single uh republican who thinks that

00:06:48.420 yeah that sounds about right 61 percent don't think he should run again

00:06:52.780 uh but i am uh the one the numbers that i think are the least believable

00:06:58.400 are anything about a rematch because that's sort of a steady state prediction

00:07:04.660 uh steady state means that none of the variables change everything you know today stays roughly the

00:07:11.460 same but that never happens there's zero chance of that so anything that says you know what a matchup

00:07:17.520 would look like cannot account for all the surprises and those would be probably decisive like hunter

00:07:24.420 biden's laptop uh for example all right adam schiff uh tweeted this about the supreme court leak

00:07:33.960 on roe versus wade he said i don't care how the draft leaked that's a sideshow what i care about

00:07:40.600 is that a small number of conservative justices who lied about their plans to the senate intend to

00:07:46.040 deprive millions of women of reproductive care codifying roe isn't enough he says we must expand

00:07:52.980 the court now even joe biden is not in favor of expanding the court and the reason is it would

00:08:02.080 destroy the entire system if everybody who came in could just add to the court and then have a court

00:08:07.940 that would do whatever they wanted you've ruined your entire you know balance of power the entire

00:08:13.200 everything that makes the system work would be gone it would be the most fundamental part of the system

00:08:18.260 it would just be gone you know the the competitive nature of the the different branches

00:08:23.160 um so adam schiff is in favor of the thing that would literally destroy the republic

00:08:29.300 and he's still got a job he was the one who pushed the russia collusion

00:08:37.360 that almost destroyed the country and he didn't get penalized for that so here's the question that i

00:08:47.360 asked and i asked this in all seriousness how many ways can one person uh try to injure the republic

00:08:54.960 before you have to ask who's paying him am i right he doesn't look like he's working for the united

00:09:03.200 states he doesn't even look like he's working for democrats right joe biden looks like he's working

00:09:10.140 for democrats

00:09:10.920 if if i can say that you know unpopular opinion joe biden looks like he's trying to make the world a

00:09:20.520 better place and he has a you know a democrat worldview about it but adam schiff doesn't look

00:09:25.300 like that adam schiff just looks like he's trying to destroy the republic how many times does he have

00:09:32.000 to do something that doesn't look productive like it looks like it's designed to make things worse

00:09:37.120 before you have to ask who the fuck is paying him that's a fair question because if somebody

00:09:43.360 continually acts just like a democrat i don't have any question about that hey he's acting like a

00:09:50.280 democrat and the republicans are acting like republicans okay and maybe even some of them are more

00:09:56.080 extreme than others okay none of none of that looks like any kind of foreign interference but as soon

00:10:05.320 as you throw in the stuff that schiff does like russia collusion and expanding the court these are

00:10:11.060 literally system destroying concepts that he's a primary voice behind i don't see him as like other

00:10:19.240 democrats he looks like he's working for another country now i'm not that's not a accusation

00:10:25.580 because i don't have any data to support that but if somebody continually acts in a fashion that

00:10:32.500 doesn't look even political it doesn't look like it's good for the country it doesn't even look

00:10:37.420 political it looks literally like he's working for russia not saying he is he just acts exactly like

00:10:44.740 it or china i suppose well my series about dave the new engineer who uh if you're watching a color

00:10:54.220 version of the strip which doesn't run in every paper um you can see that he's colorized in a way

00:11:00.040 that would make him look like he is black but uh he was hired to help the diversity quota within the

00:11:06.560 the dilbert universe and uh but dave does not play along we learn he's a prankster and he refuses to

00:11:13.720 identify as black even though he was hired for that purpose now he's qualified where we're not

00:11:20.420 suggesting he's not a qualified engineer but the the pointy ear boss says he was trying to you know

00:11:26.620 improve his diversity so um so far here's the blowback from dave the engineer who is black and

00:11:35.760 identifies as white i have received in total now this is just the ones i know about

00:11:42.820 so a lot of people complain to me in a lot of different ways i don't see all the complaints

00:11:48.700 of course but as far as i know out of can somebody do the math for me uh 13 percent of 370 million

00:11:58.700 citizens are in this country are black and american out of all the black americans in the entire country

00:12:05.860 now of course they're not all reading dilbert of course but i don't think i receive one complaint

00:12:12.720 that i'm aware of nobody that i know is black and i you know you can't know for sure but if you're

00:12:20.500 looking at the profiles and what people tell you nobody uh so the first thing i did was confirm a

00:12:28.200 suspicion that i've had for a long time it's very racist but i'm going to say it i'm going to say it in

00:12:34.040 public anyway it's super racist it's like really racist are you ready for this i've always

00:12:42.400 suspected that black people have a good sense of humor because it seems that way whenever i meet

00:12:48.860 somebody who's black i'm always laughing right now of course that's just a bigoted you know anecdotal

00:12:59.460 biased not based on any data but it sure feels like it right you meet a white guy sometimes they

00:13:08.920 have a good sense of humor sometimes they don't but it's pretty rare in my own experience to me

00:13:14.960 anybody black who doesn't have a good sense of humor it's just rare now so here i did a comic which

00:13:23.540 literally had nothing but respect for the black character nothing but respect because he's treated as a

00:13:30.240 high functioning uh engineer because he got the job he is one of the crowd and he's got a good sense

00:13:38.100 of humor and he's he's mocking the boss like the other cartoon like the other characters do so it's

00:13:43.540 nothing but positive and so when black people looked at it said oh added a black character we like that

00:13:50.260 maybe i don't know who knows what anybody's thinking and uh no problem here but the trans community

00:13:57.340 is up in arms the comic has nothing to do with trans anything it's not directly or indirectly

00:14:04.260 talking about them it really is just about how the employees in the office deal with this

00:14:11.100 you know awkward situation basically so you cannot make everybody happy if you wondered can you make

00:14:19.840 everybody happy nope nope you can't oh don't tempt me damn it i have just been challenged

00:14:28.660 not not in direct words but somebody said i should make dave the black character also trans

00:14:35.960 oh how i hate you i hate your freaking guts right now because you know how much i want to do that

00:14:42.700 i want to do that oh i want to do that

00:14:46.940 damn it damn it no i probably won't because it just complicates things but i hate to be challenged

00:14:57.740 that way because it's just too tempting to do it all right i'm weak are you watching the uh amber turd

00:15:05.560 trial she got to testify uh it is really fascinating

00:15:11.120 she she does the cry face without tears like she's the worst actress in the world the only

00:15:21.360 professional actress who can't cry on command and she doesn't even look like a good liar

00:15:27.900 it is so well you know i can't read her mind so i'll be i'll be humble about what i can really

00:15:35.340 know about her private thoughts but the way it comes across is so disingenuous whereas johnny depp's

00:15:43.180 story came across as quite believable now here's the interesting thing we've had expert testimony

00:15:50.060 the amber heard uh seems to have some borderline personality trait or um some hysterical thing or maybe

00:15:59.220 she's a vulnerable narcissist anyway she's in that class b group of personality disorders

00:16:05.280 according to an expert now if you're on the trial and you hear an expert say yes we've diagnosed this

00:16:14.660 person as a person with these personality traits there's something missing in the diagnosis

00:16:21.800 what would have been really useful and perhaps johnny depp's attorney will get to this is that if you're in

00:16:29.320 that class of class b people you don't tell the truth that's a defining characteristic now i got some

00:16:39.120 pushback when i called that lying i called it lying and you know a medical doctor pushed back and said

00:16:47.080 well maybe it's not lying in the sense that they know they're doing it because they might talk themselves

00:16:53.340 into an alternative truth and act as if it's true i don't believe that i don't believe that i believe that they're just

00:17:02.940 lying i believe that they inhabit the character really really well to the point where

00:17:09.100 even a professional would say i think you actually believe this in my personal experience

00:17:15.140 it's just lying they don't believe it but that's that's just subjective you know so keep in mind that the

00:17:22.240 experts and i think i think this is a true that the experts are more likely to believe um that they've come to

00:17:30.860 believe their own lies it's just personally i'm not convinced that's all so how do you have a trial

00:17:38.520 continue after the expert has said that the one person whose testimony will be key to all of this

00:17:44.660 is a known medically medically they're liars medically from a mental health perspective

00:17:55.900 one of the two people whose claims are really the central part of the case because it's a lot about

00:18:02.920 their testimony right it's not just the audio recordings and things like that you got to hear

00:18:08.260 what they say about it and what one person is saying about it is coming from somebody who an expert has

00:18:14.120 labeled as a professional liar basically not professional but somebody who would be a continuous

00:18:20.260 expected to be lying about everything now i suppose in a trial everybody who's guilty is lying all the

00:18:26.820 time but this is really a different level this is somebody you can guarantee will lie about everything

00:18:33.540 all the time everything all the time everything important sometimes unimportant things yeah because

00:18:40.480 this is the kind of lying that isn't even related to a benefit it's just lying to lie it's just lying all

00:18:46.700 the time for anything so how do you even have a trial because there's no expert who has said

00:18:53.100 johnny depp is a liar by medical necessity right keep in mind that if the expert is right amber heard

00:19:02.480 can't tell the truth it's just not even an option do you understand that do you understand that if the

00:19:10.000 expert is right about amber heard she can't tell the truth and it's not one of her possible it's not a

00:19:16.280 possibility she doesn't have that feature it's just a bug there's no feature there and i don't think that

00:19:24.880 that point has come across to the jury yet do you i don't think the jury has heard you know this is a person

00:19:32.920 who can't tell the truth that's not even an option that's the way it should be described as someone who doesn't

00:19:39.660 have the option of telling the truth all right um

00:19:45.200 so uh here's more um foreshadowing i told you a while ago that it seemed to me that the biden

00:19:56.520 administration had shifted from trying to you know minimize the damage in ukraine or something like

00:20:03.460 that to outright winning just outright winning here's more foreshadowing on that so you cnn has

00:20:11.660 a report that the former commander of the u.s special operations command in europe uh and he's retired

00:20:19.680 u.s army major general mike ripas all right so he's been advising ukraine for the last six years

00:20:27.020 and who better right the head of u.s special operations command in europe advising ukraine on

00:20:33.680 how to how to defend themselves i guess that's the person you'd want to do it right but uh so he says

00:20:41.560 this ukraine is in trouble because their supply chain is inefficient no surprise but he says to win the war

00:20:47.480 uh we'd have to put a lot more effort into it and we'd need to stand up uh five brigade five brigades

00:20:55.380 of forty thousand ukrainian soldiers each to push rush out so two hundred thousand ukrainian soldiers

00:21:03.400 to push rush out which would be uh double what they have now i'm not sure what the numbers are

00:21:12.360 but that's a lot of people especially in the in the uh context of an ongoing war i don't know how you

00:21:19.600 get two hundred thousand extra people quickly but that's a very specific prediction isn't it

00:21:26.340 that's pretty specific because here's what i what i see in this if it's true and i would at this point

00:21:34.800 i don't see any reason to doubt the opinion of general ripas i mean he's like i said he's exactly

00:21:41.380 the right person to be talking about this topic uh if he says two hundred thousand people would

00:21:47.400 push rush out two hundred thousand soldiers who obviously would have to be equipped and resupplied

00:21:52.640 but doesn't that sound like something that could be done

00:21:56.200 am i right it sounds really hard like really hard but i think it's within the realm of doable isn't it

00:22:06.820 you don't think you well i'm seeing some no's on the locals platform what um do you think that

00:22:13.620 they just wouldn't have the manpower or wouldn't have the time or wouldn't be able to supply them

00:22:18.040 or all of the above it's possible it's undoable i'll give you that but it's it feels so specific

00:22:26.520 that it's now putting it in the range of something that we could actually do

00:22:32.240 right so have we has anybody ever given us a specific um invoice for winning the war this is

00:22:46.920 the first time i've seen it so and it's not that specific but it's like it's like somebody who

00:22:52.900 actually knew what they're talking about and said all right if you want to win the war here's the

00:22:56.640 invoice it's whatever it costs for you know these five uh brigades of forty thousand each plus the

00:23:04.200 resupply plus the weapons it's probably i don't know another fifty billion or something if you had

00:23:10.580 to guess fifty billion maybe i don't know something like that so now there's a price tag on it

00:23:17.320 what do you think now of course there are too many wild cars

00:23:22.600 putin could go tactical nuclear anything could happen but this is a big change isn't it when you

00:23:30.640 go from hey it looks like ukraine is doing better than we thought oh wow they've lasted a week well

00:23:38.620 russia's definitely gonna win but you know they're sure getting the bloody nose in the process now it's

00:23:44.440 all the way to ukraine could win and here's the invoice if you want to do it here's the price

00:23:48.920 i don't know that seems like a gigantic change to me and it also suggests that the biden administration

00:23:55.100 is thinking in these terms of actually winning which is what i told you i was starting to see

00:24:00.700 by the way has anybody else talked about this scott the neocon for whoever's calling me a neocon

00:24:08.620 i'm not exactly in favor of war that's certainly not with russia

00:24:14.280 um yeah the question of whether we need to stay out of it is is a good one and separate

00:24:22.240 uh but i think i was the only one who was saying um based on the language and by the way this is

00:24:28.280 what hypnotists learn hypnotists learn to look at the language not just what it's saying the choice

00:24:35.320 of words because that gives you a little foreshadowing sometimes of what's to come

00:24:39.020 so anyway to me it looked like we've changed from uh holding them off to winning outright

00:24:45.100 um let's talk about the supreme court leak you know the weird thing about this story is that people

00:24:52.060 did such a good job people meeting the pundits of considering all the angles on this there's not much

00:24:57.980 left people did a good job of this um i would say the bottom line is it's clearly politically motivated

00:25:05.200 the timing is probably not a coincidence and that it's perfectly timed to

00:25:10.860 reboot and reset the democrat um messaging which they're doing so they're going to take it to

00:25:18.640 um republicans are evil and they're bad people and they're going to take away your rights so that'll be

00:25:25.400 the new technique will it work probably yeah it probably will work because this distraction is a good

00:25:32.880 one it's you know life and death it's an emotional thing it's babies it's everything you'd want in a

00:25:38.540 diversion so uh it does look uh like it's probably a left-leaning person who had a political motive

00:25:46.900 but also and i'm going to be generous here also i i strongly suspect that whoever leaked this

00:25:55.160 thought they were making the world better i don't believe it was leaked

00:25:59.920 somebody somebody's saying that i've changed since ilan took over twitter you're wrong you're just

00:26:08.840 wrong

00:26:09.160 all right but you everybody sees what they want to see all right uh so there's not much more to say

00:26:17.660 about the supreme court leak um joy behar has called for a sex strike if abortion becomes

00:26:24.400 or if roe versus wade gets overturned i guess she's called for a sex strike now a lot of people

00:26:30.680 commented wittily that uh she probably could stage a sex strike and it wouldn't hurt really anybody

00:26:37.840 but here's the uh is it ironic you tell me is this the correct use of the word irony

00:26:46.320 that if democrat women decided not to have sex there wouldn't be any abortions anyway

00:26:51.880 am i wrong so finally joy behar has has brought the world together unexpectedly you wouldn't see her

00:27:02.780 as the great unifier but she did because if there's one thing that democrats and republicans can

00:27:08.220 completely agree on is that democrats shouldn't have sex am i right

00:27:13.300 uh i feel like we found we found the middle ground

00:27:18.160 uh now democrats are doing it for their own reasons you know to to boycott or you know maybe

00:27:25.240 not to um i mean they don't want to serve the patriarchy don't want to be a slave to the patriarchy

00:27:31.760 so democrats have lots of good reasons for going on a sex strike and i think republicans could

00:27:37.060 get behind that it would end it would end uh you know abortions as a problem could end a lot of

00:27:45.520 problems really if you think about it if you if you play the long game could solve a lot of problems

00:27:50.980 all right it turns out that elon musk will not own twitter uh by himself so there are a number of

00:27:57.900 money moneyed people like larry ellison and uh cutter's sovereign wealth fund and uh several others

00:28:05.860 add up to about seven billion i guess so musk would own the rest but there'd be minority ownership

00:28:11.800 do you know what that tells me

00:28:13.200 here's that here's what that tells me that there are a lot of really smart investors who think that

00:28:20.440 elon musk got a good deal that's why they're they're staying in because otherwise they could just you

00:28:27.100 know if they already own shares they could just take their money and leave

00:28:30.000 but apparently people think that uh twitter's a good investment with elon at the musk i'm sorry at

00:28:37.780 the at the helm so i think so too i think musk will add enough to the product that uh it should do

00:28:47.460 fine i i wouldn't be surprised if it doubles in a year or two now i should tell you i do own

00:28:53.040 twitter stock but i think it's irrelevant because if the deal goes through i just get what i get

00:28:57.660 right so an interview with uh grimes elon musk's ex-girlfriend

00:29:04.380 and she was uh she was saying that she thinks the universe is waking up and becoming conscious

00:29:14.800 and that we're experiencing we're we're alive during the most amazing part of evolution

00:29:22.220 that we um grimes is an ex-wife or ex-girlfriend

00:29:27.480 or is she is she ex or still a girlfriend

00:29:33.040 oh i don't know so i don't know what her current situation is with elon musk but that's less

00:29:39.800 important than uh the question of thinking the universe is waking up because remember elon musk

00:29:46.500 tweeted that and i wrote a book about it called god's debris

00:29:51.200 and um are there any coincidences in the world what are the odds that grimes and musk are both

00:30:05.840 talking in terms of the universe becoming aware at the same time that musk is buying twitter which

00:30:11.280 many people including myself believe is god's mind and that god is actually recombining

00:30:20.000 as he or she always does because time is circular that's what i think but it's interesting to see

00:30:27.920 people having the same view i wonder if this will catch on all right here's a weird coincidence that

00:30:33.640 tells you you might be living in a simulation people on the political right are anti-mask

00:30:39.260 generally speaking people on the right are anti-mask and people on the left are anti-musk

00:30:47.580 is that weird we went from anti-mask to anti-musk seriously what are the odds of that and here's what

00:30:57.460 it feels like it feels as though the simulation is winking at us and hinting you know you're waking

00:31:06.460 up you know you're going to realize your actual nature in a pretty in in a minute hey watch this

00:31:15.880 anti-musk anti-mask do you see it just give you a little little coincidence little hints that what

00:31:23.920 you see is not natural that the coincidences maybe are more meaningful maybe it's a hint maybe it's code

00:31:31.860 reuse

00:31:32.380 yes the universe is waking and some of us are baking all right well anyway simulation is waking up

00:31:43.540 um biden has decided to be uh totally divisive uh he had his deplorables moment finally you know

00:31:55.140 hillary clinton called uh much of the magga movement deplorables and now joe biden because he's a

00:32:02.680 brain-dead idiot has decided to sow more division and uh he said the magga crowd is the most extreme

00:32:09.080 political organization that's existed in american history really really

00:32:15.380 because i'll bet there have been more extreme ones than that i'll betcha i'll betcha there have been

00:32:24.220 now now that you know that hillary clinton identified a big part of the country as deplorables

00:32:31.140 and that uh biden has is now deriding a big part of the country does it make you like trump more

00:32:38.880 because as as uh let's say as provocative as trump was he never targeted americans not as a group

00:32:48.380 he targeted you know individuals of course but uh this is really remarkable that we could have two

00:32:56.860 two of the biggest leaders on the left uh literally say bad things about a big portion of the country

00:33:03.120 like just citizens citizens who just have legitimate opinions you don't have to agree with them but

00:33:10.360 they're pretty legitimate as opinions um so once again trump is looking better the longer he's out of

00:33:18.260 uh out of office robbie starbuck had a uh tweet that i thought captured things well

00:33:25.940 and this is where i would say um is this a mea culpa no what is it when you revise your opinion

00:33:35.040 is that that's what's going to happen with me right here in a moment let me read robbie starbuck's tweet

00:33:40.940 he said what de santis did to disney just became a thousand times more important than many realized

00:33:47.260 at the time and that would be me i would be one who didn't realize it at the time he said here's why

00:33:52.720 if roe is in fact overturned the left is going to push corporations to threaten red states over new

00:33:59.240 laws ending abortion what de santis did will make companies think twice to which i say yeah i agree

00:34:06.700 with that i agree with that and when it was happening i thought it was a smaller deal than it has turned

00:34:14.320 out to be because we're not really seeing corporations weigh in yet are we a few maybe

00:34:19.580 but um i do think this was a warning shot across the bow of corporations to stay out of the political

00:34:26.780 arena which i think is good and it looks like it worked uh it's another win for de santis i mean

00:34:35.840 he's racking him up like it's just crazy at this point i actually want to find something to criticize

00:34:41.580 him for but he's not making it easy he's really not making it easy to criticize him he's he's he's

00:34:47.140 about the tightest politician i've seen in a long time and by tight i mean he just doesn't say things

00:34:54.120 that are gaffes that he doesn't say the thing that puts him at risk just just to get attention right

00:35:00.400 he just does good practical things that his base likes and he just sets him up and knocks him over

00:35:07.820 one after another it's really impressive i have to say there are very few politicians who have

00:35:13.560 impressed me with just skill you know i've i've talked about trump and aoc and i've talked about

00:35:20.040 other people but de santis really does have the whole package there's a big story today how many of you

00:35:26.840 heard about the big pfizer document dump a gazillion pages of stuff and there's hashtags trending and

00:35:35.720 people say that the uh i'm not saying this but people say other people who are not me say that

00:35:42.540 the pfizer documents prove that they knew that there were all kinds of problems with the drug

00:35:46.660 and but people have different ideas of what is showing now why is it not a major story if that's true

00:35:55.000 it's not on fox news it's not on cnn it's not anywhere as far as i know it's not on the left or the right

00:36:04.640 so what do you think is causing that

00:36:07.820 do you think it's because the documents show that there's something horrible happening here

00:36:14.560 and uh ordinary people who have read it and those ordinary people have correctly interpreted the data

00:36:20.080 in its full context and it's a smoking gun is that what's happening and then all of the major

00:36:27.360 networks even fox news is deciding it's not a story for what because they're all bought off by big

00:36:33.200 pharma is that why it's possible yes you know it's funny i say it like it's a ridiculous idea which i do

00:36:42.700 intentionally it's like really you think that both the left and the right were bought off by big pharma

00:36:48.940 to which i say oh yeah that's totally possible because they are the biggest advertisers for the left and the right

00:36:55.100 we know that like we don't have to research it you just turn it on there's the commercial

00:37:00.700 they're the biggest advertisers so no you can't really you can't trust the major media entities at all

00:37:07.820 but i haven't seen any entity uh dig into it and make the case that the data is showing us there's harm

00:37:17.000 i haven't seen anybody even try that yet i've only seen individuals who said they looked at it

00:37:22.440 and clearly didn't understand it and they're pretty they're pretty sure that they have an opinion

00:37:28.520 uh dr peter mccullough please look what he said about it well you're gonna have to give me another

00:37:35.800 source i hear what you're saying i hear what you're saying but it's gonna have to be a source that's not

00:37:43.720 one of the uh rogue doctors here's what i want i want a doctor who is not one of the rogue doctors

00:37:52.440 to look at it and say holy cow there's a problem here that i was not expecting what i don't want is

00:37:59.960 the people who predicted it all along to tell you that it's there if you're believing the people who

00:38:05.640 predicted it all along that is unwise that is unwise because those people don't have the ability to see

00:38:13.080 it differently it's a rorschach it's like a rorschach test so the ones who need it to be the way they

00:38:19.160 want it are going to see it that way dr mccullough needs it to say there's something wrong he will see

00:38:25.240 that dr malone probably needs it to say there's great harm from the vaccine he will see that because

00:38:34.040 he needs it if you don't need it you might not see it and in fact i've seen some pushback

00:38:40.040 uh it doesn't seem that the data has anything scary in it that an expert would agree with but

00:38:47.560 if those experts happen to be one of the rogue doctors who have spoken out about it they're the

00:38:52.840 only ones you should not look to do you understand that that in this particular case if you're trying

00:38:59.320 to see if the pfizer documents are telling you something scary the least credible people even if

00:39:05.080 they're right even if they're right so this has nothing to do with who's right or who's wrong

00:39:11.320 the least credible people would be dr mccullough dr malone um anybody anybody who was predicting it

00:39:20.360 they're the least credible because with all those documents you can see anything you want

00:39:25.240 you need somebody like uh i don't know joe rogan and elon musk somebody who who you know can see both

00:39:37.320 sides if they need to right um yeah so i wouldn't believe any of the famous doctors i would look to

00:39:47.800 people whose names have not been famous for having an opinion on it already yeah i think well well

00:39:56.120 butchern is going to have a problem coming up too as you say in the comments all right so i don't know

00:40:01.960 what to think of the pfizer document that's uh there's nobody talking about it that i find credible

00:40:06.840 if i ever see anybody credible talking about those documents i will let you know

00:40:10.920 um apparently there's a a movement to get major corporations to not advertise on twitter

00:40:21.000 and now we know who is behind it so there's a george soros clinton and obama staffers and european

00:40:29.400 governments are behind it so there are 26 activist organizations and ngos that have all signed some

00:40:37.240 letter um trying to discourage companies from advertising on twitter if if elon musk ends up

00:40:45.400 owning it and and me elon musk says interesting oh he tweeted this interesting i wonder if those

00:40:54.440 of funding these organizations are fully aware of what the organizations are doing does that sound

00:41:01.080 like a familiar question wondering if george soros for example is aware of what he's

00:41:07.080 funding that's what i've been asking for years right i would say do you think he knows no because i

00:41:14.200 think he doesn't i think he funds organizations that generally sound positive in his world view

00:41:21.080 uh that they do more things than he's aware of so i feel like his money is being misused

00:41:27.720 but i don't know that's just a speculation so musk is asking the same question he wonders if the

00:41:34.040 people funding them actually know how the organizations are using their money it's a very good question

00:41:40.360 and are you alarmed that there would be some democrat sort of led operation to kill twitter

00:41:48.280 now that twitter is trying to become a free speech platform in a way that it had not been before

00:41:54.200 i i don't see any coincidences anymore

00:42:01.800 yeah

00:42:04.440 all right ladies and gentlemen

00:42:08.280 have i completed my task of entertaining you like nobody ever could before by the way if if you're

00:42:13.800 wearing uh headphones or ear earbuds you will feel less lonely when you listen to this

00:42:20.600 uh live stream it's true it'll be just like i'm whispering in your ear

00:42:28.040 all right is there any topic i missed today

00:42:33.960 um musk using his cloud to make soros make an official statement has he made a statement

00:42:38.920 uh something about trans kids yeah well what about trans kids i'm not sure what angle you're looking at that i talked about chapelle

00:42:56.120 um

00:42:57.640 i i'm not going to read the norm uh norm's biography madison cawthorne all right so

00:43:06.280 i keep seeing stories that a young guy was partying and joking around is that the whole story

00:43:13.480 oh why do i care about madison cawthorne's private life i don't know uh 2000 mules

00:43:21.320 so yeah we forgot about that one um so the documentary 2000 mules which purports to show

00:43:28.680 uh this is uh uh dinesh de souza's film and it purports to show that there was some ballot stuffing

00:43:37.400 and irregularities with mail-in ballots it doesn't prove the case it simply uh attempts to show enough

00:43:45.640 evidence that an investigation would be warranted now i guess twitter uh banned their twitter account

00:43:52.680 now i don't know why i didn't see the reason but that's pretty bothersome because i'm pretty sure

00:44:01.560 it's well documented in terms of you know it's interviews with real people and i don't think it's

00:44:07.480 made up so i don't know why you banned that did anybody see a reason

00:44:12.840 scott thinks it's just boys being boys i don't know what you're talking about but you're writing

00:44:26.120 in all caps i'm gonna get rid of your stupid ass goodbye you know one way to get uh one way to get

00:44:35.480 banned on my channel is to tell me what i'm thinking in front of other people

00:44:39.000 now don't tell me what i'm fucking thinking tell me what you're thinking if there's anything

00:44:45.000 happening in there because you're really bad at telling me what i'm thinking you're really bad at it

00:44:52.680 well thank you uh redubs i appreciate that

00:44:56.760 i've changed why do you keep saying that

00:45:13.080 i'm going to hide you from this channel for saying that i changed since elan here's why

00:45:20.520 again you're reading my mind i haven't changed

00:45:23.720 did will chamberlain go too far uh so i'm seeing all the tweets about will chamberlain

00:45:32.040 but i haven't seen the story about it so i don't even know what that's all about

00:45:35.240 oh adus yeah talked about that yesterday

00:45:51.080 all right um that's all i got for now he has attempted to out the leaker oh chamberlain

00:45:58.040 tried to out the leaker but uh it's not confirmed right a lot of people were saying there's an

00:46:03.960 individual there who's got connections to politico it would make sense that's probably the person but

00:46:09.720 i think that's that's deeply unfair at this point and imagine if you're wrong about that imagine iding

00:46:16.920 the whistleblower based on just somebody having connections and then being wrong about it

00:46:22.440 i mean that would be really really bad

00:46:31.560 uh it's not a whistleblower

00:46:35.160 because it's a leak so it's not a whistleblower because it's not about uh anything bad going on

00:46:41.320 it's just a regular process oh okay i guess i'll take that

00:46:44.520 yeah will chamberlain proposes a specific leaker i think that's deeply unfair don't you now he could

00:46:53.240 be right or he could be wrong but i don't know if you identify a leaker and it becomes news

00:47:03.000 you can't wash that off i think that would be a lawsuit wouldn't it

00:47:06.840 he framed it as speculation but that doesn't help framing it as speculation doesn't help at all

00:47:17.480 that's a messed up thing to do frankly now i i blocked will chamberlain a long time ago

00:47:23.560 for being a jerk i forget the exact thing but so i guess i'm not surprised by his behavior if that's true

00:47:30.040 well just because he's a lawyer

00:47:38.360 okay

00:47:38.680 um

00:47:42.200 yeah he might be a lawyer but i don't see how you could out a whistle

00:47:45.480 out a leaker and be wrong about it and think you're going to get away with it

00:47:52.280 i suppose if you frame it as speculation you can get away with it but that's a messed up thing to do

00:48:00.040 yeah adam schiff is a lawyer unfortunately

00:48:09.560 oh somebody says that teaching people how to improve their lives helps you to replace having

00:48:15.240 kids do you agree yes i agree with that yeah more generally speaking because i do not have

00:48:21.720 biological children i do feel and i feel it directly you know it's not it's not like a subtle thing

00:48:29.880 i feel a direct need to help the people who are here sort of help the tribe

00:48:34.680 help the country help the town no i feel that all the time and i do think that if i had biological

00:48:41.000 children my intentions and my energies would be shifted to them so in the sense that your energy has

00:48:49.640 to go somewhere uh my positive energy is not going toward a biological child so it's going toward

00:48:56.280 other ways so yeah yeah yeah there's definitely a compensation thing going on there

00:49:07.320 um all right now i'm just catching up on your comments you're more apparent to me than my parents

00:49:14.840 you know there are a lot of people who don't have functional parents like a lot of people maybe

00:49:20.600 most i don't know i don't know how many people have two functional parents but uh there is this

00:49:26.440 need for something that's like a parent that's functional and i do think the internet dads are filling

00:49:32.520 that filling that hole um

00:49:36.600 oh elon gave me a new topic oh if i'm if i'm different because of elon musk it's because the topic is

00:49:50.520 more fun right um someone's asking me about christina's flying i have no idea unfortunately i'm not the

00:50:00.360 person to ask on that question anymore uh baseball post oh that was great

00:50:10.360 uh yesterday's lifestyle framing for abortion horrible solemnism

00:50:16.360 yeah i don't know what that means

00:50:19.800 um adam schiff has the amber herd disease somebody just said i wonder about that because if you notice

00:50:27.640 that adam schiff tends to blame people for what he's doing have you noticed that that whatever

00:50:34.040 adam schiff is doing he is publicly blaming somebody else for doing it that's not doing it what does that

00:50:40.600 sound like that's projection that's literally a you know that category b personality disorder thing

00:50:49.400 he acts like somebody who has that disorder but i wouldn't say i could diagnose him that way

00:50:54.360 all right that's all i've got for now and i'll talk to you tomorrow

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 05, 2022

Episode 1734 Scott Adams： The Universe Is Becoming Conscious, More Amber Turd, Supreme Court, More

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript