Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1912 Scott Adams： A Nonzero Chance The Pelosis Were Getting Hammered At The Same Time

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, the highest

00:00:09.040 achievement that humanity has ever accomplished.

00:00:13.000 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there is nothing better.

00:00:17.700 And luckily, you're here, so good for you.

00:00:22.140 Your day is starting off right.

00:00:24.080 And if you'd like to take it up another level, and it's possible, I know, seems unlikely,

00:00:30.060 but it's possible.

00:00:30.860 All you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or chalice, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel

00:00:36.520 of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:39.180 I like coffee.

00:00:41.260 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day.

00:00:45.160 The thing makes everything better.

00:00:46.500 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:00:51.280 Go.

00:00:52.400 Yeah, finally on time.

00:00:54.260 You're finally on time.

00:00:55.300 So, is it hammer time?

00:01:08.060 True story.

00:01:11.100 M.C. Hammer's first home was built by the same builder who built the home I'm in.

00:01:18.960 True story.

00:01:20.540 Just a weird coincidence.

00:01:22.840 Well, let's talk about all the things.

00:01:26.140 Funniest tweet of the day is that Biden's poll numbers are up in four states.

00:01:32.560 Does anybody understand that reference?

00:01:34.880 You had to watch all the news yesterday to know how funny that is.

00:01:39.320 Biden's poll numbers are up in four states.

00:01:42.100 Biden said in public that there are 54 states.

00:01:45.940 Now, the joke's on you.

00:01:50.560 You thought he misspoke, right?

00:01:53.020 You thought he didn't know the number of states and he misspoke.

00:01:56.780 No.

00:01:58.360 This is the Democrat plan.

00:02:00.520 They're going to try to get four extra states recognized before the midterms. 0.91

00:02:05.180 It's their only chance.

00:02:06.920 They've got a few days to do it.

00:02:08.880 We'll get D.C. in there and maybe Guam.

00:02:11.460 I don't know.

00:02:13.120 A few other things.

00:02:14.960 Maybe some Indian reservations.

00:02:16.780 Whatever it takes.

00:02:18.300 Whatever it takes.

00:02:19.220 We'll get to 54 by the midterms.

00:02:21.660 No, not really.

00:02:26.400 I have to give you some background to this story first.

00:02:33.000 There's a bad element of my personality, which I confess I'm not proud of.

00:02:42.260 I'm not proud of this at all.

00:02:44.420 It's just true.

00:02:46.480 When I hear a story about a serial killer who built an underground torture chamber that his neighbors didn't know about for decades,

00:02:56.840 I say to myself, well, it's terrible that he did these crimes.

00:03:01.060 I feel bad for the victims.

00:03:03.380 But it's also true that is one industrious serial killer.

00:03:09.320 And part of me is thinking, wow, there's a person who had a plan and executed a plan.

00:03:15.960 Executed more than that, as it turns out.

00:03:18.220 But I always think, you know, you've got to look at the positive part.

00:03:21.620 But there's somebody who had a system, put it together, was dedicated, made it work.

00:03:28.660 Well, I take that story and move to this story, which is there's a homeless man in Los Angeles

00:03:34.140 who is tired of the city asking him to move or take down his tent.

00:03:39.860 So he built a wooden structure on wheels.

00:03:48.000 So he built basically a wooden tent.

00:03:51.620 And it's not a tent.

00:03:53.000 It's like a little house.

00:03:54.560 So basically, he built his own ADU.

00:03:57.560 You know, that means additional dwelling units or something like that.

00:04:02.260 Like people put in their backyard to put the mother-in-law in. 0.68

00:04:05.740 So he built one.

00:04:06.560 Apparently, he's even got electric.

00:04:08.520 He's got an electric generator.

00:04:10.440 I think he might have running water in there.

00:04:12.480 But the funniest part is that it's on wheels.

00:04:15.080 So if they tell him to move, he just picks up his house and he pushes it down the sidewalk.

00:04:20.720 And I'm thinking to myself, this is not the worst idea, right?

00:04:33.080 So imagine, if you will, that we had a place that all the homeless could go where they would be left alone to do what they want.

00:04:43.140 Drugs, live on the street, do whatever they want.

00:04:45.560 But you also gave them, let's say, some instructions on how to build their own little structures.

00:04:52.620 It might be a fun experiment that's good for them and good for us.

00:04:58.580 Just see what they could come up with.

00:05:00.740 I mean, what would happen if you let the homeless build the world that they want to live in?

00:05:06.680 See, the trouble is that, you know, the non-homeless have built this world, and then the homeless don't want to live in it. 1.00

00:05:13.280 So maybe give them just a little bit of help to build the world they want to live in.

00:05:20.600 Maybe they could do a good job.

00:05:22.320 I don't know.

00:05:23.120 This guy seems pretty happy with his little mobile sidewalk home.

00:05:29.780 There's something, like, amazingly human and inspirational about this, as weird as it is.

00:05:35.960 All right, we have to talk about Paul Pelosi.

00:05:37.800 When was the last time a story was exactly what it looked like?

00:05:45.840 You know, you hear a story and you go, well, that's the story.

00:05:48.780 And then a year later, that's still the story.

00:05:51.660 It feels like that never happens now, right, if politics are involved, especially.

00:05:57.640 So here are the weird things we know about this story.

00:06:00.980 There's so many weird things about this.

00:06:02.500 So you know that the police came when Pelosi was in his underwear and the breaker-inner guy was in his underwear and they were wrestling over a hammer.

00:06:13.580 The police said, put down that hammer, and Pelosi did, but the other guy didn't, and the other guy beat him with a hammer.

00:06:19.620 So here's the new stuff that I'm finding out today.

00:06:22.620 And when I say I'm finding out, that just means I'm a little slow on it.

00:06:26.060 Number one, apparently there was at least one more person in the house, but we don't know anything about that person.

00:06:33.780 Because somebody answered the door for the police and it wasn't those two people.

00:06:38.640 Now, I heard that normally the house would be staffed.

00:06:43.920 So I'm guessing it was a staff member who was asleep until that point.

00:06:48.600 Maybe a staff member who just didn't know what was happening until it was sort of too late or something.

00:06:54.020 I don't know.

00:06:56.000 The next question I'd ask is, was the staff member in his or her underwear?

00:07:01.980 I just want to know if everybody who goes to that house just wears underwear.

00:07:05.960 I mean, you can't rule that out.

00:07:07.520 I only know two people who have ever been described to be in the house, and both of them were in their underpants.

00:07:13.040 If a third person was also known to be in the house, should we follow the pattern?

00:07:18.340 Let's see, first one was in underpants, second one was in underpants, third one, well, I don't know, maybe underpants.

00:07:24.420 Possibly.

00:07:25.560 I'm not ruling it out.

00:07:27.020 There's no evidence of that fact.

00:07:29.640 Then the other funny thing was, and I didn't know this yesterday, I think I saw a Cernovich tweet about it, but I didn't connect it to the story.

00:07:39.400 So Cernovich was on it right away.

00:07:40.840 The broken glass for the window that allegedly was the access point for the homeless guy, the broken glass was on the outside of the home.

00:07:50.500 That's not how that works.

00:07:56.140 If you break glass, it goes in toward the hammer direction, or if it was a hammer.

00:08:02.920 But if you were having any kind of an altercation inside the house, you could imagine something getting broken and landing outside the house.

00:08:11.540 So we don't know anything about that broken glass.

00:08:14.100 That's something.

00:08:14.540 Now Hillary, of course, wanted to immediately get in on the action. 1.00

00:08:20.240 And before we knew much about the story, when people were saying, this homeless guy was radicalized by MAGA.

00:08:28.140 Hillary gets in on it, and she tweets that the Republican Party and its mouthpieces now regularly spread hate and deranged conspiracy theories.

00:08:39.520 It is shocking, but not surprising, that violence is the result.

00:08:44.020 As citizens, we must hold them accountable for their words and the actions that follow.

00:08:49.120 We must hold them accountable.

00:08:51.360 We must hunt them down.

00:08:53.100 She didn't say that, but I read between the lines.

00:08:55.760 Got to hunt those Republicans for doing this bad stuff.

00:08:59.700 Now, here are stories I've heard this morning, but I can't put any credibility on them.

00:09:07.120 I'll just tell you this is what's going around.

00:09:09.660 The stories that he was MAGA are based on social media or website postings, right?

00:09:18.320 Those appear to have been created when he got caught.

00:09:22.240 In other words, they were fake.

00:09:23.620 So do we have a confirmation that his postings about MAGA were fake?

00:09:28.940 Or were some of them real, but there were also some fakes?

00:09:32.920 We don't know, right?

00:09:34.760 So some people are saying he's MAGA, but apparently he also was a Black Lives Matter,

00:09:41.380 or he lived with a Black Lives Matter supporter who supported LGBTQ,

00:09:47.100 and he was a Berkeley nudist, hemp-making nudist.

00:09:57.560 So 100% of the way the guy lived suggests he was a Democrat, or leaning left, right?

00:10:05.540 100% of the way he lived.

00:10:07.460 But there's this sketchy website, social posting thing that some people are saying was fake,

00:10:13.460 and I don't know.

00:10:13.980 I don't know if we're not.

00:10:16.260 Now, if we had not heard from Michael Schellenberger about how this guy really lived,

00:10:20.580 I don't think the news was going to cover it.

00:10:25.460 Watch how many times you get your news from just somebody on Twitter.

00:10:30.120 He's not just somebody, but people on Twitter who are not part of a news organization

00:10:34.860 are telling us more than the news.

00:10:37.840 That's like a real thing that's happening now.

00:10:43.020 So what else is funny about this?

00:10:44.860 Let's see.

00:10:45.260 Then Elon Musk responded to Hillary Clinton's tweet, and Elon, I'm paraphrasing,

00:10:56.220 but he said, there's a small chance there's more to the story.

00:10:59.620 And then he tweets a story that was so fake news about, you know, some gay bar kind of a thing.

00:11:06.800 It was so fake news that I think it was already taken down nine minutes after he tweeted it.

00:11:11.400 I couldn't even read it because it was taken down so fast.

00:11:15.180 Now, if the head of Twitter tweets something that looks very sketchy,

00:11:24.860 he would have known it looked sketchy, but he said there's a small chance.

00:11:30.400 If somebody says there's a small chance, are they signaling that it's a low credibility?

00:11:35.680 Was he just having fun with it? 0.85

00:11:37.120 Did he believe it might be possible that her husband was gay, or that Pelosi's husband was gay? 0.94

00:11:45.060 Was he just putting it out there?

00:11:48.780 I don't know.

00:11:49.940 We don't know what Elon Musk was thinking,

00:11:53.500 but I saw some pushback that it was deeply irresponsible

00:11:58.120 for her to, for Elon Musk to tweet an obviously, in some people's opinion,

00:12:06.180 obviously untrue source.

00:12:08.940 What do you think?

00:12:10.800 Do you think it was,

00:12:12.220 do you think it was irresponsible to tweet an obviously untrue source?

00:12:19.040 Well, you'd have to,

00:12:21.380 the first thing you'd have to ask yourself is,

00:12:23.700 who was he replying to, and what was he replying to?

00:12:26.580 What he was replying to was an obviously untrue tweet.

00:12:32.660 Hillary Clinton was making a statement of fact about this guy being a MAGA guy,

00:12:38.640 and that is definitely not proven.

00:12:41.380 It might be proven.

00:12:42.800 You know, later it might be proven.

00:12:44.360 But at the time that Hillary was tweeting it, 1.00

00:12:47.520 it was closer to bullshit. 1.00

00:12:49.760 I mean, she was just making a stand so that that would be in your head, 0.99

00:12:53.320 whether it was proven true or not true in the long term. 1.00

00:12:56.580 What Elon did was tweet some bullshit to match your bullshit. 1.00

00:13:00.860 And when I saw that, it was like, 1.00

00:13:02.520 oh, good. 1.00

00:13:03.900 Some bullshit to match the bullshit. 1.00

00:13:06.240 That feels like a step forward. 1.00

00:13:09.860 Because here's why it's a step forward.

00:13:13.100 Because probably the left actually sees Elon Musk's tweets.

00:13:17.040 But they don't see anybody else's tweets. 0.97

00:13:20.320 So he's one of the few people who can actually call bullshit on the left, 0.91

00:13:25.320 and the left will actually even see the tweet. 0.99

00:13:29.420 So calling bullshit on Hillary Clinton was fun. 1.00

00:13:34.500 The fact that he used some bullshit to call bullshit is double fun, in my opinion. 0.99

00:13:40.400 Because if there's anything we know, he's not taking this too seriously. 0.99

00:13:45.540 I mean, he's taking the business seriously, but he's not taking himself seriously. 0.96

00:13:50.420 We know that because he already tweeted a dick joke already. 0.92

00:13:55.080 I don't know if you missed it. 0.77

00:13:56.960 But you have to check his feed every day now. 0.97

00:14:00.500 He literally tweeted a dick joke with no political purpose whatsoever. 0.98

00:14:06.140 It was just a dick joke. 0.96

00:14:09.120 That's it. 0.96

00:14:11.460 Now, if you tell me I could be happier, 0.98

00:14:14.960 knowing that the new owner of Twitter is using Twitter to tweet dick jokes, 0.98

00:14:19.620 there's nothing that would make me happier. 0.93

00:14:22.120 No, nothing.

00:14:23.720 You could try to make me happier today, but good luck.

00:14:27.740 That would be hard to top.

00:14:30.420 So that's awesome.

00:14:32.480 Here's the next awesome thing.

00:14:36.140 You know what bugs me a lot in life?

00:14:39.320 Probably bugs you too.

00:14:40.940 It's a thing called terms of service.

00:14:44.600 You know how companies have terms of service and,

00:14:47.920 I hate it when this company makes me

00:14:51.400 have to bow down to their terms of service.

00:14:55.940 Don't you hate it, that?

00:14:57.280 Don't you wish there was some way you could flip it around?

00:15:00.880 Don't you wish that the company would have to bow down to your terms of service?

00:15:09.440 But impossible, right?

00:15:11.600 You know, that's like a crazy thing.

00:15:13.760 That could never happen in the real world.

00:15:16.300 There'd never be a company that would bow down to your terms of service.

00:15:19.440 Interestingly, do you know what the terms of service are for Tesla employees?

00:15:29.000 Elon Musk's rule at Tesla, if you didn't know this,

00:15:32.500 is that they're specifically instructed,

00:15:34.700 I'm not making this up,

00:15:36.900 Tesla employees are specifically instructed

00:15:39.580 to not do something that could show up in a Dilbert comic.

00:15:45.360 That's like a real thing.

00:15:46.540 It's in writing.

00:15:50.680 Now, suppose the person who came up with that terms of service,

00:15:56.120 Elon Musk,

00:15:57.180 suppose he took that to his next company.

00:16:00.320 I mean, why wouldn't he?

00:16:01.900 I mean, it's still the rule of Tesla.

00:16:04.640 So is there any reason he wouldn't bring it to Twitter?

00:16:08.280 If he does,

00:16:10.240 if he does, which is a reasonable assumption, right?

00:16:13.000 It's a reasonable assumption.

00:16:14.000 If he does, Twitter employees will be living under my terms of service.

00:16:21.580 Thank you.

00:16:22.700 Thank you.

00:16:23.960 Thank you.

00:16:28.460 Now, is that simulation perfect or what?

00:16:33.760 Am I right?

00:16:35.920 Remember Elon has told himself

00:16:39.100 that reality tends to move in the direction of greatest entertainment value?

00:16:45.440 Is this not the greatest entertainment value

00:16:48.180 that Twitter might be under,

00:16:50.020 the Twitter employees might be under my terms of service?

00:16:53.780 That's like a real thing.

00:17:00.320 How much more perfect could that be?

00:17:02.960 Well, not.

00:17:04.480 Couldn't be more perfect.

00:17:05.640 And here's more to why I think that.

00:17:11.300 So the other thing that Elon tweeted today is

00:17:13.300 he got an automatic message,

00:17:15.860 which I assume you get when you're a new manager at Twitter.

00:17:20.600 And the message was that he needs to sign up

00:17:22.980 for Twitter's Management 101 workshop.

00:17:27.100 So Elon tweeted, he thought it was funny

00:17:32.140 that he's being asked to sign up

00:17:34.300 for a Twitter 101 workshop,

00:17:38.840 Management 101.

00:17:40.380 But then he tweeted,

00:17:42.700 you know, that Management 201

00:17:44.240 is such a tantalizing carrot.

00:17:46.220 And I thought,

00:17:49.360 I want to name my band

00:17:50.560 Tantalizing Carrot.

00:17:54.980 Now, when I tell you that he's good at this,

00:17:58.660 this is sort of a Trump tell.

00:18:02.380 And the tell is,

00:18:03.600 can you ever come up with a phrase

00:18:05.060 like tantalizing carrot

00:18:06.840 that just by itself

00:18:09.140 is just so fresh

00:18:11.440 and, I don't know,

00:18:12.780 you just want to say it, don't you?

00:18:14.820 So this is what Trump does

00:18:16.060 when Trump says,

00:18:17.320 you know, crooked Hillary or whatever, 1.00

00:18:19.280 you just want to say it. 0.98

00:18:21.300 It comes out of his mouth

00:18:22.560 and then you want to repeat it.

00:18:23.820 But when I heard tantalizing carrot,

00:18:26.800 tantalizing carrot,

00:18:28.660 that must be my new band name.

00:18:31.840 All right.

00:18:35.080 I saw LeBron was concerned

00:18:37.200 because there are reports

00:18:38.340 that the N-word usage

00:18:40.800 is up 500% on Twitter

00:18:42.940 since Elon Musk took over.

00:18:46.720 Now, let me ask you.

00:18:48.820 I have seen zero occurrences

00:18:50.800 and I spend a lot of time

00:18:52.980 with some rough customers

00:18:54.820 on Twitter.

00:18:57.160 Right?

00:18:57.880 If your content leans right in any way,

00:19:00.680 you see some rough customers.

00:19:02.660 I haven't seen that word.

00:19:04.720 Have you?

00:19:06.240 Has anybody even seen it once

00:19:08.020 since Elon Musk took over?

00:19:11.160 Private, right?

00:19:13.080 Now, don't you think

00:19:14.140 that the algorithm

00:19:14.960 is suppressing it?

00:19:16.740 And, you know,

00:19:17.240 probably should.

00:19:19.140 I wouldn't have a big,

00:19:20.480 I wouldn't have a big complaint

00:19:22.180 about that, would you?

00:19:24.040 I mean, some people may say,

00:19:25.620 free speech, free speech.

00:19:26.840 But, you know,

00:19:27.800 hate speech is not

00:19:28.780 exactly free speech.

00:19:31.000 You know,

00:19:32.020 there is a line.

00:19:34.220 You know,

00:19:34.420 if the algorithm

00:19:35.200 blocked or suppressed

00:19:36.860 anything that had

00:19:37.860 that word in it,

00:19:39.860 that would be

00:19:41.120 an exception

00:19:41.700 to free speech,

00:19:42.760 which is,

00:19:43.540 let me say this,

00:19:45.160 if it were overt,

00:19:47.980 I'd be fine with it.

00:19:49.440 I'd be less fine with it

00:19:50.720 if I didn't know

00:19:51.380 it was happening.

00:19:52.880 See what I'm saying?

00:19:54.480 I mean,

00:19:54.780 if Twitter said,

00:19:55.460 we're just going to

00:19:56.060 suppress that word,

00:19:58.140 use it all you want,

00:19:59.100 but it's just going to

00:19:59.680 show up on your own feed,

00:20:00.740 we're not going to

00:20:01.120 show it to other people.

00:20:02.640 I'd be fine with that.

00:20:04.020 As long as I knew

00:20:04.700 that's what they were doing

00:20:05.500 and why,

00:20:06.700 then I could choose

00:20:07.460 to be on the system.

00:20:09.020 You know,

00:20:09.200 people could say,

00:20:10.020 I don't want to be

00:20:10.920 on a system

00:20:11.400 that can't use that word.

00:20:13.080 Well, okay.

00:20:14.440 It's a free market. 0.97

00:20:17.600 Go nuts. 0.66

00:20:19.500 Now, if you extended that, 0.99

00:20:22.700 you know,

00:20:22.920 be careful how you extend it.

00:20:24.320 You might extend it

00:20:25.140 to other known,

00:20:26.340 obvious hate words,

00:20:28.780 but, you know,

00:20:29.420 it wouldn't go much further.

00:20:32.080 All right.

00:20:33.060 So when I did

00:20:33.960 a little Twitter poll,

00:20:35.380 and I asked how many people

00:20:36.300 had seen this N-word

00:20:37.380 or even an uptick in badness

00:20:39.220 is the way I said it.

00:20:40.500 Only 6% of the people

00:20:41.800 who follow me

00:20:42.640 say they've seen

00:20:44.200 an uptick

00:20:44.860 in any badness recently

00:20:46.380 that it's much worse.

00:20:53.400 What?

00:20:53.880 All right.

00:21:01.300 The other news about Twitter,

00:21:03.680 Twitter is just so interesting

00:21:04.840 this week,

00:21:05.740 is that the executives

00:21:09.260 that Musk fired right away,

00:21:11.420 including the CEO,

00:21:13.540 Parag Agrawal,

00:21:16.020 the report is that

00:21:17.380 Musk fired them

00:21:18.840 as opposed to

00:21:20.860 retiring them

00:21:22.440 or something

00:21:22.940 that would allow them

00:21:23.900 their large severances.

00:21:25.860 So the early report

00:21:26.960 was that they would get

00:21:28.680 these huge

00:21:29.300 multimillion-dollar severances,

00:21:30.800 but then today's report,

00:21:32.880 and neither of these

00:21:33.540 are credible, right?

00:21:34.720 So, so far,

00:21:35.640 we don't have any

00:21:36.260 confirmation of any of this.

00:21:37.840 But today's report

00:21:38.760 is that because

00:21:40.020 they were fired for cause,

00:21:42.060 meaning that bad performance,

00:21:44.420 that Elon Musk

00:21:45.740 would not have to pay

00:21:46.740 that because it was

00:21:48.380 not because of the

00:21:49.660 takeover,

00:21:51.180 it was for cause.

00:21:53.980 I don't know.

00:21:54.440 I don't know.

00:21:57.340 I mean,

00:21:57.640 I don't think

00:21:58.280 any of them

00:21:59.940 are going to end up poor,

00:22:01.460 but do you think

00:22:03.120 it would be reasonable

00:22:04.020 that the CEO of Twitter

00:22:05.380 could be fired for cause?

00:22:07.880 I would say,

00:22:09.240 yeah,

00:22:09.520 if anybody had cause

00:22:10.600 to be fired,

00:22:11.300 it would be that guy,

00:22:12.720 at least,

00:22:13.360 you know,

00:22:13.660 if you're the new owner.

00:22:15.280 I certainly would,

00:22:16.200 I would have fired him

00:22:17.060 for cause,

00:22:18.700 right?

00:22:19.160 Wouldn't you?

00:22:20.680 I mean,

00:22:20.940 you wouldn't have lasted

00:22:21.660 a minute

00:22:22.100 if I bought the company.

00:22:24.440 And I'm not sure

00:22:25.460 any CEO would have,

00:22:26.900 right?

00:22:27.240 You don't really want

00:22:27.900 to have a co-CEO

00:22:29.020 or anything.

00:22:30.300 Yeah,

00:22:30.640 I mean, 0.81

00:22:30.960 if you have an ugly

00:22:32.800 takeover like that,

00:22:33.820 you just have to

00:22:34.400 clean out the

00:22:35.160 negativity

00:22:36.200 as soon as you can.

00:22:39.240 So I think

00:22:39.920 that's going the way

00:22:40.520 it should have.

00:22:43.760 So the New York Times

00:22:44.980 is reporting

00:22:45.760 that Ukraine 0.91

00:22:46.500 has a distinct

00:22:47.720 artillery advantage

00:22:49.000 over Russia now.

00:22:52.200 Did you expect

00:22:53.120 to hear that?

00:22:55.160 Didn't we hear

00:22:56.260 from the very beginning,

00:22:58.020 well,

00:22:58.360 sure,

00:22:58.820 Ukraine is plucky 0.61

00:23:00.000 and they've got

00:23:00.720 some advantages

00:23:01.520 and sure,

00:23:02.700 they've got Starlink

00:23:03.680 and they've got,

00:23:04.980 you know,

00:23:05.180 better morale

00:23:05.840 for fighting

00:23:06.440 and they've got,

00:23:07.480 you know,

00:23:07.740 some Western stuff.

00:23:09.040 But didn't we,

00:23:09.880 didn't we always believe

00:23:11.340 that the artillery advantage

00:23:13.400 was just clearly Russia?

00:23:15.580 No doubt about it.

00:23:16.580 Right?

00:23:18.180 Now,

00:23:19.220 Russia still has 0.83

00:23:19.960 the numerical advantage

00:23:21.320 advantage by,

00:23:22.600 I don't know,

00:23:22.980 100 to 1.

00:23:23.940 So it's a gigantic

00:23:24.820 military advantage

00:23:26.440 in numbers,

00:23:27.980 artillery numbers.

00:23:29.140 But apparently

00:23:29.720 the U.S.

00:23:31.200 has provided,

00:23:31.860 or the West,

00:23:32.500 has provided enough

00:23:33.340 of the accurate stuff,

00:23:36.420 including some drones,

00:23:38.140 that Ukraine 0.91

00:23:39.380 is actually doing

00:23:40.260 more damage to Russia 0.93

00:23:41.240 than Russia is doing 0.72

00:23:42.140 to Ukraine.

00:23:42.860 Do you believe that?

00:23:44.580 Now,

00:23:46.620 remember,

00:23:47.840 I give you my,

00:23:48.740 I give you my,

00:23:50.100 my disclaimer

00:23:53.040 for all news

00:23:54.560 about Ukraine.

00:23:56.220 All news about Ukraine

00:23:57.540 should be considered

00:23:58.420 low credibility.

00:24:00.300 Doesn't matter

00:24:00.880 if it comes out of my mouth

00:24:01.880 or anybody else's,

00:24:02.660 right?

00:24:03.140 That's our deal.

00:24:04.400 Our deal is the only way

00:24:05.740 we can talk about it

00:24:06.740 is if we all agree

00:24:07.980 that every fact

00:24:09.220 that we allege

00:24:10.760 is low credibility.

00:24:12.800 As long as you'll

00:24:13.500 give me that freedom,

00:24:14.580 then we can talk about it

00:24:15.920 and have some fun.

00:24:17.120 So,

00:24:17.540 there are two,

00:24:18.260 there are two narratives

00:24:19.460 out there

00:24:20.000 competing.

00:24:22.240 One is that Russia 0.99

00:24:23.400 will,

00:24:24.200 you know, 0.93

00:24:24.760 freeze and starve Ukraine, 1.00

00:24:26.680 take as long 0.73

00:24:27.260 as they want.

00:24:28.740 They have such

00:24:29.660 an advantage

00:24:30.540 that eventually

00:24:31.320 they'll just

00:24:32.000 grind them down

00:24:33.380 and take over.

00:24:34.600 And there's nothing

00:24:35.320 you can do

00:24:35.800 in the long run.

00:24:37.140 That's one narrative.

00:24:38.480 The other narrative

00:24:39.320 is that Ukraine

00:24:40.180 has such

00:24:41.420 better morale

00:24:43.340 and better weaponry

00:24:45.380 that the Russians

00:24:46.980 ultimately are going

00:24:48.280 to get,

00:24:48.720 you know,

00:24:49.440 beaten back

00:24:50.040 and their morale

00:24:50.780 will collapse

00:24:51.460 and things

00:24:53.740 will go very bad.

00:24:55.300 Do you think

00:24:56.060 that we could

00:24:57.220 really tell

00:24:57.680 which of those

00:24:58.200 is true?

00:24:58.560 Do you think

00:25:00.460 from our position

00:25:01.300 today

00:25:01.820 you could tell me

00:25:03.680 that Russia 0.72

00:25:04.420 won't

00:25:05.020 mount a massive

00:25:07.120 counterattack

00:25:08.120 that works?

00:25:09.760 Could you tell me

00:25:10.520 that can't happen?

00:25:12.220 I mean,

00:25:12.700 I'd bet against it,

00:25:14.400 but I wouldn't

00:25:14.920 tell you

00:25:15.220 it can't happen.

00:25:19.040 Are you 1.00

00:25:19.720 fucking idiot? 1.00

00:25:21.180 Jesus, 1.00

00:25:22.020 Shanika, 1.00

00:25:22.900 why the fuck 0.99

00:25:24.020 are you on here? 0.99

00:25:25.200 Could you listen 1.00

00:25:25.800 to one fucking thing 1.00

00:25:26.960 I say before commenting? 1.00

00:25:28.840 Listen to this asshole. 1.00

00:25:30.520 Scott, 1.00

00:25:31.500 we just don't get

00:25:32.540 why you always

00:25:33.180 believe pro-Ukrainian news.

00:25:35.540 Oh,

00:25:35.880 why do I always

00:25:36.800 believe pro-Ukrainian news? 1.00

00:25:38.780 You fucking idiot? 1.00

00:25:39.740 How many times 1.00

00:25:41.400 do I have to tell you

00:25:42.020 I don't believe it?

00:25:44.500 Don't believe it.

00:25:46.400 You shouldn't believe it.

00:25:47.620 I don't believe it.

00:25:48.600 You shouldn't believe it. 1.00

00:25:50.720 Fucking idiot. 1.00

00:25:52.080 Jesus Christ. 1.00

00:25:56.840 Seriously.

00:25:58.320 Like,

00:25:58.760 it's so frustrating

00:25:59.840 to live with people

00:26:00.760 who are such 1.00

00:26:01.240 fucking idiots 1.00

00:26:02.000 in the world. 1.00

00:26:04.360 Isn't it?

00:26:05.740 It's like

00:26:06.140 you try to have

00:26:06.820 any conversation

00:26:07.640 about anything

00:26:08.360 and there's always 1.00

00:26:09.500 one fuck idiot. 1.00

00:26:10.880 Have you noticed 1.00

00:26:11.440 that if you work

00:26:12.480 with like five people

00:26:14.120 in your day job,

00:26:15.840 one of them

00:26:16.520 is always 1.00

00:26:17.640 a fucking asshole. 1.00

00:26:19.780 Always. 1.00

00:26:20.720 Have you noticed that?

00:26:22.700 And here's the weird part.

00:26:24.520 If that person leaves,

00:26:27.860 they're always replaced 1.00

00:26:29.420 with another fucking asshole, 1.00

00:26:30.800 aren't they? 1.00

00:26:31.800 Just like a different one.

00:26:33.280 Because there's no such thing

00:26:34.460 as five people

00:26:35.180 without one.

00:26:35.760 And if you tell yourself,

00:26:38.220 Scott,

00:26:38.500 that's not true.

00:26:39.780 I'm in a group

00:26:40.560 of five people

00:26:41.240 and there are no 1.00

00:26:41.820 fucking assholes 1.00

00:26:42.460 in my group, 1.00

00:26:43.880 you're the fucking asshole. 1.00

00:26:46.500 I hate to tell you. 1.00

00:26:48.540 Because it's like

00:26:49.200 a universal rule.

00:26:50.120 Five people,

00:26:51.320 one's going to be bad.

00:26:53.840 So,

00:26:54.340 Shinikwa's

00:26:54.920 the bad one there.

00:26:57.880 Anyway,

00:26:58.440 so no,

00:26:58.920 we don't believe

00:26:59.380 anything that comes

00:27:00.040 out of Ukraine.

00:27:00.560 Let's see.

00:27:05.840 So,

00:27:06.080 Russia is reportedly

00:27:07.360 going to suspend

00:27:08.400 its deal

00:27:09.180 about grain

00:27:10.340 so that

00:27:11.700 they can put pressure

00:27:12.800 on Ukraine

00:27:13.520 to 0.98

00:27:14.880 starve people. 0.76

00:27:18.140 So,

00:27:18.600 it does look like

00:27:19.300 Russia's strategy 0.52

00:27:20.100 is to starve

00:27:21.400 and freeze 0.94

00:27:22.520 anybody they can

00:27:23.960 to get

00:27:25.020 some kind

00:27:26.340 of advantage.

00:27:28.620 Do you think

00:27:29.400 that'll work?

00:27:29.960 And why isn't

00:27:32.080 that

00:27:32.440 a war crime?

00:27:35.740 At what point

00:27:36.740 does

00:27:37.360 targeting

00:27:39.080 the population

00:27:40.340 centers

00:27:40.820 turn into

00:27:41.840 a war crime?

00:27:43.780 Are you telling

00:27:44.720 me that

00:27:45.280 it's

00:27:45.780 completely

00:27:47.700 militarily

00:27:49.040 valid

00:27:49.600 to knock out

00:27:50.580 the power

00:27:51.420 before the

00:27:52.660 winter

00:27:52.920 for

00:27:53.660 a

00:27:54.320 civilian

00:27:55.700 population?

00:27:56.460 I get

00:28:00.020 why it

00:28:00.340 would be

00:28:00.560 a war crime 0.74

00:28:01.140 to round

00:28:02.560 up people

00:28:03.000 and just 1.00

00:28:03.360 shoot them. 1.00

00:28:05.040 But why 1.00

00:28:05.420 is it

00:28:05.660 not a war

00:28:06.300 crime

00:28:06.600 to cut

00:28:07.580 off their

00:28:08.160 utility

00:28:09.660 so they 0.97

00:28:10.180 die?

00:28:10.440 Is it

00:28:12.160 because it's

00:28:12.740 slower?

00:28:14.020 So,

00:28:14.340 that's okay

00:28:14.920 because it's

00:28:15.380 slower.

00:28:17.680 Yeah,

00:28:17.980 no,

00:28:18.160 I realize

00:28:18.540 siege

00:28:18.920 warfare

00:28:19.320 has been,

00:28:20.120 you know,

00:28:21.000 let's see,

00:28:21.560 standard

00:28:22.040 warfare

00:28:22.840 forever.

00:28:23.300 but it's

00:28:25.120 still a

00:28:25.380 war crime,

00:28:25.860 isn't it?

00:28:27.880 Is it

00:28:28.500 not?

00:28:29.380 Like,

00:28:29.640 it's a

00:28:29.940 weird place

00:28:30.520 to draw

00:28:30.980 the line.

00:28:32.540 I've

00:28:32.980 always,

00:28:33.480 I've

00:28:34.400 always been

00:28:34.900 curious about

00:28:36.120 how we,

00:28:36.820 how we

00:28:38.640 avoid using

00:28:39.420 our best

00:28:39.900 weapons in

00:28:40.520 a war.

00:28:41.600 Like,

00:28:41.920 how we

00:28:42.260 actually get

00:28:43.280 away with

00:28:43.740 not using

00:28:44.260 nuclear and

00:28:45.320 chemical

00:28:46.520 weapons.

00:28:47.040 I'm glad

00:28:47.380 we don't,

00:28:47.980 of course.

00:28:49.200 But it's

00:28:50.100 weird that

00:28:50.700 war has

00:28:52.360 rules.

00:28:53.300 Isn't it?

00:28:54.760 How weird

00:28:55.460 that war

00:28:56.020 has rules.

00:28:59.940 And that

00:29:00.680 people

00:29:01.480 obey them.

00:29:03.100 Now,

00:29:03.380 I get that

00:29:03.880 if they

00:29:04.460 feel like

00:29:04.880 if they

00:29:05.200 don't,

00:29:05.760 then everybody

00:29:06.200 will turn

00:29:06.640 against them,

00:29:07.600 blah,

00:29:07.820 blah,

00:29:07.920 blah,

00:29:08.120 blah.

00:29:09.480 But still,

00:29:10.500 I'm surprised.

00:29:11.420 It's not how

00:29:11.860 you expect

00:29:12.340 people to

00:29:13.100 act.

00:29:14.560 All right.

00:29:16.860 Here's my

00:29:17.640 call for

00:29:18.560 fake news.

00:29:19.620 I'm going

00:29:19.820 to call

00:29:20.080 some fake

00:29:20.520 news.

00:29:21.860 Have you

00:29:22.200 seen the

00:29:22.580 reports about

00:29:23.340 the plucky

00:29:24.740 Ukrainian

00:29:25.700 citizens who

00:29:27.480 have started

00:29:27.900 their own

00:29:28.360 drone-making

00:29:29.120 little

00:29:29.780 factories?

00:29:30.960 And they're

00:29:31.400 taking the

00:29:31.920 smaller

00:29:32.480 hobbyist drones

00:29:33.480 and they're

00:29:34.400 weaponizing

00:29:34.940 them.

00:29:36.240 And the

00:29:37.420 news is

00:29:37.960 reporting that

00:29:38.620 it might be

00:29:39.140 changing the

00:29:39.780 tide of the

00:29:40.280 war.

00:29:42.840 Okay,

00:29:43.420 Bob, 1.00

00:29:43.880 you fucking 1.00

00:29:44.620 cock-sucking 1.00

00:29:45.800 idiot who 1.00

00:29:46.900 says that's a 1.00

00:29:47.660 bit naive,

00:29:48.320 Scott.

00:29:48.660 Bob,

00:29:49.360 wait a 1.00

00:29:50.120 fucking 1.00

00:29:50.660 second, 1.00

00:29:51.160 will you?

00:29:51.980 Wait a 1.00

00:29:52.600 fucking 1.00

00:29:53.040 second. 0.99

00:29:54.000 The context

00:29:54.860 of this is

00:29:55.960 I told you

00:29:56.540 it's fake

00:29:57.120 news.

00:29:58.880 So if I

00:29:59.700 say I'm

00:30:00.220 going to

00:30:00.440 tell you

00:30:00.740 something

00:30:01.020 that's 1.00

00:30:01.340 fucking 1.00

00:30:01.740 fake news 1.00

00:30:02.540 and then

00:30:03.400 I describe

00:30:04.040 it and

00:30:04.740 you say

00:30:05.160 I'm gullible

00:30:05.860 for believing

00:30:06.500 it,

00:30:07.060 how about

00:30:07.520 listening to 1.00

00:30:08.100 the fucking 1.00

00:30:08.660 fake news 1.00

00:30:09.280 part of

00:30:09.660 that before

00:30:10.160 you comment? 1.00

00:30:11.780 Idiot. 1.00

00:30:15.560 Sorry, 1.00

00:30:16.160 I'm just

00:30:16.400 having fun

00:30:16.900 with them.

00:30:21.540 So yes,

00:30:22.540 my call

00:30:23.340 is that

00:30:23.780 all those

00:30:24.240 stories are

00:30:24.760 fake news

00:30:25.480 to hide

00:30:26.780 the following

00:30:27.680 speculated

00:30:29.000 possibility.

00:30:31.140 I'm just

00:30:31.880 speculating

00:30:32.440 this.

00:30:33.420 I'm speculating

00:30:34.140 that the

00:30:34.520 Ukrainians have 1.00

00:30:35.300 such good

00:30:36.100 drones from

00:30:36.860 the United

00:30:37.260 States,

00:30:38.320 like the

00:30:38.740 really good

00:30:39.200 stuff,

00:30:40.500 and maybe

00:30:40.940 some of

00:30:41.300 them are

00:30:41.540 small too,

00:30:42.660 that they

00:30:43.520 have to

00:30:43.880 cover for

00:30:44.480 the fact

00:30:44.860 that they

00:30:45.160 have advanced

00:30:45.780 weaponry from

00:30:46.500 the U.S.,

00:30:47.500 and the way

00:30:47.960 they cover

00:30:48.440 it is by

00:30:48.920 showing this 1.00

00:30:49.340 bullshit story 1.00

00:30:50.320 of these 1.00

00:30:51.300 plucky

00:30:51.720 Ukrainians who

00:30:52.560 are making

00:30:52.840 their own

00:30:53.260 drones that

00:30:54.400 are changing

00:30:54.840 the course

00:30:55.300 of the war.

00:30:56.980 Does it

00:30:57.940 seem to

00:30:58.380 you that

00:30:59.660 the people

00:31:00.120 in the

00:31:00.440 little factory

00:31:01.080 making their

00:31:01.760 own hobbyist

00:31:03.200 drones,

00:31:04.260 are they the

00:31:04.800 ones changing

00:31:05.380 the course

00:31:05.860 of the war?

00:31:07.140 I don't

00:31:07.760 think so.

00:31:09.040 Now,

00:31:09.540 I believe

00:31:10.300 they probably

00:31:10.780 exist.

00:31:11.940 I believe

00:31:12.320 they probably

00:31:12.800 are making

00:31:13.320 their little

00:31:13.780 drones that

00:31:14.420 try to drop

00:31:15.720 a hand

00:31:16.060 grenade or

00:31:16.540 something,

00:31:17.080 and it

00:31:17.400 probably

00:31:17.560 makes a

00:31:17.940 difference,

00:31:18.600 a little

00:31:19.160 one.

00:31:20.940 It feels

00:31:21.620 like a

00:31:22.000 cover story,

00:31:22.660 doesn't it?

00:31:23.840 Who's with

00:31:24.540 me that it

00:31:25.220 feels like a

00:31:26.080 cover story?

00:31:27.000 Don't know.

00:31:28.360 If I said I

00:31:29.420 knew, that

00:31:29.880 would be going

00:31:30.340 too far.

00:31:31.280 But doesn't

00:31:31.840 it feel

00:31:32.200 exactly like

00:31:32.980 a cover story?

00:31:34.580 Right?

00:31:35.320 Once I tell

00:31:36.060 you, you see

00:31:36.620 it, right?

00:31:37.540 You probably

00:31:37.920 didn't see it

00:31:38.420 until I

00:31:38.720 mentioned it,

00:31:39.240 but as soon

00:31:39.580 as I

00:31:39.780 mentioned it,

00:31:40.280 you go,

00:31:40.660 oh, God,

00:31:42.080 obviously these

00:31:43.120 little hobby

00:31:43.700 drones are not

00:31:44.340 making a

00:31:44.740 difference.

00:31:45.860 Obviously, it's

00:31:46.580 a cover story

00:31:47.200 for the good

00:31:48.020 stuff.

00:31:50.320 Yeah, it's a

00:31:50.720 little too

00:31:51.000 on the nose.

00:31:56.540 Somebody on

00:31:57.200 YouTube says,

00:31:57.940 I'm dealing

00:31:58.300 with low

00:31:58.940 information

00:31:59.560 viewers.

00:32:01.600 You know,

00:32:02.300 that is so

00:32:02.900 wrong.

00:32:05.040 I would argue,

00:32:06.280 I don't know

00:32:06.680 if you could

00:32:07.240 test this,

00:32:07.840 it would be

00:32:08.060 interesting if

00:32:08.660 you could.

00:32:09.000 I would argue

00:32:11.140 that my

00:32:11.540 viewers are

00:32:12.260 probably the

00:32:13.100 best informed

00:32:13.940 of just

00:32:16.880 about anywhere

00:32:17.460 because I

00:32:18.720 don't know

00:32:19.040 anywhere else

00:32:19.640 that even

00:32:19.980 tries to show

00:32:20.640 you both

00:32:21.080 sides, you

00:32:22.780 know, if

00:32:23.060 there is a

00:32:23.440 both sides.

00:32:24.360 Do you know

00:32:24.720 any other

00:32:25.580 source that

00:32:26.180 even tries to

00:32:27.120 tell you

00:32:28.160 what's real?

00:32:29.540 I don't know.

00:32:30.820 I'm not aware

00:32:31.400 of one.

00:32:32.620 I mean,

00:32:32.840 usually they're

00:32:33.360 either just

00:32:33.860 having fun

00:32:34.640 or they're

00:32:36.120 one-sided.

00:32:36.980 You get a

00:32:39.180 little bit of

00:32:39.700 Bill Maher,

00:32:40.320 but that's

00:32:40.660 it.

00:32:43.040 All right.

00:32:47.140 I saw

00:32:48.120 Andres

00:32:49.020 Backhouse,

00:32:50.380 who says

00:32:51.280 lots of

00:32:51.780 provocative

00:32:52.280 things lately.

00:32:54.340 Let me give

00:32:55.360 you some

00:32:56.680 advice.

00:32:57.520 And Andres,

00:32:58.120 if you watch

00:32:58.700 this, this is

00:32:59.540 for you

00:32:59.880 specifically.

00:33:01.320 So this is

00:33:01.820 advice for

00:33:02.360 Andres.

00:33:04.220 People follow

00:33:05.260 me and they

00:33:05.940 see me

00:33:06.540 use profanity

00:33:08.740 and attack

00:33:09.520 people on

00:33:10.120 Twitter and

00:33:10.960 generally be

00:33:12.260 a flaming 1.00

00:33:13.040 asshole in 1.00

00:33:13.820 public. 1.00

00:33:15.180 Don't be

00:33:15.720 like me.

00:33:17.300 Right?

00:33:17.580 I think Mike

00:33:18.560 Cernovich gave

00:33:19.220 the same

00:33:19.620 advice, if I

00:33:20.640 remember correctly.

00:33:21.880 Don't be

00:33:22.560 like me.

00:33:23.580 Right?

00:33:24.240 So if I

00:33:25.340 can make it

00:33:25.840 work, it

00:33:27.460 has more to

00:33:28.040 do with my

00:33:28.500 specific

00:33:29.000 situation.

00:33:29.860 Right?

00:33:30.540 Now part of

00:33:31.160 it is I

00:33:31.500 have FU

00:33:32.100 money, so

00:33:32.760 I have more

00:33:34.440 freedom.

00:33:34.720 But if I

00:33:35.720 thought I

00:33:36.080 needed a

00:33:36.500 paycheck

00:33:36.820 someday, I

00:33:37.460 wouldn't act

00:33:37.900 like this

00:33:38.540 in public.

00:33:39.960 You know

00:33:40.300 that, right?

00:33:41.440 I would

00:33:41.800 never act

00:33:42.440 the way I

00:33:42.900 do if I

00:33:43.940 had to get

00:33:44.260 a job.

00:33:46.520 It's only

00:33:47.100 because I

00:33:47.520 don't need

00:33:47.820 a job that

00:33:48.440 I can be

00:33:50.500 profane and

00:33:51.300 do whatever 0.94

00:33:51.680 the hell I

00:33:52.100 want.

00:33:53.020 But if you're

00:33:54.140 trying to get

00:33:54.680 through, let's

00:33:55.900 say, the early

00:33:56.860 part of your

00:33:57.420 career where you

00:33:58.580 really depend on

00:33:59.340 other people to

00:34:00.180 treat you

00:34:01.420 right, don't

00:34:02.100 be provocative

00:34:03.880 on social

00:34:04.460 media.

00:34:06.060 It's not to

00:34:06.980 your advantage,

00:34:07.680 not even a

00:34:08.200 little bit.

00:34:09.020 It's fun, and

00:34:10.440 it gets you

00:34:10.800 retweets, and I

00:34:11.500 can see why you

00:34:12.080 do it, but it's

00:34:13.100 just a bad life

00:34:14.080 strategy.

00:34:14.640 Don't do it.

00:34:15.320 You should

00:34:15.600 delete your

00:34:16.020 account.

00:34:16.600 Get rid of

00:34:17.000 all the

00:34:17.260 tweets.

00:34:18.160 For sure, you

00:34:18.960 should get rid

00:34:19.460 of all your

00:34:19.880 provocative

00:34:20.300 tweets.

00:34:21.260 For sure.

00:34:26.120 But what I

00:34:26.960 forgot what his

00:34:27.900 point was, but

00:34:28.780 his point was

00:34:29.460 that it's

00:34:29.820 provocative.

00:34:30.240 He says, it's

00:34:31.340 probably fair to

00:34:32.040 assume that the

00:34:32.600 Ukrainian army

00:34:33.400 also has an IQ

00:34:34.460 advantage over

00:34:35.260 the Russian

00:34:35.660 military.

00:34:38.080 IQ advantage.

00:34:40.060 Now, they

00:34:40.760 might have a

00:34:42.020 professional

00:34:42.740 in some cases.

00:34:47.820 Well, all

00:34:48.920 right, let's

00:34:49.360 think it through

00:34:50.680 a little bit.

00:34:51.200 I don't know

00:34:51.580 the answer to

00:34:52.000 the question,

00:34:52.340 but let's

00:34:52.540 think it

00:34:52.800 through.

00:34:54.060 So, if

00:34:55.640 you're a

00:34:56.000 Ukrainian, what 0.71

00:34:57.380 is the

00:34:57.760 requirement for

00:34:59.360 you to

00:34:59.800 serve?

00:35:00.240 If you're

00:35:02.540 Ukrainian, the

00:35:03.500 requirement for

00:35:04.140 you to be in

00:35:04.460 the military is

00:35:05.100 to be male, and

00:35:06.940 not even male.

00:35:07.800 I think women 1.00

00:35:08.280 are serving as

00:35:09.160 well.

00:35:10.340 But let's say,

00:35:11.460 stick with the

00:35:12.040 average.

00:35:12.820 You have to be

00:35:13.540 male within a 0.91

00:35:15.840 certain age.

00:35:17.280 What is the

00:35:18.200 Russian requirement

00:35:19.220 to be in the

00:35:19.900 military?

00:35:20.220 military?

00:35:23.120 I don't know

00:35:23.840 exactly, but it

00:35:24.760 seems to me that

00:35:25.440 the ones that

00:35:26.220 were in the

00:35:26.780 military probably

00:35:28.280 were the ones

00:35:28.940 who didn't have

00:35:29.500 options.

00:35:33.520 Am I right?

00:35:35.000 If you were to

00:35:35.800 compare a

00:35:36.440 volunteer army of

00:35:38.240 people who didn't

00:35:40.200 have any choice

00:35:40.880 they're defending

00:35:41.440 their country,

00:35:43.140 you end up

00:35:43.720 getting, don't

00:35:44.480 you get the,

00:35:45.280 like, Benjamin

00:35:46.400 Franklin, and

00:35:47.520 you end up

00:35:49.120 with George

00:35:49.560 Washington, and

00:35:51.100 you end up

00:35:54.140 with the

00:35:54.400 founding fathers,

00:35:56.060 right?

00:35:56.480 I mean, this is

00:35:57.240 an exaggeration to

00:35:58.220 make the point,

00:35:58.820 right?

00:35:59.520 But the people

00:36:01.020 who volunteer to

00:36:02.460 save their own

00:36:03.100 country that they

00:36:04.700 live in are

00:36:06.260 going to be the

00:36:06.780 cream of the

00:36:07.220 crop.

00:36:08.580 Am I wrong?

00:36:10.860 Isn't it the

00:36:11.620 smart people who

00:36:12.360 are staying to

00:36:12.840 fight in Ukraine?

00:36:14.940 And in Russia, 1.00

00:36:15.980 only the dumb 1.00

00:36:16.620 people are getting 1.00

00:36:17.200 into the

00:36:17.500 war.

00:36:18.140 Now, again,

00:36:18.780 these are wildly

00:36:19.640 exaggerated,

00:36:21.020 because the

00:36:21.440 conscription is

00:36:23.480 picking up just

00:36:25.160 anybody they can

00:36:25.800 get.

00:36:26.780 But you tell me

00:36:27.820 that the smartest

00:36:28.580 people in Russia

00:36:29.400 are in the

00:36:30.020 military.

00:36:31.000 Can you tell me

00:36:31.620 that?

00:36:32.960 Seriously, are

00:36:33.920 the smartest

00:36:34.420 people in Russia

00:36:35.980 in the military?

00:36:37.600 Now, ask the

00:36:38.480 same question

00:36:38.980 about Ukraine.

00:36:40.840 I'll bet they

00:36:41.620 are.

00:36:42.600 I'll bet they

00:36:43.160 are.

00:36:43.920 I'll bet the

00:36:44.420 smartest people

00:36:45.140 are in the

00:36:45.640 military in

00:36:46.740 Ukraine.

00:36:47.080 along with

00:36:49.880 everybody else,

00:36:50.740 right?

00:36:51.300 But I'll bet

00:36:51.980 there is actually

00:36:53.460 a noticeable IQ

00:36:54.640 difference in the

00:36:55.380 Ukrainian military.

00:36:56.040 And there is

00:36:57.980 some report that

00:36:58.840 the American

00:36:59.880 trainers or the

00:37:00.840 NATO trainers

00:37:01.620 were impressed

00:37:03.200 with the

00:37:03.740 Ukrainians' 1.00

00:37:04.400 ability to

00:37:05.100 quickly pick up

00:37:06.400 the weaponry,

00:37:07.820 et cetera.

00:37:08.180 the smartest

00:37:11.060 man in the

00:37:11.440 U.S.

00:37:17.320 The latest

00:37:18.580 evidence that

00:37:20.200 ivermectin

00:37:20.840 proves science

00:37:21.560 doesn't work,

00:37:23.480 and what I mean

00:37:24.160 by that is I'm

00:37:24.800 not saying ivermectin

00:37:25.820 works or doesn't

00:37:26.600 work.

00:37:27.240 I have no idea.

00:37:28.960 What I'm saying

00:37:29.800 is that the way

00:37:30.900 we dealt with

00:37:31.540 ivermectin proved

00:37:33.400 you can't trust

00:37:34.080 science anymore.

00:37:34.860 Would you all

00:37:36.020 agree with that?

00:37:37.540 It was the most

00:37:38.540 stark case of

00:37:40.680 where no matter

00:37:41.820 which way it

00:37:42.720 goes, no matter

00:37:44.620 what we learn in

00:37:46.160 the long, long

00:37:46.820 run about

00:37:47.280 ivermectin, that

00:37:48.600 it worked or

00:37:49.160 didn't work, the

00:37:50.180 one thing we can

00:37:50.840 agree on is it

00:37:51.700 ruins science,

00:37:53.160 because we can

00:37:53.680 never trust it

00:37:54.340 again.

00:37:56.280 That's how I

00:37:57.060 feel.

00:37:57.240 And here's

00:37:58.540 like just the

00:37:59.060 perfect example.

00:38:00.660 And I say,

00:38:02.000 when I talk

00:38:02.540 about ivermectin,

00:38:03.560 I'm saying the

00:38:04.140 same thing I say

00:38:04.860 about Ukraine,

00:38:06.600 which is everything

00:38:07.620 I say about

00:38:08.440 Ukraine or

00:38:09.420 ivermectin, no

00:38:11.480 matter how

00:38:12.000 confidently I

00:38:12.880 say it, just

00:38:14.380 assume that I

00:38:15.100 don't know that's

00:38:15.660 true, because you

00:38:16.680 can't know anything

00:38:17.320 about either one

00:38:17.940 of those things.

00:38:19.220 But this was

00:38:20.600 fun.

00:38:20.900 I tweeted this.

00:38:22.240 So you knew

00:38:22.900 there was this

00:38:23.340 new study that

00:38:24.440 purported to be

00:38:25.900 a credible study,

00:38:27.240 that purported

00:38:28.360 to say ivermectin

00:38:29.300 doesn't work.

00:38:30.700 And then the

00:38:31.220 skeptics tore it

00:38:32.100 apart and said,

00:38:32.920 here are all the

00:38:33.560 problems with it.

00:38:34.740 And they did look

00:38:35.400 like real problems

00:38:36.200 to me.

00:38:37.160 I mean, I'd like

00:38:37.980 to hear the

00:38:38.300 counterpoint, but

00:38:39.080 it looked like the

00:38:39.900 skeptics did a

00:38:41.580 good job of

00:38:42.440 tearing it apart.

00:38:44.060 But then, this

00:38:45.900 is just the best

00:38:47.220 part.

00:38:47.540 Somebody who is

00:38:48.080 real good with

00:38:48.920 statistics says

00:38:50.980 that if you look

00:38:51.880 at the study, it

00:38:52.700 proves it does

00:38:53.320 work.

00:38:55.080 And that the

00:38:55.740 people who did

00:38:56.200 the study don't

00:38:56.860 know how to

00:38:57.220 do their own

00:38:57.760 statistics.

00:38:59.280 And he showed

00:39:00.100 his work.

00:39:01.520 He showed where

00:39:02.380 in the study he

00:39:03.300 was referring to.

00:39:04.940 He says, if you

00:39:05.760 actually knew how

00:39:06.480 to do, I don't

00:39:07.100 know, Bayesian

00:39:07.800 whatever, he said

00:39:09.520 if you actually knew

00:39:10.140 how to do it right,

00:39:11.240 you could take their

00:39:12.160 own numbers, and

00:39:13.080 it shows something

00:39:14.340 like over 90%

00:39:16.140 effect, 90%

00:39:18.180 certainty, that

00:39:20.640 ivermectin works.

00:39:23.340 According to the

00:39:24.280 study that says it

00:39:25.220 doesn't work, if you

00:39:27.360 did their own

00:39:28.000 numbers correctly, so

00:39:29.400 he's just using

00:39:30.020 their own numbers.

00:39:31.380 He's not adding

00:39:32.160 any numbers, he's

00:39:32.900 just doing the

00:39:33.380 math correctly, he

00:39:34.800 claims, on their

00:39:36.560 own data.

00:39:37.740 It says if you do

00:39:38.460 the math correctly,

00:39:39.260 it works.

00:39:40.340 It looks like it

00:39:40.880 works fine.

00:39:42.900 Now, which would

00:39:44.920 be unusual, because

00:39:46.320 the other critics,

00:39:47.680 now here's where it

00:39:48.340 gets interesting, the

00:39:49.740 other critics were

00:39:50.580 saying that, for

00:39:52.080 example, here's

00:39:53.280 one example of

00:39:54.480 what's wrong with

00:39:55.060 it, the people

00:39:56.640 were supposed to

00:39:57.520 start the

00:39:58.260 ivermectin within

00:40:00.760 a few days of

00:40:01.960 symptoms, right?

00:40:03.440 And if that were

00:40:04.460 not true, then

00:40:06.720 everything is 0.92

00:40:08.760 ridiculous. 0.98

00:40:10.360 Do you know 1.00

00:40:10.760 how the people

00:40:11.640 who started within

00:40:12.700 a few days of

00:40:13.540 symptoms, do you

00:40:14.200 know how they got

00:40:14.900 the ivermectin?

00:40:15.760 I'm just going to

00:40:19.060 wait for your head 1.00

00:40:19.620 to explode. 1.00

00:40:20.780 I'm just going to

00:40:21.240 put this together

00:40:21.880 slowly, so your

00:40:23.000 head just goes

00:40:23.520 bam, when I'm

00:40:25.220 done.

00:40:26.300 So it was a

00:40:27.180 test to make

00:40:28.560 sure that people

00:40:29.260 who had just got

00:40:30.540 the symptoms, like

00:40:31.460 really early, if

00:40:32.980 they took ivermectin

00:40:34.040 to see if that

00:40:34.860 made a difference.

00:40:35.940 And how did they

00:40:36.600 get the actual

00:40:37.280 ivermectin medicine?

00:40:40.680 It was mailed to

00:40:42.020 them.

00:40:44.080 It was mailed

00:40:45.580 to them through

00:40:46.440 the regular

00:40:47.240 mail.

00:40:50.720 I don't even

00:40:51.640 know if it was

00:40:52.160 priority.

00:40:56.700 Come on.

00:40:58.500 Come on.

00:40:59.780 That's like not

00:41:00.420 even trying.

00:41:02.100 So none of the

00:41:03.100 people in the

00:41:03.660 study ever saw

00:41:04.820 the people who

00:41:05.420 ran the study.

00:41:06.200 It was all done

00:41:06.700 remotely.

00:41:08.420 They just mailed

00:41:09.160 them.

00:41:09.600 And then here's

00:41:10.020 the second thing

00:41:10.600 they didn't do.

00:41:12.040 There was no

00:41:12.760 monitoring of whether

00:41:13.740 they actually took

00:41:14.440 the drug.

00:41:15.580 Or if they took

00:41:17.540 the right amount

00:41:18.280 or if they took

00:41:18.920 it at the right

00:41:19.380 time.

00:41:22.160 None of that.

00:41:23.600 So that was a

00:41:24.920 study that people

00:41:25.620 were pointing to

00:41:26.740 and saying,

00:41:27.220 proof.

00:41:28.860 Proof that it

00:41:29.700 doesn't work.

00:41:31.280 Now, again, if

00:41:33.640 you're listening to

00:41:34.380 me and saying,

00:41:35.540 you know, Scott is

00:41:36.780 telling you it

00:41:37.280 works or it

00:41:37.760 doesn't work, I'm

00:41:38.400 not telling you

00:41:38.900 that.

00:41:40.080 I'm telling you

00:41:40.880 that ivermectin

00:41:42.460 proves science

00:41:43.140 doesn't work.

00:41:43.840 So I'm not

00:41:44.860 going to use

00:41:45.220 science to give

00:41:45.880 you an opinion

00:41:46.380 when ivermectin

00:41:47.220 proves science

00:41:47.800 doesn't work.

00:41:48.860 It can't tell

00:41:49.520 me if ivermectin

00:41:50.720 works, so

00:41:51.360 therefore science

00:41:52.060 doesn't work.

00:41:53.820 And I don't

00:41:54.600 think it's a

00:41:55.000 hard question

00:41:55.540 either.

00:41:57.000 You know, if

00:41:57.440 you're looking at

00:41:58.200 all the things

00:41:58.900 that science has

00:41:59.660 tried to determine,

00:42:01.760 where on that

00:42:02.520 list would be

00:42:03.420 does ivermectin

00:42:05.100 work against

00:42:05.740 COVID?

00:42:06.080 That would be

00:42:08.160 near the easiest

00:42:10.620 thing that science

00:42:11.940 could do.

00:42:12.440 Am I wrong?

00:42:14.740 What could be

00:42:15.760 more easy for

00:42:17.600 science than

00:42:19.060 showing whether

00:42:19.800 ivermectin, which

00:42:20.820 has already

00:42:21.200 developed and

00:42:21.860 worked and it's

00:42:22.960 in the marketplace

00:42:23.580 and we already

00:42:24.280 know the safety

00:42:24.920 profile, right?

00:42:26.840 If you already

00:42:27.780 know the safety

00:42:28.580 profile and you're

00:42:30.160 testing against

00:42:30.860 this one specific

00:42:31.960 virus, you tell

00:42:34.180 me that science

00:42:35.040 can't figure that

00:42:35.840 out in two years?

00:42:38.000 I mean, clearly

00:42:38.660 science doesn't

00:42:39.440 work.

00:42:40.200 It's just broken.

00:42:40.960 So there's that.

00:42:48.100 I feel like there

00:42:48.940 were some other

00:42:49.460 funny stories that

00:42:51.380 I didn't get to.

00:42:53.000 Was there

00:42:53.360 something funny

00:42:54.240 that happened

00:42:54.620 today that I

00:42:55.240 forgot?

00:42:55.580 Ivermectin is a

00:43:06.380 promising anti-cancer

00:43:07.660 drug.

00:43:08.460 Yeah, I talked

00:43:08.980 about Ligma and

00:43:09.880 Johnson, that

00:43:10.660 hoax, the

00:43:12.600 slaughter meter.

00:43:13.420 I think I'm going

00:43:13.920 to stay away from

00:43:14.520 the slaughter meter.

00:43:15.240 Has Gottfeld

00:43:20.920 announced his dog?

00:43:26.280 Well, that would

00:43:26.920 be a...

00:43:28.880 All right.

00:43:29.220 Well, I did see

00:43:29.760 it.

00:43:29.980 I saw a picture of

00:43:30.780 it.

00:43:30.980 It's the most

00:43:31.560 adorable little dog.

00:43:33.720 Does it have a

00:43:34.280 name?

00:43:35.060 What's the dog's

00:43:35.720 name?

00:43:35.920 Does it have a name

00:43:41.980 yet?

00:43:42.340 All right.

00:43:43.560 We'll let the

00:43:44.380 audience do it, I

00:43:45.020 guess.

00:43:45.820 Oh, yeah.

00:43:46.800 What is wrong

00:43:47.560 with Madonna?

00:43:48.860 Do you know

00:43:49.460 Madonna scares me

00:43:50.960 more than most

00:43:52.380 people?

00:43:53.000 Let me tell you

00:43:53.580 why.

00:43:54.520 If you're not

00:43:55.240 following the

00:43:55.880 Madonna thing,

00:43:56.600 she's had enough 0.96

00:43:57.980 looks-like cosmetic

00:44:00.740 surgery on her 0.96

00:44:01.580 face, at least,

00:44:03.040 that she is no

00:44:03.780 longer recognizable.

00:44:05.140 Like, you literally

00:44:06.040 wouldn't recognize

00:44:06.760 her on the street.

00:44:07.480 She doesn't look

00:44:07.960 like Madonna even

00:44:08.760 a little bit.

00:44:09.300 And it doesn't

00:44:09.780 look good.

00:44:11.120 Like, she's sort

00:44:12.060 of a creature-looking

00:44:13.220 thing now.

00:44:13.760 Now, obviously,

00:44:15.980 that suggests that

00:44:17.300 she doesn't have

00:44:17.980 anybody giving her

00:44:18.800 advice that she

00:44:19.660 follows.

00:44:20.820 And she's doing

00:44:21.920 these cringy

00:44:23.480 TikToks that are

00:44:27.020 just awful.

00:44:28.420 so here's what I

00:44:31.360 worry about.

00:44:32.940 Who in the world

00:44:34.060 can tell her to

00:44:35.040 stop doing

00:44:35.680 whatever she's

00:44:36.300 doing?

00:44:38.000 It's nobody,

00:44:39.000 right?

00:44:39.940 Like, literally

00:44:40.600 nobody.

00:44:41.080 she's completely

00:44:43.780 uncontrolled.

00:44:45.040 And I was worrying

00:44:46.880 that about myself.

00:44:49.600 Because, you know,

00:44:51.040 I do seem to have

00:44:51.760 some influence on

00:44:53.380 some things in the

00:44:54.260 world.

00:44:54.920 But what happens if

00:44:55.960 I lose my mind?

00:44:58.500 Like, who's going

00:44:59.060 to stop me?

00:45:01.220 Seriously.

00:45:02.700 Like, who could

00:45:03.500 stop me if I

00:45:04.760 decided to go

00:45:05.460 evil?

00:45:05.720 I mean, you

00:45:10.320 know, if all I

00:45:11.680 were doing was

00:45:12.260 talking, you

00:45:13.400 know, and

00:45:13.840 basically that's

00:45:14.800 what Madonna's

00:45:15.520 doing.

00:45:16.260 Madonna's just

00:45:17.020 communicating.

00:45:18.500 If all I was

00:45:19.460 doing is

00:45:19.900 communicating,

00:45:21.700 how would you

00:45:23.320 know I had

00:45:23.900 turned into

00:45:24.460 some, like,

00:45:25.240 evil, like,

00:45:26.700 mentally insecure

00:45:27.920 person?

00:45:29.200 I don't know.

00:45:32.460 So I do worry

00:45:33.580 that I could be

00:45:34.180 dangerous if I

00:45:36.840 lost my mind

00:45:37.600 because there

00:45:37.940 wouldn't be

00:45:38.180 anybody to

00:45:38.540 stop me in

00:45:39.020 time.

00:45:44.540 Yeah.

00:45:46.940 I wrote a

00:45:48.180 book about

00:45:48.540 this called

00:45:50.520 The Religion

00:45:51.120 War.

00:45:52.160 And The

00:45:52.720 Religion War 0.56

00:45:53.360 was published

00:45:54.440 in 2003,

00:45:58.040 maybe?

00:45:58.780 It was a

00:45:59.420 sequel to

00:45:59.920 God's

00:46:00.220 Debrie.

00:46:01.120 And in

00:46:02.340 it, it

00:46:03.740 was a time

00:46:04.460 in the future

00:46:05.060 in which

00:46:05.600 small drones

00:46:06.840 could be

00:46:07.680 carrying

00:46:08.200 munitions.

00:46:10.600 And, you

00:46:12.060 know, it

00:46:12.300 sort of starts

00:46:12.860 from there.

00:46:13.360 The cities

00:46:13.760 are unsecure.

00:46:14.780 Cities are

00:46:15.320 unsafe because

00:46:16.100 of drone

00:46:17.060 attacks.

00:46:19.000 But there

00:46:19.760 was a

00:46:20.040 character in

00:46:20.560 there who

00:46:22.140 hired somebody 0.99

00:46:24.720 to kill 1.00

00:46:26.100 him if 1.00

00:46:27.120 necessary.

00:46:27.660 part of

00:46:30.260 the plot

00:46:30.720 is that

00:46:31.560 the main

00:46:31.960 character

00:46:32.380 who had

00:46:32.720 a lot

00:46:32.920 of power,

00:46:34.000 one of

00:46:34.320 the main

00:46:34.580 characters,

00:46:35.440 actually had

00:46:36.160 a person

00:46:36.680 he hired

00:46:37.660 as an

00:46:38.020 assistant 1.00

00:46:38.360 to kill 1.00

00:46:39.620 him if 1.00

00:46:40.960 it ever

00:46:41.280 got to the

00:46:41.780 point where

00:46:42.100 it had to

00:46:42.420 be done.

00:46:42.760 if I lost

00:46:50.500 all my

00:46:50.880 followers from

00:46:51.480 being insane, 0.53

00:46:52.980 you would

00:46:53.380 look into

00:46:53.760 the cause?

00:46:55.120 Well, I

00:46:56.280 think I

00:46:56.620 would have

00:46:56.880 more

00:46:57.220 followers if

00:46:57.920 I were 0.97

00:46:58.180 insane, 0.72

00:46:58.820 don't you? 0.82

00:47:00.960 Because it

00:47:01.520 depends how

00:47:02.000 insane I

00:47:02.520 went.

00:47:02.720 If I

00:47:03.000 went full

00:47:03.660 hammer in

00:47:06.940 my underpants 0.98

00:47:07.620 insane,

00:47:08.240 then yeah,

00:47:08.820 I get that.

00:47:09.360 but suppose

00:47:10.440 I just

00:47:10.780 sort of

00:47:11.060 turned in

00:47:11.720 some way.

00:47:13.460 I don't

00:47:13.640 know,

00:47:13.920 that's what

00:47:14.440 I worry

00:47:14.740 about.

00:47:15.660 I worry

00:47:16.120 about having

00:47:18.340 too much

00:47:18.840 freedom.

00:47:20.960 Isn't that

00:47:21.580 weird?

00:47:21.800 I literally

00:47:23.180 worry about

00:47:23.700 having too

00:47:24.180 much freedom

00:47:24.720 because there's

00:47:25.240 some point

00:47:25.680 where that's

00:47:26.060 going to be

00:47:26.300 dangerous.

00:47:28.360 Yeah, I

00:47:28.680 don't want

00:47:28.900 to go full

00:47:29.420 yay.

00:47:32.180 All right.

00:47:35.900 Depends on

00:47:36.460 where you

00:47:36.720 place the

00:47:37.160 hammer.

00:47:38.420 You know,

00:47:38.760 there's a

00:47:39.100 non-zero

00:47:39.640 chance that

00:47:40.500 both the

00:47:41.140 Pelosi's were 1.00

00:47:41.720 getting hammered

00:47:42.360 at exactly

00:47:42.840 the same

00:47:43.220 time,

00:47:44.360 just on

00:47:44.780 different

00:47:45.040 coasts.

00:47:48.480 God's

00:47:48.920 debris should

00:47:49.560 be turned

00:47:49.980 into a

00:47:51.020 oh my

00:47:54.800 God.

00:47:56.800 I just

00:47:57.820 figured it

00:47:58.360 out.

00:48:00.260 Oh no.

00:48:02.660 All right.

00:48:04.760 Here's what

00:48:05.420 probably has

00:48:06.920 to happen.

00:48:07.860 So God's

00:48:08.360 debris is a

00:48:09.080 small book

00:48:09.700 which features

00:48:10.460 primarily two

00:48:11.560 characters talking.

00:48:12.640 And I always

00:48:13.040 imagined that

00:48:14.240 it would be

00:48:14.560 turned into

00:48:14.960 either a

00:48:15.440 play or a

00:48:15.980 video in

00:48:17.120 which the

00:48:17.520 two characters

00:48:18.180 talking would

00:48:19.740 have what

00:48:20.640 they're talking

00:48:21.200 about somewhat

00:48:22.160 animated at

00:48:23.420 the same time

00:48:24.020 that they're

00:48:24.360 talking.

00:48:25.200 So you

00:48:25.740 could hear

00:48:26.040 their words

00:48:26.640 but you

00:48:26.960 could see

00:48:27.260 it visually

00:48:27.780 while they're

00:48:28.320 talking.

00:48:29.900 And I

00:48:30.480 thought the

00:48:31.180 AI is right

00:48:32.180 at the point

00:48:32.720 where you

00:48:33.120 could just

00:48:33.460 feed it

00:48:33.880 the script

00:48:35.800 and tell

00:48:36.860 it to

00:48:37.420 build the

00:48:38.860 visual.

00:48:40.500 And AI

00:48:40.920 could probably

00:48:41.500 come very

00:48:41.960 close to

00:48:42.860 designing two

00:48:43.720 characters,

00:48:44.980 putting them

00:48:45.360 there,

00:48:45.620 and then

00:48:46.060 showing you

00:48:46.640 what they're

00:48:46.980 thinking

00:48:47.420 above.

00:48:53.620 Yeah,

00:48:54.120 that's the

00:48:54.460 perfect.

00:48:54.980 I think it

00:48:55.600 needs to be

00:48:55.960 an AI

00:48:56.440 creation.

00:48:59.420 Now,

00:48:59.800 I'm not

00:49:00.200 authorizing

00:49:00.840 that yet,

00:49:02.440 so there

00:49:02.760 would be a

00:49:03.120 copyright problem

00:49:03.820 if somebody

00:49:04.160 makes it on

00:49:04.620 their own.

00:49:05.580 But I'd

00:49:08.140 be real

00:49:08.500 interested to

00:49:09.140 see if it's

00:49:09.540 doable.

00:49:10.520 I'll tell

00:49:10.880 you what I

00:49:11.200 will authorize.

00:49:12.140 I'll authorize

00:49:13.200 a test,

00:49:15.480 like one

00:49:15.960 chapter or

00:49:16.560 something.

00:49:23.240 Yeah,

00:49:23.800 the power

00:49:24.160 of God's

00:49:24.620 degree is

00:49:24.980 that the

00:49:25.260 reader casts

00:49:26.040 themselves in

00:49:26.780 the role.

00:49:28.060 It's true.

00:49:28.880 Yeah,

00:49:29.140 it might come

00:49:30.080 across different

00:49:30.680 in a different

00:49:31.140 medium.

00:49:31.840 That is true.

00:49:36.060 All right.

00:49:42.140 another Fed 0.77

00:49:44.700 hike.

00:49:52.020 Ask the

00:49:52.660 AI to

00:49:53.120 throw in

00:49:53.440 some free

00:49:53.900 A-B

00:49:54.320 testing.

00:49:55.120 Okay.

00:50:00.560 Okay,

00:50:01.180 Rizzo.

00:50:03.880 So,

00:50:04.360 over on,

00:50:05.680 let me

00:50:06.560 fix the

00:50:07.580 broken egos

00:50:08.360 over on

00:50:09.360 YouTube.

00:50:09.600 On YouTube,

00:50:12.700 Dr.

00:50:13.360 Umar is 0.59

00:50:13.800 saying,

00:50:14.140 Scott's

00:50:14.500 ego is

00:50:15.000 out of

00:50:15.280 control

00:50:15.660 lately.

00:50:16.880 And Frank

00:50:17.240 Rizzo is

00:50:18.060 saying,

00:50:18.880 time and

00:50:19.340 time again,

00:50:19.800 he just

00:50:20.080 keeps doing

00:50:20.940 the same

00:50:21.460 comment.

00:50:22.580 Time for

00:50:23.080 more ego

00:50:23.620 jerking.

00:50:24.280 Cover

00:50:24.460 yourself

00:50:24.820 from

00:50:25.060 Scott's

00:50:25.560 splooge.

00:50:27.580 Now,

00:50:28.520 Frank is

00:50:29.560 saying this

00:50:30.000 over and

00:50:30.560 over again.

00:50:32.040 So,

00:50:32.360 his comment

00:50:33.040 about my

00:50:33.600 ego,

00:50:34.200 he really

00:50:34.800 needs you

00:50:35.220 to see

00:50:35.540 it.

00:50:36.500 So,

00:50:36.800 could you

00:50:37.100 all give

00:50:37.860 Frank

00:50:39.460 some

00:50:39.740 attention

00:50:40.180 because he

00:50:41.120 seems to

00:50:41.500 be suffering

00:50:42.080 some kind

00:50:43.400 of a 0.91

00:50:43.880 narcissistic

00:50:44.860 supply

00:50:46.140 problem?

00:50:47.380 So,

00:50:47.900 if you

00:50:48.480 could all

00:50:48.820 give Frank

00:50:49.280 some

00:50:49.500 attention

00:50:49.980 and his

00:50:51.100 weak, 1.00

00:50:51.860 pathetic 1.00

00:50:52.240 little ego 1.00

00:50:52.900 that is

00:50:54.180 destroying

00:50:54.620 his life, 0.89

00:50:55.460 maybe you

00:50:56.080 could resurrect

00:50:56.560 it.

00:50:57.560 Because he

00:50:57.960 has a

00:50:58.300 problem

00:50:58.640 when people

00:50:59.300 whose job

00:50:59.880 it is to

00:51:00.340 tell you

00:51:00.640 what they

00:51:00.940 do,

00:51:01.760 tell you

00:51:02.160 what they

00:51:02.460 do.

00:51:04.080 Frank,

00:51:04.740 you realize

00:51:05.280 that my 0.99

00:51:05.640 whole fucking 0.99

00:51:06.580 act is 1.00

00:51:08.680 telling you

00:51:09.120 what I

00:51:09.400 think is

00:51:09.780 going to

00:51:10.040 happen and

00:51:11.240 then comparing

00:51:12.060 it to what

00:51:12.540 happened.

00:51:13.620 That's all

00:51:14.440 I do

00:51:14.780 here.

00:51:16.480 If you

00:51:17.120 can't handle

00:51:17.700 that,

00:51:18.640 you really

00:51:19.200 need to be

00:51:19.720 somewhere else

00:51:20.280 and just 1.00

00:51:20.620 fuck off. 1.00

00:51:25.460 So, 1.00

00:51:26.140 Frank,

00:51:26.420 if you'd

00:51:26.680 like to

00:51:26.980 stay here

00:51:27.320 with your

00:51:27.600 tiny little

00:51:28.140 ego,

00:51:29.200 you have

00:51:30.000 been promoted

00:51:30.800 to mascot.

00:51:32.500 You know

00:51:32.840 what that

00:51:33.100 means,

00:51:33.400 right?

00:51:34.400 Now you're 1.00

00:51:35.080 my bitch. 1.00

00:51:35.660 so Frank, 1.00

00:51:38.420 you're my

00:51:39.140 new Shelly

00:51:39.720 because you're

00:51:41.400 such a 1.00

00:51:41.840 fucking 1.00

00:51:42.140 asshole 1.00

00:51:42.600 that I'm 1.00

00:51:43.620 going to

00:51:43.800 use you

00:51:44.200 as the 0.99

00:51:44.500 butt of 0.93

00:51:44.900 all of

00:51:45.300 my jokes

00:51:45.840 of small

00:51:46.760 egoed

00:51:47.300 tiny 0.76

00:51:47.720 little 0.54

00:51:48.200 troll 0.99

00:51:48.840 piss 0.99

00:51:49.560 ants. 0.94

00:51:53.440 All right.

00:51:59.480 You know,

00:52:00.300 tell me

00:52:03.420 the truth.

00:52:05.100 How much

00:52:05.700 do you

00:52:06.000 enjoy

00:52:06.380 seeing

00:52:06.900 somebody

00:52:07.260 push 0.64

00:52:07.580 back

00:52:07.860 at

00:52:08.060 trolls?

00:52:11.780 Is it 0.84

00:52:12.600 unpleasant

00:52:13.080 because,

00:52:13.720 you know,

00:52:13.920 it's sort

00:52:14.160 of a

00:52:14.420 negative

00:52:14.820 energy?

00:52:15.620 Or is

00:52:16.220 it fun

00:52:16.700 because I'm

00:52:17.400 just using

00:52:17.840 it for

00:52:18.100 entertainment?

00:52:19.580 It doesn't

00:52:20.300 stay with

00:52:21.340 me,

00:52:21.620 right?

00:52:22.360 The moment

00:52:23.020 I'm done

00:52:23.420 with it,

00:52:23.820 I'll never

00:52:24.380 remember it

00:52:24.920 again.

00:52:26.000 Yeah,

00:52:26.200 it's pure

00:52:26.520 entertainment.

00:52:27.820 Pure

00:52:28.000 entertainment.

00:52:30.300 Time for

00:52:34.260 Scott's

00:52:35.240 booster.

00:52:38.180 How many

00:52:38.880 on YouTube,

00:52:40.040 let's see

00:52:40.320 how many 1.00

00:52:40.640 stupid 1.00

00:52:41.180 people there 1.00

00:52:41.700 are.

00:52:42.200 All right,

00:52:42.420 here's a

00:52:42.740 test for 1.00

00:52:43.240 stupid 1.00

00:52:43.540 people. 1.00

00:52:44.680 Stupid 1.00

00:52:45.080 people, 1.00

00:52:45.640 how many

00:52:45.940 believe that

00:52:46.560 I promoted

00:52:47.260 vaccinations?

00:52:48.380 Go.

00:52:49.520 I know

00:52:50.120 on the

00:52:50.640 locals

00:52:51.520 platform,

00:52:52.160 they're smart,

00:52:52.740 so I don't

00:52:53.080 have to ask

00:52:53.460 that question.

00:52:54.600 But on

00:52:55.040 YouTube,

00:52:55.920 how many

00:52:56.360 believe I

00:52:56.920 promoted

00:52:57.400 vaccinations?

00:52:58.740 Go. 1.00

00:52:59.480 Stupid 1.00

00:52:59.760 people, 1.00

00:53:00.300 show

00:53:00.940 yourself.

00:53:02.440 Okay?

00:53:03.380 Gordy is 1.00

00:53:04.280 stupid and 1.00

00:53:06.500 is proud 1.00

00:53:07.260 to admit

00:53:07.620 it.

00:53:09.300 Go ahead.

00:53:12.400 Steve

00:53:13.040 wanted to

00:53:13.680 mention some

00:53:14.280 fake news

00:53:15.020 from a long

00:53:15.560 time ago

00:53:16.120 because he

00:53:17.200 couldn't get

00:53:17.660 anything new.

00:53:20.580 So,

00:53:22.120 what,

00:53:25.320 really?

00:53:26.580 Yeah,

00:53:26.880 I thought

00:53:27.180 there would

00:53:27.400 be more 1.00

00:53:28.080 stupid people 1.00

00:53:28.800 on YouTube. 1.00

00:53:30.660 I'm

00:53:30.860 actually a

00:53:31.340 little

00:53:31.440 impressed.

00:53:32.080 Is it

00:53:32.340 because you're

00:53:32.820 too shy? 1.00

00:53:33.780 Stupid 1.00

00:53:34.180 people? 1.00

00:53:35.340 Where are

00:53:35.860 all my 1.00

00:53:36.180 stupid 1.00

00:53:36.440 people? 1.00

00:53:37.920 You're

00:53:38.240 all smart.

00:53:38.780 All the

00:53:39.000 ones commenting

00:53:39.640 are smart.

00:53:42.020 Yeah,

00:53:42.540 interesting.

00:53:42.960 All right.

00:53:45.680 All right.

00:53:48.500 Too shy.

00:53:53.940 Sparky says,

00:53:55.080 listen to this

00:53:55.780 comment.

00:53:57.100 Sparky paid

00:53:57.780 five dollars for

00:53:58.580 this comment.

00:53:59.380 Scott, you're a

00:54:00.080 busy man.

00:54:01.160 Why do you

00:54:01.580 waste your time

00:54:02.220 using the

00:54:02.860 MSM,

00:54:03.600 mainstream media,

00:54:04.560 as a source

00:54:05.360 after they've

00:54:07.320 continually misled

00:54:08.360 you?

00:54:09.540 Sparky, you're

00:54:11.580 very close to

00:54:12.300 mascot territory

00:54:13.180 here, but you

00:54:14.580 did pay five

00:54:15.580 dollars for

00:54:16.160 that comment.

00:54:17.640 So, I'm

00:54:18.420 going to call

00:54:18.760 that a

00:54:19.360 break-even.

00:54:20.960 Your comment

00:54:21.760 did not rise

00:54:22.920 to the level

00:54:23.620 of good,

00:54:27.200 but you did

00:54:28.120 pay me five

00:54:28.740 dollars for

00:54:29.280 it, of

00:54:30.300 which I

00:54:30.640 think I

00:54:30.960 get some

00:54:32.320 of that.

00:54:33.040 So, I

00:54:33.320 think I

00:54:33.560 made three

00:54:34.040 dollars, pay

00:54:34.800 taxes, buck

00:54:35.600 fifty.

00:54:35.960 All right,

00:54:36.880 so I'm

00:54:37.040 probably a

00:54:37.460 buck fifty

00:54:38.100 ahead for

00:54:39.940 that comment.

00:54:40.640 Okay, more

00:54:41.200 of those.

00:54:42.500 Sparky, I

00:54:43.220 give you a

00:54:43.600 pass, I

00:54:44.880 came out

00:54:45.200 ahead.

00:54:45.800 Keep going.

00:54:46.840 Keep going

00:54:47.340 with that,

00:54:47.700 more of

00:54:48.260 that.

00:54:52.500 Has

00:54:52.940 anyone checked

00:54:53.540 in on Keith

00:54:54.120 Oberman?

00:54:56.840 Has

00:54:57.280 anybody

00:54:57.560 actually quit

00:54:58.540 Twitter because

00:55:00.580 of Elon

00:55:01.000 Musk? 0.97

00:55:01.380 and Dr.

00:55:07.640 Umar says,

00:55:08.380 but Scott

00:55:08.800 believes the

00:55:09.380 science on

00:55:10.040 climate change.

00:55:12.260 Oh, Dr.

00:55:13.300 Umar,

00:55:13.780 Samir, I

00:55:15.460 don't know if

00:55:15.880 you're real

00:55:16.420 because I

00:55:17.100 can't imagine

00:55:17.560 real people

00:55:18.180 being such a 1.00

00:55:18.840 dumb cunt, 1.00

00:55:19.820 but let me 1.00

00:55:21.780 address that.

00:55:23.880 Does Scott

00:55:24.980 believe the

00:55:25.640 science?

00:55:27.060 What do you

00:55:27.740 think?

00:55:28.560 Do I

00:55:28.960 believe the

00:55:29.540 science of

00:55:30.160 climate change?

00:55:31.380 those of you

00:55:34.560 who have

00:55:34.620 been watching

00:55:34.960 me, do I

00:55:35.460 believe the

00:55:36.020 science of

00:55:36.460 climate change?

00:55:39.300 I'm seeing a 0.98

00:55:40.180 mixture.

00:55:41.460 No and

00:55:41.860 yes.

00:55:42.880 The answer

00:55:43.660 is no and

00:55:45.240 yes.

00:55:47.060 So it

00:55:48.220 depends what

00:55:48.640 you call the

00:55:49.080 science.

00:55:52.040 I believe,

00:55:52.940 now I

00:55:53.280 don't, usually

00:55:53.940 I don't, with

00:55:54.540 science I

00:55:54.980 usually give it

00:55:55.700 a likelihood.

00:55:57.640 So the

00:55:58.140 first part is

00:55:58.940 that you're a 1.00

00:55:59.700 dumb idiot, 1.00

00:56:00.160 idiot, and 1.00

00:56:01.740 dumb idiots 1.00

00:56:02.200 are the 1.00

00:56:02.500 worst kind 1.00

00:56:02.980 of idiots, 1.00

00:56:04.100 you would be 1.00

00:56:05.200 an idiot to 1.00

00:56:06.580 think that I 1.00

00:56:07.240 say science is

00:56:08.240 binary, that it's

00:56:09.820 right or wrong,

00:56:11.020 because I can't

00:56:11.660 tell.

00:56:12.360 What I usually do

00:56:13.280 is say what the

00:56:13.880 odds are.

00:56:14.740 And so what I

00:56:15.180 say about climate

00:56:15.860 change is that

00:56:17.240 the basic science

00:56:18.500 has a good chance

00:56:20.340 of being right,

00:56:21.260 very high chance.

00:56:22.300 And the basic

00:56:23.080 science is if you

00:56:24.800 add CO2 to the

00:56:27.180 environment, it

00:56:28.960 is likely to

00:56:29.680 warm, all

00:56:31.280 other things

00:56:32.340 being constant.

00:56:33.780 I think that's

00:56:34.540 true, probably.

00:56:37.020 Now if it

00:56:37.820 turned out that

00:56:38.360 that was not

00:56:38.960 true someday,

00:56:41.020 would you say

00:56:41.800 Scott was

00:56:43.000 wrong?

00:56:44.520 Well, you

00:56:45.600 couldn't say

00:56:46.100 that, because

00:56:47.180 even if I said

00:56:48.040 it was a 90%

00:56:49.060 chance of being

00:56:49.860 right, and

00:56:50.960 then it turned

00:56:51.440 out to be

00:56:51.900 wrong, you

00:56:52.920 couldn't even

00:56:53.480 say the odds

00:56:54.080 were wrong.

00:56:55.200 Think about

00:56:55.680 it.

00:56:57.260 If I say

00:56:57.980 there's a 90%

00:56:58.900 chance of

00:56:59.420 something is

00:56:59.880 true, and

00:57:01.020 then later we

00:57:01.620 find out it's

00:57:02.180 not true, was

00:57:03.540 I wrong?

00:57:04.900 That's the

00:57:05.400 question for you.

00:57:05.940 Was I wrong

00:57:06.680 if I say there's

00:57:07.940 a 90% chance

00:57:08.960 it's true, but

00:57:09.500 then later we

00:57:10.020 find out it's

00:57:10.500 not true?

00:57:11.560 No, I was

00:57:12.100 not wrong.

00:57:13.120 There's no way

00:57:13.880 to determine

00:57:14.460 whether I was

00:57:15.060 right or wrong,

00:57:15.960 because I

00:57:16.620 wasn't talking

00:57:17.200 about whether

00:57:17.660 it was true or

00:57:18.300 false, I was

00:57:19.640 talking about

00:57:20.040 the odds.

00:57:21.740 The odds

00:57:22.560 allowed it to

00:57:23.180 happen or not

00:57:23.760 happen, because

00:57:24.760 10% is

00:57:25.440 a healthy

00:57:26.760 odd.

00:57:29.460 So no.

00:57:31.620 There's no way

00:57:32.400 to determine if

00:57:33.280 my estimate of

00:57:34.180 the odds was

00:57:34.780 wrong.

00:57:35.500 All we know

00:57:36.060 is what

00:57:36.320 happened.

00:57:37.080 That's all you

00:57:37.560 know.

00:57:38.180 Now, if you

00:57:38.760 did lots of

00:57:40.080 iterations of

00:57:41.260 that, I suppose

00:57:41.700 you could tell

00:57:42.120 something.

00:57:46.400 Yeah, Jason,

00:57:47.300 I'm going to

00:57:47.640 agree with you

00:57:48.320 there.

00:57:49.460 So then the

00:57:50.700 part of the

00:57:51.100 science I don't

00:57:52.060 believe is that

00:57:53.480 we can estimate

00:57:54.420 the so what.

00:57:56.980 You know, that

00:57:57.480 is it going to

00:57:58.120 be a catastrophe

00:57:59.120 or not a

00:57:59.940 catastrophe.

00:58:00.740 That part of

00:58:01.420 the science is 1.00

00:58:02.140 bullshit. 1.00

00:58:04.500 So how many 1.00

00:58:05.840 of you would

00:58:06.800 agree with my

00:58:08.000 assessment,

00:58:08.660 number one,

00:58:09.860 when you're

00:58:10.540 saying about the

00:58:11.520 basic science of

00:58:12.380 adding CO2,

00:58:13.660 would you agree

00:58:14.400 with the statement

00:58:15.020 that you can't

00:58:16.420 know, but you

00:58:18.100 could put a guess

00:58:19.400 on it?

00:58:20.700 Like, is it

00:58:21.360 10% or 90%?

00:58:22.760 And even that,

00:58:23.540 you will never

00:58:23.960 know if you're

00:58:24.400 right about it.

00:58:26.120 Is that a more

00:58:27.420 reasonable way to

00:58:28.260 approach it?

00:58:29.280 Because ask

00:58:30.120 yourself, have you

00:58:30.800 ever been positive

00:58:31.720 something was true

00:58:32.780 to find out later

00:58:34.520 it wasn't?

00:58:36.060 And how many

00:58:36.760 times has it

00:58:37.260 happened this

00:58:37.820 year?

00:58:39.520 How many times

00:58:40.340 this year were

00:58:41.560 you positive

00:58:42.100 something was

00:58:42.740 true to find

00:58:43.840 out it wasn't?

00:58:45.540 It's the most

00:58:46.080 common thing in

00:58:47.400 the world.

00:58:47.900 So if you think

00:58:48.600 that you're

00:58:48.960 positive about

00:58:49.840 climate change,

00:58:50.780 either that the

00:58:52.200 basic science is

00:58:53.220 accurate or not,

00:58:54.720 if you're

00:58:55.200 positive, well,

00:58:56.660 then you're

00:58:56.940 definitely not

00:58:57.500 part of the

00:58:57.920 reasonable crowd.

00:58:59.760 The reasonable

00:59:00.760 crowd would put

00:59:01.460 a percentage on

00:59:02.200 it.

00:59:02.780 If you were the

00:59:03.600 most ardent

00:59:04.460 pro-climate

00:59:05.560 change scientist,

00:59:07.040 if I trapped

00:59:08.420 you in private,

00:59:09.900 I could get you

00:59:11.500 to say, okay,

00:59:12.120 99% chance I'm

00:59:13.380 right.

00:59:14.180 But they're

00:59:14.760 never going to

00:59:15.180 say it's binary.

00:59:17.180 No real

00:59:17.800 scientist would

00:59:18.440 say that.

00:59:28.300 All right.

00:59:31.300 Higher CO2 is

00:59:32.640 a blessing for

00:59:33.360 the planet,

00:59:34.300 somebody says.

00:59:35.380 Now, would

00:59:35.840 you say that

00:59:36.540 that's 100%

00:59:39.280 true?

00:59:40.300 Or do you

00:59:40.980 just think that's

00:59:41.640 more likely

00:59:42.160 true?

00:59:43.420 Somebody said

00:59:44.220 that more CO2,

00:59:45.900 and again,

00:59:47.700 there's no limit

00:59:48.300 on what more

00:59:48.900 means.

00:59:49.840 So I guess

00:59:50.240 more would

00:59:50.800 mean there's

00:59:51.320 no limit to

00:59:51.900 how much

00:59:52.220 more, that

00:59:53.440 more CO2

00:59:54.520 with no

00:59:55.340 limitations is

00:59:56.280 just good for

00:59:56.820 the planet?

00:59:57.760 How many

00:59:58.340 people would

00:59:58.740 say that there's

00:59:59.320 no limit to

01:00:00.020 how much CO2

01:00:00.740 we can add to

01:00:01.320 the planet?

01:00:02.500 How many say

01:00:03.120 that's 100%

01:00:03.840 sure?

01:00:04.320 No limit.

01:00:04.860 that would be a

01:00:08.220 crazy opinion.

01:00:09.900 That would be the

01:00:10.680 craziest opinion

01:00:11.540 of all.

01:00:12.500 There's a limit to

01:00:13.620 just about everything

01:00:14.320 except too much

01:00:16.000 money.

01:00:17.360 I'm not sure you

01:00:18.360 can be too

01:00:19.140 attractive or too

01:00:20.040 rich or too

01:00:21.440 healthy, but you

01:00:23.700 can be too much

01:00:24.420 of everything else

01:00:25.160 practically.

01:00:32.420 Dr.

01:00:33.060 Umar,

01:00:33.640 Samir,

01:00:34.140 I'm going to 0.80

01:00:34.460 block you because

01:00:35.320 you don't add

01:00:36.000 anything.

01:00:36.700 You don't add

01:00:37.460 anything to this

01:00:38.100 conversation.

01:00:38.840 I'd be very

01:00:39.280 surprised if you

01:00:39.980 add anything to

01:00:40.660 life in general

01:00:41.320 based on the

01:00:42.280 poor quality of

01:00:42.960 your comments.

01:00:47.220 Put you in

01:00:47.900 timeout.

01:00:48.280 somebody's asking

01:00:54.220 me the thermal

01:00:54.920 conductivity of

01:00:56.040 CO2.

01:00:58.680 I'm pretty sure

01:00:59.780 that that

01:01:00.520 discussion is not

01:01:01.520 going to go

01:01:01.860 anywhere useful.

01:01:05.160 Yeah, let's not

01:01:06.080 talk about it.

01:01:07.120 But when it

01:01:08.180 comes to climate

01:01:08.940 change, people,

01:01:10.740 I don't think

01:01:11.520 people want to

01:01:12.420 be rational about

01:01:13.440 it.

01:01:14.800 Do you?

01:01:16.340 I don't think

01:01:16.980 people want to

01:01:17.660 be rational about

01:01:18.260 it.

01:01:19.300 Because what

01:01:21.060 people want is

01:01:22.780 that the changes

01:01:23.680 that would be

01:01:24.280 driven by a

01:01:25.100 belief either

01:01:26.340 happen or don't

01:01:27.120 happen.

01:01:27.840 So there are

01:01:28.120 people who want

01:01:28.800 their gas price

01:01:29.760 to come down

01:01:30.460 and there are

01:01:31.920 people who,

01:01:32.520 you know,

01:01:33.460 want, you know,

01:01:34.400 their taxes to

01:01:35.100 go to this or

01:01:35.680 that.

01:01:36.980 But,

01:01:38.080 all right.

01:01:45.420 How many times

01:01:46.340 do you think

01:01:46.680 Scott's father

01:01:47.760 called them

01:01:48.180 while growing up?

01:01:50.560 Zero.

01:01:53.720 Pretty sure

01:01:54.480 my father never

01:01:55.420 swore at me.

01:02:00.220 So here's my

01:02:02.120 mascot, Frank.

01:02:03.560 Listen to this

01:02:04.040 comment.

01:02:04.900 Scott, do you

01:02:05.500 think if you

01:02:06.040 spent equal time

01:02:06.900 on Justin,

01:02:07.780 this is my

01:02:08.120 stepson who

01:02:08.700 died of a

01:02:09.340 fentanyl overdose,

01:02:10.800 as you did

01:02:11.380 stroking your ego

01:02:12.260 on the internet,

01:02:12.800 that he might

01:02:13.820 be alive today?

01:02:15.000 Honest question.

01:02:17.120 Now, you see

01:02:17.740 why I've

01:02:18.860 promoted him

01:02:20.340 to mascot?

01:02:21.920 Because this is

01:02:23.000 a whole other

01:02:23.520 level.

01:02:25.540 That's a whole

01:02:26.260 other level.

01:02:28.600 All right,

01:02:29.060 you're hidden

01:02:29.500 on this channel.

01:02:32.060 So Frank

01:02:33.100 has been

01:02:34.700 deleted.

01:02:35.600 But, you know,

01:02:36.180 do you wonder

01:02:36.640 if Frank is real?

01:02:37.540 Because I feel

01:02:40.100 like he's been

01:02:41.160 making it his 0.64

01:02:43.380 hobby to troll

01:02:44.180 me for a long

01:02:45.080 time.

01:02:46.440 I don't think

01:02:47.400 Frank's real.

01:02:52.980 Could be a

01:02:53.740 bot.

01:02:54.540 Well, the

01:02:55.060 bots always

01:02:55.600 take the

01:02:56.160 stepson

01:02:56.760 approach.

01:02:59.140 So the

01:02:59.760 bots always

01:03:00.300 go after,

01:03:01.760 ha, ha,

01:03:02.300 ha, you're

01:03:02.880 the Garfield

01:03:03.440 guy.

01:03:06.160 If you're

01:03:06.800 so smart,

01:03:07.360 why is your

01:03:07.860 stepson undone?

01:03:09.520 If you're so

01:03:10.140 smart, why'd

01:03:10.760 you get married

01:03:11.300 or divorced?

01:03:13.300 So the

01:03:13.720 bots always

01:03:14.220 have like

01:03:14.700 three or

01:03:15.900 four approaches.

01:03:22.200 Please

01:03:22.640 silent

01:03:23.120 Chuck

01:03:23.600 Monk.

01:03:26.860 Somebody

01:03:27.300 else on

01:03:28.060 there who's

01:03:28.480 being bad?

01:03:30.720 All right,

01:03:31.180 I will if I

01:03:31.700 see it.

01:03:33.680 Oh, I

01:03:35.120 did a comic

01:03:35.840 today about

01:03:36.520 Rob Reiner.

01:03:38.320 How would

01:03:38.600 you like me

01:03:38.960 to read

01:03:39.260 that to

01:03:39.560 you?

01:03:40.240 You'd love

01:03:40.760 it.

01:03:42.580 So I

01:03:43.140 don't go

01:03:43.540 hard on

01:03:44.000 Rob Reiner.

01:03:47.060 I'm in a

01:03:47.680 different direction

01:03:48.220 which may

01:03:48.700 surprise you.

01:03:50.400 So it's

01:03:50.760 Dilbert and

01:03:51.360 the boss

01:03:51.740 talking.

01:03:53.140 You can,

01:03:53.780 if you were

01:03:54.240 on Locals,

01:03:54.860 you'd already

01:03:55.340 see this.

01:03:56.800 And the

01:03:57.340 boss says,

01:03:57.900 it's time to

01:03:59.340 tweet at

01:04:00.160 actor and

01:04:00.820 producer Rob

01:04:01.600 Reiner and

01:04:02.100 call him a

01:04:02.600 me-head.

01:04:03.680 And Dilbert

01:04:04.140 says,

01:04:04.700 why?

01:04:05.740 And the

01:04:06.040 boss says,

01:04:06.580 because he

01:04:06.940 once played a

01:04:07.540 character on

01:04:08.040 TV who was

01:04:08.620 called me-head.

01:04:10.120 And Dilbert

01:04:10.520 says,

01:04:11.220 and?

01:04:12.280 And the

01:04:12.540 boss says,

01:04:13.080 and I

01:04:13.440 disagree with

01:04:13.980 his political

01:04:14.480 opinions.

01:04:15.500 Dilbert says,

01:04:16.340 so?

01:04:17.480 And the

01:04:17.760 boss says,

01:04:18.600 therefore he

01:04:19.180 must be

01:04:19.500 punished.

01:04:20.960 And Dilbert

01:04:21.320 says,

01:04:21.860 and what will,

01:04:22.960 and that

01:04:23.740 will accomplish

01:04:24.320 exactly what?

01:04:27.080 And then for

01:04:27.820 two panels,

01:04:28.520 the boss

01:04:28.880 thinks.

01:04:30.880 So I like

01:04:31.680 these panels

01:04:32.140 where he's

01:04:32.500 just thinking,

01:04:33.380 because I

01:04:34.120 don't have to

01:04:34.440 write anything.

01:04:35.940 And the

01:04:36.340 last panel,

01:04:37.040 he's walking

01:04:37.500 away thinking,

01:04:38.540 I just

01:04:39.180 realized I'm 0.99

01:04:39.740 a jerk. 0.99

01:04:42.240 I think 1.00

01:04:42.880 that's what

01:04:43.440 Frank Rizzo

01:04:45.620 was realizing.

01:04:47.740 Frank decided

01:04:49.140 that coming

01:04:49.900 and tweeting

01:04:50.400 the worst

01:04:51.000 things in the

01:04:51.620 world at me

01:04:52.260 a live

01:04:52.880 stream to

01:04:54.160 try to

01:04:54.620 ruin the

01:04:55.660 fun for

01:04:56.080 everybody else.

01:04:57.020 He decided

01:04:57.620 that was a

01:04:58.160 good use of

01:04:58.720 his time.

01:05:00.280 Does he

01:05:00.920 know why?

01:05:02.900 There's only

01:05:03.620 one reason,

01:05:04.360 Frank.

01:05:06.820 Frank,

01:05:07.980 I just

01:05:08.700 realized I'm 0.99

01:05:09.360 a jerk. 0.99

01:05:10.960 I just 1.00

01:05:11.660 realized I'm 0.99

01:05:12.180 a jerk. 0.99

01:05:14.200 Yeah, 1.00

01:05:14.540 so my

01:05:15.000 problem with

01:05:15.520 calling Rob

01:05:16.080 Reiner a

01:05:16.680 me-head is

01:05:17.500 that it

01:05:18.080 is too

01:05:19.260 NPC-like.

01:05:21.020 it's just

01:05:22.960 too boring.

01:05:25.440 I kind

01:05:26.340 of like

01:05:26.680 responding to

01:05:27.840 him in

01:05:28.180 clever ways.

01:05:29.240 That's fun.

01:05:29.860 That's what

01:05:30.180 Twitter is

01:05:30.560 for.

01:05:31.460 But just

01:05:32.100 calling him

01:05:32.600 a meat 0.56

01:05:32.960 head and

01:05:34.040 saying,

01:05:34.460 well,

01:05:35.400 there's

01:05:36.020 meat

01:05:37.120 head's

01:05:37.480 opinion.

01:05:39.220 Please don't

01:05:40.000 do that.

01:05:41.540 Because it

01:05:42.540 bores me to

01:05:43.340 the point of

01:05:43.800 pain.

01:05:44.640 It's like,

01:05:45.040 oh,

01:05:45.860 another person

01:05:47.040 thinks that's

01:05:47.620 the first

01:05:48.020 person who

01:05:48.540 thought of

01:05:48.820 that.

01:05:49.980 If it's

01:05:50.700 the first

01:05:51.220 thing you

01:05:52.880 think of

01:05:53.320 to say,

01:05:54.480 just assume

01:05:55.200 everybody else

01:05:55.880 thought of

01:05:56.240 it,

01:05:56.440 too.

01:05:58.040 Just assume

01:05:58.940 that.

01:06:01.140 What about

01:06:01.840 calling him

01:06:02.380 a beta?

01:06:03.440 You know,

01:06:04.640 I think I'm

01:06:05.640 ready to

01:06:06.200 retire this

01:06:06.940 whole beta

01:06:07.580 alpha thing.

01:06:11.200 Frank Rizzo

01:06:12.160 is the name

01:06:12.780 they used

01:06:13.160 in the

01:06:13.460 Jerky Boys

01:06:14.060 album.

01:06:14.540 Oh,

01:06:14.660 that would

01:06:14.880 make sense.

01:06:15.340 You know,

01:06:17.240 I'm ready

01:06:17.900 to retire

01:06:18.460 the alpha

01:06:19.100 beta thing.

01:06:21.560 Because I'm

01:06:22.160 not sure

01:06:22.480 the alphas

01:06:24.100 are really

01:06:24.560 alpha.

01:06:26.180 You know

01:06:26.440 what I

01:06:26.600 mean?

01:06:27.180 I'm not

01:06:27.720 sure it

01:06:28.020 means what

01:06:28.460 it used

01:06:28.740 to mean.

01:06:31.020 Let me

01:06:32.200 ask you

01:06:32.480 this.

01:06:34.680 Say you're

01:06:35.400 a woman 0.57

01:06:35.740 and your

01:06:37.060 biological

01:06:37.600 impulse is

01:06:38.340 you want

01:06:38.620 a mate

01:06:39.700 who can

01:06:40.260 protect you.

01:06:41.940 Like,

01:06:42.300 physically

01:06:42.700 protect you.

01:06:45.340 Who could

01:06:46.040 protect

01:06:46.440 somebody

01:06:46.880 better?

01:06:48.520 Somebody who

01:06:49.160 is 6'4",

01:06:50.120 an MMA

01:06:50.940 fighter,

01:06:52.100 or me?

01:06:54.800 If you're

01:06:55.480 going to

01:06:55.680 marry an 0.95

01:06:56.340 MMA fighter

01:06:57.220 who is 6'4",

01:06:58.420 or me,

01:07:00.620 which one

01:07:01.160 of them

01:07:01.380 is going

01:07:01.560 to keep

01:07:01.820 you safer

01:07:02.360 for the

01:07:02.840 long run?

01:07:04.840 It's not

01:07:05.460 even close.

01:07:06.620 It's not

01:07:07.220 even close.

01:07:08.520 Now,

01:07:08.980 let's take

01:07:09.940 me out of

01:07:10.380 the equation,

01:07:11.040 right?

01:07:11.820 So instead

01:07:12.300 of me,

01:07:12.720 let's just

01:07:13.080 say,

01:07:13.360 Elon Musk.

01:07:17.420 Elon Musk.

01:07:18.960 So who

01:07:19.780 would keep

01:07:20.120 you safer?

01:07:21.200 Well,

01:07:21.700 I mean,

01:07:22.060 he's a special

01:07:22.640 case,

01:07:22.980 he's famous.

01:07:23.500 I'll just

01:07:23.760 say a

01:07:24.000 billionaire.

01:07:24.640 Who

01:07:24.960 would keep

01:07:25.240 you famous,

01:07:25.820 a nerdy

01:07:26.400 billionaire

01:07:26.780 or an

01:07:28.500 MMA

01:07:28.840 fighter?

01:07:30.900 So it's

01:07:31.440 not me,

01:07:31.960 it's just

01:07:32.220 some nerdy

01:07:32.740 billionaire. 0.95

01:07:33.940 Nerdy 0.90

01:07:34.340 billionaire

01:07:34.700 or MMA

01:07:35.460 fighter?

01:07:35.920 Who keeps

01:07:36.240 you safer

01:07:36.660 if you're

01:07:37.020 a woman? 0.80

01:07:39.160 Okay,

01:07:39.620 it's a

01:07:39.880 trick question.

01:07:40.760 It's not

01:07:41.160 even close.

01:07:41.840 The

01:07:42.000 billionaire.

01:07:42.320 Because the

01:07:43.820 things that

01:07:44.320 could threaten

01:07:44.960 you in

01:07:46.880 terms of

01:07:47.360 somebody beating

01:07:48.240 you up,

01:07:48.880 they exist.

01:07:49.760 Those are

01:07:50.040 real risks,

01:07:50.560 but they're

01:07:50.980 kind of

01:07:51.200 rare relative

01:07:52.880 to all the

01:07:53.520 other risks

01:07:53.940 like being

01:07:54.400 poor or

01:07:55.320 being unfairly

01:07:58.040 jailed or

01:07:58.820 hanging around

01:07:59.340 with the

01:07:59.640 wrong people,

01:08:00.880 just all

01:08:01.500 kinds of

01:08:01.860 stuff.

01:08:02.020 Health

01:08:02.240 problems,

01:08:03.820 living in

01:08:04.720 a dangerous

01:08:05.800 neighborhood,

01:08:07.720 all the

01:08:08.220 things that

01:08:08.560 the billionaire

01:08:08.960 can protect

01:08:09.600 you from.

01:08:10.220 Legal

01:08:10.520 problems,

01:08:11.080 you name

01:08:11.920 it.

01:08:13.060 Probably

01:08:13.380 live longer.

01:08:17.040 Jar Jar

01:08:17.760 Sphinx 0.99

01:08:18.380 says,

01:08:20.160 Scott equates

01:08:20.840 himself with

01:08:21.560 Elon.

01:08:24.320 I often

01:08:26.520 talk about

01:08:27.000 that kind

01:08:27.460 of comment

01:08:27.780 as one of 1.00

01:08:28.160 the dumbest. 1.00

01:08:28.840 It's actually 1.00

01:08:29.360 in Loser

01:08:30.920 Think as 0.94

01:08:31.560 one of the

01:08:32.060 examples of 0.98

01:08:32.940 Loser Think. 0.85

01:08:33.460 So good 1.00

01:08:35.440 for you

01:08:35.840 for doing

01:08:36.320 a chapter

01:08:36.720 of my

01:08:37.100 book called 0.81

01:08:37.920 Loser Think.

01:08:39.840 So congratulations 0.98

01:08:40.580 on that.

01:08:44.080 All right.

01:08:45.200 So who

01:08:47.020 is the alpha

01:08:48.340 in the

01:08:48.900 situation where

01:08:49.760 you've got the

01:08:50.540 MMA fighter

01:08:51.360 or the

01:08:51.960 billionaire who

01:08:52.680 made his own

01:08:53.220 money?

01:08:54.140 So let's say

01:08:54.560 it's a

01:08:54.840 billionaire nerd

01:08:55.700 who made

01:08:56.840 their own

01:08:57.160 money the

01:08:57.700 honest way.

01:08:58.380 They were

01:08:58.540 just smart.

01:08:59.200 It worked

01:08:59.460 hard.

01:08:59.800 Made their 0.93

01:09:00.100 own money.

01:09:00.420 Who's the

01:09:01.020 alpha?

01:09:05.640 I don't

01:09:06.220 know.

01:09:07.620 So I

01:09:08.080 think the

01:09:08.420 whole what

01:09:09.060 is alpha

01:09:09.540 is all

01:09:10.200 mixed up

01:09:10.680 now.

01:09:11.960 Isn't it?

01:09:15.180 Oh,

01:09:15.780 Jar Jar was

01:09:16.340 joking.

01:09:17.040 Okay.

01:09:19.920 The MMA

01:09:20.760 fighter is the

01:09:21.520 alpha because

01:09:22.040 he could beat

01:09:22.660 up the 0.95

01:09:23.020 nerd.

01:09:24.580 Could he? 0.97

01:09:25.720 And the

01:09:26.420 nerd wouldn't 0.87

01:09:26.980 have him 0.96

01:09:27.340 killed after 0.99

01:09:27.900 that?

01:09:29.880 Well,

01:09:30.420 let me ask

01:09:30.880 you this.

01:09:31.560 What would

01:09:31.960 happen if

01:09:32.580 an MMA

01:09:34.540 nerd

01:09:35.240 cornered me 0.95

01:09:37.600 and beat

01:09:38.180 me up?

01:09:39.900 But I

01:09:40.500 knew his

01:09:40.800 name.

01:09:42.160 I knew

01:09:42.680 who he

01:09:42.880 was.

01:09:43.640 How would

01:09:44.020 that turn

01:09:44.420 out for

01:09:45.120 the MMA

01:09:45.820 fighter?

01:09:52.080 What would

01:09:53.600 I do?

01:09:54.560 You don't

01:09:55.000 think I'd 1.00

01:09:55.420 kill him? 1.00

01:09:56.420 Of course 1.00

01:09:56.980 I would.

01:09:58.240 One way or

01:09:58.920 another.

01:09:59.180 If somebody

01:10:01.100 actually

01:10:01.440 captured me

01:10:03.640 and beat

01:10:04.440 me to

01:10:04.980 hospitalization

01:10:06.040 but I

01:10:07.640 knew their

01:10:08.000 name and

01:10:09.160 where they

01:10:09.500 lived, I 1.00

01:10:11.200 would kill 1.00

01:10:11.520 them for 1.00

01:10:11.840 sure.

01:10:13.080 There's not

01:10:13.580 the slightest

01:10:14.000 chance I

01:10:14.460 wouldn't kill 1.00

01:10:14.820 them.

01:10:16.400 I mean, I'd

01:10:17.000 do it one

01:10:17.440 way or the

01:10:17.920 other, but

01:10:19.420 of course I'd 1.00

01:10:20.200 kill them. 1.00

01:10:20.580 I might do 1.00

01:10:20.940 it legally, I

01:10:21.840 might do it

01:10:22.160 cleverly, I

01:10:22.920 might hire

01:10:23.300 somebody, I

01:10:23.880 might do it

01:10:24.220 myself if I

01:10:25.000 got mad

01:10:25.340 enough.

01:10:25.600 But I

01:10:26.800 would definitely 1.00

01:10:27.320 kill them. 1.00

01:10:28.880 So the 1.00

01:10:29.260 thing is, you

01:10:29.720 can't tell who

01:10:31.300 the alphas

01:10:31.760 are.

01:10:33.880 Yeah, you

01:10:34.280 can't tell who

01:10:34.780 the alphas

01:10:35.100 are.

01:10:38.720 Talk about a

01:10:39.460 post-truth

01:10:40.300 world, that's

01:10:40.900 all we talk

01:10:41.380 about.

01:10:42.940 We live in a

01:10:43.920 world where you

01:10:44.600 can't trust

01:10:45.120 anybody's truth.

01:10:46.140 Arkanside,

01:10:54.020 yeah.

01:10:59.840 Your

01:11:00.320 husband thinks

01:11:01.060 exactly this

01:11:01.860 way, exactly.

01:11:06.720 All right,

01:11:07.820 you'd go to

01:11:08.460 prison though?

01:11:09.340 Not

01:11:09.600 necessarily.

01:11:13.120 You think I'd

01:11:14.020 go to prison

01:11:14.560 for murder?

01:11:16.820 Do you

01:11:17.420 think I 0.99

01:11:17.740 would murder 1.00

01:11:18.360 somebody in

01:11:18.980 a way that I

01:11:19.760 was likely to

01:11:20.440 be caught?

01:11:22.280 I wouldn't do

01:11:22.960 that.

01:11:24.800 Unless I was

01:11:25.500 willing to

01:11:26.340 take myself

01:11:27.360 out at the

01:11:27.800 same time.

01:11:29.000 Now, in the

01:11:29.780 real world, it's

01:11:30.620 nearly impossible

01:11:31.380 to kill somebody 0.97

01:11:32.200 and get away 0.99

01:11:32.780 with it,

01:11:33.380 wouldn't you

01:11:33.740 say?

01:11:36.820 Wouldn't you

01:11:37.340 agree that

01:11:37.920 murdering

01:11:38.720 somebody, if 0.98

01:11:39.780 you have a

01:11:40.120 connection to

01:11:40.760 them, if it's

01:11:41.220 a random

01:11:41.600 murder or a

01:11:42.640 gang murder,

01:11:43.180 you can still

01:11:43.820 get away with

01:11:44.280 it.

01:11:45.000 But if it's

01:11:45.660 like a

01:11:46.000 direct planned

01:11:47.580 murder of

01:11:48.900 somebody that

01:11:49.500 you have a

01:11:49.900 connection to

01:11:50.560 and a

01:11:50.860 motive, that's

01:11:52.900 going to be

01:11:53.160 really hard to

01:11:53.740 get away with. 0.70

01:11:54.520 Because as

01:11:54.920 soon as they

01:11:55.240 have a

01:11:55.500 suspect, they 0.99

01:11:56.200 can get

01:11:56.600 you.

01:11:57.800 So you'd

01:11:58.440 have to

01:11:58.720 make sure

01:11:59.040 that you

01:11:59.340 would never

01:11:59.640 even be a

01:12:00.120 suspect.

01:12:00.920 I don't

01:12:01.240 know how

01:12:01.460 you do

01:12:01.720 that.

01:12:03.460 I don't

01:12:03.980 know any

01:12:04.280 way you

01:12:04.520 could murder 0.98

01:12:04.840 somebody in 0.99

01:12:05.360 2022.

01:12:06.740 So let me

01:12:07.300 say this

01:12:07.660 clearly.

01:12:09.480 Don't murder

01:12:10.160 anybody unless

01:12:11.420 you're willing to

01:12:12.000 go to jail.

01:12:12.540 because I

01:12:13.920 don't think

01:12:14.300 you can get

01:12:14.720 away with

01:12:15.120 it if

01:12:15.680 they know

01:12:16.060 you.

01:12:20.280 Just give

01:12:20.940 the cops a

01:12:21.460 better suspect.

01:12:25.200 Yeah,

01:12:25.680 Epstein's sort

01:12:26.360 of a special

01:12:27.040 case.

01:12:28.620 We don't

01:12:29.160 know the

01:12:29.440 story there.

01:12:33.480 There's a

01:12:34.060 Seth Rich

01:12:34.620 laptop?

01:12:35.500 That can't be

01:12:36.100 true.

01:12:37.480 Really?

01:12:37.880 All right.

01:12:40.900 How does

01:12:41.440 this fit with

01:12:41.980 your simulation?

01:12:42.940 I don't know.

01:12:43.500 I think it

01:12:43.860 all fits.

01:12:48.420 You would

01:12:49.040 snitch on

01:12:49.480 me?

01:12:52.880 Walking

01:12:53.240 back now?

01:12:53.880 I'm not

01:12:54.120 walking it

01:12:54.520 back.

01:12:55.480 I'm telling

01:12:55.880 you I can't

01:12:56.400 think of any

01:12:56.940 way to do

01:12:57.320 it.

01:12:57.800 But I

01:12:58.160 would think

01:12:58.580 of one.

01:12:59.540 I'd

01:12:59.820 figure it

01:13:00.240 out.

01:13:01.040 I just

01:13:01.520 haven't put

01:13:01.920 enough time

01:13:02.320 into it.

01:13:04.540 One way

01:13:05.120 or another

01:13:05.400 I'd figure

01:13:05.820 it out.

01:13:07.880 Talk about

01:13:10.320 the Jimmy

01:13:10.900 Kimmel

01:13:11.360 response to

01:13:12.200 Elon.

01:13:12.700 I haven't

01:13:13.100 seen it.

01:13:14.060 Can you

01:13:14.300 paste that

01:13:15.600 in the

01:13:15.760 comments?

01:13:16.660 So Jimmy

01:13:17.080 Kimmel

01:13:17.460 said something

01:13:18.080 funny to

01:13:18.640 Elon?

01:13:23.800 If you

01:13:24.520 know what

01:13:25.160 that was,

01:13:26.620 let me

01:13:27.040 know.

01:13:32.280 How would

01:13:33.060 Carrie

01:13:33.460 Lake do

01:13:34.100 in a

01:13:34.320 debate

01:13:34.640 with

01:13:35.020 Hillary?

01:13:36.500 As far

01:13:37.320 as I

01:13:37.620 can

01:13:37.780 tell, 0.94

01:13:40.660 let me

01:13:41.680 pause for

01:13:43.200 a moment

01:13:43.480 before I

01:13:43.920 make this

01:13:44.300 statement.

01:13:47.420 I think

01:13:48.200 Carrie

01:13:48.500 Lake would 0.96

01:13:48.960 be 100%

01:13:50.180 of all

01:13:50.920 American

01:13:51.500 politicians

01:13:52.120 in any

01:13:52.760 debate.

01:13:55.280 Is that

01:13:55.900 too strong?

01:13:57.100 At the

01:13:57.600 moment,

01:13:57.900 there's

01:13:58.060 nobody on

01:13:58.520 her level.

01:14:01.480 So here's

01:14:02.540 the thing.

01:14:03.460 If you're

01:14:04.020 looking at

01:14:04.440 all the

01:14:04.820 persuaders,

01:14:05.440 and you're

01:14:06.480 asking

01:14:06.740 yourself,

01:14:07.280 is Carrie

01:14:07.840 Lake one

01:14:09.240 of the

01:14:09.500 best or

01:14:09.980 the best

01:14:10.340 persuader,

01:14:11.240 you're

01:14:11.680 actually

01:14:11.980 underselling

01:14:12.680 her.

01:14:14.660 All of

01:14:15.320 the other

01:14:15.660 persuaders are

01:14:16.520 in their

01:14:16.800 own league,

01:14:18.860 and she's

01:14:19.460 the only

01:14:19.880 one who's

01:14:21.620 in this

01:14:21.920 other league.

01:14:22.920 It's

01:14:23.520 empty,

01:14:24.800 except for

01:14:25.360 her.

01:14:26.560 Now,

01:14:27.760 she's better

01:14:28.440 than Trump

01:14:29.000 because she's

01:14:31.840 provocative

01:14:32.400 without going

01:14:33.380 too far.

01:14:34.020 He goes

01:14:34.340 too far

01:14:34.780 into the

01:14:35.240 maybe there's

01:14:36.920 a dog

01:14:37.260 whistle

01:14:37.500 there.

01:14:38.060 Did I

01:14:38.320 hear a

01:14:38.560 dog

01:14:38.720 whistle?

01:14:39.260 But I

01:14:39.660 don't think

01:14:39.940 I've heard

01:14:40.220 it from

01:14:40.620 her critics.

01:14:42.200 I don't

01:14:42.520 think she's

01:14:42.920 gone anywhere

01:14:43.420 near anything

01:14:44.100 that's dog

01:14:44.700 whistly.

01:14:45.680 Right?

01:14:46.260 Not that I've

01:14:46.980 heard of.

01:14:47.420 I would have

01:14:47.780 heard it by

01:14:48.120 now.

01:14:49.160 So in

01:14:49.760 my opinion,

01:14:51.200 she actually

01:14:51.920 occupies a

01:14:53.540 zone that

01:14:54.060 nobody's in.

01:14:54.940 She's

01:14:55.200 actually alone.

01:14:57.660 If you

01:14:58.300 say DeSantis,

01:14:59.300 I would say

01:14:59.720 DeSantis is

01:15:01.280 the best of

01:15:02.380 the people

01:15:02.860 who are in

01:15:03.340 the lower

01:15:03.720 league.

01:15:05.560 She would

01:15:06.260 destroy him. 0.95

01:15:09.060 This is very 0.80

01:15:09.960 much like,

01:15:11.380 you probably

01:15:12.460 saw this on

01:15:13.020 the internet,

01:15:13.560 there was

01:15:13.780 some discussion

01:15:14.540 about how

01:15:17.900 good women's

01:15:19.440 professional

01:15:20.000 soccer is.

01:15:21.840 And some

01:15:22.280 high school,

01:15:23.080 I think some

01:15:23.580 high school

01:15:24.000 team beat

01:15:24.560 them or

01:15:24.840 something,

01:15:25.160 boys.

01:15:28.080 So when

01:15:28.800 I say

01:15:29.360 Carrie Lake

01:15:29.880 is in a

01:15:31.160 different

01:15:31.400 league,

01:15:33.020 I mean,

01:15:33.680 it would

01:15:33.880 never be

01:15:34.320 a fair

01:15:34.640 fight.

01:15:36.060 It would

01:15:36.280 just never

01:15:36.680 be a fair

01:15:37.140 fight.

01:15:37.900 I think

01:15:39.200 DeSantis

01:15:39.740 and Trump

01:15:41.720 are very

01:15:42.460 similar in

01:15:43.380 persuasion

01:15:43.900 ability with

01:15:45.540 Trump having

01:15:46.120 that extra

01:15:46.740 glitz and

01:15:47.780 firepower and

01:15:48.840 everything else.

01:15:50.000 Whereas DeSantis

01:15:50.940 probably is

01:15:51.480 better at

01:15:51.860 staying out of

01:15:52.340 trouble.

01:15:54.040 So that

01:15:55.380 could work

01:15:55.780 either way.

01:15:57.160 But right

01:15:57.660 now there's

01:15:58.020 nobody in

01:15:58.440 Carrie Lake's

01:15:59.220 league.

01:16:01.160 And for

01:16:03.300 a while

01:16:03.600 there I

01:16:03.900 thought AOC

01:16:04.660 would be

01:16:06.960 among one

01:16:07.700 of the best

01:16:08.220 communicators.

01:16:09.680 And I

01:16:09.820 think she

01:16:10.120 is one

01:16:10.420 of the

01:16:10.580 best still

01:16:11.240 on the

01:16:11.880 left.

01:16:12.700 But she's 0.97

01:16:13.180 not in

01:16:13.600 Carrie Lake's

01:16:14.240 league.

01:16:15.500 They're not

01:16:15.840 in the same

01:16:16.340 strata.

01:16:19.680 And by the

01:16:20.060 way,

01:16:20.660 let me be

01:16:22.660 clear.

01:16:23.220 When I talk

01:16:23.740 about Carrie

01:16:24.320 Lake's

01:16:24.720 skills,

01:16:25.820 that's all

01:16:26.500 I'm talking

01:16:26.940 about.

01:16:28.220 Okay?

01:16:28.940 So this

01:16:30.180 is one of

01:16:30.500 those cases

01:16:30.980 where somebody

01:16:31.480 is going to

01:16:31.760 say I'm

01:16:32.180 promoting

01:16:32.680 Carrie Lake.

01:16:34.040 I'm promoting

01:16:34.800 her in the

01:16:35.200 same way I

01:16:35.720 promoted AOC.

01:16:37.600 That her

01:16:38.460 skill level

01:16:39.280 is unusual.

01:16:40.800 It's unusual.

01:16:41.800 And that's

01:16:42.160 really worth

01:16:42.740 pointing out.

01:16:44.060 But I

01:16:44.540 didn't support

01:16:45.200 AOC's

01:16:45.820 policies.

01:16:46.680 I'm not

01:16:47.300 sure I know

01:16:47.760 exactly what

01:16:48.500 Carrie Lake's

01:16:49.120 policies are.

01:16:49.960 I have a pretty

01:16:50.400 good idea.

01:16:50.860 But for

01:16:51.920 example,

01:16:52.420 I would

01:16:52.660 disagree with

01:16:53.200 her on

01:16:54.000 fentanyl.

01:16:56.240 So I

01:16:56.800 think her

01:16:57.180 first line

01:16:57.860 of policy

01:16:59.880 on fentanyl

01:17:00.520 is build

01:17:01.020 the wall.

01:17:02.460 And I

01:17:02.940 say that's

01:17:03.520 somebody who

01:17:04.160 is acting

01:17:05.200 like they

01:17:05.580 don't understand

01:17:06.200 the problem.

01:17:07.800 Which is

01:17:08.480 unusual because

01:17:09.200 her game is

01:17:09.980 very strong.

01:17:10.840 So on

01:17:11.140 fentanyl,

01:17:11.860 I don't

01:17:12.320 agree with

01:17:12.760 her.

01:17:14.000 And I

01:17:15.060 would back

01:17:15.720 anybody who

01:17:16.500 had a better

01:17:17.040 idea on

01:17:17.520 fentanyl,

01:17:18.040 basically.

01:17:20.860 Where do

01:17:22.280 you put

01:17:22.540 Tulsi in

01:17:23.520 terms of

01:17:23.960 communicators?

01:17:26.380 Well,

01:17:26.860 Tulsi's

01:17:27.460 communication and

01:17:28.840 persuasion style

01:17:29.740 is, you

01:17:30.840 know,

01:17:31.160 commercial

01:17:31.580 grade,

01:17:33.020 you know,

01:17:33.600 national

01:17:34.380 politician

01:17:35.000 level.

01:17:35.940 So she

01:17:36.680 has, you

01:17:37.060 know,

01:17:37.140 all the

01:17:37.520 tools.

01:17:38.880 But she

01:17:40.980 doesn't have

01:17:41.700 the,

01:17:44.140 the,

01:17:44.920 Carrie

01:17:45.080 Lake has

01:17:45.500 an extra

01:17:45.880 gear that

01:17:47.320 just nobody

01:17:47.840 has.

01:17:49.060 So Tulsi,

01:17:50.000 I would say,

01:17:50.380 is, you

01:17:51.600 know,

01:17:51.740 one of the

01:17:52.240 better

01:17:52.480 communicators

01:17:53.300 within the

01:17:54.240 standard world.

01:17:56.800 But I

01:17:57.500 don't think

01:17:57.780 she has

01:17:58.000 like an

01:17:58.340 extra

01:17:58.680 gear.

01:18:00.180 She's

01:18:00.480 just really

01:18:01.000 solid

01:18:01.640 commercial

01:18:02.180 grade,

01:18:03.580 you know,

01:18:03.840 national

01:18:04.240 politician

01:18:04.720 grade,

01:18:05.740 which are

01:18:06.380 all pretty

01:18:06.820 good.

01:18:09.040 Scott was

01:18:09.560 duped by

01:18:10.220 AOC.

01:18:11.980 Duped?

01:18:15.080 Really?

01:18:17.720 Duped.

01:18:18.280 I have

01:18:19.220 exactly the

01:18:19.800 same opinion

01:18:20.320 I always

01:18:20.780 had,

01:18:21.760 which is

01:18:22.200 that she's

01:18:23.220 good at

01:18:23.520 getting

01:18:23.720 attention,

01:18:24.340 which is

01:18:24.620 good

01:18:24.820 persuasion.

01:18:26.520 You agree

01:18:27.040 with that.

01:18:27.900 You have

01:18:28.160 the same

01:18:28.560 opinion of

01:18:29.100 her that I

01:18:29.600 do,

01:18:30.140 exactly the

01:18:30.820 same.

01:18:33.100 Would you

01:18:33.500 put Candace 0.92

01:18:34.340 on par with

01:18:35.740 Carrie

01:18:36.040 Lake?

01:18:36.500 No.

01:18:37.460 No.

01:18:38.340 Candace would 0.99

01:18:38.920 be another

01:18:39.320 example of

01:18:40.160 the very

01:18:41.580 best in

01:18:42.920 the normal

01:18:43.400 universe.

01:18:43.920 Candace is

01:18:47.560 up there

01:18:47.920 in the

01:18:48.460 DeSantis

01:18:48.940 realm.

01:18:52.240 I think

01:18:52.820 she's

01:18:53.240 maybe just

01:18:54.840 a notch

01:18:55.660 below

01:18:56.000 DeSantis.

01:18:57.860 Because the

01:18:58.480 thing that

01:18:59.000 Candace does

01:19:00.960 is she'll

01:19:01.460 go a little

01:19:02.260 bit further

01:19:02.860 into the

01:19:04.620 speculative

01:19:05.120 than DeSantis

01:19:07.180 does.

01:19:08.580 And I

01:19:08.900 think she

01:19:09.800 goes a

01:19:10.180 little bit

01:19:10.540 too far

01:19:11.000 into it

01:19:11.400 and that's

01:19:11.700 where she'll

01:19:12.320 lose some

01:19:12.840 people on

01:19:13.360 the other

01:19:13.640 side.

01:19:15.460 So I

01:19:17.200 think Carrie

01:19:17.940 Lake goes

01:19:20.180 pretty far

01:19:20.760 but she

01:19:21.160 seems to

01:19:22.060 stay with

01:19:22.760 the provable.

01:19:24.720 Like the

01:19:25.020 easily,

01:19:25.960 demonstrably,

01:19:26.940 obviously true.

01:19:28.360 Actually,

01:19:28.860 that's what's

01:19:29.340 the strongest

01:19:29.780 thing about

01:19:30.300 Carrie Lake.

01:19:31.460 The strongest

01:19:32.160 thing about

01:19:32.700 her is she

01:19:33.100 doesn't say 1.00

01:19:33.540 crazy shit. 1.00

01:19:37.680 We've all 1.00

01:19:38.280 been waiting

01:19:38.680 for that,

01:19:39.140 right?

01:19:40.120 Someone who's

01:19:40.820 just like a

01:19:41.280 really strong

01:19:41.800 politician.

01:19:42.840 who doesn't 0.89

01:19:43.280 say crazy 1.00

01:19:43.860 shit. 1.00

01:19:45.540 Now, 1.00

01:19:45.900 maybe she 0.99

01:19:46.320 did and I

01:19:46.740 missed it,

01:19:47.280 but I

01:19:47.540 haven't heard

01:19:47.880 any.

01:19:49.220 Right?

01:19:49.640 Am I

01:19:49.920 right?

01:19:50.860 She staked

01:19:51.940 out aggressive

01:19:53.980 sensibleness

01:19:55.920 like nobody

01:19:57.080 could.

01:19:57.840 See,

01:19:58.100 the trouble

01:19:58.400 is you

01:19:59.740 can't sell

01:20:00.460 reasonableness

01:20:01.280 because nobody

01:20:03.140 wants to see

01:20:03.700 it.

01:20:03.900 It's boring.

01:20:05.160 Here's what

01:20:05.660 she did.

01:20:06.180 All right.

01:20:06.580 I think I

01:20:08.200 finally figured

01:20:08.800 it out.

01:20:10.000 She solved

01:20:10.580 the puzzle

01:20:11.040 that nobody

01:20:11.560 ever solved

01:20:12.120 before,

01:20:13.080 which is

01:20:14.460 how can

01:20:14.920 somebody

01:20:15.340 who is

01:20:15.840 sensible

01:20:16.540 get a lot

01:20:17.700 of attention?

01:20:19.840 Nobody's

01:20:20.340 ever solved

01:20:20.800 that before.

01:20:22.660 That's the

01:20:24.060 secret.

01:20:24.500 I just

01:20:24.780 figured it

01:20:25.180 out.

01:20:25.860 She's

01:20:26.300 making

01:20:26.700 sounding

01:20:27.300 sensible

01:20:28.060 exciting.

01:20:29.520 All those

01:20:32.140 examples we

01:20:32.840 keep seeing

01:20:33.280 where she

01:20:33.840 tears down

01:20:34.800 the people

01:20:36.180 asking the

01:20:36.700 questions.

01:20:37.640 When she

01:20:38.060 goes after

01:20:38.480 the media,

01:20:39.920 she does

01:20:40.440 it so

01:20:40.920 sensibly

01:20:41.660 and

01:20:42.280 clinically

01:20:43.580 that it's

01:20:48.420 really

01:20:48.900 entertaining

01:20:49.600 and all it

01:20:51.000 was was

01:20:51.440 sensible.

01:20:52.800 Who's ever

01:20:53.580 done that

01:20:54.020 before?

01:20:54.400 Reagan was

01:20:56.620 the great

01:20:57.020 communicator,

01:20:58.420 but he

01:20:58.740 still was

01:20:59.580 a different

01:21:02.560 vibe.

01:21:04.060 Different

01:21:04.360 vibe.

01:21:06.320 Yeah.

01:21:07.840 She actually

01:21:08.640 made sensible

01:21:09.660 sexy.

01:21:12.960 Right?

01:21:14.100 She made

01:21:14.720 being sensible

01:21:15.580 sexy.

01:21:17.460 Because let's

01:21:18.560 be real.

01:21:19.940 She's sexy. 1.00

01:21:22.360 She's sexy. 1.00

01:21:23.820 I would be

01:21:24.500 surprised if

01:21:25.400 she doesn't

01:21:25.860 appeal to

01:21:26.380 both men

01:21:26.960 and women

01:21:27.520 and all

01:21:28.200 of LGBTQ

01:21:28.960 as being

01:21:30.560 sexy.

01:21:32.120 And here

01:21:32.500 I'm not

01:21:32.800 talking about

01:21:33.300 even just

01:21:33.780 her looks.

01:21:35.160 Her looks 0.90

01:21:35.640 are strong.

01:21:37.060 But it's

01:21:37.860 more about

01:21:38.300 her.

01:21:39.180 Am I

01:21:39.480 right?

01:21:40.580 It's more

01:21:41.180 about her

01:21:41.540 vibe that

01:21:43.620 I would

01:21:44.000 bet appeals

01:21:44.840 to across

01:21:45.800 the entire

01:21:46.300 spectrum of

01:21:47.120 different people.

01:21:49.160 And she

01:21:49.900 pulls that

01:21:50.380 off by

01:21:51.080 being sensible.

01:21:52.940 It's a

01:21:53.340 weird thing.

01:21:55.620 Yeah.

01:21:56.180 So I

01:21:57.560 think it's

01:21:57.860 the combination

01:21:58.560 of being so

01:21:59.420 skilled and

01:22:00.520 being a

01:22:01.120 Republican and

01:22:03.300 then being

01:22:03.800 sexy and

01:22:04.600 then also

01:22:05.160 being sensible

01:22:05.960 we haven't

01:22:07.520 seen.

01:22:07.780 I haven't

01:22:09.300 seen that

01:22:09.620 before and

01:22:10.020 not that

01:22:10.340 smart.

01:22:13.600 She

01:22:14.080 sticks to

01:22:14.640 undeniable

01:22:15.300 facts.

01:22:16.020 That's what

01:22:16.480 I've observed

01:22:17.120 but I

01:22:17.660 haven't

01:22:17.880 watched.

01:22:20.800 Jesus

01:22:21.280 Christ. 0.88

01:22:22.240 Such awful

01:22:23.180 people over 0.89

01:22:23.720 here.

01:22:27.100 I'll hide

01:22:27.820 you on this

01:22:28.280 channel.

01:22:30.220 All right.

01:22:30.680 Yeah.

01:22:30.920 She had a lot

01:22:31.280 of TV

01:22:31.560 experience.

01:22:32.140 It certainly

01:22:32.600 helps.

01:22:33.100 All right.

01:22:35.160 That's all

01:22:35.400 for now.

01:22:36.340 YouTube,

01:22:36.940 I'll talk

01:22:37.380 to you

01:22:37.660 tomorrow.

01:22:39.860 And stay

01:22:41.200 all.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 30, 2022

Episode 1912 Scott Adams： A Nonzero Chance The Pelosis Were Getting Hammered At The Same Time

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript