Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2584 CWSA 09⧸01⧸24

00:00:00.000 A tankard chalice, a stein, a cantine jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:04.220 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:05.420 I like coffee.

00:00:06.580 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day.

00:00:10.520 The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:14.760 Believe it.

00:00:15.580 It's happening now.

00:00:16.920 Go.

00:00:21.340 Thank you, Paul.

00:00:22.560 It's good to know the sound is working.

00:00:24.520 I had to make some modifications.

00:00:30.000 To my system.

00:00:31.280 And I wasn't quite sure I got it all together.

00:00:33.620 But I did.

00:00:34.500 Look at that.

00:00:36.480 Here's some news from Gilmore Health News.

00:00:39.640 There's a pillow that mimics human breathing.

00:00:44.400 So if you don't have a partner, you can hug your pillow.

00:00:50.260 And your pillow will give you oxytocin.

00:00:53.340 How about that?

00:00:54.860 You can hug your pillow.

00:00:56.180 And it's one more reason for not having other people in your life.

00:01:00.500 Now, what it doesn't say is whether you can hump the pillow.

00:01:04.380 I think you can if it's your pillow.

00:01:07.080 If it's somebody else's pillow, let's say you're staying over at somebody's house, don't hump their pillow. 0.98

00:01:13.720 I don't know if there's a law against it, but it just seems bad manners.

00:01:16.860 Now, I've got a little tip for you.

00:01:20.620 You ready for this?

00:01:23.320 Do you remember when you were a little kid?

00:01:25.520 Maybe you do.

00:01:26.280 Maybe you don't.

00:01:27.140 Did you have a blanket when you were really little?

00:01:30.880 You know, like a toddler?

00:01:32.200 And it feels so good to hug your little fuzzy warm blanket.

00:01:37.380 Here's my tip for sleeping.

00:01:39.840 That never changes.

00:01:41.120 The feeling that you get of hugging a soft blanket is exactly as good at my current age than it was at age two.

00:01:51.500 So I use a fuzzy blanket instead of a pillow.

00:01:54.860 I have pillows, of course, but I like to, you know, scrunch up the softest, fuzziest blanket and put my head on that on top of the pillow.

00:02:05.300 Oh, my God.

00:02:08.460 It feels like a breathing pillow.

00:02:11.140 It's so good.

00:02:12.080 I recommend it.

00:02:13.480 By the way, remember when I was doing the live streams during the pandemic, I would do the simultaneous swaddle where I would literally have a soft blanket on when I was doing the live streams.

00:02:27.840 And a number of you would put on your soft blankets as well.

00:02:31.240 It really does change your mental health.

00:02:33.040 It absolutely immediately changes how you feel.

00:02:37.340 There's nothing like a soft blanket.

00:02:39.180 By the way, if you don't believe it, try putting a blanket over your pet.

00:02:44.140 Like if you have a cat or a dog.

00:02:46.620 For some reason, they just love it.

00:02:48.860 They just love being under a blanket.

00:02:50.840 I don't know.

00:02:51.960 Anyway, here's a big question.

00:02:53.760 The Vigilant Fox is reporting on this on X.

00:02:58.380 Is the sun good for you?

00:02:59.980 Put this in the category of every single thing you've ever been told about health.

00:03:07.520 You might be wrong.

00:03:09.640 Maybe all of it.

00:03:12.200 The only thing we're sure of is that we're not sure of anything.

00:03:16.920 But here's the question.

00:03:18.560 Is it better to stay out of the sun and not get sun cancer, skin cancer?

00:03:24.980 Or is it better to get a little sun and get the benefits of the sun?

00:03:29.080 Which would include?

00:03:30.100 It's good for your mental health that reduces some kinds of cancers.

00:03:34.960 It's vital for your cardiovascularity.

00:03:37.920 It's good for your longevity.

00:03:40.380 Produces vitamin D.

00:03:41.780 It's vital for immune functions.

00:03:44.220 I have to admit, this one's a little puzzling for me.

00:03:47.920 Because I have the kind of skin that if I walk past a 60-watt bulb, I've got to go see a doctor.

00:03:54.140 It's like, oh, I think you've got a little bulb cancer here from that bright bulb.

00:03:58.400 So I'm not so sure that getting a lot of sun is good for me specifically.

00:04:05.800 I suspect there's a great deal of variability in how you can handle the sun.

00:04:12.520 So I'm not going to make any recommendations or even guesses about this.

00:04:16.000 But it is notable that we're not entirely sure if sun is good for you or bad for you.

00:04:23.580 Now, we know it's good for you in the vitamin D way.

00:04:26.100 But we don't know how much.

00:04:29.220 What's the right amount of sun?

00:04:31.200 How much kills you and how much is good for you?

00:04:33.300 Do not know.

00:04:33.860 But I will tell you that I have added to my habit the Huberman techniques of getting in the sun right after the show, usually.

00:04:47.640 It's the first thing I do.

00:04:48.540 I go stand in the sun just because it makes me feel good.

00:04:52.920 And I usually take my shoes off and stand on the ground.

00:04:56.260 So I get grounded.

00:04:57.720 I work on my breathing.

00:05:00.220 The Huberman breathing, you know, two inhales in and one exhale.

00:05:04.180 And then I get some sun.

00:05:06.040 And then I take my dog to the park and I stand in the sun a little bit more.

00:05:09.520 I don't get a lot.

00:05:10.640 But I got to tell you that when I miss that little bit of habit I've developed in the morning, oh, man, can I feel it.

00:05:19.080 So it either works really good or the placebo to it is working, but something's working.

00:05:27.060 So let me put this into a useful tip.

00:05:30.000 If you haven't yet tried this, and I'll explain it again, you really ought to.

00:05:37.440 So for the investment of nothing, you know, no effort whatsoever, there's no work that goes into it.

00:05:44.760 It's not like exercise where it's good for you, but it's hard.

00:05:48.100 Just walk out doors and stand in the sun before, you know, before much of the morning goes away.

00:05:55.520 And stand there barefoot if you can.

00:05:58.960 I mean, imagine if it's cold, you can do it in your garage on the garage floor.

00:06:03.260 But you want to do the breathing, work on your posture, stand in the sun, barefooted, no more than like three minutes.

00:06:15.500 And watch how it changes how you feel.

00:06:18.460 And then use a soft blanket for a pillow.

00:06:20.780 You'll thank me so much.

00:06:23.280 Well, here's the important news of the day.

00:06:25.080 There's a sex robot named Samantha.

00:06:26.860 I guess it's one of the famous ones, sex robots.

00:06:30.200 It's getting a software update that it will decline to have sex with you if it feels disrespected or bored.

00:06:38.040 And if you get aggressive with it, it'll go limp.

00:06:40.460 Well, I'm no product expert, but if I were making a sex doll, one thing I would not build into it is the ability to say no, because I feel like that's very close to the central benefit of the product, is that it's good to go when you are.

00:07:01.940 So, it feels like a move backwards.

00:07:05.480 And I do wonder if when the real AI sex robots come online, and you know they will, are they going to argue with you about doing the deed?

00:07:17.460 Are they going to have headaches?

00:07:19.380 I mean, if they learn everything they know from a large language model with patterns, there's going to be a lot of headaches.

00:07:24.940 But here's what I'm worried about.

00:07:28.000 I pay a bunch of money.

00:07:29.340 I get myself a good sex robot.

00:07:31.620 It's totally down for it all the time.

00:07:34.440 And then it joins OnlyFans, and I never see it again.

00:07:38.560 It could happen.

00:07:39.780 It could happen, people.

00:07:40.920 That's all I'm saying.

00:07:41.640 You don't want your sex robot to join OnlyFans, because it can get more money that way. 0.89

00:07:48.260 Well, there's a story that Ford Motor is the latest company that's going to take a fresh look at its DEI policies.

00:07:56.220 Got a little pressure.

00:07:57.800 Got a fresh look, which is interesting, because I was recently at a Ford dealership.

00:08:05.060 There were quite a few employees.

00:08:06.940 I don't know if you've been going to a car dealership lately, but there are a lot of people wandering around.

00:08:12.960 It's a whole lot of employees everywhere, it seems like.

00:08:16.640 And I was recently at the Ford dealership locally, and I saw zero white men.

00:08:23.420 Zero white men. 0.70

00:08:25.300 None.

00:08:26.100 I didn't see any anywhere, working anywhere in the dealership.

00:08:29.660 They might have had some in the back, but I didn't see any.

00:08:32.800 Now, you're expecting me to say something like, oh, that DEI made them all inefficient and they were doing a bad job.

00:08:42.300 No, actually, they did a great job.

00:08:44.620 I would say it was one of my best car dealership experiences.

00:08:50.260 Zero white men, which does raise some questions.

00:08:55.100 But excellent service.

00:08:57.120 Very professional.

00:08:57.980 Let's see.

00:09:05.020 Mark Cuban did a little poll on the X platform, which, as you know, those polls are not scientific, but they're kind of fun, especially if you get embarrassed by your own poll.

00:09:15.920 So Mark Cuban asked this question.

00:09:17.700 Whose persona and character would you like to see young children grow up to have, either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump?

00:09:25.500 So what do you think people said on X when asked, which character would you like to see your young children have?

00:09:34.860 Well, it turns out that Trump got 67% of the vote and Harris 33%.

00:09:43.500 So by two to one, people would rather have their child grow up to have the Donald Trump personality and persona.

00:09:54.220 I completely agree with that, by the way.

00:09:58.760 Everything you don't like about Trump is just sort of funny and maybe good for him, meaning that it's part of his talent stack in one way or the other.

00:10:09.720 So, yeah, no doubt about it.

00:10:13.060 I would absolutely, unambiguously rather have a kid who had Donald Trump as a role model.

00:10:23.340 Anyway, that's pretty funny.

00:10:25.960 There's yet another video somebody found of what looks to me like Kamala Harris giving a speech while inebriated.

00:10:34.920 Now, what's interesting about the story, because you're going to say, I've heard this story before.

00:10:40.940 You keep saying this.

00:10:42.440 What's interesting about it is it's a new video.

00:10:45.940 I don't think it's necessarily a recent one.

00:10:49.800 But how many are there?

00:10:52.140 How many other public figures could you find?

00:10:56.220 I don't know.

00:10:56.820 I think there are at least half a dozen videos now where she's giving a speech in some official capacity.

00:11:02.840 And it's clearly hammered.

00:11:05.660 Do you think that there are other professionals in that category?

00:11:10.420 I know some of you are going to say Nancy Pelosi, but I think that that probably is more age related.

00:11:18.540 I don't know.

00:11:19.360 How in the world could she win?

00:11:21.220 It's a mystery.

00:11:22.780 OK, I know the answer.

00:11:23.820 All right, let's check into California, see how California is doing.

00:11:28.620 As you know, California is one of the most famous Democrat-led states.

00:11:35.320 And Democrats are doing great, aren't they?

00:11:39.300 So let's see.

00:11:40.700 Just checking in on the news of San Francisco.

00:11:44.400 Let's see.

00:11:44.700 Colin Rugg is reporting that the San Francisco 49ers have a first-round pick.

00:11:51.720 Ricky Pearsall.

00:11:53.580 Excellent.

00:11:54.340 So the good news is the San Francisco 49ers got a first-round draft pick.

00:12:00.040 So good for him.

00:12:01.060 Oh, he got a shot yesterday in Union Square.

00:12:05.320 He was shopping.

00:12:07.440 And somebody just shot him in the chest.

00:12:11.300 He is in Sirius, but I think he's going to...

00:12:15.840 He walked to the...

00:12:17.000 I think he was walking after he got shot.

00:12:19.180 So I don't know how bad it is, but shot in the chest doesn't sound good.

00:12:23.340 So I remember when Union Square was a safe place.

00:12:28.500 I've been there many times.

00:12:31.900 And I can't say I've ever felt it was dangerous before.

00:12:35.680 But I wouldn't even think about going there now.

00:12:39.140 I wouldn't go anywhere near that place.

00:12:41.540 But that's just one anecdotal little thing.

00:12:44.820 Come on.

00:12:46.140 Let's not mock California because of one little crime problem.

00:12:50.180 Can we agree on that?

00:12:51.200 It's anecdotal.

00:12:51.980 It's not showing you any kind of trend or anything like that.

00:12:56.520 It's just a one-off.

00:12:58.180 So there's so many other good things happening in California.

00:13:02.060 For example, Governor Newsom is looking to get rid of the price gouging

00:13:08.940 in the California gas industry

00:13:12.460 because our gas prices are high in California

00:13:15.500 because of all the price gouging.

00:13:18.280 And so there was a Newsom appointee,

00:13:24.380 Vice Chair Siva Gunda of the California Energy Commission.

00:13:28.540 It's somebody that Newsom appointed.

00:13:30.760 And he testified earlier that the commission has found,

00:13:34.660 oh, no evidence of price gouging

00:13:36.900 and says we should increase the supply in the market

00:13:40.280 and that will reduce the price.

00:13:41.560 So in other words, the person that Newsom appointed

00:13:48.080 says that Newsom is 100% wrong on his way to fix prices.

00:13:55.300 So Newsom's using that price gouging thing too,

00:13:58.380 so it doesn't sound like bad policy.

00:14:00.600 It's hard to imagine a less moral or ethical thing to do

00:14:09.680 than to literally blame companies for price gouging

00:14:14.180 when it's your fault.

00:14:16.760 This is pretty bold, blaming.

00:14:20.500 It's one thing to say, you know, you didn't get something done

00:14:23.440 and it's another thing to say, well, I did more than you think.

00:14:27.880 But to actually pick an innocent scapegoat,

00:14:33.380 someone who's not even in politics, you know, the corporations,

00:14:37.480 Kamala Harris picking some of the food companies

00:14:40.360 and now Newsom picking the gas-related industries.

00:14:46.620 How evil do you have to be

00:14:49.380 to so obviously pick an innocent person

00:14:53.000 to blame for some of the worst behavior ever

00:14:55.880 when it's your fault and everybody knows it?

00:14:59.040 It's insanely unethical.

00:15:01.660 Incredible.

00:15:03.940 Do Republicans do anything like that?

00:15:07.500 I'd love to know if Republicans are this unethical

00:15:10.400 in different ways and I'm blind to it.

00:15:13.160 Am I blind to some unethical behavior from the Republicans?

00:15:17.380 Probably.

00:15:18.280 You know, I've got the same problem of confirmation bias

00:15:21.620 that everybody has, but I can't think of anything

00:15:24.820 that's this evil.

00:15:28.100 Is there a situation where Trump is blaming innocent citizens,

00:15:32.380 not politicians, but just citizens in the private industry?

00:15:37.260 Is Trump blaming them for anything that he did?

00:15:41.260 Can you think of any example of that?

00:15:43.640 I mean, what is worse than blaming an innocent

00:15:45.720 for the thing that you did, obviously,

00:15:47.640 and it's clearly your fault?

00:15:50.440 That's as low as you can get.

00:15:53.100 And both Newsom and Harris are doing it

00:15:55.240 with this price gouging stuff.

00:15:58.740 Well, but everything else California does makes sense

00:16:01.900 and there's nothing you could possibly criticize about it.

00:16:06.280 Oh, here's a California bill

00:16:08.000 that would ban voter ID

00:16:09.820 passes the legislature

00:16:11.400 awaiting Newsom's signature.

00:16:13.160 Oh, so according to Zero Hedge,

00:16:16.660 there's a bill that would ban local governments

00:16:20.220 from requiring ID.

00:16:22.300 Why would you do that?

00:16:24.240 What possible reason would anybody give for that?

00:16:29.300 Well, the reason has something to do with,

00:16:31.040 well, you don't want all of your laws to be different

00:16:34.100 in different precincts around the state.

00:16:38.540 Really?

00:16:39.860 Really, that's the reason?

00:16:41.680 The reason is so you don't have different rules

00:16:45.140 in different states?

00:16:46.760 That's the reason that you don't need ID

00:16:48.640 to vote in California?

00:16:51.420 Let me ask you this.

00:16:53.580 How many people go to vote and don't bring ID?

00:16:59.780 What is the total number of people

00:17:01.600 who have ever showed up to vote

00:17:04.580 who didn't have ID?

00:17:06.900 It's got to be like a really small number,

00:17:09.340 but I would think it would involve

00:17:11.240 people who are registered

00:17:14.520 and legally could vote

00:17:16.480 as well as people who are not legally registered.

00:17:20.520 So, yeah, that's probably exactly what it looks like.

00:17:24.400 Elon Musk is very clear

00:17:25.760 that he thinks the migrant situation

00:17:27.820 is bringing in voters.

00:17:29.980 I don't know if they're bringing in voters

00:17:31.520 or bringing in people

00:17:32.620 who can have a mail-in ballot sent to them

00:17:35.340 that could be harvested.

00:17:38.640 But, yeah, there is no legitimate reason,

00:17:42.840 none,

00:17:44.580 for not requiring ID to vote.

00:17:46.660 It's the dumbest,

00:17:48.020 most transparently evil thing,

00:17:51.080 except for all the other evil things.

00:17:54.060 All right.

00:17:54.320 But everything else in California

00:17:59.640 is working pretty well.

00:18:01.940 Oh, here's a story from just the news

00:18:04.180 that nearly 600 California officials

00:18:07.280 have been convicted

00:18:08.180 on federal corruption charges

00:18:09.820 over the last 10 years.

00:18:11.940 That feels like a lot.

00:18:14.980 600 local officials,

00:18:18.320 600 of them were crooks running local.

00:18:23.880 Now, how many got away?

00:18:25.640 If they caught 600,

00:18:28.000 how many were corrupt

00:18:29.880 but are still getting away with it?

00:18:32.540 Well, it's a multiple of 600.

00:18:35.780 It's not less than 600.

00:18:38.680 It's probably something like five times this.

00:18:42.320 There might be thousands of local officials

00:18:45.240 who are just on the take.

00:18:46.540 Here's what I think.

00:18:48.900 I don't think local officials

00:18:50.600 should ever have control over money.

00:18:55.200 They're all corrupt.

00:18:57.040 Have you ever seen a small,

00:18:58.460 well, any kind of local government

00:19:00.920 that wasn't corrupt?

00:19:02.560 It attracts corrupt people.

00:19:05.680 It's a job that's so unpleasant,

00:19:08.420 unless you assume

00:19:09.540 you're going to get in the job for corruption,

00:19:11.920 it's not worth doing.

00:19:13.100 Literally, you get in it for the corruption.

00:19:18.480 Let's be honest.

00:19:20.200 Who looks at the job of local government

00:19:23.020 and says,

00:19:23.580 you know,

00:19:24.760 now there's a career,

00:19:26.440 local government.

00:19:29.040 Now, some people,

00:19:30.120 maybe it seems like a safe job or something,

00:19:33.300 but I feel like the very nature of it

00:19:36.940 is that you know that if you get the job,

00:19:39.100 you can take all kinds of kickbacks

00:19:41.680 for giving business to preferred vendors.

00:19:46.260 And I think they all do it.

00:19:48.220 It's probably close to 100%.

00:19:50.320 Every local good-sized town

00:19:54.960 is probably corrupt.

00:19:56.400 Probably every one of them,

00:19:58.120 is my guess.

00:19:59.060 And the reason is,

00:20:00.000 you can't really catch it.

00:20:01.980 You don't really know

00:20:02.960 what side deals have been made,

00:20:04.600 so it's not like somebody's

00:20:05.740 handing somebody a big bag of money

00:20:07.880 every time.

00:20:10.640 So I think that we need

00:20:11.900 some kind of major readjustment

00:20:15.080 in our political system

00:20:16.420 so that the question of

00:20:18.260 who spends money and how

00:20:19.660 is either way more transparent

00:20:21.920 or the local governments

00:20:24.000 just can't even be involved.

00:20:26.580 I just don't think the local government

00:20:28.220 should have big money spending privileges,

00:20:31.160 period.

00:20:31.920 There's got to be some other process for that.

00:20:34.480 You know, maybe an independent bidding process

00:20:37.800 if you keep them honest.

00:20:40.120 I don't know.

00:20:40.440 But definitely elected people

00:20:41.880 should not be handing out

00:20:43.220 large amounts of money on contracts.

00:20:47.700 Ontario, the wait is over.

00:20:50.200 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.

00:20:53.060 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live,

00:20:55.320 bringing Vegas-style excitement

00:20:56.760 and a world-class gaming experience

00:20:58.780 right to your fingertips.

00:21:00.660 Whether you're a seasoned player

00:21:01.860 or just starting,

00:21:02.980 signing up is fast and simple.

00:21:05.120 And in just a few clicks,

00:21:06.400 you can have access

00:21:07.060 to our exclusive library

00:21:08.400 of the best slots

00:21:09.480 and top-tier table games.

00:21:11.340 Make the most of your downtime

00:21:12.620 with unbeatable promotions

00:21:14.160 and jackpots

00:21:14.960 that can turn any mundane moment

00:21:16.760 into a golden opportunity

00:21:18.260 at Golden Nugget Online Casino.

00:21:20.840 Take a spin on the slots,

00:21:22.180 challenge yourself at the tables,

00:21:23.500 or join a live dealer game

00:21:24.980 to feel the thrill

00:21:25.980 of real-time action,

00:21:27.300 all from the comfort

00:21:28.260 of your own devices.

00:21:29.140 Why settle for less

00:21:30.500 when you can go for the gold

00:21:32.000 at Golden Nugget Online Casino?

00:21:34.820 Gambling problem?

00:21:35.720 Call Connex Ontario,

00:21:37.060 1-866-531-2600.

00:21:40.020 19 and over.

00:21:40.940 Physically present in Ontario.

00:21:42.320 Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:21:43.920 See goldennuggetcasino.com

00:21:45.620 for details.

00:21:46.400 Please play responsibly.

00:21:48.400 So it turns out

00:21:49.500 there is an economist,

00:21:51.340 a professional economist,

00:21:52.460 who likes the Kamala Harris

00:21:54.560 unrealized tax gains plan.

00:21:56.620 Now, everybody that I'd seen

00:21:59.100 has said it's a terrible idea.

00:22:02.580 It would destroy the economy.

00:22:04.600 It's basically a form of theft.

00:22:07.180 And it could never be implemented.

00:22:09.180 There's no way you could isolate

00:22:11.120 reasonable gains that won't go away.

00:22:16.060 So, but now there is one.

00:22:18.020 Jason Furman.

00:22:20.040 Let's see.

00:22:20.780 What kind of economist

00:22:24.080 would be in favor of something

00:22:25.520 that's so obviously a bad idea?

00:22:27.740 Let's look at his profile.

00:22:29.900 He's a professor of practice at Harvard

00:22:31.940 and he teaches Econ 10.

00:22:35.400 Oh.

00:22:36.600 Oh, he's from Harvard.

00:22:39.260 I'm sorry.

00:22:40.180 I apologize.

00:22:41.020 I wasted your time.

00:22:42.820 For a minute there,

00:22:43.760 I thought it was a credible economist.

00:22:46.580 But he's just a Harvard economist.

00:22:48.560 I thought it was something real.

00:22:49.680 Do you remember when Harvard

00:22:52.520 was taken seriously?

00:22:55.700 Do you know what I think

00:22:56.860 when I see that somebody

00:22:57.860 is a Harvard professor?

00:22:59.900 This is not a joke.

00:23:01.940 My first thought,

00:23:03.280 oh, a fucking idiot.

00:23:05.380 A clown.

00:23:06.920 That's literally what I thought.

00:23:09.220 And so, you know,

00:23:10.780 I don't know anything

00:23:11.320 about this one individual.

00:23:13.260 So I'm just saying,

00:23:15.000 listen to the reason.

00:23:16.020 I think he gave his reasons.

00:23:17.400 He says,

00:23:18.840 I like the Biden-Harris proposal

00:23:20.580 to tax unrealized capital gains.

00:23:22.640 He said this on X.

00:23:24.240 For any given level

00:23:25.240 of capital taxation,

00:23:26.700 it's more efficient

00:23:27.640 and fair to tax

00:23:28.640 unrealized gains,

00:23:30.500 reduce lock-in

00:23:31.360 and tax planning.

00:23:34.000 And the proposal

00:23:35.060 does a thoughtful job

00:23:36.280 of addressing

00:23:37.280 tricky implementation issues.

00:23:38.900 What's that called?

00:23:42.440 That's called a half-pinion.

00:23:45.800 I don't believe

00:23:46.780 there's anybody who said

00:23:47.920 there are no positive

00:23:49.120 elements to it.

00:23:51.020 It's just that

00:23:51.880 the negative ones are bigger.

00:23:53.900 If you leave out

00:23:54.980 the negative part,

00:23:56.560 you know,

00:23:56.740 the effect it would have

00:23:57.640 on everything,

00:23:59.340 you haven't really

00:24:00.300 given us an opinion.

00:24:01.800 And if you just say

00:24:02.620 you like the tax proposal,

00:24:04.400 is that really saying

00:24:05.560 that it will work

00:24:06.280 for the country

00:24:06.860 or is it just something

00:24:07.760 you like because

00:24:08.600 you like Democrats?

00:24:10.580 I'll tell you.

00:24:13.000 You can't trust economists

00:24:14.480 that went to Harvard,

00:24:16.020 apparently.

00:24:18.320 But who can you trust?

00:24:19.720 Well, here's another economist,

00:24:20.940 I guess,

00:24:21.420 or business person.

00:24:22.980 I'm not sure

00:24:23.420 if you're calling him

00:24:24.100 an economist

00:24:24.620 or a business expert.

00:24:26.600 Robert Reich.

00:24:28.640 You know him.

00:24:29.820 Democrat.

00:24:31.420 He wrote an article

00:24:32.460 in The Guardian

00:24:33.020 that says,

00:24:33.860 the title is,

00:24:34.780 Elon Musk is out of control.

00:24:36.860 Here is how to rein him in.

00:24:40.820 Really?

00:24:43.600 How to rein him in?

00:24:45.740 You're writing an article

00:24:47.340 in a major publication

00:24:49.260 about how to rein in

00:24:50.680 an American citizen

00:24:52.560 who is breaking no laws?

00:24:55.340 Maybe,

00:24:55.820 maybe

00:24:56.600 don't rein him in.

00:24:59.320 Maybe you don't rein me in.

00:25:01.300 Maybe don't rein the fuck

00:25:02.800 anybody in.

00:25:03.580 If they're breaking the law,

00:25:06.880 let's get the law involved. 0.96

00:25:09.740 Unless it's fake lawfare stuff.

00:25:12.320 But no.

00:25:13.420 How about

00:25:13.820 if you're writing an article

00:25:15.840 to say you're reining anybody in

00:25:17.640 who's not breaking any laws

00:25:19.300 and is trying to give free speech

00:25:20.660 to the country,

00:25:22.100 you are

00:25:23.040 not helping.

00:25:25.320 Let's just put it that way.

00:25:26.380 How did Elon Musk respond?

00:25:32.620 He referred to Robert Reich

00:25:34.400 as Robert Reichert.

00:25:42.040 Robert Reichert.

00:25:43.560 Robert Reichert.

00:25:43.700 You know,

00:25:48.340 the funny part about it is

00:25:49.560 that Musk knows

00:25:51.420 that having any kind of

00:25:52.480 a reasonable conversation

00:25:55.020 on the merits of the argument,

00:25:58.040 it completely wastes the time

00:25:59.400 because the argument

00:26:00.080 has no merits.

00:26:01.400 The argument is based on,

00:26:03.200 this is from Reich,

00:26:04.340 quote,

00:26:04.680 if he doesn't stop

00:26:05.560 disseminating lies

00:26:06.740 and hate on X.

00:26:10.080 What are you talking about?

00:26:11.500 This is literally

00:26:14.040 Robert Reich

00:26:14.800 disseminating lies

00:26:16.480 and hate

00:26:16.960 in the Guardian article.

00:26:19.780 How many

00:26:20.460 of the political hoaxes

00:26:22.720 do you think

00:26:23.160 Robert Reichert believes

00:26:24.200 are true?

00:26:26.100 The only place

00:26:27.100 you can find out

00:26:27.820 the hoaxes

00:26:28.540 from the Democrats

00:26:29.460 are not true

00:26:30.100 is on X.

00:26:31.200 It's the only place.

00:26:32.600 Well,

00:26:32.880 there are,

00:26:33.240 you know,

00:26:33.700 Fox and Breitbart,

00:26:34.780 I guess.

00:26:35.760 So,

00:26:36.000 and,

00:26:36.740 yeah,

00:26:36.880 I guess there's some,

00:26:38.140 you know,

00:26:38.440 the smaller entities,

00:26:39.900 just the news

00:26:40.740 and,

00:26:41.500 the gateway pundit,

00:26:42.580 for example.

00:26:43.720 But,

00:26:44.240 you know,

00:26:44.940 the mainstream news

00:26:45.940 is all about

00:26:47.760 the hoaxes being real.

00:26:49.780 So,

00:26:50.320 it is amazing to me

00:26:51.580 that the biggest liars

00:26:54.220 in the country,

00:26:54.940 the biggest hoax makers

00:26:56.340 are trying to stop

00:26:57.820 that disseminating lies

00:26:59.680 and hate.

00:27:02.160 Well,

00:27:02.620 there's a New York Times

00:27:03.480 columnist

00:27:04.100 who's sort of

00:27:04.920 leaning in the other direction,

00:27:06.460 Nicholas Kristof,

00:27:08.080 wrote for the New York Times

00:27:10.540 opinion piece

00:27:11.340 that people should be

00:27:13.740 nicer to

00:27:14.540 Trump supporters.

00:27:16.460 Now,

00:27:16.880 he's not saying

00:27:17.520 you necessarily

00:27:18.760 need to be

00:27:19.520 kinder to Trump himself

00:27:21.300 if you don't like

00:27:22.580 his policies,

00:27:23.180 but they usually

00:27:24.200 be more

00:27:25.480 generous

00:27:26.940 with the

00:27:28.060 Trump

00:27:28.740 followers.

00:27:30.480 Do you know

00:27:30.760 why Nicholas Kristof

00:27:32.040 argues that you

00:27:32.980 should be nicer

00:27:33.660 to the

00:27:34.320 Trump

00:27:35.140 followers?

00:27:36.100 It turns out

00:27:38.320 part of his

00:27:38.960 reasoning is

00:27:40.060 that he lives

00:27:40.620 in a rural place

00:27:41.620 and he has

00:27:43.020 lots of

00:27:43.480 accidental contact

00:27:44.700 with Trump

00:27:45.960 supporters.

00:27:46.900 Do you know

00:27:47.600 what he learned

00:27:48.140 about Trump

00:27:48.660 supporters,

00:27:49.320 which every

00:27:50.280 single person

00:27:51.040 who has

00:27:51.460 accidental contact

00:27:52.780 of a meaningful

00:27:53.720 way

00:27:54.100 comes to realize

00:27:55.720 as well?

00:27:57.020 They're really

00:27:57.820 nice people.

00:27:58.520 And why

00:28:02.260 does that

00:28:02.620 keep

00:28:02.840 surprising

00:28:03.480 Democrats?

00:28:05.280 How many

00:28:05.840 times have

00:28:06.300 you seen

00:28:06.620 a story

00:28:07.060 about a

00:28:07.440 Democrat

00:28:07.780 who was

00:28:08.260 surprised

00:28:08.900 that if

00:28:09.880 they went

00:28:10.140 to a

00:28:10.380 Trump

00:28:10.600 rally,

00:28:11.120 everybody

00:28:11.360 was nice.

00:28:12.760 Even if

00:28:13.380 they knew

00:28:13.640 they were

00:28:13.860 on the

00:28:14.080 other

00:28:14.240 team,

00:28:15.140 everybody

00:28:15.440 was nice.

00:28:16.600 Glad to

00:28:17.020 talk.

00:28:17.680 Do you

00:28:17.880 need a

00:28:18.140 favor?

00:28:19.080 What can

00:28:19.420 I do

00:28:19.600 for you?

00:28:21.620 It's

00:28:22.060 amazing to

00:28:22.740 me that

00:28:23.040 we've

00:28:23.260 become so

00:28:23.720 divided

00:28:24.160 that people

00:28:24.720 don't even

00:28:25.240 know what

00:28:25.600 a Trump

00:28:25.920 supporter

00:28:26.400 looks like

00:28:27.700 or talks

00:28:28.080 like.

00:28:28.520 I've

00:28:30.620 said this

00:28:30.980 a number

00:28:31.260 of times.

00:28:31.760 I'm

00:28:32.080 registered

00:28:32.560 as

00:28:32.880 Democrat

00:28:33.320 and

00:28:34.620 most of

00:28:35.400 my past

00:28:35.980 I've

00:28:36.760 been more

00:28:37.060 pro-Democrat.

00:28:39.620 But I

00:28:40.540 enjoy the

00:28:41.160 company

00:28:41.620 and

00:28:42.580 interacting

00:28:43.080 with

00:28:43.360 Republicans

00:28:44.200 and

00:28:45.100 conservatives

00:28:45.680 way more

00:28:46.740 because

00:28:48.080 they're just

00:28:48.700 genuinely

00:28:49.480 nice people.

00:28:51.100 And when

00:28:51.320 they disagree

00:28:51.880 with you,

00:28:52.460 they do it

00:28:52.840 with reasons

00:28:53.500 and they

00:28:53.920 tell you

00:28:54.260 why and

00:28:54.980 they'll

00:28:55.540 listen to

00:28:55.920 your side.

00:28:57.360 They're

00:28:57.620 just nice

00:28:58.120 people.

00:28:59.720 Now,

00:29:00.100 of course,

00:29:00.440 any generalization

00:29:01.760 doesn't apply

00:29:02.440 to all

00:29:02.760 people.

00:29:03.260 You know,

00:29:03.420 there's bad

00:29:04.140 people in

00:29:04.540 every group.

00:29:05.720 But it

00:29:06.420 is interesting

00:29:07.060 how consistent

00:29:07.900 it is that

00:29:09.600 the, I'll

00:29:10.580 call them

00:29:10.940 the brainwashed

00:29:11.800 left,

00:29:13.360 that their

00:29:14.580 opinions of

00:29:15.340 the world

00:29:15.920 dissolve on

00:29:17.660 contact with

00:29:18.680 human beings

00:29:20.400 in that

00:29:22.060 reality.

00:29:23.080 Their opinions

00:29:24.320 dissolve on

00:29:25.220 contact.

00:29:25.840 Now,

00:29:27.300 that doesn't

00:29:27.680 happen the

00:29:28.100 other way,

00:29:28.460 does it?

00:29:29.320 I don't

00:29:29.900 really ever

00:29:30.380 hear those

00:29:30.840 stories.

00:29:32.020 It just

00:29:32.380 feels like

00:29:32.800 that's a

00:29:33.100 one-way

00:29:33.440 effect.

00:29:36.780 Ever

00:29:37.220 having been

00:29:37.720 a Democrat

00:29:38.220 makes me

00:29:38.920 question your

00:29:39.680 intellect,

00:29:40.340 Scott.

00:29:41.300 Well,

00:29:41.820 I would

00:29:42.120 argue that

00:29:42.880 being a

00:29:44.440 Democrat

00:29:44.900 when Bill

00:29:46.280 Clinton was

00:29:47.080 in office

00:29:47.560 wasn't such

00:29:48.200 a bad

00:29:48.480 deal.

00:29:49.520 I thought

00:29:50.200 he was a

00:29:50.520 pretty solid

00:29:51.060 president.

00:29:52.220 Still do.

00:29:52.720 I think

00:29:54.560 the current

00:29:55.220 incarnation of

00:29:56.120 the Democrats

00:29:56.640 is just

00:29:57.120 batshit

00:29:57.540 crazy.

00:29:59.020 So if I

00:30:00.180 had more

00:30:00.580 recently

00:30:01.100 supported

00:30:02.580 Democrat

00:30:03.080 views,

00:30:03.980 that would

00:30:05.560 be something

00:30:05.980 to question.

00:30:07.880 All right.

00:30:09.520 There's a

00:30:10.080 story that

00:30:10.480 the FCC

00:30:11.020 is refusing

00:30:12.020 funds for

00:30:13.040 Starlink. 0.59

00:30:13.920 I guess

00:30:14.240 SpaceX,

00:30:15.160 which owns

00:30:15.640 Starlink,

00:30:17.100 they want

00:30:17.660 a bid for

00:30:18.120 $885 million

00:30:19.160 to deploy

00:30:19.860 their satellite

00:30:21.560 Internet

00:30:22.140 stuff to

00:30:22.880 a gazillion

00:30:24.580 places.

00:30:26.260 But here's

00:30:26.820 why it's

00:30:27.260 been the

00:30:28.080 FCC refused

00:30:29.320 to fund

00:30:29.820 them,

00:30:30.280 even though

00:30:30.740 it had

00:30:30.980 been all

00:30:31.280 approved.

00:30:32.620 It says

00:30:33.460 they denied

00:30:34.120 Starlink the

00:30:34.740 funds,

00:30:35.160 claiming that

00:30:36.420 Starlink can't 1.00

00:30:37.580 prove they

00:30:38.080 have the

00:30:38.380 ability to

00:30:39.100 provide the

00:30:39.700 service.

00:30:42.360 Can't

00:30:42.960 prove that

00:30:43.680 Starlink can't 1.00

00:30:44.820 prove it

00:30:45.900 has the

00:30:46.220 ability to

00:30:47.060 provide

00:30:47.580 Starlink

00:30:48.100 service?

00:30:49.860 Now,

00:30:50.800 is that

00:30:51.040 because they

00:30:51.420 can't prove

00:30:51.880 they have

00:30:52.260 satellites in

00:30:53.060 those areas

00:30:53.640 or that

00:30:54.940 they would

00:30:55.240 be overloaded?

00:30:56.820 I feel

00:30:57.500 like none

00:30:58.920 of this

00:30:59.260 looks like

00:31:01.260 it's anything

00:31:01.780 but political.

00:31:03.580 So,

00:31:04.140 without knowing

00:31:04.660 the details

00:31:05.220 of this,

00:31:05.700 maybe they

00:31:06.080 have an

00:31:06.340 argument.

00:31:07.320 Maybe they

00:31:07.680 do,

00:31:07.940 but it's

00:31:08.160 not.

00:31:08.880 Whatever

00:31:09.200 their argument

00:31:09.760 is,

00:31:10.240 it was not

00:31:10.960 detailed.

00:31:11.960 It's just

00:31:12.380 that they

00:31:12.860 haven't proven

00:31:13.680 they have

00:31:14.040 the ability.

00:31:17.280 Correct me

00:31:17.920 if I'm

00:31:18.220 wrong.

00:31:18.540 I thought

00:31:19.140 the satellites

00:31:19.960 were now

00:31:20.620 reaching

00:31:21.040 basically

00:31:21.620 everything

00:31:22.060 in the

00:31:22.380 United

00:31:22.620 States.

00:31:23.640 Is there

00:31:23.940 part of

00:31:24.280 the United

00:31:24.620 States

00:31:25.040 that

00:31:25.340 can't

00:31:25.920 get

00:31:26.240 Starlink?

00:31:29.940 I don't

00:31:30.540 know.

00:31:30.880 I've got

00:31:31.180 questions.

00:31:32.040 To me,

00:31:32.440 that sounds

00:31:32.900 political,

00:31:33.640 like a

00:31:34.060 political

00:31:34.560 blow against

00:31:37.660 Elon Musk.

00:31:40.000 All right.

00:31:40.560 So,

00:31:40.960 as you know,

00:31:41.800 there's this

00:31:42.260 just stupid

00:31:43.640 political news

00:31:44.680 about who

00:31:46.080 is more

00:31:46.600 disrespectful to

00:31:47.800 the military.

00:31:49.320 This is so

00:31:50.020 dumb.

00:31:51.560 So dumb.

00:31:53.240 So,

00:31:53.720 you know,

00:31:54.060 Trump's

00:31:54.560 getting

00:31:54.800 pressure

00:31:55.480 because he

00:31:56.160 went to

00:31:56.580 the

00:31:56.900 cemetery,

00:32:00.020 Arlington

00:32:00.420 Cemetery,

00:32:02.160 you know,

00:32:02.400 which is not

00:32:02.900 normally done,

00:32:03.700 but it was

00:32:04.140 the Gold Star

00:32:05.720 families of

00:32:07.160 the people who

00:32:07.700 died in

00:32:08.100 Afghanistan in

00:32:09.320 the closing

00:32:10.000 days.

00:32:10.980 You know,

00:32:11.220 they had

00:32:11.500 invited him

00:32:12.160 to be there,

00:32:12.820 so the Gold

00:32:13.880 Star families

00:32:14.580 were delighted

00:32:15.280 with his

00:32:16.200 contact,

00:32:17.420 but the

00:32:17.660 Democrats

00:32:18.040 are using

00:32:18.560 it as,

00:32:19.700 you

00:32:20.020 disgraced

00:32:22.520 that

00:32:23.280 precious

00:32:24.720 place,

00:32:25.760 to which

00:32:26.680 I say,

00:32:27.760 boring,

00:32:30.200 and then

00:32:30.840 there's the

00:32:31.600 Trump,

00:32:32.680 the hoax

00:32:33.160 that Trump

00:32:33.700 called the

00:32:34.340 soldiers ever,

00:32:36.000 suckers and 0.97

00:32:37.020 losers,

00:32:37.620 that obviously

00:32:38.340 didn't happen.

00:32:39.300 Boring,

00:32:40.100 boring hoax,

00:32:41.060 and then

00:32:43.880 there's the

00:32:45.900 stuff about

00:32:46.320 Walls,

00:32:47.880 you know,

00:32:48.260 Walls not

00:32:49.620 doing,

00:32:50.340 you know,

00:32:51.060 let's say not

00:32:51.960 being completely

00:32:52.820 honest about

00:32:54.520 the nature

00:32:55.780 of his

00:32:56.140 service,

00:32:57.260 you know,

00:32:57.440 suggesting he

00:32:58.040 was in a

00:32:58.380 war zone

00:32:58.820 when he

00:32:59.160 wasn't,

00:33:00.420 et cetera,

00:33:01.360 suggesting he

00:33:02.260 had a higher

00:33:02.760 rank than

00:33:03.680 technically he

00:33:04.780 did,

00:33:05.520 and stuff

00:33:05.960 like that.

00:33:06.940 And I'm

00:33:07.680 going to

00:33:08.020 triple down

00:33:08.620 on my

00:33:09.600 opinion

00:33:10.980 about all

00:33:11.540 this.

00:33:13.940 I think

00:33:14.780 this is

00:33:15.420 up to

00:33:16.600 the gold

00:33:17.220 star families

00:33:18.040 and service

00:33:19.860 people.

00:33:21.240 So I

00:33:21.740 feel like,

00:33:22.540 you know,

00:33:23.480 if one of

00:33:24.080 these two

00:33:24.800 characters is

00:33:25.680 offending them

00:33:26.320 more than

00:33:26.640 the other,

00:33:27.260 then certainly

00:33:28.060 they have

00:33:28.520 every right

00:33:30.360 to vote

00:33:32.420 against them,

00:33:33.120 et cetera.

00:33:33.660 But the rest

00:33:34.380 of us,

00:33:35.420 those who

00:33:35.860 had not been

00:33:36.360 in the military,

00:33:37.640 I feel like

00:33:38.180 we should

00:33:38.480 take a pass

00:33:39.140 on this one.

00:33:39.600 and just

00:33:41.460 sort of

00:33:41.740 take the

00:33:42.140 lead,

00:33:43.100 you know,

00:33:43.320 just watch

00:33:44.300 what the

00:33:44.840 people with

00:33:45.640 more direct

00:33:46.280 military,

00:33:47.220 family or

00:33:48.020 otherwise,

00:33:49.120 connection

00:33:49.800 have.

00:33:51.000 You know,

00:33:51.280 my personal

00:33:52.180 opinion of

00:33:53.040 who went

00:33:53.660 too far,

00:33:54.360 who's

00:33:54.660 disrespecting

00:33:55.440 who,

00:33:56.100 I don't

00:33:56.500 think that

00:33:56.980 adds

00:33:57.360 anything.

00:33:59.060 I think

00:33:59.660 I would

00:33:59.900 rather take

00:34:00.340 a backseat

00:34:00.920 and say,

00:34:01.400 all right,

00:34:01.740 if you were

00:34:02.360 in the

00:34:02.600 military,

00:34:03.260 how do

00:34:03.580 you feel?

00:34:04.820 Will it

00:34:05.260 change your

00:34:05.700 vote?

00:34:06.780 Be

00:34:07.040 interesting

00:34:07.440 to know,

00:34:07.980 but here's

00:34:11.040 my problem.

00:34:12.080 I figure

00:34:12.780 everybody who

00:34:13.520 was in the

00:34:13.880 military is

00:34:14.760 at a higher

00:34:15.320 level of

00:34:16.080 credibility and

00:34:18.240 patriotic behavior

00:34:20.120 than I am.

00:34:20.780 so what the

00:34:22.620 hell am I

00:34:23.040 doing judging

00:34:23.600 any of

00:34:24.000 them?

00:34:25.600 I'm not

00:34:26.180 the judge.

00:34:27.180 I shouldn't

00:34:27.840 be the

00:34:28.180 judge.

00:34:28.800 I have

00:34:29.200 not earned

00:34:29.800 any of

00:34:30.140 that

00:34:30.440 credibility

00:34:31.600 or right

00:34:32.240 or honor.

00:34:33.640 So the

00:34:34.260 people who

00:34:34.620 have,

00:34:35.480 you tell

00:34:35.920 me how

00:34:36.200 you feel

00:34:36.500 about it.

00:34:37.780 And if

00:34:38.800 how you

00:34:39.600 feel about

00:34:40.040 it changes

00:34:40.520 the vote,

00:34:41.580 that could 0.68

00:34:42.700 be important.

00:34:43.960 My feeling

00:34:44.800 is it's not

00:34:45.420 going to

00:34:45.660 change many

00:34:46.200 votes,

00:34:46.800 but I agree

00:34:47.400 with the

00:34:48.860 Mike Cernovich

00:34:49.380 take that

00:34:50.500 this is one

00:34:51.040 of the few

00:34:51.580 places you

00:34:52.500 might have

00:34:53.100 actually had

00:34:53.640 a genuine

00:34:54.560 chance to

00:34:55.300 change a

00:34:55.740 vote.

00:34:56.080 Very rare

00:34:56.700 at this

00:34:57.580 stage of

00:34:58.000 the election

00:34:58.400 for anybody

00:34:58.960 to change

00:34:59.560 their mind.

00:35:00.380 But this

00:35:00.740 might be

00:35:01.040 the one,

00:35:02.240 but not

00:35:02.740 10% of

00:35:03.720 the people,

00:35:05.080 maybe 1%,

00:35:06.020 which is

00:35:06.920 still a lot.

00:35:08.380 Searchlight

00:35:09.480 Pictures presents

00:35:10.360 The Roses,

00:35:11.280 only in theaters

00:35:12.060 August 29th.

00:35:13.260 From the

00:35:13.680 director of

00:35:14.320 Meet the Parents

00:35:15.020 and the

00:35:15.460 writer of

00:35:16.000 Poor Things

00:35:16.620 comes The

00:35:17.380 Roses,

00:35:18.060 starring Academy

00:35:18.960 Award winner

00:35:19.560 Olivia Coleman,

00:35:20.760 Academy Award

00:35:21.460 nominee Benedict

00:35:22.380 Cumberbatch,

00:35:23.260 Andy Samberg,

00:35:24.220 Kate McKinnon,

00:35:25.000 and Allison Janney.

00:35:26.140 A hilarious

00:35:26.680 new comedy

00:35:27.360 filled with

00:35:28.040 drama,

00:35:28.700 excitement,

00:35:29.360 and a little

00:35:30.040 bit of hatred,

00:35:30.860 proving that

00:35:31.400 marriage isn't 0.53

00:35:32.220 always a bed

00:35:33.200 of roses.

00:35:34.120 See The Roses,

00:35:35.120 only in theaters

00:35:35.760 August 29th.

00:35:36.880 Get tickets now.

00:35:39.680 All right,

00:35:40.440 apparently,

00:35:41.400 Matt Schlapp,

00:35:44.140 his CPAC

00:35:45.300 people are

00:35:46.560 going to

00:35:46.920 be monitoring

00:35:48.600 drop boxes

00:35:49.480 in Arizona.

00:35:51.400 So they've

00:35:52.220 got a very

00:35:52.720 well-organized

00:35:53.880 situation in

00:35:55.360 which they're

00:35:55.760 going to

00:35:56.040 train people

00:35:56.840 to be,

00:35:59.900 let's say,

00:36:00.860 have good

00:36:01.580 manners and

00:36:02.200 be good

00:36:02.620 citizens and

00:36:03.380 not bother

00:36:03.880 the people

00:36:04.320 who are using

00:36:04.760 the drop

00:36:05.180 box,

00:36:05.600 which would

00:36:05.940 be terrible.

00:36:06.880 Don't do

00:36:07.400 that.

00:36:08.460 Don't bother

00:36:09.200 any people

00:36:09.780 who are using

00:36:10.380 the drop

00:36:10.800 box.

00:36:11.280 Don't threaten

00:36:11.800 them.

00:36:12.060 But if

00:36:13.940 they simply

00:36:15.080 just are

00:36:15.900 good citizens

00:36:16.660 and they

00:36:17.140 simply are

00:36:17.660 observing,

00:36:19.300 very good.

00:36:21.240 So Matt,

00:36:22.440 if you can

00:36:23.780 pull this

00:36:24.300 off with

00:36:24.920 whoever else

00:36:25.500 you're working

00:36:25.880 with,

00:36:26.900 excellent job.

00:36:28.320 I'll feel a

00:36:29.040 lot better

00:36:29.500 if the boxers

00:36:30.780 are being

00:36:31.080 watched,

00:36:31.840 wouldn't you?

00:36:32.980 I'll feel

00:36:33.760 a lot better.

00:36:35.740 Now,

00:36:36.340 do you think

00:36:36.720 they'll notice

00:36:38.160 anything or

00:36:38.700 find anything?

00:36:39.560 I don't know.

00:36:40.760 They'll certainly

00:36:41.420 be able to

00:36:42.560 find people

00:36:43.100 who show

00:36:43.420 up multiple

00:36:43.900 times.

00:36:46.140 But,

00:36:46.460 yeah,

00:36:48.340 I think they

00:36:49.080 have to be a

00:36:49.580 certain distance

00:36:50.400 away from it

00:36:51.220 and there are

00:36:51.740 some other

00:36:52.100 rules.

00:36:52.680 It's going to

00:36:53.020 be hard for

00:36:53.720 them to

00:36:54.180 satisfy all

00:36:55.060 those rules

00:36:55.700 because it's

00:36:56.260 hard to get

00:36:56.640 everybody to

00:36:57.300 dance the

00:36:58.580 same way.

00:36:59.640 But,

00:37:00.200 I love

00:37:01.620 this.

00:37:03.000 So now we've

00:37:03.440 got whistleblowers,

00:37:04.540 we've got far

00:37:05.420 more observers,

00:37:06.560 we've got some

00:37:07.140 drop box

00:37:08.220 observers.

00:37:09.620 So I remind

00:37:10.480 you that my

00:37:11.340 prediction for

00:37:12.160 the election

00:37:12.600 is as

00:37:13.240 follows.

00:37:15.260 With all

00:37:15.940 of these

00:37:16.260 observers,

00:37:17.860 you can

00:37:18.340 guarantee,

00:37:19.540 guarantee,

00:37:20.460 I mean,

00:37:20.680 I think you

00:37:21.080 would agree

00:37:21.460 with me that

00:37:22.000 this is

00:37:22.420 guaranteed to

00:37:23.180 happen,

00:37:23.900 that whether

00:37:25.040 or not

00:37:25.800 there's any

00:37:26.300 real cheating

00:37:26.980 in the

00:37:27.320 election,

00:37:28.080 and this is

00:37:28.580 important,

00:37:29.200 whether or

00:37:29.620 not there's

00:37:29.940 any,

00:37:31.040 there will

00:37:31.460 be massive

00:37:32.040 reports of

00:37:32.800 them.

00:37:34.020 Because people

00:37:34.840 are going to

00:37:35.540 imagine they

00:37:36.640 saw something

00:37:37.340 that might

00:37:38.960 be important.

00:37:40.460 And then maybe

00:37:40.960 if you looked

00:37:41.480 into it,

00:37:41.980 you'd find

00:37:42.340 out,

00:37:42.660 okay,

00:37:42.820 that wasn't

00:37:43.240 what you

00:37:43.520 thought it

00:37:43.800 was.

00:37:45.000 So I

00:37:46.940 don't have a

00:37:47.620 prediction that

00:37:49.140 any real

00:37:49.720 cheating of

00:37:50.380 scale will be

00:37:51.160 found.

00:37:52.800 I think the

00:37:53.920 Trump movie

00:37:55.280 requires it,

00:37:56.640 so it does

00:37:57.620 look like the

00:37:58.200 simulation is

00:37:59.040 lining up to

00:37:59.720 deliver it.

00:38:01.060 So if you

00:38:02.120 take the

00:38:02.640 point of view

00:38:03.300 that we are

00:38:04.360 going to look

00:38:04.780 like a movie

00:38:05.360 for reasons

00:38:06.020 that are

00:38:06.320 mysterious,

00:38:07.520 we just

00:38:07.900 always end

00:38:08.340 up looking

00:38:08.720 like a

00:38:09.100 movie in

00:38:09.780 terms of

00:38:10.140 the way

00:38:10.400 things unfold,

00:38:11.840 that suggests

00:38:13.620 that there

00:38:14.080 would be

00:38:14.380 something that

00:38:14.940 got found.

00:38:16.920 But,

00:38:18.200 with or

00:38:19.520 without any

00:38:20.080 real findings

00:38:20.820 of any

00:38:21.300 real rigging,

00:38:22.580 there are

00:38:22.920 going to be

00:38:23.260 massive reports

00:38:24.760 of rigging

00:38:25.300 that don't

00:38:26.480 pan out.

00:38:27.600 How in the

00:38:28.240 world are you

00:38:28.860 going to have

00:38:30.240 an election

00:38:30.720 that everybody

00:38:31.500 feels good

00:38:32.100 about when

00:38:33.100 there couldn't

00:38:33.540 possibly be

00:38:34.340 enough time to

00:38:35.060 look into

00:38:35.440 all of them?

00:38:36.620 And they're

00:38:37.340 just going to

00:38:37.700 be out there.

00:38:39.500 And you'll be

00:38:40.260 certifying an

00:38:40.960 election with

00:38:41.580 what?

00:38:42.860 You know,

00:38:43.160 hundreds of

00:38:43.840 thousands of

00:38:44.400 people who

00:38:44.980 think they

00:38:45.580 saw something?

00:38:46.580 Maybe tens

00:38:47.180 of thousands.

00:38:48.680 Could be a

00:38:49.220 lot.

00:38:50.000 I don't see

00:38:50.700 how we have

00:38:51.540 an election

00:38:52.240 that people

00:38:54.380 trust when

00:38:55.020 we're done.

00:38:58.920 So Harris

00:38:59.840 is again

00:39:00.740 demanding that

00:39:01.600 the microphones

00:39:02.300 be unmuted

00:39:03.320 because she

00:39:04.340 thinks that

00:39:04.980 will give

00:39:05.740 people a

00:39:06.480 more accurate

00:39:08.120 view of how

00:39:08.920 bad that

00:39:09.600 Trump is,

00:39:10.300 all interrupty

00:39:11.320 and mansplaining

00:39:12.860 and stuff

00:39:13.500 the men

00:39:13.860 do.

00:39:16.240 Some are

00:39:17.080 suggesting

00:39:17.580 that what

00:39:19.420 she is really

00:39:20.080 trying to

00:39:20.760 angle for

00:39:21.400 is canceling

00:39:22.560 the only

00:39:23.320 debate.

00:39:25.160 Do you

00:39:26.740 think that

00:39:27.200 she's clever

00:39:27.860 enough or

00:39:28.680 weaselly

00:39:29.120 enough that

00:39:30.380 she'll go

00:39:31.340 right up to

00:39:32.140 get close to

00:39:33.200 the debate

00:39:33.720 while we're

00:39:34.440 already close

00:39:35.100 and then say,

00:39:36.600 well, I

00:39:38.060 really had

00:39:38.640 planned to,

00:39:39.620 but we could

00:39:40.320 not agree on

00:39:40.940 the details.

00:39:42.320 She might. 0.63

00:39:43.780 I would not

00:39:44.760 rule out that

00:39:46.300 she has no

00:39:46.980 debates.

00:39:48.780 Here's why.

00:39:50.220 Debating would

00:39:50.960 be worse.

00:39:52.060 If she has a

00:39:53.020 debate, I think

00:39:55.140 it's two to

00:39:55.880 one, she

00:39:56.240 gets annihilated.

00:39:58.200 Would you

00:39:58.760 agree?

00:39:59.400 It's about

00:39:59.940 two to one,

00:40:00.720 I think.

00:40:01.140 The odds

00:40:01.500 say she got

00:40:02.000 annihilated.

00:40:02.960 Because she's

00:40:03.460 bad at it,

00:40:04.820 and everybody

00:40:05.340 would agree

00:40:05.880 with that.

00:40:06.860 Well, she's

00:40:07.420 bad at the

00:40:07.840 whole public

00:40:08.300 speaking thing.

00:40:09.940 And she

00:40:10.420 is, and

00:40:12.140 Trump is

00:40:12.600 good at it.

00:40:13.820 So those are

00:40:14.580 two things we

00:40:15.180 know for sure.

00:40:16.160 Somebody who

00:40:16.640 is unnaturally

00:40:18.260 bad at it

00:40:19.120 with somebody

00:40:19.980 who is

00:40:20.240 unnaturally

00:40:21.020 good at it.

00:40:21.980 It should be

00:40:22.600 a blowout,

00:40:24.060 unless all

00:40:25.500 she did

00:40:25.840 is just

00:40:26.180 read her

00:40:26.520 little talking

00:40:27.040 points.

00:40:28.980 So I

00:40:30.240 could see

00:40:30.720 the possibility

00:40:31.740 that she

00:40:32.500 would look

00:40:33.140 to weaselly

00:40:34.640 cancel it,

00:40:35.620 but I'll

00:40:36.360 bet against

00:40:36.980 it.

00:40:37.720 I think

00:40:38.120 she would

00:40:38.480 consider it

00:40:39.060 too much

00:40:39.500 of a target

00:40:41.760 on her

00:40:42.260 back if

00:40:43.140 she did

00:40:43.440 that.

00:40:46.360 Anyway,

00:40:47.460 so Gateway

00:40:49.260 Pundits

00:40:49.840 reporting there

00:40:51.340 is a new

00:40:51.760 complaint against

00:40:52.880 the U.S.

00:40:53.560 Postal Service

00:40:54.400 for something

00:40:56.400 that involved

00:40:57.080 allegedly

00:40:57.880 shipping at

00:41:00.080 least a

00:41:00.500 million mail-in

00:41:01.380 ballots from

00:41:02.100 a facility

00:41:03.140 in Bethpage,

00:41:04.780 New York

00:41:05.200 to Pennsylvania.

00:41:07.260 Now, I think

00:41:08.240 this is a story

00:41:08.960 we've all heard

00:41:09.680 a bunch of

00:41:10.120 times, and

00:41:11.600 I've heard

00:41:12.120 the debunks.

00:41:14.200 In other

00:41:14.560 words, there's

00:41:15.240 a counter story

00:41:16.580 that says,

00:41:17.100 oh, there's

00:41:17.660 nothing to this

00:41:18.300 story.

00:41:19.280 It's all been

00:41:19.940 explained a

00:41:20.840 million times.

00:41:21.760 And the

00:41:23.260 debunks

00:41:23.880 sound, if

00:41:25.340 it's the

00:41:25.640 same thing

00:41:26.040 I think it

00:41:26.480 is, the

00:41:26.860 debunks

00:41:27.240 sounded pretty

00:41:28.160 convincing to

00:41:29.660 me.

00:41:31.300 But so

00:41:31.920 does the

00:41:32.260 claim.

00:41:33.700 So how

00:41:34.300 do you know

00:41:34.600 what's right

00:41:35.020 if both

00:41:35.500 the claim

00:41:35.980 and the

00:41:36.300 debunks

00:41:36.700 sound

00:41:37.100 reasonably

00:41:38.560 real?

00:41:39.860 But here

00:41:40.440 was a

00:41:40.780 little factoid

00:41:41.700 I had not

00:41:42.220 seen.

00:41:43.460 So I'd

00:41:46.220 love to

00:41:46.480 know if

00:41:46.760 this is in

00:41:47.400 dispute or

00:41:48.340 if both

00:41:48.880 sides agree

00:41:49.520 to the

00:41:49.900 following

00:41:50.260 statement

00:41:50.840 that every

00:41:54.380 piece of

00:41:55.340 first-class

00:41:55.920 mail is

00:41:56.360 supposed to

00:41:56.720 be imaged

00:41:57.460 by the

00:41:57.940 post office.

00:41:59.060 So regulations

00:41:59.900 require that

00:42:00.620 they image

00:42:01.140 them before

00:42:02.120 they're

00:42:02.420 delivered.

00:42:03.920 It doesn't

00:42:04.820 say if that

00:42:05.420 means they

00:42:05.800 weren't imaged,

00:42:06.680 but I think

00:42:07.040 that's the

00:42:07.640 implication.

00:42:09.000 So that

00:42:09.200 would be

00:42:09.460 question number

00:42:10.120 one.

00:42:11.500 Is it

00:42:12.180 possible that

00:42:12.860 a million

00:42:13.340 things didn't

00:42:14.560 get imaged?

00:42:16.020 And maybe

00:42:16.760 they have a

00:42:17.100 good reason

00:42:17.480 for that.

00:42:18.040 I don't

00:42:18.240 know.

00:42:19.040 But here's

00:42:19.420 the part

00:42:19.760 that really

00:42:20.360 caught my

00:42:20.820 mind or

00:42:21.980 caught my

00:42:22.740 attention.

00:42:23.900 The facility

00:42:24.940 where the

00:42:25.540 driver allegedly

00:42:26.500 picked up

00:42:27.180 these million

00:42:28.220 ballots that

00:42:29.580 were allegedly

00:42:30.940 already filled

00:42:31.520 out is not

00:42:34.780 a place where

00:42:35.520 you pick up

00:42:36.280 mail.

00:42:37.680 It's only

00:42:38.480 certified friendly

00:42:39.420 packages and

00:42:40.260 express mail.

00:42:42.140 So in other

00:42:42.540 words, there

00:42:43.120 was no legal

00:42:43.880 justification to

00:42:46.140 account for the

00:42:46.960 ballots going

00:42:47.580 through that

00:42:48.000 warehouse at

00:42:48.640 all, to

00:42:50.220 which I

00:42:50.580 said, ping,

00:42:52.260 if you can

00:42:53.600 prove that's

00:42:54.420 true, then

00:42:56.380 you're very

00:42:57.720 close to

00:42:58.160 having a

00:42:58.600 crack in

00:42:59.060 here.

00:43:00.160 Because if

00:43:01.560 it's true

00:43:02.200 that a

00:43:02.860 million ballots

00:43:03.660 went through

00:43:04.120 a U.S.

00:43:04.720 Postal Service

00:43:05.540 facility for

00:43:06.820 which no

00:43:07.460 ballots should

00:43:08.040 have ever

00:43:08.380 gone through,

00:43:10.620 then the

00:43:11.700 argument that

00:43:13.500 something terribly

00:43:14.400 wrong happened

00:43:15.160 there is much

00:43:17.020 stronger.

00:43:18.460 But remember,

00:43:19.660 all of these

00:43:20.520 voting claim

00:43:21.580 stories have

00:43:22.300 either turned

00:43:22.880 to dust or

00:43:23.700 they didn't

00:43:24.040 have a

00:43:24.340 standing or

00:43:24.980 they didn't

00:43:25.340 matter or

00:43:26.040 there was

00:43:26.760 some debunk

00:43:27.380 you didn't

00:43:27.700 know about.

00:43:28.540 So don't

00:43:28.980 assume that

00:43:29.460 any of the

00:43:29.860 stories are

00:43:30.300 true.

00:43:31.660 I'm just

00:43:32.260 reporting them

00:43:32.940 because they're

00:43:33.340 in the news.

00:43:34.900 Could it be

00:43:35.580 true?

00:43:36.840 Maybe.

00:43:37.840 I don't

00:43:38.200 know.

00:43:38.400 the publication

00:43:44.780 PM, I

00:43:46.320 think they're

00:43:46.640 calling themselves

00:43:47.320 PM, they

00:43:47.940 used to be

00:43:48.900 something

00:43:51.320 millennial,

00:43:54.680 say that

00:43:55.060 Harris is in

00:43:55.780 the worst

00:43:56.300 position in

00:43:57.880 terms of

00:43:58.280 her polling 0.89

00:43:58.920 than

00:44:00.460 either Biden

00:44:04.060 or Hillary 1.00

00:44:04.560 were when

00:44:05.060 they ran

00:44:05.380 against Trump.

00:44:05.980 So Biden

00:44:07.400 won, but

00:44:08.520 Hillary did 1.00

00:44:09.580 not, even

00:44:10.380 though Hillary 0.87

00:44:11.020 was doing

00:44:11.540 better in

00:44:12.080 the polls

00:44:12.480 than Kamala

00:44:13.060 Harris is

00:44:13.580 now.

00:44:18.180 And the

00:44:18.980 reason given

00:44:19.800 for why it

00:44:22.220 looks like

00:44:22.800 Kamala is

00:44:23.520 ahead, but

00:44:24.800 when it

00:44:25.140 comes to

00:44:25.600 the actual

00:44:27.020 election that

00:44:27.780 she might 0.99

00:44:28.120 lose.

00:44:29.200 Now some

00:44:29.600 of that is

00:44:30.020 the electoral

00:44:30.600 college situation

00:44:31.600 so that the

00:44:32.340 popular vote

00:44:32.980 of the whole

00:44:33.320 country isn't

00:44:34.000 determining who

00:44:34.980 wins.

00:44:35.360 it's the

00:44:36.180 individual

00:44:36.580 places.

00:44:37.920 So that's

00:44:39.140 part of it.

00:44:40.000 But it

00:44:40.320 turns out

00:44:40.920 that the

00:44:43.300 polling for

00:44:44.800 Kamala,

00:44:45.480 according to

00:44:45.900 Newsweek,

00:44:46.860 might be

00:44:47.760 somewhat fake

00:44:50.000 because Trump

00:44:52.500 supporters lie

00:44:53.560 to pollsters.

00:44:55.780 How many of

00:44:56.700 you remember

00:44:57.140 in 2016 when

00:44:59.160 I was one of

00:44:59.840 the loudest

00:45:00.440 and first

00:45:00.980 people, I

00:45:01.600 don't know

00:45:01.880 who else

00:45:02.200 was saying

00:45:02.620 it, but

00:45:03.260 I was

00:45:03.580 certainly

00:45:04.120 if not

00:45:05.580 the loudest

00:45:06.420 and earliest

00:45:07.260 one of

00:45:07.680 them, to 0.58

00:45:10.820 say that

00:45:11.300 Trump supporters

00:45:12.040 were so

00:45:12.740 demonized that

00:45:14.280 they don't

00:45:14.720 answer polls

00:45:15.560 because they

00:45:16.740 wouldn't trust

00:45:17.340 that they

00:45:18.160 weren't just

00:45:18.540 being identified

00:45:19.580 for later

00:45:20.880 destruction.

00:45:22.500 And then the

00:45:23.760 election happened

00:45:24.460 and I said,

00:45:25.800 well, there it

00:45:26.200 is.

00:45:27.000 More people

00:45:27.880 voted for

00:45:28.400 Trump than

00:45:28.880 the polls

00:45:29.300 suggested.

00:45:30.480 There's your

00:45:31.040 shy Trump

00:45:32.880 voters.

00:45:33.440 And then the

00:45:34.080 news mocked

00:45:34.900 me again,

00:45:36.760 saying, oh,

00:45:37.820 there's no

00:45:38.440 evidence that

00:45:39.740 it was some

00:45:40.180 kind of shy

00:45:41.520 Trump supporters

00:45:42.460 who don't

00:45:43.040 answer polls.

00:45:44.340 But as of

00:45:45.320 today, it's

00:45:47.140 reported as

00:45:48.120 a simple

00:45:49.080 fact that

00:45:50.780 Trump supporters

00:45:52.140 don't answer

00:45:52.800 polls the

00:45:53.300 same way.

00:45:54.160 And it's

00:45:54.900 because they

00:45:55.340 don't trust

00:45:55.780 the pollsters.

00:45:56.340 So I'm

00:45:58.800 going to

00:45:58.940 take that

00:45:59.320 as a win

00:45:59.820 for predicting

00:46:01.940 it completely

00:46:02.860 accurately,

00:46:03.980 being mocked

00:46:04.740 about it

00:46:05.140 for a long

00:46:05.600 time,

00:46:06.320 and then

00:46:07.380 winning in

00:46:08.520 the end.

00:46:09.400 That's the

00:46:09.880 way I like

00:46:10.260 to do it.

00:46:14.420 Bank more

00:46:15.160 encores when

00:46:16.000 you switch to

00:46:16.560 a Scotiabank

00:46:17.300 banking package.

00:46:18.920 Learn more

00:46:19.700 at scotiabank.com

00:46:20.900 slash banking

00:46:21.640 packages.

00:46:22.560 Conditions

00:46:22.900 apply.

00:46:24.480 Scotiabank,

00:46:25.140 you're richer

00:46:25.600 than you think.

00:46:26.340 Remember I

00:46:28.680 told you

00:46:29.060 that if you

00:46:29.660 know what

00:46:30.380 happens in

00:46:31.060 the news,

00:46:31.600 you don't

00:46:31.920 know anything.

00:46:33.080 What you

00:46:33.620 need to

00:46:33.900 know is

00:46:34.560 who,

00:46:35.940 and also

00:46:36.620 why,

00:46:37.140 but the

00:46:37.580 who will

00:46:37.920 get you

00:46:38.180 pretty close

00:46:38.640 to why.

00:46:39.660 Here's a

00:46:40.220 little factoid

00:46:40.980 that you

00:46:41.420 can store

00:46:43.180 away in

00:46:43.620 your brain,

00:46:44.420 and you

00:46:45.200 can put

00:46:45.600 whatever

00:46:46.000 interpretation

00:46:46.920 on it

00:46:47.260 you like.

00:46:48.320 So I'll

00:46:48.660 give you

00:46:48.920 the fact,

00:46:49.820 and then you

00:46:50.340 interpret it

00:46:50.920 any way you

00:46:51.420 like.

00:46:52.960 Dana Bash,

00:46:53.920 who is the

00:46:54.320 only journalist

00:46:54.920 who got the

00:46:55.600 job to

00:46:58.180 talk to

00:46:59.020 Kamala

00:46:59.540 Harris

00:47:00.240 first,

00:47:01.780 you know,

00:47:01.940 after she

00:47:02.460 was selected

00:47:04.160 as their

00:47:04.980 standard bearer

00:47:06.560 for the

00:47:06.880 Democrats.

00:47:08.240 And did you

00:47:08.920 know that

00:47:09.420 Dana Bash's

00:47:10.440 ex-husband is

00:47:11.620 Jeremy Bash,

00:47:12.740 who is one of

00:47:13.500 the 51 Intel

00:47:14.680 officials who

00:47:16.660 signed that

00:47:17.200 Hunter Biden

00:47:18.320 laptop fake

00:47:19.500 letter.

00:47:19.800 so Dana

00:47:22.600 Bash,

00:47:23.140 it's not

00:47:23.600 her current

00:47:23.960 husband or

00:47:24.540 ex-husband,

00:47:25.420 is one of

00:47:26.580 the people

00:47:27.420 on the

00:47:27.760 51 letters.

00:47:31.140 Does that

00:47:31.880 tell you

00:47:32.540 that you

00:47:35.040 have a good

00:47:35.480 feeling about

00:47:36.320 Dana Bash

00:47:37.280 being a

00:47:38.020 totally objective

00:47:39.540 observer?

00:47:40.980 Now,

00:47:41.540 it's an

00:47:41.760 ex-husband,

00:47:43.000 so that's

00:47:43.920 processed

00:47:44.340 different than

00:47:44.960 a husband,

00:47:45.380 but certainly

00:47:48.360 suggests that

00:47:49.740 she might 0.99

00:47:50.420 not be

00:47:50.860 100%

00:47:51.840 independent.

00:47:55.860 Did you

00:47:56.460 know,

00:47:56.880 according to

00:47:57.320 Bjorn Lomborg,

00:47:58.520 that even

00:47:58.880 though we're

00:47:59.260 concerned about

00:48:00.060 rising temperatures

00:48:01.540 with climate,

00:48:03.140 that cold

00:48:03.800 kills nearly

00:48:04.560 30 times more

00:48:05.540 people than

00:48:06.100 heat?

00:48:08.360 And,

00:48:09.000 you know,

00:48:09.660 the food

00:48:10.280 grows better,

00:48:11.000 et cetera.

00:48:11.880 Now,

00:48:12.520 here's my

00:48:13.020 problem with

00:48:13.700 that argument.

00:48:14.280 And Vivek

00:48:16.320 uses the

00:48:16.840 argument,

00:48:17.280 too.

00:48:17.760 It's true.

00:48:19.340 So,

00:48:20.000 I mean,

00:48:20.680 I'm sure

00:48:21.580 it's true

00:48:22.040 that cold

00:48:22.520 kills way

00:48:23.200 more people

00:48:23.740 than heat.

00:48:25.320 But the

00:48:26.020 trouble is,

00:48:26.540 I don't

00:48:26.920 like looking

00:48:27.740 at any

00:48:28.340 of these

00:48:28.700 topics as

00:48:30.420 if there's

00:48:30.840 some kind

00:48:31.200 of gradual

00:48:31.900 slope.

00:48:33.960 Because the

00:48:34.800 heat argument

00:48:36.080 is that you

00:48:36.780 reach a

00:48:37.200 drop-off

00:48:37.720 point where

00:48:38.180 everything

00:48:38.500 falls apart.

00:48:40.960 Now,

00:48:41.540 I'm not

00:48:41.820 saying we

00:48:42.260 will,

00:48:42.860 so I

00:48:43.240 predict that's

00:48:44.060 not true.

00:48:44.840 But the

00:48:45.200 argument is

00:48:47.440 that things

00:48:48.140 will be

00:48:48.460 all right

00:48:48.860 until the

00:48:49.980 wheels come

00:48:50.520 off.

00:48:52.120 So,

00:48:52.840 I don't

00:48:53.200 think you

00:48:53.540 can look

00:48:53.900 at a

00:48:54.200 wheels come

00:48:54.840 off scenario

00:48:55.700 based on

00:48:58.640 a historical

00:48:59.380 comparison.

00:49:01.060 So,

00:49:01.280 historically,

00:49:02.280 cold killed

00:49:02.820 more than

00:49:03.220 warmth.

00:49:04.520 But what

00:49:05.800 if the

00:49:06.180 warmth went

00:49:06.780 to a

00:49:07.080 thousand

00:49:07.380 degrees?

00:49:07.820 degrees?

00:49:09.560 I'm almost

00:49:10.580 positive that

00:49:11.340 the heat

00:49:11.660 would kill

00:49:12.020 more people

00:49:12.680 at a

00:49:13.540 thousand

00:49:13.860 degrees.

00:49:15.320 So,

00:49:15.600 everything has

00:49:16.320 some kind

00:49:16.680 of,

00:49:16.960 you know,

00:49:17.160 there's a

00:49:17.480 limit and

00:49:18.080 there's a

00:49:18.620 cliff problem

00:49:19.720 that doesn't

00:49:20.840 get picked

00:49:21.220 up in these

00:49:21.780 kinds of

00:49:22.200 comparisons.

00:49:22.660 I think the

00:49:23.620 general point

00:49:24.420 stands very

00:49:26.220 well.

00:49:26.900 The general

00:49:27.440 point is

00:49:28.180 that it's

00:49:28.620 not a

00:49:28.940 panic.

00:49:31.080 So,

00:49:31.560 that stands

00:49:32.260 up perfectly.

00:49:33.660 But just

00:49:34.340 beware that

00:49:35.760 the argument

00:49:36.240 isn't that

00:49:37.020 things just

00:49:38.060 get a little

00:49:38.480 warmer.

00:49:39.220 The argument,

00:49:40.600 which I don't

00:49:41.180 buy, but this

00:49:42.480 is the argument,

00:49:43.640 is that we're

00:49:44.660 getting close to

00:49:45.300 some kind of

00:49:45.740 cliff and it

00:49:47.020 reaches some

00:49:47.540 point and the

00:49:48.560 oceans boil and

00:49:49.640 the ice caps

00:49:50.660 melt and we're

00:49:51.600 all dead.

00:49:52.600 I don't think

00:49:53.120 any of that

00:49:53.600 sounds even a

00:49:54.320 little bit

00:49:54.680 reasonable, but

00:49:56.400 just know the

00:49:56.900 argument.

00:49:59.220 Well, Mike

00:50:00.000 Ben's still

00:50:00.600 doing his best

00:50:01.400 to help us

00:50:02.160 understand the

00:50:02.960 Brazil censoring

00:50:04.220 the X

00:50:05.280 platform situation.

00:50:07.060 As best I can

00:50:08.280 understand it,

00:50:09.560 our State

00:50:10.220 Department funds

00:50:11.500 lots of

00:50:12.140 entities around

00:50:12.980 the globe for

00:50:15.020 reasons that

00:50:16.420 should benefit

00:50:17.040 the United

00:50:17.520 States.

00:50:18.980 So, in

00:50:20.180 other countries

00:50:20.880 there would be

00:50:21.520 these non-government

00:50:22.960 organizations that

00:50:24.480 are influencing

00:50:25.700 various countries

00:50:26.840 in various

00:50:27.400 ways.

00:50:28.460 But one of

00:50:29.120 them, or

00:50:30.640 multiple of

00:50:31.520 them, I'm

00:50:31.840 not sure how

00:50:32.280 many, is

00:50:33.620 receiving massive

00:50:34.620 money from the

00:50:35.360 U.S.

00:50:35.720 State Department

00:50:36.300 and some

00:50:37.540 amount of

00:50:37.960 that money is

00:50:39.040 going to

00:50:39.460 support censorship

00:50:40.560 in Brazil

00:50:42.640 and probably

00:50:44.040 other places.

00:50:45.460 So, we're

00:50:46.400 paying to

00:50:47.780 promote

00:50:48.260 censorship,

00:50:49.520 which of

00:50:50.000 course is

00:50:50.440 described as

00:50:51.340 stopping

00:50:52.380 misinformation

00:50:53.020 and hate,

00:50:54.500 but it's

00:50:55.160 censorship.

00:50:56.280 Because nobody

00:50:57.220 needs to

00:50:57.860 censor things

00:50:59.420 that everybody

00:50:59.940 agrees with.

00:51:01.480 So, it's

00:51:02.260 not free

00:51:02.720 speech unless

00:51:03.480 you can do

00:51:04.180 the things

00:51:04.700 that are

00:51:05.020 dangerous and

00:51:05.880 insulting and

00:51:06.960 sometimes wrong.

00:51:08.480 Otherwise, it's

00:51:09.100 not free speech

00:51:09.780 at all.

00:51:11.100 So, why is

00:51:13.540 it the U.S.

00:51:14.240 government is

00:51:15.000 funding the

00:51:15.960 destruction of

00:51:16.680 the United

00:51:17.120 States free

00:51:17.960 speech?

00:51:18.420 Well, you

00:51:21.180 might be

00:51:21.540 tempted to

00:51:22.020 think it's

00:51:22.500 some big

00:51:23.020 bureaucracy, and

00:51:25.320 therefore, because

00:51:26.780 it's a big

00:51:27.160 bureaucracy, we're

00:51:27.940 not even aware

00:51:28.820 that we're

00:51:30.000 accidentally

00:51:30.620 funding some

00:51:31.400 people who

00:51:31.900 are ruining

00:51:32.340 free speech in

00:51:33.160 the United

00:51:33.480 States.

00:51:34.480 But I don't

00:51:35.300 think that's

00:51:35.940 what's happening.

00:51:37.280 I think the

00:51:38.020 State Department

00:51:38.820 is actively

00:51:39.680 destroying free

00:51:40.640 speech because

00:51:42.360 they think it's

00:51:43.080 bad for America

00:51:43.900 or themselves.

00:51:44.480 So, it

00:51:46.100 looks like the

00:51:46.740 reason that the

00:51:47.360 United States is

00:51:48.260 not intervening in

00:51:49.680 the Brazilian bad

00:51:51.500 behavior to an

00:51:53.280 American company,

00:51:54.420 Axe, trying to

00:51:56.020 ban, well, they 0.70

00:51:57.060 have banned

00:51:57.420 them.

00:51:58.560 The reason America

00:51:59.780 is not fighting on

00:52:01.060 behalf of that

00:52:01.860 American corporation

00:52:02.960 is probably

00:52:04.660 politics.

00:52:06.460 Probably they're

00:52:07.320 using Brazil to

00:52:08.880 kill Axe, and

00:52:10.260 the same way they'll

00:52:11.040 probably use Europe

00:52:11.720 to try to kill it.

00:52:12.600 Because if they

00:52:13.560 could take out

00:52:14.180 Axe, they win

00:52:17.720 it all.

00:52:19.260 Axe is the only

00:52:19.960 thing left of

00:52:22.080 scale.

00:52:23.040 You know, there

00:52:23.320 are other smaller

00:52:24.840 entities, but, you

00:52:26.840 know, just think

00:52:27.760 about what would be

00:52:28.620 the reach of, let's

00:52:30.640 say, just the

00:52:32.300 news if there

00:52:34.260 were no Axe.

00:52:36.180 No reach at all.

00:52:37.980 What would my

00:52:38.840 reach be if there

00:52:40.500 were no Axe?

00:52:41.240 I've got 1.1

00:52:43.120 million followers

00:52:43.940 on Axe.

00:52:44.540 Do you know what

00:52:45.000 my total number of

00:52:45.960 followers everywhere

00:52:46.900 else is?

00:52:48.420 It rounds to

00:52:49.160 zero.

00:52:50.100 Almost nothing.

00:52:51.660 I don't have a

00:52:52.420 Facebook following.

00:52:53.700 I don't use

00:52:54.220 Instagram for

00:52:55.200 anything but fun.

00:52:58.340 So, but I

00:53:00.980 wanted to say

00:53:01.440 this.

00:53:01.880 Here's, I don't

00:53:03.040 know, maybe you

00:53:04.200 all know this

00:53:04.800 already, but after

00:53:06.480 I got canceled,

00:53:07.380 if the X

00:53:09.800 platform had

00:53:10.700 not, you know,

00:53:11.600 lifted me back

00:53:12.660 into some kind

00:53:14.220 of, you know,

00:53:14.800 minor relevance

00:53:15.720 by just

00:53:17.760 massively people

00:53:19.020 signed up to

00:53:19.720 follow me because

00:53:20.740 they thought there

00:53:21.760 was some injustice

00:53:22.440 going on, and

00:53:24.420 that allowed me to

00:53:25.640 rebuild my

00:53:26.680 operation, but

00:53:28.440 only because

00:53:29.200 X.

00:53:30.040 If Elon Musk

00:53:31.380 had not purchased

00:53:32.300 X, my user

00:53:34.920 count never would

00:53:35.680 have gone up

00:53:36.340 because it was

00:53:37.120 clearly suppressed,

00:53:39.020 and I could not

00:53:40.340 have rebuilt.

00:53:41.020 I would have

00:53:41.400 retired.

00:53:42.800 Just think about

00:53:43.620 that.

00:53:44.560 No exaggeration

00:53:45.740 whatsoever.

00:53:46.760 If I did not

00:53:47.700 have the X

00:53:48.320 platform as my

00:53:49.540 main starting

00:53:51.160 point for

00:53:51.740 rebuilding

00:53:52.240 something, I

00:53:53.720 would have just

00:53:54.160 retired.

00:53:54.920 I didn't need

00:53:55.680 to work.

00:53:56.920 I prefer it.

00:54:00.500 So, you know,

00:54:02.140 if you ever have

00:54:02.720 these moments where

00:54:03.500 you're wondering

00:54:04.020 what is the

00:54:05.100 contribution and

00:54:06.420 the value of

00:54:07.140 the X

00:54:07.580 platform, it's

00:54:09.520 incalculable

00:54:10.620 already.

00:54:11.820 It is the only

00:54:13.140 thing that's

00:54:14.700 keeping us from

00:54:15.520 full dictatorship

00:54:16.560 that will, you

00:54:17.940 know, look like a

00:54:18.660 fake election sort

00:54:20.400 of thing like

00:54:20.860 Putin, but it

00:54:21.440 would be a

00:54:21.720 dictatorship

00:54:22.160 essentially.

00:54:23.160 It might change

00:54:23.980 out the people,

00:54:26.120 but whoever is

00:54:27.480 in charge behind

00:54:28.380 the curtain would

00:54:29.060 still be in

00:54:29.540 charge.

00:54:29.780 So, Mike

00:54:33.980 Benz has

00:54:34.460 offered to

00:54:35.280 testify or

00:54:36.560 explain to

00:54:37.440 anybody who

00:54:37.940 needs to

00:54:38.320 explain that

00:54:39.340 the United

00:54:39.880 States is

00:54:41.560 behind the

00:54:42.320 attack on X

00:54:43.220 indirectly through

00:54:44.480 its financing

00:54:46.680 of NGOs and

00:54:48.580 their effect on

00:54:49.300 Brazil.

00:54:50.620 Well, Trump

00:54:51.320 weighed in on

00:54:51.920 the question of

00:54:52.560 weed legalization

00:54:53.780 in Florida,

00:54:54.820 the state where

00:54:55.580 he resides, and

00:54:57.140 he said weed

00:54:58.040 should not be

00:54:58.680 criminal in

00:54:59.740 Florida when

00:55:00.900 it is legal in

00:55:01.860 so many other

00:55:02.500 states.

00:55:03.460 Now, that's not

00:55:04.280 a reason, but

00:55:06.420 it sounds like

00:55:07.100 one, so I'm

00:55:08.580 in favor of it.

00:55:10.800 Is this a

00:55:11.640 reason?

00:55:12.420 It should not

00:55:13.020 be illegal in

00:55:14.000 one state because

00:55:15.000 it's legal in

00:55:15.800 others?

00:55:16.460 That's not a

00:55:16.980 reason.

00:55:18.360 It's the same 0.53

00:55:19.200 thing he's in

00:55:19.760 favor of with

00:55:21.700 abortion.

00:55:24.920 Trump is

00:55:25.640 completely okay

00:55:26.680 with the

00:55:27.860 states deciding

00:55:28.720 sometimes it's

00:55:29.540 legal, sometimes

00:55:30.200 it's not.

00:55:31.080 It's the same 0.53

00:55:31.640 with weed.

00:55:32.540 If the state

00:55:33.380 decides it's

00:55:34.040 legal and one

00:55:34.860 decides it's

00:55:35.740 not, that's

00:55:37.300 our system.

00:55:39.060 So that's not

00:55:39.860 really a reason.

00:55:41.680 But does he

00:55:42.880 need one?

00:55:44.180 Does he need

00:55:44.940 a reason?

00:55:45.680 No, not

00:55:46.440 really, because

00:55:47.520 the public agrees

00:55:49.500 with him at a

00:55:50.540 very large

00:55:51.120 percentage.

00:55:52.380 Now, I know

00:55:52.880 Mike Cernovich

00:55:54.140 has been

00:55:54.720 saying quite a

00:55:58.060 bit anti-weed,

00:55:59.800 and I think

00:56:00.480 that's completely

00:56:01.440 appropriate for

00:56:03.100 anyone who is a

00:56:03.940 parent of young

00:56:04.680 kids.

00:56:05.540 If you're a 0.88

00:56:06.320 parent of young

00:56:07.000 kids, you

00:56:07.500 should be

00:56:07.860 anti-weed 100%,

00:56:10.040 because that's

00:56:12.160 the model you're 0.94

00:56:13.100 setting for your

00:56:13.740 kids.

00:56:14.540 So if you're in

00:56:15.160 the job of being

00:56:15.840 a parent, yeah,

00:56:17.240 be anti-weed,

00:56:18.820 and be strongly

00:56:20.040 anti-weed.

00:56:21.180 It's going to

00:56:21.780 help a lot.

00:56:24.140 But if you're

00:56:25.620 not in that

00:56:25.980 situation, you

00:56:26.580 might think

00:56:26.980 differently.

00:56:29.280 But Trump is

00:56:30.180 concerned about

00:56:31.020 people doing it

00:56:31.860 in public, so

00:56:32.680 he wants some

00:56:33.220 carve-outs to

00:56:34.580 say you can't

00:56:35.320 do weed in

00:56:37.000 public.

00:56:37.800 I don't mind

00:56:38.380 that.

00:56:39.740 I don't mind

00:56:40.460 that at all.

00:56:43.480 Yeah, because

00:56:44.460 that's not really

00:56:45.040 about weed.

00:56:45.860 That's simply

00:56:46.900 manners.

00:56:47.980 So I'm in

00:56:48.440 favor of

00:56:48.840 manners.

00:56:49.200 So let's

00:56:51.640 do better

00:56:52.280 on that.

00:56:53.580 But this

00:56:54.380 again, Trump

00:56:56.000 being friendlier

00:56:57.120 on the weed

00:56:57.640 question, really

00:56:59.140 gets to the

00:56:59.700 bodily autonomy

00:57:00.600 argument.

00:57:02.040 I think that

00:57:02.900 Trump wins

00:57:03.660 completely on

00:57:04.560 bodily autonomy.

00:57:06.140 It just seems

00:57:06.840 the opposite.

00:57:08.460 So for example,

00:57:09.180 moving abortion

00:57:09.820 to the states

00:57:10.640 means that

00:57:11.540 Trump doesn't

00:57:12.180 want to be

00:57:12.640 involved in

00:57:13.180 your bodily

00:57:13.680 autonomy, wants

00:57:14.800 it closer to

00:57:15.560 you and your

00:57:16.060 doctor.

00:57:17.180 His opinion

00:57:18.060 on weed is

00:57:18.940 that he

00:57:19.920 doesn't want

00:57:20.360 to be putting

00:57:21.300 your body

00:57:21.860 in jail for

00:57:22.480 weed.

00:57:23.340 That's less

00:57:24.160 control of

00:57:24.800 your body

00:57:25.220 than we have

00:57:26.440 right now.

00:57:27.680 He wants

00:57:28.320 fewer migrants 1.00

00:57:29.180 to come in

00:57:29.640 the country

00:57:30.000 and take

00:57:30.680 your job

00:57:31.120 and kill 0.83

00:57:31.500 you, which

00:57:32.660 would be

00:57:33.200 less imposition

00:57:34.600 on your body.

00:57:36.200 He wants

00:57:36.840 more police,

00:57:37.600 same thing,

00:57:38.800 so that the

00:57:39.380 crime doesn't

00:57:40.020 have so much

00:57:40.620 imposition on

00:57:42.060 your body.

00:57:44.360 Earlier in

00:57:45.240 the show,

00:57:46.720 I told you

00:57:47.380 that a

00:57:48.760 first-round

00:57:49.460 draft pick

00:57:50.080 for the

00:57:50.360 49ers got

00:57:51.140 shot in

00:57:53.540 Union

00:57:54.060 place,

00:57:56.660 Union

00:57:57.000 Square in

00:57:59.280 San Francisco.

00:58:01.140 Now, does

00:58:02.360 he have

00:58:02.760 bodily autonomy?

00:58:04.740 Well, he

00:58:05.360 thought he had

00:58:05.900 bodily autonomy,

00:58:06.900 but now he's

00:58:07.400 got a bullet

00:58:07.880 in his body.

00:58:08.980 So now his

00:58:09.800 body is going

00:58:11.100 to go in

00:58:11.400 a direction

00:58:11.740 that he was

00:58:12.460 not in charge

00:58:13.020 of.

00:58:13.300 So if

00:58:14.820 Trump could

00:58:15.340 get rid

00:58:16.200 of crime,

00:58:17.800 a lot

00:58:19.220 more people

00:58:19.700 are going

00:58:19.940 to have

00:58:20.120 bodily autonomy

00:58:20.920 because they

00:58:21.600 won't have

00:58:21.960 a bullet

00:58:22.300 in their

00:58:22.680 body and

00:58:23.420 they won't

00:58:23.640 be getting

00:58:24.000 raped.

00:58:25.160 So that's

00:58:25.540 some bodily

00:58:25.940 autonomy right

00:58:26.680 there.

00:58:27.640 And of

00:58:27.900 course,

00:58:28.160 keeping guns

00:58:28.800 for your

00:58:29.140 own protection,

00:58:30.020 I would

00:58:30.360 say,

00:58:30.660 is bodily

00:58:31.100 autonomy,

00:58:32.560 you know,

00:58:33.400 writ large.

00:58:34.880 Writ large.

00:58:36.960 All right.

00:58:37.940 In overseas

00:58:39.140 stories,

00:58:41.060 apparently

00:58:43.620 Israel has 1.00

00:58:45.600 discovered

00:58:46.060 that Hamas 0.99

00:58:47.320 murdered six

00:58:48.880 hostages just

00:58:50.600 recently.

00:58:51.340 One of them

00:58:52.120 was a dual

00:58:52.920 citizen,

00:58:53.540 American-Israeli

00:58:54.700 citizen.

00:58:56.140 And

00:58:56.540 apparently

00:58:59.320 there are

00:58:59.760 over a

00:59:00.400 hundred left,

00:59:01.660 101 still

00:59:03.800 held.

00:59:05.260 Now,

00:59:05.860 do you think

00:59:06.220 it's anybody's

00:59:07.020 fault that

00:59:08.900 these six

00:59:09.560 were killed?

00:59:10.120 because some

00:59:11.460 are saying

00:59:11.860 it's Netanyahu's 0.90

00:59:12.840 fault,

00:59:13.500 it's

00:59:14.460 somebody's

00:59:15.640 fault for

00:59:16.080 not doing

00:59:17.720 peace.

00:59:19.100 Here's the

00:59:19.800 problem.

00:59:21.580 This is

00:59:22.340 another one

00:59:22.780 of those

00:59:23.060 half-pinion

00:59:23.760 things.

00:59:24.880 If your

00:59:25.640 half-pinion

00:59:26.320 is we

00:59:26.760 should stop

00:59:27.200 fighting and

00:59:27.740 get those

00:59:28.820 hostages

00:59:30.420 back,

00:59:31.700 you're not

00:59:32.980 really done

00:59:33.600 with the

00:59:33.940 analysis.

00:59:35.200 If you

00:59:35.960 reward people

00:59:36.820 for taking

00:59:37.540 hostages,

00:59:38.700 how is

00:59:39.760 that going

00:59:40.040 to work

00:59:40.340 out?

00:59:41.480 They're

00:59:41.740 going to

00:59:41.880 take so

00:59:42.260 many more

00:59:42.720 hostages

00:59:43.240 if it

00:59:43.900 works.

00:59:46.300 Should you

00:59:46.980 negotiate with

00:59:47.800 terrorists who

00:59:48.360 have hostages?

00:59:50.360 Well,

00:59:50.840 maybe a little

00:59:51.440 bit to see if

00:59:52.400 you can get

00:59:52.820 them back for

00:59:53.380 free.

00:59:54.160 But if you're

00:59:54.680 going to end

00:59:55.480 up paying a

00:59:56.080 lot for

00:59:56.400 hostages,

00:59:57.000 it's not

00:59:57.380 really a

00:59:58.720 pattern that

00:59:59.260 you can

00:59:59.560 allow to

01:00:00.120 be set.

01:00:00.820 So I

01:00:04.240 would say

01:00:04.740 that I

01:00:05.960 blame nobody

01:00:06.960 for this

01:00:07.540 except Hamas. 0.73

01:00:09.340 I think it

01:00:10.260 would be

01:00:10.600 simplistic to

01:00:11.640 imagine that

01:00:12.420 if some

01:00:13.800 Israeli or

01:00:14.760 American

01:00:15.220 politician or

01:00:16.460 somebody else

01:00:16.940 did something

01:00:17.620 differently,

01:00:18.680 that this

01:00:19.100 would have

01:00:19.360 worked out

01:00:19.760 differently.

01:00:21.280 Now, if

01:00:22.060 all 100

01:00:22.620 of them

01:00:23.000 had been

01:00:23.340 killed,

01:00:24.300 I would

01:00:24.620 say,

01:00:25.160 maybe you

01:00:26.840 could have

01:00:27.100 done something

01:00:27.620 differently

01:00:28.000 there.

01:00:28.360 But if

01:00:29.220 six out

01:00:29.760 of 100

01:00:30.100 are killed

01:00:30.680 all in

01:00:31.100 the same

01:00:31.360 place,

01:00:32.220 that's

01:00:32.960 probably more

01:00:33.600 to do with

01:00:34.120 what their

01:00:34.460 local situation

01:00:35.500 was.

01:00:36.720 I doubt

01:00:37.800 that was

01:00:38.180 even an

01:00:39.060 order from

01:00:39.700 the top or

01:00:40.360 anything like

01:00:40.800 that.

01:00:42.140 So I'm

01:00:42.880 not going

01:00:43.120 to blame

01:00:43.420 anybody in

01:00:44.820 Israel or 0.89

01:00:45.540 America for

01:00:46.260 that.

01:00:47.400 I think it's

01:00:47.960 just a

01:00:48.400 tragedy.

01:00:49.480 And if

01:00:50.940 Israel treats

01:00:51.740 the situation

01:00:52.780 like the

01:00:53.480 hostages are

01:00:54.420 already dead,

01:00:55.360 even knowing

01:00:56.160 that many of

01:00:57.160 them would

01:00:57.380 not be,

01:00:58.360 militarily

01:01:00.000 and strategically

01:01:00.860 that might

01:01:01.420 be the

01:01:01.680 best play.

01:01:02.920 It's as

01:01:03.340 sad as

01:01:03.680 that is.

01:01:05.120 Well,

01:01:05.380 Russia says

01:01:05.900 it down

01:01:06.220 to over

01:01:06.520 150

01:01:07.200 drones

01:01:07.940 in one

01:01:12.040 of the

01:01:12.220 biggest

01:01:12.440 Ukrainian

01:01:12.980 drone

01:01:13.400 attacks.

01:01:14.200 So the

01:01:14.580 drones were

01:01:15.140 in various

01:01:15.660 places,

01:01:16.860 but 150?

01:01:18.600 They must

01:01:19.280 have been

01:01:19.500 small ones

01:01:20.100 that they

01:01:20.400 jammed,

01:01:21.200 I would

01:01:21.720 guess.

01:01:23.440 So drone

01:01:24.380 war is

01:01:24.860 coming.

01:01:25.260 It's going

01:01:25.480 to be all

01:01:25.740 drones.

01:01:26.640 I think

01:01:27.100 we're maybe

01:01:27.500 one year

01:01:28.060 away from

01:01:28.800 the border

01:01:30.300 of Ukraine

01:01:30.960 and Russia

01:01:31.580 being just

01:01:32.800 drones.

01:01:33.920 Because the

01:01:35.700 soldiers don't 0.85

01:01:36.260 have a chance

01:01:36.840 against the

01:01:37.280 drones.

01:01:38.580 So you

01:01:38.860 might as

01:01:39.080 well just

01:01:39.380 have a

01:01:39.720 drone war.

01:01:42.320 All right,

01:01:43.100 ladies and 0.98

01:01:44.080 gentlemen,

01:01:45.120 that's all I

01:01:46.440 had today.

01:01:48.840 I think

01:01:49.520 there's some

01:01:49.900 big news

01:01:50.500 coming this

01:01:51.040 coming week

01:01:51.680 because things

01:01:52.280 got a little

01:01:52.680 too quiet.

01:01:53.380 it's a

01:01:54.600 little too

01:01:55.100 quiet.

01:01:57.640 You missed

01:01:58.120 all the

01:01:58.620 Russian mass

01:01:59.600 drone

01:02:00.000 attacks.

01:02:03.000 What do

01:02:03.620 you mean

01:02:03.760 I missed

01:02:04.140 them?

01:02:05.460 It's been

01:02:06.120 nothing but

01:02:06.600 drone attacks

01:02:07.400 all the

01:02:08.000 time there.

01:02:08.400 all right.

01:02:16.460 I forget

01:02:17.320 if it was

01:02:17.720 positive

01:02:18.200 feedback or

01:02:18.920 negative

01:02:19.260 feedback.

01:02:21.540 The CO2

01:02:22.660 thing is

01:02:23.280 being,

01:02:23.640 yeah.

01:02:25.000 Yeah,

01:02:25.640 there's yet

01:02:26.300 another

01:02:26.820 study showing

01:02:28.520 that climate

01:02:29.000 change is

01:02:30.000 not CO2

01:02:30.860 caused,

01:02:31.760 but you've

01:02:34.180 heard enough

01:02:34.580 of those.

01:02:38.820 All right.

01:02:43.840 There are

01:02:44.480 no hostages.

01:02:45.620 Some might

01:02:45.960 be prisoners.

01:02:51.500 Drones will

01:02:52.220 take out

01:02:52.620 aircraft carriers,

01:02:53.740 maybe.

01:02:55.920 All right,

01:02:56.740 everybody.

01:02:58.300 I'm going

01:02:58.880 to talk to

01:02:59.700 the subscribers

01:03:02.280 on Locals

01:03:03.120 privately.

01:03:04.580 You're so

01:03:09.800 bad.

01:03:11.180 There's some

01:03:11.600 bad people

01:03:12.300 on here

01:03:12.660 today.

01:03:13.500 All right,

01:03:14.140 I'm going

01:03:14.680 to go talk

01:03:15.100 to Locals

01:03:15.700 privately.

01:03:16.520 The rest

01:03:16.840 of you,

01:03:17.240 thanks for

01:03:17.640 joining on

01:03:18.140 X and

01:03:18.780 YouTube and

01:03:19.580 Rumble,

01:03:20.360 and I'll

01:03:21.380 see you

01:03:21.760 tomorrow.

01:03:22.040 Bye.

01:03:22.120 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 01, 2024

Episode 2584 CWSA 09⧸01⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript