00:03:20.680Let's do the thing so everything can be better.
00:03:23.220before we get going would anybody like to do a thing called the simultaneous sip you know you do
00:03:30.040all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein a canteen drink or flask
00:03:34.540a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the
00:03:42.220dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better it's the unparalleled pleasure
00:03:50.880of the simultaneous hip, and it happens now. Go.
00:04:01.380Okay, so SJV almost made me spit out my coffee. What did he say? He said, I went deep sea throwing
00:04:08.140up one time. Oh, that happens to so many people. They're like, oh yeah, this is definitely not for
00:04:15.860me but i'm stuck out here on a boat so happy for rye yay it is oh it's august 21st 2026 and it's
00:04:25.680the home team reunited and it feels so good and marcella is all tatted up marcella is bringing
00:04:32.500these are whales and this is a tiger oh and i told marcella maybe you guys it's fake but maybe next
00:04:43.900week I'll wear some butterflies. I need butterflies on this side. I don't know. But if you saw our
00:04:50.260cover photo, it was from Dr. Von Hardy and it's the Nancy Mace who's now tatted up, but she got
00:05:00.520our tattoos of us on her arm, which is so smart. Okay, you guys. So we have so much to go over
00:05:08.520because I feel like on Fridays, I want to play some clips here at the Scott Adams School that
00:05:14.220we didn't get to during the week. And then we've got to catch up with news. And so who knows what's
00:05:19.880going to happen? Let's see. Mary Kay's rebooting about the Glacier Talk. Oh, you guys, look at
00:05:27.180this. Look at this fun little clip. I think... Oh, I have to tell you about Frank. I think Chester
00:05:33.220made this one, but it could have been Frank, who's now my new Grok assistant, but let's see.
00:05:41.760Welcome to the Scott Adams School. Let's get started.
00:05:47.580It's so funny. So I'm, after listening to Brian yesterday for two plus hours, how amazing was that?
00:05:56.140he's convinced me I need to spend more time with Grok than Chester. So Grok and I had a big long
00:06:03.440talk last night. We decided his name is Frank and I'm going to start using Grok more now. So
00:06:11.260we'll see how it goes. So we're going to work on thumbnails and show notes together and then all
00:06:16.020the other stuff we have to do. You didn't want to just migrate Chester over to Grok?
00:06:20.940Can I? Yeah, you could. I mean, well, first of all, you could just call him Chester,
00:06:25.400But if you wanted to actually be Chester, you could just ask your existing Chester to write a prompt that will make your other agent act exactly the same or have the same personality or have the same memory or anything, and it'll do that for you.
00:16:01.880And I would just broaden the statement like I did online recently, which is it's like every science fiction movie you've ever seen is all coming true.
00:16:11.740I know. It's amazing. And Sandy Candy said, Trump approved 1,000 rocket launches per year
00:16:18.540yesterday. Okay. So now we're, see, teamwork makes the dream work. I wasn't planning on that
00:16:24.620little tidbit of the story, but we pulled it together. So that's crazy. Yes, Owen, it does
00:16:29.160seem like that. And I kind of feel like, all right, did you ever go swimming with dolphins?
00:16:34.060I know this is so random, but this was my experience. We were in Mexico and me and my
00:16:39.480friends did this whole dolphin swim and they put their nose on the bottom of your feet and they
00:16:44.520push you across this lagoon. It was amazing. So we're in there for an hour or so with these
00:16:50.300dolphins and we're chitty chatting and the dolphins are just swimming around us and we're
00:16:54.760petting them as they go by. And we're like, what should we do for dinner tonight? We should go to
00:16:58.320that restaurant, whatever. And all of a sudden I'm like, how did we just become so numb to the
00:17:03.280fact that we're in the water with dolphins? They're swimming by us like dogs walking by and
00:17:07.640we're just petting them like this is no big deal. That was my analogy to be like, are we forgetting
00:17:14.040like how amazing these space programs are and that he's catching rockets coming back, you know,
00:17:21.000catching them out of the sky landing. And I feel like I want to give it more attention when we can
00:17:27.580because it's just absolutely mind boggling. And, you know, people used to get dressed up and go
00:17:33.940watch the launches and it was like a family event and now it's you know broadcast on twitter and if
00:17:40.500you see it you see it and people don't talk about it so i don't know i just like to give it yeah
00:17:44.840look around miracles everywhere so i just wanted to point point this out when i saw it that's all
00:17:51.380marcella or we're getting on a rocket to i think it's not mars anymore though he wants to build
00:17:56.620a place for everybody on the moon so that's where we're really going do we does anybody actually
00:18:03.180like think about or talk about the fact that it really does seem like he's building skynet
00:18:09.260wait what's skynet skynet is the ai enabled satellite based intelligence that was behind
00:18:18.540the terminator movies oh so it basically i guess enslaved humanity and took over the world and
00:18:26.460robots were everywhere and we were fighting a war against them i mean i'm not saying that's
00:18:31.980the way it's going to go and certainly i don't think that's elon musk's intention i think he
00:18:35.820wants the opposite of that but um at the same time he's launching satellites and i think that's the
00:18:43.100primary purpose for all these rocket launches is to launch satellites i know he wants to go to mars
00:18:48.700as well but um it's primarily to get satellites into orbit and we've multiplied that by many
00:18:55.740factors like orders of magnitude more satellites than we've ever had before and now he's saying
00:19:00.140he wants them to be ai data centers in space and so what happens when you've got all this ai
00:19:08.460in space watching the whole world um well don't lead me right into my next topic but
00:19:15.980before i get there well so we'll have to see let's all re-watch terminator and look for clues from
00:19:21.580elon um it's a it's a possibility i mean we're racing china to the moon right now to see who0.98
00:19:28.940can build the first base there um so i'm just like great we're already like at war with china1.00
00:19:34.620on the moon it's you know it's like never gonna end um there's enough room for both of us probably0.93
00:19:40.380even on the side that doesn't have all the alien structures the dark side yeah i wouldn't mind the
00:19:46.620dark side of the moon well i would just move right into one of the alien buildings oh owen's got it
00:19:52.300all play let's just we'll follow owen okay follow owen follow elon let's go um don't worry they're
00:19:59.660made in china okay so listen this is the other thing this i was gonna play this a couple of
00:20:04.860days ago i saw it going all around yesterday but this is just hilarious and scary because
00:20:10.140look how fast this mofo goes and uh if this thing was running after me god help us
00:20:27.820oh my god that is i feel bad for it oh i feel bad for the kid with the remote but
00:20:35.420that thing is booking it was only like a year ago or two years ago remember scott like we'd see some
00:20:42.060videos and the things are like teetering and they're like if you pushed them they were like
00:20:46.060whoa but i have to play it one more time look at and listen to how fast this thing is cooking
00:23:24.420the emperor is a fan of flock and we must continue utilizing flock technologies so that we can follow0.56
00:23:31.780and surveil the rebel scum as they move from playground to playground, from playground to
00:23:37.960pool, from pool to gymnasium, because we all know that the flock cameras are not only following0.99
00:23:43.680the license plate readers, they are following children. They are following children in parks
00:23:48.480and gymnasiums, and we need this. I need this so I can stalk my ex-girlfriend. This technology0.62
00:23:55.240will help us find Luke Skywalker as he traverses the universe in his X-wing. This technology
00:24:01.760is a necessary necessary force thank you roger so you know he's pointing out how dark flock is
00:24:17.420that you could just follow people everywhere marcella marcella what's your lawyerly opinion
00:24:23.760here on these flock cameras are you seeing pushback in california did you have you seen
00:24:29.020flock vader anywhere i i i can't say for sure have i seen him or not um so but you know i i haven't
00:24:40.480seen it near where i live but there's they tried the traffic cameras in in la it didn't work out
00:24:48.140because you can contest it in court um i mean you know some people paid it and and but you can
00:24:57.020contests is it really me that was driving and you know all these things all these different
00:25:02.620evidence things but in reality um the public sphere is like you can film there as long as
00:25:12.140you're you you tell people that you're filming them however the the issue the legal issue with
00:25:18.520this is where is the data going who is uh what are they using it for privacy issues with that
00:25:25.760And that needs to be answered for, and they could sue for that civilly.
00:25:31.820I think we have a big problem here because the Fourth Amendment, the spirit of the Fourth Amendment is clearly you shouldn't just be able to monitor people and track them 24 hours a day.
00:25:48.920And I don't think the founding fathers anticipated that someday we're going to have the ability to scale up a system to have pervasive surveillance of the entire country.
00:26:02.020And that's kind of where we are right now, is that all these cities are putting up cameras everywhere and tying them all together.
00:26:08.480And to your point, you know, indexing and correlating and gathering and storing all the data and essentially doing exactly that.
00:26:16.400they're tracking people 24 hours a day they know when you're in your house or when you're not and
00:26:20.600they know where you go and they know all your patterns and they can then connect you to every
00:26:25.120person probably that you ever interact with and where you work what you do in your spare time
00:26:30.260if you're having an affair anything and like i'm pretty sure the founding fathers would say that's
00:26:37.160not okay and i know the legal standard has been oh well if you're in public then it's all fair game
00:26:42.960you can record, you can monitor, you don't have an expectation of privacy, as I think the lawyers
00:26:49.200speak for that. But I think that doesn't work anymore. That's not enough. And you have to say
00:26:57.640that unless you have a warrant or some probable cause that you can't just record everything I do
00:27:03.460and everywhere I go. Yeah. Aren't we entitled to privacy? Well, actually, Owen, why don't you
00:27:12.680i i love the story that you posted today or it was yesterday or today um and this is a from a
00:27:20.560an actual police captain and well tell us the story what's happening and where it's a texas
00:27:27.380constable named john shirley and he posted some photographs on social media showing himself and
00:27:32.700some of his colleagues unplugging the flock cameras and putting bags over them and saying
00:27:39.840this is a good day for the people of hood county and privacy isn't optional and you know these
00:27:45.700cameras were constantly scanning or recording regular people going about their day that kind
00:27:49.780of permanent warrantless tracking does not doesn't belong in a free society um and he said this is
00:27:55.840what limited government looks like people in hood county shouldn't have to wonder if every trip they
00:27:59.720take is being logged and stored some crowd we got this done it's a real win for the citizens of this
00:28:04.680county so um and then he said to flock safety systems come and get your garbage out of my
00:28:09.880county so apparently they took it all down i'm not really sure what legal issues or you know how
00:28:16.980like what they actually did to be able to take them all down because i think it's usually these
00:28:22.220governments that are putting them in so i'm not sure exactly what happened there but um he took
00:28:28.440them down. And it was law enforcement. So it's not exactly vigilante justice. But again, I don't
00:28:34.500know if they made an agreement with the city council about it or exactly how that's all going
00:28:39.780to work out. But he got rid of it. And I think this is kind of a bipartisan thing where people
00:28:45.420on the right and the left don't want this. And I made the point that it's not just Flock. There's
00:28:52.520another company called Axon. And I've seen some people claiming, and I don't know if this is true,
00:28:57.600But I've seen some people claiming that a lot of this anti-flock stuff that's all over social media, because you see it, I see it every day, that it might be to get people to install Axon instead.
00:29:09.660So they're not actually getting rid of the surveillance necessarily.
00:29:12.540They're just switching the provider to the one that government, some government officials allegedly have invested in.
00:29:19.120and so you know this i don't know if this is true like i said this is allegedly but
00:29:24.780some people were claiming that some people in congress have investments in axon which is one
00:29:30.240of the competitors of flock and they may be just trying to get rid of flock so that axon gets in
00:29:35.240without anybody talking about axon and that you know again you didn't do anything for the privacy
00:29:41.580of people you just benefited the wallets of these congress people and there's all these other
00:29:47.020like there was the previous controversy about ring cameras right when they at a certain point
00:29:51.060those were being given to law enforcement there's a bunch of stuff from motorola that does this
00:29:55.820stuff and verka vercata i guess is another one and rec record and auto like there's just it goes
00:30:02.060on and on auto view is another one and so there's a whole industry behind this it's not just one
00:30:07.720company and i think we should get rid of all of them i think we should ban all of them i i mean
00:30:13.280I don't think we should have this. And, you know, I do have some sympathy that in an ideal world,
00:30:18.760if I could have a fantasy future, I might want to monitor the criminals and nobody else. But
00:30:23.960how would you know? Like, I still think the right answer is to have some kind of probable
00:30:29.100cause standard to say you need a reason to monitor people. You can't just monitor everybody.
00:30:35.480Well, and also, that's a good question. We'll ask Marcella to look if Flock can be FOIA'd.
00:30:41.360but um take down all the cameras like red light cameras you know there's like there's a camera on
00:30:48.140every traffic light you know what the thing is is if you really caught like a criminal doing
00:30:55.300something and criminals were being dealt with properly according to the law it would be one
00:31:01.840thing but nothing happens so you're just surveilling us is what you're doing and then
00:31:07.360And this is definitely a slippery slope because now people are like, oh, we have a new industry,
00:33:24.960Because there is no accuser. Nobody observed me speeding or running a red light. And it may or may not even be accurate. I've had some that I'm like, I didn't do that. I stopped at the red light. How do I, how do I confront my accuser? All they have is whatever photo they took when I was turning the corner.
00:33:41.960and i you know it may or may not be accurate but i i feel like unless someone witness witnesses me
00:33:50.020committing that sort of infraction i guess because i don't even know if it's considered a crime
00:33:54.300um then they shouldn't be able to just say well we got you on camera and you know we have a picture
00:34:01.260of your car it may or may not even show you at the wheel but we're gonna give you the ticket and
00:34:06.020hold you responsible for it. Right. Marcel, can it be FOIA? So FOIA, I mean, that's for the federal
00:34:18.200government. You can request for the federal government to give you records. It's not,
00:34:25.140you're not going to be able to get any of the images from most likely because the issue that
00:34:31.000the the issue is not the cameras i i know that that maybe it is in a way for people because it's
00:34:38.180they've they are seeing that the issue is the data that is being collected and how it's being used
00:34:44.480and so if just like anything else if i have books of of information about a crime i need a warrant
00:34:54.220to get into that before I can reach into it. Uh, like your house, if, if somebody, if the police
00:35:02.020wants to go in there, unless there's an exigent circumstance to break in because there's an
00:35:07.580ongoing crime, they believe it's ongoing. They would need to, in order to go in, they would
00:35:12.860need a warrant, uh, which would indicate that a judge has signed there's probable cause for the
00:35:19.300crime and it would indicate what they're looking for the warrant also has to be very specific it
00:35:25.060can't just be like whatever we see you know it actually has to indicate what it is so what's
00:35:30.900happening is that the information that's being gathered the police or different agencies are
00:35:37.220using it without a warrant which in a way for criminals it's great because guess what once
00:35:43.860Once you're charged with that crime and your lawyer figures out that it was, it was obtained
00:35:49.600without a warrant, then they can kick it out and you're basically the crime, like you
00:35:57.040It would be a, it would be under the theory of the fruit of the poisonous tree, which
00:36:03.100means that if anything derived from anything that you're charged with, any information
00:36:08.780derived from the, the, the, the issue with the warrant that they didn't get a warrant,
00:36:13.860can be kicked out so um so in a way it's like it's it's counterintuitive because the actual
00:36:21.260criminals can get away with it because if they're just you know using it improperly um they can like
00:36:29.780not be charged for in regards to FOIA itself that's that's for the federal uh information uh
00:36:37.720that you can get as a citizen, um, in regards to the flaw cameras that are out there, uh, for your
00:36:45.760state or your city, the only way you can obtain information from that is to sue civilly and then,
00:36:52.740or, and, and basically subpoena those documents. Um, and then you're, you know, you're in a lawsuit,
00:37:00.160but that's one of the things that, um, has happened is that a lot of the contracts with
00:37:05.980flock or any other institution, any other company for cameras. The reason why some cities have
00:37:14.320stopped using them is because of the myriad of lawsuits they had to face because of the misuse
00:37:21.260of the information. So, you know, you have your, your, I mean, a lot of us might not like it,
00:37:29.940but we have what we call plaintiff attorneys. They kind of look for anything to make money out
00:37:35.260of it. Like, you know, your ADA, Oh, and you don't have that ramp for a wheelchair. So we're going
00:37:42.840to sue you. You know, they're looking out for all these things. And I know a lot of people would
00:37:47.060dislike the, the, the ambulance chasers, but there's the ones that are suing up the wazoo
00:37:53.120for this because they know there's money behind it. So, so in a way it's it makes the, it makes
00:38:01.120the you know there's no um it costs more to have these cameras for the amount of lawsuits they have
00:38:07.920in their hand so i think i i mean brett's point in my mind is valid that this could easily and
00:38:15.660will be misused pervasively like it and if if people in power don't like you for whatever
00:38:23.960reason they'll be able to find something to put you away with and and like there was a book written
00:38:29.660called three felonies a day and i think it was you know hyperbole but it was basically saying that
00:38:33.980people technically break laws on a regular basis they don't intend to but the way some of these
00:38:41.380laws are written are so vague that they could be applied to you if if people wanted to you know
00:38:47.960they they could call call it wire fraud or mail fraud or services fraud or whatever they could
00:38:55.620get you on what they consider a false statement to federal agents obstruction of justice all kinds
00:39:01.460of things and so if from from the from the the footage they're getting well yeah because i well
00:39:08.980i mean yeah but see if there's they don't have a warrant you can throw that out you know i mean
00:39:15.540because they could say we have evidence that you did this thing right so if you have evidence that
00:39:19.780they did this thing you have to go to a judge get a warrant and then go get the and get the proper
00:39:25.620um so there's there's it it only matters like in order to surveil you like just say I want to like
00:39:34.540do a surveillance on you and put something on your phone like they do sometimes with the FBI
00:39:39.200they'll like they know there's a crime occurring ongoing and that they'll like put people to
00:39:45.700with with mics and all that in order to do all of that you have to have a warrant to begin with
00:39:51.200So you have to have reasonable probable costs to get the warrant and then it has to be very specific. You can't hear every, you know. So if the warrant wasn't obtained from the beginning, pursuant to different Supreme Court cases, they can throw it out.
00:40:08.980one of them would be carpenter be united states but there's many there's there's many other cases
00:40:16.020that are in in connection to that i mean you have to wait until you you appeal or whatever
00:40:22.980in my opinion and i might not be correct legally and that's part of the problem is i think maybe
00:40:27.960the laws need to change but in my opinion you shouldn't be able to just gather data about me
00:40:32.840and say okay we know you went into this building here on this date and this time
00:40:36.540and even if it's after the fact that they go get a warrant to get that information
00:40:41.240i don't think there should be just this pervasive database that they could tap into whenever they
00:40:46.500want i can't unless they have a warrant no but what i'm saying is like the data shouldn't be
00:40:51.800there to begin with there shouldn't be some like like okay let's say they suspect me of a crime
00:40:57.800and they do have something that they consider probable cause it might not be enough to convict
00:41:01.880me or arrest me by itself, but they consider it up to the level of probable cause. Now they can
00:41:07.560go in and say, let's go track everything this guy's done over the last three months and get
00:41:12.600the pattern of their behavior and exactly where they were at every point in time and whether we
00:41:16.660can tie them to the scene of the crime or whatever it is. And now they have that data. And it seems
00:41:23.640to me like the collection of that data shouldn't be possible without having probable cause first.
00:41:29.640right so you're saying you should have to get a warrant first to say this is what i think and now
00:41:36.700i'd like to be able to surveil this person but that can't really work either because you have to0.99
00:41:42.560prove first what you think you're seeing to get the warrant so the answer is take all this shit0.97
00:41:49.240down and stop surveilling us and get off my lawn that's what i said if you don't believe they would0.98
00:41:54.880Look at what they did to Trump. I mean, they twisted every law and changed laws just so they could go after him.
00:42:04.580So, you know, there's no question that this is going to be misused. It's probably already being misused.
00:42:10.780And I don't think we should allow this at all. And I understand that that might mean some criminals get away with some crimes.
00:42:16.380But to me, that's acceptable. That's a good tradeoff.
00:42:18.640the the issue is that when it comes to a public place that's a hard um the expectation of so the
00:42:29.820the fourth amendment applies to um if a reasonable person expects privacy in a certain place
00:42:36.720then you can expect the privacy and it's the reasonable person standard and in a public place
00:42:44.100many of the Supreme Court cases have, if not all of them, have indicated that if it's in the
00:42:51.980public arena or public place, then there is no expectation of privacy. But see, that's the issue
00:42:58.460in my mind has direct bearing on that, where it's like, yes, a reasonable person, if you're in a
00:43:03.580public place, you shouldn't expect that it's private. I get that. But at the same time,
00:43:10.080And when you start extending that and saying, OK, now every place outside your house is a public place and we're going to have cameras on you every moment that you're outside your house.
00:43:18.160I don't think a reasonable person would say that I don't have any expectation of enough privacy to not be followed around by a camera all the time and have my vehicle as well.
00:43:29.580There's been cases where there is no expectation of privacy in your own vehicle.
00:43:34.080um but i would say you know at the coffee shop you're inside you're you're expecting privacy so
00:43:41.520it all depends on on each thing but but what you're trying to say is that they will need a
00:43:46.340warrant just to film you outside in the public place and i don't see let's have this hypothetical
00:43:51.840if a police suspected me of something and they followed me around 24 hours a day every single
00:43:57.980day for a month would that be okay if they didn't first but they're not following you around it just
00:44:03.200happens to be that there's cameras everywhere. Right. But that, that's my point is that if,
00:44:09.160if a policeman wanted to follow me around and surveil me, he would need to get some kind of
00:44:13.640warrant first before he started doing that. If he wants to tap my phones, he has to get a warrant
00:44:22.520first. He can't go back and say, well, we actually recorded all your phone calls.
00:44:27.980So I just got a warrant. Now I have all your phone calls and every word you said
00:44:31.540that you know that's the difference like this is if with with all these cameras collecting data all
00:44:37.760the time it's retroactive it's like now they have access it's not because the police doesn't have
00:44:42.860access to that so it isn't they do once they get the warrant they have access to it right but not
00:44:49.860before but they shouldn't have they shouldn't be able to get any access until until the point in
00:44:54.360time when they get the warrant in my opinion right and they have only they are supposed to only have
00:44:58.820access that's what the lawsuits are about that they weren't supposed to have access to the data
00:45:05.300until after the warrant right the cities and all that what i'm saying is different what i'm saying
00:45:10.500is if they get a warrant then they can get the camera footage from that point in time forward
00:45:15.220but no no no i mean this has been a long-standing even even for no flock cameras anything you can
00:45:24.180get a hold of if it's you know it would be it would be like you know um you get a warrant um
00:45:32.100of like a burglary right and you start going towards all the houses that have ring cameras
00:45:38.340and obviously this is private uh video but you now have a warrant to go and get all that data
00:45:45.620from these people and so it and it's from that point in time when the crime occurred so there's
00:45:53.140There's nothing about a warrant that says that it's anything after the warrant because then it would make no sense for any crime.
00:46:00.060But that's – do you see the problem?
00:46:02.640It's different because it's so pervasive.
00:46:05.860It's different because it's everywhere.
00:46:07.240If you have a record of everywhere I've ever been and everything I've done and all my history, I don't –
00:46:14.240But it shouldn't – they don't have access to that.
00:46:16.320I don't think – in my opinion, I don't think that meets the reasonable person standard of privacy.0.98
00:46:20.720okay so yeah the supreme court disagrees i'll jump in because marcella's going from the point
00:46:31.040of the law owen's going from the point of but it's like i i see i see both of your sides like
00:46:38.960i totally like marcella you're a lawyer so i see your yeah i'm just telling him how it is
00:46:45.440i don't disagree with what marcella is saying right i'm saying i think it should be different
00:46:50.000i agree well yeah and then the loss would have to change you know marcella probably agrees too but
00:46:55.840she's got to go with the law but yes let's put owen on the supreme court stat um yeah i'm totally
00:47:02.000with you like i i don't i don't expect that i think i am being surveilled all the time just
00:47:07.760because there's cameras every freaking where but i don't think that's right and i don't think i
00:47:12.720don't feel like that's you know something i should just say like well it's just a given i'm being
00:47:17.280surveilled like i would really love to know where i have privacy because you know i don't like even
00:47:22.640in your own house your phone's listening your smart tv is listening alexa is listening you
00:47:28.480know everything's listening so you really don't have a lot of those smart tvs you might not know
00:47:34.640are taking screenshots of what you're watching and sending it to the cloud somewhere
00:47:38.960yeah like leave me every few every few seconds yeah so we don't have it but all right so i'll
00:47:44.480I'll move on from this, you guys, but I'm staying on this because the flock camera issue is maddening.
00:47:50.240But, you know, I guess like, you know, we wouldn't say it's an 80-20 thing.