Rebel News Podcast - DAILY ｜ Harper endorses Poilievre; Charest supports vax mandates; Ironman wants you to eat bugs

00:00:00.000 Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, you have tuned into the Rebel News live stream

00:00:19.260 on this, a Tuesday, July 26, 2022. I'm David Menzies and my co-host, well,

00:00:26.560 let me tell you a little bit about my co-host. Do you know, folks, today is National Coffee

00:00:33.420 Milkshake Day and my co-host, he hates coffee milkshakes, as do I. He is the he-man with a

00:00:42.600 slingshot. He is the Khaleesi of Haldeman County. He is Dakota Christensen. How you doing there,

00:00:50.540 Dakota? I'm doing just fantastic, David. What an intro. You deserve it. Now, I'm serious. When it

00:00:59.140 comes to, you know, a coffee milkshake, you know, it's the idea of one plus one equals three, but

00:01:05.780 sometimes it goes south, even if you like the first two ingredients. I mean, I love coffee.

00:01:10.360 I love milkshakes. Coffee should not be combined with a milkshake. It's just like, I love music.

00:01:15.600 I love movies, but I hate musicals. I just hate them, right? You know, so, you know, there's a

00:01:23.000 whole list of things out there, I think, Dakota, that on their own are fantastic, but when you

00:01:29.880 combine them, you just ruin both of them. What do you think? Yeah, you know what? I think you make

00:01:36.580 some good points there. I'm honestly not sure how I feel about a lot of those things. Like, there are

00:01:41.200 some things I can think of where it's like, yeah, you throw a bunch of stuff together. It's better when

00:01:45.200 you combine it. I think you might have something there, though. When you take something great in

00:01:49.940 its simplest form and you start overcomplicating it, you just make it worse, you know? I think

00:01:55.640 you're onto something there, David. Well, thank you. I mean, I don't know anything about cooking

00:01:59.640 or engineering, but I like the phrase, keep it simple. The best engineering, I think, subscribes to

00:02:07.840 less is more. So let's not over-engineer our milkshakes. In any event, Dakota, why don't you

00:02:15.320 tell the folks at this point what the ostensible policy reason is for this show?

00:02:22.040 Well, absolutely. This is the Rebel News Daily livestream. We tell you all the cutting-edge

00:02:28.360 news of the day, and of course, we give you our thoughts and reactions on all of that.

00:02:32.340 And so, you know, we jump right in. You can interact with us. You can send us, I believe,

00:02:36.520 Rumble rants and Super U tips. Unfortunately, YouTube doesn't like us, has us demonetized.

00:02:42.880 So if you're on YouTube, I'd highly recommend hopping over onto Rumble or Odyssey so you can

00:02:47.800 actually interact with us, send us your messages, we'll respond to you, and we go through sort

00:02:52.520 of the cutting headlines of today, David.

00:02:55.380 You know, the good news is, Dakota, is I don't think we have anything that is YouTube unfriendly

00:03:04.280 because, you know, I think it's safe to say we have a love-hate relationship with YouTube. It's

00:03:10.560 kind of like Highway 407. I love Highway 407 for getting me from point A to point B at actual

00:03:17.480 highway speeds as opposed to bumper-to-bumper horror, which you get on the 401. What I hate

00:03:23.880 about 407 is the bill that comes in the mail. They take a picture of your license plate.

00:03:29.900 And oh, to our American friends out there, you have nothing to complain about when it comes

00:03:36.440 to tolling because I've gone on the Ohio Turnpike and I couldn't believe how cheap it was. But

00:03:42.900 getting back to YouTube, we love the reach, don't we, Dakota? We have like over 1.5 million subscribers.

00:03:50.480 We hate the censorship. And when it's topics like talking about a contrarian opinion to the COVID-19

00:04:01.300 narrative, that will get you a hit. Talking about electoral fraud, that's 2020 electoral fraud.

00:04:10.380 Can't talk about that. You can talk about 2016 electoral fraud. In fact, I think they encourage

00:04:15.900 you to talk about that, how Trump stole the election from Hillary Clinton. But yeah, so

00:04:22.480 it's very much a double standard. And I always find it shocking, Dakota, that YouTube being

00:04:30.840 in the land of the First Amendment, for them to subscribe to this censor platform, it's incredible.

00:04:40.180 And I think I've said this over and over on this show. When you go back some 15 years ago,

00:04:46.380 when you saw the likes of YouTube and Facebook and Twitter emerge, it was come one, come all.

00:04:53.900 This is going to be, you know, a biosphere of free speech. We love you. We're going to have

00:05:00.600 diverse ideas. Oh, and we're going to get free content, by the way. What a business plan,

00:05:05.800 right? Getting all the content for zero. And then once these platforms, Dakota, achieved critical

00:05:13.620 mass, they decided who is welcome and who is unwelcome. I mean, it was like just, we really

00:05:22.180 got hoodwinked. And the fallacy, of course, you know, of their free speech narrative is that most of

00:05:28.620 these people are on the left and they don't believe in classical liberalism anymore. They don't

00:05:35.260 believe in freedom of expression, of speech, etc. And they're censorious. You know, it's so sad to

00:05:42.420 see what's happened to the left, both here in Canada and the U.S. You're absolutely right. And

00:05:48.800 you know what? Just on your 407 point, slight tangent, I went on the 407 highway one time, David,

00:05:54.640 one time on one exit and I got a $15 bill in the mail. So I know what you're on about. One exit.

00:05:59.840 Yeah, I think it might have been two, but even still, it was something ridiculous like that. 0.96

00:06:05.880 Wow. And you probably didn't have a transponder. 0.60

00:06:09.900 No, I did not. That's the struggle.

00:06:11.940 Yeah, you'll be nailed. You see, folks, don't do what Dakota did unless you really have to get

00:06:16.360 there on time. In any event, enough about this. What do we have? Well, that was a fantastic

00:06:22.460 tweet, I would say. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Oh, God, do I miss him? Oh,

00:06:32.180 do I miss him so much? Well, he endorsed a particular candidate last night for the CPC leadership.

00:06:40.900 Why don't we run the video and see who Mr. Harper likes?

00:06:45.620 Friends, fellow Conservatives, greetings. I haven't talked to you like this in a while and much has

00:06:54.420 transpired. Our party once again has a leadership race underway. In this particular race, there's

00:07:02.060 been a lot of speculation about whom I support or do not support and why. So it may be useful for my

00:07:09.140 fellow party members to hear my views straight from me. It's a strong field, but one candidate has

00:07:15.960 garnered disproportionate attention. Pierre Poilievre was a strong minister in my government.

00:07:22.460 In the past several years, he's been our party's most vocal and effective critic of the Trudeau

00:07:27.200 Liberals. He's been talking about the issues, especially the economic issues that matter. Slow

00:07:33.160 growth, debt, inflation, lack of job and housing opportunities, and the need to fix the institutions

00:07:40.660 that are failing Canadian families. He's proposing answers rooted in sound conservative ideas,

00:07:46.960 but ones adapted for today's realities. That's why he has the strong support of our caucus and our

00:07:53.500 existing membership, and why he is bringing the most new members and a new generation into our party.

00:07:59.840 That's how we win the next federal election. And in my opinion, Pierre has made by far the strongest

00:08:06.960 case that he is the person to do that. I know, of course, that others, including some of my friends,

00:08:14.240 may disagree with me, and I respect their views. But I thought you would like to know what my opinion

00:08:20.580 actually is. Thank you for listening. God bless all of you, and God bless Canada.

00:08:26.080 Well, Dakota, in my opinion, that is a huge endorsement. What do you say?

00:08:35.160 Yeah, absolutely. Especially since I find for the, you know, a number of years now, Harper has been

00:08:40.600 rather like he stayed in the background, kind of in the shadows. He hasn't, I mean, he never really was

00:08:46.440 one to be very talkative with the media, I think you would say, or to put his face out there

00:08:51.320 more than he needs to. And so I think it's definitely it is a big deal for him to be coming

00:08:56.620 out and putting his face out there on video and giving that endorsement, I think is a big deal.

00:09:00.800 And it's very interesting seeing people's reactions to this, I think, because when you look at people

00:09:06.160 on the conservative side, it's funny to see some people say, who just never liked Harper, they think

00:09:12.560 he's, you know, too far right wing corrupt all those Harper days. And then you find other people

00:09:18.160 who maybe like the more typical PPC supporter would say, oh, Harper, he's just another globalist

00:09:23.240 sellout. And this just shows that Pierre Polyev, he's just, you know, with the globalists. So it's

00:09:27.940 funny to see how people on, you know, different sides are reacting to this. But personally, I think

00:09:33.380 this is nothing but another sort of feather in the cap for Polyev there. And I think there is a huge

00:09:38.600 swath of the conservative movement, that this just kind of helps them feel a little bit better

00:09:43.720 about saying, yeah, you know what, like, hey, I miss the days of Stephen Harper, if only we could go

00:09:48.700 back to that, despite his faults. You know, if Polyev has his endorsement, I feel a little bit better

00:09:53.640 about giving him throwing my support behind Polyev. So no, it's interesting to see the lines people can

00:09:59.460 tell their their reactions to this video. I think you're right, Dakota. And something you said, I mean,

00:10:04.160 those who I guess we would describe as red Tories. Well, you have a candidate there, a prominent

00:10:10.920 candidate, that would be Sean Charest. That's who you would support, you know, a eight year liberal

00:10:18.200 premier of Quebec. And I think Stephen Harper is speaking to people that want to bring the party

00:10:26.180 more to the right, and not be, you know, waffling all over the place. I mean, it was interesting in his

00:10:33.220 words, he said, we're having a leadership convention, quote, once again. And what I took from that is

00:10:42.360 almost, you know, I don't know, a bit of condemnation, a bit of shock, what have you, because

00:10:48.060 when you think of it, Dakota, from 2019 to 2022, I mean, that's not even one four year term of

00:10:58.840 government, three leadership conventions for the Conservative Party of Canada. Let's hope we do,

00:11:08.540 you know, have somebody who comes as advertised. I think that was the major fallacy of both Mr.

00:11:16.120 Scheer and Mr. O'Toole. They said one thing before they became leader. And then once they became leader,

00:11:23.360 they were all over the map. And, you know, and by the way, people say, by the way, instead,

00:11:28.940 aside from blocking up some streets, what did the trucker convoy do? Well, it got rid of Aaron O'Toole.

00:11:34.180 It's not just because of the trucker convoy. That was the last straw. When you asked Aaron O'Toole,

00:11:40.240 do you support the truckers? Yes or no? He could not give you an answer with some nonsense about reaching

00:11:46.200 out to the trucking associations, which do not support the truckers. So, you know, people see

00:11:52.960 through that kind of con job. I am hopeful of, I mean, there are some good candidates. I like what

00:12:01.140 Roman Baber stands for. I like Lesley Lewis and her policies. But I think Pierre Polyev, you get the

00:12:08.140 sense of some momentum there, right? He's like a juggernaut right now. He's unstoppable.

00:12:15.120 I think this helps him. And, you know, for PPC supporters, Dakota, here's the burning issue

00:12:24.460 for them. And by the way, I do like the PPC. And, you know, I love Maxine Bernier. I always have time

00:12:31.660 for him. And he always has time for us. And that's great. But the thing is, they have to come to a

00:12:39.380 realization, I think, whenever the next federal election is, which is you really have zero chance,

00:12:47.120 almost zero chance of a PPC government coming into place. There's not even one man with one seat

00:12:53.960 in that party. So do you want to squander that vote? Or do you want to go with somebody, Pierre

00:13:00.660 Polyev, who, by the way, Dakota, has been echoing many of the platform planks Maxine Bernier has done?

00:13:09.940 I've covered a few, you know, rallies of Pierre Polyev. And I can tell you, the single promise that

00:13:18.200 he makes that gives them the loudest and most prolonged standing ovation is defunding the CBC.

00:13:25.240 That's right out of the PPC playbook. My question to you, Dakota, do you think PPC voters,

00:13:33.980 and they got a great percentage of the vote, which at the end of the day means nothing,

00:13:38.200 you've actually got to win the writing. Do you think they're going to say, I'm going to have to

00:13:42.980 maybe hold my nose, go back to the conservatives and vote for him? Or is it just it's Mad Max or nobody?

00:13:50.280 Mm hmm. Well, I feel like especially with this last election, I feel like there was a very large

00:13:56.460 swath of the People's Party that went to the PPC only because they were so disillusioned with the

00:14:03.500 Conservative Party. They like Aaron O'Toole was, we always said he's just, you know, liberal under a

00:14:09.720 different color. You know, he's, you know, he may be wearing the blue tie under the Conservative Party

00:14:14.000 of Canada. He's, you know, his platform is almost identical to Trudeau. Like he was so unpalatable,

00:14:19.320 I think, to any real conservatives that that's why the PPC was able to swallow up so much of the

00:14:23.560 party. And the Conservative Party, I think, was so evidently corrupt in many areas. And so I feel

00:14:29.460 like if Pierre Polyev, because he's such a front runner right now, if he falls through and if he

00:14:34.240 does win this leadership election, and if he does stay true to what he's campaigned on, like you said,

00:14:40.040 we want someone who remains as advertised. I feel like if he stays true to all the principles that

00:14:46.460 he has campaigned on and he does what he says he's going to do, I feel like there's a large swath of

00:14:50.620 the PPC who will be pulled back into the Conservative Party. Of course, I think there are

00:14:55.080 those who will remain with the PPC for sure. Maxine Brigny does have a very strong following

00:15:00.980 within a certain section of the population who are very much not going to go back to the 0.86

00:15:05.900 Conservatives, I think. But I think there is a large amount who will, who, you know, because like

00:15:10.260 you're saying, there are very similar on a lot of issues, which is interesting because we see

00:15:14.680 those like Jean Charest now calling Pierre Polyev an extremist in the party. His extreme views are

00:15:19.920 unacceptable and it's unelectable, whereas diehard members of the People's Party would say that,

00:15:26.600 oh, well, he's just another sellout and, you know, he's another phony politician. We can't trust him.

00:15:30.920 So, I mean, my kind of hard and fast rule is, well, I'm not going to give my trust to any

00:15:34.740 politician, but I'll throw some cautiously optimistic support behind them, however.

00:15:40.960 Yeah, I'm with you, Dakota. I am, I would support a Pierre Polyev, but with the caveat,

00:15:46.840 as long as he comes as advertised, you know, it will be heartbreaking. It will be crushing

00:15:53.000 if he does a flip-flop. My spidey senses are saying that he won't, that he means what he says

00:16:01.000 and he says what he means. Jeez, what a concept, right? But, um, yeah, imagine. And I'll tell you

00:16:07.220 one thing I would love, you know, if, um, that was a presser that, uh, Stephen Harper, uh, was giving

00:16:13.940 and it wasn't, it was just a private video that he put up on Twitter. The question I would love to

00:16:19.420 ask him, and maybe it's just because I personally invested so much time in it. I'd love to get Mr.

00:16:26.420 Harper's opinion on sneaky Patrick Brown and how he was thrown out of the party and what he thinks of

00:16:33.560 him for breaking the rules and getting caught breaking the rules and then blaming everybody

00:16:40.120 else and saying it's a conspiracy and everyone's out to get him. I would love to see someone as solid

00:16:46.060 as Stephen Harper, uh, give his opinion on Patrick Brown. What do you think he thinks of the sneaky

00:16:54.200 one Dakota? Well, I think Patrick Brown is such an obvious case of he's just, he's just had scandal

00:17:01.280 after scandal being caught in lie after lie after lie. I think Patrick Brown has demonstrated himself

00:17:07.020 so consistently as someone who will literally do or say anything on any issue in order to help

00:17:14.420 himself get ahead that, uh, I, I honestly don't think that, uh, Stephen Harper would think it worth

00:17:19.660 his time commenting on it. Uh, to be honest, like if I think if you had the opportunity to put the

00:17:24.600 question to him, I'm honestly not sure he would actually say anything of substance on the matter,

00:17:28.960 but, uh, I don't know, to me, it just seems so obvious that anyone who has followed the legacy

00:17:34.400 of Patrick Brown in the slightest, uh, can see that he is the, the epitome of the, you know,

00:17:41.740 what we think of the worst of politicians. Indeed. And to, to your words of he'll say and do

00:17:47.440 anything to get elected, what, what the viewers are watching right now, I don't know if you can see

00:17:51.580 it, uh, Dakota. It's that June 3rd, um, you know, event in which Lincoln, Jay and I followed, uh,

00:18:00.880 Patrick Brown, uh, right to a police station. Uh, here we are being told to come outside because

00:18:06.760 they've just set up a spot check on the parking lot of the police station, a spot check that began

00:18:14.460 and ended with my car and not the first car in, which was sneaky Patrick Brown's, uh, SUV there.

00:18:22.360 Um, the it's, it's amazing because to the point of what you said, he'll say anything.

00:18:30.120 If only we could get our hands on the call he made to police, or maybe it was a 911 call even.

00:18:35.740 I wonder what he said, you know, to the police or to the 911 dispatcher. Like, was it, I I'm fearing for

00:18:44.380 my life. There were these guys following me. There's been a lot of carjackings. This is all,

00:18:49.660 you know, theories. It's, it's impossible to prove. Um, as I understand it, we can't get a copy

00:18:55.360 of a 911 call unless the caller, uh, consents, uh, to, to allowing that, um, transcript to be

00:19:03.360 revealed. That's what I've been told by legal, but it's amazing because if he said stuff like that,

00:19:11.180 and I have a feeling he did, I have a feeling he, you know, had some kind of narrative that I'm

00:19:17.400 being followed, which he was, we were following him. Absolutely. Cause we wanted to, uh, you know,

00:19:22.340 once he got out of the vehicle, we wanted to ask him questions. But again, if he said that his life

00:19:29.340 or property were at risk, it was all blown away by the fact that his chauffeur, which we later found

00:19:36.620 out is guess what, uh, Dakota, a, um, full-time city of Brampton employee. So that makes it core

00:19:43.860 seven that we know of that we're working on the Patrick Brown for conservative leader campaign.

00:19:49.560 He said to, uh, Lincoln Jay, uh, we know who the F, uh, you are. And I'm sure that chauffeur might be in

00:20:00.660 a little bit of hot water because it destroys any kind of narrative, uh, that Patrick Brown might've

00:20:08.080 said to the authorities that there were some gang bangers, you know, uh, following me. Uh, because

00:20:14.820 if the chauffeur knows who we are, surely Patrick Brown knows who we are. We're no threat to him,

00:20:19.940 unless you, I don't know, count impolite questions as being threatening. So there again, uh, Dakota,

00:20:27.660 I guess that's one anecdote yet. Another anecdote, I should say that backs up what you say that he'll

00:20:33.460 say or do anything. Yeah. And on that note of the, what he said to the police call, because I think

00:20:39.480 it's one of two things there. And like you're saying about the driver saying, we know who you

00:20:43.440 are destroys, um, the narrative of if you recall and say, Hey, I'm fearing for my safety. There are

00:20:49.620 people following me. I don't know who they are. It's either that, or what could be even worse rather

00:20:54.680 than him lying to the police and saying, Oh, there are these people. I don't know who they

00:20:57.800 are. They're following me. They admitted they knew who you were. So the, all the other thing is, Hey,

00:21:03.920 I have rebel news following me in the car. I'm going to call up my buddies, the police station

00:21:08.760 and let them know, Hey, they're following me. Can you stop them? I'm going to walk in.

00:21:12.680 It's either he lied to the police or he called up his buddies at the police station and had them help

00:21:18.760 him out, uh, in a rather inappropriate way to apprehend media and get him out of a bit of hot water

00:21:23.900 himself. It is astonishing. Uh, now, of course he's yesterday's man. When it comes to the CPC,

00:21:29.800 he will be running for mayor of Brampton again, just for the sake that he can, uh, be mayor of

00:21:36.040 Brampton. It's all about the insatiable quest for power when it comes to Patrick Brown. And it's kind

00:21:41.540 of funny that I feel sorry for Bramptonians, good people that they have to endure this guy. Um,

00:21:49.640 he's run that city like, well, basically his own private bordello for the last four years,

00:21:55.160 his own fiefdom. Um, the last five city council meetings, if you can believe it, Dakota never

00:22:00.880 even happened. The city is kind of operating on autopilot. We know of now seven for sure employees

00:22:07.760 working on his campaign. Uh, the chief administrative officer, a former cop doesn't return my calls,

00:22:15.380 um, my emails. I gave him a package last week. Uh, no farm, no fall, even though the media relations

00:22:22.860 people, uh, don't return calls or emails. It's astonishing Dakota. It is, um, you know, it's like

00:22:31.140 everybody is on, I won't say on the take, but everybody, it seems as answerable to Patrick Brown.

00:22:39.700 You know, it's like, it, it, it, it is like something out of, um, I don't know, a fiefdom

00:22:44.720 from game of thrones, right? He sits on the mafia kind of shakedown, man, the top, the head of the

00:22:51.640 family and he is, you know, his, uh, his capos and then the foot soldiers and they're all answering

00:22:57.060 up to the man up top. It's yeah, it's, it's a weird thing to look at how Patrick Brown is running

00:23:02.320 the city of Brampton and how that municipality is kind of turned into its own little, you know,

00:23:06.600 political cabal in its own right. It is dysfunctional. We'll see what happens October,

00:23:11.460 but right now, um, we must break for an ad. Check this one out folks. Hey folks, check

00:23:18.460 out the newest arrival to the rebel news store. Yes. F is for Fidel and F is for father. I mean,

00:23:27.680 could it be? Yes. It half this photo, the colored half is a Justin Trudeau. The black and white half

00:23:34.560 is a young Fidel Castro. Wait now, or is it vice versa? It's so confusing. I'm a huge forensic

00:23:42.580 files fan. Wouldn't it be great if we could have a piece of Justin's DNA and a piece of Fidel's DNA

00:23:49.600 and put the rumor to bed once and for all. But in the meantime, we'll just have to walk around

00:23:56.600 wearing this shirt hinting at a great Canadian conspiracy or is it in any event. If you want

00:24:07.140 to get this shirt folks, go to the rebel news store and check this out. Type in our new discount code.

00:24:14.620 That's summer. S U M M E R. And if you buy two unisex t-shirts, you get an additional one for free.

00:24:24.500 What a deal. Like I said, Justin Trudeau, Fidel Castro. As they used to say on the ABC

00:24:32.360 Detergent ads, do you tell the difference? I can't tell the difference.

00:24:38.220 You know, I got to tell you, Dakota, I have a little conspiracy theory about Justin Trudeau's 1.00

00:24:44.760 awful Jim Carrey, dumb and dumber haircut. And it's this. Just days after we ran that ad, 1.00

00:24:53.860 and by the way, I think it might be our top seller right now this summer. They are flying off the

00:25:00.800 shelves. Lady Menzoid wore hers to the convoy that descended upon the Vaughn Mills shopping mall in

00:25:08.960 Vaughn, Ontario. And wow, was she the belle of the ball at that gathering wearing that t-shirt?

00:25:15.780 People loved it. So I'm sure that generated even more sales. I'm thinking he wants to disassociate

00:25:22.900 himself from the uncanny resemblance of a young Castro and a current vintage Trudeau. And what

00:25:32.380 better way to do that than to give yourself maybe the most horrible haircut in Canadian political

00:25:38.800 history? What is your take, Dakota?

00:25:42.440 I think that is a grand theory, David. I'll have to think about that a little bit. I do like it,

00:25:49.820 though. I very much like it. And that ad is the best ad we've ever shot. I think it's incredible.

00:25:55.120 As soon as the conspiracy, or is it, comes on, it kills me every time. It's golden. But honestly,

00:26:01.300 it's worth looking into the, you know, all the, I think there's, I think it's in Medium,

00:26:05.660 an article that's called, No, Nothing's Been Debunked. And it goes through all the ways that

00:26:09.540 the Trudeau-Castro theory about how Fidel Castro could be his father is very plausible. Of course,

00:26:16.080 there's no proof. There's no evidence of anything, but there's a lot of plausibility.

00:26:20.780 Well, Margaret loved to travel around. In fact, from time to time, there were even

00:26:25.120 Mounties dispatched to find out where the hell she was on the continent,

00:26:29.140 or off-the-count continent, as the case may be. So, you know, but again, unless we can

00:26:35.520 submit that to a DNA test, and I have a feeling there's no way in hell Justin Trudeau would ever

00:26:41.700 agree to that. It's all lose-lose if things go wrong for him. But I'm telling you, folks,

00:26:50.280 the resemblance is uncanny, and we cannot prove it. But wow, if you want to wear it on your t-shirt,

00:26:57.800 on your chest as a question mark as to his real paternal roots, please do so. You know,

00:27:06.400 here's the other thing, Dakota, before we move on. I bet if he sees that, much like the F Trudeau

00:27:13.920 flags, which might have almost outnumbered the Canadian flags at the Dutch farmer rally I went to

00:27:21.700 and Vaughn on Saturday with super producer Olivia. I think this gets under his skin. I think he is

00:27:30.600 such a sociopath that he can't believe there are people that dislike him and even use four-letter 0.85

00:27:40.980 words to convey their feelings towards him. What do you think about that?

00:27:45.520 Oh, yeah. Yeah. I think there's no doubt just he's such a narcissist that I can't imagine that

00:27:52.840 seeing flags with his name, but with a certain expletive beforehand or seeing that shirts like

00:27:58.160 that. I mean, it has to get under his skin. I mean, the whole convoy, you could just see how

00:28:02.840 stressed and anxious and worried he was throughout that whole time in February when the convoy was in

00:28:08.000 Ottawa. And, you know, there were a few moments where he's lashing out a little bit. Yeah, I can

00:28:14.180 only imagine it gets under his skin. And I see we have some other topics that are pretty much

00:28:21.880 YouTube friendly. Oh, here, you know, this intrigues me. I haven't seen the video, so I'm

00:28:28.520 going to be seeing it for the first time. But it is something that is so much in the news cycle

00:28:34.060 for this calendar year of 2022, Dakota. Essentially, it's Robert Downey Jr. promoting mealworms. Now,

00:28:42.860 before we get to the video, I can tell you this. I just wrote a monologue about it's a group of

00:28:50.300 almost 100 mayors. They're called the C-40. Sounds like an explosive. Of course, John Tory is on that

00:28:57.660 list. And it's all about climate change and all about the war on the farmer, which is coming to

00:29:05.600 Canada, by the way. It's not just something far off in the Netherlands. And I say that because of

00:29:11.540 the Justin Trudeau Liberals proposed mandates of reducing fertilizer. And I made the quip. I said,

00:29:19.540 you know, it seems that not a week goes by where I don't come across a story involving edible insects.

00:29:29.400 And just to make sure I was on solid ground with that statement, I went to Google News,

00:29:35.180 typed in edible insects. And my goodness, I said, not a week goes by. I should have said not a day goes

00:29:41.580 by. Dakota, the last news item was only 10 hours old. I mean, it was. And then there was something

00:29:50.320 from just, I think, four days ago from the BBC, a big factual feature of why it's a good idea for

00:29:57.800 crickets to replace beef. Unbelievable. But what I can't help but think is that all these people,

00:30:06.220 I mean, Robert Downey, he comes from a place of privilege. He gets, what, 20, 30 million dollars

00:30:11.540 a movie just to put on an Iron Man costume. The politicians, the Claude Schwab's of the world,

00:30:19.000 they're all preaching this. But I just wonder if they're having a cricket sandwich as opposed to a

00:30:25.800 Big Mac. So why don't we roll this video? And I want you to weigh in on this. It's almost a fetish

00:30:33.000 by certain people in certain circles to promote insect eating.

00:30:40.860 It's incredibly comfortable. Now, what is this? This looks like I could make cocoa with this. What is

00:30:46.160 right? What is that? Well, that's an insect based premium protein. It's made from Molitor,

00:30:52.380 which is mealworm larvae. The company is called Insect. This is Infrost. This is for fertilizer.

00:30:59.000 And as you have there, this is a powder derived from the mealworm. And it's a insect protein just

00:31:07.860 been approved by the EU for human consumption. You're not just getting me to eat dirt, are you?

00:31:15.140 No, man, I wouldn't play you, bro. We're like one. We're like one entity now.

00:31:20.280 If this is protein, it's essentially tasteless. It's just a protein supplement.

00:31:24.580 Exactly. I can put this in a smoothie or something.

00:31:28.260 I'm telling you. Yep. And they'll be making all kinds of stuff out of it. And by the way,

00:31:33.800 it is the making of it is severely reducing the amount of emissions it takes. It is an innovation,

00:31:42.220 Justin. We're doing something incorrectly. If we make this switch, it's a huge, huge intervention.

00:31:49.620 Well, you know, Dakota, go back to the beginning of the show. I guess I now have an answer in terms of

00:31:57.840 how do you make a coffee milkshake taste even worse? And I guess it's to put up grinded down

00:32:04.300 insects into the beverage. What's your take on what Robert Downey was trying to sell us?

00:32:10.640 Yeah, I mean, to your point about it's everywhere now, there's this massive push. It's like this campaign

00:32:16.680 that's being pushed across and they're roping celebrities into it left and right. And on the

00:32:20.700 last live stream I was on, we showed a video of Nicole Kidman sitting there eating insects. She's 1.00

00:32:25.360 like, oh, here's a mealworm. And she'd eat it. Oh, delicious. And, you know, there's this push all

00:32:30.500 around. It's like this campaign to try and promote like people to eat bugs and, you know, bug supplements

00:32:37.920 and all that for as an alternative protein that's more climate eco-friendly. And it's just like,

00:32:43.740 it's the current thing right now. It's what the people are pushing. You know, we always talk about,

00:32:47.320 oh, I support the current thing. What's the woke, you know, social agenda that the celebrities are

00:32:52.840 pushing these days. Well, now eating bugs is on the list. And I mean, I personally, I've got no issue

00:32:58.100 if you want to go and eat the bugs. If that's what the market wants, if the market demands more insect

00:33:02.020 protein and the consumers are there for it, they want to eat the bugs. I say, let them have it. But

00:33:06.420 it's just, it's creepy and weird when we have this sudden uniform push of all these celebrities

00:33:11.800 saying, come on, guys, eat the bugs. It's good for you. And it'll save the planet. You know,

00:33:16.380 eat less beef and eat bugs instead. It just, it just seems weird. Yeah. Like this whole set here

00:33:21.200 is just, you know, it's, it's very weird advertisement for eating bugs. I don't know.

00:33:27.820 I mean, again, like, Hey, proteins, protein, I'll try these things. If you put bugs in front of me,

00:33:32.340 I'll try them just for the experience. Honestly, you know, I'll, I'll try anything you want to give me,

00:33:36.740 but, uh, I don't think I'll be making bugs a staple of my diet anytime soon. Uh, I don't know. I would

00:33:43.480 have to see a very compelling case as to why I should, maybe it was because all the rest of the

00:33:47.980 food gets so expensive. I have no choice. Maybe that's the, maybe that's, uh, what pushes people

00:33:52.140 to accept the bugs, you know, beefed at $50 a pound or have a bunch of crickets.

00:33:56.860 Well, you know, Dakota, call me cynical, but as we were watching that Nicole Kidman video,

00:34:02.700 uh, did you notice there were no closeup shots? I mean, I'm wondering, we get the shot of the

00:34:08.840 mealworms in the, uh, silver, uh, canister, and then she put something in her mouth. Maybe that

00:34:15.960 was a gummy worm. You know how they like to fake things in Hollywood, right? But I think it should

00:34:21.080 be noted that we've heard estimates of up to 2 billion people on this planet of some 8 billion

00:34:28.360 use insects, uh, or consume insects, I should say, as part of their daily diet.

00:34:33.840 And I think, um, I'm not saying that figure is wrong, but we have to connect the dots. And that

00:34:40.760 is to say, if someone is in Uganda and doesn't have access to, oh, I don't know, a cheeseburger,

00:34:47.620 and the only way to get through the day with something in your belly, so you don't starve

00:34:53.380 is an insect. Well, then you're going to eat insect, not out of desire, but out of necessity.

00:35:00.440 I think that's what's going on. A, B, I think the reason, yeah, there you go. Um, 2 billion people

00:35:08.240 eat insects and you can too. No, I don't need to. I still have a little green in my wallet, uh,

00:35:15.940 to buy a sandwich. Thank you. A sandwich that I want to make sure it's free of bugs. Because I

00:35:21.220 remember a world Dakota where if you bought something from a restaurant, it had bugs in it,

00:35:26.040 uh, you know, bylaw would give the restaurant a ticket, uh, the food inspectors. Um, now I guess

00:35:32.640 they're encouraging it too for added protein. But the thing is, um, you got to wonder what is the

00:35:38.920 ostensible policy reason of, uh, the likes of C40 and the World Economic Forum and the United Nations

00:35:46.260 and the celebrities in Hollywood, uh, urging us to do this. And I think it is because of the climate

00:35:54.060 change virtue signaling that you see in the Netherlands. The, the Dutch government has

00:35:59.400 declared war on nitrogen, a much needed element for farming. It's going to put farms out of business.

00:36:04.180 Here in Canada, if the Trudeau, uh, proposals go through, you are looking at farmers having lower

00:36:10.680 yields, less profits, higher prices for me and you, and family farms going under. And it's all in the

00:36:18.380 name of climate change. So the elitists I'm sure know that if you take away nitrogen, if you take away

00:36:26.520 fertilizer, take away manure, it means less food. So we've got to sell in advance this idea

00:36:33.020 that it's actually downright fashionable. Hey, look, the stars in the Hollywood Hills are eating

00:36:39.100 bugs. Why aren't you? I think that might be part of it. Dakota, what do you think?

00:36:45.080 Well, yeah, absolutely. And like I was kind of saying at the end of my last comment there,

00:36:48.480 almost in jest, but it is quite serious note in terms of, like you're saying, all of these

00:36:52.920 emission targets and nitrogen caps that we're seeing being introduced as a top-down government

00:36:57.340 policy in the Netherlands, in Canada, like you're seeing it around the world now, different

00:37:02.880 governments are now introducing very similar policies to these, which like you said, is going

00:37:08.020 to mean a decrease in the production of food. When you have less food, less traditional farm food,

00:37:15.020 the price of those foods are going to skyrocket. So only the rich will be able to afford them.

00:37:20.260 And then while all of these policies are being implemented that are forcing farmers to produce

00:37:25.040 less food, we have these cricket and other insect production facilities popping up, like the one

00:37:31.880 in London, London, Ontario, that was recently had this big announcement of, oh, the largest cricket

00:37:37.020 farm in the world is now opening here in Ontario. This is great. You know, we're going to start producing

00:37:43.260 more insects en masse. So these bug foods will be economic, you know, they will be affordable for

00:37:50.980 the average person. But all of these traditional foods, especially animal products are going to be

00:37:55.700 complete luxuries. And again, I've got no problem with those things. If that's what the market naturally

00:38:02.100 allows, if that's what consumer decisions drive. But this is a weird top-down government policy that

00:38:09.500 is forcing farmers out of business, forcing them to produce less food, and then encouraging the

00:38:15.740 production of insects all in the name of global emissions and climate change. It just, it's so weird,

00:38:21.140 and it does not add up.

00:38:22.640 Well, you know, earlier this month, I did visit that London facility, Dakota. It is enormous. It almost looks

00:38:32.280 like a real-life Borg cube touched down in London, Ontario, except there's not cyborgs in it. It's, I presume,

00:38:40.040 billions of crickets. And I did speak to the CEO. I found him a very nice man. And he assured me it's

00:38:49.080 none of the crickets being produced are for human consumption. It's for pet food consumption. I don't

00:38:55.620 know if we asked Fluffy and Fido if they're okay with that or not. So I'll, we'll be putting together

00:39:02.300 a report on, on my visit there. But it's very odd too, that, you know, part of my upcoming monologue

00:39:10.040 is that this year that we're living in, 2022, was the time for the 1973 science fiction film,

00:39:20.880 Soylent Green. And it's kind of uncanny how many things have come true. And I mean, and that's a huge,

00:39:27.240 you know, risk trying to guess the future in 50 years. But some of it, they were bang on. For

00:39:34.960 example, assisted suicide, you know, in the movie, it's not only legal, it's actually encouraged and

00:39:42.520 your remaining family members get death benefits when you exit the planet to help with the population

00:39:49.000 issue. And the other thing, of course, is the title of the film, Soylent Green. That is a substitute

00:39:54.780 food replacement. For anyone that hasn't seen Soylent Green, I'm not going to give the spoiler

00:40:00.360 of what they make Soylent Green out of. Let's put it this way. Once you know the secret behind

00:40:08.380 Soylent Green, eating bugs would be like filet mignon. Okay, let me tell you that much. And one last point,

00:40:16.640 as this war on the farm continues, as this promotion of edible insects continues, when I think of elites,

00:40:26.620 one of the big world elites, Dakota, is Bill Gates. And isn't it odd that Bill Gates is now

00:40:33.880 the single largest owner of American farmland, right? So he's not down with the bug menu.

00:40:43.980 It looks like he's got enough farmland to keep him and his buddies well nourished with beef and pork

00:40:51.880 and chicken and what have you. I also understand he is the single largest shareholder of CN Rail,

00:40:59.380 because it's one thing to raise the beef and the pork and whatnot, but you've got to get it to market

00:41:07.080 too. So it seems that for such a guy who was considered a futuristic visionary, when you go

00:41:13.380 back to the beginning of Microsoft, he's really old school when it comes to his edibles. What say

00:41:21.440 you, my friend? Well, if you think about what I was just saying earlier, you know, if you consider

00:41:27.220 what I was saying to end up coming to pass, where you have this, these government policies implemented,

00:41:33.720 where it forces so many farms to shut down, it reduces the ability of like these small family

00:41:40.120 farmers and private farm ownership on a small scale is reduced, and the price of traditional

00:41:45.620 farm produced food gets jacked up, then Bill Gates is sitting pretty, he's got all this farmland. And

00:41:50.820 if he's got his farming systems in place, and like you said, if he's got rail to transport it, then

00:41:56.460 that's an incredibly profitable business right there of this commodity of farm fresh food coming out of

00:42:02.660 Bill Gates farms going to feed all the those who are well enough to actually afford that quality

00:42:07.840 food. It feels like to me, he's just reading the tea leaves here, maybe I don't know if he's

00:42:12.820 helping out any of these policies being pushed. But seems to me like if that is where the if that's

00:42:21.680 the direction we're headed with these big governments forcing this to happen, then hey, I'd be buying up

00:42:27.100 all the farmland I could do if I was in his position, because looks like farm produced food is about

00:42:32.000 to become a lot more valuable. You know, that's a great point. And then again, to throw back to

00:42:36.120 Soylent Green, which was eerily prescient, given that it was shot in 1973. That is one of the plot

00:42:44.040 points that only 1% of the world's population, which by one thing that did get it wrong was the

00:42:50.760 population estimates. Presumably, the world is populated with 40 billion people, not the

00:42:58.280 current 8 billion it is right now. But only less than 1% of the super wealthy could actually ever

00:43:10.340 dream of eating a piece of beef. It is in the thousands of dollars. And hey, who knows, maybe

00:43:19.340 Bill Gates saw that movie recently and said, I think this isn't a piece of science fiction. It's a business

00:43:26.360 plan for our real future. Exactly. Oh, man. In any event, we must break for an ad, I understand.

00:43:36.080 Because you know what, folks, in addition to your generous donations, selling the merchandise is one

00:43:41.580 of the ways in which we keep the lights on. We don't subscribe to the mainstream media business plan

00:43:47.420 of, oh, let's just take a direct withdrawal out of Canadians' wallets every two weeks. So let's roll with

00:43:54.640 an ad. So I absolutely love having the opportunity to chat with you, to chat with our ever-growing

00:44:03.520 audience. But I'd actually love for you to have that opportunity as well. We actually have

00:44:07.500 advertising opportunities available with rebelnews.com. We don't get handouts from the

00:44:12.040 government. We trust on supporters, viewers, and advertisers like you. So instead of folks listening

00:44:17.200 to me in this spot, they could actually be checking out your company, getting information about your

00:44:21.440 business. For more information or to advertise with us, send an email to ads at rebelnews.com.

00:44:29.480 Oh, wow. Did Adam look really something like that on that horse? But I can tell you,

00:44:35.320 Dakota, Sheila knows this. I've told this anecdote so many times. In 1985, when I began my journalism

00:44:41.360 career in Alberta, I rode the Bucking Bull Champion of the province for the previous year, Oscar,

00:44:49.880 at the Smoky Lake Rodeo. The ride lasted two and a half seconds. My recovery lasted, I think,

00:44:56.600 two and a half months. I was taken to hospital immediately with a hyperextended elbow and bruised

00:45:01.600 ribs and whatnot. But I did survive. So Adam Seuss, you get on a bull before you take any kind of Calgary

00:45:08.020 stampede bragging points. But, you know, I think part of the message of why it's good to advertise

00:45:13.940 with us, Dakota, is that rebel viewers are incredibly loyal. They buy our merchandise like

00:45:24.000 crazy. They love us. You know, when you go to an event, they are so appreciative. You know, they

00:45:30.040 ask for selfies. I mean, I don't think, you know, Rosemary Barton has ever been asked for a selfie by

00:45:39.200 anyone. But they love what it is we're selling. And I guess what I'm trying to get to, it's almost like

00:45:45.540 I've heard when it comes to NASCAR that, you know, when the drivers in their cars, they're covered

00:45:51.680 in ads and logos and whatnot. And evidently, it is the best marketing buy you can do because NASCAR fans

00:46:00.260 vote with their wallets. If your driver is wearing a Tide logo, guess what? The next day when they're

00:46:07.520 shopping, they're going to buy a box of Tide as opposed to another box of detergent because,

00:46:12.580 you know, Tide is supporting your favorite driver. I think that's the connection here,

00:46:18.640 that you align your brand to Rebel News. I think you're going to win. I think you are. There's a

00:46:26.860 great chance your sales are going to go up. What do you think? Yeah, I think you're right. And I

00:46:32.960 think it's there are a lot of people who do follow us who like to know that they are supporting

00:46:37.700 companies that share certain more traditional values of freedom and conservatism. And I feel like

00:46:46.100 they're like you're saying, there are a lot of very loyal viewers that we have who want to support

00:46:50.520 people like that, but also don't know quite where to find them. So it's always a great opportunity,

00:46:54.120 I think, to advertise with media companies that sort of wear their hearts on their sleeve,

00:46:59.060 so to speak, in terms of their values and their, you know, viewpoints and don't try and hide that

00:47:04.940 under the rug at all. We're very clear. We're very open. We're very transparent about what we think

00:47:08.960 and what we, you know, what we subscribe to ourselves philosophically. And so I think it's

00:47:15.700 always a good idea and a good plan to sort of align with those who share those values.

00:47:24.000 No, I think you're right. What Aaron O'Toole and Andrew Scheer taught us is wishy-washy is a recipe

00:47:32.600 for disaster. Even going back to the late nineties, when you had Paul Martin running for prime minister

00:47:38.940 and he earned the nickname, Mr. Dithers. Now, once you get the nickname, Mr. Dithers,

00:47:47.240 it's over, Johnny. Okay. It is over. And I think the last straw for him is he was doing a photo op

00:47:55.280 and he was putting a wreath. It was Christmas time, uh, on his door and a reporter simply asked,

00:48:04.080 I think it was just like a joking question. It wasn't a gotcha question. And she asked, uh,

00:48:10.300 Mr. Martin, is that a Christmas wreath or a holiday wreath? And Martin looked like Bambi caught in the 0.89

00:48:18.260 high beams of a Hummer on the 401. Okay. Dakota, he was actually terrified. And his answer was,

00:48:24.380 it's a $50 rate. He wouldn't commit either to traditionalism or wokeism and, uh, went up the

00:48:34.580 middle and we all know what happened to Paul Martin's career. Uh, although I will say this,

00:48:38.920 I would have Paul Martin in a heartbeat over Justin Trudeau. Paul Martin did do great work as a finance

00:48:44.480 minister. Uh, Justin Trudeau and his cronies, uh, think, um, uh, well, the budget will balance itself

00:48:51.000 and let's just print money and let's send Canada into a stagflation environment. Incredible. And we

00:48:57.600 should go back cause we did, uh, uh, tease it at the beginning of the show. Um, Jean Charest. Yeah.

00:49:04.700 Speaking of liberals, uh, Jean Charest says vaccine mandates keep public sector workers safe. And he said

00:49:14.640 this in a campaign mail out, um, that gets my spidey senses tingling, uh, Dakota, because I truly

00:49:23.860 believe it's only a matter of time, i.e. the fall when flu season comes in, when we'll have the due

00:49:31.240 rigueur premier Ford announcement. Well, you know what folks, if it was up to be, uh, I wouldn't close

00:49:36.420 down businesses and I wouldn't mandate, uh, max masks and I wouldn't demand, uh, vaccine apartheid.

00:49:42.840 Um, and when you see Sheree, you know, talking about vaccine mandates and public sector workers,

00:49:49.360 I think that is kind of, if he did become prime minister Dakota, I think we know where he weighs

00:49:57.460 when it comes to vax policies and it ain't a good one.

00:50:01.480 Mm-hmm. Yeah. And I, uh, I think in that article, we were flashing there from true North,

00:50:07.660 uh, it was interesting when someone from his campaign was asked about that, about him saying,

00:50:12.360 so, you know, Jean Charest, he supports vaccine mandates. He said, Oh, we'll know at the, uh,

00:50:16.680 this other event here, he said his, he was asked about his thoughts on vaccine mandates. And

00:50:20.760 his response there was simply that, well, I don't think anyone thinks vaccine mandates would be

00:50:25.760 effective anyway. So who would possibly implement those? But he made no hard and fast condemnation.

00:50:31.480 Or statement. He just sort of like we were talking about went up the middle. Well,

00:50:35.740 you know, these days who really thinks vaccine mandates would be an effective policy,

00:50:39.140 but that totally leaves him open to in the future saying, Oh, well, actually we now believe them

00:50:44.240 to be a very effective policy and vaccine mandates all around. It just, uh, you know,

00:50:49.140 you just absolutely lacks principle. Yeah. Well, then again, uh, if I'm reading the tea leaves

00:50:54.760 correctly, Dakota, um, Jean Charest has a snowball's chance in hell of becoming leader of the conservative

00:51:02.080 party and therefore, uh, getting a chance at becoming prime minister. I really think,

00:51:06.380 um, we, we are aboard the Pierre Polyev, uh, steamroller here. And, um, so really, uh, you may as well ask,

00:51:16.420 I don't know, Scott Atchkinson, uh, what he thinks of vaccine mandates, you know, I'm not trying to be

00:51:23.300 cruel to Scott, but like, there's a time in which you got to say it's over and just quietly, uh, exit

00:51:30.680 stage. Right. And speaking of over, we've only got 10 minutes left. Uh, Dakota, I believe we might

00:51:36.580 have some chats that we do. Okay. And is that me, Olivia? You want me to read? Okay. Dakota,

00:51:49.020 I think it's on your end. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. I got, uh, got this right here. I go for it. Adam Ottawa

00:51:57.620 says the Ottawa LRT is down again this week. They say it's because of lightning striking the electrical

00:52:03.260 line. Cue the climate alarmist relying on 100% electricity is just not working. Apparently.

00:52:09.420 Oh yeah. Adam Ottawa. Thank you for that dollar. Uh, brilliant comment. Uh, anything that, you know,

00:52:17.060 what the climate alarmists don't understand or pretend not to understand Dakota is whether an

00:52:23.360 environment are two different things. We've only kept accurate weather, uh, records for the last

00:52:29.380 three centuries. Guess what folks, that is a blink of an eyelash in terms of geological time. Um,

00:52:35.680 the planet is billions of years old. And when you say that, uh, there was a record temperature set

00:52:43.060 in London or there's a BC wildfire or an electrical strike took down the Ottawa transit line, uh, that is

00:52:51.260 zero evidence of climate change, but the Greta Thunberg acolytes, Dakota, they will nevertheless run with it.

00:52:59.380 Mm-hmm. No doubt. Okay.

00:53:05.540 Now, again, from Adam Ottawa, do you want to see real hate in action? Read some of the comments made

00:53:10.920 by the left on the CBC news article about Harper's tweet. Why do those on the left think they can be

00:53:16.660 hateful themselves? Well, they, it's, I guess, um, it's almost an indoctrination Dakota, I think,

00:53:25.180 because we go, you know, when you go to right of center demonstrations versus left of center

00:53:30.160 demonstrations, you know, which one has the violence because I find that members on the left,

00:53:35.280 they can't articulate what their points are. And they've been brought up, uh, for a couple of

00:53:40.580 decades now, an entire generation or more with that phrase, punch a Nazi. Now, what is the definition

00:53:47.580 of a Nazi? Is it someone on world conquest and engineering a genocide? No, the new definition is

00:53:54.640 somebody that disagrees with you, be it climate change or, uh, the U.S. election of, uh, 2020.

00:54:02.060 And what's the result? Not to debate, not to engage with words, but to throw a punch, to break the law,

00:54:10.620 to commit physical assault, to commit vandalism, to burn down places. That is what the left is all

00:54:17.160 about. And again, it's, I, I, you know, hearken back to this, you know, incredible lack of ability

00:54:25.380 to simply articulate what it is they stand for because they probably don't even know what they stand for.

00:54:32.060 Yeah. And there's just this, this overemphasis, like you're saying, and the definition of a Nazi

00:54:35.880 these days is anyone you don't like, or anyone, anyone who disagrees with you. And it's just sad

00:54:39.960 to see these people who genuinely do believe that certain people who are on the opposite side of the

00:54:45.160 political spectrum from them are their actual enemy who is out to destroy their lives, make their 0.83

00:54:50.480 lives hell, wants to harm and oppress them. And they genuinely believe that. And so, yeah, there's a lot

00:54:56.420 of, you know, misplaced hate out there and it is actually very sad to see. 0.99

00:55:00.380 It's pathetic. 0.98

00:55:04.520 Adam Ottawa is on a roll today. 1.00

00:55:06.280 Hat-trick.

00:55:08.640 Yeah. CBC is reporting on alleged desecration of the unknown soldier tomb in Ottawa, but they won't show

00:55:15.020 us what the desecration entailed. Who, how can we judge for ourselves if we can't see the damage?

00:55:20.300 Yeah, that's interesting. I was actually reading that earlier this morning. The desecration was they

00:55:25.700 draped a flag over it. Now, I don't think that's appropriate. It was a, it was a U.S.-Canada,

00:55:30.840 one of those hybrid flags, and they draped over the flag, they draped it over the monument. Now,

00:55:35.240 again, I don't think what they were doing was appropriate. I don't think that's something you

00:55:38.540 should be doing on the tomb of the unknown soldier, but I would hardly call it desecration,

00:55:43.420 per se, because that sort of paints the image that they were, you know, graffitiing it or something

00:55:46.960 like that. Like they were, you know, actually vandalizing it where they draped some fabric over it,

00:55:51.700 which again, it's disrespectful and inappropriate, I would say. But yeah, like, like Adam Ottawa was

00:55:57.340 saying, there seems a little, you know, bit of hyperbole there to saying they desecrated the,

00:56:03.240 yeah, here's the video here. They draped a flag. Yeah. So again, I don't condone this.

00:56:08.740 I don't think this meets the benchmark Dakota of desecration. Now, had they spray painted the tomb,

00:56:15.160 you know, had they taken a mallet and smashed pieces off, that's another kettle of fish.

00:56:20.840 But I would imagine if that's a US and Canadian flag that they've draped over the tomb, I think

00:56:27.840 these are people, I'm just guessing now, because I don't know this story in depth, who are supportive

00:56:34.960 of the veterans and not anti-veteran, because they would probably drape, you know, I don't know,

00:56:41.300 the flag of Antifa over the tomb, if that were the case. So, but you know, Adam Ottawa raises a good

00:56:48.700 point. I am getting sick and tired, Dakota, because we're all adults here that are consuming news,

00:56:53.980 that when you read mainstream media accounts of controversial issues, how details are specifically

00:57:03.440 left out of the story. You know, as an example, maybe you'll have a hockey game where the story is

00:57:12.920 one player said something offensive to another and they're calling for a suspension and, you know,

00:57:20.940 fines and what have you. Can we have the quote that he allegedly said? I mean, no matter what it is,

00:57:29.820 whether it's a racial slur, whether it's something about his mother, I think we can handle it.

00:57:34.960 I don't think we'll need grief counseling, but I see it happening more and more, Dakota.

00:57:41.680 Yeah, actually, like that article we had flashed up, they were saying, Anand, you know, this minister,

00:57:46.580 this liberal politician said this about, you know, this quote, desecration of the tomb of the

00:57:51.520 own soldier. I feel like that's way too common in media these days, the legacy media especially,

00:57:56.580 is that they don't just report on what happened, they report on it from the lens of this is the

00:58:01.360 comment that this politician or this person in power made on it. So it's always through the lens,

00:58:07.600 through the perspective of this politician who's, of course, trying to win political points through

00:58:12.160 every comment or statement they make. So we always have that political lens being laid across these

00:58:17.660 news pieces. And it's so rare to actually just get a straight news item on this happened at this

00:58:22.340 place at this time. This is why these people are outraged about it. This is what these people have

00:58:26.420 to say rather than headline, ooh, you know, this politician commented on this happening.

00:58:31.880 And that's the lens through which you view it. I find that it happens way too often.

00:58:35.520 No, that's a good point. And if you are the CBC and their legacy media ilk, you don't bite the hand

00:58:42.340 that feeds you. So if the politician making the comment is a Justin Trudeau liberal cutting checks for you

00:58:48.140 to make sure your media organization stays alive, because if you had to, you know, compete in a,

00:58:54.920 you know, a capitalist society in which you're not subsidized by tax dollars, you'd fail.

00:59:03.220 Well, you really don't want to, you know, be too much of a muckraker, you know, Dakota, because like I

00:59:09.880 said, it's Papa Trudeau that's giving you those biscuits to stay alive. Do we have another

00:59:16.840 super chat? Yes, we do.

00:59:20.720 Exactly. Yeah. January 777 says, too much sewage under the bridge with CPC. We need complete change

00:59:29.680 other than libs slash CPC. Define insanity, doing the same thing over and over, expecting different

00:59:35.300 results. Too many red Tories inside CPC. You know, well, that is true, the red Tories inside the CPC.

00:59:43.200 But the other issue, though, is who is the head of the fish? And we had two weaklings in Scheer and

00:59:52.700 O'Toole. We have a street fighter in Pierre Polyev. He's been magnificent as a minister, I think.

00:59:59.320 So I think that's what counts most. And he'll steer that party. And you know what? If Pierre Polyev is

01:00:06.800 so toxic, as some people say, well, maybe these red Tories will just leave on their own accord.

01:00:12.480 We had sneaky Patrick Brown saying before he was booted out of the party, if he wins, I'm not a part

01:00:18.240 of the CPC. You know, who says that? Who? Like, can you believe how entitled and selfish this guy is

01:00:26.680 that this party should really be called me, myself and I? Because if that's not who's leading it,

01:00:32.020 I have nothing to do with it. What a creep. Yeah. Well, it's interesting how he said he

01:00:36.980 Patrick Brown could see himself working with any other leader but Pierre Polyev. I think it's

01:00:41.440 particularly because, you know, of course, there was so much animosity between them. But he just knew

01:00:45.680 that Polyev wouldn't, you know, wouldn't tolerate any of his scandal plagued BS, quite frankly,

01:00:52.480 in the party. So I think he just knew he had no hopes of any success in a conservative party led

01:00:58.320 by Pierre Polyev. And so he felt that, of course, making that statement is very appropriate because,

01:01:03.880 oh, of course, you know, I couldn't stand to let that extremist lead the party. I wouldn't lead.

01:01:08.260 But of course, he just knew that if Polyev won, he himself had no chances of getting anywhere in the

01:01:12.940 party. And, you know, as a sidebar to this story, Dakota, I want to get your opinion on it was in the

01:01:19.500 news cycle last week, but it stuck in my head for whatever reason. And it was reports of Justin Trudeau

01:01:28.100 actually contemplating a fall election. And what the only reason I could see that making sense in

01:01:38.880 his work mind is he's believing the media Kool-Aid of Pierre Polyev being an extremist. And he is

01:01:47.740 actually such a narcissist, as you described him aptly earlier, that he thinks with Polyev at the 0.67

01:01:54.960 helm, now is the time to strike. I personally feel that the best before date has come and gone with

01:02:01.940 this government. I also think that the NDP is no longer a credible party to denounce the Trudeau's

01:02:09.160 every day as the Trudeau liberals, rather, every day in the in the media, and then vote always to

01:02:16.060 back them up. That makes that party a joke, quite frankly. And I think if Trudeau has drunk that Kool-Aid,

01:02:24.480 he is in for a shock. Do you think there's any possibility that we could be seeing a fall election?

01:02:32.900 Honestly, I truly hope so, because it would be really something, because like these past two

01:02:37.700 elections, we have not had a real conservative leader leading the Conservative Party of Canada.

01:02:43.880 So if we can get someone who is a real conservative to lead the Conservative Party in another election

01:02:49.820 soon, I'm sure that would spell the end of Trudeau. I hope you're right as well. And for another reason,

01:02:56.480 it could be the ultimate revenge on Jagmeet Singh. Don't forget the reason I think he's agreed to

01:03:05.180 this extension till 2025. Well, you do the math. He was first elected 2019. 2025 is exactly six years.

01:03:12.940 That means he gets the full government pension kicks in, whether he wins or loses. And the possibility

01:03:20.660 for him being ousted, which was the whole idea of this coalition, he'd flip his lid, I would say.

01:03:28.260 So we'll see what happens in the weeks ahead. I hope you're right. Please, Justin, do it. Just do it,

01:03:35.580 as Nike says. Do we have another super chat there? Yes, we do.

01:03:40.600 Yeah. Frazbo, recently I read that Pierre Polyev and Harper are members of the WEF. If this is true,

01:03:46.720 it should be spread far and wide. Please check it out.

01:03:49.540 Yeah. And so that's been the common criticism since day one, that Pierre Polyev, oh, he's WEF,

01:03:54.740 he's World Economic Forum, and Harper as well. And I think Pierre Polyev has adequately addressed this

01:03:59.980 more than enough times of asking him point blank. There's no more you can do beyond asking him point

01:04:05.900 blank, are you WEF? Do you support WEF? And he's denounced them on multiple occasions. And he's gone

01:04:12.120 as far as saying that if he's elected prime minister, he would ban any member of his cabinet

01:04:17.880 or any, I think he said any sitting MPs, but at the very least, any members of his cabinet from

01:04:23.240 participating in the World Economic Forum at all. Yeah. Ban ministers and other top officials

01:04:26.780 from involvement. So, I mean, it doesn't get more clear than that. And if he backpedals on that,

01:04:31.740 that's a pretty extreme flip flop. But I mean, it seems clear enough. And my thoughts on Stephen

01:04:36.740 Harper being World Economic Forum, I think you can certainly see videos of Stephen Harper participating

01:04:44.160 with World Economic Forum. He was definitely involved. In my mind, I imagine he may have just

01:04:49.060 simply been naive to the true intentions or identity of the World Economic Forum. The idea of global

01:04:55.340 cooperation, especially back when Stephen Harper was prime minister, it seems like, oh, yeah,

01:04:59.420 this coalition of, you know, leaders getting together to promote, you know, multilateralism

01:05:05.320 and global cooperation. I'm not sure Harper was really tuned in during his time as prime minister

01:05:10.540 to what the World Economic Forum would become. That's just my sort of speculation personally. But

01:05:15.940 hey, I don't know. I couldn't really tell you for sure.

01:05:19.160 No, I kind of agree with you, Dakota. I mean, I have a book back in my library at home.

01:05:23.820 Uh, it's, uh, got the photograph of the Ford Pinto on it. And the name of the book is

01:05:30.400 looked good on paper. So, uh, sometimes you, uh, get all vested into something or you're all in on

01:05:38.700 something that looks good on paper. And then you find out that, uh, well, in reality, as was the case

01:05:45.560 with the, uh, the original Ford Pinto, uh, you didn't want to get into a fender bender, uh, with that

01:05:50.940 vehicle. Um, and, uh, you make a, uh, uh, another decision. Well, Stephen Harper is out of politics,

01:05:57.460 but you showed Pierre Paulie have making that statement. And, uh, again, I go back to what I

01:06:04.120 said at the beginning, as long as Pierre Paulie have comes as advertised Dakota, I really like what

01:06:09.760 I see. Exactly. And I feel like your choice ultimately comes down to the one who's saying

01:06:15.920 he is going to do this good stuff and maybe he back pedals on it and completely flip-flops and

01:06:20.180 that'll be terrible. Or do you elect someone who is not saying any of this and is guaranteed to not

01:06:25.120 go through with it? So, you know, you can roll the dice with someone like Pierre Paulie have,

01:06:28.620 or you can just go for certain death by, you know, WEF policies. So that's the way I see it.

01:06:37.200 And sojourner $1. The only way I would vote for a CPC leader is if they publicly denounce the UN

01:06:46.120 2030 agenda that Mulroney signed and the party has held to ever since. To me, that's when the CPC died.

01:06:53.300 Hmm. Well, you know what? That's a good point. I guess, um, next time we bump into Pierre Paulie,

01:07:00.320 we should ask him that question. Will you denounce, uh, that, uh, UN, uh, 2030 agenda? It's amazing.

01:07:07.800 Everything is 2030 is now the new doomsday, isn't it? Uh, Dakota, uh, the previous one was 2012. It was

01:07:16.200 the, uh, the Mayans predicting 500 years ago that the world was going to end. Uh, they couldn't see their

01:07:22.500 own world ending in the here and now with Spanish conquistadors sailing into their territory, but

01:07:28.300 I digress. But, um, and that is, um, I must say it's a funny thing about Pierre Paulie. He, he was on,

01:07:35.860 uh, a Jordan Peterson podcast and he was talking about his, um, you know, how he, uh, admired the

01:07:43.400 mainstream media. And yet we cannot get him to sit down for a scheduled interview. Uh, I would love

01:07:51.180 that Ezra would love that anyone on our staff would love that, but by the same token, he doesn't run

01:07:56.720 away from us. Like you bumped into him in a parking lot, I think, but he, he answered a couple of your

01:08:02.180 questions. It was very brief, but he didn't run away. He didn't stick security on you. So it's,

01:08:08.640 um, you know, this is a little perturbing to me, Dakota, because if you do have admiration for the

01:08:15.040 mainstream media, um, and if you look at who... Sorry, to correct you, David, you're saying

01:08:20.220 mainstream media, I believe you mean... Oh, sorry, independent media. Thank God you, uh, I would

01:08:25.820 hate to that to exist on public record. Uh, it would be the end of my reputation. But if, if that is the

01:08:31.300 case, come on, sit down and have an interview. Uh, he's a great debater. Uh, it's not going to be

01:08:36.660 a gotcha kind of thing. I mean, we're going to give him hard questions. Uh, but I would like to see

01:08:41.640 that happen. Mm-hmm. Yeah, absolutely. Any, any more chats here? Yes. Oh, yes. AMT 60. I've heard

01:08:51.280 that Pierre was part of the WEF earlier, but his pick scrubbed from WF site. He talks about freedom

01:08:57.360 and I like his message, but I hope he's being honest. Roman's great, but not the same charisma.

01:09:02.780 Mm-hmm. Yeah, you know, and, uh, but to Roman's, um, credit, uh, last week he did give an interview

01:09:10.380 to our, uh, beloved colleague, Sheila Gunn-Reed. So if Roman can do it, Pierre certainly can.

01:09:17.440 It's true. Yeah, it's a great interview. I highly recommend checking it out. It's got

01:09:20.900 some good ideas, good stuff, and yeah, giving him credit. He will sit down with us for a good

01:09:25.100 talk. And I do like everything Roman Babers saying. I think he's on the money on most of

01:09:29.220 his policy points. Yep. I agree. Adam Ottawa back again. If bugs are the answer, why aren't

01:09:37.700 they pushing them onto clients of food banks put their words to the test?

01:09:42.580 Wow. Isn't that a great, you know, Adam Ottawa, I got to tell you, you're hitting it out of the

01:09:48.160 ballpark today. Um, yeah. Uh, or would that be elitist just getting our own domestic poor,

01:09:55.260 much like the third world net nations poor, uh, eat bugs? I, you know, that sounds like a caper. 0.82

01:10:02.360 Um, I'm just worried about maybe receiving a violent reaction coming over to homeless people

01:10:09.680 and offering them bugs. But, um, yeah, that is an amazing point. Uh, I wonder if we put that

01:10:18.780 to the likes of, uh, John Tory and whoever runs the food bank system in Toronto, what their answer

01:10:25.260 would be to that Dakota. Yeah. I will say, don't you worry soon enough, those at food banks will be

01:10:30.860 eating the bugs because we will all be eating the bugs. The only thing we'll be able to donate to

01:10:35.200 the food banks will be our own bug food products. So it'll happen soon enough not to worry. Wow. Well,

01:10:41.540 we'll, we'll keep our eye on that one. Frasbo donates $1. The trouble with being old is I remember

01:10:49.300 just a few years ago, restaurants would be closed if you found a bug in your soup. Well, you know,

01:10:55.220 Frasbo, that's a great, uh, statement. Um, we're going to have to rewrite that classical joke,

01:11:01.180 uh, waiter, there's a fly in my soup. And the response from the waiter is, Oh, I didn't notice,

01:11:06.500 sir. That's going to be an extra dollar for the added protein. Yeah, exactly.

01:11:11.740 Ooh. Polato Newman says that distant popping sound you hear is all the heads on Wellington

01:11:22.640 street exploding after hearing Stephen Harper's endorsement of Pierre Poliav.

01:11:27.480 I know, which to me is, um, you know, a badge of honor. If you're having, uh, those on the left,

01:11:36.620 uh, having a mental meltdown, uh, couldn't be happier. Absolutely. Twinks gives us $2. Remember

01:11:47.440 Bill Gates is money behind WF and UN policies on depopulation buying farmland also to turn it into

01:11:54.940 UN agenda natural land while millions starve. They want to get rid of 7 billion people. According to

01:12:01.700 the agenda, 7 billion, we've only got about 8 billion. That's well, as Kathleen Wynne would say,

01:12:10.340 the ex premier of Ontario, I think that's a stretch goal. Yeah, but no doubt Bill Gates is,

01:12:17.180 is tied right at right in bed with all these nice big globalist orgs. No doubt.

01:12:22.020 January 7, 7, 7, 7 gives us $1 and says, David, I agree with your head of the fish comment in my

01:12:33.620 business. A bean counter in charge has always crashed and burned. The CBC needs a ground up

01:12:39.380 manager like Rowan Babber. Still no more lib slash CPC. Well, you know what? Uh, January, uh, triple

01:12:46.840 seven, you raise a good point. Um, I, I don't think Roman Babber is going to become the leader

01:12:52.280 of the conservative party, but who's to say he's not going to run as an MP, uh, in a writing and,

01:12:58.840 uh, maybe even be part of, uh, a cabinet. And I think, uh, we're better off for that.

01:13:08.600 Yeah, I agree with you. I do like, you know, like you're saying we have some great candidates

01:13:12.360 in the leadership and I would love to see like, if you know, so I do believe Pierre is going to

01:13:17.240 get elected as leader. He is running, he's a front runner with such a margin. Like I'd love to see

01:13:21.840 the likes of Leslie Lewis and Roman Babber actually be in the cabinet. I think that would be such a

01:13:26.640 great, you know, team actually to provide some real leadership and direction for our country.

01:13:31.500 I don't know. I'd be excited about seeing that. Yeah. I think the only two that wouldn't sign on

01:13:36.420 willingly, well, one is gone, uh, sneaky Patrick Brown and the other is John Charest. Uh,

01:13:41.800 no loss as far as I'm concerned. Yeah, exactly. And that is it at all. Okay then. Well, Dakota,

01:13:50.200 thank you so much for, uh, substituting for the she devil. She is covering an important, uh, court, 1.00

01:13:56.600 uh, matter in Alberta right now, I understand. And I want to thank the team behind the board,

01:14:02.680 Olivia, Efren, and Danny. And of course, I want to thank our audience for tuning in,

01:14:08.360 especially those who made those generous donations. It's how we keep things humming here.

01:14:14.760 And, uh, tomorrow there will be two other rebel news reporters doing the live stream.

01:14:20.520 So until Sheila and I reunite on Thursday, as always, folks stay sane for the fourth dose,

01:14:28.760 same thing. If you're, if you're, uh, you know, over age 50, if you have underlying medical conditions,

01:14:33.240 immune compromised, then, then certainly consider that fourth dose. The other thing that we need to

01:14:37.960 consider is that in early fall, um, there's a, a real chance of a, a biovalent vaccine, um, that we

01:14:45.880 begin a, uh, our fall campaign with that is going to be, um, very likely, uh, more effective against the,

01:14:52.920 the newer, uh, variants that we're dealing with. And because there's going to be a three to six month

01:14:57.880 interval between doses, a large fourth dose campaign right now could potentially delay the receipt of

01:15:03.800 a much, uh, um, uh, possibly better, uh, vaccine and, and fall. So a lot of variables there.

Rebel News Podcast - July 26, 2022

DAILY ｜ Harper endorses Poilievre; Charest supports vax mandates; Ironman wants you to eat bugs

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript