Rebel News Podcast - October 02, 2026


EZRA LEVANT | Jack Mintz on Alberta's boom, Canada's energy future and the cost of Ottawa's economic plans

Mentioned
EZRA LEVANT | With Alberta's independence referendum closing in, Carney delivers a pipeline on paper America's "silent inheritance" was just unlocked — what's it worth? | Presented by Guildhall Wealth

Episode Stats


Length

37 minutes

Words per minute

160.66

Word count

6,000

Sentence count

208

Harmful content

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. Wow, what a great guest today. You may have heard his name, Dr. Jack Mintz,
00:00:04.900 one of the smartest economists in the country. And he, I think it's fair to call him a Westerner
00:00:11.060 and maybe even a conservative, but economics is not a partisan science. And he'll tell it like it
00:00:16.560 is. A really interesting chat, especially about things like the auto sector, oil and gas and
00:00:22.940 pipelines. We really cover the whole waterfront. I think you're really going to enjoy it. And
00:00:27.080 And I feel like we were really lucky to spend a whole hour with him today.
00:00:30.900 I hope you enjoy it, too.
00:00:32.920 Before I go, though, let me invite you to become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus.
00:00:36.100 That's the video version of this podcast.
00:00:38.340 Just go to rebelnewsplus.com, click subscribe.
00:00:41.040 Not only do you get the great video content, but you really do support Rebel News.
00:00:44.700 We take no government money, and it shows.
00:00:47.360 We depend on you.
00:00:57.080 tonight one of canada's leading economists spends the whole hour with us
00:01:09.320 talking about the economic strength of alberta and what might be going wrong with the economic
00:01:14.840 plans for canada as a whole i'm talking about dr jack mince he's up next it's september 30th
00:01:21.220 and this is the ezra levant show
00:01:23.120 well we love talking about politics and so much of politics is about prosperity about
00:01:43.820 making a living making ends meet and how much of our work we have to give to the government by way
00:01:49.200 of taxes and regulations.
00:01:51.680 Alberta really is such an interesting case
00:01:54.380 because per capita is by far the biggest economic engine
00:01:58.820 in Alberta.
00:01:59.660 I think Saskatchewan might be tied with it
00:02:01.400 because of its mining and agriculture.
00:02:04.700 But Alberta, despite the regulatory war on its core
00:02:09.180 industry for the past decade, it's actually booming.
00:02:13.260 How is Alberta doing this despite the fact
00:02:16.080 that there has been so many regulations
00:02:18.380 and even bans on tanker traffic, for example.
00:02:21.800 And how is the rest of the country doing?
00:02:23.720 Of course, I'm a sharp critic of our Prime Minister, Mark Carney,
00:02:26.980 but what is the economic truth behind it?
00:02:30.140 Well, to get that, you need to go to a reputable economist,
00:02:33.620 someone who is non-partisan,
00:02:35.840 someone who has the respect across the political aisle.
00:02:38.260 I'm talking about Dr. Jack Mintz,
00:02:40.800 the University of Calgary School of Public Policy,
00:02:43.240 is where he hangs his head.
00:02:44.500 He's also with the MacDonald-Laurier Institute,
00:02:46.920 and he writes for the Financial Post.
00:02:49.080 And what a pleasure to have him on the show today.
00:02:51.640 Dr. Jack, great to have you back.
00:02:53.780 I think you're the key man to answer these questions.
00:02:56.700 You actually chaired the Alberta Premier's Recovery Council
00:03:00.380 a few years ago.
00:03:01.740 So I think you know that file probably closer than most.
00:03:06.440 Well, that was a tremendous experience,
00:03:08.320 and it was also a good way to get to know the province
00:03:10.620 very well during that period.
00:03:14.020 And so many things said, it's very true.
00:03:16.120 Sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt you. The phrase recovery, because it really had a tough go with the NDP and the regulations and the taxes. Has Alberta recovered from that NDP experiment, or are there still taxes or regulations on industry that have yet to be removed?
00:03:35.900 well a combination of things but let's uh first start uh the economic recovery council really
00:03:43.020 started out of the pandemic it was a terrible year 2020 because you not only had a huge drop
00:03:50.060 in oil prices due to the pandemic as people quit driving around the world and things like that
00:03:57.260 but also you had the people forget the russian saudi price war and so the price of oil dropped
00:04:03.340 to less than $20 a barrel, which was just catastrophic for Alberta.
00:04:10.300 And the Kenney government at that time, hats off to them, developed an economic recovery plan,
00:04:16.400 which was even just a few months into the pandemic, way ahead of any other province.
00:04:22.320 But that plan actually became sort of like the Bible for the province to come out of what was a really dire situation
00:04:32.080 at that time. And it succeeded. It was all sorts of policies such as new irrigation for agriculture
00:04:44.100 in the south. It cut the corporate income tax rate from 12% that the NDP did hike to 8%. So
00:04:54.300 Alberta actually has the most competitive corporate tax system in Canada and actually
00:04:59.480 actually matches quite well with the united states um and yeah as well uh alberta uh ended ended up
00:05:09.080 investing in infrastructure and some roads and things like that uh and and diversified some of
00:05:15.760 the other industries that it has even though oil and gas is still pretty important uh it it it's
00:05:21.500 amazing how other industries have also grown in alberta and and i think this reflects something
00:05:27.060 which i learned when i was on uh as i headed the economic recovery council when i had to meet every
00:05:33.940 uh industry group in in alberta uh during that very difficult time and it was very interesting
00:05:40.580 that when i met with them they didn't talk about giving them a handout it's an entrepreneurial
00:05:46.740 economy and what people wanted was getting the government out of the way not in the way by the
00:05:52.660 way this was contrary to ontario which i was involved in a very similar type of exercise
00:05:58.740 where there people just kept on talking about how they needed some sort of government subsidy
00:06:03.700 in order to to move ahead and so i think that's actually the one thing that really
00:06:08.420 makes alberta very different from the rest of countries is this entrepreneurial society where
00:06:14.580 people feel that they can actually achieve things without having the government uh always giving
00:06:21.380 them money to to do it you know that's such an important observation some of the key industries
00:06:27.380 in ontario i'm thinking the auto industry i'm thinking of steel the government's response is
00:06:33.220 always another grant another loan another subsidy and none of that seems to be sticking whereas i
00:06:40.100 i don't think i've ever heard alberta's oil and gas or mining industry actually ask for a bailout
00:06:46.020 or a subsidy they at most it seems to me they're asking for rules to be removed from their from
00:06:52.500 their path it really is is quite opposite and i don't know if it's just the nature of the of the
00:06:58.260 industry um you know maybe oil is always going to be successful when you're next to the hungry
00:07:03.060 economy of the united states but i i i think there's something to the free market approach
00:07:07.700 what when you look at what's going on with the steel industry and the auto industry in ontario
00:07:12.980 what would an Alberta-style solution be?
00:07:18.060 Or is that just something that tariffs are going to overwhelm?
00:07:20.820 Like, is there an Alberta solution to the auto sector and the steel sector?
00:07:26.280 Well, I think right now, I think one of the calamities that Canada has faced,
00:07:31.280 and I think for a very long time now,
00:07:34.620 has been the fact that the manufacturing sector in Ontario and Quebec
00:07:42.640 has been on a secular decline sorry for uh over 50 years back in 1972 one might remember
00:07:52.320 you know canada got very worried about some tax changes that were made in the united states
00:07:57.520 that would make manufacturing very competitive internationally and so the king government at that
00:08:02.800 time as well as the provinces brought in accelerated depreciation for machinery and
00:08:09.440 and used in manufacturing and processing, they lowered the manufacturing corporate tax rate,
00:08:15.600 and then this just continued on and on and on. We had potential bailouts. We had bailouts that
00:08:24.040 had to take place, for example, Chrysler in the early 90s, and then there was a big bailout in
00:08:29.320 2008 for the auto sector. There's been loans and grants thrown at them. There's been all sorts of
00:08:35.360 tax preferences, investment tax credits, etc. All this has gone on year by year for the
00:08:41.660 manufacturing sector, and yet it's failed. And this is not to say that these things don't,
00:08:48.120 you know, if they didn't happen, maybe things would have even been worse.
00:08:52.280 But we have been supporting a declining industry for many, many years. I think in Alberta,
00:08:58.520 it maybe would be more like what Australia had done in the 1990s, where Australia tried to
00:09:05.320 move to a much more market-based economy, get rid of many of the impediments to economic growth,
00:09:13.820 and including free trade and a reduction in tariffs that were protecting many industries
00:09:21.600 in Australia. One of those industries was the auto sector, and the auto sector was declining
00:09:26.780 in Australia, and they pleaded for subsidies to be given by the Australian government,
00:09:31.680 and australia said sorry uh we're just not going to go this route and by the end of the 1990s there
00:09:38.720 was no auto industry uh manufacturing industry left in australia did australia die did it do
00:09:46.240 badly no because resources were released to other more productive parts of the economy
00:09:51.840 and australia also resource booming economy like alberta with its mining sector has done quite
00:10:00.400 well over the years uh and and part of that is because they also tend to be very entrepreneurial
00:10:05.840 in their outlook you know it the shame of it is we're having the worst of both worlds we're seeing
00:10:11.280 the decline in the auto industry plus tens of billions of dollars thrown at it and i'm not sure
00:10:17.040 if uh if mark carney's passive aggressive battle with the us is helping but something interesting
00:10:24.160 has really perked up this year.
00:10:26.380 And I'm talking about data centers and high tech.
00:10:29.720 And what's so surprising to me,
00:10:31.260 and maybe I shouldn't be surprised,
00:10:33.280 is Alberta and Saskatchewan have led the way.
00:10:36.140 There was that huge investment by Meta,
00:10:38.900 the company that owns Facebook,
00:10:40.480 a $13 billion AI data center
00:10:44.200 and plus a $4 billion power plant to give electricity.
00:10:47.880 $17 billion, just huge,
00:10:50.320 not a drop of government money in it.
00:10:52.100 And then I see a huger investment in Saskatchewan.
00:10:56.440 And now they're talking about building nuclear reactors there.
00:10:59.900 So if you would have asked, you know, I think an ordinary person, average person, where would this be built in Canada?
00:11:07.640 They'd probably guess Ontario.
00:11:09.560 Maybe they'd say B.C.
00:11:11.380 But they've chosen Alberta and Saskatchewan.
00:11:13.960 Is that also a reflection of those two provinces' entrepreneurialism?
00:11:18.240 Is it because they have a lot of energy in the form of natural gas?
00:11:22.880 Why have AI data centers gone to those two wonderful provinces?
00:11:28.260 I'm from Alberta originally myself.
00:11:30.160 Why have they gone there rather than Quebec or Ontario?
00:11:32.640 I'm not saying they have no data centers, but these mega, these giga centers.
00:11:37.720 Why have they gone to Alberta, Saskatchewan?
00:11:40.100 Well, I think if you look at a map of planned data centers for Canada,
00:11:48.080 yes there are some for ontario and quebec and and the atlantic but the really big ones
00:11:53.840 are going to be in saskatchewan and alberta the hyperscalers are looking at those two provinces
00:12:01.120 and that's primarily i think because of uh because of the energy uh sources that are available
00:12:10.080 that can support these centers but also it helps that you do have this
00:12:15.760 entrepreneurial climate and governments that are willing to have regulations that that let's say
00:12:23.040 make it easier i think for ai to to be developed now of course we're seeing a lot of reaction
00:12:29.360 lately over over artificial intelligence some of it is inappropriate reaction for example
00:12:35.920 concerns over water when actually a lot of these data centers tend to use recycled water so
00:12:42.480 as someone remarked that i heard talking about it they only are going to use through their lifetime
00:12:48.080 maybe two pools of water swimming pools of water in total for each of them so that's how little
00:12:55.280 water they're going to use there's also concerns about driving up electricity prices but as pointed
00:13:00.320 out if the ai centers are required to supply their own electricity which can happen in alberta
00:13:06.640 because of natural gas supplies as well as in saskatchewan then they can actually end up
00:13:14.320 contributing electricity to the overall system not just for the data center and that actually
00:13:20.320 could help drive down electricity prices rather than going up i think the biggest concern these
00:13:25.680 days about ai i think have to do uh with a completely different issue than data centers
00:13:32.240 which by the way data centers are important not only for artificial intelligence but also
00:13:36.480 for cloud computing, which everybody uses today as part of their internet, but also I think the
00:13:45.620 real concern is over artificial intelligence and safety, and that, of course, is where some of the
00:13:50.500 debate is today, but that's completely independent of the data center issue. Yeah, you know, I attended
00:13:55.720 a fairly large anti-data center protest in the small town of Morinville, not too far from the
00:14:02.120 Meta data center and they all were using talking points about water and energy
00:14:07.040 what you've just discussed but when I press them a bit that was I think those
00:14:10.820 were just messages that they were sort of programmed to say they were all
00:14:14.900 actually worried about AI itself and I'm not sure if protesting out against a
00:14:19.820 particular factory is going to stop this AI revolution which is I mean it's
00:14:24.880 already here and by the way if they don't build the data center in Alberta
00:14:28.880 Saskatchewan. They'll build it in Mississippi or whatever. What's so interesting to me about that
00:14:33.980 is, I mean, I remember the word diversification used for Alberta's economy going back to Ralph
00:14:41.040 Klein's days. I mean, and to me, it became code for the government's going to take a bunch of
00:14:47.340 public money and give it as a gift to a company that has no hope of succeeding on its own. That's
00:14:54.420 why they need the money. So diversification was always code for subsidies and picking favorites
00:15:01.360 in the market and corporate welfare. But this AI diversification, it really is a diversification.
00:15:08.660 It's a totally different industry, relies on energy, and I suppose even the cooler climate.
00:15:13.800 I mean, if you had to cool a data center in Texas or one in Alberta, I mean, I know which would be
00:15:18.480 easier. And I don't see government money, at least not in the ones that are being done in the
00:15:24.540 prairies. Evan Solomon, the federal AI minister, is throwing cash around. That's, I think,
00:15:29.140 all liberals know how to do, really. But I think this is actually a true diversification. And if
00:15:34.760 you start adding up the dollars, it's not quite yet where the oil industry is. But I think they
00:15:40.760 announced 50 billion worth of data centers in Saskatchewan. That's huge. Well, that's true.
00:15:47.640 And frankly, Meta and Amazon and these other magnificent seven companies, let's say,
00:15:56.440 that are worth over a trillion dollars each in market capitalization, they don't need
00:16:02.780 government subsidies at all. They will be able to make enough profits, just like the
00:16:10.400 oil and gas sector in Alberta. The oil and sand companies have done perfectly fine and they don't
00:16:15.740 need to have government subsidies. In fact, I'm actually, this is one of the things in which I'm
00:16:22.120 quite alarmed right now by federal policy is a sense that governments have to pick the winners
00:16:28.200 and the losers under their philosophy of industrial policy that only the governments know which
00:16:33.820 industry should be invested in. And then to attract people, they want to throw some subsidies along
00:16:39.580 with it or create mixed enterprises, which is something we used to do back in the 1970s,
00:16:45.200 which was actually a failure in policy.
00:16:48.480 And so I think one of the things that I think is really important is for Alberta and Saskatchewan,
00:16:58.280 that in attracting these businesses, they should make sure they have the regulations
00:17:02.120 in place that make sure there isn't environmental harm to the population or the communities
00:17:06.920 are hurt, but at the same time, don't interfere or delay the development of these things.
00:17:14.440 And I think that's why Auburn and Saskatchewan have been successful, is because of a regulatory
00:17:18.720 system that I think has been conducive for investment, but at the same time protects
00:17:23.140 the interests of the people that can be affected if these various projects that are done don't
00:17:31.660 take into account some of the things that might impact their lives.
00:17:35.540 You know, my few dealings with Meta, that's the Facebook company, tell me they're very alive to those public policy issues and to winning hearts and minds. And I know some data centers in the States have done dramatic things, not just building parks and recreation centers and paving roads, but in one county, I think they were giving $50,000 bonuses to school teachers.
00:17:58.280 like just a shocking amount of money that I mean first of all you're going to win the teachers
00:18:03.740 over but but I mean just I mean that really is a giving back to the community move I mean it
00:18:09.580 it's certainly uh you know the teachers union is going to be happy but but when you're getting
00:18:14.680 that kind of obvious benefit to the local community it's going to change the discussion
00:18:19.400 a little bit what's interesting is when I was at that protest I saw a lot of recycled climate
00:18:25.400 protesters, anti-oil protesters. It's like they moved on. No one's really talking about global
00:18:31.060 warming anymore. AI is the hot ticket. Port over their concerns. And like it was really quite
00:18:37.920 striking. I was just at a, you know, a rebranding exercise for the anti-oil activists. That's what
00:18:44.520 I saw with my own eyes. Hey, speaking of oil, it still is the number one export in Canada. I mean,
00:18:51.360 It's by far larger than Canadian automobile exports to the States.
00:18:56.400 And it's the one thing that, you know, in trade wars cannot be relocated.
00:19:02.080 I mean, Donald Trump has expressly said he would prefer factories come home,
00:19:07.200 especially if they're shipping into the States.
00:19:09.140 He wants those factories in the States, not in Canada or Mexico.
00:19:13.180 But you can't move the oil sands.
00:19:15.300 I mean, you can move the oil, but the oil sands are where they are.
00:19:18.540 And the fracked gas is where it is.
00:19:21.360 And I think that Trump acknowledges that because he's gone a little bit easy on tariffing oil and gas from Canada.
00:19:29.860 What do you think the future is for Alberta oil and gas?
00:19:34.580 In a way, railways have picked up some of the surplus that pipelines would have taken.
00:19:39.160 When I was up at the Metadata Center, it's right next to an enormous oil train facility where these huge long trains, you know, there's all these refineries there.
00:19:49.540 Like, frankly, because there's been no pipelines, they've been building more trains.
00:19:54.620 What's the future of oil and gas in Alberta?
00:19:57.580 And do you actually think any new pipelines will get built?
00:20:01.820 Well, I think, first of all, oil and gas, I think we should separate them.
00:20:07.180 Oil, of course, is very important in transportation.
00:20:11.940 There will be a shift in the world towards more electrification of cars.
00:20:15.780 uh but you know it's not something that's going to be done right away and as we've seen north
00:20:20.660 america has not gone over very well uh but certainly there will be that demand but oil
00:20:26.100 is also very important uh for plastics and for other types of uses bunker oil in shipping and
00:20:32.820 things like that and it's very hard to move to new technologies if they're going to cost a lot more
00:20:38.420 and and so that's been one of the reasons why uh this view that you know demand for oil is
00:20:44.340 going to peak and et cetera et cetera uh has not happened yet but you know uh but it you know it
00:20:50.820 will it will be um it will be in demand and it'll be particularly uh countries that have a good um
00:20:59.140 that are relatively peaceful let's say and have good governance uh are going to do much better
00:21:04.980 And so, because as we've seen now with the Iran-U.S. war, that the Strait of Hormuz is no longer a, let's say, a non-risky area for oil supply and demand.
00:21:24.980 And so, what do people do when you have risk like that?
00:21:29.140 Well, it's called risk management.
00:21:30.760 So, people are going to try to look for alternatives.
00:21:33.500 And so countries that are safer in supply are going to be able to sell their oil more likely.
00:21:42.440 Secondly, there will be the countries themselves in the Middle East are going to look for alternative ways of avoiding using strata hormones in the future.
00:21:51.840 And that could be pipelines going through Turkey, et cetera, et cetera.
00:21:55.060 And then, of course, there will be an even greater shift towards other types of energy
00:22:02.180 because the demand for energy is going to keep rising a lot over the next many years,
00:22:08.360 not just due to artificial intelligence and the internet, but also for other reasons as well.
00:22:15.360 And so you're going to need everything, I think, in order to provide that.
00:22:19.740 natural gases is particularly in a good position because it's it's relatively
00:22:25.360 cleaner but it's also very important for petrochemicals and other types of uses
00:22:31.280 and you know in industry and and and as we've seen it's very important for
00:22:37.720 electricity and so therefore natural gas I think particularly will have very
00:22:43.100 strong demand in the coming years and so that puts Alberta I think in a very good
00:22:48.320 position. And I think the idea of trying to diversify our demand, that we're not just selling
00:22:54.200 over 90% of our natural gas and oil only to the United States, but to other countries are being
00:23:00.680 able to do that is very important. And that will depend on infrastructure, pipeline infrastructure
00:23:07.120 that allows natural gas and oil to be shipped to other parts of the world. Although we do have to
00:23:13.320 Remember, the reason why many, even with the building of new pipelines, sometimes the U.S. market is still the better market in terms of the netbacks that companies can get because of lower transportation costs.
00:23:28.160 The Keystone XL pipeline was going to bring about 800,000 barrels a day from Canada.
00:23:32.480 It was going to start in Alberta, scooch over to Saskatchewan, pick up more oil there, and then come straight on down.
00:23:38.520 And it was a glorious plan, and it was approved by both countries.
00:23:42.720 But before it could be finished, Barack Obama killed it.
00:23:46.700 And I'm trying to remember, I think Trump revived it.
00:23:49.260 And then I think he was killed again on the very first day by Joe Biden.
00:23:52.640 And it's been going back and forth.
00:23:54.140 It's partly built.
00:23:55.780 I think the company that owns it now has a different name.
00:23:58.800 I think it's called Southbow.
00:23:59.720 And if I'm not mistaken, they've got some more permits from the states.
00:24:05.100 And they've done a call for, like they've asked, anybody want to ship?
00:24:08.800 And if I've got my facts straight, Dr. Jack, they have full commitments for 20 years.
00:24:16.060 Like they have filled their proposed pipeline with companies saying, yeah, we're in.
00:24:21.300 So that could happen very easily.
00:24:24.720 There's no government money needed on that one.
00:24:27.020 But then you've got this Mark Carney idea that Danielle Smith seems to support of building
00:24:32.820 a pipeline to the West Coast at a staggering cost, $35 billion a year.
00:24:38.200 which is just, you know, that's triple what the original Kinder Morgan pipeline would have been.
00:24:45.640 Do you think either of these pipelines will actually be built?
00:24:50.840 Do you think that the one to the west will be stopped by some judge citing,
00:24:56.480 oh, there's indigenous title or the requirement to consult more?
00:24:59.880 Like, do you actually think either of them are going to be built?
00:25:03.500 hard to tell uh and this is uh some of the risks that alberta continues to face in the case of the
00:25:11.900 one going south um uh you know the old keystone xl by the way the pipe that tce originally laid
00:25:19.060 is still there on the canadian side so it could be easily used by so uh by south pole uh anyway
00:25:25.800 that that uh that doesn't require as many permitting uh as initially uh planned under
00:25:34.120 the keystone because of the route that would be taken however uh who knows if in 2028 you get a
00:25:40.760 democrat president that gets elected uh could put an end to very quickly to to the building
00:25:48.040 of it unless permits and and and there was a final guarantee um before then uh the pipeline could go
00:25:56.040 ahead of course the united states is very worried about energy security too so so the you know the
00:26:01.560 agenda has changed uh you know 10 years ago it was all about climate change and people were scared
00:26:08.040 that remember the uh greta thurnberg said that you know the world was going to uh disappear by the
00:26:14.440 2030 if uh because of climate change well i guess those predictions uh uh aren't true it's very very
00:26:21.720 funny how these things go from uh decade to decade uh but lately because of the ukrainian uh russian
00:26:27.640 war and now uh what's happening in the middle east uh energy security is very important so the united
00:26:33.160 states uh does want to have uh canadian oil it also wants venezuelan oil competition with them
00:26:40.520 But I think it's not entirely clear how the Democrats may want to look at this after 2028, given the importance of energy security to the United States.
00:26:54.100 As for the pipeline going out west, the part that concerns me is that maybe we really should be talking about two pipelines or three pipelines in the future, and not just one.
00:27:07.500 But we're building the one with a whole bunch of provisals.
00:27:12.040 You know, the oil gas companies, the oil sand companies have to invest over $20 billion into carbon capture and storage facilities in Canada that will take out roughly, I think, if I understand, 8 million tons a year of carbon out.
00:27:29.380 And there's all sorts of issues that are involved that we haven't really had a good public discussion about yet.
00:27:34.620 um and uh the industrial carbon price has been increased which is going to add to the cost of
00:27:41.460 of of uh per barrel uh of of oil it's not too too too much for the oil sands but actually for
00:27:48.480 conventional oil it's going to go up quite a bit um and uh and also power is going to be
00:27:54.140 significantly affected which people don't talk about um then then we also have uh bc oh it's
00:28:01.200 not a lot of money, but they get to extort a payment for them for transporting oil through
00:28:08.380 British Columbia, even though it has no business to do that. In fact, it's a federal responsibility
00:28:15.080 when it comes to interprovincial transportation and pipelines, et cetera. And BC is already
00:28:21.780 collecting money through its property tax and its corporate income tax when it comes to pipelines.
00:28:25.820 So this little extra bit is, I think, a really terrible precedent that we're setting up in Canada for the future.
00:28:35.380 So, you know, it's all so full of politics, and we haven't even gotten into the potential tie-ups that could happen.
00:28:45.040 I have a quick question for you.
00:28:46.600 You've been very generous with your time, and I don't want to keep you too long.
00:28:49.900 I don't know of other jurisdictions in the world.
00:28:52.400 Certainly no OPEC jurisdiction, not Russia, not the United States, not even California, has a carbon sequestration program that's regarded as a genuine business.
00:29:05.960 Like even in California, they exempt their very heavy L.A. oil fields, Bakersfield, I think it's called.
00:29:12.860 Only in Canada do we say, oh, yeah, we're going to decarbonize oil.
00:29:17.400 That sounds like dehydrating water.
00:29:19.840 Like, it's just, I don't believe that there's any market demand for that.
00:29:23.640 It's just another way of taxing, regulating, you know, enriching rent seekers, as an economist would say.
00:29:32.140 Like, I do not believe there is, just like I don't believe there would be a single wind turbine built in Canada were it not for subsidies.
00:29:38.820 I just don't believe it's economic.
00:29:40.960 Do you have a view on all this carbon capture, carbon sequestration stuff?
00:29:45.960 Is it, I just don't think it's an industry.
00:29:48.340 I think it's Enron accounting plus social license Greta Thunberg BS.
00:29:54.580 And I think it's effectively a tax that's going to stop these pipelines from being built.
00:30:00.660 But I'm an amateur.
00:30:01.600 What do you think?
00:30:03.540 Well, I'm not a physicist, so I sometimes don't like to comment on science when it comes to carbon in the future,
00:30:13.020 since I know there's different prevailing views.
00:30:15.400 But I will say that we've learned now that after a number of years of policies that they
00:30:22.960 have increased significant costs for electricity pricing in Europe, which is a huge issue for
00:30:30.580 the United Kingdom and for Germany and other countries that have adopted the various policies.
00:30:37.880 And now the European Union wants to be in a carbon tariff.
00:30:42.320 And I kind of wonder if Canada is going to become some sort of partner.
00:30:46.260 We don't know what it is, but if part of our deal is going to be a carbon tariff in Canada,
00:30:51.160 which will be an interesting topic to discuss.
00:30:55.120 But I think the carbon issue, I think, really comes down to the net zero commitment.
00:31:03.540 Is this something that is even feasible at this point?
00:31:07.140 are we is really the best way trying to to simply move away from fossil fuels entirely
00:31:14.740 or to invest more in mitigation to deal with higher temperatures you know there are some
00:31:20.340 positives actually with higher temperatures in fact there's less death during cold periods which
00:31:26.660 is important in canada you know cold cold weather can actually cause death and so you get if you get
00:31:32.900 at warmer temperatures in the wintertime,
00:31:34.800 that's actually a positive.
00:31:37.140 And of course, yields go up.
00:31:39.520 And in fact, Canada and Northern Europe,
00:31:43.200 I've seen this in the past by scientists show
00:31:47.240 that actually they could be beneficiaries
00:31:49.380 of higher temperatures, not worse.
00:31:52.140 And so it's a complicated situation,
00:31:54.940 but right now the politics is now focused
00:31:57.440 on things like energy security,
00:31:59.440 which is completely Trump, sorry to use the word,
00:32:02.900 but it has trumped the the whole carbon issue and and so when you look at carbon
00:32:09.380 capture and storage that that you know the Prime Minister wants which is
00:32:14.580 really part of a net zero commitment that he still has in his mind then then
00:32:21.360 obviously this is one way of trying to achieve it but it's and maybe it's part
00:32:26.580 of the way of trying to sell it to to Central Canada voters so that they will
00:32:31.040 support it but in the end when you kind of look at it relative to everything
00:32:35.720 else you know it's not entirely clear it's going to be that that useful the
00:32:41.180 the one thing though that the federal government did recently change which is
00:32:44.420 useful for carbon capture and storage is that enhanced oil recovery now counts in
00:32:51.380 terms of in terms of the projects and if you look at the carbon capture and
00:32:56.060 storage uh projects that take place around the world including one in saskatchewan uh there's
00:33:03.740 they and they're smaller they're not too huge but enhanced oil recovery is one uh very positive
00:33:10.140 thing that you do get out of carbon storage but other than that um it's going to be just an expense
00:33:16.860 uh for the industry um that is going to be like any regulation that's going to be required of
00:33:23.340 them to to cover and so what they told the government is that since you're requiring this
00:33:29.740 and it's a hugely expensive thing that we want public support for in other words subsidies and
00:33:36.220 things like that i guess who ultimately pays for that yeah yeah it sounds like the what we talked
00:33:41.740 about at the beginning of our conversation bailouts and fake investments in electric vehicle batteries
00:33:47.340 and whatnot last question super quick snapper are you were a consultant for uh the premier
00:33:53.660 uh when jason kenny was in that office are you doing any consulting do you stay in touch with
00:33:58.780 the new premier danielle smith at all are you not at liberty to say well actually i i just finished
00:34:04.860 doing two things for the alberta government over the past two years one of them is i chaired a
00:34:09.500 panel on funding post-secondary education in alberta for the minister of advanced education
00:34:15.900 miles mcdougall uh and we that report came out last august and to happily to uh a great deal
00:34:23.580 of support uh by the both the institutions the government and the students so i'm hoping that
00:34:28.940 report uh gets used well in upcoming budgets uh the second uh the second item uh was recently
00:34:37.660 the alberta cost of separation study that was done by the school of public policy
00:34:42.220 I was asked by the Minister of Finance, Nixon, to chair an independent panel to assess the
00:34:53.440 school's report, but also to provide advice to the school to make sure that all the different
00:34:59.800 aspects of the issue were going to be covered. And so we kind of acted like referees for
00:35:05.660 an academic report that was going to come out. And so that work is now finished.
00:35:11.980 You know what, that is a whole other fascinating topic that we're very interested here.
00:35:16.100 But we've already taken up so much of your time today.
00:35:18.700 Maybe we can get together again in time and talk about that, the cost of separation.
00:35:25.540 And of course, that referendum is coming up in, well, just three weeks or so.
00:35:29.900 And it's going to be a momentous, be very interesting.
00:35:32.820 I predict that the referendum will not pass, but I believe that the number will be significant
00:35:37.800 enough that it will become a perpetual issue in Alberta going forward.
00:35:42.480 And I actually think that's a good thing because I think Alberta has been treated
00:35:45.840 more gently by the rest of the country because of it.
00:35:48.880 Last word to you, Dr. Jack.
00:35:51.040 What would you say to Canadians and to Albertans in particular?
00:35:54.680 Is the future hopeful?
00:35:55.840 Are you an optimist or is it going to be tough slogging ahead?
00:36:01.160 Well, I think for Alberta, I think it's going to be very positive.
00:36:03.760 you know I think there's a lot of good things that are available for the for
00:36:08.980 the province of course there's always risks and we have to remember that for
00:36:12.760 Canada at least the federal government has shifted from 10 years of being
00:36:17.800 focused on redistribution and not economic growth at all in fact it's been
00:36:22.900 a it's been a terrible lost decade I'm hopeful that some of the initiatives
00:36:29.920 that are being taken now are going to be good for the province their Canada and
00:36:33.460 and the province that will allow for more economic growth.
00:36:37.820 But I am still concerned that the philosophy of the federal government
00:36:40.760 is even more embedded in the industrial policy approach,
00:36:44.400 favoring some industries over others.
00:36:46.640 And we're not seeing a reverse of a number of other policies
00:36:50.080 that were adopted during the Triddle years,
00:36:52.300 such as DEI, as an example. 0.85
00:36:55.880 Wow. Well, thank you so much for the past hour.
00:36:59.340 I've learned a lot. I'm sure our viewers have as well.
00:37:01.840 it's actually just wonderful to to put these questions to you and and thank you for your
00:37:06.000 thoughtful answers i hope we can talk again maybe after the referendum we can have we could talk
00:37:11.120 about what that means going forward dr jack mince of the ufc school of public policy thanks very
00:37:17.200 very much for today. My pleasure. All right, there it is.