Rebel News Podcast - Muslim outreach： Andrew Scheer's “new friend” Omar Subedar publishes tips on beating your wife

00:00:00.000 Hello, my rebels. Today, I look at Andrew Scheer's Muslim outreach. He met with some Muslims in the

00:00:07.800 GTA, and he posted some pictures and comments to his Facebook account. Well, who did he meet with?

00:00:15.640 What did he say? And these folks he met with, what did they say? I go into it in some detail.

00:00:22.220 I hope you'll find it interesting. Hey, before I get to it, can you do me a favor and go to

00:00:26.400 TheRebel.media slash shows and sign up to be a premium member. First of all, it's cool

00:00:32.300 to say you're a premium member of The Rebel. I mean, that's pretty cool. Second of all,

00:00:38.420 it supports us, helps pays the bills. Third of all, and perhaps most importantly,

00:00:42.640 it gives you access to the video version of my show. And that's going to be interesting because

00:00:46.640 today I show you what these Facebook photos look like, and I show you images from one of the

00:00:55.320 IMAM's own website. I can describe it to you on a podcast, but wouldn't you like to see it

00:01:00.820 with your own eyeballs? That's what the premium content subscription gets you. So go to TheRebel.media

00:01:05.840 slash shows, eight bucks a month, do it. Here is the show.

00:01:10.060 You're listening to The Rebel.media Podcast.

00:01:13.300 Tonight, Andrew Scheer does outreach to the Muslim community. What do liberals think about that?

00:01:19.080 What do conservatives think about that? It's April 11th, and this is The Ezra Levant Show.

00:01:25.320 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?

00:01:29.640 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.

00:01:33.700 The only thing I have to say to the government, the wire publisher, is because it's my bloody right

00:01:38.860 to do so.

00:01:45.300 Here's a new tweet from a Muslim member of parliament named Salma Zahid.

00:01:49.960 She's a liberal. She says,

00:01:53.280 Yesterday, Andrew Scheer met with imams and Muslim leaders in Scarborough, but he didn't tweet about it,

00:01:59.800 and access to the Facebook post is restricted. Why is he hiding this outreach? Worried about his base?

00:02:05.520 Does he have different messages for different audiences?

00:02:07.700 Hmm. And as you can see by her tweet, it's a Facebook post. And Zahid took a screenshot of it.

00:02:17.440 And it doesn't look particularly secret to me, got to be honest with you.

00:02:20.660 Looks like a posed photo op that was obviously designed for circulation.

00:02:25.660 Sheer wrote, as you can see,

00:02:27.300 Today I visited with imams and others from Toronto's Muslim community to reaffirm my commitment to protecting religious freedom

00:02:34.540 and my condemnation of anti-Muslim hatred and bigotry.

00:02:38.020 Thank you for the important discussion.

00:02:41.180 Now there's a very interesting choice of words in there. I'll get back to that in a minute.

00:02:44.580 Something interesting. I don't know if you noticed it exactly. I'll come back.

00:02:47.500 But let me just finish up with this Salma Zahid, a Muslim liberal. 0.68

00:02:51.300 And she seems agitated by this whole thing, a bit paranoid, maybe even.

00:02:56.080 She did a series of tweets about it, although I'm not sure if she actually did any of this herself

00:03:00.620 or if the liberal war room just told her what to say, as they tend to do these days with women, 0.99

00:03:06.040 especially in the Liberal Party.

00:03:07.620 Anyways, here's a link to the Facebook. Sorry, this is her next tweet.

00:03:13.340 She says, so this is a series. She says,

00:03:16.540 Here's a link to the Facebook post.

00:03:20.320 The gear icon under his name means a customized audience.

00:03:25.200 His other posts have a globe icon for a global audience.

00:03:30.040 Who is he allowing to see this post and who is he hiding it from?

00:03:34.900 I don't think she wrote that herself, do you?

00:03:37.560 Now it sounds a bit weird because Facebook is all about sharing.

00:03:41.120 Andrew Scheer has almost a quarter million followers.

00:03:42.840 It's for propagating stories and pictures to his supporters.

00:03:46.440 I think she's a bit paranoid. I'm not quite sure.

00:03:50.120 I'll keep reading. She did one more tweet. Let me read her last tweet.

00:03:52.960 She said, looks like the Yellow Vestors found out anyway, and they're not happy. 0.72

00:03:58.760 And she links to an Antifa left-wing website that grabs a few random Facebook comments 0.98

00:04:04.180 from people who criticize Scheer's photo op.

00:04:07.320 Now I think that's odd because I think her earlier tweet was implying that it was a secret Facebook post.

00:04:12.200 I'm not even sure if that exists.

00:04:14.880 And when people later on pointed out, hey, Zama, this whole thing's public.

00:04:20.240 She writes one last tweet. She says,

00:04:23.360 To those pointing to the two public posts below,

00:04:27.060 the original one with the restricted view, mouse over the clock icon,

00:04:30.540 and you will see they were actually posted Wednesday afternoon and backdated.

00:04:34.160 Glad he's reaching out. Just unclear why his instinct was to hide it.

00:04:38.060 Okay, it's really getting lost in the weeds there.

00:04:41.560 But I think it's Fred asked, is she really glad that Andrew Scheer is reaching out to Muslims?

00:04:47.080 I doubt it. She's a liberal. The liberals have a lock on the Muslim vote. 1.00

00:04:51.160 Here's a poll suggesting that 65% of Canadian Muslims voted liberal last time.

00:05:00.340 This was from Enveronics.

00:05:02.600 Suggests only 2% voted conservative.

00:05:05.160 Now I'm not sure how statistically accurate that is,

00:05:07.460 but I believe it in general because Trudeau made a conscious decision in the 2015 election

00:05:13.520 not to even try and bother to win the Jewish vote.

00:05:16.160 I mean, look, Stephen Harper had pretty much locked that up by being so pro-Israel.

00:05:20.860 There really was no way to be more pro-Israel than Harper.

00:05:24.900 And there's never been a Trudeau instinct to be pro-Israel anyway.

00:05:29.520 Sorry, to out-Israel, Harper.

00:05:33.800 Trudeau's always been hostile to Israel and to Jews, frankly, a little bit.

00:05:37.340 Trudeau's brother, Alexandre, who was his policy advisor during Justin Trudeau's leadership campaign.

00:05:43.020 I don't know if you remember, but he actually made a propaganda film

00:05:45.600 in cooperation with the dictatorship of Iran called The New Great Game. 0.57

00:05:50.400 And from a sheer mathematical point of view, why bother trying to win over Jews 1.00

00:05:55.280 when there are only a few hundred thousand of them in the whole country

00:05:57.860 and there are now four or five times as many Muslims in Canada

00:06:01.380 because of open borders immigration?

00:06:04.400 So instead of trying to win the Jews, 0.96

00:06:08.700 Trudeau appointed as his right-hand campaign organizer

00:06:11.640 this guy, Omar al-Jabra,

00:06:13.700 the Saudi-born former head of the Canadian Arab Federation,

00:06:18.140 an anti-Semitic NGO that actually called for the terrorist groups,

00:06:22.560 Hamas and Hezbollah, to be legalized in Canada.

00:06:26.420 Al-Jabra would condemn Canadian officials even visiting Israel.

00:06:30.460 He's so extreme,

00:06:32.420 he had Trudeau go to even the most dangerous mosques in Canada to campaign,

00:06:37.920 including a mosque in Montreal called the Asuna Wahhabi Mosque

00:06:41.920 that the U.S. Pentagon says was a hot spot for recruiting terrorists.

00:06:49.460 Here's Trudeau bragging about campaigning there.

00:06:53.240 Because I spend a lot of time running from the Bangladeshi to the Pakistani

00:06:57.920 to the Maghreb to the Asuna Wahhabi Mosque.

00:07:03.200 I cover all the different communities.

00:07:08.360 It's clear now that the SNC-Lavalin thing has blown a hole

00:07:12.200 in the side of the Liberal Party's ship.

00:07:15.160 And now that the carbon tax is becoming more and more unpopular.

00:07:19.560 So what can liberals talk about these days?

00:07:21.520 They've decided

00:07:22.260 everyone who isn't a liberal is just a racist.

00:07:27.980 An Islamophobe.

00:07:28.200 An Islamophobe.

00:07:28.900 In the past 24 hours alone,

00:07:30.760 half of Trudeau's cabinet has repeated

00:07:32.480 the exact same talking points

00:07:34.280 about the threat of neo-Nazis

00:07:36.260 and white supremacists

00:07:37.320 and Islamophobes in Canada.

00:07:39.500 It's the number one issue to the liberals

00:07:41.740 just in the last 24 hours they've decided this.

00:07:44.620 If all else fails, call people racist.

00:07:47.000 Now they used to call Canadians sexist too,

00:07:49.520 but they can't really do that

00:07:50.640 now that Trudeau has proven himself to be a fake feminist. 1.00

00:07:53.280 But look at this.

00:07:53.960 They're all, all, all, all calling conservatives racist.

00:07:58.760 It's pitiful, but it's all they have left.

00:08:01.100 And the media party runs with it.

00:08:03.520 All right, enough about the liberals.

00:08:04.900 I just wanted to show you,

00:08:06.300 first of all, the weird messaging by Salma Zahid,

00:08:09.240 the liberal, or whoever wrote her tweets for her,

00:08:11.840 and how the liberals are making their desperate

00:08:14.900 last six months before the election

00:08:17.100 all about calling people racist.

00:08:18.780 But back to Andrew Scheer's actual visit,

00:08:21.960 and actually those Facebook images of it.

00:08:24.400 It's not hidden.

00:08:25.980 It's the first thing you see

00:08:27.460 when you go to his Facebook page.

00:08:29.940 At least it's the first thing I saw.

00:08:31.980 Doesn't look hidden to me.

00:08:33.600 And back to the message wording for a second.

00:08:36.040 Let me read that to you again.

00:08:38.300 Today I visited with imams and others

00:08:40.000 from Toronto's Muslim community

00:08:41.220 to reaffirm my commitment to protecting religious freedom

00:08:43.640 and my condemnation of anti-Muslim hatred and bigotry.

00:08:46.420 Thank you for the important discussion.

00:08:49.240 Now there are more than a million Muslims in Canada.

00:08:51.320 Many are citizens.

00:08:52.080 It is appropriate that the leader of the opposition

00:08:54.620 and a man who would be prime minister

00:08:56.320 meets with them,

00:08:57.440 meet with any group of Canadians.

00:08:59.760 He seeks to be the prime minister for the whole country.

00:09:02.220 He says he reaffirms his commitment to religious freedom.

00:09:05.180 That sounds good to me.

00:09:07.300 Of course, our Canadian ideas of religious freedom

00:09:09.580 are quite different than religious freedom

00:09:11.420 in Islamic countries,

00:09:13.480 like Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Iran.

00:09:16.300 Omar al-Jabra is from Saudi Arabia.

00:09:18.060 In places like that, Islam is dominant and superior 1.00

00:09:21.800 and all other religions are either banned or submissive.

00:09:27.080 In fact, in Mecca, infidels aren't even allowed to visit the city.

00:09:32.700 So I'm sure Andrew Scheer meant the Canadian version

00:09:34.740 of freedom of religion.

00:09:36.600 And he says he condemns, quote,

00:09:38.260 anti-Muslim hatred and bigotry.

00:09:41.000 That's what I wanted to focus on a moment ago

00:09:43.020 because that's different than the leftist word Islamophobia.

00:09:47.940 Islamophobia is a made-up word, of course,

00:09:50.060 but it means people who are afraid of Islam.

00:09:54.020 But Islam is a religion, a doctrine, a set of ideas,

00:09:57.100 a political philosophy.

00:09:59.920 Muslims, by contrast, are individual people. 0.97

00:10:03.720 Some might be religious, some aren't.

00:10:05.580 Some are religious in different ways.

00:10:07.880 Some are political, some aren't.

00:10:09.040 So saying you're against anti-Muslim bigotry

00:10:12.680 means you're against the baseless hatred of someone

00:10:16.180 because they are a Muslim person.

00:10:19.000 Which is different than saying you're against

00:10:21.420 hatred or fear of Islam, the religion.

00:10:24.500 And that's a very important distinction

00:10:26.260 because that is the deliberate tactic of the left,

00:10:29.760 that vocabulary Islamophobia.

00:10:32.480 Because it calls you a bigot, a hater,

00:10:34.720 if you dissent from the Muslim religion of Islam

00:10:39.600 or the politics of Islam,

00:10:40.940 which you surely must do, by the way,

00:10:42.920 if you are a Christian or a Jew or a Hindu or Sikh

00:10:46.040 because it's incompatible.

00:10:47.560 You can't agree to the theology of Islam 1.00

00:10:50.680 and be a Christian or a Jew.

00:10:53.120 It's incompatible.

00:10:55.100 In fact, I know a number of Muslims

00:10:56.340 who are anti-Islam against the doctrine.

00:10:58.820 I know a number of ex-Muslims,

00:11:01.220 a number of Muslim reformers.

00:11:03.140 The phrase Islamophobia is used

00:11:05.780 to shut up any criticism of Islam as a religion.

00:11:10.060 Just to shut them down.

00:11:11.320 So I noticed the wording,

00:11:13.240 Shir didn't say Islamophobia,

00:11:14.600 and I'm glad he didn't.

00:11:16.840 And I immediately noticed,

00:11:18.360 as I am absolutely sure you did,

00:11:21.580 these two women, 0.99

00:11:24.380 these two young Muslim women

00:11:26.520 who are not wearing hijabs,

00:11:29.540 let alone niqabs. 1.00

00:11:31.600 In fact, as you can see,

00:11:33.180 he's making physical contact

00:11:35.580 with at least one of them,

00:11:36.980 and their pretty hair.

00:11:38.960 That's the main photo on his page,

00:11:41.100 as you saw.

00:11:41.680 There are only those two women 1.00

00:11:43.440 in all of the pictures

00:11:44.720 associated with this Muslim meetup.

00:11:47.340 The rest are men.

00:11:48.300 Look at this.

00:11:48.660 Look around the table there.

00:11:50.280 You can see,

00:11:51.880 yeah, there are the two women there. 1.00

00:11:53.200 Flip back to that last photo for a second.

00:11:55.520 Oh, go back a little bit.

00:11:56.800 You can see one of the women on the left, 0.99

00:11:59.060 the second one in,

00:11:59.820 and one of them you can just see

00:12:01.520 your hands on the right,

00:12:03.220 but there's one, two, three, four,

00:12:05.400 five, six, seven, eight, nine,

00:12:06.780 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 guys.

00:12:09.320 So it's just the two attractive women 1.00

00:12:11.380 and the guys.

00:12:13.080 So it's a very strategic choice,

00:12:15.200 only two women, 0.98

00:12:17.640 and it shows that Andrew Shira

00:12:19.080 is friendly with Muslims,

00:12:20.220 but not with Islamism 0.96

00:12:22.920 or symbols of political Islam,

00:12:25.280 which the niqab and the hijab are.

00:12:27.700 That's such a hot issue right now in Quebec,

00:12:30.160 especially because of the Bill 21 percopet.

00:12:33.240 But here's the photo,

00:12:34.320 and I flashed it for a second there.

00:12:36.020 Here's the photo

00:12:37.160 that Andrew Shira took

00:12:39.120 that is halal.

00:12:41.540 No women in this picture,

00:12:44.360 just the Muslim men 0.94

00:12:45.780 who will feel free to publish it

00:12:48.020 on their mosque websites

00:12:49.240 because those two uncovered girls 1.00

00:12:52.380 aren't in the shot.

00:12:54.140 Now, I don't know

00:12:56.620 who those two guys are

00:12:57.840 on the right,

00:12:58.660 the guy on the right

00:13:00.360 and the guy right next to Shira.

00:13:02.400 I'll dig into it more.

00:13:03.920 I'm doing some research on it,

00:13:05.040 but I absolutely

00:13:06.060 and immediately

00:13:07.300 recognize that guy

00:13:09.460 on the left.

00:13:11.220 His name is Omar Subedar.

00:13:15.240 That's his name.

00:13:17.300 Here's his Facebook page.

00:13:19.140 He's an Islamic teacher,

00:13:20.920 publisher,

00:13:21.240 unelected politician,

00:13:23.920 a big wheel.

00:13:25.460 He's a huge fan

00:13:27.140 of Justin Trudeau.

00:13:28.740 They've met so many times,

00:13:30.520 and Subedar 0.98

00:13:31.000 has promoted Trudeau so much.

00:13:34.820 He's also a huge fan

00:13:36.000 of Patrick Brown,

00:13:37.640 the disgraced former leader

00:13:39.480 of the Ontario BPCs

00:13:41.880 who was driven out

00:13:42.940 because of a sex scandal.

00:13:44.860 Now, I know Omar Subedar

00:13:46.300 because he has a lot to say.

00:13:49.300 Obviously, he's an anti-Israel extremist.

00:13:51.640 This is from his Facebook page,

00:13:53.660 a page saying Israel doesn't exist,

00:13:55.840 has never existed,

00:13:57.160 pro-PLO.

00:13:58.400 I mean, obviously,

00:13:58.940 it goes without saying.

00:14:00.420 He's obsessed with anti-Israel,

00:14:02.660 anti-PLO memes.

00:14:04.340 That's not even news these days.

00:14:06.500 He's cleaned up his Facebook page a bit

00:14:08.240 since I last did a report on him.

00:14:10.460 But just for example,

00:14:11.620 he shared a page called

00:14:13.620 There Is No Israel. 0.99

00:14:16.840 But in the word Israel,

00:14:18.040 the S was a dollar sign.

00:14:19.580 He calls Israel an apartheid state.

00:14:21.780 Of course he does.

00:14:22.760 He says it's a puppet of NATO

00:14:24.320 to colonize Muslim Arabia 0.98

00:14:26.600 and steal their oil.

00:14:28.340 He supports George Galloway,

00:14:29.880 the anti-Semitic British politician

00:14:31.260 who has publicly given money

00:14:32.820 to the Hamas terrorist group.

00:14:34.240 That's sort of gross

00:14:35.180 that that's one of Scheer's new friends.

00:14:38.860 But in addition to preaching

00:14:40.380 and Facebooking,

00:14:41.600 he's also a lecturer

00:14:43.320 and a publisher.

00:14:45.320 This is his company,

00:14:47.420 Bukhari Publications.

00:14:50.000 He now calls it Bukhari Academy.

00:14:53.660 And I know this from when I reported it

00:14:55.580 back at the Sun News

00:14:56.620 after Trudeau slithered up to this guy.

00:14:59.400 Subirat publishes books.

00:15:01.360 He publishes advice

00:15:02.680 to Canadian Muslims

00:15:03.940 on how to live.

00:15:04.720 He wants people to live

00:15:06.120 according to the laws of Islam.

00:15:08.000 That's Sharia law. 0.95

00:15:08.960 He believes in the theocracy.

00:15:11.460 And one of the things

00:15:12.320 that this Omar Subidar

00:15:14.440 is an expert about

00:15:16.020 is how to treat women.

00:15:19.700 He's a ladies' man, 1.00

00:15:20.900 so to speak,

00:15:21.480 an expert.

00:15:22.820 He's got lots of lady advice 1.00

00:15:24.140 and he shares it with the men

00:15:25.660 in his community.

00:15:27.920 Here's some advice he wrote

00:15:29.440 called maintaining a marriage.

00:15:34.660 Maintaining a marriage.

00:15:36.140 Andrew Scheer's new friend

00:15:38.200 starts off

00:15:39.120 by explaining

00:15:40.180 that in Islam

00:15:41.660 Allah has,

00:15:43.540 and I quote,

00:15:45.660 he has made the husband

00:15:47.160 officially in charge

00:15:48.400 of managing the relationship

00:15:50.060 by saying

00:15:50.680 men are in charge of women. 0.99

00:15:53.500 And he says

00:15:54.360 Allah has given precedence 1.00

00:15:56.380 to men over women.

00:15:58.580 And he says

00:15:59.380 the wives, 0.97

00:16:00.340 on the other hand,

00:16:01.100 have an obligation

00:16:01.940 to be obedient

00:16:02.960 to their husbands.

00:16:04.020 Now maybe he's just being

00:16:06.680 what we might call

00:16:07.280 old-fashioned.

00:16:08.480 I mean, no problem, right?

00:16:09.480 I mean, obedience,

00:16:10.660 I'm sure he doesn't mean

00:16:11.820 in the way

00:16:12.240 that a child

00:16:13.020 has to be obedient

00:16:13.940 or a pet

00:16:15.920 has to be obedient, right?

00:16:18.360 Well, let's let

00:16:19.260 Omar Subidar

00:16:19.880 speak for himself.

00:16:20.820 He says

00:16:21.260 if for some reason

00:16:23.380 the wife

00:16:24.360 becomes stubborn,

00:16:26.840 arrogant,

00:16:27.680 or disobedient

00:16:28.880 even after the husband

00:16:30.500 is doing his part,

00:16:31.600 then Allah has introduced 0.96

00:16:33.640 a three-point dispute

00:16:35.540 resolution plan.

00:16:37.080 Oh, did you know that?

00:16:39.440 The first,

00:16:40.720 says Omar Subidar,

00:16:41.920 is for the man

00:16:42.680 to give his wife 0.60

00:16:43.500 some advice,

00:16:45.520 to sit her down 0.82

00:16:46.720 and tell her

00:16:47.780 the way things

00:16:48.460 are going to go.

00:16:49.160 But what if that

00:16:50.940 doesn't go so well?

00:16:53.080 Well, the second point

00:16:54.320 in his three-point plan

00:16:55.480 is, and I quote,

00:16:57.900 forsake them in bed.

00:17:00.300 If the problem persists

00:17:01.560 after exercising

00:17:02.560 the first measure,

00:17:03.620 then the husband

00:17:04.060 should refrain

00:17:05.020 from having

00:17:05.720 sexual relations

00:17:06.680 with her.

00:17:08.180 I'm not making that up.

00:17:10.100 Now,

00:17:11.260 I'm not sure

00:17:11.880 how many women 1.00

00:17:12.620 watching my photo

00:17:13.860 would think

00:17:14.300 that refraining

00:17:15.140 from relations

00:17:16.380 with this fella

00:17:17.100 is a punishment.

00:17:18.820 But look,

00:17:19.280 shakuna sangu,

00:17:20.340 everyone's got

00:17:20.900 their taste.

00:17:21.640 There's someone

00:17:22.000 out there

00:17:22.440 for each of us.

00:17:23.460 Thank God.

00:17:24.820 Look, I'm just

00:17:25.240 joking around,

00:17:25.860 but it's step three

00:17:26.680 that is the real

00:17:27.920 cause for worry.

00:17:29.560 I mean,

00:17:29.800 Omar Subidar

00:17:30.340 going on a sex strike

00:17:31.440 is one thing,

00:17:32.200 but let me quote

00:17:33.060 to you point three.

00:17:34.480 This is Andrew

00:17:35.180 Scheer's new friend.

00:17:37.340 So just to recap,

00:17:38.040 step one

00:17:38.440 to a disobedient wife 1.00

00:17:40.060 is to give them

00:17:40.920 advice,

00:17:41.300 give them a lecture.

00:17:41.980 Step two

00:17:42.320 is to punish them

00:17:43.880 by not having

00:17:44.860 sex with them. 0.99

00:17:45.400 But here's step three,

00:17:46.760 and I quote verbatim

00:17:47.720 at length

00:17:48.560 so you'll see

00:17:49.240 the whole context.

00:17:50.420 This is Andrew Scheer's

00:17:51.160 new friend,

00:17:51.880 Omar Subidar,

00:17:52.740 who says,

00:17:54.660 strike them. 0.99

00:17:57.220 If the problem

00:17:57.680 still does not

00:17:58.260 get resolved,

00:17:59.160 then as a final resort,

00:18:00.220 Allah has permitted 0.97

00:18:00.960 the husband

00:18:01.380 to discipline his wife 0.75

00:18:02.680 by striking her.

00:18:04.760 However,

00:18:05.040 this does not imply

00:18:05.800 that Allah is promoting 1.00

00:18:06.660 domestic violence.

00:18:08.160 The prophet,

00:18:09.120 praise be unto him,

00:18:10.300 has made it very clear

00:18:11.340 that the beating

00:18:12.180 should not be agonizing

00:18:14.340 in any shape or form.

00:18:15.700 He mentioned

00:18:16.520 in the sermon

00:18:17.520 during his farewell

00:18:18.600 pilgrimage

00:18:19.580 and hit them lightly.

00:18:23.600 The objective

00:18:24.620 of striking her lightly

00:18:26.400 is to discipline her

00:18:28.020 and to make her realize

00:18:29.140 that what she's doing

00:18:29.880 is unwarranted.

00:18:33.460 So he's telling Canadians

00:18:34.880 in English

00:18:36.500 to beat their wives. 0.64

00:18:40.600 Now he's clearly

00:18:43.140 a moderate

00:18:43.780 because he said,

00:18:45.320 now don't make it

00:18:46.260 agonizing, fellas.

00:18:48.020 You just got to

00:18:48.940 hit them lightly.

00:18:49.840 You know,

00:18:50.840 light punch.

00:18:51.560 Don't break any bones, fellas.

00:18:53.320 Just a light slap, okay?

00:18:55.220 He actually goes on

00:18:56.360 to recommend

00:18:56.880 a foot-long heavy stick.

00:18:58.840 That's how they do it

00:18:59.640 in the old country.

00:19:00.860 But not agonizing, fellas.

00:19:02.780 All right?

00:19:03.180 I swear to God

00:19:06.240 this is what

00:19:06.720 this guy's publishing

00:19:07.500 here in Canada.

00:19:09.740 Not back in Pakistan. 1.00

00:19:10.960 Here in Canada.

00:19:12.100 In English.

00:19:13.340 It's what he does

00:19:13.880 for a living.

00:19:14.820 And he has thousands

00:19:15.940 in his flock.

00:19:18.180 His advice

00:19:19.040 on how to handle women 0.99

00:19:20.400 strike them. 0.99

00:19:22.240 Allah has permitted it. 0.95

00:19:23.540 Just don't make it agonizing.

00:19:25.720 Just hit her. 0.99

00:19:27.660 She deserves it.

00:19:29.820 Allah says.

00:19:30.780 Now, like many Canadians,

00:19:33.560 I have Muslim friends.

00:19:34.560 Like most Canadians,

00:19:35.800 I reject Islam, 1.00

00:19:36.700 the religion.

00:19:37.220 It's not incompatible

00:19:38.300 to have Muslim friends

00:19:39.400 to like Muslims,

00:19:40.320 to reject the religion.

00:19:42.600 We do that

00:19:43.200 with every religion.

00:19:44.620 Separation of church 0.92

00:19:45.800 and state.

00:19:46.280 Separation of mosque 0.86

00:19:47.220 and state.

00:19:47.660 In fact,

00:19:48.000 many Muslims

00:19:48.900 come to Canada

00:19:50.020 themselves

00:19:50.680 to get away

00:19:51.860 from Sharia law

00:19:52.820 and to get away

00:19:55.080 from Muslim imams

00:19:56.020 who tell men

00:19:56.800 that it's okay

00:19:57.860 to beat their wives. 0.64

00:20:00.780 Now, of course,

00:20:02.960 Justin Trudeau

00:20:03.760 loves this guy

00:20:04.960 and the feeling

00:20:06.140 is mutual.

00:20:08.400 But Andrew Scheer,

00:20:10.540 does he know

00:20:12.100 who Omar Subedar is

00:20:15.180 and what his views

00:20:17.060 on wife beating are?

00:20:19.560 I'm not sure

00:20:20.540 which is worse.

00:20:21.300 If Andrew Scheer

00:20:22.040 just doesn't know

00:20:23.900 or if he does know

00:20:26.960 and per Salma Zahid's

00:20:30.000 weird Twitter

00:20:30.700 conspiracy theory

00:20:31.700 somehow tried

00:20:33.240 to keep

00:20:33.620 his particular choice

00:20:35.280 of new friends

00:20:36.040 on the lowdown.

00:20:38.480 Which do you think

00:20:39.500 happened?

00:20:41.240 Stay with us

00:20:42.020 for more.

00:20:42.320 Welcome back.

00:20:57.300 Well, a funny thing

00:20:57.900 happened to me

00:20:58.960 yesterday

00:20:59.660 when I was making

00:21:00.800 my video

00:21:01.520 about things

00:21:02.880 Jason Kenney

00:21:03.720 could do

00:21:04.360 to stop

00:21:05.700 environmental extremists

00:21:07.220 in Alberta.

00:21:08.420 And one of the things

00:21:09.140 I wanted to show

00:21:10.080 was a new law

00:21:11.720 introduced in South Dakota

00:21:13.420 against riot boosting.

00:21:16.500 That's a new word

00:21:17.140 I'd never heard before.

00:21:18.480 It means people

00:21:19.200 who promote,

00:21:20.840 agitate,

00:21:21.600 fund,

00:21:22.060 organize riots.

00:21:23.400 They call it

00:21:23.780 riot boosting.

00:21:24.760 So I typed

00:21:25.480 into Google

00:21:26.420 as you can see here

00:21:28.480 riot boosting law

00:21:30.840 South Dakota.

00:21:32.760 It doesn't get

00:21:33.880 more precise

00:21:34.720 than that.

00:21:35.800 But look at the results

00:21:36.920 that came up.

00:21:37.540 The very first one

00:21:38.640 is a rebuttal

00:21:39.480 to the law

00:21:39.940 by the ACLU.

00:21:41.580 Then an environmental

00:21:42.960 condemnation of it.

00:21:44.340 Then another condemnation.

00:21:46.260 Then the ACLU

00:21:48.200 rebutting it again.

00:21:50.200 And then

00:21:50.660 again and again

00:21:52.640 left wing

00:21:53.400 or environmental groups

00:21:54.720 denouncing the bill.

00:21:58.060 The very last item

00:21:59.540 on the first page

00:22:00.200 is a Washington Post

00:22:01.120 story that's neutral.

00:22:02.300 But in that first list

00:22:03.920 of ten results,

00:22:06.240 you'd think I would have

00:22:07.660 the riot boosting law

00:22:09.540 South Dakota.

00:22:10.600 But in fact,

00:22:11.580 I did not.

00:22:12.140 I had to keep

00:22:12.780 searching more

00:22:14.340 and more and more

00:22:15.300 and clicking through

00:22:16.080 more and more and more

00:22:17.340 anti-riot boosting

00:22:19.280 commentary

00:22:20.140 before I could get

00:22:21.780 to the thing

00:22:22.300 that was being criticized.

00:22:23.260 You see what I'm saying?

00:22:24.640 I wanted to see

00:22:26.100 a document,

00:22:27.340 an official document,

00:22:28.700 so official

00:22:29.500 it's on the government's

00:22:30.540 own website.

00:22:31.620 But Google would not

00:22:33.580 let me get

00:22:34.380 to that document

00:22:35.320 even though I described

00:22:36.460 it perfectly

00:22:37.100 without first

00:22:38.640 making me look

00:22:40.200 at a dozen

00:22:41.560 rebuttals,

00:22:42.960 counterpoints

00:22:43.640 and denunciations.

00:22:45.580 Had I grown bored

00:22:47.000 or lost interest,

00:22:48.360 I never would have got

00:22:49.860 what I was searching for.

00:22:51.700 Now was that

00:22:52.340 the fact that

00:22:53.320 typing in

00:22:53.900 riot boosting law

00:22:55.040 South Dakota

00:22:55.660 wasn't clear enough?

00:22:57.680 Was there some reason

00:22:59.100 that that was pushed down?

00:23:01.180 And the criticisms

00:23:02.240 were pushed up?

00:23:04.000 Well, I'll never know.

00:23:05.420 But our next guest

00:23:06.480 says that there

00:23:07.760 are things afoot

00:23:09.100 that we don't know

00:23:10.460 that the U.S. Congress

00:23:11.740 is trying to find out.

00:23:13.420 I'm talking about

00:23:13.860 our friend Alan Bokhari,

00:23:15.500 the senior tech correspondent

00:23:17.060 for Breitbart.com.

00:23:18.520 Alan, great to see you again.

00:23:20.480 Good to see you, Ezra.

00:23:21.220 What do you think

00:23:21.760 of my little anecdote?

00:23:22.800 It's just a personal story,

00:23:24.320 but I found it quite odd

00:23:25.840 that I described a law

00:23:27.260 in a state perfectly

00:23:29.120 and yet it did not

00:23:31.120 show up

00:23:31.740 in the first dozen

00:23:32.680 or so hits,

00:23:33.360 but criticisms did.

00:23:34.500 I wanted to see it.

00:23:35.400 It wouldn't let me.

00:23:37.280 That is interesting

00:23:38.160 and we know

00:23:38.540 during the net neutrality debate

00:23:40.540 these tech companies

00:23:41.420 were artificially promoting,

00:23:43.460 well, it certainly looked

00:23:44.580 that they were pushing

00:23:45.440 pro-net neutrality posts

00:23:48.960 up their search results.

00:23:51.460 Now,

00:23:53.300 the idea of Google

00:23:54.520 search engine manipulation

00:23:55.520 has actually been

00:23:56.900 alleged by Donald Trump.

00:23:58.600 the mainstream media

00:24:00.240 called it a conspiracy theory,

00:24:01.600 of course,

00:24:02.340 but it's actually been

00:24:03.420 proven now

00:24:03.960 because a couple of months ago,

00:24:06.120 Breitbart released

00:24:06.740 an exclusive story

00:24:07.820 in which

00:24:08.520 a hidden blacklist

00:24:11.200 was found

00:24:11.920 within Google

00:24:14.460 that allowed the company

00:24:16.300 to manually

00:24:17.320 adjust search results

00:24:19.340 on YouTube

00:24:20.140 and in that same leak

00:24:21.980 a member of Google's

00:24:23.340 trust and safety team

00:24:24.260 admitted that they

00:24:25.080 occasionally do

00:24:26.140 the same thing

00:24:26.740 for so-called

00:24:27.280 controversial search results

00:24:28.560 on Google's

00:24:29.100 main search engine.

00:24:30.100 So it's now been confirmed

00:24:31.260 thanks to these Google leaks

00:24:32.420 that Google manipulated

00:24:34.520 search results

00:24:35.320 on YouTube

00:24:35.860 and on its main search engine

00:24:37.160 and they're doing so

00:24:38.160 for political topics

00:24:39.020 on YouTube.

00:24:39.700 They deliberately

00:24:40.440 adjusted their search algorithm

00:24:42.180 to kick pro-life videos

00:24:43.420 out of the top 10

00:24:44.140 search results.

00:24:45.420 We've now seen news

00:24:46.880 from other sources

00:24:48.040 that Google

00:24:49.080 pushes conservative websites

00:24:51.840 out of new search results.

00:24:53.120 So this is all confirmed now.

00:24:55.360 The Democrats, of course,

00:24:56.700 will still call it

00:24:57.260 a conspiracy theory

00:24:58.020 because it's in their

00:24:58.940 interest to do so,

00:24:59.900 but the facts speak

00:25:00.780 for themselves.

00:25:01.840 Yeah, I mean,

00:25:02.400 I, of course,

00:25:04.000 have been watching

00:25:04.660 the marginalization

00:25:05.920 of Tommy Robinson

00:25:07.480 in the United Kingdom.

00:25:08.720 We here at The Rebel

00:25:09.740 have tasted

00:25:10.900 some of that censorship,

00:25:11.940 but I would have thought

00:25:12.800 that something

00:25:13.920 as official

00:25:14.780 as a government,

00:25:16.360 a state legislature

00:25:17.640 of South Dakota

00:25:18.500 would be immune to this.

00:25:20.940 No, that actual

00:25:22.620 government legislature,

00:25:24.740 the Senate of South Dakota

00:25:26.340 was pushed below

00:25:28.680 a far left-wing activist group

00:25:30.720 called the ACAU.

00:25:31.840 It was just a little taste of it.

00:25:33.280 It's an example.

00:25:33.920 And I just,

00:25:34.940 I wonder how much

00:25:36.660 of the world around me

00:25:37.940 that I think I know

00:25:39.160 is not real

00:25:40.720 because if so much

00:25:42.760 of our world

00:25:43.160 comes from the internet

00:25:44.160 and what we search,

00:25:45.920 if someone's putting

00:25:47.140 their finger on the scale,

00:25:48.220 we start to lose touch

00:25:49.800 with reality,

00:25:50.780 don't we?

00:25:52.180 Because we,

00:25:52.940 I mean,

00:25:53.880 we walk around

00:25:54.820 in real life,

00:25:56.180 Alan,

00:25:56.460 and we try and observe things,

00:25:57.700 but we think

00:25:58.260 the internet

00:25:58.780 is a window,

00:26:00.080 but it's a very

00:26:00.840 contorted lens.

00:26:02.060 It's not a clear

00:26:03.320 glass window,

00:26:03.960 is it?

00:26:05.500 Not at all.

00:26:06.240 And it's an interesting

00:26:07.120 example that you use

00:26:08.040 because Google

00:26:09.360 and YouTube

00:26:10.160 maintain in public

00:26:11.200 that they're

00:26:12.240 non-political

00:26:13.280 in their approach

00:26:13.900 to search,

00:26:14.400 that they only,

00:26:15.520 if they promote

00:26:16.120 certain sources,

00:26:16.800 it's only to promote

00:26:17.660 so-called authoritative

00:26:19.100 sources.

00:26:20.080 But there's nothing

00:26:20.780 more authoritative

00:26:21.420 than a government website,

00:26:22.480 so it's very surprising

00:26:24.040 to me that

00:26:24.700 that government document

00:26:26.320 was so hard to find

00:26:27.320 on Google search,

00:26:28.120 whereas left-wing

00:26:29.680 advocacy organizations

00:26:30.680 were so easy to find.

00:26:32.520 Of course,

00:26:33.200 on YouTube,

00:26:33.760 with the re-ranking

00:26:34.520 of abortion results

00:26:35.460 that I mentioned,

00:26:36.420 the so-called

00:26:37.000 authoritative sources

00:26:37.840 were all left-wing

00:26:38.660 pro-abortion propaganda.

00:26:42.100 Now,

00:26:43.060 as you said,

00:26:44.320 this is quite insidious

00:26:45.280 and it's hard to discern.

00:26:47.100 In fact,

00:26:47.300 there's been research

00:26:48.000 showing that search engine

00:26:49.120 bias is a lot more

00:26:50.000 dangerous than media bias

00:26:51.220 because ordinary users

00:26:52.460 of Google search

00:26:53.380 and other similar services,

00:26:55.860 they just automatically

00:26:57.500 trust the first page

00:26:59.400 of search results.

00:27:00.140 They don't,

00:27:01.140 it hasn't,

00:27:02.180 you're registered with people

00:27:03.320 that these results

00:27:04.980 could be manipulated.

00:27:06.480 And the vast majority

00:27:07.440 of users,

00:27:08.340 I don't know the exact number,

00:27:09.540 but it's well over 70%,

00:27:10.700 possibly over 90%,

00:27:11.920 will not go past

00:27:13.100 the first two pages

00:27:15.020 of search results.

00:27:16.180 And more than half

00:27:17.740 will not go past

00:27:18.420 the first five search results.

00:27:20.400 So if you manipulate

00:27:21.260 those search results,

00:27:23.400 especially in a controversial,

00:27:24.960 politically charged topic

00:27:25.840 like abortion 0.68

00:27:26.460 or the environment,

00:27:27.640 then you can easily control

00:27:29.300 what people are seeing

00:27:31.140 and what information

00:27:33.140 they receive

00:27:33.800 in this supposedly

00:27:34.500 free internet.

00:27:35.460 Yeah.

00:27:35.840 Well,

00:27:36.420 forgive me for indulging

00:27:37.840 by telling you

00:27:39.180 that personal search experience,

00:27:40.480 but I use Google

00:27:41.440 probably 100 times a day

00:27:43.940 for trivia,

00:27:46.540 for a restaurant,

00:27:48.580 for a map.

00:27:50.040 And the fact that

00:27:51.100 I can no longer trust it

00:27:52.380 is deeply unsettling to me.

00:27:55.760 I think it is also

00:27:56.980 to some people

00:27:57.960 in the U.S. Senate,

00:27:59.940 not as many as it should,

00:28:01.860 but your reporting

00:28:03.180 in Breitbart.com

00:28:04.420 tells us that there's recently

00:28:06.500 been an inquiry

00:28:07.520 in the Senate

00:28:08.040 led by Ted Cruz

00:28:09.260 and other senators

00:28:10.600 have participated.

00:28:11.540 Tell us a little bit

00:28:12.460 about this latest

00:28:13.360 round of investigations.

00:28:15.900 Is it Twitter

00:28:16.460 that's in the hot seat now?

00:28:19.640 Well,

00:28:20.360 Twitter,

00:28:20.800 Facebook,

00:28:21.220 and Google

00:28:21.820 were all supposed

00:28:22.480 to send representatives

00:28:23.460 to this hearing

00:28:24.380 in the Senate

00:28:25.000 which took place yesterday.

00:28:26.600 Google once again

00:28:27.940 declined to send

00:28:28.840 a high-ranking member

00:28:29.980 of their team,

00:28:30.720 so the lower-ranking member

00:28:32.420 they wanted to send

00:28:33.240 was simply denied

00:28:34.120 by the senators.

00:28:37.720 And interestingly,

00:28:38.920 this hearing came

00:28:39.660 just one day

00:28:40.460 after a Democrat hearing

00:28:42.440 in the House,

00:28:43.060 the House Judiciary Committee,

00:28:44.880 now run by

00:28:45.860 Russiagate pusher

00:28:47.640 Jerry Nadler.

00:28:49.460 And it's interesting

00:28:50.440 to watch the contrast

00:28:51.420 between those two hearings.

00:28:52.480 And the first one,

00:28:53.200 the Democrat-controlled one,

00:28:54.280 it was all about

00:28:54.980 hate speech

00:28:55.700 and extremism online

00:28:57.460 and how the social media platform

00:28:59.760 needed to do more

00:29:00.360 to stop it.

00:29:00.940 So that hearing

00:29:01.520 was pressuring

00:29:02.100 the social media companies

00:29:03.000 to do more censorship

00:29:03.840 and be more politically biased.

00:29:05.880 Whereas the second one

00:29:06.820 in the Senate,

00:29:07.380 still controlled by Republicans,

00:29:08.400 was organized

00:29:10.220 by Ted Cruz,

00:29:11.140 who's been very vocally

00:29:12.520 opposed to Silicon Valley

00:29:13.560 bias.

00:29:14.520 One of the earliest

00:29:15.460 senators to speak out on it,

00:29:16.680 possibly the earliest.

00:29:19.340 And that really exposed

00:29:21.500 how Silicon Valley

00:29:23.240 actually is

00:29:23.900 censoring conservatives.

00:29:25.320 And what I found

00:29:26.480 interesting about it

00:29:27.140 was Ted Cruz

00:29:27.740 started the discussion

00:29:28.660 by framing it

00:29:29.500 around solutions.

00:29:30.660 So it's not

00:29:31.360 retreading old ground.

00:29:32.720 We already know

00:29:33.380 that they're biased.

00:29:34.480 So Cruz is outlining

00:29:35.520 how it could be tackled

00:29:36.420 with potentially antitrust law,

00:29:38.200 with reform of legislation

00:29:39.680 to strip their immunity

00:29:40.880 if they stop,

00:29:42.140 if they don't stop

00:29:43.480 acting in a biased,

00:29:44.540 non-neutral manner.

00:29:46.120 And there were

00:29:46.560 several key moments,

00:29:47.720 key standout moments

00:29:48.560 in the hearing.

00:29:49.460 You know,

00:29:49.900 Twitter was left,

00:29:50.720 Twitter's representatives

00:29:51.480 were left speechless

00:29:52.160 at one point

00:29:52.780 because they've consistently

00:29:54.420 avoided answer,

00:29:55.620 giving a straight answer

00:29:56.580 to the question,

00:29:57.280 are you a neutral platform?

00:29:59.120 But what Cruz did

00:29:59.800 would you call that?

00:30:01.000 I think we have a clip of that

00:30:01.740 that we've taken,

00:30:02.460 I think,

00:30:02.840 from Breitbart,

00:30:03.460 actually.

00:30:04.020 Let's play about

00:30:04.620 a minute or so.

00:30:05.980 This is Ted Cruz

00:30:06.760 pressing Twitter

00:30:07.800 on are you neutral

00:30:09.440 that all people have

00:30:10.820 like a stage

00:30:11.820 that any theater,

00:30:13.040 that any actor

00:30:14.020 could rent to put on a play?

00:30:15.360 Or are you a publisher

00:30:16.640 that chooses

00:30:17.420 and curates

00:30:18.280 and edits

00:30:18.800 and censors?

00:30:20.140 Let's run a bit

00:30:21.180 of that clip

00:30:21.700 and I think this is

00:30:22.400 taken directly

00:30:22.960 from Breitbart.

00:30:24.140 Gentlemen,

00:30:24.580 let me start

00:30:25.220 with a question

00:30:25.840 that I have asked

00:30:27.180 both of your companies

00:30:28.300 more than once,

00:30:29.280 which is a simple

00:30:31.280 and straightforward question

00:30:32.640 that I'd like to get

00:30:33.580 a simple and straightforward

00:30:34.440 answer to,

00:30:36.140 which is,

00:30:36.940 and let's start

00:30:37.480 with you,

00:30:37.860 Mr. Monge,

00:30:38.420 does Twitter consider

00:30:39.220 itself a neutral

00:30:39.940 public forum?

00:30:41.360 Twitter strives

00:30:42.100 every day

00:30:42.560 to be an impartial

00:30:43.420 platform

00:30:43.940 where all voices

00:30:45.400 can come and speak.

00:30:46.480 Mr. Monge,

00:30:47.080 you answered this

00:30:47.640 recently in the House

00:30:48.440 and gave an answer

00:30:49.240 that was a long paragraph

00:30:50.320 and it didn't answer it,

00:30:52.580 so I'm going to try.

00:30:53.780 I don't actually expect

00:30:54.500 to get an answer

00:30:55.180 because I've asked

00:30:55.900 you this before,

00:30:57.260 but are you able

00:30:59.040 to answer yes or no

00:31:00.820 whether you consider

00:31:01.460 yourself a neutral

00:31:02.160 public forum?

00:31:02.800 I didn't testify

00:31:03.400 in the House, sir.

00:31:05.340 I'll answer the same way.

00:31:06.400 Okay, please do that.

00:31:07.600 Which is that Twitter

00:31:08.880 is an open

00:31:09.740 internet platform

00:31:10.740 where people

00:31:11.560 from all stripes

00:31:12.280 and political affiliations

00:31:13.600 all around the globe

00:31:14.760 come and speak.

00:31:16.940 So recently,

00:31:17.800 the CEO of Twitter,

00:31:19.700 Jack Dorsey,

00:31:20.540 said, quote,

00:31:21.660 I don't believe

00:31:22.320 that we can afford

00:31:23.020 to take a neutral

00:31:23.720 stance anymore.

00:31:24.640 I don't believe

00:31:25.240 that we should optimize

00:31:26.140 for neutrality.

00:31:27.520 Does this represent

00:31:28.620 the policy of Twitter?

00:31:29.480 I have not seen

00:31:31.640 that quote, sir.

00:31:33.400 Do you agree with it?

00:31:37.600 That is not how

00:31:38.660 he is building

00:31:39.420 the platform

00:31:40.600 and how everybody

00:31:42.200 who comes to Twitter

00:31:42.940 every day.

00:31:44.340 I think it's important

00:31:45.320 to note, sir,

00:31:46.280 that three quarters

00:31:47.520 of our users

00:31:48.960 are overseas

00:31:49.760 and that we are

00:31:51.440 a global company

00:31:52.200 that is staffed

00:31:53.440 globally.

00:31:54.480 All right, mister.

00:31:55.580 Yeah, I don't know

00:31:56.120 what that answers

00:31:58.920 to questions

00:31:59.720 that were not asked.

00:32:01.180 No answers

00:32:01.780 to questions

00:32:02.460 that were asked.

00:32:03.620 That's got to be

00:32:04.380 frustrating for

00:32:05.460 Senator Cruz

00:32:06.620 or for anyone

00:32:07.400 who wants an answer

00:32:08.240 to that.

00:32:10.040 Yeah, Cruz said

00:32:10.920 at the start,

00:32:11.460 you know,

00:32:11.720 part of the hearing

00:32:12.220 was about transparency

00:32:13.400 and getting some answers

00:32:14.500 on how tech companies

00:32:16.140 actually enforce

00:32:17.840 their policies

00:32:18.420 and clearly that

00:32:19.380 wasn't happening

00:32:20.120 at that committee.

00:32:21.000 But it's important

00:32:21.680 that the questions

00:32:22.260 were asked

00:32:23.060 and as you all

00:32:25.360 saw in that clip,

00:32:26.280 there was one point

00:32:27.060 where Twitter's

00:32:28.580 representative couldn't

00:32:29.180 answer for about

00:32:29.700 10 seconds.

00:32:31.160 And it wasn't just Cruz

00:32:32.320 also, there were other

00:32:32.960 senators at the hearing.

00:32:34.500 What we're seeing

00:32:35.260 in the Senate now

00:32:36.300 is a sort of new group

00:32:37.440 of Republican firebrands

00:32:38.680 who are very,

00:32:40.180 very focused

00:32:42.120 on the tech issue.

00:32:43.080 You have Josh Hawley

00:32:44.060 as well,

00:32:45.040 who's been taking

00:32:46.000 Google to task

00:32:46.740 especially,

00:32:47.320 and he also had

00:32:47.700 Marsha Blackburn

00:32:48.820 on the same committee.

00:32:49.700 She herself was a target

00:32:50.720 of Silicon Valley censorship

00:32:51.960 during the 2018

00:32:54.040 midterm elections.

00:32:55.020 She had her ads

00:32:55.640 banned by Facebook

00:32:56.480 and Twitter.

00:32:58.840 So we are going

00:33:00.060 to see,

00:33:00.560 I think,

00:33:01.220 more attention

00:33:01.780 given to this issue

00:33:02.640 in the Republican

00:33:03.340 controlled Senate.

00:33:05.040 But at the same time,

00:33:05.960 the Democrats

00:33:06.340 in the House

00:33:06.880 are now using

00:33:07.980 their control

00:33:08.720 of committees

00:33:09.200 to pressure

00:33:09.620 Silicon Valley

00:33:10.320 to do more censorship.

00:33:11.620 So we're really

00:33:12.280 seeing this battle

00:33:13.140 emerging for control

00:33:14.480 of social media

00:33:15.240 with the Republicans

00:33:16.000 pushing for less censorship

00:33:17.180 and the Democrats

00:33:17.760 pushing for more.

00:33:19.200 And they're both

00:33:19.820 going to use

00:33:20.300 their political weight

00:33:22.780 to achieve that.

00:33:24.280 What worries me

00:33:25.140 is that when a Democrat

00:33:26.360 threatens a tech company,

00:33:29.440 the tech companies

00:33:30.120 know it's going to be

00:33:30.660 back with regulation

00:33:31.660 because the Democrats

00:33:32.280 won't hesitate

00:33:32.940 to legislate.

00:33:34.340 Whereas Republicans

00:33:35.600 still have this faction

00:33:37.100 of free market conservatives

00:33:38.460 who just want

00:33:38.840 a totally hands-off approach

00:33:40.260 despite the fact,

00:33:42.220 as I believe it was

00:33:43.180 Ted Cruz

00:33:43.680 who said on the committee

00:33:44.860 that these companies

00:33:47.260 are now bigger

00:33:47.940 and more powerful

00:33:48.820 than Standard Oil

00:33:49.740 than Bell Telephones

00:33:52.280 than all the other

00:33:53.140 monopolies

00:33:54.280 that have been broken up

00:33:55.160 and regulated

00:33:55.940 in America's history.

00:33:57.420 I have to say

00:33:58.480 that if I once thought

00:34:00.240 that Donald Trump

00:34:00.840 might be the man

00:34:01.840 like Teddy Roosevelt

00:34:03.620 to trust bust

00:34:04.500 the Silicon Valley giants,

00:34:06.760 I no longer believe

00:34:07.660 he has that zip in him.

00:34:10.520 I just don't see it.

00:34:11.960 If a guy won't build a wall,

00:34:13.180 I don't think he's going

00:34:13.980 to bust up

00:34:15.140 the social media trust.

00:34:16.660 Let me play a clip.

00:34:17.420 You mentioned Josh Hawley

00:34:18.520 from Missouri.

00:34:19.220 I am not familiar with him

00:34:20.420 and that's one of the good things

00:34:21.820 about these senators

00:34:23.100 who are taking a run at it.

00:34:24.200 They're younger,

00:34:24.940 they're more tech savvy.

00:34:26.840 In some earlier iterations

00:34:28.300 of these Capitol Hill grillings,

00:34:30.960 it's clear that the people

00:34:32.260 who are asking questions

00:34:33.380 maybe at most

00:34:35.520 have a Facebook page at home

00:34:37.360 that their kids

00:34:38.020 show them how to use.

00:34:39.580 So Ted Cruz

00:34:41.080 seems to know stuff

00:34:42.140 and here's a clip

00:34:42.780 of Josh Hawley

00:34:43.900 in the Senate

00:34:44.360 who I think clearly

00:34:46.300 knows it's tough.

00:34:47.020 Take a look.

00:34:48.900 ...that the review team follows.

00:34:50.400 Is there a protocol

00:34:51.060 that they follow?

00:34:52.140 There are protocols

00:34:53.420 on any number of issues,

00:34:54.500 yes, sir.

00:34:55.120 Including about

00:34:55.900 de-platforming.

00:34:57.540 Let me explain.

00:34:59.200 First, just answer

00:34:59.940 that question.

00:35:00.540 Is there a protocol?

00:35:01.740 There are many

00:35:02.520 workflows and protocols

00:35:03.580 and processes.

00:35:04.260 Will you make those public?

00:35:05.740 We make our terms

00:35:06.840 of service public.

00:35:07.680 Will you make

00:35:07.960 the protocols public

00:35:08.920 for the review

00:35:09.520 of when you ban people

00:35:10.520 like the unplanned movie

00:35:11.600 and Jesse Kelly?

00:35:12.620 Will you make those

00:35:13.160 protocols as it relates

00:35:14.480 to the human reviewers?

00:35:15.580 Will you make those public?

00:35:16.500 I think you're aiming

00:35:17.340 at a very important question

00:35:18.280 which is transparency.

00:35:19.440 Why don't you just

00:35:20.100 first answer my question.

00:35:21.420 Will you make those public?

00:35:22.360 Will you commit today to me?

00:35:23.240 You said earlier

00:35:23.740 that you are

00:35:24.200 a pro-transparency company,

00:35:26.200 that you want

00:35:26.820 to embrace transparency.

00:35:28.340 So you have your chance now.

00:35:29.820 Tell us you'll make

00:35:30.360 the protocols public.

00:35:31.240 Will you make them public?

00:35:32.080 It's not up to me

00:35:32.800 to make them public, sir.

00:35:33.660 I mean, again,

00:35:36.360 the reference there

00:35:37.100 for folks who don't understand,

00:35:38.360 there is a pro-life movie

00:35:39.740 that was simply deleted

00:35:41.600 from Twitter.

00:35:43.200 Their account,

00:35:44.060 Jesse Kelly,

00:35:44.920 a humorous conservative

00:35:46.620 commentator from Texas,

00:35:47.720 simply deleted

00:35:48.820 and it was later found out

00:35:51.180 it was done by humans,

00:35:52.700 obviously,

00:35:53.200 not just an algorithm

00:35:54.180 and they would not

00:35:55.320 explain the rationale.

00:35:56.940 All the errors,

00:35:58.180 Alam,

00:35:58.700 seem to go one way.

00:36:00.140 In fact,

00:36:00.480 I can't even ever remember

00:36:02.160 a liberal or a Democrat

00:36:03.660 being deplatformed at all,

00:36:05.380 let alone by mistake.

00:36:08.260 Just a quick note,

00:36:09.280 and I'm not sure

00:36:09.740 if you know this,

00:36:10.300 Alam,

00:36:10.640 one day we went

00:36:11.540 to our Facebook page

00:36:12.620 and it said,

00:36:13.820 you've broken the terms

00:36:14.760 of service in a post,

00:36:17.120 press the button

00:36:18.180 to unpublish

00:36:19.180 your whole page.

00:36:20.180 They didn't tell us

00:36:20.980 what we did wrong,

00:36:23.360 what post out of our thousands

00:36:24.860 did it,

00:36:25.420 and the only button

00:36:26.420 we pushed,

00:36:26.860 there wasn't a yes or no,

00:36:27.780 it was unpublish

00:36:29.140 your whole page or not.

00:36:31.200 And I got in touch

00:36:33.120 with senior Facebook executives

00:36:36.040 here in Canada

00:36:36.760 and they,

00:36:37.480 after hours,

00:36:38.240 said,

00:36:38.480 oh,

00:36:38.800 it was a glitch.

00:36:40.540 That was all they would say,

00:36:42.260 it was a glitch.

00:36:44.240 So,

00:36:45.400 the glitches only happen

00:36:46.840 one way,

00:36:47.320 don't they?

00:36:48.740 Absolutely,

00:36:49.480 and YouTube as well.

00:36:50.860 They recently

00:36:51.420 permanently banned

00:36:52.920 Hunter Avalon,

00:36:53.940 who's a very mainstream

00:36:54.960 conservative YouTuber

00:36:56.460 who had over

00:36:57.160 500,000 subscribers,

00:36:58.760 and then about an hour later

00:37:00.520 they reinstated him

00:37:01.380 saying it was all

00:37:01.920 a mistake and error.

00:37:02.880 So this always happens

00:37:03.580 to conservatives

00:37:04.120 and it always happens

00:37:04.960 one way.

00:37:06.240 And you also have to think

00:37:07.460 about Auden-Rig

00:37:08.320 grassroots conservatives

00:37:09.280 who aren't able

00:37:10.080 to get a response

00:37:11.000 from the press departments

00:37:13.120 of these massive companies.

00:37:14.920 They're probably being

00:37:15.960 banned by accident

00:37:17.180 every day

00:37:17.740 without any recourse.

00:37:19.640 And this is,

00:37:20.800 you know,

00:37:21.060 Josh Hawley

00:37:21.560 is really a center

00:37:22.480 to watch on this issue

00:37:23.740 because he really

00:37:24.500 understands it inside out

00:37:26.040 and he asks exactly

00:37:26.740 the right question.

00:37:27.920 Why aren't these

00:37:28.600 protocols public?

00:37:30.140 We know that Twitter

00:37:31.740 has an algorithm

00:37:32.480 that suspends people

00:37:33.440 and we know it goes

00:37:34.120 for manual review.

00:37:35.220 We don't know

00:37:35.820 who does the manual reviewing.

00:37:37.140 We need to know that

00:37:37.900 if we're going to

00:37:38.620 hold them accountable.

00:37:39.920 Yeah,

00:37:40.180 you're so right.

00:37:41.000 I mean,

00:37:41.180 I actually didn't have

00:37:42.340 a friend at Facebook.

00:37:43.260 I just went on to LinkedIn

00:37:44.220 and I spammed 0.88

00:37:45.360 every single person

00:37:46.600 on the Canadian

00:37:47.440 executive list

00:37:48.600 of Facebook.

00:37:49.940 I just,

00:37:50.780 I mean,

00:37:51.080 imagine just saying

00:37:52.180 you've done something wrong.

00:37:53.440 We're not going to tell you

00:37:54.420 what you did wrong.

00:37:55.600 We're not going to tell you

00:37:56.680 when you did it wrong.

00:37:58.580 But take our word for it.

00:38:00.060 You did something wrong

00:38:00.920 sometime

00:38:01.360 and therefore

00:38:02.720 push this button

00:38:04.420 and you will be the one

00:38:06.640 who deletes your own website.

00:38:08.200 That was the weirdest

00:38:09.320 part of it.

00:38:10.120 They didn't have the courage

00:38:11.440 or the intellectual honesty

00:38:12.500 to delete our website.

00:38:13.980 They said,

00:38:14.720 so push this button

00:38:16.560 and it was only one button.

00:38:17.860 Alan,

00:38:19.120 there wasn't a yes

00:38:19.880 or a no.

00:38:20.600 It was now

00:38:21.820 you destroy your own. 0.78

00:38:24.120 Now take the pill.

00:38:25.440 It was so,

00:38:26.560 so weird.

00:38:27.220 And again,

00:38:27.520 I find myself

00:38:28.180 talking about me

00:38:29.240 and the rebel.

00:38:29.780 I don't particularly mean to

00:38:31.140 other than

00:38:32.120 I think we are

00:38:34.120 like Breitbart is

00:38:35.540 in the United States.

00:38:36.280 We are the target

00:38:37.300 of this

00:38:37.700 in Canada

00:38:38.740 most acutely.

00:38:40.600 Are you optimistic

00:38:41.780 or are you pessimistic here?

00:38:43.560 Are things getting

00:38:44.500 better or worse?

00:38:45.220 Well,

00:38:47.200 I'm optimistic

00:38:48.240 about the Senate

00:38:49.000 because we've got

00:38:49.560 these new senators now

00:38:50.760 who really do understand

00:38:51.960 the tech issue.

00:38:53.020 But at the same time,

00:38:53.740 you've got Democrats

00:38:54.460 applying a press

00:38:57.120 from the other direction

00:38:58.100 from the House.

00:38:59.360 And as you said,

00:39:00.040 the executive branch,

00:39:01.000 Trump has talked a lot,

00:39:02.820 tweeted a lot about

00:39:03.680 social media censorship

00:39:05.240 and bias.

00:39:06.100 But at the same time,

00:39:07.060 he has people like

00:39:07.820 Jared and Ivanka

00:39:08.980 in the White House

00:39:10.200 who certainly Jared,

00:39:11.800 I think,

00:39:12.080 agrees with the liberals

00:39:12.880 on this

00:39:13.540 and is quite friendly

00:39:15.100 to Silicon Valley.

00:39:16.020 He gave them

00:39:16.400 extra protection

00:39:17.000 to the USNCA,

00:39:18.020 the new trade bill.

00:39:19.660 I think the point

00:39:21.280 about errors

00:39:22.180 and suspensions

00:39:23.020 highlights one of the points

00:39:24.620 Cruz made,

00:39:25.380 which is that

00:39:25.840 Section 230 reform

00:39:27.100 is absolutely essential

00:39:28.120 to solving this problem.

00:39:29.500 That's the piece

00:39:30.080 of legislation

00:39:30.700 that says tech companies

00:39:31.840 are allowed to censor

00:39:33.100 use generated content

00:39:34.160 without any recourse.

00:39:35.480 If that part of Section 230

00:39:37.000 came out,

00:39:37.640 suddenly the courts

00:39:40.660 would open up

00:39:41.420 to ordinary users

00:39:43.700 who want to actually

00:39:44.600 hold these companies

00:39:45.380 account for mistaken

00:39:46.360 suspensions.

00:39:47.580 And I think then

00:39:48.140 you'd see companies

00:39:49.080 becoming a lot more

00:39:49.880 cautious about

00:39:50.880 who they suspend

00:39:51.700 and why.

00:39:53.440 And hopefully,

00:39:54.440 the end goal,

00:39:55.780 I think,

00:39:56.100 for all users

00:39:56.840 should be acquiring,

00:39:58.560 winning back,

00:39:59.200 taking back control

00:40:00.320 from the social media giants.

00:40:01.740 Yeah.

00:40:02.400 Because if you go back...

00:40:05.180 Sorry, go ahead,

00:40:05.940 Alam.

00:40:06.060 I didn't mean to interrupt you.

00:40:07.120 Yeah, just to close the point,

00:40:08.900 it's all about

00:40:09.440 giving control

00:40:10.280 back to the users.

00:40:11.320 There's absolutely no reason

00:40:12.580 for any social media company

00:40:14.120 to ban lawful content.

00:40:16.360 If people don't want to see

00:40:17.520 certain types of lawful content

00:40:18.960 filter it out of their feed,

00:40:21.200 they should be given

00:40:21.820 their choice to do that,

00:40:22.840 but it shouldn't be imposed

00:40:23.740 on them by Silicon Valley.

00:40:25.020 There's no reason

00:40:25.820 to do that.

00:40:27.060 The same algorithms

00:40:28.240 used to suspend

00:40:29.120 certain types of content

00:40:30.200 can be turned

00:40:31.600 into optional filters

00:40:32.560 that users press a button

00:40:34.040 to turn on or off,

00:40:35.340 just like Google Safe Search.

00:40:36.440 The technology's already there.

00:40:38.080 They have it.

00:40:38.960 The reason they aren't doing it

00:40:40.000 is because they want

00:40:40.460 to keep that control

00:40:41.380 and because Democrats

00:40:42.240 in the media are pressuring them

00:40:43.460 to keep that control.

00:40:44.560 Yeah, it's just as bad

00:40:45.480 up here in Canada.

00:40:46.300 Another day,

00:40:46.720 we'll have to have you

00:40:47.360 help us analyze

00:40:48.200 the threatening moves

00:40:49.400 by Karina Gould,

00:40:51.160 the so-called

00:40:51.760 Democratic Reform Minister

00:40:53.240 up here,

00:40:54.100 or Democratic Institutions Minister

00:40:55.680 who is moving

00:40:56.320 to censor the Internet.

00:40:57.900 You know, Alam,

00:40:58.340 I was going to close

00:40:59.020 by saying the best thing

00:41:00.100 that could happen

00:41:00.740 would be for Twitter

00:41:02.080 to ban Donald Trump

00:41:04.620 in a fit of censorship

00:41:06.060 because finally

00:41:06.920 he would understand

00:41:08.180 how catastrophic

00:41:09.220 this will be

00:41:09.860 to his presidency.

00:41:10.660 But as soon as I was

00:41:11.340 formulating those words

00:41:14.320 in my mind,

00:41:14.960 I thought,

00:41:15.340 well, hang on,

00:41:16.420 they are banning him.

00:41:17.680 On several occasions now,

00:41:19.180 they've simply deleted

00:41:20.460 videos that he's tweeted.

00:41:23.080 So they're sort of

00:41:23.920 conditioning even him

00:41:25.380 that they will censor him

00:41:27.060 if they bloody well please.

00:41:28.120 Last word to you.

00:41:28.760 Yeah, and Facebook

00:41:29.760 banned his immigration video

00:41:31.620 during the 2018

00:41:32.380 election campaign.

00:41:33.440 That's open election

00:41:34.720 interference with a campaign

00:41:37.060 video from the president.

00:41:39.100 And Twitter actually did

00:41:40.320 delete his account.

00:41:42.260 They called it

00:41:42.960 a rogue employee,

00:41:43.780 another one of those mistakes.

00:41:45.120 So, you know,

00:41:45.840 it's already happened.

00:41:47.320 They're already suspending

00:41:48.280 all his supporters.

00:41:49.700 They're already suppressing

00:41:50.780 pro-Trump populist media

00:41:53.540 on Google search.

00:41:54.500 It's already happening.

00:41:55.680 It's just, you know,

00:41:56.200 the question is

00:41:56.640 what is he going to do about it?

00:41:58.000 Well, this is terrifying stuff.

00:42:00.640 Hopefully, neither you nor I

00:42:02.700 will simply be unpersoned,

00:42:04.680 deplatformed, and evaporated

00:42:06.360 like the South Dakota

00:42:07.800 riot-boosting law

00:42:09.640 is being thrown down

00:42:12.140 the memory hole.

00:42:12.720 That is so bizarre

00:42:13.480 because there is nothing

00:42:14.660 more official than

00:42:15.400 the legislature of South Dakota,

00:42:17.480 but apparently that's not

00:42:19.180 legit enough for Google.

00:42:21.380 Great to see you again, Alan.

00:42:22.320 Thanks for your time.

00:42:23.680 Thanks, Ezra.

00:42:24.420 All right.

00:42:24.800 There's our friend Alan Bokari,

00:42:26.080 the senior tech editor

00:42:27.400 of Breitbart.com.

00:42:29.040 Stay with us.

00:42:29.520 More ahead on The Rebel.

00:42:41.040 Hey, welcome back

00:42:41.840 to my monologue yesterday

00:42:42.720 about six things

00:42:43.540 Jason Kenney could do

00:42:44.540 to get Alberta's oil

00:42:45.360 and gas sector

00:42:45.960 back on his feet.

00:42:46.620 Mark writes,

00:42:47.100 Virtually every member

00:42:48.940 of the mainstream media

00:42:49.820 is a riot booster

00:42:51.280 and Trudeau and Obama

00:42:52.920 and Notley

00:42:53.480 and especially

00:42:54.180 the most prominent

00:42:54.920 CBC hosts.

00:42:56.720 Well, and you're not

00:42:58.280 speaking metaphorically,

00:42:59.840 David Suzuki,

00:43:01.400 perhaps the most prominent

00:43:02.640 CBC-er now that

00:43:03.940 Gian Gomeshi was cashiered,

00:43:06.380 he personally attended

00:43:09.340 the riots in Burnaby

00:43:12.400 against the Trans Mountain

00:43:13.520 pipeline or at least

00:43:15.160 the illegal blockade.

00:43:16.280 I'm not sure if he was there

00:43:17.200 when the rioting happened,

00:43:18.300 but I know he came

00:43:19.360 to give support

00:43:20.060 whether it was before

00:43:20.900 or after the riots.

00:43:21.640 So yeah, yeah,

00:43:22.660 they don't just do it

00:43:23.520 through the media,

00:43:24.420 they do it in person.

00:43:26.860 Henson writes,

00:43:28.280 Great recommendations, Ezra.

00:43:29.700 If those could be passed

00:43:30.500 in BC,

00:43:31.300 I'd be happy to see

00:43:32.220 David Suzuki get charged

00:43:33.340 and put away

00:43:33.820 for riot boosting.

00:43:37.460 Well, yeah,

00:43:38.600 I mean, riot boosting.

00:43:39.940 We have incitement

00:43:41.060 to riot.

00:43:41.660 We have conspiracy.

00:43:42.680 This just makes it

00:43:43.700 very particular

00:43:44.520 and it allows people

00:43:46.540 to sue civilly

00:43:48.000 and I think you get

00:43:49.040 triple damages.

00:43:49.960 So let's say

00:43:50.920 you're an oil company

00:43:51.840 and someone smashed up

00:43:53.360 your terminal

00:43:53.820 and cost you

00:43:54.720 $50,000 in damages.

00:43:56.540 You can sue

00:43:57.480 and get triple.

00:43:58.880 That would make

00:43:59.600 these environmental groups

00:44:00.640 avoid you.

00:44:03.040 Ron writes,

00:44:04.660 While what you propose

00:44:05.300 for Kenya is worth adopting, 1.00

00:44:06.420 I don't see how

00:44:07.000 it will get pipelines built.

00:44:08.240 You're correct.

00:44:11.580 It's not going to get

00:44:12.440 pipelines built

00:44:13.180 if there are

00:44:14.480 these three problems.

00:44:15.620 Number one,

00:44:16.140 Justin Trudeau.

00:44:17.440 Number two,

00:44:19.920 BC's Premier Horgan.

00:44:21.300 And number three,

00:44:21.880 the courts.

00:44:22.880 You're right.

00:44:23.700 Yeah, you're right.

00:44:26.000 I think we need

00:44:27.020 to change the culture

00:44:28.320 to demonize

00:44:30.320 and denormalize

00:44:31.680 the law-breaking

00:44:33.280 scofflaw

00:44:34.000 foreign lobbyists

00:44:35.240 and to normalize

00:44:36.880 working.

00:44:37.300 Trump is doing

00:44:38.760 that in America.

00:44:39.520 When he showed up

00:44:40.400 at that campaign rally

00:44:41.920 with a sign that said

00:44:42.740 Trump digs coal,

00:44:44.780 a decade worth

00:44:45.620 of coal demonization

00:44:46.820 was stopped

00:44:47.340 in its tracks.

00:44:48.420 Now,

00:44:48.740 there's still a lot

00:44:49.240 more work to do,

00:44:49.980 but Trump doesn't

00:44:51.040 demonize coal

00:44:51.700 like Obama did

00:44:52.720 and like Trudeau does.

00:44:55.200 Speaking of Trump,

00:44:55.960 I think he may be

00:44:56.700 the only pipeline

00:44:57.440 Albert he gets

00:44:58.040 in the next five years.

00:44:59.440 The keystone excel.

00:45:01.740 On my interview

00:45:02.520 with Mark Morano,

00:45:03.440 Anna writes,

00:45:05.400 Greta Thunberg

00:45:06.300 really creeps me out.

00:45:08.240 Also,

00:45:08.880 she has these

00:45:09.600 crazy eyes.

00:45:11.400 Reminds me of

00:45:12.520 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

00:45:16.440 You were so right

00:45:17.560 about it on your show

00:45:18.500 last night.

00:45:19.540 I have the same feeling

00:45:20.700 she has successfully

00:45:21.940 started a mass psychosis

00:45:23.680 among her peers

00:45:24.900 which spreads

00:45:25.680 like a wildfire.

00:45:26.900 It reminds me

00:45:27.420 of the Children's Crusade

00:45:28.840 from 1212.

00:45:30.480 She does have

00:45:33.640 crazy eyes

00:45:34.160 and I'm not

00:45:34.940 saying like,

00:45:36.740 you know,

00:45:36.960 some people are cross-eyed.

00:45:37.920 I'm not making fun

00:45:38.660 like that.

00:45:40.140 I'm not even making fun

00:45:41.320 of how she looks.

00:45:42.100 I'm talking about

00:45:42.980 what she does.

00:45:44.060 She styles her hair

00:45:45.140 with the pigtails

00:45:45.980 and she dresses 1.00

00:45:46.700 like a child

00:45:48.040 of tender years

00:45:48.740 although Mark told me

00:45:50.120 yesterday,

00:45:50.760 I think,

00:45:51.000 that she's 16.

00:45:53.060 And the way

00:45:53.880 she looks

00:45:54.720 like that,

00:45:55.520 that's not a mannerism

00:45:56.700 or a tick.

00:45:59.020 That is dramatic acting

00:46:01.280 and it's super creepy.

00:46:04.960 I think it really

00:46:05.840 is creepy.

00:46:06.960 I have to look

00:46:07.560 into the Child's Crusade

00:46:09.200 of 1212

00:46:09.760 because even just

00:46:10.920 hearing those words

00:46:11.820 is creepy

00:46:13.740 but I want to learn

00:46:15.060 because surely

00:46:16.400 there's nothing new

00:46:17.540 under the sun

00:46:18.180 and if there was

00:46:19.280 some childish cult

00:46:20.260 800 years ago,

00:46:23.000 perhaps what we're seeing

00:46:25.320 in this global warming mania

00:46:26.900 is an echo of that.

00:46:29.000 Thanks for the tip.

00:46:31.120 Well, what do you think

00:46:31.800 about my review

00:46:32.520 of Omar Subadar?

00:46:35.900 If you were Andrew Scheer,

00:46:37.040 would you meet with him?

00:46:38.420 Do you think

00:46:38.760 he did his due diligence

00:46:39.820 on that guy

00:46:41.020 and said,

00:46:41.900 look, I just got

00:46:42.560 to meet with him.

00:46:43.180 I just got to meet

00:46:43.720 with somebody.

00:46:45.200 I can tell

00:46:46.000 he put some thought

00:46:46.680 into it.

00:46:47.660 There were two

00:46:48.280 uncovered,

00:46:49.460 attractive Muslim women 1.00

00:46:50.920 who were prominent

00:46:53.060 in the photos.

00:46:54.040 That sends

00:46:54.540 a different message

00:46:55.240 and covered hijabis.

00:46:57.900 He did not use

00:46:58.960 the word Islamophobia.

00:47:00.380 He said

00:47:00.760 anti-Muslim bigotry

00:47:02.500 which is more precise

00:47:04.220 and therefore

00:47:04.820 doesn't sweep up

00:47:06.320 legitimate criticism

00:47:07.600 of Islam.

00:47:09.260 I don't know

00:47:10.320 if he vetted

00:47:11.100 his guest list

00:47:12.380 and if he did,

00:47:13.960 I wonder why

00:47:14.800 he decided

00:47:15.540 it was okay.

00:47:17.940 We'll have to ask him

00:47:18.920 one day.

00:47:19.320 I'm sure he'll sit down

00:47:20.160 for an interview

00:47:20.680 with us any day now.

00:47:22.180 Until next time,

00:47:23.100 on behalf of all us

00:47:23.900 here at Rebel World

00:47:24.540 Headquarters,

00:47:25.040 see you at home.

00:47:25.460 Good night.

00:47:26.420 Keep fighting for freedom.

00:47:27.380 Good night.

00:47:27.520 Keep fighting for freedom.

Rebel News Podcast - April 12, 2019

Muslim outreach： Andrew Scheer's “new friend” Omar Subedar publishes tips on beating your wife

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript