00:20:53.980range up to around 20 million. So that is just because of government policy. They said you can't
00:21:00.820own your private farms anymore. We're going to own farms. We'll call it collectivism. We'll make0.93
00:21:05.820sure that everything is distributed to everyone equally. So you've got bread lines, you are
00:21:10.540rationed certain amount of food. You can't just make as much food as your community needs or
00:21:15.120as your family needs. We are going to force you to give it to us to then redistribute to
00:21:19.900other people. And there wasn't enough food. The government didn't do it efficiently. And so people
00:21:26.440died. And when people refused, when people defected, when people didn't want to go along
00:21:30.900with this, when they resisted their farm being taken from them, they were executed. And socialists0.53
00:21:36.540are always very, very, very sensitive when it comes to pushing back against their ideology,
00:21:41.640because if you are going to have a completely collectivist society, everyone has to comply.
00:21:46.480and in order for everyone to comply you have to agree so any thought crime any word crime any
00:21:53.460attempt to try to convince something of something convince someone of something else has to face
00:22:01.060imprisonment you have to face execution which is of course exactly what happened in the soviet
00:22:05.460union as well as these work camps that tried to um you know work it out of the defectors and those
00:22:14.400who disagreed with socialism. So this led to tens of millions of people dying.
00:22:25.300You guys know how much I love Adele. I use their products every day, both their cosmetic line and
00:22:31.480their skincare line. It's just top-notch. I use their essential cleanser, their essential
00:22:35.320moisturizing spray, which works for all kinds of things, by the way. It works for like body spray,
00:22:40.820room fragrance. And I love that it's not synthetic, that I don't have to worry about it messing with
00:22:46.340my endocrine system, messing with my health, causing allergic reactions because it is all
00:22:52.340completely holistic. And this is also true of their makeup. I love their bronzing cream. It
00:22:57.840goes on so smoothly and it gives really good coverage stays for a long time. But again,
00:23:02.780it's totally moisturizing and all natural. I love that they're unapologetic about their faith in
00:23:09.020Christ, unapologetic about being pro-life. Their tagline, beauty comes from the heart,
00:23:13.480is inspired by 1 Peter 3, 3 through 4. And I just love that they wear that as their brand and as
00:23:19.340their identity. Go to adelnaturalcosmetics.com, enter promo code Allie for 25% off your first
00:23:25.340time purchase. That's adelnaturalcosmetics.com, code Allie. And then if we look at China,
00:23:35.660This is actually the death toll when it comes to what happened under Chinese communism is higher0.70
00:23:42.180than the Holocaust by orders of magnitude is higher than really any human atrocity that has0.81
00:23:49.220ever existed. So let me tell you what happened in China not very long ago, not even 100 years ago.0.75
00:23:54.840There are people alive today here in America that suffered under this leader Mao Zedong.0.66
00:23:59.960He set out to build a classless communist society. Land reform came first. Private land
00:24:05.040was seized from landlords and redistributed to peasants. Landlords were publicly humiliated,
00:24:10.180tortured, many were executed. We see this echoed in the language that we hear today by many
00:24:15.460socialists in America, that landlords are these evil guys, you know, setting out to make people
00:24:21.200impoverished and homeless. And this of course comes from this communist mentality. Then came
00:24:28.460the Great Leap Ford in China, 1958 to 1962. This was an attempt to turn China from an agricultural0.66
00:24:34.860society into an industrial society. So the government took all the farms, people were
00:24:40.980executed when they resisted, or if they were just a landlord already, because of the confiscation
00:24:47.880of farms, you were dealing with a famine. You were dealing with starvation, mass starvation,
00:24:53.060which led to millions of deaths. But then private farming was ended altogether. Millions of peasants
00:24:58.840were forced to leave agriculture to go into mining construction and steel production. The
00:25:03.480government took too much food for the cities, even as agricultural production declined. These
00:25:09.180policies contributed directly to what is referred to as the Great Chinese Famine, which caused 40
00:25:14.980million deaths, making it the deadliest famine on record. Total deaths from all of Mao's communist
00:25:21.760policies range from 70 to 80 million. China also had these struggle sessions where if you were,
00:25:29.440especially if you were a professor, if you were in the intelligentsia, or if you were just a person
00:25:34.120and someone's neighbor who was found out to be questioning the socialist communist regime,
00:25:39.320you would be taken out, you'd be flogged, you'd be shamed out in the public square.
00:25:43.880People would walk by and to try to prove their own allegiance to the regime and their own virtue.
00:25:49.520They would call you names. They would say horrible things about you. And those struggle sessions,
00:25:53.400it's a communist form of sanctification. It's a very ugly satanic form of sanctification,
00:25:58.620Whereas of course, we know that God is making us whole holier through the trials that we go through for our own good. Like this is the satanic inversion of that, that through shame and through cruelty and through torture, we are going to try to make you a good socialist, um, uh, socialist regime supporter, um, total deaths from all of Mao's communist policies range from 70 to 80 million.
00:26:24.840when it comes to the work camps, when it comes to dying in prison, when it comes to the massive
00:26:29.720famine. Then later in 1979, the government of China enforced the one child policy that said
00:26:36.740you could only have one child. Things were so catastrophic there. They were still reeling from
00:26:40.920the effects of this famine. They weren't willing, they still aren't willing to relent, um, all of
00:26:47.320the government control. And so instead of going back to, okay, we need the individuals, we need
00:26:52.820the private, um, private industrialization, the private ownership of these farms in order to get
00:26:58.920back on track. They said, no, no, no. It's because there's too many people. And so we need a one
00:27:03.340child policy that led to thousands and thousands and thousands of abortions and infanticide. That0.99
00:27:10.540was 1979 to 2015 y'all. That's not very long ago. That is 11 years ago that the one child policy
00:27:17.860stopped in china and i watched a documentary a few years ago of this woman who now is in america
00:27:25.100but talked about the one child policy and how horrible it was there would literally be piles
00:27:30.080of dead babies in certain outside of like the city limits this is so similar to the exposure
00:27:36.880hills in ancient rome it's just all the same thing paganism secularism getting out of god's
00:27:43.980ordering of things, children and vulnerable people always pay the price. And so socialism
00:27:50.060claims to be helping the least of these claims to be helping the vulnerable. It's actually the
00:27:54.380vulnerable that these socialist policies always hurt the most. Then we have Cambodia from 1975
00:27:59.980to 1979, Pol Pot's communist regime abolished private property, emptied the cities, shut down
00:28:05.920markets, abolished money, trade, forced people into rural communes to grow rice. The goal was0.72
00:28:12.600Marx's goal, classless society with no inequality and no oppression. Its leaders wanted something
00:28:18.580called a year zero, a total reset. Remember us talking recently about the great reset in which
00:28:24.780they would start over and build an entirely new oppression-less society. When it comes to
00:28:31.560Khmer Rouge and Cambodia, like there is so much history there. There's a book about the killing
00:28:38.580fields and how children were recruited to fight in Pol Pot's army and the death and destruction
00:28:46.760and the starvation and the torture and the imprisonment to try to get back to year zero.
00:28:51.800I mean, it is some of the most brutal stuff to read. And it was all started in the name of
00:28:57.620compassion and trying to help the poor. It's estimated that Cambodia lost 1.5 to 2 million
00:29:05.100people up to a quarter of the population again they died from starvation from disease from
00:29:11.860overwork because the communal farms failed the communal farms failed um and these mass graves
00:29:18.560as i said were known as killing fields a saying attributed to the regime went keeping you as no
00:29:23.960gain losing you as no laws because when the collective is the goal the individual no longer
00:29:30.100matters. This is not a belief that individuals matter because they are made in God's image.
00:29:35.040And so we need to make sure that they are dignified. It is the belief in the collective.
00:29:39.360So if you have to lose one or 2 million people in order to get to this oppressionless society,
00:29:46.400then no big deal. That is again, why progressives and conservatives have a very different view
00:29:51.300of the value of human life from conception onward. We could go on and on. There have been so many
00:29:56.980countries that have tried the same thing even more recently. If we look at a place like Zimbabwe,
00:30:02.500Zimbabwe and Africa used to be called the breadbasket of Africa. It was thriving. There was
00:30:07.220a lot of trade that went on there. There were farms that were very successful. And then you
00:30:11.780had Robert Mugabe. He took over 1970s, 80s was when he was coming to power. And he said, no,
00:30:19.000we've got these white oppressors because the most successful farms for the most part were owned by0.77
00:30:23.560these white Zimbabweans who had been there for generations, but he said, no, these are colonizers.0.82
00:30:28.080These are oppressors. We're going to confiscate these farms. We're going to give them to the more
00:30:32.980indigenous Zimbabweans, the black Zimbabweans. We are going to take their farms over. This of1.00
00:30:38.240course led to deaths, to executions, to, um, arson of these farms because, okay, if you won't
00:30:45.160let us have them, then you can't have them either. The white farmers fled, the government took over0.68
00:30:51.160and then redistributed these farms and all the farms failed because none of these people who
00:30:57.060were given these farms knew how to farm. They didn't know anything about trade. They didn't
00:31:02.820care about serving the community and selling and making a profit both for themselves and for their
00:31:10.040communities. And so it's spiraled. The country spiraled into poverty, which of course led to
00:31:16.180millions of deaths, it still has not recovered. It's still a very corrupt nation. The healthcare
00:31:21.620system, there's almost nothing to speak of. And it is all because Robert Mugabe came in and he
00:31:27.440said, I'm going to end oppression and I'm going to end inequality. And to do that, there's going
00:31:33.540to be some pain, but we'll figure it out. And they still have not recovered after 40 plus years.
00:31:40.380Okay, so that's just a taste of what has happened throughout history when socialism is implemented.
00:47:11.720And so he is always funding these far left politicians. Of course, El Saeed seems to be
00:47:16.540in bed with the Soros family. Democracy PAC funded by the Soros family has given $9 million to Senate
00:47:22.860majority PAC, which has pledged $30 million to help elect El Saeed. It's very interesting how
00:47:29.660these people like AOC, like Mamdani, like El Saeed, even like the woman that I debated
00:47:35.860recently for the free press, like they all have a particular look, they all have a particular story,
00:47:42.400and they all seem to have a ton of money that is funding them. Obviously, Democrats are very good
00:47:49.440at recruiting these particular candidates with a certain aura that they are confident have the
00:47:55.040potential to win, and they all have radical left socialist policy positions. El Saeed has been very
00:48:02.320careful not to publicly associate with DSA while he has been running. So something in him understands
00:48:08.780that socialism, just blatant socialism, saying that I'm a democratic socialist the way that
00:48:13.760Bernie Sanders did is still not popular enough. They think they can sell the ideas without selling
00:48:18.380the packaging of socialism. They might be right about that. The truth is the DSA doesn't care.
00:48:23.380Whatever, whatever works. As of July, 2026, DSA officials said that they were mobilizing
00:48:29.400organizers, volunteers, and resources to support El Saeed's campaign. So he might not openly say
00:48:34.540I'm a socialist. The socialists are saying we openly support El Saeed. And that tells you
00:48:39.420what you need to know. Of course, he's a radical in every other progressive sense as well. But the
00:48:45.120fact that he is so closely associated with the Soros family, so closely associated with the DSA
00:48:51.000tells you a lot about how radical he is. So if you are in the state of Michigan,
00:48:55.860you need to ensure that you are getting out to vote. And then we have another candidate who is
00:49:01.320up for reelection. That is AOC. She is also kind of doing the same thing here. And she is on the
00:49:08.300one hand, a couple of years ago, talking about the means of production using socialist terminology.
00:49:14.020And now she is still espousing a lot of the same ideas, but while she's running for office,
00:49:18.560she won't call herself a socialist. Here's top three. Do you think people should die because
00:49:23.460they can't afford insulin. Do you think that fossil fuel CEO should decide whether the planet
00:49:28.080gets set on fire? Unionize your workplace. Start a worker cooperative. If it's too extreme for
00:49:37.840working people to own the means of production, why is it okay for private billionaires to own
00:49:44.220the means of production? Okay, so this is kind of the same thing that Karl Marx did. Say things
00:49:49.420like, oh, you need the people, the working people to own the means of production without actually
00:49:53.040talking about how state confiscation, state compulsion, how do things get into the hands of
00:49:59.400working people? And how has that actually looked throughout history? It's looked like a lot of
00:50:03.560violence. Now you can say, well, I still don't like the oligarchy that we have of these, you
00:50:08.220know, these companies, BlackRock, these huge billionaires owning so much of what we have.
00:50:14.360Okay. Well, the government doesn't solve that problem by taking over the means of production.
00:50:19.600And then you have AOC now. She says she's talking just like a socialist in that last clip. I don't know why she's whispering, but she is. And then now she's saying, oh, I actually disagree with the Democratic socialists on some things, too.
00:50:33.700But do you see, I mean, are those positions you support?
00:50:35.600you support? No, but I think that this is a free country. Everyone can have all sorts of beliefs
00:50:42.780and they can organize around them and you're free to do what you like and, you know, have
00:50:47.940conversations with your neighbors. But my job as an elected official is to guarantee health care in
00:50:54.260America. Okay. So the positions that he was asking about, public ownership of corporations and
00:50:59.940industries, abolishing the police in prisons, granting amnesty for all immigrants, abolishing
00:51:04.500the Senate. I don't think that there's anything on that list that she doesn't actually agree with
00:51:09.320or that she has any kind of contention with. She has talked about abolishing the police in prisons.
00:51:14.020She talked about amnesty for all illegal aliens. She's, I don't know if she's ever talked about
00:51:18.300abolishing the Senate, but she is just going to say no there because she wants to win. She's a0.92
00:51:22.800politician, just like anyone else. Some of these socialist politicians sound like they're more
00:51:27.180genuine than others. Um, but they're not. The truth is, is that the Democrats are playing it
00:51:32.500well. Socialism scares a lot of people off, just the word itself, but the ideas are kind of
00:51:37.700popular. 43% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialist ideas. According to a 2026
00:51:44.120Gallup poll, that's the highest level recorded since Gallup started tracking the question since
00:51:48.0002010. So this idea that I think a lot of us had that socialism has died in popularity is just not
00:51:53.360true. As you'd probably expect, it's highest for Democrats and for Gen Z. 65% of Democrats rated
00:52:01.300socialism positively compared to only 14% of Republicans, 57% of those aged 18 to 34 viewed
00:52:08.680socialism positively. Now, this to me is just not surprising when you have a generation that has
00:52:13.700been raised on the idea that doing what you want to do and doing what makes you happy and leisure
00:52:19.900and relaxing are the most important things in life, that they would not see dignity, that they
00:52:24.940would not see inherent goodness and necessity and simply working hard and earning something for
00:52:30.140yourself. I'm not saying all Gen Z are lazy. I know that from firsthand experience that that is
00:52:35.000not true. I have Gen Z women who work for me who are amazing hard workers, very thoughtful people.
00:52:40.220I'm very thankful for that. But in general, there's a technology addiction problem. There0.99
00:52:45.180is an outsourcing of critical thinking and hard work to AI problem amongst a lot of young people.
00:52:51.940So it shouldn't be that surprising that you can easily sell them the idea. Well, yeah,
00:52:56.100you shouldn't have to work. Like you shouldn't have to work very hard. The government should
00:53:00.540just give you what you need and then you can go to brunch and get your iced coffee at the bodega
00:53:05.180and be happy. I think that's the dream that's sold. Of course, as we know, that's not how
00:53:11.460socialism actually, actually ends up. So we've got some work to do. We've got some work to do
00:53:17.640when it comes to the ballot box. Make sure you know who is on your ballot. If you are in the
00:53:21.480state of Texas. Look, you got Tallarico versus Paxton. I understand you don't, you don't like
00:53:27.500Paxton. A lot of you don't out there. And honestly, I don't even know what his campaign has been
00:53:33.280doing. It hasn't been strong. It's been largely absent. He's got some moral issues in his past
00:53:37.480that we do not have to justify. And you don't even have to overlook. You just have to look at
00:53:43.340the simple fact that you have two centers on the ballot. One who represents policies that are
00:53:48.000better. One who represents policies that are worse. We've talked about James Tallarico a lot.
00:53:52.240We can link those episodes in the description. So you can go see policy for policy statement
00:53:56.780for statement, what he actually supports. He would be a disaster. Okay. He also has his own
00:54:02.440moral issues. It's not like he has been above reproach in his own moral personal life,
00:54:06.800plus his wackadoodle theology, plus his terrible policy positions, especially on things that are
00:54:12.440unquestionable for the Christian, like abortion, like gender, like parental rights. I mean,
00:54:17.820he is absolutely radical and atrocious when it comes to those things. You do not have to like
00:54:22.120the person that you vote for. You don't have to agree with them on everything. You don't have to
00:54:25.540want to be their friend. They're not your pastor. They're not your Valentine. You're not voting
00:54:30.040based on vibes. You are voting based on policy. And at the end of the day, Paxton's policies are
00:54:36.720better than Tallarico's policies. Every election for all of history has been the decision between
00:54:42.540two sinners. You can choose to opt out, but you can't opt out and then complain
00:54:47.900for yourself or for your kids. Politics matter because policy matters because
00:54:52.300people matter. Politics affects policy. Policy affects people. People matter. People matter to
00:54:59.020God and therefore they matter to us. So I do encourage you to go out and vote. And I do
00:55:03.060encourage, I'm just going to tell you like vote Republican down the ballot. I'm not going to be
00:55:06.400shy about that. I'm not going to tell you that, oh, there are some Democrats that are better.
00:55:11.840There's not. There's not. Because of what the Democratic Party represents. There might be some
00:55:16.120individual Democrats on the ballot who might be less pro-abortion than others, less radical on
00:55:20.660gender, not out-and-out socialists. I'm sure that is true. I'm sure there might be some personally0.58
00:55:26.160moderate Democrats out there. But once they get to Congress, everything changes. Once they get
00:55:31.540to Congress, they will vote in lock step with Hakeem Jeffries. They will vote in lock step
00:55:37.800with the Democrats in the house and the Senate. Okay. They're, they're not going to go in there
00:55:43.200and try to shake things up and moderate. That's not what happens when they get to DC. What happens
00:55:48.740with the Republicans, unfortunately, is that they run a very conservative campaign and then they end
00:55:53.900up moderating once they get in office. What happens with progressives is that they run a
00:55:57.420moderate campaign and they end up going to the left once they get in office. So just understand
00:56:03.240that, that if you're voting, you think you're voting for a moderate Democrat, you're actually
00:56:07.120voting for a radical progressive. If you think that you're voting in many cases for, uh, for a
00:56:14.460hardline conservative Republican, you're probably voting for ultimately a moderate Republican,