Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - October 24, 2026


REPLAY | Wikipedia Co-Founder: Studying Hollywood Cults Led Me to Christianity | Larry Sanger | Ep 1143

Ep. 1412 | The Dark Side of the “Pro-Life” Movement & the Shocking Truth About Abortion Politics | Ginna Cross

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

123.79

Word count

7,084

Sentence count

444

Harmful content

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

12

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.840 Larry Sanger is the co-founder of Wikipedia.
00:00:04.280 He is also a philosopher, a lifelong skeptic, and a longtime agnostic.
00:00:10.280 Recently, he announced that he has converted to Christianity.
00:00:14.420 I wanted to hear his testimony.
00:00:16.440 What led to him finally accepting that Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life?
00:00:22.280 He has a really, really interesting story.
00:00:24.420 And it's amazing to look at how God used so many moments throughout his life to lead him to the cross.
00:00:42.400 Larry, thanks so much for taking the time to join me.
00:00:45.740 If you could tell everyone who you are and what you do.
00:00:47.600 um well right now i am president of the knowledge standards foundation and we collect all of the
00:00:57.680 free world all free encyclopedias in the world um we do a number of other things all right my claim
00:01:05.200 to fame is um i was co-founder of wikipedia now i'm ex-founder i like to call myself because you
00:01:12.420 know how it is. And this is another thing that the Knowledge Standards Foundation is doing. This
00:01:18.380 is 70,000 books on a 128 gigabyte hard drive. Basically, the classics of Western civilization
00:01:26.340 backed up in the palm of your hand. And that's just something that I've been trying to get out
00:01:33.880 there. There needs to be many, many, many copies of all the public domain books, not just one or
00:01:41.660 two on archive.org. This is one of my hobby horses. Yeah, amazing. Okay, before we even
00:01:50.380 get into your Christian testimony, I want to go all the way back. I want to hear your life story
00:01:54.520 and how you got to the point of helping found Wikipedia and how your interest was sparked in
00:02:01.240 all of this. So can you take me all the way back to your childhood and tell me what your upbringing
00:02:05.460 was like? Sure. Well, I mean, I was born and raised in the Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod.
00:02:17.960 That's my earliest church memories come from that. My dad was an elder.
00:02:25.520 But I asked a lot of questions sort of constitutionally. That's just how I am.
00:02:30.460 And I, for example, I would ask, you know, well, if God has created everything, then what caused God and that kind of thing, you know, those sort of basic questions that thoughtful kids will ask.
00:02:49.100 Um, and, uh, I was confirmed at age 12 and, um, but around age 16, um, I had a class in
00:03:01.880 philosophy at, in high school, they had such a thing.
00:03:05.620 Um, and, um, it was very interesting to me.
00:03:09.580 And I started thinking the following summer, uh, about the basic questions of philosophy.
00:03:17.940 And I decided because I knew all these people who had messed up their lives.
00:03:24.140 In fact, it seemed to me that practically everybody I knew had messed up their life in one way or another.
00:03:30.220 Like my parents were divorced.
00:03:32.600 My, you know, like my my siblings, friends were like some of them were seriously strung out on drugs and all kinds of things like that.
00:03:42.920 And I had talked to these people.
00:03:44.900 I knew certain things that they thought, and I thought they'd made mistakes.
00:03:49.080 You know, they were wrong about things.
00:03:53.360 So I developed a very deep conviction, totally independent of religion, that it was very important to have the truth.
00:04:03.880 And so, ever since then, I have thought of myself as a philosopher.
00:04:16.160 Even before I went to college, I knew I wanted to be a philosophy professor, although I changed my mind about that.
00:04:24.880 So, I became a non-believer in my teen years, an agnostic.
00:04:32.920 I wasn't an atheist. I was a skeptic. But there's a difference, I think. I won't go into that.
00:04:40.520 But the point is that I basically stopped caring very much about the possibility that God might exist.
00:04:49.920 And then what happened? Well, while I was finishing my dissertation, Jimmy Wales gave me the job of starting an encyclopedia for bombist.com, which was his website.
00:05:10.880 And that became Newpedia, which became Wikipedia.
00:05:15.760 So I named Wikipedia.
00:05:18.320 I set many of the original policies, or at least articulated them, and sort of led the community and got it started on a lot of its habits.
00:05:32.920 Not all of its bad habits, hopefully, but a lot of its good habits anyway.
00:05:39.440 in the first 14 months of that. First couple of years, if you include Newpedia. And so I'll just
00:05:49.820 pause there. Yeah, sure. Sure. Yeah, that's all super fascinating that you were interested
00:05:55.760 in philosophy. You describe yourself as kind of like a naturally inquisitive kid, and you brought
00:06:03.160 your philosophical questions to a pastor when you were a teenager, correct?
00:06:08.560 Right.
00:06:09.440 And how did that go?
00:06:11.900 I just called him up on the phone one time.
00:06:16.620 I think probably maybe my mom or dad told me that I should do that.
00:06:26.300 And I don't think it was the Lutheran pastor that—I think it was another one from a different church.
00:06:34.440 So he didn't know me. 0.62
00:06:35.940 And I might have sounded like a disrespectful, snot-nosed kid.
00:06:42.160 I'm not really sure, to be quite honest.
00:06:47.140 But I had sincere questions for sure, and he could have engaged me in conversation about them.
00:06:54.220 And it's clear to me that he didn't want to talk.
00:06:59.760 The conversation was over within, I don't know, five or ten minutes.
00:07:05.940 And what kind of questions were you asking him? Do you remember?
00:07:12.740 They were typical skeptical objections. I can't remember exactly which ones, but, you know, like the very one that I mentioned before, right?
00:07:25.340 So if an explanation is needed for the universe, why isn't an explanation needed for God?
00:07:31.760 I know the answer to that one now.
00:07:35.140 Yeah.
00:07:35.940 but you but you didn't then and the people that you went to in authority weren't really giving you
00:07:42.100 an answer and how did that how did that make you feel because you describe in your
00:07:46.720 article that's your version yes you were brushed off by multiple people by right was it by your
00:07:53.960 parents first that kind of made you believe that believing in god was irrational and that you can't
00:08:00.120 ask questions? I wouldn't say they brushed me off. I even had long conversations with
00:08:05.620 my brother-in-law, who was one of the other people in my family other than my dad,
00:08:14.060 who had actually gone to college. And he helped a lot. This is my sister's husband, and
00:08:24.320 And he passed away, I guess, eight years ago.
00:08:32.080 He tried, so you can't blame him.
00:08:36.600 And I did have some conversations with him,
00:08:39.000 but I had increasingly sort of deep, thoughtful discussions or questions, rather,
00:08:48.920 that could not be answered except by somebody with a requisite amount of philosophical or
00:08:58.620 apologetic training. I mean, even later, 10 years after that, I could have answered my own questions
00:09:05.000 from a Christian point of view. So it was just the lack of knowledge that was the problem, I think.
00:09:11.400 You went to Reed College. Their unofficial motto is communism, atheism, free love. So
00:09:17.940 you were surrounded by people, obviously, who also did not believe in God. You went on to
00:09:23.600 Ohio State for graduate school, also surrounded by unbelievers. But you were approached by a 1.00
00:09:31.200 Christian student when you were in grad school that kind of challenged your agnostic beliefs,
00:09:35.600 right? Yeah, he actually did. Now that you mention it, that's not in my essay, but I remember having
00:09:44.080 some long discussions. And I did like sort of, I was willing to talk about the possibility of
00:09:52.540 all sorts of things. And I remember talking about cosmology with him, you know, and what the
00:09:58.500 universe must be like if, you know, it has a creator that exists outside of time, for example,
00:10:07.080 because there's some, it very quickly gets very deep when you start asking questions like that.
00:10:11.840 And I remember talking about him about questions like that.
00:10:14.980 But he wasn't really trying to evangelize me very hard.
00:10:19.540 But he made an impression simply due to the kind of guy that he was.
00:10:23.880 He was very nice.
00:10:26.240 He's very kind.
00:10:30.100 And so, yeah.
00:10:33.200 And then, well, he caught me, well, I won't say what it was, but he caught me in a sin.
00:10:45.260 And I didn't see much of him after that, which was disappointing.
00:10:52.900 But, you know, I didn't feel guilty.
00:10:59.960 That's the thing.
00:11:00.620 It didn't seem like a sin to me at the time.
00:11:03.200 so yeah he challenged you with a fine-tuning argument and that's the laws of the universe
00:11:08.740 are so precise that any small change would prevent it from supporting life and so yeah that's the
00:11:14.320 argument that there must be uh an intentional creator and that really left an impression on you
00:11:21.860 Yes. So in this little story, basically, what happened was a graduate student who was, sorry, no, it wasn't a graduate student. He was a student in my class, actually. He was just a very smart undergraduate.
00:11:43.020 way, he came into the student assistant room and basically wanted to engage me in discussion
00:11:56.260 about arguments for the existence of God, because that would be what we were studying
00:12:00.740 at that time.
00:12:01.580 And it was very interesting the way that he expressed the fine-tuning argument, right?
00:12:11.820 So the universe has got a certain constants, scientific constants, such that if you change them in minute ways, then weird things happen or fail to happen.
00:12:30.100 Like, you know, atoms don't form or, you know, yes, the universe is left in a soup of inert material or whatever.
00:12:40.020 Um, and, uh, so everything is fine-tuned for, uh, the existence of, of life.
00:12:51.380 And, um, it doesn't that suggest a designer.
00:12:56.480 Um, and I didn't have an answer to him except to say, well, you know, it might have some
00:13:05.460 other sort of explanation, which just seems kind of lame.
00:13:09.020 It still seems lame to me now.
00:13:11.940 And I was, although I was stymied a little, I didn't feel like terribly embarrassed, but it left me emotional, though.
00:13:28.320 And I don't think it was because I was unable to answer.
00:13:31.760 I mean, I'm unable to answer all sorts of problems in philosophy, right?
00:13:37.460 So it's not that. I think it had to do with my awareness that I had just closed the door on something that might be more valuable than I was then willing to admit.
00:13:56.680 And you write that your marriage and the subsequent birth of your first child really changed how you saw the world.
00:14:08.820 It kind of disrupted a lot of the beliefs that you have. Is that correct?
00:14:14.420 Yeah, well, because I had the relatively idiosyncratic, you know, commitment to Ayn Rand's ethics, sort of.
00:14:23.220 I wasn't totally committed to it, but according to Ayn Rand, the author of The Fountainhead, our moral obligations all stem from our self-interest.
00:14:36.640 So if we ought to do something, if it is right for us to do something, you can explain that in terms of what is good for you in your enlightened, as it's called, your enlightened self-interest.
00:14:47.920 All right. And I thought that that was probably right. I remember defending that throughout graduate school. And then, you know, I got married in 2001 after I got my PhD and had my first child in 2006.
00:15:07.800 And I just occasionally thought, isn't it interesting that I would die for these people?
00:15:17.320 I mean, of course I would die for these people, but father wouldn't.
00:15:21.000 He's not a good father if he wouldn't.
00:15:23.280 And I certainly felt like I would.
00:15:25.000 But then I thought, if I'm willing to die for them, then doesn't that mean that I would be doing something not in my own self-interest?
00:15:36.820 Of course.
00:15:39.460 Right.
00:15:39.980 Yeah.
00:15:40.540 It's obvious to me now.
00:15:42.220 Yeah.
00:15:42.440 But at the time, because I myself had sort of accepted an error, the same sort of thing that I was wanting to avoid earlier, it was hard for me to come to that realization.
00:15:58.220 You also talk about watching the atheistic movement, if you want to call it a movement, become increasingly bombastic and radicalized.
00:16:12.700 I would say these are kind of like my words, becoming like their own kind of dogmatic religion. 0.61
00:16:19.420 And you contrasted that to how you saw the behavior of Christians, even Christians on social media. 0.82
00:16:26.680 That's right. 0.61
00:16:28.220 Well, I mean, I grew up talking to atheists.
00:16:33.380 I went to high school and college and graduate school, talking to people who didn't believe in the existence of God.
00:16:44.540 And they used arguments.
00:16:47.600 They actually tried to engage in a reasonably respectful conversation.
00:16:55.240 And then the new atheists came along and they started acting, as you say, quite dogmatic in their declarations.
00:17:04.360 And by that time, I actually knew, I taught the arguments for the existence of God.
00:17:11.280 I knew at least what weight they carried from practically anybody's point of view.
00:17:19.100 I mean, most philosophers don't think that they entail that God exists.
00:17:23.960 They don't think they're that strong. Some do. But they're willing to concede that there's
00:17:33.720 quite a bit to argue about there. But people like Dawkins and Sam Harris were just unable
00:17:44.480 to articulate the skeptical point of view in any sophisticated way at all.
00:17:52.220 And yet, they were extremely dogmatic and insulting, off-putting, and I compared that 1.00
00:18:01.060 to the behavior of Christians. 1.00
00:18:04.360 Yeah.
00:18:04.740 And now, this has nothing to do with the merits of the arguments, but it does make one reflect
00:18:12.080 on the worldview of, uh, that, that you're buying into if you were a skeptic yourself,
00:18:19.640 right? It's like, at the very least, if you're going to be a non-believer, don't be like them.
00:18:25.440 Okay. I mean, yeah. So I I'm curious, had Dawkins had any impact on your thinking, 0.97
00:18:32.920 um, up to that point? I mean, he had had, you know, he has influence on a lot of non-believers
00:18:39.560 world not at all not at all i didn't even i never was acquainted with anything that he
00:18:46.040 said or did um if anybody had an influence in that direction it would have been ayn rand
00:18:54.040 yeah you know and things that she wrote in the 1960s and 70s um an essay by uh mark twain
00:19:02.100 What was that essay? What did it say?
00:19:06.500 I can't even remember. The last time I saw it was when I was a teenager.
00:19:12.080 But he wrote an essay. He was an atheist, or at least an agnostic. I can't remember.
00:19:17.620 But Nietzsche and a few others. And of course, the biggest influences were personal influences,
00:19:28.120 people that I knew, my professors, you know, who could actually do a better job than any of those
00:19:34.780 people at articulating why they are not Christians. Even better than another one that I remember 0.55
00:19:43.060 reading, Bertrand Dressel. It's like Bertrand Dressel. He was a lightweight when he's writing
00:19:47.300 about this stuff. They're much better atheists. And even before you were a Christian, long before
00:19:55.860 you were a Christian, you did expose your two boys to the Bible simply because you knew
00:20:02.520 that it was very influential, right?
00:20:04.520 That's also, I would say, pretty unique for an agnostic.
00:20:09.840 Is it?
00:20:11.120 I'm not sure about that, but maybe.
00:20:13.100 I don't know.
00:20:13.940 Maybe it's because when I think of agnostics and atheists, most that I've had an interaction
00:20:18.600 with, and maybe this is not a fair assessment, they seem pretty antagonistic towards Scripture. 1.00
00:20:25.860 You could be right. You could be right. I do think that a lot of people who are into
00:20:33.700 classical homeschooling might want to assign readings from the Bible, even if they're
00:20:39.240 non-believers. So it's kind of like that, I guess. And I had a Christian upbringing myself,
00:20:44.980 and I said, no, they really would be totally ignorant of some culturally important things
00:20:52.020 if they hadn't read at least a couple of Gospels and Genesis and the first 25 chapters of Exodus
00:21:03.160 and maybe a few other things, Psalms. So we went over stuff like that.
00:21:08.980 And you continue to write about philosophy, and you write that your own philosophical
00:21:18.080 writings kind of left you unsettled, like your own philosophical writing started
00:21:24.480 challenging your beliefs. Can you explain that?
00:21:28.440 Yeah, I wrote a series of essays that sort of dismantled some of the reasons that I had
00:21:40.260 for disbelief. So to explain this, I have to explain, when I was a graduate student,
00:21:49.900 I formulated what I called a no concept view. That's not just me. I think other people call
00:21:55.460 it that too. But the no concept view is similar to the positivist view, which says basically we
00:22:01.860 have no concept of God at all. There isn't any content to the concept. And my take on it was
00:22:08.540 what God is essentially is the creator of the universe and a spirit. And he created the
00:22:14.620 universe essentially with a thought. But we have no experience of thoughts bringing things into
00:22:20.680 existence directly. It's always through the, you know, the medium of, you know, our bodies or
00:22:26.260 whatever, at least our brains. And so we have no conception of
00:22:34.240 that. Okay, so then, I think it was 2017 or something. I wrote
00:22:41.500 an essay, sort of riffing off of what had been in the air at the
00:22:47.980 time, imagine that there were sufficiently advanced AI, that
00:22:58.860 the singularity happened, things just started exploding,
00:23:02.860 technology became wildly powerful beyond what we know
00:23:10.300 now. I mean, like, that our technology today looks like
00:23:14.480 magic would look like magic to people of 1000 years ago, but
00:23:17.680 imagine that there were supercharged development of technology over a period of millions of years,
00:23:25.660 a billion years, right, from a continuous development. Well, isn't it possible that
00:23:35.800 we would find the levers, as it were, that would bring a moon into being, you know,
00:23:43.500 Once all the space equipment were made, et cetera, and eventually maybe, you know, galaxies and universes.
00:23:55.200 And isn't it possible that the brain interfaces now, isn't it possible that such apparatus might be controlled with a thought?
00:24:10.240 So I thought, well, then I guess it's conceivable to bring
00:24:15.960 Of course, there's a response to this argument
00:24:20.040 I'm not going to get into it
00:24:21.060 But the point is that the bare idea of a thought bringing creation into existence
00:24:30.780 I thought of a way to talk about that coherently
00:24:39.560 Yeah. And that was enough to, you know, I didn't conclude that the universe is therefore a simulation, which is Elon Musk's conclusion, which he drew after that, actually. No, I think that that is merely evidence that it's possible that a creator exists.
00:25:06.220 You also dealt with the issue of why be moral and the problem of evil, which, of course,
00:25:14.140 these are things that have been debated for a long time. And there are always questions that
00:25:17.820 I have for my atheist friends that I haven't ever gotten a good answer on. That's not to say that
00:25:22.680 no atheist has an answer for it. But those that I've talked to of, you know, even the one that
00:25:29.460 you articulated. Why sacrifice yourself for a child? He can give you nothing in return.
00:25:37.680 Why sacrifice yourself for a loved one? Why do things that are not in your direct self-interest
00:25:43.800 just because they are the right thing to do? Most atheists I know would say that being kind or being
00:25:52.980 charitable with expecting nothing in return is a good thing, that that is a sign of virtue.
00:25:59.460 but they can't tell me why or why beauty exists, why there are these like intangible realities
00:26:07.340 that have nothing to do with the perpetuation of the species or survival of the fittest.
00:26:15.680 And so tell me how you articulated that before you were a Christian.
00:26:21.020 What conclusion did you come to about why it's important to be good or be moral?
00:26:26.440 Yeah. Well, I'll tell you, the line that you just outlined there is not the one that I took in this essay that I wrote. I think it's called Why Be Moral on LarrySanger.org, if you want to look at it. It's a pretty long essay.
00:26:51.780 Um, and, and, but it was important to, to my, uh, to my conversion in a certain way.
00:27:02.100 Um, I actually disagree with the notion that in order to make sense of our moral obligations,
00:27:10.520 we have to depend on, um, an existent God.
00:27:14.860 I think that we naturally have certain desires.
00:27:22.920 They are built-in desires all organisms do.
00:27:26.800 And what we ought to do, what is meant by normative language, evaluative and prescriptive language, in other words, saying what is good or what we ought to do, is ultimately explainable in terms of life.
00:27:44.860 So, basically, without going into the details, we ought to do, and in fact, if we're well-functioning, we want to do things that are good for our lives and for the lives of people and animals and living things around us.
00:28:09.580 I thought that this was a naturalistic theory of ethics, and I explained it in detail.
00:28:19.860 But philosophers who hear this will recognize that it's a version of natural law ethics.
00:28:27.620 And when I started thinking again about the arguments for the existence of God, the way it worked in was this.
00:28:41.960 But if God is, or if there is a creator who designed the universe and designed our human nature, and if basically we are made happy by following certain moral rules or making more likely to be happy when we do, let's put it that way,
00:29:06.920 that actually is evidence of the goodness of God.
00:29:14.840 So I don't say that God is necessary in order to explain morality.
00:29:24.840 I say that the fact that human nature pushes us in the direction of goodness
00:29:32.620 and that the designer seems to require that of us if there is a designer.
00:29:39.220 So, given that assumption, right, that would imply that the designer is good.
00:29:46.080 So, the conclusion of the argument from morality in my hands is not that God exists,
00:29:54.780 it's that if there is a God, then God is purely good.
00:30:00.600 Okay, I got it.
00:30:02.620 And so coming to that conclusion and writing that essay, you write in your most recent essay that you started to move from this kind of, you know, coolness towards Christianity to a warmness towards Christianity as you realized, okay, connecting these ideas about morality to Christianity and what the Bible says actually makes sense.
00:30:27.300 Can you talk about how the Jeffrey Epstein scandal plays into your testimony?
00:30:32.940 Very interestingly.
00:30:35.260 Right.
00:30:37.380 So a friend of mine was opening my eyes to the existence of various, call them elite pedophile rings.
00:30:52.600 Epstein was not the only one.
00:30:54.680 You can look up the NXIVM case or Sir Jimmy Savile or Mark Bennewitt, and I think is his name in Belgium, is it?
00:31:05.120 Anyway, I might have the names wrong there.
00:31:09.580 But the point is, and then there's like pedowood, which is what we call the prevalence of pedophilia in Hollywood.
00:31:18.100 It's very weird that a lot of the people who are involved, or at least accused of being involved in such activities, have occult beliefs.
00:31:31.360 And my friend said it worked with such people, knew them personally.
00:31:39.320 And he confirmed that.
00:31:42.140 He said, that's why they use all of these symbols, you know, like the old one eye, which people were obsessing about five years ago, remember?
00:31:50.640 And people still notice that.
00:31:52.740 But they used to do that all the time.
00:31:54.740 I think they avoid it now.
00:31:56.300 But generally speaking, a lot of movie posters would show up with this one.
00:31:59.800 That's an occult symbol.
00:32:01.700 So that's what he said.
00:32:02.620 I don't know if I totally believe it, but it was interesting.
00:32:06.820 It got me thinking.
00:32:07.680 And at the very least, I said, due to this, you know, the fact that these people are able to get away with horrific crimes, just look at how Epstein has been dealt with.
00:32:22.240 It cannot be denied that justice has not been done.
00:32:26.840 There's a lot of guilty people walking around free right now.
00:32:30.960 Okay.
00:32:32.620 How is that possible in our society?
00:32:35.180 I said, well, our society must be governed like judges, for example, must be beholden somehow or other.
00:32:44.440 I don't know how exactly. I have ideas, of course, by powerful people, right?
00:32:52.840 And are such powerful people occultists? And this is what my friend was saying.
00:32:57.500 So he was pushing these books about the occult on me, not the actual, you know, Aleister Crowley or whatever on me, but he was, you know, things that were written about the occult.
00:33:10.820 And I, even that kind of weirded me out because I said, look, if I actually thought there was a reason to investigate this stuff because they, I don't know, it's like an important part of a culture because our culture is like ruled by people who believe this.
00:33:35.840 then doesn't that mean
00:33:38.040 that if they're going to go to all
00:33:40.060 these risks
00:33:40.880 and
00:33:43.160 these moral
00:33:45.780 horrors as part of their
00:33:47.920 beliefs
00:33:49.260 that's putting a lot
00:33:52.080 on the line for something that you actually think
00:33:54.040 is a lie
00:33:54.660 so if it
00:33:58.040 were true though then that
00:34:00.140 would at least mean that the spirit world
00:34:02.100 is true like demons exist
00:34:03.860 whatever that they could appeal to ascended masters and whatever um well then um doesn't
00:34:12.600 that mean that uh it's possible that god exists um that's one thought that i had but another is i
00:34:21.460 didn't want to read those books that my friend was was pushing at me i looked at a few of them
00:34:25.880 a little bit and looked at a few videos and it's like i just kept getting creeped out essentially
00:34:31.900 There's a little more to it than that.
00:34:33.360 But, yeah, I didn't want to get into it.
00:34:35.760 I didn't want to open any portals, you know, so to speak.
00:34:39.620 But one thing I learned is that, you know, like if you look at Masonic symbology, it's based on a lot of Old Testament, like temple symbology.
00:34:58.260 um it and and the notion is what what occultists like to do is to invert biblical symbol uh symbols
00:35:10.640 so um in other words pervert them twist them um and so that led me to think maybe i should read
00:35:20.440 the bible if i want to understand them at least it'd be safe to read that and actually try to
00:35:25.240 understand it. And then maybe I would be, I don't know, in the clear to read some of the occult
00:35:33.080 stuff if I wanted to. Never wanted to after that, though. Yeah. So you started reading the Bible,
00:35:39.300 really digging into the Bible, December of 2019. You said that you used a 90-day study plan on the
00:35:46.620 YouVersion app, and you really liked the ESV Study Bible. We have that in common. I started
00:35:52.100 reading the ESV study Bible when someone gave it to me as a gift when I was in college. And
00:35:56.020 I've tried several other study Bibles since then, and that is my go-to. But tell me about that
00:36:02.440 experience. So, yes. Well, it wasn't the only Bible commentary that I used, but I used it quite
00:36:13.360 a bit. And in fact, my current two-year plan, I'm just finishing up reading the entire thing.
00:36:19.340 um uh so i at first i thought i was just going to read it a little bit at bedtime and then
00:36:31.820 it became sort of an obsession for a hundred days um i was uh reading everything carefully
00:36:41.520 sometimes twice i was looking up answers to all my questions to you know understand what it meant
00:36:48.560 I actually was trying to understand what the things on the page meant.
00:36:53.140 And I'm, you know, I'm trained in reading old texts.
00:37:00.400 One of my areas of concentration is early modern philosophy.
00:37:05.340 So I'm pretty good at it.
00:37:07.560 So I knew, of course, to like when to look up concepts in an encyclopedia,
00:37:13.540 wanted to look up definitions in like a Bible dictionary, wanted to look at maps,
00:37:22.740 went to just look at a general commentary, because something, even though the words are
00:37:28.140 good English, I just understand why would they say that. And in the process of doing this,
00:37:36.360 I actually acquainted myself with theology, because you can't understand the philosophy if you don't understand the concepts that it contains, and you can't understand biblical concepts unless you understand theology, or at least you acquaint yourself with theology as you come to understand them.
00:37:59.900 So somebody who knows the Bible very, very, very well knows a lot of theology, for sure.
00:38:05.740 And the thing is, despite having a Ph.D. in philosophy, which is sort of an adjacent field, I had no idea that people who did theology and analyzed biblical concepts, etc.,
00:38:30.740 did anything that was worth doing, that it was interesting, that it was coherent.
00:38:38.840 I had no idea of that at all.
00:38:43.280 And it is, as it turns out.
00:38:46.820 If you actually study that stuff, it makes sense. 1.00
00:38:50.380 There's a reason why very, very smart people, some of the smartest people in history, in fact, have been Christians.
00:38:58.560 Newton, you know, Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine.
00:39:03.600 These are very, very smart people.
00:39:05.400 And a lot of other people, too.
00:39:07.080 A lot of scientists, even in this center.
00:39:09.700 Well, even today, sure, yeah.
00:39:11.940 But, so.
00:39:13.300 And when you read through the Bible for the first time, did it strike you immediately that this seems true? 0.87
00:39:21.580 No. 0.67
00:39:22.760 No.
00:39:23.020 It didn't.
00:39:24.260 No.
00:39:25.440 It took time.
00:39:26.420 I mean, in other words, you know, I resisted the idea.
00:39:36.000 I mean, I was a fairly confirmed non-believer.
00:39:39.360 Again, I wasn't an atheist, but it wasn't a live proposition for me, you see.
00:39:44.500 So it took a lot.
00:39:47.320 One thing that I did, though, even in, I think, the months before I started reading the Bible,
00:39:52.500 I started rethinking some of the traditional arguments for the existence of God a little bit, which might have been one of the reasons why I picked up the Bible.
00:40:01.280 But the two processes went hand in hand.
00:40:04.020 And so, in other words, I actually had to persuade myself that there were better versions of the arguments for the existence of God and that they work together in a certain way, which I simply hadn't understood before, which I'm writing about in a book now.
00:40:25.000 I had to sort of like teach myself these things or be led to them one way or another.
00:40:32.340 and before I could really take what the Bible said seriously.
00:40:40.100 But I will say this, the Bible, one of the things, a good example of this,
00:40:48.860 of how the Bible sheds light on philosophical arguments,
00:40:54.900 like in a way that I hadn't really appreciated before.
00:40:58.040 So, in Exodus chapter 3, God, he introduces his name.
00:41:07.000 He says, I am that I am.
00:41:12.220 What?
00:41:13.200 That's a name?
00:41:15.040 That isn't even good grammar, I said to myself.
00:41:20.940 But I looked up the Hebrew.
00:41:24.160 Not that I knew Hebrew, but, you know, there's interlinear tools, which are pretty easy to use, and everything is explained.
00:41:32.620 It's very nicely laid out on BibleHub.org.
00:41:37.260 And I looked at commentaries, and, well, it turns out that there are very good reasons why he would introduce himself that way.
00:41:46.760 He was saying, as theologians generally say, that he is that which exists.
00:41:58.580 Existence is part of his essence, as philosophers would say.
00:42:04.040 He is, in fact, that which must exist unlike everything else.
00:42:10.020 The existence of everything else in the universe is conditioned upon his existence.
00:42:15.520 That actually is all contained within his saying that this is his identity, because the notion of a name in Hebrew, and I think the ancient world to a great extent, was it said what you were, right?
00:42:32.420 And this is why kings renamed their vassals, right?
00:42:36.920 Gave them new names to say, this is what you're going to be to me, right?
00:42:40.700 This is why Abram was renamed the father of a nation, Abraham, right?
00:42:48.140 God named himself saying, I am that which exists necessarily, essentially.
00:42:55.340 And the experience of like coming to grips with that exegetical question just made the whole argument from contingency much more alive.
00:43:08.020 And I said, OK, well, I don't believe that it follows from the fact that there are the assertion that there is a necessarily existent being that that's God.
00:43:24.080 It doesn't follow. Not immediately.
00:43:26.200 You have to say a lot of other things.
00:43:27.600 But isn't it interesting, right, that the Bible says, God says that he is the necessary being, and that that's the conclusion of, like, the most bedrock argument that natural theology offers, natural theology being the philosophy of religion and the study of the arguments for the existence of God.
00:43:47.820 and can you tell me how you got to because after you read through the bible you continue
00:43:54.500 still to this day to continue to read through the bible um you concluded at some point after this
00:44:01.240 that god does exist you believed that jesus is the son of god according to what you read in
00:44:08.920 scripture but you didn't yet believe that jesus died for your sins so can you take us from your
00:44:17.520 philosophical journey from understanding that God exists to understanding the Christian claim
00:44:24.700 that Jesus is God and that he died for our sins and is our way of salvation.
00:44:32.460 So it's interesting. It is a very long and gradual process. And I mean, in the spring of 2020,
00:44:47.520 Um, I, I would have said I have a provisional Christian belief.
00:44:53.420 It's like, I'm inclined to believe it seems probably right, um, that, that sort of thing.
00:44:59.200 Um, and I, I was able to articulate right around the time when I started, you know,
00:45:08.500 when I was willing to admit to myself that God exists,
00:45:13.920 that I was more inclined to believe that than not.
00:45:20.740 The first time I prayed, taking myself to be sincerely,
00:45:24.920 really praying to God was like the end of February.
00:45:28.800 And right about the same time, I wrote an essay,
00:45:32.940 which you can find on my blog,
00:45:34.660 which is a theory of divine sacrifice or something like that,
00:45:40.080 which is about the whole question, why did Jesus have to die on the cross?
00:45:46.500 And how could that somehow save us?
00:45:51.400 You know, what does that have to do with, like, forgiving our sins and things like that?
00:45:57.680 I'm not going to get into, like, theories about that, which are interesting.
00:46:01.440 but I was able to articulate
00:46:06.040 and understand the theories
00:46:07.580 to a certain extent at that time
00:46:10.080 could do a better job now
00:46:11.940 but I didn't feel it
00:46:16.060 you know
00:46:18.040 it's one thing to
00:46:21.180 it's one thing to feel like you have
00:46:25.500 a grasp on the concepts
00:46:29.280 And it's quite another to actually believe what it's saying.
00:46:35.920 But I don't know when it was, but at some point, I, well, I guess you could just say I increasingly felt convicted, as the word is, of my sins by God, by the Holy Spirit.
00:46:52.100 And I increasingly felt the need of a Savior.
00:47:00.320 See, this bothered me because I thought, isn't this kind of back—isn't it reversed?
00:47:08.560 It is.
00:47:09.980 Most people seem to come to the faith by first saying, as they say, they need a Savior, and therefore they surrender their will to God.
00:47:22.100 I didn't feel like I needed a savior precisely
00:47:26.520 it was only after I actually
00:47:29.820 was better convinced that God exists
00:47:33.740 that Jesus was a real person
00:47:35.440 really helped to read The Case for Christ
00:47:37.700 that's a great book
00:47:38.920 that I was able to
00:47:44.440 start taking that part really seriously
00:47:47.800 and caring about it
00:47:49.860 and now I really care about it
00:47:52.100 So when do you say, do you remember like the moment that you decided to say and accept, okay, I am a Christian?
00:48:05.640 No, I'm not sure that I can say that.
00:48:07.940 I can say the moment when I started believing in God and trusting in God, but to say that I am a Christian and entailed all kinds of other things that I had to sort of work through.
00:48:29.640 And most of it had to do with, you know, problems associated with my being a skeptic, a methodological skeptic is the word.
00:48:39.760 And so, you know, like I was saying, when I was young, I thought it was really important to have the truth.
00:48:45.340 And therefore, it was necessary to have really good reasons to believe whatever you believe.
00:48:51.040 And you have to understand your beliefs.
00:48:52.460 And, well, Christianity involves all kinds of things I didn't understand.
00:48:57.480 and all kinds of things I couldn't justify.
00:49:03.260 And you might say, well, you have to take a leap of faith.
00:49:06.980 Well, that's not what faith is.
00:49:09.140 Faith is not the acceptance of things for no good reasons.
00:49:13.700 Faith is simply the loyalty to God.
00:49:18.380 I think I had that, but it took me time before I actually developed the conviction
00:49:27.140 that the Bible is inerrant, which is what I think now.
00:49:33.440 But it was probably some time in 2020 or 2021, maybe 2021,
00:49:41.020 when I actually developed that.
00:49:43.540 I was still struggling with the whole idea of inerrancy in the first few years.
00:49:50.420 So if there's a lesson for people who are similarly situated, it would be that it's okay if it's a process, at least.
00:50:03.280 Yeah.
00:50:04.440 It's okay for me, I hope.
00:50:07.080 Yeah.
00:50:07.720 Yeah. And have you been able to find a church, because you write about this,
00:50:14.720 still having a lot of questions and trying to find a place that can take your questions?
00:50:22.480 Well, yeah. So I've read a lot of books about theology, basically, several dozen in the last
00:50:32.620 five years. And so it isn't a lack of knowledge. It is the lack of certainty
00:50:42.520 that I don't want. There are certain things that I know I'm not going to be praying to Mary.
00:50:51.560 Got pretty good reasons not to do that, pretty sure. And there's a number of other things
00:50:56.460 of that sort that would point me down one path versus another denominationally.
00:51:06.540 But I feel like I need to make up my mind about more of the basic principles. And it takes a long
00:51:14.700 time for me to make up my mind about things. Because like I say, I still have this sort of
00:51:21.260 methodological skepticism. It's really not just a principle I accepted and can easily discard.
00:51:30.740 It's sort of like part of who I am. And I know that for the same reason, you know, if I were to
00:51:38.640 go to, like I've thought of, you know, Independent Baptist Church or maybe the Anglican Church of
00:51:47.700 North America, maybe the orthodoxy, if I can put aside my, you know, my, well, resistance to
00:51:57.540 praying to saints, and so forth. I know that I would, like, ask questions, and I know myself,
00:52:08.220 I'm very persistent, not necessarily that I would, like, annoy people with my questions,
00:52:15.600 But if they're trying to engage me, I'm not going to be able to go along.
00:52:19.760 So it's kind of hard, you know, one thing that some people, not everybody, by the way,
00:52:26.280 but one thing that some people insist on is that if you're going to join a church,
00:52:32.900 then you have to submit yourself to an authority.
00:52:36.440 Well, the only authority at this point that I really want to submit myself to is that of Scripture.
00:52:43.880 got and i think i'm getting closer to the point where i can i can submit myself to to people
00:52:52.760 without disrupting see that's what i don't want to do i don't want to disrupt the proceedings
00:52:58.260 i don't want to be a bad influence um you know um because i easily could be so but i'm prioritizing
00:53:09.260 you know, study of the distinctives of the issues on which Christians divide.
00:53:20.760 Well, I'm confident that God is going to use you to be one of those people that can answer
00:53:26.980 people's questions. And I just love hearing people's testimonies and all of the different
00:53:33.480 parts of the constellation of someone's story that in retrospect they can see, but in the
00:53:39.080 moment. It's hard to see how God is piecing things together, but I believe that he's going
00:53:44.060 to use this testimony for his glory, which is always what he does. But also there are a lot
00:53:49.880 of very smart questioning young people who want a place to go to ask good questions. And you are
00:53:56.140 someone who has asked questions over and over and over again. And rather than just like sit in your
00:54:02.600 questions, you have sought the answer to them. And I really believe that that discipline and
00:54:10.260 that curiosity that you've had your entire life is going to affect the lives of other skeptics
00:54:17.280 and questioners and new believers. And so I'm just very grateful for that.
00:54:24.240 Well, I hope God uses me that way, I guess, if that's what I'm good for.
00:54:30.460 Yeah, me too. Me too. Where can people find you and support you, follow you, all that good stuff?
00:54:39.360 Well, my blog is larrysanger.org. That's where the essay that we've been talking about, we've been asking questions based off of. It's the latest thing. A skeptic, what is it called? A skeptic returns to Christianity.
00:54:58.460 Yes. Anyway, something like that. And there's also I'm on X.com, but I don't actually do much there except share my stuff. I'm one of the advisors of BitChute now. And so I'm putting my videos there. My latest video is a is a video version of the same testimony.
00:55:22.260 um and uh yeah uh there's a oh there's a bible study that has started a lot of uh a lot of bible
00:55:33.860 geeks um are are uh gathering and we i mean it's gone from like 30 people to like 120 in the last
00:55:42.400 couple of days um so you're welcome to join us if you're into like brainy bible study um awesome
00:55:51.660 And where's that?
00:55:54.060 That is on Telegram, and there is a link down at the bottom of the testimony.
00:56:02.440 There is a – I've talked about moving to a signal group.
00:56:07.960 You can join both if you like, but for now we're sticking to Telegram.
00:56:12.300 Okay, very good.
00:56:13.560 Well, Larry, I really appreciate you taking the time to share, and I do encourage people to follow you and to read your stuff.
00:56:21.860 So thank you so much.
00:56:24.080 For sure.
00:56:24.640 Thanks.
00:56:25.080 Thanks for having me on.
00:56:43.560 Thank you.