SNEAKO - January 10, 2023


SNEAKO Reacts To Tate's Lawyer Breaking The Silence...

Hosted by
Nicolas Kenn De Balinthazy
Mentioned
Andrew Tate Procurorul Dicot Andrew Tristan Lawyer
SNEAKO Reacts To What Romanians Think Of Tate's Arrest Logan Paul is a Literal Matrix Agent

Episode Stats


Length

17 minutes

Words per minute

139.13

Word count

2,411

Sentence count

83

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, we have a new update from Andrew Tate, lawyer who finally breaks his silence and talks about what happened to his clients. We also have the full translated into English version of the interview that Andrew Tate said.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00 All right, Andrew Tate, lawyer, finally breaks his silence.
00:00:03 This is a big update and they asked me to cover this. 0.99
00:00:06 Bro, he's Romanian as fuck. 1.00
00:00:07 So, I don't know what the translation is going to look like or sound like, 0.99
00:00:11 but here's the update.
00:00:13 We now have the full translated into English version of the interview
00:00:16 that Andrew Tate says is an important video statement from our lawyer.
00:00:20 I'll play this clip for you guys now.
00:00:30 With the turn
00:00:35 We're looking for TEIT
00:00:37 for the Primeá»™i DT
00:00:40 we're Isabel
00:00:42 Now after that, you're seeing you, DOSAR
00:00:48 Yeah, no
00:00:50 No, I'm saying care
00:00:53 I'm taking care
00:00:54 I was changing the
00:00:56 and I didn't
00:00:57 and I will
00:00:58 the 29 December 2022,
00:01:01 date la care, 1.00
00:01:03 pana la care, 0.99
00:01:04 acesti au avut calitatea de martori,
00:01:06 astfel incat nu ar fi avut posibilitatea
00:01:08 sa studieze dosarul de urmarire penala,
00:01:11 au fost retinuti cu prilejul
00:01:13 aducerii la cunostinta a calitatii de
00:01:16 inculpati si ai limiterii
00:01:19 ordonantei de retinere de catre Procurorul Dicot,
00:01:22 pentru ca in ziua de 30 December,
00:01:25 orele 14,
00:01:27 to be established data, to be established data, to be established
00:01:31 for putting discussion on a mandate of preventive
00:01:35 for a period of 30 days.
00:01:39 We have the opportunity to study the criminal dosage
00:01:43 for 45 minutes before the beginning of the session.
00:01:52 the date or the moment where I have taken knowledge about the content of the proposal of the preventive proposal
00:02:01 which was over 100 pages.
00:02:07 The first place was in April 2022 when at that time were released
00:02:17 In this period, when they have had the Martor in the 29th and 12th and 2022, these funds have been supported?
00:02:35 In part, with the purchase of the 11th and 4th and 2022, they took all their computers. 0.97
00:02:45 And that should get me fucked up because remember, Europeans, they make their dates gay, so this is actually April 11th. This is back in the first trafficking take down when I first heard about Andrew Trism. 0.98
00:03:15 And they apologize once they return those computers.
00:03:45 8 months later.
00:03:47 Now,
00:03:49 one of the accusations that
00:03:51 have a gravitate
00:03:53 and in the face of
00:03:55 a public opinion
00:03:57 is
00:03:59 the infractions
00:04:01 of viol.
00:04:03 I'm talking about viols
00:04:05 asupra one person
00:04:07 of feminine
00:04:09 in the Republic of Moldova
00:04:11 And it would have been one or two infractions
00:04:17 It would have been two acts of material
00:04:19 Two acts of material for one of the Tate
00:04:23 That's it
00:04:23 In this context, as a parent of the lor, can you tell us what do they exist in this sense for the support of these acuzații?
00:04:34 Stimulată doamnă Anghelescu, voi puncta încă de la început asupra faptului că nici până în prezent nu mi s-a pus la dispoziție dosarul de urmărire penală pentru a asigura apărarea eficientă a clinenților noștri.
00:04:51 I'm not going to watch the FNF breakdown, but I want to watch the FNF, this is their lawyer, this is new information and they asked me to watch this and basically, from what it looks like, they have nothing.
00:05:21 ales procuror nu exista in acest moment nici o singura proaba in afara de declarantie victimei
00:05:30 care sa conducå la ideea ca ar fi fost savarşita vreo infratiune de viol
00:05:36 ba mai mult din inchierea motivata a judecatatorului de drepturi de drepturi si libertati a tribunalului bucuresti
00:05:44 rezulta foarte clar ca nu se sustine o astfel de infratiune
00:05:50 and that there are no elements of the probatory
00:05:53 which to maintain this infraction,
00:05:55 which is the reason why
00:05:57 Judecătorul de Drepturi și Libertăți
00:05:59 does not have a reasonable doubt
00:06:01 that this fact could be retained
00:06:03 in the sarcina of the one.
00:06:05 Now we know that
00:06:07 it's like the better call Saul of Eastern Europe.
00:06:09 Judecătorul de Drepturi și Libertăți
00:06:11 is not a part of the Judecătorul
00:06:13 of the Premier Preliminary.
00:06:14 In this context,
00:06:16 Judecătorul de Drepturi și Libertăți
00:06:18 gravitatea faptei așa cum este ea în litera legii pentru a hotărâ această arestare.
00:06:25 Mai mult decât atât au cântărit și celelalte două infracțiuni, aceea de trafic de persoane și cea de grup infracțional organizat.
00:06:35 Bun, dar permiteți-mi totuși să punctez asupra următoarei chestiuni.
00:06:38 Chiar dacă judecătorul de drepturi și libertăți la momentul analizării propunerii privind emiterea unui mandat de arestare preventivă
00:06:45 It is not in the process in which to analyze the facts,
00:06:49 but to analyze the 204 code of procedural penal,
00:06:52 and the 223 code of procedural penal,
00:06:55 that 223 code of procedural penal
00:06:57 make the case of a suspicion reasonable.
00:07:00 Or, because I am a judecator of freedom and freedom
00:07:03 to be able to analyze asupra suspicions reasonable,
00:07:05 we need to analyze asupra the motive
00:07:07 described in the report of the preventive
00:07:10 presented by the procuror,
00:07:12 with the elements of the penal, which I am in the face, when I analyze the proponent.
00:07:17 Or, if, after a few hours, the court of the Dread and Liberties,
00:07:22 studying the Dread and Liberties,
00:07:24 corroborated with the inserated in the proposal of the arrest preventive
00:07:28 is that they don't have any elements to create
00:07:32 a reasonable reason for these facts.
00:07:35 This is evident that the court of the opinion of the penal,
00:07:39 We don't have a problem.
00:07:41 Let's go back a little bit to the infraction of viols.
00:07:43 I have taken attention to the motivation
00:07:46 and the motivation that you have been given to the public,
00:07:50 having an integral part,
00:07:53 I have taken attention to the two reports of extrajudicial experts
00:07:58 which have been made with the two women
00:08:05 who are American citizens.
00:08:07 That American girl that infiltrated Eastern Europe, basically, even though you get away from all the wokeness in America, it still follows you no matter where you go. 0.75
00:08:16 L America. 0.67
00:08:17 And that's crazy that they were arrested. There's no actual evidence. Everybody knows this. The police must know this. The Romanian government knows this. And they still got locked up for 30 years.
00:08:37 They basically are keeping them in jail for as long as they can without having any actual evidence.
00:08:44 The investigation period for the 30 days is pretty much just applying pressure on them because they have nothing.
00:09:07 We are talking about two referats of extrajudice.
00:09:15 What do you mean?
00:09:17 That's not a lie.
00:09:18 That's not a lie.
00:09:20 That's not a lie.
00:09:22 That's not a lie.
00:09:24 That's not a lie.
00:09:26 because of the criteria of the person, of the solicitation, and in order to discuss the analysis of the profession,
00:09:34 this report of expertise.
00:09:36 I don't know why the name is the report of expertise.
00:09:39 That's why we are asking.
00:09:41 This report of expertise.
00:09:42 That's why we are asking this.
00:09:44 I'm calling this point of view of a psihologist with a so-zise traumas 1.00
00:09:47 which are suffered by people, I don't know,
00:09:50 people who have suffered control of the psychology of the profession.
00:09:54 What I find is beyond your claim and what you can do is to buenosophy nothing but THIS
00:10:05 to go based on this and two tests.
00:10:14 At the same time, for the fact that is at the grave, for the fact that is at the probable,
00:10:19 are going to be, at the moment of the proposal of the preventive proposal,
00:10:22 are going to present any probes that don't present any doubt of impartiality or partiality,
00:10:27 that don't present any doubt of the veridicity of probes,
00:10:30 which is what the solicit to be asked to be administered.
00:10:34 So, effectively, I consider that the person who has presented a report to the procureur,
00:10:39 A fost depus la dosarul cauzei și cu titlul de mare probă în dosar s-a susținut că trauma există și ea cătă agresiunea în orice formă ar fi fost exprimată este de asemenea dovedită.
00:10:49 Nici pe departe.
00:10:50 Nothing!
00:10:51 The legal nu stă în picioare.
00:10:53 Aș vrea să îmi punctați fără frumos dacă se poate.
00:10:56 Când anume au fost luate aceste expertise, când s-au făcut aceste evaluări asupra celor două fete și dacă ele se mai află în țară la acest moment?
00:11:05 Am precizat încă de la început că mă voi limita a prezenta în discuția noastră elemente de natura
00:11:11 Nu pune în pericol urmărirea penală sau a împieta în vreun fel buna desfășurarea procesului penal
00:11:16 Însă în spiritul legalității răspund că nu cunoaștem dacă la acest moment cele două se mai află în țară sau nu
00:11:22 Însă se pare că nu s-ar mai afla în țară
00:11:25 Eu așa știu pe surțele mele
00:11:26 De expertiză psihologică ar fi fost întocmite cam în perioada plecării lor din țară și a existat este o incertitudine
00:11:34 They would have been taken from the country after the leave of the country. 0.96
00:11:37 But I'm wondering why these people are not found in the country.
00:11:41 Why the penal punishment for the fundamental rights of inculpaters 1.00
00:11:45 for the demonstration of the right and the right and the right?
00:11:48 Alright, I'll watch the FNF breakdown.
00:11:51 I can't do with this language anymore. It sounds good, but just...
00:11:54 I'm a retard. Why did I search FNF breakdown? That was stupid.
00:12:00 It's on BOTSUB? 1.00
00:12:02 No, they're live.
00:12:03 suspicion of the commission
00:12:05 of this fax, it is obvious that the judge himself
00:12:07 supports the opinion of the defense.
00:12:09 We have no evidence.
00:12:11 So that
00:12:13 kind of summarizes the interview as well.
00:12:16 Guys, on the Twitter thread.
00:12:18 After a few hours, the judge of Rights and
00:12:19 Liberty studying the criminal investigation file
00:12:21 in conjunction with those inserted in the report with the proposal
00:12:23 for preventive arrest assesses that there are no
00:12:25 elements to create reasonable suspicion.
00:12:28 Lawyer's suspicion of the commission
00:12:29 of this fax, it is obvious that the judge himself
00:12:31 supports the opinion of the defense. We have no
00:12:33 evidence thank you for the 33 the struggle of sneeko streaming at the same time as fnf i got 0.99
00:12:37 you the w sneeko john this is this these are bullshit charges oh myron you're you're just 0.95
00:12:43 okay go ahead and hit play so now we're going to go into uh the other charges 0.99
00:12:52 with regards to the two uh two offenses trafficking inhuman beings and organized
00:12:56 crime group what evidence is there in the file in my view there is no evidence they're either and i
00:13:03 I am talking about evidence leading by itself or directly to the formation of an opinion of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of offenses provided for and punishable by criminal law.
00:13:18 In this case, we're talking about human trafficking and organized crime.
00:13:20 The documents to which we have so far had access do not accurately describe matters relating to the constituent elements of the offense.
00:13:33 for organized criminal group they do not accurately describe the hierarchy of the group
00:13:37 they do not describe the function of each person who is part of this alleged criminal group and
00:13:43 also with regards to trafficking in human beings as the offense described it does not
00:13:50 comply with the legal requirements concerning the way in which the offensive trafficking human
00:13:56 being as good why did they get fresh to read this pause so what did he just say there guys
00:14:02 when it comes to the the charges against andrew when it comes to you know organized criminal
00:14:07 activity right and human trafficking there are elements of the crime that need to be met
00:14:11 so as far as the organized criminal activity there's no hierarchy there's no role of each
00:14:16 member there's no uh established outline of duties and you know what they do to you know
00:14:22 perpetuate their criminal organization none of that stuff like a rico was substantiated right 0.83
00:14:26 in accordance with the romanian law and then as far as like the human trafficking goes they have
00:14:31 not met the prerequisite elements from that either so they're just charging them with these charges
00:14:36 with no real substantiation because they're not meeting any of the elements from what they've
00:14:41 seen wow is that legal so just so and then he's now he's going to go into the details of the human
00:14:47 trafficking charges right just so everyone understands so when we talk about human
00:14:51 trafficking we have in mind strictly by law found human traffickers professionally for a decade
00:14:55 transportation against the will shelter also by coercion and so on are you saying that there is
00:15:06 no evidence whatsoever from the motivated reasoning of the judge of rights so so basically
00:15:17 guys pause so you guys saw it there coercion being held against will etc is any of that in there no
00:15:24 no now he's going to go into scenario okay i'm going to step out of our file and ask you rhetorically
00:15:30 the following question if in our understanding from our
00:15:35 discussions you propose to me to come and visit me on the territory of romania you being a spanish
00:15:40 citizen and i ask you several times are you sure you want to come are you sure you want
00:15:46 us to meet and what pause go back real quick just a little bit uh are you sure you want to come are
00:15:52 you sure you want to us to meet and you also motivate your
00:16:00 decision to come and visit me i.e the fact that you no longer like spain since you travel quite
00:16:04 a lot and i provide you with the financial means so that we can see each other is there any constraint
00:16:09 in my transporting you as a trafficked person on the territory of romania no obviously not
00:16:16 but what happens next also matters let's say to romania get in touch with you and then let live
00:16:23 and then live in transportation after i come let's say to romania get in touch with you and
00:16:27 then i live in your house or in the there's the interviewer now neighborhood and things happen
00:16:35 that traumatize me because we want everyone to be well informed on these so no evidence
00:16:40 good news chat you can relax you can chill with the schizo and the autism it seems like there's 0.92
00:16:46 there's good news from the lawyer there's no actual substantiated evidence i think we're in
00:16:52 the clear but it's just it's really eye-opening to see like when you reach a certain level of
00:16:56 influence and fame it doesn't even matter what you're guilty of it doesn't even matter if you're
00:17:00 a criminal or not they're going to lock you up if you're inspiring enough people and as a result
00:17:04 the same amount of people that have nothing are going to wish the downfall upon you and
00:17:08 that's that's how it goes that's how it goes
00:17:13 that's your job