00:00:00.000Well, there are two lawsuits. One is Dominion versus me in Washington, D.C., and the other is Dominion versus Dominion's CTO versus me down in Tampa, Florida.
00:00:11.460And they're both basically the same suit, that I said ugly things about them, said their equipment stinks and is rigged and its key components are made in China.0.95
00:00:19.640It's all built Swiss cheese with back doors and elections get rigged.0.99
00:00:24.100the judge we were supposed to get a trial next week in florida on wednesday the judge there has
00:00:32.760been and that's because i'm a florida resident and they had to see me there and the judge has
00:00:38.400been very fair so far i mean he's not he calls balls and strikes he's been fair for three or
00:00:44.260four years as this progresses we get up to the trial we had to file something that showed what
00:00:50.760we're going to argue in trial and for the first time the judge got to see all the evidence we
00:00:56.360have gathered and and he looked at it and he says he you know to win a libel suit they have to prove
00:01:03.780that what i well i didn't say anything someone else said something and i funded a movie that
00:01:08.620got made and they said well i published the movie and this ugly thing got said in the movie
00:01:13.080words words words but at the end of the day they finally saw a couple weeks ago what we are what
00:01:20.660we're going to argue and what the proof is. And they have to prove that what I said about them
00:01:26.440was false. I knew it was false. And I said it out of malice. Well, what I said about them isn't
00:01:32.460false at all. What I said about them is once we gave it to a real government a year and a year
00:01:40.340ago, it triggered a Navy flotilla to steam the Caracas because we have them dead rights.0.94
00:01:45.740Our country was overthrown by this Venezuelan-Cuban operation. They installed by it, and China's behind it all, and we have them dead to rights.0.94
00:01:55.100So once the judge saw what we actually have, he came out yesterday and ruled, or two days ago, and ruled, there's no way to—I mean, what he should have said is, this is all true.0.86
00:02:08.900He took a little bit of a limp-wristed approach and said there's no way to prove that what Burns said was with malice because once you read this stuff, it's clear that I'm – how do you prove that the guy made this up and he did it to be mean when here's all this evidence?
00:02:24.400So once they looked at our evidence, and by the way, what we gave that judge with that filing wasn't even the big, was an amuse-bouche, was an appetizer serving what we were going to show in court.
00:02:36.500And that was enough to say there's no way at all to prove that this guy did anything out of malice.
00:02:41.520Anyone would look at this and realize, and so he threw the case out.