00:00:00.000It was recently revealed that the Trump administration is drafting a proposal, championed by Vice President J.D. Vance,
00:00:05.660that would alter how the government distributes funds already earmarked for child care.
00:00:10.240The new plan would take roughly $12 billion allocated to help working parents pay for commercial child care
00:00:16.560and also make it available to mothers who want to stay home and raise their own children.0.78
00:00:21.680After Vance spent the last several months exposing disastrous levels of fraud in the child care system being exploited by ethnic cartels,0.79
00:00:28.960cartels, it made perfect sense that the administration would adjust the program.
00:00:33.540Instead of cheering this accomplishment, many establishment conservative figures
00:00:37.620attacked both the program and Vance with charges of socialism. The incident serves as a good
00:00:44.040reminder that the battle for the future of the GOP sits under the surface of every debate the
00:00:48.760right is currently having, and that cheap ideological slogans still dominate the conservative
00:00:53.920mind. The Child Care and Development Fund was created in the 1990s to provide low-income parents
00:01:00.560with assistance to pay for daycare while they go to work. The program, as it currently exists,
00:01:06.000only distributes its $12 billion to low-income mothers if they leave their children to go to
00:01:11.000work. That means a larger percentage of the funding is likely going to single mothers and0.87
00:01:15.960dedicated voters for the Democratic Party. Vance's proposal would not add any additional funding to
00:01:21.580the program, but it would make the same pool of money available to married stay-at-home mothers0.81
00:01:26.960who prefer raising their own children to sitting in a cubicle. In response, conservative commentators
00:01:32.460like Meghan McCain and Dana Loesch went on social media tirades about the program being socialist
00:01:38.620and J.D. Vance representing big government conservatism. For most of history, being a
00:01:44.440widow or a divorcee with a child was a terrible situation, one to be avoided at all costs.
00:04:14.340Florida provides a great example of why something like this already works.
00:04:18.340In Florida, the state legislature passed a bill that allows school funding to follow the student instead of the institution.
00:04:24.940Lawmakers knew that for a whole host of statutory reasons and political realities,
00:04:29.580they weren't going to stop the collection of taxes for public schools.
00:04:32.700So instead, they ensured that the money could also go to schooling alternatives.
00:04:36.780If families decide to homeschool or send their children to private school, the taxes they already paid would be redirected to those efforts instead of funding the public school the family wasn't using.
00:04:48.580The legislators would have likely preferred to eliminate the tax altogether, but that was not political reality, so they decided the perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good.
00:04:59.140The cheap slogans about Vance's proposal repeated by conservative commentators
00:05:03.080reveals how a large percentage of the movement is still dedicated to rigid ideology
00:05:07.360instead of winning victories that actually improve the lives of Americans and grant the right more power.
00:05:12.940I mean, Meghan McCain is out there talking about the dangers of government spending
00:05:16.820when her father used his vote in the Senate to protect Obamacare while supporting every war on the planet.
00:05:23.660Dana Loesch is suggesting that a GOP Congress which won't pass one of the most popular bills
00:05:28.940in human history, the SAVE Act, that they're going to magically eliminate the program and