The Ben Shapiro Show - August 28, 2026


EVERYTHING You Need to Know About the Lindsay Clancy Case


Episode Stats


Length

44 minutes

Words per minute

172.09

Word count

7,572

Sentence count

542


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:00.000 The jury is now out on Lindsay Clancy.
00:00:02.000 Clancy, of course, murdered her three children and then jumped from a second story window after cutting her wrists.
00:00:07.000 All of that is undisputed.
00:00:09.000 The question is whether she was mentally ill to the extent required by law to fulfill the insanity defense.
00:00:14.000 Today, we're going to go through the entire case.
00:00:16.000 So you know what the hell you're talking about when you talk about this case, because the ridiculous hot takes that you are seeing online from legitimately all sides, they could power a small city.
00:00:26.000 Now, as I've been saying, this case is not about you.
00:00:30.000 It is not about your dyspepsia at having to deal with annoying toddlers.
00:00:33.000 It is not even about the awfulness of postpartum depression.
00:00:36.000 It is not about selfish women or abortion or the fall of Western civilization.
00:00:40.000 This case is about a fact pattern.
00:00:42.000 And you should know the fact pattern because if we would like to come to a consensus as Americans, as opposed to just beating each other with pool noodles, the facts ought to matter at least a little bit.
00:00:51.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:59.000 And one of my great irritations with all of the coverage surrounding Lindsey Clancy's case is that so little of it focuses in on the actual facts of the case.
00:01:07.000 And this sort of stuff drives me crazy.
00:01:08.000 The same thing happened in a sort of different way with George Floyd.
00:01:12.000 The entire George Floyd case, the Derek Chauvin prosecution, none of it was predicated on the facts of the case.
00:01:17.000 It was all based on narratives drawn from the case that had very little to do with the actual case.
00:01:22.000 So you'll recall that in that particular case, there were narratives that were drawn about the nature of America's criminal justice system being biased against.
00:01:29.000 Black people.
00:01:31.000 There are all sorts of takes about how America's systemic racism had led to the death of George Floyd.
00:01:36.000 And then you looked at the facts of the case and it didn't look like Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd.
00:01:41.000 Didn't even look like he manslaughtered George Floyd.
00:01:44.000 There's not even an accusation of racism in that case.
00:01:46.000 And so if you were just looking at that case, the fact pattern of that case, and then you were looking at Americans going after each other and then riots to the tune of $2 billion over that case, you would say this is nuts.
00:01:57.000 And we are consistently doing this now in America.
00:02:00.000 We are taking outstanding circumstances.
00:02:03.000 It's circumstances that are few and far between, incredibly rare with particular fact patterns.
00:02:08.000 And then we are using them as ways to project our own dyspepsia with America and with our fellow Americans onto those cases.
00:02:15.000 And it's inappropriate and it's wrong.
00:02:17.000 Each one of these criminal cases deserves actual attention.
00:02:21.000 Instead of us just jumping to the conclusions that we are looking for based on our priors, we should be looking at the fact pattern.
00:02:27.000 So let's begin with filicide.
00:02:29.000 So filicide is when parents kill kids.
00:02:32.000 This is why I'm saying this.
00:02:32.000 Very uncommon.
00:02:33.000 The reason I'm saying this is because when you try to project Onto extraordinarily uncommon circumstances.
00:02:39.000 Your particular life, circumstance, your point of view, America more broadly, the patriarchy, your experiences with your kids, you're doing it wrong.
00:02:47.000 Felicide is very, very rare in the United States.
00:02:51.000 And multiple felicide by mom is vanishingly rare in the United States.
00:02:56.000 There are about 3.6 million births per year in the United States.
00:02:59.000 There are somewhere between 450 and 500 cases of felicide every year in the United States, which accounts for about 2.5% of all US homicides annually.
00:03:07.000 Most of them are by men, most of them are single homicides.
00:03:11.000 There are about 15 to 20 cases of multiple filicide, meaning multiple kids killed by a mom in the United States each year.
00:03:18.000 Because they are so rare, that is why we know the names of people like Andrea Yates or Lindsey Clancy.
00:03:23.000 Because it is not, in fact, a commonplace occurrence for a mom to kill multiple children.
00:03:30.000 The reason I'm pointing this out again is because if you are taking away from Lindsey Clancy's cases that she is just like you, you are doing it wrong.
00:03:36.000 Or if you are taking away from Lindsey Clancy's case that women be Cray generally, you are doing it wrong.
00:03:42.000 And there are good studies that have been done on filicide and its connection to postpartum psychosis and other forms of mental illness.
00:03:49.000 There was one from 2007 in the World Journal of Psychiatry.
00:03:55.000 And it describes this phenomenon.
00:03:58.000 It says, quote, a lesser threshold for hospitalization should be considered for mentally ill mothers of young children due to the possibility of multiple deaths from a filicide suicide.
00:04:08.000 Factors which potentially merit psychiatric hospitalization include maternal fears of harming their child.
00:04:13.000 Delusions of their child's suffering, improbable concerns about their child's health, and hostility toward a despised partner's favorite child.
00:04:19.000 Psychotic mothers who fear that their children may suffer a fate worse than death due to persecutory delusions should either be hospitalized or separated from their children.
00:04:28.000 These mothers may be reluctant to share their delusional ideals.
00:04:31.000 Now, again, why am I reading that?
00:04:32.000 Because so much of that seems to describe the fact pattern that we're actually looking at.
00:04:37.000 As we'll discuss, Lindsey Clancy, either according to the prosecution, believed she should kill her kids.
00:04:43.000 Because her kids were an obstacle to her killing herself, or according to the defense, she did so because a voice told her that she needed to kill her kids.
00:04:52.000 Either way, one of the things that is interesting and fascinating about this case and the practice of psychiatry generally is extraordinarily imprecise.
00:05:01.000 You can have a series of symptoms, and that series of symptoms can be put into a basket of categories.
00:05:08.000 There are multiple diagnoses that can be made of any basket of symptoms, particularly when you're talking about complications arising from drug interactions.
00:05:16.000 That is just a reality of psychiatry.
00:05:19.000 As I say, when it comes to psychiatry, It is essentially a more sophisticated version of the shaman who's using various berries to treat various symptoms.
00:05:28.000 It is trial and error.
00:05:29.000 You have to determine whether a symptom abates or whether it exacerbates.
00:05:32.000 You then have to titrate up or titrate down.
00:05:34.000 You have to determine whether you need a second medication in order to deal with secondary effects.
00:05:38.000 Psychiatry is extraordinarily imprecise.
00:05:40.000 Diagnosis is imprecise.
00:05:42.000 Prognosis is imprecise.
00:05:44.000 All of it is extremely imprecise.
00:05:45.000 And that is complicated by the fact that, unlike other health conditions, psychiatric conditions, because so many of them are internal, You can't see inside somebody's brain the way that you can just x ray a leg.
00:05:57.000 That means that very often you don't even know the internal psychiatric symptoms of a person who is under psychiatric care.
00:06:03.000 They may be lying to you, right?
00:06:05.000 As that study says, mothers may be reluctant to share delusional ideas.
00:06:08.000 Why?
00:06:09.000 Because they're afraid the kids will be removed from them, for example.
00:06:12.000 Some Lindsey Clancy cases we'll discuss.
00:06:13.000 The defense is going to argue that actually Lindsey Clancy was not even telling her psychiatrist everything, which again is not rare.
00:06:21.000 It is, in fact, quite common in normal psychiatry, let alone postpartum.
00:06:27.000 Psychosis or heavy drug interactions or suicidality.
00:06:31.000 People are not always honest with their psychiatrists.
00:06:34.000 Okay, so in the Lindsey Clancy case, the charges that were put before the jury were put before the jury by Judge William Sullivan, and here is what he explained The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any mental disease or defect that may have existed did not deprive the defendant of her ability to behave as the law requires, that is, to obey the law.
00:07:02.000 Okay, so under Massachusetts law, basically, there are a few requirements in order to determine whether the insanity defense applies.
00:07:09.000 One, she had to understand the nature of what she was doing.
00:07:11.000 For the insanity defense to fail, she had to know what she was doing.
00:07:14.000 Two, she had to appreciate that what she was doing was wrong.
00:07:18.000 You have to know that murder is wrong.
00:07:20.000 You can't think that murdering somebody is right at the time.
00:07:23.000 Andor she has to be capable of conforming her conduct to the requirements of law.
00:07:28.000 Now, there are a series of potential verdicts that we'll get to in a moment.
00:07:32.000 There are nine women and three men on the jury.
00:07:34.000 The four person is an older woman.
00:07:35.000 People are immediately, again, projecting their beliefs about the gender split in American politics onto this jury.
00:07:42.000 It's a heavy female jury, therefore, they're going to acquit.
00:07:45.000 I don't know what they're going to do because, again, the fact pattern here is very complex and also very vague.
00:07:45.000 I don't know.
00:07:51.000 Right now, she faces three counts of first degree murder.
00:07:54.000 First degree murder in Massachusetts means that Clancy intentionally killed her children with deliberate premeditation or under a prosecution's other theory with extreme atrocity.
00:08:04.000 Or cruelty.
00:08:05.000 Now, there's no question extreme atrocity or cruelty is a part of this.
00:08:08.000 No question.
00:08:09.000 There's no way to read the 911 transcript and not have your heart break.
00:08:13.000 I mean, it's truly devastating.
00:08:16.000 And as far as deliberate premeditation, clearly there is planning.
00:08:19.000 But again, the question is intent.
00:08:22.000 Mentally ill people, like truly mentally ill people, cannot have the requisite amount of intent.
00:08:27.000 They can't have the so-called mens rea.
00:08:28.000 They can't have the mindset necessary to actually be able to commit a crime.
00:08:32.000 Because again, if you are mentally ill to the extent that you can't determine right from wrong, And that you're not capable of conforming your conduct to the requirements of law or understand the nature of what you're doing, that's the insanity defense.
00:08:43.000 So, if she's found guilty of first degree murder, mandatory sentence of life in prison with no possibility of parole.
00:08:50.000 If she's found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, she won't face prison time, but she's not going to walk away.
00:08:56.000 I said this on the show last week, and people are like, well, you know, she theoretically could.
00:09:01.000 She's not going to walk away.
00:09:03.000 Under Massachusetts law, there is no time limit for involuntary commitment at a mental health facility.
00:09:08.000 Andrea Yates, similar case back in 2001.
00:09:11.000 She drowned five of her children.
00:09:12.000 She eventually was acquitted.
00:09:14.000 She's still in a mental facility in 2026.
00:09:18.000 So, the judge is now offering sort of a Chinese menu of possible charge options.
00:09:23.000 I don't like when judges do this, by the way.
00:09:25.000 I think it probably ought to be legally barred.
00:09:27.000 If a judge is offering several duplicative charges in the attempt to get somebody to say yes to a conviction and then we'll figure out the charge later, I just think that's bad prosecutorial practice.
00:09:39.000 But a couple of the other charge options that were added at the 11th hour include second degree murder, in which the jury would have to find that Lindsey Clancy intentionally killed her children, but without premeditation.
00:09:50.000 Or extreme atrocity or cruelty.
00:09:51.000 Again, I'm not sure how that helps the prosecution, because again, the intent is the question.
00:09:55.000 And manslaughter, which would require jurors to find that Clancy caused her children's death through wanton or reckless conduct.
00:10:03.000 And again, wanton or reckless conduct, typically when it comes to manslaughter, is like you were driving drunk.
00:10:08.000 We'll get into the entire timeline of what happened in the Lindsay Clancy case first.
00:10:12.000 Let's talk about ZipRecruiter.
00:10:13.000 Picture calling customer service about a missing order.
00:10:15.000 You navigate that AI menu, you explain the problem, you get transferred, you explain the problem a second time.
00:10:19.000 At this point, you put more work into locating the package than the company that actually shipped it in the first place.
00:10:24.000 And then somebody finally says, let me track that down.
00:10:27.000 And they actually do.
00:10:28.000 That's the person you remember.
00:10:29.000 You know, the one who actually took responsibility.
00:10:31.000 There's plenty of discussion about artificial intelligence changing the job market, but businesses still need people with good judgment, initiative, and an interest in doing the job well.
00:10:40.000 That's where Zip Recruiter comes in.
00:10:42.000 Candidates can go the extra step and tell you in their own words why they're interested in your position.
00:10:46.000 And Zip Recruiter has a new feature that shows you the most interested qualified candidates first so you meet the right people faster.
00:10:52.000 Their powerful matching technology helps you find qualified candidates quickly so you can spend less time sorting through applications And more time running your business.
00:10:59.000 Find somebody who takes ownership of the problem and actually calls back.
00:11:03.000 Save time and meet great candidates sooner with Zip Recruiter.
00:11:06.000 Four out of five employers who post on Zip Recruiter will get a quality candidate within the very first day.
00:11:10.000 Try it for free at ziprecruiter.comslash daily wire.
00:11:13.000 That's ziprecruiter.comslash daily wire.
00:11:15.000 Meet your match on Zip Recruiter.
00:11:16.000 Okay, so now I want to get into the timeline of the case, and then we'll get into the prosecution's case and the defense's case.
00:11:21.000 So, the timeline of the case December 2016, Lindsay Clancy and Patrick Clancy are married.
00:11:26.000 About a year later, their daughter Cora is born.
00:11:30.000 In 2019, their son Dawson is born.
00:11:33.000 And in 2022, Callan is born.
00:11:35.000 So those are the three kids.
00:11:37.000 And these are very, very small children.
00:11:40.000 Now, friends, relatives, coworkers, teachers, Anani, and Patrick all described Lindsey Clancy before the psychiatric decline as attentive and organized and loving and active and very, very involved with the kids.
00:11:53.000 After the birth of her last child, Callan, apparently she started to go into significant mental decline.
00:11:59.000 In September 2022, She had massive increases in anxiety as her return to nursing approached.
00:12:06.000 She searched for psychiatric help and she was diagnosed with generalized anxiety.
00:12:11.000 September 15th, her psychiatrist, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, prescribed sertraline.
00:12:18.000 The defense said that Clancy's mood and agitation worsened with antidepressants.
00:12:22.000 The Commonwealth emphasized contemporaneous notes did not document psychosis or mania.
00:12:27.000 Now, again, as we'll discuss, not every symptom gets described to psychiatrists.
00:12:32.000 This is part of the problem with insanity defense claims, right?
00:12:36.000 Not everything is well documented.
00:12:39.000 And also, high anxiety can manifest in things that look like psychosis but aren't quite psychosis and aren't quite mania.
00:12:46.000 In October, she started telehealth psychiatric treatment.
00:12:50.000 Her notes and messages started reflecting anxiety, sleep trouble, guilt, and feeling disconnected.
00:12:55.000 Late October, she had an adverse reaction to an SSRI.
00:12:59.000 They then added lorazepam, hydroxazine, and busbarone were also used.
00:13:03.000 Now, again, as I said, very often in psychiatry, what will happen is that somebody is put on a medication, they have an adverse reaction to the medication, a secondary symptom arises.
00:13:11.000 And now, in order to deal with that secondary symptom, you put a new drug on the premises, right?
00:13:17.000 You start taking more than one drug.
00:13:20.000 In October 25th, she wrote about resentment that her older children prevented her from experiencing Callan as though he were her first baby, followed by a wish to feel love and connection.
00:13:28.000 November 16th, she went to South Shore Hospital's emergency department for insomnia and she was prescribed trazodone.
00:13:36.000 And then a little bit later, she connected with a psychiatric nurse practitioner named Julie Paul.
00:13:40.000 The intake documented severe anxiety, insomnia, and depression.
00:13:44.000 They added on fluoxetine, trazodone, mertazapine, hydroxazine, busbarone, lorazepam, quitiapine.
00:13:55.000 All of these show up.
00:13:56.000 And again, it's very, very difficult.
00:13:59.000 You're dealing here with brain chemistry.
00:14:02.000 The brain is not well mapped.
00:14:03.000 This is just the reality.
00:14:05.000 In November 29, November 29th, the end of the month, there's a text suggesting that she'd become dependent on a benzodiazepine.
00:14:16.000 She started having suicidal thoughts.
00:14:17.000 On December 4th, she contacted a suicide hotline.
00:14:21.000 On December 6th, Patrick expressed concern she was over medicated.
00:14:25.000 For the next couple of weeks, family texts described sleep problems, fear, hopelessness, medication reactions, and repeated attempts to obtain care.
00:14:32.000 Her Edinburgh postnatal depression scale was reported as 23 and later 17.
00:14:36.000 Those are both clinically significant.
00:14:38.000 Again, the way that you typically diagnose psychiatric conditions is an actual checklist.
00:14:42.000 And if you hit a certain number on the checklist, then you're considered to have the condition.
00:14:45.000 As I say, psychiatry is very, very rudimentary.
00:14:49.000 I keep saying that because it's important for people to understand it.
00:14:51.000 People think that treating the brain is like treating other parts of the body.
00:14:55.000 It really is not at all.
00:14:58.000 In late December, Patrick later told investigators she had disclosed suicidal thoughts and thoughts of harming the kids.
00:15:04.000 Several treating clinicians testified she denied homicidal intent or psychosis to them.
00:15:08.000 So, again, this goes to people don't tell their psychiatrists the truth all the time, which informs some of the testimony, as we'll see in just a second.
00:15:17.000 December 30th, she went to Massachusetts General Hospital's emergency department and then entered McLean Hospital voluntarily.
00:15:23.000 From January 1st to 5th, she was on voluntary psychiatric hospitalization there.
00:15:30.000 Dr. Aliyah Goodhart testified that Clancy was depressed and anxious, had reported suicidal thinking, and wanted help.
00:15:36.000 She did not show psychosis or mania during the admission, denied a current plan, identified the children's reasons to live, and sought discharge.
00:15:42.000 And she was prescribed yet more trazodone and lorazepam.
00:15:45.000 She had follow up with Dr. Tufts January 6th.
00:15:49.000 She was taking a huge cocktail of drugs January 9th through 16th.
00:15:55.000 Her device history, her search history showed searches concerning drug interactions, sleep deprivation, psychosis symptoms, schizophrenia, hallucinations, intrusive thoughts, depression, bipolar disorder, and suicide.
00:16:09.000 The prosecutors would later argue that she was basically searching up rationales that she could later use to defend against her actions.
00:16:16.000 But the defense would argue she was searching that because she was suffering from it.
00:16:19.000 A January 20th query asked Can you treat a sociopath?
00:16:23.000 The prosecution argued again that all of this showed self monitoring and concealing planning.
00:16:28.000 And the defense said, well, the reason that you are searching up hallucinations is because you're having them.
00:16:33.000 The defense also elicited records of searches about carotid artery, cutting the throat, and disabling airbags.
00:16:40.000 January 24th was the day of the murders, 2023.
00:16:43.000 Cora, the oldest, attended a routine pediatric appointment.
00:16:46.000 The family played in the snow and built a snowman.
00:16:48.000 4 13 p.m., Apple Max Activity examined the route from the home to 3V, that's a Kingston restaurant.
00:16:54.000 The prosecution characterized this as calculating how long Patrick would be away.
00:16:58.000 The defense noted route searches are routine when ordering food.
00:17:01.000 At about 5 15 p.m., Patrick testified he left first for CVS and then for 3V to pick up the food.
00:17:06.000 Before leaving, he saw Dawson eating and he said Clancy sounded and acted normal.
00:17:11.000 At 5 23 p.m., sorry, at 5 32 p.m., CVS surveillance showed Patrick entering the store.
00:17:16.000 At 5 33, there's an incoming call from Patrick to her, followed by a 14 second outgoing callback from Clancy while the phone remained locked.
00:17:26.000 Apparently, she sounded normal, according to Patrick, but he recalled an impression she might be in the middle of something.
00:17:31.000 5 54, he showed up at the restaurant.
00:17:33.000 6 09, he returned home with the food.
00:17:36.000 He found the primary bedroom door locked.
00:17:38.000 He forced the entry.
00:17:39.000 He saw blood and an open, broken window and looked outside.
00:17:42.000 And Clancy was lying injured in the yard below.
00:17:43.000 She, of course, was paralyzed from the waist down.
00:17:45.000 She had cut herself and she had jumped out the window.
00:17:47.000 He asked where the children were and she indicated the basement.
00:17:49.000 He found Dawson alone in a rear basement gym office area, shirtless and wearing a diaper.
00:17:53.000 Cora and Callan were together elsewhere in the basement.
00:17:56.000 Resistance bands were on or near their necks.
00:17:58.000 Patrick removed the bands and began resuscitation.
00:18:00.000 At 6 11, he called 9 1 1.
00:18:03.000 The 9 1 1 call is absolutely horrifying.
00:18:06.000 The investigators immediately started an investigation January 25th.
00:18:12.000 They seized all the materials.
00:18:15.000 The children's toxicology was negative for sedation or poisoning substances.
00:18:18.000 There was no evidence they'd been drugged.
00:18:20.000 And she was charged February 7th, 2023, with three counts each of first degree murder, strangulation, or suffering, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon.
00:18:30.000 There were 21 days of testimony.
00:18:31.000 There were some 85 witnesses.
00:18:34.000 And we're going to go through some of the key witnesses here.
00:18:38.000 Yesterday was the closing argument.
00:18:42.000 Lindsey Clancy herself did not testify before the jury.
00:18:44.000 Now, again, that is not a rarity.
00:18:46.000 Very often, the person at issue doesn't testify because they don't want to be subjected to cross examination.
00:18:52.000 And the jury was told you're not allowed to draw adverse inference from her decision not to testify.
00:18:57.000 Again, her affect in the courtroom was a major issue because people were saying that she looked cold or disconnected.
00:19:02.000 Again, it is unclear to me at this point.
00:19:04.000 I assume she's still on a significant cocktail of drugs at this point.
00:19:10.000 Now, we're going to go through the prosecution case.
00:19:13.000 So, the prosecution basically argues here that Lindsey Clancy was profoundly depressed, but she was not psychotic.
00:19:19.000 They argued that she knew exactly what she was doing, that she understood that it was wrong, and that she deliberately executed a plan to kill her kids and then commit suicide.
00:19:29.000 The prosecution says that she was desperately unhappy and suicidal, and that she had come to view her children as an obstacle to killing herself.
00:19:37.000 So, in that theory, Killing the kids was part of a rational plan, right?
00:19:43.000 Basically, if I kill the kids, then I can kill myself, which theoretically is different from a psychotic delusion.
00:19:49.000 Voices made me think that killing the kids was necessary or morally right.
00:19:55.000 So they would need to establish that whatever her psychiatric problems, they did not deprive her of criminal responsibility.
00:19:59.000 So that is their case.
00:20:01.000 In a moment, we're going to go through the prosecution witnesses, the defense witnesses, and the rest of the case.
00:20:06.000 First, most Americans spend decades putting their money into a 401k.
00:20:09.000 Every paycheck, some money goes in.
00:20:11.000 You watch the number grow.
00:20:12.000 Maybe you rebalance occasionally.
00:20:14.000 How many people actually know everything they're allowed to do with that money?
00:20:17.000 Here's an option that surprises people.
00:20:19.000 Certain physical gold and silver can be held inside a self directed IRA.
00:20:22.000 Depending on the retirement account you have, qualified IRA or 401k assets may be eligible to roll into a self directed precious metals IRA through a properly executed rollover without triggering current taxes or early withdrawal penalties.
00:20:35.000 You don't have to choose gold, but you should at least know that the choice is there, especially given the fact that the stuff you're holding in cash, well, the government, very rarely the government makes the dollar more valuable.
00:20:44.000 This is where Golden Crest Metals can help.
00:20:46.000 They will walk you through the process from establishing the self directed accounts and coordinating the rollover to choosing eligible metals and arranging secure storage.
00:20:53.000 Golden Crest is a boutique precious metals firm.
00:20:55.000 Transparent pricing, liquid products, straightforward service, no high pressure call center experience.
00:20:59.000 And right now, my listeners can get a free investor kit, a free portfolio review with no obligation, up to 25 grand in free silver on qualifying purchases.
00:21:06.000 Text the word Ben to Metals.
00:21:08.000 That's 63825.
00:21:10.000 You can also speak to somebody.
00:21:11.000 Just call 888 429 3999 or visit Golden Crest Metals.comslash Ben.
00:21:16.000 Again, that's Golden Crest Metals.comslash Ben.
00:21:19.000 So the prosecution witnesses included Patrick Clancy, who is her husband.
00:21:24.000 He testified that Lindsay said she had heard a man's voice telling her to kill the kids.
00:21:27.000 Again, the prosecution would argue and have expert witnesses argue that you made this up later.
00:21:31.000 This is afterward.
00:21:34.000 But going back to that first part, she said she had thoughts of harming the kids.
00:21:38.000 Is that correct?
00:21:39.000 Yeah.
00:21:40.000 And did she tell you whether or not she had specific thoughts of how she would harm the kids?
00:21:46.000 No.
00:21:48.000 And she didn't describe that as hearing this external voice telling her to harm the kids, correct?
00:21:53.000 Correct.
00:21:54.000 A few days after this happened, did you receive a phone call from the defendant while she was at Brigham and Women's Hospital?
00:22:04.000 I think it was like a week or so after, yeah.
00:22:09.000 And what did the defendant say at that time about what had happened with the children?
00:22:18.000 She didn't talk about our kids.
00:22:20.000 She talked about what she went through.
00:22:24.000 And what did she say about what she went through?
00:22:26.000 She said she heard a man's voice telling her that if she didn't do it now, she would lose her chance.
00:22:36.000 So, again, that is him testifying that that's what Lindsay said later.
00:22:40.000 Now, her chief psychiatrist throughout a lot of this period was Dr. Jennifer Tufts.
00:22:45.000 She claims that there were no signs of psychosis or mania.
00:22:49.000 Now, again, I'm not accusing Dr. Tufts of saying something that is untrue.
00:22:55.000 I will say that if there were signs of psychosis or mania, And Tufts had missed them, that would have been a problem, obviously.
00:23:03.000 You were asked about your January 23rd, 2023, session with the defendant.
00:23:11.000 Defense counsel asked if you had recommended a hospital evaluation for her on that day, and you said no.
00:23:18.000 Why not?
00:23:21.000 Because she was completely denying any suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation.
00:23:29.000 There were no.
00:23:31.000 Signs of psychosis or mania.
00:23:34.000 So there were no serious signs that her safety or that anyone else's safety was at risk.
00:23:46.000 And during that session, did she ever tell you that she planned to harm herself or the children?
00:23:51.000 No.
00:23:53.000 Now, again, as we'll talk about, and the reason I keep putting focus on this is because I think it is true.
00:24:00.000 Just because a psychiatrist testifies that a person who is.
00:24:04.000 Psychotic is not fully psychotic or is not expressing.
00:24:08.000 Many people who have suicidal ideation will not tell their psychiatrist they are suicidally ideated.
00:24:13.000 Now, again, maybe she did, or maybe she was not suicidally ideated, and actually, this whole thing was a plot, right?
00:24:19.000 That is the question of fact that is being presented.
00:24:21.000 So, again, the prosecution's case is that she was not psychotic, that she was depressed but not psychotic, that she was not in the throes of a manic episode.
00:24:29.000 Sometimes a manic episode in bipolar one can manifest as hallucinations and hearing of voices, for example.
00:24:35.000 They're saying none of that happened.
00:24:37.000 So, the prosecution also called a Dr. Gregory Sathoff, who's a forensic psychiatrist for the FBI for counterterrorism, who says that she did this quickly and methodically.
00:24:48.000 Did the defendant tell you that the voice told her where to kill the children? No.
00:24:55.000 Did the voice tell her how to kill the children? No.
00:24:58.000 Did the voice tell her what to use to kill the children? No.
00:25:03.000 Did the voice tell her in what order to kill the children? No.
00:25:08.000 Did the voice tell her where to try to kill herself? No.
00:25:12.000 Did the voice tell her in what way to kill herself? No.
00:25:18.000 The fact that the voice, according to the defendant, the voice didn't tell her any of those things, but instead just said, Kill the kids so you can kill yourself.
00:25:27.000 Is that significant in your evaluation in any way?
00:25:30.000 How so?
00:25:30.000 Yes.
00:25:33.000 Well, in the small amount of time that Miss Clancy had in the home without her husband, it was important in order to carry this out, as well as her suicide, to do this quickly, methodically, and the like.
00:25:55.000 And so basically, the case that he's making is that she didn't hear a voice, the voice is made up.
00:25:59.000 She knew that she had to act quickly in order to dispose of the children, murder the kids before her husband got home.
00:26:06.000 The prosecution also called a forensic psychologist named Dr. Kirk Heilbrunn.
00:26:10.000 He said that she had bipolar two, not bipolar one, with manic episodes.
00:26:14.000 And so, again, the difference between bipolar one and bipolar two is that bipolar one requires one full manic episode.
00:26:20.000 A manic episode is elevated, irritable, energized mood, can manifest with hallucinations, and usually lasts at least a week.
00:26:28.000 So, you're talking like a major psychiatric episode.
00:26:30.000 Bipolar two.
00:26:32.000 Usually requires a hypomanic episode.
00:26:34.000 A hypomanic episode is a milder form of mania that generally doesn't impede your functioning.
00:26:39.000 So the idea would be that if she had never been diagnosed with bipolar one, it would have been surprising for her to hear a hallucination.
00:26:45.000 Now, there are cases in which bipolar two has manifested with hallucinations, but this is Dr. Heilbronn.
00:26:52.000 I ended up with a diagnosis, making a diagnosis of bipolar two disorder, which is a slightly less, not slightly, it's a less severe form of bipolar disorder.
00:27:07.000 And doctor, why did you diagnose with bipolar 2 and not bipolar?
00:27:13.000 Because bipolar, as I said, is a more severe kind of diagnosis.
00:27:18.000 It's more noticeable.
00:27:20.000 And if you had a bipolar diagnosis, then I would want to see something that clearly and definitely looks like a manic episode.
00:27:31.000 And I did not see any evidence of that before January 24th of 2023.
00:27:38.000 Okay, horrifyingly, Heilbronn also testified that Clancy told her kids to go to God while strangling them.
00:27:46.000 Again, the case itself is horrifying.
00:27:47.000 And just on a level of pure, unbridled evil action, the immediate normal human response is death penalty.
00:27:55.000 Obviously, clearly.
00:27:57.000 But that's not the question.
00:27:58.000 The question is, again, the insanity defense here.
00:28:02.000 And further evidence that you saw for the suicide combined with ultra sick filicide?
00:28:07.000 There was.
00:28:09.000 One of the things that she said when asked about what happened is that in the course of strangling each child, she said, Go to God, baby, go to God.
00:28:25.000 And that was part of her expectation that she and the children would be together in heaven with God.
00:28:34.000 One doctor, Alvra Mack, also testified for the prosecution.
00:28:37.000 He's a forensic psychiatrist.
00:28:39.000 That she retained capacity required for having criminal responsibility, which of course is the entire question, is whether she had the mental capacity to know what she was doing was wrong and knew what she was doing as she was doing it.
00:28:51.000 The various mental status examinations done by the doctors at the Brigham generally showed normal mental status.
00:28:59.000 One particular portion of the record reviews their review of whether or not she had the ability to make a decision, in that case, a change to her health care proxy.
00:29:13.000 And so the physicians there were able to examine her closely in order to understand that she did have decision making capacity.
00:29:23.000 And that's an example of something you reviewed in the record that was close in time to the incident itself, correct?
00:29:33.000 Yes.
00:29:34.000 So the closing argument was made by the Plymouth County Assistant DA woman named Jennifer Sprague.
00:29:39.000 And she said, again, the descriptions here are pretty horrifying because the case itself is horrifying.
00:29:45.000 Here she was.
00:29:46.000 Talking about the bodies of the children.
00:29:50.000 She killed them and she left them there on the floor with the bands around their necks.
00:29:56.000 She didn't bring them up to their beds and put them with their favorite stuffed animal and cover them up gently and lovingly, leaving them peacefully there.
00:30:04.000 No.
00:30:06.000 She left them discarded on the basement floor like broken toys because she was done playing the game.
00:30:17.000 You know to a moral certainty.
00:30:20.000 She is guilty.
00:30:23.000 And so Sprague's case was that there was a rational order to the killing of the kids, and that because she demonstrated planning capacity, this means she wasn't mentally ill at the time.
00:30:31.000 The defense would argue, obviously, that planning capacity does not mean that you're not mentally ill when you're in the throes of doing stuff.
00:30:37.000 This, by the way, that latter part is actually true.
00:30:40.000 There are people who are mentally ill who have the capacity to plan action.
00:30:43.000 The question is whether they know the difference between right and wrong when they're doing it.
00:30:46.000 Again, I keep coming back to the legal standard because that's the issue of the case.
00:30:50.000 Here was the assistant DA Jennifer Sprague on the rational order of killing of the children.
00:30:56.000 You know it was deliberate premeditation because of the way she killed them and the way they died.
00:31:04.000 And the order also shows a rationality, the order she killed them in.
00:31:10.000 Because Horan and Dawson are older.
00:31:14.000 If she had tried to strangle one in front of the other, they would have known this is bad.
00:31:20.000 And they would have tried to intervene or run and hide.
00:31:23.000 And she had a very limited time.
00:31:25.000 She didn't have time to try to find a child who ran off and hid.
00:31:29.000 So, taking Dawson first and moving him to a separate room, having Horace stay with Callan and having Dawson go in another room, that's rational.
00:31:39.000 That makes sense.
00:31:40.000 That's ordered thinking.
00:31:43.000 Now, again, you could theoretically have ordered thinking within a disordered mind.
00:31:47.000 That happens fairly frequently with mental illness.
00:31:49.000 But the case that the prosecution is making is that her entire goal was to kill the kids.
00:31:55.000 And not only that, the prosecution actually argued that she was not fully attempting to commit suicide.
00:31:59.000 That if you're trying to kill yourself, then you actually cut yourself in a different way.
00:32:03.000 And you don't jump from a second story window, you jump from a higher height.
00:32:06.000 Here was the DA.
00:32:08.000 She cut herself.
00:32:10.000 But you saw the cuts on the meaty pot of her arm horizontally.
00:32:15.000 No arteries, no major blood vessels.
00:32:19.000 Didn't need to be stitched the next day.
00:32:22.000 The one on her neck didn't need to be stitched at all.
00:32:24.000 She knew as a nurse, those weren't going to kill her.
00:32:28.000 But she was trying.
00:32:30.000 And then going out of the window, 12, 13 feet, she landed the wrong way and ended up paralyzed on the frozen ground.
00:32:38.000 You know, the idea that falling out of a 12 foot window is going to definitely kill you, not necessarily.
00:32:49.000 Okay, so then the DA argued in the end she was depressed but not psychotic, and this is the case of the prosecution.
00:32:56.000 She was depressed, right?
00:32:59.000 And she was trying to deal with that, trying to get help for that.
00:33:05.000 But it wasn't the fault of the providers that she was struggling with this or that she wasn't getting better.
00:33:11.000 They were doing the best they could.
00:33:13.000 You have the records.
00:33:14.000 You heard the testimony.
00:33:16.000 They were doing the best they could with the information she provided them.
00:33:21.000 And that wasn't always accurate information.
00:33:23.000 That wasn't always the full picture.
00:33:26.000 And they were doing the best they could with her level of cooperation and compliance with the plan.
00:33:34.000 Okay, so that is the prosecution's case.
00:33:36.000 The defense, by contrast, argues that Lindsey Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis.
00:33:41.000 And that was actually superimposed on bipolar depressive illnesses and exacerbated by bad psychiatric treatment and mixed medication.
00:33:50.000 And they presented a lot of medical evidence talking about everything from suicidal thoughts to severe insomnia to medication problems to psychiatric treatment and ultimately psychotic symptoms.
00:34:01.000 So the defense called a bunch of witnesses.
00:34:03.000 Those witnesses included Lindsay's mom, who read a text from Lindsay Clancy asking for help about three months before the murder of her children.
00:34:12.000 If this is a copy of the text that you're referring to.
00:34:16.000 Yes, it is.
00:34:17.000 Would you read that for the jury?
00:34:20.000 Mom, will you please come up and stay with me for a bit?
00:34:24.000 I'm really sick.
00:34:26.000 Something is wrong.
00:34:27.000 I had horrible insomnia all night, and I just don't know how I'm going to get through the day.
00:34:33.000 I started taking the medicine my doctor prescribed for anxiety, and I think it's made things worse.
00:34:40.000 It's just really scary, and I don't want to be alone.
00:34:45.000 He says three months before the killing.
00:34:48.000 Dr. Philip Resnick is one of the doctors who was called to testify, and he says that Clancy was psychotic on that day.
00:34:57.000 Ms. Clancy's case, she had not only a command hallucination on the day that she killed her children, she had what is known as a delusion of influence.
00:35:11.000 That is, not only did she hear a command, But she felt that her body was taken over by an external force where she was in a dream state and did not have control of her own body.
00:35:28.000 It was almost like she was a puppet and someone else was pulling the strings.
00:35:35.000 Another defense witness, Dr. Donald Condi, clinical and forensic psychiatrist, explained that it's also possible that she was lying to her own care providers about her symptoms because she wanted to be with the kids, and she knew that if she testified to her psychiatrist about what was happening, that.
00:35:50.000 The kids might be removed from her or she might be involuntarily committed.
00:35:55.000 Would you agree that there are reasons that a woman would not tell the doctor or minimize their symptoms out of fear?
00:36:03.000 Yes.
00:36:04.000 What kind of fear?
00:36:04.000 Fear of what?
00:36:05.000 Well, in the records it's stated that Ms. Clancy reported she was worried that her children would be taken away from her, perhaps by the Department of Children and Families, if she reported very severe symptoms.
00:36:21.000 The other thing is, as a health care professional, boards of registration sometimes take a dim view of people who have been in treatment for certain psychiatric illnesses.
00:36:35.000 And so she might have been concerned about her nursing license, but that's speculation.
00:36:42.000 So there are other reasons why a person may be concerned about telling healthcare providers, mandated reporters, that they're hearing voices, correct?
00:36:55.000 Yes.
00:36:58.000 The Clancy defense attorney, it was Kevin Reddington.
00:37:03.000 His concluding argument was she went from happy mom, happy family, to this.
00:37:10.000 Horror show.
00:37:11.000 That's mental illness.
00:37:14.000 How does this?
00:37:20.000 It's a picture of the family with the kids.
00:37:23.000 This.
00:37:27.000 A picture of her in her hospital bed paralyzed from the waist down.
00:37:29.000 Damn medicine.
00:37:31.000 And the lousy medical care that she got.
00:37:34.000 You can troop as many paid experts as you want to come in here.
00:37:40.000 And tell a jury, oh, well, she didn't say that she heard voices inside her head.
00:37:45.000 She said she heard voices from outside her head.
00:37:48.000 She said she was making chicken McNuggets.
00:37:49.000 There was a bowl on the sofa.
00:37:51.000 She wasn't making chicken McNuggets.
00:37:53.000 She said something as I think and I muse and I try real hard to tell you what my opinion is that this woman was acting in her right and right when these children were killed.
00:38:10.000 So.
00:38:12.000 Many people are taking a lot of messages away from this, as I said at the top.
00:38:16.000 I don't see how you can.
00:38:18.000 I don't see how you can.
00:38:18.000 This is an open question of fact.
00:38:20.000 This case is an open question of fact.
00:38:24.000 When people show up and they protest outside the courtroom and they project their own feelings onto a case that is horrifically terrible, a tragedy in every element, an act perhaps of the gravest evil, when you project your own issues onto that, you're doing something wrong.
00:38:42.000 And that is true on all sides.
00:38:44.000 All the hot takes on every one of these topics.
00:38:46.000 They need to stop.
00:38:47.000 They're bad for the country and they're also just bad thinking.
00:38:51.000 Ricky Schlott spoke with some Clancy supporters outside the courtroom for the New York Post and she described what she saw.
00:39:01.000 As much as we might want tangible symbols or stories that reflect our critiques of society, sometimes things are just not that clear.
00:39:11.000 And while, yes, I think that some of what the supporters were saying were callous, I think it was also the result of a lot of just.
00:39:19.000 Genuine suffering that brought them here.
00:39:21.000 And in some ways, one woman told me that this was therapy for her as she sat beside the ashes of her own child who took his life and she blames a failure of the mental health system.
00:39:34.000 And, you know, I think that's probably the best snapshot that I can give of how people are doing and why people are here in the first place.
00:39:44.000 Now, again, I don't think people should be there in the first place.
00:39:47.000 I think there are a lot of reasons to be concerned about.
00:39:49.000 About women's health, lots of reasons to be concerned about psychiatry.
00:39:53.000 But turning this into a political football is, to me, an act of patent looniness.
00:39:58.000 I see no rationale for it whatsoever.
00:40:01.000 Well, Clancy's defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, he politicized himself.
00:40:06.000 He came out and he said that Clancy is concerned about women's rights.
00:40:09.000 What in the world are we talking about here?
00:40:11.000 What are we talking about?
00:40:12.000 What the hell does this have to do?
00:40:13.000 A woman does not have a right to kill her children, obviously.
00:40:17.000 What does this have to do with feminism or women being put under the boot of the page?
00:40:21.000 What are we even doing here?
00:40:23.000 Why?
00:40:23.000 Why are we doing it?
00:40:27.000 Such a marvelous, sweet, Innocent person, she's just amazing and so strong and just trying so hard to get up from.
00:40:38.000 She's just been beat down for three and a half years and she feels that she's had a fair trial with the judge and the jury's been very attentive and all we can do is hope for the best.
00:40:46.000 You may not have used the description.
00:40:48.000 Do you want to say, has she said anything about women raising postpartum, psychosis?
00:40:53.000 She's very concerned, especially as a labor and delivery nurse.
00:40:56.000 She's very concerned about women's rights, the fact that women are.
00:41:01.000 Pretty much marginalized.
00:41:04.000 I think it's readily apparent that DSM is a joke.
00:41:07.000 I couldn't get into the social implications in the trial, understandably, but if the United States would take a lesson from Europe, Belgium, England, France, Peru, a lot of these countries, they take care of their women that have psychosis, keep them with their babies, they don't rip the babies away from them and put the women in jail.
00:41:30.000 I mean, I'm sorry, this is not a moment for political activism when your client is on trial for a triple homicide against her own children.
00:41:38.000 So the jury is currently out.
00:41:39.000 They've asked for some additional pieces of evidence.
00:41:42.000 They sent a note to the trial judge.
00:41:44.000 Apparently they asked to see two bags of pills that were entered into evidence along with the knife that Clancy used in her suicide attempt.
00:41:51.000 I'm not sure exactly what they think they're going to find there.
00:41:54.000 Maybe the idea is that she was over medicated.
00:41:57.000 Look how many pills this is.
00:41:59.000 Or maybe they're trying to see, you know, how big the knife was.
00:42:01.000 Was she really trying to hurt herself?
00:42:02.000 Was it big enough to really hurt herself?
00:42:04.000 How sharp was it?
00:42:05.000 I'm not sure what they're looking for there.
00:42:06.000 Okay, so I told you I would get to my take.
00:42:09.000 Were I on the jury?
00:42:10.000 The burden of proof here is very, very high for the prosecution.
00:42:13.000 Very high.
00:42:14.000 Because again, the behavior here conforms with the mental illness theory of the case.
00:42:20.000 Were this a preponderance of the evidence case, meaning like civil standard, preponderance of the evidence just means a majority of the evidence, then I might be inclined to convict.
00:42:28.000 Were I on the jury, I would be inclined to find for the defense on the basis of the insanity defense.
00:42:35.000 I would.
00:42:38.000 And then I would hope and pray that.
00:42:41.000 Lindsey Clancy ended up involuntarily committed for literally the rest of her life, which is what happened to Andrea Yates.
00:42:47.000 But that is just me following the facts.
00:42:49.000 And I can see others who follow the facts differently.
00:42:51.000 My friend Ali Beth Stuckey, for example, she followed the facts and found the opposite conclusion.
00:42:56.000 This is one of the reasons why I'm sort of perturbed by the radical polarization and opinion over this case.
00:43:03.000 The fact pattern just is not clear, the fact pattern is complex, the burden of proof on the prosecution is high.
00:43:11.000 And so, I think if everybody had a little bit more grace for one another while looking at the actual fact patterns, it would be a lot easier to come to the proper conclusions from this case.
00:43:20.000 And the proper conclusion from this case is that horrible tragedies happen.
00:43:24.000 Psychiatric care in general is an extraordinarily blunt instrument.
00:43:29.000 And that sometimes acts of horror and acts of evil don't have the marks of clear justice that we would like to see in life.
00:43:42.000 I wish they did.
00:43:43.000 I wish they did.
00:43:44.000 But to pretend away the complexity in the name of political narrative to me, it's bad for the country.
00:43:48.000 It's bad for our justice system.
00:43:50.000 It's just not great in general.
00:43:52.000 What an amazing video you just watched.
00:43:53.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:43:55.000 Well, you know, if you'd think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out.