The Ben Shapiro Show - August 26, 2026


Meta Just Paid $16.7 Billion for Harming Kids


Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

190.81

Word count

4,977

Sentence count

379

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

18

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I've said it before and I will say it again.
00:00:02.000 If I could smash a big red button that made social media altogether disappear tomorrow, I would do it at great cost to my own livelihood.
00:00:10.000 I would do that because I care a lot more about my kids than I do about the clicks and the likes.
00:00:14.000 I've also said it before and I'll say it again.
00:00:17.000 Artificial intelligence is incredible.
00:00:19.000 Overall, it is probably going to save the American economy.
00:00:22.000 Now, again, that may not be popular, but it happens to be true.
00:00:25.000 So here is the thing technology is scary.
00:00:28.000 Sometimes it's scary for a very good reason, and sometimes it's scary just because it's scary.
00:00:32.000 But we have to tell the difference between the two.
00:00:35.000 Because if we don't, we'll either destroy our own brains or we will destroy our entire economy.
00:00:40.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:49.000 So, again, technology is scary.
00:00:51.000 And new technology is always scary because we're not sure exactly what to do with it. 0.97
00:00:55.000 And the temptation is always to kill it, to burn it with fire. 0.55
00:00:59.000 And again, sometimes I'm actually pretty sympathetic to this particular temptation. 0.97
00:01:04.000 So, I don't know if you've been watching the robot games over in Beijing, but you know, it's creepy and weird.
00:01:10.000 It's creepy and weird.
00:01:12.000 So, here was some of what it looked like when Beijing hosted the World Robot Games.
00:01:17.000 You can see gigantic lines of robots dancing in unison, walking in unison.
00:01:22.000 It's from ABC News.
00:01:25.000 Yeah, not a super fan.
00:01:28.000 Not super into it.
00:01:29.000 I mean, to be fair, the Beijing Olympics a few years back kind of looked like that, but with humans, because again, the Chinese government would prefer automatons.
00:01:39.000 Now, again, some of these robots are not that scary because they're falling over.
00:01:43.000 There are some funny moments in which these robots did not look like they were doing an amazing job and proceeded to sort of crash into each other.
00:01:49.000 One robot fought another robot and then broke out into a victory dance.
00:01:53.000 Here's what that looked like.
00:02:02.000 I mean, one of them actually didn't win, just kind of fell down.
00:02:05.000 But the winning robot then broke out into a victory dance.
00:02:09.000 I mean, again, some of this stuff is creepy, some of it's scary, some of it's just weird.
00:02:09.000 Okay.
00:02:15.000 Some of it was pretty funny.
00:02:16.000 One of the humanoid robots kind of fell down and broke, which I have to admit made me laugh.
00:02:28.000 Here is a running.
00:02:28.000 Oh, well, there goes one of the robots.
00:02:31.000 I guess it on the stretcher.
00:02:34.000 Goodbye, robot.
00:02:35.000 But the robots will get better.
00:02:36.000 Okay.
00:02:37.000 And the robots will get creepier for sure.
00:02:39.000 Well, there is one robot.
00:02:39.000 Oh, boy.
00:02:40.000 Yeah.
00:02:41.000 Okay.
00:02:42.000 It broke itself.
00:02:43.000 And the second one just crashed.
00:02:44.000 Okay.
00:02:46.000 So, you know, again, it'll burn itself with fire as it turns out.
00:02:49.000 But again, I'm laughing about all this.
00:02:50.000 But again, technology is pretty scary.
00:02:52.000 It can be really scary.
00:02:54.000 Okay.
00:02:54.000 They even made robot kids in China.
00:02:56.000 I don't know why you'd want a robot kid.
00:02:58.000 Regular kids are great, but they made robot kids for no reason, which is crazy.
00:03:07.000 No, no, bad.
00:03:09.000 Do not like.
00:03:12.000 Why?
00:03:12.000 No.
00:03:13.000 Because they're not producing enough regular kids in China. 0.98
00:03:15.000 So they need robot kids now. 0.98
00:03:18.000 All of the annoyance and none of the comfort.
00:03:20.000 Okay, so I'll be the first to say it.
00:03:22.000 Sometimes we ought to burn technology with fire.
00:03:24.000 Well, today, Facebook signed a gigantic settlement with some 29 states to put some new restrictions on the use of its technology for children.
00:03:32.000 Now, let's be clear.
00:03:33.000 Social media is disastrous for kids' brains.
00:03:36.000 Disastrous.
00:03:36.000 It is basically a drug.
00:03:38.000 It addicts them. 0.96
00:03:39.000 That's what it's designed to do.
00:03:42.000 In much the same way that nicotine is addictive, it turns out that actually social media is addictive.
00:03:47.000 You have hacked your brain, and now you have basically found dopamine release features that allow you to directly access the dopamine release with a few easy hand motions.
00:03:57.000 And kids pick up on this stuff so fast.
00:03:58.000 If you ever leave a small child in proximity of an iPad, I'm talking like two years old.
00:04:03.000 That kid will find it, start manipulating it, and become addicted to it.
00:04:06.000 Their eyes glaze over, they turn into little zombies.
00:04:08.000 It's a real thing.
00:04:10.000 And again, there's a lot of brain studies to demonstrate this.
00:04:13.000 There's one study from the Curious Journal, 2025, called Modern Day High, the neurocognitive impact of social media usage.
00:04:21.000 They found, quote, Social media engages in brain reward pathways akin to those seen in addictive behavior, with extended beta and gamma activity having the potential to interfere with emotional regulation and attention.
00:04:32.000 These neurophysiological consequences, especially delayed alpha recovery and increased delta activity.
00:04:38.000 Could bring to the fore new concerns regarding digital fatigue and mental health.
00:04:41.000 The research indicates the importance of platform design interventions and additional longitudinal investigations.
00:04:46.000 So, in other words, a lot of this stuff was designed to do it.
00:04:48.000 And again, you know this yourself.
00:04:50.000 If you have ever scrolled X, doom scrolled X, the reason it's designed the way it originally was with Twitter, where you'd scroll with your thumb and then you'd hear a little noise, is it was literally training you in Pavlovian fashion to get that small dopamine release so that you'd want to do it again.
00:05:05.000 And again, there are lots of studies along these lines.
00:05:07.000 There's one study from the Children's Health Council that's funded by the NIH.
00:05:12.000 And it found that children who spend more than seven hours a day of screen time may experience premature thinning of the part of the brain that processes sensory information.
00:05:20.000 That data comes from a $300 million research funded by the National Institutes of Health, following 11,000 kids aged nine to 10.
00:05:28.000 It turns out heavy screen time has negative implications for kids' emotional, psychological, and cognitive development.
00:05:35.000 And kids with more screen time have premature thinning of the brain cortex.
00:05:38.000 That's the part that's responsible for interpreting information from the physical world. 1.00
00:05:41.000 So, again, This stuff is making you stupid. 1.00
00:05:43.000 And it was designed to make you stupid because it was designed to be addictive. 1.00
00:05:47.000 It was designed to make you want to watch more of it. 0.99
00:05:48.000 Well, now, Meta has been sued in a wide variety of states over its design, and they reached a $17 billion settlement.
00:05:56.000 Now, to be fair, Meta is worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
00:05:59.000 So this is not remotely the value of the company, but it's a pretty major settlement nonetheless.
00:06:04.000 According to CNBC, Meta and a coalition of state attorneys general have settled a major federal case centering on allegations the social media giant misrepresented the extent of child mental health harms caused by apps like Facebook and Instagram.
00:06:17.000 The settlement was revealed in a court filing released Wednesday that details several requirements Meta has to make to ATAPS as part of a proposed consent judgment.
00:06:24.000 So, it's not just they're paying the states a bunch of money, they are, but also they are including a bunch of new changes in the app.
00:06:33.000 So, those changes apparently include daily usage limits and also nighttime blocks for teenagers who use Insta and also Facebook.
00:06:40.000 Also, enhanced age assurance measures to prevent kids from ending around the security features and the creation of some additional tools for parents and guardians.
00:06:49.000 Some states are clearing a couple of billion dollars.
00:06:53.000 Other states didn't join in on the settlement.
00:06:55.000 So, Texas didn't join in on the settlement, Florida did not join in on the settlement.
00:07:00.000 Rob Bonta, who is the AG for California, said today, we have secured a settlement with Meta that will make social media less dangerous for our kids and make a world of difference for children and their families.
00:07:09.000 Meta has agreed to make massive transformations that reduce the risk of harm from its platforms and will do it within months.
00:07:13.000 So, what are some of the things that have been put in place?
00:07:16.000 Well, Meta announced it.
00:07:18.000 The majority of the terms are required to remain in place for some 10 years and they automatically apply to everyone under the age of 18 on Instagram and Facebook.
00:07:26.000 So, time limits a default two hour daily time limit that teens can only turn off with a parent's permission.
00:07:31.000 Now, again, The devil is in the details.
00:07:34.000 How do you assure that it's not just the kid logging on to mom and dad's account and then turning it off themselves?
00:07:39.000 Very difficult to actually assure that's what happens.
00:07:43.000 Night mode, a default block from the apps between midnight and 6 a.m., which again, that is not a particularly huge restriction considering that the vast majority, vast bulk of time that young people would spend on Facebook and Instagram, presumably, is not between midnight and 6 a.m., which is when they're sleeping.
00:08:00.000 Notifications are muted by default between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.
00:08:04.000 Now, again, muted by default means theoretically you could unmute by not default.
00:08:09.000 Teens will also receive prompts after every 15 minutes of continuous screen time on either Facebook or Instagram.
00:08:14.000 And they will receive prompts when their daily total usage hits 60 minutes and 90 minutes.
00:08:20.000 Teens will be able to choose a non-algorithmic feed as their default.
00:08:24.000 Now, again, that should be the default.
00:08:26.000 The default should be non-algorithmic.
00:08:28.000 The algorithmic feed is dangerous.
00:08:30.000 The algorithmic feed basically feeds you what you want to see.
00:08:33.000 It's one of the things that makes these feeds so addictive.
00:08:35.000 It's one of the reasons why, if you click on a particular video on YouTube, you are then going to be fed a bunch of similar content.
00:08:41.000 And it's how you end up down crazy rabbit holes in the online space.
00:08:44.000 It's why young people appear to be so siloed in their information on everything from news to entertainment.
00:08:51.000 Teens will be able to turn off autoplay.
00:08:54.000 But again, that is not the default.
00:08:56.000 That should be the default, right?
00:08:57.000 The default should be no autoplay because autoplay is the idea that when you scroll and you hit a video, it starts playing.
00:09:03.000 The default should be that you actually have to click it to make it play.
00:09:08.000 Now, one good development here is that teens aren't going to see the number of likes and reactions on posts by default.
00:09:13.000 That is a good default.
00:09:15.000 Again, kids who are seeking that echo chamber, kids who want people to give them the likes and the clicks, if they can't see that, that is useful.
00:09:25.000 They're also getting rid of, apparently, teens being able to use cosmetic surgery filters and extreme makeup filters.
00:09:33.000 So, again, why that was ever in place in the first place is insane to me, especially for young girls where social contagion is a real thing.
00:09:39.000 Huge mistake to have them capable of accessing all of these filters and make their face look different. 0.82
00:09:46.000 They also want age assurance.
00:09:48.000 So they're investing in stronger technology to proactively catch accounts that belong to under 13s and strengthening the technology to identify accounts that are between the ages of 13 and 17.
00:09:59.000 App stores have to provide developers with age information that is verified.
00:10:02.000 So they're saying it's not just us, it's also the app store that has to make sure this is the case.
00:10:07.000 In a second, we'll get to more on everything going on with social media. 0.99
00:10:10.000 As I'm saying, your kids have been accessing a lot of crap information. 0.93
00:10:13.000 That's also true for pretty much everybody who's accessing legacy media. 0.94
00:10:17.000 The New York Times readership among young Americans has totally cratered, but it's not as though that is being replaced by better information unless you are making Prager U available to your kids.
00:10:27.000 Prager U is the rising generation's last best hope.
00:10:30.000 Millions of students log on every day for five minute videos on economics, history, faith, and freedom that teach the truth, not what CNN and others want young people to believe.
00:10:38.000 Prager U has no paywall, no smirking newscasters, no bias dressed up as objectivity, just the facts presented in an age appropriate, wholesome, all American way.
00:10:46.000 But Prager U runs on people like you.
00:10:48.000 Not the government, not advertisers who despise you.
00:10:51.000 Give today.
00:10:51.000 Your donation is triple matched.
00:10:53.000 Go to prageru.com slash daily wire.
00:10:55.000 It's prageru.com slash daily wire.
00:10:58.000 And we've been working with PragerU for years.
00:10:59.000 They're awesome.
00:11:00.000 I have a bunch of videos myself with PragerU.
00:11:02.000 They're informing literally millions of young people every single day, but in the right way with good information, not the algorithmic slop they're getting everywhere else.
00:11:11.000 Go check them out right now.
00:11:11.000 PragerU.com slash daily wire.
00:11:13.000 Every donation you give is triple matched.
00:11:16.000 Jonathan Haidt, who's been probably the leader in this area, He put out a tweet that is sort of half celebrity and half warning.
00:11:24.000 He said Meta's $16.7 billion settlement is the largest accountability moment in social media history for child safety.
00:11:30.000 The 47 AGs who drove it deserve tremendous credit.
00:11:33.000 Restricted notifications and time limits are good.
00:11:35.000 It's historic the AGs have gotten design changes.
00:11:37.000 The settlement leaves untouched many of the features that harm kids.
00:11:40.000 For example, the algorithm, right?
00:11:42.000 This is the point that I was making.
00:11:43.000 It was established in the previous court case and in Meta's own research that Meta's design harms children.
00:11:48.000 The work ahead is to make them change that design.
00:11:50.000 Not just how long kids can access Instagram's harmful design and not just on an opt in basis is a great step.
00:11:56.000 Let's work together to make sure that it is not the last step.
00:11:59.000 So, again, all of this is beneficial.
00:12:01.000 We should be moving toward more of this.
00:12:03.000 I think, frankly, that there should be heavy handed regulation on social media and you should be banned from social media completely until you are of age.
00:12:12.000 I do not think minors need or have the right to social media.
00:12:17.000 Social media is a disaster area.
00:12:18.000 It's terrible for them in every way it is possible for it to be terrible for them.
00:12:21.000 There are a bunch of other countries that have already done this.
00:12:23.000 And I think that frankly, it would be a welcome development.
00:12:27.000 Because when you are feeding algorithmic slop to young people, you are wrecking their brains, really wrecking them.
00:12:33.000 And again, you can say all you want.
00:12:35.000 I've said it too.
00:12:36.000 It's up to the parent to make sure their kids don't engage in this stuff.
00:12:39.000 I have kids who are 12, 10, 6, 3, and 0.
00:12:41.000 So I have lots of kids.
00:12:43.000 And my kids are stronger than I am when it comes to not being part of this entire milieu.
00:12:48.000 They're not interested in it.
00:12:49.000 My 12 year old is constantly saying that she wants nothing to do with it.
00:12:53.000 As she gets older, I hope that that remains.
00:12:56.000 But there are lots of other parents who just aren't as involved on this level, and their kids' brains matter as well.
00:13:03.000 And when you wreck those brains, very, very difficult to unwreck.
00:13:05.000 Now, not all tech is created equal.
00:13:09.000 So, one of the weirdnesses of the current way that people perceive technology is that they're actually warmer toward, for example, Facebook, Instagram, than they are toward actual technologies that are going to transform the American economy.
00:13:21.000 So, fascinating poll demonstrates that most Americans actually like, for example, the big tech platforms.
00:13:29.000 They actually like them.
00:13:30.000 They think they're good, which again, I'm going to go no on that.
00:13:36.000 So, for example, this is a survey from the argument of 3,008 registered voters, and it finds that on Google, 29% of people are very favorable, 35% of people are somewhat favorable.
00:13:50.000 On Amazon, 62% favorable.
00:13:51.000 Again, I like both Google and Amazon.
00:13:53.000 Microsoft, 52% favorable.
00:13:57.000 Apple is 50% favorable.
00:13:58.000 Okay, but once you get to OpenAI, Grok, and Anthropic, massive unfavorables.
00:14:05.000 This is particularly true with XAI and Anthropic.
00:14:09.000 Why?
00:14:09.000 Well, because, first of all, a lot of people use ChatGPT.
00:14:11.000 It turns out the more you interface with the technology, the more you tend to like it and to use it.
00:14:16.000 ChatGPT, about 48% positive and about 27% negative.
00:14:22.000 So overall, more positive than negative.
00:14:25.000 With that said, it is still significantly less popular than the other sort of technology companies.
00:14:32.000 What does this result in?
00:14:33.000 There's an overall unease, like a very, very large overall unease about AI.
00:14:38.000 Now, I should start from the beginning here.
00:14:39.000 Artificial intelligence could save the American economy, seriously.
00:14:44.000 AI boosts productivity.
00:14:45.000 You know this yourself.
00:14:46.000 If you use ChatGPT, the amount of time it would take me, for example, just in my job, to research particular data questions.
00:14:52.000 And again, we go through, we check the data.
00:14:55.000 But the amount of time it would take me, de novo, to research a particular multi part complicated question is so much larger through things like Google use than it would be simply by using ChatGPT or Claude or Perplexity.
00:15:11.000 It boggles the mind.
00:15:12.000 It is significantly more efficient.
00:15:14.000 To synthesize information using AI than it is to do it using the old fashioned way of just Googling things.
00:15:21.000 And this is true in a wide variety of arenas.
00:15:23.000 The uses for AI are legion, and very often they're excellent, like really, really good.
00:15:29.000 The AIs are really good, which is why, according to the Dallas Federal Reserve, quoting Goldman Sachs, you could see a massive boost in American productivity, somewhere between 0.3 and 3.0 percentage points a year over the next decade, with a median estimate of 1.5 percentage points in productivity increased.
00:15:48.000 As the Dallas Federal Reserve says, if that happened, it would make a remarkable impact.
00:15:53.000 Do this the next time you're shopping.
00:15:54.000 Turn the package around.
00:15:55.000 Forget the beautiful branding on the front.
00:15:57.000 Read what's actually inside the product.
00:15:59.000 The ingredient list will tell you a lot.
00:16:01.000 Now take a look at that balance of nature bottle.
00:16:03.000 When you start looking what's actually in the whole health system, it's all ingredients you recognize.
00:16:07.000 It's apple, broccoli, ginger, cinnamon, turmeric, psyllium.
00:16:12.000 The whole health system brings together 47 ingredients, real whole fruits, veggies, spices, fibers.
00:16:17.000 It's not made from concentrates or isolates.
00:16:19.000 The fruits and veggie supplements have naturally occurring phytonutrients that are verified through lab testing.
00:16:24.000 Phytonutrients, by the way, are simply the naturally occurring plant nutrients, the compounds that contribute the color, taste, smell of fruits, veggies, spices, other plant foods.
00:16:31.000 So, yes, you should read the label.
00:16:33.000 You know, when I eat, I want to understand what I'm putting into my body without somebody needing to stand next to me and translate it for me.
00:16:39.000 I don't want to use AI to figure out what I'm eating.
00:16:42.000 If that is appealing to you to just, you know, have the ingredients in front of you, the clean stuff, the stuff you need, go to balanceofnature.com today, receive an additional 10% off when you subscribe to any of their subscriptions.
00:16:51.000 Just use promo code ShapiroPlus.
00:16:54.000 Use code Shapiro and Balance of Nature will send you a free guiltless snack with your order.
00:16:57.000 That's balanceofnature.com, promo code Shapiro.
00:17:00.000 Also, when we talk about keeping healthy, you need better sleep.
00:17:04.000 I need better sleep.
00:17:05.000 I got to say, last few nights have not been the best because I haven't been able to sleep on my Helix sleep mattress.
00:17:09.000 I've been a little bit under the weather.
00:17:11.000 I can't share the room with the new baby.
00:17:13.000 So I've had to sleep not in my room.
00:17:15.000 So I can't be on the mattress.
00:17:16.000 I want my Helix sleep mattress back because the reality is it was made just for me. 0.99
00:17:16.000 It sucks. 0.99
00:17:22.000 Now, listen, it's really easy to get one. 0.99
00:17:24.000 Nobody wants to spend a Saturday wandering through a showroom and lying on a bunch of different beds under fluorescent lights while a salesperson stands by taking notes.
00:17:31.000 Helix gets rid of all the awkwardness and the guesswork.
00:17:33.000 Their quick sleep quiz considers your sleep position, comfort preferences, support needs, and then matches you with one of more than 20 mattress models, which is how my wife and I got the Helix sleep mattress that is breathable, but firm, which is the thing, right?
00:17:44.000 Helix ships your mattress directly to your door for free.
00:17:47.000 You'll also receive 120 night sleep trial and a happy with Helix guarantee.
00:17:50.000 So you can actually try it at home.
00:17:51.000 Take advantage of Helix's Labor Day sale.
00:17:53.000 Go to helixsleep.com slash Ben.
00:17:55.000 And get 27% offsite wide.
00:17:57.000 That's helixleep.comslash Ben for 27% offsite wide.
00:18:01.000 helixleep.comslash Ben.
00:18:03.000 And yet, at the same time, you have a lot of people, mainly people who are catastrophists about technology and who are very often in favor of centralized control, saying they want centralized control.
00:18:13.000 So I'm amused to see so many people who are on the right who hate Bill Gates for a variety of reasons, including, for example, his devotion to the idea of big government redistributionism and also his love for global warming.
00:18:25.000 Now, Bill Gates is out there ripping on AI and suggesting that mass numbers of jobs will be wiped out.
00:18:32.000 Now, again, we have not seen mass numbers of jobs being wiped out.
00:18:36.000 And my suspicion is that you will see jobs that are lost, but you will also see an enormous number of jobs that are gained.
00:18:42.000 Jobs will change.
00:18:44.000 I think that this technology will bleed into the public gradually, a little bit slower than people think it's going to.
00:18:51.000 That's sort of the vast unemployment wave that Bill Gates is predicting here is exaggerated.
00:18:58.000 He said in an interview with Semaphore that, quote, the technology has crossed dangerous thresholds in biology, cybersecurity, white collar work, and human relationships.
00:19:07.000 Originally, three years ago, he said that the coming bumpy AI job disruption would lead to a manageable transition and the technology would help people work efficiently.
00:19:15.000 Now he says it will wreak economic catastrophe with far fewer jobs than exist today, thanks to the speed of AI advancements and what he calls a non existent response from government and tech leaders.
00:19:25.000 So he's afraid, he says, that if AI continues unchecked, society will turn against it entirely.
00:19:32.000 He says, What is the backlash going to be as these jobs go away?
00:19:35.000 It'll make the data center thing look like nothing.
00:19:38.000 Now, again, Bill Gates has spent his career basically since founding Microsoft, dooming and glooming it up.
00:19:46.000 It took him years to acknowledge that his sort of doomsday view of global warming was unrealistic.
00:19:50.000 He wrote an entire book, which is not very good, I've read it, about how to defeat global warming.
00:19:55.000 And the answer is global redistributionism, of course.
00:19:58.000 And of course, he's involved in a wide variety of truly globalist institutions.
00:20:02.000 And it took him a while to realize that actually all of that was nonsense.
00:20:05.000 Here he was last year saying the Paris climate goals were unrealistic.
00:20:10.000 That was a key milestone because the countries of the world said, hey, this is a mutual problem.
00:20:16.000 The temperature rise, the entire world will experience a temperature rise from the emissions from all these countries.
00:20:24.000 So getting countries to commit was very, very important.
00:20:29.000 The one thing about that accord that turned out not to be realistic was the ambitious goal of staying to 1.5 degrees.
00:20:38.000 We won't be able to do that.
00:20:41.000 Even if you took all the money away from health, you wouldn't be able to do that.
00:20:46.000 Okay, so again, why are so many people now jumping on the Bill Gates bandwagon?
00:20:51.000 He was wrong about the climate accords.
00:20:53.000 He was wrong about the widespread COVID vaccine.
00:20:56.000 He was wrong about a bunch of things.
00:20:58.000 But now people are jumping on back of this.
00:20:59.000 Why?
00:21:00.000 Well, first of all, we should acknowledge there are a bunch of people in the AI space, these so called AI doomers.
00:21:06.000 Many of them are leading AI companies.
00:21:07.000 And what they really, really want is the government to step in and heavily regulate AI so that they have market capture.
00:21:14.000 One of the things to be wary of when it comes to artificial intelligence regulation is the idea that the people who have the biggest companies want to write the rules.
00:21:21.000 So, Dario Amodi, who is the founder of Anthropic, he wrote a 20,000 word opus on his website back in January about AI.
00:21:29.000 And he acknowledges that the most obvious effect of AI is to greatly increase economic growth, which, by the way, again, that is not an anodyne question.
00:21:36.000 When the economic growth increases, that means you live better.
00:21:40.000 It means that you have better stuff.
00:21:42.000 It is easier for you to get things, things become cheaper.
00:21:46.000 You get massive advances in scientific research, biomedical innovation, manufacturing, supply chain, the financial system.
00:21:53.000 He acknowledges all of that.
00:21:55.000 He suggested as much as a 10 to 20% sustained annual GDP growth rate, which again, I think is overstated, but would be magic.
00:22:04.000 But what he actually wants is massive tax redistributionism and regulation.
00:22:09.000 So the effect of all this is that people get freaked out because you have the heads of these AI companies telling you to be doomers, freaking out, worrying.
00:22:17.000 And then you have a bunch of politicians who are going around catering to the freaked out rather than trying to explain what exactly is happening.
00:22:23.000 And so you end up right now in politics with this bizarre increase in hatred for AI.
00:22:29.000 Data centers.
00:22:30.000 All a data center is, is a place that processes an enormous amount of data.
00:22:30.000 Okay.
00:22:34.000 That's it.
00:22:35.000 It is a big building in which there are a bunch of computers that process data.
00:22:39.000 That's the whole thing.
00:22:43.000 And again, Americans are kind of fine with big buildings that do things.
00:22:47.000 They just don't seem to like the data centers very much.
00:22:49.000 So, for example, there's an Echelon insights voter poll that was taken in June.
00:22:57.000 It found that 68% of Americans Would support an Amazon distribution center being built in their area, but only 27% would support versus 62% oppose a data center to power artificial intelligence.
00:23:10.000 That makes no sense.
00:23:11.000 An Amazon distribution center is likely to have a lot more ingress and egress, right?
00:23:15.000 People going in and out, lots of trucks moving in and out, lots of traffic, a lot more human beings.
00:23:22.000 And the same thing is true of a traditional manufacturing factory 67% say they want it.
00:23:27.000 Data centers are a lot cleaner, they have a lot less.
00:23:30.000 Trucks moving in and out.
00:23:31.000 Like there's a lot less sort of threat to communal way of life, a big building that's just kind of standing there and the employees go in and out.
00:23:37.000 Okay, but because people are afraid of AI, they are afraid of the data centers.
00:23:42.000 And because politicians are afraid of the people, they are now responding to that by cracking down on the data centers. 0.97
00:23:46.000 Now, there's smart ways to sort of play this politically and stupid ways.
00:23:51.000 Greg Abbott in Texas is trying to cater to people who are concerned about the data centers while simultaneously not killing the thing that is going to actually generate economic growth. 0.96
00:24:02.000 City Journal has a really good piece on this.
00:24:04.000 Pointing out that basically Texas, which has more planned data center capacity than any other state by far, is forcing ERCOT, which is the regional grid operator, to overhaul its review processes for large new connections.
00:24:22.000 So they've created a streamlined process to group the first wave of projects together so regulators can assess them more efficiently.
00:24:27.000 So basically, make sure there's enough power to power the data centers.
00:24:30.000 Pennsylvania, under Josh Shapiro, the governor over there, is doing something different.
00:24:33.000 They've basically made it very, very difficult to build data centers.
00:24:36.000 But I fear. 1.00
00:24:37.000 That an enormous number of politicians are going to drive America into the primrose path of anti tech stupidity. 0.99
00:24:42.000 Now, again, there is good tech and there's bad tech. 0.97
00:24:45.000 Not all tech is created the same.
00:24:48.000 Not all tech is created the same.
00:24:49.000 The promises of social media were basically a giant lie.
00:24:52.000 They promised more friendship, they delivered far more antipathy, they promised more information, and they delivered a bunch of misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, and slop.
00:25:02.000 They promised connection, and instead, they often delivered addiction.
00:25:05.000 And now kids have been feeling the consequences of this for a decade and a half, and it's been a disaster.
00:25:11.000 But I don't think that that's true of AI.
00:25:15.000 If we would like to destroy ourselves, what we should do is free up social media and restrict AI.
00:25:20.000 And it seems like, you know, there's still a great tendency to do that.
00:25:24.000 What we actually should be doing is we should be cracking down on social media for the sake of particularly young people who are vulnerable to the addictive qualities.
00:25:32.000 And we should be ensuring, obviously, the worst excesses of AI are avoided. 0.98
00:25:36.000 But we should not be attempting to hamstring AI so we actually lose to the Chinese. 0.98
00:25:43.000 Because if you fall behind our enemies, they are not stopping. 0.98
00:25:45.000 They're not going to stop at all, not for a moment.
00:25:49.000 AI can work for us in ways that really help all of us.
00:25:53.000 I don't think that's true of social media.
00:25:55.000 What an amazing video you just watched.
00:25:57.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:25:58.000 Well, you know, if you think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out this crazy story here.