00:01:58.000His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:02:06.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:03:26.000But this one is what's called a superseding indictment, a ginormous indictment, not really, or a mega indictment, where they come down and they add another layer on top of indictment that already exists.
00:03:40.000That's what a superseding indictment is.
00:03:42.000Now, interestingly enough, when they do a superseding indictment and it pairs with a previous one, this could delay when this trial is actually going to occur.
00:03:51.000Because now the Trump attorneys can say, whoa, whoa, whoa, we need more time.
00:03:54.000Like, this is all new stuff, new charges, new witnesses.
00:03:57.000So this could potentially delay this trial post-election of 2024.
00:04:06.000So why they're doing this, I have my own personal theory, and we'll get to that.
00:04:10.000And around this indictment is obstruction of justice.
00:04:16.000Now, the last indictment pointed towards basically character assassinating Trump by talking about him supposedly waiving this classified Iran memo.
00:04:27.000But then the indictment wasn't actually about the memo.
00:04:29.000Well, this Department of Justice superseding Ultra MAGA indictment is now explicitly charging Trump with a crime for allegedly possessing a classified war plan at Mar-a-Lago.
00:04:42.000So look, if we're looking at charging people on this sort of topic, maybe we should charge the Pentagon leaders with crimes against the American people for trying to start a war with Iran, or at least we could fire them or take their pensions away.
00:04:56.000No, instead they're richer, literally fatter than ever.
00:05:00.000The charging documents accuse Donald Trump of conspiring to delete the security footage at Mar-a-Lago after the FBI asked for it.
00:05:09.000And as part of that, they are now bringing criminal charges against an entirely new person.
00:05:13.000This is what I really want to focus on.
00:05:16.000This is a guy by the name of Carlos De Oliveira.
00:05:26.000In order to remove Trump, in order to destroy his legacy in the history books, so that populist nationalism, pro-American political forces are destroyed, it's not enough to just go after Trump.
00:06:11.000And as if they're trying to prove our point that they have contempt for the working class, they have now indicted a maintenance man, Carlos de Oliveira, on federal charges.
00:06:26.000A guy that works at Mar-a-Lago, I don't know much about him.
00:06:51.000Well, the Department of Justice certainly has made a lot of false allegations over the last few years.
00:06:56.000What we can definitely say is that Trump would be faring better if, like Joe Biden, he had a spokesperson and legal advisor working directly for Jack Smith's team.
00:07:07.000But I want to just focus on the cruelty here.
00:07:10.000They're going to destroy, they're going to try to destroy this man's life.
00:07:13.000I will personally donate to Carlos de Oliveira's legal fund.
00:08:01.000It's not about what he did or did not do, of which I'm rather honestly uninterested in a conversation around deletion of footage when Hillary Clinton bleached bit emails and smashed phones and walked away freely, when Lois Lerner's IRS emails poof, magically disappeared.
00:08:23.000I roll my eyes at this idea that now Carlos de Oliveira has to defend himself with hundreds of thousands of dollars.
00:08:38.000This is about throwing the book at Carlos de Oliveira.
00:08:43.000This is how they went after the Gambino crime family.
00:08:45.000It's how they go after cartels because they want Carlos de Oliveira to take the stand with a plea deal to say, yes, President Trump told me to delete the footage because he was afraid the FBI was going to come and get it.
00:09:04.000And just remember, remember when the Mueller team accidentally deleted all their phones by putting in the wrong password repeatedly in violation of federal law?
00:09:46.000When you go after the rank and file, the ordinary class, the muscular class, they're making a Soviet show trial example.
00:09:56.000They want you to be fearful that anybody in Trump's orbit, anybody that is supportive, and by the way, it continues, from the Michigan electors to the indictments of the we build the wall folks of going after Steve Bannon, top down, bottom up.
00:10:10.000Go after Trump, go after the ordinary man, take scalps.
00:10:14.000It's not enough just to get the mascot.
00:10:16.000You must get the ordinary folk because Carlos de Oliveira will receive zero sympathy from the Department of Justice unless he sings, unless Carlos de Oliveira's memory sharpens to such a great extent, where he all of a sudden says Donald Trump was saying repeatedly how he wanted footage to go away and tie it, da, da, da.
00:10:41.000Then all of a sudden, Carlos de Oliveira will get a plea deal and will not serve prison time.
00:10:45.000But if Carlos de Oliveira fights the charges, they're going to crush this guy's life.
00:10:53.000I will personally donate to his legal fund.
00:10:55.000I will personally donate to the Michigan Electoral Legal Fund.
00:11:01.000And I have so many takeaways with this.
00:11:04.000And I have to be very honest with you.
00:11:05.000I have to be very transparent with you.
00:11:26.000Man, that is so bad that they have been able to move the Overton window that significantly, where we kind of just say, oh, there's another one.
00:11:37.000I guess you're indicting the opposition leader, the political candidate who could displace the regime.
00:13:28.000I have to go through the daily disciplines of reminding myself and basically like going through a cold shower moment where you're like, oh my gosh, this is the death of the country, a slow-motion demise of our nation.
00:13:44.000They're just going slow and slow and slow.
00:13:47.000Mark Levin says, in 250 years, no former president has ever been indicted, not even one count.
00:13:52.000Now, Democrats and their hack prosecutors have thrown open the door.
00:13:55.000Every imaginable so-called crime could be thought of to use bring charges.
00:13:58.000And I'll be honest, a majority of Republicans I talk to now are kind of like, eh, what's another one?
00:15:28.000And I'll call the governor of Georgia and make sure that all of his charges are dropped there.
00:15:32.000If I'm president of the United States, not only will I drop charges against Trump, I will instruct my attorney general to immediately go after Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Peter Strzok, and the Democrats so they can feel what it's like to have government thrown at them.
00:17:15.000You said here in a you said here in a tweet, the outrage is not allegations of attempts to delete video.
00:17:21.000The outrage is a DC federal judge, Obama, working hand in glove with Biden, Garland, Monaco, DOJ, and Democrat D.C. grand jury authorized a subpoena to get camera footage from inside Donald Trump's home.
00:17:35.000So this was related to the superseding indictment that was handed down last night against this low-level Trump organization, this poor man who's now been ensnared in Jack Smith, DOJ's dirty prosecution of Donald Trump.
00:17:48.000But to my point, it's not the outrage is not allegedly that Donald Trump instructed or suggested someone should delete the video.
00:17:58.000The outrage is that a DC judge, Beryl Howell, who was the chief judge at the time, Joe Biden's DOJ, this preceded Jack Smith, by the way.
00:18:08.000So this is Biden, Merritt Garland, Lisa Monaco's DOJ, who sought a subpoena to get security footage from inside the former president's home.
00:18:21.000Not only was the raid of Mar-a-Lago such an invasion of his privacy, so too is a subpoena trying to get security footage so they could see who was moving what boxes around Mar-a-Lago between the storage room and Donald Trump's office.
00:18:38.000This is why Charlie, DOJ, and Jack Smith conducted the entire investigation in Washington, D.C., and then at the last minute moved it to Southern Florida for the actual indictment.
00:18:50.000The venue, the proper jurisdiction, has always been Southern Florida because that's the scene of the alleged crime, Palm Beach, Florida.
00:18:58.000But they kept it in Washington, D.C. because the judges there are nothing more than a rubber stamp.
00:19:03.000Beryl Howell, the chief judge and Obama appointee who also oversaw special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, she is the one making all of these decisions, allowing DOJ to get away with whatever they want to.
00:19:18.000And so the outrage is that now Jack Smith has nine months of security footage from inside Mar-a-Lago for what?
00:19:27.000And then he told Trump's defense team last week in a hearing, oh, by the way, you don't need to look at nine months of security footage.
00:19:36.000Well, why didn't they just get the 10 days then?
00:19:39.000So this is what's so egregious, so unprecedented, so dirty.
00:19:43.000The outrage isn't what Donald Trump allegedly said about the video.
00:19:47.000The outrage is that Joe Biden's DOJ, Merrick Garland's handpicked special prosecutor, has that much footage of the inside of Donald Trump's home.
00:20:00.000I believe that they're going after the maintenance man because for two reasons, to try to get him to sing against Trump, but also show they're willing to go after the rank and file, the muscular class, the ordinary people.
00:20:11.000I think it's legal leverage, but I also think that there is an example here, almost a Soviet-style show trial.
00:20:17.000I'm going to go after the lowest level, bottom-up, top-down.
00:21:33.000They want you to be afraid to speak your mind.
00:21:35.000They want you to be afraid to run a business.
00:21:38.000This is all part of a plan of shilling and chilling speech.
00:21:44.000And so, Julie, the significance of this, what I'm trying to understand, though, is now that they've added the superseding indictment, this could now make the timeline post-November of 2024.
00:22:02.000So the trial date is now set for May 20th of 2024.
00:22:07.000A superseding indictment, and I've watched this happen over and over in January 6 cases.
00:22:12.000A superseding indictment bringing new charges and a new co-defendant kind of resets the clock, basically.
00:22:20.000And so the May 2024 date, to the extent that it was ever feasible, given all the restrictions for the handling of these alleged classified documents, now will set the clock back.
00:22:31.000And that May trial date definitely will not go forward.
00:22:36.000So there's a very good chance, yes, this could be extended past the election.
00:22:39.000But I'll tell you, Charlie, I've said this over and over: the last person who wants his case to go to trial is Jack Smith and the DOJ.
00:22:45.000They have no case because they are going to have to argue, number one, that these actually were classified documents.
00:22:52.000Number two, that he, as president, had no authority to keep them.
00:22:57.000Number three, that he didn't cooperate and willfully retained national defense information when all evidence to the contrary, he overcooperated, if anything, Charlie.
00:24:09.000To your point there, it is to pivot away from all the attention to what happened in court yesterday with Hunter Biden and the sweetheart plea deal and the immunity agreement that basically all of this was an immunity agreement to shield him from future prosecution for violating FARA and other matters.
00:24:28.000But look, this is death by a thousand cuts, Charlie.
00:24:30.000And this is the DOJ and the Biden regime intentionally inflaming half of the country.
00:24:36.000They are just an accelerant to continue to destroy our country to criminalize political dissent.
00:24:45.000You are going to have indictments from Fannie Willis to DA in Fulton County.
00:24:50.000But the big bombshell, of course, will be next week, criminal indictments against Donald Trump for January 6th.
00:24:56.000And Charlie, the first indictment won't be the last.
00:24:59.000The superseding indictment in the classified documents case is only an example of how many times Jack Smith will supersede an initial indictment against Donald Trump, adding charges, adding defendants and marquee defendants.
00:25:12.000Could be John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Mark Meadows.
00:25:17.000It could be a few Republican House members.
00:25:19.000I mean, this is going to be nonstop lawfare against Trump, his associates, White House aides, congressional Republicans, and of course, as we just said, his voters and supporters.
00:25:35.000So, Julie, what do you anticipate out of Georgia?
00:25:38.000That one's kind of just been waiting in the wings.
00:25:41.000I think we might see something in the next couple of weeks.
00:25:43.000Yes, it looks like it, because to your point, they have been erecting barricades outside of the Fulton County courthouse.
00:25:51.000Again, more optics suggesting that Trump supporters are going to, what, are they going to commit another insurrection at the Fulton County courthouse after these charges are announced?
00:26:01.000And it looks like these are going to be fraud election fraud related, which is so just deliciously ironic, not really deliciously, but it will be conspiring to interfere in an election or commit some sort of election fraud.
00:26:16.000That's what it looks like will be coming out of Fannie Willis's office.
00:26:21.000But of course, you know, we could have two major indictments next week.
00:26:27.000I believe that that will be announced on Tuesday.
00:26:30.000The grand jury for Jack Smith meets on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
00:26:33.000There was some rumor speculation that it would have been announced yesterday, but looked like that didn't happen, even though Trump's attorneys were meeting with Jack Smith's team yesterday.
00:26:43.000So it could come Tuesday and Fannie Willis's, maybe her announcement will be Monday.
00:27:14.000I do hope when these Republican senators and House members go home, they get an earfill from their constituents that they're not doing enough.
00:27:22.000I mean, obviously the Senate is pretty limited, but House Republicans are not.
00:27:28.000It would be nice if they had the backing of Republicans in the Senate, but they really don't.
00:27:34.000But cutting off funding, you know, using the power of the purse, going forward with some impeachment inquiry.
00:27:42.000I am not supportive of impeaching Joe Biden because we would be doing the Democrats a favor.
00:27:48.000Poll after poll shows that the majority of Democrats do not want Joe Biden to be the nominee.
00:27:52.000He should be forced to run on his record and not just his record as president, but his record of corruption and selling out this country to enrich his family.
00:28:03.000I would like to see impeachment proceedings either against the former chief judge of the DC District Court, Beryl Howell, because she has been the biggest enabler in all of this, or Christopher Wray, because that will touch on both January 6th classified documents, the raid of Mar-a-Lago, and of course the Hunter Biden investigation, Hunter Biden matter.
00:28:23.000So, but look, we are limited in what we can do.
00:28:28.000But the danger here, to your point, is not just silencing what we're doing now, it is setting extremely destructive, dangerous precedents, case law, where a nonviolent felony count of obstruction of an official proceeding that was passed in the wake of the Enron scandal that has to do with tampering with witnesses and evidence can be distorted and used as a felony applied to political protesters.
00:28:56.000And a felony that not only could result in 20 years in prison, but also be used as justification, Charlie, to deny release of defendants accused of that nonviolent, basically process crime.
00:29:10.000So that's the dangerous precedent too for Donald Trump.
00:29:13.000If he's charged with obstruction, which he will be, I think that'll be the first count.
00:29:17.000If he's charged with something like seditious conspiracy, we now have precedence in multiple courthouses, by the way, Trump and Obama judges who have denied release of defendants charged with obstruction of an official proceeding.
00:29:31.000Hold on, this is the biggest hold on thing.
00:29:34.000You're trying to say that Donald Trump might not be granted bail.
00:29:40.000There is case precedence in multiple cases.
00:29:44.000There is precedent to deny the release of a defendant who's been charged with obstruction of an official proceeding.
00:29:52.000So you would say that potentially if Donald Trump is indicted on seditious conspiracy, they could prevent him from campaigning, access to a phone.
00:30:01.000He could be in a January 6th style gulag this fall.
00:30:07.000Jack Smith's team could, based on what's happened the past two years, with judges and primater on this, he could ask to keep Donald Trump in custody awaiting trial.
00:30:19.000Now, the other side, to your point, Charlie, or they could ask for very strict release conditions, home confinement, a curfew, a monitoring device.
00:30:29.000I don't see any way that Jack Smith is just going to ask for regular release conditions for Donald Trump if he's charged with these serious felony counts.
00:30:44.000She's saying it's possible that Donald Trump might be put in a permanent gulag, unable to travel, unable to communicate in the midst of a presidential election cycle.
00:30:52.000And Republicans are writing press releases and sending money to Ukraine.