ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Golden One
- February 08, 2016
Legalising Drugs. Straight-Edge Economist Answer to Drugs. Supply and Demand!
Episode Stats
Length
6 minutes
Words per Minute
161.04794
Word Count
1,086
Sentence Count
72
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
1
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
I want to elaborate a bit on drugs, supply demand, market forces, alcohol and whether it's a good
00:00:13.800
idea to forbid things or not. Before I begin, I would like to, as I do sometimes, quote Tywin
00:00:20.120
Lannister and say that a good king knows what he knows and knows what he does not know. And I'm
00:00:27.320
no expert on drugs. What I do know is that there should be a distinction between marijuana and
00:00:33.200
other drugs simply because there are, in certain cases, medical uses for marijuana. So I'm leaving
00:00:41.640
that there, so just keep that in mind. However, I want to take this opportunity to talk a bit about
00:00:48.100
the market forces of supply and demand. And I want you to keep this supply and demand,
00:00:55.080
wow, look at my forearms. Fucking glorious, if anything. Okay, the main point of this video
00:01:01.540
is actually to admire my forearms. But yeah, keep in mind, supply and demand, all time. Am I for
00:01:07.180
legalizing drugs? Am I for forbidding drugs? Am I for forbidding alcohol? Let us, as always,
00:01:14.860
true friends, look at history to show the way how humans react. This is also an important lesson.
00:01:21.940
If you want to see how people usually act, react to a certain happening, as it were, just look at,
00:01:30.400
you know, historical examples of such. So we can look at the area of forbid. I don't know what you call
00:01:37.560
it in English, but we had it in Sweden and in America and some other nations, the United States of
00:01:43.600
America that is, where you try to forbid alcohol. Now, there was a demand. They tried to create a
00:01:52.760
little barrier here, separating supply and demand. Now, the thing is, what happened? Did people stop
00:01:59.640
consuming alcohol? No, because there was still this huge demand for it, because people like to get
00:02:04.820
drunk. I think it's really, really degenerate. And I think no one who's watching this should
00:02:09.160
participate in such degenerate behavior. If you do, stop right now. So what happened was that
00:02:14.680
smuggling increased in America. It became a lucrative initiative for, you know, gangsters to
00:02:21.460
participate in the smuggling and the outlawed brewing of said alcoholic beverages. So what happened
00:02:28.460
was not that people stopped using alcohol, unfortunately, but that the supply met demand
00:02:35.260
outside of the law, because realize that this is supply and demand are extremely hard to separate.
00:02:42.340
Supply and demand will find a way, just like a romantic love will find a way. No, but yeah,
00:02:47.940
keep that in mind. Like, it's really hard to separate the two. So even if you forbid something,
00:02:53.080
and if there's still a demand, it's really hard to stop it, basically. So then we have the option
00:03:00.440
of letting the revenue of the drug sales or the alcohol sales. Like in Sweden, we have the following,
00:03:06.320
which I'm a great proponent for. We have the Systembolaget. So the state owns the right to sell
00:03:12.080
liquor. So the revenue of a detrimental thing goes to the state. And then the state can spend it on,
00:03:18.200
you know, free education and health care. Or as in Sweden's case right now, spend it on accepting
00:03:23.200
rape fugees, who will be detrimental to society.
00:03:27.120
But either way, in a perfect society, this revenue from a bad drug will obviously go to good
00:03:34.340
things. So that is my take on that whole thing. I'm not a proponent of forbidding things per se,
00:03:42.800
but if you can control it and utilize that negative force to something good. So we could legalize
00:03:50.200
drugs and have it, you know, controlled directly under the state. So that the revenue of the fucking
00:03:55.880
idiots who use it does not go to criminal gangs, but go to the state instead. And the state can
00:04:01.720
utilize it for fun things. Then we get rid of, you know, you take a source of income from these
00:04:07.400
criminal gangs and give it to the state instead. And that's the benefit of legalizing drugs. Now,
00:04:12.560
keep in mind, I'm a straight edge here. I'm still a great proponent of reducing alcohol consumption
00:04:18.620
and drug consumption as much as possible. That is my, I would rather live in a world where none of
00:04:23.700
those exist. So you might think like, oh, but why is he for legalizing drugs if he hates drugs? Well,
00:04:30.120
just because of human nature. And if we want to break this, we need to do something about demand.
00:04:36.000
We can work away demand in many given ways. We can work at it at a metapolitical level. We can
00:04:42.440
continue to create this culture of strength where, you know, you don't want drugs because drugs are for
00:04:47.800
fucking pathetic, weak people. So then you can reduce the demand as such and then the supply will
00:04:52.620
follow. Realize that if no one wants a particular product, if no one wants to buy a prostitute, if no one
00:04:59.660
wants to buy drugs, if no one wants to get drunk on cheap alcohol, those, the supply will drop as well.
00:05:07.520
Demand and supply always follow each other. So when the demand drops, the supply will follow, which then
00:05:14.840
in turn decreases the amount of drugs or whatever it is that is in circulation in the market.
00:05:22.460
So I hope that makes some sort of sense at least. But to briefly recap, supply and demand will always
00:05:28.260
meet each other. It's really, really hard for a state to separate the two. But what you can do is
00:05:33.620
harness that very negative energy for your own benefit, for the state's benefit. And then you can
00:05:38.740
spend it on fun things. Fun in this case being education, etc. And now you can also work on a
00:05:44.740
metapolitical level to try to destroy drug culture. And then also, like, I don't have anything against
00:05:51.940
outlawing either of it, but it can be detrimental in the fact that, you know, criminal gangs can get
00:05:58.060
another source of revenue. And, like, legalizing drugs, this is never something I, you know, actively
00:06:04.560
want to drive a policy war. I'm just throwing some thoughts out there to make you to think a bit
00:06:09.040
more. So it's not like if I'm ever part of a political party, legalizing drugs will not be
00:06:14.800
high on my agenda. This is just, like, general thoughts that are interesting to discuss. And I've
00:06:19.920
got this question many times. And who am I? I'm the Lion of Wisdom. XXO. Boom.
00:06:34.560
The Lion of Wisdom
Link copied!