00:09:47.020If you're a man, if you're a young man,
00:09:49.020and the, and the father of a woman that you want to court is doing these things, just walk away.
00:09:55.520Yeah. Like it's actually that simple. He's just alienating good candidates for his daughter.
00:10:00.800He's not loving her. So literally just show him the consequences of his folly and walk away.
00:10:06.520That's the same with the baptism thing. Like it's not binary, but if a father is making it binary,
00:10:12.220pick someone else. Yeah. I mean, save yourself the trouble, honestly.
00:10:15.640Yeah, I think this is a really interesting test. Asking some of these questions around courtship is really interesting because it's actually similar to something I learned early on in my career when I, before I was a pastor and I was interviewing for different jobs is something that you don't realize is that when you're, say you're a young man and you're looking to court this young lady, it's just like finding a job.
00:10:38.300you're getting interviewed for a position and you think that you're coming like hat in hand,
00:10:44.000like a pauper, a beggar, you know, just hoping for the opportunity. That's actually not what's
00:10:49.100going on. You're interviewing the interviewer as well, because you're going to be marrying
00:10:54.820into this family as well. So it's really giving you a lot of data as to what sort of woman you're
00:11:00.620going to be marrying potentially and what sort of family you're going to be marrying into.
00:11:04.620so all of these things while it's difficult to have like a a checkbox like the fathers seem to
00:11:10.540have in some of these situations to where it's you know if you're a presbyterian if you you know
00:11:15.760don't sign the antioch declaration like these checkboxes you don't have to have necessarily
00:11:20.800those same you know you don't have to have checkboxes that are automatically yes or no's
00:11:25.320on some of these tertiary issues but it is really helpful to go in and to paint a better picture of
00:11:30.740what sort of woman and family are going to be marrying into. So it's a test on both, both
00:11:35.280accounts. So one of the things I would encourage young men to do is they're looking for a wife,
00:11:40.340uh, is to actually have that mindset that you're interviewing the family as well. You're
00:11:46.360interviewing the father. Uh, and so, yeah, these are red flags. Yeah. Cause like if the, if it's
00:11:53.760true that your wife is not your mission in life. And it is true. But then if you're willing to
00:12:02.060compromise on these, like, for example, if a father is like, you can only court my daughter
00:12:05.940if you become a Baptist and you're actually willing to succumb to that, you've actually
00:12:13.080proven yourself to be less than honorable because you're being tossed around by your
00:12:18.980more base affections and sexual desires. Now you want to pursue those sexual desires in a godly way
00:12:25.400and that's good, but if you're willing to forego your convictions on covenant theology, then you're
00:12:30.240not really a man of conviction anyway. Same with the Antioch Declaration. Whether you signed it and
00:12:34.700they don't want you to or you didn't sign it and they do want you to is beside the point. If you're
00:12:39.400willing to just sign something that is so divisive and that really does represent two polarizing
00:12:45.860views of how we should look at history and its interaction with the church, all because you want
00:12:51.240to court some girl that you have no guarantee of marrying whatsoever, that means that you actually
00:12:55.360need to have a more rigorous idea of what your mission in life is to begin with. And so that,
00:13:00.740yeah, then you can come in with having some cards in the conversation and saying like,
00:13:06.040I actually don't need you. Like, I don't need you potential father-in-law. And so if you're
00:13:11.880going to be a butthole, then I'm just going to walk away. And I mean, do we have to beep that
00:13:16.640out? Like where, what is that the technical term? That is the technical term. I think that was a
00:13:20.840technical term is something else. I think, I think it would be listen. Yeah. To hypothetically say
00:13:27.320someone could be acting like, like that, like that thing, like that anatomical reference. Yeah.
00:14:59.380Most people don't know this, but in 1776, private American citizens outfitted battleships to fight0.84
00:15:05.560British tyranny. They didn't wait for permission, they just acted. Armored Republic honors that
00:15:10.400legacy. They make steel core body armor and tactical gear for the responsible law-abiding
00:15:15.300citizen. Because when tyranny rises, readiness matters. And hey, every product is made right
00:15:21.020here in the U.S. So be ready, be armored, be free. Visit armoredrepublic.com or text
00:15:28.060JOIN to 88027. That's ArmoredRepublic.com or text JOIN, J-O-I-N, to 88027.
00:15:45.420In 2023, Indigo Sundries became one of our sponsors. At the time, their business was
00:15:50.240little more than a side hobby, generating a couple hundred dollars a month. But because of
00:15:54.140their partnership with us and because all of you chose to support them, they've grown enough to
00:15:57.920make it their full-time livelihood. This is what happens when Christians support Christians. Our
00:16:01.820communities are strengthened and faithful businesses thrive. So if you're a Christian
00:16:05.300business owner who wants to reach thousands of like-minded people and grow your company,
00:16:09.580we'd love to partner with you. Email us at advertising at newchristendompress.com.
00:16:21.960Attention business owners. Proverbs tells us, in the multitude of counselors, there is victory.
00:16:27.860At Keep Wise Partners, they aim to apply this principle to your business as you work to build Christendom in all your labors.
00:16:34.680Running a small business is challenging, but you don't have to go it alone.
00:16:38.560Keep Wise Partners offers expert bookkeeping services with the care and integrity you'd expect from a partner who shares your values.
00:16:45.660And to take it a step further, their advisory services bring invaluable insights to you as you aim to meet your business goals.
00:16:53.380Here at New Christendom Press, we've partnered with KeepWise for all our bookkeeping needs
00:16:57.320and have greatly benefited from all their assistance.
00:17:00.480Visit KeepWisePartners.com or call Derek Taylor at 781-680-8000 to schedule a free consultation.
00:17:09.940KeepWise Partners, bringing finance and accounting excellence to the way you build your business.
00:17:14.920are you ready to step back in time and experience the thrill of hunting and shooting the way it used
00:17:26.620to be at muzzleloaders.com they've got everything you need to embrace the heritage of black powder
00:17:32.220shooting from traditional flint locks and percussion rifles to cutting edge inline muzzle
00:17:37.660loaders they carry the top brands and accessories to help you get started whether you are seasoned
00:17:43.100black powder enthusiast are just starting out they're here to help every step of the way and
00:17:47.900here's an exclusive deal just for our listeners get 10 off your first order when you use the
00:17:54.400coupon code kingshall at checkout that's kingshall all caps one word for 10 off with fast shipping
00:18:02.600unbeatable customer service and expert advice muzzleloaders.com is your one-stop shop for all
00:18:09.340things muzzleloading. Visit them today at muzzle-loaders.com. That's muzzle-loaders.com
00:18:17.220and rediscover the tradition. New question. Ready? Yeah. I've got one that I think is,
00:18:24.440is interesting. Says, can you give a hypothetical yet concrete example of how to put no enemies on
00:18:31.720the right into practice when bad actors demand your compliance? So we're talking about, so that
00:18:37.800I can define some of these terms for people that aren't familiar with them. We're talking about
00:18:41.320what's typically called struggle sessions. We're talking about no enemies on the right is the idea
00:18:46.440that in terms of public discourse and political coalition that we want to avoid insofar as it's
00:18:54.620practically possible to infight amongst the right and even publicly counter-signal people
00:19:02.040who would maybe say something that is further right on an issue than you would.
00:19:06.220basically it's saying we should do what the left does in a sense because the left you know they
00:19:11.460they will use elements like aoc or nancy pelosi who are a little bit more radical green new deal
00:19:17.100type stuff that the democrat party doesn't actually have an intention of passing but they
00:19:21.140will use that radical fringe to push the window of consensus leftward and then they'll actually
00:19:28.820pass something that is they don't gate keep their own people they don't gate keep their own people
00:19:33.280yeah um so what would a concrete example look like um when a bad actor demands your compliance
00:19:40.120in struggle sessioning someone over a right-wing view i have a couple thoughts i don't know if
00:19:45.360you have some thoughts no go for it so one of the thoughts like to frame the christian ethics
00:19:51.420of the conversation is that no enemies on the right is a technical tactical and strategic
00:19:57.180principle which means that it genuinely must be applied with wisdom rather than an absolute rule
00:20:03.680it doesn't mean that any time somebody says they are on the right or that they say something and
00:20:09.600they genuinely are on the right that you have a moral obligation rooted in the 10 commandments
00:20:14.160to not ever disagree with them and if you do disagree to never do it publicly it's a tactical
00:20:20.360and strategic question in principle not an absolute ethical moral guideline from sinai right
00:20:27.400so when i'm thinking about this question there are situations where i would quite gladly disagree
00:20:34.680with somebody on the right and even do so publicly or someone allegedly on the right etc
00:20:38.900that's that's my first kind of guideline of of to avoid the ham-fisted straw man presentation of
00:20:47.520what no enemies on the right might look like as a tactic people are going to say well does that mean
00:20:51.880you know if jesus has enemies on the right then you have to have enemies on the right as well
00:20:55.440and i would say yeah that's true and that's also not at least if i'm appealing to this principle
00:21:01.200what i would mean by it um that's the first guideline when when the rule says no enemies
00:21:08.760on the right the word enemies there is doing a lot of kind of nuanced heavy lifting where
00:21:14.120they may actually be an enemy on a particular issue, which is to say you disagree. You disagree
00:21:20.800with them. You think they're counterproductive. But that doesn't mean you have to make them into
00:21:23.460a perceived enemy to the public. Yeah. And there's a few, that's definitely true. And there's a few
00:21:29.360practical elements to this as well. For example, when I'm weighing this, some of this won't apply
00:21:34.280to everybody, but when I'm weighing the question, am I going to take my public platform, which has
00:21:41.680potentially routinely reaches hundreds of thousands of people tens of thousands of people
00:21:47.180sometimes millions of people am i going to ben's like wow sometimes billions billion never billions
00:21:53.820uh everyone's saying it no i am strategically thinking if there's something even on the right
00:22:02.380that i disagree with am i going to help it more than discourage it by pointing a flashlight on it
00:22:10.680and and some of the time my calculus is i'm actually not going i'm going to be counterproductive
00:22:15.380to even my own end of attempting to lead people into truth goodness and beauty on the right
00:22:20.860by even point making a big deal out of this like if some anon on twitter says something that i
00:22:30.420disagree with for example i help him by quote tweeting it i don't hurt him i no matter how
00:22:37.520much i take him down i've actually helped him quite a bit by quote tweeting him so i have tried
00:22:42.140to discipline myself about that on one level um but also yeah we need to make a distinction between
00:22:47.560enemies and people with whom we have just disagreements there's also a big important
00:22:52.880like there's a distinction to make in the nature of the disagreement so if you are and there's also
00:22:58.280conscience individual conscience that comes into play like if you are scrolling twitter and you
00:23:02.500have a platform and you see something from someone that would be in your camp that you disagree with,
00:23:10.100what is the nature of the disagreement? Is it a tactical disagreement? Is it a disagreement on a
00:23:15.200perspective of something? Is it a tertiary theological disagreement or is it a moral
00:23:20.900disagreement where you believe that if that person is living out that idea, they're actually
00:23:29.120committing a moral failure. Okay. Well then you could say like, maybe you have an obligation to
00:23:33.760approach that brother and say, Hey, I think this is wrong. That would be done privately in
00:23:37.280accordance with Matthew 18. Let's say it's one of the other disagreements, but you feel very
00:23:41.460strongly about it. Well, if, if it's a conscience issue, I think that there's a way to address it
00:23:48.920that doesn't tank the pushing of the plow or the pushing of the Overton window to the right.
00:23:55.300again privately is a really good way to do that yeah um and then if it's not a conscience issue
00:24:00.820if you're like i disagree with that but i actually don't care that much for whatever reason you
00:24:06.940should just move on yeah and let the lying dog lie you go ahead dan you know what's interesting
00:24:15.400and you guys can correct me if if i'm wrong just thinking through some of the categories uh ben
00:24:20.280that you laid out with, you know, theological, moral, personal convictions, strategic disagreements.
00:24:30.040It appears to me that some of the biggest disagreements, particularly around race,
00:24:36.800the Antioch declaration, some of the stuff with Will Spencer that just cropped up,
00:24:42.280it'll be old news by the time this podcast comes out.
00:24:45.400Yeah. But it seems like there is a like a behind the scenes motivation is actually a strategic disagreement, but it's being painted as a moral and theological disagreement to the public. Would you guys say that's true? Because if it is, that means that it's actually quite difficult on social media to understand where the disagreements lie with some of these people on the right. Yeah. Do you think that's accurate?
00:25:12.880I was actually going to say part of the difficulty with this question is that the hypothetical has to be limited to what you can control.
00:25:20.340And you run into a lot of difficulties when you have what I think you're saying is true, where strategic and tertiary things are being presented as moral failures by those that disagree.
00:25:34.740You now have an obligation to defend your name.
00:25:39.820And so now you've gotten pulled in to a disagreement that takes place on the right that everyone can see, but it's not because you wanted to.
00:25:53.440So in the hypothetical, you, if you were the one who was like the aggressor, you could go to that person privately.
00:26:00.860You know, you could do all these things.
00:26:01.920But when you're the one who's being, who's the victim, who's not the aggressor, you might be put in a position where you have to, because you're before God, defend your good name to a group of people with, with a topic and an issue that you had no intention whatsoever of, of, you know, discussing in the public, getting a public, in the public sphere, like position on, because you just, for whatever reason, you're like, that's not, I don't care to give a public opinion on that.
00:26:28.880that's actually a really good point. Like most of the time when I'm thinking of no enemies on the
00:26:32.500right, one of the biggest, and I'm realizing it as you said this, one of the most common ways that
00:26:37.040I exercise this principle is actually simply in choosing which topics I feel equipped. Yeah.
00:26:44.580I believe myself equipped to speak on. And when someone, let's say there's an issue where
00:26:50.280someone either presents themselves or they genuinely are an expert or a subject matter
00:26:56.160expert or that it's like a, they know a lot about a topic and they speak to it. And maybe two or
00:27:01.700three things that they say out of 15 propositions strike me as wrong. And I'm like, I don't know if
00:27:08.300I'd agree with that. But then as I evaluate it, I think to myself, do I know a lot about this topic?
00:27:14.360Am I overextending principles from other topics I do know and assuming that they apply equally here
00:27:19.340or that my knowledge is adequate to address this issue? So most of the time for me, it's actually
00:27:23.440not in terms of volume i'm not no no enemies on the right thinking avoiding struggle sessions and
00:27:29.840i would say that too but i'm more often saying there's someone on the right they said a bunch
00:27:35.440of stuff they they are presenting themselves maybe as a subject matter expert i was neutral on two of
00:27:42.360the things they said i don't know if i agree with three of them i agree with eight of them
00:27:46.000do i need to say something 99 out of 100 times my answer this is my calculus again it's tactical
00:27:53.720is no yeah what what am i helping the the cause of the christian right by engaging in that probably
00:28:01.280not do i know everything about everything no i definitely don't maybe that triggers going and
00:28:07.160looking into it and even asking them privately or talking to them about it um the other give a
00:28:12.580concrete example and then maybe we move on let's say tanner cartwright you guys know tanner cartwright
00:28:17.100chops magnificent chops he's like a very right wing sort of dude out in um ref i think he's at
00:28:25.320reformation church with jerry doris i'm if i get this wrong sorry is that the kentucky guy
00:28:30.760yeah yeah yeah i met him we lexi and i went out there for their one of their conferences a while
00:28:35.560ago or like a camp they did and it was great group of people so so tanner when he pops up on my
00:28:41.520timeline, it's often like engaging in the same sort of stuff. All of us do political, cultural
00:28:47.520stuff. Let's say that Tanner says something and it's like, he's got the Elijah turned to 11 and
00:28:55.100he is engaging in public mockery. And it's the type of public mockery of some issue where genuinely
00:29:02.780it is a question of tactics and wisdom of whether I would say it that way or whatever. And I do this
00:29:10.680all the time and people disagree with me and say, Brian, I agree with the substance of what you said,
00:29:16.200but you said it way too abrasively. You said it way too, you were a jerk, whatever. And before
00:29:21.340God, I didn't think I was being a jerk. I thought I was engaging in licit tactical public mockery
00:29:27.960of the Elijah sword. Okay. So let's say Tanner says something and a hundred thousand people are
00:29:33.580mad at him. And 10% of the people who are mad at him are people on our team somewhere. They're
00:29:39.080like he went too far even for our camp tanner cartwright he went too far um brian denounce him
00:29:44.520and they start and some movement starts where it's like let's all denounce tanner cartwright
00:29:49.880for his thing under very few circumstances would i consider doing that i would just not i would
00:29:56.540ignore it and and even if i looked at it and and i can think of specific examples where this has
00:30:02.340happened where people have done stuff that i i genuinely looked at and said i wouldn't have done
00:30:07.700that. I actually think that that was maybe borderline crass. That was maybe borderline
00:30:12.140too far. It was trying to be too edgy. I don't know. That would hurt. That would bother my
00:30:18.580conscience to talk that way. And most of the time I don't say anything. Are you, are you talking
00:30:24.520about wish.com, Eric Kahn or team to eric.com right now? It's hard to tell them apart. Sometimes
00:30:30.400the most concrete example, ironically, is the NSA ads with the middle finger. Oh yeah. I never
00:30:34.580would have done that i think and now now see i'm even publicly talking about it hopefully just by
00:30:40.140way of illustration yeah and we can just drop it there that that was that was a concrete example
00:30:43.980where i think you could go back i don't think i said anything about it at the time a lot of people
00:30:48.480were trying to cancel canon over it or nsa over it and i was like i wouldn't have done that i
00:30:53.780disagree i get their justification i think it was was not the right way of doing it um but this
00:31:00.340doesn't have to become but i but i'm not going to help yeah by by coming out and just and here's
00:31:07.460the other thing it is so tempting to make your whole personality the second you set yourself up
00:31:11.660as like the in the camp discernment minister here's the thing it's such a slippery slope no
00:31:18.520one likes the hall monitor and when like those people who do that as the in the camp discernment
00:31:24.420guy. They're just acting like, uh, you know, the guy at civil air patrol, who's a sophomore in high
00:31:31.760school, but who's an officer at weekend civil air patrol. And he just loves screaming at the
00:31:37.700middle schoolers or the guy in class who is good for nothing else than to be a hall monitor. So
00:31:42.660the teachers make him a hall monitor and literally everyone hates him because he thinks that now he's
00:31:47.160going on a power trip and now he gets to, you know, he gets to lord it over people. That's what
00:31:52.080you're doing. This is how struggle sessions become wicked, wicked things. Uh, to your point about
00:31:58.680only, you know, using your level of competency in an issue to kind of help be a guidepost for
00:32:04.940whether or not you engage. So a struggle session, let's say that the one who is, uh, being the
00:32:11.500accuser in the struggle session is uninformed on the topic that he wants to have the struggle
00:32:16.520session about. Okay. Now what quickly will happen is he'll realize how uninformed he is on the topic
00:32:23.060and he'll shift gears completely and turn it into a gospel issue. Yeah. Oh yeah. And this is the
00:32:28.180trope of like, well, I'm Kyperian and I'm Vantilian. So therefore I know everything and I'm able to
00:32:33.500speak competently to everything. And they psychologize and pathologize everything. No,
00:32:36.780you're not. What you're doing is shifting the goalposts and you're turning tertiary things or
00:32:40.640even like quaternary things into things that now determine whether or not someone is in the
00:32:45.820kingdom of heaven. And yeah, go ahead. And then, well, I was just going to say the second thing
00:32:49.040is let's say the, the accused is the one that's uninformed. So the accuser is very informed on a
00:32:54.500topic and he's now bringing in this accused person who's adjacently related to the topic
00:32:59.140to answer for it, but he's actually uninformed. Now you are forcing him via public shame and threat
00:33:05.060to make a claim that he will be obligated to answer for before God on the final judgment day.
00:33:10.900Yeah. You're doing something wicked in both situations. You're either anathematizing someone needlessly because you don't understand a topic in question, or you are forcing someone to give their name to something that they haven't accurately informed themselves on. And they're going to have to answer for every idle word that's spoken.
00:33:29.260Yeah. Yeah. No, good points. I think this, this relates to another question. Maybe we can bridge
00:33:34.120into it and it might be old news by the time this comes out. It did relate to Will Spencer's article
00:33:38.580on Christ overall. One of the, one of the, there were two really controversial aspects of the
00:33:43.580article that I could discern. One of them was Spencer's claim that like the right-wing ideologies
00:33:50.160that are popularizing or gaining ascendance or in the, in the zeitgeist right now are more
00:33:56.040dangerous than internet pornography or more pernicious. And the other was this, basically
00:34:02.120his presentation of a hypothetical where you're going into a church member interview. And as a
00:34:05.920pastor, you should be asking the question of someone like, do you believe there's a cabal
00:34:09.740of Jews running the world? And the best answer allegedly, what, you know, that Spencer put
00:34:15.100forward was like, what do you even mean? I don't even know what you're talking about. Like he had
00:34:18.060never even thought about it. And then basically the implication was that anybody who said something
00:34:23.480like, well, hang on a minute. What do you mean by that? What do you mean by cabal? What do you
00:34:27.580mean by Jew? Do you mean every individual Jew? Do you mean like there are prominent Jews? Do you
00:34:31.180mean that a besetting sin of Jews historically or currently is X, Y, or Z? If anybody kind of gets
00:34:36.960more into that granular detail where it shows that they're at least a part of this conversation
00:34:40.720about subversion and cultural subversion and what it has to do with race and what it has to do with
00:34:46.620Jewishness and Bolshevism and some of these historic questions and cultural and political
00:34:50.620questions. And so people asked us, what do you, can you address that? What do you think about
00:34:56.840a church not admitting a potential member with contrary views on like the post-war consensus
00:35:01.100or some of these things? And to me, this relates to the struggle session question in a lot of ways
00:35:06.580because I have found so often that what's happening in a lot of these arguments is that
00:35:14.200there's a subtle form of question begging that the person is engaging in who is scoffing at the
00:35:20.800idea at all that someone might conclude some historically non-centrist or non-majority
00:35:29.500opinion when it in even maybe a minor a very minority position on some historical event or
00:35:34.260political subversion or something like that and the question begging is that um they must be wrong
00:35:41.200on those things because so often it's like the assumption of the listener is that's such an
00:35:49.720absurd question on the face of it yeah that only a com i mean a complete bitter nincompoop who's
00:35:57.460been just taken in by the worst straw man versions of fatherless race baiting you know critical
00:36:03.880theorists woke right etc etc um only those sorts of people would hear that question and go like
00:36:11.180hang on, there's nuance to that, or here's my position or opinion. And I haven't found that
00:36:17.060to be the case amongst the new Christian, right? I'm thinking of like Steven Wolf, CJ Engel,
00:36:23.140Andrew Isker, us, a lot of guys who are involved in this conversation that are often smeared as
00:36:28.580woke right or whatever. Most of us, if you said, what do you think about Nick Fuentes
00:36:33.760and his the statement of x y and z most of us would be like well a do you think that that's
00:36:41.860what we were talking about do you think we were like that in that group or agree with him or like
00:36:45.540that's where i thought about this for the first time well it's like no that that's not the source
00:36:50.780we're not that guy they they jump to straw men because we straw men never listen we never listen
00:36:56.280listen to nick one first of all someone used a phrase and i had to google it and it had something
00:37:00.960to do with nick fuentes and that's how little i know about nick fuentes was that but there's a lot
00:37:06.580of the time struggle sessioning is it is a tactical play and one of the tactics is the
00:37:12.920circular argument or the begging the question where they're basically framing a position from
00:37:18.220the outset as absurd yeah and then concluding that it's sinful and that it also involves all
00:37:24.340these pathologized emotional kind of undercurrents or motives. And I've just found that most of the
00:37:32.560time it is so much more complicated than that. When you get into the issues that people are
00:37:37.180trying to struggle session about. Yeah. An example would be that a guy just recently, you know,
00:37:42.160said that I was engaged in critical race theory for just quite blandly noting the historic
00:37:48.720involvement of uh certain elite jews in the pornography and smut industries which is just
00:37:54.960beyond question yeah like in the 70s and 80s the vast majority of the porn industry was were run by
00:38:00.980several prominent jewish elites yeah we know this it's just historical fact it doesn't follow that
00:38:08.280every single individual jew in america was involved etc like there's a bunch of stuff it doesn't
00:38:12.120entail and the same and it shows like that you're kind of poking something in the eye because if you
00:38:16.600were to do the same tweet but exchange all of the quotes from prominent jews uh or examples of
00:38:22.900prominent jews with a prominent feminist at the time totally promoting porn no one would accuse
00:38:27.440you of misogyny and no one in our camp would accuse you of misogyny or even more so if i had
00:38:32.200said a besetting sin of whites in the west has been apostasy no one no one would accuse you of
00:38:38.100almost nobody would run to the contrary statistics and say oh okay yeah i get what you're saying but
00:38:43.660actually whites have also been a bulwark in preserving christian faithfulness and actually
00:38:48.780the most conservative practice of of christianity in the west has been the you know these european
00:38:54.340and anglo-protestant groups i'd be like no one would do that they would just go that's right
00:38:58.740because you're critiquing your own kind of camp yeah and and that's all and and you're also you
00:39:04.180you're basically doing the fire extinguisher flood thing where it's like the culture already
00:39:09.900is totally down with any anti-white sentiment so if you say something that fits even broadly with
00:39:16.180you know anti-white sentiment you know just see jeremy carl's book the unnecessary or um the
00:39:21.720the unprotected the unprotected class i mixed it up with every class the unnecessary i was mixing
00:39:26.780with buchanan's church book um the unnecessary war so basically like in conclusion to my own
00:39:35.540question that i asked like you guys are welcome is uh that i i thought will spencer was was was
00:39:44.460fought was pretty off on that yeah and that he was basically asking clergymen to take on authority
00:39:51.320that christ did not give them and that he was making a number of uncharitable assumptions that
00:39:57.040even flirted with question begging with respect to some of the historical political social cultural
00:40:02.500religious racial questions at the heart of his thesis he was kind of assuming from the outset
00:40:07.980and he hand waved it like you know there's mountains of evidence read this you know this
00:40:12.500it's all clear the reality is a lot of these things are not so clear yeah and there is huge
00:40:18.260historical debate and that actually like you both within and without the church both exactly both
00:40:25.700within and without church good actors and bad actors yeah you know we the other thing too is
00:40:30.040that like, whether you're pastoring someone who is a member or someone who's suing for membership,
00:40:36.500you can't be in the business of proactive punishment for potential sins. And you have
00:40:43.400to be in the business of addressing punitively the sins that you actually see in people or that
00:40:47.900they confess to. So, you know, in a membership interview, you may ask like, you know, Hey,
00:40:52.660just pastorally, do you struggle with anything in particular that you need counseling for that you,
00:40:56.980you know want accountability as you walk in repentance that you want prayer for but what you
00:41:01.200can't do is like you seem like the type of guy that beats your wife and so therefore i'm going
00:41:05.400to treat you as one that beats your wife what you can't do is ask the question like hey do you like
00:41:09.360the nfl yeah i love the nfl oh so you must be a sabbath breaker you serial set you hate god yeah
00:41:16.500no you can't do that you're not allowed that's that's not something that god has given the church
00:41:20.720the authority you're actually dipping in you're dipping your toe pretty deep into a roman catholic
00:41:25.580error of having juridical oversight over everyone's life like everything like down to the minutiae if
00:41:32.220you were like hypothetically let's say that you were in a community of people the membership is
00:41:37.500drawing from the broader community where they have this besetting sin and let's say hypothetically
00:41:42.460that the besetting sin of the white community you're in is that they love lynching minorities
00:41:47.500in a murderous way they just love it like it's the besetting sin of their surrounding area
00:41:53.080now someone's suing for membership in that situation you would be perfectly pastorally
00:41:58.100within your rights to say what do you think about murdering ethnic minorities yeah and they'd be
00:42:03.940like oh i'm a christian i don't do that that would actually be sinful yeah you know see the
00:42:08.38010 commandments or i used to i've i used to do that repent etc etc right now you'd be perfectly
00:42:13.580within your rights what the question is assuming is that right now like there is just a rampant
00:42:20.080an unchecked wave of um fatherless bitter-hearted um disaffected basement dwelling incel young men
00:42:33.200who just like their whole heart is consumed with the hatred of an envy all nine on non-whites
00:42:40.740and they're full of you can smell the envy and a crackling even you could hear it a lot of the
00:42:46.240time where i'm seeing the like show me your show the work when i actually get down to talking to
00:42:51.240people like in our church we have lots of book groups and men talking and there's all sorts of
00:42:56.200contexts where men are talking about all sorts of issues and of course like right now in the
00:42:59.700zeitgeist there's a lot of conversations about race and nationalism and liberal democracy and
00:43:04.260world war ii and um like jewish communism and that extent and there's like we're we're a church full
00:43:11.660of men we're interested in stuff there's lots of these conversations sitting on any of those
00:43:16.080conversations, you know what you won't find? Like I haven't found yet a case where I had to take
00:43:21.280someone aside and say, brother, you are clearly consumed with bitterness. You're blaming all of
00:43:28.380your problems on this ethereal cabal of et cetera and et cetera. And you are consumed with hatred
00:43:34.260and envy. What I've actually found are lots of sober conversations that are like people trying
00:43:38.920to get to the historic political social truth and how to live in light of today and around very
00:43:44.840controversial questions and a lot of disagreement in that 100 like in our church with our within
00:43:49.660our church we went through and for our men's book group one of the things we did was read
00:43:53.360steven wolf's case case for christian nationalism and the campus split yeah within the men in our
00:43:58.680church and guess what we didn't anathematize each other and we're all still really good friends
00:44:02.640it's possible yeah you don't have to be autistic about everything absolutely and some some guys
00:44:08.360that are like very strongly like nationalism is the way to go liberal democracy was a globalist
00:44:13.980communist like play and there's all these issues with it isn't it clear and then other guys were
00:44:18.420like i'm skeptical of the nationalism thing i i think that actually the american experiment
00:44:23.940it was infiltrated by subversives but it fundamentally there's a lot of good there
00:44:29.420and it's a great system that we should continue to rescue today and constitutionalism like
00:44:34.460these are complicated genuinely difficult debates anybody who tries to simplify them down and this
00:44:40.700bothers me on both sides to if you disagree with me you're an idiot and not a christian yeah like
00:44:47.420that's just not the case guys yeah like and that is spirit that is spiritual and intellectual
00:44:52.100immaturity yeah spiritual deadness it just shows like it's especially intellectual immaturity yeah
00:44:57.780because you're not you're not reasoning at that point you're actually just blustering
00:45:04.040so to beat that question to death all right how about a theological question oh it's your turn
00:45:10.600though. No, no, no, no, no. Go for it. We have a theological question. Theological question.
00:45:13.700I didn't even have one post-millennialism. Okay. Okay. Oh, I love this question. I think I know
00:45:19.600what you're going to ask. If the post-millennialist position is wrong, what are the implications to
00:45:24.840how you live now? Sinful, greedy, sinfully living with wrong purpose, any massive implications at
00:45:33.380all, or just being wrong on a doctrinal position like so many are on so many topics? I was wrong
00:45:39.240about the question. I thought it was going to be the AI one, but which is also a good one. Maybe
00:45:42.460we'll get to it. I think that's perfect bridge for the next one. Great question. Um, so what
00:45:47.900if the postmanal position is wrong? How would you live differently? Yeah. So, so like what would
00:45:52.340the implications be briefly? It's, it's wrong to be wrong. It's not good. So you don't just want
00:45:57.680to be like, Oh, it would change nothing. There's no implications. There's almost always going to
00:46:01.300be an implication for being wrong for confessing something false. Um, we want to be correct and
00:46:07.600in accord with truth, recognizing that in our current state, there are issues with, about which
00:46:14.600you might be able to have degrees of confidence, but not certainty, even with respect to the
00:46:19.380biblical data, et cetera. So I would say, first of all, there is going to be some thing that is off
00:46:26.420somewhere when you're wrong about something, even if it's tiny and minute, when it comes to like
00:46:33.080how I live my life, what does post-millennialism have to do with it? Post-millennialism is not the
00:46:38.260most driving factor of how I live my life in terms of family, personal piety, evangelism,
00:46:46.160church practice, church order. People make this mistake. A lot of the time, even politically,
00:46:50.020they think that post-millennialism is what entails Christian nationalism or some other
00:46:54.760political system. It doesn't. The biggest thing that post-millennialism does for me practically
00:49:18.900We're still calling people to repent, calling patients to, like it literally, the post-millennialism means that we believe Christ will return after the millennial reign.
00:49:31.420So it's literally a doctrine that defines when you believe the bodily return of Christ in glory will come in reference to the millennial reign.
00:49:39.960and so because that's actually the doctrine you can talk about implications all day but those
00:49:46.440implications are related to other doctrines they're not contained in post-millennialism like a hermetic
00:49:51.680seal and so for that reason yeah it would actually it would literally change nothing about how i live
00:49:56.600my life the only thing i would add to that definition is that it also entails the successful
00:50:02.620evangelism of the world but even millennials believe that christ returns after the millennials
00:50:06.400Right. But, but even then, like, and you can see this with amillennials who some of them are more
00:50:10.780or less hopeful. It's an, it's an, it's an implication of the doctrine. It's not like
00:50:15.400a necessary part of it. I think that post-millennialism isn't post-millennialism.
00:50:20.860If you don't believe like the thing that distinguishes amillennialism from post-millennialism
00:50:25.740is the successful evangelism of the nations. Well, see, that's where you get into a functional,
00:50:30.420similarity between modern post-millennialism and amillennialism? Because amillennials believe that
00:50:38.200Christ is reigning right now from heaven. And there's a spectrum of how visible that spiritual
00:50:44.780reign is on the earth. But then the typical post-millennial position would be that Christ
00:50:52.520actually reigns from heaven on the earth for a literal thousand years that we could be in now,
00:50:58.320or we may not be in now, we actually don't know, we could judge by the fruit and make it and make
00:51:03.000a judgment. Uh, but it, but it doesn't. And, and so therefore when that millennial reign is going
00:51:08.800on, yes. Okay. I get to your point. Like, yes, it will mean that it's the golden age of the church
00:51:15.440on the earth. So it will be successful, but it doesn't have to be successful right now for
00:51:19.200post-millennial. Not today. No. And in fact, it doesn't have to be successful for the next 30,000
00:51:24.080years right and it could still be a post-millennial uh post-millennialism could still be true and
00:51:29.300classical post-millennial the distinction that i want to make is that you have um the two main
00:51:35.340forms of post-millennialism one shares the timeline with amillennialism yeah in this and this would be
00:51:42.460the view that i hold that the millennium is not a literal thousand years but it actually begins
00:51:47.580with the enthronement of Christ and continues.
00:58:10.320And then the second would be to talk to the church that you would be considering transferring to.
00:58:16.040And then working with those two church bodies to actually the elders of both churches to actually facilitate some sort of transfer of membership.
00:58:33.600The other thing is that that's a temptation is that when somebody is dissatisfied, say there's just, I just don't prefer the preaching or there's these theological things that really bother me.
00:58:43.940It doesn't seem like a good enough reason to leave.
00:58:46.320So I have to find some disqualifying sin and absolutely blast this church in order to make sure that I, you know, these elders aren't qualified to be elders.
00:58:58.220I don't recognize them as true shepherds.
00:59:01.100And so they can't do anything to me because this isn't a true church over something that
01:21:26.460Some innovations should be rejected outright.
01:21:28.460There's something about that that is militating against what God created a human being to be and to do.
01:21:36.820So I do want us to think carefully and craftily and cunningly about technological advance in general and not just go, oh, it's all post-millennialism.
01:21:48.480It's all just like, woo, post-millennial hope.
01:21:50.780Like, look, Palantir, and they've given, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, like, hang on.
01:21:55.220There are things that make us human that we could theoretically come up with technological ways to solve that maybe in solving them, we would destroy ourselves or harm ourselves significantly.
01:22:09.480Could I invent a technology that allowed me to never need to speak because I could just telepathically communicate?
01:22:16.100Like there's all sorts of technological supposals that we could do where all of us would stop for a second and go, something about that seems really off.
01:22:23.280Yeah. And I do think we need to just be careful. Yeah. It's worth always keeping in mind that a lot of the people that are really pushing this technology, uh, are really into transhumanism and actually turning humanity into something quote unquote more than it is, which is to say less than it is. And so, yeah, like to show my cards, when it comes to lab grown meat, I'm a Luddite.
01:22:49.240yeah i'm just not i'm not in that's not a post-millennial innovation that's garbage
01:22:53.920and it should burn in hell and i hate lab-grown meat uh so yeah yeah there's some things and
01:22:59.240it's genuinely like it's it's hard to live in a time you think about we look back on the
01:23:05.120industrial revolution and we can identify and we've done it on the king's hall 5 10 15 aspects
01:23:10.800of the industrial revolution that led to system and network effects that were deleterious that
01:23:17.740harmed society and the social fabric in ways that are still unfolding like a slow motion car wreck
01:23:23.220to the family um to masculinity femininity the duties like the things that made us human
01:23:29.180and you can't roll back and say that we're now going to return to a prime i'm not saying the
01:23:33.300prime the the romantics were right and we should return to a state rousseau was right and let's go
01:23:37.880to a noble savage state not i'm not saying that um but it actually is difficult to think clearly