The Matt Walsh Show - October 02, 2021


Matt Walsh Tears Down Pro-Abortion Arguments


Episode Stats


Length

4 minutes

Words per minute

220.48808

Word count

1,036

Sentence count

85

Harmful content

Misogyny

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

With abortion back in the news, you ve been hearing lots of pro-abortion arguments. They come fast and furious and repetitively, and the one thing they all have in common is that they re all quite wrong and stupid.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 With abortion back in the news, you've probably been hearing lots of pro-abortion arguments.
00:00:03.780 They come fast and furious and repetitively, and the one thing they all have in common is that they're all quite wrong and stupid.
00:00:15.060 So now I'm going to go through every pro-abortion argument and debunk them all in about four minutes or less, hopefully.
00:00:21.480 All right, so four minutes on the clock. Let's go through them.
00:00:23.920 Argument number one, a woman has the right to choose. 1.00
00:00:26.860 Answer, no, nobody has a universal right to choose.
00:00:29.280 We all agree that some choices must be prohibited.
00:00:31.320 The question is not if women should be able to choose generally, but if they should be able to choose to intentionally destroy innocent human life. 1.00
00:00:37.600 If you say they do, then you have to defend that choice on its merits.
00:00:40.460 You can't defend the choice based simply on the fact that it is one.
00:00:43.540 Two, pro-lifers want to control women's bodies. 1.00
00:00:45.740 Answer, no, the body in dispute is not the mother's.
00:00:48.360 The question, again, is whether the body of the human in her womb can be intentionally destroyed.
00:00:52.800 The child's body is the one at issue here, and we as pro-lifers are the ones trying to defend it.
00:00:56.960 Three, pro-lifers are only pro-birth.
00:00:58.900 They don't care about babies after they're born. 0.99
00:01:01.060 Answer, you have no data or evidence to support that stupid claim.
00:01:03.800 Besides, our position is that babies in the womb have moral worth equal to babies outside.
00:01:08.840 Of course we believe babies outside have worth.
00:01:11.180 That's the whole basis of our argument.
00:01:12.820 Our assertion is that babies in the womb have worth, and that's based on our contention that babies and all people outside have worth.
00:01:19.320 Our argument hinges on the comparison between humans inside and outside the womb.
00:01:23.760 And our contention is that there is no inherent difference in these groups aside from their physical location.
00:01:29.280 Four, the fetus is just a clump of cells.
00:01:31.520 Answer, we're all clumps of cells.
00:01:33.460 Some of us are far clumpier than the average infant.
00:01:36.040 None of that is relevant.
00:01:36.960 What's relevant is whether the fetus is a distinct and separate human entity, which he is.
00:01:41.980 Five, the fetus is not a person but a potential person.
00:01:44.740 Answer, no, he is, again, a distinct human entity.
00:01:47.340 If this is not the definition of a person, then none of us are persons.
00:01:51.020 Also, even if he is a potential person, it doesn't automatically follow that we should destroy him.
00:01:56.440 Do you believe that all non-persons can be killed?
00:01:58.740 What if I decapitated a bald eagle?
00:02:00.540 How would you feel about that?
00:02:01.740 You see, you're wrong that the unborn child isn't a person.
00:02:04.380 By definition, he is.
00:02:05.620 But even if you were right, you'd still be wrong.
00:02:07.740 That's how wrong you are.
00:02:09.040 Six, women have reproductive rights. 0.77
00:02:11.060 Answer, this one I agree with.
00:02:12.700 Nobody should ever be forced to reproduce.
00:02:14.960 But birth is not reproduction.
00:02:16.300 Conception is reproduction.
00:02:18.480 By the time the abortion is procured, reproduction has already occurred.
00:02:21.780 Seven, what about rape and incest?
00:02:23.580 Answer, that's not an argument.
00:02:25.080 That's a hypothetical.
00:02:26.200 Rape and incest only account for about 1% of all abortions.
00:02:29.160 These are hard and rare cases.
00:02:30.800 They might mitigate the individual moral culpability of a woman who chooses abortion,
00:02:34.740 but they don't change the fact that the unborn child is a distinct human entity,
00:02:38.100 i.e. a human being, i.e. a person,
00:02:39.800 and therefore worthy of the same protections the rest of us receive.
00:02:42.720 We can't kill the child for the sins of the father.
00:02:44.760 Answer, if you want to execute somebody for rape, execute the rapist, not the baby.
00:02:49.020 Eight, women cannot be forced to remain pregnant.
00:02:51.200 They have bodily autonomy.
00:02:52.420 Answer, no, they don't have absolute autonomy.
00:02:54.920 And yes, they should be forced to remain pregnant if the other option is to kill the child. 1.00
00:02:58.940 If this sounds harsh to you, then consider the fact
00:03:00.660 that we already force parents to do all kinds of things for their born children.
00:03:04.900 We force them to feed their children, clothe their children, 1.00
00:03:07.220 care for their children every second of the day.
00:03:09.240 We impose responsibilities on parents that we don't impose on anybody else.
00:03:13.180 I am required to do things for my child that I don't have to do for any other human on earth.
00:03:18.700 If parents don't want to fulfill that obligation, they must find somebody who will.
00:03:22.080 They can't simply leave their kid on the side of the road,
00:03:24.120 nor can they drown their kid in the bathtub.
00:03:26.460 Murder and neglect are not acceptable parenting strategies for babies outside the womb,
00:03:30.480 and they shouldn't be for babies inside the womb either.
00:03:33.300 Nine, fetuses aren't conscious, therefore we can kill them.
00:03:36.460 Answer, first of all, how do you know?
00:03:37.620 We know basically nothing about the nature of consciousness.
00:03:40.240 We can't even agree on what consciousness is, much less where it comes from or how it works.
00:03:44.160 Besides, let's say that they aren't conscious.
00:03:46.200 How does that justify murder?
00:03:47.840 Especially when we know that their state of unconsciousness is temporary.
00:03:51.700 Should it be legal to kill people when they're sleeping?
00:03:53.940 What about a person who's in a coma but expected to recover within a few months?
00:03:57.500 And if consciousness is the measure,
00:03:59.240 then shouldn't the right to life be granted in degrees according to the level of consciousness?
00:04:03.200 Not everybody is equal in consciousness.
00:04:04.560 A 25-year-old has greater consciousness, greater self-awareness,
00:04:07.620 than a one-year-old.
00:04:08.680 What about people with dementia?
00:04:10.140 They're conscious to some degree, but it's fading.
00:04:12.380 So how far does that go?
00:04:13.180 What's the limiting principle here?
00:04:14.540 There isn't one.
00:04:15.500 Ten, finally, pro-lifers are just a bunch of men trying to boss women around.
00:04:19.580 Answer, not true.
00:04:20.640 The pro-life movement is and has always been led primarily by women.
00:04:23.940 Also, it's irrelevant.
00:04:24.860 Also, it's a double-edged sword.
00:04:25.940 Roe v. Wade was decided by only men.
00:04:28.960 Should we overturn it on that basis?
00:04:30.600 I'm guessing you'd say no.
00:04:32.260 That's why that argument doesn't work.
00:04:34.180 None of these arguments work,
00:04:35.280 which isn't a surprise given that you're trying to justify the murder of children.
00:04:38.480 There are no good arguments for that,
00:04:40.100 as should hopefully now be obvious.