The Michael Knowles Show - June 18, 2025


BREAKING： Supreme Court Upholds Trans Ban For Minors


Episode Stats

Length

9 minutes

Words per Minute

174.43094

Word Count

1,645

Sentence Count

122

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

Supreme Court strikes back at the pro-Transgender ideology with a 6-3 ruling in favor of Tennessee's law allowing trans kids in the state to use the bathroom that corresponds with their gender identity. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito join forces to uphold the law.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 With 20 years reporting on the markets, I know that some industries are built to last,
00:00:03.980 but others are built to lead. John Oelichman here. If you want exposure to what's really
00:00:08.280 shaping our world, think beyond trends. Think defense, healthcare, telecom, real estate,
00:00:13.920 gold, crypto. They're not just headlines, they're foundations. And with GlobalX,
00:00:18.400 one of Canada's largest ETF providers, you can invest in them intelligently. With a range of
00:00:23.660 ETFs designed for long-term growth and steady income opportunities. GlobalX,
00:00:28.120 where innovation meets investing. Brought to you by GlobalX Investments Canada, Inc.
00:00:32.440 For key risk information, please refer to the ETF's prospectus, available at globalx.ca.
00:00:37.940 Marvelous, excellent breaking news. The Supreme Court is cited with my own Attorney General here
00:00:44.880 in Tennessee, Jonathan Scrimetti. In U.S. versus Scrimetti, this is the biggest case pertaining
00:00:51.340 to transgenderism and specifically transing the kids that we have in the U.S.
00:00:57.420 And the Supreme Court has just dealt a major 6-3 blow to the pro-trans ideology side and has defended
00:01:05.800 kids and justice and human nature and reality. And this is a really, really good decision. And it's
00:01:15.240 a harbinger, I think, of things to come, of good things to come. So at issue in the case was this
00:01:21.300 Tennessee law which said that you can't trans the kids. And this was a law that, you know, we at the
00:01:31.160 Daily Wire have been really interested in. And this is an issue, obviously, that we've been really
00:01:35.420 interested in. Matt, obviously, had his movie, What is a Woman, became a global phenomenon. I gave a
00:01:41.580 speech that went a little bit viral at CPAC, pointing out that transgenderism is absurd and it's bad for
00:01:47.600 everyone and it's good for no one. And for that reason, it needs to be eradicated from public life
00:01:51.400 entirely. DW has made movies and chocolate companies about this issue. We've really,
00:01:57.620 we've cared about this issue a lot because, one, it presents a grave injustice toward human beings and
00:02:04.800 especially to kids. But two, because it's just a symbol of all that has gone wrong in liberalism.
00:02:10.060 And so to rewind some of the degradation of the past 50, 100 years, you really, you need to start
00:02:15.740 pulling on that string. And for all of those reasons and many more, I'm just so pleased to see
00:02:20.360 that not only have we, not only as an institution, but as a conservative movement, have we been able
00:02:27.240 to push back on this ideology, get transing the kids clinics closed, go out there and, you know,
00:02:36.240 convince people of an idea that we used to know for all of history. But now we've got real
00:02:41.860 legal heft behind it. What is in this case? So at issue, you had three trans plaintiffs or the parents
00:02:51.760 of trans kids saying that they wanted to keep transing their kids. And the Tennessee law said,
00:02:56.460 no, you can't. So it goes all the way up to the Supreme Court. Is transgenderism protected by the
00:03:01.960 Equal Protection Clause? Does the logic of the Bostock decision, which the Supreme Court, even with
00:03:06.780 ostensible conservative Neil Gorsuch said, you know, identifies gender identity as a protected
00:03:15.540 class along with sexual orientation, along with biological sex in civil rights law on Title VII.
00:03:20.940 Does all of that imply, does accepting the trans ideology in principle imply that you have to be,
00:03:29.260 have a right to trans the kids? And the Supreme Court said, no. And the decision's really good.
00:03:34.180 So Chief Justice Roberts wrote the decision. I'm just skimming it here. Obviously, it's much longer
00:03:38.220 and this news just broke. But Roberts says, no, writing for the court, 6-3, the Tennessee law can
00:03:45.700 be upheld. Thomas, great, good old conservative Clarence Thomas comes in. He says, yeah, look,
00:03:52.060 I agree with the court. The law obviously should be upheld. But I do not agree with the court
00:03:55.840 that we should ignore the Bostock decision. He said, I think the Bostock decision, which holds
00:04:02.260 that transgenderism is a protected class and right under civil rights law, Title VII. I think that
00:04:08.060 case fails on its own merit. So I still disagree with that case. I still think that case should
00:04:12.920 be overturned. But regardless, that doesn't affect this case. Obviously, we should allow states to
00:04:19.380 prohibit transing the kids if they want. Justice Alito, another strong, good, hardcore conservative
00:04:24.220 comes in. And he similarly, though not exactly the same way, he disagrees. And he says, you know,
00:04:32.460 look, I disagree a little bit with the court's decision because the court is holding that the
00:04:36.500 Tennessee law does not discriminate on the basis of transgender identity. And Alito says, yeah, well,
00:04:43.800 I actually think it kind of does. But I just don't think that transgender is a suspect class,
00:04:50.340 meaning a class that has historically been subject to discrimination and therefore gets special
00:04:54.560 protection under the law. So he says, look, I disagree with the court a little bit. Yeah,
00:04:58.080 the law does kind of, in a sense, discriminate against transgenderism. I just think that's a
00:05:02.060 ridiculous framework, meaning there are greater implications for the law. And maybe we need to
00:05:06.120 overturn some other court decisions too. But in any case, really good stuff. Totally what you would
00:05:10.360 expect of those guys. Great news that the other conservative justices have gone along with this.
00:05:16.260 There's one last bit I want to read to you from the opinion of the court. This is from Roberts's
00:05:21.020 opinion, the majority of opinion. Hold on. He just keeps writing and writing and writing. Where is
00:05:27.400 it? It's here. It's all, I guess it's all the way at the end of the opinion.
00:05:34.560 Yes, here we are. Recent developments only underscore the need for legislative flexibility
00:05:43.580 in this era. And it goes on to explain how, you know, Tennessee is enacting this law and throwing
00:05:52.680 itself into a heated scientific dispute. And so the court is not going to weigh in on that scientific
00:05:59.220 dispute. That is not the competency of the court exactly. The court, in the heat of that scientific
00:06:04.880 and medical dispute, is going to put that decision back where it belongs in the hands of the people,
00:06:09.940 and in this case, in the hands of the states. Great decision. Major win. I think a lot of us,
00:06:17.280 certainly in this building, but throughout the entire conservative movement, we're glad to see
00:06:20.920 this. It's a reminder that, okay, I think the fever might have broken and reality and sanity are being
00:06:26.640 restored. We're not going to make a national policy and a constitutional right of making eunuchs out of
00:06:32.220 little kids. You know, that, what an evil country would do that. We're not, we're not there yet.
00:06:36.700 Thank God, we're not there yet. And okay, then the question becomes,
00:06:41.400 if there is some kind of civil right to transgenderism, as Bostock holds,
00:06:48.320 but states are allowed to not trans the kids, as U.S. versus Scrimetti holds,
00:06:55.540 how do those two decisions go together? This is what we look forward to now. Something's got to give.
00:07:03.080 Those two decisions don't make sense together. Either transgenderism is real or it's not. This
00:07:08.880 was the point of my CPAC speech. Either a man can become a woman or he can't. If a man can become a
00:07:13.380 woman, or if a man can be born in the wrong body or whatever, then you should trans everyone,
00:07:17.700 including the kids, if they want to be transed. Because you're making a claim about human nature
00:07:21.700 that implies, taken to its logical conclusion, implies you have to trans the kids.
00:07:26.200 But if it's wrong to trans the kids, the only reason it would be wrong to trans the kids
00:07:32.000 is because that claim you're making about human nature and the trans ideology isn't true.
00:07:37.420 If it's not true for kids, why would it be true for adults?
00:07:41.540 In that case, it's not that a man can be born in the wrong body or that he can change his sex or
00:07:45.880 something. It's just, we would just go back to the traditional understanding of these issues,
00:07:50.560 which is that sometimes people get a little confused and sometimes people suffer from mental
00:07:55.360 illnesses. And we need to treat those illnesses rather than affirm delusions, which is not good
00:08:00.240 for anyone. And in this broader opinion, I forget exactly which justice brought it up. It might
00:08:05.600 have been Thomas brings up the Cass Review in the UK, which says, wow, man, these trans procedures
00:08:11.480 actually don't really help anybody. They don't work to do what they say they're going to do,
00:08:15.720 but they also just don't even help alleviate anxiety or depression or suicidality. So yikes,
00:08:20.760 maybe this whole ideology is on its way out. Maybe this is the beginning, the first major
00:08:26.900 Supreme Court decision to say, okay, we've made some errors in recent years. Maybe in the future,
00:08:32.480 we're going to reconsider these errors and maybe we'll end up where we should, which is that
00:08:36.500 transgenderism should be eradicated from public life entirely. The whole preposterous ideology
00:08:42.520 beginning to end. Okay. Good news. See you next time.
00:08:48.660 Did you know that over 85% of grass-fed beef sold in U.S. grocery stores is imported? That's why I
00:08:54.300 buy all my meat from GoodRanchers.com instead. Good Ranchers products are 100% born, raised,
00:08:59.800 and harvested right here in the USA from local family farms. Plus, there's no antibiotics ever,
00:09:05.080 no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient. That's meat. Best of all,
00:09:10.300 Good Ranchers delivers straight to your door for added convenience. So lock in a secure supply of
00:09:14.620 American meat today. Subscribe now at GoodRanchers.com and get free meat for life and $40 off with code
00:09:20.080 dailywire. That's $40 off and free meat for life with code dailywire. Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.