The Michael Knowles Show - August 05, 2026


Ep. 2031 - Bill Maher Goes OFF On Rising Socialists, May Vote Republican


Episode Stats


Length

52 minutes

Words per minute

171.23

Word count

9,069

Sentence count

617


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.000 I'm Howard Mackler. I spent my career building companies that help businesses solve problems.
00:00:04.840 Now I built SuperShore because I think business insurance is broken. Some brokers hand you a
00:00:09.860 policy, collect their commission, and disappear until renewal. Your business runs all year,
00:00:14.600 and so do the gaps and the risks. For companies with 25 or more employees,
00:00:18.980 whether you're the owner, CFO, or HR manager, SuperShore is built for you. We're licensed in
00:00:24.560 all 50 states, covering business insurance and employee benefits, with year-round support for
00:00:29.460 you and your team. You can go to Supersure.com and use the fine print facts tool, which translates
00:00:35.060 your current policy into plain English, so you see what's common and what's not. The business
00:00:39.880 value calculator helps you estimate what your company is worth, so you know what actually
00:00:44.920 needs protecting. Go to Supersure.com. All your policies in one place. Go to Supersure.com.
00:00:51.660 That's Supersure.com. You can thank me later. Paid for by Supersure Insurance Agency, LLC,
00:00:56.580 a licensed insurance agency.
00:00:58.600 Recently, our company's softball team
00:01:00.560 lost the big game by one run.
00:01:02.880 Then Dale tried to console us with the quote,
00:01:05.340 winning isn't everything.
00:01:07.200 Well, Dale and I are very different.
00:01:10.880 I get early payout from Bet365.
00:01:12.800 If my team goes up big, I get paid out instantly,
00:01:15.620 even if they blow the lead later.
00:01:17.600 Sound familiar, Dale?
00:01:19.380 Thanks, Bet365.
00:01:21.040 Must be 19 or older, Ontario only.
00:01:22.580 Please play responsibly.
00:01:23.380 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling
00:01:24.820 or the gambling of someone close to you,
00:01:25.860 please go to connexontario.ca and see supply.
00:01:28.360 This episode is brought to you by Cardiff,
00:01:30.640 America's favorite small business lender
00:01:32.300 with over $12 billion funded since 2004,
00:01:34.880 applying under three minutes for same-day funding,
00:01:37.380 up to $500,000 at cardiff.co slash Knowles.
00:01:41.420 Voters headed to the ballot box yesterday
00:01:43.660 for primaries in Michigan, Missouri, Kansas,
00:01:47.180 Virginia, and Washington
00:01:48.160 to choose between radical DSA socialists
00:01:51.980 and ordinary center-of-the-party Democrats.
00:01:55.860 And the problem is today, there is basically no difference.
00:02:00.500 We will get into the candidates and the results.
00:02:03.360 Then the Cambridge City Council votes to restore supposedly racist gunshot detectors
00:02:09.660 after black racial activists got another black man killed.
00:02:13.700 And Politico reports that the GOP has a groiper problem.
00:02:18.700 But there's more beneath the surface.
00:02:20.580 I'm Michael Knowles.
00:02:21.200 This is the Michael Knowles Show.
00:02:25.860 welcome back to the show my pals at the oxford union have gone viral
00:02:44.760 for a recent debate starring tommy robinson the anti-islam activist uh the clip has a muslim
00:02:51.640 student at Oxford making a joke about how Tommy would be ripped apart and killed by the angry
00:02:58.780 Muslim mob outside, if not for the rules and decorum and privileges afforded by the Oxford
00:03:04.160 Union. And the right is apoplectic over this. They're missing some key details of what's going
00:03:10.140 on. So we'll get there in a moment. First, though, the elections. This is pretty wild.
00:03:15.760 This is a live issue right now because we're now at Banana Republic, so we can't conduct
00:03:20.780 elections in a single day. Now, it takes days and weeks sometimes to finish our elections,
00:03:26.700 but really tight races all throughout the country over these candidates, especially in the Democrat
00:03:32.960 primary. That's what really matters. You have the DSA, the Democratic Socialists of America,
00:03:37.920 really on the rise, huge faction of the Democrat Party, now more popular than elected members of
00:03:43.880 Congress among rank and file Democrat voters. And so this was the story of the election is,
00:03:49.220 Will the centrist, moderate, mainstream Democrats be able to fend off the insurrection from the
00:03:57.340 socialist wing of the Democrat Party? But that framing just totally misses what's actually going
00:04:02.560 on. So one of the key congressmen who is being targeted here is this guy Sri Tanadar. Sri
00:04:10.440 Tanadar. Last time I checked it right before the show went live, they were really in a neck and
00:04:16.840 race, still counting the votes. It's probably going to drag on for a little while, though I'll
00:04:20.280 ask the producers to give me an update if they finally make a call. The official story of this
00:04:25.240 election is that the socialist challenger, Donovan McKinney, is trying to unseat this
00:04:33.160 two-term congressman, the more establishment Democrat, Sri Thanedar, for this Detroit area
00:04:39.140 seat. Shri has been in Congress for two terms now. The way that you, in this audience, the
00:04:47.700 creme de la creme over here, just right-wingers generally might have experienced Shri Thanedar
00:04:53.540 actually involves me. It was when I was on Piers Morgan's show, what was it, eight or nine months
00:04:59.060 ago. We were debating the Insurrection Act, some of the ICE protests and the deportations.
00:05:05.820 And this congressman, Thanedar, came on and he said, you know, this is an authoritarian, tyrannical power grab by Donald Trump.
00:05:13.960 And he has no right to do this. And this is terrible.
00:05:15.940 This was when Trump was threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act.
00:05:18.360 And I asked the congressman a simple question about it that he could not answer.
00:05:23.780 There is this raging argument now about whether it is constitutional to do what Trump is rolling out in places like Chicago.
00:05:30.860 It's unconstitutional.
00:05:32.000 You know, the solution is empower the local law enforcement.
00:05:36.200 Congressman, are you familiar with the Insurrection Act?
00:05:39.100 Yes, I am.
00:05:40.240 So what do you think that's for?
00:05:41.720 You said that this was illegal for the federal government to send National Guard into cities and states.
00:05:46.660 What do you think the Insurrection Act is for?
00:05:50.340 Congressman, do you actually know what the Insurrection Act says?
00:05:55.240 Well, look what we saw happen in January 6th in the Congress.
00:06:01.520 That's insurrection. Are you familiar with with what the Insurrection Act?
00:06:05.240 Yes, I am. Look, this president has used all kinds of excuses to break the law.
00:06:10.820 This president has. No, but that is the law. So what is the law, Congressman? You say you're
00:06:14.280 familiar with the Insurrection Act, but you don't seem to be able to describe what it does.
00:06:18.420 What do you think the Insurrection Act does? Look, look, the issue here is that we need our
00:06:23.000 cities safe. We need our cities safe. The real issue is January 6th. What? This is a pretty
00:06:29.280 simple question for a federal legislator, especially one who is spouting off on whether
00:06:33.660 or not Trump has the right to invoke the Insurrection Act. He says, this is illegal,
00:06:38.480 this is wrong, you can't do this. And he said, well, what do you think the Insurrection Act's
00:06:41.640 for? He doesn't know. He's not familiar with the relevant piece of federal legislation as a federal
00:06:49.040 legislator. And the craziest part, that exchange goes on for like five minutes. I don't have time
00:06:54.040 to get into the whole thing. He never comes up with an answer, spoiler alert. The craziest thing
00:06:58.440 about it is. In this election, Shreed Anadar is the moderate choice. That's the moderate choice.
00:07:06.000 This is a guy who wants to, who has openly supported abolishing ICE, impeaching Trump
00:07:14.540 over nothing, supports socialist medicine, Medicare for all, as they call it, but single
00:07:20.760 payer socialist medicine. The Green New Deal was at $90 trillion. He was in the Democratic
00:07:29.100 Socialists of America, but he left the DSA after the DSA refused to condemn Hamas after the October
00:07:35.160 7th, 2023 terror attack on the state of Israel. So he left the DSA because he said, look, this is
00:07:41.240 a little too far even for me. But he agrees with the DSA on everything. He supports the Equality
00:07:46.920 Act, transing the kids, he's the moderate option. But the difference between the moderate option
00:07:55.480 and the radical socialist option in these races is nothing. The only difference that I can see
00:08:03.400 is that some of them hate Israel a little more than the others. But when it comes to domestic
00:08:10.580 issues, even other foreign issues like mass migration, they all agree entirely. If you look
00:08:15.740 around. We're not going to get into all the elections today, but at some of the other ones,
00:08:19.240 you have this guy running, Abdul El-Sayed. Abdul El-Sayed, who is the more radical candidate
00:08:25.920 running for Senate. He has a narrow lead at the moment. Again, this could be changing by the
00:08:31.240 minute, but he has a narrow lead over Representative Haley Stevens. Haley Stevens, who is supposedly
00:08:36.900 the centrist. But Abdul El-Sayed, abolish ICE, Medicare for All, abolish medical debt. He's in
00:08:44.360 favor of a wealth tax. So you go in to people who have too much money, according to whichever
00:08:51.880 socialist is running, and you say, hey, you know that money you have that has already been taxed
00:08:56.140 at the corporate level? It's been taxed at the income level or at the capital gains level.
00:09:00.460 It's been taxed front ways and back ways. We're going to tax it again, but only for some rich
00:09:05.200 people. And we're only going to do it one time. And neither of those two conditions are ever true.
00:09:09.320 We just saw this in New York with Mamdani. Mamdani said, I'm only going to tax, I'm only going to
00:09:14.060 take property for 31,000 New Yorkers, and they're barely even here, and it doesn't really matter.
00:09:19.800 31,000 quickly becomes almost a million, and not only does he go to tax them, he actually doxes
00:09:24.660 all of them in the process. This is why this very left-wing economist, a business professor at NYU,
00:09:31.100 Scott Galloway, said, wait a second, I supported this legislation, but now they're coming after me.
00:09:34.580 The Leopards Eating Faces Party is trying to eat my face too. How crazy.
00:09:37.920 very very radical the one big story of the night for the supposed centrist win
00:09:44.180 is that this guy wesley bell fended off cory bush in congress cory bush was one of the junior
00:09:49.680 members of the squad she was kind of the ringo of the squad aoc is the paul mccartney ilhan omar
00:09:55.700 is the john lennon you know a little more radical a little scarier a little little more supportive
00:10:01.820 of violence. Then you have, I don't know, is Ayanna Pressley, she's kind of like the George
00:10:07.580 Harrison maybe. I don't know. I'm losing my analogy here. In any case, Cori Bush gets booted
00:10:11.980 out of Congress last go around. She was trying to get her seat back, and the moderate Wesley Bell
00:10:17.580 fended her off. Who's the moderate? Wesley Bell supports abolishing ICE, socialist medicine,
00:10:24.040 Medicare for All, radically pro-abortion, radically pro-criminal, doesn't want to prosecute the
00:10:28.620 criminals. The only difference here, as I mentioned earlier, is that Wesley Bell is pro-Israel,
00:10:34.240 basically pro-Israel. Cori Bush hates Israel. But again, I guess that's preferable. I'm not
00:10:40.600 looking forward to another radical Muslim state in the Middle East. But on the list of political
00:10:46.600 issues, that one's relatively low for me. So if the choices that were being given here from the
00:10:52.260 Democrats are people who want to abolish ICE, support socialist medicine, trans the kids,
00:10:56.960 pro-abortion, massive tax increases, all that, and other people who agree with exactly the same
00:11:03.400 stuff, there's really not much of an option. What you should conclude, regardless of how the
00:11:08.060 individual race has come out, oh, Sri is kind of leading this guy or the other guy's leading him
00:11:12.060 or whatever, the real conclusion from the race was apparent before a single ballot was cast.
00:11:19.720 Namely, the Democrat Party is now completely owned by the socialists.
00:11:25.600 Full stop, end of story.
00:11:28.360 Now, some Republicans, some conservatives are going to say, well, this is good because it gives us an opening.
00:11:33.560 We can even try to pick off some of the moderate liberals, the center-left people who will say that they didn't leave their party, their party left them.
00:11:41.420 There are a lot of these guys, true neocons in the sense that they were Democrats until very, very recently.
00:11:47.620 I mean, one example, one person who's made himself a real face of this is someone like
00:11:52.740 James Lindsay, who I think he voted for Obama.
00:11:56.080 I think he voted for Hillary.
00:11:57.560 But he said, you know, the Dems have gotten a little too crazy, especially with this trans
00:12:00.500 stuff.
00:12:01.020 So now I'm on the right.
00:12:02.460 But he's not really on the right.
00:12:03.760 A lot of these guys are not really on the right.
00:12:05.260 Bill Maher is not really on the right.
00:12:07.180 But they say the left has gotten too crazy.
00:12:09.280 And so now I'm going to come on over to the right.
00:12:11.800 But the problem is, for a lot of the disillusioned liberals and recent Democrats, they haven't given up a lot of their premises.
00:12:19.900 And so you look at someone like Bill Maher.
00:12:22.260 Bill Maher just came out.
00:12:23.160 He said, hey, this socialist stuff, I'm not saying I'm going to be a Republican now, but my vote is up for grabs.
00:12:28.100 Now, we'll get into his logic and reasoning in a second.
00:12:30.560 Then we'll get into the supposedly racist gunshot detectors that were abolished by the racial activists that now got another black man killed.
00:12:38.780 First, I want to tell you about Cardiff.
00:12:40.060 Go to Cardiff.co slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. America's 36.2 million small businesses drive
00:12:47.320 our economy, but more than 70% need additional capital at least once a year. Even with small
00:12:52.120 business revenue at an all-time high, big banks are tightening underwriting and approving fewer
00:12:56.080 loans. If you want bank rates without the bank delays, Cardiff can get your business approved
00:13:00.180 in minutes and funded the very same day. Check out Cardiff.co slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S,
00:13:05.640 up to $500,000 in the same-day funding. Small business is really important. It is the backbone
00:13:11.160 of America. I'm so pleased to partner with Cardiff, which was just voted America's favorite
00:13:17.980 small business lender, both 2024 and 2025, by workingcapital.com. You can use the funding
00:13:24.500 however your business needs it, whether that's new hiring, whether that's expanding or purchasing
00:13:28.860 inventory, whether that's getting materials in bulk. Banks try to lock out small businesses.
00:13:32.840 Cardiff has the key. Big banks may not want to approve your business loans. Cardiff does.
00:13:36.580 If you've been in business for at least a year and are pulling in $20,000 a month in revenue,
00:13:40.680 apply now for up to half a million bucks in same-day funding. Cardiff.co slash Knowles.
00:13:45.440 That's Cardiff, C-A-R-D-I-F-F dot C-O slash Knowles. Real growth, fast funding, Cardiff.
00:13:51.880 Borrow better. Because of the now dominance of socialism in the Democrat Party,
00:13:58.300 Bill Maher, no less a liberal than Bill Maher, says his vote is up for grabs.
00:14:04.500 And finally, new rule, Donald Trump has told one trillion lies.
00:14:08.680 But when he says the Democratic Socialists of America are actually communist, that's not one of them.
00:14:15.180 And it's not hard to prove it just by quoting the DSA and their candidates.
00:14:20.000 It gives me no pleasure to have to do this.
00:14:22.140 I'd much rather keep going the good vibes from my summer vacation.
00:14:26.380 I had an awesome one, by the way.
00:14:28.220 I totally got a girlfriend at Bible camp.
00:14:39.780 However, right before we left, Vice President J.D. Vance was on the show,
00:14:45.120 and I told him that if the Democratic Party keeps going in the direction of the DSA,
00:14:50.520 my vote was in play.
00:14:52.440 And all I heard all vacation was, oh, my God, you're a Republican now.
00:14:55.980 No, that's not what I said. I said in play. And here's why. Because not a week goes by
00:15:03.240 where I don't read about some newly chosen, exciting new face in the Democratic Party.
00:15:08.740 And then when that face opens its mouth, the communist manifesto or some other crazy
00:15:14.980 comes out. Okay. Now notice, even in this creed de coeur that you're getting from Bill Maher,
00:15:20.860 he's still not willing to say okay i'm gonna vote republican even as the socialist candidates take
00:15:27.920 over the party even as as he says they open their mouths and out comes the communist manifesto
00:15:32.320 even still he's not willing to say okay i'm gonna vote republican now he just says look my vote's
00:15:37.220 just like kind of in play because these guys are making me a little uncomfortable i just wish
00:15:41.640 we could go back to that amiable liberalism of yesterday and you hear this from a lot of these
00:15:49.520 guys, who are on the disillusioned center left, as well as the people who actually did make the
00:15:53.940 flip, who said, you know what? Look, I voted for Obama. I voted for Hillary. But transing the kids,
00:15:59.960 that's a bridge too far. So now I guess I'm on the right. But I'm still a liberal. I just wish,
00:16:07.780 you know what they wish? They wish that we could go back to 1998. That is what that faction wants.
00:16:15.680 They say, you social conservatives, you're all crazy. He makes a joke there about Bible camp
00:16:18.920 because Bill Maher is famously an, infamously an atheist. But he says, look, I'm not one of these
00:16:23.720 crazy conservatives. I'm not one of those conservatives, you know, one of these guys
00:16:26.960 who are half fascist probably, you know, these guys who go to church all the time and like give
00:16:31.100 to charity and don't want to murder babies and think that marriage has a meaning and it means
00:16:35.740 what it's always meant everywhere for all of history all the time. But look, I'm not one of
00:16:40.020 those crazy guys. I just want to go back to the liberalism of 1998, which is nostalgia,
00:16:47.680 which is history after a few drinks. What you have to ask yourself, if you are a disillusioned
00:16:53.920 Democrat who has either come over to the right in recent years or who's thinking about coming
00:16:57.860 over to the right, who is scandalized by the socialists in the Democrat party, what you have
00:17:02.500 to ask yourself is, how did it happen? How did it happen? How did the socialists seemingly overnight
00:17:12.160 take over the Democrat Party? I think there are a few reasons. One is mass migration. You've
00:17:19.080 actually changed the demographics of the country, and the people you've brought in are more likely
00:17:22.900 to align with Democrats, and they're more likely to push these elements of the Democrat Party,
00:17:28.080 including economic socialism, race socialism, the kind of racial grievance, sexual grievance,
00:17:33.680 all the rest of that. So migration is a big part of it. And it goes even deeper than that.
00:17:39.960 it's the very principles of liberalism. The principles that undergird the liberalism that
00:17:47.480 you supported before it went a little too far, those very principles are what has led with
00:17:54.520 inescapable logic to the radicalism that you now abhor. That's the issue. The example that I
00:18:01.420 frequently cite because it's so clear is that you might say you love feminism, but you hate
00:18:08.840 transing the kids. But given the principles of feminism, the central principle of which is that
00:18:14.900 men and women are basically the same, they might look a little different. They might not look a
00:18:18.680 little different. I don't know if you've seen feminists lately, but they might have some
00:18:23.180 superficial differences, but they're basically the same. Woman needs a man like a fish needs a
00:18:27.660 bicycle. That principle leads necessarily to the LGBT movement, at least the LGB movement.
00:18:36.440 You say, well, if men and women are basically the same, then the way a man interacts with a woman is no different or should be no different than the way a man interacts with a man or a woman interacts with a woman.
00:18:45.480 And if you accept the LGB kind of movement, the premises of that, which is that our sexual behavior and our sexual identity has no reference to biology or to any differences that you find in nature or certainly not to teleology.
00:19:03.940 If you accept that, then that leads necessarily to redefining marriage.
00:19:09.180 And if you accept that, you've now enshrined in law that there's really no difference between men and women, all the way down to the fundamental political institution, then it ain't so hard to get to transgenderism.
00:19:18.960 In fact, it's necessary to get to transgenderism.
00:19:21.000 And if transgenderism is true, that a man can be born in a woman's body, or a man can become a woman, or a man might as well be a woman, then of course you should trans the kids.
00:19:29.120 that's just that that's just following an idea to its logical conclusion well the same thing is true
00:19:35.640 more broadly of liberalism the problem here is not just that the left went a little too far
00:19:41.940 if you rewound the clock to 1998 as bill maher and a lot of these guys the the true current
00:19:49.120 neocons and all the rest want to do why do you think that you wouldn't just end up right back
00:19:55.320 where we are 28 years later. Why do you think history would stop? Why do you think that we
00:20:02.080 would stop following ideas further and further and further? You can't stop history. The conditions
00:20:08.100 that led to 2026 liberalism were already present in 1998 liberalism, as they were in 1968 liberalism,
00:20:16.220 as we might say they were in 1789 liberalism, or even further back.
00:20:20.660 Just as the central premise of feminism is that men and women are basically the same,
00:20:25.320 So, too, the premise of liberalism is that the individual is almighty.
00:20:32.480 The individual is sacrosanct.
00:20:36.340 It's not just that individuals have rights.
00:20:39.940 Individuals have a way that they ought to be able to live.
00:20:42.500 No, no, it's deeper than that.
00:20:44.120 It's that the individual is the ultimate in politics.
00:20:47.840 We must maximize individual autonomy at all expenses.
00:20:54.260 And that just isn't true.
00:20:56.320 That contradicts like 3,000 years of political philosophy, which says that, yes, individuals
00:21:01.260 matter, but individuals have their context in society because politics is about how we
00:21:07.320 all live together.
00:21:08.560 Some use the folk etymology of poly, meaning many, and ticks, meaning blood-sucking leeches.
00:21:13.500 So politics is, of course, many, many blood-sucking leeches.
00:21:16.120 But the real etymology of it comes from the polis, that we live together in society.
00:21:20.360 And so man is not essentially an individual autonomous creature that fell out of a coconut tree, to quote that great philosopher Kamala Harris, but man is a social creature, a political creature.
00:21:31.960 And so man as an individual must be understood within the context of man as a social animal.
00:21:39.020 That is classical political philosophy.
00:21:41.180 That is conservatism understood for all of history until very recently.
00:21:46.580 Liberalism says something different.
00:21:47.780 And so what the liberals are going to argue, like Bill Maher, is that we need to double down
00:21:53.840 on liberalism to stop communism. They think that these are antitheses or something. They're not.
00:22:00.920 They're not opposites. They're actually two sides of the same coin. Communism, in many ways,
00:22:07.140 is a radically individualist political ideology. A friend of mine who's kind of a Marxist,
00:22:14.220 kind of like a right-wing Marxist guy. He's a very interesting thinker, very smart guy.
00:22:18.140 He made this point to me 15 years ago. He said, you know, Michael, if Karl Marx were alive today,
00:22:21.380 he'd be in the Tea Party. I said, what? It's a shocking statement, but it kind of makes sense.
00:22:26.220 Inasmuch as communism, fascism, Nazism for that matter, socialism, all these isms,
00:22:35.240 they emerge historically and intellectually from liberalism, from the revolutionary ideologies of
00:22:41.840 the 17th and 18th centuries. And what they all have in common is they all begin at least with
00:22:48.500 the individual. So liberalism begins with the individual and then tries to just maintain this
00:22:54.780 untenable position of making the individual primary in all of politics. That's not possible.
00:23:01.760 That's incoherent because we have to live in society. Socialism and communism follow that
00:23:06.520 idea a little further and say, well, no, the individual is primary, but in order to do things
00:23:11.320 in politics, we need to lump all those individuals back together in a collective. That's the symbol
00:23:16.220 of fascism too, the idea of collecting all of the individuals into the strong bundle of sticks,
00:23:20.680 the fascis. But all of those ideologies misunderstand how politics is actually to
00:23:27.640 work and how we can actually defend the legitimate rights of the individual, which is through all of
00:23:34.360 those mediating social institutions, the fundamental institution being the family,
00:23:39.300 Followed by civic associations, local government, the interplay between enterprise and the public authority, the church, which also relates both to business and the civil authority, larger jurisdictions like counties and states, all the way up in a process of subsidiarity.
00:24:02.840 this is all pretty basic Catholic social teaching, which is being maligned right now by liberals for
00:24:06.800 very stupid reasons, all the way up to the national government or to the imperial government,
00:24:11.840 for that matter, if you live in an empire. That's the key. That's what they're missing.
00:24:18.160 So if you don't like that liberalism has led seemingly overnight to socialism and to communism,
00:24:27.440 If you don't like that liberalism, sometimes more quickly than at other times,
00:24:32.440 leads to this sort of radicalism, this anarchism, this terror.
00:24:36.260 It happened pretty fast during the French Revolution, which is the liberal revolution,
00:24:41.220 par excellence.
00:24:42.320 If you don't like that, then what you need is not just to try to rewind the clock,
00:24:46.280 which is not possible.
00:24:48.120 What you need is an alternative, a more durable understanding of human nature
00:24:53.040 and political philosophy.
00:24:54.520 And that alternative is classical political philosophy.
00:24:59.420 That alternative is what we used to call conservatism before conservatism became indistinguishable from different forms of liberalism.
00:25:07.900 That's what you need.
00:25:09.520 And that's the point that I think Bill Maher doesn't want to accept.
00:25:13.120 That's the point that a lot of the more neo-conny types don't want to accept.
00:25:17.360 But that's just a fact.
00:25:18.680 if you cannot explain to me how socialists became more popular in the democrat party
00:25:26.000 than the elected democrat officials many if not most of whom are overt socialists at this point
00:25:32.280 if you can't explain to me how that happened then why should i listen to your political prescriptions
00:25:36.360 on anything else because i can explain to you how that happened i can explain to you how liberalism
00:25:41.620 leads to socialism and fascism and communism all the other isms i can explain that to you
00:25:46.560 And I think this is why you're seeing a return on the right now to that more classical political philosophy.
00:25:53.220 A little less chitchat about some, you know, pundit who wrote a book 20 years ago and a little more chitchat about Aristotle and Cicero and St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas and Donozo Cortez and all these other great political philosophers.
00:26:08.480 Because of their understanding of politics is much more durable.
00:26:12.780 And that means that you're going to talk about the individual in its proper context,
00:26:16.940 but you're also going to talk about things like the common good.
00:26:19.260 You're going to talk about things like objective truth.
00:26:21.300 You're going to talk about things like morality.
00:26:23.540 You're going to talk about the relationship between the religious order and the state,
00:26:28.240 which is always and everywhere present.
00:26:30.380 That's been true since man first walked out of the cave.
00:26:34.020 You're going to have to talk about these things because otherwise,
00:26:37.400 and this is what the socialists and the communists prey on,
00:26:39.720 Otherwise, you're going to be a vulnerable individual who is now detached from family, from religion, from church, from enterprise increasingly, from civic associations, from patriotism, from love of country, from any sense that you can know anything about the moral order.
00:26:58.220 a radical sort of skepticism because we're so afraid of authoritarianism that the individual
00:27:03.320 is going to be entirely vulnerable and his rights are going to be squashed. And the only people who
00:27:07.800 benefit are going to be the radical leftists. That's what you're seeing play out. Maybe we
00:27:12.460 need an alternative. Bill Maher doesn't just need his vote to be up for grabs. Bill Maher needs to
00:27:17.620 recognize, maybe we can talk about this on his show or on my show. He needs to recognize that
00:27:22.700 you got to go back a little further than 1998. Okay. Speaking of radical policies,
00:27:27.760 the Cambridge City Council has just voted to restore racist gunshot detectors because their
00:27:34.300 racial justice program just got another black guy killed. First, though, I want to tell you
00:27:38.480 about Catholic Match. Go to catholicmatch.com. Summer may be the best time of the year to stop
00:27:43.280 merely thinking about dating and actually go on a date. Catholic Match can help. Say yes to the
00:27:48.840 festival, the hike, the cookout. Say yes to getting out into the world and meeting someone.
00:27:53.560 Say yes to going to the cigar lounge and smoking a Mayflower. Actually, but usually on dates,
00:27:57.640 you don't do that. Sometimes though, you find that woman, you marry her right away.
00:28:01.240 Catholic Match makes all that dating, amid our horrible swipe culture, it makes it much easier
00:28:07.860 because the people there are serious about their Catholic faith, serious about marriage,
00:28:11.340 and serious about finding someone with whom they can build a life. The goal is not endless
00:28:14.920 messaging. The goal is to meet the person who gives you a reason to delete the app altogether.
00:28:19.780 Go to catholicmatch.com or download the app today. That is catholicmatch.com. Go do it.
00:28:25.340 People get married here. They check off all the boxes of compatibility, not just taking nice long
00:28:31.080 walks on the beach, not just, you know, I like blondes. We're talking about the real deep stuff,
00:28:36.320 morality, what kind of life you want to live, kids, all the way down to liturgical preferences.
00:28:41.440 Right now, catholicmatch.com.
00:28:44.920 So, some months ago, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, they voted to get rid of gunshot detectors.
00:28:53.620 I think they're shot spotters or something like that, which is this technology that hears gunshots
00:28:58.840 go off, then alerts the police so the police can go and save people and protect people and
00:29:04.260 arrest the criminals. In May, May 18th, you had all the usual suspects, all these racial justice
00:29:13.940 advocates, come out saying it is important for the protection of black people that we get rid of
00:29:21.560 this policing technology. Here you have a member of the Democratic Socialists explaining why.
00:29:28.160 Hello, my name is Kayla Goodell. I'm a Cambridge resident and DSA member,
00:29:32.920 and I live over at 339 Broadway. I am here again to discuss my support for Charter Right 2,
00:29:38.900 the discontinuation of Cambridge's use of ShotSpotter. This council has heard many reasons
00:29:43.880 the residents of Cambridge oppose the continuation of ShotSpotter over the past weeks and years and
00:29:49.040 again tonight. I will reiterate them quickly. ShotSpotter is unfettered surveillance on the
00:29:54.700 largest populations of brown and black residents of Cambridge. ShotSpotter is not accountable to
00:29:59.760 the Freedom of Information Act. ShotSpotter data has been thrown out in court in Massachusetts
00:30:04.780 for violating our all-party audio recording law. ShotSpotter's approval did not go through
00:30:10.620 the Cambridge City Council.
00:30:13.000 Shotspotter is funded by DHS
00:30:14.760 and undermines Cambridge's status
00:30:16.440 as a sanctuary city
00:30:17.660 and our commitment
00:30:18.660 to not collaborate with ICE.
00:30:20.720 I'm going to keep it brief tonight
00:30:22.180 because you have all heard this many times
00:30:24.660 and I hope you take that into consideration
00:30:26.500 as you move forward.
00:30:28.200 Straight out of Central Casting,
00:30:30.040 right out of Hollywood,
00:30:31.080 you get this sort of bookish looking
00:30:33.260 young white woman
00:30:34.140 wearing big silly glasses,
00:30:36.300 wearing, I can't tell if it's a sweater
00:30:38.280 or a Palestinian keffia.
00:30:40.620 or a sweater that is designed to look like a Palestinian keffia.
00:30:43.400 The DSA members love wearing the Palestine keffia,
00:30:46.640 even though most of them are bookish-looking white people,
00:30:50.980 especially white women.
00:30:51.920 In any case, she comes out here and she says,
00:30:54.960 you know, for all of these reasons,
00:30:56.460 because of the violation of supposed civil liberties,
00:30:59.220 we cannot have police respond to gunshots in black neighborhoods.
00:31:05.720 Okay, so what's the result?
00:31:08.300 The Cambridge City Council agrees with her.
00:31:10.620 Agrees with the DSA. Says, we're going to get rid of the shot spotters. You're right. You're right.
00:31:14.840 We can't have police responding to gunshots in black neighborhoods. What happens? A black guy
00:31:19.220 just got killed. This guy, Xavier Bautista, I think he's about 32 years old. He was walking to work.
00:31:23.420 Just gets shot on July 4th. Public works employee. So as a result of the white liberal lady
00:31:33.660 wearing the vaguely keffiyeh looking garment, coming out and whining about racial equality.
00:31:40.460 As a result of that, an innocent black guy was just killed walking to work on the morning of
00:31:45.060 Independence Day. So now the Cambridge City Council, luckily local government is sometimes
00:31:51.260 more responsive than national government. The Cambridge City Council votes to restore
00:31:56.540 the shot spotter. They're going to reactivate it, but only for 90 days. And then they're
00:32:00.880 going to forget about all the terrible consequences of getting rid of the shot spotter. They're
00:32:04.880 probably going to get rid of it in 90 days. But they say, okay, well, this black guy got killed.
00:32:08.380 And now, so we don't, we basically just don't want to look like racists. When we were having
00:32:12.740 police respond to gunshots in black neighborhoods, we looked, we were called racists by the white
00:32:17.980 lady. So we don't want to do that. We're going to get rid of it. But now because of our stupid
00:32:21.280 policy, the black guy just got killed. We're all going to work. So now we're really going to look
00:32:26.000 racist. So we're going to put it back in, but only for 90 days. And they're just going to be
00:32:28.600 vacillating back and forth and back and forth. This is a pretty simple, just on the actual
00:32:34.800 policy itself. It seems like if you got a lot of gunshots going off and you have a technology
00:32:39.120 that can tell the police when the gunshots are going off, the police, the primary duty of which
00:32:44.200 is to respond to gunshots, and then they can go and maybe help the people and arrest the criminal.
00:32:49.340 That seems like the most basic policy, the sort of thing that we should all be able to agree on,
00:32:52.860 right? But we can't. Well, I can't. But they can't in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
00:32:59.660 Coming from the DSA. Well, the DSA is coming to a legislative office, a governor's mansion,
00:33:06.560 maybe a presidency near you. Because the DSA now owns the Democrat Party. Whether or not the DSA,
00:33:14.480 the formal card-carrying DSA candidates win the primaries, which are unfolding as we speak,
00:33:20.020 it actually doesn't matter. Because the DSA already owns the Democrat Party,
00:33:26.160 and even the moderate candidates who are running against the DSA candidates hold basically all of
00:33:31.380 the positions that the DSA holds. Not a good sign. A reminder that Republicans need to win
00:33:38.740 in the midterms and then in 2028. And the Republicans are looking more and more attractive.
00:33:43.760 You look at the midterm polling, the Republicans should be getting creamed right now for historical
00:33:48.100 reasons, also because the Iran war is unpopular, also because the Iran war is messing up markets
00:33:52.880 because the Strait of Hormuz controls 20% of global oil, along with a lot of other stuff.
00:33:58.680 So that creates inflationary pressure. People are complaining about the cost at the grocery store
00:34:03.080 and the price at the pump and all the rest of it. So the GOP is running relatively quite strongly
00:34:09.140 right now. So what has to happen? The liberal media have to come in and say that the GOP is
00:34:16.700 even more dangerous than the Democrat Party. This is why you're seeing an article from Politico
00:34:22.000 Magazine, Politico, which is establishment left, says, GOP staffers say that the party has a
00:34:30.480 groiper problem. Party veterans are concerned that the pipeline of young Republican talent
00:34:35.300 is veering off course and into terminally online extremism. So what is a groiper for those who are
00:34:42.220 not terminally online in the audience. A Gruyper is most literally a fan and devotee of Nick
00:34:51.120 Fuentes, who is this sort of reactionary political commentator and all-around provocateur.
00:34:58.060 So that's what a Gruyper means, someone who is a devotee of Nick Fuentes, who has received
00:35:03.360 endless media coverage for his very nasty comments on Jews and all sorts of other things,
00:35:08.820 especially Jews. He has a real hobby horse about the Jews. Okay. So is that real? We've seen these
00:35:13.640 reports. 30 to 40% of GOP staffers are groipers. 50% maybe are groipers. And then you're having
00:35:20.000 all of these sort of veteran staffers, some of whom have had their jobs displaced, some of whom
00:35:24.740 have been booted out of the think tanks, who are all whining, saying, these kids are stupid,
00:35:28.040 and they don't know anything, and they're empty. And things were so much better back 20 years ago
00:35:32.380 when it was just the kind of bow tie class of Republicans running the show. And they don't,
00:35:37.180 We just need to go back to the days of Mitt Romney is kind of what they're saying.
00:35:40.280 So now they're accusing the young people of being grippers.
00:35:43.820 Is that true?
00:35:46.880 I think this is a definition problem.
00:35:49.020 I'm not willing to say it's total nonsense.
00:35:51.660 Obviously, Nick Fuentes has had a real run.
00:35:54.040 There's no doubt about that.
00:35:55.640 He has been aided in that largely by the liberal media.
00:35:58.860 The New York Times loves giving that guy giant profiles.
00:36:04.220 The liberal news aggregators, they do everything they can.
00:36:07.180 to push his clips. And he's a very talented communicator. There's no doubt about that.
00:36:12.140 But the left has a real interest in pushing him as the sort of face of the American right.
00:36:20.040 So that's true. He's definitely gained an influence. A lot of people, if you're involved
00:36:23.280 in politics at all, you see his clips come up in your algorithm. No doubt about it.
00:36:27.760 But what does it mean? Do they mean literally that 30 to 50% or more of the young staffers
00:36:36.380 in the GOP, that they hold Nick Fuentes's positions, that they want to entirely decouple
00:36:46.200 from Israel, maybe destroy the Israeli state. Maybe, I don't know, Israel's a little unpopular
00:36:50.500 right now, but I'm skeptical of that. Do they mean, Nick Fuentes says that he wants to go vote
00:36:54.760 for Democrats. He encourages and really demands that all of his followers vote for Democrats in
00:36:59.280 the midterms. Are we saying 50% of the Hill staffers are going to go vote for Democrats in
00:37:03.120 the midterms. I'm a little skeptical of that. Nick Fuentes hates J.D. Vance, hates him with a fiery
00:37:08.880 passion and says terrible things about his wife and says if Vance is the nominee, he's going to
00:37:12.880 vote for a Democrat in 2020. We're saying that the young Hill staffers, the young GOP staffers
00:37:17.700 hate J.D. Vance. Fuentes hates Trump too. They hate Trump. And no, in fact, I know for a fact
00:37:25.460 that is not the case because I spent a lot of time in Washington, D.C. and I talked to a lot
00:37:29.400 of GOP staffers and a lot of people on the Hill and in the White House and all throughout the
00:37:33.580 government. And I just know for a fact that's BS. But so what this really is, is a definition
00:37:38.840 problem. I don't want to totally dismiss it. I am actually quite concerned about the mainstreaming
00:37:44.560 of anti-Semitism in the United States. I actually think it's wrong. Put aside the question of the
00:37:49.640 state of Israel or Zionism and all the debates that pertain to that. I actually am quite concerned
00:37:55.260 about the mainstreaming of just contempt for Jews. I don't like it. It's always fun to make
00:38:02.060 little jokes about every little group or whatever, but I am concerned. Now, the rise of anti-Semitism
00:38:06.960 is without question chiefly coming from the left. It's leftists at Columbia University who are
00:38:14.480 chasing the Jewish students around. It's the DSA. It's the liberal white lady with the big
00:38:20.440 stupid glasses wearing the keffiyeh, who's engaging in the real overt disdain for Jews.
00:38:27.280 Which again, is a sort of different issue than politics about the state of Israel.
00:38:31.640 So I'm really concerned about that, along with all of the other bad isms,
00:38:34.760 not just antisemitism, but all the other isms that are rising up.
00:38:38.080 But let's get to the question that Politico is, does the GOP really have this problem?
00:38:43.080 No, I think it's a definition issue. Because when Politico says that they're
00:38:48.640 Groypers, or when the older staffers are complaining about Groypers, what they really
00:38:52.520 mean is that the young GOP likes Trump and J.D. Vance too much. The older GOP, don't forget,
00:39:01.020 Nick Fuentes hates Trump, hates J.D. Vance. Very overt about that. Doesn't want his followers to
00:39:06.380 vote for Republicans in midterms or in 2028 if Vance is the nominee. The older Republicans
00:39:12.500 Republicans also hate Trump and Vance. Maybe they'll vote for the GOP, but they also hate
00:39:18.400 Trump and Vance. Their problem with the young GOP staffers is not that they hate Trump and Vance,
00:39:24.680 it's that they like Trump and especially Vance too much. Their problem with the young GOP staffers,
00:39:30.160 this is where it really broadens out, is that they're not perfectly in ideological conformity
00:39:36.780 with the GOP of the George W. Bush era. Or they don't just in their sleep mutter the same slogans
00:39:47.320 that you heard from the late 1980s through, I don't know, 2013. That's their problem. Their
00:39:53.840 problem is that the young GOP quotes Aristotle sometimes more than Hayek. Their problem with
00:39:59.660 the young GOP is they talk about the common good more than just radical individualism.
00:40:04.960 Their problem with the young GOP is that they prefer foreign policy restraint to bombing every country in the Middle East.
00:40:12.620 But that's not a Kruper problem.
00:40:15.940 That's just a return in many ways to a more traditional kind of conservatism.
00:40:21.480 The kind of conservatism even that animated Bill Buckley, the founder of the post-war conservative movement.
00:40:27.140 These are not fringe radical ideas.
00:40:29.380 They're the kind of ideas, in fact, that have predominated in political philosophy
00:40:33.200 since antiquity. That in our modern, most radical, most liberal impulses,
00:40:39.820 in recent decades, we have sort of thrown out in favor of liberalism.
00:40:44.900 The retconning of the American Revolution into some kind of radical libertarian adventure,
00:40:49.280 which it simply was not. The idea that the animating spirit of America is liberalism,
00:40:54.580 which it simply was not. Alexei de Tocqueville, the greatest analyst of American democracy,
00:41:01.940 wrote a whole book called, two books actually, called Democracy in America,
00:41:04.740 makes that abundantly clear, as do the writings of our framers and our founders,
00:41:08.360 who had much more in common with Cicero and Aristotle than they do with some modern
00:41:13.020 libertarian pundit. That's really what this is about. It's a sea change. Yeah, no, we don't want
00:41:18.660 the nasty isms. We don't want cruelty. We don't want anti-Semitism or bigotry or misogyny. We
00:41:24.360 don't want any of that. But that's not really what I think the old guard of the GOP is mostly
00:41:30.500 taking issue with. The younger conservatives are recognizing that whatever, we're grateful
00:41:36.920 for the victories of our forebears, but the state of the GOP and the conservative movement has
00:41:43.020 become a little bit weak. And we allow the Democrats to run roughshod over our country
00:41:46.180 and flood our country with foreign nationals and permit the rise of socialism. And so if the
00:41:50.980 strategy of the old guard conservatives has led to this moment. Maybe we need to try another course.
00:41:56.620 That has nothing to do with Nick Fuentes or any badism. That is a serious engagement with
00:42:03.080 conservatism and with the state of the country. Okay. Speaking of young people, a Yale professor
00:42:08.480 just went on Ross Douthat's show. Ross, who is at the New York Times, he's about to go over to 60
00:42:14.960 Minutes now, which is great. We love getting our conservatives on network TV. But a really good
00:42:20.220 interview from Ross here with this Yale professor who insists that children need representatives
00:42:26.960 in politics. This to me, this is another aspect of the kind of inevitable logical power of ideas
00:42:36.760 and the ideas of liberalism. He says, children need representation in politics. And if we're
00:42:41.560 not going to let five-year-olds vote, then we need to give proxy votes to the youngest eligible
00:42:45.520 voters to represent them because their parents certainly cannot. We'll get to that in a moment
00:42:49.820 First, my favorite comment yesterday. It's from Dirty630. It says, first, they came for the
00:42:57.580 billionaires, and I said nothing, for I was not a billionaire. I like this line. Not to sound like
00:43:02.940 an old guard's GOP show myself, just like the party of the rich or whatever. But this is actually
00:43:07.880 an important point when it comes to socialism, and they learned it in New York. It's not that
00:43:13.460 there's no argument whatsoever for a progressive tax rate. It's not that we shouldn't take seriously
00:43:18.780 wealth inequality because the palace is never safe when the cottage is unhappy. It's not that
00:43:23.720 we can't take social solidarity into consideration. We should. But when the libs are in vain against
00:43:30.500 billionaires, when they have their pitchforks and their torches and they're coming to eat the rich,
00:43:35.260 they ain't just going to eat the rich. They're going to eat you too. And the 31,000 gazillionaires
00:43:41.480 that they're targeting are quickly going to become a million people. They're going to dox you and
00:43:44.740 they're going to come for you too. It's not going to work out very well. Okay, speaking of these
00:43:49.120 young people, here we have Yale professor Samuel Moyne, who's a professor at Yale Law School,
00:43:54.160 the single most prestigious law school in the country. He's also a professor at Yale College.
00:43:57.880 He's a history professor. He's even the master of Grace Hopper College. At Yale, they have
00:44:01.480 residential colleges, and the residential colleges have a dean, and they have a social leader,
00:44:06.280 which is called the master of a college traditionally. So this guy is intimately
00:44:09.500 involved in all aspects of Yale, including student life. In fact, he has more to do with the social
00:44:15.560 life of students than any other kind of professor at Yale. And he says that children need representatives
00:44:21.440 in politics because their parents' interests are contrary to their own. I've gotten in some hot
00:44:28.100 water for proposing we consider overweighting the votes of younger people or assigning the youngest
00:44:34.920 eligible voters, proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country.
00:44:40.200 So those are edgier.
00:44:41.460 Why not assign them to those children's parents?
00:44:44.900 Well, because there's a divergence of interest between parents and children.
00:44:49.640 And I think it's likelier that young people, not people who are raising families, will
00:44:57.120 have the best insight into the interests of children.
00:45:02.100 Whereas you, if you were awarded five proxy votes.
00:45:05.860 I think it's absurd to imagine that a 24-year-old recent college graduate has a better assessment of the interests of my own children than I do.
00:45:16.760 And I say this with all due respect to 24-year-old recent college graduates of whom I hope to be the parent of in nine years or so.
00:45:23.980 I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with the interests of their children.
00:45:32.100 And part of our goal, I think, as parents, but also as a society, is trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of their parents as much as we rely on parents to raise them.
00:45:45.780 Cinema. Absolute cinema.
00:45:49.040 This is a perfect representation of a conservative worldview versus a liberal worldview.
00:45:55.200 from two guys who are very intelligent,
00:45:58.400 very, but both live in New Haven, actually.
00:46:00.600 I think Ross is up there too.
00:46:02.540 But same social context,
00:46:04.940 one just seeing the world through the conservative lens,
00:46:09.020 one seeing it through the liberal lens.
00:46:10.140 What does this guy say?
00:46:11.020 First of all, I don't want to,
00:46:13.380 a lot of people are making personal attacks
00:46:14.760 on the Yale professor.
00:46:16.240 And I don't wish to do that.
00:46:18.420 But just looking at this guy saying,
00:46:20.520 he's sitting there, he says,
00:46:21.280 well, you know, what we really have to do
00:46:22.960 is liberate children from their parents
00:46:25.040 their parents have total contrary interests, and they're holding them hostage. And look,
00:46:32.160 what did he say? What did he actually say? He said, we rely on parents to raise the children.
00:46:39.240 We rely on parents to raise the children, but we have to intervene when the parents don't want to
00:46:49.820 let us do what we want to do to the children.
00:46:54.900 Excuse me?
00:46:56.220 Excuse me?
00:46:56.980 You want to say that again?
00:46:59.520 You rely on me to raise my own kids?
00:47:02.460 Is that what you do?
00:47:03.620 Is that what you do?
00:47:04.620 Do you want to come to my house and tell me that?
00:47:06.860 You want to tell me about all the rights
00:47:08.500 that you have to my children?
00:47:12.400 You want to empower some 23-year-old recent college graduate
00:47:18.320 to represent my children's interests
00:47:21.480 because some 23-year-old guy
00:47:23.100 who just graduated college
00:47:24.240 on the other side of the country
00:47:25.800 understands my children better than I do,
00:47:28.620 understands what's good for my children
00:47:29.740 better than I do.
00:47:31.020 You understand?
00:47:32.140 You, Yale professor,
00:47:34.640 understand what's better
00:47:35.480 for my little kids than I do,
00:47:36.560 and you're going to intervene?
00:47:38.600 I don't think so.
00:47:40.000 I don't think that's going to happen.
00:47:42.020 I don't.
00:47:43.300 Oh, man, that really,
00:47:44.960 that spikes my cortisol.
00:47:46.300 That gets my old blood pumping
00:47:47.760 when I hear that. And I actually don't wish, despite his voice and the words that he's saying,
00:47:52.860 I legitimately, I sincerely don't wish to cast any undue aspersions on him.
00:47:59.560 But this doesn't sound good. It sounds bad when you say it like that. And yet, in his defense,
00:48:06.160 that is the inevitable consequence of following liberalism to its conclusion. If liberalism is
00:48:12.160 all about the individual, then yeah, we need to protect the rights of the individual children
00:48:19.840 who are held hostage by the oppressive bonds of their mommy and daddy. That's not my view.
00:48:27.740 But my view does not emphasize the individual. I'm not a liberal. I'm not one of these new
00:48:31.860 neocons, the neo-neocons. I'm not a classical liberal. I'm not a new liberal. I'm not a middle
00:48:36.840 of the road liberal. I'm not a liberal. I'm a conservative. And so I don't think the fundamental
00:48:41.540 unit of society as the individual. I think it's the family. That's the fundamental unit of
00:48:46.020 politics. Politics means multiple people. So you can't, the fundamental unit of politics can't be
00:48:51.420 a single person. That's not politics. It begins with the family. You are not born like falling
00:48:58.080 off a coconut tree. You were born into a family, not merely with rights and entitlements, but with
00:49:02.720 obligations to the family in a community of love. You were born literally as a product of love.
00:49:08.700 and our loves have an order to them the vice president got in big trouble for talking about
00:49:16.940 this was roughly a year ago that there's an order to love you have greater obligations to your
00:49:22.500 children and to your parents than you do to some guy on the other side of the world or some
00:49:26.080 professor sitting in his ivory tower at yale and and liberalism totally undermines that
00:49:33.120 totally reverses that. And we see this borne out in social science, that the libs actually say
00:49:39.540 they care more about people far, far away than they do to those close to them, which is why
00:49:44.020 they're more likely to cut off their family, which is why they're more likely, what do they
00:49:48.420 call it, going no contact, which is why they're more likely to be really nasty to all the people
00:49:53.100 that they actually interact with in their communities and social media than they are
00:49:58.340 to people on the other side of the world. And for conservatives, it's the opposite.
00:50:01.800 We can sometimes seem like we don't care that much about the abstract person on the other side of the world, but we do care about people in our communities visibly much more.
00:50:11.220 That's the difference.
00:50:13.880 And so look, just look at where these ideas end up.
00:50:18.280 Look at feminism ending up at transing the kids.
00:50:21.660 Look at the Democratic Party ending up totally dominated by socialists.
00:50:26.300 Look at liberalism ending up by some of the most intelligent people.
00:50:29.180 I mean, the guy's a Yale law professor.
00:50:30.300 He clearly has a pretty high IQ.
00:50:32.500 He's clearly read a lot of books.
00:50:34.580 Look at where, and he clearly is interested
00:50:37.280 in the education of children,
00:50:38.780 so much so that he's the social head
00:50:40.560 of a residential college undergraduate.
00:50:44.060 Look at where liberalism ends up.
00:50:45.840 It ends up with we need to liberate children
00:50:47.560 from their parents.
00:50:49.100 We can't totally rely on parents
00:50:51.280 to raise their own children.
00:50:52.340 They're hostages, these children of their parents.
00:50:54.720 And ask yourself, do you think that's true?
00:50:57.600 Do you think that's good?
00:50:58.540 does that reflect the society you want to live in? Well, if not, then we can't just rewind the
00:51:05.720 clock to 2015 or 1998. You need an alternative viewpoint. C.S. Lewis puts it very well. He says,
00:51:12.880 well, one, C.S. Lewis in Screwtape actually describes exactly what he's describing. He's
00:51:16.680 saying, the demon speaking to his demon nephew says, hey, if you have to deal with these feelings
00:51:23.240 of love, make sure that your patient directs the feelings of love in the abstract on the other side
00:51:27.760 of the world. Make sure he's really nasty to the people around him. So his love is ultimately not
00:51:32.860 real. He says that. And then C.S. Lewis also points out that the true progressive is the one
00:51:40.980 who, when he's going down the wrong path, is the first one to turn around and walk in the other
00:51:44.240 direction. You need to choose an alternative, an alternative path. Okay. I want to get to the
00:51:51.440 Oxford clip. Am I allowed to get to the, no, I'm not. I'm going to be a tease for two days in a row.
00:51:57.760 but we will get to the Oxford clip at some point because it's big and it pertains to the mass
00:52:03.340 migration debate and Islam and whether or not the kids are all right. But now I'm very excited.
00:52:08.740 I have a very special guest, Professor Richard Werner. Dr. Werner is going to be coming on the
00:52:12.760 show to discuss this shift in economics. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss
00:52:19.720 it. Become a member. Use code Knowles Canada WLAS. Check out for two months free on all annual plans.
00:52:27.760 Thank you.