00:08:28.060and I take away reason and accountability.
00:08:38.180One of the all-time great movie lines, that is Lindsay Clancy's defense. Lindsay Clancy's
00:08:42.840defense and the defense being offered by all these women who are supporting her0.89
00:08:45.360is literally, well, a woman is like a man without reason or accountability.
00:08:50.020So a lot of people are shocked by it. Obviously, the crime itself is shocking,0.92
00:08:53.880but then the reaction is scandalizing people even more. How could all of these women1.00
00:08:59.560defend Lindsay Clancy murdering her kids? And I would just like to remind people,
00:09:03.620because I think this is missing from the Lindsay Clancy discourse.0.96
00:09:08.020You know half of American women overtly defend infanticide, right? You know that? You remember0.99
00:09:16.280that? You remember that half of women in this country, many of whom are not on psych drugs,
00:09:22.500many of whom do not have postpartum depression. Half of women in this country go to the ballot
00:09:28.040box, go on television, go to political rallies holding signs specifically to defend murdering1.00
00:09:35.920their own children. You remember that? We call it abortion now that we use euphemisms like women's
00:09:41.780rights. The fact that women's rights is now a euphemism that refers exclusively to killing0.84
00:09:48.820your own kids should mean that we are not surprised by this. It reminds me of what Mother0.99
00:09:53.760Teresa said at the United Nations. It was 1994 where she said, the greatest threat to peace in
00:09:59.320the world is abortion. Because if a mother can kill her own kids, there's nothing that anyone0.83
00:10:03.600can't do. So none of this should be surprising at all. It wouldn't be surprising to Jack Nicholson's
00:10:10.780character in As Good As It Gets. And it's certainly not surprising to any of us who've
00:10:15.120paid attention to the role of abortion politics in our country. So long as you have legal abortion,
00:10:20.100so long as abortion remains a top political issue, especially for liberal women,
00:10:24.520why should we be surprised by Lindsay Clancy? Lindsay Clancy did the same thing.0.99
00:10:30.800She did the same thing, except it's more evocative. It's more graphic. It's harder to
00:10:36.840deny what Lindsay Clancy did, but it is the same thing. It's just killing your kids.1.00
00:10:40.920So when these crazy liberal women come out, they're the ones who say, I'm pro-liberal.0.99
00:10:44.080I'm pro-LGBT, I'm anti-racist, I'm all the left-wing slogans. When they come out there0.98
00:10:48.140and say, you know, I sympathize with Lindsay Clancy, I see myself in her. Yeah, they're being
00:10:52.460honest. They're being much more honest than most other people in the debate. Okay. Speaking of
00:10:57.680having babies, we will move on from the Lindsay Clancy case, which some are calling the Carmelo
00:11:03.140Anthony case for women. You know, one of those cases where it's like so obvious the person is
00:11:08.100guilty, but based purely on identity politics, you have all these people rallying to the cause
00:11:12.620of the obvious criminal. Now we will turn to a really crazy story down in Texas. A surrogate
00:11:18.700mother was commissioned, was hired to gestate a child for a couple in, I think it was California.
00:11:26.520And then the baby had a defect. The baby wasn't going to come out perfectly according to a genetic
00:11:31.400test. And so the parents, the biological parents, told the surrogate that they hired to murder the
00:11:37.000baby. And the surrogate said no. Now where it stands is in a little bit of limbo. First though,
00:11:42.620I want to tell you about Policy Genius. Go to policygenius.com slash Knowles. A curious thing
00:11:48.200happens when you become a husband and a father. You're really tired all the time. That's one
00:11:52.620thing. The other thing that happens is you discover that everything costs money. Groceries,
00:11:57.500bills, braces, cars, and a dozen other expenses your kids have not yet invented. Providing for
00:12:03.260a family means accepting responsibility for all of it. And those responsibilities do not just
00:12:07.000disappear if something happens to you. That is why life insurance matters. You keep a spare tire
00:12:11.480in the car and smoke detectors in the house, not because you are expecting a disaster,
00:12:15.920but because sensible adults prepare for things they hope never happen.
00:12:19.320If your family depends on your income, protecting them financially is simply part of the job.
00:12:23.780PolicyGenius makes that process straightforward. Their online marketplace lets you compare life
00:12:27.480insurance quotes from top insurers while licensed experts help you understand your options,
00:12:32.260handle the paperwork, and find coverage that fits your family. Because you cannot anticipate every
00:12:36.640expense, you can make sure that your family is prepared for the biggest ones. Go see why thousands
00:12:42.460of customers have given Policy Genius five-star reviews. With Policy Genius, you can find 20-year
00:12:47.220life insurance policy starting just $276 a year for a million dollars in coverage. Go to
00:12:51.460policygenius.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S, compare life insurance quotes from top companies,
00:12:56.220see how much you can save. Policygenius.com slash Knowles. McKenna West is the surrogate
00:13:02.820mothers. This is a woman who rented out her womb to commercial surrogacy. This couple wanted to1.00
00:13:08.840rent a womb. So they hire her, and the father goes into some medical office and commits a0.53
00:13:15.920gravely immoral act. And then they harvest the biological mother's eggs, and then some witch0.78
00:13:21.240doctor scientists mix them together in a Petri dish. And then they implant the baby into this0.96
00:13:26.120woman who is hired for the transaction. And then they're doing medical tests. They say,
00:13:31.180okay, the baby's got a little bit of a heart condition. So then the parents who contracted
00:13:35.920this woman's womb, the parents say, okay, well, let's just kill our baby then. We'll try again,0.99
00:13:41.000but kill this baby. And the surrogate, to her great credit, said, well, I'm not going to do0.99
00:13:46.220that. I'm not going to kill the baby just because he's not going to come out perfect in your
00:13:49.440imagination. And there was this big battle over it. Well, finally, the surrogate won,
00:13:56.080and the surrogate was able to have the baby. The parents in this case are these two people,
00:13:59.860Omar Ahmed and now Sheen Gilkar. Very often, commercial surrogacy is used for homosexuals1.00
00:14:06.020who want to create children to intentionally deprive them of a mother or a father, which has0.96
00:14:10.280an additional unethical component to it, an additional kind of grotesquerie. But in this
00:14:18.320case, it was a man and a woman, and they hired this surrogate. And so they said, okay, you're
00:14:23.140going to have the baby. We can't get you to kill the baby. Okay, fine. Now give us the baby.0.99
00:14:27.520The reason the baby was born in large part was because Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,
00:14:32.200who is now running for Senate against James Tallarico, he intervened.
00:14:35.500He filed a motion asking a Texas state court to order the doctors to help the child,
00:14:41.220not to kill the child, and then also to perform the surgery that would help the child to live
00:14:45.000later on. Now there's a fight over who gets the child because the surrogate mother wants to keep
00:14:51.580the child. And the biological parents who contracted the surrogate's womb and who tried0.95
00:14:57.300to kill the baby, they want the baby back. So the surrogate is saying, look, I'm not going to give0.68
00:15:02.780you this baby back. You tried to kill the baby, and I bet you're not going to give the baby the0.97
00:15:06.200kind of care that he needs. So I'm going to keep the baby so that you don't kill it. And the0.94
00:15:10.960attorney for the biological parents said, that's outrageous. This is our baby. This baby belongs
00:15:17.280to us. And it's absurd to say that the parents would neglect the health of the child. According
00:15:23.080to the parent's attorney, they say that Ken Paxton turned this tragedy, what tragedy?
00:15:29.120It's a comedy. It's a happy story. The tragedy would have been if the parents succeeded at
00:15:33.360getting the surrogate to kill the kid. The comedy is the surrogate was able to prevail and save the
00:15:38.820kid's life. But they're accusing Paxton of political theater. And they say the parents
00:15:44.740always place the health of their baby first. That's the argument from the attorney. These
00:15:50.180biological parents have always placed the health of their baby first. They literally tried to kill
00:15:55.760him. They tried to enforce a contract and bring the weight of the legal system down to force the
00:16:02.980surrogate mother to kill the kid. But they've always placed the health of the baby first.0.95
00:16:08.160That is the most absurd statement maybe that has ever been uttered in a courtroom.
00:16:11.920the attorney then goes on saying that the surrogate's claims for custody are baseless
00:16:17.320they're in violation of multiple court orders out of multiple states so what are we supposed
00:16:23.340to do here obviously these parents are horrifying people who tried to murder their kids you don't
00:16:30.100want the the baby to go back to the biological parents but those are his parents and a lot of
00:16:38.800people are very confused about abortion. A lot of people don't think deeply about abortion. A lot
00:16:42.560of people don't want to think deeply about abortion. So there are plenty of people who
00:16:46.320say that they support abortion who are good parents. There are plenty of people who might0.86
00:16:54.400consider aborting a baby who could end up being relatively good parents, I guess. It's possible
00:17:01.500in this bizarre, confusing, and fallen world. But I sure wouldn't give that baby back to those
00:17:06.720parents. Then on the other hand, though, the baby is the child of those parents. The baby's DNA is
00:17:13.620the DNA of those parents. The baby was created by the intent of those parents. So the surrogate
00:17:20.840doesn't really have a, certainly doesn't have a legal right to the baby. And even the moral right
00:17:25.800that the surrogate would have, that's a little bit unclear. There's not a ton. I mean, the surrogate
00:17:29.740is the only mother that this baby has yet known. But it's not a morally satisfying answer just to
00:17:36.380say, okay, well, now the baby stays with the surrogate because the parents tried to kill
00:17:39.620the baby, even though it was in the contract that the surrogate signed that the parents could try
00:17:43.100to kill the baby if the parents wanted to. The surrogate has done something wrong here too.
00:17:48.600The surrogate, by engaging in commercial surrogacy, by commoditizing human life,
00:17:52.400has done something wrong here too. By participating in a situation where this baby,
00:17:57.660even if things had gone perfectly, this baby was only ever going to know for his entire nine months
00:18:02.460this surrogate mother. And then you're just going to rip that baby away from the only mother he's0.80
00:18:06.660ever known. That's an evil thing to do too. Every part of this is morally fraught, which is why
00:18:15.040as this issue comes more and more into light, as more and more people do it, as there are more and
00:18:19.460more public subsidies for it, as the technology gets better and better, we are beginning to
00:18:24.520grapple finally, seriously with the fact that it's just wrong. The problem with IVF and surrogacy,
00:18:32.300I know many people listening right now have done IVF and surrogacy, and a lot of them have done it because they haven't thought thoroughly over the implications.
00:18:39.140A lot of them have done it because they thought, ah, all the really negative side effects aren't going to happen.
00:31:12.080President Trump was asked about John Ossoff, and he gave us the first new nickname of the 2028 presidential cycle.
00:31:19.920I think it was a pretty effective one.
00:31:22.260hey what do you think about john ossoff sir oh you mean uh wait for it the lights come down
00:31:49.400the audience gets quiet they know something's coming oh uh hold on wait a second you're uh
00:31:55.580you're talking about uh peewee herman and so there it is you know he's been sitting on this one for
00:32:03.260months and it comes out and he says okay john ossoff is peewee herman this is a pretty effective
00:32:07.520nickname it diminishes him also have diminished himself yesterday but it diminishes him it's it's
00:32:13.560pretty sticky. The closest analog is when Trump called Buttigieg Alfred E. Newman, the guy from
00:32:20.180the cover of Mad Magazine. And I think there are a lot of similarities between Buttigieg and John
00:32:25.220Ossoff. But the Pee Wee Herman nickname is stickier. It's actually better branding than
00:32:31.360Alfred E. Newman. Because Alfred E. Newman, I grew up reading Mad Magazine, but a lot of people did
00:32:35.000not. It's kind of like more of an old-timey thing. So that nickname doesn't totally land
00:32:39.140with millennials and Gen Z, but everyone remembers Pee Wee Herman. So the Pee Wee Herman one,
00:32:45.240I think, really sticks. It also, the Pee Wee Herman accusation, it includes, it's got a kind
00:32:51.480of a pervy connotation to it. And so it has this double effect. One, it fits him, it diminishes him,
00:32:58.380it rings true. But then it's got this kind of pervy connotation, which Ossoff lived up to.
00:33:05.720This was a great moment to release this nickname because Ossoff comes out there and he, in an accusation, accidentally seems to make a confession.
00:33:14.160Says, yeah, you know, you see a woman working for a man in politics, you know that guy's sleeping with her.
00:33:18.920Which, if I were an enterprising young reporter, I would probably start calling up John Ossoff's female staff, present and past.
00:33:26.520If John Ossoff is just assuming that men in politics sleep with their young female staffers, that seems like it could be a confession.
00:33:35.000I'm not accusing John Ossoff of anything.
00:38:04.020So, Roger, there's a lot I want to talk to you about.
00:38:07.300First off the bat, Wall Street Journal runs this article that the kids are Nixon maxing.
00:38:13.260so uh nixon he's had a tough political legacy not just on the left but on the right a lot of people
00:38:20.740they don't want to focus on nixon they want to they want to focus on reagan you know reagan was
00:38:24.260sunnier he was brighter and nixon we just kind of want to forget about him now you worked for
00:38:29.180nixon and reagan and trump you helped convince trump to run for president so you've got a long
00:38:34.780record with all these guys but i have long felt that richard nixon got short shrift i feel the
00:38:41.340left never forgave him for nailing Alger Hiss, for being totally right about a communist at the top
00:38:45.540of the State Department. I think he was a great man. I think his story is inspirational. I think
00:38:50.560he was run out by the deep state. And I think you're seeing a little bit of revision to the
00:38:55.220story of Richard Nixon. Why is it happening now? Well, it's an excellent question. This is something
00:39:01.920I've been trying to achieve for 30 years. President Trump has asked me numerous times,
00:39:07.560why did Nixon quit? And the answer is because there was no internet in 1973, 1972 and three.
00:39:16.160You had a monolithic media, three major news networks. You didn't really have national
00:39:22.620newspapers yet, but you did have very influential news magazines, Newsweek, Time, Life, Look, and so
00:39:29.220on. They were universally hostile to Nixon. And Nixon's great crime, of course, was when he was
00:39:36.020elected, they assumed he was the ultimate hardliner. Nixon turned out to be a peacemaker.
00:39:42.020He ended the war in Vietnam ahead of the schedule that the Pentagon wanted. He reached a strategic
00:39:48.960arms limitation with the Soviets, something the Pentagon was opposed to. He opened the door to
00:39:54.520China at a time that China was a dirt poor backwards agrarian society where a few people0.96
00:40:01.820had indoor plumbing and the rural areas had no electricity. It isn't until 30 years later,0.77
00:40:08.520when Bill Clinton gives China most favored nation trading status, then extended by George W. Bush,0.90
00:40:16.040that China becomes the dangerous nuclear and economic superpower that they are today.0.91
00:40:22.640Nixon very skillfully played the Chinese off against the Russians to secure that0.94
00:40:27.680strategic arms limitation agreement, which probably saved the American people billions
00:40:32.900of dollars over time. Nixon was the first president to cut defense spending during his
00:40:40.500time in office. And there is no question that this revision of Nixon, both the reexamination
00:40:48.580of Watergate and the result and reexamination of his presidency, which is an extraordinarily
00:40:54.640consequential presidency is really kicked off by J.D. Vance. When J.D. Vance goes to the Nixon
00:41:01.200library and says accurately that Richard Nixon was taken down by the same deep state actors who
00:41:09.060tried to take Donald Trump down, he kicks off this phenomena of Nixon maxing, aided by the
00:41:16.140young guys at the Nixon Foundation who very skillfully use social media memes and short
00:41:23.380videos on YouTube, on Instagram, on X, and so on, to get people to take a second look at Richard
00:41:31.360Nixon, something I've been trying to do for 30 years. I've written two books on this,
00:41:35.640Nixon Secrets, which is the untold story of the rise and fall Watergate and the Pardons,
00:41:42.980and also Tricky Dick, the rise and fall and rise of Richard M. Nixon. I've been pounding on this
00:41:48.880door for 30 years, but thanks to J.D. Vance, thanks to you, Michael, thanks to Chris Ruffo,
00:41:55.040we're finally getting the re-examination that Richard Nixon and his presidency deserve.
00:42:00.820Now, the one thing you left out there, Roger, well, one thing is that you're now in Matt Walsh's,
00:42:06.240my friend's new real history show, about Watergate, about Nixon. But even more important
00:42:12.160than that, people can go watch that up on Daily Wire, even more important than that,
00:42:16.160you do have a tattoo of Richard Nixon on your back.
00:42:18.880I do. But it's not a political statement. What it is, is a reminder. You can see in the mirror every morning that in life, when you get knocked down, when you suffer defeats, when you're disappointed, when you're discouraged, when you want to give up, that's the time you have to dust yourself off, get up off the mat and get back in the fight.
00:42:40.420So the story of Nixon is a story of persistence. It's a story of resilience. It's it's it's an American story. And, you know, I thought about the possibility at some point of adding Goldwater, Reagan and Trump to have kind of a Mount Rushmore effect on my back.
00:42:59.600But it would be pretty painful, to be honest.
00:46:06.000I do. But let's recognize that was President Reagan when he was clearing brush at his ranch in the sky outside of Santa Barbara, California.
00:46:18.340And the whole key to being well-dressed is being dressed appropriately for the activity in which you're about to engage.
00:46:25.900So, in other words, don't wear workout clothes to a five-star restaurant. Don't wear a three-piece suit to a bowling alley.
00:46:32.560Don't wear workout clothes when you're going to the mall.
00:46:36.000So Reagan is dressed perfectly appropriately for clearing brush.
00:47:51.340And to your point on the roped shoulder, you know, I love this is another little tidbit for the young trad men who want to dress a little better in the audience.0.89
00:47:58.940One of the great American inventions is the sack suit.
00:48:02.740This was pioneered by places like J Press, Brooks Brothers, and that has a softer shoulder.
00:48:09.700It's a little, a friend of mine described it as the kind of suit that's built for a potato-shaped man.
00:50:37.120There's that wonderful picture of him walking along the beach in Oxford shoes and a tie and his slacks.
00:50:44.760And yes, you almost think he went swimming in a three-piece suit.
00:50:50.240Yeah, no, he was wearing hush puppies on the beach.
00:50:52.860You know, President Nixon walked my wife and I through that little home where he was born, where he lived on the grounds of the Nixon Library.
00:51:02.660He said, you know, this is where I slept. This is where my brother slept. This is where they're going to lay me to rest. It is one of the most incredible memories that I have.
00:51:12.300He was a great man. And I'm glad now, thanks to you and J.D. Vance and Chris Ruffo and hopefully a little bit myself, people are reexaminating his presidency, the end of the Vietnam War, the passage of a strategic arms limitation, the desegregation of the public schools,
00:51:31.100the saving of Israel against the total annihilation in the 1973 Yom Kippur War,
00:51:38.360the war on cancer, the 18-year-old vote, the end of the military draft. This list goes on and on.
00:51:45.580The Environmental Protection Agency at a time that we had no environmental protection. Yeah,
00:51:51.260today, I think he would look at it and realize that we're overregulated, but that's not how it
00:51:55.960began. He was taken down by a cabal because he was going to reorganize the government and he was
00:52:01.920going to take power away from the deep state. And that is the great story of the documentary that
00:52:08.260your colleague Matt Walsh has put together. It's really amazing. Folks have to see it.
00:52:13.060Nobody has done more to bring about the Nixon maxing than Roger Stone. That is a simple fact
00:52:18.700of history. And so everyone needs to go check out Matt's new show on it, Real History.