The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 637 - The “Country Over” Party

00:00:00.000 The handful of disgruntled Republicans who are still making the case for Biden over Trump

00:00:06.280 have one last plea. They want you to vote for country over party.

00:00:13.560 I've been voting since 1984 when I proudly cast my first ballot for Ronald Reagan.

00:00:18.920 I've been a conservative Republican my entire life. I've never before voted for a Democrat

00:00:23.900 for president. But this year, principle and conscience require me to do just that.

00:00:28.960 I'm voting for Joe Biden. When you fill out your own ballot, ask yourself who will best restore

00:00:34.860 decency and civility to the White House? Who can I be proud to tell my children and grandchildren

00:00:39.940 I voted for? My fellow Republicans, it's not easy going against the head of our party.

00:00:45.440 Believe me, I know. But I also know that character, moral leadership, and integrity are values that

00:00:51.500 we cannot put aside when we cast our vote for president. If we hold on to these values,

00:00:56.200 our country will be better for it. And so will our party. And please, don't let anyone tell you

00:01:01.900 that by casting your vote for Joe Biden, you are somehow not being conservative. This year,

00:01:06.940 the most conservative thing you can do is to put country over party. That's what I'm doing.

00:01:12.560 I hope you'll join me. 1.00

00:01:14.180 Country over party, one of the stupidest, most meaningless platitudes in our national discourse. 0.98

00:01:21.000 You join a political party, you support a political party because you believe it will help the country. 1.00

00:01:25.100 Right. Jeff Flake and all of the seven other never Trump Republicans are not putting country over

00:01:31.080 party. They're just switching parties because they are libs. And Joe Biden does not have more

00:01:36.900 integrity, more moral leadership, more character than Donald Trump. Actually, he has much, much less.

00:01:41.800 And if Biden wins, we are going to have a country over party. It's going to be the country over party

00:01:46.520 because the country is going to be over. For goodness sakes. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael

00:01:50.860 Knowles show. I'm Joe Biden and I'm running in the country over party. That's right. You have

00:02:02.720 enough of this country? Well, then vote for me because then it'll be over. So enjoy, enjoy. That's

00:02:07.440 what I promise you that he's probably going to flip flop on that too. We, I guess we can hope

00:02:11.360 my favorite comment from yesterday from Scott O'Brien, Schumer generations of yet unborn will

00:02:17.280 suffer the consequences of this nomination conservatives, but they will be born. This

00:02:21.980 is true. It is better to be born than not to be born. It's, it's so creepy. I have friends, I kid you

00:02:28.120 not, who are dressing their daughters up as a Ruth Ginsburg for Halloween. This obviously, what is Ruth

00:02:39.700 Ginsburg most famous for in her judicial philosophy? Not letting those little children, better to let 1.00

00:02:47.140 the, to not in the womb and not good. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Like

00:02:51.220 the statement country over party. You know, I'm, I'm being a little hyperbolic, I guess, when I say

00:02:58.640 that the country will be over if Joe Biden wins, but in some ways I'm not, I'm not being earnest enough

00:03:05.000 because this has been building for a long time. I don't think Joe Biden started the problem, but he is a

00:03:08.840 symptom of the problem, which is losing our constitutional government. This is, this goes

00:03:13.580 back at least to Woodrow Wilson probably goes back even further than that. We're losing so much of our

00:03:18.360 political control in this country. And you see, uh, social violence beginning. I mean, you're seeing

00:03:24.500 cities lighting on fire. You're seeing a lot of unrest as they call it around the country. So you got

00:03:30.860 to be prepared. Now is a better time than ever to be prepared with long-term nutritional food options.

00:03:35.940 Ready Wise has many options, such as emergency meals, freeze dried fruits and vegetables for

00:03:41.380 convenient on the go nutrition, new adventure meals for hiking, camping, and other outdoor

00:03:46.300 activities. Obviously I don't do a whole lot of hiking, camping, and other outdoor activities, but

00:03:51.140 they are very delicious. If you go out there, you can enjoy those adventure meals. When government

00:03:55.460 resources are strained, it can be days, if not weeks before fresh food is available. Don't put

00:04:00.980 yourself in a situation when you need food during an emergency. Prepare today. Ready Wise uses the

00:04:06.620 finest ingredients, the latest food prep technology to ensure optimal taste and freshness. Meals are

00:04:12.340 packed into durable, long lasting pouches designed to keep food fresh for up to 25 years, which, you

00:04:18.420 know, should last a pretty long time. Plus it tastes great. This week, my listeners can get free

00:04:22.900 shipping at readywise.com when entering Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S, at checkout, or by calling 855-453-2945.

00:04:30.300 Ready Wise has a 90 day, no questions asked return policy. So there's no risk taking the

00:04:35.420 initiative to get yourself and your family prepared today. It is R-E-A-D-Y-W-I-S-E.com,

00:04:41.080 promo code Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to get free shipping. They do this all the time, this country

00:04:47.660 over party thing. Every election, there is some number of disgruntled Republicans who, for whatever

00:04:54.880 reason, they can't get a job as campaign strategists. That's what happened with the Lincoln

00:04:59.600 Project, or they got booted out of the Senate because they were libs and the more conservative

00:05:04.220 guy exposed them like Jeff Flake, or whatever reason. They come out and they say, listen,

00:05:09.480 I'm a Republican, I'm a conservative Republican, but I can't vote for this man. I, not him. I mean,

00:05:15.200 this, this goes back at least to the Barry Goldwater campaign.

00:05:18.700 I don't know just why they wanted to call this a confession. I, I certainly don't feel

00:05:24.040 guilty about being a Republican. I've always been a Republican. My father is, his father

00:05:28.900 was, the whole family is a Republican family. I voted for Dwight Eisenhower the first time

00:05:35.180 I ever voted. I voted for Nixon the last time. But when we come to Senator Goldwater, now it seems

00:05:44.700 to me we're up against a, a very different kind of a man. This man scares me. Now maybe

00:05:53.300 I'm wrong. A friend of mine has said to me, listen, just because a man sounds a little

00:05:59.880 irresponsible during a campaign doesn't mean he's going to act irresponsibly. You know

00:06:03.680 that theory that the White House makes the man. I don't buy that.

00:06:08.180 I don't buy that. No, no. I, I'm a Republican. I'm a conservative Republican, but I hate those

00:06:14.540 Republican candidates. Every, every year, something like this crops up. So what, what is the threat

00:06:21.640 that we're facing? Joe Biden has said, and the Democrats who are behind him have said, they

00:06:26.820 want to add two new states to the country. That alone takes the Republicans out as a national

00:06:31.940 governing party. They say they want to pack the courts or term limit the justices on the

00:06:37.460 court and put them on lower courts so that you can add new, new judges to the court.

00:06:41.060 That would destroy any conservative judicial movement. If there is one at all, they have

00:06:46.660 said they want to curtail the first amendment. They've said they want to curtail the second

00:06:49.640 amendment. They have said they want to upend the energy industry. There are so many, I mean,

00:06:55.760 I'm not even discussing, you know, the tax hikes or something like that. I'm talking about

00:07:00.180 the structural damage that even just this election could do, particularly if the Democrats win

00:07:05.280 the House and the Senate as well. They are proposing things that would eliminate the Republicans

00:07:10.760 as a governing party. So if you support your country and you're a conservative, probably

00:07:17.140 that means you don't vote for the leftist party. You vote for the conservative party, which

00:07:21.800 is the Republican party. And if you do that, if you really believe those things and you want

00:07:26.900 to support your country, there is no argument to voting for Joe Biden. You cannot do it because

00:07:33.840 of the mean tweets. Joe Biden is way crueler than Donald Trump. Joe Biden perpetually refuses

00:07:39.560 to acknowledge two of his grandchildren because he's embarrassed by them. And so he won't acknowledge

00:07:44.460 them even when he's corrected about it. Donald Trump's a liar. Joe Biden's been lying since 1.00

00:07:48.360 the eighties. Joe Biden had to drop out of the 1988 presidential race because he was a liar 0.96

00:07:52.460 and a plagiarist. And even the mainstream media made him drop out. Donald Trump is corrupt. 0.81

00:07:57.460 How is he corrupt? Joe Biden has been corrupt since he got on the Senate, got into the Senate 1.00

00:08:04.100 in 1973. Right away, he got his brother, Jim Biden's sweetheart deals. When he got a chair

00:08:09.720 on the Senate banking committee, he would call up the bankers when the bankers would pressure

00:08:13.420 Jim Biden to pay. He would also let Jim Biden peddle influence in the 1990s. He would also

00:08:18.640 let his brother get a one and a half billion dollar contract for construction in Iraq when Joe

00:08:23.580 Biden was, uh, was a senator and later than the vice president, which is when the contract went

00:08:29.540 through during the Iraq war. Jim Biden didn't know anything about construction or about Iraq.

00:08:34.240 Obviously we've seen the, the evidence of corruption with Hunter Biden. Talk about corruption.

00:08:39.020 Joe Biden makes Donald Trump look like a school child. And then talk about moral leadership. Joe Biden

00:08:44.600 sues nuns and he thinks you ought to have abortion on demand paid for by taxpayers. And he believes 0.99

00:08:51.700 that we ought to send pallets of cash to America's enemies. And he believes we shouldn't respect our

00:08:56.960 commitments to our allies. And he wants to take our property. That's moral leadership. Or you got the

00:09:04.200 other guy who does what he says he's going to do and has a good moral vision. It's not even close.

00:09:08.040 Just look at the consequences around the country. We had more riots in Philly last night. Country over

00:09:12.500 party. You had rioters tagging a bank of America with graffiti that read death to America.

00:09:21.700 Right there. Death to America. These are BLM rioters. Kind of ironic because there's one guy in the bank 1.00

00:09:31.620 who is a black guy and he seems like a little, a little worried about these fellows out here who 0.76

00:09:35.520 are causing all the trouble. Setting fires, smashing windows, death to America though. 0.99

00:09:41.900 How many of those rioters do you think are voting for Donald Trump? How many do you think are voting

00:09:47.080 for Joe Biden? Jeff Flake is on the same side as the people who are spray painting death to America

00:09:52.940 on buildings and setting cities on fire. Country over party. I don't think so, Buster. Beverly Hills

00:09:59.300 right now is on full alert. Why is Beverly Hills on full alert? It's pretty nice area. Usually beautiful

00:10:05.880 weather, pleasant people. Why is it on full alert? Because they are worried that between Halloween and

00:10:12.760 election day, there could be more riots. They are shutting down Rodeo drive, the most famous,

00:10:18.680 the most famous roadway in Beverly Hills on election night because they are afraid that leftists,

00:10:24.980 not conservatives, leftists will burn the place to the ground if they don't get their way.

00:10:30.600 When you side with them, are you choosing country over party? No, you're choosing a banana republic.

00:10:35.820 You're choosing a tin pot dictatorship over your country when you side with these left wingers.

00:10:43.240 And that's just the tip of the iceberg because there's an entire edifice led by big tech that

00:10:49.860 sits underneath this, that is pushing this establishment left wing view. You know, it gets

00:10:57.000 people really agitated. Sometimes you need to relax and I would recommend Thompson Cigars to relax.

00:11:01.000 With over a century in the business, these guys know their stuff. I have been

00:11:05.180 a customer of Thompson Cigars for half of my life. I still have the first box of cigars that my

00:11:12.020 mother bought me from Thompson when I was 16 years old for Christmas. I love these guys. They've got

00:11:16.000 the best prices on the biggest brands in the business. They've got my father. They've got

00:11:21.020 Monte Cristo. They've got Cohiba. They've got La Flor Dominicana. They've got Oliva. They got everything

00:11:26.360 that you want. There are over 12,000 different cigar options available with new in-demand brands added

00:11:31.260 weekly. Looking to try new rare top rated blends, but you don't want to splurge on the boxes. Well,

00:11:36.620 this is where Thompson really, really shines. They've got the Thompson Cigar Tour, a smattering

00:11:41.300 of five different blends delivered to your doorstep each month. They also have insane cigar deals via

00:11:47.380 email daily with personalized email preference options. You sign up to receive them all or just

00:11:51.980 the days you feel like it. They give you the choice and they are the number one choice for premium

00:11:56.320 cigars in the USA because they deliver the very best customer experience. For a limited time,

00:12:01.360 Thompson is offering 15% off orders over 75 bucks or 20% off orders over 99 bucks. To take advantage of

00:12:07.360 these incredible savings, you simply go to ThompsonCigar.com and use promo code Knowles,

00:12:11.780 K-N-W-L-E-S, when you are ready to check out. That is T-H-O-M-P-S-O-N, Cigar.com. Use promo code

00:12:21.040 Knowles. Sometimes people ask me for recommendations. I'll give you my top shelf recommendation for this week

00:12:25.460 is the Armada Man of War. And then my lower, more, you know, budget priced recommendation

00:12:31.700 would be the Illusione Rothschildes. I don't even know quite how to pronounce it, but it's that

00:12:36.460 little tiny Illusione. It's really great. I've been smoking them all week. Go check it out.

00:12:39.700 ThompsonCigar.com. Promo code Knowles. Yesterday, the big tech giants testified before the Senate.

00:12:48.000 And we knew this was going to happen. It's because Twitter was suppressing the New York Post story

00:12:52.040 that was damaging on Joe Biden. It's because Facebook was suppressing that as well. So they

00:12:57.060 get hauled before the Senate. I was discussing the logistics of this last week with Senator

00:13:02.340 Cruz on our show Verdict. And he gave me a little behind the scenes, which is there were two options

00:13:06.560 here. Either the big tech guys could have testified before the Commerce Committee or before the

00:13:11.660 Judiciary Committee. Two different issues. And Senator Cruz was saying he hoped that it was before

00:13:16.040 the Judiciary Committee because the Judiciary Committee is a little tougher and they've got

00:13:19.640 more bulldog senators on the panel. And they thought they could have gotten more information.

00:13:24.860 Senator Cruz also said he hoped that they would testify in person. Unfortunately,

00:13:28.580 neither of those things happened. Whoever was calling the shots back there gave the big tech

00:13:32.780 guys a little bit of an out. They were before the relatively meeker Commerce Committee and they got

00:13:36.560 to do it out of state. They got to do it virtually. So it reduced the virality and the tension of these

00:13:44.260 moments. That's too bad. I hope they get hauled before the Senate again and have to

00:13:49.540 testify, you know, in person and before the Judiciary Committee. Still, we got some good

00:13:54.560 hits in. Still, we got some good information. The best hits did come from Cruz. I don't say

00:13:58.540 that just because I'm friends with the guy and I host a podcast with him. He shines in these moments

00:14:04.200 and he cut to the heart of the issue. He had Jack Dorsey, this creepy, long bearded, nose ring

00:14:11.280 wearing, hipster CEO of Twitter who tried to kill the New York Post Hunter Biden story. He had him in

00:14:17.920 front of him and he said, Jack, does Twitter influence the political elections? Very simple

00:14:26.260 question. Does Twitter influence the elections? Mr. Dorsey, does Twitter have the ability to influence

00:14:35.040 elections? No. You don't believe Twitter has any ability to influence elections? No, we are one part

00:14:45.260 of a spectrum of communication channels that people have. So you're testified to this committee right

00:14:50.980 now that that Twitter, when it silences people, when it censors people, when it blocks political

00:14:55.600 speech, that has no impact on elections? People people have choice of other communication channels

00:15:01.900 with which not if they don't hear information. If you don't think you have the power to influence

00:15:07.020 elections, why do you block anything? Well, we have policies that are focused on making sure that

00:15:14.260 more voices on the platform are possible. We see a lot of abuse and harassment, which ends up silencing

00:15:19.240 people and having them leave from the platform. You can tell me what a bogus non-answer Jack gives to

00:15:25.540 that question. You can really see how Cruz is a master at this kind of questioning. I remember one time

00:15:31.440 he was grilling Zuckerberg on the Hill and you saw Cruz shine as a prosecutor here. You saw him

00:15:39.160 solicitor general in his previous life before the Senate. And you could see that shine. He lured

00:15:46.140 Zuckerberg in. I don't remember the question. So Mark, what color is the sky? Well, the sky is blue,

00:15:53.460 Senator. Yeah. And Mark, two plus two. What does that equal? Well, that equals four, Senator. Why did

00:16:00.420 Palmer Luckey get fired? And he just, he off-foots it a little bit. Palmer Luckey was a, ostensibly a

00:16:07.080 political firing because he was conservative. And Zuckerberg didn't have an answer for it. Same

00:16:12.100 thing here. He goes, does Twitter influence the elections? No, man. Jack Dorsey is this like

00:16:17.580 ridiculous hipster. No, not at all, man. It doesn't influence the elections at all. No, it has no, no 0.99

00:16:23.920 political effect. Okay. Then why do you suppress the political stories? Oh, whoops. Yeah. I did just

00:16:31.500 admit that I did that. Uh, we suppress people's voices so you can hear them better. And whatever

00:16:37.420 non-answer that was then, because that was not sufficient. Cruz ripped Dorsey. Mr. Dorsey,

00:16:45.160 who the hell elected you and put you in charge of what the media are allowed to report and what the 0.72

00:16:52.080 American people are allowed to hear? And why do you persist in behaving as a democratic super PAC

00:16:58.900 silencing views to the contrary of your political beliefs? Let's give, uh, Mr. Dorsey, uh, uh, a few

00:17:06.500 seconds to answer that. And then we'll have to conclude this, this, um, segment. Well, we're,

00:17:12.880 we're not doing that. Uh, and this is why I opened, um, this hearing with calls for more

00:17:19.260 transparency. We realize we need to earn trust more. We realize that more accountability is

00:17:24.480 needed to show our intentions and to show the outcomes. Um, so I, I hear the concerns and

00:17:29.800 acknowledge them, but when we want to fix it with more transparency, but he's obviously not hearing

00:17:35.880 the concerns. He's not answering the questions. Cruz raises a great point. There are still like

00:17:40.560 three bizarro freshman year libertarians who say, well, guys, come on. Twitter is a private company.

00:17:46.880 Google's a private company. First of all, like not really. And second of all, they, they control the

00:17:52.540 flow of information. They control the public sphere, which by the way, they have gained access

00:17:57.680 to by fraud. They told people they were getting one product and they actually gave them another.

00:18:02.840 They got legal liability protection through section 230 because they pretended to be one product and

00:18:07.940 actually they were another. This is a question about, you know, the individual operations of these

00:18:16.380 businesses or self-government. And by the way, no grown man should have a nose ring. I know this

00:18:21.920 seems tangential. We should pass a constitutional amendment in this country that grown men are not 1.00

00:18:27.640 permitted to wear nose rings. It is a national humiliation, particularly when coupled with that

00:18:32.820 beard, which should land Jack Dorsey on the no-fly list. It wasn't only Senator Cruz who was going after

00:18:39.200 him. Mike Lee did a great job too. Mike Lee, you know, was pretty, pretty hardcore guys,

00:18:44.260 brilliant in constitutional law. Mike Lee first goes after Mark Zuckerberg. And it was another one

00:18:52.880 of these simple questions that they couldn't answer. We know that many conservatives have

00:18:55.780 been censored. We know a lot of conservative stories have been censored. So Lee says, okay,

00:19:00.080 you guys say it's not a partisan issue. It's not an ideological issue. Can you name me one lib

00:19:05.520 that's been censored on your platforms?

00:19:07.260 Can you name for me one high profile person or entity from a liberal ideology who you have censored

00:19:15.760 and what particular action you took?

00:19:19.780 Senator, I can get you a list of some more of this, but there are certainly many examples that

00:19:26.740 your Democratic colleagues object to when, you know, a fact checker might label something as false

00:19:33.780 that they disagree with or they're not able to.

00:19:37.540 I get that. I get that. I just want to be clear. I'm just asking you if you can name for me one

00:19:43.540 high profile liberal person or company who you've censored. I understand that you're saying that

00:19:49.600 there are complaints on both sides, but I just, I just want one name of one person or one entity.

00:19:58.880 Senator, I need to, I need to think about it and get you more of a list.

00:20:03.580 Oh my gosh. It's so embarrassing. Zuckerberg usually is a little quicker on his feet than this.

00:20:09.360 He goes, well, look, we have a list. We can get you more of a list. I guess, no, I don't need,

00:20:12.540 you didn't get me, you didn't give me anything. So you, you're not giving me more of it. You're

00:20:16.300 giving me anything at all, but it's okay, Mark, you don't need to give me the full list.

00:20:19.940 Just name like one guy, just one. Cause I could name a ton of conservatives. Name one guy.

00:20:25.080 Uh, uh, uh, I don't know. So then Lee moves on. He goes, okay, Jack Dorsey, same question to you.

00:20:30.540 Name me one liberal who has been censored on your platform.

00:20:35.040 What about you, Mr. Dorsey?

00:20:36.800 Well, we, we can, um, give a more exhaustive list. Um, but again, we don't have an understanding

00:20:42.340 of political ideas of our accounts, but I'm not asking for an exhaustive list. I'm asking for a

00:20:47.800 single example. One, one individual, one entity, anyone. We've, we've, we've taken action on tweets

00:20:53.460 from members of the house for election misinformation. Can you identify any example?

00:20:58.540 Yes. But two, two democratic, um, two, two democratic, uh, Congress people on election. 0.93

00:21:07.000 I'll get those, those names too. 1.00

00:21:09.900 Pathetic, pathetic. Dorsey thought that he, like he was anticipating this question or he's just 1.00

00:21:15.160 making it up on the spot. But assuming someone briefed him and said, look, there actually,

00:21:18.320 there were a couple of times you took down a couple of tweets from Democrats. Make sure you

00:21:20.820 have that in your head. No, no. We had some liberals. Yeah. What are their name? Well, first he tries to

00:21:26.040 say, we're unaware of the ideological views of our users. Like, Oh, really? Are you, you're unaware

00:21:31.340 of what Donald Trump thinks versus what AOC thinks. But then he contradicts himself and he says, no,

00:21:35.480 well we, yeah, no, we took down some liberals. Yeah. What, who? A couple Democrats. Yeah. What,

00:21:40.860 where were they? Uh, their congressmen. Yeah. What are their names? Uh, yeah, no, my boyfriend,

00:21:47.400 he lives in Canada. He lives. Uh, no, you can't meet him guys because he lives in Canada. I'm starting to

00:21:51.900 think he doesn't exist. If our country is being led by that hipster jihadi over there, 1.00

00:21:56.420 then something tells me that the state of the union is not particularly strong at this moment.

00:22:00.920 You know what that means? Always a good time to diversify your investments into gold,

00:22:04.760 something new for you. And I think very useful. The price of gold has been skyrocketing lately,

00:22:11.640 but it's difficult to buy gold sometimes because gold is expensive. We don't always have like

00:22:15.740 thousands of dollars lying around to go buy bars of gold. Well, luckily now there is a new company

00:22:21.380 called Acre, which allows you to buy gold for as little as $30 a month. How does that work? We

00:22:27.300 know that gold costs more than $30. How do you do it? You subscribe to gold bars for as little as $30

00:22:32.520 a month. Then you pay each month. And once your gold stash reaches the price of their gold bars,

00:22:38.480 good, you're paid off. They discreetly ship Acre gold to your house. Acre lets you invest in physical

00:22:44.640 gold without it coming out of pocket all at once because that's a lot of money. Acre keeps you updated

00:22:50.060 on your gold stash every month and ships once you reach the price threshold. With Acre, taking

00:22:55.420 physical delivery of your gold means it is safe and sound in your hands. Acre ships your gold

00:23:00.240 directly and most importantly, discreetly to your door. Acre just recently introduced their new $100

00:23:04.660 per month subscription for their five gram gold bar. I have invested in precious metals. I have enjoyed

00:23:10.360 doing so. Visit getacregold.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. Start investing in physical gold today.

00:23:16.360 Make sure you go to this URL because Acre is giving away a gold bar. To qualify for that giveaway,

00:23:21.000 tweet or post why you should be the recipient and mention at get underscore Acre. Again, that is

00:23:27.240 getacregold.com slash Knowles. Thank you, Acre Gold, for supporting the show. All right. I've pretty much

00:23:34.500 had it with these tech guys, but there was one last moment that I think is worth pointing out.

00:23:39.260 Marsha Blackburn, my new senator. I'm leaving California. I'm moving to Tennessee. I'm very

00:23:45.220 pleased to be trading Kamala Harris for Marsha Blackburn. Marsha Blackburn does a great job 0.96

00:23:49.360 and she did an especially great job yesterday during these hearings because she caught Jack

00:23:55.260 Dorsey in a lie. Jack Dorsey says that he doesn't censor world leaders. Why did he bring this up?

00:24:00.380 Because you've got tweets from the grand poobah of Iran up, of the, the Ayatollah that are vile, 0.99

00:24:08.680 vicious tweets and he doesn't take those down. So that's the rule, right? You're going to take down

00:24:13.800 the New York Post, but you're going to leave up the Ayatollah of Iran because you don't censor

00:24:18.020 world leaders. Problem is Jack has censored Trump. So Mr. Dorsey, is Donald Trump a world's leader?

00:24:27.780 Yes. Okay. So it would be important for world leaders to have access to your platform, correct?

00:24:36.260 Correct. And so why did you deny that platform via censorship to the U.S. president?

00:24:43.800 We haven't censored the U.S. president. Oh, yes, you have. How many posts from Iran's terrorist 1.00

00:24:50.300 Ayatollah have you censored? How many posts from Vladimir Putin have you censored?

00:24:57.140 We have, we have labeled tweets of world leaders. We have a policy around not taking down the content,

00:25:03.540 but simply adding more context around it. Okay. And the U.S. president, you have censored

00:25:09.080 65 times. Just to be clear, we have not censored the president. We have not taken the tweets down

00:25:16.960 that you're referencing. They have more context than a label applied to them. And we do the same

00:25:22.300 for leaders around the world. So everything about that is a lie. He censored Trump. He censored Trump

00:25:27.880 multiple times. Now what he's saying is, no, all I did was block out what he tweeted and then make you

00:25:33.480 click through to a separate page so that you could see what he read. That's not censorship.

00:25:39.160 Yes, it is. That is censorship. You don't have to formally, permanently delete something to censor

00:25:44.460 it. If you slap a big label over it such that you can't read it until you click through to another

00:25:49.060 page, that is censorship. And he has done that to Trump. Then he tries to pretend that he's done

00:25:54.260 that to the other world leaders. Maybe he has in some isolated cases, but not all the time,

00:25:59.340 not even in the most egregious examples. Iran's leader denies that the Holocaust happened. Says

00:26:04.680 there was no Holocaust. He is called to wipe Israel off of the face of the earth. Seems kind of violent 0.97

00:26:09.860 to me. Not only are those tweets still up, there's no extra context around that. Jack Dorsey and Twitter

00:26:17.360 have censored Trump much, much more significantly than they have censored the leader of Iran. I said

00:26:23.880 that was the last one. There's one more I have to get to. Cory Gardner. Cory Gardner also grills,

00:26:28.260 at least Zuckerberg. I think he was just glad to be out of the line of fire. He said, yeah, okay,

00:26:31.720 you take it, Jack. Jack Dorsey just absolutely crumbled under pressure and Cory Gardner

00:26:36.780 called him out for the double standard. So somebody denying the murder of millions of people

00:26:42.460 or instigating violence against a country as a head of state is not categorically falling in any of those

00:26:50.040 three misinformation or other categories Twitter has? Not misinformation, but we do have other

00:26:55.100 policies around incitement to violence, which may, some of the tweets you mentioned or the examples

00:27:01.660 that you're mentioning may fall afoul of. But for misleading information, we're focused on those

00:27:08.020 three categories only. So somebody denies the Holocaust has happened is not misinformation?

00:27:14.000 It's misleading information, but we don't have a policy against that type of misleading information.

00:27:18.940 Millions of people died. And that's not a violation of Twitter. Again, I just don't understand

00:27:25.720 how you can label a president of the United States. Have you ever taken a tweet down from the

00:27:31.980 Ayatollah? So he crumbles and, and Cory Gardner points out this double standard. It's beyond that

00:27:38.420 though. It's beyond just big tech. Consider the mainstream media. Do you remember a couple of years

00:27:41.860 ago, the mainstream media published the anonymous op-ed. This was about the resistance within the Trump

00:27:47.560 administration. And there was, there were questions. Did Pence write this op-ed? Did Nikki Haley write 0.98

00:27:52.680 this op-ed? Did the then chief of staff, John Kelly, write this op-ed? There was a book anonymous,

00:27:58.420 all published anonymously about the deep state overthrowing Trump, which in itself, by the way,

00:28:04.260 is a vicious, awful thing. We elected Trump. We didn't elect this anonymous person. It is wrong.

00:28:10.040 It is immoral. It is anti-constitutional to undermine the president that you are ostensibly serving

00:28:16.560 and enacting his agenda. It's a wrong, it's, it's, it's a betrayal, not just of the president,

00:28:22.080 but of the American people. Well, we found out, we found out who the anonymous was. What was it?

00:28:27.420 Pence? Was it Haley? Was it? No, it's some schmuck, some guy we've never heard of, and we'll forget his

00:28:31.440 name in 10 seconds. Miles Taylor, former chief of staff at the department of Homeland Security, 0.99

00:28:37.140 wrote the op-ed. He's just some guy who wanted to make a name for himself, make some money,

00:28:46.240 felt that he was more important than the president, felt that the American people were really looking to

00:28:50.440 Miles Taylor for leadership, not Trump, not the guy they elected, but, but Miles Taylor,

00:28:56.480 because he knows better than the people and then the constitutional system. So he came, obviously,

00:29:02.700 just shows you the lies and the dishonesty of the times, because that's not a story.

00:29:10.600 Low-level staffer at some agency, or I guess, I guess he's relatively high at one of the agencies,

00:29:16.640 but there are a zillion agencies. So I don't know, in, in the broad administration, he's a low-level

00:29:20.920 staffer, is disgruntled at his boss. That's not a story. There's no reason to publish a big anonymous

00:29:25.740 op-ed. That doesn't mean anything. They just did it to try to create the insinuation of some

00:29:31.340 nefarious plot, or I guess they would have considered it a righteous plot to overthrow

00:29:35.960 the Trump administration, but it's fake. It's dishonest. And this kid is dishonest too. He

00:29:40.720 actually lied about it. He was asked point blank by Anderson Cooper on CNN, are you anonymous? And

00:29:45.120 he lied and he said, no. There was an op-ed, there was a book by someone calling themselves anonymous.

00:29:50.520 Are you aware of who that is? I'm not. Look, and I, that was a, a parlor game that happened in

00:29:57.840 Washington, DC of a lot of folks trying to think of, uh, who that might be. I've got my own thoughts

00:30:03.220 about who that might be, but, uh, you know, I want my focus to be on the president and I certainly

00:30:07.600 don't want to, uh, I, I wear a mask for two things, Anderson, uh, Halloween's and, uh, pandemics. So no.

00:30:15.720 What a lame denial. It's too bad though, because he had this kind of too clever by half answer when he

00:30:22.900 said, are you anonymous? He goes, well, Anderson, I'm going to answer a completely different question.

00:30:26.420 That seems sort of cute, but it's obvious that I'm evading the question, but it didn't work because

00:30:31.280 he had already flatly denied it. So he'd already lied. Are you aware of who anonymous is? No, I'm

00:30:35.520 not, but you are. So you're a liar and a traitor and a schmuck. And now, and everyone's going to 1.00

00:30:41.580 forget your name in two seconds after I finished reading the story. Is that country over party

00:30:45.700 supporting that guy? How about, how about, uh, Ilhan Omar, Ilhan Omar and all the rest of the squad

00:30:51.600 calling to defund the police, right? Calling to, and why did they say defund the police? Well,

00:30:56.740 it would cause mayhem and violence and death immediately. That would be the first

00:31:00.160 proximate effect of it. But, but beyond that, the police are a symbol. The reason they go after

00:31:06.900 the police is because the police are law enforcement and the police are themselves a symbol of the law,

00:31:11.620 of the order, of the constitutional system. You attack the police because you oppose the entire

00:31:18.220 system. I was at a rally once covering it for the, the revolutionary communist party. This was about

00:31:24.380 a year and a half ago. And the, that they talked about this explicitly. They said, this is the symbol

00:31:30.440 of the system and we're going to tear it down. And I was shocked at the time. And then I was even more

00:31:34.720 shocked because later on you heard this exact same rhetoric from elected representatives. Ilhan Omar was

00:31:39.660 just asked about this on Axios. And she said, there's no question about her support for the police.

00:31:43.740 I get very frustrated when people talk about what the polls say in favor of, you know, the Black Lives 0.92

00:31:52.300 Matter movement, or when I hear, you know, people say law and order, I support our law enforcement,

00:31:59.140 which is not even something that people are questioning, but are not willing to aggressively

00:32:06.820 speak to what it means for us to care about the Black individuals in our community as they care

00:32:17.900 for everyone else. Yeah. Nobody's questioning your support of the police because you have said

00:32:23.480 multiple times, you don't support the police and you've called to defund them. So you're going to

00:32:28.000 support that. You're going to, are you going to support the law and order, the law enforcement,

00:32:32.740 the law, the constitutional order, or are you going to support that lawlessness country over party?

00:32:36.820 And how about right back to Biden? There's a new leaked tape from Hunter Biden where he was caught

00:32:41.580 talking at ostensibly from Hunter Biden talking about how deeply mired in corruption, particularly

00:32:47.320 in China, the Biden family was. I get calls from my father to tell me that the New York times is

00:32:54.800 calling, but my old partner, Eric, who literally has done me harm for, I don't know how long is the

00:33:00.540 one taking the calls because my father will not stop sending the calls to Eric. I have another

00:33:06.680 New York Times reporter calling about my representation of the, literally, Dr. Patrick Coe, 0.71

00:33:13.560 the f***ing spy chief of China, who started the company that my partner, who was worth $323 billion 0.77

00:33:25.180 found it. It is now missing. The richest man in the world is missing. Who was my partner? He was missing 0.96

00:33:36.160 since I last saw him in his $58 million apartment and signed a $4 billion deal to build the f***ing

00:33:43.940 largest f***ing LNG court in the world. And I am receiving calls from the Southern District of New

00:33:53.520 York, from the U.S. Attorney himself. My best friend in business, Devin, has named me as a witness

00:34:00.360 without telling me. In a criminal case, and my father without telling me.

00:34:07.460 So this goes on. I misspoke earlier. I said that it shows the kind of deep corruption that the Biden

00:34:14.380 family was mired in. It's not was, it is. It is mired in this corruption right now. And it appears

00:34:19.980 to go all the way to the top. That's country over party. Is that what that is? I don't think so. That's

00:34:24.140 the country over party. That's what we're going to rename the Democrats, the country over party. You

00:34:28.740 know, a couple of years ago, maybe more than that at this point, I was asked to be in a political

00:34:34.480 commercial. And it was a little too much for the focus groups. It was a little edgy. So didn't see

00:34:42.380 the light of day then. But this has been repurposed into a commercial that I think not only fits in

00:34:47.120 with the tenor of 2020, certainly fits in with the tenor of today's show. These are the stakes of the

00:34:52.540 election. Five months in office and Democrats are in full control of Washington, D.C. I'm not on a

00:34:58.440 timetable. I'm on a mission. Kamala Harris cast the tie-breaking vote confirming six new Supreme Court 1.00

00:35:03.740 justices today. We have a chance to change the course of history. COVID czar Andrew Cuomo tells

00:35:10.200 us about severe new penalties for Democrats implement free health care for all illegal

00:35:15.040 immigrants. Where is Joe Biden? The president hasn't been seen in public for three weeks.

00:35:19.600 It's Washington's worst kept secret that Kamala Harris is calling the shots. 1.00

00:35:25.720 Washington's newest parlor game is who will be Kamala's vice president.

00:35:33.740 It doesn't have to be this way. There's still time to stop the zombie apocalypse.

00:35:42.360 That's basically what we're talking about. And the zombie might not be all of us. You know,

00:35:47.680 it might not be like actual zombies where you got to like shoot them right in the heart and they're 0.97

00:35:51.460 coming around, they're just eating you. It's a zombie constitutional order. It's a zombie country. 0.98

00:35:56.420 It's a zombie mainstream media apparatus. It's a zombie educational apparatus. It's a zombie country 0.67

00:36:02.280 that has been hollowed out from within, deprived of its vitality. It is now staggering along,

00:36:10.180 kind of looks like Joe Biden while it's staggering along. Are we going to preserve the life of the

00:36:14.840 country or are we going to let it get sucked out even more? Potentially if the Democrats get their way

00:36:20.920 such that conservatives will not have the opportunity to win at the national level anymore,

00:36:26.120 which is what they are openly, explicitly promising. We'll find out November 3rd. By the way,

00:36:30.580 our live stream is going to start Tuesday, November 3rd at 3 p.m. Eastern, 12 p.m. Pacific. We're going

00:36:34.400 to have special guests, live interviews, and much more leading to a very special episode of Backstage

00:36:38.880 where we'll be covering the results with you in real time. And even better now, you join Daily Wire,

00:36:43.460 get 25% off with code ELECTION so that you can watch all of our election coverage live on Apple TV,

00:36:48.440 on Roku, anywhere you want. So watch the election with us at dailywire.com. Get 25% off

00:36:53.060 your Daily Wire membership with code ELECTION when you sign up today. We'll be right back with the

00:36:57.620 mailbag. I'm running late as always with the mailbag, so I'm going to fly through these. First

00:37:13.860 question from Jacob. Hey, Michael, my brother recently brought up a point that the rate of

00:37:19.000 abortions has experienced a greater decrease in years in which Democrats were presidents. He

00:37:23.640 argued, why should we vote for a Republican if our main priority is voting for a pro-life country?

00:37:28.700 He argued that even if they don't pursue policy in line with us, the results speak for themselves.

00:37:33.500 This has me confused also why rates of abortion decreasing faster under Democrat presidents.

00:37:38.140 Came for Ben, stayed for Michael. The reason, I've seen this meme going around. First of all,

00:37:42.840 the premise is not true. The chart that you're referring to that's going around is fake.

00:37:47.000 Even PolitiFact and the CDC admit that this is fake. The reason that it is fake is that states

00:37:51.780 voluntarily report their abortion data, and some states do and some states don't, and the reporting

00:37:56.220 varies from year to year. So you can't even rely on the chart. But let's just say it were true.

00:38:00.420 Let's say that abortion dipped down more under Democratic presidents than under Republican

00:38:04.160 presidents, which isn't true. There's no evidence that it's true, but let's say that it were.

00:38:07.580 Even if that were legit, correlation is not causation. It may well be the case that abortion rates

00:38:12.660 tick down when mercury is in retrograde or something, but that doesn't mean that mercury

00:38:17.620 being in retrograde is the cause of the decrease in the abortions. Why do abortions decrease?

00:38:22.740 Well, it can be because the economy is doing better. When does the economy do better? It did better

00:38:26.620 under Trump than it has under basically anybody in American history. So, okay, there's one mark in

00:38:31.720 our favor. It's often because there are more restrictions on abortions. Who puts more restrictions 0.94

00:38:37.280 on abortion into place? Conservatives and Republicans. But sometimes there's a lag on that. A policy will go

00:38:42.340 into effect. Let's say you're talking about fifth grade education. That's not going to have an effect

00:38:46.780 on the abortion rate probably until a few years down the line into teenage years and into twenties and

00:38:51.480 thirties. Why else are there lower rates of abortion? Well, because more judicial rulings have

00:38:57.140 circumscribed the breadth of Roe versus Wade and, and ridiculous judicial decisions that have permitted

00:39:03.980 abortion. Well, how, how long is that effect going to be? A Republican appoints a judge. A judge might not get a 0.98

00:39:08.960 case like that for five, 10, 20 years. So that effect is going to be, there, there's just no

00:39:13.260 connection between the president and the abortion rate. And also the chart is fake. From Alan,

00:39:21.800 do you like pumpkin spice flavor? Alan, I feel like I'm going to make myself into a little Jack Dorsey

00:39:28.000 here. You know, it's like the hipster and the, I, I love pumpkin spice. I love it. It's great. It's too

00:39:35.380 sweet when you order it at the coffee shop. So you got to reduce the amount of sweetness, but

00:39:39.420 it's terrific. I look forward to it every year. If that makes me basic, I don't know. Based and

00:39:45.280 basic. That's, that's what I say. Pumpkin spice. From Travis. Hey, Michael, would it be fair to claim

00:39:50.080 the Federalist party eventually became the Republican party while the Democratic Republican

00:39:53.380 party became the Democrat party? Or were the divisions between the Republican and Democrat parties

00:39:57.720 completely separate and distinct from those of the Federalist and Democratic Republican

00:40:02.380 parties? Many thanks. The answer is yes. The answer to all of that is yes. The first political

00:40:08.560 party in the United States begins after Washington. If you supported Washington in those early years of

00:40:16.660 the country, you were pro-administration. That was your part, but there weren't really parties yet.

00:40:20.840 Then you had the rise of the Federalist party. There was the Federalist party. That's like John Adams.

00:40:25.980 And then in response to that, you had the Democratic Republican party or the Jeffersonian Republican

00:40:31.480 party. Those were a little, it's how you can't even call them more liberal or more whatever.

00:40:36.660 It's just, they were kind of different parties. Then the Federalist party goes away as a national

00:40:42.440 governing party and you have only the Democratic Republican party. That, this is the era of good 0.99

00:40:47.940 feelings. Then the Democratic Republican party progresses, progresses, progresses. And then you have

00:40:52.660 the Democratic party, the current Democratic party break away founded by Andrew Jackson. As a result of

00:40:59.300 that founding by Andrew Jackson, you have a response to it, which is the Whig party. The Whig party persists

00:41:04.580 for a few decades. Then the Whig party goes the way of the dodo and you get the Republican party

00:41:10.280 founded with some anti-slavery Democrats and Northern abolitionists. The Republican party founded to abolish

00:41:16.540 slavery. And then the Republican party opposes the Democratic party in the civil war. The Republican

00:41:21.600 party wins. The Republican party becomes a national governing party, but the Democratic party doesn't go

00:41:25.500 away. And that's where you get our two systems. Now, if you were to ask me, Michael,

00:41:28.360 you could get in a time machine and transport yourself back to the Adams administration.

00:41:31.640 Who do you support? I would probably support a Federalist. And I suppose some Democrats would

00:41:36.920 support the Jeffersonian Democrats, but a lot of them probably wouldn't like the Jeffersonian

00:41:41.160 Democrats too much because they were too small government, right? I'm trying to use the terms that

00:41:46.640 we use today to talk about our government, but they're not perfect analogs. They are all different

00:41:52.120 political parties. And I think it's a trap to try to look back in history and say, oh, if I lived then,

00:41:57.420 it would be exactly this. No, these were different historical questions. Politics changes over time.

00:42:02.040 There are eternal principles. These people understood the principles perhaps a little

00:42:05.260 differently than we do. But that is a brief history of American political parties. From Colin,

00:42:09.480 my little 11-year-old brother is wearing nail polish. What do I do? I try to convince him it's

00:42:14.140 for girls, not boys, but my mom, dad, stepmom, and half-sister all support his decision. How do I help

00:42:18.200 him? You probably can't because you're not raising him. He's not your kid. He's your brother.

00:42:21.940 It's bad. That's not good. They shouldn't be encouraging it. This is bad parenting on their

00:42:27.300 part. They're doing it because there's a popular mania that we need to indulge any sort of curious

00:42:35.600 or unusual instinct or delusion among children, especially children. That's what's creepiest

00:42:40.820 about it. But you don't. One thing you could point out to them, because we're often told,

00:42:45.240 let children be children. Just let them be them. There is some truth to that. You want to

00:42:49.520 encourage their better inclinations and their natural passions and talents if they're ordered

00:42:54.420 rightly. But when I was a kid, I wanted to be Batman. I told people to call me Batman. My mother

00:43:00.640 did not tolerate that for very long because I'm not Batman, and it would have been wrong to indulge

00:43:05.060 the idea that I am Batman. So all education is coercive, and education means upbringing. It's not

00:43:10.900 just book learning. It's how you are brought up, how you are raised, the manners you have, the way that

00:43:15.280 you engage with society. All education is coercive. You will tell people to do some things and not to

00:43:21.260 do other things. To indulge in this kind of delusion is a sort of coercion because you are

00:43:28.520 steeping them in a very radical liberal ideology. You could also steep them in a more conservative

00:43:33.940 philosophy. You could also steep them in religion. You could also steep them in whatever. It is a choice

00:43:40.440 that your parents are making, and I suspect they just don't want to make the choice at all. So let him do

00:43:44.140 what he wants to do. Can't let kids do what they want to do. Read, read, what's that book? The one where

00:43:49.600 they kill Piggy. Read Lord of the Flies. Read that. Letting children do what they want to do all of the

00:43:54.180 time is not a great idea as a rule. Perhaps the nail polish is harmless. Perhaps it's not. Perhaps it will

00:43:59.860 confuse him, and that would be very sad, and I don't think they want to have to answer for why they

00:44:03.660 messed up their child's psychology when he was so young. So you could present it to them in that way,

00:44:08.360 but really, ultimately, you don't have much of a say in the matter. From Josh,

00:44:11.380 Oh, swarthy one. Why is it that in conversations about hotly debated subjects, liberals will often 0.99

00:44:18.240 interject right as a filler, as though by merely speaking the word you will hypnotically be swayed

00:44:24.900 to their position? Does this tactic actually work? I've always found it to be intellectually a

00:44:29.980 turnoff. P.S. Love the Show came from Noel, stayed for Clavin. Wait a second. I don't like that last part.

00:44:34.460 Right? Right? Right? They do this. It's a tick. We all have verbal ticks, but we should work to

00:44:41.980 eliminate them, and the left has more verbal ticks, I've found, than the right. It used to say, we used

00:44:47.820 to say, this is my position. Two plus two equals four. You know? You know? Now we would say two plus

00:44:54.860 two equals four, right? The reason you do it is to establish your premises along your line of

00:45:02.320 argument so that it becomes more difficult to disagree in the end. Now, if the argument were

00:45:07.220 really, really strong, probably they wouldn't have to do this, or if they were more in command

00:45:10.480 of their rhetoric and oratory skills, they would not have to do this. I suspect the other reason that

00:45:16.700 they do this so frequently is because they're not confident in their premises. So they'll say,

00:45:22.900 we all know gender is a social construct, right? So gender is a social construct, right? And

00:45:27.860 therefore, men can be women, right? Because gender is a social construct.

00:45:32.200 Quod erat demonstrandum. You know, there it is. There's my proof.

00:45:37.320 But I don't grant the premise of a right. I don't do that. And there are all these different

00:45:44.720 ticks that come up. People used to state their opinions. Then they started to say, I think.

00:45:49.600 I think this. I think that. Then I think became, I believe. I believe this. I believe. Then it

00:45:54.120 became, I feel. I feel. I just feel. Then it's, I feel like. I feel. I just feel like. And that entire

00:46:01.500 rhetorical progression takes you further and further away from making claims, from making truth claims.

00:46:11.380 When I state an opinion, I say,

00:46:16.340 men are not women, to use the example we've been using. Men are not women. That is my opinion. And 0.98

00:46:22.740 it's a statement of fact. And my opinion happens to be correct because opinions are statement of

00:46:26.140 fact from one's point of view. Then I can say, I think. Okay. That's granting that there could be

00:46:30.620 disagreement. Then I believe. Because people don't take belief or faith seriously now. That's taking it

00:46:35.340 even further. That's bringing it out of the realm of fact and opinion into the realm of preference.

00:46:39.220 Then it's, I feel like. Well, that's just a sensation. You can't disagree with a sensation.

00:46:44.600 The like. Even the use of like, like, like. The valley girl. Well, it's just like, like, like,

00:46:49.640 like. That is taking statements away, even beyond metaphor, into simile. So you can't disagree with it.

00:46:57.860 Everything is just like something else. It's all just a comparison. You're not making any statements

00:47:01.560 of fact. It's because we're afraid of making claims now. Because we're told, you can't disagree

00:47:07.580 about anything. You can't, you're erasing someone's lived experience. You're denying their

00:47:11.580 oppression. You're, you're claiming that there's an objective reality, but we know everything's

00:47:15.940 relative. These little ticks reflect the ideological framework that we're all moving around in,

00:47:21.900 like fish moving through water. They're unaware of that water. So watch it in your own speech.

00:47:28.820 Don't use these frivolous, meaningless expressions, such as country over party. Don't do that

00:47:34.300 because then in that case, we will all just be sitting here with our dunce hats on,

00:47:40.740 blowing our streamers at the country over party. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles

00:47:44.500 Show. See you on Monday.

00:47:45.520 If you enjoyed this episode, and frankly, even if you didn't, don't forget to subscribe.

00:47:56.700 And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends

00:48:01.100 to subscribe. We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.

00:48:07.100 Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show,

00:48:11.760 The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show. The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies,

00:48:17.360 executive producer Jeremy Boring, our technical director is Austin Stevens, supervising producers

00:48:23.080 Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling, assistant director Pavel Wadowski, editor and associate producer

00:48:29.120 Danny D'Amico, audio mixer Robin Fenderson, hair and makeup Nika Geneva, and production assistant

00:48:35.780 Ryan Love. The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.

00:48:40.640 You know, The Matt Walsh Show, it's not just another show about politics. I think there are

00:48:45.460 enough of those already out there. We talk about culture because culture drives politics and it 0.69

00:48:50.500 drives everything else. So my main focuses are life, family, faith. Those are fundamental.

00:48:57.640 And that's what this show is about. I hope you'll give it a listen.

00:49:00.400 Thanks for listening.

00:49:02.400 Thanks for listening.

00:49:03.860 Bye.

00:49:05.020 Bye.

00:49:06.180 Bye.

00:49:07.020 Bye.

00:49:08.760 Bye.

00:49:09.040 Bye.

00:49:09.280 Bye.

00:49:09.660 Bye.

00:49:12.280 Bye.

00:49:13.460 Bye.

00:49:14.040 Bye.

00:49:17.040 Bye.

00:49:17.080 Bye.

00:49:17.140 Bye.

00:49:19.660 Bye.

00:49:21.200 Bye.

00:49:22.120 Bye.

The Michael Knowles Show - October 29, 2020

Ep. 637 - The “Country Over” Party

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript