The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - DUMP Gondek! Poll shows Calgary mayors race in tie ahead of vote!

00:00:00.160 Ahoy everyone, Wyatt Claypool here back on the whiteboard one final time for the Calgary Mayoral Race.

00:00:08.580 I lied. The last video was not my last polling video.

00:00:12.140 This one is going to be, and this one is more interesting than the previous one.

00:00:17.660 So, the previous poll I put out was the Janet Brown poll that was 27% Jeremy Farkas,

00:00:25.460 23% Sonia Sharp, and 23% Jody Gondek, and then you had, like, Davison at 16 and Thiessen at 8.

00:00:34.420 But I want to update you guys on an internal number that Sonia Sharp's campaign has right now

00:00:41.200 on where the race currently sits right before Election Day.

00:00:46.420 This, what I'm about to show you, basically means it's a turnout election.

00:00:49.740 If you live in Calgary and you don't want a woke progressive as mayor, go out and vote for Sonia Sharp.

00:00:57.160 I am just openly in favor of her campaign because she actually has good policies.

00:01:01.700 Jeremy Farkas, the old one, somehow died in a car crash we didn't hear about,

00:01:05.940 and now we have this crazy, bizarro, woke version of him.

00:01:09.100 That's awful.

00:01:10.180 And, of course, the current mayor, Jody Gondek, is still awful.

00:01:13.500 So, right now, we have, in the new poll that they just released internally,

00:01:21.440 we have Farkas, Gondek, and Sharp pretty close in the polls.

00:01:33.220 How close do we have these people?

00:01:35.360 Well, right now, we have Jeremy Farkas sitting at 25%.

00:01:44.720 And then, we have Gondek at, drumroll everyone, 25%.

00:01:58.040 You know, and three guesses what Sonia Sharp is currently at. 1.00

00:02:03.420 Sonia Sharp is at 25%.

00:02:11.940 This is actually how the race is ending.

00:02:15.920 I'm not sure who's doing their internal polling.

00:02:18.420 Maybe it's Mark Henry with Think HQ because he's kind of associated with them.

00:02:22.260 But I don't think he actually does as much day-to-day work as people think.

00:02:26.200 They may have also used another firm.

00:02:28.920 These are very realistic numbers based on every poll that's come out.

00:02:32.400 Based on the Janet Brown poll, who is the best pollster in the entire country,

00:02:37.060 this is a pretty realistic way for this whole race to finish.

00:02:40.640 And then, you also had, to fill in the blanks here,

00:02:44.040 Brian Thiessen had about 15% or so.

00:02:49.080 And then, you had Jeff Davison at 10%,

00:02:54.420 which means that he's fallen down into last place,

00:02:58.640 according to the internal Sharp numbers.

00:03:01.380 That's not like, oh, well, he's being put into last place in her internal numbers

00:03:05.780 to make him look bad.

00:03:07.360 He was already losing.

00:03:08.740 It just depends on if he's coming in fourth place or fifth place.

00:03:12.460 Jeff Davison's team does not have any organization.

00:03:16.160 Yesterday, they just blew a bunch of money at McMahon Stadium

00:03:18.620 having some drones display vote Davison in the air.

00:03:21.520 Neat? Yes.

00:03:25.440 Objectively neat.

00:03:26.920 Is that going to win him any votes?

00:03:29.420 Probably not.

00:03:30.760 It was probably a big waste of money.

00:03:33.380 And right now, you have Jeff Davison pretending to be conservative

00:03:36.680 despite having as woke left of a voting record

00:03:40.280 as Jody Gondek from when he was a counselor between 2017 and 2021.

00:03:45.620 Literally voted to defund the police.

00:03:47.520 Literally voted against every single cost savings measure.

00:03:50.120 Voted for every tax increase.

00:03:52.260 That was Jeff Davison.

00:03:53.740 And for some reason, his team, despite knowing he is at or around 10%,

00:04:00.040 even if we are to be generous and go back to the Janet Brown poll,

00:04:04.020 the most accurate pollster in Canada, saying he's at 16.

00:04:07.380 I kind of doubt it, though, because Brian Thiessen, she said he was at 8.

00:04:10.340 I can see a lot of people not knowing who Brian Thiessen is,

00:04:13.620 but Brian Thiessen is going to do better on turnout

00:04:15.880 because municipal elections tend to be lower turnout elections.

00:04:19.380 He'll do better simply because he has the Calgary party

00:04:22.200 in every single ward promoting him,

00:04:24.860 whereas Jeff Davison kind of has the ABC party promoting him.

00:04:28.480 But the thing is that the ABC candidates are probably not going to win anywhere,

00:04:34.200 whereas a Calgary party candidate conceivably will win in a few of the wards,

00:04:38.120 so then it will push up Thiessen's numbers.

00:04:40.500 But even if I was to pretend Jeff Davison has that 16,

00:04:43.960 how is he going to win?

00:04:45.780 You think he's going to double his support in the last week of the campaign?

00:04:49.600 He is not.

00:04:50.480 The election is actually tomorrow,

00:04:52.940 and I don't think that vote Davison in the air with your own

00:04:55.740 is going to turn it around.

00:04:58.020 And the thing is, I've had a lot of people beforehand saying,

00:05:01.520 not a lot, I think the vast majority of people

00:05:03.660 are planning on voting for Sonia Sharp,

00:05:05.460 but you have people saying, well, Farkas in the Janet Brown poll is at 27,

00:05:11.060 and Sonia's at 23, and Gondek's at 23.

00:05:14.540 Well, if we want to keep Gondek out, we have to vote for Farkas. 1.00

00:05:18.020 It's like, okay, if I just color Gondek,

00:05:22.600 like the branding of her campaign,

00:05:25.360 from pink to slightly bluish for Jeremy,

00:05:30.340 does it make it better?

00:05:32.180 No?

00:05:32.980 Okay, so voting for somebody who is just doing the same thing as Gondek

00:05:37.120 doesn't make the city better.

00:05:39.520 Do not do that.

00:05:40.300 It's stupid logic.

00:05:41.340 Well, I want Gondek out.

00:05:43.200 Okay, well, were you happy when Gondek got in

00:05:45.720 because it wasn't Nenshi before?

00:05:47.460 Or did you recognize at the time,

00:05:49.640 this is basically Nenshi again?

00:05:51.620 Okay, guys, she's basically Nenshi again.

00:05:54.900 We can just put the big N next to Gondek's name, 0.57

00:05:58.740 and we can put another N next to Farkas's name.

00:06:02.580 We have two Nenshis here. 1.00

00:06:05.080 But getting back to the race dynamics,

00:06:07.560 again, please vote for Sonia Sharp. 0.92

00:06:09.860 Check out my endorsement list for the rest of the campaign.

00:06:12.740 I'll even bring it up on screen a little bit later

00:06:15.320 so you guys can see all my endorsements.

00:06:17.120 I actually did add somebody for Ward 5 and 8 school board,

00:06:21.460 so thank you for somebody for notifying me

00:06:24.000 of a good candidate for school board in that area.

00:06:26.720 I actually heard they're like pro Sonia,

00:06:29.700 so that's helpful.

00:06:31.120 But this election is just going to be turnout.

00:06:34.500 That's it.

00:06:35.760 And, again, Sonia, I've had people nitpicker to death,

00:06:39.360 and it's really obnoxious.

00:06:40.520 Like, at the debate, they're like,

00:06:41.940 oh, my goodness, Davison said he's in favor

00:06:44.640 before your tax freeze,

00:06:45.880 and Sonia Sharp criticized him.

00:06:48.240 It's like she's not a conservative.

00:06:49.840 Okay.

00:06:50.460 The whole point is that Davison's lying

00:06:52.720 about being in favor of a four-year tax freeze

00:06:54.740 because, previously,

00:06:56.220 he voted in favor of every tax increase

00:06:58.560 that came in front of him

00:07:00.020 when he was a counselor between 2017 and 2021.

00:07:03.840 And, literally,

00:07:04.700 two minutes after she said

00:07:06.300 that the tax freeze rhetoric from him is silly,

00:07:08.880 she said that she wants to lower taxes

00:07:11.940 by cutting wasteful spending

00:07:13.900 and reducing the size of administration.

00:07:16.340 Now, that may not mean that she can reduce taxes 1.00

00:07:18.800 in the first year or even the second year,

00:07:21.080 but, at the very least,

00:07:21.980 she's the only one actually vocalizing.

00:07:23.840 She's just going to cut. 1.00

00:07:25.020 Everyone else is like,

00:07:25.800 we need to find efficiencies.

00:07:27.540 That is the most generic language

00:07:29.100 I've ever heard in my life.

00:07:30.380 If you say cut,

00:07:31.460 I believe you.

00:07:33.220 Honestly,

00:07:33.800 the winning campaign

00:07:34.980 is whoever's just going to promise

00:07:36.460 to rip the stupid blue ring out of the ground

00:07:38.360 because that would be awesome.

00:07:40.640 But, overall,

00:07:41.440 Sonia's the only person saying

00:07:42.460 that she'll actually cut taxes.

00:07:44.060 She's the only person saying

00:07:45.380 that she'll actually put

00:07:46.340 a number of police officers on the streets.

00:07:48.700 She says 500,

00:07:49.680 even if she just put up 300.

00:07:51.500 Perfect.

00:07:52.280 Pretty much nobody else

00:07:53.160 will actually name an amount of police officers.

00:07:56.140 They just, like, naysayers,

00:07:57.080 like, you can't police your way

00:07:58.660 out of a drug crisis.

00:08:00.240 You actually can.

00:08:01.720 Have you ever seen El Salvador?

00:08:03.480 Have you ever seen other countries?

00:08:05.240 You can police yourself out of a lot of stuff.

00:08:07.100 You just have to make sure

00:08:08.020 people actually start going

00:08:08.980 to involuntary treatment

00:08:10.960 for drug issues.

00:08:12.960 But, she's got that going,

00:08:14.420 reducing the size of administration,

00:08:16.580 putting more police officers on the streets,

00:08:18.960 and then, you know,

00:08:19.660 attempting to lower taxes

00:08:21.360 and all that stuff.

00:08:23.040 Hopefully, I have ended the debate

00:08:24.760 on, well, is she conservative enough?

00:08:27.200 Well, the other guy

00:08:28.000 that people are saying

00:08:28.860 is more conservative

00:08:29.660 is going to lose.

00:08:31.600 One, he's lying.

00:08:32.900 He was not conservative

00:08:33.800 when he was on council,

00:08:35.120 and he's just doing an about face

00:08:36.720 because it's the only way

00:08:37.560 to make himself relevant.

00:08:39.440 Okay, you can vote

00:08:40.300 for the about face guy.

00:08:42.040 He's at 10,

00:08:43.020 and let's even be generous

00:08:44.160 and say,

00:08:44.940 oh, maybe the 16% number

00:08:46.500 was right,

00:08:47.000 and he gained two cents.

00:08:48.280 He's at 18 now, guys.

00:08:50.280 He's not winning.

00:08:51.280 He does not have a big team.

00:08:52.760 And that is actually where

00:08:54.000 Sharp has a big advantage.

00:08:56.900 Marcus does not actually

00:08:57.860 have a team.

00:08:58.420 And by the way,

00:08:59.200 Marcus has been donating.

00:09:00.760 He's some of the most

00:09:01.440 left-wing council candidates

00:09:03.460 in some of the wards

00:09:04.640 who apparently he's friends with,

00:09:06.320 like Nathan Schmidt

00:09:07.480 or Nathaniel Schmidt.

00:09:09.260 You have Andrew Ewell,

00:09:10.900 and then you also have,

00:09:12.620 I think, Harrison Clark

00:09:14.040 in Ward 9.

00:09:15.260 All these people

00:09:15.720 in different wards,

00:09:16.580 Ward 8, Ward 7, Ward 9.

00:09:18.880 They're all very,

00:09:19.860 very left-wing,

00:09:21.000 and that's who

00:09:21.760 Farkas is donating to.

00:09:23.000 And you'll still say

00:09:23.500 to people,

00:09:23.900 oh, he was good on council.

00:09:26.120 Well, he's not anymore.

00:09:27.800 I take the person's 0.96

00:09:29.760 council record into account

00:09:31.020 if they stand by

00:09:32.020 their council record.

00:09:33.240 The man doesn't even stand

00:09:34.400 by his own council record anymore,

00:09:36.300 so he can no longer

00:09:37.300 use that as a measuring stick.

00:09:39.300 He just became friends

00:09:40.180 with NGF after the election.

00:09:41.580 His brain broke

00:09:42.300 because he lost to Gondek

00:09:43.400 last time,

00:09:44.140 and now he is, like,

00:09:45.220 attempting to be like Gondek,

00:09:46.940 thinking that's the path

00:09:47.800 to victory.

00:09:48.600 It's really weak.

00:09:50.440 So, on this,

00:09:52.040 I think that Farkas has,

00:09:54.260 his positive is

00:09:55.700 name recognition.

00:09:57.540 He's got the name recognition.

00:09:59.620 A lot of people

00:10:00.240 who know who Farkas is.

00:10:01.920 The problem is,

00:10:02.520 that's also something

00:10:03.460 that Gondek 1.00

00:10:06.100 has going for her, 0.95

00:10:07.900 but at the same time,

00:10:09.360 her big negative

00:10:10.120 is that she is hated.

00:10:14.600 Farkas isn't really hated.

00:10:16.100 There are certain conservatives

00:10:17.020 who hate him

00:10:17.560 because of the kind of betrayal

00:10:19.520 that they feel,

00:10:20.700 but I would say,

00:10:21.640 right now,

00:10:22.380 his negative is

00:10:23.640 no team around him.

00:10:25.920 Even Gondek,

00:10:27.900 despite not running

00:10:28.700 with a party,

00:10:29.700 she has Calgary's future

00:10:31.100 on her side,

00:10:31.860 a really big progressive pack.

00:10:34.080 At the same time,

00:10:35.320 Calgary's future

00:10:36.940 has also endorsed

00:10:37.940 many Calgary party candidates

00:10:39.480 who are pumping up Thiessen.

00:10:41.520 So, I think Thiessen's

00:10:42.320 actually going to be

00:10:43.000 doing better,

00:10:44.040 and that,

00:10:44.700 unlike last time,

00:10:45.960 she's not going to be

00:10:46.600 soaking up all of those

00:10:47.720 Calgary future

00:10:48.800 endorsement,

00:10:50.660 like,

00:10:51.140 votes,

00:10:52.020 because people don't like her.

00:10:53.340 Even if you're progressive,

00:10:54.440 you kind of have to acknowledge

00:10:55.340 she didn't do a very good job. 0.99

00:10:56.520 But with Sharp,

00:10:59.440 she actually has

00:11:00.340 the bigger team

00:11:01.180 for positive stuff.

00:11:02.940 I know that her people

00:11:04.080 know who she is,

00:11:05.060 but I mean,

00:11:05.460 like,

00:11:05.780 there's a difference

00:11:06.240 between people knowing

00:11:07.040 your name

00:11:07.480 and the name recognition

00:11:09.300 that you gain

00:11:10.040 from being involved

00:11:11.180 for, like,

00:11:11.800 8,

00:11:12.240 12 years,

00:11:13.560 like Gondek

00:11:14.380 or Farkas have been, 1.00

00:11:15.880 you know,

00:11:16.180 or 8 years or so.

00:11:17.300 So they were involved

00:11:18.420 for so long

00:11:19.100 that their name recognition

00:11:20.060 is, like,

00:11:20.500 a really big,

00:11:21.480 solid thing.

00:11:22.460 She has the bigger team, 0.62

00:11:23.640 and then I would also say

00:11:25.100 she has endorsements 0.81

00:11:26.200 going for her.

00:11:29.560 Not just me,

00:11:30.700 guys.

00:11:31.100 I'm not the biggest

00:11:31.780 endorsement in the world

00:11:33.280 in terms of people

00:11:34.140 knowing who I am.

00:11:35.180 People may watch the show

00:11:36.280 and like my opinion,

00:11:37.620 but there's a difference

00:11:38.380 between that

00:11:39.020 and, like,

00:11:39.540 federal conservative MPs

00:11:41.000 endorsing you,

00:11:41.760 which becomes, like,

00:11:42.340 a big newspaper headline.

00:11:43.980 Ain't nobody writing

00:11:44.760 a newspaper headline

00:11:45.520 about what Wyatt's doing.

00:11:47.160 Sadly, I guess,

00:11:48.100 or actually probably

00:11:48.900 a good thing.

00:11:50.240 I would say that

00:11:51.080 Sharpe's thing

00:11:51.760 is a little bit more

00:11:53.120 unknown.

00:11:55.080 Again,

00:11:55.560 people know who she is,

00:11:56.500 and I think they know

00:11:57.140 she's in the running,

00:11:58.140 but naturally,

00:11:59.220 because you are the,

00:12:01.120 what I say,

00:12:01.620 upstart candidate,

00:12:02.500 you didn't run last time.

00:12:03.960 You haven't been a face

00:12:04.840 in previous elections

00:12:05.960 other than just running

00:12:07.060 for council.

00:12:07.980 So at least compared

00:12:08.960 to these two people,

00:12:10.240 a little bit more

00:12:11.300 of an unknown,

00:12:12.540 but still polling the same.

00:12:14.680 So I would say

00:12:15.440 this is the big thing

00:12:17.340 that's going on here

00:12:18.340 is that

00:12:19.320 for turnout

00:12:20.420 on election day tomorrow.

00:12:22.580 Yes,

00:12:23.060 Farkas may be a default 1.00

00:12:24.200 because people

00:12:24.880 recognize the name.

00:12:26.440 That also goes

00:12:27.140 for Gondek.

00:12:27.900 Problem for her

00:12:28.500 is that she's hated.

00:12:29.920 Problem for Farkas 1.00

00:12:30.880 is that he has no team

00:12:32.280 actually pushing out

00:12:33.440 his vote

00:12:33.900 in the same way

00:12:34.840 that Gondek 1.00

00:12:35.740 and Sharpe do.

00:12:36.840 Yes,

00:12:37.120 he'll have a big team,

00:12:38.340 but he has to recreate

00:12:39.420 a GOTV,

00:12:41.000 a get-out-the-vote campaign

00:12:42.200 in every single award

00:12:43.660 if he wants to actually

00:12:45.160 hit up every single award,

00:12:46.620 whereas Sharpe

00:12:48.940 effectively has people

00:12:50.280 helping her

00:12:50.820 in pretty much

00:12:51.740 every award

00:12:52.320 and then her campaign 1.00

00:12:53.500 can just cover the areas

00:12:54.480 that they don't have

00:12:55.560 council candidates

00:12:56.340 promoting her as well.

00:12:57.720 So it gives her

00:12:58.560 a lot more push tomorrow.

00:13:01.160 So yeah,

00:13:01.900 but her issue 0.54

00:13:02.880 is that she may be

00:13:04.060 considered the person

00:13:05.260 that less people

00:13:06.080 know about

00:13:06.680 and that they'll just

00:13:07.820 default to someone

00:13:08.500 like Farkas. 1.00

00:13:09.080 I don't think

00:13:09.440 that's going to happen

00:13:10.020 this time,

00:13:10.920 but it's always

00:13:11.420 the possibility

00:13:12.140 and I think

00:13:13.360 that the federal

00:13:14.020 conservative endorsements

00:13:15.260 and other provincial

00:13:16.020 conservative endorsements

00:13:17.160 are going to help her

00:13:18.500 a lot in making sure

00:13:20.140 that people kind of

00:13:20.960 funnel into voting

00:13:21.940 for an actual

00:13:22.480 conservative this time

00:13:23.480 rather than

00:13:24.480 splitting up their votes

00:13:25.440 between a bunch of

00:13:26.180 also-ran conservative

00:13:27.320 candidates.

00:13:28.460 I don't believe

00:13:29.040 splitting the vote

00:13:29.980 is a real thing.

00:13:30.960 You can end

00:13:31.660 splitting the vote

00:13:32.340 as a mayoral candidate

00:13:33.620 by just being bigger

00:13:34.520 than everyone else.

00:13:36.020 Just don't vote

00:13:36.860 for Jeff Davison.

00:13:38.480 He's not going to win, guys.

00:13:40.220 It's just not going to happen.

00:13:41.880 I'm sorry.

00:13:42.820 If you really loved the guy

00:13:44.100 and you believed him

00:13:44.980 for some reason,

00:13:46.120 it ain't happening.

00:13:47.660 Anyways,

00:13:48.400 now I just want to

00:13:49.140 quickly bring you guys

00:13:49.940 through my current

00:13:50.800 list of endorsements.

00:13:52.620 I'll read them off

00:13:53.540 for you guys.

00:13:54.120 I have also

00:13:54.960 Airdrie Cochran,

00:13:56.200 Red Deer,

00:13:58.220 and Medicine Hat

00:13:59.080 and Edmonton Mayers.

00:14:00.300 If you're in Medicine Hat,

00:14:01.120 definitely vote for Drew Barnes. 0.83

00:14:02.160 He's fantastic.

00:14:03.300 The other ones,

00:14:03.760 you guys will have

00:14:04.140 to go check out.

00:14:05.180 Drew Barnes is my friend

00:14:06.060 so he gets the special

00:14:06.740 treatment as a non-Calgary

00:14:07.880 candidate for me

00:14:08.620 to read him.

00:14:09.700 So,

00:14:10.120 for mayor,

00:14:10.800 Sonia Sharp is the best choice.

00:14:13.080 Counsel,

00:14:14.100 Kim Tires,

00:14:15.400 Ward 2,

00:14:16.460 Jennifer Waness,

00:14:17.460 Ward 3,

00:14:18.540 Christy Edwards,

00:14:19.640 Ward 4,

00:14:20.280 Jeremy Wong,

00:14:21.440 Ward 5,

00:14:22.060 Harnit,

00:14:22.740 Ushiana.

00:14:23.840 I had to swap out

00:14:24.720 someone else for Harnit.

00:14:26.120 She looks good.

00:14:26.820 The other guy was a little

00:14:27.420 crazy when I looked

00:14:28.260 into his background,

00:14:29.280 but she has a really

00:14:30.420 good platform as well.

00:14:32.020 Ward 6,

00:14:32.900 Joanne Burst. 1.00

00:14:33.680 That's actually where

00:14:34.300 I live.

00:14:34.800 And by the way,

00:14:36.300 little note on Joanne Burst

00:14:38.660 running in Ward 6.

00:14:39.500 Her main opponent

00:14:40.420 is John Pentazopoulos.

00:14:43.040 The guy has been running

00:14:44.400 around presenting himself

00:14:45.180 as a businessman.

00:14:46.240 He's in solar and wind,

00:14:47.620 guys.

00:14:48.420 This isn't an oil and gas

00:14:49.760 guy from downtown.

00:14:50.680 He's running to represent

00:14:52.000 his community.

00:14:52.980 He is a solar and wind

00:14:54.840 green energy guy.

00:14:55.940 And then his campaign

00:14:57.800 manager is literally

00:14:59.200 the NDP constituency

00:15:03.920 president for Calgary

00:15:05.180 Elbow.

00:15:06.000 I'm not kidding.

00:15:06.760 I didn't bring the

00:15:07.340 screenshots here,

00:15:08.080 but I can guarantee

00:15:09.520 you it's real.

00:15:10.920 I was looking at them

00:15:11.940 yesterday.

00:15:12.440 They're saved to my

00:15:13.140 phone.

00:15:13.760 It's the same guy.

00:15:14.880 I'll even just read it

00:15:15.960 so you know I'm not

00:15:16.940 lying and you can go

00:15:18.440 look it up yourself.

00:15:19.620 The man's name is

00:15:20.820 Brian Wiesmiller.

00:15:22.220 And we have a photo

00:15:24.560 of Rachel Notley

00:15:25.900 thanking him at some

00:15:27.360 sort of breakfast.

00:15:28.920 John Pentazopoulos is

00:15:30.000 just another Trojan

00:15:30.900 horse guy like

00:15:32.200 like Hoopmans was

00:15:33.560 last time if you're

00:15:34.320 in Ward 6.

00:15:35.000 So please vote for

00:15:36.040 Joanne Burst. 1.00

00:15:36.760 She's great.

00:15:37.880 I'm very friendly with

00:15:38.820 her.

00:15:39.740 Ward 7, vote for

00:15:41.100 Terry Wong.

00:15:41.940 Ward 8, Cornelia

00:15:42.920 Wiebe, who's in an

00:15:43.860 absolute bloodbath of

00:15:45.040 the campaign right

00:15:45.700 now.

00:15:46.000 That vote is going

00:15:47.000 to split like five

00:15:47.860 different ways and she

00:15:48.580 has a real chance to

00:15:49.740 win a downtown

00:15:50.320 riding as a

00:15:52.200 conservative and

00:15:53.500 she's a good

00:15:53.840 conservative.

00:15:55.040 Ward 9, Gargar, very

00:15:56.860 good with the police.

00:15:57.900 He's a fantastic

00:15:58.640 police candidate.

00:16:00.220 He's not like a 0.97

00:16:01.340 police officer but he

00:16:02.240 works with the police.

00:16:03.560 Very pro-cop guy,

00:16:04.700 wants to bring bike

00:16:05.460 patrols back to

00:16:06.180 places like Forest

00:16:06.880 Lawn.

00:16:07.860 Ward 10, Andre

00:16:08.800 Chabot.

00:16:09.680 Ward 11, Rob

00:16:10.640 Ward.

00:16:11.560 Ward 12, Shane

00:16:12.700 Bysick. 1.00

00:16:13.540 Ward 13, Dan

00:16:14.680 McLean.

00:16:15.600 Ward 14, Landon

00:16:16.820 Johnston.

00:16:17.780 And for school

00:16:18.380 board, we'll go

00:16:19.000 through this quickly.

00:16:20.320 Ward's 1 and 2

00:16:21.080 school board for

00:16:21.860 public is Cindy

00:16:22.720 Dubray.

00:16:23.760 Ward 3 and 4 is

00:16:24.760 Joni Liu.

00:16:26.340 Ward 6 and 7 is

00:16:27.520 Jennifer Stewart.

00:16:28.720 She's fantastic.

00:16:29.480 I went door

00:16:29.780 knocking with her 0.99

00:16:30.300 very briefly for a

00:16:31.540 bit.

00:16:31.920 I didn't have a lot

00:16:32.340 of time.

00:16:33.480 Ward 8 and 9, Olga

00:16:34.900 Knight.

00:16:35.900 Ward 5 and 10,

00:16:36.920 Mandeep Manhas.

00:16:38.420 Ward 11 and 13,

00:16:39.680 Tyson Ario.

00:16:40.800 Ward 12 and 14,

00:16:42.100 Darzouk.

00:16:43.120 And for Catholic

00:16:43.780 school board, I only

00:16:44.660 have two endorsements

00:16:45.540 for a couple of

00:16:46.380 awards.

00:16:47.020 It's 6 and 8, it's

00:16:47.840 Valerie Dove, and 0.99

00:16:49.040 in 12 and 13, it's

00:16:50.500 Steve Chapman.

00:16:51.980 Okay.

00:16:53.160 Hopefully, and if you

00:16:54.220 guys need to see that

00:16:54.920 list, I will have it

00:16:55.720 pinned at the top of

00:16:56.480 the comments in the

00:16:57.800 description below if

00:16:58.740 you want to go look at

00:16:59.780 it in detail or share

00:17:00.800 it with your friends.

00:17:01.680 I invite you, if you're

00:17:02.620 in Calgary, to share

00:17:03.940 the list so that people

00:17:05.080 know who's actually

00:17:05.740 conservative.

00:17:06.940 Anyways, that should

00:17:08.160 be it for me today,

00:17:08.980 guys.

00:17:09.560 I will see you guys

00:17:10.300 all later.

00:17:11.860 I probably won't do a

00:17:12.520 stream about the

00:17:13.460 election.

00:17:13.860 I'm literally about to

00:17:14.700 fly to Victoria right

00:17:15.660 now, and I need to

00:17:16.680 film a video right

00:17:17.520 before I got on the

00:17:18.300 plane effectively.

00:17:19.760 Anyways, that's it.

00:17:21.400 See you guys later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - October 19, 2025

DUMP Gondek! Poll shows Calgary mayors race in tie ahead of vote!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript