00:00:00.000In Canadian politics, I always find whenever the Liberals are in trouble, the legacy media's coverage of the story becomes a story in and of itself,
00:00:10.040because they refuse to lay blame at the feet of Prime Minister Mark Carney, even when he is absolutely blameworthy,
00:00:18.220because they're funded by the Liberal federal government, and they're not going to bite the hand that feeds them.
00:00:24.160I know I talked about this in my previous video, but that was a fairly brief segment of the video.
00:00:30.000I want to extend this out just to marvel at just how twisted the headlines are
00:00:35.280when it comes to the Gordie Howe Bridge situation,
00:00:37.740and then I want to move into some CBC coverage regarding just general trade issues with the United States.
00:00:44.620I posted this on X just a little bit ago, just a montage of a bunch of the headlines on Google right now,
00:00:51.860but I want to take you through a few specific ones to make my point.
00:01:26.500He said something, and the truth was the opposite of what he said.
00:01:31.800As I talked about in the previous video, people like Liberal MP Mark Gerritsen were going around accusing Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives of both spreading misinformation and disinformation.
00:01:44.320Accusing the Conservatives of knowingly lying about what was in the deal, when in fact the reverse was true.
00:01:50.480Mark Carney and Mark Gerritsen were lying about what was in the deal, despite having access to the deal.
00:01:56.500despite being the ones who helped craft and sign the deal.
00:02:01.220And yet we have these media outlets saying,
00:02:03.200oh, the conservatives are accusing them of lying,
00:02:05.600which invites liberal audience members to assume
00:02:08.300that the conservatives must be just making up things.
00:02:17.960That is what that headline ends up fostering
00:02:21.100in default liberal viewers of the story.
00:02:23.720With the global news one, Gordie Howe Bridge Revenue Sharing Agreement appears to contradict Carney. No, it does contradict Carney. And it contradicts him because he was lying. He was saying the opposite of what the deal actually said.
00:02:40.580He claimed profit sharing when the deal was revenue sharing.
00:02:45.220He claimed that we were going to be able to take not only maintenance costs out of the revenues before they were split,
00:02:50.880but also operating costs as well as the interest costs for the bridge and other things to do with the construction costs.
00:02:59.660The only things included in the deal are maintenance and snow removal,
00:03:04.820the two lowest cost aspects of the bridge in the opening few years.
00:03:10.580Snow removal doesn't cost all that much.
00:03:12.700You know, yes, for a bridge that big, it's going to cost more than your driveway.
00:03:15.860But in the grand scheme of things, it's a fairly minor cost.
00:03:18.620And maintenance costs for a brand new piece of infrastructure is also going to be far lower than what it would be in, let's say, like 50 years.
00:03:26.860And now let's get to the last one before I move into what I originally said in my post.
00:03:32.960How does this new Gordie Howe bridge deal compare to the original one?
00:03:36.200wow that makes you want to take some melatonin and fall asleep you're really burying the lead
00:03:43.640here the prime minister of the country lied about the deal he was running away from reporters the
00:03:49.500previous day for asking questions what he said is the direct opposite of what he claimed and the
00:03:56.600opposite of his elbows up brand can all what claw machine did all these people get their journalism
00:04:04.060degrees from. It's maddening that they can get away with this. We need a media czar who basically
00:04:12.600oversees any legacy media that gets money from the government because they should be forced to
00:04:18.540change their headlines if it's just obviously obfuscating what the truth is because they know
00:04:24.020a lot of people will see the headline pop up on their phone and they'll assume that that and the
00:04:28.580subheader and maybe the summation that their AI gives them on their phone of what the story said.
00:04:33.000that's probably what it was rather than going down sometimes four, five, six lines into the story
00:04:39.680when it finally says Carney said it was profit sharing, Buddy lied, and it's basically full
00:04:44.220revenue share, and pretty much President Donald Trump is eating his lunch. But this is what I said
00:04:49.080in my original post. The Canadian media is incapable of admitting that Prime Minister
00:04:54.760Mark Carney lied about the Goree Howe bridge deal. Let's say Hasbro said batteries included
00:05:00.320in a product when batteries were not included when you go and buy the product. We would not say,
00:05:05.900quote, battery situation seems to contradict Hasbro, unquote, or, quote, new product releases
00:05:12.380as rival Mattel accuses Hasbro of lying, or, quote, how does Hasbro's new product compare to
00:05:19.040the original marketing material? We would just say they lied. And, you know, shock gasp, I agree
00:05:24.440with myself there, but I'm trying to be a bit quippy about it because we would never put up
00:05:29.320with this in any other situation. If Kiripolyev, if Danielle Smith, if any conservative had claimed
00:05:36.580one thing that the liberals had done, and then it was the opposite, there would be headlines all
00:05:42.680over the place saying that the conservatives had lied. If the deal came out and Mark Carney was
00:05:46.360absolutely telling the truth, there would be headlines saying that the conservatives were
00:05:50.040liars. Even though the conservatives never accused him of lying until today when it was proven,
00:05:55.220And they were just saying, we want to see the deal because based on the conflicting sort of statements they're making and the very confusing way they're wording this net profit sharing kind of like agreement when the before the deal was released, they're saying, we want to see the real thing.
00:06:09.360We feel like this sounds a bit dishonest. Can you give us some transparency? But the media would have absolutely skewered them, even though they hadn't actually done anything wrong.
00:06:18.580But Carney does something objectively wrong. And the media is like nowhere to be seen. They're like looking at their shoes. They're like focusing in on like the parts of the agreement that don't matter whatsoever. And now I need to bring you to some CBC coverage that is absolutely wild on the situation. Because this video that I believe was from a segment from today, just says Ottawa calls off bridge opening ceremony with the United States.
00:07:46.900They made this issue kind of implying that the issue is about Trump,
00:07:51.280about how the Americans have been mean to us recently with the new terror threats,
00:07:54.900and that's the implied reason why the bridge isn't going to be opened
00:07:58.540in a joint ribbon cutting between the Canadians and the Americans.
00:08:02.660No, it was probably cancelled because it's an embarrassing situation for Carney
00:08:07.460because he lied about the deal and he is getting absolutely fleeced on a bridge that Canada paid
00:08:13.300for 100%. That's why he doesn't want to be in the same. That's why he doesn't want a bridge
00:08:18.560opening where he and Trump are at it or even just representatives of the US and Canada are at it
00:08:23.140because it will remind people of the thing he lied about. Because let's say if you were canceling
00:08:29.800this because of the trade situation, you're stupid. Why wouldn't you want that to be used1.00
00:08:34.840as an opportunity to make a statement about how we're better together and we should be doing more
00:08:39.320together rather than tariffing each other. You could use it as a great platform to speak out
00:08:44.340against tariffs and propose some ways of coming together and basically going guns down on both
00:08:50.160sides and having fewer tariffs. You could easily do that. They're not doing that. That's not why
00:08:55.140they're walking away from doing a joint bridge unveiling. Because really, it's about him being
00:09:01.480embarrassed on the deal he made with Donald Trump, giving him 50% of the revenues on a bridge that
00:09:06.140the Americans didn't put a penny into. And as I've been using the analogy throughout this week now,
00:09:12.620and I think it's a good one, Mark Carney is a broken vending machine and Donald Trump will
00:09:17.980keep kicking it because he gets free sodas every time he does it. If you got a free can of Coke,
00:09:22.800every time you kicked a vending machine, you'd keep kicking it. Now, I think morally speaking,
00:09:28.040I think we're all against stealing, and we wouldn't all do that. But in a very morally
00:09:32.220gray world where we're just trying to get by, you'd keep kicking it to get a free bag of chips
00:09:37.500or a can of Coke. That is why Donald Trump is going after us, but not the Mexicans. Because0.96
00:09:43.420the Mexicans are not a broken vending machine that gets you free products for slapping at it.0.88
00:09:47.580Mark Carney is. And now I want to jump over to this other segment on the CBC with our favorite
00:09:53.900host, Mr. David Cochran, who, of course, has this whole segment where we talk about the trade deal
00:10:01.400issue from the perspective of Trump's bad. Trump sucks. And really, all of this, that's all you1.00
00:10:09.320need to know, is that Trump's bad. We shouldn't never analyze, not for a second, that Mark Carney's
00:10:14.800incompetent. Now, check out this part of the interview where he asks Tim Powers a question,
00:10:19.580And I think Tim Powers does a good job of summing up the default CBC liberal position on trade, all of the dumb excuse making that will be made for the next month or Mark Carney until he either caves on the trade agreement and actually sign something or we end up having even more tariffs applied to us.
00:10:39.840The five percent. So, Tim, like the other tariffs, the one 10 percent tariff is going to probably go away Friday.
00:10:47.140Others will come on stream. They might be the 308.
00:10:49.780I don't know if I'm getting my legislation or my ammunition mixed up.0.96
00:10:54.760But what are your thoughts on what Greer had to say and sort of what this all tells us about where the Kuzma stuff is?
00:11:01.580months. No, to give you some context, Jameson Greer had kind of repeated Trump talking points
00:11:08.240about how Canada's been unfair to America on trade and this and that. And we're just doing
00:11:13.100this to try and rectify trade imbalances. Now, I don't agree with Trump and Jameson Greer on that
00:11:18.840issue. It is a lot of just kind of noise in order to justify what they're doing. At the end of the
00:11:24.060day, really doesn't matter. They're doing it. Now, what are we going to do? But they constantly
00:11:29.080keep harping on, oh, well, they're wrong. It's like, oh, wow, have we considered going down
00:11:34.680to Washington and telling Trump he's wrong? Wow, yeah, that's going to clear up things in five
00:11:39.080seconds. Three at seven, you should know that. And thank you for not saying I'm 100 years old,
00:11:45.200being the oldest person here. Look, I was implying it. I got that. I'm sure most of the audience did
00:11:50.680as well. But look, Friday, before all this, we had Friday was the fires, right? Last Friday was
00:11:57.580the fires it was there's been a steady uh stream of things when he hasn't moved off the fires and
00:12:04.300by the way americans if you're watching dm me i got a basement full of hockey sticks i can get to
00:12:08.940you before august 19th i mean it it all seems to be about distraction it's hard not to suggest that
00:12:18.180it is that i agree with jordan i agree with amanda on that um it doesn't seem that they're
00:12:25.900having the desired impact that they want to divide and conquer yet you're in pei you're talking to
00:12:32.360these premiers well there might be you know some frustration from doug ford that he feels he's
00:12:36.880doing more than other premiers this isn't the beginning of all of this which you will well
00:12:41.620recall when daniel smith was on one side and doug ford was on another then what does she mean what
00:12:48.180what does tim powers mean that when they used to be on separate sides no daniel smith was never on
00:12:53.980like a pro-Trump side, and then Doug Ford was on the pro-Canada side. Danielle Smith has always
00:12:59.220been pro-Canada, and she did something really smart when she headed down to Mar-a-Lago before
00:13:03.560Trump was inaugurated in January 2025. Danielle Smith was being proactive, trying to defend her
00:13:11.080province from incoming tariffs. And the whole idea that, well, what Trump's doing here is it's
00:13:17.640a distraction. He's trying to divide us and all this stuff. Never actually getting to a point
00:13:23.500here of like okay what is the net effect what are you talking about this is liberal slop tv
00:13:31.460programming basically trying to keep people in like the minority port report like like swimming
00:13:39.580pool with the helmet on just like saying like yes trump's bad he's trying to divide us united we're
00:13:44.620strong. We need to link arms and fight for Canada. It's like, guys, okay, sure. Now what?
00:13:54.320Now what? Now what? Now what are we going to do? I've been watching so many clips from the CBC
00:14:02.020over the last couple of days. At no point did they actually say, yes, Mark Carney should be
00:14:06.100doing this. Because if they say what Mark Carney should be doing, it would reveal the fact that
00:14:09.480he's been sucking at his job and he hasn't been doing anything. He, in fact, is not defending
00:14:14.640the country. As conservatives have been pointing out, they have no leverage. We have no leverage
00:14:19.800on the Americans because our domestic economic policy sucks. All the trade diversification has
00:14:24.440basically been doing a complete hill of beans at this point. Us cozying up with the Chinese doesn't1.00
00:14:29.200make us look good at the negotiating table and is probably going to be undermining further0.94
00:14:33.200our economic and national security when it comes to the threats of the CCP. And we've been making
00:14:39.000concessions all the long, all along to the Americans at the same time. So we're not even
00:14:43.700consistent in trying to be like tough elbows up type, you know, political actors. We are just
00:14:49.060all over the place. And so we just keep talking about Trump. What about him? Okay, he did the
00:14:55.620thing. Now, what are we going to do? What thing are we doing in response to his thing?
00:14:59.380The facts seem tighter on all of this. I'm listening to Premier Lance today. I noted again,
00:15:06.960You know, he was asked a question about potatoes and would they be impacted?
00:15:10.140And he said, we've had maybe 1% of the impact of the tariffs has been on us.
00:20:33.220Because Lisa Wright's actually bringing us back to the real topic at hand.
00:20:37.200What's Carney going to do on the main thing that we're supposedly caring about?0.98
00:20:41.280In fact, it's now becoming this retarded patriotism question.0.90
00:20:45.400Is Alberta going to blow itself up to benefit Mark Carney?0.71
00:20:49.680Are you going to throw yourself on the barbed wire so that Mark Carney can walk over you in doing nothing?
00:20:58.180We wouldn't even get anything if we did that.
00:21:00.120But it's going to be like, are you going to are you going to eat your own thumbs to prove that you're fealty towards the Liberal Party and Mark Carney?
00:21:06.460And then Nathan Collins rolls his eyes at the idea that maybe we shouldn't bankrupt small and medium-sized business owners just so that Mark Carney doesn't have to bruise his ego in actually signing a deal with Donald Trump.
00:21:21.180And it's not like we're asking Mark Carney to humiliate himself.
00:21:24.740It's just his own ego that feels humiliated in having to sign a deal with Trump.
00:21:29.420Claudia Scheinbaum does not seem like she lacks luster in trying to sign a deal with Trump.
00:21:33.840If anything, she sounds very formidable as a human being.
00:21:38.040She doesn't seem like she's going hat in hand.
00:21:40.200She's going powerfully to negotiate a trade deal.
00:21:42.900Mark Carney's only going to go hat in hand because he thinks he's too sophisticated to have to talk to Donald Trump.
00:21:48.680So apparently, we're going to set your small business on fire so that he doesn't have to do that.
00:21:54.500Anyways, that should be it for this video, guys.
00:21:57.560They're all turning into rants these days, but that's just how it goes down in the street sometimes.
00:22:02.580Anyways, with all that being said, if you like the channel, make sure to leave a like on the video.
00:22:07.700If you're still watching and not a subscriber, hit the subscription button.
00:22:13.360Rude. You're not going to hit it. Rude.
00:22:15.800But you should do it because I'm trying to get to 100,000 subscribers.
00:22:18.680And then also, if you want to become a monthly contributing member of the channel,
00:22:21.840there is a join button below the video where you can give a few dollars a month to make it more sustainable for me.
00:22:27.360And if you live in the city of Calgary, sign up on my list on WyattClaypool.com, pinned at the top of the comments, because I'm thinking about running for a nomination for the United Conservative Party for the next Alberta Provincial election to win a seat back from the NDP.
00:22:43.800And in case you're thinking about it, I'm absolutely still behind Dallas Brody and 1BC and British Columbia, and I am still for Directive Communications. I just happen to throw a lot of irons and a lot of fires.
00:22:53.900Anyway, so with all that being said, thank you guys for watching, and I'll see you all later.