The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Liberal Media Went Way Too Far! - Exploits MP Resignation To Attack Poilievre!

00:00:00.000 You will not be surprised to hear that the Liberal legacy media did something disgusting and unethical

00:00:06.340 in the aftermath of a Conservative MP, Larry Brock,

00:00:10.500 announcing last night that he will be resigning from office on September 18th.

00:00:15.540 I don't want to give you any of the background details yet.

00:00:18.540 I first want to show you what most Canadians will be hearing about the situation.

00:00:24.160 Here is CTV News trying to blame everything on Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives.

00:00:30.000 All right, let's talk about Conservative MP Larry Brock, his resigning from his Ontario

00:00:34.900 riding. This makes him the seventh member to leave caucus. How do you read this? What

00:00:39.840 is going on? Is this anything to do with, you know, the disillusionment that perhaps

00:00:45.680 other Conservative members have felt?

00:00:47.980 How could it not be? I mean, seven MPs, four of which have defected to the government side,

00:00:54.960 three, including Mr. Brock, could just say, look, I'm going to do something else with

00:00:58.740 my time. I'm going to do something else with my career. Frankly, it feels like a slow motion

00:01:05.500 vote of non-confidence. It's like a gradual mutiny. There's no accelerating moment. It

00:01:11.220 isn't like anyone's bringing forward a vote against Mr. Polio's leadership. But when you

00:01:17.820 lose seven caucus members in a year, when you lose a majority to your opponent when you had

00:01:22.340 held him to a minority. All of that speaks very troublingly to the status of your leadership.

00:01:29.760 By the way, Mark Carney and the Liberals have lost, I believe, like five MPs to resignations.

00:01:36.320 People like Chrystia Freeland and Jonathan Wilkinson and Nate Erskine-Smith. There's a few

00:01:41.940 others in there as well. Sometimes people just resign. Sometimes there's a story behind it.

00:01:47.040 Sometimes there isn't. In fact, with the Liberal MPs who've resigned, it was more clear-cut that

00:01:52.800 they just don't like Mark Carney. Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney have really bad blood

00:01:58.400 when he basically threw her under the bus for all the economic problems under Justin Trudeau,

00:02:03.960 even though he was the economic policy advisor to Prime Minister Trudeau.

00:02:08.760 Nate Erskine-Smith also famously disliked Mark Carney. Jonathan Wilkinson's more of a mixed bag.

00:02:14.740 I never focused on that one as much for good reason, because he was more so an aging politician who was probably looking for an easier job.

00:02:22.200 So he was going to get out of office while he was ahead.

00:02:25.580 But Larry Brock, he is currently leaving his riding of Brantford, Brant South, Six Nations because he has a personal medical issue.

00:02:35.060 He is leaving because the job of MP can be really hard on you.

00:02:39.560 He is 61 years old, which is not super old in any way.

00:02:42.800 But the thing is, if you have an underlying medical problem that's just making the job tougher, all the travel, really early mornings and really late nights are not desirable.

00:02:53.320 That is what people who know Larry Brock have been saying, that this is absolutely a personal reason for having to leave office.

00:03:00.820 He's absolutely a committed orthodox conservative, and he is very likely to campaign in favor of the person replacing him in the riding.

00:03:09.020 And yet we have Scott Reid here just assuming that this has everything to do with Pierre Polyev based on what? Nothing. I'm sorry, people resigning does not simply mean that it's a Pierre Polyev problem. People crossing the floor doesn't even necessarily mean that. Michael Ma, who crossed the floor, is obviously a CCP agent based on all of his actions since crossing the floor and some before. So that doesn't say anything about Pierre Polyev.

00:03:36.880 Chris Dontremont still has never articulated a problem with Pierre Polyev.

00:03:40.680 He just makes vague insinuations that Polyev's a bad guy, yo,

00:03:44.200 when everyone knows that he wanted the deputy speaker job

00:03:47.220 and freaked out when he wasn't given it,

00:03:49.160 and instead Tom Kamik was given the deputy speaker role,

00:03:52.440 so then he crossed the floor.

00:03:53.920 Other people like Marilyn Gladwell are famous attention seekers, 1.00

00:03:57.420 probably just doing this because she wants to be in government.

00:04:00.460 And when it comes to some of the other people who have left but not crossed the floor,

00:04:04.320 Richard Martel was always a very, very red Tory. I could see that guy not getting along with

00:04:10.600 Piripolyev, but it doesn't say something about like the conservative base turning on Piripolyev.

00:04:15.440 It says something about Richard Martel not being a base conservative. He is not a very conservative

00:04:22.380 guy. And so if Mark Carney offers him a job in the Senate and the conservatives are currently not

00:04:28.420 in government at the moment, you'll probably take that. He doesn't really care too much about the

00:04:33.560 mission the conservative party is on so he'll leave the other person who's left other than

00:04:38.060 larry brock who didn't cross the floor was kathy wagenthal do you think kathy wagenthal like the

00:04:44.980 most pro-life mp who is going to be replaced by a very pro-life replacement do you think she's

00:04:51.960 leaving because she's lost confidence in pier polia or is it because she's 70 and she's probably

00:04:58.120 not going to run again and she wants to give her replacement some time in office to learn

00:05:03.420 the ropes before the next election so that if the conservatives do get into government that person

00:05:08.380 will have some experience under their belt because she's just filling out time at this point and so

00:05:13.180 she decided hey liberals have a majority anyways i'm going to step down spend time with my family

00:05:19.660 and grandkids and let somebody else gain the experience in office while they're in opposition 0.86

00:05:24.620 so that they can maybe one day do something in government that's why she left there's not always

00:05:29.900 a story here. But the confidence that Scott Reid has in just saying, oh, without a doubt,

00:05:34.980 this has something to do with Pierre Polyev. And she sets up the question so obviously that

00:05:38.940 she wants him to say it's Polyev's fault.

00:05:41.140 Moving on, is this anything to do with, you know, the disillusionment that perhaps other

00:05:47.540 conservative members have felt?

00:05:49.480 The disillusionment that other conservatives have felt. Is it disillusionment? Michael Ma

00:05:55.700 believes that child labor and slavery in China is perfectly okay, is that guy really a disillusioned

00:06:02.680 conservative, or is he a Chinese Communist Party asset? He literally tried to needle a witness

00:06:09.580 during a committee meeting over the idea of whether or not there are really concentration

00:06:14.520 camps full of Uyghur Muslims in China. Like, no, that guy's just a bad actor. Chris Dantremont 1.00

00:06:22.280 is a full of himself like a blowhard who wanted to be deputy speaker uh what is the lemieux not 0.91

00:06:30.600 the lemieux guy there's the other guy i don't even care who he is the guy up in edmonton river like 0.96

00:06:35.400 uh you know riverview or whatever riding it is that guy lives in victoria like full time he knew

00:06:41.320 he wasn't going to get re-elected if he ran again and everyone was finding out he hadn't lived in

00:06:45.240 his riding in years and so why didn't he just cross the floor and join the party where it'd be

00:06:49.540 easier to be reelected in his new home where he would actually be able to get the nomination

00:06:54.480 that was probably more of his reason to to cross and then marigan lynn gladio is a massive 0.58

00:06:59.660 attention seeker richard martell is probably the only one you could really point to and say

00:07:04.660 that guy has an ideological issue with piropolyev and he's taking a senate appointment

00:07:08.720 as a conservative senator he's not even moving over to the liberals because although he's a very

00:07:14.580 very soft conservative richard martell is still not a liberal so he's going to join the conservative

00:07:20.100 senate caucus led by leo husakis there's just nothing really going on here but of course 0.91

00:07:26.740 scott reeds here says fool without a doubt how could it not be how could it not be how could

00:07:31.860 this not say something about pure polyeth yes we've never done a segment on this when it comes 0.98

00:07:35.940 to freeland resigning or uh the former toronto police chief i forget his name you know or jonathan

00:07:43.220 Wilkinson or Stephen Gilboa, all these people. It doesn't say anything about Mark Carney. If

00:07:50.280 anything, it actually says he's very robust and powerful that these people are leaving.

00:07:53.820 It never says anything about a liberal prime minister if his MPs are leaving. It says everything

00:07:59.300 in the world about Pierre Polyev, even though many of the people resigning have good reasons

00:08:03.900 to resign in the case of Larry Brock and Kathy Wagenthal, or the other people are just open

00:08:09.600 grifters? Because if you want to do real damage to Pierre Polyev as somebody who has become

00:08:14.420 disillusioned with him and hate his leadership style and hate his policy, why wouldn't you talk

00:08:19.380 about that in the media? The most Dontremont has ever done or any of the other MPs have ever done

00:08:24.120 is basically going out into the media and saying, well, you know, the Conservatives should look

00:08:28.760 inward. Conservatives should look inward. They should look in their own offices. They should

00:08:33.860 to clean it up. How? What don't you like? Or are you crossing because you either think it's going

00:08:40.620 to be an easier re-election, or because you are just looking for notoriety and publicity like

00:08:46.720 Marilyn Glaju, or because you're basically Xi Jinping's cousin in the case of Michael Ma?

00:08:51.940 Like, what are we talking about here? I want to play this again because I find his points just

00:08:56.440 so asinine. When you know Larry Brock is leaving because of a medical issue, and by the way,

00:09:01.500 It has nothing to do with liberal bribes, as some people assumed right away.

00:09:05.620 Nothing to do with that.

00:09:06.800 He's taking a provincially appointed Crown Prosecutor position in his area of expertise in his hometown.

00:09:14.000 It's an easier job.

00:09:15.480 It's still a tough job, but you don't need to be constantly traveling, which really sucks the life out of you.

00:09:19.800 And if you have anything that's limiting you medically, it's really devastating to be constantly waking up at like four in the morning to travel to Ottawa, coming back home late at night, you know, staying very late in Parliament, waking up sometimes at 5.37 to make sure you're there for the opening of Parliament.

00:09:39.520 That can be hard on you if you have anything that's maybe fatiguing you.

00:09:42.920 If Hendy Fry tomorrow, the liberal MP from Vancouver, I believe Vancouver Granville or something like that, might not be her riding.

00:09:50.880 But if she resigned tomorrow, I wouldn't be pumping out a video saying, wow, this really says something about Mark Carney.

00:09:56.740 She's like 82.

00:09:58.000 It makes sense that she's resigning.

00:09:59.880 Sometimes there's no story there.

00:10:02.420 There is really no story there with Larry Brock.

00:10:05.700 he was an extremely orthodox hawkish conservative mp and whoever replaces him he will probably

00:10:12.480 campaign for that guy fundraise for him and do events with him within his own riding he was very

00:10:18.540 much on the conservative mission and him resigning can't just be can't just be spun without evidence

00:10:24.100 that paulia is a bad guy and i mean seven mps four of which have defected uh to the government side

00:10:30.940 three including mr brock could just say look i'm gonna do something else with my time i'm gonna do

00:10:35.680 something else with my career um it it frankly what's what's kathy wagenthal doing with her

00:10:42.920 career she's 70 larry brock is this some big career move that he wanted to be a crown prosecutor

00:10:50.500 in brantford like dude shut up the other guy who wanted to become a senator that one you can

00:10:57.500 actually try and throw at the feet of pure poly of richard martell leaving but even then it doesn't

00:11:02.180 really hold that much water because he's a very very red tory and so yes the party is no longer

00:11:07.960 the party of erin o'toole so maybe richard martell doesn't like being around anymore

00:11:11.840 sure leave the the base can decide if they're really upset about richard martell leaving

00:11:17.160 feels like a slow motion vote of non-confidence it's like a gradual mutiny there's oh it's a

00:11:24.000 gradual mutiny everyone then why don't they have a vote there's literally something called the

00:11:30.900 reform act that that has that is empowered inside the conservative party if 25 only 25 conservative

00:11:37.960 mps signed a letter calling for a vote in caucus to remove peer poly of it would happen so why

00:11:44.260 don't if all seven of these people have no confidence in peer poly of well in theory

00:11:49.000 there's probably people on the fence that would sign a letter it's almost like there's nobody else

00:11:52.960 not at least not a substantial faction that would sign something against poly of not nearly 25 if

00:11:59.140 all these people somehow hate Polyev and they're leaving. But really, it's not that simple. A lot

00:12:03.760 of people are leaving for their own complex personal reasons, well, whether petty or noble

00:12:08.500 in the case of people like Larry Brock and Kathy Wagenthal. No accelerating moment. It isn't like

00:12:15.000 anyone's bringing forward a vote against Mr. Polyev's leadership. But when you lose seven

00:12:21.660 caucus members in a year, when you lose a majority to your opponent when you had held him to a

00:12:26.460 minority. All of that speaks very troublingly to the status of your leadership. Do you want to see

00:12:33.720 Larry Brock's riding? This is not going to be a loss riding for the conservatives in a by-election.

00:12:39.880 Now, some bad pollsters, like some bad polling projectionists, like 338, really got to take

00:12:45.940 338 with a grain of salt because they just mix in awful polls into their averages. This is how

00:12:52.360 he won re-election in 2025. Larry Brock got 52.44% of the vote. He increased his margin,

00:13:01.160 his percentage, by 12.36%. Now, the Liberals did tighten up the margin in the riding a bit,

00:13:08.200 but that's because the NDP collapsed by 16.6% and their candidate only spent $1,500.

00:13:16.760 That's obviously not going to happen again because Avi Lewis doesn't want to look like his party's

00:13:21.180 completely dead in the water. They're going to spend $25,000, $30,000 there, really fight for

00:13:28.520 every vote to make it look like they're back. This is not going to happen again. This was a high

00:13:33.080 watermark for the Liberals. Previous elections, Larry Brock wins with 40.3% of the vote, but he

00:13:39.260 beat the Liberal by nearly 12% of the vote, 11.9% of the vote. That is a pretty big win for Larry

00:13:48.120 Brock there. Usually the NDP gets 19.6%. And that was back in 21 when Cole Squire for the PPC got

00:13:56.880 8.5% of the vote. I'm sorry, this story just doesn't say anything about anything. But they're

00:14:03.520 willing to exploit the story of a MP. And I don't believe he has a medical condition that's like

00:14:10.020 life-threatening or anything like that. Or he wouldn't be trying to get a job elsewhere as a

00:14:13.880 prosecutor but they're exploiting somebody's medical difficulties in order to try and make

00:14:20.080 this a anti-peer poly of story even though larry brock literally put out a statement saying that

00:14:26.120 you know poly i was doing a great job and everything like that i support the team and i

00:14:30.040 support whoever's going to replace me it was a very good letter and you could say well of course

00:14:34.200 he's going to say that no no not of course he's going to say that he could have just resigned and

00:14:38.680 said nothing, and let the speculation take place by him not giving a shot in the arm

00:14:47.360 to Polyev on the way out, saying, I really like this guy, people stand with him.

00:14:50.600 That's what he's saying.

00:14:51.660 And now, yeah, it's a lot of boilerplate political talk.

00:14:54.060 That's just what every resignation letter is, whether they're leaving on good reasons

00:14:58.080 or bad reasons.

00:14:59.400 But if you actually wanted to take a pound of flesh out of Polyev, if you were disillusioned,

00:15:03.360 the letter would read like he was disillusioned.

00:15:06.540 But anyways, now I want to move on to another topic here. So job numbers are in for the month of July, and it actually does look good for Mark Carney and the Liberals. I never want to ever cover up, you know, good news for the Liberal government here.

00:15:22.680 Now, I'm going to temper the good news by pointing out that people are very much rating Mark Carney on a curve here. Here is Richard Diaz saying, credit where it is due, public sector employment as a share of total is falling. And in the month of July, about 75,000 jobs were created. Now, that's good. I'm not going to complain about that.

00:15:44.520 I want to see less public sector jobs and I want to see more private sector jobs.

00:15:49.040 Absolutely. Credit where it is due.

00:15:52.000 We should be employing more people.

00:15:54.420 Now, the way the media covers it, though, is annoying to me because liberal government should be saying, hey, that's good.

00:16:00.800 We have more jobs.

00:16:02.220 Now, we'll wait a couple of months and see how many of them are actually going to be permanent jobs and how many are going to be summer jobs.

00:16:07.800 I suspect a good portion are summer jobs when you see how many of the jobs were created in areas like retail or professional services and stuff like that.

00:16:17.340 A lot of this could end up being hospitality industry, things to do with Stampede in Alberta, things to do with other festivals going on around the country.

00:16:26.720 You know, people working in industries where naturally you only work the summer and then in the winter you're finding a different job or you're just working a summer job because you're a student.

00:16:36.160 I actually found out today, which is shocking, you know, this Canadian summer jobs program where they cover 100% of the minimum wage cost for, you know, young people and students who are working if it's a nonprofit and they cover up to 50% if it's a private company or corporation, if it's a, you know, youth summer job.

00:16:55.900 I found out those actually often do not get counted out in terms of seasonal adjustments.

00:17:02.980 Those are just counted into the numbers, and they are not seasonally adjusted out, which proves my point that seasonally adjusting numbers is just useless. 0.88

00:17:11.520 We might as well not do it, because it becomes a hiding place for idiots to be able to say, well, no, actually all these are permanent jobs because they're seasonally adjusted.

00:17:20.240 Seasonal adjustment really does not count a lot of this stuff. 0.97

00:17:24.120 and kirk lubomov here says canada added 75 000 jobs in july but the interesting important data

00:17:31.260 is the full-time jobs those this is what it looks like by province so a lot of full-time jobs created

00:17:37.700 in british columbia and quebec newfoundland labrador manitoba nova scotia and then there

00:17:43.500 was actually job losses in ontario alberta saskatchewan new brunswick and prince edward

00:17:48.560 Island. Now, what I would point out there is that if it's this many jobs concentrated in places like

00:17:55.820 British Columbia and Quebec, that probably has more to do with government subsidies than you

00:18:01.180 would think. And remember, the World Cup was in British Columbia. British Columbia's job market

00:18:07.320 sucks. It is terrible. They're usually losing jobs unless they're subsidized. And when you actually 1.00

00:18:14.380 look at the underlying numbers here there is a lot of jobs suddenly created in the lumber sector

00:18:21.260 people who are harvesting and processing lumber that is a bit suspicious because in british

00:18:28.140 columbia the lumber industry has been dying longer than i was going to make a dark joke and i'm just

00:18:36.180 going to not, but it's been dying for a very long time. So when suddenly it gets 8,000 jobs

00:18:45.380 in British Columbia in a single month, that feels more like the relief subsidies from the government

00:18:52.700 because of tariffs, more than actual organic job creation, because every single month we have seen

00:18:59.200 mills closing. So as mills are closing, how are more people being hired? That just sounds like

00:19:04.740 jobs are being filled at existing mills because of subsidies because if you're offered money to

00:19:10.540 employ people well why not take it so you have world cup jobs which are full-time jobs but

00:19:17.360 they're temporary that are also going to be going away that we're still existing in july

00:19:22.220 those jobs are going to be going away probably you're going to have these subsidy jobs that

00:19:27.340 will go away as soon as the subsidy money runs out or a trade deal is struck and so when i look

00:19:33.480 at this, I'm happy we're creating jobs, but the concentration of it in BC and Quebec does shout

00:19:40.040 subsidized. This is not organic growth. And by the way, we are celebrating having what is a 6.4

00:19:47.380 or 6.2, it's in the 6% range, low 6% range, 6% unemployment. That is like nearly twice what the

00:19:56.560 U.S. is at, I believe they're at like 3.2% or so, we're at like 6.1, 6.2%. Absolutely ridiculous 0.76

00:20:04.240 that we even are going to be spinning up all these great headlines about how good of a job

00:20:08.800 Mark Carney is doing, when by any actual G7 standard, our unemployment is absolutely terrible.

00:20:15.880 We are chipping away at a problem that we have been accumulating for more than 10 years under

00:20:21.220 the Liberals, which Mark Carney was an advisor on. And by the way, a lot of the jobs being created

00:20:26.620 are in part more so just recovering jobs that we have lost in 2025 and early 2026. So the actual

00:20:35.380 change since Mark Carney became prime minister, or maybe before the big job drop off when the

00:20:41.980 tariffs first hit, when you compare that level to the current level, basically nothing has changed.

00:20:47.720 And that level wasn't good. We haven't gotten back to a good level. We've gotten back to basically the crappy, low-growth recession level that we had under Justin Trudeau before the tariffs hit. But we are grading Mark Carney on a curve, so no doubt we're going to see a bunch of articles about how this just demonstrates how much of a powerhouse he is.

00:21:07.140 And in two months, when all the summer jobs start dropping off, we're not going to have people saying, oh, my goodness, Mark Carney's doing such a bad job.

00:21:14.940 In liberal Canada, we count the rise and we just ignore the falls.

00:21:20.020 If you go off of a liberal media, we actually have like 200 percent employment probably eventually because we only ever count the rise.

00:21:28.000 And then we just ignore whenever a bunch of jobs slough off.

00:21:30.780 Like when Carney in like November and December of 25 was like, oh, look, 150,000 new jobs were created.

00:21:38.060 That really demonstrates the power of Carney-nomics.

00:21:40.480 And then ignored in January when all those holiday jobs just like died.

00:21:45.020 We lost like 180,000 jobs in a single month in January.

00:21:49.360 And I don't even blame him for most of those because they're just seasonal holiday jobs.

00:21:53.580 I do blame him for the permanent full-time jobs lost.

00:21:57.400 But I guess who's counting here?

00:21:59.100 now like half the jobs are created in like retail and hospitality so probably a lot of summer jobs

00:22:04.900 here some of it's in areas where hey good people are employed but i don't want the conservative

00:22:10.480 party to like look at this and be like oh well we now can't criticize him on job creations because

00:22:15.640 he had good headlines you can go at the inter the underlying rot under the floorboards and one last

00:22:22.040 thing i want to say in this video that's kind of related to a lot to the sort of campaigning that's

00:22:27.300 going on in these by-elections. I really don't like when conservatives sort of see by-elections

00:22:34.400 come up and they say, well, it's a safe liberal seat, so why bother campaigning hard? Or it's a

00:22:39.840 safe conservative seat, it's going to be won anyway, so we shouldn't focus on it too hard.

00:22:45.320 I posted this the other day and I posted above it again. Lynn Brooks here was taking a photo of

00:22:51.940 some signs going up in beaches east york for the conservative candidate jim cybros if you live out

00:22:57.700 there make sure you go and get a lawn sign this is a safe liberal seat the liberals are very likely

00:23:03.060 going to win it uh mike layton the son of jack layton says he's not going to run which is not 0.93

00:23:07.860 going to heavily damage how much how well the ndp is going to do that sucks but i was saying to people

00:23:13.780 that it doesn't matter if it's a safe liberal riding we should always be swinging at the fence

00:23:18.260 i said doesn't matter what riding a by-election is in the cbc needs to push as hard as possible

00:23:24.180 all part of the attritional political war with the liberals any gain is worthwhile

00:23:28.900 while fighting for even if it's just a gain in the percentage of the vote in a losing riding

00:23:34.580 and then i said last night i reiterate again the conservative party and frankly all conservative

00:23:40.420 parties everywhere need to refit themselves for attritional political combat you need to run on

00:23:46.260 bold ideas, sorry, big bold ideas that get attention and that hit the doors hard in every

00:23:51.740 riding, especially during by-elections. No such thing as a safe liberal or safe conservative

00:23:56.600 riding. Every single riding needs to be treated like a battleground because they are. If a riding

00:24:02.240 cannot be won, you cannot help change the nation. Even if a riding cannot be won, you can help

00:24:09.240 change the national culture by nudging liberal strongholds over to the right. It's a cascading

00:24:14.140 effect. And I want to do a video on this in the future where I break down the theory of how to

00:24:20.640 win swing ridings. And that requires the safe liberal ridings that border swing ridings to be

00:24:27.340 competed for hard. If the liberals are easily winning a riding, but it borders a swing riding,

00:24:33.700 you better hope that the neighborhoods in that safe liberal riding that border the swing riding

00:24:38.820 at least look competitive because people are influenced by the voting patterns of people

00:24:44.600 around them. So if you're not competing hard for safe liberal riding, people are going to be

00:24:49.120 driving to work through that riding and they're just going to see it just covered in liberal

00:24:52.980 signs and they're going to say, what's the point? Because people don't think about politics from a

00:24:57.760 bird's eye view and think, well, no, I live in a swing riding, so it definitely is worth, you know,

00:25:01.920 getting conservative lawn sign and volunteering and donating and showing up on election day and

00:25:06.420 voting, they're just going to see liberals all over the place, even if they live in a highly

00:25:11.360 competitive riding between the conservatives and the liberals. They'll just say, I live in a liberal

00:25:16.000 part of the world, so what's even the point? You fight for every square inch of the country,

00:25:21.160 because the fact that a riding is safe liberal is no reason to give up on it. That's in fact a good

00:25:27.780 reason to fight hard for it, because even if the conservatives only get 14% of the vote,

00:25:31.980 make it 20 make it more normal to vote conservative because it has a cascading effect

00:25:37.900 on the bordering ridings and regions that are more winnable this is why i don't like when the

00:25:44.700 conservatives just throw up their hands and they say we'll wait we'll wait for a more winnable race

00:25:48.440 no every race can be won by some metric or another even if you can't win the seat you can win

00:25:56.260 the momentum fight in order to push things more blue anyways with all that being said thank you

00:26:03.420 guys for watching make sure to like share subscribe consider hitting the join button

00:26:07.420 and becoming a member of the channel leave a comment with what you think and i'll see you guys

00:26:12.060 all next time

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 07, 2026

Liberal Media Went Way Too Far! - Exploits MP Resignation To Attack Poilievre!

Episode Stats

Transcript